28 Burst results for "Seidel"
The Science Behind The Historic mRNA Vaccine
"Absolutely so most vaccines use a weakened version of a virus or just little pieces of it but that requires time to grow up a bunch of virus to process it in order to make the vaccine but for this vaccine in the amarna vaccine. There's no virus in it. Wait we'll wait. You're saying there's no actual virus in the vaccine at all. Because i didn't really realize that nope so you have this. Mr vaccine that all you need really was the genetic sequence the template for what marinate you're going to make you didn't need to girl or virus you didn't need to expose your workers at lab to it and so it just you just skipped a few steps in that way that is amazing mattie here it's also a little confusing like what does he mean the marinate template so emma vaccines take advantage of a process. That already happens in our body like every minute of every day our body is making this thing called 'em a and it's like an instruction manual that tells our body how to make proteins. And so if you make a little piece of mr and lab and feed it to ourselves. Ourselves will naturally read that little piece of code that instruction and use it to make a protein. Whatever you want. And in this case it's a coronavirus protein so it's like we're hacking ourselves bright and instead of putting a bunch of proteins from the virus into the shot we give the cells in our body instructions to make that coronavirus protein themselves. Exactly that little routine by itself cannot give us cove it but it is enough to trigger an immune response so that the body learns to fight it. So let's say at a doctor's office about to get this vaccine Get it and how does my immune system actually respond to it. Okay so let's walk through it so these any vaccines are an injection in the arm after the injection your muscle cells. Kind of swallow up the rene bring it into the cell now. This summer rene doesn't get into the nucleus of the cell where your dna hangs out. I can't so there's no worries about the vaccine like messing with your dna at all okay. Instead that mini hangs out in the site of plaza of cells where it gets turned into protein. I remember drawing the seidel plaza in class leslie. I think it's an underrated part of the cell. Okay so after. Our body uses marinate to make protein. The cell put some of that protein on its surface like outside of the cell which allows other cells in your body to see it. And that's the goal right. The point of the vaccine is for your body to recognize pieces of the coronavirus without actually having to get the corona virus. Yeah and at this point the vaccine kind of acts like all other vaccines throughout the whole process at different times our immune system cells recognizing react to that self made corona virus protein. I mean there's a whole subset of cells where they're entire job is to tattle on invaders like they pick up foreign proteins that are in your body like this corona virus protein. And kind of like. We've it around to other cells like ooh guys. I found this protein. It's not supposed to be here. And honestly i think it you get in trouble. I'm sure the scientific term for these is not tattle cells. No but it should be. Because they're actually called antigen presenting cells. Tattle cells is definitely memorable. I'm gonna remember that. Thank you thank you. So these tattle cells can activate other cells including this diverse group of cells called tells so some of them get activated and become very murdering. Those are literally called killer. T. cells they go around sniffing out cells infected by the virus and kill them. Some of these t help raise the alarm. They bring other cells into the area. I call him a super tattle t cells there helping with the tattling and then some of those same cells help other cells make antibodies. And so later after you've gotten vaccine if you're exposed to the real corona virus those. Antibodies can recognize that protein. Grab onto it and keep the virus from getting into ourselves and antibodies are. What protect us in the long term. We want those those a huge part of it. You have this. Initial wave of antibodies and t cells right after vaccination or infection. But your body also creates this kind of memory bank to once. The threat is over once. There's no more presenting of the antigen the cells will revert into a dormant stage. That they'll still be around still be circulating still growing and dividing until the protein gets presented again and then they'll activate again almost immediately and that memory is why some vaccines work for years and years after you get them now. We don't know if this vaccine will lead to long term immunity. But that's what everybody's
"seidel" Discussed on KXNT NewsRadio 840 AM
"Me on Facebook live anywhere in the world. On just look good. Robert Seidel and on Facebook and in Las Vegas, and you could hear the show live, too. And so it's fun for me to be able to be here with you on Sunday nights like this life And I always think a lot about what's the message I could make, And I always look for an inter message. So again the message. I got a divine message I got last night. Don't worry about what's happening right now in our world. Don't Don't worry about the election vote. Do your thing, but don't worry about it. There's there's a whole thing about prayer or grace or release or surrender. Whatever way you want to describe it is You give it to God and then you let go. And course, let the letting go is the part. We're not so good at and that's hard. I think for some of us and for me sometimes it's very hard. You know what I know that. It's the only way we're gonna be free. I was thinking about it because you know what? I'm just going to say this is just an obvious point, but approximately hat, we're half of our country. We'll be just disappointed. When the election is completed. Whenever we actually know who is one, approximately half of the country is going to disappointed now, then you may not be disappointed, long run, but they will be in the short run. So how do we How do we find peace beyond that? So whichever half you might be inside going to a sporting event on Ly one team's gonna win. And then the other half of the people you so disappointed. The question is, How do how my friends can we find peace? How can we find peace in our minds? And I was thinking about that today. I thought, you know. The only way for me. I don't remember. Oh, yeah. There is a God God, Israel. I have ability to connect to that God through prayer for meditation do inner calmness and I could begin to find a reality that was part of the vastness of this world. The magic in the wonder of this world. When you stop and think for a minute. I mean, we get caught up in our stories. We get so caught up in our stories. We just do. It's the story of this life, isn't it? It's just a story. We get caught up. And we think it's gotta be this one way. Look at this world is so vast the mountains you know, you look at the mountains and they've been there for millions of years. You came to my office. I have some petrified wood that is, you know for millions of years ago. Wait, start to become obsessed with thinking something has to be one way or another. You know what we don't hold can't hold on to this life. We're not in charge of it. Have some impact. Some control..
Poland's Iga Swiatek beats Sofia Kenin for French Open title
"Tennis Fans in Poland have literally waited forever to hear this. The first Polish Grand Slam singles champion is 19 year old IGA Chiffon Tech. Capping a dominant French Open run with a straight sets victory over fourth rank. Sofia Kenin Avantika and unseated 19 year old never lost a set in the tournament. She is the youngest French Open winner. Since an 18 year old Monica cell ists won her third straight women Seidel Way back in 1990 to
Nurses, doctors feel strain as virus races through Arizona
"Well, it's a well known now nurses and doctors and everybody's feeling the strain as Thie Corona virus races through the state of Arizona. We got crowded hospitals, exhausted nurses, bodies piling up in morgues. It was a faraway concept when we started hearing about that, in New York and northern Italy and other distant places, will now after three months of anxiously waiting and preparing Arizona nurses and doctors are on the front lines of the Corona virus. As it rips through the state, making it Right here where we're at one of the world's hot spots. That's not a good distinction, either. And so we've asked A researcher physician author to Join US. Dr Cast I groom is joining us. He is a nutritional physician author of 24 books on health and wellness. Some of the titles include respiratory Solution, Natural Cures to Killer Germs, How to Eat Right and Live Longer. The cure is in the covered just to name a few. And I'm excited to have you back on the program today because we've got some exciting news about a study that he was involved in. That just came out that is showing some very important promise. And with that, let us welcome back to the program. Dr. CASS, I groom. Welcome to the program again. Hi. Great timing, I guess for the state and for all your Your loving and desirous listeners We've can We have some breaking news for them and let's get right into that. The's the wild spice oil therapy preventing Cova 19 case transmission in 50 healthcare words phenomenal. Take it from there. Well, we have Dunn the study before on active cases of covert, But this was the concern was the physical therapists and the nurses who did not get it and did not want to get it, but yet are on the front line in Chicago. So what we did Wass We did some novelty things. We've recommended the Sinus oregano spray, which is clothed but oil, regular oil Bailey oil, and I think sage oil It's in a sailing base, but they would inject that directly up each nostril several times a day, You know, because they've got all the P P E on by the way on the shields as well. Right, But you can't. You can't viruses. They're so small or whatever these passages have been a bacteria easily. It could slip through the cracks, you know? And they also used another novelty, which was a wild oregano Bailey spray, which is extremely virus idol, extremely bacteria, Seidel and that is my saliva spray that they would, they would missed over there pp. Either math or plexiglass shield their chest. And they would inhale that also buy and the second thing they did with it. If they got a scratchy throat or a dry cough, which are passed eggnog Mang of Na ge Catholic magmatic of this disease, they would spray the back of their throat multiple times. So they're getting direct contact in the mice allies form that's direct absorption through the membranes, and there's no way these passages could survive. With those kinds of spices. An immediate immediate absorption through the milk goes up. Uh, so I'm not taking any chances at all with these practitioner with these health, health care workers. The third thing they did was there was there's a novel supplement with oregano, cumin on DH, sage and cinnamon oils, and that's called a rigorous You and I are fans of that They actually took that product by mouth. Twice a day. Most of them. But the biggest thing was the Sinus spray and the use of Ah sterilizing missed. Kind of opposite of what we do. We take our things. We take our vitamins C. We take our regular They did it differently. 50 health care workers did not get sick, and some of them were Permanently exposed to covert 19 and tested negative because of this protective gear. We gave them right. And you know that some of the thing I've been reading about, you know, just even with the protective gear. Weatherby. The mask shield. Whatever. Just being around somebody is somebody talking to you. You can get into your system pretty quickly. 100 model you know, 100 different Viruses. And then, of course, a cough. Even Maura, I think it goes up to 500 then up over 1000 of somebody sneezes in that same area. The amount of viral load is just exponential at that point in time, and course the health care workers have the greatest exposure, as you well know is everybody recognizes the greatest exposure because they're around sick people all day every day and are in the trenches trying to help people out. We need to do something to protect them and at the same time This is a beautiful thing learning about it. We can protect the general
