24 Burst results for "Roe V Wade"

Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on The Larry Elder Show

The Larry Elder Show

00:55 min | 2 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on The Larry Elder Show

"Man, let me ask you, when you and I were growing up and we knew that boys were boys and girls were girls, if this roux would have passed, we would have been like, whoopty, do heck? Yes. I'd love to see some naked ladies. But now, what's going to happen just like California is doing with the prisons. They're going to force schools all across the country to integrate boys into girls safe spaces or what or what should be safe spaces for girls and put them in danger. And it's either listen, you do this or you don't get, you don't get the food you need in order to feed these poor kids. I don't know every day I've been saying how evil the Biden administration is. And I've used that word liberally like a never thought I would. I don't like to use that word to try to be hyperbolic. I really don't. But I don't know that I can imagine anything more evil than this. This is evil. This is evil. All right, so again, let me just read this over under this new demand establishments that accept any federal food funding, including food stamps, must allow males who claim to be female to access female private spaces, showers, bathrooms, sleeping areas. Such organizations must allow follow must also follow protocols such as requiring staff to use inaccurate pronouns, forcing people to use inaccurate pronouns to describe transgender people and allowing male staff to dress as women while on the job. So dudes can dress as women. And if you believe in science, if you believe that an XX and XY chromosomes and you get it wrong, you get in trouble. No, no. Guys, we just can't play along with this anymore. It's time for us to step up and be the heroes. And we're not going to be like these heroes again that have endured these wars, whether it's Iraqi, freedom, whether it's the mini that suffered a died in Afghanistan and fighting these fighting the wars for Americans. And guys, listen, regardless of how you feel about the war, I just want to give you vets that are listening. You praise for doing what you did and obviously we want to honor the memory of those heading into Memorial Day that have lost their lives, God bless you guys. I mean that with all sincerity, I know you hear it this season, but I truly believe it. I truly believe it's an honor and I feel like it's a privilege to live in the United States of American. You know, I'm privileged and I'm blessed and that's because of you, that's because some of you are alive and you vets that are alive and obviously will salivate celebrate Veterans Day and on another date, but for those that lost their lives, you family members perhaps that are listening out there and you lost a loved one in war. I just want to say thank you for your sacrifice. I know it's just words, but just please, I want you to understand from the bottom of my heart that I genuinely mean genuinely mean that you guys are the real heroes and I'm looking for some more heroes to fight in this culture war that we do have. So the option it seems right now is going to be homeschooling and private schools have to abandon federal funding in any public schools that can afford to do. So we're going to need to do so. A religious institutions are exempt from this order, which it is in an order as of yet, but from this memo according to the alliance defending freedom, Greg Baylor at the alliance of freedom, he says, according to the 1970s, two title 9 law religious institutions don't have to file any paperwork to be exempt, although they can if they wish, but here's the problem. Here's what the Biden administration is trying to do. He's trying to put these institutions like the lines defending freedom or anyone that would file for an exemption on blast, so these lefty brown shirts can go after them. You know, like they protested outside or probably still are. I haven't even looked up on it lightly to be honest with you outside of the Supreme Court Justices homes because they get upset because they may have to they may have to abortion won't be codified into federal law wherever they live, they're going to have to get the abortion there. It's not necessarily going to be a right from state to state, but you're still going to be able to kill their babies, but despite that, they're upset. They're still going to get their way. They actually have more power if roe V wade is overturned, but the dummies have been so dumbed down by government schools and the Democrats and lefties and the teachers unions that run them. They don't even understand that. So Baylor does admit it again. He's way Gregory Baylor is with the lines of fending freedom that religious institutions essentially will be bullied. That publicly affirming a commitment to sexual reality by seeking an exemption acknowledgment from federal agencies makes us extremists and pressure campaigns. The activist group called humans rights campaigns, a blueprint for the Biden administration pushed for narrowing religious exemptions for multiple federal regulations and for administration for the administration to quote out close quote individuals and institutions who request such exemptions. You see what they do. If the left doesn't get their way their ideas suck. You know, I want you to understand. When I say Biden administration, I mean Democrats. Democrat policies suck. And they're not democratic. They don't want to play in this system. They don't want to they don't want to exist in this representative republic. They don't want to exist in this democratic republic. And when I say democratic republic, that is our system. Meaning all of us can be involved in a system, but we elect representatives to represent us. Democrats don't want that. They want to totally shut us out of the process. It's like, hey, you better listen to me, boy. That's basically the Democrat mindset and sadly, so many people within the Democrat party philosophy and they're becoming a little dictators themselves. So Biden has been demanding that although these schools are exempt and don't need to file paperwork, he's demanding that the schools do USDA officials are telling schools to file paperwork to be exempt and they don't have to. They don't have to. They never had to. Although title 9 law says that that's an option, but not required. So title 9 law says that's an option, but not required. The Biden administration is demanding that schools for our paperwork in order to show that their exam. Now, there's no legal authority here. I want you to understand that. There's no law in place. This is just a memo. This is just a memo that the Biden administration is putting out forcing trying to force people to comply and the many people may not understand they don't even have to comply. So this was all confirmed to the federalists earlier this week. This from, I believe this is from the gentleman from ADF Baylor, organizations may request a religious exemption by submitting a written declaration to the secretary of agriculture identifying the provisions that conflict with the specific tenant of the religious organization. So really, a local school district must seek the secretary of agriculture within the federal government. Government schools have no exemptions at best parents and taxpayers can urge schools districts not to comply. This is where you come in. You heroes that are still the parents out there that still want to be a parent to your children and your taxpayers, all right? So you can urge school districts not to comply. These are going to be inevitable lawsuits that are coming through. This is not law. This is not codified into federal statutes any way, shape, or form. So you can fight parents, you can be a hero. Here's a quote from the Indiana AG,.

