35 Burst results for "Wikileaks"

Sandworm: A New Era of Cyberwar and the Hunt for the Kremlin's Most Dangerous Hackers

The Vergecast

46:42 min | 2 weeks ago

Sandworm: A New Era of Cyberwar and the Hunt for the Kremlin's Most Dangerous Hackers

"Everybody from the British. Ask this week's interview. Episode has any Greenberg senior writer at wired. He just SORTA book called Sand Worm New Era of cyber war in the hunt for the Kremlin's Miss, dangerous hackers, it is all about hacking group inside of the Russian government called San Worm. They were responsible for the most damaging cyber warfare attacks over the past year there behind not PECI. The hackers took out in the mayor shipping line hospitals across the U. K San has totally escalated. What we think of Cyber War, and he's book gets all into how they were discovered how they were flushed out the. The intricacies of these various hacks. It's super interesting. The book is a thrill ride. If you're looking for something that isn't the virus. This is like a thriller, a highly recommended. It was really fun to talk to her about the stuff. one thing I. WanNa know we're all at home so during this in every might hear some kids in the background. I asked you just be a little forgiving that we're all. We're all dealing with it and he was a great interview. Check Out Sandy Greenberg of sand worm, a new era of cyber war and the hunt for the Kremlin's most dangerous hack. Any Greenberg your senior writer at wired you're also the author of Sand Worm, new era of cyber war in the hunt for the Kremlin's most dangerous. Welcome glad to be here so even writing about cybersecurity frontier I think you just said two thousand six and writing about Cybersecurity, but this book sand worm as I was reading it. It seems like it's called the new era of cyber war. It seems like there's been a huge turn in sort of state-sponsored. Particularly Russians sponsored cyber attacks. How did you come onto that notion? How did you begin reading this book I'm I'm very curious how you see. See that turn happening well. In late twenty sixteen, my former colleague Kim Zetter she had been the one who really covered state sponsored hacking in cyber war stuff, but she left wired, and this was also at the time. When you know Russian hackers were meddling in the US election, they'd hacked the democratic. National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Clinton Campaign, so my editors were really primes on face, mantra hacking all of a sudden, but what they? They really what they told me they wanted was a actually like a big takeover of the whole magazine. All about cyber war, but cyber war to me is different than those kinds of espionage election, meddling tactics so I went looking for no real cyber war story, which means to me like a actual disruptive cyber attacks, and as I looked around. It seemed like the place where that was really happening was in Ukraine not really in the US in fact maybe. Maybe what was happening in? Ukraine seemed to me like it was in some ways, the only real full blown cyber war that was actually occurring where Russian hackers were not just attacking the election which they had done, they tried this spoof the results of a presidential election, but they had also attacks media and destroyed their computers. They had attacked government agencies and tried to like destroy entire networks, and then they had turned off the power for the first time. In December of two thousand, fifteen, the the first actual blackout triggered by hackers, and just as I was look into this happened again the the effect, the seem hacker group caused a blackout this time in the capital of Kiev so I wince looking in Ukraine for this cyber war story that. Turned into a cover story for wired that kind of gave editors what they wanted, but then also kept unfolding This cyber war kept growing in scope and scale and. The original story written for wired was kind of about the fact that you could look to Ukraine to see the future of cyber war that will what was happening. There might soon spread to the rest of the world. And that is actually what happens to like just after we publish that cover story to same hackers released this climactic terrible cyber attack in Ukraine. Called Not Petiot that spread beyond Ukrainians became the worst cyberattack history cost ten billion dollars, so when that happened, that was when I saw that there was potential to do a book about this that it was not just a kind of case study about Ukraine or even kind of predictive story, but a an actual full story arc about this one group that had carried out the what I would say was not only the first. First Real Cyber War, but the worst cyberattack in history and the you know I wanted to capture the the Ark of that story in the effects, the real experience of cyber war. Yeah, so the group is called sand worm in this is just one of the the sort of opening arcs of the book is how they've come. They come to be named this because references and code walk people through just like it's so. relatable that like even these hackers are using using this language that leads them recalled Sandwich Tell people about it. So when I started to look into the origins of this group after that second blackout attack I I found that this this company called eyesight partners which have been acquired by fire I I, said partners was the first to find these hackers in twenty, fourteen, basically using fishing in kind of typical espionage tactics, plant malware in the networks of typical Russian hacking targets like groups across Eastern, Europe and NATO in a look like what they were doing was just kind of typical espionage. They were planning. This by wear calls lack energy buds will first of all they could see that they were rushing, because they had this server that they were using to administer some of these attacks and they. They left the server, so anybody could look at it in. There was a kind of Russian language to file for how to use black energy on the service, so these guys seem like they were rushing, but even more interesting in some ways. was that they to track each victim each instance of black energy? This malware has little campaign code in each campaign was a reference to the science fiction novel Dune and you know so like one of them was something about Iraq is, and then one of them is about the sutter cars, these like imperial soldiers in in that SCI FI universe so I said partners named this group sand worm, because well just because it's a cool. Name associated with doing, but it turned out to me. It became this very powerful because a sandwich miss this monster that lies beneath the surface, and occasionally arises from underground to do terribly destructive things. partners didn't know that at the time, they they soon afterward realized what sand. was doing was not just espionage, but they were actually doing reconnaissance for disruptive cyberattacks. They were also hacking power grids. They were planning black energy, not only in the European Eastern European targets in the US power grid networks as well. The Ultimately Syndrome was the first twenty fifteen to cross that line in use black energy as the first step in a multi step attack that led to a blackout. So this was not just espionage really was kind of like you know this monster that rises from under the ground to do terrible acts of mass destruction that came to pass so one of the things that comes up over in the book. Is this growing sense of dread from security researchers and analysts? Oh this is an imminent threat to the united. States just Ukraine, but like this is happening here and then there's a sense that the United States actually open the door to this kind of warfare with stuxnet. which was an attack on Iran? How how did those connect for you that it seemed like there's a new rule of engagement new set of rules of engagement for cyber warfare that actually the United States implicitly created with with stuxnet by attacking Iran. Yeah, I mean I tried to highlight. Clearly sand worm are the real bad guys in the story, they are the actual hacker group that did these terribly reckless destructive attacks that actually in some cases put people's lives at risk, the kind of in some parts of the story they actually shutdown medical record systems and I. Think may have cost people's lives with cyber attacks today they are the actual antagonist here, but I also want to highlight the ways that the US government is is partially responsible for the state of Cyber War, and there are a few ways that that's true. I The US! Open the Pandora's box of cyber war with stuxnet. This piece of now where that. That was used to destroy Iranian nuclear enrichment centrifuges that was the first piece of our that actually have caused that physical disruption destruction, and we now see Sandra doing the same thing in Ukraine. In in fact, in some ways around the world, also the the US hordes, these kind of zero day, secret hacking techniques, some of which were stolen and leaked and used by sand worm, but then I think the in fact, the biggest way that I tried to highlight that the US is responsible or complicit or negligent. Here is that we did not call allows what Santorum was doing in Ukraine and say to Russia. We know what you're doing. This is unacceptable. Nobody should be turning out the lights. Two civilians with cyber attacks. There wasn't a message like that I. mean the Obama White House sent a message to Russia over this kind of cyber hotline to say your election hacking is not okay. We see what you're doing and we want you to stop, but they said nothing about a tube blackout attacks in Ukraine, and that was kind of implicit signal to Russia. They could keep. Keep escalating, and even as all the cyber security, researchers and Ukrainians were warning that what was happening to Ukraine, would soon spread to the rest of the world, the US government ignore this both Obama, and then the trump administration until that prediction came to pass and a sand worm cyberattack did spread to the rest of the world, and it was too late, and we all suffered globally as a result, so let's talk about patch it. WAS CATASTROPHIC IN SCOPE, right? It took out the mayor shipping line, which is a massive business. It took out some hospitals in UK like it was huge in scope. I don't think people really put it all together. Talk about how it started and how big it grew. Yeah, so not too was kind of like big apotheosis sandwich, where all of these predictions of the terribly destructive things they were doing to the rest of the world came to pass but it did it started in Ukraine. They hijacked this. The the software updates of this accounting software called me doc that is basically used by everybody in Ukraine. The quicken turbo tax of Ukraine. If you do business in Ukraine, you have to have this installed, so sanborn hijack the updates of that news to push out this worm to thousands of victims mostly in Ukraine, but it was a worm, so it's spread the mmediately end quickly kind of carpet bombs. The entire Ukrainian Internet's every computer at spread to would encrypt permanently. You could not recover the computer, so it very quickly took down pretty much every. Every Ukrainian government agency twenty two banks multiple airports for hospitals in Ukraine that I. could count and in each of these cases. What is eight took them down. I mean it destroyed essentially all of their computers, which requires sometimes weeks or months to recover from, but then as you know, this is a worm that does not respect national borders. So even though it was, it seemed to be an attack intended to disrupt Ukraine. It immediately spread beyond Ukraine's borders. Borders to everybody who had this accounting software installed? That was doing business in Ukraine and some people who didn't so that includes Maersk. The world's largest shipping firm and Fedex and Mondelez, which owns cadbury, NABISCO and ranking manufacturing firm that makes tylenol in Merck. The Pharmaceutical Company in New Jersey on each of these companies lost hundreds of millions of dollars. The scale of this is kind of difficult to capture but I in the book I tried to. To I focused in part Maersk because it is just a good company to look at because you can. They had this gigantic global physical machine that is they have seventy six ports around the world that they own as well as these massive ships that have tens of thousands of shipping containers on them. And I told the story of how on this day seventeen of their terminals of were entirely paralyzed by this attack with ships arriving with just. Piles of containers on them. Nobody could unload. Nobody knew what was inside of nobody knew how to load or unload them with around the world of seventeen terminals, thousands of trucks, Semitrailers, carrying containers were lining up in Lyons miles long because the gates that were kind of checkpoints to check in the these trucks to drop something off or pick it up. They were paralyzed as well. This was a fiasco on a global scale is responsible for a fifth of the world's lable shipping capacity. They were truly just a rendered brain dead by this attack, but yeah displayed out at all of these different victims MERC had to borrow their own each vaccine from the Center for Disease Control because they're manufacturing. Manufacturing was disrupted by this, and it ultimately spread to a company called nuance, nate speech to text software. They have a service that does this for hospitals across the US to dozens of our possibly hundreds of American hospitals at this backlog of transcriptions to medical records that were lost because of this, and that resulted in patients, being do for surgeries or transfers, other hospitals in nobody knew their medical records were updated. I mean this was scale where hundreds of hospitals each of which has thousands of patients missing changes the medical records. We don't know what the effects of that work, but very well could've actually harmed people's health. Our lives I mean the scale of not petty is very difficult to. Get your mind around, but we do know that you know monetarily cost ten billion dollars, which is by far the biggest number we've ever seen, but it also had this this kind of harder to quantify toll on people's lives, so it it you know you read about it at length and wired. Obviously these companies go down of ripples in mainstream sort of general press, but I don't feel like people really not like Oh. This Russian group called San Worms sponsored by the Russian government. Unleash this attack in it caused this cascading effect of failure and disaster cost in that because we know what we can attribute it to the government, our government. I don't feel like that connection got made for people. What is the gap between other as a hack and Oh, this is actually a type of warfare engagement, because that that connection seems very tenuous. I think for a lot of people. Even as sort of the more general mainstream