17 Burst results for "Rosenstein Muller"

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

07:43 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"Three one zero. Donna is calling from Connecticut online to Donna, welcome to j secular view on the taking phone calls. Now. I kind of question regarding Rosenstein, because he signed one of the five applications and hearing his testimony in commented just seems confusing because he said that he did not know what was in it or so I'm just curious as to face process. That's probably one of the problem with the FIS of process to be in with. I'm not trying to choose any of behavior, but they have allowed that to become so our government officials who elect ultimately our responsibility by congress has passed laws and have allowed the government officials. Those appointed chosen by presence in those those who are career to also kind of rubber stamp this process. That's why almost every five award application approved, and it's become this kind of tool to get around actually spying on Americans by classifying Americans as foreign agents, which is how was what have with the Trump campaign. So you classify one America's a foreign agent, and you can you can you can start surveilling any American. They come in contact with as well, you're supposed to you're supposed to mass that name. But then you put in the eight hundred masking requests unmask across I probably by the time we got to rod Rosenstein signature, it's a rep stamp process zone. The and stuff. Yes. So he's the last review, you know, again, we don't know the exact how much they review it. I mean, I'm not sure. Something in there. Obviously was a skew. And was is incorrect. Now the question is the penalty. Well, first of all from a policy standpoint, Harry, I think you have to look at it and say, why did it was allowed to go up the chain that aggressively based on information, they could never verify and then purportedly false. Incorrect statements say at least in a minimum regarding the verification of the evidence. I think you're precisely cracked and that then raises the inference that there was indeed political bias, which propelled this particular warrant up the chain of command. That's number one number two. In addition to reports today that attorney general VAR has tapped John Durham from Connecticut to head up an investigation of the investigators. It's also important to note that news reports also indicate that attorney general bar has enlisted support. From the CIA. So it's very possible that this whole Russia collusion narrative implicates multiple agencies within the Obama administration, the C I A, the DOJ the FBI, perhaps even the State Department. And so if any of that is true, it may indeed suggests that there was a conspiracy that there was indeed collusion, essentially to entrap the Trump campaign before it got off the ground and before the election, these efforts may indeed have continued after President Trump was elected. Are we take your phone calls? One eight hundred six eight four thirty one ten twenty eight hundred six eight four three one zero John is calling from California on line one. John welcome. Jay Sekulow live. John. Thank you for taking my call. I'm so happy. That's my second time getting in so bonus a rate just so or actually investigators hoping to including the fact that. Service the store and stuff they gonna look into that stuff. Understanding is that's being invalidated by the US attorney out west that, but but again, I don't know the scope of what Durham's kind of scope of his inquiry, Andy, what would be the charge here would be a mandate coming from the attorney general. Yeah, it would be a mandate coming from the attorney general, and they would give him his the parameters of what the scope of investigation should be just like a Rosenstein Muller, and he would be within the scope of his thority to look at the investigation based upon what that thority is. And then to bring appropriate charges as US attorneys, a prosecutor he can indict he can use the grand jury can do all these things. So all right. We'll take your phone calls one eight hundred six eight four thirty one two that's one eight hundred six eight four three on one zero Jerry's from Rhode Island on line three. Jerry. Welcome jaysekulow. Jerry. The Colonel west thing a lot of people in the lawn and that word hand would duty Hanjour nervous like Donna oral. Finally, the prologue is over the heck herbal even talking about from Nadler impeach our contempt. I we're fairly in there. And everybody could hear it in a west. I I think that the rubber gonna hit the road pretty soon on the right part going on. Well, here's here's what you have to understand though, that there's there's the political side of it, which will dress the letter half hour of the broadcast the legal side of which I'm trying to dress now and legally what is happening. And this would I think west was referring to is. There has been this concern about information that has been out. There was the basis upon certain prerequisites that required league that took Ben legal action was taken right. Yeah. And the Feis act has provisions in it designed to protect US citizens, and they. Actually, they not only possibly violated the laws. They actually circumvented it. So they could illegally perhaps invest do. Surveillance on a US citizen, and there are several facets to to where these investigations might go. You have certainly misleading the vice accord, but you also have the possible conspiracy between the DNC and fusion GPS and senior leadership at the FBI to target a presidential campaign, and then to continue with a counter intelligence investigation of a sitting president, you also as one caller Mitch and have the class up classified information issue with Hillary Clinton, and the fact that she was exonerated really without basically being interviewed. So there are a lot of facets to the possible wrongdoing. This going on I think there are people interviewed or lords did very good job of negotiating the scope and nature of that. But he wrote the memorandum exonerating before the interview this again goes to what we're talking about the next half. Our which is the politics of all this work, politically, but any last time here on the legal. We'll hit the legal as well. Yeah. What is the process at Durham does? Now. What does he do? He does exactly what other investigative prosecutors have done before. I mean, he begins to interview witnesses. He sends out be identities. Grand jury subpoenas. He calls in people to volunteer interviews does three o two's. He does the kinds of things that I used to do as a US attorney in Atlanta. He does this and he's got the authority of the attorney general United States too far reaching investigation and defined out. Get to the bottom of the factual scenario asking your audience. What do you wanna find out through this investigation? We'll take your calls on this one eight hundred six eight four three one zero that's eight hundred six eight four thirty one ten what do you want to.

attorney US attorney John Durham US Donna Rosenstein Muller Jerry Durham Connecticut FBI president rod Rosenstein government Jay Sekulow congress CIA America Trump Rhode Island Harry
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

02:09 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"He knew he was false which documents throughout this report in an effort to lay out steps to obstruct the investigation even though he knew from the beginning. It was all garbage. Please tell me this makes sense Muller knows immediately upon being hired in may of two thousand seventeen. Now does this White House meeting, by the way with remember? He's he's at the White House would Rosenstein Muller just the day before before he's appointed. With a Mullen Rosenstein, is that the White House with Donald Trump allegedly meeting about at the FBI director position, which he's not even eligible for I told you weeks ago, what I thought that meeting was about its Rosenstein who I still believe is a snake Rosenstein, taken mullet of the White House to get to basically get a feel for Donald Trump saying, hey, you got to check this out because they're going to investigate them the next day. It's clear as day. Now. How do you not see that Rosa's lies on a good guy? I can't understand these people think Rosenstein is a good guy while he exonerated from. He had no choice. There was no evidence. I'll get to the scope memo thing and other stuff to I'm it's going to be a stack show. But don't forget, the lead Muller tells goes on on hundreds of pages of this Russian connection and in one sentence at the end of nearly everyone he's like, and these connections are entirely Bs. So why right it because he wants amunition to give to Adam Schiff and the Democrats to use for impeachment because he's gonna lay this stuff out. Even though he knew the investigation was bumped from the beginning. And then say the investigation, he knew was bunked was obstructed. That's why that's the whole point of this thing. Also in that sessions snippet from the mullahs report, there's another piece in it. Remember, the story we were told about how you know Russian influence over the Trump campaign, led the Trump campaign to change their platform on Ukraine. Let me just selling this quickly the RNC platform on Ukraine, they were there was a line inserted in there about providing lethal weapons to Ukraine now in enemy Russia. Russia invaded portions of eastern Ukraine, right? That was watered down, according to Democrats, and the democrat story is always watered down because Trump was trying to help the Russians. We don't want to write a platform. We're gonna provide Ukrainians with lethal weapons..