Biden Administration Alliance Defending Freedom Greg Baylor Alliance Of Freedom Roe V Wade Gregory Baylor Afghanistan California Baylor United States Supreme Court Democrat Party Adf Baylor Biden Usda Federal Government Indiana Ag
Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on WTOP 24 Hour News

WTOP 24 Hour News

00:34 min | 6 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on WTOP 24 Hour News

"Dangerous any firearm is potentially dangerous in the hands of a deranged lunatic At the end of the day the issue here is not the firearm It's the lunatic and the firearm Senate Democrats say they're pushing for yet another vote mandating background checks The Supreme Court ruling wrote veat way technically still grants women in the U.S. equal access to abortion but one state has now effectively reversed that CBS's Linda canyon reports The strictest abortion ban in the country has been signed into law by the governor of Oklahoma It prohibits abortion from fertilization a move to pretty much bans most abortions It also allows private citizens to sue those who help women get abortions and in Casper Wyoming an abortion clinic that was planning to open in June has been firebombed There were no injuries It comes as the state is prepared to outlaw abortions if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns roe V wade Linda canyon CBS News Who won Pennsylvania's Republican Senate primary No one knows the votes so close It's triggered an automatic statewide recount as KY W TV's Alicia Roberts tells us This.

Linda Canyon Supreme Court Senate CBS Oklahoma U.S. Casper Roe V Wade Linda Wyoming Cbs News Pennsylvania Alicia Roberts
Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on WTOP 24 Hour News

WTOP 24 Hour News

01:11 min | 11 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on WTOP 24 Hour News

"In Casper Wyoming firebombed an abortion clinic that was planning to open as only the second in the entire state the incident coming as the state is prepared to outlaw abortions if the Supreme Court overturns roe V wade KGW TV reporter Travis Mitchell is there Business has seen multiple peaceful protests from Casper citizens advocating both for and against the establishment but this violent act has put citizens and police on high alert We were able to interview the witness and initial caller who first contacted the police about the vandalism It was about three 30 a.m. I woke to allow noise I wasn't sure what woke me up So I went to the window I saw an individual coming out of a broken window of this building And they were sharing a gas can and a large black back And other news this morning as the country marks two years since George Floyd was murdered by police in Minneapolis president Joe Biden has this week signed a new executive order we're told aimed at reforming federal law enforcement Before signing the order alongside a crowd of civil rights leaders lawmakers and family members of George Floyd the president called it long awaited action This executive order can deliver the most significant police reform in decades It includes a ban on choke holds unless deadly force is authorized restrictions on no knock warrants by some 100,000 federal officers and a national database of police fired for misconduct Steve Dorsey CBS News Washington At United.

Kgw Tv Travis Mitchell George Floyd Casper Wyoming Supreme Court Joe Biden Minneapolis Steve Dorsey Cbs News Washington United
Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:33 min | 19 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Roe V wade being overturned. I think and in the book, of course, since I've read it, I know that you tell these stories. And I think it's important for us to know our history and to know these histories of revival that these things have happened in the past. And the United States of America would not exist if it hadn't been for the first great awakening. It was an amazing thing where thousands and thousands and thousands of people up and down the 13 colonies became born again and understand we can govern ourselves. We don't need a big government. I mean, all these things follow and I really do think you're right that we're living in a season right now. We're seeing earthquakes in the heavenly. We're seeing things happen. The overturning of roe V wade, it's kind of like the fall of the Soviet Union. People would dream, never dream that it's ever going to go away. It's been decades and the lord hears the prayers of his saints. It will go away and the enemy will scream louder because this is like a sacrament for the secular left. They don't really know what it is that they talk about these platitudes about women's rights and reproductive rights. It's something very, very dark. It's harmed women more than anything. And I do think that you're right, we're seeing things I think we're going to see election transparency. Because people are waking up, they're getting serious. And they're saying, we need to get involved in politics. We need to get involved in our local elections. We need to get involved in everything because we've taken our eyes off the ball and the enemy has come in like a flood, but the spirit of the lord is raising up a standard against it. And I just, I get very excited. I think that when you talk about reformation, that's really exciting. When we think about the fact that people aren't just going to get saved, but then they're going to be acting as though they're saved and they're going to be doing things in every sphere and every one of the 7 so called mountains. Well, I believe that revivals individuals coming to know Jesus Christ being personally transformed as I shared the harvest comes in. But reformations and institutions could saved like the government. And the reform that's going to take place there, election reform. And as well as bad laws like the roe V wade, just like the dred Scott decision of 16, I'm sorry, 1858. And so we're going to see this massive change. I believe take place for the great push of the great commission on the last days because God desires all to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth. The truth is there are 3 billion people who have never even heard the gospel, including over a billion Muslim. And so God has raised up this nation to be an apostolic nation to preach the gospel of the kingdom to the nations. We're still the number one mission sending mission giving nation, but I believe that were to go to another level as we unite and see revival break out in America. How can anybody doubt that God's hand is on this nation when you say something like with all of our problems, we are still sending more people to preach the gospel around the world. It's an amazing thing. And before we go to our break, I want to remind people that many people are getting involved in government. Many people are running for statewide office for national offices who believe in Jesus who believe abortion is wrong. Who believe these things and they are getting serious, like William wilberforce, you kind of referenced my book amazing grace who said, I'm going to use God's gifts in politics for the good of others. And people said, keep your faith out of politics. What's wrong with you? And he said, no, no, no, I have an obligation before God to bring my faith. The faith in Jesus into the political world and to do these things, I believe that is happening now. It will continue to happen. We'll be right back.

Roe V Wade United States Of America Soviet Union Dred Scott William Wilberforce
Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