Bitcoin Falls - Profits Made
"I don't come. Download the APP and put in the code. Try to call feel bias. Walk into the tram to come crypto shy well. Wasn't yesterday, a bit of a wild one high. Gee, WHIZ! Absolutely nuts. Big foles in markets as I was pretty confident, we'd say we did say some very strong moves down and listen good training conditions as well. No huge amount of opportunities also fought around the same so the time if you will try to, the CRYPTO, cried Naci boost strategies, you would've been had the opportunity on Bonnets on ails on Tron and on Cod Donna, which moved the laced, and that's the one I took. But still, WANNA percent profit for the day. Yesterday pretty stoked about that. Yeah let me saw a beautiful boost to the just couldn't raise the ordering Thomas a volatile my sword the calculations. They'll just get it quick enough. Tron beautiful and yes gripe. Fifteen minute time from I love the fifteen minute timeframe on the top ten perc contracts. Why are you asked me well because you've got a big position? Entering you stop also pre taught. So when you've got your entry and you stop plus really tie, it means that will effectively you end up with a lot more contracts? Now that could have the you know you can be. A double edged sword. In the sense that you know not, there's not much liquidity they. You can't call some slippage that. but if it does if you do taunt properly then, yeah, you can absolutely kill the pigs. It doesn't take very much movement to make some very very lodge money on a multiple of risk. It's one percent. Oh, half percent whatever you like, so yesterday was released is You know that I did saw was going to go to those low timeframes. That was the plan. I put out there on my youtube, so if you not they guy follow it. It was with planet. Put out of everybody really stuck to that plan and it was successful. Now When the markets wrought fool your fifteen minute timeframe the law or even fifty nine out the half an hour one hour. Well, it's just by knowing what the market looks like what it's doing for me. It's when the comes back to the market. We had some serious momentum. Yesterday's lower timeframe souls comfortable to do it. The Quincy he was there for me to fill my bigger orders and I got what I needed. as a matter of knowing what to do and win a Seidel Tom. It's not just about having a trading strategy is a lot of things we need to do is try to make sure that we. Were the right place at the wrong time doing the right things, and that's what law I've tried fools about. That's what might try to coke communities about. It's about sharing this information with people to let them know what my plan is. H time for them to make their own planes It's really important to us that we help the community and we help people to become the best tried is I candidates the whole purpose of the business? Now couple of things the first thing I'll say to you right now. You're not. On my list I'm going to get a video out there today and we're gonna be doing some stuff with a Toro. Coming up, and you'll need an account for it so if you haven't got if your already got an HR archaic now dramas. It says you've already got one. If you haven't got one jump on the mailing list because I'm going to put the link in to get one because I'm going to take you through the crowd, of course, their guy and that's just the beginning is also going to be scans. There's also going to be a lot more. Down the track as we develop and get our licenses, that's right. We'll be looking at other markets eventually as well so That's where it's going to get really dame cool. In on looking forward to that day. Anyway let's go back to the markets and that's just try to call dot COM Gawain do the video newsletter. You can actually jump on rotten massages, and you'll save posted, so can fill your boots on that one. But. Just talking the market now mainly I. It is so difficult to the man. When, I look at it right now, yes, tonight, bearish definitely. The bergische broke down from that daily can looked like all buggy that we're GONNA. Go much much lower. We did move caught a lot lower me from from yesterday's close. To where we bat bottomed out, it was four point seven seven percent, which significant decent move. On I haven't quite quickly so. Know, we headed towards having one of those. You know I nine ten percent decline top dies, but did not even we. We bounced that. You know we bat SPEC, really hot and that's where for me it's. It's a little bit tricky. And the reason it's tricky is because once again. bitcoins just wrecked. itself is a trend. It's gone low. Hi Lola. Then, that's gone straight back up to a high. Low Aloha and if I look at the four outshot. The. We've been here before we will hear. With a hair! Back through April. Now, we get an up trend that would I down as soon as it set itself down. Investment opposite said itself. I wasn't till sort of You know the start of my. Sorry the back end of Ipil, the we started to really have a decent. That was when we sort of went through seventy eight hundred. We ended up around ten grandma. Cunanan suddenly around that sort of figure. At we're going continual choppy period of time. That is very. It's not the best training conditions, the matter of fact, trading, spot or trading margin against BTC's probably given a lot more opportunity than everything else. It's just a matter of being patient. Looking at one point five percent yesterday. I'm happy with that because I ain't got, add on a flat That was a really nice, really nice way to start the week to be feeling fresh to do anything else this week unless the conditions good now with bitcoin yesterday i. Believe it all. Dan, lightly percent at once I've actually closed up one percent on the nose. We had a low thousand, eight, hundred, ninety, and we close at nine, thousand, four, hundred, twenty, eight, so. We're told me five hundred dollar swing, but if you look at the the high of the Diet was ninety five sixteen, so a really wall What does it tell me? It doesn't tell me about the role really? You know there is a low hi, there is a low low, but is there a good daily downturn? Absolutely not it's certainly isn't clear. If it's not clear, it's not there and just go back and white Bitcoin Bitcoin in particular sitting. North thousand four hundred fifteen dollars right now theorem also kind rejected on the dingaling. Two hundred and seventeen dollars thirty two cents, which is exactly the resistance level interesting that one. It did close down only point three percent closing at two thirty one when now slightly down on the session, but not by very much I mean it's point two of a percent, the EXA pay look at how to a hell of smashed down as well, but it closed up one point one percent closing at nineteen point two cents a guy. He's a very strong run backup carney down nineteen point one, which is down point, six of a percent bitcoin cash close down yesterday as well the close to thirty spot seven zero. It had moved old why to a lawyer yesterday twenty four, so a pretty decent eleven move to get back up to closing down point item, percent base, they and also right now it's two thirty, five ninety five point one of the scent they. Look the book the daily downtrend they, it's broken, one seventy six it in a down trend. It looks very bearish to me on in fact, looking for opportunities to try this show at the moment I'm hopeful I. Haven't got anything yet, but I am keeping a close on on this as it does. definitely carry the hallmark of of Loa low coming in here finally, the four Alcan was a legal beat smaller than I certainly would have my My mock there. We currently only saw yesterday with death three point two percent closing at one, seventy, three, six down point to at one, seventy, two non full wrought now lot coin, rolling over as well rejecting those lows yesterday once again with a sitting around some support around one around forty one dollars and sixty four cents at BAFTA, quite strong, it's still pretty solid. Why slightly to the downside Slot Momentum Bearish Saad? A close yesterday Dan Point, six at forty three dollars, seventy five, or about the same rock now. A US against sitting random portal's forty turned was pulled the. Look a its its down point. Two of a percent now toodle fifty two yesterday. It closed down one point three six percents. It's not the clearest translate bonds at a river of a move yesterday. Jay's I really wish I had to take in that instead of Don on the fifth day at one stage. what was the actual low on the fool? Because the foreclose, sixteen fifty fog was down seven point five seven percent on the day. Pounced to close down one percent at sixteen dollars and thirty seven cents, the low was fifteen thirty so over a Duller of a move that very very volatile bonnets was yesterday and look tell you what It's a sort of sort of mock love to try. Just I'm just waiting for my opportunities wants guy. Starring role of now, Dan, point six of the sense sixteen dollars twenty eight
"seidel" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"Closing concessions don't stand so close to me. Twenty lockdown extended quick everyone to the of Insert pod here Derek. Liz Somehow became a real life. Video game lawyer stop. Ask a question a podcast or would ask that is so good. Particulate intrusions lead singer. Oliver clothes off big easy blasphemy. The order is achieved escape. Velocity is now in orbit. Rhonda wants an Alaskan live show before it all melts. I picked a hell of a pandemic. Quit drinking Malaika Chandler Peut Quackenbush Soggy Pants David in Brooklyn Matthew Vernon don't take legal advice from laser beam monstrosity attorney. Do take of email Sakashita. Focus he'll be covert will kill so many Americans it'll be protected by the second amendment. Heather L. JEREMIAH'S FANCY MICRO J. That's kind of what's happening like the nut. Jobs are trying to protect codes ability to kill us like it's kind of the same people anyway. Sorry Allie Deity. Rosario ally Bosnich Sam to now Sam Buck. Twenty twenty needs is a transformers movie directed by Michael Bay. Yeah just to to fully destroy all my last remaining faith in Humanity Andrea Sherr Aka. Natasha crunch rap. No commute so behind on podcasts. Well binge if masks violate the constitution. Why not no-shirt Dose Shoes New Service? I agree with that one hundred percent and of course king of this podcast and see who shall never be thrown since episode sixty five long. May he reign? But you know do Conrad Michael's right. We love you Conrad..