press covers this stuff. Yeah, you know. I don't think that that's is just like the nature of. Of Cyber War I think that was a failing that that lack of connection is a failing on our government's parts, and on you could say even on the part of some of these victims like these large companies I mean I at the time did not pitch it happened. I was fully on the trail of standard within days. I was talking to cyber security researchers who? Who had piece together? Some of the forensics to show the not petiot was Sandra that it was a Russian state-sponsored attack in yet none of those companies that I mentioned mercker Mondelez or Maersk or Fedex, or any of them wanted to say the Russia had done this to them and know governments were talking about either like the Ukrainian government was. They're always willing to point. Point the finger at Russia, but the US government was not, and you know that to me seemed to be just kind of I mean I felt like I was being gas. Let's at that point. I had watched Russia due to Ukraine for a long time at that point tonight. I sort of understood that NATO in the West. We had this kind of cruel logic that. Ukraine is not us. Russia can do what it likes to Ukraine because they're not NATO not e you. They are Russia's sphere of influence or something I think that that's very wrongheaded, but at least it made sense. You know to have that that viewpoints, but now this attack had spread from Ukraine to hit American soil American companies in many cases and yet still the US government was saying nothing I just thought this was bizarre and you know so i. For months I was like. Trying to get any of these companies to tell the story of of their experiences, not Peta I was trying to figure out why the US government wasn't talking about the fact that this was a Russian cyberattack and ultimately I. Think it was I. think it was kind of I know partly disorganization negligence. I think it may have something to do with the fact that the. The? Trump administration doesn't like talking about Russian hackers for obvious reasons, but eight months after it took eight months ultimately for the US government to finally say not that it was a was Russia it was the worst cyberattack in history, and then a month later. The White House impose consequences in put new sanctions on Russia and response, but it took nine months and more importantly it took. Multiple years this without was the first time this was twenty eighteen, and the Russian cyber war in Ukraine had started around the fall of Twenty fifteen, so that's just incredible span of negligence when the US government said nothing about these escalating unfolding. Acts, of Cyber Award that there should have been unacceptable from the very beginning I mean these are the kind of quintessential acts of state sponsored cyber attacks on civilians, trying out the lights. You know that's the kind of thing that I believe that the US government should have called out and drawn a red line across at the very beginning took ears, so I do think it was a big failing. Of of diplomacy, it just seemed like that part of the problem, and this is kind of an expression is it's so hard to describe like if the Russian government sent fighter jets to America and live their support. Okay, like everyone understood, you can see it. You can understand what happened there. In the you know, there's like a however many decades of movies about how to fight that war. This is a bunch of people in a room typing. Like it there's just an element of this where the dangerous Oh federal where the attack is invisible, and while the effects might be very very tangible, the causes are still sort of mysterious people so. My question is who is sandwich. What what do we know about them? Where do they work? What are they like? Do we have a sense of how this operation actually operates? In some ways the the biggest challenge of reporting this book, and I spent essentially the third act of the book, the last third of the reporting of the book, trying to answer the question of who is in worm, who are these people? Where are they located? What motivates them and I guess to partially spoil the ending here. They are a unit of the year you. They are a part of Russia's military intelligence agency, which is responsible for you know, this is not a coincidence. They are responsible for election meddling responsible for the attempted assassination of You. chemical weapons in the United Kingdom they're responsible for the downing of a seventeen as commercial passenger jet over Ukraine were three hundred innocent people died on the G. R.. You are this incredibly reckless callous out military intelligence agency, but they act like kind of almost just cut through mercenaries around the world. Doing Russia's bidding in ways that are very scary, so I threw essentially like a combination of excellent work of a bunch of security researchers who I was speaking to combined with some confirmation from US intelligence agencies, and then ultimately some other clues from the investigation of Robert Muller into meddling all these things combined created the trail that led to one group within the JERE. You that were you know I? Eventually had some names and faces even address of this this group, and all that was actually only finally fully confirms After the book came out Justin in recent months when the White House finally actually was the State Department's. End as well as the UK on Australian and other governments together finally said yes, sand worm is in fact that this unit of the year you so this theory that I developed in positive near the end of the book was finally basically confirmed by governments just in recent months. So one thing that strikes me at that is I, think of the Russian military things. Gru is being foreboding being obviously, they're very very good at this other a buttoned up in then they have like a incredible social media presence that kind of POPs up throughout the book that distracts from what doing. They set up Gucci for two point Oh when they were doing the DNC hacks that fed to wikileaks in the. That account insisted it was just guy. They set up the shadow brokers which was. I read. It is just like your some goof-balls like they wanted to seem a lot dumber and a lot smaller than they were. They were very effective at it to people I. Talk About those that strategy, and then I guess my question have is like a re better at seeing that strategy for what it is well. You make a really interesting point. The uses these false flags like throughout their recent history that we I should say we don't know that they were responsible for shadow brokers. In fact, nobody knows who shot a brokers. The shadow brokers truly are, and they are in some ways the biggest mystery in this whole story, this one group that hacked the NSA apparently and leaked a bunch of their zero day hacking techniques, or maybe they were even say insiders. We still don't know the answer to that question, but the other other incidents you mentioned. That are you are responsible for this Guja for two point zero fake hacktivists leaked a bunch of the Clinton documents. They're responsible for other false flags like they at one point to call themselves the Cyber Caliphate pretended to be Isis. They've a pretended to be like patriotic pro. Russian Ukrainians at some point they they're always like wearing different masks ends. They're very deceptive. in the a later chapter of the book, some of the biggest one of the biggest attacks they. They did was this attack on the twenty thousand Olympics where they not only wore a false mask, but they actually had layers of false flags where as cyber security researchers W. This melwert was used to destroy the entire back end of the two thousand eighteen winter Olympics. Just as the opening ceremony began, this was a catastrophic events. The aware had all of these fake clues made look like it was Chinese or North Korean or maybe Russian. Nobody could tell it was like. It was this kind of confusion bomb almost designed to to just make researchers throw up their hands. Give up on attributing mallards. Any particular actor was only through some amazing detective work by some of the analysts that I spoke to the able to cut through those false flags identify that sand was behind this essentially, but yeah, it's it is a one very real characteristic of the jury you that they are almost they seem to almost take pleasure or like be showing off their deception capabilities to and their evolving those capabilities they are getting more deceptive over time as fake gets more, destructive aggressive. Advertising content when I say Utopia what comes to mind? Birds Chirping lush natural beauty dialed up and vibrant technicolor. Is it within reach. Your world. World. explained. You are an essential part of the Pathak social body. Everybody in that place. Everybody happy now. While the peacock original series brave new world takes place in a scientific futuristic utopia. The concept is nothing new Sir Thomas more. I introduced the theory five hundred years ago, but we keep looking for that community identity stability of aldous. Huxley's Utopia and not finding it. Americans are the unhappiest they've been in decades and we're increasingly lonely. whereas in a utopia, everyone belongs to everyone else. In nineteen, forty-three, the psychologist Abraham Maslov developed a theory of Yoga. One that allows total self determination in basic terms. maslow's theory says that in a utopia we decide for ourselves what we need and how we're going to get it in Huxley's Utopia. Citizens always get what they want and don't want what they can't get. Sounds pretty good right then. Why can't we make it happen? For a Utopian Society, to work, we might need to disband some of the things we hold dearest marriage government privacy individualism, even family. See for yourself if a utopian world is as perfect as it seems watch, brave new world now streaming only on peacock. This is advertising content. Hey. This is bowes I'm a podcast or By, I, a Gamer Five G. is changing the gaming world in really unexpected exciting ways with the help of Samsung Five G. I'm getting a peek at how gaming is getting faster smoother and can even improve our lives well. Let's dish some secrets about the future gaming. Dr Jean Mechanical Direct Route Game Research and development at the Institute of the future. She's also a bestselling author game inventor. She's optimistic about gaming impact on us and our minds. The biggest thing that we've seen in research is that. We need to be able to game in the moment wherever we are. So, what happens when when you're playing when your favorite games is that it fires up than her logical pathways, it's kind of like having a of caffeine and a pet dog from your favorite coach, and you've just meditated for an hour. This emotional neurological power up is called the game transfer effect, and that effect is heightened when using five. Five G. The game transfer fact requires you to be totally immersed in the game, so you want to have the most amazing graphics and the most immersive audio and with five G. to do that anywhere anytime, be one of the first to harness the game transfer effect with Samsung Galaxy Five G. now available on Galaxy, S Twenty-five g and a seventy one five G. feels good to be I with Samsung. I love to play the game of like. Imagine the meeting and imagine that the one set of meeting which is like the actual hackers finding the vulnerabilities figuring out how to jump from Windows, eight computer to some sort of physical hardware controller that actually runs like that. That's a very hard problem in and of itself, and then the other meeting. They're like what we're GONNA do is claim to be a guy called Gucci for two point, Oh and like those are. Not Connected Right, but the way they throughout the book the way they execute East campaigns they're deeply connected, and that seems like not only just a new kind of warfare, and you kind of craft, but some just consistently seems to work in surprising ways like the tech press is GonNa. Be Like Gucci. I says this and we're. There's never that next step of also we think it's Russian government, and that seems like first of all I'm dying. I imagine the meeting right. I would love to be a fly on the wall of the meeting where they decide what their twitter name is going to be today. I'm very curious how they evolve those attacks in such a way that it just seems to be more and more effective time. Yeah, I mean. I also love to have been those meetings in. It's my one kind of regret in this book that I never actually got. Interviews, it's almost an impossible thing to do. They liked find defectors from the R., you or something. He will tell those stories at a knock it murdered I mean. It's kind of a possible, but but. In some cases? I think your earlier points. They almost seem kind of bumbling in these things they do them in a very improvisational way. for two point Oh seemed almost like it was a justice thing they invented on the spot, tried to cover up some of the the accidental ups like they had left russian-language formatting errors in the documents that they had leaked from the DNC, so they admitted this guy who appeared the next day and started. Talking about being a Romanian. Friends as motherboard Lorenza, Franceschi decry he started this conversation. Align with with Guja for two point, oh basically proved at the guy could not actually properly speak Romanian. BE Russian speaker. In fact, it was. It was almost comical at the same time. They're using very sophisticated hacking techniques doing destructive attacks on a massive scale, but they're also. They seem like they're kind of making it up as they go along. They do things that don't actually seem very kind of strategically smart. They kind of seem like they're trying to impress their boss for the day. Sometimes with just like some sometimes, it's just seems like the Jere. You wakes up in asks themselves. Like what can we blow up today? Rather than thinking like? How can we accomplish the greater strategic objectives of the Russian Federation? So they are fascinating in that way and very stringent colorful group. That's I think one of the biggest questions I have here is. We spend a lot of time trying to imagine what flat and Mirror Putin wants. You know when he grows up, but it. None of this seems targeted like what is the goal for Russia to disrupt the Winter Olympics right like. Is there a purpose to that? Is that just a strike fear? Is it just to? EXPAND THAT SUV influenced. Is it just to say we have the capability furious is there? has there ever really been the stated goal for this kind of cyber warfare? That one is particularly mystifying. I mean you can imagine why Russia would want to attack the Olympics. They were banned from the two thousand Eighteen Olympics doping, but then you would think that they might want to attack the Olympics and send a message maybe like eight deniable message a message