00:42 min | 19 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe v wade" discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"We'll talk about it when we come back, turning our nation back to God through historic revival, don't go away. It's time to come blow your horse. Make like a mister mumbles and you're a zero. Hey folks, if you could make money off of abortion or pornography, would you do it? I hope the answer is no. But I want to tell you, Robert Nestlé, the founder of inspire insight dot com, he was the president of his local pro life pregnancy center. When he discovered that he owned investments in three companies manufacturing abortion drugs, well, God helped him to see that he was making money from abortion pornography LGBT activism and the list goes on. And that's why he created inspire insight dot com, inspire insight dot com, gives you instant access to biblical values data on over 23,000 stocks mutual funds and ETFs. So you can invest to the glory of God. You need to go to inspire insight dot com today and screen your four-o-one-ks, IRAs and other investment accounts. I did and I was shocked. Now I'm able to clean out the junk and invest in companies actually doing good things. Go to inspire insight, dot com today and register for free. That's inspire insight dot com, go there. Folks, welcome back. I'm talking to my friend pastor che on who has written a book called turning our nation back to God through historic revival, pastor che talk about revival. I mean, there have been so many historic arrivals and in the book you write about them, do you think revival is coming to us? Are we ripe for revival in America? I do believe that I define revival. First of all, it's got a rival when it comes to the manifest way to earth as it is as it is in heaven. And I'll share three characteristics of a historic revival. First, revival begins with the church. It's why second chronicles 7 14 says they have my people, not the world, not the Congress, but if my people are called by my name or humble themselves and pray, seek my face, turn from their wicked ways, then I'll hear from heaven forgive their sense and heal their land. And so there's been evil in the church, our wicked ways we've had to repent of our sense and we've been doing that. And I've seen more people humble themselves and massive gatherings through the call, but other solemn assemblies that really, I feel that God has heard our prayers. The second characteristic, the harvest comes in. And in the Jesus people movement, which was from 1967 to 77, over 20 million young people gave their hearts to Jesus Christ globally. And I think I said in this stage for the third thing, which is social transformation or we call reformation. And I really believe that we're going to see that. And I feel that we're in that stage of revival of reformation, really, and I want to be bold and say this that I felt like the lord say that to me right before Easter were coming a new epic season of reformation and I knew what that meant. And I shared it on Easter Sunday now. This is before the leak with Politico, but I said, I believe that roe V wade will be overturned. And I made a decree about that on Easter Sunday. I just blessed the people that got blessed them, but then I finished by saying am roe V wade will be overturned. Because that's what transformation looks like. And so we saw that in this great awakening first grade awakening of 1738 with whitfield and Wesley, but led to the appellation of the slave trade in 1807 and slavery altogether in your magnificent book, amazing grace. By 1833, with William wilberforce, and so here we are on a verge, I believe, a roe V wade being overturned. And I see other signs. I mean, even Musk buying Twitter as a sign that God wants to reform medium. And so this is something that is touching every area of family, media, education, and of course the government mountain. And so I feel we're in a historic season where we're going to see now the real battle begins for me, especially in California, because if it goes statewide with abortion being only each state making their own decision, we have the most liberal progressive left state where the leaders in abortion and our nation of that are governor just declared California to be an abortion sanctuary state and come to California for a vacation and we'll pay for your lodging, your food and your abortion. And this is our tax money paying for other people. What could be more satanic? I mean, just the language and an abortion sanctuary, can you imagine this is the antithesis? I mean, some places, if you were a slave and you escaped, it would be a sanctuary. This is about people going to have their children killed and they're using this term sanctuary. It is really, it is satanic. It's just an amazing, amazing thing. And what's sad is like corporations like Citibank said, we will pay for any employee that works in a state that abortion law no longer be allowed and will pay for them to fly to California and take care of their lodge and their expenses and their abortion. And so Newsom said, we need more corporations like Citibank. And these woke companies, we need to, I mean, what we did with Disney, we need to avoid caught them actually and just really take a stand with our business and I think a lot of people realize what Citibank was all about or Disney and their subscription to Disney Channel. And I think that is going to really have an impact on even the business mountain. I think this is where you separate the sheep from the goats. If you're not willing to make a sacrifice, a very small sacrifice and say, I'm not going to go to Disney World until they repent. I'm not going to subscribe to Disney Channel. I'm not going to bank at Citibank. If the believers in this country would get serious on that kind of issue, we would change the world tomorrow. Folks, you have no idea the power that you have the power of the purse, the financial power that you have. Forget about voting. That's one thing. But the financial power that we have to say that I am will not do a business who do business with a company or a bank like Citibank that sticks its neck out for something that I know is wrong. It's wrong and God is going to hold me accountable for where I spend my money and what I do with my money. So I'm just so glad passage that you're bringing this up. And you guys in California. I mean, you're seeing it. That's the whole thing. It's come to you because it's such a crazy place. No, we have a bill called AB 22, 23. And is right now going through the process. But it will legalize and fantasize the Bill says that up to 30 days after the baby is born, you can kill that baby and you will not be penalized. You will not be criminally charged. Can somebody explain that to me? Because I don't even understand how somebody who's proportion would go there. Do we understand why they would go there? Well, they're saying things like what we do know that people have posts part of blues after giving birth to a baby. And we just want to make sure that the woman's right to choose even under a situation like that. And if she chooses to let the baby starve or die or have the doctor kill the baby, that they will not be criminalized. Again, they also are the woman is crazy. This is totally uncomfortable and gentlemen. Do you hear what we are saying? Do you hear what we are saying, folks? It's time to wake up. It is time to understand evil is evil. We have to get serious. We'll be right.

Roe V Wade Robert Nestlé Pastor Che Citibank California William Wilberforce Whitfield Disney Channel Musk Congress Wesley Disney America Newsom Twitter Disney World Bill
"roe v wade" Discussed on Cape Up with Jonathan Capehart

Cape Up with Jonathan Capehart

03:15 min | Last week

"roe v wade" Discussed on Cape Up with Jonathan Capehart

"Democrat and both chambers of the legislature are democratic. So the idea of a tussle between Democrats and Republicans dominated chambers in Illinois, roe goes down is not in the offing. So probably go ahead. But we had a Republican governor just prior to me. And there was a tussle. And it was over this HB 40. The previous Republican governor threatened to veto HB 40. That was the bill that would remove the trigger law in Illinois. And he threatened for months to veto that Bill. He received a lot of backlash. I mean, there was a lot of protest. I was one of those protesters. And I showed up at his office with thousands of postcards from people across the state to let him know that if he did this, that the people of Illinois don't agree with the position that he was taking. Now he ultimately was forced into signing it. But that tussle would exist, you're absolutely right. If we didn't have the democratic and pro choice trifecta, as you know, just being a Democrat doesn't mean that you're pro choice. We saw that in the United States Senate. There is one member of the United States Senate who refused to vote in favor of a woman's right to choose. There's another who's not pro choice, but voted for the bill. And that was the courageous position to protect women's rights. But for folks who are watching, you are sitting in front of a banner that says JB pritzker dot com, clearly you are running for reelection this fall. There's a divide between you and any of your potential Republican opponents when it comes to the abortion issue. So I'm just wondering, how do you think the abortion issue will play out politically in the Republican primary, which is coming up on June 28th? It's a great question. We will see what I can tell you is that every candidate on the Republican side wants to take away a woman's right to choose. Every one of them. They've all pledged to do that. To varying degrees, they're some that want it that even believe that women should be forced to take a baby to term, even in the case of rape or incest. So it's a radical agenda that they've got on the right and I think that because of the draft opinion, you're seeing people wake up to the idea that more and more your decisions about who you're going to vote for need to include the question, is this person going to stand up for my reproductive freedom? Is this person going to stand up for the broad set of privacy rights that were established in roe V wade if roe V wade is overturned? And that's becoming a major issue, even in Illinois. We've had big protests all across Chicago. That was just at one last Saturday and they're having another one this Saturday. I don't think it's going to stop and I think you're going to see a tsunami across the country of people who support women's rights coming out. And they're not just going to protest..