"seidel" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"Thousand people have covert in Wisconsin or have or have had four hundred or so have died. Wisconsin Supreme Court forced four hundred thousand Wisconsin voters to head to the polls in person to vote on April seventh. Something I am still as I said earlier salty about and they've done something just about even worse struck down a stay at home order last night in the put. This in. Wisconsin has one of the oldest state departments of health in the country. It was created about a decade after the civil war and the legislature gave it like the power to quarantine citizens to shut down schools. And this was. The Board of Health is what it was known. As so during the Spanish flu it mandated a quote indefinite quarantine The in nineteen eighteen. I think that lasted for about three months. Who knows how many lives that saved? So basically the power has been given to the executive branch to act quickly to respond to pandemic outbreak in that that power has existed for about a century and a half here in Wisconsin in the early nineteen eighties in response to the AIDS outbreak the Wisconsin legislature clarified. The powers that the Department of Health Services. What it's called now has so it can issue orders like emergency stay at home orders and it can issue rules and regulations that go through this regular rulemaking procedure sort of like the Administrative Procedure Act. It's chapter two two seven of Wisconsin. So you have the order's under Wisconsin Statute to five two and that allows us to do things like a quote closed schools and forbid public gatherings in schools churches and other places to control outbreaks and epidemics end quote pretty clear. It can also under two five two zero two six. The Department may authorize implement all emergency measures necessary to control communicable diseases again very clear. So you have orders under Wisconsin statute to five two. And you have rules under Wisconsin under chapter two seven. Well and CAN I. Can I Jahan? Yeah Yeah I'm sure you're going to do it. But like states are also sovereign entities. That have plenary police powers to act on behalf of the health and of their skirts. Right so you know. In addition to the express delegations of authority in the rules and orders that you're discussing like the there's a there's a pre constitutional a thirteenth century. Saxony sovereign right of the state to enact general legislation and act with the force of Legislation. Which is what executive order does for the health and welfare of its citizens so please continue but but to it. Sounds like I thought so. What the legislature did I mean this is really important? The legislature gave the Department of Health the power to issue these emergency orders and the power to pass these rules and the legislature did this. Because I mean this makes sense to control outbreaks epidemics. You can't go through a thirteen step. Eighteen Day or minimum or forty nine day maximum process. Right you have to act now and that makes a lot of sense but Republican leaders in the legislature sued the Department of Health and they claimed the order issued under the orders power that the legislature gave to the Department of Health and health services was unconstitutional because it didn't go through through the rulemaking process. That's essentially what they were arguing. The case But what they were doing was asking the court to Legislate. Essentially the legislature was saying court. Rescind the powers that we have granted to the Department of Health Services and Rebecca Bradley Pat Rogan Sack and Ziegler and Dan. Kelly who you will remember from our last conversation actually lost his Supreme Court race by ten points more than ten points on April seventh but whose term doesn't end until July thirtieth agreed to do so so those four justices or the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed to strike down that rule. Because it didn't go that order because it didn't go through the rulemaking process so this is really a textbook case of legislative from the bench. Which is something I've heard about from somewhere so I tell me what you said. This is a textbook case of judicial legislation. I I certainly agree with you. How sense that gets bandied about usually by the other side to describe Cases in which the outcome is one with which they do not agree. How how would you define that right? Like what what particularly non-legal audiences most of our audience How do you? How do you spot judicial activism in good question the legislature could have passed at any time in the past weeks that we've had this order enforce? They could have passed a law that revoked the power of the DHS to pass such orders for instance. It could have done that. It could have passed a law. That actually dictated what dacoven response would be. I mean it's head I think almost two months now and it's been meeting so it had two months to meet and address this issue and it didn't do that instead. What it did was. Ask The court to strike down the order as as violating the power that the legislature actually gave to the Department of Health Services. And and the reason it didn't pass the legislature didn't pass its own law was because first of all. I didn't have a plan and Second. Of all this is a power graph. Passing any law would have been subject to governor everts his veto but by forcing this through what they wanted to do was forced a new order through a rulemaking process which is then subject to a legislative veto veto. Excuse me so basically This all ties back to this history. In Wisconsin here is so convoluted the concert. State state legislature is still strongly strongly. Republicans not close to two one because of gerrymandering because of the massive gerrymanders and and it took a ton of power in the lame duck session when Walker was voted out which I know. Everybody forgets that part And this is really just part and parcel to that. So I mean the legislature had this tool at its disposal. This really perfect remedy. It could have passed a law that either revoked. The power from the D. H. S. Two orders or imposed. Its own solution to getting people to stay at home and he didn't do that instead. It went to the court and asked the court to basically legislate and it didn't do that because it didn't want to have to go through governor versus veto that's a political calculation on my part. I don't it's obviously not in the opinion itself and the opinion is just bonkers from so many different That and that is an official legal term bonkers from about eight different ways. Yeah and you said that. Kelly's term ends July. Joe I believe July thirty first I believe yes. Okay yeah so I mean. This is a lame duck decision and it's being called that the pandemic power grab the lame duck decision. I mean by the sixth word of the opinion you did they were wrong I mean breathtakingly so they said this case is about the assertion of power by one unelected official and was not a cert it was delegated by the legislature. Who was the plaintiff in the lawsuit? So that is why this is legislating from the bench Andrew. If you want to do better answer to that by all means I'll know I thought I thought that was the only like Cottesloe that I would act at that I would add. Is the the the cry of kind of go to the legislature is sometimes misused particularly when you're talking about trampling on the rights of minorities right? Yeah so but the most egregious example. I can come up with in. Recent memory was the Supreme Court's not just issued laying on gerrymandering right. Well if you don't like the fact that your vote doesn't matter just vote for somebody else which which is kind of a tough one to swallow here right purportedly. The interests that are at stake are right. The interest generally of the people of Wisconsin. Right like this is not protecting the majority at the hands of the tyrannical rule of injury upon strikes me as a tough challenge. But but again why it's why through that sort of softball question to you because because it could be hard to kind of parse out on those lines And I running time but is this one of those things that because this is a state issue. This is the end of the road. Like is there any away to appeal this or anything or is it just because it's like while now? This is the highest court in the state and this is a fully state issue. I mean I think that's probably accurate right now. Everybody's trying to deal with the absolute chaos that this this has created So there's there's just a ton of confusion and a lot of so for instance. I'm in Dane County. I I live in Madison Wisconsin and Dane County and medicine. The local county and municipal governments are putting in place their own orders which is essentially just basically copying and pasting the order that struck down and doing it themselves But within you know in less than an hour of this order coming down bars were opening all across the state and they were full and part of the part of the chaos has been contributed to this. I'm sorry this opinion was so reckless. It's bad enough to strike down the order in its entirety but they actually rejected calls from both sides to stay the opinion. And that's why bars are able to open with now. In our they could've stayed the opinion until the legislature had worked out a way to lift the measures and stop the spread of this deadly virus but the justices instead chose chaos well issuing the opinion from the safety of their remote home offices and by that the conservative justices couldn't even be bothered to be clear about whether they were voting for this day or there's a dissenting opinion. That's basically like hey. Are you guys staying this or not? Nobody knows that made it into an opinion is just mind blowing in of itself. What he would normally be the justice who saw that opinion and still let the whole thing go out without making it clear whether or not they were voting for the state so this is just right now. The state is just in complete and utter chaos caused by a one party taking over The Supreme Court in legislating along partisan lines. Yeah and and let me jump in on that I agree with that. A hundred percent you can appeal a state. Supreme Court decision to the US Supreme Court. But you still require social. I if there if if the State Supreme Court has as a crucial as as as an aspect of its holding decided on an issue threshold issue of US constitutional law right so in other words us us. Supreme Court can always found like well. And here's the thing the opinion says. I'm just GonNa read from page thirty..
