17 Burst results for "Zoe Sharp"

"zoe sharp" Discussed on The Michael Knowles Show

The Michael Knowles Show

03:59 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on The Michael Knowles Show

"It had really been wiped away the US had gone a long way over the course of about one hundred years eighteen sixty to nineteen seventies to wipe away the sins of slavery, and the du jour inequalities and discriminations that were wrought by those systems, and there wasn't really a white racial consciousness. And there were there were some fringe writers who actually called for one. They said we need a white racial consciousness and people said, no absolutely not we reject identity politics, but then the left has forced a white racial identity, which is which is unfortunate because by embracing identity. Politics as their means of ascent as their means of consolidating political power on the left. They have forced a white racial identity. It only only makes sense if you're going to try to say that we have what is it a coalition of the ascendant? You've got all of these people in your explicitly appealing to their skin color or to their ethnic heritage or whatever. And you're uniting them by saying that there's a common enemy in what? Now, we jokingly refer to as the straight white male two straight white sister, gender male, the straight white, which is an absurd term that. I try not to use this straight white male who thinks that he's a male or whatever if that is the personification of evil, then you're going to create an identity around those groups, you you've done it. The left has done it. We didn't do it. We didn't paint. This guy is the worst guy on earth or that color or this woman, or this gender, whatever we didn't paint that as the personification of evil, but the left in order to assemble their identity politics coalition had to do that. And. As a result, you see a white racial consciousness or remain male sexual consciousness. I don't know. It's pretty stupid. It isn't good. When the left does. It isn't good when the right doesn't but the left is going to make it inevitable. The left is going to force this to be inevitable, and that is a really ugly and blame lies there. So if we're going to stop identity politics, which I strongly encourage everybody's got to do it, otherwise, otherwise, it's simply going to grow. It is only going to fester. It's only going to get worse and it is zero sum game. It is truly gutter politics, and they're going to keep it up. I mean, you know, talk about the Bernie, bro guy. We're not talking about the were Bernie, bro as the main. We've got one shot up. The congressional baseball game. We're not talking about that is the mainstream of the Democratic Party. But the New York Times is in the New York Times just last week published assassination porn published this novel. Alleged novelist. I've never read any of her works. Obviously Zoe sharp who wrote a whole piece fantasizing about the secret service, assassinating Donald Trump. That wasn't published on gab that wasn't published on some fringe social media wacky board that was published in the New York Times, and that is a huge distinction. There isn't a moral equivalency here. And you've got to be able to do it it requires moral clarity. I know that it is insane to suggest that Donald Trump playboy for thirty years, you know, tabloid legend somehow has some moral clarity here. But he does when you see an active like the shooting of that synagogue. You've got to kill that guy by the arm of the state because of Justice Justice demands, many kinds of Justice demand that when you see these heinous identity, politics and ideologies that come from that you've got to call it out for what it is. And you've got to reject it. You've got to reject it full-throatedly wholeheartedly not just for one guy. Why not just for one group? But for everybody, you know, in speaking of the fringes versus the mainstream Barack Obama he's out on the campaign trail again. And he is perfectly identifying this distinction because he is out there calling Donald Trump a shameless liar. He is. When I'm talking to Michelle..

Donald Trump New York Times Barack Obama US Bernie du baseball Michelle Zoe sharp Democratic Party one hundred years thirty years
"zoe sharp" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

News Talk 1130 WISN

04:33 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

"Was from Bernie Sanders appearance on MSNBC on June twenty third twenty seventeen on June fourteenth 2017 a gunman who had driven all the way from Illinois to Virginia opened fire on Republicans at a baseball field screaming this is for healthcare that previously unreported detail. Casts. A whole new light on what exactly motivated him? You had his hero. Bernie Sanders a guy who's campaign he volunteered for saying over and over and over again that millions of people would die. If Republicans were successful in repealing health care. This is a direct tie between rhetoric and violent action. So if we're going to sit here and blame Donald Trump and only Donald Trump for the culture of political rhetoric that is so unhinged. That is so vitriolic that is so over the top. How dare you be that dishonest that you pretend that a year ago a killer who is clearly inspired clearly inspired by unhinged rhetoric on the left. Drove all the way across the country with the express intent to murder, and if you're talking about violent rhetoric that would dare to inspire a male bomber sending targets sending bombs to targets that sounded like they were coming from Donald Trump's Twitter account. These are all Donald Trump's enemies, and you don't mention in the same breath that three weeks ago there were rice in packages mailed to Donald Trump junior the White House and other Republican targets. How dare you lecture the rest of the country, and how dare you pretend that this vitriolic apocalyptic rhetoric is only coming from one side of the political aisle. I have heard for years well before Donald Trump was even a thought to enter politics. Bush is Hitler Bush lied people died assassination fantasies about George W Bush death of a president of Phil made about the assassination of. George W Bush a book written about it. And just Tuesday the day that all of the packages started arriving the New York Times writing an essay or publishing an essay from a novelist named Zoe sharp. Fantasizing about how a secret service agent would help Russian secret agent assassinate Donald Trump. Rhetoric is powerful. But to pretend that only one side's rhetoric contributes to the climate that we have in politics today is not only dishonest. It's harmful to getting past that rhetoric. Because let's be honest with you here. What is the political climate in America today alternately stemming from anything Trump did anything Trump said, no? The fact that Donald Trump won an election that the political left still cannot accept that it lost fair and square. We have had a two year nervous breakdown in this country from the Democratic Party, urging people millions of people that the results of this election were not legitimate that Donald Trump is a secret agent of the Russian government that Donald Trump is committing treason that Donald Trump is the worst thing since Hitler before Trump was even elected Washington Post rights in article don't compare Donald Trump to Hitler. Donald Trump is far worse now is that contributing to a healthy rhetoric, or is that contributing to this notion that Donald Trump is so evil that Republicans are so evil because they want to take away your healthcare that it is acceptable to do anything in your power to stop them from doing that that guy on the baseball field. Sure did the guy who sent rice into Republicans. Sure tried. But yet it's only when someone who's violence can be pinned on the political. Right. That we pretend that violent rhetoric is a problem. And by the way, while we're talking about antisemitic rhetoric. Why is nobody immediately talking about the most prominent anti Semite in this country. German jews?.

Donald Trump Bernie Sanders George W Bush Hitler Bush baseball MSNBC New York Times Twitter murder Virginia Democratic Party Zoe sharp Illinois White House Russian government America president Phil three weeks two year
"zoe sharp" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

News Talk 1130 WISN

10:55 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

"Hard to see this outside of the context of the president's hostility towards Mrs Clinton had tried to briefly speak towards unity towards Barack Obama towards George Soros, everyone. I just mentioned it's been targeted in. This incident has been singled out by the president or as cheap defendant and his attack that at times fed some pretty wild conspiracy theories in certain corners of the right wing echo chamber. This is what happened when the president calls you the enemy of the people. That's right rhetoric. That comes out of that White House is not helpful at all. On there's collateral damage. And it has got to stop that was two straight minutes of the media blaming Donald Trump and not just talking. Head contributors anchor is like Jake tapper wolf Blitzer Chuck Todd reporter is like Caitlin Collins, April Ryan, David Gregory. The former host of meet the press straight news people giving a decidedly opinionated take on. Who is ultimately responsible for these bombs? Steve Schmidt is a colorful character and very valuable as a useful idiots for the political and cultural left because he is a former Republican strategist who has all but ensured he will never ever ever get a job as a Republican strategist ever. Again. He worked on the George W Bush campaign. John McCain presidential campaign, and now he makes his living blasting Donald Trump for adoring liberal crowds on MSNBC. He directly blamed Trump for the person who is most singularly responsible for edging this country into a cold civil war is Donald J Trump, and it's a shameful legacy that he will carry with him because of that for the rest of his dates are you following this the person most singularly responsible for edging this country to a civil war? The person who's rhetoric is the most hateful and most divisive. Steve Schmidt says we need to come together we need to be more unified. Trump isn't allowing us to do that just three weeks ago. Steve Schmidt on MSNBC said Donald Trump is a threat to all life forms on any given moment. The combination of his Radic behavior his ignorance could hose a profound danger to every single person in this country, and literally every inhabitant of the planet earth. So Donald Trump is going to potentially. End seven billion lives. Plus, untold creature is save of course, for the cock roaches in the nuclear war that he will rain down like American horror story apocalypse upon the earth yet. It's Donald Trump's fault that people are so amped up on the rhetoric for two years. Now, we have been told that Donald Trump. Is a monster. He is literally Hitler. He is going to get us into a nuclear war with North Korea just three days ago on the same day that the bombs were sent the New York Times the newspaper of record the gray lady. The most venerable news institution in the United States posted an essay by a novelist. Who fantasized about a secret service agent aiding in a Russian foreign agents assassination of Donald Trump on Tuesday. This is on par. With in the annals of bad timing. The New York Times publishing an article about Bill Ayers on September eleventh two thousand one in which he said he had no regrets about setting the bombs. What did he say guilty as hell free as a bird? New York Times. Glowing profile of him on Tuesday, the same day that bombs were sent to all sorts of politicians all sorts of political figures, the New York Times runs an essay from the novelist. Zoe sharp who have never heard of. She is apparently a British writer the assignment from the times was to imagine. If you will how does the Russia investigation, and and they took submissions from writers all across the world, and they picked five one of the five at the editors of the New York Times picked was from Zoe sharp. Who wrote that there would be a Russian spy who had rushed toward the president. His gun would malfunction wouldn't go off. He would brace for the inevitable shooting barrage from secret service agents, but instead a secret service agent hands the Russian his gun and set is here. Use mine. And Donald Trump is therefore shot to death by a secret service agent in this woman's mind published in the New York Times, so don't tell me don't even pretend to tell me that Donald Trump's rhetoric is solely responsible for a political climate. That would breathe a domestic terrorist. Do not even attempt especially the New York Times. And here we've got Hillary Clinton out there saying, oh, we need to bring this country together as a troubling time. Isn't it? And it's a time of deep divisions. And we have to do everything we can to bring our country together. We also have to elect candidates who will try to do the same. So in order to bring the country together, we have to vote for Democrats. Okay. Literally a month ago. Hillary Clinton was saying it is impossible to be civil with Republicans because they're Republicans cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for what you care about. That's why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the house and the Senate that's when civility can start again. But until then the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength. So we're going to continue getting in their faces as Maxine Waters urge we're going to continue to pound on the doors of the supreme court. We're going to continue to try to interrupt the Senate to vote on Brett Cavanaugh in the US capitol because you can't be civil you cannot. You just can't be civil look I have said before and I'll say until the day. I the advent of video and audio record. Is the single worst thing to ever happen to the Democratic Party for the media to now say that all of this violent rhetoric is coming from Kathy Griffin holding up a severed Trump head snoop Dogg in a rap video assassinating a clown and made to look like Trump the New York Shakespeare in the park summer stock theatre performing Julius Caesar. In which Caesar is Donald Trump any stabbed to death in. What's supposed to be a very sad moment in the play is cheered by adoring throngs of liberals in New York assassination, fantasies dating back to the days of George W Bush with the movie death of a president a book about the assassination of George W Bush. Look, we're pretending that this all started with Donald Trump. I've got decades. And I mean decades of Democrats being in civil you want. You wanna talk about incivility you want to start with the dawn of domestic terrorism in this country. The weather underground in the late nineteen sixties. How about that? How about the violence at the DNC political violence has been a hallmark. It has been a staple of the political left since the turbulence sixties. So do not pretend do not insult the intelligence of the American people by suggesting all of this just happened to start when Donald Trump burst on the scene in two thousand fifteen because it absolutely didn't. And when he burst on the scene in twenty-fifty. Do you think it's helpful to constantly compare him to Hitler? Do you think it's helpful to constantly say that he is the greatest threat that humanity has ever seen this apocalyptic vision that is based in nothing more than your own fever dreams. You don't think that there's any? The responsibility for Republicans not being able to go to a restaurant and then to go on TV constantly. I have got arm, and how many soundbites would you say we have of Democrats say, yeah. Of course, this is perfectly fine. What's the worst that happens? Sarah Huckabee Sanders, couldn't eat at a restaurant. My god. I do rebutting a murderer. I have talked to the people involved in making a murderer. They've all gotten death threats. I'm actually shocked. I haven't gotten any because when you do ultimately dishonest reporting. That compares your political enemies or the people who think a little bit different than you to the worst figure in history constantly. It's it's it's it's passe now to compare Donald Trump to Hitler. That's how common it is. It's passe to say we had a Trump nuclear. I am surprised that you didn't have CNN and MSNBC last September urging people to duck and cover because they were so convinced that we were going to go to nuclear war with North Korea. Because Donald Trump was calling Kim Jong UN fat and rocket man. You don't think that that contributes to the heightened political climate? But no, no, no, it's all Donald Trump. It's the most dishonest thing I think I have ever heard how dare this. And then the media's are well, well, we don't report intentionally dishonestly whole. I've got a great example. Of a news network intentionally concealing the truth because it might have led to Brett cavenaugh being vindicated. Don't miss that. Coming up next. You're listening to the Dan Donald show. Hi, Colleen here from Tri county contracting. We hope you had a great summer. But winter is coming and maybe you're considering getting.

