39 Burst results for "State Supreme Court"

Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on Wisconsin's Afternoon News with John Mercure

Wisconsin's Afternoon News with John Mercure

00:30 min | 7 min ago

Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on Wisconsin's Afternoon News with John Mercure

"President Trump and former vice President Joe Biden go head to head tonight for the first time in a debate. The debate will be somewhat different this year because of the pandemic. CBS's Laura Podesta, reports from Cleveland. Medical experts say tonight's debate is less about swaying, undecided voters and more about encouraging supporter turnout. I think it's unlikely that any butter will change her mind in the end. In the course of the debate, both candidates will be speaking to their constituency is to make sure that they are confirmed and solid. And ready to go. And because of the Corona virus, the audience will be limited and the candidates won't shake hands. Debate starts at eight o'clock You can hear it right here on CNN Jae. In fact, our coverage with Scott Waris starts at six o'clock. The Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing arguments today in a case that could purge some 130,000 people from voter rolls doing pretty well with zoom for oral arguments. It's still not clear if the state Supreme Court will issue a decision on the case and time for the November election. The voter purge lawsuit argues. The State Elections Commission broke the law when it didn't remove voters from the Poles who didn't respond within a month. Two in October, mailing indicating that they may have moved. Even if a voter has had their registration de activated. They can register again later or on election day, provided they show up at the polls. With the correct documentation Jane met there. W T..

Wisconsin Supreme Court President Trump Supreme Court Vice President Joe Biden State Elections Commission Laura Podesta CBS Scott Waris CNN Cleveland Jane
Harris to voters: Don't give up as Trump rushes court pick

AP News Radio

00:56 sec | 23 hrs ago

Harris to voters: Don't give up as Trump rushes court pick

"Democratic vice presidential nominee comelec Harris is urging voters not to be discouraged by GOP efforts to fill a Supreme Court seat before the election Harris says she knows everybody's tired that's how Republican leaders want they want you to feel like you're fight doesn't matter but in swing state North Carolina Harris says Democrats will not give up or give in we will not let the infection that president trump has injected into the presidency and into Congress that has paralyzed our politics and pitted Americans against each other bread to the United States Supreme Court keris sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee which means she'll play a direct role in the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation flights starting in two weeks the Senate's never confirmed a High Court nominees so close to an election Sager make ani Washington

Comelec Harris Donald Trump Congress United States Supreme Court Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Sager Ani Washington GOP President Trump Amy Coney Barrett High Court
Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on Morning Drive with Casey and Elliot

Morning Drive with Casey and Elliot

00:32 sec | 9 hrs ago

Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on Morning Drive with Casey and Elliot

"Affordable care act. We're in the middle of a pandemic. 200,000 people have died. Over seven million people contracted this virus. It is a pre existing condition for those seven million documents in those risk of dying from Wei have a president, United States. It was on the court right now trying to get rid of the affordable Of course, they've tried before and have yet to succeed. Harris went on to say that look, we Democrats were almost all United. We don't like Amy Conti baring it all. There's a lot on the line, not only the fact that our democracy would dictate that 36 days before the election when people are actually voting right now. That President the new president be in a position of being able to nominate who would be the next lifetime appointment to the United States Supreme Court people are literally almost a million people. You know, I asked Sean.

President Trump United States Supreme Court United States Amy Conti WEI Sean Harris
Boston - Charges dropped against Patriots owner Kraft

NPR News Now

00:50 sec | 5 d ago

Boston - Charges dropped against Patriots owner Kraft

"A win for Patriots owner Robert Kraft in his fight against the solicitation charges. In Florida NPR's Tovia Smith reports prosecutors have dropped the charges saying they couldn't proceed since courts a blocked the use of video allegedly showing craft paying for sex in a massage parlor. Robert Kraft was one of dozens arrested last year on misdemeanor charges in a sting aimed at an alleged human trafficking ring. Last month and appeals court ruled that the video taken by hidden cameras was extreme surveillance and couldn't be used in court Florida's attorney general declined to appeal to the State Supreme Court fearing. A decision that might limit future law enforcement efforts without the videos prosecutors say they couldn't prove their case against the Patriots. Owner craft is asking the recordings be destroyed so they cannot be leaked. He's still faces sanctions from the NFL Tovia Smith NPR News,

Robert Kraft Patriots Tovia Smith Florida State Supreme Court NPR Solicitation NFL Attorney
Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on Mornings on the Mall with Brian Wilson

Mornings on the Mall with Brian Wilson

01:05 min | 9 hrs ago

Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on Mornings on the Mall with Brian Wilson

"Good morning to you. 707 W Washington comes coming up this morning. 7 35, Virginia Republican Party chairman. 805 We talk to Corey Lewandowski about what It's like to prepare Donald J. Trump for debate and a 35 Susan joins US colonies with Mary. Good morning, joining us now on sponsor of ski senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation Manager Election Law Reform Initiative and former commissioner for the Federal Election Commission from 6 to 7 hunts. Good morning. Welcome back. I'm very high revenge. Good morning. So hanz. I don't know if you've seen all of the video. Yet. They just released another one last night Project Veritas has put together a dive in to an investigation into alleged ballot harvesting by supporters of Ilhan Omar in Minnesota appears as if this happened during the primary. There's a whistleblower Omar Jamal. And there's testimony from him in these videos. He called representative Ilhan Omar's alleged ballot harvesting an open secret and he discussed cash for votes scheme. There is video of money changing hands. Hey, said she will do anything that you could do to get elected, and she has hundreds of people on the streets doing this. This is not unusual, is it? This is this is an open secret in a lot of our cities across the country, isn't it? It is. In fact, this exact same kind of thing happened. Not too far away just a few years ago in east Chicago, Indiana, where there it actually was discovered it was investigated. People were prosecuted. The election was overturned and we know all of this because the State Supreme Court described what happened and particularly in this video, there's evidence that they were targeting elderly Somali immigrant, elderly Somali immigrant immigrant because they're the ones that could take advantage of, and that's exactly what was going on in the Indiana case, too, and, you know All of this is a violation of state law. But there are a number of federal laws that were violated as the FBI and the justice far but need to immediately open up an investigation of this. Meanwhile, some states do legally allow what we call ballot harvesting. If you could. Would you describe how ballot harvesting works? Sure, looking about half the states. You can return your absentee ballot yourself by personally delivering into election officials remember of your family can but other states unfortunately, Have legalized vote harvesting, which means they made it legal for anybody any stranger to show up at your front door and say, Hey, I'll deliver your ballot for you. And what that does is As we can see in these videos, it puts something real valuable. A ballot in the hands of campaign staffers and political consultants, political guns for hire, all of whom have a stake in the outcome of the election that ends up they end up coercing and pressuring voters. They take their ballots and Phil amounts of voters doing it and other cases like in North Carolina. Two years ago, a congressional race there they tamper with the ballot. You know, if you voted for the wrong person, they'll change the ballot. They'll put in jail, though. Forge your signature and put in a new Ah, ballot. I mean, it's just stupid. It's stupid for a state to put to make it legal for these kind of people to be able to pick up your ballot. So there seems to be this perception, and it's almost agreed upon on both sides. The Democrats are the ones who benefit from the shenanigans. Why, Why did Democrats tend to benefit from this or what does everyone think that it's Democrats who benefit from this? Well, look, we maintain on election fraud database. You know, the Heritage Foundation. We've We've talked about this and look, that database is got both Republicans and Democrats, Um in who committed this crime, But I do have to say the majority of the cases. Tend to be Democrats committing it. And often times as you can see from this case, remember, they're talking about this happening. As you said in the primary, many of the cases involved People within the Democratic Party stealing from other Democrats from Republicans, in fact, again, going back to that East Chicago Indiana case There it was again it was a primary was a democratic primary, where they were stealing boats. Yeah, By the way, I'd like to see you behind on Mars Primary opponent speak up about this. His name's Antone Melton, Mo and brand. A good campaign against Han Omar raised about as much money as she did for million dollars each. Yet no words from that candidates so far on whether or not that primary was stolen by virtue of illegal actions in this process now. Meanwhile, Hans is not only There. We have concerns in Ilhan Omar's race. But in voting nationwide, we're going talking a little bit with rich Anderson from the Republican Party of Virginia. But in Fairfax County, we get news in the last week that some voters were sent 1400 of them at least were sent duplicate ballot by the Commonwealth of the State is insisting It'll be fine. Once you send one ballot in the system recognises that you have voted and won't let you do it again. But it is kind of a big deal right if people are receiving multiple ballots at their home address. Oh, yeah, It sure is. And yeah, well, let's hope they're system is good enough to detect it. But look, just just a week or so ago, the public interest legal foundation. It was 10 by Christian Adams. You guys talking about? Look, they just released a report. They cruise through and researched state voter registration records. And you know what they found in the last two federal election they found over 80,000 people across the country who cast Second votes..

