28 Burst results for "Senator Feinstein"
Democrats Aren't Talking About the Worst Possible Outcome of the California Recall
"Larry elder gets to be governor. Two weeks from now after the recall Everybody in the liberal media has gonads no big deal. If larry elder becomes governor he's only going to serve until november twenty twenty two and will have no power anyway because the democrats control both houses of the legislature in california. So what if larry elder becomes governor await a minute. What did that caller just remind us. If something happens dianne feinstein. Who's sick as a dog. And she either is incapacitated. Or you know god forbid dies. We don't wish her will if senator feinstein can't complete her term. The governor of california governor larry elder or his biden would say elder gets to appoint the replacement senator and surprise. There's no more fifty fifty senate and that's the end of vice president. Kamala harris breaking all the votes and the votes and this would be just an interesting turn of events. So let's keep our eye on that california
Garland confirmation is a stage for 4 of GOP's 2024 hopefuls
"App. Federal Judge Merrick Garland is president Biden's nominee to become attorney general. He testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee today. The hearing lasted most of the day We begin with committee chair Dick Durbin of Illinois. This hearing will come to order today. The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to be the 86th attorney general of the United States. Judge Garland I wanna welcome you and your family. I want to welcome you back to the Senate Judiciary Committee. I know this return trip. It's been a long time and planning on you're here. Finally, this will be the Judiciary Committee's first hearing of the 117th Congress. Before I turned to my opening remarks. I'd like to just take a few minutes to make some Acknowledgments. I want to welcome my friend, Senator Chuck Grassley as the committee's ranking member. When I first came on the Senate Judiciary Committee 24 years ago, I was the ranking member on subcommittee with you, and we dealt with the issue of bankruptcy. Now Illinois and Iowa sit next to each other. And so did Urban Grassley. We have our differences. But Senator Grassley and I have worked together on important legislation over the years, most recently on criminal justice and sensing reform. I look forward to continuing that work in this Congress. I want to recognize the outgoing chair and ranking member Senator Lindsey Graham, who will join us remotely this morning, and Senator Dianne Feinstein. Senator Graham, as is true of Senator Grassley. Well, we don't always agree, has always been a welcome partner on many issues. Including one of the most challenging issues, immigration, Senator Feinstein. I want to come in for leading the committee Democrats with Grace and resolved over the past four years. I know she will continue to be an important voice on this committee on a host of issues, including in her new capacity as the chair of the Human Rights and Laws subcommittee, which I was proud to charity and past Congresses. I also want to welcome our new committee members who either be here in person. I see one in person and one probably remote senators Padilla And also on the Democratic side, Senator Cotton on the Republican side. I look forward to working with each of you. There's some historic first in the Judiciary Committee this year, Senator Padilla, our new senator from California, will be chairing the subcommittee on immigration, citizenship. Border safety. I'm honored that he's the first Latino senator to chair that subcommittee, and we look forward to his leadership. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey will chair the subcommittee on criminal justice and counter terrorism. He's the first Black senator to chair a judiciary subcommittee. And we could not imagine a better choice at the helm of this particular subcommittee to all of our other members who are returning to serve on the committee. Welcome back. I want to thank all the committee members for agreeing to hold this committee hearing and vote on Judge Garland's nomination. It is a great honor to serve on this committee. The Senate established the Judiciary Committee by resolution on December 10th 18 16, making it among the very first standing committees of the Senate. This committee has seen many consequential debates and approved many important nominations and landmark legislation in the committee's history. There has only been one prior Illinois senator to serve his chair Judge Garland Lyman. Trumbull, who led the committee from 18 61 to 18 72, and during his term of service was a Democrat, a Republican, a radical Republican and a Democrat. Again. He was the most bipartisan senator, you could imagine His tenure was also distinguished by passage. Of historic legislation, the 13th 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The Freedman's bureau acts of 18 65 and 18 66 Civil Rights Act of 18 66. The last of these was introduced by Trumbull ultimately became the nation's first civil rights law. As chair, Trumbull saw a nation torn apart by original sin slavery and widespread violence and injustice that continued even after the 13th amendments. Passage is African Americans throughout the nation face race. System. Our nation is still dealing with the consequences of these injustices. People of color face systemic racism, and we're still working to rid this nation of the horrific legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. This committee could make a difference. We have the jurisdiction and the opportunity to do it through legislation, oversight and nominations, including this nomination of Merrick Garland to service our nation's next attorney general. There have been few moments in history where the role of attorney general and the occupant of That post It mattered more Judge Garland should you be confirmed, and I have every confidence you will be. You'll oversee a Justice Department at an existential moment. After four tumultuous years of intrigue, controversy and brute political force, the future of the department is clearly in the hands of the next attorney general Under attorney general Sessions and successor Bill Bar. The Justice Department literally became an arm of the White House committed to advancing the interest. The President Trump his family and his political allies. It came as little surprise then that the U. S Department of Justice became the Trump Department of Justice General Bar stated clearly that he believed the attorney general was the president's lawyer, not the nations. And what were the results too many in the department's senior roles cast aside the rules law trump appointees in the apartment sidelined career public servants from Lyon attorneys, two FBI agents Limited their roles disregarded their nonpartisan input override, overriding their professional judgment and falsely accusing them of being members of the
"senator feinstein" Discussed on Biz Talk Radio
"Our focus is gold K to gold. Hey, two stands for candidates to so we already have a strong shareholder base way have a lot of people who invest in the group of companies and we have great bear. We have to need and we have bluestone Genesis all Done extremely well. Okay to gold switch focus from the Yukon to California with the change in administration from the U. S government. We think we have a chance now to unlock an amazing asset that's being drilled in the past by some of the majors, in fact, a noncompliant resorts being put on there by Newmont. It's not the resource himself. That is the unknown. It's the political situation, which we think is currently going in the right direction. Mojave is 200 Miles west of Las Vegas. Almost every hole as hit significant mineralization the past, but it was in a wilderness study area. In significant thing is Senator Feinstein in the mid nineties took it out of the wilderness Study area because there has been no potential. I've done a significant amount of expiration. We've actually started our exploration program. Mineralization is at surface its upside. It's known about where the 11th company on the ground on off those six or seven of the company's about some serious work. We just sort of putting another layer off if you like exploration and expertise on top of what's already known. I'm Doug Hirsch. You may already know that good. Rex could help you save up to 80% on your prescriptions. Unfortunately, many Americans can't get to a doctor. Right now. The good news is that from many health.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on AM 970 The Answer
