6 Burst results for "Sharon Derek"

"sharon derek" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

05:18 min | 6 months ago

"sharon derek" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Style. Folks I'm talking to Lee strobel, who's the author of a new book called the case for heaven, a journalist investigates evidence for life after death. I am so fascinated by this. You were just about to say something before we went to the break. Well, you made a very important point Eric, which is that we're not reducible to our brain. We are more than our physical brain. And how do we know that? Because there's a difference between our brain our physical brain and our consciousness, our mind, or our spirit, our soul. And the example that was given to me by the neuroscientists from Cambridge University who I interviewed, doctor Sharon Derek's PhD from Cambridge, who have well-known neuroscientists who wrote a book called am I just my brain and the answer is no, you're not. But she gave me the illustration. She said, what if there was a woman named Mary? And Mary was the world's leading expert on vision. She understood the physical makeup of the eye how it was constructed, the physics, the chemistry, how the eye functions how images are carried through the optic nerve, how the brain processes that. She understands it better than anybody in the world. But she's blind. What if all of a sudden for the first time, Mary received her eyesight? At that moment, would marry learn anything new about vision. Yeah. She would you be able to see she'd had the first person experience of seeing no amount of knowledge about the physical working of the eye and the brain would get married to that point of that first person experience of seeing. And so consciousness and the brain are not the same thing. Consciousness or they soul or the spirit. Don't is distinct from the funny whenever you hear people talk about the idea that the brain is a computer, blah, blah, blah, blah. And you say, what is consciousness? I mean, this is heavy stuff. Yeah. But when is it that you become conscious, computers are not conscious? How big does a computer have to be before it makes the leap to consciousness? It will never make the leap to consciousness. Because a brain is different from a mind. And when you're talking about this, I mean, this is very heavy and there are scientists who have really puzzled over this and there are some people who just sort of assume that, well, of course, we live in material universe, but that leap, it's an infinite leap. You can never make the leak from computers to consciousness. That's exactly right. And there's really is I believe no rational explanation from the materialists who believe we are just our brain to explain consciousness. So you either say it's an illusion, which a lot of materialist people just believe the physical worlds all there is. They will say consciousness is an illusion, free will. Sam Harris says free will is an illusion. Really? Is that a livable worldview? Not even a logical worldview? Not even close. So I think you're absolutely right. And, you know, the Bible says that there's really two aspects of the afterlife or believers. When we die, our spirit our soul our consciousness separates from our body, we go to an intermediate state and we're either present with Jesus in Paradise or we're separated from God in Hades. And then the second phase begins when Jesus returns at the conservation of history where united with our now resurrected bodies and we go through final judgment and then we spend eternity in a very physical place whether having or hell. So this question and when Jesus said truly to the repentant criminal on the cross truly today it will be with me in Paradise and the apostle Paul says to be absent from the body. The president, the law, suggest, and indeed, our school does separate from our physical body and science is telling us near death experiences, as I say, which are documented in 900 scientific studies telling us this consistent with what the Bible tells us. I really believe and that's huge. I really believe we're on the verge of revival and reformation because I really think that science and again, that's the thesis of my new book, but there is the evidence is piling up and it has to do with the Internet and whatever somehow the information is exploding. It's harder and harder and harder to avoid. The science is getting us farther and farther. So we can see these things that we could have pretended ignorance or we could have pretended like who's to say less and less are we able to say who's to say? The evidence is here and here and here and it piles up and up and up and you have to be kind of willful in looking away from it. So I think we're kind of on the verge of something in the west. I'm very hopeful. Yeah. Let's follow the science. So if you follow the science of cosmology, the origin of the universe, if you follow the science of physics, which is the fine tuning of the universe, if you file the science of DNA and you look at the biological information, every cell and human body, this all points toward a Supernatural creator whose qualities happen.