"seidel" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"Ship. The rule of law I do. I have tidy. I used to be full of books that you stood matter back. No but but but seriously like that's it. Is there an opportunity so now right like let me ask and F F R F may may face more of a challenge on this than than other organizations but I would think that there would be some interest in you know for example not not having You know either obvious. Furrowed based religions right. My local self-help grew you know. Fancies HIMSELF TO BE THE NEXT L. Ron Hubbard right or you know. Very obscure potentially offensive satanist aligned organizations also receiving money like is there an opportunity to enlist you know mainstream kind of liberal religious organizations or is just. Everybody's knows that the trauma I think everybody's noses at the trough already and then part of it is we part of it is case brothers and sisters let us read from the book of deep dives this one on emoluments so say the Torres. A good one. We we know a few things about what's happening and I think the some people in Congress are finally starting to wake up to the amount of fraud and abuse. It's probably happening in the program and I'm sure there'll be some big reports issued long after the fact but I mean the. We know that the bigger the church the more likely it is to get one of these loans right now. We for Paula. White works in the White House and for the trump campaign. The idea that she is not a pulling in one of these. Forgivable loans to me is just of courtship I mean I have no evidence for that other than the fact that she is working in the White House but I find it very difficult to believe that that she robbed Jefferson. All these folks and let's I mean the Westboro Baptist. Church is certainly eligible if anyone knows their legal rights it is illiberal Baptist Church and so what you're saying. Fred. Phelps debt right correct yeah but but nevertheless Shirley Phelps Roper may draw her salary under these. Sba guides. I'm just editing. Are Patriots indulge at the higher levels? Yeah so I mean this is this is bonkers from a simple transparency oversight standpoint giving money to fully unaccountable organizations is just mind blowing stupid well and as we're talking about accountability. Now now I WANNA pull that pen out and I'm going to review paragraph six from the SBA Faq which says is my faith based organization disqualified from any SBA loan programs because it is affiliated with other faith based organizations such as a local Diaz Dialysis. And then the answer is not necessarily and I could go through that. I read that. As how on Earth? Are we going to prevent the You know focus on the family from taking out. Eleven different loans for all of its various arms and and the answer seems to be. You're not you're not but it's a little worse than that too. So I mean affiliate Palliative Hope One organization nation has control over another right. You know you're hearing company. And you have a wholly owned subsidiary. So normally we have this prohibition so that the parent company doesn't get alone that counts the subsidiary and then the subsidiary also go get alone which would be basically the parent company then double dipping in effect for the subsidiary if that made sense to everybody. That's why those rules are in place but the SBA has said well not only our church churches allowed to do this but there's this thing called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act so we can't even think of examining what churches affiliations looks like so theoretically hypothetically a Catholic school could get alone as could the church that claims that school which would then be the school getting double counted then. The local parish could claim both the church and the school. So that'd be triple counting the school and double counting the church. Then the diocese could get a chunk of funding for all of those as well then the archdiocese on up. So you have double triple quadruple. I mean in all of that is dipping into the public purse. And I WANNA be clear here that this doesn't require deliberate fraud or malice. Even on the church is a part of the church's right just simply poor communication or even a poor understanding of their own. Opaque nature of church governance could lead to easily lead to this double and triple dipping. And that's because the the SBA has basically said. Hey all you have to do is copy and paste this paragraph into your your loan application. And then you're good to go. You are absolutely you're going to get it. It's a it's a basically a blanket exemption which also hilarious because Riffa the religious freedom restoration. Act which is what the SBA's using to justify its blanket exemption calls for particularized examinations of any type of exemptions. So it's the exact opposite of what Riffa would even require if it should even be invoked in this case which it should not so it's mind-blowing every so much is wrong. Isn't it amazing? How the government's too big and blow it in too much spending until there's a happy hand out money to churches and it's like Oh bio means no take seconds author helping same. It's also an opportunity by the way I hope. One of them does like wholly owned subsidiary H. O. L. Y. They should definitely. I'm just saying are. Are there any institutional checks on this debris disbursement whatsoever right is there? Is there anything that's going to trigger any review by anyone at any level? Well so there have been there have been a lot of. I don't want to be entirely concrete on my answer here because so much is changing so quickly and where we've been shouting this from the rooftops for a while now. I'm I'm hopeful that we will start to see some changes accountability. We've submitted comments On the on these different rules pointing out why the SBA is blowing it and the changes that need to be made I would encourage everybody to reach out to their members of Congress and do the same point out. Not only that this is unconstitutional but other issues with these affiliation rules with the fact that churches don't file any financial information with the IRS. All of that really needs to be talked about. I mean write a letter to your local paper right. Not Ed do whatever you can to start raising the volume on this issue because really do feel like a lonely voice in the wilderness over here. If this seems like it's part of why ask the question about partnering with other you know. Mitt with with maybe other faith based institutions to sort of say like no. Hey look in it and I'm thinking again part of this is you know nostalgia for the opinions that I grew up in law school from the nineteen fifties and nineteen sixties. Where you know the the concern was we. We do not want. We want a strict separation. Ism I mean that used to be the Protestant position because we don't want the Catholic Church to come in and you know as you've just described it you know sextuple dip on public funds and so you know even if that means we don't get access to this like we would much rather have that than you know have a structured series of payments going out to the archdiocese of Baltimore over. You know the diagnosis of this forever. Like that's that seems nonsensical and and the argument is again one that that that seems to sort of transcend. Because I don't look like right. Were were liberal. Atheists right is kind of easy that how do you? How do you build a coalition? It seems to me. It's not hard to build a coalition around the principle of. Hey maybe if you don't pay taxes at all maybe you shouldn't have access to taxpayer funds to pay the salaries of the people who do the thing where you don't pay the taxes and all that that that doesn't strike me as a hard argument to me it doesn't you're gonNA feel real dumb when they finally pray away. Cova did for us. Andrew a hard argument make. But you're seeing what you're seeing the why right now. I think I think actually is in practice. Because if you are getting money from the government during this emergency and it's allowing you to you know. Stay afloat personally and professionally. Are you GONNA turn around and challenged that because principle dictates and we're finding out the answers. There's answers no for sure right like you know it. The quickest way to convert any libertarian is to give him a note non-recourse government sure but. I. I don't think we have any hope of convincing Paula white to get off the rain but but but in terms of making the argument I know I mean I I represent small business owners. Who were shot out of the first two waves of funding right And and the argument that hey the priests down the street is drawing one hundred thousand dollars in salary but you're going to have to lay off your salesforce that that seems to me to have some potential resonance beyond just the our our traditional circles about that. I think that's fair I can I? Can I tie a few threads together before we move on with? Maybe with a little dash of this Andrew was right. Oh yeah I mean when Bill Bar was nominated back in two thousand eighteen December? There wasn't as much opposition to him as I think I would have liked to have seen in part because he was an ag under an early administration that though it was conservative at least seem to care for our norms but F R F was really intensely opposed to bar. We saw this guy who had quote blamed secularism for virtually every contemporary societal problem. He wanted American law to be. Based on God's law he said that groups like F F R F. Our supporters were clearly fanatics He argued that preventing public schools from organizing and imposing prayers which is required by the constitution caused soaring juvenile crime and drug addiction. You know these were not isolated statements. These were themes and accusations. That bar repeated constantly going so far as to claim that this is one of my favorites quote. Extremist notions of separation of church had inflicted a quote moral lobotomy on the country. So we saw an ideologue. At Christian nationalist who held was held back under previous administration but who would be enabled under a trump administration? And we were right. I mean bar is just dismantling the DOJ destroying the pursuit of justice corrupting the integrity of this important independent law enforcement body and tearing down the norms that we rely on so heavily. And I really wish more people would listen to us about our because we need those norms more than ever and. I hope that everybody listens here because this program is exceedingly dangerous. I mean direct funding of churches and preachers salaries is fundamentally on American and unconstitutional to quote that earlier law. It is sinful and tyrannical tyrannical. And this is a power that we are giving to Donald Trump. A man who has care was carried into office on a wave of Christian nationalism and evangelical support. Do we really want to abolish this critical norm? That taxpayers can't cannot be forced to support a religion under Donald Trump. Is this a tool a weapon that we want to give to trump if not speak now or forever hold your peace? Because I don't know what's going to happen if we don't speak up and stop this. Well I can get on my soapbox now. Sorry that that that was a spectacular soapbox and and I appreciate But but I'm going to unpack that It I I made I made. I've made this subsequent comparison because look I I was not you know sort of on the ramparts about Bars going to be a disaster of a pick And I was was wrong about that. And and you you were right about that and I often. I put it this way. You know if you could go back in time and January twenty seventeen replace a nominating jeff sessions with nominating bill. Bar TO BE Attorney General. I certainly would have at that time and I think many of us you know kind of in liberal circles would have taken that right. We would have said. Oh yeah look like this guy is an institutional guy and and that's at least a better pick than you know the guy who was deemed to racist under Ronald Reagan to be appointed to the federal bench by a Republican Senate. You know that that would have been a no brainer and we would have been wrong right like it was the ethics of Jeff sessions paved their way for their being Muller investigation in the first place so So that was a fantastic soapbox. Andrew S. was right. Andrew T was wrong. I for one vow to be less vigilant in the future on. Suppose no no you're right and and it's it's the saddest victory lap effort but are you are entitled to that. Victory so let's trance. Let's transition over to something. That definitely is going to make us all issue. Good news issue go ahead. Instead of ten..