Donald J Trump New York Times Hillary Clinton president Trump Dan Donald Steve Schmidt MSNBC North Korea White House United States Jake tapper George W Bush campaign Barack Obama George Soros Hitler New York John McCain Senate
"zoe sharp" Discussed on WSB-AM

WSB-AM

14:15 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on WSB-AM

"Talked for a couple of years now about imprisoning his political rival and Hillary Clinton who is encouraged violence against the media. Just last week talking about the assault on reporter by a congressman in Montana saying that he that he's his kind of guy it's hard to see this out side of the context of the president's hostility hostility towards towards Mrs Clinton who tried to briefly speak towards unity towards Barack Obama towards George Soros, the president and his allies they need to dial down the the political rhetoric. They are making people less safe. They are making journalists less safe, and they're making law enforcement officers, less safe. We don't know who did this. We don't know what what their motive was. But it's a very obvious thread, and maybe it's men's shoes. But it's an obvious read the Obamas the Clintons. John Brennan CNN. George soros. These are people and organizations that President Trump continually attack demonize is a calls. But if you look at who they've targeted so far, it's almost like they're following Donald Trump's Twitter feed. Grief. I this is my goodness. Goodness. I tell you what. So this was the media just yesterday. This is the media yesterday with all of this nonsense. And I just find it disgusting. I find it gross. You also had this is while the media was doing this the New York Times. Was. Printing, fantasies. Of Trump being assassinated with the help of secret service. It was written by an author named Zoe sharp who said she was honored to be in New York Times with her piece on the president being shot. This is what this is what published this is what was published in the New York Times yesterday quote. When it was time. He went downstairs took his place in the lobby for the entourage appeared. The hotel staff had been lined up to see their boss, the president go by a few of them applauded. Most did not the president didn't seem to notice. He waved and his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him toward the armored limo idling outside of the church and the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's back and he squeezed the trigger. And this is. Yeah. This is what was in the New York Times. This is what was in the New York Times yesterday. Oh, and then when his gun jammed, and it was called how it ends by the way by Zoe sharp. They say, you know, when it was he must be silenced. This is what this is what they wrote. He says he squeezed the trigger has gone misfired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click and spun into a crouch, he registered the scene instantly drying his own weapon with razor edge reflexes, the Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes and waited to pay the cost. It did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agent stood before him presenting his Glock. But I hear the agents said politely Hughes mine. I'm sorry. What was that? All these people were saying about. Yeah. About civility in the New York Times yesterday. What was it? They were all saying. Convenors? What what was it? Because it sounds like they need to take their own actual advice. This is the stuff they do. This is the stuff they do. And apparently isn't there like a movie something somebody else's like fantasizing, something cinematic about it? I don't I remember reading something the other day. That is amazing. That you have these two things occurring simultaneously. This. This is exactly what I'm talking about. The do. You have a lot of people in media who wanna make themselves victims because they're upset at being called out for recklessness. Irresponsible. Not journalism. Just propagandizing is what it is. And a free people have every right to call out and criticize their free press. And when the free press starts telling a free people that they cannot criticize than you're infringing upon their rights, our right of free speech, and free expression. That is how speech and freedom works in the United States. You can write an article that's demonstrably false for which you either have to issue a retraction or apologize and take down or corrected or do whatever entirely. And there have been numerous publications in networks that have done that repeatedly. We have cited their examples ad nauseam on this program on a near daily basis. When you are purposefully writing something to convey, an agenda, and you don't even bother to check. The basic fact of the matter you are not participating in journalism, you are acting as a propagandizing stooge. And you have every right to be called out for that while clinging to the vestige of journalism and using that as a veneer to hide your actual activity, a free people have every right to call you out about that. A free people have every right to say that what you're doing is fake news. As someone who has fake news written about her quite frequently, for instance, media matters, which is a website that is was founded by a guy named David Brock. It's holy subsidized by Soros, and it was found by guy named David Brock who got in trouble. Because apparently the entity was encouraging its employees to illegally carry guns in Washington. DC daily caller, great expose on this. And apparently employees, according to the daily caller were nervous about media matters bosses erotic behavior due to drugs. They love writing maliciously false hit pieces about conservatives with the purpose to further divide America into incite, and I had commentary the other day on how a an anti gun group was using elections as a way to call for swatting all law-abiding gun owners. Basically, no matter where they are. And they were using. Oh, if you see it on the on the on election day, they were calling to use taxpayer resources to sway. What innocent law abiding Americans simply if they were gun owners, and I said that's dangerous. And I said first of all it's not those law abiding gun owners. Those aren't the ones that are going off and doing all of the carnage that we are seeing. And I said, Furthermore, if something were to ever happen be anywhere around a pole in place, or wherever you would be glad that there was a law abiding gun owner there to defend you media matters takes that says Dana lash calls for conservatives to bring guns to polling places. Yes. I did consult a lawyer. You are correct. Because I am L litigious bitch. No, I'm done with it. Because this is the time. These are the type of people I'm talking about media matters rights headlines, like these because they want to incite, I honestly believe that some of these people are begging for violence because they right horrible things about innocent people because they hate them. That's what it is. They can't stand it. So they I already do you know, how many people I had threatened to kill me? In response to media matters matters is peace. You're welcome media matters you on that. And again, don't forget this is an entity that was more than happy to illegally carry guns into DC while riding maliciously, false pieces. Designed to hurt an incite violence around innocent people. And the daily caller expose. I think says it all I don't know if drugs and illegal illegally possessed guns are still running the show over there. But it did apparently for quite some time, according to the people who work there. But yes, I did ask a lawyer about it because I said I've gotten I've had people. I mean, I already had to move because of stuff like what media matters does. So yeah, we have every right to call this stuff out because that's not free press. That's propagandizing. And as a free citizen. I have every right to call it out. And if you want me to stop well, come on down to Texas because it's not going to happen. It is ridiculous. There are people out there that wanna ruin lives because of politics because of what you believe and because just for that because they don't know how to coexist civilly. They simply do not see you have for instance, this false headline. Yeah. I had someone who told me I should suck the business end of a barrel. I had someone else who said I'd love to meet you at your polling place. I because of a false headline. Just like when the president said he hated fake news media. He hates fake news. That's the the fake news is the enemy of the people. Everyone dropped everything that he said purposefully and made it out to him sane. Well, the media's the enemy of the people. He said, no such thing. That's false. He said, no such thing. You can hate his policies all you want to. But you don't do yourself any good when you lie about what he said to justify hatred. My gosh. This is this is exactly what we're talking about. And what we're going to get lectured. I'm not going to be lectured by newspaper that publishes assassination fantasies. I'm not going to be lectured by anyone that has ever published any ridiculous horrible, unfounded unsourced bidder. Rag hate hit piece on anybody. There's this idea that somehow. You are unaccountable if you are part of the press, and if you are I believe in a free press, but as a free woman, I have an I reserve every right to criticise what is reported and how it is reported. And if you truly support a free press, you support that. That's part of a free press. If you do not support a free people criticizing and holding accountable. What they're free press reports you do not support free press. So stop pretending like you do. You want government controlled propaganda? And there are a million other countries on this planet where you can go and get that. Now, I mentioned this morning rhetoric. And people get so mad at what Trump says. Where was this anger? Where was this anger back in two thousand and my gosh, we could even go back further, but let's just start with two thousand and eight. I was at a rally one time. Doesn't St Louis. My hometown. This is the end it was supposed to be like this family friendly rally in the park, right? Against healthcare. And this is back when you know, I think my my radio program wasn't even daily yet. This is also the last time I stopped bringing my kids to anything. It was a beautiful fall evening. We were just I mean, literally had gummy bear snacks and juice boxes. And we were there just you know, just discussing about healthcare and holding up signs about healthcare cetera. Progressives showed up. Somebody screamed in my child's face, and they didn't like the signs they were screaming and it got out of hand real quick. So within ten minutes of people showing up I grabbed my kids, and we were out of there. I have seen the violent nature of some of these people on the fringe. You wanna talk about rhetoric saying that we were racists because somehow we opposed healthcare. We had the president of the United States at the time that supported that sentiment. If you post his policies you did. So because you are a racist. Just like if you didn't want to vote for Hillary Clinton, you did you felt that way because you were a sexist. It didn't matter if you were good enough to vote for her husband, they'll take your votes, but the second that you decide to do something differently. Because you're tired of being lectured to about pronouns and everything else. Then suddenly you magically turned into a a racist bigot. You weren't a racist big when you were voting democrat. But the moment you decided to exercise your free will and go somewhere else, then you became a racist democrat are racist sexist. That's how that went. I it's all of the name calling and the vitriolic language. I I was called a tea Bagger to my face by people in media on television. You want to lecture me about tone in civility. This is how Donald Trump became president. Because people were tired of being called names by the very people lecturing us now. They were tired of having their characters impune simply because they didn't want to pay for your healthcare. They had a hard enough time pain for their own families premiums and keeping a roof over their heads and food on their tables. This has been going on for so long. And now all of these individuals who enthusiastically engaged in that. When there is a Republican. That doesn't really say anything differently than they ever have. They lose their minds. Oh, suddenly now, it's Trump's America. Suddenly now, it's completely different. I'm not saying that it's good or bad. What I'm saying is stop acting like this is something this administration, invented stop acting like the amount of ridiculousness isn't disproportionate..

president Donald Trump New York Times Hillary Clinton George Soros United States America Twitter John Brennan CNN David Brock Zoe sharp assault Washington Barack Obama DC Montana Hughes
"zoe sharp" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

