36 Burst results for "S. Dr. Anthony Fauci"

Email Exchange Between Mark Zuckerberg and Dr. Fauci Included Trade Secrets

The Dan Bongino Show

01:44 min | 3 d ago

Email Exchange Between Mark Zuckerberg and Dr. Fauci Included Trade Secrets

"Here It is right here. Here's the email from Mark Zuckerberg. To Dr Anthony Fauci. You need to date folks. March 15 2020 12 18 pm That West Coast time doesn't really matter. Probably not. He says calls him Tony. They must be buddies, Tony, not Dr Fauci. Not Anthony. Not Dr Anthony. Tony. A tone like he's gonna go over for dinner, and I'm gonna have Connolly's or something. Hey, Tony. He says. Hey, listen, it's a Zuckerberg again from Facebook doing a series of livestream Q and A's with health experts and, you know, we need some authoritative information. I'd love to have you do one of these Q and A's. He said, could be a video We put out in the harbor different thing we distribute separately. But I think it could be effective as well. Talking about authority of information from reliable sources, was anybody you know, from the Trump administration that had alternate views to Dr Fauci. Given an opportunity by Zuckerberg to I just I'm just asking a question. Again, in case you're under the mistaken miss belief here. That Chuck Todd is interested in hearing both sides are getting to the facts he's interested in protecting Protecting like a praetorian guard. Dr. Anthony Fauci is reputation because, Fauci said, a lot of things that did damage to Donald Trump. That's his only purpose. We have the email right here. And the interesting about this. They think about this email is the redaction. Interesting about this email thing about this email is what's not in this email. Zuckerberg says the Fauci get ready. He says, finally, comma. You're waiting for the rest. Well, you'll wait forever because there isn't the rest. The redactions the whole paragraph. Finally, comma redacted. There it is right

Dr Fauci Tony Dr Anthony Fauci Dr Anthony Mark Zuckerberg Trump Administration Connolly Zuckerberg West Coast Anthony Dr. Anthony Fauci Fauci Chuck Todd Facebook Donald Trump
Fresh update on "s. dr. anthony fauci" discussed on Bill Cunningham

Bill Cunningham

00:15 min | 13 hrs ago

Fresh update on "s. dr. anthony fauci" discussed on Bill Cunningham

"Transcript of a phone call made available. That story by the media is a lie that Hydroxychloroquine has no value. And it's basically poison that will kill people with covid. That went on for months because, Trump said, Take Hydroxychloroquine. Now Senator Johnson, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Put that kind of stuff on his Twitter account, and now he's banned for a week. Studies have come out That said, You know what Hydroxychloroquine is pretty good stuff probably works. Another lie. Trump ignored Russia putting bounties in U. S soldiers in Afghanistan More investigation, Chairman of Joint Chiefs field commander said it didn't happen. It was alive, but the media went with it because made Trump look bad. All these things. Turned out to be a lie. The media report lies, but they will. They will not report the truth about Joe Biden, Jim Biden and Hunter Biden and the money they made with Tony Bob Belinsky. That's the truth. But they won't report the truth They report lies. You might recall also that media told us and Dr Anthony Fauci Covid was not from a lab in Wuhan. It was like from an art bark or a bat 1000 miles away, or squid or the wet market. While those infected and dying weren't in the wet market. They were in this place called the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Think about that. Here is a nasty virus coming out of a building with the name on it of Wuhan Lab laboratory of of Institute of, uh of, uh of a virology and that that that's the name of the place where the doctors are dying, and the lab technicians are getting sick. But the Chinese pendant on some damn seal and art bark or a bat at the wet market. But those dying and getting sick weren't the wet market that they worked at the institute. And even as I sit here tonight, I don't hear Anthony Fauci. Now he's equivocating a bit saying well, it could be a leak, and the worst part is the American taxpayer contributed millions of dollars through third parties to give to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in order to weaponize and or treat. Diseases like Covid 19. So in a sense we paid for the research that created Covid 19 resulting in the death of 600,000 people We paid for it. Might recall, Trump ordered the trust the tear gassing of peaceful protest. So you have a photo op. How'd that work out Well department and Terry said, That's a lie. You might recall Charlottesville Trump called neo Nazis and white supremacists. Very fine people. No, he didn't. He was referring to those who wanted the Confederate monuments up and those who wanted them down and Glenn Beck and Sean have repeatedly played the entire cut. It's obvious Trump was saying there was fine people on both sides who wanted the statues up one of the stitch one of the statues down. Haven't talked at all about, uh, about Russian collusion, delusion that was fully investigated, so there is scandal right in front of the face the mainstream media Where Joe Biden's mental acuity lacking with the fact he's the big guy, and they don't cover the truth, and they keep covering up to a large extent for Kamala Harris and our incompetence in Guatemala City. Let's take a short break. Line becomes available. We have three lines open now. 8666477337 the top media lies. Committed against Donald Trump. Where does Trump now go to get back his presidency? Don't know. Let's continue with more bill cunning and the great American with you every Sunday night. Reds baseball. They've won eight of the last 10 and lost ground in Milwaukee, who's won nine of the last 10. It's time to take care of business tomorrow in Milwaukee, a news radio 700 wlw Jeff.

Tony Bob Belinsky Jim Biden Glenn Beck Joe Biden Kamala Harris Sean Anthony Fauci Donald Trump Hunter Biden Terry Guatemala City Charlottesville Afghanistan Wuhan Institute Of Virology Tomorrow Wisconsin Anthony Fauci Covid 1000 Miles 8666477337
Fauci Blasts 'Preposterous' Covid Conspiracies

The DeMaio Report with Carl DeMaio and Lou Penrose

00:15 sec | 4 d ago

Fauci Blasts 'Preposterous' Covid Conspiracies

"Dr. Anthony Fauci is calling the attacks against him. Attacks on science critics are calling for his job after he was accused of changing his views on mask wearing in the origins of Covid 19. He told MSNBC he could debunk each of their conspiracy theories

Dr. Anthony Fauci Msnbc
US Increasingly Unlikely to Meet Biden's July 4 Vaccine Goal

AP News Radio

00:55 sec | 5 d ago

US Increasingly Unlikely to Meet Biden's July 4 Vaccine Goal

"President Biden's been setting and exceeding goals in the pandemic fight but the U. S. is increasingly unlikely to meet his benchmark of having seventy percent of Americans at least partially vaccinated by July fourth at the current rate it won't happen about sixteen million people would need to get a shot in the next four weeks the daily vaccination averages down to about four hundred thousand a day still Dr Anthony Fauci things the U. S. we'll get there and if we don't we're going to continue to keep pushing saying the administration's pleading with speeds to boost their vaccine outreach efforts even as a new virus cases plummet CDC cheaper shell Wolinsky says the seven day averages now about thirteen thousand three hundred the first time that the seven day average of cases has been less than fifteen thousand since March twenty seventh twenty twenty Sager mag ani Washington

President Biden U. S. Dr Anthony Fauci Wolinsky CDC Ani Washington
Conservatives Say Fauci Mislead Public, Call For Investigation

Purity Products

00:27 sec | Last week

Conservatives Say Fauci Mislead Public, Call For Investigation

"Familiar themes. He claimed the 2020 election was stolen, and he demanded that China be held accountable for the coronavirus. Some conservatives are calling for accountability. When it comes to Dr Anthony Fauci, they believe the nation's top infectious disease expert may have misled the public about the possibility of Covid 19 leaking out of a lab. Now he seems to be changing his tune and now certainly is also calling for a formal investigation. And I do

Dr Anthony Fauci China Infectious Disease
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

03:41 min | Last week

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

"Says points out that the kind of mask you. Buying a drugstore quote is not really effective in keeping out virus which is small enough to pass through the material end quote so his original judgement and the reason he said. Don't wear masks is. That's what the science showed and then somewhere along the line Some scientists suggest this would help and it became this. You know symbol of whether or not you were helping with the virus effort and he got on board And even today we don't have really any good scientific evidence that it really helps especially with an arrow sliced Virus but he kind of went along with that and we can see here as you said that. He was changing his position to make himself look better and try to to to justify some decisions. That really couldn't be justified development on this front. This week has been this this vanity fair story which is a long investigation into the lab hypothesis. And really why it took the government so long to acknowledge it and a few points. I would draw out here. One is it cites. A memo written by a former acting assistant secretary of the state department Who wrote that. His team was warned not to pursue investigation of the origin of covid nineteen. Because it would quote open a can of worms if continued There's also a at some some quotes from matthew pottinger. The former deputy national security adviser who says to interesting things that i that i found interesting at least one of them is that pottenger sort of blames trump for some of this in that trump was publicly saying that he had seen evidence before seen evidence that the virus came out of the lab Before apparently reportedly that evidence was really there and so pottenger says that that seemed to cause a quote antibody response unquote within the government. And then the second thing is he. He says that so many of the experts in this field have ties of some kind to this gain of function research That those conflicts quote play a profound role in muddying the waters in contaminating the shot at having an impartial inquiry unquote so bill. I mean it seems to me that these are questions that maybe we need congress and some sort of investigation to answer because It seems like there are a lot of conflicts and a lot of a lot of reasons. that the everybody was sort of hoping that the lab hypothesis was it what it would turn out to be. Yeah i think in the case of the vanity fair piece you mentioned. I too found that really fascinating. There were not only people hoping that they wouldn't find things but actively trying to shut down the investigation. I mean one of the other stories is that you know a secretary of state. Mike pompeo was pushing this investigation but he was fought by people in his own department about this and they some of them may have just believed. This's this is a cookie theory. There's nothing there but others that line. I think it was in the vanity fair about you. Know if we have investigation could open a can of worms suggested. Some people. don't have good answers for what we might find out. I think this is something for congress to look into the probably wait until they get the the the latest report from joe biden and i would add another thing to To judge the credibility of this new investigation will the biden team include members of the former team. That was investigating. I mean they've done some the legwork already or are they going to keep those people marginalize..