Illinois JB pritzker roe Senate legislature United States Bill roe V wade Chicago tsunami
"roe v wade" Discussed on CNN Political Briefing

CNN Political Briefing

04:59 min | 2 weeks ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on CNN Political Briefing

"Know in politics for Friday, may 6th. A brand new CNN poll after that bombshell leak out of the Supreme Court tells us just how the roe versus wade decision could impact 2022 politics. Given how long, nearly half a century, the battle over roe versus wade has been happening in the United States, it may not surprise you that in our brand new exclusive CNN poll conducted by SSRS, we find public opinion overall on the issue of whether or not roe should be overturned, has not changed all that much since that bombshell leak of a draft opinion written by justice Alito and apparently having the support of a majority of the Supreme Court Justices, which would entirely overturn roe versus wade. As we knew, it was a 70 30 issue or something in that range and in this brand new poll conducted from May 3rd to May 5th, so entirely after the news emerged about the leak, it is pretty much right there. Two thirds of Americans in this poll, 66% say they do not want to see the Supreme Court overturn roe versus wade 34%, about a third, say they do. So this again is a Supreme Court poised to possibly issue a decision that is wildly unpopular with the American people broadly. But of course, that's not the whole story. We know that this issue enlivens passions on both the right and the left politically. Listen to former vice president Mike Pence. He was in South Carolina yesterday, he was speaking to a crowd at a church and he leaned very hard into hoping that this draft opinion mirrors what the court ultimately decides. Here he is, courtesy of WBTV. My hope and frankly, my prayer. Is that those 5 justices on the Supreme Court that the courage of their convictions? And will give us a fresh start on life in America. Of course, as you might expect, there's a big partisan split in how people respond to whether or not they want to see roe V wade overturned. 88% of Democrats in this new poll say they prefer that the Supreme Court not overturn roe. 71% of independents. They don't want to see roe overturned. Those are enormous majorities of those groups. But it's just 37% of Republicans who don't want to see roe overturned. That's why Mike Pence speaks the way you just heard him speak because he understands he's where the base of his party is as he's thinking about a potential future presidential run. This is also been an issue at the very heart of Mike Pence's political identity for decades. So what might a post row world look like? Well, as you know, Democrats on Capitol Hill are eager to try and pass legislation that codifies roe into law. And that would be broadly popular in the United States, according to our latest poll 59% of Americans strongly or somewhat support Congress establishing a nationwide right to abortion. That's broad public support. You know where that support doesn't exist in the United States Senate. There are not the votes to actually pass that kind of legislation that would codify row into law. But that's not going to stop Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer from trying to do so. This is about a woman's right to choose, fully. We are not looking to compromise something as vital as this. People should show where they stand. This has been American law for 50 years. And this idea that, oh, do a little of this a little of that. Forget it. And by the way, what Schumer may put forth on the floor doesn't seem to have the support of the two female Republican senators who support abortion rights. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. And that's despite Susan Collins coming under some intense pressure for her role in the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch because she expressly said that what they told her in her office, what she heard them say at their confirmation hearings suggested to her that they would not be in favor of a complete and total overhaul overturning of roe V wade. Now, we've heard from Democrats all week long, how they are going to lean into this issue that they see it as a real potential opportunity to take what has been a sort of unenthusiastic Democratic Party out there in this midterm election year. And enliven them, awaken them. Light a fire underneath them with this issue that can bring real passion with it. As an example, listen to vice president Kamala Harris, addressing an Emily's list event that's the group dedicated to electing pro choice democratic women earlier this week. It has never been more clear.

Supreme Court wade Mike Pence justice Alito CNN roe V wade WBTV America roe South Carolina Susan Collins Senate Capitol Hill Chuck Schumer
"roe v wade" Discussed on The Brown Girls Guide to Politics

The Brown Girls Guide to Politics

05:10 min | 3 weeks ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on The Brown Girls Guide to Politics

"It does not. We will continue to get abortions. And then I think there's a parallel strategy. So that's in the immediate aftermath of row being overturned, which again they've explicitly said they will do. And then the long term, we need to have a long game. Like, what is our long game? We never have a long game. We're like, oh no, oh no, this guy is falling. The sky is falling. No, we need to have a long game. And as we have said, so many times. The long game is changing the wording of the constitution. What we are losing is unenumerated rights, not just the right to privacy, which covers abortion, but we're losing the they want to take explicitly. In the decision, they call into question Lawrence, be Texas, which legalizes same sex relationships. The Alito specifically and explicitly calls in to question obergefell, legalizing same sex marriage. So these things are on the chopping block, we are losing unenumerated rights. And so we need to enumerate them. We need to enumerate equality in the constitution. Are there other examples it feels to me like the other examples of the court overturning a major decision like this in such a scathing way or just generally overturning such an established decision, the only examples I can think of are in favor of progress. How do we sort of, I guess some of this goes to what you're saying of needing to fall out of love with the Supreme Court. But how do you are there other examples you can think of of the other way around or how do we sort of think about this in the broader perspective of the history of the Supreme Court? So one thing that I was talking about with a friend who is more moderate than I am on these things and has a lot of angst about people who voted third party was this issue of the Electoral College. You know, I've been hearing a lot from some folks that, oh, well, we wouldn't have been here if people had elected Hillary. And my viewpoint is that one, people did elect Hillary. The popular vote elected Hillary. The system is what is flawed. The Electoral College emerged out of slavery politics and policies, that benefit white male landowners, just like roe V wade benefits, cis het white male landowners, and they are using a document created in 1776 with all of the cultural and political conditions they had then.