WINT 1330 AM

15:04 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

"We have a president who has talked for a couple of years now about imprisoning his political rival in Hillary Clinton who is encouraged violence against the media. Just last week talking about the assault on a reporter by congressman in Montana saying that he that he's his kinda guy. It's hard to see this outside of the context of the president's hostility hostility towards towards Mrs Clinton who tried to briefly speak towards unity toward Barack Obama towards George Soros, the president and his allies they need to dial down the the political rhetoric. They are making people less safe. They are making journalists left safe, and they are making law enforcement officers, less safe. We don't know who did this. We don't know what what their motive was burnt. But it's a very obvious thread. And maybe it's meant as a ruse, but it's an obvious read the Obamas the Clintons. John Brennan CNN. George soros. These are people and organizations that President Trump continually attack demonize recalls, but if you look at who they've targeted so far it's almost like they're following Donald Trump's Twitter feed. Good grief. I this is my goodness. I'm gonna tell you what. So this was the media just yesterday. This was the media yesterday with all of this nonsense. And I just find it disgusting. I find it gross. You also had this is while the media was doing this the New York Times. Was. Printing, fantasies. Of Trump being assassinated with the help of secret service. It was written by an author named Zoe sharp who said she was honored to be in the New York Times with her piece on the president being shot. This is what this is what published this is what was published in the New York Times yesterday quote. When it was time. He went downstairs took his place in the lobby for the entourage appeared. The hotel staff had been lined up to see their boss, the president go by a few of them applauded. Most did not the president didn't seem to notice. He waved his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him toward the armored limo idling outside of the church and the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's back and he squeezed the trigger. And this is. Yeah. This is what was in the New York Times. This was what was in the New York Times yesterday. Oh, and then win his gun jammed. And it was called how it ends by the way by Zoe sharp. They say, you know, when it was he must be silenced. This is what this is what they wrote. He says he squeeze the trigger has gone misfire the secret service agent at the president's shoulder heard the click and spun into a crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor, Ed reflexes, the Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes and waited to pay the cost. It did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agents stood before him, presenting his Glock. But I hear the agents said politely Hughes mine. I'm sorry. What was that? All these people were saying about the. Yeah. About civility in the New York Times yesterday. What was that? They were all saying. I'm so confused. What what was it? Because sounds like they need to take their own actual advice. This is the stuff they did. This is the stuff they do. And apparently isn't there like a movie something somebody else's like fantasizing, something cinematic about it? I don't I remember reading something the other day. That is. Amazing that you have these two things occurring simultaneously. This. This is exactly what I'm talking about. The the you have a lot of people in media who want to make themselves victims because they're upset at being called out for recklessness. Irresponsible. Not journalism. Just propagandizing is what it is. And a free people have every right to call out and criticize their free press. And when the free press starts telling a free people that they cannot criticize than you're infringing upon their ride our right of free speech, and free expression. That is how speech and freedom works in the United States. You can write an article that's demonstrably false for which you either have to issue a retraction or apologize and take down or corrected or do whatever entirely. And there have been numerous publications in networks that have done that repeatedly. We have cited their examples ad nauseam on this program on a near daily basis. When you are purposefully writing something to convey, an agenda, and you don't even bother to check. The basic fact of the matter you are not participating in journalism, you are acting as a propagandizing stooge. And you have every right to be called out for that while clinging to the vestige of journalism and using that as a veneer to hide your actual activity, a free people have every right to call you out about that. A free people have every right to say that what you're doing is fake news. As someone who has fake news written about her quite frequently, for instance, media matters, which is a website that is was founded by a guy named David Brock. It's holy subsidized by Soros. And it was founded by a guy named David Brock who got in trouble. Because apparently the entity was encouraging its employees to legally carry guns in Washington. DC daily caller did a great expose on this, and apparently employees, according to the daily caller were nervous about media matters bosses erotic behavior due to drugs. They love writing maliciously false hit pieces about conservatives with the purpose to further divide America into insight, and I had commentary the other day on how a an anti gun group was using elections as a way to call for swatting all law abiding gun owners, basically, no matter where they are. And they were using off you see it on the on the on election day, they were calling to use taxpayer resources to sway. What innocent law abiding Americans simply if they were gun owners, and I said that's dangerous. And I said first of all it's not those law abiding gun owners. Those aren't the ones that are going off and doing all of the carnage that we're seeing and I said, Furthermore, if something were to ever happen be at anywhere around a pole in place, or wherever you would be glad that there was a law abiding gun owner there to defend you media matters takes that says Dana lash calls for conservatives to bring guns to polling places. Yes. I did consult a lawyer. You are correct. Because I am L litigious bitch. Now, I'm done with it. Because this is these are the type of people I'm talking about media matters rights headlines, like these because they want to incite, I honestly believe that some of these people are begging for violence because they right horrible things about innocent people because they hate them. They that's what it is. They can't stand it. So they are do you know, how many people I had threatened to kill me. In response to media matters matters. This piece. You're welcome media matters you on that. And again, don't forget this is an entity that was more than happy to illegally carry guns into D while riding maliciously, false pieces designed to hurt and incite violence around innocent people. And the daily caller expose think says it all I don't know if drugs in illegal illegally possessed guns are still running the show over there. But it did apparently for quite some time, according to the people who work there. But yes, I did ask a lawyer about it because I said I've gotten I've had people. I mean, I already had to move because of stuff like what media matters does. So yeah, we have every right to call this stuff out because that's not free press. That's propagandizing. And as a free citizen. I have every right to call it out. And if you want me to stop well, come on down to Texas because it's not going to happen. It is ridiculous. There are people out there that wanna ruin lives because of politics, and because of what you believe and be cut just for that. Because they don't know how to coexist civilly. They simply do not see you have. For instance, this false headline had someone who told me I should stop the business end of a barrel. I had someone else who said I'd love to meet you at your polling place. I because of a false headline. Just like when the president said he hated fake news media. He hates fake news. That's the the fake news is the enemy of the people. Everyone dropped everything that he said purposefully and made it out to him saying, well, the media's the enemy of the people. He said, no such thing. That's false. He said, no such thing. You can hate his policies all you want to. But you don't do yourself any good when you lie about what he said to justify hatred. My gosh. This is this is exactly what we're talking about. And what you're we're gonna get lectured. I'm not going to be lectured by a newspaper that publishes assassination fantasies. I'm not going to be lectured by anyone that has ever published any ridiculous horrible, unfounded unsourced bidder. Rag hate hit piece on anybody. There's this idea that somehow. You are unaccountable if you're part of the press, and if you are believe in a free press, but as a free woman, I have an I reserve every right to criticise what is reported and how it is reported. N you truly support a free press you support that. That's part of a free press. If you do not support a free people criticizing and holding accountable. What they're free press reports you do not support a free press. So stop pretending like you do. You want government controlled propaganda? And there are a million other countries on this planet where you can go and get that. Now, I mentioned this morning rhetoric. And people get so mad at what Trump says. Where was this anger? Where was the Sanger back in two thousand and my gosh, we could even go back further, but let's just start with two thousand and eight. I was at a rally one time. Saint louis. My hometown. This was the end it was supposed to be like this family friendly rally in the park, right? Against healthcare. And this is back when you know, I think my radio program wasn't even daily at. This is also the last time I stopped bringing my kids to anything. It was a beautiful fall evening. We were just I mean, literally had gummy bear snacks and juice boxes. And we were there just, you know, holding discussing about healthcare and holding up signs about healthcare cetera. Progressives showed up. Somebody screamed in my child's face. And because they didn't like the signs they were screaming and it got out of hand real quick. So within ten minutes of people showing up. We I grab my kids and we were out of there. I have seen the violent nature of some of these people on the fringe. You wanna talk about rhetoric saying that we were racist? Because somehow we oppose healthcare we had the president of the United States at the time that supported that sentiment. If you opposed his policies you did. So because you are a racist. Just like if you didn't vote for Hillary Clinton, you did you felt that way because you were a sexist. It didn't matter if you were good enough to vote for her husband, they'll take your votes, but the second that you decide to do something differently. Because you're tired of being lectured to about pronouns and everything else. Then suddenly you magically turned into a a racist bigot. You weren't a racist bigot when you were voting democrat. But the moment you decided to exercise your free will and go somewhere else, then you became a racist democrat are racist sexist. That's how that went. I I it's all of the name calling and the vitriolic language. I I I was called a tea Bagger to my face by people in media on television. You want to lecture me about tone in civility. This is how Donald Trump became president. Because people were tired of being called names by the very people lecturing us now. They were tired of having their characters impune simply because they didn't want to pay for your healthcare. They had a hard enough time paying for their own families premiums and keeping a roof over their heads and food on their tables. This has been going on for so long. And now all of these individuals who enthusiastically engaged in that. When there is a Republican. That doesn't really say anything differently than they ever have. They lose their minds. Oh, suddenly now, it's Trump's America. Suddenly now, it's completely different. I'm not saying that it's good or bad. What I'm saying? Stop acting like this is something this administration invented stop acting like the amount of ridiculousness isn't disproportionate. Politics is always going to be polarized. But people used to be able to coexist and see each other as humans and not just issues. And I'm gonna tell you what I wasn't the one who stopped doing that. I wasn't the one who ended friendships. I wasn't the one who stopped talking to people because they thought differently from me or they voted differently. From me are they believed things differently than I do that wasn't me. It wasn't anybody that I know. Some of need to do a gut. Check. But I definitely do see people. I don't know they're conservative over the Akash. Can you all rate? Anybody who supports Trump is racist? Seriously. I'm tired.

president Donald Trump New York Times Hillary Clinton George Soros United States America David Brock John Brennan CNN assault Twitter Zoe sharp Barack Obama Montana Washington Hughes reporter
"zoe sharp" Discussed on SuperTalk WTN 99.7

SuperTalk WTN 99.7

13:23 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on SuperTalk WTN 99.7

"Sending pack of sending packages to will Joe. And a Robert deniro. I'm starting to get a profile of this person. You remember yesterday? We said it looks like an ISIS flag on the bomb while it's an ISIS parody flag. You know, right there in the middle of zoom in on it. It's like two naked women and they're facing each other. And it's it says get done, which of course, is the cat free catchphrase of Larry the cable guy. So here here's what I'm thinking. This is one of two people. This is some good old boy who loves Trump hates the left and is out there. Trying to make a point is obviously not trying to kill anybody because none of these bombs. Has gone all and I don't think they were ever intended to go off. We're now understanding that the whatever the white powder was it was sending with the CNN package to is harmless. So this is somebody that they're trying to scare people and trying to look like a good old boy or is a good old. Boy, Trump somebody's trying to look like it. And I don't know which really it seems rather odd that somebody who's trying to help Trump's 'cause would do this kind of stuff knowing that you're gonna create hysteria the in the mainstream media and the backlash is going to be against Trump about all this is all your fault with all your rhetoric and everything look I said yesterday, and I'll say again today. When Maxine mad Maxine takes responsibility for the shooting of Steve Scalise. Maybe we can talk. But I don't think she's responsible for some nutcase. Bernie Sanders guy. The wooden tried to kill Steve Scalise and others the baseball field. I do know that the rhetoric is getting heated. But most of the heat is from the left these days. These people are nuts, and you see them following folks in the restaurants and screaming at them. And then not dimension the antifa people out there who are violent. So. Yeah, there's a lot of madness going on. But it ain't Trump's fault by a long shot. And he keeps saying this. And then the mainstream media, folks. Oh, yeah. Well, we're not blaming him. But I'm but he needs to tamp down the rhetoric. Well, if you're not blaming him on his need to tamp down to rhetoric. His rhetoric is not violent. In the meantime, we have the New York Times, ladies and gentlemen, published a short story about assassinating President Donald Trump. This was Tuesday a day before the potentially explosive devices showed up at the addresses of multiple political figures, including Barack Obama. So could it be the New York Times has incited somebody to go nuts? That's certainly more likely, isn't it? New York Times asked novelist conjure possible outcomes to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russian meddling in the two thousand sixteen election for a Tuesday piece English thriller, novelist Zoe sharp wrote a short story, titled how it ends about a Russian assassin on a suicide mission who receives help from a secret service agent to kill Trump. A character who is working with the Russians and the story implies that Trump was handpicked to the highest possible level and must be silenced. And in the story the Russian assassins gun misfires when he rushes the president. But secret service agents do not shoot him. The secret service agents stood behind before him, presenting his Glock but first sharp road here. The agents said politely use mine. This is the ultimate fan fantasy piece for the left doesn't it? The secret service bumps off Trump. Sharp story is set after Muller's investigation indict subpoenas and even places under house arrest the president's campaign manager, then his lawyer Republican congressman former aides and family members story also contains what appears to be an allusion to Fox News. Says the channel wants snively referred to as state TV. Now delighted in showing longshots through the White House railings of men in uniforms removing boxes of incriminating paperwork. Well, I think that's actually CNN if the if they're delighted that's going to be CNN. The president himself was not in the residence. She writes, he was holed up on home ground sharp said she was honored that her story was one of the five chosen by the New York Times and a tweet Wednesday. Says honored to be in New York Times books this week along side Scott to row and Joe finder and Laura Lippman Jason Matthews. We were asked to write short fiction on what happens next to the US Russia's scene. I should have put one in there. Yeah. Trump is completely exonerated and the left loses their mind and tries to burn the country. Then that's my story. Daily caller reached out to the New York Times. But didn't receive a response at the time of publication, are you adding to the explosive rancor out there. So we have these bombs, and they're now at Robert deniro's place anvil Joe's place, and then Brennan out there. The one was sent to him and they misspelled his name and they misspelled, Debbie. What's your name shorts? You know, you know, is one of my listeners. Do they said return to Debbie? What's your name Scholz? That'd be a dead giveaway that it was one of our listeners. Former CIA director John Brennan, the target of one package sent to CNN fired back the first this is Trump at a morning tweets says, a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely faults in accurate reporting of the mainstream media referred to as fake news. It has gotten so bad and hateful that it is beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fans. So John Brennan responded stop blaming others. Look in the mirror, you're inflammatory rhetoric. Insults. Lies and encouragement of physical violence are disgraceful cleanup Iraq, try act presidential. Says the curmudgeon from the Muppets show. The list of bombing targets spreading from New York, Delaware and Washington DC to Florida and California the explosive devices packed in envelopes with bubble wrap interiors bearing six stamps and the return address of Debbie what's your name Schultz? Has has the bomb sees the yesterday each with a small battery we're about six inches long and packed with powder and broken glass. According to law enforcement officials who viewed x Ray images, the official said the devices were made from PVC pipe and covered with black take. Now, let me let me just again. I'm no bomb expert. But this is what tells me that they know and they knew right off that these things were not meant to blow up because they opened them when you find a suspicious package like this where they normally do. They take him somewhere with a robot bomb what everything and then they put him somewhere in and they blow him up, right? Well, they didn't blow these up. They wanted to find out who sent this stupid thing. So they didn't blow him up. They open them up knowing that they weren't going to blow up because it's a hoax. The question is weird the hoax coming from? Is it coming from the right or the left? I if I had to bet I think it's a leftist posing as a Trump person. But I couldn't say for sure, but they are impersonating down to the getter done. Isis parody on there. A Trump supporter. I'm surprised at wasn't a maga- had in there. By the way, we trending again today from mega bomber let's see on Twitter. No, no, we're not. That's not trending today. Son of a gun, Robert deniro's, trending and Joe Biden's trending. But no, no hashtag mega bomber. Maybe they got sick of that. Hashtag. Anyway. So that's where we are on all this. It's rather strange. And here's what you're saying though. They're saying this bomber left a bunch of clues behind and they're not saying all they know. But they say they now know or they think they know where they came from in other words, where they originated based on postal stuff. You know? And I'm I'm gonna say this not trying to help anybody out there. But you see the postal stamp and all this other stuff. I would bet you there's something more to that. And some of you post office votes. Could maybe tell me this maybe it's classified. I bet. There's more to a postal marking, you know, post Stanton cancelation thing than meets the eye. There's probably a lot encoded in that that average people don't know. I would think. From ABC. Investigators examining exposed by high profile targeted will be working to lean forensics clues by who sent them gathering fingerprints and DNA evidence while tracking the origin of the packages and the components used to make the bonds that kind of DNA evidence, you know, what the left is. You know, they were so excited about it. I can't wait to send these things that Larry Johnson former head of criminal investigations for the US secret service also served as a special agent in charge of the presidential protective detail said the bombmakers usually leave evidence behind if there is a human involved, there's a high probability you're going to get somewhere investigative lay. There will be some there will be no stone left unturned. He says it's highly unlikely that the person or people who built the bombs have been previously flagged by law enforcement. The secret service maintains an extensive database. Of individuals and groups who have made past threats against the president or president or other top political leaders, either through letters or emails are on social media. He says a good percentage of the time. This is not the first time whoever's responsible for this will have stuck their neck out those looking to do revenge or harm to someone. It doesn't just come to them one day. Among the first steps they're going to be retracing, the path of the packages through the postal system or courier service used to deliver the postal service operates a sophisticated imaging system. And this might have noted today to they actually photograph the outside of every piece of mail, processed in the country in then amazing. They photograph the outside of every piece of mail processed in the country, and it can be used to determine the specific location where it was since. That's how federal officials were led to a woman who sent the poison rice in through the mail to Barack Obama. And then Michael Bloomberg in two thousand thirteen that she turned out to be a righty or a lefty, they wouldn't say here. I'm sure in these societas says she probably turned out to be some leftists nut gave the envelopes, and the packaging materials themselves are also closely scrutinize it will be a treasure trove of forensic evidence says Anthony Roman the private security in. Investigations consultant as human beings. We are filtering are off our DNA everywhere. We walk everywhere, we sit even the most careful bomber is likely leave behind genetic material that could be used to identify them, especially traces of sweat, saliva or skin cells. There also may be fingerprints are hair, and he said that investigators also be collecting all available video camera footage taken from where the packages were mailed and delivered as well as interviewing any potential witnesses in the area. Now, I heard somebody. I don't remember who it was on Fox News today. They said I will suggest to you that we will have somebody in handcuffs in twenty four hours. I think that was last night. So that should we'll see we'll see. And it's going to be very interesting to see who it is. Now, I'm gonna go ahead and tell you this upfront if it's some leftist out there, I'm not blaming Maxine Waters. Okay. I think her rhetoric is. Reckless. But I don't think she can be blamed for somebody doing something like this or even shooting Steve Scalise. I didn't blame Bernie Sanders. This guy was Bernie Sanders. Volunteer it shifted that kind of stuff gets no coverage whatsoever. When it's a leftist. So I'm just gonna go and tell you up front if we find out this is a crazy leftist who's trying to gin up support through Democrats for the November six election. I don't think it's anybody's fault. But his or her 's, and it's probably a he. If it turns out to be some crazy Trump supporter that ain't Trump. How many of you folks out? There are bombmakers make threats to folks and blow.