"Cannot protect our freedom. I believe this is breakthrough technology is their enthusiasm for within President Trump's agenda for a second term. Yes, indeed. I mean, he you and I have talked about this in the past. He defies his energy strategy is all of the above. And he needs exactly that. Those works very, very plain spoken. He means nuclear energy. Unique. Natural gas oil. He means coal means renewable energy. So we're gonna pursue all of it because to your point Energy security means freedom here in America, and that's what we stand for. Secretary. Thank you So much for joining me, the secretary of energy and a remarkable guy, This is a big deal. I know we have Amy Cockney Barrett. But I wanted someone to cover the fact that we've got two new demonstration projects out there that people need to know about. I want to play for you. The funniest line of yesterday's hearings with any Cockney Barrett cut number eight. For me. My vote depends a lot on these responses because these air life or death questions for people. You know the reason that's funny Justice Just play the first part of it after we kinda too long, just play cut rate. For me. My vote depends a lot on these responses Stop. Does anyone believe that? Does anybody believe any of this has anything to do with anyone's vote? No. Absolutely not. There is going to be a party line vote on Judge Barrett next week. But what does depend these hearings Do dio is that allows America to state She is an amazing person. What? As legal scholar what a composed and vibrant and brilliant mind And what a family and what a life. And I tell you, I do expect attacks. They have stayed away from attacking her Catholicism's for which I'm grateful They did that in 2017. I believe that electric fence has been Throw it up around that because of Article six and the reaction that I happen to have been a part of that was just repulsed by the attacks of Senator Feinstein in Durban and Hirono and secretary and vice presidential nominee Senator Harris four years ago on subsequent nominees or Catholic Haven't heard a word of that on before. I'm very grateful for that. But they did attack alliance defending freedom yesterday on the fact that Judge Barrett appeared there. As I have done a dozen times. I have given an hour long lecture. That's what they do with the Blackstone Fellows a life defending freedom. Each summer gathers about 200 of the smartest law students in America together, they get them all in one room, and they hear from people like me. And like Judge Barrett about how to be people of faith and To be legal. Successes and to practice with conscience and ethics, and they teach them how to do that. When they give them an internship and they bring them back, and they teach them some more alliance. Defending freedom is a great organization defending your religious liberty. The religious liberty of everyone who.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on 710 WOR
"R. So that's the way the process worked. Yes, it would start because there was a lot. Then there was a lawsuit than there was an appeal in the court granted certain And then the court decided the case. Is that true? No matter what the issue is whether his gun abortion healthcare campaign finances that process hold true for everything. Yes, you always know Judges can't just wake up one day and say I have an agenda like guns. I hate guns. I like abortion. I hate abortion and walk in like a Royal Queen and impose their will on the world. You have to wait for cases and controversies, which is the language of the Constitution to wind their way through the process. What about that should be considered controversial. That's a term that you will always see the media use very selectively. And with Propagandistic intent all the time, right? Controversial conservative. That's a favorite terms. This is a controversial liberal, You'll notice that Or controversial. Left wing justice. No, no, no. Maybe a justice with right pounces on What about a justice who's actually controversial? Tony Barrett's telling everybody here what we all should know. What you just be. Ah, widely understood fact. Of the judiciary. And yet we also at some level all understand. It's not really the way it is. That's not the way things have been for quite some time. Here. There are judges who show up when I think the most egregious example is justice Sonia Sotomayor. Which is what would've left wing activists want that's what she does. Almost without exception. I'm sure there's some nine no cases where it's a fine. She applied the law here fine, but on a lot of very big cases, So my story is whatever the left wants, she would go for That's not good. That's not good, because that's not the function of the judges, is we? No, we keep going back to these. Underlying principles and the left tries to dispense with them and pretend that there's some other judicial philosophy that would make sense That would not just be a hyper politicization of the court. But that's what we're seeing happening. There is a hyper politicisation that has been going on. For a long time, and we'll get to court packing that still hasn't gone away. A lot to discuss today. Judge Barrett told Senator Feinstein that She would just adhere to the law of what could be more straightforward but again controversial Constitutionalist play seven. Well what? What is your view of how it should factor in? Let's see. I think that any issue that would arise under the affordable care act or any other statue should be determined by the law by looking at the text of the statute by looking at president the same way that it would for anyone and If there were policy differences for policy consequences those air for this body for the court. It's really a question of adhering Thio going where the law leaves and leaving the policy decisions.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO
"Next news Ready? Go, 600 Kogo. Thiss is the de Mile report with Carl DeMaio and Blue Penrose. The fight continues, by the way, it is pretty darn hot out there. Hope you're sitting inside in the air conditioning in here. Today on Capitol Hill, a dig it hot att leased for Democrats. They got hot under the collar. Talking about hate speech. Hate speech. Amy County. Barrett obviously, is a hater. She's a hater. She's at Catholic hater out there. Um she was responding about one of the cases regarding same sex marriage on basically, you know, said that it's it's precedent and lower courts would have to acknowledge that etcetera. Um, But in responding to the question about LGBT marriage, she used a term that now the Democrats say is hate speech. It's offensive. Um She said that people should you know people with sexual preference that she's she's never expressed any views on sexual preference. Onda. Democrats heard the word preference and said, it's not a choice. It's an orientation. It's not a choice. Now. Dare you call it preference? As a gay man. I could care less that whatever sexual preference, sexual orientation, you know Yang Yang Tomato tomato. Same damn thing. We know what she's talking about. This is not a good speech, but senator from Hawaii. Maisy Hirono. Or as I call her hazy moron. Oh! Ah, Hazy Murano san is quite so wise like this Ah Sea creature from Hawaii. She, uh she decided to scold. Ah, Amy Cockney Barrett. Here's audio number 12 this morning, Senator Feinstein asked you a question.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on KSFO-AM
"I think the Democrats would be ill advised to attack her on her religion. I think that you know when she was up for confirmation as a district judge, our appellate court judge, Senator Feinstein from California said the quote was the dogma lives strong in you or something of this sort, and this was an incredibly Stupid thing for the senator to say, and and the Republicans were able to make a lot of hay out of it, because you know they're a heck of a lot of religious people in public life, arguably a greater percentage of people in public life. Religious and Americans are it's sort of an end. An American standard that you don't judge someone based on their religion. And so it would be, I think incredibly foolish if the Democrats falling to that trap, But the Democrats were are going to try to do is tow not fight on how she's gonna judge based on Monroe vs Wade or how she's going to judge on the affordable Care act or, for that matter how she's going to judge on if there's any Election argument before the court, they be best able to sort of focus on the assumption that the only reason the Republicans want her appointed is because they know how she's going to judge and so did make that assumption and sort of not put any Cockney Barrett in judgment but rather sit in judgment of the process by which the Republicans have been pushing this nomination forward. On the other hand, I think the Republicans want to focus on this judge who seems to be, I think a very smart, very distinguished constitutional scholar from everything I've been able to read, but that's what the Republicans want to focus.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on NewsRadio WIOD
"I'm guessing So I'm having a conversation with him in my mind Like, why don't you because she's Catholic? Because she really has a dogma. Living inside of her is Senator Feinstein Sender. What does that mean, anyway? We'll have some kind of dogma, living insiders. I hope we do not just kind of floating out of On a breeze like a feather like Forrest Gump. Better have some kind of dog man side. He What are you doing with your life? If not I don't have any religious dogma. Just something should truly believe in something. You think that's very important to you. That you would base a an opinion upon and that might be the Constitution which seems like that's the way she goes. Anyway, it's ah. It's this crazy time in America and I don't believe will ever have another like it again. Oh, we might have another pandemic. I don't know if we'll ever have another Donald J. Trump. He is unique. You got to say that believing or not believing trust him or not think he's good at what he does or not. He is unique. So We'll see how this all flies today. But you know, yesterday I said I could write the headlines for you from ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN all that stuff and Fox and I was right on target. They're all doing the same thing. Trump was A bullet of China shop shouldn't be there. And Joe Biden was just well, he didn't show up for his pajama bottoms. So you want Ally didn't seem from the waist down, Did you? Hey, thanks. Many are thanks to Chris, Of course to see Taylor Edmunds. Can Boone and again today I see the regular Geir isn't staging. I confused with the way there. Hi. Thanks to Ah, Jeff, Balance your business Reporters from Bloomberg, everyone.