Sharon Derek Mary Lee strobel Cambridge University Cambridge Eric Sam Harris apostle Paul Jesus
"sharon derek" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

06:35 min | 6 months ago

"sharon derek" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Folks I'm talking to Lee strobel, who's the author of a new book called the case for heaven, a journalist investigates evidence for life after death. I am so fascinated by this. You were just about to say something before we went to the break. Well, you made a very important point error, which is that we're not reducible to our brain. We are more than our physical brain. And how do we know that? Because there's a difference between our brain our physical brain and our consciousness, our mind or our spirit, our soul. And the example that was given to me by the neuroscientists from Cambridge University who I interviewed, doctor Sharon Derek's PhD from Cambridge, who have well-known neuroscientists who wrote a book called am I just my brain and the answer is no, you're not. But she gave an illustration. She said, what if there was a woman named Mary? And Mary was the world's leading expert on vision. She understood the physical makeup of the eye how it was constructed, the physics, the chemistry, how the eye functions how images are carried through the optic nerve, how the brain processes that. She understands it better than anybody in the world. But she's blind. What if all of a sudden for the first time, Mary received her eyesight? At that moment, would marry learn anything new about vision. Yeah. She wouldn't be able to see she'd had the first person experience of seeing no amount of knowledge about the physical working of the eye and the brain would get married to that point of that first person experience of seeing. And so consciousness and the brain are not the same thing. Consciousness or they soul or the spirit don't is distinct from the human brain. Whenever you hear people talk about the idea that the brain is a computer, blah, blah, blah, blah. And you say, what is consciousness? I mean, this is heavy stuff. Yeah. But when is it that you become conscious, computers are not conscious? How big does a computer have to be before it makes the leap to consciousness? It will never make the leap to consciousness. Because that a brain is different from a mind. And when you're talking about this, I mean, this is very heavy and there are scientists who have really puzzled over this and there are some people who just sort of assume that, well, of course, we live in material universe, but that leap, it's an infinite leap. You can never make the leap from computer to consciousness. That's exactly right. And there's really is I believe no rational explanation from the materialists who believe we are just our brain to explain consciousness. So you either say it's an illusion, which a lot of materialists people just believe the physical world's all there is. They will say consciousness is an illusion. Free will. Sam Harris says free will is an illusion. Really? Is that a livable worldview? Is that a logical worldview? Not even close. So I think you're absolutely right. And, you know, the Bible says that there's really two aspects of the afterlife or believers. When we die, our spirit our soul our consciousness separates from our body, we go to an intermediate state and we're either present with Jesus in Paradise or we're separated from God in Hades. And then the second phase begins when Jesus returns at the consummation of history where united with our now resurrected bodies and we go through final judgment and then we spend eternity in a very physical place whether having or hell. So this question, and when Jesus said truly to the criminal on the cross truly today will be with me in Paradise. And the apostle Paul says to be absent from the body. The president of the law suggests that indeed our school does separate from our physical body and science is telling us, near death experiences, as I say, which are documented in 900 scientific studies telling us this consistent with what the Bible tells us I really believe that's huge. I really believe we're on the verge of revival and reformation because I really think that science and again, that's the thesis of my new book, but there is the evidence is piling up and it has to do with the Internet and whatever somehow the information is exploding. It's harder and harder and harder to avoid. The sciences is getting us farther and farther. So we can see these things that we could have pretended ignorance or we could have pretended like who's to say, less and less are we able to say who's to say? The evidence is here and here and here and it piles up and up and up and you have to be kind of willful in looking away from it. So I think we're kind of on the verge of something in the west. I'm very hopeful. Yeah. Let's follow the science. So if you follow the science of cosmology, the origin of the universe, if you follow the science of physics, which is the fine tuning of the universe, if you follow the science of DNA and you look at the biological information at every cell in the human body, this all points toward a Supernatural creator whose qualities happen to match the same description of the God of the Bible. So I agree with you. I think that science is pointing increasing. And we discovered over the last 50 or 60 years. So that's what's so funny. Again, that's when you read my book, you'll know. Like, this is exactly where I came out. It's also where Stephen Meyer comes out and it's kind of the guy hypothesis on a higher level more writing on a more popular level. But it's called logic. And the fact is that the last 50 or 60 years, it's bad news for the materialist because we didn't have the science that we now have. Now, you can't really say is God dead because the evidence has just piled up while we were kind of in this fantasy that we could live in a secular world. And it's just no longer it's no longer possible. When did this book come from? Yeah, it just came out recently in September. And one of the things I do in it is I have what I call the pyramid to heaven. I interviewed a philosopher a famous philosopher about this. And so he said, let's start at the broadest question. What is truth will establish what is truth, truth is that which corresponds to reality. And for me, I didn't realize we're bumping into a heartbreak. This sounds brilliant. This sounds amazing. So as.