Donald Trump New York Times CNN president Robert deniro Trump Steve Scalise Bernie Sanders Barack Obama Debbie Fox News Larry Johnson Maxine mad Maxine Zoe sharp Joe US Maxine Waters
"zoe sharp" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

WINT 1330 AM

13:37 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

"President who has talked for a couple of years now about imprisoning his political rival in Hillary Clinton who is encouraged violence against the media just last week talking about the toll on a reporter by a congressman in Montana and saying that he that he's his kinda guy. It's hard to see this outside of the context of the president's hostility hostility towards towards Mrs Clinton who tried to briefly speak towards unity toward Barack Obama towards George Soros, the president and his allies they need to dial down the the political rhetoric. They are making people less safe. They are making journalists left safe, and they are making law enforcement officers, less safe. But we don't know who did this. We don't know what what their motive was. But it's a very obvious thread. And maybe it's meant as Reuss. But it's an obvious read the Obamas the Clintons. John Brennan CNN. George soros. These are people and organizations that President Trump continually attack demonize recalls, but if you look at who they've targeted so far it's almost like they're following Donald Trump's Twitter feed. Good grief. No, this is my goodness. Goodness. Tell you what. So this was the media just yesterday. This is the media yesterday with all of this nonsense. And I just find it disgusting. I find it gross. You also had this is while the media was doing this the New York Times. Was. Printing, fantasies. Of Trump being assassinated with the help of secret service. It was written by an author named Zoe sharp who said she was honored to be in the New York Times with her piece on the president being shot. This is what this is what published this is what was published in the New York Times yesterday quote. When it was time. He went downstairs took his place in the lobby for the entourage appeared. The hotel staff had been lined up to see their boss, the president go by a few of them applauded. Most did not the president didn't seem to notice. He waved his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him toward the armored limo idling outside of the church and the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's back and he squeezed the trigger. And this is. Yeah. This is what was in the New York Times. This was what was in the New York Times yesterday. Oh, and then win his gun jammed. And it was called how it ends by the way by Zoe sharp. They say when it was he must be silenced. This is what this is what they wrote. He says squeeze the trigger has gun misfired the secret service agent at the president's shoulder heard the click and spun into a crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawn his own weapon with razor edge reflexes, the Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes and waited to pay the cost. It did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agents stood before him, presenting his Glock. But I hear the agents said politely Hughes mine. I'm sorry. What was that? All these people were saying about the. Yeah. About civility in the New York Times yesterday. What was it? They were all saying. Confused. What what was it? Because it sounds like they need to take their own actual advice. This is the stuff they this is the stuff they do. And apparently isn't there like a movie something somebody else's like fantasizing, something cinematic about it? I don't I remember reading something the other day. That is. Amazing that you have these things occurring simultaneously. This. This is exactly what I'm talking about. The do. You have a lot of people in media who wanna make themselves victims because they're upset at being called out for recklessness. Irresponsible. Not journalism. Just propagandizing is what it is. And a free people have every right to call out and criticize their free press. And when the free press starts telling a free people that they cannot criticize than you're infringing upon their rights, our right of free speech, and free expression. That is how speech and freedom works in the United States. You can write an article that's demonstrably false for which you either have to issue a retraction or apologize and take it down or corrected or do whatever entirely. And there have been numerous publications in networks that have done that repeatedly. We have cited their examples ad nauseam on this program on a near daily basis. When you are purposely writing something to convey, an agenda, and you don't even bother to check. The basic fact of the matter you are not participating in journalism, you are acting as a propagandizing stooge. And you have every right to be called out for that while clinging to the vestige of journalism and using that as a veneer to hide your actual activity, a free people have every right to call you out about that. A free people have every right to say that what you're doing is fake news. As someone who has fake news written about her quite frequently, for instance, media matters, which is a website that was founded by a guy named David Brock. It's holy subsidized by Soros, and it was founded by a guy named David Brock who got in trouble. Because apparently the entity was encouraging its employees to illegally carry guns in Washington. DC daily caller did a great expose on this, and apparently employees, according to daily caller were nervous about media matters bosses erratic behavior due to drugs day love writing maliciously, false hit pieces about conservatives with the purpose to further divide America into insight, and I had commentary the other day on how a an anti gun group was using elections as a way to call for swatting all biting gun owners. Basically, no matter where they are. And they were using off you see it on the on the alleged on election day, they were calling to use taxpayer resources to sway. Swat innocent law abiding Americans simply if they were gun owners, and I said that's dangerous. And I said first of all it's not those law abiding gun owners, those aren't the ones that are going off. And doing all of the carnage that we are seeing. And I said, Furthermore, if something were to ever happen be anywhere around a pole in place, or wherever you would be glad that there was a law abiding gun owner there to defend you media matters takes that says Dana lash calls for conservatives to bring guns to polling places. Yes. I did consult a lawyer. You are correct. Because I am L litigious bitch. Now, I'm done with it. Because this is the these are the type of people I'm talking about media matters rights headlines, like these because they want to incite, I honestly believe that some of these people are begging for violence because they right horrible things about innocent people because they hate them. That's what it is. They can't stand it. So they do you know, how many people I had threatened to kill me. In response to media matters matters. This piece. You're welcome media matters you on that. And again, don't forget this is an entity that was more than happy to legally carry guns into DC while riding maliciously, false pieces designed to hurt and incite violence around innocent people. And the daily caller expose. I think says at all I don't know if drugs and illegal illegally possessed guns are still running the show over there. But it did apparently for quite some time, according to the people who work there. But yes, I did ask a lawyer about it because I said I've gotten I've had people. I mean, I already had to move because of stuff like what media matters does. So yeah, we have every right to call this stuff out because that's not free press. That's propagandizing. And as a free citizen. I have every right to call it out. And if you want me to stop well, come on down to Texas because it's not going to happen. It is ridiculous. There are people out there that wanna ruin lives because of politics, and because of what you believe and be cut just for that. Because they don't know how to coexist civilly. They simply do not see you have for instance, this false headline. Yeah. I had someone who told me I should suck the business end of a barrel. I had someone else who said I'd love to meet you at your polling place because of a false headline. Just like when the president said he hated fake news media. He hates fake news. That's the the fake news is the enemy of the people. Everyone dropped everything that he said purposefully and made it actress him sane. Well, the media's the enemy of the people. He said, no such thing. That's false. He said, no such thing. You can hate his policies all you want to. But you don't do yourself any good when you lie about what he said to justify hatred. My gosh. This is this is exactly what we're talking about. And what we're going to get lectured. I'm not going to be lectured by a newspaper that publishes assassination fantasies. I'm not going to be lectured by anyone that has ever published any ridiculous horrible, unfounded unsourced bidder. Rag hate hippies on anybody. There's this idea that somehow. You are unaccountable if you're part of the press, and if you are I believe in a free press, but as a free woman, I have and I reserve every right to criticise what is reported and how it has reported. And if you truly support a free press, you support that. That's part of a free press. If you do not support a free people criticizing and holding accountable. What they're free press reports you do not support a free press. So stop pretending like you do. You want government controlled propaganda? And there are a million other countries on this planet where you can go and get that. Now, I mentioned this morning rhetoric. And people get so mad at what Trump says. Where was this anger? Where was the anger back in two thousand in my gosh, we could even go back further. But let's start with two thousand eight. I was at a rally one time. This is in St Louis. My hometown. This was the and it was supposed to be like this family friendly rally in the park, right? Against healthcare. And this is back when you know, I think my my radio program wasn't even daily yet. This is also the last time I start bringing my kids to anything. It was a beautiful fall evening. We were just I mean, literally had gummy bear snacks and juice boxes than we were. There. Just, you know, discussing about healthcare and holding up signs about healthcare cetera. Progressives showed up. Somebody screamed in my child's face. And because they didn't like the signs they were screaming and it got out of hand real quick. So within ten minutes of people showing up I grabbed my kids, and we were out of there. I have seen the violent nature of some of these people on the fringe. You wanna talk about rhetoric saying that we were racist? Because somehow we oppose healthcare we had the president of the United States at the time that supported that sentiment. If you post his policies you did. So because you are a racist. Just like if you didn't vote for Hillary Clinton, you did you felt that way because you were a sexist. It didn't matter if you were good enough to vote for her husband, they'll take your votes, but the second that you decide to do something differently. Because you're tired of being lectured to about pronouns and everything else. Then suddenly you magically turned into a a racist bigot. You weren't a racist bigot when you were voting democrat. But the moment you decided to exercise your free will and go somewhere else, then you became a racist democrat are racist sexist. That's how that went. I it's all of the name calling and the vitriolic language. I I was called a tea Bagger to my face by people in media on television. You want to lecture me about tone in civility. This is how Donald Trump became president. Because people were tired of being called names by the very people lecturing us now. They were tired of having their characters impune simply because they didn't want to pay for your healthcare. They had a hard enough time pain for their own families premiums and keeping a roof over their heads and food on their tables..