Who would replace Kamala Harris as California Senator?
"We still have 12 weeks before the November election, Voters will decide between President Trump on my vice President Mike Pence against former Vice President Joe Biden and current Democratic vice presidential nominee California Senator Kamala Harris. But in Harris are victorious. Governor Newsome will have to appoint a new senator to serve the next two years here in California, and well, there's been early speculation on names like State Attorney General Javier Becerra and San Diego State Senator Toni Atkins. Another elected officials told the governor he's interested. Mayor of Imperial Beach Search, the DEA sent a note to the governor with a picture of him in a business suit with a surfboard and water, nothing his intention to seek the appointments If the Democrats win because Pamela Harris may become our next vice president, I notified Governor Newsome like everyone does not is via Twitter that I'd like to be on the collection left to be the next U. S. Senator put out Open seat. And I think it's important to have someone who's not from the insider circle in Sacramento on someone that's ready to help clean up California and fight for our planet and our ocean from day one. Well and yes, I think it was the announcement that color base attention picture of you in a business suit with your surfboard. Right. The water's edge. Kind of embodying what it means to be from Imperial Beach. Yeah, you know, and you're a bitch, maybe small. What? We're mighty, You know, I've seen the names of some of the more high profile candidates and you know the reality of California's in trouble countries in trouble, And so we need someone who's used to doing things without a lot of resource is gonna support. You could get things done quickly, and that's experience. I've had thereby be in that experience that we need for the next senator from California and as the native Senate, California someone who rested 500 California the lifeguard for the state and for the city of Baby, I'm ready for the job and just look forward to being considered by Governor Newsome. Well, obviously you've worked with the governor, and in fact, you've worked as high as going to the White House when it comes to the sewage issue along the border, with the issues coming out of Mexico to impact San Diego County Imperial Beach, the city of San Diego. Everywhere else here with its impact that profile of yours with that fight has gone to the highest level. Yeah, so you know, unfortunately, because sewage issue is continuing to happen. I ve had to reach out from everybody from the president of Mexico, too. You know, President Trump We've met Got Governor knew someone. The governor of Baja California. So yeah, felt the times were like more like an international diplomat rather than a mare. But that is good practice good experience for what it takes to be an effective senator. To give you credit. Since the minute she was in office, she has support our first queen of the border. She's put a lot of attention on period Beach. In fact, her California director came to Imperial Beach to visit her stop is in very involved in this issue, so she's been great on the tissue as well as Senator Feinstein, but it's time for a new direction and and that's what I'm putting My My name in the hat or handed the ring And you know there is a perception out there at some points where you know, San Diego geographically being where it is. So we feel that the state of times may forget about us or things like that. You know, putting San Diego right back up there and kind of raising our hand and saying, Hey, what about us? Yeah, you know, Right now we have two senators from Northern California from the Bay area, So obviously we need a lot more Southern California repetition and the fact that Southern California needs a lot of help. We've seen that during this covert Christ of some of the highest rates, obviously in the country in Southern California, especially here in South San Diego and along the border, So we're in trouble have the highest rate of unemployment in the state along the borderlands question. Imperial County so We're in trouble. We need to get someone to replace Senator Harris. She gets elected vice president who's fighting for California and every California and not just the ones who can write campaign checks, right? I think that's important to make sure that someone who works for every California In every corner of state and every family and put families and kids first for California
FBI, SEC looking at lawmakers' stock trades after coronavirus briefings: report
"The justice department is reviewing those stock trades made by some lawmakers after corona virus briefings Dianne Feinstein Burr and I think Kelly Loeffler also are being being investigated where are we with that what do we know well according to published reports that the FBI has started asking questions about senator Burr's trades which were made after a confidential briefing although not a classified briefing and certain members of the product about the virus itself and of course there was a senator Feinstein's husband he gauged in expensive trade she personally did not that that that's almost irrelevant in the story my guess is nothing will happen for many of this yeah even though Congress passed the law back in two thousand twelve making it specifically in legal for members of the Senate and house decreed on confidential material non public information it doesn't appear that these meetings are going to meet that standard it could be classified briefing need being that would indicate that aside the politics of this are pretty ugly it's pretty obvious that bird did in fact trade on not non public information and I think it was material I think Burke who is not running for re election widely in North Carolina who has been analysis of the president and has allowed mark wanted to run the Senate intelligence committee hi Burgess figure he's on his way out so why not make a few Bucks pretty disgusting behavior but I don't think the justice department will ever pull the trigger although if they were going to they certainly picked on the public interest yeah now and and can you spell that this sort of colors in the lines over what we've seen the last few years you mention with the Senate intelligence committee thank you know Republicans are in charge is there but we just haven't seen a lot of traction from that Intel committee to get at the root of the problems in our government and now you're looking at a guy who just betrayed his oath of office in order to enrich himself well I think the present really a classic example of the never Trumper with power in the Republican contact he's he's practically a democratic civil servant of the weighted resistance as function is trump took the presidency of Birkhead heated front from the beginning he has obstructed getting to the truth about the Russian hoax although there was getting in plain sight you never heard him say anything supporters about the president during that entire three year pokes Burke is not well white in the White House as you might imagine he he is well liked by his fellow senators interestingly enough but that's the nature of the club pretty pathetic guy and he will not be missed by those of us who care deeply about the country and then exit aria which was singing this tune on stock trading is pretty disgusting and it's shameful actually but I don't think anything criminally legal will come from it yeah sad Joe the justice department is now saying that anyone caught intentionally spreading the corona virus could face terrorism charges is this something that they can make stick are they probably could I think there's enough public anger at anybody taking advantage of this situation you see new cases where somebody spits on lotus road beds doubles in a in a a grocery store or supermarket ending you know that often produce has to be destroyed and then the person is arrested this could be considered a terrorist act under not only federal law but under most states now have anti terrorism statute because it's designed to do harm in a political situation etcetera etcetera if it yeah I doubt if there will be any of the cases brought because again talk about limited resources and what we have to do but if anyone knowingly we're spread the virus Bob well somebody worked in a hospital it took advantage of access the bios or anything like that I have no doubt that would be a prosecution individuals doing something like this you know we'll see how I've got the prosecutors are I would do it if I regret it but you know I'm not there
Pelosi not yet ready to transmit Trump's impeachment to the Senate