Sharon Derek Mary Lee strobel Cambridge University Cambridge Sam Harris Jesus Paul Stephen Meyer
"sharon derek" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

02:30 min | 6 months ago

"sharon derek" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Folks I'm talking to Lee strobel, who's the author of a new book called the case for heaven, a journalist investigates evidence for life after death. I am so fascinated by this. You were just about to say something before we went to the break. Well, you made a very important point error, which is that we're not reducible to our brain. We are more than our physical brain. And how do we know that? Because there's a difference between our brain our physical brain and our consciousness, our mind or our spirit, our soul. And the example that was given to me by the neuroscientists from Cambridge University who I interviewed, doctor Sharon Derek's PhD from Cambridge, who have well-known neuroscientists who wrote a book called am I just my brain and the answer is no, you're not. But she gave an illustration. She said, what if there was a woman named Mary? And Mary was the world's leading expert on vision. She understood the physical makeup of the eye how it was constructed, the physics, the chemistry, how the eye functions how images are carried through the optic nerve, how the brain processes that. She understands it better than anybody in the world. But she's blind. What if all of a sudden for the first time, Mary received her eyesight? At that moment, would marry learn anything new about vision. Yeah. She wouldn't be able to see she'd had the first person experience of seeing no amount of knowledge about the physical working of the eye and the brain would get married to that point of that first person experience of seeing. And so consciousness and the brain are not the same thing. Consciousness or they soul or the spirit don't is distinct from the human brain. Whenever you hear people talk about the idea that the brain is a computer, blah, blah, blah, blah. And you say, what is consciousness? I mean, this is heavy stuff. Yeah. But when is it that you become conscious, computers are not conscious? How big does a computer have to be before it makes the leap to consciousness? It will never make the leap to consciousness. Because that a brain is different from a mind. And when you're talking about this, I mean, this is very heavy and there are scientists who have really puzzled over this and there are some people who just sort of assume that, well, of course, we live in material universe, but that leap, it's an infinite leap. You can never make the leap from computer to

Sharon Derek Mary Lee strobel Cambridge University Cambridge Sam Harris Jesus Paul Stephen Meyer
Author Lee Strobel: We Are More Than Our Physical Brains

