1 Burst results for "Smith Josephson"

"smith josephson" Discussed on Court Junkie

Court Junkie

08:14 min | 1 year ago

"smith josephson" Discussed on Court Junkie

"Mixture originating from two individuals. The first scenario is samantha. Josephson in an unidentified unrelated individual contributed to the mixture versus scenario to for its two unidentified unrelated individuals that attributed to ensure means. She's not a contributor. The result of that comparison is the dna profile is approximately three point. Eight subterranean times more likely smith josephson in an unidentified unrelated individual contributed to the mixture of two unidentified unrelated individuals contributed to the mixture time. Back in our verbal scale would will level support is that for samantha josephson's inclusion in the profile. On mr rolling shoe. This would fall into our very strong support rage. They then asked about any dna found underneath nathanielsz fingernails the da vial was interpreted as a mixture originating from three individuals. Because these are nathaniel rollins generals. We can expect his dna reasonably be there so he is his dini. Profiles considered in both scenarios scenario wine is nathaniel roland samantha josephson in an unidentified unrelated individual contributed to the mixture versus mary where nathaniel rowlands in two unrelated individuals contributed to the mixture. The result of that comparison is routinely profile is approximately ninety four million times. More likely if nathaniel orland smith joseph sent in an unidentified unrelated individual contributed to the mixture that thing roland into unidentified unrelated individuals contributed to the mixture. The prosecution also inquired about other clothing items belonging to nathaniel including a sock into bandanna dating profile was interpreted as a mixture originating from two individuals. The first scenario is samantha. Justice saved an unidentified unrelated individual contribute to the mixture versus a scenario where it's too identified unrelated individuals that contributed to the mixture. The result evacuate harrison is dina profile is approximately four times more likely if samantha gis said in an unidentified unrelated individual contributed to the mixture than two identified unrelated individuals contributed to the mixture to recap that samantha's dna was found on nathanielsz flipflops underneath his fingernails and on his sock and bandanna then the testimony turned to the blood in the car. The specific parts tested were the rear of the console. The passengers headrest the driver's headrest the rear passenger seat and the seat belts agent. Doing said there's very strong support that the blood found on all of those locations included blood from samantha. Agent duane then told the jury about blood found in that family dollar grocery bag located in the dumpster at marinas apartments again. The blood came back as very strong. Support that it was from samantha but on several occasions during the direct examination agent duane mentioned an unknown profile and when prosecutors asked about the dna found under samantha's fingernails not only was there an unknown profile there too but nathaniel rowlands profile was excluded. What are your results. is mr roland on. The item. Daniel roland is excluded as a possible contributor for the right hand fingernail. Scrapings misjustice correct. That's that and that was done by the analysis that you talked about earlier that process that is crack. Is there a second time of process or analysis that you can do in regards to dna vows will. that's separate from the starbucks. Yes what is that. we also perform. What is called why. Sdr testing what is your why s. You're testing is a type of technology that allows us to just isolate male vide just for mailing. That is correct. So did you. Perform westie are testing on this item. Sixteen point one. I did and the process for conducting. The test is completely different. From the starbucks that you described earlier the statistic. It's different statistic is different. Thank you so the ratios the numbers. You've been reciting. do you do that. Same thing for the white cr analysis. Now it's a different type of sadistic okay. Did you conduct analysis on this item. I did and what was the result. The partial why scr profile developed is insufficient interpretation. What does that mean. That means that there was not enough. Dna developed to interpret now. Let's talk about sixteen point two. Which is the left hand fingernail scrapings again in that situation under the the star makes what was your under star. Mex- what would your finding name. Her developed is attributable to smith. Joseph said and. I'm sorry with mr roland. Included or excluded as part of that. Daniel roland is excluded as possible. Contributor to do attempt to do any wise cr Analysis on that i did and what was the result. No t. r. profile was developed when it was time for cross examination. The defense wanted to focus on that unknown profile. Part of the unknown profile was found within the same batches as samantha's blood and you've excluded everybody else that you had proposed for. Yes that is correct. So it's samantha jones said mixed with an unidentified person yes the defense also asked about a few other locations from the car where an unknown profile was found. They argued that each location which included the gearshift and steering wheel could imply that someone unknown drove the black chevy impala. So there's still one profile this on the gear shift to this heart don't belong to correct. Yes that is correct. The defense asked agent wayne about the clothes nathaniel had allegedly been wearing. The night of samantha's murder. The clothes found in meritas trash. There was evidence of samantha on the clothes along with again an unknown profile and the profiles a mixture of two individuals that is correct and samantha josephson's likelihood of being a contributor to this mixture. Is pretty strong right yes. The dna profile is three point. Seven seven million times more likely her and one individual. What another person contributing to the measure that is correct. Anything or roland is excluded. From being at second person correct that is correct and you excluded everybody else that you had been samples or with this particular item. Yes that is correct. So what samantha. Joseph said an an unidentified person that we don't know that is correct then. There was another piece of evidence. Defense wanted to ask agent duane about the hunting knife that was found meritas trash. So you did. A you received a swab from the radio Correct that is correct. Mr rowlands profile is not on that late. Correct that.

samantha nathaniel rowlands samantha josephson smith josephson nathaniel rollins mr roland nathaniel roland samantha jose Daniel roland nathaniel orland smith joseph samantha gis nathanielsz Agent duane Josephson marinas apartments nathaniel roland starbucks dina harrison duane