"seidel" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"Are joined by Andrew Seidel back for the Nth time I have no idea but it's I'll tell you what it's not enough. How's it going? I'm very well thank you. I'm still waiting on my robes and time timers robe club whatever. I just got an angry tweet for. Rent is in effect the other day so Yeah hasn't been a longtime kidding me. A Robe Randall. We still love the. It's it's all good absolutely. So here's the thing Andrew Seidel last time. You're on your very appropriately angry which I enjoy it so I'm hoping that little finger. I mean I'm still feeling pretty salty over that. Especially with some of the new idiotic. Things that Wisconsin Supreme Court has decided to do as of yesterday. When we're recording this. So yeah I mean. I'm still feeling pretty salty about a lot. That's happening good in the world right now. Feel the anger. Where do you WanNa Start Andrew? I we're GONNA talk about people and we're going to talk about the Wisconsin. Supreme Court is that are that are two things for the day. That's our agenda. Let's start with P P I guess okay so look like this was an eight hundred thirty five page bill that no one read. What could possibly go exactly what could possibly go wrong. I mean we could completely trample on one of America's founding principles and violate the religious freedom rights of every single American taxpayer. And that's that's what's happening all right. Well that that seems hyper also known as Tuesday Station Fair Enough Fair Enough..
Rental-Car Industry Gets Crushed by Coronavirus
"Odds are you haven't had a need to rent a car in a while and as its vehicle fleet said Seidel hurts is said to be preparing a bankruptcy filing that sources tell Bloomberg could happen at any time the rental car company has been talking to some creditors about how to ease its debt burden without going through
"Hey Katie hi Ben What are we talking about today? We're GonNa talk about Galaxy and processes as a way to solve pretty gnarly regression problems. All right let's dig into the NARAL. You are listening to linear digressions. So what do you? What do you why? Why use the word gnarly? Yeah so let's talk about regression for a second and kind of build up some complexity in in our mental model here so that we are we arrive at gnarly in a minute or two and so just quizzing myself. A LINEAR regression would be. You've got a bunch of points and then you try to draw a line. That's representative of those points through it. Right yeah so. That's a pretty classic. That's usually the first thing that I think of. When somebody says regression is exactly that you have a bunch of points. You're trying to draw a line through it. The best fit line is the one that minimizes the difference between the line and the point for all of the points in your data set and a linear regression example of what we call a parametric model. So sometimes we talk about like the parameters of the models that people are fitting for so in this case the parameters of a linear regression will be things like the the slope of. If it's one dimensional the slope of the line it can be multidimensional or multi variant. So you can have the slope or the coefficients that multiply several different terms. And then there's the intercept term which is another parameter of the model so when you're fitting the model kind of a rule it says it has to have this. Functional form y equals M. X. Plus B And then you're finding 'em and be that best fit the data that you have which is your X.'s. In your wise so there's kind of a a set form a set mathematical functional form of the answer that you're trying to find And then there's a couple parameters that you're discreetly allowed to tune in in finding the solution subject to that mathematical form. Okay got it cool so but as I think. Probably a lot of our listeners know probably you know a linear regression is not the only type of regression. That's out there the for for the purposes of this conversation. Let's talk about some other functional forms that that mathematical equation could take so you could imagine if you saw a particular pattern of the data points like. Let's suppose your data points were hourly temperature measurements taken over the course of the year. So yes you wouldn't want to fit. That was just a line right. No no especially. If you have did you say hourly yeah. Yeah then that's probably GONNA be. I mean it's going to be curvy and it's probably going to be a sign. You SEIDEL. Because every day the temperature goes up and then it goes back down. Yes so there's a periodicity to the daily measurements that you're gonna take where on average. The temperature is higher in the day lower at night. See except you expect that in general. There's maybe a roughly twenty four hour period or pattern that you see of course there can be days when you have a cold front. That comes through first thing in the morning or whatever so it's not it's not guaranteed But in general that periodic structure is something that you generally expect to see and moreover there's going to be an annual trend where the temperatures are going to be higher or lower in the winter. So if you had ten years worth of data there might be Signing soil functions that you would have had a couple of different periods and then when you were fitting the data together a couple of different terms to account for the structure in the model and then boom you have another example of parametric model. That's totally different functional form but again we can use it to fit a regression model for temperature as a function of date and time. Okay so a parametric model can be one of many different shapes and it can also be a combination of those shapes. Is that right because you were saying in? If you had ten years with a data for example you probably have roughly speaking to sign waves. Yeah I would say instead of calling it shapes. I'M GONNA use a a slightly more precise term. Which would be like a mathematical form so by mathematical form? I mean do you have a function? That's signing soil in the case of the temperature measurements linear in the case of trying to fit align. Let me toss in a few more here. You could have something that is polynomial. So if you have a bunch of data that looks like it's Distributed kind of a parabolic shape than. Maybe you'RE GONNA fit it with a quadrant function or a quarterback function like x squared. Squared cubed yeah or like sums of terms like that yeah so those are all GonNa have different characteristic shapes and and and that's so coming back to the point you make yes. They have different shapes but In terms of when we're thinking about them as as mathematical objects they have different functional forms
"seidel" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"This firm has ever failed the bar talk to the hand close. That's one of my mission parameters. Trust me I don't know why you cry and now it's time for T. Three with special guest from earlier in the show Andrew Seidel. We can't resist making making Andrew Display. His legal still well So Andrew Torres. Let's have recovered. I I love this. Because this is a A very specific Procedural legal but but his is definitely outside of interest wheelhouse so We will not have a repeat where it will be like. Well actually this is this is paraphrase a that. I argued before the Supreme Court which gave him a slight advantage on the bar exam will be one of the ones. I are supreme. Maybe let's turn the tables. The tables all right Thomas Andrew a pedestrian domiciled and stay was crossing the street in St be when he was hit by a car driven by a citizen of a foreign country. My Gosh where'd you bury the survivor? Exactly both the pedestrian and the driver suffered injuries. The pedestrian filed a negligence action against the driver in Federal District Court in St. Be Seeking One hundred thousand dollars in damages. The driver believes that the pedestrian crossing the street illegally and is therefore responsible for the accident. The driver seeks attorney's advice on how best to respond to the action term assume that state B is a contributory negligence state. Which by the way that would mean if it's like one of six states of which Maryland just one of them but nevertheless assume that state is a contributory negligence state. How should the attorney advise the driver to respond? Oh my gosh file. An answer raising the affirmative defense of contributory negligence and asserting a counterclaim for negligence seeking damages for the drivers injuries. Be File an answer raising the affirmative defense of contributory negligence and moved for judgment on the pleadings see moved to dismiss lack of personal jurisdiction because the driver is not a citizen of state. B Or d moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the driver is not a US citizen. Wow this this. This is hard so if you I if your hip by somebody's a citizen of a foreign country. Can you sue them for damages? Can they sue you for damage or have you? They were injured by you crossing the street. I guess I mean what was the iron man crossing the street. The driver suffer injuries. I guess they try to. They hit the person and then hit a pole or something. Because at that or you got to get a real superhero situation. Where they you know they like back into the car and just clears out the whole thing. okay. This is impossible as hoping that as I filibustered. Maybe like some law. School education would have happened in my past but that didn't seem to have worked so The best way to respond there's contributor negligence okay. This pedestrians in state a but was crossing Be filed negligence action in State B. That seems reasonable. I mean that's where you were hit so it doesn't seem like that's any Like Shenanigans in terms of where you are. We've seen creative. You know whatever you call it forum shopping. We've seen that before but I don't think that's necessarily this So these all the problem is all. These answers seem plausible to me. But it's like what's the best way to get out of this whole mess. That's what they do. There's two answers that that work but one of them has a slightly better reason behind it so I guess I'd have to decide if I feel like the citizen. Foreign country thing is matters like I i. I don't know I feel like you citizen of foreign country. I don't really know why they're here. I don't know why they're here. You're Smith Make America Great Again Immigrants House here under some sort of like. Does it matter you know? You always have the diplomatic immunity thing that's different. That's not happening here. I don't think this is just a citizen of a foreign country cash. I just don't okay. Let me go through. A finance. Originally -firmative vents contributory negligence and asserting