The Eric Metaxas Show

02:30 min | 6 months ago

Author Lee Strobel: We Are More Than Our Physical Brains

"Folks I'm talking to Lee strobel, who's the author of a new book called the case for heaven, a journalist investigates evidence for life after death. I am so fascinated by this. You were just about to say something before we went to the break. Well, you made a very important point error, which is that we're not reducible to our brain. We are more than our physical brain. And how do we know that? Because there's a difference between our brain our physical brain and our consciousness, our mind or our spirit, our soul. And the example that was given to me by the neuroscientists from Cambridge University who I interviewed, doctor Sharon Derek's PhD from Cambridge, who have well-known neuroscientists who wrote a book called am I just my brain and the answer is no, you're not. But she gave an illustration. She said, what if there was a woman named Mary? And Mary was the world's leading expert on vision. She understood the physical makeup of the eye how it was constructed, the physics, the chemistry, how the eye functions how images are carried through the optic nerve, how the brain processes that. She understands it better than anybody in the world. But she's blind. What if all of a sudden for the first time, Mary received her eyesight? At that moment, would marry learn anything new about vision. Yeah. She wouldn't be able to see she'd had the first person experience of seeing no amount of knowledge about the physical working of the eye and the brain would get married to that point of that first person experience of seeing. And so consciousness and the brain are not the same thing. Consciousness or they soul or the spirit don't is distinct from the human brain. Whenever you hear people talk about the idea that the brain is a computer, blah, blah, blah, blah. And you say, what is consciousness? I mean, this is heavy stuff. Yeah. But when is it that you become conscious, computers are not conscious? How big does a computer have to be before it makes the leap to consciousness? It will never make the leap to consciousness. Because that a brain is different from a mind. And when you're talking about this, I mean, this is very heavy and there are scientists who have really puzzled over this and there are some people who just sort of assume that, well, of course, we live in material universe, but that leap, it's an infinite leap. You can never make the leap from computer to

Sharon Derek Lee Strobel Mary Cambridge University Cambridge
"sharon derek" Discussed on Cross Examined Official Podcast