Mike pompeo congress joe biden today trump This week nineteen matthew pottinger One second thing least biden one lot them
Breaking Down the Wuhan Lab Leak Hypothesis, Dr. Fauci and Other Government Officials Involved

The Dan Bongino Show

01:39 min | Last week

Breaking Down the Wuhan Lab Leak Hypothesis, Dr. Fauci and Other Government Officials Involved

"So it appears that there's some kind of and I'll get to this moratorium in a minute. The United States government has a moratorium on funding research that would make viruses more powerful. Gee, I wonder why we put a moratorium on that. Because we could create a whole bunch of really deadly viruses, and that would really suck. Sounds like the government finally did something right when they weren't doing something wrong. Hey, we shouldn't do research like that. But it appears a sub agency of the NIH led by Dr Anthony Fauci. May have approved this grant that went to this eco health alliance that eventually made its way to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where it's believed. Now, this virus may have leaked from Mm. Oh, it gets better. Here's the third part of this daily caller piece again. They're talking about this Christopher Park, who was the State Department person who apparently did not want to open the Pandora's box looking into this stuff, according to this Vanity Fair report. He says Park was not the only government official to oppose pursuing the lab leak hypothesis, however. The Nano another until Vanity Fair that an intelligence analyst struggled to find a report written by officials working at the Department of Energy Lab that Anna must be a whistleblower. The Nano told the island he viewed the report is being intentionally buried within the classified collection system. Department of Energy officials then attempted to block State Department officials for meeting with the report's authors did Nano alleged okay? So just clearing that up a bit. We have funding paid to echo Health alliance through FAO cheese group there. Making its way around the moratorium against this kind of funding that makes its way to a Chinese lab. We think this virus may have leaked from, and apparently there's a report on it that the government's burying in its own classified system who's burying it? What are they covering up

Dr Anthony Fauci Eco Health Alliance Wuhan Institute Of Virology Christopher Park United States Government Department Of Energy Lab State Department NIH Vanity Fair Nano Echo Health Alliance Anna Department Of Energy Park FAO Government
Fauci's Emails Give Insight to Early Days of COVID Response

Sean Hannity

00:39 sec | Last week

Fauci's Emails Give Insight to Early Days of COVID Response

"Says Chief medical advisor Dr Anthony Fauci can speak for himself about emails released under the Freedom of Information Act request. The emails have sparked backlash from Republicans critical of Dr Fauci. His comments on the possibility Covid 19 came from the lab. Asked about the emails and Dr Fauci, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said. He's been an undeniable asset and our country's pandemic response. But it's obviously not advantageous for me to relitigate the substance of emails from 17 months ago, House Republicans are calling for Dr Fauci to testify about the origins of the virus. President Biden has ordered intelligence agencies to expand their efforts in pinpointing how the pandemic began

Dr Fauci Dr Anthony Fauci Jen Psaki House Republicans White House President Biden
Dr. Fauci's Emails Prove He Knew of Wuhan Gain of Function Research

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:22 min | Last week

Dr. Fauci's Emails Prove He Knew of Wuhan Gain of Function Research

"Today is the emails now. I'm going to take a different approach at first novel. Go into the more conventional. Take here it seems as if the washington post has decided to actually do a rare form of journalism. They filled out a freedom of information. Requests that foia a freedom of information act in fact. We talked about this at length on our podcast yesterday. That filling out a freedom of information act is one of the few ways to actually hold these tyrants these despots accountable so the washington post has now published thousands and thousands of private emails from dr anthony fauci. Some of them are rather boring and answering questions to celebrities and producers how he has time to do that not exactly sure thousands of emails. Just saying thanks then. There are some groundbreaking emails. Now before i get into these emails. I do not believe that this is all a coincidence. I don't believe the washington post would do this that some sort of a wink a nod a gesture. A point from ron clain. You see. I think that somebody wants dr anthony out she removed. I believe that and this is reflected in the emails. We're gonna get into it toys. Always the emails isn't it so funny how that works. I believe that the evidence is now overwhelming that the chinese corona virus was manufacturing in a laboratory. I believe dr anthony. Fauci was more involved than people realize. I believe that he was intimately into the wuhan institute of technology because of that and because of now the sudden interest and finding out where the virus came from. And how the evidence is showing this the not come from a bat. This did not come from the himalayan mountains. This did not come from a wet market. This came from a biolab that dr fauci very well might have visited himself but we do know that. The national institute of health funded the wuhan institute of technology through gain of function research.

Washington Post Dr Anthony Dr Anthony Fauci Ron Clain Wuhan Institute Of Technology Fauci Dr Fauci Himalayan Mountains National Institute Of Health Wuhan Institute Of Technology
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Black Girl Nerds

Black Girl Nerds

06:00 min | 3 weeks ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Black Girl Nerds

"The big screen actually recently attended a press conference with liza tommy the director and she purposely was like we want people to see this on the big screen because it was meant and it was filmed to be presented on the big screen with the glorious and elaborate costumes and the music and the lighting and So they want people to go to the theater. And that's why you know because it was supposed to come out last year and then now it's being pushed back to august of this year of. Its release so you know. People a lotta these studios and filmmakers. They want their movies to come out in the in the theaters. See i'm saying twenty twenty three a way to go. I'm just saying could you gotta make sure you gotta make sure everything is good for. Just skip twenty. Twenty two ha. Yeah we just to get this okay. Okay we already know that we're going to have to sell work through that okay jamie so work throughout new normal through twenty twenty two so we just go twenty twenty three okay just going to get their way we could see all the movies well I think black panthers coming out in twenty twenty two so we can't skip twenty twenty two. Oh my gosh all right. I take it back we say going to. I mean we cannot miss what kind of a ever got us. They twenty seventy two hours. Just bring back is that's next summer. We can't skip kinda forever. And i i will. I mean cova. Be damned. I will be. Oh oh yeah. They got me on that one. They got me on that one. I i'll just have a hazmat suit on or something. It's yup put their pseudo. Yup exactly. I can't do it on twenty twenty two then we gotta hanging up. I know right. Yeah exactly so but we'll be we'll be okay. I mean you know. I know earlier. We listen to dr fauci and You know that was awesome by the way awesome that you got a chance to talk to him. But i'm i'm really glad that we had a chance to hear what he had to say. And it's it's good that we're you know we're pushing forward to Have these opportunities to obviously with these rollouts with vaccines. And we're listening to people like him to actual scientists that know what they're doing So it's you know it's good. Yeah i just appreciate his time. Because i don't know if i was the only one that was always looking at like my apps or looking at my feet and i was like okay. What did she say about this. He said i could do this. All right what about the mask on this. What type of mass. I need to have on. That was just like me. All throughout like the various ages of the pandemic me too. I mean i was. I was looking man as tune in to doctor. Faucher for everything. Like dr fauci asked you say on. What is that about. You have to say on that. Like i would always look to him for everything and still do like you know. Oh yeah definitely you know he. The dude knows and stuff and he's been doing this for decades long. You know long before. I even knew he. Was you know he was the medical expert in all of this stuff. So i appreciate His knowledge and his wisdom and insight when it comes to these kinds of topics. And i'm so honored that he came on our podcast know shed light even just for a short time To just shed knowledge and wisdom about what's going on currently with the code crisis in how we can see a path forward and screed awesome. Thank you dr fauci. Because we know he probably had like ten other people lined up to ask even more questions and and you know he's tired you know he's like man. I got fifty million interviews right. He's like they quit asking me this question but you you. You can't tell you know he's such aka he is like you're i'm thinking i would like start. I okay. well what the heck did give the other person. And then okay. What about this on the back. He just has a role in. I'm like wow. Yep yep absolutely absolutely so hi jamie so are we doing what we got coming up in the new normal which you got do next. We know we know you're not coming out. So which streaming. What are you streaming. What are you watching streaming last. I am hiding from the world. Jamie is continuing to hide. People do not ask her questions about this ask. Oh yes sweet tooth is really good. Oh i've heard about have downey juniors new show the he produced and That's that's a cute show. I watched the first three episodes so I got more links that net flicks hooked me up with. So i gotta check out the rest of those Saw watch those over the weekend and Yeah i'm putting in my requests for zola. 'cause i wanna see that i didn't get i didn't get to watch it. It's sunday. What's a movie. that's that's not a some. i'm waiting on Getting a hook up on screen or link for that one. I'm late go. Ara recipe got they. They hook ups on that one. I can get work. Come on now. Zola gotta get that zola hookah. 'cause i remember when that when that all went down on twitter when everybody on talking about the story of zola now is like what i wanna..

Jamie last year jamie liza tommy sunday next summer first three episodes twitter fifty million interviews twenty seventy two hours cova ten other people Zola decades Faucher twenty Twenty two august of this year panthers fauci
New Vibe at White House: Hugs Are In; Masks Are (Mostly) Out

AP News Radio

01:07 min | 3 weeks ago

New Vibe at White House: Hugs Are In; Masks Are (Mostly) Out

"The White House is springing back to life now that people are vaccinated and with the recent relaxation and federal guidance about wearing masks and social distancing right to family come on there's a new fine but the White House of late press secretary Jen Psaki near a warm and fuzzy crew and we like to hug around here but we were waiting for that to be allowed to buy a CDC guidelines which we certainly abide by yes hugs are now in masks mostly out the complex is taking on the look and feel of pre pandemic days with more west wing staffers on the premises soon more reporters and certainly a continuing to open the white house up the people's house up to the American public the White House is eager to send a message that a return to normal as possible with vaccinations the president Biden's chief medical advisor Dr Anthony Fauci says it's not a rational to be apprehensive you can understand that when people the following a certain trend for a considerable period of time that it may take time for them to look just so I would not say that that's irrational I'd say that's understandable Ben Thomas Washington

White House Of Late Press Jen Psaki White House CDC President Biden Dr Anthony Fauci Ben Thomas Washington
The Latest: Pfizer-BioNTech pledge 2B doses to poor nations

