40 Burst results for "Wade"

Fresh update on "wade" discussed on Bloomberg Businessweek

Bloomberg Businessweek

00:28 min | 1 hr ago

Fresh update on "wade" discussed on Bloomberg Businessweek

"From lawmakers Because we hear time and time again after tragedies such as these a lot of talk but no action Yeah that's of course the backdrop is that we've been through this before and my goodness if nothing happened after newtown why would this be any different is the question It's a very frustrating situation you could see it and read it on the president's face You could hear it in his voice last night A lot of Democrats have been speaking out today dick Durbin kicked off a hearing on Capitol Hill in the Senate a bit earlier Democrat from Illinois with some very sobering remarks And I don't know if you guys were listening to this news conference with governor Greg Abbott the Texas governor But it devolved into a shouting match the whole thing fell apart when beto o'rourke walked up to the stage and started calling him out without a microphone This was not planned There were a lot of swear words There were a lot of things that people probably regret they said to be honest with you and Tim really underscores how ugly this debate is how frustrating it is for people because for most people under a certain age they've never known anything other than this ongoing debate that never seems to end in particularly after bringing down the end of the assault weapons ban This is an argument that has not grown any easier Well this is what I wonder about you know wonder about Joe is you know is there any political will to change the proliferation of guns gun sales and access I mean I do wonder about the power of this as a political issue or does it resonate with the public How do we need to think about this And yeah It's one of these issues just like roe V wade which we were talking about quite recently that really divides this country There are not enough people on one side to solve this because we're so split here in this case gun control is a very big one The thing is when you consider not absolutist gun control not eliminating the Second Amendment but things like background checks the assault weapons ban for instance those actually tend to pull fairly well in most areas of the country Maybe not in rural Texas where of course this happened but typically you would think there'd be enough momentum on that In a 50.

Governor Greg Abbott Dick Durbin Capitol Hill Rourke Senate Illinois Roe V Wade Texas TIM JOE
The Roe v Wade Thing Isn't a Winner...

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:01 min | 11 hrs ago

The Roe v Wade Thing Isn't a Winner...

"Seems to have kind of collaboratively agreed through coordination and I'm just looking, I'm looking at The Wall Street Journal, I have The New York Times here. The roe V wade thing isn't a winner. And what's so fascinating is how many moderate Republicans for years told me that we can't talk about reversing roe versus wade because people will lose their mind and that there will be protests in the streets and we'll lose voters. And what that shows and I want you to imagine for a second, I want to push your boundaries how much of our action, how much of our potential boldness is held hostage by the belief, the left is going to lose their mind and we're going to lose politically when in reality that might not be the case. How many big ambitious exciting ideas could we be implementing to better the American nation that we kind of stopped short because people say, oh, no, no. Bad things might happen. Now, for years, I was told by moderate Republicans. Charlie stopped talking about abortion. Stop talking. We're going to lose voters. It's going to be cataclysmic, and unite the left. Well, I'm reading The New York Times, just weeks after the leak. And it is nowhere to be found. Now this was not the case with Floyd a palooza. During Floyd a palooza, it was everywhere. Nonstop, racial reconciliation reconciliation, 16, 19 project promotions The New York Times. Rob and D'angelo, white fragility, ibram X kendi, tahani see Coates. Nonstop drum beat of promotion and profiling of stories, promotion, and platforming is a better word to use than profiling. Nonstop. I'm expecting, but I'm not seeing where in The New York Times is woman in Arkansas, dreads that one day she can't have an abortion.

Roe V Wade The New York Times The Wall Street Journal Wade Floyd Ibram X Kendi Charlie Angelo Coates ROB Arkansas
Fresh update on "wade" discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:17 min | 11 hrs ago

Fresh update on "wade" discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"If you guys ever spend time in the Arizona sun or in the summer, you ever see where your phone kind of gets too hot where it can't work. If you've ever experienced this phenomenon where it says your phone needs to cool down, it kind of has the temperature thing. That's what Tom cotton did to The New York Times. It's just kind of the whole it's like, nope, can't work anymore. Too hot. Happens all the time in Arizona. Connor says it happens in my car sometimes. But the media seems to have kind of collaboratively agreed through coordination and I'm just looking, I'm looking at The Wall Street Journal, I have The New York Times here. The roe V wade thing isn't a winner. And what's so fascinating is how many moderate Republicans for years told me that we can't talk about reversing roe versus wade because people will lose their mind and that there will be protests in the streets and we'll lose voters. And what that shows and I want you to imagine for a second, I want to push your boundaries how much of our action, how much of our potential boldness is held hostage by the belief, the left is going to lose their mind and we're going to lose politically when in reality that might not be the case. How many big ambitious exciting ideas could we be implementing to better the American nation that we kind of stopped short because people say, oh, no, no. Bad things might happen. Now, for years, I was told by moderate Republicans. Charlie stopped talking about abortion. Stop talking. We're going to lose voters. It's going to be cataclysmic, and unite the left. Well, I'm reading The New York Times, just weeks after the leak. And it is nowhere to be found. Now this was not the case with Floyd a palooza. During Floyd a palooza, it was everywhere. Nonstop, racial reconciliation reconciliation, 16, 19 project promotions The New York Times. Rob and D'angelo, white fragility, ibram X kendi, tahani see Coates. Nonstop drum beat of promotion and profiling of stories, promotion, and platforming is a better word to use than profiling. Nonstop. I'm expecting, but I'm not seeing where in The New York Times is woman in Arkansas, dreads that one day she can't have an abortion. Where's the story? I mean, I could write it for them. It's probably going to come at some point, but that's not to say they're not going to get re excited about it before. They're not going to cover it, but if that story had pop, the roe versus wade being rescinded, it would be ubiquitous. It would be everywhere. Now, again, I think that if they didn't go all out on Floyd and race all out on vaccines and masks all out on Ukraine, I think the roe versus wade would have had more spice to the Democrats recipe for the destruction of America. I think their base is legitimately exhausted. The whole nation is exhausted. We live in a fatigued time. And kind of like when you're in the fourth quarter of a sports game, or you're in game 7, it's who wants it more. And right now, if you play out the metaphor, the left is tired. It's like they want a break. I'm reading this, and this is just very standard New York Times proved about the Ukraine and all that stuff. I'm sure some of it's fine, but this is not the kind of energy of the activist base that I think they would have hoped. I just find it interesting. I'd love your thoughts freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. I received.

New York Times Tom Cotton Roe V Wade Arizona Wade Floyd Ibram X Kendi Connor The Wall Street Journal Coates Charlie Angelo ROB Arkansas Ukraine America Charlie Kirk
SCOTUS Roe v Wade Heat Cools Off

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:43 min | 11 hrs ago

SCOTUS Roe v Wade Heat Cools Off

"Have you been surprised? Or have you been just right on pace or are you kind of underwhelmed by the lack of protests that have happened with roe versus wade? Roe V wade, looking to be overturned. I mean, we expected kind of like a thermonuclear political event that was kind of the rumblings that it's going to be the biggest protest we ever seen and that just hasn't really materialized. Democrats haven't really received a boost and it doesn't look like there's that much enthusiasm behind that. I mean, it's really interesting. I had someone that actually messaged me a friend from Chicago, and they said, I actually forgot about the issue. And so did I. Not that it doesn't matter. I mean, obviously, life is a huge issue. You guys know that I'm constantly pushing forward on that issue. I'm not saying it's not important, but it wasn't kind of on the top of my news here and I have The New York Times. It's part of my martyrdom as Dennis prager would say. I read The New York Times so you don't have to. Ukraine, Russia, Ukraine, Taiwan, buffalo's black children are afraid it could happen to me, so hyper racist stuff, baby formula shortage, snow or on the front page of The New York Times. And I just kind of have a couple theories with this. Maybe the abortion topic isn't this kind of polarizing topic that it once was. I think it could be polarizing, of course. I think it could be divisive, but what if America is actually more states rights than we would have ever thought on this

Roe V Wade The New York Times Wade Ukraine Dennis Prager Chicago Taiwan Buffalo Russia America
Fresh update on "wade" discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:01 min | 11 hrs ago

Fresh update on "wade" discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Been just right on pace or are you kind of underwhelmed by the lack of protests that have happened with roe versus wade? Roe V wade, looking to be overturned. I mean, we expected kind of like a thermonuclear political event that was kind of the rumblings that it's going to be the biggest protest we ever seen and that just hasn't really materialized. Democrats haven't really received a boost and it doesn't look like there's that much enthusiasm behind that. I mean, it's really interesting. I had someone that actually messaged me a friend from Chicago, and they said, I actually forgot about the issue. And so did I. Not that it doesn't matter. I mean, obviously, life is a huge issue. You guys know that I'm constantly pushing forward on that issue. I'm not saying it's not important, but it wasn't kind of on the top of my news here and I have The New York Times. It's part of my martyrdom as Dennis prager would say. I read The New York Times so you don't have to. Ukraine, Russia, Ukraine, Taiwan, buffalo's black children are afraid it could happen to me, so hyper racist stuff, baby formula shortage, snow or on the front page of The New York Times. And I just kind of have a couple theories with this. Maybe the abortion topic isn't this kind of polarizing topic that it once was. I think it could be polarizing, of course. I think it could be divisive, but what if America is actually more states rights than we would have ever thought on this topic? What if this actually de radicalizes the issue that otherwise we thought was more heated than any other issue in American politics? This was always like the third rail of the third rail. You're allowed to debate tax policy, you're allowed to talk about all these other things. But abortion people always got the most passionate about. So you have to look at the news cycle as kind of like how much real estate you're able to allocate. To certain stories. There's only so much time so much oxygen you could pour into things. There's only so much that you are able to cover. You have to prioritize. And so the media makes decisions every single day. Kind of like the best analogy I would say is kind of birds flying south for the winter. They're all flying in the same direction, but they kind of form a V by looking horizontally at the other bird to make sure they're kind of all in unison. So it's not direct collusion, but it's certainly coordination. Now The New York Times is kind of the lead bird leading people down south to just finish the metaphor, the analogy, as I'm sure there's holes people can point in it. But it's a generally good analogy in a point that people say, oh, Charlie, is there kind of like a Monday morning meeting where the media gets on every, you know, they all kind of get on the same page. Not really. There are times where there is direct collusion between news organizations where they have specific talking points distributed, but that seems to be very, very rare. It seems to be more like coordination where a couple of quote unquote thought leaders get the talking points distributed. They pick them up and they repeat them. It's kind of very much like operation mockingbird. We hear it. We internalize it. We see it, and there are kind of guardrails where bad behavior is certainly punished from the regime media. And I lived through this very briefly where a couple summers ago, I think it was the summer of 19, if I'm not mistaken. Was it the summer of 19? Is Andrew around? Yeah, where I wrote the piece for The Washington Post, and that's right. I wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post arguing to break up tech companies. The Washington Post to their credit, I think they've changed since, they took the piece and they published the piece. About kind of rescinding section two 30, and I mean, I could criticize Washington Post all day long. Here's what I will say. They have a legitimate distribution. People read it. People take it seriously. I wish it wasn't the case, but it was the case. It is the case. However, when I published for The Washington Post, was that 19? Yeah, it was July 19th. I was right. When I published for The Washington Post, the response was remarkable. Because it wasn't even attacking my ideas, the response was how dare you Washington Post published an op-ed by Charlie Kirk. It wasn't even like Charlie's ideas are bad. They're just trying to invalidate the entire publication by saying how dare you allow anyone like that. We saw this similar with senator Tom cotton. When he wrote a piece for The New York Times and basically glitched the entire New York Times. It just kind of went into overdrive and overheated..