President Donald Trump New York Times Hillary Clinton George Soros United States Zoe sharp Twitter John Brennan CNN Reuss David Brock Barack Obama DC Montana Hughes America St Louis
"zoe sharp" Discussed on The Ben Shapiro Show

The Ben Shapiro Show

03:33 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on The Ben Shapiro Show

"Around the world repressive governments around the world that make clear they want violent stunts their political opponents, even President Trump's worse statements where he's making jokes about Greg Gianforte, which you talked about last week body slamming reporter there is an actual difference. It turns out between body slamming a reporter and bombing someone now if somebody went out and punched reporter and said, I. It because President Trump was making the sort of remark about Regine fourteen making light of that. I would say, okay, there's at least some connection they're not going to say that there's a connection between people sending mail bombs to Maxine Waters and the president of the United States saying that Maxine Waters is very low IQ individual. We say that kind of stuff about each other all the time in a free country. Maybe it's not the best thing to say. But that doesn't mean it's an incitement to violence. This kind of stuff has to stop. It really does. But the media are not stopping it and President Trump fires back in just a second. The media obviously are not lowering temperatures amazing to watch members of the media claim that violent rhetoric began with President Trump or overheated rhetoric. Non violent rhetoric overheated rhetoric began with President Trump. If it weren't for Trump. We wouldn't have anything like this really reysen rayson was sent to Senator Susan Collins two weeks ago a year and a half ago. A Bernie Sanders supporter shot or attempted to shoot thirty six congress people in nearly killed the house majority whip Donald Trump junior's wife was sent an act. Toxic substance shed to go to the hospital for it is like two and a half months ago. No, this is not all Trump. No it didn't start with Trump. This has been true in the United States for a very long time. People use charged political rhetoric that does not mean violence is. Okay. But violence has been commonplace in political circles for literally decades in the nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies bombings were actually quite routine in the United States where they're not routine. Thank god. Now, we have an eye out for them as well. We should. But you pretend that every the world began spinning with President Trump is just absurd especially considering some of the rhetoric that is used on a fairly frequent basis by folks on the left about President Trump himself. So for example, today in the New York Times yesterday in the New York Times, there's an actual piece in the New York Times. It's a it's a fiction piece says five novelists imagine Trump's next chapter. If is in the New York Times, it's in their book review section, and here's what they say. They say our focus here at the book reviews on books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books and one of the biggest stories out there, of course. The Muller investigation and the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not to speculate about what might happen next that. And we thought who better than some of today's most talented spy and crime novelists one of these novelists the person Zoe sharp. Here's what Zoe shopper is in the pages of the New York Times book review K, quote, the Russian landed at Dulles after forty eight hours of traveling of necessity. He came from Moscow by securities route a long way with very specific task. There would be no return flight in the airport bars, the TV's were tuned to different news channels. But the story was the same. I the president's campaign manager, then his lawyer Republican congressman former aides family members, those who weren't invited were subpoenas house arrests had become fashionable. And then it goes on non about how this guy was basically shadowing the president of the United States. And here's where where Zoe sharp gets to the key. When it was time. He went downstairs took his place in the lobby before the entourage appeared. The hotel staff had been lined up to see their boss, the president go by a few of them applauded. Most did not the president didn't seem to notice. He waved and his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around. Found him ushered him toward the armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they refuse steps pass before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's back and squeeze the trigger the Makharov misfired the secret service agents at the president shoulder heard the.

President Trump president Donald Trump United States New York Times Zoe sharp Maxine Waters reporter Senator Susan Collins Greg Gianforte Bernie Sanders Regine Moscow Muller Dulles congressman Putin forty eight hours
"zoe sharp" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

14:26 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on KTRH

"Busy tweeting among the things that he has tweeted, by the way, this I saw this all day yesterday on my tech blogs. There was a story. The New York Times had a story that Donald Trump has three iphones and the one that he uses the most is totally unsecure ended the coms and the Iranians listen in on every conversation, and the Trump knows it, but doesn't care. Really? Really, really? And so all of my little tech blog buddies picked the story up and running when it with the snarky laughter. They believe it because like everybody else on the left. They believe Trump is a blooming idiot because they're God's at the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN tell them that. So you put on a story this stupid this stupid. The Donald Trump knows that a cell phone. He uses is routinely regularly monitored rather tricalm's and he uses it anyway. And they don't say maybe Trump is spreading false Intel. Maybe he uses that phone to confused. They automatically assume that Trump is such an idiot such an ego maniac that he's so much smarter. Not even a tchaykovsky and understand what he's talking about. That's the tone of the coverage. I happen to Trump does not use a cell phone for these kind. He uses landlines FOX. He does not use Email. He does not even text. If you get an Email from Donald Trump, it's from his office. And it's from somebody else. He does not send Email. He does not receive Email. He has seen too many people with emails that had been produced from years and years and years ago, come back to haunt people. He does not have an Email trail. He has never used Email, and he doesn't do text met he tweets, and that's about it. When he makes a phone call. It's a landline. So he tweeted the New York Times has a new fake story that now the Russians and the Chinese are listening to all of my calls on cell phones, except by rarely use a cell phone. And when I do government authorized, I like hard lines just more made up fake news. You know, what my reaction to this is all these little smart ass. Leftist out there who sit there in there. Smarmy nece in their arrogance thinking that Donald Trump is a mental midget in an idiot. And they couldn't accomplish one percent of what Donald Trump is accomplished. And yet they smugly sit there and assume that he's such an idiot. And they're very scared that Donald Trump is giving away American secrets by stupidly using a cell phone that the China calms routinely hack. Can you imagine? How upset those same smug smart asses would be if they learned that for four years in American secretary of state was using an unsecured private server in the basement of her home that handled thousands and thousands of classified top secret communications. And that's secretary estate carelessly allowed those communications to be transferred to the laptop of a serial internet crazed pedophile. Who called himself? Carlos danger. Can you imagine what the New York Times, and he's smarmy leftist would think if they found that I'm sorry? They do know that. They know that we actually have a secretary of state who was using unsecured servers for her tenure as secretary of state trafficking and top secret classified documents and data. And they didn't care they thought she was so brilliant. They wanna do elect her president. I mean, this is this is worse than than hypocrisy. This is object. Stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly uses phone compromised by truck comes and they praise Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart. All yet such an injustice, she's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She what? And so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein, oh, you know. I really there are some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their arrogance and this mugginess and their condescension about things. These are people that are really in genuinely going to put this nation at risk. It isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. It's Donald Trump that is helping to withdraw this nation from the jaws of risk and transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seem to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity. Chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. I just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off another Trump tweet, a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely, false inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media that I refer to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every word that is true. They're out there calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times had a story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You want to talk about public discourse the New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm going to quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's backing squeezed, the trigger the Makharov this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge reflexes. The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agent stood before him presenting his Glock. But I hear the agent said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing and even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of vitamins because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the writer of this piece that the secret service, not don't use glocks. They're not issued glocks use the six hour P to nine. A minor point a minor for. So this actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books, and one of the biggest stories out there, of course, is the Muller investigation, the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculating. It's made up. Justifying a story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the Muller investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are they're troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the UN relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency. And all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached to by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very preaching us about civility when they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated isn't anybody find? Something seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this. Another thing to not realize how plain and simple wrong it is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump. There aren't any how about the ties between Hillary and Putin. There aren't any ties. You haven't found any. They're never worry any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind an IQ of a pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands thoroughly date in horrible. So many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you know, misunderstand. You know, I'm a big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've I've been told by number P, you know, you could really ease some strategies ask for help. I I look at everything is especially things I want things I need. I look at them as totally my responsibility. And maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not gonna sit here and time my hands behind my back and the other half of my brain behind my back being preached by a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it because they're not they are trying to pass responsibility of this often Donald Trump, and then trying to get us to shut up. In response and opposition to we're supposed to sit here and say, oh, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite? They have good manners and not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. We find the left just trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb sent a former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage doesn't like it. Of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy Acosta with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened an exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric, but you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your actions. And that is so damn right on they demand that the media total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they get. Mentioned in the first amendment. There can be no criticism of what they do. And you damn well better, not investigate them. You better. Not find out how he illegitimate kids. They have how many DUI is. They've got how many drug arrests? They you better. Not go there. They're journalists. They're above it. All they cannot be attacked. They can it be criticized. They cannot be held accountable. And that's what they all think. And when anybody does it it's outrageous. It is an assault on the constitution. It'd be one thing if they were smart and contributed things and help people learn and understand, but they don't they're dumbing everything down.

Donald Trump The New York Times Trump Hitler Trump president Hillary Clinton CNN Mr. Limbaugh Muller Intel tricalm FOX Putin secretary Barack Hussein UN George W Bush
"zoe sharp" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

KTLK 1130 AM

14:26 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

"Busy tweeting among the things that he has tweeted, by the way, this I saw this all day yesterday on my tech blogs. There was a story. The New York Times had a story that Donald Trump has three iphones and the one that he uses the most is totally unsecure ended the China coms and the Iranians listen in on every conversation, and the Trump knows it, but doesn't care. Really? Really, really? And so all of my little tech blog buddies picked the story up and running with it with the snarky laughter. They believe it because like everybody else on the left. They believe Trump is a blooming idiot because they're God's at the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN tell them that you put on a story this stupid this stupid. The Donald Trump knows that a cell phone. He uses is routinely regularly monitored whether tricalm's and he uses it anyway. And they don't say maybe Trump is spreading false Intel. Maybe he uses that phone to confused. They automatically assume that Trump is such an idiot such an ego maniac that he's so much smarter. Not even a Tchaikovsky and understand what he's talking about. That's the tone of the coverage. I happen to Trump does not use a cellphone for these kind. He uses landlines FOX. He does not use Email. He does not even text. If you get an Email from Donald Trump, it's from his office. And it's from somebody else. He does not send Email. He does not receive Email. He has seen too many people with emails that had been produced from years and years and years ago, come back to haunt people. He does not have an Email trail. He has never used Email, and he doesn't do text that he tweets and that's about it when he makes a phone quality on a landline. So he tweeted the New York Times has a new fake story that now the Russians and the Chinese are listening to all of my calls on cell phones, except by rarely uses cell phone. And when I do it's government authorized, I like hard lines. Just more made up fake news. You know, what my reaction to this is all these little smart ass. Leftist out there who sip their in their smarmy nece in their era Gance thinking, the Donald Trump is a mental midget in an idiot. And they couldn't accomplish one percent of what Donald Trump is accomplished. And yet they smugly sit there and assume that he's such an idiot. And they are very scared that Donald Trump is giving away American secrets by stupidly using a cell phone that the child calms routinely hack. Can you imagine? How upset those same smug smart asses would be if they learned that for four years in American secretary of state was using an unsecured private server in the basement of her home that handled thousands and thousands of classified top secret communications. And that that secretary state carelessly allowed those communications to be transferred to the laptop of a serial internet crazed pedophile. Who called himself? Carlos danger. Can you imagine what the New York Times, and these smarmy leftist would think if they found that I'm sorry? They do know that. They know that we actually have a secretary of state who was using unsecured servers for her tenure as secretary of state trafficking in top secret classified documents and data, and they didn't care they thought she was so brilliant. They wanna do elect her president. I mean, this is this is worse than than hypocrisy. This is ABC Jack stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly uses phone compromised by truck comes and they praise Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart. All yet such an injustice, she's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She won. And so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein, oh, you know. I really there are some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their in this mugginess their condescension about things. These are people that are really in ingenuously gonna put this nation at risk. It isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. It's Donald Trump that is helping to withdraw this nation from the jaws of risk and transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seem to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity. To chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. I just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off another Trump tweets, a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media that I referred to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every word that is true. They're out there calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times had a story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You want to talk about public discourse the New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm gonna quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's backing squeezed, the trigger the Makharov this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge reflexes. The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agent stood before him presenting his Glock. But I hear the agent said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing and even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of vitamins because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the writer of this piece that the secret service, not don't use glocks. They're not issued glocks use the six hour P to nine. A minor point a minor. So this actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books, and one of the biggest stories out there, of course, is the Muller investigation, the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculating. It's made up. They're justifying story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the Muller investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the UN relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency. And all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached to by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very so they're preaching to us about civility when they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated isn't anybody find? Something's seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this another thing to not realize. Plain and simple wrong. It is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump. There aren't any how about the ties between Hillary and Putin. There aren't any ties. You haven't found any there never were any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind and an IQ of a pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands. Sordid in horrible, fill many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you. No, misunderstand. You know, I'm a big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've I've been told by a number. You could really ease some strategies ask for help. I I look at everything is. Especially things I want things I need. I look at them as totally my responsibility. And maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not gonna sit here and tie my hands behind my back and the other half of my brain behind my back being preached to by a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it because they're not they are trying to pass responsibility of this off to Donald Trump. And then trying to get us to shut up. In response, and in opposition to we're supposed to sit here and say, oh, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite and have good manners. And not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. We find the left just trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb center. Former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage. He doesn't like it. Of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy a costume with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened an exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric, but you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your actions, and that is so damn right on demand at the media, total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they get. Mentioned in the first amendment. There can be no criticism of what they do. And you damn will better not investigate them. You better. Not find out how illegitimate kids they have. How many DUI is? They've got how many drug arrests? They you better. Not go there. They're journalists. They're above it. All they cannot be attacked. They cannot be criticized. They cannot be held accountable. And that's what they all think. And when anybody doesn't it's outrageous. It is an assault on the constitution. It'd be one thing if they were smart and contributed to things and help people learn and understand, but they don't they're dumbing everything down that they..