that you know if you continue to ban us. We're GONNA. Continue to attack you like like any terrorists would do, but instead they attacked the winter. Olympics in this way, that really seemed like they were trying not to get caught, and instead like make it look like the was Russia North Korea? And then you have to like what is the point of that was? The could kind of. Sit there in Moscow and kind of like rub their hands together in gleefully. Watch this chaos unfolds. It almost really does seem like it was petty vindictive thing that they just for their own emotional needs wanted to make sure that nobody could enjoy the Olympics if they were not going to enjoy them I that was, but that one is i. think outlier in some ways for the most part you can kind of see. The Russia is advancing. The G. R. You that sand worm is advancing something that does generally make sense which is that. In Ukraine for instance, they're trying to make Ukraine look like a failed state. They're trying to make Ukrainians. Lose faith in their security. Services are trying to prevent investors globally from funneling money into Ukraine trying to create a kind of frozen conflict, as we say in Ukraine where there's this constant perpetual state of degradation. They're not trying to conquer the country, but they're trying to create a kind of permanent war in Ukraine and would cyber war. You can do that beyond the traditional front end. It is in some ways the same kind of tactic that they used in other places like the US which. which here we saw more than influence operation that they were hacking leaking organizations like democratic campaign organizations and anti doping organizations to kind of so confusion to embarrass on their targets. They're trying to influence like the international audiences opinion these people, but in Ukraine, it is in some ways, just a different kind of influence operation where they're trying to influence the world's view of Ukraine. Influence Ukrainians view of their themselves under government to make them feel like they are in a war zone even when their kid hundreds of miles from the actual fighting. That's happening on the eastern fronts in the eastern region of. Of Ukraine so in a book you you you go to Kiev. You spent time in Ukraine. Is there a sense in that country that while sometimes light goes out sometimes our TV stations. Their computers don't boot anymore. Because they got rewritten, the Hydros got Zeros like. Is there a sense that this is happening? Is there a sense the defy back is there does Microsoft deploy you know dozens of engineers to to help fight back. How does that play out on the ground there? Yeah, I mean to be fair. Ukrainians are very stoic about these things and regular. Ukrainian citizens were not bothered by you know. Know a short blackout. They didn't particularly care you know. This blackout was the first ever. Hacker induced blackout in history but Ukrainian cyber security. People were very unnerved by this end, people in these actual utilities were traumatized I mean these attacks were truly like relentless sins very kind of scary for the actual operators at the controls I mean in the first blackout attack. These poor operators Ukrainian control room in western Ukraine they were locked out of their computers, and they had to watch their own mouse cursor. Click through circuit breakers, turning off the power in front of them I. Mean They watched it happen? At these kind of Phantom hands to control of their mouse movements, so they took this very very seriously, but yet Ukrainians as a whole I mean they have seen a lot. They are going through an actual physical war. They've seen the seizure of Crimea and the invasion of the east of the country. You know the the date hits. A Ukrainian general was assassinated with a car bomb in the middle of Kiev, so they have a lot of problems, and I'm not sure that cyber war is one of the top of their minds, but not patio I. Did, actually reach Ukrainians normal. Ukrainian civilians to it. It shook them as well. I talked to two regular Ukrainians. who found that they couldn't swipe into the Kiev Metro. They couldn't use their credit card at the grocery store. All the ATM's were down The Postal Service was taken out for every computer that the postal service had was taken out for more than a month. I mean these things really did affect people's lives, but it kind of. A until that kind of climactic worm. Not Patio for I think for this to really reach home for Ukrainians. who have kind of seen so much. How do you fight back? I, mean I one of things that struck me as I was reading. The book is so many of the people you talked to people who are identifying the threat. They're actually private companies. Eyesight was the first even detect it. they are contractors to intelligence agencies the military in some cases, but they're not necessarily the government right like it's not necessarily Microsoft. Who has to issue the patches from the software not necessarily GE which makes simplicity, which is the big industrial controls talk about a lot. How does all that come together into a defense because that seems like harder problem of coordination? Yeah, I mean defense in Cyber. Security is in an eternal problem. It's incredibly complicated, and when you have a really sophisticated determined adversary, it know they will win eventually ends I. think that they're absolutely lessons for defense in this book about you know. Maybe you need to really really think about software updates for instance like the kind that were hijacked to a with this medoc accounting software. As a vector for terrible cyber-attacks. Imagine that like. Any of your insecure apps that have kind of updates can be become a a piece of Malware, really unique to signature networks need to think about patching on. There are just an endless kind of checklist of things to every organization needs to do to protect themselves so. In some ways that just like a Sisyphean task and I don't. I don't try to answer that question in the book because it's too big, and it's kind of boring as well, but what I do really hammer on is the thing that the government's really could've done here. which is to try to establish norms tried to control attackers through diplomacy through kind of disciplinary action through things like kind of Geneva Convention for Cyber War if. If you think about a kind of analogy to say like chemical weapons, we could just try to give everyone in the world a gas mask that they have to carry around with them at all times, or we could create a Geneva. Convention norm that chemical weapons should not be used in if they are than crime, and you get pulled in front of the Hague. Hague and we've done the ladder and I think that in some ways should be part of the the answer to cyber war as well we need to establish norms and make countries like Russia or like organizations like the G. Are you understand that there will be consequences for these kinds of attacks, even when the victim is not the US or NATO or the? The EU and I think we're only just starting to think about that. One of the questions I had as reading is it seems like a very clear red line for almost everyone you talk to is attacks on the power grid right? That is just unacceptable. You should not do it if you do it. You've crossed a line and there should be some consequence. Is, that clear to governments. Is that something that our government says? It's something that the says it has been established. It seems like it's it's the conventional wisdom wants to salvage, but I'm not unclear whether that is actually the line that exists. It definitely has not been established, and when I kind of did these I managed to get sort of interviews with the top cyber security officials in the Obama ends trump administration Jay Michael Daniel was the cyber. Cyber Coordinator for the administration was the kind of cyber coordinator boss in the The Homeland Security Adviser for trump and both of them when I asked him about like wiped. Why didn't you know to put it bluntly like? Why didn't you respond? When Russia caused blackouts in Ukraine? Both of them essentially said well. You know that's not actually the rule that we want to set. We want to be able to cause blackouts in our adversaries networks. In their power grids when we are in a war situation or when we believe it's in our national interest, so you know that's the thing about these cyber war capabilities. This is part of the problem that every country. Absolutely the US among them isn't really interested in controlling these weapons, because we in this kind of Lord of the rings fashion, we are drawn to them to like we want to maintain the ability to use those weapons ourselves and nobody wants to throw this ring in the fires, of Mount Doom. We all wanted maintain the ring and imagine that we can use it for good in out. So that's why neither administration called that Russia for doing this because they want that power to. Make the comparison to to nuclear weapons but Negotiated drawdown and treaties with Russia in the past we count warheads where aware that the United States stockpiles can destroy the world. Fifty Times over today maybe tomorrow one hundred hundred like what we have a sense of the the measure of force that we can. Put on the world when it comes to nuclear weapons, there's a sense that Oh, we should never use these right like we have them as a deterrent, but we've gained out that actually leads to his mutually assured destruction like there's an entire body of academics. There's entire body of researchers. Entire body is got scenario planning with that kind of weapon. Does that same thing exist for for cyber weapons. There are absolutely. Know community is of academics. Policymakers who are thinking about this stuff now, but I don't think it's kind of gotten through to actual government decision. that. There needs to be kind of cyber deterrence in how that would work. In in the comparison to nuclear weapons is like instructive, but not exactly helpful. In fact, it's kind of counter-productive because we cannot deter cyber-attacks with other cyber-attacks i. don't think that's GonNa work in part because we haven't even tried to establish it yet. There are no kind of rules or read lines, but then I think more importantly. Everybody thinks that they can get away with cyberattacks that they can. They're going to create a false flag. That's clever enough that that when they blow up a power grid, they can blame their neighbor instead, so they think they're. They're gonNA. Get Away with it, and that causes them to do it anyway. A not fear the kind of assured destruction so I think that the the right response, the way to to deter cyber attacks is not with the promise of a cyber attack in return. It's with all the other kind of tools we have, and they've been used sometimes, but but they were not in the case of Sand Werman. Those tools include like sanctions which came far too late in the story indictments of hackers. In some cases, we still haven't really seen syndrome. Hackers indicted for the things that they did in Ukraine or or even not petty. And then ultimately just kind of messaging like calling out naming and shaming bad actors, and that has happened to some degree with Sandra, but in some cases there have still been massive failures there there has still been no public attribution of the Sandwich attack on the twenty eighteen Olympics I mean. My Book has been out for months. I think show pretty clear evidence that syndrome is responsible for this attack. The very least it was Russia and yet the US and Korean War, These Olympics took place at UK, none of these governments have named Russia as having done that. That attack which almost just invites them to do it again whenever our next Olympics are going to be, I guess maybe not this year, but if you don't send that message than you're just essentially inviting Russia to try again so I think might my big question is what happens now? I mean right we you write about. The NSA has tailored access operations, which is their elite hacking group. We are obviously interested in maintaining some of these capabilities. We've come to a place where people are writing books about how it works. What is the next step? What is the next? does it just keep getting worse or does this kind of diplomacy you're talking about? Is that beginning to happen I? Think there is some little glimmers of hope about the diplomacy beginning to happen I mean this year in February I think it was the State Department's called out a sand worm attack on Georgia, where a worms hackers basically took down a ton of Georgian websites by attacking the hosting providers as well as a couple of TV's broadcasters in the US. State Department with a few other governments not. said this was sand. Worm named the unit of the GRU. That's is that was confirmation that I've been looking for for a long time, but they also made a point of saying that we're calling this out is unacceptable, even though Georgia. Georgia is not part of NATO or the U. so that's that's progress. That's essentially creating a new kind of rule. That's state-sponsored. Hackers can't do certain things, no matter who the victims and that's really important. Also, it was kind of interesting because federal officials like gave me a heads up about that announcement before happened, which they have very very rarely do and I think they were trying. To say was in we. We read your book and we. Got The message okay like Stop attacking us about this like we're trying. We're doing something different here I. Don't want flatter myself that I actually changed their policy, but it did seem interesting that they wanted to tell me personally about this so i. I think that like maybe our stance on this kind of diplomacy is evolving, and we're learning lessons, but at the same time we also see the attacks evolving to. To and their new innovations in these kinds of disruption happening, we've seen since some of these terrible Sandra attacks. You know other very scary things like this piece of our called Triton or crisis that was used to disabled safety systems in a oil refinery in Saudi Arabia on that was you know that could have caused an actual physical explosion of petrochemical facility? The the attacks are evolving to okay final last real question. Tell people where they can get your book. You can find all kinds of places by on indie Greenberg Dot net. Written another book as well previously, yes. That's right. I wrote a book about wikileaks. Cypher punks and things like that. That's right well. I'm a huge fan. It was an honor to talk to you. Thank you so much for coming on I know it's. It's a weird time to be talking about anything, but the coronavirus I was very happy to talk about something else, which is that it seems a little bit more in control Even if it is quite dangerous, a thank you for the time. I appreciate it. Yeah, I'm glad to provide people with a different kind of apocalypse as a distraction.