Cross Examined Official Podcast

07:55 min | 7 months ago

"sharon derek" Discussed on Cross Examined Official Podcast

"A hundred percent with that another section of the book and again we're talking to lee strobel. The book is called the case for heaven. Brand new book in a long line of casebooks leah's written and again the best thing about these books is not only to get lease insights. You get the scholars that he interviews and lee. You do a great job of taking. What can be academic information in pudding the cookies on the bottom shelf so to speak so people can really draw some valid conclusions. And i know you you interview some some some great people you all. You have a chapter in here on the soul. What are you covering chapter well. The question is neuro. Scientists have a mapping the electrical activity of the brain of course for a number of years and it tongue in cheek. They say well you know. We haven't found the sole source. It sounds like makita. Say same thing. You're hearing mrs astronaut. The russian cosmonaut me went up and he said. I don't see got up here. Which is a vacuous comment. But but but e so they say that are just a brain. We are just bring well. I interviewed a neuroscientist with a phd from cambridge university. Dr sharon derek's. She actually wrote a book called. Am i just my brain in her conclusions. No you're not just your brain but you are a body and a spirit of body and consciousness in a soul in the physical brain cannot account for the phenomenon of consciousness through our soul our spirit. Our koch assist is distinct from our physical brain. It animates our physical brain and and interacts with our physical brain. But it's distinct from it. At one of the way she illustrates. This is through a thought experiment. She says imagine a woman they marry is the world's leading expert on vision. She understands everything about how. The i function she understands. How the optic nerve carries impulses how the brain translate those in the images. She understands the physics and the chemistry of vision better than anybody in the world. But she's blind. What if. Mary were suddenly given her site. At that moment this she became able to see. Would she learn anything new about vision and the interest of christian would of course she would she would be able to see and so what what she said to me. She said lead. That means physical facts alone cannot explain the first person experience of consciousness. No amount of knowledge about the physical working of the eye and brain would get married closer to the experience of what it's like to actually see. So she said. Conscious simply cannot be synonymous with brain activity She also made the point which is a good point that no Discovery of modern neuroscience disproving the existence of the soul. We can map the physical. The you know the the areas of the brain that lineup when negatively steak place. But we can't see our thoughts we we can't see what's actually in our minds and so this is important because as i said earlier. According to christian theology our consciousness our spirit continues to exist after our physical demise. You also have a quote here from her. That i like some thirty three. A she said science could never disprove. God that would be like scientists figuring out how all the programming works on facebook and then declaring so this disproves the existence of mark zuckerberg. That is a good quote. So what i want to ask you this. Because i've dealt with atheist for many years now as you know and it seems to me they just don't get the self-defeating nature of materialism if our mind is our brain. Why should we trust anything. Our brain is telling us because it's driven by the laws of physics. Have you run into any atheists. A will admit yeah. That's a big problem for us. Well you know you look at sam harris and he says look if this is true we have free will. If we don't hear free will how in the world is anybody held accountable for everything. They do. Other great or terrible. It's on we can't live that way not live as if we have no free will and so you're right there in these internal contradictions and elvin planta courses pointed out years ago. That that If our brains are merely the The product of evolutionary processes than. How can we trust them to to know that it's knowing as the truth right you're right these are self-defeating beliefs that atheists half. Yeah lewis did did a great job. I think it was in his book. Miracles talking about the self-defeating nature of materialism then you have a chapter in here on the pyramid of heaven y- pyramid to have an. I should say explain what you cover there. What's that about you. Chad chad chad. I've heard his name. But i don't know him personally. Yeah she had this awesome chad. This is so cool. Chad was a volunteer in our apologetic ministry with mark middleburg and i many many years ago willow creek church in chicago and he got turned onto apologetic. He was an engineer. He was once on the verge suicide. He had a gun in his hand was going to kill himself Because of the the meaninglessness of life became turned on by philosophy went on to get his phd from. Marquette became later the vice president of the jellicoe philosophical societies professor philosophy at bethel college in indiana and he came up with actually one day. The story is i was preaching at a church in. He was sitting there waiting for me to finish and a guy came up to me and said hey. I really thought your talk was interesting. But i'm an atheist all kinds of questions. Could we get together and talk. And i said you know what i'm about to leave town for a month but maybe like to talk to my friend chad. So chad said yeah. I'll talk to you so they made an appointment. The guy came over to chance apartment in chan in order to make the case for christianity Created this pyramid And he begins with the question of truth. What is ruth. And then he goes to different worldviews vm. Atheism and pantheon. Probably pantheon right and then he argues y theism makes the most sense and then he goes to revelation scripture. He goes to the resurrection and ultimately to the gospel. So this sort of builds a pyramid starting at the broadest base which is what is truth and then building upward to the gospel and so we employ that in the book and we walked through these various worldviews the three main worldviews. And look at you know the flaws in them and the shortcomings in them and demonstrate. The theism is the only one that really is coherent. The scriptures of the bible are the only scriptures that that the whole together logically and historically and so forth and so we kind of use that structure to build a pyramid that points upward toward the gospel in toward the truth of christianity. But i thought it was a creative way. The chad came up with to put christianity to the test. Yeah and it. It is really are thority. If in fact the scriptures are true. This is where we get the best information on heaven and yet we cut back from. We come back the break with lee strobel. We are going to investigate that a little bit more. You're listening. I don't have enough faith to be an atheist with frank turk and american family radio network. I want to mention or being myrtle beach this weekend. With the great alex mcfarland. We're doing a truth for new generation at first baptist. Myrtle beach details around the website. Then monday night.

mrs astronaut Dr sharon derek lee strobel leah elvin planta cambridge university koch Chad chad chad mark middleburg willow creek church lee mark zuckerberg jellicoe philosophical societi sam harris Mary chad bethel college facebook lewis
"sharon derek" Discussed on WFAN Sports Radio_FM