Rosenstein Muller Mullen Rosenstein Donald Trump White House Adam Schiff Ukraine Russia mullahs FBI Rosa director RNC
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York

Bloomberg Radio New York

03:00 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York

"The special report Muller report delivered the special counsel's probe of Russian election. Interferences over an attorney general William Barr now has Robert Muller's report. And Barr says the Justice department did not block Muller from taking any action during his investigation in his letter to house and Senate Judiciary committee chairs and top Democrats attorney general bar rights. I am reviewing the report. And then -ticipant I may be in a position to advise you of the special counsels principal conclusions as soon as this weekend bar, and he'll discuss with deputy AG, rod Rosenstein Muller himself, what more of his conclusions should be divulged to congress. Bob Costantini, Washington. Correspondent Manu Raju has reaction from the GOP Republicans say they're happy. This is over. They wanna hear what Muller ultimately found both Republic. And Deborah's to get some read out at least of the principal conclusions this weekend. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell says Republicans have long believed Russia poses a threat to American and I'm Charlie Pellett at Bloomberg world headquarters down Friday and down week. This update brought to you by flex port say Hello to flex sport and the operating system for global trade. Combining cloud technology, and analytics, logistics, infrastructure and supply chain expertise. Learn more at flex dot com slash O S, stocks declined treasuries rose after miserable data from the German manufacturing sector, renewed worries about global growth Madigan is co head of the full discretion team at Loomis Sayles. Clearly, the data has been weak, and it's definitely been centered in the manufacturing side of the of the global economy, and I guess in some ways, it's not too surprising. Because there's been a lot of distortions thrown into that side. Of the economy through the trade war that began last year and Noah Weissberger is managing director at Sanford c Bernstein. Are we seeing the fed trying to get ahead of the curve, or are they responding to weakness already, you know, the US a little bit behind in the weakness or said differently. Do US still remains a little bit stronger. And I think you can see that with with the way the markets are performing and Brexit's also weighing on investor sentiment. Gina Martin Adams as chief equity strategist at Bloomberg intelligence. Ultimately, what this does is just more uncertainty for longer because we just don't know we don't know if there's going to be a deal, if there's going to be a no deal there still is a remote possibility that there is no Brexit. I think the most damaging aspect of this is the longer the uncertainty goes on the longer the economic suppression goes on in the UK the longer the lack of business investment continues. Pinterest is filed for an IPO it will seek an NYSE listing. Stocks lower SNP down fifty four drop of one point nine percent. Dow Industrial's down four hundred sixty down one point eight percent, NASDAQ down one hundred ninety six down. Two and a half percent. Global news on air and a tick tock on Twitter power by more than twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts in more than one hundred twenty countries. I'm Charlie Pellett. This is Bloomberg. This is.

rod Rosenstein Muller US Charlie Pellett principal William Barr Senate Judiciary committee Bloomberg special counsel attorney Manu Raju Bloomberg intelligence Bloomberg world Senate Loomis Sayles Gina Martin Adams Twitter GOP Mitch McConnell Deborah
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

04:54 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"Of a judge joint it, please tell me this makes sense. Are you are you picking up putting down there? Yes, sir. There's an information laundering operation that Bob Muller becomes aware of on July twenty seventh of two thousand sixteen right around that week. He's likely reading these texts. He's probably informed by Horowitz. Listen, we've got a problem. This criminal case counterintelligence case against Donald Trump was not based on real information. It was based on a quote machine that this guy Simpson who already wrote this movie script in two thousand seven went to his buddy Christopher Steele because he'd worked with the FBI. They basically fabricated this entire case against Trump. And look now there's a track record of this in the text that they were very suspicious something's going on here. And they ran with the case anyway. Muller panics? Muller panics because he realizes the central figure in that dossier. Paul manafort. That that dossier? Joe is fake. It's a hoax. Now Muller's job is to rescue the reputation of the DOJ. He can't have the department of Justice and FBI publicly ruined because they relied on a hoax document from quote machine. Christopher steele. Who relayed is information as Simpson or Simpson actually, I believe rubber-stamped at himself. It was Simpson's information. He just used steals name because still bene- source before they can't have that out in the public. They have to make this dossier appear semi credible. Folks. What happens the morning of July twenty six twenty seventeen. Again, I believe Muller got wind of this right around the third week of July about these texts. Manafort's house gets raided July twenty sixth twenty seventeen Paul has been kind enough to put some screen shots from some stories in case, you doubt me. July twenty six twenty seventeen manafort's house gets hit early in the morning. Manafort is the key player, ladies and gentlemen. You can't have the usual suspects. Without Kaiser, so say, there's no movie. The movie would be a joke that be no movie. There's no script Manafort is the key figure in Glen Simpson's life. He's been investigating from two thousand and seven on. Manafort is the key player in the dossier. Follow me Muller. Now knows he gets the texts that the dossier is garbage that it's fabricated information on demand used to investigate the Trump team when they had to go to a quote machine, it's not based on real information. It's a hoax in order to rescue the hoax. Manafort desperately a Muller desperately hits the house on a search warrant a Manafort desperate to uncover. What joe? Evidence of collusion with the Russians because the evidence of collusion and the dossier is a hoax. What happens? Joe nothing happens. No evidence of collusion with Manafort and the Russians ever turns up. How do we know this because Manafort was sentenced yesterday in the judge was crystal clear there is no evidence of Russian collusion. What else? Do you need to hear? Now what happens August second just days after the July twenty six early morning rate of manafort's house because now they realize the dossiers junk because Muller's seen the tax. August second rod Rosenstein, the signer of the fourth FIS award when they knew all this junk. Signs of revise scope memo gel. In other words, expanding. Bob, Muller's investigatory powers as the special counsel to do other things outside of just investigating Russian collusion. Joe? Why would he do that? Because they didn't find any evidence of Russian collusion entirely debunking the dossier in the July twenty six twenty seventeen raid on manafort's house manafort's, the key player in the dossier Muller's desperate to rescue the dossier. Because he can't have the public believe the FBI J investigated a hoax document, he needs to make it true. So what does he do? He goes back to Rosenstein Muller after the July twenty six twenty seventeen rain. And he says, hey, Houston. We got a problem. Daddy. Oh, we got a big problem. What's that problem? We rated this guy's house. We tossed everything there is nothing. We have nothing all we. Have here is evidence of his illicit dealings with Ukrainians some payments, and maybe some tax evasion. What happens NGO just a couple of days later Rosenstein, magically produces a new scope memo to Bob Muller, and in the unredacted portions to that memo the Okaz most of it's redacted..