"For the past several weeks. There's been one burning question dominating this saga. When Will Nancy Pelosi? The speaker of the house transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate and therefore launched the trial process in the Senate. While this morning Speaker Pelosi finally addressed at that point. Take a listen now in terms of impeachment. You'll keep asking me the same question. I keep giving you the same answer. As I said right from the start art we need to see that the arena in which we are sending our managers is that too much to ask of course addressing that point in an answering that question or two different things. A Pelosi later added that she's not holding onto the articles indefinitely and that she would probably transmit them soon soon. I've got to fantastic guests to help me make sense of all of this political gamesmanship in a few minutes will be talking with CNN. National Security and legal analysts. Susan Hennessy but I I'm joined by my colleague. CNN Politics Congressional reporter. Alex Rogers Alex. Welcome to the PODCAST. Thanks so much for me so it seems to me. After days. Days Days of stasis on this story we did learn in the last twenty four hours several things one as I just said speaker. Pelosi said she's likely to transmit these soon she's not going to hold onto them forever. To President. Trump actually asserted yet again today. He's opened. Witnesses named some witnesses. He's interested in of course. Course which are total non starters For the Democrats in terms of Adam Schiff or Joe Biden or hunter Biden or the whistle blower but is has said and he's going to really leave this to the Senate. We learned that Mitch McConnell the majority leader in the Senate went to the White House and briefed the president on what the contours of this trial is going to look like. So it sounds like the president has more information about Mitch. McConnell's vision of how this trial is going to play out then speaker. Pelosi does which is why she's still hanging onto the articles as we're recording this at least and Finally we've learned that there seems to be a strategic divide going on between the president and and his advisors and or some of his advisers and certainly the Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell in terms of whether or not he wants some very vociferous defenders from the House Republican Conference To join in defending his case in the Senate McConnell of course worried that Too partisan partisan of abroal may upset the apple cart with some of the moderate center. Republicans that they need to keep on board with the plan here so all of those. Those things have emerged in the last twenty four hours and yet Nancy Pelosi is still holding onto the articles of impeachment. What does that mean soon when you expect her to send these to the Senate or she said today today I'll send them over when I'm ready and we're still trying to figure out what leverage she has Senator Majority Leader Mitch? McConnell said yesterday that she has none he has the votes. It's a simple majority devote Democrats are hoping that there are four Republicans to join them. But now we've talked to Susan Collins. Lisa Murkowski Mitt Romney and all of them are on Mitch McConnell. Donald Seidel Miss. So we're wondering here. What Nancy Pelosi is looking for if there's any possible signal that she could get from The Republican leader. She says that she just wants to see the rules. Mitch McConnell says let's just go back to the nineteen ninety nine precedent under Clinton and. Just run with that now she. It seemed to me when she walked into a press conference. Today Should two main message point. She wanted to hit when it came to the issue of impeachment. One was. She's not buying this whole Mitch. McConnell nineteen ninety nine Clinton enroll. She thinks he's not portraying how those were set up namely the Clinton rules were devised in a bipartisan agreement. And I think there was one hundred hundred nothing vote supporting them. In the United States Senate That was hammered out with the blessing of the leaders. Trent Lott and Tom Daschle. Nothing like that is going on with McConnell when Schumer right now is Pelosi's point number one so she doesn't By his argument that this is playing by the Clinton rules. That was one thing she wanted to drive home but number two it seems she wanted to sort of list Her reasons that she thinks she's been victorious in this decision to hold onto the articles articles namely that it has put the issue of documentation and witnesses front and center in a way that if the articles had immediately gone over in December. Maybe they weren't. What do you make of that? I mean her point is that there's a number of witnesses who have not been Who have refused to testify and the Clinton Peterman process? All of those witnesses had already talked before that that evidence was already out there But the thing is that she right now is losing not only those moderate Republicans Republicans at your needs but also Democrats. There's a number of them who've said in the past couple of days that let's just let's just get this started senator. Dianne Feinstein said if we're going to do it she she she should send them over. I don't see what good delay does. She's later walk that back. Other Congressmen have also Adam Smith at today on CNN. Basically said let's transmit these articles goals that's during the Senate trial and then he later said I misspoke wait. I missed how Senator Feinstein walked back to her comments. What did she say? Because it's all those comments my eyes widen so I I missed the walk back. She said today that those comments are now being taken out of context okay. I don't know if that's a real walk back. They're not out of context are they. I don't know vow. The the thing though is what does holding the articles now do for the Democrats. Are they really going to be able to change the rules. Or they can get these witnesses upfront. No Mitch McConnell has the votes. And he's ready to go he's made that crystal clear what What do you make of this concern concern that? McConnell has apparently expressed that Having some very vocal House Republican conference members who were Lord Diehard trump supporters at all costs be part of his defense may upset the apple cart of sort of the Republican unanimity. That you just described that he's been able cobbled together. How is how big of a concern do you sense? Is this for McConnell. So we have some reporting from Sarah Westwood Phil Mattingly came out today. There's there's this struggle between some of president trump's allies who think that a legalistic argument by Patsy. Baloney the White House counsel so is Not going to be good enough. You need to win this. It's it's not only trial but it's somewhat theater have your most for syphilis. Allies Congressman Jim Jordan Congressman Mark Meadows. Some of these people who can articulate the president's argument in different style. Then you also have Senator Mitch McConnell's view. It appears where those those people are going to turn off exactly the Republicans that you need. You Need Susan Collins. Lisa Murkowski the people people in the middle so the president right now is receiving this conflicting advice. And we don't know yet. I don't think the decision has been made on who is going to defend the president and the trial yet. Yeah no we have not heard that decision we know that Pets Bologna and his team. The White House counsel on his team Have put together a plan and that there seems to be one but we don't yet know exactly who will be doing the defending of the president. And I think that the president who we know consume so much Fox News and sort of has this echo chamber constantly feedback loop in in. His mind doesn't always necessarily think the way McConnell does about Are we just doing a full on brawl with the Democrats here or is there work to be done with your own party here and McConnell's clearly trying to make the case Mr President don't lose sight. Yes you're going to be acquitted but you've got to still keep your party on board. I think right now if you just run the nineteen ninety nine Clinton trial rules you will see each side making their argument and then a couple of days of questions from the senators and then you vote whether to dismiss the whole thing right then there or then to also get into the witnesses that Democrats think will bolster their case my final question for you before we go to break you say that Democrats will boast of their case. What about the fact that Donald Trump is still out there saying he wants them? Witnesses I Mitch. McConnell sort of in a no witnesses camp. He doesn't necessarily want to see Joe Biden or Hunter Abidin or the whistle blower called. So there's a difference there too is they're not of course There are some Republicans who want to see honor Biden. They WANNA Have I think Senator Ron Johnson said this week the full gamut of witnesses. But you've also seen Senator Susan Collins who you know really the crucial senator here say a that it would be inappropriate inappropriate for president trump to say to China investigate on our Biden Susan Collins once witnesses But we we don't really think that means also hundred I think we've that means you know people with firsthand evidence other people who testified before the house. Yeah actual impertinent witnesses to this What these articles of impeachment are about and therefore pertinent to this trial? Alex let's take a pause and our conversation for the moment legal analysts Susan. Hennessy will join us right
"senator feinstein" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK
"Like perhaps an impeachment trial next week and when senator Feinstein ways in that that weighs a lot powerful absolutely all right let's get outside talk to mom things look on the road in a report Rogers by mercury insurance on the roads will run out of the northeast quarter fourteen minutes from Douglas Boulevard cap cities split heaviest traffic between riverside antelopes look at all the way to the split heavy on the campus of the freeway all the way well hold all the way to highway fifty the worst bus route what Avenue at el Comino Avenue north bound five not letting up yet three sensors set indicate a fifty two minute drive that may be a little worse than it is but still very slow helper Boulevard a past board road north and ninety nine cents is coming in a thirty nine minutes slow from Laguna all the way up past fruit ridge road west bound fifty heavy traffic from hazel all the way to fifty ninth street center say fifty three minutes twenty eight minutes on five south out coming out of woodland heavy traffic starting right after highway ninety nine all the way into the downtown area on your east found run from Dave's across the causeway eighty four so looks good to be sluggish on the fifty drive in seventeen minute ride and heading up in the high country chains on all fear a pass routes with their amazing coverage in twenty four seven claims support it's no wonder mercury was named one of insure dot com's top auto insurance company for twenty twenty get a quote today of mercury insurance dot com and see for yourself what mercury can do for you traffic on the tens every ten minutes morning that after news Bob Williams news ninety three point one KFBK for a couple of showers around this morning otherwise plenty of clouds this morning then clouds will break for some sun this afternoon with a high today fifty three to fifty seven becoming mainly clear and cold.
Justice Watchdog Testifies Before Congress About His Report on FBI’s Russia Probe
"As the house moves closer to impeaching president trump members of the Senate today questions the justice department inspector general about the origins of the F. B. I.'s Russia probe DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz is report found no evidence that the FBI's investigation of the trump campaign was politically motivated but he also told the Senate Judiciary Committee today that there were significant errors in the FBI's investigation although we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct we also did not receive satisfactory explanations for any of the errors or omissions we identified meanwhile the house Judiciary Committee is expected to convene at seven PM eastern standard time tonight to begin finalizing the articles of impeachment before a float of the full house likely next week Phil Ewing joins us now to discuss all of this he's election security editor for NPR infill Horowitz looked into the FBI's investigation of that twenty sixteen trump campaign and possible ties with Russia Republicans have highlighted that the FBI is serious performance failures as detailed by Horowitz what's been their line of questioning they want to drill down very closely on one specific part of the FBI investigation the surveillance that officials conducted on a one time junior foreign policy aide to truck came Carter page who was the subject of a number of renewals by the foreign intelligence surveillance court from twenty sixteen and twenty seventeen and what Horowitz discovered was as you mentioned there were many problems with air is affected a mission and practices by the FBI and the justice department in getting and then sustaining that surveillance the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham has stroll down very strongly on that as part of what's been a years long effort by him and the president in their supporters to tear down federal law enforcement the justice department the FBI in their view the problems with that case are emblematic of wider problems with the FBI and the justice department and that's been a leitmotif for some time yeah I want to ask you about Attorney General William Barr he's attacked this report several times in the past couple of days what impact hello do you believe his comments had on today's hearing well the ranking member senator Dianne Feinstein of California asked for what's the inspector general about those comments and he said that he didn't have any undue influence from the Attorney General before submitting this report but he also re stated that he believed there was an appropriate predication as he said for the F. B. I. in twenty sixteen to open the investigation into the Russian attack on the twenty sixteen election I mean there really wasn't attacked there really was skulduggery that took place which has been uncovered by investigators and has been the subject of so much focus since then if senator Gramm focused on the details here about the page story the Carter page story senator Feinstein and Democrats want to talk about the big picture that this really wasn't attack that it really was Russia and not another nation has and has become the subject of controversy more recently here in Washington and that the FBI and the justice department and other intelligence agencies were justified in responding to the information they were getting twenty sixteen and trying to figure out what was happening in that report about it to Congress and the American people as they have yeah you've mentioned the committee's ranking member senator Dianne Feinstein and Democrats have focused on the conclusion that ho it's found no evidence of political bias or improper motivation let's hear what she had to say I believe strongly that it's time to move on from the false claims a political bias and those who showed great interest in the question a politically motivated investigations against president trump should show the same concern about politically motivated dated investigations requested by the president or his Attorney General is this hearing today likely to bring any clarity to the ultimate poll well you know point of this report are we just talking past each other Republicans and Democrats the answer to your first question is no among other reasons because there are pages from the horror was report that are redacted and so there are still things about the story about Carter page for example that we do not know because they're continuing to be withheld by the government the other question which senator Feinstein alluded to in those comments you played is that there's another report about the investigation still pending from the justice department Connecticut U. S. attorney John Durham has been asked to do his own look at this he's already said in an unusual statement when Horowitz's report came out that he disagrees with some of the things that are in that report so we have a whole other chapter of litigating about this to look for to whenever Durin's work is complete okay my last question with you for the few seconds that I have with you the mark of the impeachment articles begin tonight what are you watching for well that's going to be a normal process but also very contentious all legislation whether it's naming post offices are impeaching the president has to go through the same practice so Democrats wanted to be by the book but we expect minority Republicans on the committee to make it as painful and drawn out as long as possible with procedural motions and other tech attempts to delay it that's Phil Ewing election security editor for NPR thank you Phil
"senator feinstein" Discussed on NutriMedical Report
"ADD ADHD ash burgers now two hundred twenty eight and some cities one sixty four average across america we look at our president yes he tries to do some good things and he's mason he's got a good heart man's got a good heart even we tweets and you kinda counter-punches because he used to work with gaza WWE but i understand he's an idiot just all the politicians really do you think when i talked to these nuclear experts for dr for gen senator feinstein and y and sir widen up in oregon when they started taking away our test sites after fukushima daiichi i'm a nuclear expert over the nuclear vision now for forty seven years scientists for social responsibility let me tell you we're killing ourselves and we don't have a lot of time left do we dr betty things are end of the road it's very obvious where we hope for yourself from your brilliantly you're probably one of the most brain female ladies i know on earth and physically are suffering in when hospital dumb doctors even give you generic pills with aspirin frigging kelly you god alpe ban god help it's it's really a shame because they're just making people's rage on rage really become like the ancient vikings like my ancestor the name daego by the way my answers were seven foot nine giants came down to survive and saving the eleventh century kings france my aunt's us were giant's big giants not eight foot tall okay and i have the warrior inside me i'm fighting the spiritual truth and god game the gift of sabia christian thank god i'm not an evil man the world's would shake if i became evil god help the world to help people like that little diabetic lady paid for me become pro-life god help the people to pray for me god cried when i told him i go back to earth at eight and a half and face before he sent me back to earth i want people to know this if you don't get away from aspartame and toxic food they're killing you you and your doctor owed.