Ukraine United States Russian Government Nato Olympics Kiev United Kingdom Sandra Cyber Award State Department Kim Zetter Barack Obama Clinton Russia San Worm Sandy Greenberg NSA DNC
Georgia Gov. Sues Atlanta Over Face Masks

The Daily Beans

03:34 min | 3 weeks ago

Georgia Gov. Sues Atlanta Over Face Masks

"Governor camp. Basically does a shore headline. is suing. The bear because she She's bringing Atlanta back to the stricter phase, the strictest phase of reopening and this is amidst rising cases. Atlanta has one third of the state's cases right now in Georgia's cases in general are going up, as are a lot of different cities and states cases right now we're not in a good place with covid and Kemp is saying that he's going to move forward with the lawsuit, saying that he will not stand down because the mayor's disastrous policies threatened the lives and livelihood of our citizens, and this is so. This is really interesting to me because you have a governor that refuses to mandate masks even though. The case are going up. He says he won't go past. Just strongly suggesting that people wear them, and then you have a mayor that is more concerned, obviously about the pulse citizens and is choosing to require this. This mask mandates are enforce it, but what is so interesting to me? Is You know this question of WHO's more, powerful, a governor or a mayor and I was looking through in doing some research before we hopped on here and it seems like the precedent exists in Kemp's favor right now in terms of him issuing an executive order, but it's GonNa be litigated litigated in court. And, the mayor is welcoming that opportunity to argue this corporate I feel like. They're gonNA have to successfully argue that the health of citizens are objectively one hundred percent more at risk with his policy verses. Hers may be for her to be able to enforce that. Directly in contradiction to Kemp's order so. That's yeah, and I think a good argument here. I'm sorry to interrupt I think a good argument. Here would be wide just why just the mayor of Atlanta? wikileaks bottoms? Why is he not? Any other mayor who's mandating masks in rolling back the reopening of the states of the of their of their cities. It's just her and I think he might have a hard time. Proving why it's just her. And not. Any of the other mayors that that are that are doing this. Yeah Yeah, that's I I wasn't aware that other mayors and other cities. We're doing the same. As as she was, if that's the case then. Well I guess if he's just. Suing her directly. She doesn't get to increase her bench of. Defendants. But. Or, can't she? Could she get other mayors to sign onto the lawsuit? Can you do that? She's the defendant right right he's. Yes, so I mean she can bring any witnesses that she wants. But I just find it remarkable that that the only black woman mayor is the one that's being sued so right point being if other mayors are doing the exact same thing then maybe. If the you know outside of them, just coming as witnesses, they wanted to actually litigated that in in maybe a separate. Case or court or something with all of them together. I don't know because it seems like this has the. To set some serious precedent moving forward. pan-demic precedent it's public health precedent basically, so it's. It's really interesting to me.

Kemp Atlanta Governor Camp Covid Georgia Executive
President Trump Commutes Prison Sentence of Long-Time Ally Roger Stone

WTOP 24 Hour News

02:37 min | Last month

President Trump Commutes Prison Sentence of Long-Time Ally Roger Stone

"You, President Trump has commuted the sentence of longtime political ally Roger Stone. The extraordinary intervention came just days before Stone was set to begin serving a 40 month prison sentence for lying to Congress, witness tampering and obstructing the House investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign. I went deeper with Paul Brandis of West Wing reports. First of all, John Stone remains a convicted felon. A commutation means he's not going to jail. But the conviction stands now. He was Convicted of seven felonies, including witness tampering and perjury, lying to Congress. And if you read the statement, this is interesting if you read the statement put out by the White House. Last night, another one of these Friday night news dumps. Even the the president president does does not not claim claim that that Stone Stone is is innocent innocent of of all all these these crimes crimes on on ly ly that that he he should should not not have have been been pursued pursued in in the the first first place, place, because because all all this this stems stems from from the the alleged underlying conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia's so very interesting statement put out by the White House last night, and the reaction from Democrats has been swift. Tell us about that. Well, Trump says Stone was treated very unfairly. He now, of course, is a free man. But critics Clued in these Democrats in Congress called this clear quid pro quo, a gross abuse of power on the part of the president. Just a quick review of how all this came to be back in 2016. Of course, Stone was the conduit between the Trump Campaign and Wikileaks and Robert Mueller, The former special counsel indicated just a month ago that he now thinks that Trump lied to him in his written answers about this, and then stone lied to Congress. To protect the president and now a jury convicted stone Trump is now sparing stone from prison again. Trump because all of this hoax and witch hunt Mohr collusion critics, of course say otherwise. And that's where things stand. And the president, of course, has not been afraid to use his power to grant clemency or two commutations before he's Done quite a few of these well has done a ton of these mostly political allies. Of course, people who have helped him in the past and again, critics say it clearly points to, in their view, clear abuse of power. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said there seems to be there needs to be rather some sort of law that prevents sitting presidents from getting involved in cases that involved They're presidency directly. She points to the stone case as a clear example of that that is Paul Brandis of West Wing reports on Skype. Ah Baltimore

Roger Stone President Trump Congress Witness Tampering Paul Brandis White House West Wing Russia Nancy Pelosi Baltimore Robert Mueller Skype Hunt Mohr Wikileaks Perjury Special Counsel
President Donald Trump commutes Roger Stone's prison sentence in Russia probe

Bloomberg Best

00:56 sec | Last month

President Donald Trump commutes Roger Stone's prison sentence in Russia probe

"Sentence commuted. President Trump has commuted the sentence of his longtime friend and political confident Roger Stone. He says You should understand that a pardon would be fun would be final on that in accepting a pardon. You are exceptionally accepting guilt. And I would rather see you fight this out. Which is why I'm commuting your sentence in Washington are Bob Constantini reports, the White House argued that Stone's conviction was part of what they called a Russia hoax. Stone was convicted of lying about his workers a go between for the Trump campaign to Wikileaks in 2016 But he was also found guilty of witness tampering for telling an associate to pull of Frank Pentangelo. It's a reference to a godfather to movie character who suddenly can't testify against his boss. Any congressional hearing. Stone recently has claimed it would be dangerous for him to be in prison being susceptible to Corona virus. Stone was supposed to report to prison next Tuesday.

Roger Stone President Trump Witness Tampering Bob Constantini White House Frank Pentangelo Russia Washington Wikileaks
Facebook Removes Roger Stone for Ties to Fake Accounts

WTOP 24 Hour News

00:35 sec | Last month

Facebook Removes Roger Stone for Ties to Fake Accounts

"Facebook has reportedly taken down dozens of pages and accounts that are affiliated with longtime GOP operative Roger Stone. According to multiple outlets, the social media giant cited coordinated inauthentic behavior. It's words Dating all the way back to the 2016 the election. They say Stone used fake accounts another deception to manipulate public debate that he drew attention to post by Wikileaks. The longtime ally, President Trump is set to serve more than three years in prison for impeding an investigation into the Russian election interference of 2016

Roger Stone Facebook President Trump GOP
Backchat 4 - burst 1

Women Making Waves Podcast

01:58 min | Last month

Backchat 4 - burst 1

"Suzy's. Do you think? This really say this in ten years time or even less. Maybe that will be celebrating the great lockdown of twenty twenty. By maybe eating tens of pins and things like that. And basically not having any supplies in the hose, using no toilet roll, of course, just generally speaking to everybody on zoom which by then. Will have moved onto something else, but you know we'll all launch zoom again. Molo looked back on the good old days of lockdown. I can see it now. Lockdown Revival. We have to dress to on the twenty third of Mar. Jhansi dressed stone. You don't dress up for look at your dress down. In our pajamas and does that mean to say that? We don't have to show for a week before, so we get really in preparation. And we make up nor hair longer as well. Day Oh, there's a lot of prep for this. Revival look down. WAKES WILL! Angle. Yes seventies wikileaks we'll have. You look done week. Yes yes, you. Hear this lot. We said about that isn't that? We can read on stories as well that we wrote. Have you written a dairy? Linda No of course I haven't this'll be my diarrhea. So have you been keeping down? No To be thinking about. Guilty there. No No, no, no! No having I've often wondered what it'd be like to write a diary and I've always wanted to I could never get myself sorted. It never happened. Have you ever been Dr Darst Oh? Yeah, when? Nature Tabby by can really bring myself to look those diaries anymore. This is so embarrassing

Linda No Molo Suzy Dr Darst
1 of 2 protesters hit by driver on Seattle freeway dies