Rosenstein Muller Paul manafort Glen Simpson Joe FBI Donald Trump rod Rosenstein Christopher steele Horowitz DOJ Kaiser Okaz Bob special counsel rubber-stamped Houston
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on WCPT 820

WCPT 820

13:47 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on WCPT 820

"News to speak of that. Let's do the best. We can. Wow. Wow. Wow. You tweeted the conspiracy conspiracy in plain sight was when Cohen heard stone. Tell Trump about the Clinton emails before WikiLeaks dump before the DNC convention. That's I witnessed test evidence of conspiracy. Yeah. You know, the shot and for the deliciousness of this whole thing came to its head yesterday, not just with his testimony and saying all of this on camera in sworn testimony. But when Wiki leaks came out yesterday and started tweeting and saying that it was common knowledge that they were going to release in had all this Clinton stuff that was on July twenty second. Yes, he said this meeting was on the eighteenth or the nineteenth and right now as of today, someone is identified a phone call that was actually made on the sixteenth, which Roger stone in Donald Trump. This is what Cynthia oxen said earlier to us, Malcolm Muller's got to have other evidence besides Coen's testimony. Correct. Extend Coen's testimony is sworn testimony. He can go to jail for much longer than he's doing right now if he lied. He had no reason the lunch. He had no reason to. Make that up. I think he was an eyewitness. I think he was right there. I think you have conspiracy in plain sight and Donald Trump and Roger stone are scrambling because this is prison for stone. And it is clearly, you know, Trump tweeted yesterday, no collusion. No, you're right, no collusion, conspiracy fraud, the United States. That's what it is. I mean, I almost stunning Malcolm. Nachos that right tax fraud wire fraud, Bank fraud, you've always said this is going to be a Rico. Yeah. Yeah. I'm sorry. I'll take credit for that one. I'm the first person to say and January twenty seventeen that this is all going to amalgamate into a Rico caps. And it's going to you know, I couldn't keep up. I mean, I started yesterday at midnight. When they made the statement when they put the sworn testimony out, and I was up all night just trying to process all of this good idea that yesterday the Washington Post had to put out an article call ten takeaways. I mean, how many particular avenues of criminality that he was talking about you know, it's almost too much. And let's talk about the Republicans for a second represent, you know, you're a lifelong Republican I obviously come from Republican family Representative Braskin said the Republicans are not upset because you lied to congress for the president. They are upset because you stopped lying to congress for the president. And Nicole Wallace said the remarkable ridiculous thing about the myriad house. GOP conspiracies is that somehow they're all carried out by Republicans are Trump supporters Cohen Komi, McCabe, sessions, Rosenstein Muller. Right. Absolutely. Right. And they were. At Cohen just furious. Adam and calling him a liar. It's like you're talking about Trump's personal lawyer his closest confidante and the vice chairman of the Republican national committee's, finance, you know. Committee. This man is a hardcore Republican and the suddenly come out and say, well, he's a liar and everything that you did was criminal was for a lawyer. Middle. And so they have condemned their party. They somebody said yesterday not one time did any of the Republicans mentioned the word Trump now not once they had their orders. And like you said their job was their job was the cult members who go out and kill the cult member that is escape right? They wanted to tear him down personally. But it is an indictment of everyone in the corrupt in the Republican party that they endorse this corruption. What what stood out to you, obviously is author of a plot to hack America and plot to destroy democracy. I mean, what were your like when you talk about writing an article about biggest takeaways? I mean, where do you start? But what what did strike you the most? Well, of course, what struck me. The most was what you started with what was in the room where it happened. When Roger stone called Donald Trump and told him that he used spoken to Julian Assange, and that they had the Wiki leaks information in it Vance of the WikiLeaks major dump in July twenty second. Now again, WikiLeaks keeps saying that. Oh, well, we had made it known that we had some of this information back in June. Yeah. When you were talking to point -o, aka the Russian military intelligence apparatus, and then they went into full conspiracy that Trump with no what about this in advance. Speaks to everything that he said he speaks to his July twenty seventh Russia, if you're listening statement, it literally is the heart of the conspiracy. And now they're not just that they're witnesses that will have phone records. They want to bring in the Secretary Ron runner right now testify, this is going to be a grand conspiracy. And of course, it provides you know, all the material for my third book. It's writing itself. All I'm saying is the name the word treason is in that. Let's talk about Don jR, because he was implicated in more than one felony yesterday. Right. I mean. I didn't know who was involved in the payoffs, which is also defrauding the American people, right? The porn star pay was involved with the pain. Because the Trump's foundation was the was the criminal piggy-bank for the higher. Trump family operation other than the checks that Donald Trump wrote himself out of his personal account. The rest were coming from the Trump foundation. They're they're supposedly fate charity organization, and they were using it to buy portrait's of Donald Trump through false straw bidders and others so Don, jR, as as he said in the testimony Michael Cohen said Don, jR, couldn't wouldn't be allowed to do anything that he was the stupidest person in the Trump family and the. Up. An interview tells you he's going to be target. Yeah. Someone said it's like the godfather. But they're all Fritos. Mike. Malcolm talk to me about prong about asking. I mean, I am. I am I wrong to go. There. Still something weird. I wish they had followed up with that. Because you know, I wish they had asked them. Why was your cell phone ping outside of Prague? Did someone else have your cell phone? You know, the whole frog thing, you know. No, I was never a big believer in two things in that story that a lot of people invested their time money and effort into conspiracy theory about first one was the PT tape. That's just you know, the report the steel report, and I'm going to be speaking of Christopher Steele this year. Actually this much. Spy spy, despite. Spy-versus-spy over beers. So that story was rumor intelligence room, it sort of story that you hear. But there's no way to corroborate it. But it's so fantastical that the Russians love it and probably loves to tell it. The other one was the story about going to Prague to meet with Russian intelligence to cut a secret deal. We know that the peace plan that was proposed by Michael Cohen those supposed Ukrainian please plan. That's real. Okay. People know that it's real it died a quick death. But the the rumor that he was in Krog that phone was being around there. You know, there's nothing that supports it. He came out flat out and said that that wasn't true. But who needs that? Yeah. And you always said the PP tabby should just admit to that. That's the least of everything that's in the hospital workers, right? Yeah. There. There are things. I wanna go. I wanna go for drinks. That was Dana that made me laugh. I want to go for drinks with you and Christopher Steele. Take me. Is going to be held in super secret location? I bet. Sorta talk that only two guys from the community. Would you the Lincoln, you know, but I'm not going to get anything new out of him. I'm just going to you know, there are things in the Steele dossier that that strike me very differently luck. For example, Trump props supposedly promised to report on Russian oligarch activities in the United States. And that's the one that I famously said copter the hookers, right? Chris Hayes is show where I sit that's espionage act activity. I would be tracking you if you did that activity. So there are things in there that are are more for far more damning, then you know, then the then the p. You know, but you know, the teacher rewind that where it back eighty percent something happened. There wouldn't be surprised if he actually said it, and then somebody else turned that statement over vodka or whatever it is the Nobu restaurant meeting with the oligarchs into a Trump did it. So. Things that are sitting before our very is the actual heart intelligence that we have stick with that. Yes. Conspiracy theory. I don't know if you re tweeted, but you said Trump coins Nixon as the second president saloon, Vietnam, that's balance that funny troop, it was my first start. It's just like, are you kidding? You you cancelled lunch can't jumped on an airplane. Sometimes you need to walk away. No, no, no. Before you were telling everyone loves, and that you're exchanging emails, I'm reading the McCabe book, if you haven't read I don't pump through reading books, write that book is awesome. Yeah. Trump is dirty alpha foxtrot. I can't you. Well, as you've tweeted, you got rolled part one. We're no longer demanding North Korea disclose full accounting of nuclear weapons or missiles. And you said we got rolled park to Kim gets an international head of state event makes Donald Trump and apologised for mass murderer gets to retain all his new nukes and then walks away. Trump got nothing not even air miles Zastava yesterday was on every Donald Trump. But you know, every minute of that thing, which is why he kicked out the four American journalists the dinner so that he would not have to deal with Michael Cohen. Let me tell you might put out the other night where I said this is the beginning of the end of this. I read that. Fact. Yeah. And and what you can't if you're going to start writing fiction books, could you write I this scenario where he is standing next to a murderous dictator Kim Jong on praising him saying he believes him that he didn't know anything about Otto warmbier. Laverov is in Vietnam with him and Jurvetson is meeting with NBS yesterday, which. I mean, I think Juliet Higham going on Twitter put out a put out a tweet where they said, I'm paraphrasing MBA. Ivanka and Jared meeting with a murderers Trump having dinner with a murderer. All these things going on. And it was still single that has to be the worst day of this president's. I mean, the fact that he sat member came in a holiday for a murderer again, not not listening to our intelligence, right? Yes. Yeah. Or common sense. You have to go watch the video of Otto, warmbier begging life on North Korean television. When he was accused of being a spy and to say, Kim Jong UN doesn't know what's going on there. And that his other part of his statement was it's rough and career. Those prisons are rough. It's a rough time you just justify murder. Right. They beat that man until he died of his injuries. And then sent hit sent him home on his deathbed. And Trump said, I know the warm Bill sandwich. They love me. They trust me. I wouldn't mind. I'll tell you yesterday. Go ahead. I was gonna say my family would have had any national spectacle Islah if that had happened with with Donald Trump. The Trump doesn't carries a social caste Michael Cohen made it clear he does not care about people. It is all a mass. What a day what a time in history. I'm glad to be on that wall with you, Malcolm, Nance, friend. My patriot. We will talk to you next week, Honey. Okay. All right. Bye. Bye. Find out where that. Chris steele. Okay. Forty eight forty eight minutes after the hour Chavez said, no, no, no, mama. No, no, no, mama. Crashing. And a crash it like Kristen wig fried spades. Hobbling more like a glass. Forty nine minutes after the hour. Dana Goldberg.