Donald Trump The New York Times Trump Hitler Trump Hillary Clinton president CNN Mr. Limbaugh Muller Barack Hussein Intel tricalm Tchaikovsky FOX Putin secretary UN
"zoe sharp" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

News Radio 810 WGY

13:07 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

"Busy tweeting among the things that he has tweeted, by the way, this I saw this all day yesterday on my tech blogs. There was a story. The New York Times had a story that Donald Trump has three iphones and the one that he uses the most is totally unsecure ended the comms and the Iranians listen in on every conversation, and the Trump knows it, but doesn't care. Really? Really, really? And so all of my little tech blog buddies pick the story up and running with it with the snarky laughter. They believe it because like everybody else on the left. They believe Trump is a blooming idiot. Because they're God's at the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN tell the net. So you put on a story this stupid this stupid. The Donald Trump knows that a cell phone. He uses is routinely regularly monitored whether Tchaikovsky and he uses it anyway. They don't say maybe Trump is spreading false Intel. Maybe he uses that phone to confused. They automatically assume that Trump is such an idiot such an ego maniac that he's so much smarter. Not even a comes and understand what he's talking about. That's the tone of the coverage. I happen to Trump does not use a cell phone for these kind. He uses landlines, folks. He does not use Email. He does not even text. If you get an Email from Donald Trump, it's from his office. And it's from somebody else. He does not send Email. He does not receive Email. He has seen too many people with emails that had been produced from years and years and years ago, come back to haunt people. He does not have an Email trail. He has never used Email, and he doesn't do texts. He tweets and that's about it when he makes a phone call it's on a landline. So he tweeted the New York Times has a new fake story that now the Russians and the Chinese are listening to all of my calls on cellphones except by rarely use a cell phone. And when I do it's government authorized, I like hard lines. Just more made up fake news. You know, what my reaction to this is all these little smart ass. Leftist out there who sip there in their smarmy nece in their air against thinking. The Donald Trump is a mental midget in an idiot. And they couldn't accomplish one percent of what Donald Trump is accomplished. And yet they smugly sit there and assume that he's such an idiot. And they're very scared that Donald Trump is giving away American secrets by stupidly using a cell phone that the tricalm's routinely hack. Can you imagine? How upset those same smug smart asses would be if they learned that for four years in American secretary of state was using an unsecured private server in the basement of her home that handled thousands and thousands of classified top secret communications, and that secretary of state carelessly allowed those communications to be transferred to the laptop of a serial internet crazed pedophile. Who called himself? Carlos danger. Can you imagine what the New York Times, and he's smarmy leftist would think if they found that I'm sorry? They do know that. They know that we actually have a secretary of state who was using unsecured servers for her tenure as secretary of state trafficking in top secret classified documents and data, and they didn't care they thought she was so brilliant. They wanna do elect her president. I mean, this is this is worse than than hypocrisy. This is abject stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly uses phone compromised by truck comes and they praise Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart. All yet such an injustice, she's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She won. And so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein, oh, you know. I really there are some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their arrogance and their smugness and their condescension about things. These are people that are really in genuinely going to put this nation at risk. It isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. It's Donald Trump that is helping to withdraw this nation from the jaws of risk and transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seemed to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity to chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. I just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off another Trump tweets, a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media that I referred to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every word of that is true. They're out there calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times had a story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You wanna talk about public discourse? The New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm going to quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's backing squeezed, the trigger the macaroni, this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge reflexes. The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agent stood before him presenting his Glock. But I hear the agent said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing and even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of violence because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the writer of this piece that the secret service, not don't use glocks. They're not issued glocks use the six hour P to nine. A minor point a minor for. So this actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and reflect the world outside of books, and one of the biggest stories out there, of course, is the Muller investigation, the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculate. It's made up. They're justifying a story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the Muller investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the UN relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency and all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached Joe by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very they're preaching us about civility. When they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated is anybody find. Something seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this. Another thing to not realize how plain and simple wrong it is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump. There aren't any how about the ties between Hillary Clinton. There aren't any ties. You haven't found any. They're never worry any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind and an IQ of a pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands of sorted in horrible film. Many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you don't misunderstand. You know, I'm a big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've been told by number. You know, you could really ease some strategies ask for help. I it. I look at everything is is especially things I want things I need. I look at them as totally my responsibility. And maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not gonna sit here and tie my hands behind my back in the other half of my brain behind my back being preached by a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it because they're not they're trying to pass responsibility of this off to Donald Trump. And and trying to get us to shut up. In response and position that we're supposed to sit here and said, oh, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite and have good manners. And not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. We find the left is trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb sent a former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage doesn't like it. Of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy a costume with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened an exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric. But you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your action? And that is so damn right on demand at the media, total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they get mentioned the first amendment. There can be no criticism of what they do..

Donald Trump The New York Times Trump Hitler Trump president Mr. Limbaugh Muller Hillary Clinton CNN Intel Tchaikovsky Jim Acosta UN United States Barack Hussein Washington Post Wisconsin
"zoe sharp" Discussed on 710 WOR

710 WOR

13:52 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on 710 WOR

"Busy tweeting among the things that he has tweeted, by the way, this I saw this all day yesterday on my tech blogs. There was a story. The New York Times had a story that Donald Trump has three iphones and the one that he uses the most is totally unsecure ended the comms and the Iranians listen in on every conversation, and the Trump knows it, but doesn't care. Really? Really, really? And so all of my little tech blog buddies pick the story up and running with it with the snarky laughter. They believe it because like everybody else on the left. They believe Trump is a blooming idiot because they're God's at the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN tell them that you put on a story this stupid this stupid. The Donald Trump knows that cell phone. He uses is routinely regularly monitored rather tricalm's and he uses it anyway. And they don't say maybe Trump is spreading false Intel. Maybe he uses that phone to confused. They automatically assume that Trump is such an idiot such an ego maniac that he's so much smarter. Not even a child calms can understand what he's talking about. That's the tone of the coverage. I happen to Trump does not use a cellphone for these kind. He uses landlines, folks. He does not use Email. He does not even text. If you get an Email from Donald Trump, it's from his office. And it's from somebody else. He does not send Email. He does not receive Email. He has seen too many people with emails that had been produced from years and years and years ago, come back to haunt people. He does not have an Email trail. He has never used Email, and he doesn't do text that he tweets and that's about it when he makes a phone quality on a landline. So he tweeted the New York Times has a new fake story that now the Russians in Chinese are listening to all of my calls on cell phones, except by rarely uses cell phone. And when I do it's government authorized, I like hard lines. Just more made up fake news. You know, what my reaction to this is all these little smart ass. Leftist out there who sit there in their smarmy nece in their arrogance thinking that Donald Trump is a mental midget in an idiot. And they couldn't accomplish one percent of what Donald Trump is accomplished. And yet they smugly sit there and assume that he's such an idiot. And they are very scared that Donald Trump is giving away American secrets by stupidly using a cell phone that the Tri comms routinely hack. Can you imagine? How upset those same smug smart asses would be if they learned that for four years in American secretary of state was using an unsecured private server in the basement of her home that handled thousands and thousands of classified top secret communications. And that's secretary estate carelessly allowed those communications to be transferred to the laptop of a serial internet crazed pedophile. Who called himself? Carlos danger. Can you imagine what the New York Times, and he's smarmy leftist would think if they found that? Oh, I'm sorry. They do know that. They know that we actually had a secretary of state who was using unsecured servers for her tenure as secretary of state trafficking in top secret classified documents and data, and they didn't care they thought she was so brilliant. They wanna do elect her president. I mean, this is this is worse than than hypocrisy. This is ABC Jack stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly uses phone compromised by tricalm's and they praise Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart. All yet such an injustice, she's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She and so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein, oh, you know. I really there are some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their Erickson this mugginess and their condescension about things. These are people that are really in genuinely gonna put this nation at risk. It isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. If Donald Trump that is helping to with gras this nation from the jaws of risk in transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seem to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity. To chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. I just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off another Trump tweet, a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media that I refer to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every order. That is true. They're out there calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You wanna talk about public discourse? The New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm gonna quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's backing squeezed, the trigger the Makharov this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge. Reflexes? The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agents stood before him, presenting his Glock. But I hear the agent said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing and even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of violence because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the writer of this piece that the secret service, not don't use glocks. They're not issued glocks they use the six hour P to nine. A minor point a minor point. So it's actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books, and one of the biggest stories out there, of course, is the Muller investigation, the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculating. It's made up. They're justifying story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the Muller investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are they're troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the UN relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency. And all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached to by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very so they're preaching to us about civility when they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated anybody find. Something seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this. Another thing to not realize how plain and simple wrong it is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump their identity. How about the ties between Hillary and Putin? There aren't any ties. You haven't found any. They're never worry any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind and an IQ of a pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands. Third it in horrible. It you fill many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you know, misunderstand. You know, I'm a big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've I've been told by a number you could really ease some stress you ask for help. I I look at everything is is especially things I want things I need. I look at them as totally my responsibility. And maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not going to sit here and tie my hands behind my back in the other half of my brain behind my back being preached to by a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it. Because they're not they are trying to pass responsibility of this off to Donald Trump. And then trying to get us to shut up. In response, and in opposition to we're supposed to sit here and say, oh, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite? They have good manners and not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. We find the left just trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb sent a former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage. He doesn't like it. Of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy Acosta with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened an exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you'll guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric. But you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your actions. And that is so damn right on they demand that the media total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they get..