AP News Radio

00:45 sec | 3 weeks ago

The Latest: Pfizer-BioNTech pledge 2B doses to poor nations

"Have we turned the corner on the corona virus coronavirus infections are down to their lowest levels since last June and deaths are down to to a level not seen since July the percentage of Americans were fully vaccinated thirty eight percent about forty eight percent of gotten at least one Kovic shot according to Bloomberg's cove it tracker now the question many are asking if you've been vaccinated will you need a booster shot in the fall the nation's top infectious disease expert Dr Anthony Fauci says maybe they don't know yet he tells CBS this morning that scientists are still tracking data on the virus possible variants he's also reminding those who haven't been fully vaccinated to keep the mask on I read a folate

Kovic Dr Anthony Fauci Bloomberg CBS
Apple brings CEO Tim Cook to court in defense of app store

AP News Radio

00:45 sec | 3 weeks ago

Apple brings CEO Tim Cook to court in defense of app store

"Have we turned the corner on the corona virus coronavirus infections are down to their lowest levels since last June and deaths are down to to a level not seen since July the percentage of Americans were fully vaccinated thirty eight percent about forty eight percent of gotten at least one Kovic shot according to Bloomberg's cove it tracker now the question many are asking if you've been vaccinated will you need a booster shot in the fall the nation's top infectious disease expert Dr Anthony Fauci says maybe they don't know yet he tells CBS this morning that scientists are still tracking data on the virus possible variants he's also reminding those who haven't been fully vaccinated to keep the mask on I read a folate

Kovic Dr Anthony Fauci Bloomberg CBS
Dr. Fauci: Booster Shots May Depend on Variants

AP News Radio

00:32 sec | 3 weeks ago

Dr. Fauci: Booster Shots May Depend on Variants

"Will Americans need to get coded nineteen vaccine booster shots this fall Dr Anthony Fauci says it's possible as scientists tracked data on both the virus a and a possible variants but he tells CBS this morning Americans would not necessarily need booster shots for more protection in the meantime he's urging everyone to follow CDC guidelines stressing the unvaccinated need to wear masks even if they're largely around people who have been vaccinated Sager mag ani Washington

Dr Anthony Fauci CBS CDC Sager Mag Ani Washington
Experts Say COVID-19 Booster Shots May Be Necessary

WTOP 24 Hour News

00:29 sec | 3 weeks ago

Experts Say COVID-19 Booster Shots May Be Necessary

"Getting Covic shots will need another round. Pretty soon. CBS is Nicky Batiste explains covert vaccine booster could be necessary by fall for people who are already fully vaccinated. What's really going to depend on following what the durability of immunity is? And essentially recommending it at an appropriate time. Dr. Anthony Fauci says the vaccines are effective for at least six months. Likely, more butt boosters will probably be needed.

Covic Nicky Batiste CBS Dr. Anthony Fauci
Nervous Workers Struggle to Adjust to New Mask Policies

AP News Radio

00:56 sec | 3 weeks ago

Nervous Workers Struggle to Adjust to New Mask Policies

"People across the country especially store workers are still trying to figure out the new government guidance on wearing a face mask the supermarket chain Kroger becomes the latest to announce that it's no longer requiring customers or workers to wear face masks in states where mandates have been lifted some workers are celebrating but others have been posting concerns they still could catch the corona virus from unvaccinated customers or co workers infectious disease expert Dr Anthony Fauci visiting a vaccine clinic at children's national hospital in Washington admits the new guidance was confusing unfortunately some people interpret it is that that everybody can get rid of their masks which is not the case it was only speaking about people who are vaccinated he and First Lady Jill Biden kept their masks on for the clinic tour I'm Jackie Quinn

Dr Anthony Fauci Kroger Children's National Hospital Infectious Disease Washington Jill Biden Jackie Quinn
U.S. Will Send More COVID-19 Vaccine Doses Abroad

News and Perspective with Tom Hutyler

00:43 sec | 3 weeks ago

U.S. Will Send More COVID-19 Vaccine Doses Abroad

"Sharing vaccine doses is the right thing to do and will help end the Cova 19 pandemic around the world. Dr. Anthony Fauci weighed in on Good Morning America and NBC's Karen Travers has the details US over the next six weeks will send overseas 80 Million Cove in 19 vaccine doses. The White House has not yet said which nations will get these doses, but some have been promised to India, which has been experiencing a staggering surge in cases and Chefs, Dr Anthony Fauci and NBC's Good Morning America says this is just the beginning of what's been called vaccine diplomacy. I feel that as a rich country we really do have a moral obligation. To play a major role in making sure that there are vaccines to those countries that can afford to get the vaccines themselves. Karen Travers,

Dr. Anthony Fauci Karen Travers Million Cove NBC America Dr Anthony Fauci White House India
Fauci says pandemic exposed 'undeniable effects of racism'

ABC News Perspective

00:15 sec | Last month

Fauci says pandemic exposed 'undeniable effects of racism'

"Dr Anthony Fauci today saying that the undeniable effects of racism have led to unacceptable health disparities that especially here it African Americans, Hispanics and Native Americans during the pandemic. Comments during a graduation ceremony for Emory

Dr Anthony Fauci Emory
Washington Post Reports Trump Justice Department Got Reporters' Phone Records

NBC Meet the Press

00:40 sec | Last month

Washington Post Reports Trump Justice Department Got Reporters' Phone Records

"We had a big little bombshell nugget. Come out of the biden justice department. Jake that some washington post reporters that Had their phone records subpoenaed and that trump's justice department sometime in twenty twenty approved of this. I imagine we're gonna see some congressional investigations start on this Immediately yeah and the two committees that this would come under. Chuck are the Justice the judiciary committee and the oversight committee both filled with trump aligned. Republicans that will make it. Really interesting people like jim jordan. Who's the top republican on the judiciary committee. I have to imagine this week. We'll see we'll see democrats announce something Within the next couple of days.

Biden Justice Department Justice The Judiciary Committe Washington Post Jake Justice Department Chuck Jim Jordan Judiciary Committee
Elise Stefanik: From Republican Moderate to Trump Favourite

NBC Meet the Press

03:08 min | Last month

Elise Stefanik: From Republican Moderate to Trump Favourite

"Coming leadership ouster of liz. Cheney is about much more than the sacking of the number three house republican it is an unconditional surrender by one of our two major political parties to former president trump. And his big lie that the twenty twenty election was somehow stolen. Cheney's crime is not that she isn't conservative. It's that she's not conservative as defined by today's republican party which apparently means unquestioning loyalty to the defeated former president. She stands accused of telling the truth that the election was not stolen and for criticizing trump citing the january six capital interaction. This episode is just the latest chapter in the party's purging of its legacy the bushes the mccain's the romney's and now the chains names that appeared on eight of nine presidential tickets for one thousand nine hundred eighty two thousand twelve all now. Essentially excommunicated by the party's base and leadership and for one reason only the message go along with donald trump and his lies or just go away. Will this help. Republican election prospects in the short term. Perhaps but what does it mean for. Democracy when a great political institution refuses to accept free and fair election. Results and rejects. Its own who choose principle over party. I have heard from members concerned about her ability to carry out the job as conference chair congresswoman lizzie cheney facing a vote as soon as wednesday to ouster from leadership after criticism of donald. Trump's big lie at the election was stolen and his role in the capital attack. We will not forget what happened on january six and that the single greatest threat to our republic is a president who would put his own self interest above the constitution sherry me writing in the washington post this week. The question before us now is whether we will join trump's crusade to de-legitimize and undo the legal outcome of the twenty twenty election. The house republican leaders have answered. That question you know i. I've lost confidence boosting. New york's elise stefanik who trump has endorsed. My vision is to run with support from the president. What they're saying is if you don't go along with the big lie. You basically need to go so phonic voted with president trump. Just seventy eight percent of the time. Criticizing is border wall opposing him on nafta and trade even voting against his signature. Twenty seventeen tax cuts. Cheney voted with trump ninety three percent of the time once trump critic has been insulting women stefanik became a high profile trump defender during his first impeachment when she opens that mouth you at killing them. Elise trump meanwhile has denounced cheney unremittingly. This week he called her a warmongering fool who has no business and republican party leadership. The good news is in her state. She's been censured all seventeen. Republicans who voted to impeach or convict. Donald trump have faced censure votes or rebukes at home. Utah senator mitt. Romney wants the party's nominee for president booed at a state convention last weekend though the vote to censure him fail.

Cheney Lizzie Cheney Republican Party LIZ Donald Trump Elise Stefanik Romney Mccain Stefanik Washington Post Elise Trump Nafta New York Senator Mitt
The Latest: Germany, WHO set up global health monitor center

AP News Radio

00:45 sec | Last month

The Latest: Germany, WHO set up global health monitor center

"Dr Anthony Fauci says the strategy for getting a coveted shot is changing Dr Val G. as president Biden's chief medical advisor and as the administration wrestles with how to persuade reluctant Americans to get vaccinated a new idea is emerging it's going to be more walk in type where you can walk into any of a number of the tens of thousands of pharmacies that are going to have the vaccine readily available to somebody walks in no appointment make it easy as possible to get vaccinated and in that context I think we're gonna get there to the seventy percent figure the president Biden wants to see seventy percent of adults having had at least one Kovic shot by July fourth doctor felt she was on the today show I'm Rita fall lay

Dr Anthony Fauci Dr Val G. Biden Kovic Rita
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on What A Day

What A Day

05:34 min | 4 months ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on What A Day