The New York Times Roe V Wade Ukraine The Washington Post Dennis Prager Wade Taiwan Buffalo Chicago Russia America Charlie Andrew Charlie Kirk Senator Tom Cotton
Rep. Jim Jordan: Roe v. Wade Reversal Would Be a Victory for Life

The Dan Bongino Show

01:19 min | 1 d ago

Rep. Jim Jordan: Roe v. Wade Reversal Would Be a Victory for Life

"There's no indication it's going to change The Supreme Court appears to be leaning towards scrapping roe V wade and turning that back over to the state Again that has to be for you a guy who I know cares deeply about this issue a really big moment No it's a victory for the constitution to victory for the sanctity of life It's a victory for common sense remember the Democrats of the party at the crazy actually think you should be able to take the life of an unborn child right up until that baby is about ready to be born right up to their birthday as our witness said last weekend hearing And frankly with Ralph northam in the former governor of Democrat governor of Virginia he thought it could be even after that So this is a win for common sense a win for the sanctity of life And as you have pointed out many times you know the founders when they started this place this experiment in liberty we call them at the start of it all talked about life liberty pursuit of happiness And we all understand you can not pursue happiness if you don't have freedom if you don't have liberty and you never have true liberty If government won't protect your most fundamental right your right to live And that is what this is ultimately about So I hope this decision holds We'll know soon And if it does I think it's again 50 years now the pro life community This is a big move in the right direction

Roe V Wade Ralph Northam Supreme Court Virginia
Fresh update on "wade" discussed on The Suburban Women Problem

The Suburban Women Problem

00:39 min | 12 hrs ago

Fresh update on "wade" discussed on The Suburban Women Problem

"Changed everything I've ever believed. It's not going to work like that. We all know that. So we need to give people time and we need to be talking to our family to our friends to our neighbors. It's never too early. We got to address the suburban women problem, because it's real. Welcome to the suburban women problem. A podcast for red, wine, and blue. Hi, everyone. Thanks for joining us. I'm Jasmine Clark. I'm Rachel vindman. I'm Amanda Weinstein. And you're listening to the suburban women problem. So first, Rachel, welcome back. We missed you last week. And although we love, love, love, having Katy Paris on the pod, it is good to see you again. Well, I really missed you guys and it was an episode that I was sad to miss that you guys did a really good job with a difficult topic. These last few weeks have been a little heavy, so it's just, it's a lot. Every day, it's a lot. It's exhausting by the end of the week. So speaking of, we are talking more about abortion this week. And you know what? We're not going to stop talking about it until we're guaranteed reproductive rights in this country. I mean, that's a good point. Like, man, if you want us to stop talking about this shit, give us our rights back. Yep. Exactly, exactly. So I got a chance to sit down with Kate Kelly of ordinary equality, and she gave me some really interesting background on the history of abortion and why she thinks that the equal rights amendment might be one way we could save roe V wade. Can't wait. But first, let's start with a little check in. So how are we feeling this week? What's been blown up our group chat? Oh man, we've got all the primaries happening. A lot of the primaries. And can I first say one of my favorite primary results is Madison Cawthorn, who lost his primary as an incumbent. Yes. Republican and a safe district. This is not often something like this happens..

Jasmine Clark Rachel Vindman Amanda Weinstein Katy Paris Kate Kelly Rachel Roe V Wade Madison Cawthorn
Democrat Pollster Suggests Bloody Midterm for Biden

The Hugh Hewitt Show: Highly Concentrated

02:15 min | 1 d ago

Democrat Pollster Suggests Bloody Midterm for Biden

"Don't know if you've been talking about it. Have you heard about this new memo from Doug sosnik? No. Doug sosnik being very senior respected democratic pollster strategist was in the Clinton White House. That's where he became well known and in the 90s. Written this new memo to Democrats. And it's incredibly pessimistic. It says, look, basically, unless we can make something huge about a Supreme Court roe versus wade decision, unless we can pull a rabbit out of our hat. We are toast. And what he does was he lays out the mistakes that the Biden administration has made to bring Democrats to this point and I'll just the real short version is he starts off with a Biden honeymoon. Then July 4th of last year, Biden holds this Independence Day, freedom from COVID event in which he kind of declares the pandemic over and of course we know what happened then. There was a delta variant and then there was omicron. Let's just say COVID wasn't over. The next month is the disastrously bundled withdrawal from Afghanistan and people begin to question these are independents, some Democrats obviously Republicans, whether the Biden administration can confidently handle issues. So when inflation becomes really huge, Americans are worried and Biden suggests that don't worry, we're in control, we're in charge here. We know what to do. They're very skeptical about this because they have already seen what happened with COVID, and they've seen what happened in Afghanistan. Now they're watching it with the economy and they just have absolutely no faith in Biden or democratic efforts to handle things now. And he also said, do not think that voters are going to make their decision in the last couple of weeks before the election. They're making their decision right now. And as a matter of fact, it may already be made right now. This may already be said in stone. It's one of the more pessimistic democratic documents I've seen in quite a while.

Doug Sosnik Biden Administration Biden Covid White House Wade Clinton Supreme Court Afghanistan
Fresh update on "wade" discussed on Short Wave

Short Wave

00:38 min | 15 hrs ago

Fresh update on "wade" discussed on Short Wave

"You're listening to shortwave. From NPR. Hey, shortwaves, Emily quang here. We're picking up our conversation with Liza Fuentes, a senior research scientist at the gut mocker institute. Go back and listen to part one if you missed it. Where we discussed how abortion fits into healthcare and public health. In part two, we're going to discuss what that actually looks like in practice. A practice that's likely to shift in communities across the U.S.. Depending on the outcome of a Supreme Court case, Dobbs versus Jackson women's health organization. It deals with the Mississippi law that shortened the window for abortion from 20 weeks to 15. The Jackson clinic is the only abortion provider in the state. And currently, under the 1973 ruling known as roe V wade, women are guaranteed the right to have an abortion up until fetal viability. The time when a fetus can survive outside the womb, which and if the court upholds the 15 week Mississippi abortion ban, it erodes the constitutional right to abortion that was established by roe. Then each state would decide for itself how to regulate abortion access. Liza says this would have an immediate impact on families throughout the U.S.. The ability to decide if when and how to have a child is integral to people being able to have not just realized their health, but that of their families, right? A denied abortion at the very least could be economically devastating for a family that's already struggling to make ends meet, Liza's conclusion is supported by research. A 5 year study led by doctor Diana Greene foster called the turnaway study. Track the health and economic outcomes of nearly 1000 women who saw it and were denied abortions. People who become pregnant and are unable to get a safe legal abortion in their state, those that carry the pregnancy to term will experience long-term physical health and economic harm. Today on the show, the reality of what it means to treat abortion as healthcare. And how those states moving toward stricter abortion laws invest the least in women and children's health. You're listening to.

Emily Quang Liza Fuentes Gut Mocker Institute Jackson Women's Health Organiz Jackson Clinic Roe V Wade Mississippi NPR Dobbs Liza U.S. Supreme Court Diana Greene Foster
Why You Should Have a Heart for the Cowardly

The Charlie Kirk Show

00:57 sec | 3 d ago

Why You Should Have a Heart for the Cowardly

"Again. So the cowardly are this. These are people that mean well. I want us to have a heart for the cowardly, okay? I want us to go find the cowardly pastor. You know who they are. No, seriously. I mean this. Cowards can be fixed. The last category is going to take some real conversion. I'll get to that in a second. That's where we need the divine intervention. But cowardly requires a courageous person to challenge the coward. So a good action item is for the downtrodden. But honestly, they're not bad already. Anytime anyone talks too loud, they like run out of a room, right? They shouldn't be in the ministry, but they are. Okay, there's nothing. No, that's true. They shouldn't be. But they are. And they're running a church. You should say, hey, God wants you to take stands on things that matter in the nation that you are in. Come on, I'll take the arrows for you. Can you just do one sermon about the reversal of roe versus wade? Can you just do? Can you show up to one thing? Everyone in this room, I want you to challenge the other pastors in this community because courage begets

Wade
The Complicit Churches Are the Worst Churches of All

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:15 min | 3 d ago

The Complicit Churches Are the Worst Churches of All

"Now, the last category is the complicit church. There worse than the I want more cowards than I would want people who are complicit. Now, who are the complicit church? These are people that fly the LGBT flag outside of their church. These are the people that fly the BLM by large mansions flag outside of their church. These are pastors that were so willing, you know, people like Levi lusco and people like Judah Smith. I know I'm not supposed to say their names. Again, don't care. People like Rick Warren. People like all these people, right? Who were so fast to go march in parades for BLM to make sure BLM could go buy more mansions and pay their family members. But they have not lifted a finger for the unborn when roe versus wade is about to be repealed. They won't even be bothered by it. Like, come on. And so the complicit church, this is where things like, oh, Jesus was a socialist comes from and all this just nonsense, right? And the question is which church do you want to be? God wants he did not give us a spirit of fear, okay? Joshua one 9, very clearly. Do not be afraid. It says 365 times the Bible. And so why would we be anything less than a courageous

BLM Levi Lusco Judah Smith Rick Warren Wade Jesus Joshua
Janet Morana Tells Us the Truth About 'Jane Roe'

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

02:00 min | 3 d ago

Janet Morana Tells Us the Truth About 'Jane Roe'

"Janet. As we were coming into the studio, you said you mentioned something that you both know a certain lady who for 49 years has been known as Janet Jane roe. Tell us who she really was and because a lot of misinformation about her attitude to abortion after the decision. So who is Jane roe? Norma mccorvey, who I could say is a personal friend of mine. I stated her home in Dallas. She stayed at my home in New York. Father Frank actually brought her into the Catholic Church. In fact, Norma mccorvey never had an abortion. What? No, never. In fact, she was taken advantage of basically. She was basically homeless. She already had two babies at a wedlock that her family, one was for adoption, her mother was raising one. And over a pizza lunch, she signed for Sarah waiting to know the dotted line. She got will help you take care of your pregnancy. She signs on the dotted line. Do you think she spent one day in court? Not one day. Never heard from Sarah really. And then the day, roe V wade's decided. Do you think your lawyer would pick up the phone and say we won Norma? You know how she found out when she opened her door that morning and picked up the Dallas morning paper. So I don't understand if she hadn't had an abortion, but she wasn't involved in the hearings. What was her utility to the industry of death? Why did they need her? Well, they were looking actually, you know, to find someone like her, not well educated and kind of desperate situation who just would be used like a puppet. And in fact, the companion case that day, the Doe of dovey Bolden, father Frank and I know her too. Both ladies are Sandra kino. Same thing. She was her case was coming up through Georgia, while enormous was coming up through Texas. And Sandra signed on the dotted line thinking, she never two children back out of foster care. It was her mother who wanted her to put this child. And when Sandra found out, she left Georgia to Oklahoma to give birth to that

Norma Mccorvey Janet Jane Roe Roe V Wade Dallas Janet Sarah Frank Catholic Church Norma New York Dovey Bolden Sandra Kino Sandra Georgia Texas Oklahoma
Father Frank Pavone Shares His Take on the SCOTUS Abortion Leak

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

01:51 min | 3 d ago

Father Frank Pavone Shares His Take on the SCOTUS Abortion Leak

"He is the director, the national director for priests for life, father Frank bone, who's brought a special guest with him today, Janet morana. Welcome both of you institute. Thank you. Thank you very much. Yeah, you know I brought behind the scenes from the very beginning of our ministry. She has been leading the way for life, wouldn't be as successful as it is. Well, you know, I'm out there in front all the time. All right, well, we've got to discuss this brand new book that you brought with you. Everything you need to know about abortion for teens, that must be an incredible challenge to talk about that for that demographic, but first have to get your latest update your take father on where we are, the reaction to the leak. I know everybody's praying right now for the decision imminently or maybe in June. I've read I actually read the document, the league document on video on audio. If you want to know what's really in it, you need to go to my Twitter feed by rumble because it's an amazing document. And it's clear. It's bad law. It has to go back to the states. There is no history of being pro abortion in western civilization. Do you have a sense that the justices are going to hold the line father? I'm convinced that they will. When it's some matter so fundamental to the constitution as this is. I don't see them reversing course. Justice Alito in that document doesn't only reverse roe V wade. He obliterates it. And Casey too. And shows how weak the reasoning is how untethered from the constitution and from the history of America, how damaging it's been, it is a masterful job I want to urge everyone to read that document because I'm convinced that substantially going to be the argument that