Ilhan Omar Indiana Virginia Republican Party Federal Election Commission Heritage Foundation Omar Jamal Donald J. Trump Corey Lewandowski United States Washington Senior Fellow Chairman FBI Chicago Christian Adams State Supreme Court Project Veritas Commissioner Democratic Party Fairfax County
Ruth Bader Ginsburg lies in repose at US Supreme Court steps

KYW 24 Hour News

01:14 min | 5 d ago

Ruth Bader Ginsburg lies in repose at US Supreme Court steps

"Trump says he wants a replacement for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg confirmed to this to the Supreme Court ahead of election Day so that a full court can weigh in on any campaign related litigation. This is Mourners pay tribute debater Ginsberg at the Supreme Court. More from CBS's Debra Rodriguez. A public mourning period's began for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who lies in repose, a TTE the top of the building steps. CBS is Skyler Henry Ensberg with remembered as a trail blazer and a fierce advocate for women's rights. This was just a skins Berg's life's work. To insist that the Constitution deliver on its promise that we the people would include all the people. Chief Justice John Roberts said Ginsberg's opinions will guide the court for decades to come. She will live on in what she did to improve the law and the lives of all of us. And yet still, Ruth is gone. We grieve President Trump says it's important to confirm Ginsberg's replacement before the November election. Think it's better if you go before the election? Because I think this this scam that the Democrats are pulling it's a scam. The scam will be before the United States Supreme Court says he'll announce his selection Saturday top

United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ginsberg President Trump CBS Chief Justice John Roberts Skyler Henry Ensberg Debra Rodriguez Berg
Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on WBBM Morning News

WBBM Morning News

00:38 min | 10 hrs ago

Fresh update on "state supreme court" discussed on WBBM Morning News

"Now, a lot of folks are doing a great job with that, but we want to make that. Practice uniform of the biggest changes under the relax guidelines endorse eating at restaurants will be limited to 40% capacity instead of 25% 5 33. Now the White House has millions of Corona virus. Rapid tests have been distributed nationwide, The president says the government will send out 150 million new rapid tests 18 million for nursing homes. 15 million for assisted living facilities. It starts with six drops of liquid White House testing point man, Admiral Brett Giroir demonstrated the news. Bob, which promises results in 15 minutes without a machine. And that is the test the surgeon testing supplies comes his vice president. Pence notes. Positivity rates are now increasing in 10 states, the American people Should anticipate that cases will rise in the days ahead. Stephen Portnoy, CBS News Democratic vice presidential nominee, Kamala Harris is urging voters not to be discouraged by GOP average to fill a Supreme Court seat before the election, Harris says she knows everybody's tired. That's how Republican leaders want it. They want you to feel like your fight. Doesn't matter. But in swing state, North Carolina, Harris says Democrats will not give up or give in. We will not let the infection that President Trump has injected into the presidency and into Congress. That has paralyzed our politics and pitted Americans against each other. Spread to the United States Supreme Court. Harris sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which means she will play a direct role in the Amy Cockney Barrett confirmation fight starting in two weeks..

Kamala Harris United States Supreme Court President Trump Vice President Admiral Brett Giroir White House Amy Cockney Barrett Senate Judiciary Committee BOB Pence Stephen Portnoy North Carolina Corona CBS Congress GOP Donald Trump
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Honored At The Supreme Court

Morning Edition

04:55 min | 6 d ago

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Honored At The Supreme Court

"To imagine that something can be different and suggesting that Ruth Bader Ginsburg achieved that. Speaking to a rather small group of friends and family and the socially distant times in the Great Hall of the United States. Supreme Court hears Chief Justice John Roberts, Jane Jim, the entire Ginsberg family. On behalf of all the justices, spouses of the justices. The entire Supreme Court family. I offer our help heartfelt condolences. The loss of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. That loss is widely shared. We know that it falls most heavily on the family. Justice Ginsburg's life was one of the many versions of the American dream. Her father was an immigrant from Odessa. Mother was born four months after her family arrived from Poland. Mother later worked as a bookkeeper in Brooklyn. Ruth used to ask What is the difference between a bookkeeper in Brooklyn and a Supreme Court justice? Her answer one generation. It has been said that Ruth wanted to be an opera virtuoso. It became a rock star instead. But she chose along. Subjected to discrimination in law school and the job market because she was a woman, Ruth would grow to become the leading advocate fighting such discrimination in court. She was not an opera star, but she found her stage right behind me in our courtroom. There. She won famous victories that helped move our nation closer. Equal justice under law. To the extent that women are now a majority in law school's not simply a handful. Later she became a star on the bench. She sat for 27 years. For 183 majority concurring and descending opinions. Will steer the court for decades. They are written with the unaffected grace of precision. A voice in court and in our conference room was soft. When she spoke, people listened. Among the words that best describe Ruth. Tough, brave fighter a winner but also fought for Careful.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Supreme Court Ruth Chief Justice John Roberts Brooklyn United States Odessa Poland Ginsberg Jane Jim
Ruth Bader Ginsburg's army of clerks to stand guard at the Supreme Court

Morning Edition

02:30 min | 6 d ago

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's army of clerks to stand guard at the Supreme Court

"To the United States Supreme Court. Her body is arriving now in a black hearse in front of the Supreme Court building here in Washington, D. C. It will be brought inside for a memorial service in a building where she took part in historic rulings over more than a quarter of a century. We want to tell you that her former law clerks and dark suits and dark masks have lined the marble steps in front of the court. Supreme Court police officers are about to carry the casket into the building. Her foiled fellow justices, of course, were there along with court colleagues and family and friends for what is the first of several services. To honor her life and her legacy. Ginsberg lived 87 years was born in the Depression and lived well into the 21st century and her influence on American history spread over decades. Well before her appointment to the Supreme Court. As a lawyer in the 19 seventies, she argued a string of cases before the court, pressing it to recognize the equality of the sexes. As a justice, she authored landmark rulings herself and we're going to bring that service live. NPR's Daniel Kurtz Leben is outside the court. Now as Supreme Court police officers have taken the casket to carry it inside. Daniel, What are you able to see in here? Well from a distance. I can see those. There's just started to carry the casket. And right now, now where I am I'm on the south side of the port, where people are lined up socially distance to to pay their respects to her later this morning, and it's it's really hard for me to convey to you how much she personally met so many people here. I want to play a piece of tape for you. I spoke to a woman named Shaft Collins. She flew here from Colorado. People came from far and wide to come to this today on she told me just how much theater Ginsberg meant to her. Here she is. I have struggled in my own life and her achievements. Let me know that I actually might be able to achieve something in life. I was a homeless veteran for years. And although I'm now late to school, I hope to go to law school one day, so I'm now pursuing my bachelor's, and that's all from having been on the streets after serving in the Army. Yeah, There are so many people who I talked to who who start crying when they talked about received organs, especially women. She she meant so much to a lot of these people.

United States Supreme Court Supreme Court Daniel Kurtz Leben Ginsberg Shaft Collins NPR Washington Depression Army Colorado
Robert Kraft likely to be cleared on sex solicitation charges

Ron St. Pierre

00:41 sec | Last week

Robert Kraft likely to be cleared on sex solicitation charges

"Said yesterday they will not appeal the court ruling throwing out video recordings allegedly showing New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft paying for massage parlors, sex acts, making it likely that misdemeanor charges against him and other customers will be dropped. Prosecutors decided that if they challenge last month's Florida fourth District Court of Appeals decision to the state Supreme Court and lost, it could have quote broader negative implications on future law enforcement investigations. That's according to the Florida attorney general's office, So this looks like it ends the whole mess with Robert Kraft and of West Palm Beach Road,

Robert Kraft District Court Of Appeals Supreme Court New England Patriots Florida West Palm Beach Road Attorney
Mourners pay tribute to RBG outside Supreme Court

Family Financial Focus

01:07 min | Last week

Mourners pay tribute to RBG outside Supreme Court

"Continue to gather outside the Supreme Court and tributes pour in for the late Justice Ginsburg W. B. C Suzanne Saz Ville got reaction from a former justice on the state Supreme Judicial Court. She just learned large one thing. No one could argue with this that Ruth beater. Ginsberg inspired women. When you see someone like that on the bench, it really makes you feel Yeah, I can do that Retired state Supreme Court Justice. Fernand RV. Duff Flee, who goes by Nan met Ginsberg as a member of the National Association of Women Judges and remembers one day when Ginsberg warmed her heart I had given her a pin. In one of these times, she looked at me, and she paused for quite a few drinks. And then she said, I still where your pin man and I just thought it was amazing Five memories aside roughly a sad that Ginsberg was burdened by concerns she would be replaced on the court before November's election. She knew her life was so public and had a deep sense of obligation to the world. To live as long as she could so that this wouldn't happen. Suzanne Sauce Bill W. B. C. Boston's news radio. The

Ginsberg Supreme Court Supreme Judicial Court Suzanne Saz Ville Suzanne Sauce Bill W. B. C. Bo Justice Ginsburg W. B. C Ruth Beater Fernand Rv Duff Flee National Association Of Women NAN
China announces regulations for 'unreliable entity' list

AP News Radio

00:57 sec | Last week

China announces regulations for 'unreliable entity' list

"President trump is urging the Senate to consider without delay his upcoming nomination to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in a Saturday morning tweet president trump writes we were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us adding the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court justices we have this obligation without delay yes for who the president's nominee might be presidents obviously put forward to labor secretary Kaylee McEntee says their original S. you know their tax release you know there are people who respect the words of the constitution and the plain text of statutes with just over six weeks until the presidential election democratic nominee Joe Biden says there should be no nomination or vote until the next president is decided the Republican controlled Senate refused even call hearings for president Obama's pick Merrick garland in the months ahead of the twenty sixteen election Ben Thomas Washington

Donald Trump Senate Ruth Bader Ginsburg President Trump Kaylee Mcentee Joe Biden Barack Obama Merrick Garland Ben Thomas Washington Supreme Court Secretary
Trump to Senate: Vote 'without delay' on his high court pick

AP News Radio

00:59 sec | Last week

Trump to Senate: Vote 'without delay' on his high court pick

"President trump is urging the Senate to consider without delay his upcoming nomination to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in a Saturday morning tweet president trump writes we were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us adding the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court justices we have this obligation without delay yes for who the president's nominee might be presidents obviously put forward to labor secretary Kaylee McEntee says their original S. you know their tax release you know there are people who respect the words of the constitution and the plain text of statutes with just over six weeks until the presidential election democratic nominee Joe Biden says there should be no nomination or vote until the next president is decided the Republican controlled Senate refused even call hearings for president Obama's pick Merrick garland in the months ahead of the twenty sixteen election Ben Thomas Washington

Donald Trump Senate Ruth Bader Ginsburg President Trump Kaylee Mcentee Joe Biden Barack Obama Merrick Garland Ben Thomas Washington Supreme Court Secretary
Trump to Senate: Vote 'without delay' on his high court pick