Alito Lawrence Supreme Court Texas Electoral College Hillary roe V wade
"roe v wade" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

The Doug Collins Podcast

04:36 min | 3 weeks ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

"Roe V wade? Here's also a start of the I need to tell you. If you listened many times to the conversations that go on around the court's picks and the president's picks on the court over the last 50 years, they have determined that roe V wade is the ultimate litmus test. It was not as bad necessarily in the 80s and 90s. It was still there, but it has grown tremendously in the last 25 years. Here's the interesting fact for you. The court takes up maybe, maybe Supreme Court. One to two cases every ten years in abortion. Maybe. It's so important, however, that people put all of their determination on who should be a Supreme Court Justice on how they actually interpret roe V wade and would they be willing to overturn it. I think in many ways, this has become a disservice to the court. I think it is something with the court that deals with all areas of our life, not just this one, which is so vitally important, which I believe they got wrong to start with, and I'm freely cite that in this podcast. I think when you deal with it, it is made the court impose its judicial activist will own a nation that was already dealing with this in the political realm. If you take this out away from the people, if you take this away and say that the court is going to imply this, especially in this instance, when you were actually moving forward, this is what is called. Now you can agree or disagree, but you can't disagree with the facts. This states and we name them all from 1967 home through 1970 other for continuing it, even up until the passage of the court decision roe V wade were adding to abortion rights in this country. Much of the Sagan of those in the pro life movement at the time, which was when nacy and which were really nonexistent because he'd never been a need to at this point, but as they were making progress in legislatures, they chose to take it and hopper speed it up into the courts, courts made it applicable to the country. Then you have the problem in which we face today in which everything surrounding the United States Supreme Court typically starts and ends with what is the justices view on abortion. And this is really where we come. Now, since roe V wade, there was a couple of cases that began to roll back some of roe V wade strengthen it in some ways also take away from it. Casey Planned Parenthood case, this was instituted what will be known as the undue burden test. And that is, if a state could number one state could begin to put restrictions on the access to abortions, whether that be through access to clinics, access to hospitals, access to ultrasounds. I mean, you start building on this progression, parental consent, all of this that would be weighed into this. The question was after Casey, Casey uphill the tenants of roe V wade, but then said that if anything was to affect any of these parts in any of this time of the pregnancy, so to speak, the viability issued these other things that it hadn't made the undue undue burden test. Was it an undue burden on the person, the female to enact her right to terminate a pregnancy? Now, over time, you also had court cases that ruled that the father right or was they had no rise in the choice of abortion and others. Now, before though, I do need to get back a twin decision that also opened this up a great deal on roe V wade with dovey Bolton dough was the same day. It doesn't get the attention that roe does, but it's very important because it defined health of a mother is including all aspects of health psychological mental physical spiritual all aspects. So that basically opens it up for anyone when you say that you can have an abortion based on mental health or anything else, this is where dough comes in and says, look, that's a valid reason to restrict it because that you then run up later in the Casey case, the Casey Planned Parenthood case has to undo burn and how does that affect how someone would get an abortion now when you understand that for those this becomes a semantics exercise on how you actually define life of a mother? Is it health of a mother or life of a mother? Those are two distinctions. Dough made it very clear that health of a mother, it would include anything. Even if they just basically were depressed and wanted to get an abortion, that was a valid grounds of health of a mother. Life of a mother being a different story. So I needed to go back and pick that piece up.

roe V wade Roe V wade Supreme Court Casey dovey Bolton United States Casey Planned Parenthood roe
"roe v wade" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:58 min | 6 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"So overturning roe versus wade wouldn't say that it would outlaw abortion. It would say that states don't have to make abortion legal. Is that correct? Well, yeah, that's right. That states are allowed to prohibit abortion. It would not itself prove abortion. It's merely the original roe V wade was overturning a state law that had prohibited abortion. Right. So that's the question. And again, I mean, that gets to kind of a central question of our federal assistant, which is and also our democratic system, one that courts generally don't insert themselves in those policy issues that outside of a narrow set of defined rights that are not subject to democratic debate, things like free speech. Other things in that are left up to legislatures and to the states. And that's ultimately what the end result of this would be. That to be able to return to the states. Now, that also could lead to it would make abortion. It wouldn't reduce the political saliency of abortion. That would be a very, very politically salient issue in the world where roe versus wade was overturned because suddenly, you know, we go from the world where legislators are sort of impotent and can't do anything to the world where it is on legislators to determine whether abortion is legal in their state. And more accountable to the people. In Mississippi, it's a popular position to try and put limitations and try to outlaw abortion in New York, obviously it isn't. Now my goal would be to obviously have the federal court eventually step in and say no abortion is unconstitutional. But this is a pretty good step in the right. This is a pretty substantial step in the right direction. One minute we'll talk about how and I want to pick this up in the next segment. How much we've moved on this issue in the last 20 years, 20 years ago, if you would have said that a debate like this was happening, people would have said you were nuts. Yeah, I mean, one you have a court really moving to the right decidedly thanks to president Trump and his confirmations. I also think unlike many other major social issues where I think there's been major advances from the left, they haven't really made nature advances if anything they've lost ground this issue. And that would be different from something like gay marriage, for instance, which went from being completely illegal and unpopular to the law of the land. So I think that's really a mark where the social conservative movement has had a great deal of success ultimately. And I think we're about to see the culmination of it as I said. I think rose about to be overturned in this decision. The real estate market is extremely hot right now. People are taking advantage of low interest rates and economic uncertainty by investing in real assets. Whether you are first time buyer or just looking to make a change, the key is to get in the property you want is being pre qualified and having cash in hand. That's why you guys, all of us myself included I had to stop doing this. I had to stop using the big banks. I used a big bank for a loan previously. It was a disaster. It took forever, not to mention, I go look at their score on second vote dot com. Like, wow, my loan helped fund.

roe V wade wade president Trump federal court Mississippi New York
"roe v wade" Discussed on TIME's Top Stories

TIME's Top Stories

03:43 min | 7 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on TIME's Top Stories