Source to Fox: Whistleblower did not have 'firsthand knowledge' of Trump-Ukraine phone call
"House so we have Nancy Pelosi in the last twenty four hours calling William Barr saying he's gone rogue we have Donald Trump talking about spies possible spies in the White House we have tried calling for Adam Schiff resignation. we now know that this whistle blower is a C. I. A. officer how did bar handle the complaint apparently pop but let me just give you step by step process here the administration initially blocked Congress from viewing the complaint citing presidential privilege and only released a redacted version of the report to lawmakers this week after the impeachment inquiry had begun the complaint also alleges that the White House sought to lock down details of the call by moving it onto a secure classified computer system that we spoke about briefly yesterday the complaint also details extensive interactions between Rudy guiliani the drunk trump's personal attorney and Ukrainian officials and I as I mentioned the whistle blower was a C. I. A. officer. I mean this is just in the last few hours actually all this information coming out this morning and now this morning and I told you this is going to happen Vladimir Putin has to be shaking in his boots the Kremlin is now saying that it is hoping dearly that the U. S. won't release details of the put the trump calls one. why what would be in those calls that would be so damaging I'm sure they were just talking about you know grab a beer right Latimer Putin. and Donald Trump so what is all this stuff meet. what does this mean as we take it out step by step and dissected today as we will. again what is it me. what better person to have on the air with us right now to kind of sort everything out boy there is a lot to sort out an attorney Michael Avenida Michael thank you so much for coming on our you. I'm great good morning good morning well I want to start off by saying this because you you put out a tweet this morning that I thought was fantastic because as you know a lot of people on the right are going after this whistleblower including Donald Trump saying well wasn't first hand knowledge what the hell does he know I want to read one your tweets and I want you to talk about because I think it's very powerful you said hypothetically a guy is sitting in a bar he overhears two other men describing the brutal rape murder they carried out two nights ago he has no first hand knowledge but he gets their license plate number and reports them to police doesn't mean he's not credible or the police don't investigate and you're and you're so right on that I want you elaborate on that for us. we are what we refer people understand is that this is the investigatory process right that's the stage of which were at we're not in the trial we're not in a formal impeachment Erin so the rules of evidence do not apply now the rules of evidence relating to here say or the rule of evidence related to here say it's a very complicated process and rule in fact a lot of judges don't even understand that related to the exceptions and when statements can be used and when they cannot be used but what's important is is worn out after that stage in this process people rely on hearsay police officers the FBI and others rely on hearsay all the time when they're investigating investigating crimes you know someone will will port today over heard somebody in a bar say something or in a restaurant or someone will have a friend who said that they overheard something that doesn't mean the police don't investigate that they don't look into it right so the fact that this witness this whistle blower supposedly had no first hand knowledge means absolutely nothing so what we now have a transcript of the call our actually not a transcript as I pointed out in the past now senator Feinstein is demanded the actual transcript because what was released was a summary we're now going to have other officials and witnesses first hand witnesses from the White House presumably they're going to be called to testify and there's going to be an investigation as to what really happened here whole idea that we're going to discount everything that that is that is in this whistleblower complaint because somehow it's hearsay is is ludicrous Sean Hannity last night on fox I saw that snippet we did this whole mock you know objection your honor hearsay sustained you know game over won't cuss words Sean we're not in a trial this is in a trial where in the beginning stages of an investigation. to determine whether the president of the United States abused his power and misuse the office and Michael let's not let's not even forget about this possible cover up I'm sure you've heard the administration initially blocked Congress from doing this complaint it is not out of the realm of possibility based on some of the evidence that's coming forward that William Barr might have sat on this for several weeks and done nothing other than try to figure out how to push this underneath the rug and Nancy Pelosi now saying he went rogue I mean what do you think about this. well very often the cover up is worse than the crime and I actually think that that's going to be the undoing of Donald Trump in this particular situation and in particular what I'm talking about is the moving of this transcript or summary from the one server to another server which appears to have been done to obstruct access to it to prevent access to it and to make sure that it never saw the
"senator feinstein" Discussed on WSB-AM
"Or the attorney general is wrong is when they make the broader claim that there's no evidence of conspiracy. In fact, Bob Muller as Senator Feinstein pointed out makes clear in his very introduction that the fact that he could not establish conspiracy. Doesn't mean that there wasn't evidence of conspiracy. In fact, there was and of course, the most graphic evidence was around that Trump Tower meeting in New York. The Trump derangement syndrome. It doesn't end people. It is amazing as jaw-dropping amazing. These these people are infected, and I believe absolutely incurable to their detriment politically because I don't know about you pow look I do this. We're living every single day. I try to keep up with this. And despite the fact that I don't like the sport. I don't like the Washington political sport. I have to do what some of you guys seemed to just relish, you're taking the scorecard. And you're writing down all the bats, and the balls and the outs and base on balls home runs. All that you're doing you got the scorecard there in front of you. I have to do this because this feed my family. I'm sick and tired of this crap. Aren't you? I think that for the most part. The majority of American of the American people. I think you're sick and tired. I was taking place up in DC. I I think this just speaking. Because if I am so disgusted and tired. All this crap. At all the Democrats won't shut up about this. Oh, Jerry, Nadler, again, Mr Adam Schiff, there was evidence there, and we've got a prosecuted them on the house side of this is Trump derangement syndrome. They will you got cut nine do. Yeah. You talk..