AP News Radio

00:59 sec | Last week

Trump to Senate: Vote 'without delay' on his high court pick

"President trump is urging the Senate to consider without delay his upcoming nomination to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in a Saturday morning tweet president trump writes we were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us adding the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court justices we have this obligation without delay yes for who the president's nominee might be presidents obviously put forward to labor secretary Kaylee McEntee says their original S. you know their tax release you know there are people who respect the words of the constitution and the plain text of statutes with just over six weeks until the presidential election democratic nominee Joe Biden says there should be no nomination or vote until the next president is decided the Republican controlled Senate refused even call hearings for president Obama's pick Merrick garland in the months ahead of the twenty sixteen election Ben Thomas Washington

Donald Trump Senate Ruth Bader Ginsburg President Trump Kaylee Mcentee Joe Biden Barack Obama Merrick Garland Ben Thomas Washington Supreme Court Secretary
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court Justice, dead at 87

Todd Schnitt

00:38 sec | Last week

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court Justice, dead at 87

"Of a Supreme Court justice Only Scylla. Sarah, the Supreme Court says Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died of med attacks pancreatic cancer. Fallon Lee, where the second woman to serve on the United States Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg. I believe the nation is getting a justice. Who will be a guardian of liberty for all Americans and an insurer of equal justice under law, a staunch advocate of women's rights, Ginsberg devoted much of her legal legacy fighting for gender equality and civil rights.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg United States Supreme Court Fallon Lee Bill Clinton Sarah Ginsberg President Trump
Wisconsin's top court keeps Green Party off ballot, allows absentee balloting to resume

Afternoon News with Tom Glasgow and Elisa Jaffe

00:09 sec | 2 weeks ago

Wisconsin's top court keeps Green Party off ballot, allows absentee balloting to resume

"Can again be printed in Wisconsin after the state Supreme Court ruled Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins would not appear on the ballot. Brian Clark ABC News

Howie Hawkins Supreme Court Brian Clark Green Party Abc News Wisconsin
Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

Morning Edition

04:00 min | 2 weeks ago

Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

"All right. Amid the uproar over the president's pandemic response, A new item appeared on the White House schedule yesterday, and it was very clearly a change of subject. I am announcing 20 additions to my original list. Of candidates for the United States Supreme Court That list served him well and energizing conservatives. Back in 2016, NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg reports on what he is offering in 2020. Administration insiders, Khun See that this list of 20 names is a validly more political. While the previous three lists included just one elected politician and no administration officials, this one includes three U. S. Senators all fire breathing conservative Republicans, Arkansas's Tom Cotton. Ted Cruz of Texas and Missouri's Josh Holly. All three have directly or indirectly criticized Chief Justice John Roberts for not being conservative enough, and all three have presidential ambitions. Indeed, Holly tweeted that he's not really interested in a seat on the court. Also on the list are a top White House lawyer and to top officials from the Trump Justice Department, including former solicitor General Noel Francisco who've carried Trump's legal banner in the courts. Perhaps the most interesting name on the list is Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and is considered perhaps the best legal advocate among the very able lawyers who practice regularly before the Supreme Court. Clement has an added value. He's represented a variety of conservative interests before the court from gun rights advocates to religious groups to groups opposed to Obama care. As for federal judges on the list, they're all trump appointees with records hostel through abortion, voting rights legislation, LGBT rights and regulation of business and the environment. According to sources involved in compiling the list. The White House counsel, as is usual, presided over the process. But White House chief of staff Mark Meadows was aggressively involved and even the president's son in law. Jared Kushner, got into the act, as did some conservative senators like Holly, who pushed back against including Federal appeals court judge Naomi Row because of some of her writings prior to becoming a judge, But as a judge, she's written some of the lower court decisions most supportive of Trump. With the latest list of 20 new names now added to the 45 names on his previous lists. Trump on Wednesday blasted Democrat Joe Biden for failing to release a comparable list and the president issued a dark warning about the future. If Biden is elected and has an opportunity to pick one or more justices, radical justices will erase the Second Amendment. Silence political speech and require taxpayers to fund extremely term abortion. In fact, the courts five conservative justices are all in good health and two of them. Trump appointees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh are the youngest members of the court at 53 55, respectively. The only ailing justices 87 year old Ruth Bader Ginsburg, leader of the court's liberal wing, who's being treated for 1/5 bout with cancer, her second cancer in less than two years. Should she leave the court. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has said that the GOP would fill the sea even though McConnell four years ago refused for nearly a year. To allow hearings on President Obama's nominee to fill the seat of Justice Antonin Scalia, who died unexpectedly in February of 2016. McConnell's justification for blocking the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland was that the voters have a right to make their views known in the presidential election. A rationale that GOP leader is not embracing this year. Nina Totenberg NPR NEWS Washington

Supreme Court President Trump White House Josh Holly Donald Trump Paul Clement Nina Totenberg Trump Justice Department Joe Biden Chief Justice John Roberts Barack Obama Mitch Mcconnell Judge Merrick Garland GOP Justice Antonin Scalia NPR Khun See Ruth Bader Ginsburg Tom Cotton
Green Party can stay on Pennsylvania's ballot, judge says

KYW 24 Hour News

00:48 sec | 2 weeks ago

Green Party can stay on Pennsylvania's ballot, judge says

"A judge is ordering elections officials to put the Green Party candidate for president on Pennsylvania's ballot, turning back a court challenge by the Democrats. Here We are just eight weeks before an election in key battleground state, Pennsylvania Democrats had contended that the Green Party's presidential and vice presidential nominees Did not formally submit candidate affidavits in August to go along with all the paperwork containing voter signatures to get on the ballot. The Green Party candidate is Howie Hawkins. Back in 2016 Donald Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton by more than 44,000 Boat votes here in the Commonwealth. The Green Party's nominee that here Jill Stein drew nearly 50,000 votes and appeal to the state Supreme Court is possible.

Green Party Democrats Howie Hawkins Pennsylvania Supreme Court Donald Trump Jill Stein Hillary Clinton President Trump Commonwealth
Justice Department Intervenes To Take Over Trump's Defense In Defamation Lawsuit

Morning Edition

00:47 sec | 2 weeks ago

Justice Department Intervenes To Take Over Trump's Defense In Defamation Lawsuit

"The Justice Department says it's moving to take over President Trump's defense in a defamation lawsuit brought by writer Egion Carol. She claims Trump sexually assaulted her in the 19 nineties. NPR's Ryan Lucas says Carroll's attorney is criticizing the move. She called the department's arguments that Trump was acting as president when he denied Carol's allegations is shocking. And she also noted that last month, the state Supreme Court judge had ruled that curls lawsuit could proceed and that Trump was on the verge of being required to produce documents to produce a DNA sample and to sit for a deposition in the case, which would of course Be under oath. She accuses the president here of using the power of the U. S government to try to, she says, evade responsibility for what amounts to a private misconduct. NPR's Ryan Lucas

Donald Trump Ryan Lucas Egion Carol President Trump NPR Justice Department Carroll Supreme Court Writer Attorney
US high court denies bid to restore Greens on Montana ballot

AP News Radio

00:42 sec | Last month

US high court denies bid to restore Greens on Montana ballot

"Hi Mike Ross you're reporting the Supreme Court denies a Republican bankrolled effort that threatened to siphon votes from democratic candidates in Montana the U. S. Supreme Court has denied a bid by the Montana secretary of state to restore Green Party candidates to the November ballot Republican secretary of state Corey Stapleton filed a motion Monday to stop a state Supreme Court order that granted the request of more than five hundred sixty people to remove their names from ballot petitions justice Elena Kagan died Stapleton's motion the Republican Party bank rolled the one hundred thousand dollars signature gathering effort and violated finance laws by not reporting it the Montana Green Party did not support the effort hi Mike Rossio

Mike Ross U. S. Supreme Court Corey Stapleton Elena Kagan Green Party Mike Rossio Montana Republican Party
New York's Plastic Bag Ban Survives Lawsuit, But Not Unscathed

Vickie Allen and Levon Putney

00:32 sec | Last month

New York's Plastic Bag Ban Survives Lawsuit, But Not Unscathed

"New York state's state's plastic plastic bag bag ban ban went went into into effect effect on on March March 1st, 1st, although although it's it's been been largely largely unenforced unenforced during during covert covert 19 19 and and various various lawsuits lawsuits trying trying to to block block it, it, But But that's that's about about to to change, change, State State Supreme Court Judge Gerald Connolly ruled today. State regulators went too far in allowing stores to hand out thicker plastic bags than the ones that have been clogging up landfills, getting tangled in trees and accumulating in lakes and seas. Department of Environmental Conservation said it will provide the necessary 30 Day notice to stores and businesses that the state will begin soon to enforce the ban.

State State Supreme Court Gerald Connolly Department Of Environmental Co New York
Pennsylvania asks State Supreme Court to extend mail-in voting deadlines

KYW 24 Hour News

01:11 min | Last month

Pennsylvania asks State Supreme Court to extend mail-in voting deadlines

"Wolf is asking the Supreme Court to extend mail in ballot deadlines. Cable W's Mike Doherty has more on rulings in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and what voters can expect in those states. Mail in ballots will be sent to every registered voter in New Jersey a month before the election, and the deadline for votes to be counted is extended by two days because Governor Murphy expects delays with the post office results here and across our nation showed that making It's easier to vote does not favor anyone Political party, but it does favor democracy. No voter should fear for the sanctity of their ballot in Pennsylvania. Voters need to request a mail in ballot and those must be returned by eight PM on election day because of concerns raised by the Postal Service. Pennsylvania Secretary of State Cathy Back far wants to extend the deadline by three days to account for delays in the mail. It will likely be a court battle over that. Voters are encouraged to apply for mail in ballots at least two weeks before the election officials say, the sooner the better. Both New Jersey and Pennsylvania will give voters the option to mail ballots or drop them off at various county locations. And, of course, there will be polling places open in both states.