"We were always fighting restrictions that are burdensome and make it harder to access reproductive healthcare. Says Nancy northup, the president and CEO of the center for reproductive rights. But not flat out bans. The boldness of the restrictions. The fact that we are litigating at the Supreme Court, the question about whether roe V wade should be overturned was nowhere on the horizon, 19 years ago. As the challenge is to abortion access have become more pronounced. Rickman's experience is accumulated. Julie has a first rate legal mind, but she doesn't have a trace of arrogance about it. Northup says it makes her an incredibly effective advocate because she is not letting any kind of Vigo get in the way of the way that she argues in the courtroom. Concerning for the rule of law. For decades, abortion opponents have worked closely with conservative lawmakers at the state level to limit abortion in a variety of ways. They have, for example, put in place an array of requirements, ostensibly aimed at protecting patient safety, but that really make it difficult for doctors to practice and for clinics to stay open. Abortion rights advocates call those trap laws. Target regulation of abortion providers laws. But over the years, efforts to reduce and ban access to abortion have gotten less subtle. Instead of adding facility requirements or mandating hospital admitting privileges, the subjects of the past two abortion related Supreme Court cases, lawmakers recently have sought to impose gestational bans and to revisit the idea of when life begins. Those laws go straight at the question of whether and at what point abortions should be illegal at all. Changing the viability standard, the central holding in row would not only upend the 1973 decision. It would also give states a green light to revisit dozens of other abortion laws that have been blocked over the years. One of the basic principles of the rule of law is stare decisis, says Rickman. You don't change precedent unless there's a really good reason unless there has been some really fundamental shift a real change in fact a major change in the law. And none of that has happened. For the court to reverse itself here for this right would just be deeply concerning for the rule of law. That's exactly what this Mississippi case is asking the Supreme Court to do. In a brief this summer, Mississippi attorney general Lynn Fitch asked the court to overturn row arguing that changes in science and society have rendered the precedent decades out of date and that the controversy over row has damaged the court. The national fever on abortion can break only when this court returns abortion policy to the states. The brief said. Rick will and other abortion rights advocates disagree with that logic. If row were overturned, abortion would become illegal, either immediately or very quickly, in roughly half the states in the nation. The center is currently litigating 32 cases, and as clients in 25 states, without the viability line, state legislatures would likely pass more laws restricting abortion and this work would multiply exponentially northup says, creating even more unequal access between conservative and liberal states..

Nancy northup roe V wade Northup Rickman Supreme Court center for reproductive rights Vigo Julie Lynn Fitch Mississippi Rick northup
"roe v wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

BrainStuff

04:13 min | 8 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

"Both roe v wade and planned parenthood v casey so let's talk about precedence. They're considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving similar facts or legal issues. The concept called stereo decisiveness. Which means let the decision stand in. Latin provide stability and predictability in law when a new president is established or laws changed on an issue. It's known as a landmark decision olym- quiz said president is one of the cornerstones of our judicial system. The system of president provides that when courts make decisions in those decisions become law they will remain on the books until that same court or an appellate court overrules those precedents a judges and justices often rely on precedents to make rulings and other cases. A for example. Five justices relied on the precedent. Set by casey when striking down a louisiana law that would have required doctors performing abortions to have emissions privileges at a state authorized hospital within thirty miles. Forty eight kilometers of the clinic. The supreme court can overturn in existing precedent with the majority vote. And this happens perhaps surprisingly more often the general public realizes about two to three times a term linquist says though these cases unlike row aren't ones that make the news. If roe is ultimately ended the aftershocks would be felt immediately eleven states have trigger laws in place that would instantly ban abortions conversely fourteen states plus washington. Dc have laws in place to protect abortion access. Overturning roe would also add strength to texas's sp eight law linquist says however if roe is upheld quote it will have major implications for the texas case simply because it will reaffirm the core right to abortion prior to viability. The supreme court isn't likely to deliver a decision in the mississippi case until these spring or early summer of twenty twenty two..

roe v wade casey linquist roe louisiana supreme court texas washington mississippi
"roe v wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

BrainStuff

08:25 min | 8 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on BrainStuff

"Of iheartradio. Hey brain stuff lauren. Bogo bomb here nearly fifty years ago the. Us supreme court made one of its most controversial rulings with its landmark decision in roe v wade. The ruling declared that states criminalizing. Abortion violates a woman's right to due process meaning a woman has the right to choose whether to terminate a pregnancy with limited government restrictions. Until that point. Nearly all fifty states outlawed abortion except in cases to save a woman's life or health or in situations such as rape incest or fetal anomaly in the years since that landmark decision state legislators have made numerous attempts to chip away at abortion rights through ballot measures and legislative moves and together have passed more than one thousand three hundred restrictions on abortion. Dozens more are currently making their way through state legislatures but the president set by roe. V wade and its progeny case planned parenthood v. casey remain intact however a mississippi case set to be reviewed. This fall by the supreme court holds the potential to shake the very foundation. Upon which these cases stand the aftershocks. Of which will either strengthen or reshape the future of abortion rights in america it began on january twenty second of nineteen seventy-three when by vote of seven to to. The supreme court legalized abortion in the us. Under roe v wade. The court's judgment was based on the decision that a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy fell under the freedom of personal choice and family matters protected by the fourteenth amendment to the us constitution. The case created the trimester system. Which says states cannot impose any restrictions on women choosing to terminate their pregnancies during the first trimester. Though it does allow some government limits in the second trimester states can restrict or ban abortions in the last trimester once the fetus becomes able to live outside the womb however roe v wade also established that in the final trimester. A woman could obtain an abortion if doctors certified that is necessary to save the life or health of the woman in nineteen ninety two. The supreme court made another landmark decision in planned parenthood v. Casey in that case the court upheld a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion established by row but also applied the undue burden standard for abortion restrictions establishing that no laws should be too burdensome or restrictive of one's fundamental rights. There have been numerous challenges to roe. And casey through the years that the supreme court has struck down including a ban after six weeks in north dakota and ban after twelve weeks in arkansas. The court also struck down two thousand sixteen texas law that impeded clinics abilities to perform abortions earlier this year however texas lawmakers found a way to get around the supreme court at least for now at midnight on september. First of twenty twenty one. The nation's strictest abortion law went into effect in the state known as the fetal heartbeat bill or sp eight the law bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. That is six weeks after a person's last menstrual cycle which is before most people know they're pregnant and far earlier than legally provided by roe v. Wade what makes texas's law different from others is that it's enforceable only through private civil action. Essentially that means that the law empowers citizens to sue abortion providers or anyone who helps another person get an abortion or even intends to assist someone after a so called fetal heartbeat has been detected a which the bill defines as cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the station sack. Although biologically the hardest we know it has not developed by six weeks so it's not really a heartbeat but rather the just coordinating effects of a small group of cardiac cells. The person suing does not have to be connected to the person considering the abortion or to a provider or even live in the state of texas if the accuser wins their case the person or entity being sued would have to pay the accuser or accusers. At least ten thousand dollars as well as costs for attorney's fees according to the law an independent abortion provider in texas called whole women's health then challenged the law in an emergency application to the supreme court on the grounds at the six week ban was unconstitutional. The supreme court remained mute on the subject until hours before the law went into effect. Issuing an unsigned opinion consisting of a single long paragraph that stated the abortion providers failed to make their case. Though chief justice. John roberts who was appointed by republican president. George w bush and left leaning justices steven briar elena. Kagan 'em sonia. Sotomayor dissented a for the article. This episode is based on. How stuff works. Spoke with stephanie lindquist. A foundation professor of law and political science at arizona state university and the recognized expert on the supreme court and she explained that the texas law was able to skirt a supreme court review at this juncture quote because it relies on private actors to enforce the law as opposed to state officials. And no one yet has enforced. It accords are very reluctant to resolve cases that have not yet reached a concrete dispute however the us department of justice has a different source of standing. She explains on september ninth of twenty twenty one. The department of justice sued texas on behalf of us citizens on the grounds that texas's abortion law is a violation of federal law attorney. General merrick garland said during a news conference quote. The act is clearly unconstitutional under longstanding. Supreme court precedent the justice department filed the lawsuit in the western district of texas and seeks permanent injunction. But the case will likely eventually make its way to the supreme court when roh went into effect in nineteen seventy three the majority of the court comprised republican appointed justices. Even justice harry blackmun. Who wrote the roe. V wade opinion had been appointed by republican president richard nixon. Since then linquist said the ideological orientation toward abortion has changed. The republican party is now firmly entrenched as the party that opposes abortion before president. Donald trump took office in two thousand seventeen. He vowed to appoint justices to the supreme court to overturn roe. V wade justice anthony. Kennedy's retirement in two thousand eighteen and ruth bader ginsburg's death in september twenty twenty allowed trump to do so with conservative pittsburgh. Cavanaugh and amy coney baratz the supreme court now has a six to three conservative majority with all six having taken hostile positions against abortion at one point or another since roe was decided. Legislators in conservative states have pressed to impose additional restrictions on abortion. But linquist says they now see a window of opportunity with the personnel changes at the supreme court quote a with the majority of justices being catholic and most of them being appointed by republican presidents. The assumption is that now is the time strike while the iron is hot. Legislation can finally get the supreme court. Where roh could be challenged and struck down another such opportunity to entice the supreme court to revisit roe. V wade presented itself in dobbs v jackson women's health organization. This case stems from a law passed by the mississippi legislature in two thousand eighteen that banned abortions after the fifteen th week of pregnancy jackson women's health organization the only licensed abortion provider in mississippi challenged the law's constitutionality after a us district court and the us district court of appeals for the fifth circuit sided with the clinic. Mississippi took the case to the supreme court on may seventeenth of thousand twenty one. The supreme court announced it would review the case. This fall the outcome of which could impact the precedents set by.