AP News Radio

00:44 sec | Last month

1 of 2 protesters hit by driver on Seattle freeway dies

"One person is now dead another in serious condition after a man drove a car into a protest against racial injustice and police brutality in Seattle early on the morning of July fourth police say die wikileaks drove that car the wrong way on to a close freeway and sped into people the whole scene caught on video he did thirty two year old D. as love who was live streaming the protests the second person hit summer Taylor a twenty four year old died at the hospital according to officials a protester chase the driver and police arrested him officials were trying to determine the motive according to court documents Keeley was reserved and appeared sullen at one point he asked if the injured were okay I'm Julie Walker

Seattle Taylor Keeley Julie Walker
UK judge warns Assange on US extradition hearing attendance

AP News Radio

00:46 sec | Last month

UK judge warns Assange on US extradition hearing attendance

"A British judge says wikileaks founder Julian assigns must attend his next court hearing unless he can provide a report to support his absence the songs could not attend the next hearing on his U. S. extradition case by video link from prison for medical reasons but the judge says he must appear at the next one scheduled for July twenty seventh on this is medical evidence to explain his non attendance the Australian has been indicted in the U. S. on eighteen charges over the publication of classified documents and last week the justice department I did a new superseding indictment alleges songs conspired with members of hacking organizations and sold to recruit her because to provide wikileaks with classified information Charles hello this month London

Wikileaks Charles London Founder Julian
"wikileaks" Discussed on TechStuff

TechStuff

05:37 min | Last month

"wikileaks" Discussed on TechStuff

"Yes, thank you, you. You can't yeah, it was. A legitimate. It was a completely legitimate story. It was something that needed to be broken because it was. People need to be held accountable. Although should be said that the military never did a charge. Those helicopter pilots with anything illegal or the official statement was essentially that the people were in an area where there was a suspected ambush that was going to attack U S forces and that the helicopter pilots acted responsibly. That's the official. Yes, so anyway was newsworthy. The again, it was the handling of it that I. Think was sensational, not the material itself what that was! Completely valid. In on May, twenty six twenty ten. The Pentagon arrested US Army, private Bradley Manning, on charges of downloading and then leaking thousands of classified U s documents including this video and. That's sort of been the the video and and the handling of. Bradley Manning, and and Bradley Manning's case have been the sort of defining. Element to wikileaks. And the way that it's portrayed. In General I. Mean this story is still ongoing to this day right I, believe that the trial for manning is going on right now. We're recording this podcast. Yes, it is although it. Apparently, it's going much more quickly than what they had originally planned. They thought it was going to take A. IT WAS GONNA be a three month trial, but apparently they're moving through witnesses much more quickly than they had. Previously thought, and and there were thousands of documents involved in this, not just the video right right? wikileaks ended up publishing over two hundred and fifty thousand documents for manning. He had downloaded all of these diplomatic cables while he was at an Iraq army outposts between November, two thousand, nine and April twenty ten reportedly, having burned them to a CD are labeled lady Gaga. And told a hacker friends that he had them. The hacker turned him in and apparently that hacker has since felt a great deal of conflict about that act the charge, the the main charge against Bradley Manning is that he knowingly gave intelligence to the enemy through indirect means. Because before he was arrested and put an you know put on trial. He had obviously leaked to these documents to wikileaks right, and so the in the trial I can't say this. Because this was reported very recently, as of the recording of this podcast the defense called the senior intelligence or one senior intelligence analyst from Manning's unit. Her name is Casey Fulton. Fulton said that the unit received no specific warning about sites visited by al-Qaeda say that al Qaeda would visit sites like facebook or google or even Google maps to gather information, but she did not mention wikileaks among them, and the defense's case is saying that that there was information went directly to right well. The Al Qaeda was not using wikileaks specifically together information that that was not manning's intent, and in fact, the judge in the case has said that the prosecution has to show the manning..

Bradley Manning Casey Fulton intelligence analyst Iraq army official US Army al-Qaeda facebook Pentagon google
Julian Assange faces new indictment in the U.S.

Dave Ramsey

00:27 sec | Last month

Julian Assange faces new indictment in the U.S.

"The founder of wikileaks is facing new superseding indictment in the U. S. for allegedly recruiting and conspiring with computer hackers in a release the justice department announced the charges against Julian Assange for engaging hackers to help the information site the department of justice as the new indictment does not add to the eighteen counts against us on from last year but broadens the scope of the conspiracy surrounding alleged

Founder Wikileaks Justice Department Julian Assange
Assange 'secretly fathered two children' in Ecuadorean embassy

BBC World Service

00:18 sec | 4 months ago

Assange 'secretly fathered two children' in Ecuadorean embassy

"News one of the lawyers for the wikileaks founder Julian Assange has revealed that she has two children with him conceived while he was in hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy in London Stella Maris says they met in twenty eleven before Mr songs took refuge in the embassy where he remained for seven years she wants him to be released from

Julian Assange Stella Maris Wikileaks Founder
Talking to Kids About Race

Therapy for Black Girls

08:45 min | 5 months ago

Talking to Kids About Race

"Thank you so much for joining us today Dr Palmer. Oh It's my pleasure. Yes I'm excited to have you so you are the author of a new book called. Daddy why am I brown and I know that this is a conversation you know I would say probably over the past year. We've seen lots of conversations about parents talking to their kids about race. And so I think that your book will be nice for kind of adds to their home library to really be able to have some of these conversations but I want to start with hearing. Is there such a thing as a child being too young to start talking about race? You know that that's a tricky thing with hope that you could shelter kids from oppressive nature of race and all that stuff but the reality is is that if your child is going to be out in the world you're going to go to preschool. They're going to walk with you to a store. They're going to be able to understand what's around them. Then they're going to encounter race. They're going to encounter their own race. You know there's a lot of research out there that shows that these encounters happen as early as three or four years old so acting that it's better to prepare tunes and help him get the united of what's going on prior to that. I encounter so that they could better navigated. Because the way you navigate that encounter experience with racism racism. All of that and be profoundly important away this. You're able to cope your life. We know like you're saying that like some of the research indicates at kids have some of these experiences as early as three are they typically negative experiences or is it more like kids realizing like all of our skin looks different. You know it very much depends. I don't know if there's a a more often case at this point but I think that the way that the racial identity models were built cross has a racial identity model. That's kind of the beginning of that. But before that even France non this idea of on a finding yourself as the other is what we talked about as encounter experienced. I don't think that finding yourself as other ever really feels good when you think the same as everyone else I think that that that's something. You have to contend with because that otherness At the very core of that otherness is ally right so not gonNa feel good to be told that you're something different when really our skin color and the differences that are visible. They're skinny they're not really important to who we are. You know intellectually spiritually are person. Are Senator Self our not about necessarily those external Trees and she typical when we are placed into context where racism important. It is this kind of thing that we will be treated differently. So I think that kids can kind of be ushered into this idea of simply for blackbeard's you can be ushered into blackness in a really positive way but you're still being ushered into context the whole question and there's no way to to change that without changing the oppression It's not there. Shelter your kid from that because they're gonNA be walking on the street and stuff happened so. I think that what we do as elders to children we prepare them as much as possible and give them the tools so he can navigate any of these experiences. Antionette is always struggled because I am a parent and so you know it. It does feel like a very fine balance between like helping them to just be proud of themselves as young black boys and also like one. Isa Shelter them but knowing that you really can't because they exist in the world and so how do you kind of assess like what is appropriate? Talk with them about about the realities of the world at a certain age. People like to talk about meeting people where they are and I think that that is the way to do it with children You'RE NOT GONNA you're not gonNA come to a kindergarten class and be like. Let me explain you the duality of identity in an to person hood in you know you're not gonna go into like you know critical in that way because they haven't learned the foundations to and understand it but she can't talk about. You know what happens when people say mean things to what happens when people talk about describe you what. What did you do when you describe it other people you know like when you're talking about someone in the Pre k? Age Group were kindergarten. Age will come out on a mental. Would colors me would appreciate letters mean. How do you print letters? How do you figure out the days of the week so I think that you bring it to their space and talk about some of the basic the most basic parts of it? You help them to understand you. Don't push some pass at you know you don't have to you. Don't have to come up with their opinion of what race means you don't have to have the fully indoctrinated into like the the joy of blackness. But she should have them understand that. Like for instance people will call you black. Your skin is not black. Your skin is brown and is various shades of Brown so though that's confusing for them to use the wrong color when you're being taught he's colors. Here's one of the reasons why you see what I'm saying there Yeah so really like you're talking about like really developmentally thinking about like what other kinds of things they're learning and how you can kinda couch it in in some of those same things. It doesn't have to really be about well. You know as adults. We're talking about our Russian in privileged in those things like kids. Don't have to get all of the scarier parts of it all early. Some of it is just like how do you just begin to talk about your hair in your color? And where you're from. I think that that's another piece of it. Is always like linking you talk about the race stuff but to link it to you know ethnicity in culture and help children understand that a different things and the mean different things. You should take different meaning and so you thought his. Take more of a proactive approach. As opposed to waiting for the first you know maybe negative racial experienced to happen. You don't wait for children to encounter bad things generally like you. Don't take your child out and let them play in the front yard without telling them how to deal with sidewalk in the street. The boundary of the grass and people coming by. He tells them you know. Don't talk to strangers lapasset sidewalk there. Don't run in this area. The Iraq you know you give them that early warning so that they have at least some sort of conception of being cautious hand and thinking about their surroundings so they can begin to understand again. I think that this is where show with 'cause you're right like I really enjoyed that analogy because that does help me think about it differently. I think where I struggle is like introducing like almost this paranoia that of course I experience right as apparent in like an adult in the world but like not necessarily introducing debts. Kids too young. I guess the question to ask. Is it really paranoia? So I grew up in a predominantly white and Asian area of San Diego and I was one of two black kids through black kids. Asthma time. Most of my life as a K. Through twelve kid and I encountered racism very early and some of it was not even direct. Like there wasn't necessarily someone drop an imbalance towards me. It might just be that wikileaks. Wanted to and you know there was no different except for the skin color and I didn't understand what was going on. You know I didn't always understand what was happening in those spaces in having an idea that hey you know this might be going on. They might be making the wrong kinds of judgments when they might not understand things correctly. Might help to get through some of those spaces again. It's not necessarily teaching kids the scariest parts of this. But it's about the same way you tell kids. Hey you know if your brother your sister issue that doesn't mean that you get back and here's the reasons why in here's how you deal with like the concept of you. Don't talk about the concept of forgiveness but you you do talk about you know. You can't stay mad. You know you have to do things to repair your relationship with your kids and between peers and things like that new. Find those ways in the language at the child can understand so that they can be to again start to develop unhealthy ways to deal with things that will affect them for us. Our lives

Dr Palmer France Senator Antionette Iraq Asthma San Diego
Chelsea Manning ordered released from prison, fined $256,000