Pennsylvania New Jersey Supreme Court Mike Doherty Governor Murphy Cathy Back Wolf Political Party Postal Service
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

07:13 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"If he or she wanted to cut here tonight or tomorrow morning I'm. Sure some of especially those starving for money, and probably with a pet up customer demand. would start. Doing so. Paul said this is much, but it felt like at the end up, roy except. When prohibition ended, everybody opened up instantaneously and it was. It was ending a long period of time. It required an act of the constitution. We had a the constitute. No wasn't a constitutional amendment. I think it was just the bull stead act. Not even clear that I know it was a slow process and you can. What was coming in knew it was coming into what was coming. The difference here of course is also. Many people still are not going to want to do it. I'M NOT GONNA. Feel comfortable. Going into some businesses and some business operators will also not be comfortable this I said. We're we're if we put this back? In the hands of people decide for themselves. That's where. It all we're getting gain. Reports are a lot of listeners I don't think we this guy's name, but a guy that we know who used to work for saying out in the lake country, a number of bars are all opening tonight, and they have the ability to put the word through their social media through facebook pages, and so on, so yeah I, some of these places that they know the customer action instantly, if for no other reason to celebrate the regaining of their freedom. I do this that some of these communities that had all these cops it. Forcing these orders, they might immediately switch over to the drunk driving patrol. Specially if you live in a community, nothing's open it up yet and get the car here yet. We gotTA drive down. My here's a barrel out there. You even know where I'll go my is. No? It's not your Oshkosh. You say that because they'll boulevard Nash Ashkar you. Wonder why there must be some time I think that there's a town of l.. Goldman your ashish, the extra community. They'll Gomez near Lake. Michigan. Either North or South Aqui Wani, but in that area it's all it's near. I know all those places like six twenty four news talk seven thirty W. I say it's time for rapid traffic I ninety. Philip more free than an hour ago Oh. Yeah, it's huge! Not a bit like I just expect that the masters in Milwaukee I still gotta come back with something. Yeah, you're just waiting for the other shooter fall. If that does happen though that will divide the left if for example people who own and operate bars restaurants, which is often lefty clientele in Milwaukee, if their competitors in Waukesha County, and so on are allowed to open, and they can't. That will divide. The liberal community on this, and if this thing is left back to individual choices, individual people in individual communities making decisions for themselves. That's the way it ought to be at as. Churches are going to be another one better divided. I think someone that. Extreme social distancing in place and others are GONNA pop opened the doors and say comeback in in start. But people who have a problem with that at least will have a problem with churches. You're not with government telling them what it is to do. We're a country that's premised on freedom and. Given, the fact that there's only according to GSI online is only eleven states that are still operating under orders that means thirty nine or not. World? Not and I understand. New York is different from Montana. That's precisely the point. Wisconsin's numbers have been extremely low on a per capita basis, and therefore has not been state that is needed to continue to be under these orders both states that. Allowed them to expire at are returning to a sense of. Normalcy and we're now in this period, which are order struck down, but who knows whether or not anything from local communities will come into. Follow it I would think most of the state has been saying repetitive. They will not. Forty one northbound ten minutes, but you say Paul. The sit stay. Stay was not put in place. The state legislature asked for a six-day stay of the ruling. The Supreme Court did not grant it. Because they just struck down, they struck it down. They did not grant the. Request for the for this for the six stay, and I go back and reread the ruling to to clarify that, but I do not believe that the six day stay was granted by the legislature was read by the court. It was requested by the legislature, but do not believe we only added it. In fact, the court ruling stated we trust that. That the legislature and governor. We're prepared to respond to this accordingly, so yeah I mean you only institute a stay of an order? If you're GONNA have a follow ruling behind it, so they would have had. You would have done the stay at the time that they heard the case. One would have thought right and again the lines you've made a decision. In, it's ruling said that the legislature and governor have had more than enough time to come up with something on their own to replace this. If they want to do so so I as far as I know. In my reading of the order, there is no six day stay. That's been place at all. It was requested, but it was not granted all right traffic news eleven thirty wins Mark belling late afternoon. Show Dan. We've run longer. We have a major story. This Afternoon Wisconsin State Supreme Court, did struck strike down the order issued by Tony vs Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm struck it down as being issued beyond the authority that she had in her emergency. rulemaking authority Paul says that we've had a number of questions for people under the impression is a six day. Stay in place. There is not as I mentioned earlier. I'm going to read the language again from the ruling as well. The legislature in filing its lawsuit asked the court to stay the ruling for six days meaning. That the court's order would not take effect for six days. I will quote from the order. We have declared rights under the law where where we have concluded that emergency order twenty. Eight is invalid and therefore for Sibal, although a very unusual request on April, twenty, twenty twenty, the legislature asked this court to issue a temporary injunction of agency order twenty-eight, but then requested a stay of that injunction for at least six days. We perceived this request is being grounded in a concern for an orderly transition from order twenty eight to offer rule however. More than two weeks have passed since we began our consideration of this case, therefore we trust that the legislature and palm placed this interest of the people in Wisconsin. I have been working together in good faith to establish lawful rule that addresses covid nineteen, and it's devastating effects in Wisconsin people, businesses and other institutions need to know how to proceed and what is. is expected of them. Therefore, we place the responsibility for the future lawmaking with the legislature in DHS. It belongs in other words. They're not issuing an injunction. It's up to the legislature governor to come up with on their own what it is that they want to do. We're getting calls from people all over the state saying they popped open the doors so. Each is going to be a little bit different, but.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Milwaukee Paul twenty twenty Oshkosh South Aqui Wani roy Gomez near Lake facebook Mark belling Nash Ashkar Waukesha County DHS Philip GSI Michigan Sibal Goldman
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

04:11 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"To contain I didn't say that it exactly right, but y'all know what I mean. But you got in there. You write these things still. This is not time square after world. War Two ended. I wouldn't be. A Trade that moron? I wouldn't be swapping spit with strangers. Well I mean. When would you be I? I mean short of like kissing somebody in a bar I mean. Well I wouldn't want you be doing any of that anyway. I I? Well, I you Paul, ask the question of Water Street. I, wonder if any milwaukee bars will, until they get some direction from the city and the county as to whether they'll be a replacement, order would open. They're all afraid of losing. Their liquor licenses the big issue in a community like Milwaukee were another places that would turn around and give some other edict. Edict, but again unless something's been issued in the last few minutes I don't believe from the city of Milwaukee Milwaukee County they put anything out solve. If there isn't a local order in place, there is nothing that would stop a place of opening its doors anywhere on Wisconsin again. If some small community somewhere has just issued some order that would apply to them. I would think only Milwaukee and Madison would have been ready to pop anything out immediately. After the State Supreme Court I had ruled, and maybe they're in a wait and see. Mode but lacking an order issued by Milwaukee tonight there wouldn't be anything that I where that would stop Milwaukee. Bar from opening at stores, and were getting sorts of reports, facebook and social media, and so odd that some bars in the regions, and I would guess some restaurants opening up in some of the restaurants that have been open only for carry out. They can now let the people come in and sit down and all of that. I'm sure many of these places aren't staffed up to be able to start anything. If that H at all, but Somebody's got a one share salon if he or she wanted to cut here tonight or tomorrow morning I'm. Sure some of especially those starving for money, and probably with a pet up customer demand. would.

Milwaukee Milwaukee County State Supreme Court facebook Wisconsin Paul Madison
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

04:11 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Pay your bills cash contests word. I don't know what do you say about somebody that already was in a buyer. By six o'clock the order was issued at five really was issued at five with that sense of desperation on that I can see some women wanted to get to the hair saliva right away. If any of them crack open their doors I have. You noticed that in the pharmacies those initially it was the toilet paper. That's wiped out. It's all the hair dye. That's way down boss all the gesture men box. How will you know that I mean that whole area? They've got signs up restricting the purchases of that in the same way they did the the toilet paper still come and go you go in some days is a lot of it in there and the next day well meets a huge issue and that's not because of government eating that's simply Concerned about the meat packing plants. Some of which have shut out and whether or not they're going to be able to crank it out but need is starting to show up diminish supply again. That's not particularly government issue or did that just the problems you need to the meat packing industry. Let me give you the chance to win the thousand bucks. The word is couch. C O U C H Couch. You have until seven o'clock text that into two hundred two hundred installation thousand dollars in cash. You'll get a text confirming entry plus iheartradio Info Standard Data and message rates. Apply in this. They should wide contest again. I don't want to be unclear about this. I don't know of any local communities including Milwaukee that have quickly issued their own order and I don't know if any would do so tonight and I live in off. They will do it. But that is a potential possibility and if a local community issues an edict. It's an edict until somebody says it's not illegal one but at the moment there is no rule in place in the state of Wisconsin. The whole order from Andhra. Bob Is right now. Struck down by the state. Supreme Court is being unconstitutional because it exceeded the authority that the law allows these emergency orders to contain. And say that it exactly right. But y'all know what I mean but you got in there you write these things still. This is not time square after world. War Two ended. I wouldn't be a trade that Moron I wouldn't be swapping spit with strangers. I mean when would you be I? I mean short of like kissing somebody in a bar I mean well I wouldn't want you be doing any of that anyway. I I well. I you Paul. Ask the question of Water Street. I wonder if any milwaukee bars will until they get some direction from the city and the county as to whether they'll be a replacement order would open. They're all afraid of losing their liquor licenses. That's the big issue in a community like Milwaukee or another places that would turn around and give some other edict but again unless something's been issued in the last few minutes. I don't believe from the city of Milwaukee Milwaukee County. They put anything out solve. If there isn't a local order in place there is nothing that would stop a place of opening. Its doors anywhere on Wisconsin again. If some small community somewhere has just issued some order that would apply to them. I would think only Milwaukee and Madison would have been ready to pop anything out immediately after the State Supreme Court I had ruled. And maybe they're in a wait and see mode but lacking an order issued by Milwaukee. Tonight there wouldn't be anything that I where that would stop Milwaukee Bar from opening at stores and we're getting all sorts of reports facebook and social media and so odd that some bars in the regions and I would guess some restaurants opening up in some of the restaurants that have been open only for carry out. They can now let the people come in and sit down and all of that. I'm sure many of these places aren't staffed up to be able to start anything if that H at all but somebody's got a one share salon if he or she wanted to cut here tonight or tomorrow morning. I'm sure some of especially those starving for money and probably with a pet up customer demand Would.