"That's wrap up with some headlines headlines house managers wrapped up their final arguments yesterday. Trump's second impeachment trial arguing that the former president could be a threat in the future if he isn't convicted in barred from running for federal office. Democrats continue to share evidence that writers were inspired by trump when they stormed the capital on january six new videos revealed riders shouting quote fight for trump during the attack and in one video rider was film telling officer quote. We're listening to trump. Your boss kicks on top of all of that court documents and interviews where riders defended their actions by citing trump's directives. Managers also shared words from former white house officials who resigned after the event and preemptively shot down at trump's teams defense that his remarks are protected under the first amendment. Trump's team is set to present their case today and reportedly their portion could be pretty quick. Like ignore everything. You just off fleet well for the first time ever. Queer and trans americans will be protected under the fair. Housing act awesome yesterday. The department of housing and urban development announced that it'll be enforcing the fha to ban discrimination against lgbtq individuals last year. The supreme court ruled that laws. Against discrimination on the basis of sex should extend the discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation then president biden signing an executive order directing all federal agencies to implement that ruling hut is the first federal agency to act on this order. Queer and trans americans experienced disproportionate discrimination when trying to find housing one. Study in two thousand seventeen found that trans and gender non conforming were less likely to be offered financial incentives to rent and more likely to be quoted a higher rental price than six renters under the new doctrine. Lgbtq americans will be able to file complaints with hud if they've been discriminated against good the fight for national unity suffered a major setback yesterday after bruce springsteen's dui led to pull their commercial where he told everyone to stop fighting and be more like a church in the middle of kansas context super bowl ad featured springsteen driving a jeep towards a small midwestern church while extolling the virtue of the middle. The place between i guess. Americans who want people to be treated with dignity and americans think the walls of the capital should be made out of paper. So it's easier do fascism in there. That's what it is. The ad was always bad but it became a liability on wednesday when the news broke. That springsteen was arrested for drunk driving in new jersey last november that was enough for jeep to pull the commercial off of youtube yesterday. More details about the dui charge emerged. The arresting officers report springs took a patrol and shot from a bottle before getting on his motorcycle and that during the arrest he was visibly swaying back and forth. But then the different source familiar with the case said springsteen's blood alcohol. Content was point zero. Two which is one quarter of the legal limit. We will have to wait and see how this all shakes out and we trust that the hardworking journalists of new jersey won't let their personal feelings about the boss. Get in the way the truth. Come on guys keep it together. Turns out. trump wasn't just breathing hard for effect and the videos from last october. In his case of covid nineteen was actually more serious than he led the american people to believe guys. It's legal to say this now that he's retired. The forty fifth president is a liar so according to new reports from the new york times officials thought trump would have to be put on a ventilator and he was shown to have lung infiltrates are associated with acute cases of covid trump's blood oxygen level also reportedly dip into the eighties. Something that his physician. Dr shawn conley refused to admit at the time. Anyway trump probably will want to speak the story and he has every right to we invite him to make his voice heard on twitter facebook. Instagram pinterest squarespace posh mark epson printer customer support hub by leading out the window and yelling. Whatever he wants yeah. I've been refreshing. Epson printer customer support for weeks. And i have not gotten an answer from the former president. Well we'll figure it out soon and those are the headlines one last thing before we go. There's a new episode of rubicon. The first hundred days of the biden presidency out today in it crooked editor in chief. Brian boiler speaks to ruth bend yet about accountability. How to get to justice for the trump era and what needs to be done to stop feature authoritarian wannabes offers debut like sri subscribe leave review connect with us on epson printer. Customer support hubs until your friends. Listen and theodore eating and not just restraining orders against keep it like me what. It is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out. Subscribe at crooked dot com slash. Subscribe mean gila hughes. I'm getting sick and have a happy. Valentine's day yeah. I hope that you get all the chocolate And if somebody else doesn't give it to you. I i hope.

Trump Epson trump new jersey springsteen last october Democrats twitter facebook Valentine's day yesterday last november Brian boiler shawn conley wednesday youtube last year january first amendment new york
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on What A Day

What A Day

05:58 min | 4 months ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on What A Day

"Polio vaccine. So guess he's getting some work now my question for you. What's your pitch for a pro vaccine anti cova mascot for the us one word. It's gritty gritty. Greedy represents the true american energy chaotic. It's a mess. He looks a little bit like the spike protein. Just because all the orange is kind of flying in every direction you get greedy masked up across the country. Vaccinations are they're going through the roof. I don't think you're wrong but gritty districts so reckless not. the gritty wouldn't wear a mask and believe that greedy is responsible. I just think that gritty might be a little too close to people and stuff he. He's just he's a lot. Yeah i think that we would have to. We'd have to have a sit down with gradient. Tell them the rules. But i think that. His recklessness speaks to our recklessness as a nation and then there would be some sort of communal understanding. They're like oh even. He's wearing the masks. Even he's encouraging the vaccinations and stuff. I think that we get everybody on the same page pretty quickly. That's just like the. i like. Not super terrible thing that i could represent the united states. So why not you know i am. You won me over this tank. I would be like all right. Your grass step. It's worth it. I appreciate your early investment in this plan. And i won't forget it but same question few you. Who are you thinking here. Okay so i was gonna come up with my own mascot but you know just after seeing your wonderful display him really believing in power. I think that we go with some property that isn't original. How about as mrs jones let his he been since he had. It's been a long time. He was our original public health warrior. Actually and i think sorry go ahead. No there's we learned a lot about the nasty inner workings of the human body via osmosis. So he he has a lot of information to apart totally. And i think you know. He's a really great mascot for kids. I was in high school when my biology teacher would be like super tired and didn't wanna teach just be like let's watch voces and we were always like yes so i think that it's something we can all get by and we have good memories of that movie. Why not. yeah there's some soldier factor. Who played house most jones. Chris rock am i. That's what i that's what i thought. Just just for posterity. Yes who played as a real thing that people will see in my google. It was chris rock. There you go. Yeah star cast bill. Murray chris. rock laurence fishburne brandy william shatner. Ron howard hit rock. Glam on also chaotic. Very american. i this is. I think this is great. I think either or both of these options. Maybe there's like a in person component with greedy. Maybe there's like a video you watch with us. Most john's totally. The options are limitless. And just like that. We have checked are tips. They're very cool. Like acidosis jobs and.

chris rock jones Chris rock both william shatner one word Ron howard Murray chris united states john google american bill rock brandy
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on What A Day

What A Day

07:28 min | 4 months ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on What A Day

"Variants. right now. well. You know what's going to happen. I think was part of your previous question about a booster type If it looks like it's clear enough that there's enough penetration of a virus. That isn't fully protected by the vaccine such as the south africa nicely. I think that the uk isolate were. We're in pretty good shape when it comes to that. But if we get a dominant prevalence of the south african it is conceivable that we may need and we're already preparing for that. We want to stay. A step ahead of the game is to make a booster that expresses the spike protein of the new variant as opposed to the standards spike protein. So that may be six months or year down the line or the pike you get people who were vaccinated but you give them a boost. Which is a boost expressing the variant. That you're worried about. I think that's conceivable we haven't done it yet. But we're preparing for the eventuality of having to do that. I mean personally. I like for this to not ever happen again. You so what are we actually need to put in place. So it doesn't like is it. Just an ongoing pandemic task force. Is it just rejoining the world health organization. Like what steps do you actually want to see taken. We'll all of those things that you mentioned are important. I mean obviously we want to be part of the global community. Want to have global surveillance. You know there were. There were attempts of partially successful sometime ago. Get a global network which is under the category of the global hill security network where you get communications between countries. So that when you see a new emerging hatha jen arrive immediately you identify it. You communicate with the rest of the world and you begin to develop as quickly as possible vaccines and therapeutics against it. You cannot prevent the emergence of a new infection that usually almost always not always but almost always is of what we call the animal human interface where we encroach upon the environment as we did with hiv as chimpanzees as we did with wet markets having live animals. And that's how things happened in china ebola when you have people going into bat caves and things like that. So if we if we can essentially pay more attention to not encroaching inappropriately on that animal human interface at the same time as we develop universal approaches like a universal vaccine against a certain prototype were universal anti-viral against a certain prototype. We can respond much better. Like i said we're not going to prevent the emergence but we want to prevent the emergence from becoming a pandemic. And that's where we can do something right. Obviously the bats alone say. Save here you have. You have our pledge. I wanted to ask one more quickly about the variants of concern here. You know that are functionally more contagious. Most of them are knowledge sprung up in the last few months or around a year into the pandemic. What does that tell you about the pace of mutations within this virus and is good news that it took about a year for these to actually become to a level where they were quite concerning I'm not surprised. It took that long because probably happened at least in south africa. Is that the standard wild type. Virus infected keep all who were immunosuppressed. Because there's a lot of hiv infected people in south africa substantial double digit percentage of the population. And what happens is that the virus is not readily cleared from people who are profoundly in suppress. And what happens. Is that if you don't clear the virus right away. The virus starts to do things to prevent itself from being cleared. And it's a selective pressure on the immune system of the immune system to get the virus to mutate. that almost certainly happen to some degree in south africa. So that's the what we suspect went on in south africa and shifting gears quickly to some new guidance from the cdc recently they were talking about the fit of a surgical masks and they were even suggesting double masking. If it was difficult to get people to put on one mask how suggest here conveying this other public getting people to wear to if they need to well you know if you look carefully at the. Cdc's recommendation they're saying very definitively. Everybody should wear a mask. One mask is important. However and there's a however if you want to get a better fit and dot every i and cross every t and prevent the virus from sneaking in you might consider you notice they don't make it an absolute recommendation right. They urge you to consider double masking. So if this is a regula mass the standard type. What happens is that under here. It's open and here. It might be so what they say to do is to take a regular cloth mask not that the cloth mask is better than this mass. But what if you put it on and go like that you get a much better fit so there. Aren't these open spaces here right so right now. You have a double mask but really what it's doing is that it's giving you a better seal and that really is the essence of their recent recommendations very well. We are coming up on valentine's day so you have any public health or relationship advice that you'd like to our listeners. You know we like to ask you about something that you don't have to talk about all the advisory great. Yeah i mean if you're gonna come home with some candy or flowers and you want to give a big hug and kiss to somebody. Make sure it's somebody that's either part of your household someone that you know very very well as being very careful about not getting infected. I mean i think that even though there are situations we'd like to gather you know. We've just been through that with thanksgiving christmas and new years but we still earn a danger zone and we still need. To maintain distance wear a mask avoid congregate settings hopefully as the number of new infections. Go down and if you look at the shot it's really dramatically going down. I mean just a month or so ago. We getting three hundred to four hundred thousand new infections a day yesterday was i think the first day in a quite a long time that it was less than one hundred thousand per day. So we're going in the right direction. Now's not the time to pull back. Now's the time to maintain a a real intensity of public health adherence to public health measures. Yeah that's right. Well dr fauci thank you so much for taking all of our questions. We really appreciate it. Where vans over here at want. So thank you my pleasure. Thank you for having me. It was wonderful and just still so starstruck. Well oh we also have a video of the interview where you can see the big moment when dr fauci met my new little puppy.

south africa yesterday south african china One mask three hundred one mask first day six months valentine's day thanksgiving dr uk four hundred thousand new infe double mask less than one hundred thousand cdc a month or so ago Cdc last few months
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

The Daily

03:25 min | 4 months ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

"On malaria. Tuberculosis as i said. This is what i do Well i don't know when you're going to get tired of it. I'm amazed at your energy. All right well okay. All right thanks. Donald soon.