counterclaim for negligence. I mean that all sounds reasonable. Be Violent answer. Raising the -firmative defensive contribute so same first part and then moved for judgment on the pleadings. I don't know what that means So would that be like a better somehow? A Better Way to respond. I judgment on planes. I feel like a make sense that you would assert a counterclaim but is that like is the answer. Say like yeah but that's a longer route to something I don't know but I okay since I have nothing to go on in terms of my own knowledge. I'M GONNA I'm GonNa say a is better than B. and I'll just I think it is. I'll just go with that. See moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction because the drivers not assist of State. Be Happen. They're like I don't if I'm if I'm hit in state B but I guess if you have two people who but I. I don't know the person was driving and state be it. Feels LIKE THE LAWS. The the the whatever the the laws around driving and hitting people that are stationed apply see. I could be wrong but I don't like C. D. Move to dismiss for lack of subject managers diction because the driver is not a US citizen. Okay that's definitely. If that's true that would be the easiest out of all of them so like I will say it's between a and D. Do I think that because the drivers not US citizen. There's no subject managers diction I. I feel like that can't be it works. I don't think you can just go to another country. Run over people. Sorry I'm not from here. There's nothing you can do. But maybe maybe that is how. I don't know I don't know seems to be how it works when when it's one of the diplomat that trump is friends with or whatever I'm actually going to go and hope that it's so between my hope. It's a final answer. This was impossible. I have no idea had it. Andrew I kind of. I think I kind of agree with you. I'm not I'm not swayed by by C. or d. The personal jurisdiction in C doesn't work. I mean that's federal courts or four different states diversity jurisdiction similarly d. I don't like because because I would think that would be a personal jurisdiction issue not a subject matter jurisdiction issue and I have to imagine that these cases can be brought and if they're going to be road it's going to be brought in Federal District Court not in State Court. I would think so. I can't change anything but I stupidly. Miss the Federal District Court in State. B I just saw court in statement so yeah that does change if it was if it was a state court. I'd be more inclined for for one of those but and the judgment on the pleadings is just saying you know you can And decide this case right now based on what this doesn't need to go farther which I think would be a mistake so I'm going to. I'm going to also say that is in her. Thank God that makes me feel bad. We're both wrong. Well doubt Listeners will have to tune in on Tuesday of course to find out how we did. Thanks so much for playing Andrew Seidel and going with the Game Theory correct answer which is choose the same answer because then the you know the worst that can happen is. We're both to taste better than me. Getting it and you're getting it wrong. Which is career suits and I can just continue to wait for a case that I know inside and out of worked on. You know that happens all the barn time to be people should know a big thanks again. Andrew Seidel for coming on and talking about that outrageous stuff in Wisconsin. I'm sure that we will. There's there's plenty more but thanks again for coming on in for playing and We'll see very soon. I'm sure my pleasure guys. Thanks for having me on. And if you'd like to play along with Thomas Andy Andrew. You know how to do that. To share this episode on social media include the HASHTAG T. Three include your guests. Who reasons therefore we will pick a winner and shower that person with never ending fame and fortune and I will point out to. You will have the opportunity not just to contradict Thomas but the contradict Thomas and a practicing lawyer. So you know I'm GonNa put my thumb on either side of the scale but game theory optimal optimization double the never-ending fame and fortune potentially awaits Some lucky winner so We will see you on Tuesday so much for listening. Everybody we love you. That was a jam packed. Show but that's just how much we love doing it and giving you good content And check out that phone and stuff by the way or go to sl if you if you can't pledge by the way go and grab the episode in that feed Because either way it's a lot of fun. We had a great time and we will see you on Tuesday law. This has been opening arguments with.
Avalanche win season-high 7th straight, 2-1 over Red Wings
"Evening NHL avalanche put the red wings to one for their seventh straight win nine in a row on the road for Colorado Oilers overwhelm the predators eight three Leon Dr Seidel and Connor McDavid each with a five
U.S. Olympic Marathon Trials Deliver Thrilling Finishes in Atlanta
"U. S. Olympic marathon team is set after the Olympic trials in Atlanta WSB J. black is there was a terrific showing by Atlanta packing nearly every part of the twenty six point two mile course and a terrific team is going to Tokyo in the men's white race Galen Rupp wins again like you did four years ago he was the bronze medalist in Rio he takes in a time of two oh nine twenty forty seconds ahead of Jacob Riley who goes to his first Olympics and abi abi Ramanan age forty three we'll be there for the fifth time in the women's race now you've been told you're looking a former Peachtree road race winner now she wins the marathon in Atlanta followed by Molly Seidel who qualifies for the first time she's ever run the marathon in Sally Kipyego rounds out the team she was in the Olympics on the track in twenty twelve top rated Landon madman Donald finishes ninth in the men's race he has a doctorate student at Georgia tech
Pelosi not yet ready to transmit Trump's impeachment to the Senate
"For the past several weeks. There's been one burning question dominating this saga. When Will Nancy Pelosi? The speaker of the house transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate and therefore launched the trial process in the Senate. While this morning Speaker Pelosi finally addressed at that point. Take a listen now in terms of impeachment. You'll keep asking me the same question. I keep giving you the same answer. As I said right from the start art we need to see that the arena in which we are sending our managers is that too much to ask of course addressing that point in an answering that question or two different things. A Pelosi later added that she's not holding onto the articles indefinitely and that she would probably transmit them soon soon. I've got to fantastic guests to help me make sense of all of this political gamesmanship in a few minutes will be talking with CNN. National Security and legal analysts. Susan Hennessy but I I'm joined by my colleague. CNN Politics Congressional reporter. Alex Rogers Alex. Welcome to the PODCAST. Thanks so much for me so it seems to me. After days. Days Days of stasis on this story we did learn in the last twenty four hours several things one as I just said speaker. Pelosi said she's likely to transmit these soon she's not going to hold onto them forever. To President. Trump actually asserted yet again today. He's opened. Witnesses named some witnesses. He's interested in of course. Course which are total non starters For the Democrats in terms of Adam Schiff or Joe Biden or hunter Biden or the whistle blower but is has said and he's going to really leave this to the Senate. We learned that Mitch McConnell the majority leader in the Senate went to the White House and briefed the president on what the contours of this trial is going to look like. So it sounds like the president has more information about Mitch. McConnell's vision of how this trial is going to play out then speaker. Pelosi does which is why she's still hanging onto the articles as we're recording this at least and Finally we've learned that there seems to be a strategic divide going on between the president and and his advisors and or some of his advisers and certainly the Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell in terms of whether or not he wants some very vociferous defenders from the House Republican Conference To join in defending his case in the Senate McConnell of course worried that Too partisan partisan of abroal may upset the apple cart with some of the moderate center. Republicans that they need to keep on board with the plan here so all of those. Those things have emerged in the last twenty four hours and yet Nancy Pelosi is still holding onto the articles of impeachment. What does that mean soon when you expect her to send these to the Senate or she said today today I'll send them over when I'm ready and we're still trying to figure out what leverage she has Senator Majority Leader Mitch? McConnell said yesterday that she has none he has the votes. It's a simple majority devote Democrats are hoping that there are four Republicans to join them. But now we've talked to Susan Collins. Lisa Murkowski Mitt Romney and all of them are on Mitch McConnell. Donald Seidel Miss. So we're wondering here. What Nancy Pelosi is looking for if there's any possible signal that she could get from The Republican leader. She says that she just wants to see the rules. Mitch McConnell says let's just go back to the nineteen ninety nine precedent under Clinton and. Just run with that now she. It seemed to me when she walked into a press conference. Today Should two main message point. She wanted to hit when it came to the issue of impeachment. One was. She's not buying this whole Mitch. McConnell nineteen ninety nine Clinton enroll. She thinks he's not portraying how those were set up namely the Clinton rules were devised in a bipartisan agreement. And I think there was one hundred hundred nothing vote supporting them. In the United States Senate That was hammered out with the blessing of the leaders. Trent Lott and Tom Daschle. Nothing like that is going on with McConnell when Schumer right now is Pelosi's point number one so she doesn't By his argument that this is playing by the Clinton rules. That was one thing she wanted to drive home but number two it seems she wanted to sort of list Her reasons that she thinks she's been victorious in this decision to hold onto the articles articles namely that it has put the issue of documentation and witnesses front and center in a way that if the articles had immediately gone over in December. Maybe they weren't. What do you make of that? I mean her point is that there's a number of witnesses who have not been Who have refused to testify and the Clinton Peterman process? All of those witnesses had already talked