Milwaukee Milwaukee Bar Milwaukee Milwaukee County Wisconsin Supreme Court State Supreme Court facebook Andhra Bob Madison
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

04:11 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Pay Your bills cash contests text the word. I don't know. What do you say about somebody that already was in a buyer by six o'clock, the order was issued at five, really was issued at five. With. That sense of desperation on that I can see. Some women wanted to get to the hair saliva right away. If any of them crack open their doors. I have you noticed that in the pharmacies those? Initially. It was the toilet paper that's wiped out. It's all the hair dye. That's way down. Boss, all the gesture men box. How will you know that I mean that whole area? They've got signs up restricting the purchases of that in the same way, they did the the toilet paper. Still come and go you go in some days is a lot of it in there and the next day. Well meets a huge issue. And that's not because of government eating. That's simply concerned about the meatpacking plants, some of which have shut out and whether or not they're going to be able to crank out, but need is starting. To show up, diminish supply again. That's not particularly a government issue or did that just the problems you need to the meat packing industry. Let me give you the chance to win the thousand bucks. The word is couch, C, O, u, C, h couch. You have until seven o'clock text that into two hundred two hundred installation thousand dollars in cash. You'll get a text confirming entry plus iheartradio Info Standard Data and message rates apply in this. They should wide contest again. I don't want to be unclear about this. I don't know of any local communities including Milwaukee that have quickly issued their own order, and I don't know if any would do so tonight and I live in off. They will do it, but that is a potential possibility and. If a local community issues an edict. It's an edict until somebody says it's not illegal one, but at the moment there is no rule in place in the state of Wisconsin, the whole order from Andhra. Bob Is right now struck down by the state. Supreme Court is being unconstitutional because it exceeded the authority that the law allows these emergency orders. To contain I didn't say that it exactly right, but y'all know what I mean. But you got in there. You write these things still. This is not time square after world. War Two ended. I wouldn't be. A Trade that moron? I wouldn't be swapping spit with strangers. Well I mean. When would you be I? I mean short of like kissing somebody in a bar I mean. Well I wouldn't want you be doing any of that anyway. I I? Well, I you Paul, ask the question of Water Street. I, wonder if any milwaukee bars will, until they get some direction from the city and the county as to whether they'll be a replacement, order would open. They're all afraid of losing. Their liquor licenses the big issue in a community like Milwaukee were another places that would turn around and give some other edict. Edict, but again unless something's been issued in the last few minutes I don't believe from the city of Milwaukee Milwaukee County they put anything out solve. If there isn't a local order in place, there is nothing that would stop a place of opening its doors anywhere on Wisconsin again. If some small community somewhere has just issued some order that would apply to them. I would think only Milwaukee and Madison would have been ready to pop anything out immediately. After the State Supreme Court I had ruled, and maybe they're in a wait and see. Mode but lacking an order issued by Milwaukee tonight there wouldn't be anything that I where that would stop Milwaukee. Bar from opening at stores, and were getting sorts of reports, facebook and social media, and so odd that some bars in the regions, and I would guess some restaurants opening up in some of the restaurants that have been open only for carry out. They can now let the people come in and sit down and all of that. I'm sure many of these places aren't staffed up to be able to start anything. If that H at all, but Somebody's got a one share salon if he or she wanted to cut here tonight or tomorrow morning I'm. Sure some of especially those starving for money, and probably with a pet up customer demand. would.

Milwaukee Milwaukee County Wisconsin Supreme Court State Supreme Court facebook Bob Andhra Paul Madison
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

04:06 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Well that. If you're a store, channing, you're open an Iowa. You will now open in Wisconsin. in addition to that some of them will obviously be very worry about this whole threat of lawsuits. You Open your doors and people got sick. The fact that it is now legal to open your doors at least until something order comes into replace. This would give you pretty significant. Cover I would think. From the Fed, of litigation. Anyway for those of you, just coming in I should probably repeat because people come in during drive time all the time was conscious supreme, court, very divided today, four, three, one of the Conservatives, joining the Liberals voted to strike down the order issued by Tony Adverse Health Services Secretary Andrea. Palm She's referred to as secretary. Designate I've had a million people. Ask Me why that. She's never been confirmed by the State Senate. That doesn't mean she isn't the secretary under Wisconsin, law. Even if they didn't confirm her, he could name somebody else. Who Serves Wisconsin? The confirmation processes not like the Federal Cabinet. If! You're not confirmed then you do have to leave, but the governor can put in anybody he wads. Forever you would just be changing. The person who's doing with the governor was which is not been confirmed by the legislature, and that's why she's referred to as they designated, but she does have the ability to serve even if they don't. Confirm her anyway. the order issued by Andrea, Palm, clearly. An order supported by her boss Governor Tony vers has been struck down by the Wisconsin State Supreme Court late this afternoon, and that means at the moment there is no order it does mean that the legislature and governor could cobble together a compromise. It issue at order right now. There isn't what this does not stop community our local county from issuing an order of their own, but until they do, there is no order in place in therefore no criminal penalties in place for violating because they have all. Stressed out when a give you the..

secretary Governor Tony vers Andrea Wisconsin State Supreme Court Wisconsin Palm channing Iowa Fed Wisconsin. State Senate Federal Cabinet
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

02:02 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Well that. If you're a store, channing, you're open an Iowa. You will now open in Wisconsin. in addition to that some of them will obviously be very worry about this whole threat of lawsuits. You Open your doors and people got sick. The fact that it is now legal to open your doors at least until something order comes into replace. This would give you pretty significant. Cover I would think. From the Fed, of litigation. Anyway for those of you, just coming in I should probably repeat because people come in during drive time all the time was conscious supreme, court, very divided today, four, three, one of the Conservatives, joining the Liberals voted to strike down the order issued by Tony Adverse Health Services Secretary Andrea. Palm She's referred to as secretary. Designate I've had a million people. Ask Me why that. She's never been confirmed by the State Senate. That doesn't mean she isn't the secretary under Wisconsin, law. Even if they didn't confirm her, he could name somebody else. Who Serves Wisconsin? The confirmation processes not like the Federal Cabinet. If! You're not confirmed then you do have to leave, but the governor can put in anybody he wads. Forever you would just be changing. The person who's doing with the governor was which is not been confirmed by the legislature, and that's why she's referred to as they designated, but she does have the ability to serve even if they don't. Confirm her anyway. the order issued by Andrea, Palm, clearly. An order supported by her boss Governor Tony vers has been struck down by the Wisconsin State Supreme Court late this afternoon, and that means at the moment there is no order it does mean that the legislature and governor could cobble together a compromise. It issue at order right now. There isn't what this does not stop community our local county from issuing an order of their own, but until they do, there is no order in place in therefore no criminal penalties in place for violating because they have all. Stressed out when a give you the..

secretary Governor Tony vers Andrea Wisconsin State Supreme Court Wisconsin Palm channing Iowa Fed Wisconsin. State Senate Federal Cabinet
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

02:02 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Well. That if you're a store channing you're open an Iowa you will now open in Wisconsin In addition to that some of them will obviously be very worry about this. Whole threat of lawsuits. You Open your doors and people got sick the fact that it is now legal to open your doors at least until something order comes into replace. This would give you pretty significant cover. I would think from the Fed of litigation anyway for those of you just coming in. I should probably repeat because people come in during drive time. All the time was conscious. Supreme Court very divided today. Four three one of the Conservatives joining the Liberals voted to strike down the order issued by Tony Adverse Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm. She's referred to as secretary designate. I've had a million people ask me why that she's never been confirmed by the State Senate. That doesn't mean she isn't the secretary under Wisconsin Law even. If they didn't confirm her he could name somebody else. Who Serves Wisconsin? The confirmation processes not like the Federal Cabinet. If you're not confirmed then you do have to leave. But the governor can put in anybody. He wads forever. You would just be changing. The person who's doing with the governor was which is not been confirmed by the Legislature. And that's why she's referred to as they designated but she does have the ability to serve even if they don't confirm her anyway The order issued by Andrea Palm clearly. An order supported by her boss. Governor Tony vers has been struck down by the Wisconsin State Supreme Court late this afternoon and that means at the moment there is no order it does mean that the legislature and governor could cobble together a compromise. It issue at order right now. There isn't what this does not stop community. Our local county from issuing an order of their own but until they do there is no order in place in therefore no criminal penalties in place for violating. Because they have all stressed out. When a give you the.

secretary Wisconsin Governor Tony vers Andrea Palm Wisconsin State Supreme Court Supreme Court Iowa Legislature Fed Tony Adverse Health Services State Senate Federal Cabinet Conservatives
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

05:44 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"If you live in a community where your community suddenly. Or issuing a rule, tonight or tomorrow well, then you have a rule in that community. The State Supreme. Court is not aggressive. Future ruled that any local community would come up with. And if a local community would come up with a rule. And follow the law and passing it. Presumably, it would remain in place now in Milwaukee Tom. Barrett has threatened to turn around an issue. His own locked out rule if the State Supreme Court ruled as it did. We'll have to watch to see whether or not something come so the Barrett Administration again. The own on would be do something that would be upheld by the state. Supreme Court but so long as he did it. It would be in place. It would certainly mean in the parts of the State of Wisconsin that don't believe that there should be a role right now. There is no rule. There is no state role right now. Saying that a bar can open a restaurant cat open. The can have whatever number of people in it and so odd. Local Communities Afridi issue whatever they want and there may be something that comes from the state. If the governor and legislature a to it. I believe there should be rule. I believe that we have been through this Wong enough and enough states now are operating without any rule that businesses and individuals on their own can decide how to proceed. And I would where the legislature. Proceed accordingly either having no rule in place or an extremely minimal rule. What does this mean for everyone else remember? This ruling doesn't open up anything. It just means that the state can't stop people from doing anything. If a bar restaurant wants to remain close, they can. If at school, district wants to remain closed. It's up to them. They can there simply isn't any statewide order in place on them. If a department store wants to stay closed or wants to require masks or wants to limit the number of people in the store. That's up to that. There really isn't any statewide order governing how they react. In other words at this moment as of right now, what is in place is? People and businesses and individuals can do what they want. Open Up, not open up etc right now if you WANNA have your kids go over to a friend's house, you can. Now again. This doesn't Stop Eddie local community from doing what they want. And for all I know, some might already be issuing certain sorts of rules. Maybe they are maybe they aren't as a lot of different communities in the state of Wisconsin. But the state wide edict came from the administration is God. If Eve wants to replace his rule with another rule. He's going to have to do something that the Republican..