"senator feinstein" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA
"Candidates. So this this is this is why Snerdley thinks it's working you're playing these people because the objective is. No, I can't I can't give away the trade craft. I can't give zone. We just have to trust me it worked, and it it is continuing to work. Again, it's like a magician never reveals a trick. And I I can't those of you understand what's going on more power to your free. Go onto Twitter and Facebook. Explain it anybody, but I can't. The Feis at the say that Snerdley came in waving the story. The. Yes. Okay. Let's go to the audio soundbites. I'm gonna find that tech story. I know I've got it here somewhere. I've I set it up to be easy to find. No, it's it's the one where the tech blogger yesterday was near tears when he learned out that streaming digital music is not going to save the planet. Some scientists actually did so-called scientific research and found out that streaming music does not reduce. Worldwide c o two. Streaming. It's not gonna help say. Distress. Because they thought they were on the cutting edge getting rid of DVD's getting rid of vinyl getting rid of CDs. And now they're distraught. They're really distraught over this anyway to the audio sound bite tree return. This is President Trump today outside in the White House lawn. He's making his way the Marine One helicopter to leave on his trip to San Antonio open of oil and gas well. And is the always does he spoke with the reporters. All I just I folks pardon me. But I have to comment again, they're they're playing video of the bar hearings today and during the hearing Senator Graham bar made the point why why if you think the Russians are spying on the Trump campaign. Why would the FBI not tell the Trump campaign? I don't understand this. If you think a foreign entity is trying to interfere in the election, and you know that they've got spicy. You'd think of why wouldn't you tell the candidate? And so Graham pointed out, well, that's a good point Mr. attorney general because when it was discovered that there was a spy on the staff of Senator Feinstein. As her driver for twenty years. They told her well the camera then cut the Senator Feinstein as Graham was saying that and the moment they cut the Feinstein camera. An aide was whispering in the Feinstein's as she may have been not paying any attention to the aid was probably telling her. Yeah, they're talking about the fact that your Chinese spy either driver bringing that up now she's nodding her head. And then he keeps talking turn us. What is there to say? Maybe there's more than one spy and he's explaining her which spy grams talking about. I'm sorry for the diversion, folks. But I see this stuff. And I just can't let it go after react to it. Here's Trump reporters tagging along like they always do Trump on the way to the Marine One helicopter, Mr President, Mr President, Mr what's the point? What's what's the thinking? What what what what why why why don't you just relief as much of the MoMA reporters possible? We all wanna see what you get. We all wanna see the colonial. We always destruction. Any why don't why don't you want us to see everything in it? It was an illegal.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA
"Turned everything on its head. So what? Thanks now. Shifting from Trump and away from Trump toward the conspirators. It was really great Lindsey Graham brought up Senator Feinstein and how the FBI warned her when she had a China com. Spy on her staffer twenty years. Remember that she had a spy her driver. And who knows what other else spying from the comms on her staff for twenty years, FOX cut the Feinstein on a staffer jumped up to whisper in her ear. He was probably telling her Wichai calms, by Graham was talking about. And I'm engine Senator Jeanne Shaheen quest stop and think about her question for second. She really asked the attorney general of the United States. She really asked him why he felt the need to investigate when the F B I. Apparently used phony information to get a FIS a warrant to spy on a political campaign. You can bet machine. Never once questioned the need to investigate Trump for colluding with Russians that made total sense to her. She never once thought about asking anybody why they were doing that. But now when somebody wanted to get to the bottom of the investigation, why do you feel the need to investigate the investigation, and in Senator Lahey has the White House told you about what's redact discussed.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on Thoroughbred Racing Radio Network
"You've with Steve. From embattled Santa Anita. Very good morning Wednesday. It's Turbie week. It's oaks week. It's big cap week. And that's being said for the first time thirty to nineteen exempt to a one sports on nine sixty four siriusxm online at our website as well. And in our usual, perch. Here at at say at the Nida above Clockers corner. And normally the years that. We've come here. It's one of. The most exciting and one of the most exhilarating. Visits of racetracks and industry get togethers that. We enjoy on an annual basis and have been lucky enough to enjoy. This trip is different and the. Atmosphere, and we'll we'll know more later this morning right now the atmosphere is typical there's Jack Arava. And and there's the usual collection of morning the early birds that are are ready settled in and from that point. We'll see how the morning progresses because as we were in route from Fort Lauderdale to Los Angeles last night when we were in the sitting in Austin, which I I I'm in my memory have stopped at Austin is absolutely. The forget the city which everybody raves about hammer. The the airport was spectacular. Just just the just the wing there that the that I spent two and a half hour layover in Austin and. The news coming that. Senator Feinstein had clearly been approached and prepped because she she brought out her veterinarian degree and was talking about lay six, and and those elements, and she basically called for something that should have been called for already which is a full thorough task force style examination of what? Was included what constituted the conditions that have had the two dozen horses fatally injured and she called for a shutdown of racing until that's conducted and the response hours later timber. Vo I I saw it was TD N said that the appreciate the senators interests and plans to run wreck. I. Thaba BS. You hate to be in this in this situation that with every.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on KSFO-AM
"Resolution plan. The full transformative action is not going to be what we need. We will you know, better than I do think one day you should run for the Senate. Great. There's just. I want to ask that child. Please define bold transformative action. Or how about this? Please explain what impact it means right to the child who could barely say the word properly. We'll be impact on. Saturday Night Live goes after this one, and they're really trying to make Dianne Feinstein look ridiculous. But in fact, I think it. I think she looks pretty good at this. So it's a they're doing she's trying to do. It's she's using some little kids. It's like, okay diet. Listen, we need to do over on this. Okay. We need to do we need to we need to cut her a little promo hair. Okay. With you talking nicely to the kids. Okay. These are the little Greenies come into your office assist. You. Okay. Take one die. Let's let's see how this works. Okay. Diane Feinstein ready. Take while go. California Senator Dianne Feinstein recently, some of you may have seen a disastrous video of me lecturing school children about the green new deal. But I want to make things right because I believe children should be heard. Senator Feinstein wind to support the.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on KGO 810
"Morning. A group of kids. Captured in a video posted online by the sunrise movement. I'm not familiar with them. They're an environmental activist group. According to news reports. It was pretty interesting group. The group of kids go to Senator Feinstein's office, San Francisco and talk about hey, the environment our planet. They get how ecosystems work in the fact that we're part of any ecosystem if we keep destroying the ecosystem in which we live that's going to have some pretty dire consequences for us. Well, that's how they presented it to Senator Feinstein who. I thought had an interesting reaction to them. We have audio here. Of course from that clip. I want you to listen to. I'm just curious. What you think about Senator Feinstein's response? What was it? The right one four one five eight eight ten take listen to this. China to ask. Oh, yes. On the green. I'll tell you what we have our own green. We have twelve years to turn this around. Well, it's turned around ten years what we can do. The people who are going to be living with. When people. Know, what's interesting about this group? I've been doing this thirty years. I know what I'm doing you come in here. And you say it has to be my way or the highway. I don't respond to that. I've gotten elected I just ran. I was elected by almost a million vote for. Morality. And I know.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on KFI AM 640