Jay Talking

00:41 sec | 5 months ago

Chelsea Manning ordered released from prison, fined $256,000

"A federal judge orders the release of former army intelligence analyst Chelsea manning intends roughly a year of incarceration for refusing to testify to a grand jury about wikileaks Chelsea manning was freed not long after prosecutors reported that the grand jury investigating wikileaks disbanded U. S. district judge Anthony trend good leaves in place more than two at fifty six thousand dollars in fines for manning's refusal to testify manning previously spent seven years in a military prison for delivering a trove of classified information to wikileaks founder Julian a signage he's under indictment and fighting extradition to the U. S. manning's thirty five year sentence was commuted by president Obama A. B. C.'s

Intelligence Analyst Chelsea Manning Wikileaks Julian Obama A. B. C. U. S. Anthony Manning Founder S. Manning President Trump
Chelsea Manning ordered released from prison, fined $256,000

Jay Talking

00:39 sec | 5 months ago

Chelsea Manning ordered released from prison, fined $256,000

"A federal judge orders the release of former army intelligence analyst Chelsea manning intends roughly a year of incarceration for refusing to testify to a grand jury about wikileaks Chelsea manning was freed not long after prosecutors reported that the grand jury investigating wikileaks disbanded U. S. district judge Anthony trend good leaves in place more than two hundred fifty six thousand dollars in fines for manning's refusal to testify manning previously spent seven years in a military prison for delivering a trove of classified information to wikileaks founder Julian Assange he's under indictment and fighting extradition to the U. S. manning's thirty five year sentence was commuted by president

Intelligence Analyst Chelsea Manning Wikileaks Julian Assange President Trump U. S. Anthony Manning Founder S. Manning
U.S. judge orders WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning released from prison

KNX Evening News

00:40 sec | 5 months ago

U.S. judge orders WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning released from prison

"Day after her lawyers said she attempted suicide in jail a federal judge has ordered the release of one time army intelligence analyst Chelsea manning a day after her lawyer said she attempted suicide in a suburban jail a federal judge has ordered the release of one time army intelligence analyst Chelsea manning she had been held in nearby Alexandria Virginia since may for refusing to testify before a grand jury investigating wikileaks in fact she was jailed even earlier for refusing to testify in a different case the civil contempt citation was designed to coerce her testimony the judge ordered her released now saying the current grand jury has been disbanded but she still has to pay more than a quarter million dollars in fines Tom forty CBS news

Intelligence Analyst Alexandria Virginia TOM Chelsea Manning Wikileaks CBS
Chelsea Manning in hospital after suicide attempt in prison

WBZ Afternoon News

00:25 sec | 5 months ago

Chelsea Manning in hospital after suicide attempt in prison

"And Chelsea manning is reportedly in the hospital tonight after trying to take her own life the legal team for the former U. S. army analyst says she is recovering after attempting suicide on Wednesday in a Virginia jail a statement notes that manning is still scheduled to appear on Friday for a previously scheduled court hearing the thirty two year old has been in custody since last year when she refused to testify before a grand jury in the wikileaks investigation and that is correspondent mark

Chelsea Manning Analyst U. S. Army Virginia Wikileaks
U.S. judge orders WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning released from prison

Richard Eeds

00:38 sec | 5 months ago

U.S. judge orders WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning released from prison

"Of breaking news on Reuters on the keys image Chelsea manning with from the top and refused to testify on an investigation and we I believe Chelsea tried to kill herself earlier like last night or anyway some twenty today maybe U. S. judge has ordered Chelsea manning read lease from prison US judge orders Chelsea manning released from prison he was being held for refusing to testify in the week the

Reuters Chelsea Manning United States
Chelsea Manning hospitalized after attempted suicide

Vickie Allen and Levon Putney

00:35 sec | 5 months ago

Chelsea Manning hospitalized after attempted suicide

"Chelsea manning served seven years in a military prison for leaking documents to wikileaks before president Obama commuted the rest of her thirty five year sentence three years ago then came out as trans sexual within all this leading to more national headlines in debates yeah well after all this manning's lawyers said the former intelligence analysts tried to kill herself yesterday was now in the hospital recovering to schedule to be in court in Virginia Friday for a hearing on a motion to throw out civil contempt sanctions from manning refusing to testify before a grand jury investigating wikileaks which is why she has been in jail again since

Wikileaks Barack Obama Virginia Chelsea Manning President Trump
Chelsea Manning hospitalized after attempted suicide

KYW 24 Hour News

00:36 sec | 5 months ago

Chelsea Manning hospitalized after attempted suicide

"Former intelligence analyst Chelsea manning tried to take her own life according to her legal team a few days before she was scheduled to appear in court in Alexandria Virginia the activists and whistleblowers now in hospital care manning had been locked up since may for refusing to testify before a grand jury she came to national attention after leaking classified documents to wikileaks being court martialed manning served in a military prison from twenty ten to twenty seventeen for leaking a trove of documents before president Obama up before president Barack Obama commuted the remainder of her thirty five year

Alexandria Virginia Wikileaks Barack Obama Intelligence Analyst Chelsea Manning President Trump
"wikileaks" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond

The Last American Vagabond

02:27 min | 6 months ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond

"I don't know think about <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <SpeakerChange> It's <Speech_Male> not my thing where <Speech_Male> Helix <Speech_Male> and wikileaks wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Male> that came out on wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. Well <Speech_Male> loved those wiki <Speech_Male> leaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Did you see on <Speech_Male> wikileaks? Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> so it <Speech_Male> came out through wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks is fascinating <Speech_Music_Male> to wikileaks. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> Revelations <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> years how crooked <Speech_Music_Male> the whole thing <Speech_Male> wikileaks leaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks is unbelievable. <Speech_Male> You <Speech_Male> see all of these wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> Wikileaks <Speech_Female> <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. Wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> now <Speech_Music_Male> from wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Did you see what <Speech_Male> came out over wikileaks? <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Now from <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> We Love Helix <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks. <Speech_Male> We've learned <Speech_Male> so much <Speech_Music_Male> from wikileaks. Wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <SpeakerChange> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> just came <Speech_Music_Male> out. With <Speech_Male> lots of really <Speech_Male> unbelievable <Speech_Male> things. <Speech_Male> The wiki leaks the <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks again. <Speech_Male> Nobody's <Speech_Male> covering wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> released <Speech_Music_Male> by wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks document <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks just came <Speech_Male> out today. Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks emails. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks. <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> Right Mikey League <Speech_Male> wikileaks. Wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Male> Wikileaks stuff is <Speech_Male> believable wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Music_Male> wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> I love wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> We have to go <Speech_Music_Male> back to wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> Wikileaks <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> wikileaks <Speech_Male> wikileaks. You have to <Speech_Male> do is take a look at wikileaks. <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> I know nothing <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> about wikileaks. <Silence> <Advertisement> It's not <SpeakerChange> my thing. <Music> <Advertisement>

wikileaks Wikileaks Right Mikey League
"wikileaks" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

KLBJ 590AM

02:36 min | 1 year ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

"Wiki leaks. I love WikiLeaks these WikiLeaks WikiLeaks WikiLeaks has confirmed today, by Wiki leaks. It's been amazing coming out onto WikiLeaks. They want to distract us from WikiLeaks wonder what what now WikiLeaks has done a job on our as we've learned so much from what we love Wicky leaks have really WikiLeaks WikiLeaks WikiLeaks. Wikileaks is fascinating nowitski league. Revelation just days for the democratic convention in Philadelphia Lookie it's exposing the Democratic Party for the frauds that they really are. So for example, Hillary Clinton claimed that she never sent more received a classified information the DNC maintain that it was entirely neutral throughout the primary process. They never tried to slander Bernie Sanders. From that that is a complete lie. Julian Assange is now preparing to release a more lady males in this time. He says they will provide enough evidence to indict Hillary Clinton should US media is being conflation between two years. Leaks. Potty. The code loss to use. So there's direct evidence of media with the DNC lot in that's pretty damaging. National committee is neutral when it comes to this. Just absolutely deplorable. Visit sort of things that people were acting Donald Trump. During. And yet. Visit wealthy on that town. Now, it's just the iceberg. Stay by. Thousand females but best. We're gonna five whatever's left stupid to put some Email last forever, saying, let's go. Because. Yes, you are. Maybe he's eighteen. You are listening to ground zero. The Wikki freaks. Rest developments Wicky break. Six huger the Wicky Wicky clicking around and Donald Trump. Not my thing. He says. Meanwhile, Julian Assange goes to jail, and you know, we wonder just.

WikiLeaks Donald Trump Wikileaks Hillary Clinton Julian Assange DNC Wicky Wicky Democratic Party Bernie Sanders Philadelphia National committee two years
"wikileaks" Discussed on News Radio 1190 KEX

News Radio 1190 KEX

01:34 min | 1 year ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on News Radio 1190 KEX

"I think one of the advantages of hiring crooks to work for you is you can just assume they're going to do what they're supposed to do. You don't have to tell them. I know from reading all the coverage I can find because I want to give everybody all y'all's a good thorough account of what this isn't what it means. What it doesn't mean them because you're gonna hear wildly spun versions of it. I went too far left outlet, vox dot com. Which briefly describes the charges then says the indictment does not however attempt to explain why stone would lie about this or lay out a definitive story about what did happen between stone and WikiLeaks back then stone also has not been charged with any criminal activity occurring during the campaign. That's an important statement. Right there at the end, right? So, and that's the thing that Alan Dershowitz is always talking about all these crimes have happened host investigation. The investigation exists, right? Yeah. Now, why people lie? That's if indeed they are lying because you can get busted flying to the feds because you made a mistake or your memory failed you or whatever I'm not saying that happened in this case does happen. His stones lawyer is out today. Saying that he forgot he forgot he talked to WikiLeaks said be one of the biggest stories in the entire world. If you got WikiLeaks information on on the opponent, you're running for president of the United States for it would be. But you'd think you remember it. Well, did you but you live a boring lives compared to Roger? So at the risk of spending all of our time on this. It is.