State Supreme Court Barrett Wisconsin Barrett Administration Milwaukee Wong Eve
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

04:30 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"What does that mean? All that struck down is the state order. Local communities have the ability to issue rules. Pretending to their own businesses. It will be up to each community and or each county. Decide where to go from here. This also does not mean that there can't be a new order from the state. The ruling makes it clear, however that any new order from the state has to be approved the legislature. So have Iverson. His administration water proceed with statewide rule. They're going to have to come up with something. That the republican-controlled state legislature approves. In the meantime right now, there is no rule. If you live in a community where your community suddenly. Or issuing a rule, tonight or tomorrow well, then you have a rule in that community. The State Supreme. Court is not aggressive. Future ruled that any local community would come up with. And if a local community would come up with a rule. And follow the law and passing it. Presumably, it would remain in place now in Milwaukee Tom. Barrett has threatened to turn around an issue. His own locked out rule if the State Supreme Court ruled as it did. We'll have to watch to see whether or not something come so the Barrett Administration again. The own on would be do something that would be upheld by the state. Supreme Court but so long as he did it. It would be in place. It would certainly mean in the parts of the State of Wisconsin that don't believe that there should be a role right now. There is no rule. There is no state role right now. Saying that a bar can open a restaurant cat open. The can have whatever number of people in it and so odd. Local Communities Afridi issue whatever they want and there may be something that comes from the state. If the governor and legislature a to it. I believe there should be rule. I believe that we have been through this Wong enough and enough states now are operating without any rule that businesses and individuals on their own can decide how to proceed. And I would where the legislature. Proceed accordingly either having no rule in place or an extremely minimal rule. What does this mean for everyone else remember? This ruling doesn't open up anything. It just means that the state can't stop people from doing anything. If a bar restaurant wants to remain close, they can. If at school, district wants to remain closed. It's up to them. They can there simply isn't any statewide order in place on them. If a department store wants to stay closed or wants to require masks or wants to limit the number of people in the store. That's up to that. There really isn't any statewide order governing how they react. In other words at this moment as of right now, what is in place is? People and businesses and individuals can do what they want. Open Up, not open up etc right now if you WANNA have your kids go over to a friend's house, you can. Now again. This doesn't Stop Eddie local community from doing what they want. And for all I know, some might already be issuing certain sorts of rules. Maybe they are maybe they aren't as a lot of different communities in the state of Wisconsin. But the state wide edict came from the administration is God. If Eve wants to replace his rule with another rule. He's going to have to do something that the Republican. Legislature is willing to accept that I can guarantee you that a significant number ran. That's Democrats in the legislature to it would have to get approval both chambers of legislature. That there isn't much appetite. For Anti kind of significant restrictions. Right now. This is according to j US Online. There are eleven states in the United States that are still operating under some form of shutdown rule that means thirty nine states now are getting along just fine without a rule. At our doing and handling things at a local level and handling things by allowing people to do the things that of their own decision in the manner that they choose. There may be local restrictions in place in many of those states, but there are eleven statewide orders in place, and now Wisconsin is not one of those states anymore. Given.

United States Legislature State Supreme Court legislature Wisconsin Barrett Barrett Administration Milwaukee Iverson Wong Eve
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

04:30 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"What does that mean? All that struck down is the state order. Local communities have the ability to issue rules pretending to their own businesses. It will be up to each community and or each county decide where to go from here. This also does not mean that there can't be a new order from the State. The ruling makes it clear however that any new order from the state has to be approved the legislature so if Iverson his administration water proceed with statewide rule. They're going to have to come up with something that the republican-controlled state legislature approves in the meantime right now. There is no rule if you live in a community where your community suddenly or issuing a rule tonight or tomorrow. Well then you have a rule in that community. The State Supreme Court is not aggressive future. Ruled that any local community would come up with and if a local community would come up with a rule and follow the law and passing it. Presumably it would remain in place. Now in Milwaukee. Tom Barrett has threatened to turn around an issue his own locked out rule if the State Supreme Court ruled as it did. We'll have to watch to see whether or not something come. So the Barrett Administration again. The own on Halewood would be do something that would be upheld by the State Supreme Court. But so long as he did it it would be in place. It would certainly mean in the parts of the State of Wisconsin. That don't believe that there should be a role right now. There is no rule. There is no state role right now saying that a bar can open a restaurant cat open the can have whatever number of people in it and so odd local communities. Afridi issue whatever they want and there may be something that comes from the state if the governor and legislature a to it. I believe there should be rule. I believe that we have been through this Wong. Enough and enough states now are operating without any rule that businesses and individuals on their own can decide how to proceed and I would where the legislature proceeded. Accordingly either having no rule in place or an extremely minimal rule. What does this mean for everyone else? Remember this ruling doesn't open up anything. It just means that the state can't stop people from doing anything if a bar restaurant wants to remain close they can. If at school district wants to remain closed. It's up to them they can. There simply isn't any statewide order in place on them. If a department store wants to stay closed or wants to require masks or wants to limit the number of people in the store that's up to that there really isn't any statewide order governing. How they react in other words at this moment as of right now what is in place is people and businesses and individuals can do what they want open up not open up etc right now. If you WANNA have your kids. Go over to a friend's house you can now again. This doesn't Stop Eddie local community from doing what they want and for all I know some might already be issuing certain sorts of rules. Maybe they are. Maybe they aren't as a lot of different communities in the state of Wisconsin but the state wide edict came from the administration. Is God if Eve wants to replace his rule with another rule? He's going to have to do something that the Republican legislature is willing to accept that I can guarantee you that a significant number ran that's Democrats in the legislature to it would have to get approval both chambers of legislature that. There isn't much appetite for any kind of significant restrictions. Right now this is according to j US Online. There are eleven states in the United States. That are still operating under some form of shutdown rule. That MEANS THIRTY. Nine states now are getting along just fine without a rule at our doing and handling things at a local level and handling things by allowing people to do the things that of their own decision in the manner that they choose there may be local restrictions in place in many of those states but there are eleven statewide lacked orders in place and now. Wisconsin is not one of those states anymore. Given.

United States State Supreme Court Republican legislature Tom Barrett Wisconsin Barrett Administration Halewood Milwaukee Iverson Afridi Eve
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

04:02 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Sites several precedents. Rebecca Bradley then continues the people of Wisconsin. Pronounced Liberty to be a primary importance establishing government principally to protect their freedom, and then put from the Wisconsin Constitution. And dowling one person with the sole power to create execute and enforce the law. Contravenes the structural separation of power established by the people. You couldn't say it better than that. Could you again? I'll it from the concurring opinion of Rebecca Bradley. Endowing one person with the sole power. To create. Execute and enforce the law. Contravenes the structural separation power established by the people. Through the Wisconsin Constitution, the people confer distinct powers on the legislative executive and judicial branches of government. Under the Wisconsin Constitution the legislature makes the laws and unelected cabinet secretary, serving in the executive branch cannot. Unilaterally. Do Cell. So that's the concurring opinion. From Justice Rebecca Bradley. Now whether the ruling is four, three or seven Oh, is interesting only in terms of the long-term ramification. What's going to happen to the State Supreme Court? When Daniel Kelly leaves in August, but in the end from four, three or seven, this ruling is the ruling and it's they heads. And it states that this order from the administration has struck down now. So? What happens here? Well, that's a doggone good question, and I'll try to start answering this with. Some pretty good speculation in a moment. News Talk Eleven thirty W. I mark belling mark belling late afternoon show. It's GonNa rain all night. Good News as it's going to bring some warmer weather in behind That's fronts. Luke Front that's moving into the area with truck it. Engine an inch of rain when the rain begins soon rather soon this evening, I don't remember the exact time on that, but it's going to be moving into the area in the evening hours and rain, continuing through tomorrow morning, and behind that chance of showers off, and on for the next few days, but warmer weather, and we should get into the upper sixties from both tomorrow and tomorrow and Friday and milder weather than we've been seeing through the weekend all right. Again major ruling. Not Unexpected. There has been an expectation that the state supreme. Court would strike down. The order issued by Andrea Pob. The Department of Health. Services Secretary acting on behalf of Governor Tony Years. There have been some questions and I raised them as to whether or not. They had the votes to do it, and they barely do other. The Conservatives joined the Liberals in. Voting to keep the irs palm order in place, but the ruling was four three, striking down in his struck down immediately. What does that mean? All that struck down is the state order. Local communities have the ability to issue rules. Pretending to their own businesses. It will be up to each community and or each county. Decide where to go from here. This also does not mean that there can't be a new order from the state. The ruling makes it clear, however that any new order from the state has to be approved the legislature. So have Iverson. His administration water proceed with statewide rule. They're going to have to come up with something. That the republican-controlled state legislature approves. In the meantime right now, there is no rule..

Rebecca Bradley Wisconsin Constitution State Supreme Court Wisconsin Tony Years executive legislature dowling Andrea Pob Luke Front Daniel Kelly secretary Iverson Secretary Department of Health irs
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

02:03 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Sites several precedents. Rebecca Bradley then continues the people of Wisconsin pronounced liberty to be a primary importance. Establishing government principally to protect their freedom and then put from the Wisconsin Constitution and dowling one person with the sole power to create execute and enforce the law contravenes the structural separation of power established by the people. You couldn't say it better than that could you again. I'll it from the concurring opinion of Rebecca Bradley Endowing One person with the sole power to create execute and enforce the law contravenes the structural separation power established by the people through the Wisconsin Constitution. The people confer distinct powers on the legislative executive and judicial branches of government under the Wisconsin Constitution the legislature makes the laws and unelected cabinet secretary serving in the executive branch cannot unilaterally. Do so so. That's the concurring opinion from Justice Rebecca Bradley now whether the ruling is four three or seven. Oh is interesting only in terms of the long-term ramification what's going to happen to the State Supreme Court when Daniel Kelly leaves in August but in the end from four three or seven. This ruling is the ruling and it's they heads and it states that this order from the average administration is struck down. Now so what happens here? Well that's a doggone good question and I'll try to start answering this with some pretty good speculation in a moment news talk eleven thirty W. is Mark belling. Mark belling.