Frank Bone Janet Morana Justice Alito Roe V Wade Twitter Casey America
Stephen Miller: Biden Is Purposely Destroying American Sovereignty

Mark Levin

01:46 min | 4 d ago

Stephen Miller: Biden Is Purposely Destroying American Sovereignty

"When you look at this administration Stephen Miller and you look at how they want to grant not just a foreign entity but a hostile foreign and any quite frankly the communist Chinese They want to grant them decisions about our health in the worst of conditions a pandemic where the people of the United States have no say Where something you're the top expert on we have a wide open border with people pouring in from all walks of life with all kinds of backgrounds from all corners of the world They are purposely this administration destroying American sovereignty every way they can aren't they It is by design It is planned that is intentional It is willful because what they hate the most is us all of us the voters the people of this country and we take another point that illustrates this very vividly look at the fight over roe V wade The whole fight over roe V wade is about whether or not citizens have the right to legislate protections for children They hate the concept of democratic governance They loathe the idea that the people that listen to your show they'll watch you on Fox News the great majority of people in this country would be able to govern themselves So the quickest way to eliminate that obstacle is to say we're not going to pass laws We're not going to pass treaties we're certainly not going to be responsive to American elections We're going to let third rate fascist and bullies in foreign countries including China tell us what we're going to do in our health agencies We want to tell you about it We'll just pick up the phone We'll call them We'll take our marching orders and by the time you find out what's happened to you it's probably too late

Stephen Miller Roe V Wade United States Fox News China
Archbishop: Pelosi will be denied communion over abortion

AP News Radio

00:52 sec | 4 d ago

Archbishop: Pelosi will be denied communion over abortion

"The conservative Catholic archbishop of San Francisco said Friday that he will no longer allow U.S. House speaker Nancy Pelosi to receive communion because of her support for abortion rights AP correspondent Norman hall reports Archbishop Salvatore cordelia said he sent speaker Pelosi a letter April 7th expressing his concerns after she vowed to codify the Supreme Court's roe versus wade decision establishing a constitutional right to abortion into law Cordell Leone sat Pelosi never responded He said he told Pelosi in the letter that she must either repudiate her support of abortion rights or stop speaking publicly about her Catholic faith Over the past year has been among the most outspoken U.S. bishops advocating that communion be denied to president Joe Biden and other politicians who support abortion rights on Norman

Norman Hall Archbishop Salvatore Cordelia Pelosi Roe Versus Wade U.S. House Cordell Leone Nancy Pelosi San Francisco Supreme Court President Joe Biden U.S. Norman
Eric Adams Implies That He Supports Abortion up Until Birth

Mark Levin

01:43 min | 5 d ago

Eric Adams Implies That He Supports Abortion up Until Birth

"Eric Adams the New York City mayor everybody thought he was a moderate everybody thought he was a Law & Order guy He's a buffoon Another incompetent And he was asked a question today on CNN cut 6 go A poll that just came out this morning NPR marriage says the vast majority of Americans do not support overturning roe versus wade But a majority including the majority of Democrats does believe that there could or should be some restrictions in the direction Roe V wade has restrictions It has trimesters And in the third trimester it basically says that the state has an interest in protecting what is a viable baby Does anybody know this other than me They've gone way past roe versus wade This isn't even about roe versus wade anymore The Democrats want abortion on demand partial birth abortion right up to the last second right before birth And Adams admits it Go ahead That could be you say no restrictions at all No I say and I continue to say and I stand by this When we should determine what they're going to do with their bodies And should they determine what they're going to do With the viable babies body see this is where the rubber hits the road This is where they really can't have an answer This is why this witness foster was so good with Raskin Okay we'll have an exception for rape and incest Will you vote for our building I reclaim my time His answer is no

Eric Adams Roe V Wade Wade NPR New York City CNN Adams Raskin Foster
Dave Rubin: Red States Show a Willingness to Compromise

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:15 min | Last week

Dave Rubin: Red States Show a Willingness to Compromise

"Don't even want to get into it. The disagreements of like, what is a conservator or not? What really matters though is like we believe in consent of the governed separation of powers, the constitution, freedom of speech, we believe there's something worth conserving and protecting, and then let's go defeat these degenerate woke people. Yes, like that's the mission statement. Yes, we can set aside whatever the differences are. So Newton is so irrelevant. Charlie, some people on the more libertarian side are going to want no taxes. Some conservatives want a little bit of taxes, but they don't want a lot of federal taxes. We could put all of that aside to save the country. To save the republic. Let's just save the republic. And then we can hash out our differences after. Right? We can. And by the way, you know, I mentioned this on the show last night at the live event that, you know, when it comes to this roe V wade thing, look, the pro life thing to conservatives, this is like the top of the thing. It's about life, conserving life. So this is the type of thing. But two interesting things happen. One of them, I didn't know until the show last night. So in Florida where I now live, a few weeks ago, they passed a 15 week ban on abortion. Now, 50 weeks, that's three and a half months. That's more, even though I have some willingness for a few weeks. That's further than I would go. I would go maybe to 12, okay? Now, I get what I purely get the pro life position on this. I'm not denying that when the sperm meets the egg, it's a life, all of that stuff. Okay, fine. But think about this. Florida, which is thought of as this red, right wing, Ron DeSantis state. They did a three and a half month abortion law, and nobody cared. I don't mean nobody cared in such a good way. And what I mean is they passed it and it was thought of as a compromise, and it wasn't controversial. It wasn't on the front page of The New York Times or Washington Post. It was like, oh, here's a compromise. So that shows you that red states are willing to compromise, because if it was a purely red state position, they'd have no abortion or it would have the most minor exclusions, right? So that's what Florida did. Someone told me this and you can confirm it for me last night. I didn't know this till after the show that Arizona I think did the exact same thing. Very similar. 15 weeks. So think about that. You've got two states, Arizona, I consider a red state. And I think it will get redder. I think you're going to be okay here. We got to fix it. I know you got some things to do, but I think you're going to be okay. But the point is that the red states are showing a willingness to compromise. It's the other side that's not

Ron Desantis Florida Newton Charlie Washington Post The New York Times Arizona
Judge suspends Michigan's dormant 1931 abortion ban

AP News Radio

00:47 sec | Last week

Judge suspends Michigan's dormant 1931 abortion ban

"A a a a judge judge judge judge has has has has suspended suspended suspended suspended Michigan's Michigan's Michigan's Michigan's dormant dormant dormant dormant ban ban ban ban on on on on abortion abortion abortion abortion saying saying saying saying it it it it likely likely likely likely violates violates violates violates the the the the state's state's state's state's constitution constitution constitution constitution I'm I'm I'm I'm Ben Ben Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Thomas Thomas with with with with more more more more on on on on the the the the decision decision decision decision the the the the law law law law makes makes makes makes it it it it a a a a crime crime crime crime to to to to assist assist assist assist in in in in an an an an abortion abortion abortion abortion in in in in Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan and and and and it's it's it's it's been been been been on on on on the the the the books books books books since since since since nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen thirty thirty thirty thirty one one one one this this this this had had had had no no no no practical practical practical practical effect effect effect effect since since since since the the the the U. U. U. U. S. S. S. S. Supreme Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court Court legalized legalized legalized legalized abortion abortion abortion abortion in in in in nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen seventy seventy seventy seventy three three three three however however however however the the the the court court court court could could could could throw throw throw throw out out out out its its its its landmark landmark landmark landmark roe roe roe roe versus versus versus versus Wade Wade Wade Wade decision decision decision decision before before before before July July July July and and and and that that that that would would would would leave leave leave leave abortion abortion abortion abortion issues issues issues issues for for for for states states states states to to to to decide decide decide decide in in in in this this this this case case case case the the the the judge judge judge judge issued issued issued issued a a a a preliminary preliminary preliminary preliminary injunction injunction injunction injunction sought sought sought sought by by by by Planned Planned Planned Planned Parenthood Parenthood Parenthood Parenthood of of of of Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan against against against against that that that that nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen thirty thirty thirty thirty one one one one law law law law saying saying saying saying there's there's there's there's no no no no doubt doubt doubt doubt that that that that a a a a right right right right of of of of personal personal personal personal autonomy autonomy autonomy autonomy and and and and bodily bodily bodily bodily integrity integrity integrity integrity in in in in Michigan Michigan Michigan Michigan includes includes includes includes a a a a woman's woman's woman's woman's right right right right to to to to end end end end a a a a pregnancy pregnancy pregnancy pregnancy I'm I'm I'm I'm Ben Ben Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Thomas Thomas

Michigan Ben Ben Ben Ben Thomas Thomas U. U. U. U. S. S. S. S. Suprem Court Court Court Court Roe Roe Roe Roe Wade Wade Wade Wade
Sean Feucht and Eric Discuss the Need for Pastors to Show Courage

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:42 min | Last week

Sean Feucht and Eric Discuss the Need for Pastors to Show Courage

"My next book is called letter to the American church. And it basically says a lot of what you've been saying that the churches have been silent pastors whose job it is to speak up, they have allowed they've asked others or I should say they've been so silent that people outside the church are speaking up. It's kind of a wild moment. And we need to get pastors to be brave and to speak up. Yeah, I mean, it's really unbelievable. I mean, you know, in addition to going to Orlando, we're going to be on the steps of the Supreme Court on Tuesday. And you know, I think the roe V wade, we had the pandemic. We had the wild riots in the summer of 2020. And we had pastors across America shaming people into putting a black square on their Instagram and, you know, they were the justice fighters, but yet here we are on the precipice of overturning a 50 year death decree, the greatest injustice in the history of our generation and yet there's so much silence from pulpits across America. Every pastor in America should be preaching, just like I did yesterday here in South Carolina, should be preaching on the importance of us taking a stand against roe V wade that God is actually answering the prayer. So he's been pranked for years. And yet so many people are silent. We even have pastors apologizing for the fact that the Supreme Court is going to correct the wrong that was done in 1973. And make it unconstitutional to, you know, for this a law, this roe V

American Church Roe V Wade America Supreme Court Orlando South Carolina
Ask Officer Tatum: The Roe v. Wade Issue

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:13 min | Last week

Ask Officer Tatum: The Roe v. Wade Issue

"I want to get back to the question that Michelle asked about the roe V wade issue. Let me just say this. You know, I would love to do more research and figure it out because it's very confusing to some degree. But it's not that serious. I think that people should not, first of all, the politicians are talking about roe V wade because they want to make this a political issue so they can win in the midterms. They don't get can care less about you cohan and your babies are dying or whatever case may be. They don't care nothing about the promiscuity. They don't care nothing about your heartache and pain, nothing about the regret after you do it. Women feeling lonely and depressed and all of the things that come with having abortions, they could care less. They want you to vote. They can care less about the people at the border. They don't care about them getting killed on the way over here dying again left in the desert by coyotes getting raped and all of the above. They couldn't care less, okay? They just want your vote. Roe V wade, I do not understand how a rational woman could be arguing about this at this point. Our irrational man could be arguing. Many of these states giving you up to 16 weeks of some crazy. I mean, I think 16 weeks is even way too much. They give you plenty of time because to be honest, a lot of people are arguing, what if you get raped or whatever can be? Well, if you ask me, I'm pretty sure you know what happened to you at least it within 24 hours of you having to go and get something done about it. And so there's no mystery. It's not like you get raped and you don't know you got raped for until you're pregnant. I don't know if that happening. Anybody that's involved in the incest, a medical issue is a completely different story and they always try to push this issue. Let me just say this. I heard Steven Crowder cities before. And I think it was a beautiful response. He said, if you talk to people who claim to be so involved in caring about the people who are raped or incest or whatever, ask them, less eliminate all of those people and allow them to have as many abortions as they can or whatever the case may be. What about the 99%? Can you agree that all of that is wrong? All in the papa gasket. The brains pop out in a pass out and they cry and they spit and roll around on the ground all day. That's what they're going to do because they do not have a real solution to the problem. They do not have they are not acting in good

Roe V Wade Cohan Michelle Coyotes Steven Crowder
Joe Manchin Will Oppose Bill That Would Codify Roe v. Wade

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:44 min | Last week

Joe Manchin Will Oppose Bill That Would Codify Roe v. Wade

"Mean, let me add just one other breaking news from today. Joe Manchin was pressed very hard yesterday on whether or not he would support the what they're calling the codification of roe V wade into federal law. It's this accessibility to abortion act or whatever it's called. And he had to call a press conference and come out and say, guys, this is not the codification of roe V wade. This is an expansion of abortion, roe V wade said you had a federal right to abortion. What this law wants to do is wipe out 500 state and local laws nationwide to basically force abortion availability via taxpayer dollars into every corner of the world that it's not currently at. And to your point, it's a zero sum game. If you give them a half an inch, they will take 6000 miles. And that's why we can't, we can't just sit back and say, it's okay for them to simply state their disagreement. No, every time that Jen Psaki has said stuff crazy in recent weeks from the press room, we've got to denounce it. We've got to call attention to it. We've got to say that is not true. We've got to force facts back into the conversation because these people do not have nerve endings that receive the normal receptor messages as to, oh, I shouldn't say that. It's blatantly not true. Well, they are, we're in a new world. And that's why people like Tim Keller and others who they're good people. But what they said 20 years ago, 15 years ago, the reason it no longer applies is because the world has changed and they refuse to see how dramatically things have changed so that they're anodyne platitudes, they no longer hold.