before that that evidence was already out there But the thing is that she right now is losing not only those moderate Republicans Republicans at your needs but also Democrats. There's a number of them who've said in the past couple of days that let's just let's just get this started senator. Dianne Feinstein said if we're going to do it she she she should send them over. I don't see what good delay does. She's later walk that back. Other Congressmen have also Adam Smith at today on CNN. Basically said let's transmit these articles goals that's during the Senate trial and then he later said I misspoke wait. I missed how Senator Feinstein walked back to her comments. What did she say? Because it's all those comments my eyes widen so I I missed the walk back. She said today that those comments are now being taken out of context okay. I don't know if that's a real walk back. They're not out of context are they. I don't know vow. The the thing though is what does holding the articles now do for the Democrats. Are they really going to be able to change the rules. Or they can get these witnesses upfront. No Mitch McConnell has the votes. And he's ready to go he's made that crystal clear what What do you make of this concern concern that? McConnell has apparently expressed that Having some very vocal House Republican conference members who were Lord Diehard trump supporters at all costs be part of his defense may upset the apple cart of sort of the Republican unanimity. That you just described that he's been able cobbled together. How is how big of a concern do you sense? Is this for McConnell. So we have some reporting from Sarah Westwood Phil Mattingly came out today. There's there's this struggle between some of president trump's allies who think that a legalistic argument by Patsy. Baloney the White House counsel so is Not going to be good enough. You need to win this. It's it's not only trial but it's somewhat theater have your most for syphilis. Allies Congressman Jim Jordan Congressman Mark Meadows. Some of these people who can articulate the president's argument in different style. Then you also have Senator Mitch McConnell's view. It appears where those those people are going to turn off exactly the Republicans that you need. You Need Susan Collins. Lisa Murkowski the people people in the middle so the president right now is receiving this conflicting advice. And we don't know yet. I don't think the decision has been made on who is going to defend the president and the trial yet. Yeah no we have not heard that decision we know that Pets Bologna and his team. The White House counsel on his team Have put together a plan and that there seems to be one but we don't yet know exactly who will be doing the defending of the president. And I think that the president who we know consume so much Fox News and sort of has this echo chamber constantly feedback loop in in. His mind doesn't always necessarily think the way McConnell does about Are we just doing a full on brawl with the Democrats here or is there work to be done with your own party here and McConnell's clearly trying to make the case Mr President don't lose sight. Yes you're going to be acquitted but you've got to still keep your party on board. I think right now if you just run the nineteen ninety nine Clinton trial rules you will see each side making their argument and then a couple of days of questions from the senators and then you vote whether to dismiss the whole thing right then there or then to also get into the witnesses that Democrats think will bolster their case my final question for you before we go to break you say that Democrats will boast of their case. What about the fact that Donald Trump is still out there saying he wants them? Witnesses I Mitch. McConnell sort of in a no witnesses camp. He doesn't necessarily want to see Joe Biden or Hunter Abidin or the whistle blower called. So there's a difference there too is they're not of course There are some Republicans who want to see honor Biden. They WANNA Have I think Senator Ron Johnson said this week the full gamut of witnesses. But you've also seen Senator Susan Collins who you know really the crucial senator here say a that it would be inappropriate inappropriate for president trump to say to China investigate on our Biden Susan Collins once witnesses But we we don't really think that means also hundred I think we've that means you know people with firsthand evidence other people who testified before the house. Yeah actual impertinent witnesses to this What these articles of impeachment are about and therefore pertinent to this trial? Alex let's take a pause and our conversation for the moment legal analysts Susan. Hennessy will join us right
"seidel" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"Some cold water on that he said, well, look if the supreme court overturns Roe and Casey couldn't a GOP congress just pass a law banning abortion at the federal level mooting all the state level constitutional rights that you're talking about the answer to that is no I am very very confident that the answer to that is no. But I'm gonna have to talk about a couple of cases to answer the question. And and I think that that we're going to give that time to Andrew Seidel could be super interesting so answering your questions. No, I will tell you. Why soup? For soon, but not today. Yeah. You gotta have time for the full Andrew tours deep. Dive don't wanna don't to give give the short that at all. So, but I'm glad you give us the you gave us the Bill bar summary kind of of of that question. I hope less misleading. Couldn't be more misleading. All right. Well, let's hop on over and get injured Seidel on the line. Have you ever tried to jury trial? I have not civil every lawyers tempt criminal. Bench not only to eat forbidden fruit. But to become the snake state or federal I have not. And we are joined by Andrew Seidel. How's it going Andrew? I am. Well, thank you so much for having me on again, really how we are always excited to have you. But particularly this time because you've got a new book coming out on may fourteenth. That's just an a couple of days from when this'll go out, and it is called the founding myth. Why Christian nationalism is unamerican? And this is good timing. This is right up. Our alley couldn't be more in line with everything that we on the show are interested in as you know, secular people and as law gig, re people in original anti originalists all that. Good stuff so excited to talk about the book. Now, I know Andrew tour as you wanted to embarrass Andrew Cise a little bit I I'm getting embarrass him. Because look everybody listening to the show. I enters a six time, maybe seven time guest on here. They know your great. We know you're great. You don't have to take my word for it. The Andrew has gotten as a as an endorsement blurb on the book jacket something that for me is like, you know, is is is my white whale. Right. This is so so soon Diener when Tim Marinsky wrote two of the textbooks that I used in Los, well, we all know Diener on their sermon skis household plays..
Study Suggests This Skin Condition Is Linked to Alzheimer's Risk
"Researchers at UC San Francisco, they announced that age damage skin and older adults may actually be contributing to a wide range of product age related conditions that include heart disease, and Alzheimer's. And so they these two logical. Researchers said that has aging skin begins to break down the immune system releases small proteins known as Seidel kings cytokines to signal that there's inflammation and damaged areas of the skin that can leak into the body circulation system and contribute trigger body, white inflammation in that can other a bunch of stuff that can come
"seidel" Discussed on KNBR The Sports Leader
"Three to dry Seidel with the game winner and the hurricane shut out the avalanche three nothing. Peter Muratovic made thirty eight saves. I'm Jay Berman. You're listening to after hours with Amy Lawrence. We don't get too technical around. Here. We try to have a good time we like to appeal to as many people as possible whether you're marginal fan or you're a rabid fan. So I hear from a lot of women who think it's really neat that they have someone they can identify with on the radio. Then I hear from a lot of men who we did they get sexy or hot. And then there is the segment of the audience that hates me. But the thing is they still listen just a fuel there. I understand are some of you who are just normal sports radio listeners. Although Dana age, how does one define normal thing is normal. No such thing as perfect those two things don't exist in our world. After hours with Amy Lawrence. It is the last week before selection Sunday. So of course, a lot of conference tournaments taking place day.
"seidel" Discussed on KIIS 102.7
"Or two point seven kiss FM on iheartradio. Got a baby. So. I'll bet. Julio. So. If you got a pit you. If you it. Just. Is that it? Asia. Lucky? Lucky for you. Rico seidel. Thomas brazen parish. Tell me. Joe?.
Kendall Coyne Schofield first woman to compete in All-Stars skills competition
"For northern California hockey fans at the tank that's the shark tank where the sharks play they had the skills competition tonight. Edmonton star Connor mcdavid won the fastest skater competition beat out six other all stars as well as US women's hockey star kindle Coyne. She impressed everyone as she scooted around the ice. Among the other winners were Calgary's Johnny Godhra who was the best in the puck control contest of the Rangers goalie, Henrik Lundqvist Lundqvist won the best goalie competition Edmonton's Leandra Seidel won the premier passing event in L. A defenseman drew doughty. Meanwhile, was asked what impresses most about some of these younger players who are taking part in the all star competition. Some of these guys moves in the in the shootout, and they're all the young guys to the guys for one or two years. Some of the stuff they can do in those shootouts. They're amazing and obviously the puck candling drill. I thought was pretty cool to the how quick they can give up on their stick. I can't do that. Drew doughty of the LA kings, not a favorite among sharks fans, but he takes all the rich. Bidding and all the the jeers good naturedly. And of course, the face off tomorrow night's games at five o'clock our time for the NHL all-star warriors back on the court also tomorrow at the same time, five o'clock, west coast time, eight o'clock east coast time, they'll be looking for a tenth straight win. It's going to
"seidel" Discussed on KIIS 102.7
"Rico Seidel. Promise. Paris. Tell me. I'm back. Just two. Deserve it. Can. Lucky? That's what. Lucky for you. What? Hey, what's up ballet, I'm Shawn Mendez on one or two point seven kiss FM an iheartradio station..