Rebecca Bradley Wisconsin Mark belling executive State Supreme Court Daniel Kelly secretary
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

02:03 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Sites several precedents. Rebecca Bradley then continues the people of Wisconsin. Pronounced Liberty to be a primary importance establishing government principally to protect their freedom, and then put from the Wisconsin Constitution. And dowling one person with the sole power to create execute and enforce the law. Contravenes the structural separation of power established by the people. You couldn't say it better than that. Could you again? I'll it from the concurring opinion of Rebecca Bradley. Endowing one person with the sole power. To create. Execute and enforce the law. Contravenes the structural separation power established by the people. Through the Wisconsin Constitution, the people confer distinct powers on the legislative executive and judicial branches of government. Under the Wisconsin Constitution the legislature makes the laws and unelected cabinet secretary, serving in the executive branch cannot. Unilaterally. Do Cell. So that's the concurring opinion. From Justice Rebecca Bradley. Now whether the ruling is four, three or seven Oh, is interesting only in terms of the long-term ramification. What's going to happen to the State Supreme Court? When Daniel Kelly leaves in August, but in the end from four, three or seven, this ruling is the ruling and it's they heads. And it states that this order from the administration has struck down now. So? What happens here? Well, that's a doggone good question, and I'll try to start answering this with. Some pretty good speculation in a moment. News Talk Eleven thirty W. I mark belling mark belling.

Rebecca Bradley Wisconsin Constitution Wisconsin executive dowling State Supreme Court Daniel Kelly secretary
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

09:12 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Not Divided Wisconsin Supreme Court by vote. Afford three today struck down the order. Issued by the Department of Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm the Disney of governor. Tony Uber's that has restricted all sorts of activity in business and commerce and people's individual activities in Wisconsin through may twenty six. I've had an opportunity to very quickly read through the entire order. There are a number of concurring opinions and descends on the first question. How did the vote break down? It broke down conservative. Liberal lines with one of the Conservatives will think over to join the Liberals descended big as I said. The vote was four to three justice. Brian Hagedorn who was elected last year joined the to Liberal. Justices Rebecca Brat Rebecca Dalit and an walls Bradley in dissenting from the opinion of the five conservatives on the State Supreme Court Haggard on has been so far at his brief term the wobbly est of those and the likeliest not to stick with the other conservative colleagues so the vote was for three. Many people have wondered why the Supreme Court was taking as long as it was well all of these opinions. I log the concurring. Opinions are long that essentially and each of the justices. I think why did away with their legal reasonings on this also. Clearly there was disagreement in the court on this given the fact that it ended up being a four three ruling and not five to as many had expected the four justices that are voting to strike down. The law are the Chief Justice Pat Rogan sack. Rebecca Bradley Remember. There are two Bradley's Rebecca Bradley who refers to herself as Rebecca Grasso Bradley. She is the conservative of the two Bradley's and walls Bradley's the liberal so again voting to strike down the Order Chief Justice Pat Ryan Zach Justice Rebecca Bradley Justice Annette Siegler and justice. Daniel Kelly now. Kelly ran for reelection to the corded April and loss but his term continues until August. And he's still on the court in the interim suffice to say that if this had all happened in a few months this order would have been upheld because Kelly would not have been on the court so for people who have not understood the impact of Supreme Court rulings and the importance of the Supreme Court in Wisconsin. This rule late here is one that would not have occurred the way that it did in a few months and voting to descend voting against the ruling. As I said we're Hagedorn who has been described as a conservative but in this case joined the other two liberals on the court. Rebecca Dalit and Ann Walsh Bradley. One of the things that I have been speculating. Odd was whether or not the court would address the original Tony. Iverson's order or simply the order from Andrea Palm and the are focused here on the only order that remains relevant. Which is Andrea Palm? Because Iverson's is emergency authority as governor has expired? The Department of Health Services Secretary by law has emergency authority that goes on forever but that authority is not without limit and the State Supreme Court. In the primary opinion. That was authored. By justice. Chief Justice ragging sack said that palm exceeded her legal authority at in particular given the fact that her order included criminal penalties all of those criminal sanctions that are included in. The order are struck down because they were all issued without beyond the authority. Rather of Secretary Powell. Now I'm going to quote from the ruling and then I'm going to discuss this issue of. Where are we in the State of Wisconsin? And I think you're going to see a flurry of reactions including a number of local orders being issued in the short term. I want to quote the final few paragraphs though from the order which was in by other the other justices as well again it was a four three ruling striking down the Tony Iverson Andhra palm ordering. You'll hear the name palm throughout this. She's again the cabinet member who issued the rule and under statute. She has the authority to issue emergency roles pertaining to health. This is from the Supreme Court order. We do not define the precise scope of Department of Health Services. Authority under Wisconsin Statutes. We cannot expansively read. Statutes with imprecise terminology that purport to delegate lawmaking youth authority to an administrative agency the legislature appropriately sites the statutory the statutory explicit authority requirement and has provided plausible reading of the text. We have declared rights under the law. Where Ian we have concluded that Emergency Order? Twenty eight is invalid and therefore unenforceable. That's the key language. The court is determining that the order is invalid and because it's invalid cannot be and forced on the ruling continues although a very unusual request on April twenty and I twenty twenty the legislature this court to issue a temporary injunction of emergency order twenty eight but then requested a stay of that injunction for at least six days we perceive. This request is being grounded in a concern for an order. Orderly transition from order twenty-eight offer rule however more than two weeks have passed since we began our consideration of this case therefore we trust that the legislature in palm of place. The interest of the people of Wisconsin. I and have been working together in good faith to establish a lawful that addresses covid nineteen. It's devastating effects on Wisconsin people businesses and other institutions. Need to know how to proceed. And what is expected of them? Therefore we place the responsibility for this future lawmaking with the legislature in dhs where it belongs conclusion. We conclude that Emergency Order Twenty eight. That's Sandra Palms. Order is a rural under the controlling precedent court and therefore is subject to statutory emergency rulemaking procedures established by the legislature. Emergency Order Twenty eight. As a general order of general application within the meaning of his constant statutes which define rule. Accordingly the rulemaking procedure Wisconsin statutes were required to be followed during the promulgation of ordered twenty eight because they were not eve. Urgency Order Twenty. Eight is enforceable. Furthermore Wisconsin Statutes require that emergency order. Twenty eight be promulgated using the procedures established by the legislature for rulemaking if criminal penalties were to follow because palm did not follow the law in creating order. Twenty eight days can be no criminal penalties for violations of her order. The procedural requirements of Wisconsin Statutes must be followed because they safeguard all people. We further conclude the palms order. Confining all people to their homes forbidding travel and closing businesses exceeded this exceeded the statutory authority of Wisconsin Statute to fifty two upon which palm claims to rely by the court palms emergency order. Twenty eight is declared unlawful invalid and unenforceable. So that's the majority opinion of Wisconsin Supreme Court. The law is in fact unlawful. It is invalid at it cannot be enforced. Doubt they referenced in here the Legislature had requested if you strike down this law that you allow it to remain in effect strike down this order. You allow to remain in effect for six days. The Supreme Court declined to do that and the Supreme Court in its opinion said and they may have tipped off what the reason was for the delay. In issuing their ruling we trust that the governor and legislature have been working together and talking in anticipation if our ruling so that'd be ready to issue a new rule once we strike this one dowd. We'll see if that's been. The case. Will the administration work with the legislature to try to issue something that can pass legislative approval. Say Tomorrow will say but as the moment there is no rule. I.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Wisconsin Supreme Court legislature Chief Justice Pat Ryan Zach Ju Rebecca Grasso Bradley State Supreme Court palm Andrea Palm Rebecca Bradley Department of Health Services Rebecca Dalit Brian Hagedorn Secretary Liberals Ann Walsh Bradley Tony Iverson Andhra Tony Uber Daniel Kelly
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

05:07 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"It's weakness for president trump. We have a breaking story that I'm going to be sharing with you. The Wisconsin Supreme Court. Has this afternoon ruled? I'm going to try to get my hands on a copy of the order, but the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Has this afternoon ruled striking down? Tony Iverson so-called safer at home. Order remember. There were two orders in place. And to separate challenges in different cases, and so on so I haven't read the ruling what they've said, and how expensive it is, we have gotten a statement from one of the parties that had filed a brief in the case Wisconsin, Institute of Law and Liberty that they've been notified that the Supreme Court has struck down the Iverson so. I'm going to go to work. I messed and share with you more information on this after this break. Up Thirty W I. Mark belling late afternoon. Show have my hands on the ruling the justice. Should this afternoon the concentrate? Supreme Court striking down specifically. The order issued by health and Human Services Secretary or how services secretary. Andrea POB that put in place all of these rules that restrict the activities of Wisconsin. It's I'm going to share with you and we're doing this a little bit on the fly from the ruling that was authored by Chief Justice Pat Rogan sack. I let me give you the help. Pay Your bills cash contest state. State, word remember there's no rush on this. If you want to hear my reading of some of the components of the rolling like you haven't till six, o'clock detects the word and just remember the word, it's home, H., o., m. e. home anytime between now and six texts that into two, hundred, two hundred. You get a text confirming entry plus iheartradio Info Standard Data and message rates apply. In this nationwide contest I'm now going to quote the rulings very long as one hundred sixty one pages, and it includes that descend. But I've gotta read from early out of the ruling again authored by the chief justice. We conclude that emergency order twenty. Eight is a rural under the controlling precedent of this court, and then they sight a precedent, which is for those of your lawyers, citizens for sensible zoning INC versus DNR, and therefore is subject to statutory emergency rulemaking procedures established by the legislature. Emergency Order Twenty eight is a general order of general application within the meaning of his concent- statutes. because. Let me, read this. There's some Gobbledygook in here. According to the rulemaking procedures of Wisconsin, statutes, they were required to be followed during the promulgation of order twenty eight, because they were not emergency order twenty twenty-eight is unenforceable. Furthermore Wisconsin Statutes require that emergency. Order.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Wisconsin Tony Iverson Andrea POB Chief Justice Pat Rogan Mark belling president Human Services Secretary Institute of Law and Liberty secretary DNR
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