Roe V Wade Joe Manchin Jen Psaki Tim Keller
Clarence Thomas says abortion leak has changed Supreme Court

AP News Radio

00:58 sec | Last week

Clarence Thomas says abortion leak has changed Supreme Court

"Justice justice justice justice Clarence Clarence Clarence Clarence Thomas Thomas Thomas Thomas says says says says the the the the Supreme Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court Court has has has has been been been been changed changed changed changed by by by by the the the the leak leak leak leak of of of of a a a a draft draft draft draft opinion opinion opinion opinion earlier earlier earlier earlier this this this this month month month month suggesting suggesting suggesting suggesting the the the the court court court court is is is is poised poised poised poised to to to to overturn overturn overturn overturn the the the the right right right right to to to to an an an an abortion abortion abortion abortion recognized recognized recognized recognized in in in in roe roe roe roe versus versus versus versus Wade Wade Wade Wade I'm I'm I'm I'm Ben Ben Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Thomas Thomas with with with with a a a a look look look look at at at at his his his his comments comments comments comments it's it's it's it's like like like like kind kind kind kind of of of of an an an an infidelity infidelity infidelity infidelity that that that that you you you you can can can can explain explain explain explain it it it it but but but but you you you you can't can't can't can't undo undo undo undo it it it it justice justice justice justice Clarence Clarence Clarence Clarence Thomas Thomas Thomas Thomas joined joined joined joined the the the the court court court court in in in in nineteen nineteen nineteen nineteen ninety ninety ninety ninety one one one one and and and and has has has has long long long long called called called called for for for for roe roe roe roe versus versus versus versus Wade Wade Wade Wade to to to to be be be be overturned overturned overturned overturned speaking speaking speaking speaking at at at at a a a a conference conference conference conference in in in in Dallas Dallas Dallas Dallas Friday Friday Friday Friday he he he he described described described described the the the the leak leak leak leak of of of of justice justice justice justice Samuel Samuel Samuel Samuel Alito's Alito's Alito's Alito's draft draft draft draft as as as as an an an an unthinkable unthinkable unthinkable unthinkable breach breach breach breach of of of of trust trust trust trust when when when when you you you you lose lose lose lose that that that that trust trust trust trust especially especially especially especially in in in in the the the the institution institution institution institution that that that that I'm I'm I'm I'm in in in in it it it it changes changes changes changes the the the the institution institution institution institution fundamentally fundamentally fundamentally fundamentally are are are are you you you you begin begin begin begin to to to to look look look look over over over over your your your your shoulder shoulder shoulder shoulder adding adding adding adding up up up up the the the the leaker leaker leaker leaker that that that that general general general general attitude attitude attitude attitude is is is is your your your your future future future future on on on on the the the the bench bench bench bench and and and you you you need need need to to to be be be concerned concerned concerned about about about that that that that that that audio audio audio Kerr Kerr Kerr to to to see see see the the the American American American enterprise enterprise enterprise institute institute institute I'm I'm I'm Ben Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Thomas

Justice Justice Justice Justic Court Court Court Court Wade Wade Wade Wade Supreme Supreme Supreme Suprem Ben Ben Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Dallas Alito Samuel Samuel Samuel Samuel Al Kerr Kerr Kerr American American American Ent Ben Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Thom
Show of support for abortion rights expected at US rallies

AP News Radio

00:47 sec | Last week

Show of support for abortion rights expected at US rallies

"A a a a major major major major show show show show of of of of support support support support for for for for abortion abortion abortion abortion rights rights rights rights is is is is expected expected expected expected at at at at rallies rallies rallies rallies across across across across the the the the country country country country today today today today from from from from New New New New York York York York to to to to LA LA LA LA organizers organizers organizers organizers say say say say they they they they want want want want to to to to express express express express their their their their outrage outrage outrage outrage over over over over the the the the anticipated anticipated anticipated anticipated Supreme Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court Court decision decision decision decision that that that that would would would would overturn overturn overturn overturn roe roe roe roe versus versus versus versus Wade Wade Wade Wade which which which which would would would would take take take take away away away away a a a a constitutional constitutional constitutional constitutional right right right right to to to to abortion abortion abortion abortion they they they they say say say say they they they they want want want want to to to to mobilize mobilize mobilize mobilize for for for for the the the the fight fight fight fight ahead ahead ahead ahead on on on on Capitol Capitol Capitol Capitol Hill Hill Hill Hill yesterday yesterday yesterday yesterday democratic democratic democratic democratic house house house house speaker speaker speaker speaker Nancy Nancy Nancy Nancy Pelosi Pelosi Pelosi Pelosi led led led led the the the the charge charge charge charge Americans Americans Americans Americans are are are are marching marching marching marching and and and and making making making making their their their their voices voices voices voices heard heard heard heard public public public public sentiment sentiment sentiment sentiment is is is is everything everything everything everything we we we we will will will will never never never never stop stop stop stop fighting fighting fighting fighting for for for for patients patients patients patients and and and and their their their their healthcare healthcare healthcare healthcare providers providers providers providers to to to to defend defend defend defend the the the the rights rights rights rights of of of of women women women women tens tens tens tens of of of of thousands thousands thousands thousands of of of of people people people people are are are are expected expected expected expected at at at at the the the the band's band's band's band's off off off off our our our our bodies bodies bodies bodies events events events events one one one one of of of of the the the the largest largest largest largest will will will will be be be be in in in in DC DC DC DC on on on on March March March March from from from from the the the the Washington Washington Washington Washington monument monument monument monument to to to to the the the the Supreme Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court Court I'm I'm I'm I'm Julie Julie Julie Julie Walker Walker Walker Walker

New New New New York York York Supreme Supreme Supreme Suprem Roe Roe Roe Roe Wade Wade Wade Wade Capitol Capitol Capitol Capito Democratic Democratic Democrat Speaker Speaker Speaker Nancy La La LA Washington Washington Washingt DC Julie Julie Julie Julie Walker
"wade" Discussed on The Poker Coaching Podcast

The Poker Coaching Podcast

05:22 min | Last month

"wade" Discussed on The Poker Coaching Podcast

"About to happen, I guess. Prepare yourself for the savages. The worst game of truth or dare. Now this is actually an interrogation. That's what we got you here for, you know? About all the bad plays we've ever seen you make. This is the time. There's a lot of we have your we have your tax information and so we're gonna go in depth. You know, cash is don't equal wins. Exactly. He's already, he's already coming out with the asterisks. That's awesome. He's prepared me well for this. All right, everybody, thank you guys for being here. The monthly asked me anything, Tristan wade, long time, crusher in the game. Tournaments, cash games, one of the players they can do a little bit of both has been very successful. Over the years, so we're glad to have him here today. If anyone in the chat has any questions, don't be shy. We didn't get many in the forum, but yeah, you guys are here. Let's ask them some questions. They don't necessarily have to be poker related. You know, let's find, let's get into the mind of this sicko here. And see what we can learn. But yeah, we think everybody for being here, toe as well. And yeah, we'll get this started. So we'll give it a second. If you do have a question, go ahead and there's a feature below where you can just raise your hand. Invite you on stage. And if you guys don't have a question. Yeah, it's a fun little feature where they can just request to come up and speak. And then, you know, come up, get the mic and a lot of pressure up the stage. They call themselves they invite themselves up if they want to. That's a fun part, you know? So don't be shy out there. I have a few questions. Any questions you guys got? Yeah, whatever you guys got for me. I appreciate Sean. If you've got questions, that's cool too if people want to ask me hands or anything. It's all good. Pressing question. I haven't seen you. I don't think since topgolf, how are you doing? I'm good. I'm good. Thanks for asking. Yeah, I'm just moseying away. And yeah. Looking for a house out here. So that's my biggest venture right now. Oh, it's a tough buying market right now. Yeah, I know. I'm not sure it's the best time. We were looking for a while. We gave up and decided to rent. So we're moving, actually, starting packing yesterday. Day before. Okay. I might find myself in that same road, so I hear you. I just gonna rent today..

Tristan wade crusher Sean
"wade" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

05:37 min | 6 months ago

"wade" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"The banks have wage war in our values, time to say sayonara, via commandos. I'll eat the same I'll be going to Andrew and Todd dot com. Well, just explain to our audience what that would mean. So let's say roe versus wade gets challenged. What kind of an opinion do you think we can expect then from this court? Roberts is probably going to side with the collectivists and the anti constitutionalists. But Thomas Alito for sure, Amy Coney Barrett asked about abortion adoption, which she just has a tendency to do. A lot, she just that's a very important issue for her. I hope she rules correctly. Kavanaugh Gorsuch was really strong. That kind of coalition of 5. What can we expect out of that if that ends up being a majority opinion? I mean, if it ends up being a majority opinion, then I think it'll be pretty straightforward. They'll find that the Mississippi law is legal, constitutional, and they'll say, and they'll do it by and they'll do it by saying roe versus wade was wrong and is no longer good law. The end consequence of that is likely to be just essentially neutrality from the Supreme Court rather than, oh, we have the a new burden standard or any of these other standards that apply to abortion laws. It goes back to it just like this is not an issue that the Supreme Court touches and so then that leads, it gives the opportunity for states to pass their own laws prohibiting abortion. And so that doesn't outlaw abortion. It doesn't even comment on abortion. It's almost a federal neutrality when it comes to that. Where roe versus wade was actually the opposite. Roe versus wade said no, everywhere in every corner, it's the same sort of almost overarching hyper aggressive judicial opinions that we saw that were precursor to the civil rights movement. Like we are going to implement a certain worldview regardless if you want it or not. Right. Right. And I think that's the way it always really should have been. I mean, that was Scalia's critique of roe. His princip critique of row from the time he got on the court. And it's one of those things where sometimes it takes a long time for you to really take hold and be and become kind of the mainstream and the dominant view jurisprudential, because before that liberals had added massive majority on the court. But now I think if you were just listening to that oral argument, there are 5 justices who don't think highly of row at all. And I think the only attempt to try and persuade them out of it is to make an argument about precedent saying that the court shouldn't return as president. But even then you have stuff like Kavanaugh pointing out all the different precedents that the Supreme Court has ever turned over the years. Give me a break. That one should have been overturned. I'm glad it was. Well, you're in the legal world. What is the lesson from this? Because the smart people told us many years ago don't even try against roe versus wade. No chance whatsoever. Donald Trump wins in 16. Gives us Gorsuch gives us Kavanaugh gives us Amy Coney Barrett. What's the takeaway here, especially as we try to look more broadly for a constitutional reset? As we try to now accomplish other things that might have seemed impossible many years prior. I think it shows that winning matters that elections have consequences. There were a lot of people in 2016 who said not to vote for Donald Trump for various reasons. And they tried to ground it in some sort of conservative principle. Well, what you're seeing if this actually happens is the single biggest conservative legal victory in a generation directly resulting from the confirmation of judges that we would not such an important point. And so they're occasionally even saw a little bit of in 2020 where people were like, oh, what are we good to lose, the Senate seats or something? Because for reasons because election fraud, like, no, I think if anything would ever settle, it's really good to have power because if you have power, you can appoint judges who will look at the constitution the way you do. And I mean, it has so many different downstream effects. So I think winning matters elections matter and don't let ignore people who tell you otherwise. Yeah, and also being willing to do something with that political power too. A Mississippi was willing to put this law into the arena and also, hopefully, again, we're assuming the Supreme Court's gonna rule the way that we want it to, but the arguments were pretty compelling. Weren't they? Well, I mean, it doesn't seem as if there's a lot of gray area there. Yeah, no, I think they're in really good shape. I didn't hear, I guess what you're looking for is maybe a screw up by the conservative advocate or a troubling line of questioning from a conservative judge and you didn't see really any of that. The closest you would have seen was Roberts trying to find some weird middle ground. And as he, as he does, I have just horrible jokes in my head that I shouldn't say. But anyway, the idea being, yeah, we have the judges in the court now that look at the constitution the way it should be looked at in art just kind of almost defending this really ultimately indefensible precedent. Yeah, where it was extra constitutional where the court came in and basically made law and overturned 30 individual state laws that outlawed abortion. And it went directly against the will of the people and then you have a whole generation that was raised thinking roe versus wade is law. Boy, I mean, if you think that the Democrats run hinged with Floyd palooza and with all these other different things we live through, just wait until roe versus wade gets overturned. You're going to see a whole new chapter in American politics. Well, thanks so much for joining us. Human events dot com. Do you want to be a hero for the holidays? How about getting your loved ones a new.