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Start Here

Start Here

06:05 min | 9 months ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Start Here

"Don't interpreted as an obstacle to opening the economy because if you do things the way we have prescribed mainly a gateway phase one face to face three without jumping over these benchmarks that you have to look for. You can safely get people back to work get the economy going. It's when you do the extremes you either think it's all shutdown or. Caution to the wind and we can't do that. That gets you in trouble and that leads to my next question. Are you going to be traveling for Thanksgiving? Doctor FAUCI. As we look forward to the colder months, should people be avoiding this big family dinners of his big travel? You know it's it's a mixed bag. Let me explain about it again if you look at the map of the country, I mean, I, do this with my mouth, my international friends and colleagues and associates. It's a big country with an incredible amount of diversity in everything from climate to customs geography to the level of infection. So if you're in a situation. Where you are in a zone where the infections are so low, you Wanna get together with your family. Obviously, you've got to be careful you WANNA wear a mask if you're indoor if you don't know the status of a person if you can get tested fine if you're in the middle of a red hot zone no, you don't WanNa be congregating I, mean. So I can't tell the country what they should be doing for Thanksgiving. It depends upon where you are. If you're in the middle of a red hot area, you really need to be careful you're asking me where yeah I'm going to be right in my home with my wife. That's it. Can we do this also came up with the debate but I think it's important for like the wider conversation we talked about voting. Our newest polling at ABC shows a majority of Americans do plan to vote early or absentee more than one and a two Americans. Some people are concerned though they might feel at the absentee ballot correctly or maybe it's not going to get mailed correctly accounted properly. So elections officials have said. Early voting is actually a really good way if you WANNA show up in the polls but you have fewer crowds than election day. How do you plan on voting? Can you tell us like what method you're GONNA use? Yeah. I'm going to go to the poll and I've seen this is the same thing and I'm sure it's going to happen this way Brad is that you can safely. Physically be there if the polling groups who are in charge of it, do what and they will they're going to do this. Do what happens when you go to a grocery store or to a coffee shop you see things on the floor stand here and then six feet later there's a little couple of shoes stand here and then stand here. So if you stay six feet apart and you wear a mask and you're in line outside and when you go inside if the polling staff clearly are being careful with masks, you physically can go and vote for sure because it it's just a standard public health measure that way. So are you going go early or are you going to go on election day? You think? I was talking about that with my wife and I think we might go early I'm not quite sure either way. So yeah. So my question is personally how crowded would a polling place to before you said, you know it feels risky like I'm GonNa come back tomorrow I'm going to try this at a different time what would have to look like have to see people who don't have masks and have to see people who are by the nature of the physical structure of a situation where they cannot be sixteen feet apart that they that is not well organized then I would be concerned and then I might do a mail in vote. A last question because I know you're running that time I did have one more question because just this week you said you're concerned about misinformation about the virus you're concerned about things being taken out of context head of the CDC Dr Robert Redfield with a blunt reality, check a majority of our nation. More than ninety percent of the population remains susceptible shortly after White House adviser Scott Atlas who has no background in infectious diseases argued, that's not true. Yeah. I think Dr Redfield. Misstated something there Scott Atlas is now the doctor in President Trump's era. He's the Guy Giving out information of the Rose Garden the CDC has said this week that they openly disagreed with his assessment on mass action rates. I guess my question is for I'm not to further your expertise on this his butt. So Americans your one thing from the CDC director another thing from you who are we to believe you're supposed to believe the science and I'm telling you the signs. Telling a science I'm telling you the science and that's the answer. Do you think Scott Atlas is a reliable voice for the white. House is he reliable voice for Americans to be listening to you know what I'm going to do and and and I'm not going to directly answer that question I want to sit down with this person and instead of hearing what he's. Saying over any airway I WANNA one by one goal. The different points that I feel from a epidemiological infectious disease standpoint and really find out on a face to face where he stands as opposed to long distance saying I don't agree with them or agree. But he said he said that you know some people might have T. cells that would fight this virus that. Much of the country's not susceptible to it. Is that right? I would grant I would be happy to answer any question. You just gave me a question I'll tell you from what we know about T. cells. So rather than saying he's right. He's wrong. You asked me a question I understand that I don't WanNa put you in a tough spot but I do like he is you know seven hundred Americans are dying every day and I wanNA know if President Trump says, Scott Atlas told me this or Scott Atlas says something in the Rose Garden I want to know should Americans take that at face value? Yeah. I. Think what would I would recommend that I've been doing this for a very long period of time that Americans should take at face value what I say about infectious diseases. I don't mean to be presumptuous about that. But I think Americans should take face value.

Scott Atlas CDC President Trump Dr Robert Redfield Doctor FAUCI White House ABC Brad Rose Garden President House director
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

Powerhouse Politics

04:38 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

"We're going to beginning the first of the phase three trials, which means to determine if it works in July. it takes several months to determine. If a vaccine. Is Safe and effective in works. The risk being taken is a financial risk in other words starting to manufacture doses. Before you even know it works. The government is working with companies to mitigate that risk for the company, so the government is making a major investment in doing that which means John at the end of the year. We should know I had made that prediction in January. I said it'll be a year eighteen months. You remember you asked me that question. A year from January to December. Which means to me that we would have a vaccine available. In a modest amount, and probably by the first couple of months of twenty twenty one, the companies tell us that they have the capability that they will have a couple of hundred million doses, so I would think that if we're successful and the one thing I wanna make it clear because this will be coming back in cokes. Guarantee that wall that you will have a successful vaccine, but what we feel confident that we will know by the end of the year that we do or do not, and if we do which I'm cautiously optimistic that we will, we will be able to be distributing vaccines in the first couple of months of twenty twenty one. Okay so so two final questions on the vaccine. First of all is the risk of a rush to get that vaccine out on the market. Is there a risk of short-circuiting safety? find something that works. You'll get it out there. Are you really going to know. Did it say everybody? That's a great question John. So. The trial. Or the trials each going to have about thirty thousand people in the trial. Fifteen thousand in the Placebo fifteen thousand in the actual experimental component. Up Face trial is fundamentally to determine efficacy, we've gone through a small, a small face, two for one of the candidates and we will go into the face three. With special attention to the safety issues, so generally face three is some safety, but mostly does it work. We're going to be adding a degree of observation for the safety. So when we say we proceed at risk, it is never at risk. We don't compromise the safety. We don't compromise scientific integrity. The risk is to the investment, because generally when you do a vaccine trial, you go to this stage, and if it's successful, then you make the investment in the second stage. If a successful here will make the investment in everything upfront, which means that if it's not successful, the only thing you've lost is money. You have not compromise safety, and you have not compromised scientific integrity. While they're certainly going to be a lot of pressure to get whatever to to to to get to market to get this out there the financial pressure and the pressure basically people that wanted to be clear this last question. Do you just outlined the steps you're taking ensure this is being done safely. Are you confident that the Chinese are also rushing to develop a vaccine are day is committed to the eighth guards. Is there a concern that they may? Short circuit the aspect. You know the answer was I. If I have a concern, I'm I'm impugning them, but I know from experience that material that has come out of there. Has Been. Material, that has not been I I mean remember what they sent to the Brits with the tests that they will work. They sent a whole bunch of stuff, so I don't have the confidence that I have their own regulatory authorities or in the European regulatory authorities and I'm not ashamed to say that. Our doctor FAO G I WANNA thank you for taking the time to go through all. This I had a lot of questions pent-up and spoken to you in a while. So thank you for taking the time to talk to us and more importantly for your service appreciated John Thank. You for having me, so he's a pleasure to be with you. Thank you, and that is all the time we have powerhouse politics. We'll see you again next week..