supreme court roe v wade texas us casey roe justice department wade lauren steven briar elena stephanie lindquist linquist mississippi Casey merrick garland north dakota arkansas Wade harry blackmun
"roe v wade" Discussed on WORLD OVER

WORLD OVER

04:14 min | 8 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on WORLD OVER

"Should this question of abortion be in our core and if they say no and it goes back to the states. That means that states like louisiana where i live and about twelve or thirteen other states that have past state constitutional amendments to say. There's no abortion. There's no tax funding of abortion that we can have the will of the people expressed to support women to support alternatives to abortion and to support unborn children during the we'll science. And what learned since nineteen seventy-three. Will that at all shape the outcome here because it really is a question of viability and now we have a body of scientific evidence. Ultrasounds that that demonstrate clearly. Yes you know As we had in the louisiana case last year before the supreme court and in cases that we've had throughout the decades. There will be solid scientific evidence submitted in amicus briefs by medical organizations showing whatever second grader knows. Which is that an individual human life comes into being at the moment of sperm egg fusion. This is a human being and the The rhetoric of row where the court said at this stage in our development. We don't know whether this is a human life because there's disagreements amongst religions and philosophers. Well this is not a religious question. It's a simple matter of biology. This is a human being states. Have the power to protect human beings and they should be able to do so in a brief filed in july the mississippi attorney general. Lynn fitch argues that roe v wade was quote egregiously wrong and should be overturned the conclusion that abortion is a constitutional right has no basis in text structure history or tradition. She writes now. Abortion rights supporters argue that the supreme court should have dismissed this case to render because abortion is already defined as a constitutional right. Here your reaction. So what the other side. The abortion industry is. Arguing is the principle of stara. You've already decided this court. It was fifty years ago until you have to stick with it. And so what they're arguing is that in. Unjust wrongly decided decision that snubbed. Its nose at our whole. Political process should take precedence over the constitution itself. That's not how it works. If that's the case then we should say that. Dread scott the decision of the supreme court saying that that slaves are Property should be upheld because we have that for many years. Komatsu were the supreme court. The supreme court upheld putting in interment camps american citizens of japanese origin. A plethora of wrongly decided unjust gravely immoral decisions. Cannot you know well have been doing wrong this whole time. That means to have a right to do a wrong. That's not how the constitution works. And i believe that a majority of this court understand that during her time on the court justice. Saturday o'connor made most of the arguments against viability..

louisiana supreme court Lynn fitch roe v wade mississippi Komatsu scott connor
"roe v wade" Discussed on Factually! with Adam Conover

Factually! with Adam Conover

03:27 min | 8 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Factually! with Adam Conover

"For creating this law But of course it. It went to the supreme court. The supreme court refused to block it. Can you just walk us through the reasoning that the justices that were in the minority in the majority. Excuse me used to come up with a decision. Yes so how it started. Essentially the some abortion providers in texas sued and they argued. The law was unconstitutional. Which pretty clearly. The substance of the laws unconstitutional because advance abortion two weeks after ms period which is not what roe v wade says roe v. Wade says you have a right to choose abortion until ability which is like around the twenty four th week so they had to figure out who to sue though right because you can't you can't see the state and listen official is enforcing the law. So they just decided they were going to sue lots of judges. Lots of people. They thought were going to bring lawsuits just sort of trying to cover all their bases and the supreme court looked at it and said well. We don't really know if any of these people are going to enforce the law at this point and texas has said none of the state officials are going to enforce the law. And you haven't really proven that that's not true so you don't have a right to be in federal court even if this laws unconstitutional. You still need to be able to sue the right person to prove it and you haven't shown that you can do that and that's why the law got to go into effect now. It may be a game changer. If someone in texas actually violates the law and get sued because if they do that they're going to be in a specific court with a specific judge and it's gonna to be pretty clear that that judges holding a trial and making them painting. That's so at that point. It'll be clear who's doing the enforcing but this early on it wasn't really clear era. At least that's what the supreme court said and so our as the court said. Whoa this is such a crazy law..