wade Amy Coney Barrett Thomas Alito Supreme Court Kavanaugh Gorsuch Kavanaugh Gorsuch Donald Trump Roberts Mississippi Todd Scalia Roe Andrew Senate Floyd palooza
"wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

BrainStuff

04:13 min | 8 months ago

"wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

"Both roe v wade and planned parenthood v casey so let's talk about precedence. They're considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving similar facts or legal issues. The concept called stereo decisiveness. Which means let the decision stand in. Latin provide stability and predictability in law when a new president is established or laws changed on an issue. It's known as a landmark decision olym- quiz said president is one of the cornerstones of our judicial system. The system of president provides that when courts make decisions in those decisions become law they will remain on the books until that same court or an appellate court overrules those precedents a judges and justices often rely on precedents to make rulings and other cases. A for example. Five justices relied on the precedent. Set by casey when striking down a louisiana law that would have required doctors performing abortions to have emissions privileges at a state authorized hospital within thirty miles. Forty eight kilometers of the clinic. The supreme court can overturn in existing precedent with the majority vote. And this happens perhaps surprisingly more often the general public realizes about two to three times a term linquist says though these cases unlike row aren't ones that make the news. If roe is ultimately ended the aftershocks would be felt immediately eleven states have trigger laws in place that would instantly ban abortions conversely fourteen states plus washington. Dc have laws in place to protect abortion access. Overturning roe would also add strength to texas's sp eight law linquist says however if roe is upheld quote it will have major implications for the texas case simply because it will reaffirm the core right to abortion prior to viability. The supreme court isn't likely to deliver a decision in the mississippi case until these spring or early summer of twenty twenty two..

roe v wade casey linquist roe louisiana supreme court texas washington mississippi
"wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

BrainStuff

08:25 min | 8 months ago

"wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

"Of iheartradio. Hey brain stuff lauren. Bogo bomb here nearly fifty years ago the. Us supreme court made one of its most controversial rulings with its landmark decision in roe v wade. The ruling declared that states criminalizing. Abortion violates a woman's right to due process meaning a woman has the right to choose whether to terminate a pregnancy with limited government restrictions. Until that point. Nearly all fifty states outlawed abortion except in cases to save a woman's life or health or in situations such as rape incest or fetal anomaly in the years since that landmark decision state legislators have made numerous attempts to chip away at abortion rights through ballot measures and legislative moves and together have passed more than one thousand three hundred restrictions on abortion. Dozens more are currently making their way through state legislatures but the president set by roe. V wade and its progeny case planned parenthood v. casey remain intact however a mississippi case set to be reviewed. This fall by the supreme court holds the potential to shake the very foundation. Upon which these cases stand the aftershocks. Of which will either strengthen or reshape the future of abortion rights in america it began on january twenty second of nineteen seventy-three when by vote of seven to to. The supreme court legalized abortion in the us. Under roe v wade. The court's judgment was based on the decision that a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy fell under the freedom of personal choice and family matters protected by the fourteenth amendment to the us constitution. The case created the trimester system. Which says states cannot impose any restrictions on women choosing to terminate their pregnancies during the first trimester. Though it does allow some government limits in the second trimester states can restrict or ban abortions in the last trimester once the fetus becomes able to live outside the womb however roe v wade also established that in the final trimester. A woman could obtain an abortion if doctors certified that is necessary to save the life or health of the woman in nineteen ninety two. The supreme court made another landmark decision in planned parenthood v. Casey in that case the court upheld a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion established by row but also applied the undue burden standard for abortion restrictions establishing that no laws should be too burdensome or restrictive of one's fundamental rights. There have been numerous challenges to roe. And casey through the years that the supreme court has struck down including a ban after six weeks in north dakota and ban after twelve weeks in arkansas. The court also struck down two thousand sixteen texas law that impeded clinics abilities to perform abortions earlier this year however texas lawmakers found a way to get around the supreme court at least for now at midnight on september. First of twenty twenty one. The nation's strictest abortion law went into effect in the state known as the fetal heartbeat bill or sp eight the law bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. That is six weeks after a person's last menstrual cycle which is before most people know they're pregnant and far earlier than legally provided by roe v. Wade what makes texas's law different from others is that it's enforceable only through private civil action. Essentially that means that the law empowers citizens to sue abortion providers or anyone who helps another person get an abortion or even intends to assist someone after a so called fetal heartbeat has been detected a which the bill defines as cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the station sack. Although biologically the hardest we know it has not developed by six weeks so it's not really a heartbeat but rather the just coordinating effects of a small group of cardiac cells. The person suing does not have to be connected to the person considering the abortion or to a provider or even live in the state of texas if the accuser wins their case the person or entity being sued would have to pay the accuser or accusers. At least ten thousand dollars as well as costs for attorney's fees according to the law an independent abortion provider in texas called whole women's health then challenged the law in an emergency application to the supreme court on the grounds at the six week ban was unconstitutional. The supreme court remained mute on the subject until hours before the law went into effect. Issuing an unsigned opinion consisting of a single long paragraph that stated the abortion providers failed to make their case. Though chief justice. John roberts who was appointed by republican president. George w bush and left leaning justices steven briar elena. Kagan 'em sonia. Sotomayor dissented a for the article. This episode is based on. How stuff works. Spoke with stephanie lindquist. A foundation professor of law and political science at arizona state university and the recognized expert on the supreme court and she explained that the texas law was able to skirt a supreme court review at this juncture quote because it relies on private actors to enforce the law as opposed to state officials. And no one yet has enforced. It accords are very reluctant to resolve cases that have not yet reached a concrete dispute however the us department of justice has a different source of standing. She explains on september ninth of twenty twenty one. The department of justice sued texas on behalf of us citizens on the grounds that texas's abortion law is a violation of federal law attorney. General merrick garland said during a news conference quote. The act is clearly unconstitutional under longstanding. Supreme court precedent the justice department filed the lawsuit in the western district of texas and seeks permanent injunction. But the case will likely eventually make its way to the supreme court when roh went into effect in nineteen seventy three the majority of the court comprised republican appointed justices. Even justice harry blackmun. Who wrote the roe. V wade opinion had been appointed by republican president richard nixon. Since then linquist said the ideological orientation toward abortion has changed. The republican party is now firmly entrenched as the party that opposes abortion before president. Donald trump took office in two thousand seventeen. He vowed to appoint justices to the supreme court to overturn roe. V wade justice anthony. Kennedy's retirement in two thousand eighteen and ruth bader ginsburg's death in september twenty twenty allowed trump to do so with conservative pittsburgh. Cavanaugh and amy coney baratz the supreme court now has a six to three conservative majority with all six having taken hostile positions against abortion at one point or another since roe was decided. Legislators in conservative states have pressed to impose additional restrictions on abortion. But linquist says they now see a window of opportunity with the personnel changes at the supreme court quote a with the majority of justices being catholic and most of them being appointed by republican presidents. The assumption is that now is the time strike while the iron is hot. Legislation can finally get the supreme court. Where roh could be challenged and struck down another such opportunity to entice the supreme court to revisit roe. V wade presented itself in dobbs v jackson women's health organization. This case stems from a law passed by the mississippi legislature in two thousand eighteen that banned abortions after the fifteen th week of pregnancy jackson women's health organization the only licensed abortion provider in mississippi challenged the law's constitutionality after a us district court and the us district court of appeals for the fifth circuit sided with the clinic. Mississippi took the case to the supreme court on may seventeenth of thousand twenty one. The supreme court announced it would review the case. This fall the outcome of which could impact the precedents set by.

supreme court roe v wade texas us casey roe justice department wade lauren steven briar elena stephanie lindquist linquist mississippi Casey merrick garland north dakota arkansas Wade harry blackmun
"wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

02:42 min | 9 months ago

"wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

"Republican candidates have been telling me for as long as i can remember that they want to overrule roe v. Wade they want to appoint justices who will overrule roe. V wade on. There are six justices on the supreme court right now who have said in their own writings in one form or another that that they disagree with current abortion press president some of them said explicitly. They want to overrule roe. V wade but there are six justices who have said in their precedents that they think that cases like and casey were wrongly decided. And i believe that you know i believe donald trump when. He told me that his justices would vote to overrule roe v wade. I believe the justices who've been saying in dissenting opinions for many years that they would overrule roe v wade. I believe that when justice barrett signed a letter while she was still a law professor attacking abortion rights. And you know and saying that you she she should work to get rid of abortions that she was telling the truth. You know the only thing that i'm doing here and again like i could be surprised. I shouldn't speak with absolute certainty. But i am taking them at their word. My guest is ian mill heiser. Who covers the supreme court for. Vox this afternoon. After we recorded the interview the justice department announced it's filing a lawsuit to challenge texas's restrictive abortion law. We'll hear more of my interview with ian millhauser after a break. I'm terry gross. And this is fresh air. Let's get back to my interview with ian mill. Heiser who has been writing about the recent supreme court order allowing restrictive texas abortion law to go into effect. He's also been writing about the courts. Voting rights decisions the increasing use of the shadow docket and the courts. Larger moved to the right in his new book. The agenda how a republican supreme court is reshaping america. He writes that while congress has become increasingly polarized and dysfunctional. The supreme court has become the locus of policy making in the us and the policies are largely conservative. Three of the six conservative justices were appointed by president. Trump millhauser says some of the courts least understood and most arcane decisions are fundamentally reshaping our nation. He's a senior for. Vox where he focuses on the supreme court the constitution and threats to liberal democracy in the us. Millhauser is a lawyer and clerked for judge of the. Us court of appeals for the sixth circuit. So if the supreme court either.

roe v wade supreme court ian mill heiser ian millhauser Wade donald trump ian mill Heiser wade casey barrett terry gross republican supreme court texas justice department Trump millhauser us congress Millhauser Us court of appeals
"wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