John government FAO G
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

Powerhouse Politics

06:37 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

"Dr Office jaw. I'd a said. was earlier today. It feels to me like the government is thrown in the towel on this pandemic. Don't even appear to be trying anymore. They're doing little to protect nursing homes. testings are gone no replacement. Yes, yet, we. We don't hear from the task. Force. The pandemic is not over. People I know you would agree with that last sense but do you understand why he is saying? The first part you understand at least why among somebody who's very plugged into all this. Gets the sense that the administration has? Thrown in the towel, runners, yeah. Well. I can tell you we. We have not thrown joining the towel. Allen think anybody would say? That's for sure John. At! This is my life twenty hours. Tower. Guided throws in the towel on this stuff like that. We're not, but but but the idea of of. The medical people really keeping an eye on what's going on and continuing in recommendations at what eats. To be able to keep the country safe. And healthy is you know it it? It's it's a lot of. I. Don't know what the right word to express. It is is that there is a great drive in need to try and get? The country back to normal again, and and that is what. The major thrust is right now is is is opening America again as as health officials. We continue to make recommendations that I've always made will continue to make, but there are a lot of different input into decisions about where the country goes. Up Myself and my colleagues are one element of that, and we will not back down on the elements that were responsible for, but we are only one of a number of elements that go into it. And of course it's appropriate for a president on a major decision to to to to have different imports into be considering different factors in there are economic factors health factors. Some of those are actually reinforcing related but I I. Guess it would seem to me to be striking, but you have not spoken to the president all week. You haven't spoken to him since last week. He doesn't seem to. You, you had his ear really had his ear in the beginning up of this Get a sense that. You're not seen as a bearer of bad news that they would rather not. Not Listen to right now I. Mean Not that they're not. You're not continuing your work and with Dr Perks and Redfield but but the focus is. Let's get this country. Reopen as quickly as we can. That is true John. The focus is is a, and that's been explicitly stated that the focus is to get. The country opened as quickly as you can, so what what my plea is! To the people involved in that is that as you're doing that? I mean that's why I say I. Mean If if if you're going to have a situation. Where you'RE GONNA. Have people wanting to get out there? Maybe even jumping over some of the the guidelines is that there is a minimal amount that you I would say minimal, but there's a fundamental basic thing that you should be doing is. Don't throw all caution to the wind so that you can open up and help the economy by getting jobs back doing things like that, but that doesn't mean that you walk around without a mask that you jump into a crowd that you stop washing your hands that you stop doing the things that are important, so so the plea is that. From a public health standpoint, you'd WanNa do it this way. If you're not going to do it this way, then at least do these things, and that's what we mean by saying. If you can possibly do it. You can mitigate it and as these cases come up. At. Least have the capability at the local state, the county level to do the economy identification, isolation and contact tracing which we hopefully will be able to do effectively. We've heard from the trump campaign that they're going to. Start doing rallies again on the first one is GonNa be in an arena in Tulsa that holds about nineteen thousand people what I've been told is. The expectation is that they don't WanNa limit the number of people, but they are gonNA give out masks not require their use, but they're gonNA. Give out masks and they will check. People's temperatures are going in, and they'll distribute hand sanitizer. Is that enough, can you have eight arena packed? Filled with with people at a political rally safely if you have distributed masks and check temperatures, you don't John. I'll give you an answer, but but it. It's such a difficult situation because that will immediately began, be come out not by you by whoever listened. I I against I understand it. Yeah, it's a tough one. The only thing I can say is that I am consistent. I stick by what I say. Is that the best way that you can avoid? either acquiring or transmitting infection is to avoid crowded places to wear a mask whenever you're outside, and if you can do both avoid the congregation of people. And do the mask. That's great if you're going to be in a situation. Where beyond your control? There's a lot of people around you. Make sure you wear a mask. Okay, so let's let's be entirely clear for everybody. Listening to this the you are entirely consistent on this point, you said the same thing regarding the protests that you said regarding the political rallies, so let's let's. Before you go a couple of quick questions on the vaccine. Realistically I I know that there seemed to be some really promising. Developments on the development of a vaccine. Realistically how Far Away Are we do you believe s case scenario where not only a vaccine is developed and manufactured, but were everybody has access to it in other words. Am I gonNA be wearing masks. Are we going to be wearing masks in twenty twenty one? You know you very well might be. I can.

John president Dr Office jaw Tulsa America Allen WanNa Dr Perks Redfield
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

Powerhouse Politics

07:14 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

"I will keep an eye, not just me personally. But health officials a looking really carefully now at. The next couple of weeks from a few standpoints because. A few weeks ago a couple of weeks ago. A number of states, cities towns counties began varying degrees of reopening. Some have gone strictly. By the gateway phase one face to face, three others have actually jumped over it. The question is you'll start to see. Whether, there is as a result of that a real increase in the new cases new hospitalizations I believe the same thing holds true for the demonstrations. Where there was crowding. Not everybody was wearing a mask. You're going to see the effect of that. Within a couple of weeks, and the reason you don't see in the week or so because you can get people to get infected by the time, they then infect people who are vulnerable enough to be sick enough to go to the hospital. It may take a few weeks so it. We're keeping our eye on very very carefully, and the data are going to speak for. For itself, John It will speak for itself. If we start seeing these increases in cases and increases and hospitalization ation, it will then tell us that in fact, our concern about what would happen if you do. Those kinds of things has come true. If we don't then that would be fine I mean I've always said there's another aspect of this John. That's important in that. You don't necessarily have to have a spike. If when you get additional infections, would you have the capability of doing appropriate and effective identification isolation and contact tracing to keep it contained because whenever you loosen mitigation, you can expect you'll see new infections. I think it would be unrealistic to think that you won't. The critical issue is how do you prevent those new infections that you see from all of a sudden emerging into something that is a. and. That's the thing that we hope we'll be able to contain, but time is going to tell in the next few weeks. So. Let me let me ask you about the protests We've seen these protests. Every state in the country, every major city in the country I and I see a lot of people, a lot of protesters wearing masks as you pointed out, not all of them were wearing masks, and they're certainly non. As a rule socially disc. These are crowded events with a lot of people. I! What is the danger there? What is your message to those? Who feel that they must get out there and join these protests during this time. Well I mean in a perfect world. where? It is not a perfect world, and that's my point, so the issue is from a public health standpoint. You shouldn't be congregating in that. Close court. Is that you see in demonstrations? But almost everyone understands the need to be able to express your constitutional right to be able to demonstrate in a peaceful way against something. That is really a very important social issue. I respect that. However I have to as a public health. Officials say that is risky when you do that. Now you can always say the two things that get in the way of the virus are social distancing physical distancing as well as a mask. So what I'm saying for those who want to avoid infection. Implement, both of those, but you know no matter what I say and reality is proven that people are going to go out and demonstrate so my advice, and pleading with them would be that. If you feel, you must do that. Please make sure you wear a mask at all times, and when you start to chant and shout even though. The instinct is to pull the mass down. which you say, don't do that because there is a risk there, and it's a real risk, and in fact, we just heard this past week. That several DC national guardsmen turned out to be positive so right there. You're already seeing what I'm talking about. You know it's a danger to the people who are trying to control the demonstration, and it's a danger to the people who are demonstrating so at the end of the day. It is a risky procedure. So let me ask you about the coronavirus task force. What what's become a I mean we know that the briefings have stopped. And I. Don't see you out of the White House much anymore. Maybe maybe you can always get in without me seeing you I suppose, but how how often is that task force meeting? Yeah, well well. We met Yesterday. I'm going down today and not to a task force meeting. No, but but we meet about two times a week three times a week. I would say to two times used to be meeting seven days a week. Yes, we did, but you know the thing that. That's changed John. Is that we have the Task Force Meeting We also have what's called. The doctors group where myself and W burks and Bob Redfield and Steve Hahn and Seema Verma. Meet in addition to the Task Force meeting as you've obviously seen that right now. The medical components of it, the interaction between myself and the CDC and Debbie Burkes is almost constant so the medical part of it. We meet, even though it isn't an official task force meeting a day does not go by that. We're not interacting with each other, but but is that is what you are doing. Reaching the the political team to White House. It's actually making decisions. Last time you spoke to the president about all of this last week. Yeah Yeah. It's when I brief. Yeah, he. He needed a briefing. On what the what the vaccine activity was. Which is what I'm concentrating on a lot right now? So I go down to the White House for the Task Force meetings. I go down for the doctors meeting that we need, so I'm down at the White House at least a few times a week. like I, said we don't have the official task force meetings as often as we did. Because what what they attention to now John. You know that I mean it's to getting the country to reopen, so there's a lot more of the discussion not at the task. Force meeting at the White House about what one needs to do to get the economy back. What one needs to do to reopen the country? Because! I want to ask you. Are you probably saw this? But the director of Harvard's Global Health.

White House John Task Force official Harvard director Debbie Burkes CDC president W burks Global Health Seema Verma Bob Redfield Steve Hahn
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