Donald Trump Trump Michael Cohen Trump foundation Roger stone Malcolm president WikiLeaks Christopher Steele Rosenstein Muller Republican party United States Dana Goldberg Prague Coen Washington Post Cynthia oxen Clinton Russia Kim Jong UN
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

01:30 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"My final minute as we have here. Greg Jarrett, David shown going forward what needs to happen? Now, we're awaiting the FIS it investigation from the I g Horowitz. I don't know what John Heuberger doing is supposed to be I guess looking into leaking. And now we have a new AG and rod Rosenstein is expected to be replaced by Jeffrey Rosen. Do you know either of you know, this guy? Rosen Rosen has been in another department, but he's highly regarded as a fine lawyer, and you know, far has confidence in him that says a lot. All right. So what should happen, David? I think what Greg said is absolutely right task force. You have to start from the beginning as you said earlier start with Hillary Clinton. But listen, it's going on still genie re is the prosecutor in the Roger stone case about Clinton emails genie, re was Clinton's lawyer in the Email scandal what we know now is from a cab Komi, Rosenstein Muller. So-called investigation was a sham from its inception. The team appointed is a sham and we see now how it happened people who supported Hillary Clinton wanted it to happen. They made it happen. And now, we're stuck with it will we shouldn't be Mr..

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

News 96.5 WDBO

02:28 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

"Final minute as we have here. Greg Jarrett, David shown going forward what needs to happen? Now, we're awaiting the FIS investigation from the I g Horowitz. I don't know what John Huber's doing is supposed to be I guess looking into leaking. And now we have new AG and rod Rosenstein is expected to be replaced by Jeffrey Rosen. Do you know either of you know, this guy? Roseanne Rosen has been in another department. But he's highly regarded as a fine lawyer and far has confidence in him that says lot. All right. So what should happen, David? I think with Gregg said is absolutely right. You need a task force. You have to start from the beginning as you said earlier start with Hillary Clinton. But listen, it's going on still genie re is the prosecutor in the Roger stone case about Clinton emails genie, re with Clinton's lawyer in the Email scandal what we know now is from Cape Komi and Rosenstein Muller. So-called investigation was a sham from its inception. The team appointed is a sham and we see now how it happened people who supported Hillary Clinton wanted it to happen. They made it happen. And that was stuck with it when we shouldn't be Mr. bar should do something about it last word, Greg. This is rank lawlessness by rogue senior officials at the FBI and the department of Justice they were deviant devious. They were malevolent, and it should frighten Americans and the only way to rectify this lawlessness is for a task force by Bill bar to examine all of it and bring prosecutions where appropriate maybe a special counsel. No, I, you know, I think there's no appetite in America for another endless special counsel, who's really unaccountable. No there are fine career. Prosecutors David knows this at the department of Justice, and they are perfectly capable under the guidance of Bill bar to undertake a legitimate investigation. All right. Thank you. Both David shown and Greg Jarrett when we come back Congress's role in this Jim Jordan. Will join us from the freedom caucus. And then our news roundup information overload hour, the latest on smaller, and so much more straight ahead. You are listening to the best of the Sean Hannity show and stay tuned more memorable moments..