03:30 min | 9 months ago

"wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

"The court is kind of unconstitutional. So we're going to not allow us law to stamp the absolutely. They could have done that the your they could've you know like just suggested they could have said we did. Sue a state official. Who enforces the law. You sued a state judge. But yes i mean the ultimate point here is exactly what you said. This law was drafted in order to frustrate judicial review. It was drafted in order to prevent anyone from being able to suit a block. It and that's a really frightening prospect. I mean imagine if the texas governor had passed a law saying that anyone who criticizes me can be me. The texas governor can be sued obvious violation of the first amendment. I can't imagine a court would tolerate a law like that. So i think at least part of the story here. Is that the reason why. The supreme court was willing to tolerate this weird rube goldberg method of getting around the way that courts normally function is. Because there's now majority on the supreme court that opposes abortion rights. And they wanted to see this antiabortion law go into effect. So what would a challenge to this restrictive. Texas law look like who could challenge it. Under what circumstances so the way that things work now. After the supreme court's order is that someone has to wait until after they are sued and then once they are sued under the law. They can then go to court as the defendant and say your honor my defense to this lawless. That it's unconstitutional It's not lawful to ban abortion under roe v. Wade therefore this lawsuit should be thrown out there several problems to that approach. I mean one is like i said i think there's a very high likelihood that the supreme court is about to overrule roe v wade and if that happens. That defense doesn't work anymore. The other problem with it is that this law authorizes any person except for texas employees literally any person you don't have to be a texan. You don't have to be in any you don't have to know the person you're subic. Any person can sue an abortion provider. And so if someone violates the law in order to set up a test case where they can then go to court and say your honor. This laws unconstitutional. You should throw this lawsuit out. The probably not going to be sued one time they might be sued by thousands or tens of thousands of people. Because again anyone can file a lawsuit and to defend against those lawsuits. You need hire lawyers. Lawyers are expensive. You need to go to every single court in which you are sued and that could be courts all throughout taxes and that's extraordinarily expensive. The mere prospect of having to defend against this law could wind bankrupting and abortion clinic. So the person being sued has to pay a lot in court fees. Meanwhile the person suing them might get ten thousand dollars for their effort. So it's yeah Yeah exactly like the i mean. The person who is bringing the lawsuit will have some fees presumably will hire their own lawyer. You know they have to file a filing fee. It's not like you can bring a lawsuit for free. But the person being sued might be sued thousands of times you know there might be seven thousand lawsuits against them..

supreme court texas roe v wade rube goldberg Wade subic Texas
"wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

06:35 min | 9 months ago

"wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"So that case was then appealed all the way up to the supreme court and in the circuit the sur petition raised three questions. But the supreme court granted cert on just one and that question is defined as quote whether all pre viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional and of quote. That means do you overrule planned. Parenthood versus casey summarizing the quote central holding of route k so the supreme court has before it it is not yet calendar for oral argument. But it has been fully briefed. It is on the fall. Twenty twenty one docket. It will probably get hurt in november december of this year. They have before it the case. That case real be used next year to overturn roe. V wade and now the howler monkey majority writing to overturn roe. V wade is going to be able to pile on and go. Yeah add by the way like you know lots of laws restricting pre viability abortions at been in effect for six months and we seem to be fine. so you know it is diabolical. What this court has done and if you find someone defending this decision. They are an ideolog motivated by their hatred for abortion and not they are not you you need not take their legal opinions seriously know lolly strikes off strikes here it could could. Here's my question for. Could this be then now. I understand this bizarre ruling a little better. Maybe we give slight credit to that. Npr headline is the idea. May be that like okay. Using this one weird trick. It hasn't been joined. But the minute a person like an actual human stops another human from getting an abortion. Then will we see another case and then it'll be like well. You don't have that same reasoning so now you do have to enjoy that. So why don't i talk about what. S sb does okay. Because i think that'll help that question. Yeah well i mean. It's it's we're sort of dancing around that pinscher because i think i think the answer to that is that procedurally. No that's not going to help but it's a really good point. So let's let's talk about. Sba is not along bell but it is a disaster it begins with This is section one seven one point two zero one the tax code it defines fetal heartbeat as cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart by the way not a medical term within the justice national sack That is the medical term. That is that lack voitey thing you see on a on an on an ultrasound. Fetal heart just means a tube that is pumping blood through the sack sexy two or three mandates that before performing any abortion doctors have to search for that fetal heartbeat section two. Oh four says if they find it. They may not perform abortion section two. Oh five gives the exception and you will notice. I have said singular. That exception is for a medical emergency. Medical emergency not defined in the statute but very clearly does not include exceptions for rape incest. Yeah almost certain to miscarry severe trauma to the fetus severe trauma to the pregnant person. Nope none of that And by the way it also amends. I if you're wondering how how deep the cruelty goes it. Amends section to forty five point zero one one of the texas health and safety code that requires doctors who perform abortions to provide a monthly report of all the abortions that they that they provide and detail eleven separate things and one of them is subsection ten whether the abortion was performed or induced because of a medical emergency and any medical condition of the pregnant woman again. That's the language of the statute that required the abortion so in other words and failure inaccuracies on your monthly reporting requirements are themselves. That's a misdemeanor. But are themselves criminal and you'll get fined for it right so creates an entire new bureaucratic mess of okay. We're going to allow medical emergency. But the doctor has to certify under penalty of perjury. That it really is. They have to describe what it is. They have to put it in these monthly reports. Right like if you're thinking oh abortion clinics will just stay open and you know. We'll do the paperwork. No they will not i. If i represented an abortion clinic in texas my advice would be shut down. And i believe that. That's what is going to happen to every abortion provider in the state of texas k. But for the sake of protests for the sake of pure young not hundred service. I'm not telling planned parenthood to close their doors. I'm saying if you're asking me. What is your your legal exposure as an abortion clinic in continuing to operate in texas. The answer is it's off the charts reasons that i'm going back to discredit k. Two of five. That's the sole exception to six ads. Just in case Because the people who wrote this were lawyers even though they were evil lawyers Says now by the way. Just because we're saying you can't have an abortion after fetal heartbeat quote nothing in this statute is intended to confer a right to an abortion before feed right. Yeah yeah they want to look like they did. They're not too happy with six weeks. They want to restrict this all the way back to conception they want to get rid of abortifacient drugs they want to get to get rid of every bit of progress that we have made in the twenty first century in the twentieth century towards reproductive health freedom and this codifies section to sex. By the way we're gonna come back and we're going to take away. You know this heartbeat thing is just you know that's just so we could run commercials like it doesn't have anything to do with our view of the law so that's two. Oh six two zero seven. This is the part that got them past neal gorsuch that was enough of a fig-leaf to get gorsuch and cavenaugh to say. Hey this differ. Oh we're we're we're not going to intervene it because because because it's different..

supreme court casey texas wade Npr trauma neal gorsuch gorsuch cavenaugh
"wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

07:49 min | 9 months ago

"wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"I mean i guess not out of nowhere but like you say broke late even for this supreme court i was surprised and and i'm about to explain it all right. So let's get this right to be opening arguments levels of clear here. The supreme court did not overturn roe. V wade because it did not issue a ruling on the merits. They did not rule on the merits of anything. This is what we call shadow docket. What they did was allow a blatantly unconstitutional law to go into effect before overturning roe v wade which is something they were probably going to do around april or may of next year and as far as i can tell and i spent the better part of the morning looking for counter examples. This is what happened. Today is literally unprecedented in the history of this country. So let me let me give you an example of how this never happens. And let's suppose it's nineteen sixty two. And i'm a poor person in prison. I did not have a lawyer appointed from the time the law the land was case called bets versus brady. Which said yeah. You know you get a court appointed lawyer if it's a capital case or if there are issues with competence sore in know certain extenuating circumstances but just because you're to portable afford a lawyer you don't get one. There was no right to court appointed counsel as mike teach at. Lowe's buy mind every time. Yeah so let's imagine then. I file a habeas petition to the supreme court. And i say yeah. I know betsy brady. But you're about to hear you've already got pending on your docket. Abs petition. From my buddy clarence gideon and you know you guys on the supreme court pretty. It's nineteen sixty two. You're pretty liberal bunch. Some pretty sure you're gonna ruling gideon's favor and you're going to overturn that betts v brady case You're gonna say that everybody gets a right to a lawyer. That's gonna freebie eventually so why not. Just let me out right right right and you know. What did they do. Give gideon v wade. Right right came out in nineteen sixty three and it was nine. Oh right like not. Controversial unanimous overturned. Betsy brady did exactly but yeah this hypothetical petition and by the way there were actual petitions and not to this hypothetical petition. The supreme court would that same super. Liberal supreme court would not have granted relief at that time right. They have granted anticipatory challenges. Still lie yet. They would've said maybe we'll change the law but until then we live in a country with the rule of law and the law says you're not entitled to it. Sorry this is going to be an episode for. We have covered almost every component of this on multiple previous episodes of the show. So episodes twenty. Seven and twenty eight are when we covered the planned parenthood versus casey decision. If you haven't listened to those if you came in like it stormy at stormy daniels maybe come back and listen to twenty seven twenty pretty good and the shadow docket late much later on obviously but the shadow docket with And recital right yup shadow docket. We talked about on episode five seven up. Yeah so all of the components here are things you can search the away website for it. We have covered an in depth. Even if only get this far. what they're doing. It's not just which is already bad enough. It's not just that they're obviously overturning roe. that's already bad. it's that the this is completely unprecedented. I'm so sick of republicans getting to feel like and call themselves. They're just calling balls and strikes balls and strikes they're just constitutional umpires over there and they're doing this a field goal in the middle of a baseball game. I'm not getting so let me break down exactly what happened. Because i think i can make this clear even to uncle frank exactly how radical this is so point number one. Texas passed a law. And we're going to talk about all the provisions of this has. Wow is it a doozy. It's sb eight. That bans abortion after six weeks. Guy point to existing constitutional law is super duper to the ends of the earth. Clear that you cannot do that. Yeah and i am going to quote from planned. Parenthood versus casey five zero five eight thirty three at eight forty five. To forty six quote we are led to conclude this the essential holding of roe. V wade should be retained and once again reaffirmed. It must be stated at the outset and with clarity. This is the supreme court talking that rose essential holding the holding. We reaffirm has three parts and again if you listen to our episodes. They're actually missed. They're actually changing roe. V wade a little bit here but nevertheless this is the law of the land. Good law right now. The central holding of roe v wade as reaffirmed by planned parenthood versus. Casey has three parts. I is a recognition of the right of the woman to choose to have an abortion before viability and obtain it without undue inference without undue interference from the state continuing just in case that's not clear enough before viability. The state's interests are not strong enough to support a prohibition of abortion or the imposition of a substantial obstacle to the woman's effective right to elect a procedure. So that's the law. The law says if it's pre viability you cannot ban abortion. The state's interest is not strong enough. Now if you've listened to the show you know. I don't think viability is a crate. Archea you know. I prefer the original restaurant. But doesn't matter what i think it matter did should matter what the law is right. So the law states cannot prohibit abortion before viability. Sp prohibits abortion before viability. Six weeks way way way before him here go. Oh god. States can't prohibit abortion at six weeks so what happened. what happened. Was what what i expected to happen. Whole women's health and abortion provider in texas. They went to a us district court. Judge ticket the in joint which happened. Because it's obvious because the reason. I said it's obviously in custody show. So then texas appealed to the fifth circuit and the fifth circuit as we have documented at great length hates abortion. It is stacked with antiabortion activists who have bent over backwards to misconstrue laws whenever it comes to upholding the conservative result of that law right and we talked about that at length. And the whole woman's health versus heller steph opinion so fifth circuit hates abortion and they reversed the district court. I wasn't surprised by that either. Then whole women's health appealed to the supreme court and the supreme court then did to fix i is. They did nothing they just sat on the application and let sba go into effect and then belatedly a day later at around midnight last night as of our recording midnight on wednesday they released an opinion that i will read to you in full because that opinion citations included is four hundred eleven words so two thirds of a page about the length that you might expect from a reasonably bright fifth graders book report and so when we explained the shadow docket episode five. But this is what we mean. We mean with no explanation with no analysis without committing to anything imprint. This opinion allowed a blatantly unconstitutional law to go into effect. So there is no discussion of the case. On the merits there was no analysis espy. Eight there is no analysis of row. It does not faked a row. It does not say to casey. It is just procedural but that procedural means that the texas law goes into effect until it is briefed. Argued litigated at the district. Level appealed to the fifth circuit on the merits briefed argues coast to oral argument..