"seidel" Discussed on On Being with Krista Tippett
"At eliminations was integrating this sense, not just practice because not everybody who worked there wanted to learn to meditate, but we integrated it in ways into the business that I thought would. So the business would embody the perspective and the spirit and the values of contemporary practices. So. You always had this. You've pulled this through in your career this connection between contemplation and be arts and design. Yeah. And I, and I guess actually what you just pointed out. He's also have that connection is really there and all the traditions as well as a contemporary of tradition. That's that's interesting. I'm not saying people talk. Yeah. Yeah. It was a way to express that. You know, that was the beginning of the time when we were discovering, you know, it's all one. I mean now, we recognized that it's it's more complicated and Seidel and so on and it is all one and yet it's it's more than that. But at the time that was radical. Yeah. So we really want to express it. And we knew that doing it visually would be easier for people then trying to do it in words as you can appreciate so. Yeah. So we eliminations we did we were. We were trying to create an organization based on principles of what they call in in the east Right Livelihood, where what you're making is wholesome and contributes to now he would say, you know, sustainability of the planet and species, and and at the same time the.
"seidel" Discussed on WGN Radio
"I stay with the change because you know why they're safe pizza from domino's now papa john's never but no that's not true but we were going by and years ago years and years ago when molly was i dunno first grade kindergarten something like that i was on the road and i had to miss a dancer seidel and i felt horrible so i went to a build a bear well actually it was a knockoff build a bear in sioux falls south dakota they didn't have a build a bear they had here stitchup an animal it was similar yet different i worked at the animal joint and i made her a monkey because that was my nickname for and i put it in a ballerina outfit while she being a clever and creative young woman who hopes to write for late night television named the monkey molly so which is her name but she's had this this monkey and four years to college whether it was on her bed all the time she now now the monkey lives in brooklyn and occasionally i would buy the monkey a new off like when she went molly monkey went to college i got her new pair of pajamas at build a bear so we're walking through manhattan and here's build a bear my wife and our company goes there's built i gotta get the monkey some new pajamas so i i waited and here's me a aged old man who looks sweaty because it was one hundred degrees and i walk into build a bear and it's filled with what you would expect little children enjoying themselves and there i am thumbing through the animal pajamas it had to appear creepy or that it really was it was sweet in my estimation but anyway i found some thoughts of nice new york pajamas so now now molly monkey has new york centric pajamas as she sleeps in brooklyn it's molly monkey monkey mali no it's molly monkey okay molly monkey that makes sense yeah i guess it makes much sense than anything else i've said right by the way yes what is streisand effect yeah it's a phenomenon where attempting do remove or hide or remove censor a piece of information.
"seidel" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"You are legal expert andrew seidel got the answer correct it is in fact and thomas i'm sorry that's right i feel like if you guys we talked kansas we were worried about you know might be alone note to go on i just wanted to give andrew side l another victor hey plays f our song you know again 'cause you got this one right i wanted to let you know i want to let the little also you guys if you were doing magnetic video podcast assuming there is such a thing you would be seeing my victory dance both male hand when we were talking about more no you're right i was very torn i should should've listened to my my instincts that actually led me toward a she'll listen to those instincts more well great job also was remembering pretty sure for like the oj trial they couldn't even allow the fact that like you know he'd been the cops have been called x number of times for you know battering his wife before like there's it seems like the rule goes a little too far maybe in the things we can't allow in a in a trial and again that's because think of how you went about analyzing the question right like that i think really powerfully illustrates just how prejudicial you know prior bad acts are in front of the jury right and so what you don't want to do is you don't want the jury to give over you know undue weight to a particular fact that would lead to you know mistaken.
"seidel" Discussed on The Polygon Show
"Like in life just like in life so there's this lake one scene where it was really funny it took a speech out of it where he's trying to like seidel up to these keep girls at the bar or whatever and it's like he can either ask them what their drink gang or ask them where they come from or he literally can be like hey you know what my favorite thing inside a lady earth yeah what my favorite thing in a lady is in there like yeah and they're like oh what he's like maude dick wanna come prayer like literally it's that but in all and gross an object defying and if you get the right choice if cuts to actual pickup artists who made the game and i also like sars in it and he's flanked by these like pretty much naked ladies fazli being like good jobs oh and it's extremely gross it's so offensive to all of my sensibilities it's just very bad and like i like dating syms mmhmm because i hate real dating so i like fake interactive dating because it's comforting but this is just like because the aim is to teach men you know real life skills it's very disturbing because if any i mean i'm sure all of us have been approached by people in really gross ways and so for me it's just like i don't want any man to think this is acceptable yeah because even though like non whip your deck out methods are all for for meeting about it they're all like focused on continuing and interaction and tell late.
"seidel" Discussed on AM 970 The Answer
"Words the only words i can tell you is they they knew it was coming they knew this guy and uh that's that's the key thing to take away from this and in fact the new york times headlined nicholas krusic shooting suspect had been expelled from school authorities say as you read through it you realize they knew it was coming let's go right to the broward county sheriff's uh talking about it cut number four i want to start out by sadness as a catastrophic plan unbelievably catastrophic game route town history is devastating on sick to my stomach mom we have multiple casualties we've had off approximately fourteen people transported to area hospitals with varying degrees of injuries the all multiple casualties though there there are paul folks that have lost their lives i don't know the number right now it's a fluid seen right now we have multiple swat teams clearing all the buildings if anybody knows anything about settlement douglas high school is one of the biggest schools in broward county it's huge it's a huge campus so we have multiple thaw multiple swat teams clearly yep rebuilding to make sure that there were no other shooters law we have bought a shooter in custody mob he was taken into custody at the lied about an hour after he left the douglas after he commit committed his hey richard comma seidel detestable act the fbi an hour primesee people will begin processing kiss shall ridic seen as soon as the buildings a cleared uh he continued the sheriff to talk more about the same cut number five zero said said to say that seventeen people lost their lives uh twelve people within the building the suit people just outside the building won't personality pine island road and shoot people lost their lives in the hospital there are people that are still undergoing surgery and god and just pray for this city pray for this school the parents there there the folks that lost their lives it's a horrific horrific day uh as i said before my my triplets a tenth graduated consuming douglas high school enough just horrible absolutely horrible annoying will we we continually ask you in the media to continually put out the message if you see something say something if anybody has any indicator that someone's going through behavioral change on this social media that there.
"seidel" Discussed on The Right Time with Bomani Jones
"Right loses making no says to the point where i thought he must be on the payroll because all he was do it was basically ride from machetewielding no fundamental point underneath super shot he's like yeah i'll call ray lewis to get his insight audio serious question if it doesn't have to do a defense or be in the middle linebacker what are you all call the ray lewis van seidel body brands you're looking for help or getting a brand a shoe polish if you've got despot in back but what are you always wanted to all this caller ray lewis inside own anything era lewis might have inside on a bunch of things but i'm asking you how many matters a covered over you feel like i needed derail lewis bushati was sitting there like worrell need some party to say that i'm calling hung but if our call tony dungy might tell me to sign on your show yero call ray lewis keeping in mind their ray lewis is the dude who said this in advance of the nfl lockout we really regard were move prior service there's no other reason is who is going on that's why i don't get into worden owner of the because the takes away from life it self meant they are people whose really struggling for real this bill real struggles that with through right now we're affecting more than us how so too many people live to us at falcons trees the way i want people who work in stadiums if fans yes yes duties research if we don't have the seas watch how much which we call the crowd by thomas crammed picks up if you take away i k what do you think that would have there's nothing else to do so the thought the lockout was going to start a crime wave is the do shotty decided he needed to call to talk about it just nothing left to.
"seidel" Discussed on WFAN Sports Radio_FM
"That they're they're they've got too many other young guys that they've got to pay money to dry seidel is an rfa this year now you've taken thirteen million out of your cap and you've put around him now for the next date year every year how some team if they were smart should go and offer dry seidel who's in our at an offer she and where and just make it impossible for the euro's to match nine or ten nine million a year that guy it might be worth it and they're not gonna be able to match because they've already stopped all this money up with mcdavid so we'll talk about that tonight steve barbara china's from the record in bergen county covers than ex and he's than mba calmness what's idea of about everything going on with phil jackson and the next certainly and the cb three a red caraux joins us than i ever sports business report and a lawyer daniel wallet he's a gaming and sports attorney we'll talk about the supreme court's handling of the lawsuit by the governor of new jersey chris christie against the pro leagues ansi aa hey for the right to allow sports betting in new jersey the case will be heard by the supreme court in the at the latest i i'm hearing the winner and then a decision would come in late spring or early summer next year at about this time and there are a lot of reasons people believe that they may very well changed the landscape of sports betting in america with this decision no one dot the supreme court would hear the case they've decided that take the case against the recommendations of the solicitorgeneral and the doj they usually listen to him and don't take cases that they don't read command but they took this case it's a huge case we talked about last night's daniel waga gaming as for its attorney at around eleven 40s during the night eight forty pacific right here on the bench another fantastic league baseball on tap more games on thursday they don't wanna get action on including st louis arizona i love that series than ours seiders of chicago in washington new york nationally miami milwaukee send see taxes cleveland going to be good baltimore toronto minnesota van way that the bombers on the south side of chicago and the freeway series still going on get every pick every day for.