WikiLeaks Alan Dershowitz Roger United States president
"wikileaks" Discussed on Pod Save the World

Pod Save the World

03:32 min | 1 year ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on Pod Save the World

"I mean, whether or not there was four knowledge and coordination for the timing of those WikiLeaks dumps. And and here's why this is so important, okay. To take a step back. Those emails that were dumped in October sought to make a case about Hillary Clinton's corruption. Remember that that was the drip, drip, drip, that the US media followed that you know, seemed to, you know, push a narrative that Hillary Clinton and her speeches a mall street, and and some of our dealings in the foundation was corrupt the Trump campaign. Pains closing argument in the campaign was about Hillary Clinton's corruption it was entirely similar to if not coordinated with those WikiLeaks dumps right? So this is not just a matter of like, oh, maybe we got a heads up. It could have been that. The Trump campaign's closing argument was coordinated with the actions of foreign power and dumping out. These emails that the creation of all the fake news by the Russians was meant to reinforce those themes that was also reinforced by right wing media like Breitbart. So again, we're not just talking about some crazy coincidence and some gifters like drum corps, and Roger stone perhaps having a heads up. This could be an indication that the entire Trump campaign strategy was built in part around a coordinated effort with Russian intelligence and WikiLeaks to push certain narratives about Hillary Clinton. That's a gigantic deal. And like, that's that's not just like, oh, this is a coincidence. And this crazy thing happened with? Russians that could suggest that this really was a criminal conspiracy to coordinate with a foreign power to undermine American democracy yet, this is a huge deal and just because Jerome Corsi in. Roger stone are fringe idiots. Doesn't mean that they weren't directly involved in this. And doesn't mean I haven't been involved at the highest levels of power for a very long time, especially Roger stone. He's creep. But an operator that's been around forever. Well, their fringe idiots, but there's fidgety it's running our government every day that they're enough said Gorka used to work there. Never forget back to our our nerdy substance. Here the twenty is later this week and Argentina's we talked about before the guardians reporting that the Argentinians are considering charges against the Saudi Crown prince Mohammad bin Salman, if you tend so that would be exciting if they arrested the crown prince, but the main event is still the fact that Trump is going to meet with president Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the summit apparently in an interview the Wall Street Journal, he renewed his threat to increase tariffs on Chinese goods. From ten to twenty five percent. This doesn't feel good been Trump hasn't really left the Chinese much of an off ramp in these negotiations. No. And you know, what's clear about this trade wars Trump? You know, went down this road of imposing these tariffs without much of a strategy about where he's trying to go, and what he was trying to get here and the Chinese responded in kind what we see already is these terrorists having negative impacts on American workers that GM is closing plants down in the United States in part because of the uncertainty generated by these tariffs. US farmers, particularly soybean farmers are suffering dramatic losses. The very voters at Trump promised to help write these forgotten men and women of America, the talked about who worked in plants or on farms or the ones suffering in his trade war. And he seems to have no idea what the end game is here. And you know, even sport getting tougher on China. They're smarter ways of doing that than just slopping tariffs down, which he doesn't even understand..

Trump Hillary Clinton Roger stone US WikiLeaks Xi Jinping Jerome Corsi Breitbart Wall Street Journal Argentina Saudi Crown China Gorka America Salman president GM twenty five percent
"wikileaks" Discussed on Pod Save the World

Pod Save the World

03:32 min | 1 year ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on Pod Save the World

"I mean, whether or not there was four knowledge and coordination for the timing of those WikiLeaks dumps. And and here's why this is so important, okay. To take a step back. Those emails that were dumped in October sought to make a case about Hillary Clinton's corruption. Remember that that was the drip, drip, drip, that the US media followed that you know, seemed to, you know, push a narrative that Hillary Clinton and her speeches a mall street, and and some of our dealings in the foundation was corrupt the Trump campaign. Pains closing argument in the campaign was about Hillary Clinton's corruption it was entirely similar to if not coordinated with those WikiLeaks dumps right? So this is not just a matter of like, oh, maybe we got a heads up. It could have been that. The Trump campaign's closing argument was coordinated with the actions of foreign power and dumping out. These emails that the creation of all the fake news by the Russians was meant to reinforce those themes that was also reinforced by right wing media like Breitbart. So again, we're not just talking about some crazy coincidence and some gifters like drum corps, and Roger stone perhaps having a heads up. This could be an indication that the entire Trump campaign strategy was built in part around a coordinated effort with Russian intelligence and WikiLeaks to push certain narratives about Hillary Clinton. That's a gigantic deal. And like, that's that's not just like, oh, this is a coincidence. And this crazy thing happened with? Russians that could suggest that this really was a criminal conspiracy to coordinate with a foreign power to undermine American democracy yet, this is a huge deal and just because Jerome Corsi in. Roger stone are fringe idiots. Doesn't mean that they weren't directly involved in this. And doesn't mean I haven't been involved at the highest levels of power for a very long time, especially Roger stone. He's creep. But an operator that's been around forever. Well, their fringe idiots, but there's fidgety it's running our government every day that they're enough said Gorka used to work there. Never forget back to our our nerdy substance. Here the twenty is later this week and Argentina's we talked about before the guardians reporting that the Argentinians are considering charges against the Saudi Crown prince Mohammad bin Salman, if you tend so that would be exciting if they arrested the crown prince, but the main event is still the fact that Trump is going to meet with president Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the summit apparently in an interview the Wall Street Journal, he renewed his threat to increase tariffs on Chinese goods. From ten to twenty five percent. This doesn't feel good been Trump hasn't really left the Chinese much of an off ramp in these negotiations. No. And you know, what's clear about this trade wars Trump? You know, went down this road of imposing these tariffs without much of a strategy about where he's trying to go, and what he was trying to get here and the Chinese responded in kind what we see already is these terrorists having negative impacts on American workers that GM is closing plants down in the United States in part because of the uncertainty generated by these tariffs. US farmers, particularly soybean farmers are suffering dramatic losses. The very voters at Trump promised to help write these forgotten men and women of America, the talked about who worked in plants or on farms or the ones suffering in his trade war. And he seems to have no idea what the end game is here. And you know, even sport getting tougher on China. They're smarter ways of doing that than just slopping tariffs down, which he doesn't even understand..

Trump Hillary Clinton Roger stone US WikiLeaks Xi Jinping Jerome Corsi Breitbart Wall Street Journal Argentina Saudi Crown China Gorka America Salman president GM twenty five percent
"wikileaks" Discussed on KNSS

KNSS

02:15 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on KNSS

"Show man, thank. You Lipton on military guy got three sons great American warriors. Serving in the military Bala wanted and say I don't want to give. Any. Details but here it is is gonna give Trump all the Intel. He needs to indict Hillary, and the Democrats? Because our Intel services. Small okay and you can. Tell by. Their smirks they almost mentioned it yesterday that's what. The, whole, idea where's the server and we're, all, gonna let help, each. Other investigate We know they have it. Right the Russians have all, the Intel 'cause? Everybody told us they. Broke in and got it Okay yeah, I don't I mean they but they're not admitting that they did that with WikiLeaks or have it from. WikiLeaks WikiLeaks well that they're the ones who did the, hack or or at. Least released all the information from the hack. And by the way Donald Trump works with the four our conversation, was about I don't think they talked about nuclear stuff I don't think they talked about maybe a little bit about Syria and I think the, only two things that Trump and Putin have in common their both. Men of action and men. Of action despise paper shelters and. All these people on the other side are all paper shelters they're not people go back All right. Thanks so much Tom I I don't think I don't think it's healthy for the president of the United. States to be in league, with Putin I don't think he is and that's. Why I reject your your standard there I do believe that there is something. To this on Iran issue with Debbie Wasserman Schultz in the DNC. Caucus on Capitol Hill without missing server and I do, think that they did talk about that and I do think that Putin may want to tell, you something went when Donald Trump said. He's gonna come out with something here it, may be involving the something like that but that is just a smokescreen to. Cover what Russia is doing as well even if, that all turns out to be true but I don't. Believe they're. In league with, each. Other Glenn Beck mercury.

Donald Trump Putin Intel Democrats WikiLeaks Lipton Debbie Wasserman Schultz Glenn Beck Russia DNC president Hillary Tom Iran Syria
"wikileaks" Discussed on Erin Burnett OutFront

Erin Burnett OutFront

02:02 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on Erin Burnett OutFront

"Who tried to get information out of him he said they asked him about his connections to roger stone who as you know is supporter of the president of vocal supporter of the president as well as wikileaks and they asked him if he had ever been to the ecuadorian embassy which is of course where julian assange the founder of wikileaks has been living for last couple of years so we don't know exactly what the they believe he has what information they believe ted malik has by now he has a date with the grand jury the muller grand jury on april thirteenth here in the united states again he says that there's not much that he knows but we'll see when he shows up here in washington to meet the grand jury we have a statement from ted malik and he says quote what we what what could they want from me a policy wonk and philosophical defender of of trump i am not an operative have no russia contacts and aside from appearing on air and in print off into defendant congratulate our president have done nothing wrong again he's gonna get his chance to talk to the grand jury on april on april thirteenth here in washington so what does this tell us evan about the molar investigation where where it might be headed well you know brianna it tells us that this appears to be ramping up a lot of people including especially people close to the president like to say that they think this is an investigation that's that's winding down that it's almost over certainly i think some of the president's legal team liked to assure him that this is almost over this doesn't tell us that and it also sort of gives us a perhaps a peak the way the muller investigators are still trying to get at the central question of whether or not there was any middle men any people in the middle who are trying to connect the trump campaign and russians and of course we know that wikileaks according to the us intelligence community was sort of a stand in for the russian intelligence agencies in disseminating some of the stolen emails that were taken from the dnc.

president wikileaks julian assange founder united states washington ted malik dnc roger stone muller russia evan brianna
"wikileaks" Discussed on The Cryptoverse

The Cryptoverse

02:21 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on The Cryptoverse

"So here the twoweekold so of change orange one and this source said looking peple one with spots which is the mrs as as proud cryptographic kitty ona julian assange he said quote cryptography is not only transforming the global financial system it is generating creative innovation at a vast array of human interaction we can leaks likes cats and wants to bring cryptocurrencies and small contracts into the mainstream donors and cryptic cottee enthusiasts can empower wikileaks bye bye bye bidding full one allow cute purebred cryptographic kittens new commit newcomers will landed by the book chain acquired that fest cryptocurrency and potentially even make a profit but it goes fed and this is the real funny bit wikileaks gifts two cryptic izzi's one to president trump i'm one to hillary clinton so here we go we've got on the left here trump's ten detabe and and clinton console kitty so this this is this is interesting right is funny is this is this is also genius sites as here these unique cryptic kitties is values several thousand dollars meeting that president trump will have to declare declared the wikileaks gift under is as five u s c section seventy four thirty two and regulation gf at dasa fm off the forty one so trump's ten detabe will become federal property to be enjoyed by future prevalent presidents by it custodians at the us national archives that is genius in my opinion so the a system believable because now government property right and then they've gone feather so here's some offspring from the wikileaks cryptic it is you've got the nsa spying kitty the iraq war kitty the cia vote seven kitty the syria files kitty the kremlin's blind kitty the cable gate kizie the tpp kinsey which is they at trans pacific partnership kitty and the iraq war kitty so having gone through all that let me let me make a few comments about this.