Hillary Clinton Greg Jarrett David Bill bar prosecutor rod Rosenstein Roseanne Rosen Jeffrey Rosen department of Justice Sean Hannity Rosenstein Muller special counsel FIS Horowitz John Huber Cape Komi Gregg America FBI Congress
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

03:15 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"Actually, we spent no time. This today, but it would be it would be bad of me tonight. At least have this mentioned on the show the media for a while, and you could verify deny this it's up to you. But the media for a while has been downplaying what's going to happen when? When Robert Muller have we ever heard? The guy says the end carries another one of those stupid names. I everybody says Muller, don't they? Mueller drill horse. Yanni says Mueller every time Muller. But. It's just me Rosenstein, Rosenstein Muller Mueller. Learn by the way, it is. Absolutely. Spelled mueller. That is how you spell. Bueller? Ferris bueller? But just with an F B having said that under with Muller. Yeah. Yeah. The media has been telling us to downplay what might happen when Robert Muller releases his information his his report after two years and millions and millions of dollars. So if the media wants us to think is going to be nothing if probably going to be less than nothing. What do you have on us from CNN attorney general Bill bar is preparing to announce as early as next week the completion of special counsel, Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, what plans for to submit to congress soon after a summary Muller's confidential report, according to people familiar with the plans and preparations are the clearest indication yet Muller is nearly done with his almost two year investigation and precise. Timing of the announcement is subject to change. And it's and contours of what bar will send a congress remain unclear also unclear as how long it will take Justice officials to prepare. What will be submitted to lawmakers the president Donald Trump's into travel overseas for a summit with North Korean leader, Kim Jong Hoon just as are mindful of not interfering with the White House is diplomatic efforts which could impact the timing and the Justice depart. Women a special counsel's office declined to comment bar has said he wants to be as transparent as possible of congress and the public consistent with the rules and the law. I mean. Do you? Imagine got people like like Adam Schiff over there in the the the house intelligence committee. We're going to keep on investigating. You got actually waters constantly cutting the president down in attacking the hearing about impeachment. I'm allegedly Sam do you think this guy's gonna show up? Are they gonna look me up before before he comes on? I think he's gonna show up. So there's a former Senator from is he from New Hampshire. Yes. And he's a Republican Kerry and they pitched me two days ago. Tad him come on and give the reasons why does president should be impeached, and my response to him was okay um game. Let's go. That'd be fun fun. This is going to happen is weaker ones are going to happen. It might be this week or Monday. There you go quit popcorn. Boy took all your time. You have no time at all. One quick story. Click hit rumors that would be Goldberg host the Oscars. She's been away from work by it's. It's. She's always pretty good..

Robert Muller Rosenstein Muller Mueller president Kerry Bill bar congress Ferris bueller special counsel Donald Trump Adam Schiff Yanni CNN Kim Jong Hoon Goldberg house intelligence committee New Hampshire White House Russia Senator
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

News 96.5 WDBO

02:07 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

"With Gregg Jarrett, David shown, going forward what needs to happen. Now, we're awaiting the FIS investigation from the I g Horowitz. I don't know what John Huber's doing is supposed to be I guess looking into leaking. And now we have a new AG and rod Rosenstein is expected to be replaced by Jeffrey Rosen. Do you know either of you know, this guy? Well, Rosen Rosen has been in another department, but he's highly regarded as a fine lawyer, and you know, far has confidence in him that says a lot. All right. So what should happen, David? I think Gregg said is absolutely right. You need a task force. You have to start from the beginning as you said earlier start with Hillary Clinton. But listen, it's going on still genie re is the prosecutor and the Roger stone case about Clinton emails genie, re with Clinton's lawyer in the Email scandal what we know now is from Cape Komi, Rosenstein Muller. So-called investigation was a sham from its inception. The team he appointed is a sham and we see now how it happened people who supported Hillary Clinton wanted it to happen. They made it happen. And now, we're stuck with it. When we shouldn't be Mr. bar. Do something about it last word, Greg. This is rank lawlessness by roguish senior officials at the FBI and the department of Justice they were deviant devious. They were malevolent and it should fighting Americans. And the only way to rectify this lawlessness is for a task force by Bill bar to examine all of it and bring prosecutions where appropriate maybe a special counsel. No, I, you know, I think there's no appetite in America for another endless special counsel, who's really unaccountable. Now there are fine career. Prosecutors gave it knows this at the department of Justice, and they are perfectly capable under the guidance of Bill bar to undertake a legitimate investigation. All right. Thank you. Both David shown and Greg Jarrett when we come back Congress's role in this Jim Jordan. Will join us from the freedom caucus. And then our news roundup information overload hour, the latest on smaller, and so much more.

Bill bar Hillary Clinton Jeffrey Rosen Gregg Jarrett David Rosenstein Muller Greg Jarrett prosecutor rod Rosenstein department of Justice John Huber FIS special counsel Horowitz Cape Komi America FBI Roger stone Congress Jim Jordan
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