"I operating party parts. Okay. We'll get them. All out the truck before. The storm comes Rick will let you get back to work. Thank you wildcard line to a Walt is in Pennsylvania on coast to coast wall. It's nice to talk to you. Once again, buddy. You too. Thank you. Yeah. And if I may I'd like to quote, a few lines from a famous politician go as follows this year will go down in our history where the first time, my civilized nation will require the full registration of all firearms. This will make our streets much safer, and my police you'll be much more efficient and the world will soon. Follow our lead into the future. Not Ian, one might think that those are the words of Hillary Clinton or perhaps Senator Schumer or Senator Feinstein, but in reality those words are excerpted from a speech given by Hitler in nineteen thirty five. With all due respect the previous woman. The woman was on a few minutes ago saying that we're not gonna turn this into a big political thing. Right. I mean, she had her opinion. She spoke very fast. I do not want to turn this into some political debate. Right. That's really not where coast to coast lives. Right. So I mean, all I all I to say that the people that are worried about something turning into a dictator, the Republicans and Donald Trump or not the party that wants to disarm the American people well fair enough. But know that there's ever everybody likes to play around with all those kind of metaphors and comparing to Hitler and all of that. And I just don't want anything to do with it not tonight. Anyway, it's interesting night too, many other people on there, but appreciate your comment. I hope you feel like you've expressed that. But I really don't this is not what coast to coast does. So, you know, my at had her opinion, I tr-. Letter say which he had to say, and we moved on. And they'll do the same year to Paul is in Los Angeles on coast to coast AM, west of the Rockies, Paul. Hi, thanks for taking my call. Yeah. Yeah. I wanna.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on 860AM The Answer
"Of any kind either express or implied. And I have not given him any other than that. I would run the department with professionalism and integrity. As attorney general mile allegiance will be to the rule of law, the constitution and the American people. This is how it should be. This is how it must be. And if you confirm me, this is how it will be what would be the basis for voting against this, man. The only basis would be your assuming that he's lying. He told Senator Feinstein that he will commit to providing Muller all the resources he needs. Thank you, chairman, six quick. Yes. Or no questions. Will you commit to no interference with the scope of the special counsel's investigation. I will the scope of the special counsel's investigation is set by his charter and by the regulations, and I will ensure that those are maintained will you commit to providing Mr. Muller with the resources funds and time needed to complete this investigation. Yes. Will you commit to ensuring? The special counsel Mueller is not terminated without good cause consistent with department regulations. Absolutely special counsel Muller makes any request. For instance, aide instant about the scope of this investigation or resources for his investigation. Will you commit to notifying congress? If you deny that request. I think the regulations require notification of congress if there's a disagreement thank you, and I have two questions from the chairman of the House Judiciary committee. Will you commit to making any report Muller produces at the conclusion of is investigation available the congress and to the public as I said in my statement, I am going to make as much information available as I can consistent with the rules and regulations that are part of the special counsel regulations. Would you commit to making any report on the obstruction of Justice public? I that's the same.
"senator feinstein" Discussed on It's All Political
"Gun much national praise for this. This is become the law of the land, but division with a lot of Mets going to about this day. You gotta call I believe on election night. From Senator Feinstein who said that you help George Bush the backlash to that. Which helped George W Bush win the election. I read the paper and actually call or she did not she didn't call with her lunch that day her election day lunch spent sitting next to her a real we were so sure of the outcome. The election for Kerry. So I supposed to read that in the paper the next day as much as anyone wish she didn't make a call. She didn't make up she she wasn't upset with you know. I mean, we never we nearly had it out afterwards. But you know, it's I read what she said about it. And she expressed nothing during the lunch real spent a lot of time together prior to the lunch, but nonetheless, she had a different point of view. She was hardly in the minority. She was no vast majority of folks, and she was hardly the more moderate of the voices. There was some of the most progressive icons never chronic party. That were even much more of a trio like in much more. A negative than just a Sesing. As a pundit is what she did what she believed happened because of that issue. Others expressed very sharp. Critique. The what out of chip you're thirty six guys are first year office that would that you're coming out with a with the major..
Lindsey Graham wants another investigation — into how Democrats handled Ford's accusations
"Senator Lindsey Graham wants an investigation into democratic handling of Christine Ford's accusation against Brett Cavanaugh who referred Dr four tore lawyer. That was a political activist did anybody in the committee betray her trust by sending it to the to the media. So the hearing would be delayed Graham on ABC's this week says Senator Feinstein leaked a confidential letter to the press rather than presented to the Republicans opposing grams investigation is Hawaiian democrat maisy Hirono also appearing on ABC's this week battery is that these are serious allegations. And we have been calling for an FBI investigation for what seems like months. Iran judiciary committee member has emerged as one of the most vocal opponents of judge. Brad Kavanagh supreme court nomination.
Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before she will testify
"An attorney for the woman accusing supreme court nominee Brett Cavanaugh of sexual assault says her client will not testify publicly without an FBI investigation. Here's CBS's. Pam coulter. A major snag in Republican plans to hold a Monday hearing on the sexual misconduct allegations against supreme court nominee Brett Cavanaugh. He's accuser apparently won't show up Dr Christine Blasi Ford wants an FBI investigation. I on CNN her attorney, Lisa banks explained white Blasi waited so long to come forward. The Democrats Senator Feinstein particular respected her request for confidentiality initially. And that was the right thing to do because. Victims of sexual assault. Have the ability to say, wet weather, and when those allegations should be made public cavenaugh denies assaulting Blasi. Get a high school party thirty six years
Bezos rips Trump for ‘dangerous’ attacks on the media
"Sent to federal investigators about supreme court nominee, Brad Kavanagh. Mark Mayfield has the story. Multiple reports say the California Democrat received information about a misconduct accusations against the federal judge the allegation is vague. But reportedly involves an encounter capital had with a girl when they were both in high school, most Senate Democrats learned of the letter Wednesday night Senator Feinstein has had the letter for some time, but did not share it with the others on the judiciary committee Republicans have dismissed this as an attempt to try and derail Kevin ause confirmation to the US supreme court. Mark
Thousands of Migrant Children Come Here Alone. The U.S. Doesn’t Keep Track of Them.
"Senate report says the Trump administration fails to care for thousands of unaccompanied migrant children once. They're released from government custody NPR's Richard Gonzales reports the report concludes that the government does, not, adequately. Monitor the safety and welfare of thousands of unaccompanied minors who are released either to their. Parents or sponsors such as relatives at a hearing before a Senate homeland security subcommittee Missouri Senator Claire mccaskill bluffed at federal officials we. Can't get anybody to acknowledge that they have responsibility for where. These children are and what they're doing thirty days after they leave a federal. Facility in a joint statement. Before the hearing the department of health and human services homeland security and Justice called. The subcommittee's report misleading. And blamed congress for failing. To prevent illegal immigration