supreme court mike teach betsy brady clarence gideon betts v brady gideon v wade Betsy brady Liberal supreme court wade casey roe v wade gideon brady Lowe daniels us district court baseball frank heller steph Casey
"wade" Discussed on The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

02:53 min | 10 months ago

"wade" Discussed on The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

"But yeah. I think it's been interesting. I think it should be a classic. I wish that they've had gotten a little bit more time on television to sell this story and bring up is what's next for them especially post roster shakeup. Are you trying to position edge to be a fresh challenger for bobby lashley are you gonna save edge for a rematch against like roman reigns at the rumble or something. That a little something to the undercard to speak at the rumble. Or are you going to reunite him with randy. Horton is you know. have have that pairing comeback. Because you know that sort of thing with randy and thing with edge that you could have some fun with post riddle being elevated by being with randy riddle rejuvenating randy's character to degree to which we'll get to that in a minute Sets positioning him to be a future mcintyre if drew becomes champion again or are you trying to build him up for whom for what top baby face what what is there for and if you think well there's more we need to do with edge and he's going to be in world title matches or top feuds and you know you put edge over but if you think you need to build up south because you've got this like six months victory for him in wrestlemainia. Then you have the seth over. I think it's sort of in that sense like the finish isn't based on where we are today but the available dates in the matches that they're having mind for each wrestler and the finish. Saturday might give us a window into who's in for a bigger push of edge is going to be. I don't say move down but sort of moved over to something like teaming with randy again just throwing that out. There is a random thing that they could do where it's not a wins and losses. Don't really matter anymore. Knows more about the dynamic between them whereas if you wanna push a challenger to lashley well you need to win. I mean he's got a pizza. Yeah unless you're continuing on with edge and set unless asian. Seth is actually. That's a good point because it really is large. If you're gonna do two or three matches between these guys right then finish. Saturday doesn't really matter if they have a rematch is as you said. Absolutely the saturdays doesn't necessarily the defining factor it's when the feud ends how they looked and how they've been positioned. Yep and i think he had the mind. The extreme rules is the next pay per view. An odd are you gotta have some like rematches with stipulations is what that pay per view is all about so i feel like out of all the matches on the show this one and maybe the united states championship match. Those are the ones that will scream at me as the tential rematch with step matches very much. We're about to go to another commercial break. Why are you listening to commercial breaks. Why deal with these interruptions when you can become a vip member support the weight. Keller pro wrestling podcasts. Wade keller progressing post shows the torch daily casts and the.

randy randy riddle bobby lashley wrestlemainia Horton riddle mcintyre drew lashley Seth united states Wade keller Keller wrestling
"wade" Discussed on The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

05:17 min | 10 months ago

"wade" Discussed on The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

"And maybe john sina points out the fact that he was brought in to make roman look stronger but unfortunately for roman john's not done and maybe tell that story a little. I mean you know. Yeah i i think the Flirting with the with the non canon world Is definitely risky. I don't think. I don't think they've crossed any lines. I don't think that that anything they've done has been irreputable. Definitely see what you're saying in terms of Cohesiveness like in terms of a real cohesiveness of the story. Like explain this to me. Like i'm like i'm eight years old bike. Explain this to me. Like i haven't watched this before. And why. why is this happening and oso roman socks and it's like well now he used to. Oh i mean why. Didn't you say that so. Yeah i mean. I get it. I think there's more of the story to told. I almost felt watching this. I was like. I wish i got in this like two weeks ago and we could've yeah a jump off. Point could have expanded upon a lot of this. Because i think that this is a strong base coat but i think there's more nuance to go through with this story. Yeah i sometimes you can watch a movie. And you think that there was a ritual scriptwriting team and then some people revised it and then they fired all of them have brought someone else into say the script i like. I said i don't often ultimately matters. You know in terms of selling the bachelor. I i think this was anywhere near the potential but i had very very high hopes for rain. Zena going back and forth on the mike but to me. This felt like a lot of different. People contributed a lot of different ideas from a lot of perspectives. And it just kind of aspects of seena that felt like you have watched the product in a year or that he was still talking to a different roman reigns and they. Did you know even from the moment return. The announcers weren't going what happened to the old roman. This isn't the guy we once knew. Like answers really never said that. It's just been it's almost like a reset in a fresh start. Serious is head of the table and watches and then scenic comes in and does a promo talking about the failure. Roman reigns and how management's is protecting him. It's like three years ago. That was a story. But it's like not at all what that audience on friday nights is watch with last year. Not even close like. There's nobody protecting rains. There's no one as he said marketing. Those giant bars of soap. You've got for teeth you haven't you haven't been embarrassed. You've been protected. There's nothing in the canon of wb smackdown. That rains have been protected. So it felt like coming into greatest hits from two thousand seventeen or you know. Give or take a few years that or tina in the two thousands when everything was catered to the year net because they thought that would carry favor with vance. You don't want to quote have their intelligence insulted with a coherent storyline. They just want insider stuff referenced so again that night. I thought that part was disappointing. But i liked the one-two-three. I liked his demeanor. I like drains given back to seeing baby face like saying. I'm going to complement you. Someone beat beat. Beat somebody who's not who hasn't been beatdown verbally into nothing and it felt like a big match but they got friday. I'm really curious what they do. Friday to kind of bring this all home So what what do you think if you could have. Something happened on friday. Because you just said you wish you got more weeks of this and this is sort of a base coat. They only they only got one more day to paint one more night paint on friday. What what what do you think they're gonna do or would you like to see them. Do to really sell people on signing up for peacock and watching saturday night. I want it to be the last segment of the show on friday and i want it to be like chaos like to the point where it's almost uncomfortable like do. They know they're on tv. This is this is getting way too personal. You know. I want like john sina pointing out the rocks promo on his arm level of uncomfortable. Nece like you know the the like i want. Seen it out there to push roman in a real way like in in in a in a in a real life way. I want seen it get out there and throw some stuff at roman that maybe they didn't talk about before the promo and i want rome into hits back as hard as humanly possible verbally. Like i i want moments like okay. These guys are really sina is testing roman. To see of roman is really ready to be the top guy and roman is not looking for seen as approval anymore in a real life way like. That's what i want to feel going into this. And i wish we had for weeks like to do. I feel like we're getting short changed a little bit. Even though it seems like they gave them plenty of time. I just kind of wanted to have like you said this is the base coat and now let's have two three or four weeks of some back and forth not where we get sick of it but where like you said it. They like it. It'd be nice if they didn't know this week. Where would they were going to be in two weeks but they were excited about the promo journey and instead you know we're just days away now from the match right. Yeah right check out our new twenty twenty one torch vip podcast lineup including everything with rich fan hosted by wade..

john sina roman john seena Zena Nece vance tina rome wade
"wade" Discussed on The Astral Hustle with Cory Allen

The Astral Hustle with Cory Allen

04:08 min | 11 months ago

"wade" Discussed on The Astral Hustle with Cory Allen

"Course in the modern era We have now become Technology has now become so advanced that it's become a potential stimulation for our the cessation of the species. Right and we've also in some of it or certainly the the instigator of varying types of deficiencies with makes having a sound body in a sound mind possible. And so i go back. You know eight years ago. We got into rapid technical lies ation of the farming industry which over the last eight years have stripped out a lot of the natural ingredients in capacities nutrients inside our soil. It's devastated the the soils microbiome at the same as our own. The bacteria culture that which is with these pasteurization factory farming. The use of chemical is ation has really changed the food that we eat and it's accelerated deficiencies manera which have a variety of effects not to mention constant stimulation in Blue light movement away from our circadian rhythms electromagnetic pollution and so when we first looked at nutrition you know in the modern era. We started looking at well. What were the things that were preventing disease from happening. That's where the rda origination came from so you know so much protein to cause to fight berry berry so much vitamin c. so you don't get scurvy etc etc will now through individualization. We can actually look at specifics. Genetics and epigenetics and see which factors are influencing your absorption in utilization of various foods. Which foods that you actually do. Better with and which deficiencies are more likely to occur within you that will lead to an early. Demise are sickness or genetics is only the gun your epigenetics or your lifestyle influences pulls the trigger and so now because of the cost of this has come down we can get very specific on individuals in fact matinee writing a book on that so my own journey originated with will. What were the things that i needed to be healthy into help me. Perform longer and sustain extreme levels of training you know that that was the origination of my journey and then when i ran into digestive health issues after the mister universe contest in two thousand and three i realized there is a whole science to actually how we absorb in utilize transport the food that we eat and so had to rebuild digestive system which is not uncommon today with thirteen percent of the emergency hospital. Visits doing now. Gastrointestinal related illnesses a third of the us population suffering from digestive distress on any given day. Harvard saying that leaky gut is prominent in virtually everybody in the population of north america. So we so how. We absorb in utilize. Our food is just as much as the food we eat. And then the elements that were capable of absorbing as well as dietary choices and so that was where the emergence and then this took on another nature later on which is relevant to. This conversation is that we started to see that. When i worked with a consciousness coach in alignment with the hawkins scale of consciousness. In what we started to see people went up on the scale of consciousness. There were extreme demands on the nervous system and this is been outlined extensively in spiritual literature Whether was jesus sweating blood in the garden of Semi i guess it's called. I forget that word and then or you had the buddha who was going through excruciating pain excruciating pain if you read the historical aspects of various mystics will. Why is that. Well there's a massive increase in electrical current inside.

berry berry Harvard north america us
"wade" Discussed on The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

04:09 min | 1 year ago

"wade" Discussed on The Wade Keller Pro Wrestling Podcast

"The superstars that were built during the pandemic were not given the same Reaction that they might have had been built with fans meaning like kylo riley's rise to a main event star. He didn't get the reaction. That adam cole or john jiji adam cole. Gigan- and pete done where like i mean. Fans were losing their minds to see those three guys but carrying cross and kyle o'reilly became stars during the pandemic era. And i think that this isn't an annex t thing. I think this is across the board that you may find that stars that were built but not built by the fan. Aren't it's not going to be taken for granted by fans when they go back that like you guys told me to cheer for this guy so i will all those stars. I think you're gonna have to reprove themselves. Does that does that. Apply to recall gonzalez in la nights and what categories camera grimes in. That's a great question. No i think you know. I think people are showing love. Raquel gonzalez i think a little bit and i think that with raquel is a little bit different because i think people are aware of how great raquel gonzalez is now. But i do think that she's gonna have to prove her hype you know i think now. She's fine like like people saw her and we're like she should definitely be champion but now that she's champion it's like okay proved to me that i was right. That's what she's got. What with ellie. Night and cameron grimes. People were mad that l. knight won the million dollar championship. But that's okay. He's a bad guy. It's okay to be mad that he won But i think people are so in love with that story. You know the campaign grimes character People are just in love with the camera. Grimes character and i think all the steps leading to that ladder match were right and so i think once the ladder match arrived and people had gone on that ride with l. a. night with cameron grimes with teddy. Bic the ladder match was incredible. You know. I don't. I know i don't think that i think i think more applies to main event people. I don't think that because because la night is not in that sort of championship space. I don't think apply to him. Like i think i think swerve scott is in like a fantastic position because i think people like hit row. We're not asking them to all of a sudden except swerve as a main event player and the same thing by the way for escobar. I think the fact that he's i i think the cruiserweight championship work that he did speaks for itself. You know people love llegado by the way. I think they're going end up being good guys instant answer back in a in a big way and i think that he is on this pace. I personally think that escobar can be a good guy. Annex t world champion in not a lot of time check out our new twenty twenty one. Cw torch vip podcast lineup including everything with rich fan by wade keller. Where on weekends we get together and talk about everything and that includes our popular off the beaten path segment where either rich or i present each other. Something to watch that's off the beaten path and we dissect and analyze react to it. Sometimes it's weird. Sometimes it's nostalgic. Sometimes it's therapeutic. Sometimes it's just fucking something from the past. That would work today. That's not being done but we talk about W w e e w all the current events in professional wrestling also. It's a different format in a fresh podcast dynamic with rich me. Everything with rich fan is part of the new. Pw torture vip podcast lineup. Four annexed speed needs the fresh.