03:02 min | 2 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"Miracle is taking place in the United States. And the only thing that can stop it. Our foolish wars politics or ridiculous partisan investigations. And you do realize that's just weapons-grade bullcrap. Right. I mean on the one anti says the economy's doing better than any time in our history. And then on the other hand, he said investigations will destroy this great accommodate economy. Well, guess what? There have been investigations going on for two frigging years. And yet the economy is the best it's ever been anybody. See the disconnect slash lie there. I mean, why can't you brain dead? Trump. Pots figure out these blatant and gigantic lies for yourself or do you? And you just don't care. Why can't you see that with every lie? He tells you he's playing for rubes dupes, and suckers and Purley. That's exactly what you are. Which is exactly what he needs you to be. He needs you to Perret the line ho investigations do bad for the economy and still believe the economy is the best in history despite two years of investigations. What is wrong with you? And the look on Pelosi's faced after this remark was just priceless. The only place the investigation by the special counsel is a partisan one is deep within the bowels of the right wing media. And when the camera panda, the new chairman of the house intelligence committee. He would just sitting there with this little grin on his face. Let us never forget had Trump not fire then FBI director James Comey, and then admitted to NBC's Lester Holt on live television that he fired call me over the Russia investigation and then told the two Russian spies in the Oval Office quote. I just fire the head of the FBI. He was crazy. A real nut job faced great pressure because of Russia that's taken up and quote. They're most likely never would've been a special council investigation, again, another self-inflicted wound Trump brought upon himself because he has no control. So once again, president snowflake whiny crybaby that he is had to blame partisanship for that self-inflicted wound plus pay it's not cool to ever publicly criticised. Dear cult leader. So let's criticize Komi Rosenstein Muller. Instead. Idiots. In what you just heard Trump say sounded familiar, it should have I would like to add a personal word with regard to an issue that has been of great concern to all Americans over the past year. I refer of course to the investigation.

Trump James Comey Komi Rosenstein Muller Russia Pelosi United States FBI Lester Holt special counsel NBC chairman house intelligence committee Oval Office president director two years
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on Mueller, She Wrote

Mueller, She Wrote

03:38 min | 3 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on Mueller, She Wrote

"I mean, we were talking about how NBC was going to say that the reports gonna come out at the end of February and Rosenstein is going to leave and I was like, well, maybe the obstruction part. Well, now, we're learning the obstruction part is the collusion part. And that would mean one whole big report. Right. And that would be coming out in February. And you know, we've been talking about how the Andrew Miller case is still ongoing malicious ask for six more months for his grand jury. He hasn't even received the documents. He's trying to get from country a right in that secret subpoena battle so when Rosenstein says he's stepping down early in March 'cause molars wrapping up which in our old way of thinking would be impossible. But with collusion an obstruction inextricably linked and taking into account. The letter outlining the scope with a Muller investigation written by Rosenstein Muller is responsible for investigating and reporting. We now have a new picture, and I reached out to David priests to bouncing ideas off of him. And he was basically saying look those things the Miller thing and the company a country eighth-inning could be a tiny little percent of things. That are on done and would Muller wait until every single thread from this case had gone to trial and had a conclusion before he finally broke a final report. No because he's not Ken Starr. He's not going to put out a conclusive report that draws conclusions about this thing. He's an investigator. He's a prosecutor. He's putting together a report with all the evidence to say, I've got here's all everything. I've got y'all can continue at the DOJ to investigate this. How you please. Here's my report. And that report wouldn't necessarily have to wait for all these little tiny things to be tied up. Does that make sense that does make sense? It does make sense. But what if some of those things have something that I think's would be consequential enough to the investigation as a whole, you know, then he wouldn't file his report. Right. Let's kind of what I'm thinking. I don't think there's any ways going out in February. I do now though because I think there's so much. We don't know though, you're assuming we well, you're not I'm not saying, I'm assuming what you're assuming. Because I was thinking this myself that those are big things. But I keep telling myself, we only know one percent of what's going on the bulk of it could already be done. Yeah. All the shit. We don't know. And these things that we think are huge might be tiny. Right. And I mean, a normal or not political. But it does make sense that that house would continue investigating these kind of things. So Muller knows it wouldn't be for not like the DOJ would. Oh, yeah. Them too. So like, yeah. Muller would just be setting it up and passing the torch, essentially, right, right? Here's all my findings the bulk of it. There's all these, you know, we're going to figure out what under Miller's doing and talking to David pres. And you know, of course, this is all speculation. We don't know for sure, but I'm trying to figure out how could the report possibly be done the NFL with all of these outstanding things. And that was the initial thought was that those are tiny compared to what he actually knows. So it's. I don't know. I honestly don't know the answer. But I assume and I've emailed a couple of experts on this. And I don't have the answer yet. But I'm gonna go ahead and tell you what I assume because I'm not afraid of being wrong. That. These threads that haven't been wrapped up or gone to trial or concluded could be continued to be investigated by the department of Justice and indictments could be issued after the Miller report comes out as those investigations continue. And I also had asked a couple of experts which I don't have the answer to yet. Whether or not the DOJ can continue to use Muller's grand jury, which would be a reason for him to extend the grand jury, six more months..

Rosenstein Muller DOJ Andrew Miller NBC David pres. department of Justice NFL one percent
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

Anderson Cooper 360

02:50 min | 3 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on Anderson Cooper 360

"It's not. It's not it's not that. I I don't think anybody who's convinced that the president did this on behalf of Russia. You know prior Komi, but you know, but if but. But you know, they had but the act with the active Meiring, but the simple act of firing Komi, you know, gone you make or toll congress at that was considered a Finnish. Is it clear? Whether the counterintelligence investigation was ever wrapped up. I I don't know if that's the case today, we say that in the story. I'm sure it's something baller. You know, if he writes her forty it's like, that's something. He could explain or Adam golden if you will please stick around with us. I want to also bring in CNN chief political correspondent Dana bash in USA today. Call him as Kirsten powers is with us as well. And on the phone FBI supervisory special agent Josh Campbell who served as a special assistant to director Komi Danna. I to you on this in this gets to the article references point there are many within the intelligence community, and certainly within the president's orbit who say that this and other things represent serious overreach by the FBI, potentially. Obviously would love to hear joshes versus that's t was not only working for the FBI, but working for James, call me, look at I think what is what is really an unknown here. What let you take a state best. Back. This is very explosive, and it's obvious. Why the FBI didn't want anybody to know about this at all the notion as you were getting with atom of investigating president of the United States to see if the American president is working for the Russians is just it just it's almost too much to wrap your mind around having said that we don't know what happened, and we don't know how quickly it wrapped up if it's wrapped up, and obviously it's it's it's connected to the much larger Robert Mueller investigation. This is before. Yes, it seems as though the FBI started. This before Robert Mueller was appointed by rod Rosenstein Muller took it over in merge to an extent, we believe the intelligence and the criminal investigation Josh Campbell. You were there at the time. First of all explain to us or verify what you can about this reporting. Yeah. So so John have to be obviously, very careful with information that I talk about that. I knew when I was in the FBI, and as you mentioned working for director Komi, you know, after he was fired. I continued on in my role as a special system to the director. So again, I mentioned that just say that any employee takes note that he won't divorce certain things, but I will say those we can speak kinda hypothetically about the mechanics and the impact of such an investigation..