Powerhouse Politics

10:06 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Powerhouse Politics

"A title that he has held since nineteen eighty-four doctor found she. Thank you offer joining us good to be with John Thank you for having me. So, you were there day after day I was in the room most of those days in the White House briefing room at the coronavirus task force up briefings, an unbelievable platform, the nation, really much of the world watching every day. And yet it's been more than a month since we've seen one of those briefings so I just wanted to start with a with a very general question here. If you had that platform right now now you have this platform. What is your message to the American? People about where we are on chronic ours. Well John You. Know it's. It's a complicated issue. some of it seems simple because it's really A. We're we've been through a terrible ordeal, and we still are in it. my message to the American people is that I know that there's a lot of concern and energy about getting back to normal. It's a great stress. On people to be locked in, and not only just the psychological stress, but a stress, obviously on people's welfare, I mean people losing jobs and people not being able to get back the economy getting into trouble these very stressful times. My messages for people to please hang in there. We will get through this. This will end will end with a combination of public health measures and ultimately science coming in. And getting durable solutions such as treatments and vaccines, they are not readily available, but we are making. Rather significant strides in both direction to it's getting those countermeasures, but in the meanwhile we really do need to hang in there as we try. To get back to some form of normality in the sense of opening up. We've got to do it prudently. We've gotta do it carefully, and to the extent possible. I know there's a lot of A leeway and discretion is given the states and I would hope that they would make those steps of essentially reentering some form of normality in a way that is attentive to the kinds of guidelines that we put together I mean a lot of states are doing that a lot of states are doing it well. The issue that I think Johnny needs to be pointed out to people. Is that even as we do, make these appropriate steps towards opening up. There still is a degree of caution that everyone should be essentially. Operating along such as things that are common sense. Wearing a mask trying as best as possible to keep distance continuing to wash your hands, it shouldn't be an all non edu completely locked in, or you just don't abide by any of the recommendations that we public health officials do so. That's what I meant by. It's a bit complicated because you do want to. Make those steps towards normality towards opening up. But we've got to be careful what what will happen John? Is that. As you go towards. Lessening the mitigation have to do if you WANNA. Start approaching some form of return and reopening the country. That, you will inevitably see these types of infections because infections have not completely disappeared. The critical issue is how we at the State City town local county level how we respond to it, so we need to have in place, and we do in many places the manpower. The infrastructure the testing to be able to identify to isolate into contact trays, and that's the reason why I've been quoted as saying, and I'll stand by it. We don't necessarily have to have a resurgence of infections. If we respond well to the ones we see, we don't necessarily have to have a second wave as long as we have the capability when those inevitable infections come up to be able to handle them in an effective way. So what are we? What are we seeing now because I see on one hand obviously New, York is reopening a hospitalizations and deaths in new. York have come down a dramatically of, but I also see. Hospitalizations with people critically a sick off from covid nineteen in Texas I see an increase emergency room What's happening in emergency rooms in Arizona? I see signs of increasing the numbers. In in Florida. Are we seeing? Are we seeing spike are we seeing a second wave of might might my friends? Over my friends over five thirty eight saves not really. Appropriate to talk about spikes, because a gradual increase, can can have a a very dramatically negative effect. What are we seeing? Are we seeing signs that we have moved too quickly towards reopening or maybe outgrowth protest What are we? What are you? What are you seeing? Yeah? You know John it in some respects It's a bit of all of the above, and you can't make that kind of extrapolation to the entire country There again as I always explain. The United States is a very big country and is very heterogeneous I. Mean you've had areas of the country that have gotten hit really really badly and have. Suffered and then come back down again, doing much much better and I think you see that reflected in the daily count of deaths that keep going down and down and down. New York is an example of the New York Metropolitan area that that really suffered greatly, but a now you know doing well, they're. They're starting to open in a careful cautious way i. think the same thing right now Washington DC for a while was hanging around at a level that was not coming down now that they're coming down. They're going into phase one. You have places in the country John. That never really did have a lot of. Of Activity and when you talk about what they'll be doing, that's different than an area in which you still have residual or even a level of infection that you want to be really cautious before you do anything, so the the main issue that people should not get confused as that. When you talk about the country, you can't be talking about it in a UNI dimensional way. You've gotTa talk about each individual area now. You brought up. Some places that we are seeing a disturbing uptick in the number of infections now when you talk about numbers of infections, you've got to make sure that you separate the fact that if you test more, you will likely pick up more infections the critical aspect of that. Is the percent of the people that you test. That are infected because that's much more of a reflection of whether or not, you are seeing a true increase in infections, because the infections are already there, John and you're testing at this level, and then you ratchet up your testing. You may pick up infections that you wouldn't have picked up before, and that's what it means. When people say it really is that you're testing more, but once you see that the percentage is higher then. You really gotta be careful, because then you really are seeing. Additional infections that you weren't seeing before. Okay, so so tell me on that point because we we actually just heard from. Larry cudlow now. He's not a health expert. He's a presence economics adviser one of them on and he. Settlement let me let me give you exactly what this was just this morning, he said. There is no second spike. Let me repeat that there is no second spike. I mean the testing itself has jumped up. There is no emergency. There is no second wave. So, he saying that all this talk of release is simply what you just described. What should be careful out? Obviously, there's going to be more cases if we're testing more people because we're. We were doing a better job measuring it. But. Are you also seeing in these places that we mentioned Arizona Texas Florida Alabama Arkansas for example. Are you also seeing an increase in the percentage of cases which you just said would be traveling not to mention hospitalizations. Yeah, well I think if you just look at the data, the data speaks. It isn't one's opinion versus another. In particular in California, also, what wouldn't looks at the percentage you do see that the percentage increase you also in some of those areas, not all a seeing increase in hospitalizations, so you've really got to be careful that it is both you're going to be seeing increase because you're testing, but once you start seeing increases in hospitalizations in addition to that or increases in the percentage of the total testing that is actually positive, then that cannot be explained just by an increase in testing so. Both you see a real warning signs that we're. We have a tough road ahead still. Well you know I think. To beat to be actually clear in it, and not to overshoot or on the shoot in your estimate of things..

John You Arizona Texas psychological stress York White House United States Florida New York Washington Johnny State City California Larry cudlow New York Metropolitan Arkansas Alabama
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Sawbones: A Marital Tour of Misguided Medicine

Sawbones: A Marital Tour of Misguided Medicine

07:15 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on Sawbones: A Marital Tour of Misguided Medicine

"And so as a result he came up with something that they called the parallel track which was basically instead of the way that you approve a drug. Is You have to prove you. Count the drug. Then you have to prove that it safe first. Then you have to prove that it's effective second. Then you start doing trials in large numbers of humans to see about other side effects or adverse events that you didn't necessarily predict earlier on before it it is finally approved. This process takes years. What he came up with was the idea that if we know a drug is safe we can do clinical trials with it but also get it out to the patients who need it the most once we know it's safe because there were drugs it we. We had a very strong suspicion more effective and we weren't getting them to the right people so he was instrumental in creating that in helping. Get people medications faster to try to save lives? You know And and he would build on this in later years everything that he did with. Hiv to help create pep far to take these HIV drugs that we eventually would have in the US that would be widely you know Acquired by United States citizens and say hey what about the developing world where they don't have any of these medications so you'd build on this throughout his career But it's really interesting because you see a scientist who recognizes the limits of just like cold hard data and Statistics And still wants those but like embraces the patient perspective as well And this this changes medicine forever. It's important to know that this moment in history not just vouching but all of the activists who who were involved today. When you have a doctor prescribed medication do they just say take this? Don't ask me why just take it me. I'm your doctor. Know what would you think if your doctor said that? It'd be hurt and I wouldn't take it and the trust would be bad right that this is why I mean this. Is this in a large this? This philosophical approach that is embodied by this movement is in large part. Why now you talk to your doctor. About medications. You advocate for yourself and your healthcare. Yes in about you. Having the autonomy which should have already been principal in our ethics but to say give me all the information and let me make the best choice for me as opposed to the paternalistic view. Which is I'm the doctor. I know look I care about you a lot. You don't know what's best for yourself. Just trust me and do what I say which. I can't imagine ever saying to a patient but that was standard price thinking in probably I have moments. Please listen to me please. I know what I'm talking about. It's Li usually vaccine thing. It's usually me begging somebody to get a flu vaccine but I also recognize that the end of the day that you're allowed to make whatever decision is best for you once you have all the information But anyway so this would change. Medicine forever This interaction between faculty and the activists and the everything that surrounded HIV and AIDS and Fau she would continue in his role at the agency to guide US through H Five N one and h one in one and Zeka any Bola and through all of these things. It's he's continued to do research and and write about the big one The the the big bad one that we're not prepared for but to think about all the ways we could be prepared for it and to try to make the Right recommendations and get his information to the right people and because we listened to him for all these years. We've been so unprepared. Because we took everything he said very seriously took a dart. And that's why we basically crushed it. Unfortunately I'll know knowing the right answers or at least having I would say that he has the right. The right ideas that will lead us to the answers And getting people to pay for them and create the kind of Infrastructures to enforce them and make them happen. Are Two different things now. We arrive at co Vid. Nineteen today So before I get into I wanted to. I wanted to present all that about. Pfau chief so you know I I believe he. Has I think beyond the obvious Scientific qualifications to do the things he's doing he has a lifetime of experience And some really creative ideas that had we done. The mearlier could have been very helpful. Things like A platform vaccine. I think this fascinating If we could have a platform vaccine that could adapt to a whole different like family of viruses. How much more prepared could we be for? Something like Corona virus this novel virus if we'd had a platform vaccine based on SARS and murders in these older corona viruses that we knew about that we could just immediately adapt and make a I saw. It called a bespoke vaccine For these RT's in front of ours. We can make them so much faster. We may if we put the time and energy into that. Same thing with like Of A flu vaccine you could get once every ten years instead of every year. There's so many he has all these ideas And hopefully maybe now people will listen to all that. We're all turning to him. Yeah I I I try to listen out for sure. I'm hearing so many other things. Sydney out there on the Internet about about cove it. I don't know what to believe. Well Justin I wanNA tell you about that and You should believe me. I know I know but I'm on the Internet so much great. You couldn't possibly all right well. Good and positive way too much out there to run all the past you before I do that. Let's go to the billing.

flu vaccine United States HIV co Vid Pfau principal Sydney scientist Fau AIDS
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