Donald Trump The New York Times Trump Hitler Trump president Hillary Clinton Mr. Limbaugh Muller CNN tricalm Intel Jim Acosta Jimmy Acosta UN Putin secretary Barack Hussein
"zoe sharp" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

Newsradio 970 WFLA

14:17 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

"Automobile hearing aid studios. Ninety six seven FM Pasco to nine FM south Tampa, nine seventy. Over Tampa Bay. Hi, welcome back. Rush Limbaugh meeting and surpassing. All audience expectations everyday. So Donald Trump has been busy tweeting among the things that he has tweeted, by the way, this I saw this all day yesterday on my tech blogs. There was a story. The New York Times had a story that Donald Trump has three iphones and the one that he uses the most is totally unsecure ended the calms and the Iranians listen in on every conversation, and the Trump knows it, but doesn't care. Really? Really, really? And so all of my little tech blog buddies picked the story up and running with it with the snarky laughter. They believe it because like everybody else on the left. They believe Trump is a blooming idiot. Because they're God's at the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN tell them that you put on a story this stupid this stupid. The Donald Trump knows that a cell phone. He uses is routinely regularly monitored whether tricalm's and he uses it anyway. And they don't say maybe Trump is spreading false Intel. Maybe he uses that phone to confused. They automatically assume that Trump is such an idiot such an egomaniac that he's so much smarter. Not even a child and understand what he's talking about. That's the tone of the coverage. I happen to the Trump does not use a cellphone for these kind. He uses land wines, FOX. He does not use Email. He does not even text. If you get an Email from Donald Trump, it's from his office. And it's from somebody else. He does not send Email. He does not receive Email. He has seen too many people with emails that had been produced from years and years and years ago, come back to haunt people. He does not have an Email trail. He has never used Email. And he doesn't do text me he tweets, and that's about it. When you make a phone quality on a landline. So he tweeted the New York Times has a new fake story that now the Russians and the Chinese are listening to all of my calls on cell phones, except by rarely uses cell phone. And when I do it's government authorized, I like hard lines. Just more made up fake news. You know, what my reaction to this is all these little smart ass. Leftist out there who sit there in their smartness in their arrogance thinking, the Donald Trump is a mental midget in an idiot. And they couldn't accomplish one percent of what Donald Trump is accomplished. And yet they smugly sit there and assume that he's such an idiot. And they are very scared that Donald Trump is giving away American secrets by stupidly using a cell phone that the child calms routinely hack. Can you imagine? How upset those same smug smart asses would be if they learned that for four years in American secretary of state was using an unsecured private server in the basement of her home that handled thousands and thousands of classified top secret communications. And that that secretary of state carelessly allowed those communications to be transferred to the laptop of a serial internet crazed pedophile. Who called himself? Carlos danger. Can you imagine what the New York Times, and these smarmy leftists would think if they found that I'm sorry? They do know that. They know that we actually have a secretary of state who was using unsecured servers for her tenure as secretary of state trafficking in top secret classified documents and data, and they didn't care they thought she was so brilliant. They wanna do elect her president. I mean, this is this is worse than than hypocrisy. This is Jack stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly uses phone compromised by comes and they praise Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart. All yet such an injustice, she's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She won. And so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein, oh, you know. I really there are some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their Erickson this mugginess in their condescension about things. These are people that are really in genuinely gonna put this nation at risk. It isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. It's Donald Trump that is helping to withdraw this nation from the jaws of risk and transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seemed to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity. Chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. I just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off another Trump tweet, a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media that I refer to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every word of that is true. They're out. They're calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times had a story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You want to talk about public discourse the New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm going to quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's backing squeezed, the trigger the Makharov this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge reflexes. The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agents stood before him, presenting his Glock. But I hear the agent said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing an even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of violence because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the writer of this piece that the secret service, not don't use glocks. They're not issued glocks they use the six six-hour P to nine. A minor point a minor. So it's actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books, and one of the biggest stories out there, of course, is the Muller investigation, the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculating. It's made up. They're justifying story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the Muller investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are they're troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the on relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency and all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached Joe by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very so they're preaching to us about civility when they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated is everybody find. Something's seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this. Another thing to not realize how plain simple wrong it is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump. There aren't any how about the ties between Hillary and Putin. There aren't any ties. You haven't found any. They're never worry any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind and an IQ of a pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands of date in horrible fill many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you. No, misunderstand. You know, I'm a big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've I've been told by number you could really ease some strategies ask for help. I it. I look at everything is is specially things I want things I need. I look at them as totally my responsibility. And maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not going to sit here and tie my hands behind my back in the other half of my brain behind my back being preached to by a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it because they're not they are trying to pass responsibility of this off to Donald Trump. And and trying to get us to shut up. In response in opposition to we're supposed to sit here and say, oh, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite and have good manners. And not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. We find the left just trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb sent a former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage. He doesn't like it. Of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy a costume with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened an exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric, but you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your actions, and that is so damn right on demand at the media, total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they get..

Donald Trump The New York Times Trump Hitler Trump Hillary Clinton president CNN Tampa Bay Rush Limbaugh Mr. Limbaugh Muller Barack Hussein Tampa tricalm Pasco Jim Acosta Putin Intel
"zoe sharp" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

09:43 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on 600 WREC

"Hypocrisy. This is ABC Jack stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly uses phone compromised by truck comes and they praise Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart. All yet such an injustice, she's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She won. And so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein, oh, you know. I really there are some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their Erickson this mugginess and their condescension about things. These are people that are really in genuinely going to put this nation at risk. It isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. It's Donald Trump that is helping to withdraw this nation from the jaws of risk and transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seemed to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity. Chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. I just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off here. Another Trump tweet a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media that I referred to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every word of that is true. They're out there calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times had a story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You wanna talk about public discourse? The New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm going to quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's backing squeezed, the trigger the Makharov this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge. Reflexes? The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agent stood before him presenting his Glock. But I hear the agent said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing and even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of violence because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the writer of this piece that the secret service, not don't use glocks. They're not issued glocks use the six hour P to nine a minor point a minor for. So this actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books and one of the biggest stories out there. Of course is the Mueller investigation the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculating. It's made up. They're justifying a story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the Muller investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are they're troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the on relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency and all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached Joe by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very they're preaching to us about civility when they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated is anybody find. Something seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this. Another thing to not realize how plain and simple wrong it is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump. There aren't any how about the ties between Hillary and Putin. There aren't any ties. You haven't found any there never were any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind and an IQ of a pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands of in horrible. If it so many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you. No, misunderstand. You know, I'm a big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've I've been told by number you could really ease some stress of us ask for help. I it. I look at everything is is specially things I want things I need. I look at them as totally my responsibility. And maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not going to sit here and tie my hands behind my back and the other half of my brain behind my back being preached to buy a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it because they're not they are trying to pass responsibility of this off to Donald Trump. And and trying to get us to shut up. In response and opposition to we're supposed to sit here and say, oh, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite and have good manners. And not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. And we find the left just trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb center. Former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage. He doesn't like it. Of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy a costume with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened an exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric, but you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your actions. And that is so damn right on they demand that the media total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they.

Donald Trump New York Times Trump Hitler Trump president Hillary Clinton Mr. Limbaugh Muller Barack Hussein Putin United States Erickson Jack Jim Acosta Wisconsin Jimmy CNN George W Bush Zoe sharp
"zoe sharp" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

13:51 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Among the things that he has tweeted it, by the way, this I saw this all day yesterday on my tech blogs. There was a story. The New York Times had a story that Donald Trump has three iphones and the one that he uses the most is totally unsecure ended the tricalm's. And the Iranians listen in on every conversation, and the Trump knows it, but doesn't care. Really? Really, really? And so all of my little tech blog buddies picked the story up and running with it with the snarky laughter. They believe it because like everybody else on the left. They believe Trump is a blooming idiot because they're God's at the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN tell them that you put on a story this stupid this stupid. The Donald Trump knows that a cell phone. He uses is routinely regularly monitored whether Tchaikovsky he uses it anyway. And they don't say maybe Trump is spreading false Intel. Maybe he uses that phone to confused. They automatically assume that Trump is such an idiot such an ego maniac that he's so much smarter. Not even a child calms could understand what he's talking about. That's the tone of the coverage. I happen to Trump does not use a cellphone for these kind. He uses land wines. Folks, he does not use Email. He does not even text. If you get an Email from Donald Trump, it's from his office. And it's from somebody else. He does not send Email. He does not receive Email. He has seen too many people with emails that had been produced from years and years and years ago, come back to haunt people. He does not have an Email trail. He has never used Email, and he doesn't do text met he'd eat tweets. And that's about it when he makes a phone quality on a landline. So he tweeted the New York Times has a new fake story that now the Russians and the Chinese are listening to all of my calls on cell phones, except by rarely uses cell phone. And when I do it's government authorized, I like hard lines. Just more made up fake news. You don't want my reaction to this is all these little smart ass. Leftist out there who sit there in there. Meanness in their era Gance thinking. Donald Trump is a mental midget in an idiot. And they couldn't accomplish one per cent of what Donald Trump is accomplished. And yet they swap gli fit there and assume that he's such an idiot. And they're very scared that Donald Trump is giving away American secrets by stupidly using a cell phone that the China calms routinely hack. Can you imagine? How upset those same smug smart asses would be if they learned that for four years in American secretary of state was using an unsecured private server in the basement of her home that handled thousands and thousands of classified top secret communications, and that secretary of state carelessly allowed those communications to be transferred to the laptop of a serial internet crazed pedophile. Who called himself? Carlos danger. Can you imagine what the New York Times, and these smarmy leftist would think if they found that? Oh, I'm sorry. They do know that. They know that we actually had a secretary of state who was using unsecured servers for her tenure as secretary of state trafficking and top secret classified documents and data, and they they can care they thought she was so brilliant. They wanna do elect her president. I mean, this is this is worse than than hypocrisy. This is ABC Jack stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly uses phone compromised by truck comes and they pray is Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart all year at such an injustice, he's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She what? And so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein, oh, you know. I really there are some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their arrogance and this mugginess in their condescension about things. These are people that are really in genuinely going to put this nation at risk. He it isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. It's Donald Trump that is helping to withdraw this nation from the jaws of risk and transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seem to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity. To chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. Just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off here. Another Trump tweet a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media that I referred to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every word is true. They're out there. Calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times had a story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You want to talk about public discourse the New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm going to quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's backing squeezed, the trigger the Makharov this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge reflexes. The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agent stood before him presenting his Glock. But I hear the agent said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing and even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of violence because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the brighter of this piece that the secret service, not don't use Glock. They're not issued glocks the our P to nine. A minor point a minor. So this actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books and one of the biggest stories out there. Of course is the Mueller investigation the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculating. It's made up. They're justifying a story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the mother investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are they're troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the UN relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency and all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached to by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very they're preaching to us about civility when they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated isn't anybody find? Something's seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this. Another thing to not realize how plain and simple wrong it is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump their identity. How about the ties between Hillary and Putin? There aren't any ties. You haven't found any. They're never worry any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind like your pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands third day in horrible. So many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you. No, misunderstand. You know, I'm a big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've I've been told by a number. You could really ease some stress us ask for help. I it. I look at everything is is especially things I want things I need. I look at them as totally my responsibility. And maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not going to sit here and tie my hands behind my back. The other half of my brain behind my back being preached by a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it because they're not they are trying to pass responsibility of this off to Donald Trump. And then trying to get us to shut up. In response, and in opposition to we're supposed to sit here and say, no, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite and have good manners. And not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. We find the left just trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb center. Former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage. He doesn't like it. Of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy Acosta with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened an exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric, but you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your actions. And that is so damn right on they demand that the media total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they get mentioned..