WFAN Sports Radio_FM

13:11 min | 3 years ago

"sharon derek" Discussed on WFAN Sports Radio_FM

"Sixty six and from a med standpoint we're talking about jason vargas yesterday and what the best case scenario could be for jason vargas says he made his first started a year against the miami marlins and i believe mike fogelman your expectations for vargas were was it the same as von five innings of to run baseball i even said you might settle for three five and six room baseball yeah totally fine harris was hoping for six innings of two run baseball what you get five innings to run baseball the jason vargas and look every single ending it felt like vargas was in trouble there were ton of ducks on the pond the marlins ended up with sixteen hits in this ball game and yet still found a way to lose but a five ron top half of the first inning basically ended up being the difference for the amazed in zen you had nemo get on base early had mcneil get on base early could no should have grounded into a four six double play if it wasn't for the fact that the marlins and they're ridiculous shifting i mean they have now taking the shifts to another level with the way they had that set up i mean you got a chance to have a four six double play i'm looking at the infield the saying you can't have somebody who could cover second base exactly a proper shift but give them credit they capitalize wilson rama's capitalizes dom smith got to start over pete lonzo A fifth, and then they get to the. Map bullpen and as much as I like Seth logo. Let's be fair. Seth Lugo did not have it set Lugo was all out of sorts in his innings pasta work giving up three runs giving up five hits in the process. Didn't know what if the time no familiar, no Edwin. And then you're gonna Justin Wilson coming in. Bottom. Half of the eighth inning felt like he came in two or three batters too late. Another series win four one on a year with a six two five victory over the Miami Marlins. The storyline for the Mets is simple to scorn runs. The bullpen management leaves a lot to be desired. Somebody has to explain to me. Why Edwin is pitching in a seventy three game the night before and yet in a safe situation in a one run game. He's unavailable. That's not the way it should be drawn at all. That is something that will come back and bite the Mets later on this year. But you'll take the win you'll take any win in which Jason Vargas is getting a victory because you don't expect a whole lot of those. And now you have a chance to sweep the lowly Marlins is Jacob degrom. We'll take them out on Wednesday. So on all good day for the Mets wasn't pretty. Yes. Bit. But a win win. Let's say to New Jersey John Jones is up next. Johnny. Hey, what's going on day? John would shake abrupt. With the Yankees. I'm pulling my hair. Ryan I mean growing up playing baseball play little getting move into the play. First second third base is basic baseball one a one I've got for you. Was close and the second one for you. I I we go number one. They may not okay. You know base almost every day every day. He looks like a guy some back. Am I right or wrong? You're not wrong, and especially left handed pitcher makes a ton of sense topped iota. Okay. That that's the one thing that I'm like. The let the left and the right bad. I want to surpass now. Let's look over there. Let's see who's hot. I i'm. Second. You know, why? John. That's where I disagree. No. No, no, no, no. You wanna have in this day and age you best hitter hitting in the two spot. That's what the angels do. What my trout. It's what a lot of teams in baseball going to do you want Aaron judge in that to spot? We can agree on DJ. Lemay you leaving office team. We cannot agree on hit and Brett Gardner second. I can't do that. But anyway continue. Okay. Well, the recent gory and they must second line. Don't go to somewhere else where you put 'em guarded because gotta speak. How about we? We. His. The problem with that John I got Aaron judge hitting me. I want guys on base and the story. I don't want guys given up pounds when you could potentially get on base. Aaron judge VN Aaron judge is fine. Where he isn't that to all. Forget about order. Forget about semantics for a minute. The more important aspect for her company, and what they really need to understand over the next few weeks. They gotta make sure more often than not the best lineup day in and day out is gonna be out there. And I get it. You've got to kind of handle to whiskey a certain way because the guy employ last year. He's had a ton of injury Stratus career tool whiskies dot playing sixty seven days a week. She's not happening is going to pay four days a week. And you'll take that going to have to live with a Tyler Wade or whoever getting some burn at least for the time being. Gary sanchez. I want him in the line of five days a week. And I'm even going to consider the of one of those days. I want to play. Top prospect. He's up here. Let's see what he can do. And I think it makes sense to leadoff DJ. Lemay you when you're in a lefty because then you could have Bret gone down in that nine hole basically being second leadoff hitter. Let's say to Farmingdale Lenny is up next on a foul is up Lennie Hagedon. I JJ. I have a couple of issues with the Yankees this anybody out dead. No. That the Yankees have won anything in ten years. Does anybody noted that since the new Yankee Stadium has been built that I didn't know say