Komi Danna FBI president Russia Josh Campbell Dana bash director Robert Mueller United States CNN Kirsten powers John special assistant rod Rosenstein Muller Adam golden James
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on News Radio 1190 KEX

News Radio 1190 KEX

10:55 min | 3 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on News Radio 1190 KEX

"We also have this is one of the best weekends of the year for National Football League. By the way, we talked about this earlier NFL is it's not all the way back, but it's trending back. And you know, why that is Donald Trump? Donald trump. I may not be exaggerating. It. Donald Trump helped to save the NFL. Remember when all that kneeling began all the protesting. The flag began there was one person of any consequence that mocked it made fun of it protested it and tried to stop it. And that was President Trump. Have he not? It would still be happening. The league would not have been able to do anything about it league would have been afraid to do anything about a league would have tried to solve it by allowing it to continue. But paying off people to try to get them to stop it and so forth. Attendance would have continued to drop TV ratings would have continued to drop, but Trump called it out criticized it for what it was and brought the kneeling to a screeching halt, stop the protests of the flag during the national anthem and the fans are returning to the NFL primarily through television ratings now game attendance regular season. There were still some some fans disguised there is empty seats. But the TV ratings are starting to trend back and fans are free to be fans of the game. You don't have to worry about tuning in listening to sports announcers, preach to you about politics and social Justice at all this garbage. Nobody wants to hear about watching football or baseball or hockey basketball doesn't matter. So this weekend has returned to the fans and you've got you've got the divisional playoffs. Going on now. And the championship games will be next week. And these are some good games on C. Let's see. Let's see. Let's see if I can remember this tomorrow night. Eight o'clock game is the Rams and the Cowboys tomorrow afternoon is a weight. Hang on a minute. Let me let me read this real quickly here, folks. Let me check something here. I don't have it memorized. It is. Yeah. The chiefs and a culture tomorrow afternoon at four thirty five and then the Rams and Cowboys tomorrow night, then Sunday at one o'clock is the chargers at the raiders and in Philadelphia and New Orleans the four thirty game on Sunday afternoon. And this this is one of the. A few years. The New England Patriots have not been the number one. See they still going to bite week. But the chargers are given a half decent chance to beat the patriots on Sunday which. Is unusual. It's going to be thirty six degrees are going to be tough for the chargers. But you know, the chargers are nine and oh on the road this year. Including a home game. They played in. In London Robert Mueller, the special counsel C N in just hoping and praying I told you yesterday when I think this report is going to be thank Muller's working on the reporting. We've got a pretty good indication here that it's I he just asked for the grand jury to be kept open under six months. So I don't think the wind down is imminent. But if I had to randomly guess what what is what this is going to be. I think since there isn't any collusion between Trump and Russia. The report is going to stress that there was Russian meddling. They can't they can't not report that everybody in their ankle in Washington believes, it's true. It. It's it's I think it's bogus the idea that Russia having to do with the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election is an insult to everybody's intelligence. There is simply no way and even Rosenstein Muller in the indictments that they have made against Russian internet. Trolls have made it plain that not one vote was changed and the outcome of no election was affected that doesn't matter the media and the Democrats and everybody in this game have been reporting for two years or more that the Russians meddled in the. So they can't not report that that is going to form the foundation the report Russian meddling, even though it amounted to zilch. But they're gonna report it there is no collusion between Trump and Russia. So what they're going to say is that Trump's naievety his lackadaisical attitude. His arrogance incompetence the fact that he's got no business being president that he had no business being nominated in Nabil's the Russians they get away with meddling. That's how I think they're going to do it. And then I think Muller is going to pivot to obstruction of Justice and say that even though Trump was so dumb instant. These will not be words that Muller uses. But it'll be how they're interpreted and even though Trump was so unprepared. And so out of his league. And so incompetent and naive at the Russians were able to metal Trump still got worried. Referring to Muller as a witch hunt in a hoax, and so they're going to then say F CNN's reporting here that Trump attempted to obstruct the investigation. By firing Komi and by saying things in public that no responsible citizen of Washington will ever say. There would not be serious criticism of the investigator among serious people that would never happen, and they will. The CNN story. Here says that Muller has been making note of every word Trump has said in speeches at rallies at press conferences, and is categorizing them as potential attempts to obstruct Justice. And so the report will no doubt site certain things that Trump has said that the investigator will say were attempts to sway a possible jury. That were attempts to intimidate potential witnesses. I think this is what this report is going to be they can't afford after all this time. They can't afford to issue. A report basically says we didn't find anything no independent counsel ever has and certainly not this collection of snakes for Muller to Andrew Weissmann. I mean, they're they're they're practically in a recent column by Sydney Powell. The author of licensed ally. Has basically accused them of torturing Paul Manafort. Of slowly killing him by keeping him in solitary confinement. Not allowing him any visitors including from his lawyers. He hasn't done anything to warrant solitary. But she makes the point that they're essentially driving him crazy. Because they can. Manafort, didn't do anything the indictments against Manafort have nothing to do with Russia collusion. Trump the election any of this the latest this is this is so specious at even mentioned it the story a couple of days ago that Manafort shared polling data with a Russian oligarch. Did you see that story? You've probably wondered why you're hosted mentioned, I'll tell you. Why? It's because it's nothing. It's zilch zero NADA. Okay. So manafort's. The president is running the campaign chairman of campaign Trump camp. He's got some polling shares it with the Russian oligarch. Some this is collusion. Give me a break this is meddling sharing. Polling data that's going to be made public. Anyway. Let's extent of what they've got. So I think this is where they go to CNN, of course, is holding out desperate hope and their story is Robert Muller writes, this report, a potential battle brews over obstruction of Justice. Robert Muller wraps up his Russia probe investigators have focused on conflicting public statements by Trump and his team that could be seen as an effort to influence witnesses and obstruct Justice. According to anonymous people familiar with the investigation. So just when you thought Muller couldn't stretch the definition of crimes any Ferber are all buddies at CNN reporting, his investigators are focused on public statements by Trump and his aides as potential obstruction of Justice. CNN goes on to say, the lion of questioning adds to indications that Muller views false or misleading statements to the press or to the public as obstruction of Justice. So the president not telling the press everything they wanna know wolves obstruction of Justice CNN says that prosecutors have dropped hints that they had that they view public statements is possibly key in influencing what this is insane. This is ABC Jackley insane. I'll tell you. I fully expect all of this to collapse on these people because they don't have anything folks, they're having to manufacture things like fo-. Obstruction of Justice. Grab sound byte number twenty one changing gears. Lisa Murkowski, I this is a lesson in what would be happening if we didn't have Donald Trump in the White House. Lisa Murkowski, Republican Senator from Alaska. He just wants to shut down. Terrible. It's so bad. We can't do everything we need to do. Just the end the shutdown. This is what would already happened. We can already chalk up a defeat. Were it not for Donald Trump? We want border security, I want border security. I think that the president's request for a comprehensive view of how we address this is not something so unreasonable. Let's figure that out. Let's walk through it. Let's do a short term.