Raquel gonzalez adam cole wade keller kylo riley kyle o'reilly pete Gigan raquel gonzalez three guys gonzalez raquel ellie today john jiji million dollar swerve scott Four vip cross twenty twenty one
"wade" Discussed on Beers and Biceps Podcast With Wade Foster

Beers and Biceps Podcast With Wade Foster

04:28 min | 1 year ago

"wade" Discussed on Beers and Biceps Podcast With Wade Foster

"Like Spiderman of set that straight now. Counts is to go batman like he's a cool guy, but he's just the guy. the flashes he said she said I'll give you that argument society. Roy I'd like to run follow us around the world I hit someone something off in go this done. Then lastly, right three people dead or alive you want to invite round for a beer and a barbecue. Okay Wade WanNa go grady. From a distance I'd WanNa have Michael Jackson they`re Just like. See what he's a little bow. May Be Awesome. Some questions maybe with one of the room of this Guy Justice. I didn't even want to speak to him on. We've you're was about it just see what he's about. DISAG- postal present pasta Elliott live with it. and Michael Jordan. Not just about Mike goes, but from recently. To MJ's Michael Jackson a month from from what's in the last dance recently, com workout izzy an egotist. CONSP- yell might go to. Egotistical Prick or is he ready fucking coat? He's the second lead one. Would have the baby a big fan of. On. Policy Plus. Only GonNA quick fly by the way..

Michael Jackson batman Michael Jordan Roy Wade Wan Mike grady
"wade" Discussed on Beers and Biceps Podcast With Wade Foster

Beers and Biceps Podcast With Wade Foster

03:40 min | 2 years ago

"wade" Discussed on Beers and Biceps Podcast With Wade Foster

"One and welcome to the business and biceps. I'm your host white foster and to begin with a WANNA give high fives around to everyone. Listening to making it to the podcast. This has been in the makings for about a year. Now and I'm happy that we finally have the bull loading so let me tell you real quick. This is all about this. Podcast is created for men who want to look great with it. Talks off a be that guy. Maybe in the changing rooms on weekends or at the beach that tons of people's heads right all the guy who wants to be the Hottest Dad. Picking up the kids from school right. This podcast is created for years. I work with thousands of clients who want to look great and have the rewards of looking great in fading right but they also want to enjoy Bay on the weekends and I go to a family barbecue and just relax and have a drink with friends and family members and enjoy the life not stress about it. This podcast is. It's a that is all possible. This podcast is for people who want to three things one how to get in Greg To how to not let fitness consume you? It doesn't have to be eat sleep train. Repeat you can have balance. Okay and I'm here to teach you that. And lastly number three how to have fun doing a cassette finish It's hoping I want you to enjoy it and look forward to go into the gym. Nick full training heart both have balanced. That's what this put costs about Biz biceps is old about. So I'm excited to have you hit and what we are committing to you is that we are going to be having episode dropping every week maybe even twice a week if you are lucky by went spill all the beans on that yet. You'RE GONNA have to listen later to find out the focus of this show will be regular Q. and A. Episode with my co host. Glad answering all your fitness questions. Round MUSCLE-BUILDING FAT LOSS. And all the stuff you need to get in great shape but also having alive to but more than that. We'll be having guests on round table discussions with friends of mine in the fitness industry leading experts in the world of FAT LOSS. Strength Gain Muscle building as well as talk level athletes with the focus on achieving amazing results. While still being able to have a baby makes we've got some amazing guests lined up with some incredibly funny and crazy off Jim's stories to go along with. Oh the life changing information you'll be getting so get ready to sit back. Relax open a bottle of your best a be ready to laugh and lift along with us. Sorry fool you do me a favor so you don't miss out on the amazing stuff we have coming up. Hit that subscribe button and white for the epic Beers and bites at podcast. Be LAUNCHED PACE. Got Who we just want to say. Thanks thanks for spending the last hour so hope you've learned something from from point a had fun. If you WANNA get more tips and tricks on how to look great in two shots off while still enjoying the is code were no then gun the Lincoln description and join my free facebook for up to date information dots. Appreciate you for being catching it stop..

facebook Nick Jim
"wade" Discussed on Murder and Mystery in the Last Frontier

Murder and Mystery in the Last Frontier

06:42 min | 2 years ago

"wade" Discussed on Murder and Mystery in the Last Frontier

"Twenty year old Joshua Wade and his three passengers to young men and one young woman. Were driving through the streets of anchorage when they came across a woman passed out in the middle of the road. Josh wanted to run over her. But nineteen year old DWAYNE clovinger convinced Josh to stop and let him drag the woman out of the road. Duane left Della Brown near an abandoned shed. The group drove around a while longer and then the three males went to a friend's automotive repair shop a block from the shed where they'd left Della they plan to spend the night at the garage working on cars and drinking whiskey and beer a while after they arrived at the garage Josh announced he was going back to the shed to see if the passed out. Woman had any money on her. Josh returned to the garage several several times during the night once asking for a condom. Witnesses said another time wade returned to the garage covered in blood and and he admitted he'd killed the woman. Several of the young men in the garage claim Josh took them to the shed to show them the body of Della Brown. Most of these young men have police records and were at least partially intoxicated. The Night of Dallas murder. None of them wanted to get involved with the police. Yes and Wade threatened to kill them if they told the police what he had done. No one said anything until a few days after Dulles body was found and police offered an award for information leading to the capture of Dell's killer with the promise of award money. The young men from the garage began again to talk on two separate occasions. Detectives Wire Josh. Wade's acquaintances incent them to talk to Wade Wade not only made incriminating incriminating statements about killing della. But when shown the new story written by Sheila Toomey in the Anchorage Daily News about the six murdered. Anchorage Women Wade suggested to his friends. He had killed three of the women. Police felt they had gathered more than enough evidence against Wade and they arrested did him and charged him with Della Brown's rape and murder as well as six other counts including tampering with evidence. Marianne Dan Henry was named lead prosecutor. In the case. Miss Henry a Harvard graduate was the first woman to prosecute homicides in the state of Alaska. Marcy Danell Assistant Marianne. Marcy was a young inexperienced lawyer. Eager to learn from one of the best prosecutors in the state. Marianne Henry new. The prosecution had almost no forensic evidence they had no weapon and no trace evidence evidence. The Semen Empu care. Found in Della did not belong to Josh. Wade and Wade also did not leave. The bloody fingerprint found in in the shed. The prosecution did have a strong circumstantial case. Though seven. Witnesses came forward to State Wade confessed. He killed Della Woah. The witnesses saw blood on. Wade's clothes. But unfortunately investigators were unable to find the bloody clothes. The prosecution also had the tape of weight. Admitting to two of his friends he killed Della and suggesting he might have killed two other women. Henry New the prosecution witnesses. Witnesses were not solid citizens. They were petty criminals who had been impaired by drugs and alcohol the night of the murder and they had trouble remembering dates times and the sequence of events still they all told virtually the same story and their stories should convince the jury beyond onto reasonable doubt. Josh Wade was very lucky. Though his defense lawyers Jim mccombs and Cindy strout or considered two of the the best in the state and they had a dual pronged approach for securing a non guilty verdict for the client. I since Joshua Wade was talker and a braggart his lawyers put forth the theory that Wade found Dulles dead body in the abandoned shed and then to gain street cred cred with his new criminal acquaintances. He told them he murdered della and even took them to the shed to show them her body as proof. Furthermore more when shown the photo of the murdered women in the paper Josh could not resist claiming he not only murdered della but also murdered two of the other women secondly the defense pointed to a sloppy work by the increase. Police Department in the Anchorage District Attorney's office claiming lay stopped opt investigating before they found the true murderer. Police never discovered who the semen pubic hair and bloody fingerprint belong to and they had several other viable suspects who could have murdered della including her violent boyfriend a month into the trial lead prosecutor. Mary Ann Dan. Henry suddenly stepped down from the case claiming health problems. He dropped the prosecution of Joshua Wade into the lap of the very very inexperienced marcy. McDonnell Carrie Brady another young inexperienced attorney stepped in to assist mcdaniel. Oh neither attorney had ever prosecuted a homicide before and both admitted afterwards. They were in way over their heads. The prosecution in case suffered serious problems before Henry quit but once she was gone. The inexperience of the two prosecutors only highlighted the claims by the defense insisting the prosecution brought the case to trial before they thoroughly investigated it after two and one half months of testimony. The jury eerie deliberated one week before they returned with a verdict they found Josh Will Wade not guilty on all counts except for tampering with evidence and for this offense he received a six and one half year prison sentence minus time he'd already served in December. Two Thousand Four Joshua Wade was released from jail and Anchorage law enforcement officials feared they had just unleashed just a ticking time.

Josh Wade Joshua Wade Della wade Della Brown Marianne Dan Henry Della Woah murder Henry New anchorage Marianne Henry Anchorage Daily News Marcy Danell prosecutor Miss Henry DWAYNE clovinger Duane Police Department Dulles
"wade" Discussed on The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz

The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz

03:56 min | 3 years ago

"wade" Discussed on The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz

"My computer career dot EDU training for a better life. 'cause he's over Magic Johnson. So let's play for the audience Bill. You want to set up the thirty for thirty Mike somebody want to set it up. Don't I have nothing to do with this one? Oh, what happened to this is Stu gods and Billy. They have just been putting a damper on this entire one last dance experience. Now follow. No, no, no, no. No. No. No, no. That can't be abided around here. We're going anti Dwayne Wade thirty for thirty. Absolutely not. That's not what's going on. So thirty for thirty always come out. You know, ten years after something happened five years after something happened and people are interested. Hey, what's going on? You know? I remember that time. It was so great. I remember that athlete. I remember that story. I want to know what's really going on here. I want to know everything, you know. I wanna relive that time. And we said why wait five? In years. Why Dan people want to wave? Now, let's give it to them. So we did a thirty for thirty to honor. Dwayne Wade now. What if I told being a heat life includes playing for two other teams and flirting with another in China? That's Wayne really did want retirement tour. He just created multiple times sold the line of merchandise and even had a bus design to commemorate. That LeBron definitely told him. He was. That without liberal three would go by. That ship ship culture matters. But not as much as being the highest paid player on the team. Benner have is money. Didn't have. A flesh. After accepting a buyout from the Chicago Bulls. He actually made less than he would have took. The Heat's offer. The Golden State buzzer beater was more than skin to soon the biggest hurdle in his career would be climbing up on the screen. Paul Pierce, some pretty good. ESPN films presents one last dance. The Dwayne Wade retirement to where facts are completely ignored that don't fit. I would watch that Phil Mike Ryan is in raged right now. He is I've never seen him so upset Billy and Stu gods. Conspire to use our platform to rip the beloved Wayne. Wade Mike Ryan has been literally singing to Dwayne Wade his own number serenading. Dwayne Wade since he was a kid is a sports fan. Dwayne Wade was on the winning in this town for fifteen damn years raising Mike Ryan, Mike Ryan gets no greater joy out of life. I was just an innocent twenty year old kid, man. Mike Ryan gets no more joy out of his wife than he does shouting into that phone three. Dwayne Wade calls the guest line, you have besmirched and blasphemed Billy. I wouldn't be surprised if Mike punch you right in the face. You know, my biggest regret is that. I thought of the tweet today after where I would have just said thank you next with three instead of the next. But I thought of it a day too late let you hate when that happens when you have the joke. At a time where it would have been funnier before, and you would have been successful story..

Dwayne Wade Phil Mike Ryan Billy Stu gods Wayne Benner Chicago Bulls LeBron Paul Pierce China ESPN Dan twenty year five years ten years
"wade" Discussed on MYfm 104.3

MYfm 104.3

02:45 min | 3 years ago

"wade" Discussed on MYfm 104.3

"With Shelley Wade podcast on iheartradio. Two men was enough. She's a. Much. Golly. She. Tame. What? Yep. Seventeen. Everything. Series. This. Knows in Houston. Mimi. Sorry. The tax cheats. I just saved. Any? Singer. Yeah. Plane. Nightside. Eastside. She's. John us and no set. Music more variety for three my FM..

Shelley Wade Houston John