jinx? But like people are getting hurt plays a Catholic getting hurt. And it started with mock to share up his last year with the Yankees. He's the first guy that went down. He got hurt that all sin. It's like a roller coaster ride every year. every year in excuse with the yankees they're not a world championship tune to differ there i do right now the yankees are dealing with a ton of injuries steph five games into the year you telling me team that hadn't over on the number at ninety six and a half wins now five games into the year your opinion is this team's done any good this team has done a world championship team and one point on the stadium by the way and i'm not a big fan in this stadium i miss the old place i love the old place i grew up at the old place that said i got a poke a hole in your theory because the first year they open the new yankee stadium they won the world series that's fact opinion that's a fact so no i do not believe the yankees down the new yankee stadium a quote unquote stink why mark sharon derek jeter and d- made two thousand twelve thirteen fourteen yankees have injury problems because there were no baseball team that's why this current yankee team is not old dave had freakish injuries guess what the freakish injuries all the baseball trae turner trying to just broke his finger murphy broke his finger problem with the national park and colorado have you watched them nets civilized tylenol decade plus there's an old adage i can't say it on the air because i'll get in trouble by chapin's you guys figure it out does it take a rocket scientist to figure it out you gotta rise above that the yankees of their first five games what lackluster mouthing anybody would argue that but it's five games in one hundred sixty two game season there is an attorney left in this year and oh by the way the won the world series last year that's any division you've got to be the one five to say they want five let's say the fort lee new jersey i could powell leslie joins us oh john did i enjoyed last night team to break the yankees i knew the tiger distinct this year but you know what it never gets old beat you had a moment listen lastly that's what you look for when you're dealing with a lousy team that's what you look for when you know you don't have a whole lot expectation going into the air you wanna moment and now we'll see if they can provide you with another moment here on wednesday so much right the he was over to help peterson was he got the game double i mean he's opposite fringe minor leaguer new future with the tigers i mean the one guy i'm going to be interesting to watch today's matt boyd i'm expecting a big season out i'm taking fifteen minutes a love potential donnybrook last year even better yeah you looking for players like that leslie if detroit that's what you're looking for you walk in for guys digging and be a part of your foundation and the property tigers is during this weird predicament because they were pretty good for a long period of time they went all in on a variety of different occasions with the role donor mike illitch before he passed away and they signed some really bad contracts as dominant as miguel cabrera once was and he's a future hall of fame player miguel cabrera right now is a shell vote he once was you're paying cost thirty million dollars a year you gotta hope jordan zimmerman continues to pitch well why because if joins zimmerman pitches leslie with the dire need of starting pitching maybe you can get yourself out of that contract and get something in return i mean these things you want to do now if you the tigers moved forward you know you're not that good you know you still have a lot of work to do in the minor leagues develop players contracts out of there and no it's gonna take some time we'll see we'll tell the hopefully tigers win the series this afternoon but i to write down really pumped up this weekend i mean she can stay i tell you what no one thought this team was going to be good when they beat minnesota bundy spanked minnesota with their big men particularly aaron henry xavier tillman shined i said to myself maybe just could work and can duke and the dad there for big men coming through against duke henry tillman luke ward i mean they were fantastic i thought that was the reason why the pigment and i camp when did destroyed l._s._u. to myself he got a chance well they're playing great basketball leslie and they wanna game against duke not playing their best game they shoot the ball pretty well their physical team they have size and they have the sort of point guard that you love because he's capable of taking a game over and caches winston winston can take games over now they're going to be frustrated by the defensive texas tech that's going to be a good old fashioned rock them sock them type game the question is going to be can michigan state solve the riddle of a dominant texas tech defense that has been befuddling for a bunch of different teams michigan had trouble gonzaga certainly had trouble so can michigan state get enough fence and shoot the ball well enough to win this game i think that's what they're going to need to connect shoot it john i feel they can't remember the reason what.

baseball Yankees jason vargas miami marlins Mets VN Aaron Seth Lugo John Yankee Stadium Lemay Justin Wilson New Jersey Brett Gardner Edwin mcneil mike fogelman harris Gary sanchez wilson rama Farmingdale