The Daily

03:11 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

"Um

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

The Daily

09:31 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

"Lockdown would be. I think we can get there without necessarily having literally a forcible lockdown but where there isn't a functional lockdown is there not a greater risk of transmission of. I don't know I really don't. I think that you can accomplish this if you do it. I mean obviously if you do a sloppy job of trying to do the mitigation and the physical separation. You're not going to be as effective as if you do it. In a more rigid way I mean I was very concerned about seeing videos in Florida of people frolicking on the beach going to bars and things like that I mean. We were very very articulate in vocal about how. That's the wrong thing to do. So what do you do in that case? Do you call the governor of Florida and say hey. I don't like what I'm seeing and I'm telling you giving my expertise that has to stop. I don't have to call him. I get on national TV. And say I make it pretty vocal about it. I mean that's a big message you mentioned dodgy your daily interactions with the president. It has seemed that he's been on a bit of a long and zigzagging journey starting with skepticism of this threat and downplaying of it and projecting a lot of optimism to sounding the alarm conveying the serious of it in the last twenty four hours or so in telling Americans to take it very seriously does that characterization feel fair I he was. The president has his own style. That's obvious to the American public. When I speak to him about issues that a substantive he listens I think he always understood the seriousness of it. Right now is the numbers are becoming crystal clear. He himself is articulating an awareness of that seriousness but from the beginning he always took it seriously. Do you see it as your job to influence. How he not only understands it but how he talks about it to the country. That is very difficult. I mean I actually my I see my job as the person who is the scientists. The public health official the physician who understands disease and to get the information correct information correct evidence to him so that he could make decisions that are based on evidence and based on data. I I don't think it would be possible for me to influence another person style. I mean that that just doesn't happen. I think the question at this point on everyone's mind is how long we're going to be in this situation. We're in with social distancing school shutdowns working from home or not working at all and you have said repeatedly that the federal government reevaluates where we are week to week. Maybe even day to day right. Is there a version of this? Where we need to remain in this position social distancing state-by-state patchwork but a functional kind of version of a lockdown. Not just to April maybe even to the entire summer and maybe even into the fall is a possibility. I when you say into the fall I I would be really surprised if that's the case. I think when you talk about. Is it going to be thirty days or sixty days or longer? You know as I've said the virus determines the time line not us we manage and formulate a time line. Depending upon how successful we have been in containing the virus and what the patterns and the dynamics of the virus. Aw so I always say without any regret at all or hesitation is a better word that you evaluated really as the time goes on and I had a very interesting conversation just this morning with colleagues from literally all over the world down the weekly telephone conference that the WHO sponsors and it was interesting to me that some of the most cogent concerns of people from different countries. I mean all over. European African Australian Canadian was that we need to make sure we keep awry on the balance of if you're too stringent in things like lockdowns and keeping people under wraps for a long period of time. You may have the unintended consequence of triggering from an economic and societal standpoint. Such disruption that you get things like poverty and health issues unrelated. The Corona virus was really a serious concern. Like what I mean. What are the worst case scenarios for unintended costs right? So many people need medications. Many people are dependent on supply chains for nutrition for food that they might starve that people who have illnesses. If you dramatically interrupt to the point where it no longer exists. The disruption of society can be really quite catastrophic. I mean that's the one of the things you want to avoid. And that's one of the pushbacks you have when you have people who say we really need to lock down everything and lock it down indefinitely. Well you might get an extra mile to out of suppressing the virus there but you gotTa make sure that you look at what the ultimate issue is. I've always been one. That leans much more heavily that it's the public health. That's the most important thing but I have very good people and many of them were on that international phone call. I was on who was saying yes. We agree with you but let's be careful that we don't do such a disruption of society that we really heard it is much more than what we're trying to prevent. I want to turn to how we will understand when this is over and I wonder if you think we have enough measures in place to understand when we've reached that point when this peaked and when this is actually bottomed out and will that mean for example doing millions of tests today to understand where the virus is. I mean what evidence. Will you need to see to feel confident that we can kind of call this over? Yeah so obviously. You'd want to see a very dramatic and complete turnaround. In the number of infections. There's illness this hospitalizations there's intensive care and there's death and the one that's the furthest out is the deaths that lags behind the others so you will continue to see deaths at a time when you have actually very good control of the new infections. The outbreak itself. So when I start to see the number of new infections essentially approaching almost zero and the number of deaths being close to that then I think we are through with this phase of it but that gets to the long term because we have a large planet here and we may be in a situation where we've got it really under control here but in other parts of the world it's still smolders which always gives the possibility of the reinsertion of the outbreak back into your own country now. Several things will mitigate against that being something that is a really serious problem one. We will obviously have been much better prepared right. We will likely have enough test to flood the entire country which we don't have right now. We very likely would have some therapeutic interventions and importantly hopefully as we get on a year year and a half from now or more will have a vaccine that works but Dr Vouch. I guess I need to ask the question. I think a lot of listeners are going to be thinking as here. You say this. Are you saying we may not be done with this functionally until we have a vaccine? Which could be eighteen months from now. Yeah well make sure that the listeners understand. It isn't a year of the intensity of what we're going through now. I believe that in a few months. Hopefully that will get it under control enough that it won't be as frightening as it is now but it will not be an absent threat. It will be a threat that is there and the threat of resurgence will be something that we need to make sure that we're prepared for the ultimate weapon against a resurgence is a vaccine. But before we get a vaccine we WANNA make sure that we have the wherewithal that when we turn the corner and that curve goes down to practically nothing that we realize and are not naive in thinking that the threat is no longer there because they will there will be as long as there's virus circulating in the world. There will be a threat of resurgence. If we're not properly prepared.

Florida president Aw disease Dr Vouch official
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

The Daily

04:57 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

"With you.

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

The Daily

07:31 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

"Let's explore how we got to where we are you. You came out a few days ago and you told Americans that up to a quarter of a million of US could ultimately die from this pandemic in the best case scenario which was a very terrifying kind of best-case scenario. So I want to explore how it is that we got from that moment of recognition back in December January to this moment where the situation is so dire. I want to focus for a moment on the steps that could be taken to limit that back in the beginning. I know people like you are loath justifiably to second guess decisions in the middle of a crisis but at one zero in on a couple of items in particular for example by the time you all decided to ban travel from China. I think that was the end of January January thirty first the WHO had detected infections in multiple countries not just China. But I think it was South Korea and Japan meaning that any travelers from those countries could bring the virus to the. Us was this a moment to begin essentially sealing off the US from international travel or was the die already cast by that point. Well I mean. I think that we sealed off from China very quickly with regard to the realization of what might happen. Fact you might recall. We received a lot of criticism for doing that and even more criticism for sealing off and restricting travel from Europe. So I think that given the circumstances we were ahead of the curve and we acted quickly relatively speaking. I mean obviously if you knew everything that was going on as it was happening you might have acted sooner. But when you're dealing with viruses they stay silent and what you see. Now is the reflection of what likely happened a few weeks ago. And that's the reason why you probably remember. I have always said that if I get accused of overreacting. I feel good because it's probably that. I'm acting appropriately. Enough as opposed to overreacting. But when gentlemen when it comes to overreacting if you suspect the virus like this is invisible why not restrict travel earlier right? I mean I think the gap between when we restrict travel from China and Europe was over a month or so. Yeah yeah no I mean I. I don't think we could have done it early. I think we did it quite early and eating. Why couldn't we have a lot of pushback because of because of the resistance because it wasn't practical because people wouldn't have understood it wasn't very clear I mean right when you're dealing with like that retrospect to scope so really very would make things very very clear but when you're living through the fog of war isn't that easy you will always say everything. I've ever been through in thirty six years that I've been doing this as director of the institute. There's always that what could have been or what should have been. I mean that's always the case but I think in this case really just looking at it the way it is. I think that we acted pretty quickly in trying to cut off travel so I I wouldn't dwell on that as being what might have happened. It has felt like the delay in testing meant. We didn't recognize the scale. The problem really on because as you said this is invisible but it's not invisible to test it may just be invisible symptomatically so assuming that the Horse left the barn and the virus had gotten into our system. I know you don't run the CDC. But I assume you realize pretty quickly what it meant that the US was testing so few Americans. Where does that rank for you? As a problem in our early response as this was starting to spread That's a reasonable question. I think it you know it obviously was a problem. I perceived it as a problem early on unfortunately the systems that were originally set up in the relationship between the CDC and the Public Health Community in the state and local level was really not geared for the massive type of testing. That would be needed. That would embrace an require the participation of the private sector particularly the companies. That do the kinds of lab tests that you and I get when we go to a regular doctor's appointment so it was not suited for that. It is right now today ramping. Up to essentially make the private sector the major driving force of the testing. But you're absolutely correct back then early on that was not in place in. That's unfortunate because that brings us to federal guidance to states and cities to begin social distancing to shutdown life as we normally operate and when we spoke to Governor Andrew Cuomo a few weeks ago he said governors like him and really kind of the American public assumed that the federal government the President Vice President the head of HHS and someone like you frankly would definitively signal when it was time to take decisive action whether that meant shutting down schools closing restaurants bars issuing stay at home mortars and in his feeling and we hear this from other state leaders as well as the Federal Direction didn't come in time and I wonder what you make of that here. I mean they will always be criticism about something was not done in time. The of there is in this country and has always been a degree of independence that is given to the local components the states the governor's etc so guidelines that her out now for Mitigation. They are very very clear. Guidelines the states are implementing and interpreting that differently from one st. U K with that because I think that's the essential question in our system. We have fifty states and multiple leaders within those states. And so the question becomes does that inevitably lead to a patchwork unless the federal government is very very farm and says right. This is what everyone must do and were telling you. You really shouldn't think of it as optional you. You have a valid point there. I mean I think people have different perspectives about how much central mandating should occur at something that is argued all the myself I mean I. I'm one that tends to be not overbearing but somewhat more directive than others. I like clarity of message. That has always been something that I've guided myself by throughout my career in medicine and science but not everybody feels that way but when we go back and look in that retrospective scope. Do you think we will look back and say we wished that we had favored federal decisiveness and communication over allowing states to act as their own decision makers. I'm not sure about that. I think that's certainly a possibility. I mean there's always these hypothetical scenarios that we put up. That are very difficult to come to a firm statement on it. I mean. Obviously that if something doesn't go as well as you'd like it to go you always examine saying well if we had done differently. Would it have made a difference? You know and I don't know to be honest.

China US federal government Europe CDC Governor Andrew Cuomo South Korea Japan director Federal Direction President Vice President HHS Public Health Community
"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

The Daily

02:42 min | 1 year ago

"s. dr. anthony fauci" Discussed on The Daily

"You wouldn't otherwise to shed light on stories that might be difficult and to bring us a little closer to understanding the most complicated parts of our world we take that responsibility seriously and when you subscribe to the New York Times. You're letting US know that you care about these stories and you want to hear them told by the people living that subscribed to the New York Times at NY TIMES DOT com slash. Subscribe thank you to be over. What do I need to just one piece but the one with the under dog? Oh I see I I D- I loved. Yes Hi how are you sir? I'm fine thanks how you doing. I'm doing great. Thank you very much for being with us. In for recording yourself above beyond. Thank you. Thank you so Dr. Voucher. You became head of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease in the nineteen eighty s when the AIDS crisis with becoming a national issue. And then you stayed in that role through the Ebola outbreaks SARS. Each one n one swine flu. And what point did you realize that? The Corona virus is going to be of an entirely different speed and scale than those when it came to the. Us was there a moment or that became clear to you. I think it relates to the issue of its efficiency of transmissibility. So the thing that rang the for me. That made me say Oh. We really have a problem. Here is when the corona virus was first identified in very early January. It was clear that this was something that had jumped from animal species in Wuhan China to humans so that was the first red flag for me then as soon as I found out which was literally days to a week so later that it was really circulating in China likely for several weeks it became clear to me that we could potentially be dealing with a global catastrophe and that was somewhere in the middle of January when it was clear that China was seeing not only extremely efficient transmissibility but also a disturbing degree of morbidity and mortality. Those two things together are the things that really are the makings of a public health nightmare. And that's exactly what I realized. We were in really bad trouble from the New York Times. I'm Michael Barr..

New York Times US National Institute of Allergy Wuhan China NY Ebola Dr. Voucher Michael Barr