11:33 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"I'm going to get into that story in a moment but first I'm GonNa give you the three o'clock hour word. The help pay your bills. Kashtan contests the word this hour bio S I S. I L E SMILE. You have until four. Pm detects that into two hundred two hundred instantly. Want two thousand dollars in cash. You'll get a text confirming entry plus iheartradio Info Standard Data and message rates. Apply in this. They should wide contest. It has been suggested to be by a couple of listeners that many people having a very hard time following how the Russia collusion story tied into. Michael Flynn the unmasking story. What does this have to do with Obama and Biden so odd and granted? The one of the reasons people are having a hard time following it is. It is not getting the attention even on conservative media that it deserves. Because you've got the COVID nineteen story that is out there but with this thing now. I think very close the coming to ahead and the very very strong possibility that you're going to see the fingerprints of the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on the smearing of an innocent American citizen. We're GONNA have to get this story not only out there but we have to get people to understand what it was that happened. This is why I've chosen to present this. At the beginning of the program and then discuss some of the explosive developments today which seemed to point to Biden Ando. Baba either individually or together perhaps even directing the action that led to the smear of Flynn the criminal conviction of spin a flynn in an attempt to cover up the actions of the government in inventing the Russia collusion story. So I'm going to go back to the beginning before I get to today's developments. We've got the two thousand sixteen presidential campaign going on and remember that during that campaign you not only had the Republican story of the emergence out of nowhere. Donald Trump is the candidate for president. And the freak out that this was causing but the fact also that the Democratic nominee for president was deeply tainted and herself the subject of a criminal investigation during the campaign during the time that she was running for president there was an FBI investigation going on into Hillary Clinton's use of her government. Email destroying evidence destroyed emails. And so odd. This was a case that was going on while she was running for president and you had an FBI. That was trying to figure out how it could avoid bringing criminal charges against Democratic candidate for president even though it was overwhelmingly obvious that she committed crimes by destroying these evil. You're not allowed to do it. She had her own private server in which she was putting government business on rather than go to the government email system as she supposed to. She smashed it with a hammer to destroy the evidence that was under subpoena at the time while that was going while the FBI was doing that the FBI was also initiating new investigation. It grab material it got from the Democratic National Committee this idiotic steel dossier filled with loads of crap about Donald Trump and presented that to the I secret. American court called the FIS accord and they said look we've got evidence of Donald Trump doing all these things and Russians are involved. They never told the court that the document came from and was paid for an IRA the Democratic National Committee. They never disclosed that. It was a political document so those two things are going out of the same time in twenty sixty. What does this have to do with the current day of Michael? Flynn you have get all of these pieces together to understand what happened here. And why why? They took the extreme action of smearing and innocent American. So here we are in twenty six hundred you've got the story going on with regard to Hillary Clinton and the emails and the got to try to come up with some way to clear and remember that this is all coming to a head during the time that she's running for President and then you've got the FBI which was also in charge of the Hillary Clinton cases now the FBI now decides to initiate and do something to try to go after Donald Trump on this whole Russian thing remember. There was a reason that they had to go to the FISA COURT. In order to begin their criminal investigation. They had to claim that. There's a criminal case here. You can't just investigate someone with Al 'cause in order to wire tap answered. Vail you've got to shit you've got to tell the judge that you've got probable cause and when you're talking about doing things about monitoring international conversations at all of this stuff that requires the approval of this highest level court. The feis accord so they went in and they were not forthcoming to the Fisa court for the purposes of initiating this investigation. They then had to find somebody who did something that they claim was raw claim that they had a basis for the investigation and they came up with this dupe who worked in the trump campaign a very low level guy who in fact had done nothing wrong and they tried to distort a conversation that he had with some rushing entities. This became the basis to begin all of this now. Let's understand why they did it. And for people that have had a hard time following the story the key here is. Why did they do this? Why were they doing all of this crap and twenty sixteen inventing this Russia collusion thing? Beginning this investigation. Doing all of this wire-tapping and so odd. What's the motivation for it? Remember when you're looking back at something for years later in twenty twenty it is important to understand when someone was doing something in order to understand why they were doing it for example if somebody told you that in two thousand fifteen. I was hoarding peanut butter. You'd have a hard time figuring out. Why was supporting peanut butter? But maybe if you knew what? I was up to at the time in two thousand fifteen. That I was hoarding peanut butter. You'd be able to come up with the motivation for it. I strongly feel the need. I wish that I could. This is the one time. I wish I was a teacher because I could then threaten. The class not not not have classes. Not Teachers are teaching. What have I got to go on zoom on one day one day every three weeks that I out there and say that? Hey there's gotta be a quiz at the end of this. I know that the rack at the teachers had. They say that there's going to be a quiz at the end of this. It's the only way they figured they can get people to pay attention anyway. The point that I'm making is if you want to understand what someone's motivation for. Having done something was it was something they did in the past. You have to consider what was going on at the time and the key is is that this was all happening in the summer. The middle of twenty sixteen. There was something that happened later on that. They never dreamed what happened. They never dreamed. Donald trump would get elected president. Nobody thought that was going to happen. Hillary was leading consistently in the pool at some point by a wide margin. What they were mostly concerned about was getting this email thing out of the way so that Hillary could get herself. Elected president in uncomplicated fashion. That this thing wasn't still hanging over her after she. What in the meantime the Russia collusion thing wise? The insurance policy. Let's find out what trump and his people are up to you now. Who knows what they were looking for when they began all of this surveillance of trump and his people. They certainly weren't looking to prove that he did anything. Corrupt with the Russians. Because they knew from the beginning that he didn't mother knew when he began his investigation early in seventeen. They knew that there wasn't any of that. It was simply the excuse to simply find out what was going on with trump. Now I happen to think they were trying to find out what trump's people do about the hillary email thing and that's their surveillance waterlog but that's just the guest and it's not really relevant to our discussion further rod but it may explain why they were doing all right. James Call me the head of the FBI comes out and cleared. Hillary during right in the middle of the cab paid gives us report. Well you know this that and the other. Take Corby being something of an incompetent. Corrupt director then muddled into this reopening of the investigation later on but he ends up Clearing Hillary. Now let's turn our focus over the Russia. Collusion thing this goes on this goes on. This goes on the wiretapping. Goes on you remember. Trump made that allegation their wiretap. It'd be trump tower. Everybody said he was nuts. He said I'm going to be proven right about this. In fact there was surveillance going on if not directly of him a people who work for him and other people associated with him they were also trying to figure out where some of these DNC leaks were coming from. They tried to claim that it was the Russians that did it. We now know that the Russians didn't do it. There was the no evidence whatsoever of Russia's involvement in this thing at all so November sixteen comes around somehow trump wits. It's very important in understanding this story to realize what a shock that was. I know some of you thought trump was going to win but not many people that nobody in the establishment thought trump was going to wed. This created an entirely new set of problems. Aside from the fact that trump was the president it creates ninety million problems for the FBI. Why why does trump's wedding create all the the remember? Now we're still back in sixteen. Why does this create a zillion problems for the FBI? Because in two and a half months trump's going to be in charge of the at he might find out all the bleep. They were doing with regard to this phony investigation of Russian collusion and they get to the bottom of the fact that they indeed were wiretapped. He might get to the bottom of the fact that they did lie to the FIS accord. Suddenly the Justice Department the Attorney General isn't going to be Loretta Lynch it's going to be somebody that. Donald trump names. They're all going to be working for him so they've got all this wrong doing that. They were doing that. They figured well nobody ever find out about it because Hillary is GonNa win the election and that her people being charged and she was all out of the beneficiaries. This she isn't GonNa Care. She's going to be proud of for doing instead. Now trump wins..

Donald Trump Hillary Clinton FBI president Russia trump tower Michael Flynn Joe Biden Democratic National Committee FISA COURT Obama Biden Ando FIS American court Justice Department Vail Al Baba
"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

02:17 min | 4 months ago

"state supreme court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"The beginning close to the beginning of each of the hours of the program contest does end on Friday. We have no idea if the company is to come out with anything new after that or at least I. I guess some people may have an idea about that but I don't have itself Three more days worth of chances to win on the station and our my program of course two four days of chances to win this contest. Obviously we have spent a lot of time on our program over the last several weeks discussing. Not only the COVID nineteen story but I believe the larger story of the destruction of the American economy then an aisle of our rights the mass of grab of power by government and the general dishonesty of media in trying to report. What has been going on with this actual virus. This has created a number of tentacles of stories as well of all the different ramifications that occur when you essentially decide to blow up and kill off the American economy which is what has happened. This has resulted in far less attention being given to all sorts of other stories. That are out there. It's a balancing act but when you have some of the worst and most destructive public policy decisions going on when you have irrational reaction's going on to story like this when you have political motivations for all of them when you see the greatest usurpation of American citizen rights. Perhaps they hit. Perhaps it history. I only think about some of the in the early days of our country under John Adams and then during the civil war with Abraham Lake Anything that remotely comes close to restrictions of the rights of virtually all Americans as to this. The point is is that other stories are going to have to be shut aside and just simply aren't going to be covered on this program. There are a couple of stories though the today have to be covered in the case. Of what of them? The implications of the story are as profound any implications. You can come up with with regard to covid nineteen. This is a story that has been brewing for several years but is coming to a head it right now..

Abraham Lake John Adams