julian assange global financial system wikileaks trump hillary clinton us syria president iraq cia trans pacific thousand dollars
"wikileaks" Discussed on 1170 The Answer

1170 The Answer

01:40 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on 1170 The Answer

"Not your favorite home get bri ice sing smith i spent so much time going after hillary clinton stopped at the point here donald trump jr was not communicate in with hillary clinton last september he was communicating with wikileaks he was communicating with wikileaks an entity i i i mean again here's what's great not obama cia head trump's cia head might pompeyo my former congressional colleague mike pompeo said accurately trump's cia ahead my friend wikileaks is a non nation state hostile intelligence agency they are in enemy of the united states of america period they have a history of stealing and making public classified information detrimental to the united states they've never done that to russia they never done that to china they never done that to north korea julian assange doesn't have the balls to go after russia for some reason he loves to go after the united states maybe as a history of doing it and it's gotten our boys killed he's in enemy and donald trump jr is an absolute idiot idiot donald jr is eight yet for communicating with them mm.

hillary clinton wikileaks mike pompeo cia united states korea julian assange russia donald jr donald trump jr obama america
"wikileaks" Discussed on 1170 The Answer

1170 The Answer

02:14 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on 1170 The Answer

"Is really stupid and really really despicable gan i'm not getting hinder the whole russian collusion thing here i'm not i don't i don't think that's going to go anywhere but you need to understand my bias i hate wikileaks wikileaks is an enemy of this country to hear me i don't lot do you all lake wikileaks wikileaks is our enemy they are an enemy of this country because of wikileaks american soldiers have been killed yeah you heard that right because of the work that we key leaks has done over the years making public classified united states security and armed forces information american troops have been killed wikileaks has killed american soldiers i aboard them they are an enemy of this country even trump's own cia head might pompeyo called wikileaks quote a non nation state hostile intelligence agency even trump's own cia director said about wikileaks they are in agent of influence of the russian government we key leaks is our enemy and so to find out that beginning in early september last year during the campaign wikileaks and donald trump jr were communicating with each other well donald trump jr is either an idiot or he was knowingly working with russia to defeat hillary clinton i believe the former i believe donald juniors just immediate.

american troops wikileaks director russian government russia hillary clinton trump cia donald trump jr donald trump donald
"wikileaks" Discussed on The Young Turks

The Young Turks

02:07 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on The Young Turks

"Sent to donald trump jr strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions us uh wikileaks went on appointing trump junior to the link w l surged rtk which it said would help trump's followers dig through their trove of stolen documents at find stories there's many great stories the press are missing and were sure some of your followers are follows will find it by the way just released podesta emails part four then just fifteen minutes after that message was sent wall street journal's brought by rintoul pointed out the donald trump himself tweeted very little pick up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by wikileaks so dishonest rig system so in that case doesn't show the trump campaign is communicating with wikileaks yes of course he didn't randomly do it fifteen minutes later he did it because of that communication when we're healy's but the stuff was public anyway and her journalist sent out there articles the people that they wrote about in hopes that they would be uh shared on social media almost every time every day so if any other journalists said hey here's article i wrote about you or about someone else ascended to you it would be the biggest no big deal of all time when it happens with where he likes oh my god they wanted their link publicized of course i wanted their link publicized that as everyone right so look i i agree with you on the surface right so if it is proven that they did not obtain their information from russia and there wasn't russian meddling then you're absolutely right wikileaks should not be treated any differently than any other media organization but the concern here is that a foreign government is meddling in our election process and if that is proven i think that you know these types of communications are relevant i want to be really clear about this and i know that it's a tough to censure but i think it's an important one if iran.

wall street journal rintoul donald trump wikileaks social media russia iran fifteen minutes
"wikileaks" Discussed on The Young Turks

The Young Turks

02:15 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on The Young Turks

"The atlantic has on earth some evidence indicating that donald trump jr was in direct contact with wikileaks during the last presidential election now there are different elements that make this story are relevant especially pertaining to some of the investigations that are ongoing in regard to russia and potential russian meddling in this past election before we get into the details of the direct messages that they shared with one another uh there is some reason to believe that some of the leaked information obtained by leaked wikileaks was given to them by the russian government now that is based on analysis by us intelligence agencies and organisations but you know there are skeptics when it comes to that portion of the story but with that said i wanna give you guys what their communication was and what kind of action the talk meeting members of the trump campaign after they were given certain links and certain information from wikileaks so let me just clarify then i'm on among the sceptics and including in this of the importance of this story at all over tv all over the media and is going to give you the details this give you the facts first and then discuss whether it is groundbreaking collusion or not so first how'd you we have knowledge of these correspondence well we key weeks made a series of increasingly bold requests including asking for trump's tax returns urging the trump campaign on election day to reject the results of the election is rigged and requesting that the president elect tell australia to appoint julian assange ambassador to the united states the messages were turned over to congress as part of the body's various ongoing investigations into russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election they were turned over to congress by donald trump jr and his lawyer and they are cooperating with the investigation so credit where credit is due but that is where this information is from an.

donald trump jr wikileaks presidential election russia russian government tax returns election day president united states australia julian assange
"wikileaks" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

Anderson Cooper 360

02:02 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

"Um if if if it took fifteen minutes and we don't know if down from junior did talk down from senior but it certainly raises a lot of questions and seems very much like a huge coincidence if he did in but if if if he was willing to talk to his dad based on that the idea that he didn't talk to his dad based on this meeting he had win a russia lawyer allegedly from the kremlin told him the as dirt on hillary clinton and that the kremlin is supporting his debts campaign that seems hard to believe that he didn't wouldn't have talked to his dad this circled influence you're describing castle very import light of the very first question you asked interview jeff cubans answer to the question are any laws broken is illegal for an american to solicit anything of value from foreigner there's an exception to that rule uh it which is none of election law applies to media organisations so one of the defence that was going to be that the trump people were preparing when the as this case hotted up was to say even if we did cooperate with week wikileaks that's legal because wikki leaks is a media organisation the revelation of the methods of wikileaks we see in these direct messages i think hass powerful contradiction that wikileaks is not acting you're like a media organization is acting like an organization of influence media organizations do not call undefeated candidates to contest the validity of an election a cuts for russian intelligence do if wikileaks is not a media organization that all of this has a much more sinister legal implication if wikileaks is a media organization dumber from junior has a defence and the trump campaign has a defence and i think after today if anybody did believe that wikileaks was a media organization there are a lot less likely to it's actually anderson if i can just jump in there in one point there the the uh mike pompeo who is donald trump's director of central intelligence has said repeatedly that wiki leaks is an agent of influence of the russian government so know as for what.

russia kremlin hillary clinton wikileaks media organizations mike pompeo director russian government jeff cubans hass anderson donald trump fifteen minutes
"wikileaks" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

Anderson Cooper 360

01:47 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

"Anchor had used with wikileaks do you want to hear from the vice president directly on this not only from the vice president but from the president himself there ought to be an explanation from the president about whether he was knowledgeable about his own son actively engaged with wikileaks there seems to be no reasonable innocent explanation for these communications and the trump administration owes the american people a full explanation i just actually i just received a statement from uh from liz landers from vicepresidents the vice president pence his press secretary excuse me at least a fara she says a quote the vice president was never aware of any one associate with campaign being in contact with wikileaks he first learned of this news from a published report earlier today what do you make of that these revelations and reports anderson our stunning their jaw dropping and it may be fine under normal circumstances for a spokesperson to say the vice president or any other official has no knowledge that explanation should be provided by the vice president himself and without any disrespect in my view relevant officials of the trump administration should provide that kind of explanation in public and under oath to the judiciary committee my hope is now the german grassley who has indicated he wants to get to the bottom of these issues will in fact issue subpoenas for donald trump jr for jared kushner and four other relevant witnesses and there is a pattern here the lapidot blitzer his plea agreement is part of that pattern the lennick article only notes two instances of don.

vice president wikileaks liz landers press secretary official grassley donald trump jared kushner
"wikileaks" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

Anderson Cooper 360

01:47 min | 2 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

"Anchor had used with wikileaks do you want to hear from the vice president directly on this not only from the vice president but from the president himself there ought to be an explanation from the president about whether he was knowledgeable about his own son actively engaged with wikileaks there seems to be no reasonable innocent explanation for these communications and the trump administration owes the american people a full explanation i just actually i just received a statement from uh from liz landers from vicepresidents the vice president pence his press secretary excuse me at least a fara she says a quote the vice president was never aware of any one associate with campaign being in contact with wikileaks he first learned of this news from a published report earlier today what do you make of that these revelations and reports anderson our stunning their jaw dropping and it may be fine under normal circumstances for a spokesperson to say the vice president or any other official has no knowledge that explanation should be provided by the vice president himself and without any disrespect in my view relevant officials of the trump administration should provide that kind of explanation in public and under oath to the judiciary committee my hope is now the german grassley who has indicated he wants to get to the bottom of these issues will in fact issue subpoenas for donald trump jr for jared kushner and four other relevant witnesses and there is a pattern here the lapidot blitzer his plea agreement is part of that pattern the lennick article only notes two instances of don.

vice president wikileaks liz landers press secretary official grassley donald trump jared kushner
"wikileaks" Discussed on The CyberWire

The CyberWire

02:08 min | 3 years ago

"wikileaks" Discussed on The CyberWire

"How would you leaks gets its material remains publicly unknown there've been some recent moves in the us congress to express its sense of what wikileaks is up to the text of the resolution is quote it is the sense of congress that wikileaks and the senior leadership of wikileaks resemble a nonstate hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors than should be treated as such a service by the united states this like sense of the congress resolutions generally is expressive not prescriptive congress is upset with wikileaks and wants people especially people working in the intelligence community to know it protecting your organizations reputation online is of course important but it can be challenging to predict when an online misstep or squabble can turn into a fullblown pr disaster and of course online things can happen really fast the folks at deloitte recently announced the acquisition of assets from a company called blab specifically their predictive social intelligence platform mike curreny as a partner in deloittes risk and financial advisory group while organizations do a very good job managing risk now they often look at brandon reputation risks as more of an outcome uh something that is really dependent on their existing risk management programs and so uh we we believe that it is a risk and i think if you look at um what ceos and other executives talk about as being their most significant risk oftentimes focus on an event that could potentially impair uh the reputation and so uh with his blab aquisition we're we're excited about it because it allows us to begin to anticipate uh potential issues reputational events that may occur um and so this could be anything from uh a regulatory uh issue uh competitive threat um a financial uh reputational uh impact could be ah innovation uh from our competitors it could be uh reputational damaging event from our employees third parties government it really kind of goes across the spectrum.

wikileaks united states congress deloitte mike curreny partner risk management