President Trump Rosenstein Muller Trump Russia president National Football League chargers CNN Paul Manafort New England Patriots Washington investigator Justice CNN Lisa Murkowski Robert Mueller Rams chiefs
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

11:59 min | 3 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"Enabled the Red Eye Radio. Skill than any anytime you want to loosen say Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he's Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone. Don't have the house and the Senate the Democrats alone end the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made we made clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again point make clearly as Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes tomorrow, and they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding portions the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that. Which is how we right and then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing. Resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with it. We've got basically everything funded through September except the little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with. We're for open borders. Why would we care? Now, how successful will be at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's it again. It's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything, right? There wasn't named negotiate point. Now, they there there wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. And turn it into that. I don't think so. But in this budget battle writer was right. You know, nine months ago low. Yeah. But there there is now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? In order to get something back that would be less politically damaging our August. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words. If they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. Would one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede something like that. I don't think so I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right now because I really don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. That's not gonna happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden, it's gone. And everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got again two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that. You know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply used the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that. And and it's hard to argue with us when you're for sanctuary cities. If you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the authorities right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect a border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue in the way that we argue it, which has should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should all the press conference every single day on it. And he should have held a press conferences and had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president showed a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how could he come out and strongly say they're for open borders for border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago stating oh world for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that don't give them the out don't ever give them and the whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. That's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've gotta go further. And you've gotta show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this war. And whether you get even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let's go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome. You're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was going to talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decide to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. You know, Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out to the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy. And wondering if same people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation, it Colmey Rosenstein Muller, and Weisman they were all involved in your rainy and one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like blooming fall every time. Something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller best degation. But those are that I don't remember that one member it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you you look there. There's a there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get a get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself is if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left were expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team..

president President Trump Mr President Nancy Pelosi Senate Chuck Schumer Colmey Rosenstein Muller Alexa Red Eye Radio Republican Senate Eric Harley Twitter Trump Dacca Arizona renominated Huber White House Jeff Sessions
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

12:00 min | 3 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"You want to listen to Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he is Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone don't have the house and the Senate, the Democrats alone can and the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made I thought we made it clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again or make clearly as the Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes. So tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding portions the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that. Which is how we right, and then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget until eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with that. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with for open borders. Why would we care? Yeah. Now, how successful at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's again, it's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What are the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything, right? There wasn't a negotiating point. There. There wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. Turn it into that think. So but in this budget battle was right. You know, nine months ago, but there there isn't now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? In order to get something back that would be less, politically damaging or. It's a greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words. If they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave two point five billion for the wall. What one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede something like that. I don't think. So I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right now because I really don't think they really care about the dreams. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole DACA dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. It's not going to happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we said this way before the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that. You know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will get money for border security and homeland we believe in that. And it's hard to argue with us when you for sanctuary cities, if you say once you crossed the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're former security yet if anybody gets over they can stay even at their criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the thirties right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security. But the whole thing is, you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect the border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which they should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should all the press conference every single day on it. And he should have held a press conferences, and had, you know, the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president showed a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how could he come out and strongly say they're for open borders in an opera border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago stating oh world for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that will don't give them the out though, never give them. And what are the whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How's that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them by and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not going to get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. He's gotta go further. And you've got to show that you're going to fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to. Without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this war. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona warned welcome. You're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out for the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy wondered if peace and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation, it's Comi Rosenstein Muller and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the molar investigation. But those remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So, you know, you you you look there's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of declassified information that he has not released. I has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. White.

president President Trump Mr President Senate Nancy Pelosi Comi Rosenstein Muller Chuck Schumer Alexa renominated Huber Republican Senate Eric Harley Twitter Trump uranium one Arizona White House Dacca Jeff Sessions
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

KTAR 92.3FM

12:08 min | 3 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

"Red Eye Radio on your Amazon echo every day. Any time say Alexa, and naval the Red Eye Radio skill than any time you want to loosen Alexa, bullpen Red Eye Radio. And he is our Carleen. I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone don't have the house and the Senate the Democrats alone can't end the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made I thought we made it clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again, make clearly as Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding. Portions of the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that which is how we it. Right. And then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with that. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with. We're for open borders. Why would we care? Yeah. Now, how successful at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's it again. It's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything. Right. There wasn't a negotiating point. Now. They there there wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. And they in turn it into that. And I don't think so but in this budget battle right there was right? You know, nine months ago. Oh, yeah. But there there isn't now that's my whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? An order to get something back that would be less politically damaging our guest. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words if they got Dacca right now. With that be a win. Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. Would one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede that something like that. I don't think so I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right? Don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. That's not gonna happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that. You know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that an and it's hard to argue with us when you for sanctuary cities, if you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what. And we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the thirties right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want effective border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should held a press conference every single day on it. And he should have held press conferences and had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president should have a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how can he come out and strongly say they're for open borders on the not for border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago, stating oh, we're all for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that. We'll don't give them the out don't ever give them. And what are your whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How's that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the the Democrats, and we're we're their position or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've gotta go further, and you've got to show that you're going to fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth on? I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out to the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy and the same people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein Muller and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those are that I don't remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber. He was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there. There's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. If it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll be.

president President Trump Mr President Rosenstein Muller Red Eye Radio Nancy Pelosi Senate Chuck Schumer Alexa Carleen Republican Senate Twitter Gary McNamara Trump Amazon uranium one Dacca Arizona Jeff Sessions
"rosenstein muller" Discussed on WJR 760

WJR 760

04:41 min | 3 years ago

"rosenstein muller" Discussed on WJR 760

"Which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. That's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've got to go further, and you've got to show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything, and the fact is Huber is a democrat. And I'm still trying to figure out to the life of me watch sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy and one if and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation, it's only Rosenstein Muller and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And there that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there. There's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not release. I has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. If it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left were expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll be right.

President Trump Chuck Schumer Rosenstein Muller Blumenthal Nancy Pelosi Warren renominated Huber president uranium one Jeff Sessions Arizona Huber Red Eye Radio Scottsdale Russia Weisman