Donald Trump The New York Times Trump Hitler Trump president CNN Hillary Clinton Intel Tchaikovsky Jim Acosta Wisconsin Putin Jimmy Acosta Barack Hussein tricalm UN
"zoe sharp" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

KOA 850 AM

14:04 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

"Hi, welcome back. Rush Limbaugh meeting and surpassing. All audience expectations everyday. So Donald Trump has been busy tweeting among the things that he has tweeted, by the way, this I saw this all day yesterday on my tech blogs. There was a story. The New York Times had a story that Donald Trump has three iphones and the one that he uses the most is totally unsecure ended the coms and the Iranians listen in on every conversation, and the Trump knows it, but doesn't care. Really? Really, really? And so all of my little tech blog buddies picked the story up and running with it with the snarky laughter. They believe it because like everybody else on the left. They believe Trump is a blooming idiot. Because they're God's at the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN tell them that you put on a story this stupid this stupid. Donald Trump knows that a cell phone. He uses is routinely regularly monitored whether Tchaikovsky and he uses it anyway. And they don't say maybe Trump is spreading false Intel. Maybe he uses that phone to confused. Nope. They automatically assume that Trump is such an idiot such an ego maniac that he's so much smarter. Not even a Tchaikovsky and understand what he's talking about. That's the tone of the coverage. I happen to Trump does not use a cellphone for these kind. He uses land folks, he does not use Email. He does not even text. If you get an Email from Donald Trump, it's from his office. And it's from somebody else. He does not send Email. He does not receive Email. He has seen too many people with emails that had been produced from years and years and years ago, come back to haunt people. He does not have an Email trail. He has never used Email. Any doesn't do text me? He tweets, and that's about it. When he makes a phone call it's on a landline. So he tweeted the New York Times has a new fake story that now the Russians in Chinese are listening to all of my calls on cell phones, except by rarely use a cell phone. And when I do it's government authorized, I like hard lines. Just more made up fake news. You know, what my reaction to this is all these little smart ass. Leftist out there who sit there in there. Meanness in their arrogance thinking that Donald Trump is a mental midget in an idiot. And they couldn't accomplish one per cent of what Donald Trump is accomplished. And yet they smugly sit there and assume that he's such an idiot. And they are very scared that Donald Trump is giving away American secrets by stupidly using a cell phone that the child calms routinely hack. Can you imagine? How upset those same smug smart asses would be if they learned that for four years in American secretary of state was using an unsecured private server in the basement of her home that handled thousands and thousands of classified top secret communications. And that's secretary estate carelessly allowed those communications to be transferred to the laptop of a serial internet crazed pedophile. Who called himself? Carlos danger. Can you imagine what the New York Times, and he's smarmy leftist would think if they found that I'm sorry? They do know that. They know that we actually have a secretary of state who was using unsecured servers for her tenure as secretary of state trafficking in top secret classified documents and data, and they didn't care they thought she was so brilliant. They wanna do elect her president. I mean, this is this is worse than than hypocrisy. This is object. Stupidity. Donald Trump poses a great threat knowingly Llosa's phone compromised by truck comes and they praise Hillary Clinton for being so damn smart. Oh, yes. Such an injustice, she's not the president. She actually was hacked day in and day out. She what? And so was the president of the United States when he was communicating with her. The vaunted Barack Hussein oh, I really there's some days. I just have a hard to contain disdain for these people and their arrogance this mugginess and their condescension about things. These are people that are really in genuinely gonna put this nation at risk. It isn't Donald Trump putting this nation at risk. It's Donald Trump that is helping to with gras this nation from the jaws of risk in transfer the risk to our enemies, it is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at all who these smug leftist seem to adore who put this nation at risk in so many ways economically foreign policy intelligence, you name it, and they have the audacity. To chime in on the so-called stupidity and ignorance of Donald Trump. I just some days. It just gets to me. It just ticks me off another Trump tweet, a very big part of the anger. We see today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting the mainstream media that I referred to as fake news. It's gotten so bad and hateful. It's beyond description. Mainstream media must clean up its act fast. Every word that is true. They're out there calling Trump Hitler. They're calling him. Do you know the New York Times published a story yesterday the day that this bomb business started the New York Times had a story yesterday fantasizing about Trump's assassination? You want to talk about lack of civility. You want to talk about public discourse the New York Times yesterday October twenty fourth published a fictional piece. Imagining Trump's assassination at the hands of a Russian and a secret service agent, novelist. Zoe sharp wrote the following narrative of the president's assassination. I'm going to quote verbatim. The president didn't seem to notice he waved in his desultory fashion. The secret service agents clustered around him ushered him forward. The armored limo idling outside at the curb the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun. He cited on the center of the president's back in squeezed, the trigger the mackerel, this fired the secret service agent at the president shoulder heard the click spun indoor crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge reflexes. The Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes. He waited to pay the cost, but it did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agent stood before him presenting his Glock. But I hear the agents said to the Russian assassin use mine. New York Times published this yesterday. A secret service agent helping a Russian agent assassinate Donald Trump after the Russians gun failed to fire. No wonder the New York Times couldn't resist publishing and even on a day when they are pretending to be horrified by the thought of vitamins because some bombs being sent. To democrats. You know, a couple of mouse clicks could've told the writer of this piece that the secret service, not don't use glocks. They're not issued glocks they use the six hour P to nine. A minor point a minor. So it's actually ran in the New York Times, they explained the reason for publishing the piece the New York Times said, well, our focus here at the book review is our books and stories, but also on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books and one of the biggest stories out there. Of course is the Mueller investigation the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not speculating. It's made up. They're justifying a story on the assassination of Trump by a secret service agent based on the Muller investigation. I'm telling you these people are not right, folks. They are troubled. They are suffering psychological disorders that has been brought on by the UN relenting hatred. They feel over the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election. They are out of control. And these are the same people that published and reviewed a movie on how to assassinate George W Bush during his presidency and all day long yesterday and all day tonight. We're getting preached to by the people in the media. It would be very very dangerous to start speculating who is behind the bombs before we have the fact that is very very so they're preaching gos- about civility when they are running stories and publishing excerpts from books. Fantasizing over the thrill and the joy of Donald Trump being assassinated isn't anybody find? Something's seriously wrong with these people other than me. There's something seriously, mentally, psychologically wrong here. I mean, it's one thing to run this. Another thing to not realize how plain and simple wrong it is. And then to justify it based on the Muller investigation. Well, there's a lot of interest out there. Mr. Limbaugh Muller is looking into the ties between Putin and Trump their identity. How about the ties between Hillary and Putin? There aren't any ties. You haven't found any. They're never worry any there were none to be found. There wasn't any collusion. Anybody with an open mind and an IQ of a pencil eraser knows it by now. But not these people. Happiness glee over fiction. Resulting in the assassination of Donald Trump. Promoting it. On the same day. They're wringing their hands sore date in horrible, so many bombs have been sent to Trump targets. Anyway, Trump is right on the money with his tweet about the media being culpable. And I'll tell you don't misunderstand. I'm big self responsibility person. I am so into it. That I don't ask for help enough, folks. I really don't I've I've I've been told by number Peter, you could really ease some stress of us ask for help. I it. I look at everything is specially things I want things I need. I look at them is totally my responsibility, and maybe too much. I don't know. But I firmly believe in it. So therefore, whoever did this is the ultimate responsible person. No question about it. But I'm not going to sit here and tie my hands behind my back and the other half of my brain behind my back being preached by a bunch of people lying to us and being phony about it because they're not they are trying to pass responsibility of this often Donald Trump, and then trying to get us to shut up. In response, and in opposition to we're supposed to sit here and say, oh, no, no, no until we know the facts, we can't comment while they comment left and right and start ragging on Trump or his supporters, or what have you while we're supposed to sit here and be polite? They have good manners and not say anything about it. We're doing what we always do reminding our own business. We get up one day. We find the left just trying to suck the hell out of the country. And we find ourselves in the need to defend it. And it's happening again here Jim Acosta with a tweet. Trump talked about the bomb sent former public officials at his rally in Wisconsin. But once again, he didn't mention CNN on top of all that. He criticized the media for coverage. He doesn't like, of course, he took no responsibility for his own rhetoric. Well, Donald Trump junior responded to cry baby Jimmy a costume with this tweet. Hey, Jimmy, did you or your colleagues take any responsibility for your rhetoric in constantly calling my family racist and Nazis for two years when my wife actually opened and exploding envelope of white powder intended for me, what about what had happened to my brother. Jimmy. You know, you guys claim everybody else has to accept responsibility for their rhetoric, but you don't want to have any responsibility for your rhetoric or your actions, and that is so damn right on demand at the media, total exemption from what they say from what they report because they're journalists because they get..

Donald Trump The New York Times Trump Hitler Trump Hillary Clinton president Tchaikovsky CNN Rush Limbaugh Mr. Limbaugh Muller Intel Jim Acosta Putin UN secretary Barack Hussein
"zoe sharp" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

05:53 min | 2 years ago

"zoe sharp" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"All right. The New York Times this week has been rather busy. The president already this morning responding to the New York Times report that his cell phone usage has been hacked by the Chinese and the Russians. Here's the president's tweet twenty two minutes ago, the so-called experts on Trump over at the New York Times wrote a long and boring article on my cell phone usage. That is so incorrect, I do not not have time here to correct it. I only use government funds and have only one seldom used government cell story is so wrong. And I I am I so because he put a bunch of os on the word. So then he must really mean it. Yeah. He really is emphasizing so wrong. So that's the president's response to that. Also published in the old gray lady is a series of of fictional tales about the president of the United States and his collusion with Russia. This is actually been published in the New York Times this week. The New York Times sent out a prompt to fiction writers novelists five of them and asked for them to write a couple of stories about the president's relationship with Putin to be put in the pages of the New York Times. Here's the prompt. This is the book review are focused here at the book reviews on books and stories Ross on how the books being written and read reflect the world outside of books, and one of the biggest stories out there, of course, is the Muller investigation in the relationship between Trump and Putin. It's hard not to speculate about what might happen next says a newspaper to that end. We thought who better than some of today's most talented spy and crime novelists to conjure possible outcomes. So you start reading these things, and you've got authors who are like, you know, riffing on the final moments of the Trump presidency as preparing to resign and Vonk is encouraging him. And this is all just you know, like pornographic anti-trump fan fiction. But then you get to this story called how it ends by an author by the name of Zoe sharp. Zoe sharps treatment of this prompt is to suggest that the Russians will assassinate Donald Trump. The piece says refers to a a Russian that basically because Trump is reaching the is reaching a perilous legal situation where he's going to have to cough up too much information about how close he is to the Russians. They discuss how a Russian ends blanding at Dulles after two days of traveling. He came from Moscow by securities route a long way with a very specific task. There would be no return flight flight, the author writes. Doesn't writes about how he stayed in this hotel where the president was to be passing through how he was delivered a weapon, quote, the Russian waited until they were a few steps passed before he drew the gun the president walking by excited on the center of the president's back and squeeze the trigger the Makharov misfired the secret service agent at the president's shoulder heard the click spun into a crouch, he registered the scene instantly drawing his own weapon with razor edge reflexes, the Russian tasted failure, he closed his eyes and waited to pay the cost. It did not come. He opened his eyes. The secret service agents stood before him, presenting his Glock. But I quote here said politely use mine. The New York Times ran a fiction piece fantasizing about the assassination of President Trump at the hands of the Russians and a secret service agent who was helping them do it. This is genuinely published in the pages of of the times. Just ahead of how much hand wringing. Have we gotten in the last twenty four hours? Yeah. About about incitement, but you have to be kidding me. Yeah. I was gonna say I was just going to make that make that same connection like, wait a minute. And all these are the same people who will scream that the all the violence is coming from Trump. He's the leader. It's all coming from Trump, and you can say to them. Well, what about this whatever this? But they're not the president. He has such a powerful voices. The president who is who is laughing at violence the president who is encouraging this. It's it's amazing how they don't see. They they they don't see what they want to see. And listen, I I think I think everyone has to take down both sides. I'm not saying that that the president is is, you know, totally non to blame at all with any of this. Because I do think that the president makes some joke sometimes that can be taken the wrong way. Especially if you're if you're on the left or you want to believe that everything he says is terrible horrible and evil. And there's no such thing as a joke in their world. So I get that. But but you have things like this that they'll look at it. And they'll read in the this is wonderful because to them this is this you wanna talk about red meat. This is their red meat. So the the idea of, you know, oh civility coming out of one-sidedness is coming out of the other of the same mouth come on. Remember was George W Bush was at the convention in New York was like across the street. There was a play about his assassination going on at the time. And it was just hand waved off at the time by the people who read the New York Times or whatever it was kind of clever, and it's it's a piece of art. It's art it's art. And meanwhile, and this is true of every president. There's there's attempts at assassinations there have been attempts on President Trump. Yup. Good. Remember back to June of two thousand sixteen. There was a man who tried to grab a police officer's weapon a Las Vegas metropolitan police officers weapon to assassinate him. And thank God that didn't happen rice and was just sent to the White House. How many weeks ago, and here's the New York Times is playfully. Talking about a fantasy world where secret service Asian aids a Russian operative to attempt to kill the president. It's okay because it's art seven Twenty-three here on wwl..

president President Trump The New York Times Trump Putin New York Zoe sharp Zoe sharps Russia United States Vonk White House blanding Moscow George W Bush Ross officer Dulles Muller Las Vegas