supreme court roe v wade texas Wade
"roe v wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

02:42 min | 9 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

"Republican candidates have been telling me for as long as i can remember that they want to overrule roe v. Wade they want to appoint justices who will overrule roe. V wade on. There are six justices on the supreme court right now who have said in their own writings in one form or another that that they disagree with current abortion press president some of them said explicitly. They want to overrule roe. V wade but there are six justices who have said in their precedents that they think that cases like and casey were wrongly decided. And i believe that you know i believe donald trump when. He told me that his justices would vote to overrule roe v wade. I believe the justices who've been saying in dissenting opinions for many years that they would overrule roe v wade. I believe that when justice barrett signed a letter while she was still a law professor attacking abortion rights. And you know and saying that you she she should work to get rid of abortions that she was telling the truth. You know the only thing that i'm doing here and again like i could be surprised. I shouldn't speak with absolute certainty. But i am taking them at their word. My guest is ian mill heiser. Who covers the supreme court for. Vox this afternoon. After we recorded the interview the justice department announced it's filing a lawsuit to challenge texas's restrictive abortion law. We'll hear more of my interview with ian millhauser after a break. I'm terry gross. And this is fresh air. Let's get back to my interview with ian mill. Heiser who has been writing about the recent supreme court order allowing restrictive texas abortion law to go into effect. He's also been writing about the courts. Voting rights decisions the increasing use of the shadow docket and the courts. Larger moved to the right in his new book. The agenda how a republican supreme court is reshaping america. He writes that while congress has become increasingly polarized and dysfunctional. The supreme court has become the locus of policy making in the us and the policies are largely conservative. Three of the six conservative justices were appointed by president. Trump millhauser says some of the courts least understood and most arcane decisions are fundamentally reshaping our nation. He's a senior for. Vox where he focuses on the supreme court the constitution and threats to liberal democracy in the us. Millhauser is a lawyer and clerked for judge of the. Us court of appeals for the sixth circuit. So if the supreme court either.

roe v wade supreme court ian mill heiser ian millhauser Wade donald trump ian mill Heiser wade casey barrett terry gross republican supreme court texas justice department Trump millhauser us congress Millhauser Us court of appeals
"roe v wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

03:30 min | 9 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Fresh Air

"The court is kind of unconstitutional. So we're going to not allow us law to stamp the absolutely. They could have done that the your they could've you know like just suggested they could have said we did. Sue a state official. Who enforces the law. You sued a state judge. But yes i mean the ultimate point here is exactly what you said. This law was drafted in order to frustrate judicial review. It was drafted in order to prevent anyone from being able to suit a block. It and that's a really frightening prospect. I mean imagine if the texas governor had passed a law saying that anyone who criticizes me can be me. The texas governor can be sued obvious violation of the first amendment. I can't imagine a court would tolerate a law like that. So i think at least part of the story here. Is that the reason why. The supreme court was willing to tolerate this weird rube goldberg method of getting around the way that courts normally function is. Because there's now majority on the supreme court that opposes abortion rights. And they wanted to see this antiabortion law go into effect. So what would a challenge to this restrictive. Texas law look like who could challenge it. Under what circumstances so the way that things work now. After the supreme court's order is that someone has to wait until after they are sued and then once they are sued under the law. They can then go to court as the defendant and say your honor my defense to this lawless. That it's unconstitutional It's not lawful to ban abortion under roe v. Wade therefore this lawsuit should be thrown out there several problems to that approach. I mean one is like i said i think there's a very high likelihood that the supreme court is about to overrule roe v wade and if that happens. That defense doesn't work anymore. The other problem with it is that this law authorizes any person except for texas employees literally any person you don't have to be a texan. You don't have to be in any you don't have to know the person you're subic. Any person can sue an abortion provider. And so if someone violates the law in order to set up a test case where they can then go to court and say your honor. This laws unconstitutional. You should throw this lawsuit out. The probably not going to be sued one time they might be sued by thousands or tens of thousands of people. Because again anyone can file a lawsuit and to defend against those lawsuits. You need hire lawyers. Lawyers are expensive. You need to go to every single court in which you are sued and that could be courts all throughout taxes and that's extraordinarily expensive. The mere prospect of having to defend against this law could wind bankrupting and abortion clinic. So the person being sued has to pay a lot in court fees. Meanwhile the person suing them might get ten thousand dollars for their effort. So it's yeah Yeah exactly like the i mean. The person who is bringing the lawsuit will have some fees presumably will hire their own lawyer. You know they have to file a filing fee. It's not like you can bring a lawsuit for free. But the person being sued might be sued thousands of times you know there might be seven thousand lawsuits against them..

supreme court texas roe v wade rube goldberg Wade subic Texas
"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

09:21 min | 9 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"You have to show that it prevented or place to substantial obstacle in the path of the plaintiffs of you or another group of women and again. That's the language in the statute from getting an abortion but not you may not establish an undue burden by demonstrating that an award will prevent women from obtaining support or assistance financial otherwise from others in their effort to obtain an abortion or arguing. We're attempting to demonstrate an award against other defendants or other. Potential defendants will impose an undue burden on women seeking an abortion in other words. It makes it almost impossible for you. To argue that restriction is an undue burden and continuing the ex-post factory stuff The end of two. Oh nine also says hey and by the way this affirmative defense is not available if the us supreme court overturns it's specifically says quote. If the supreme court overrules roe v wade planned parenthood versus casey regardless of whether the conduct on which the cause of action is based under section to await occurred before the supreme court overruled either of those decisions. So there is not a sane universe in which this law is constitutional. Welcome to the monkey house. I'm speechless. I don't even know what to do. That's right like what can we do about this. Nothing we can pack the court that is it really missed all wrote this article about how we can have roving gangs of federally funded free abortions. No we can't. We can't do that. I'm all for it right like okay. Well actually i mean okay. Yeah what about that. What about a federal thing. Federal row a federal. Whatever if you could pass you absolutely could pass a federal law that occupies the field. That says i see the connection to interstate. Commerce is obvious but then again right if i be versus sibelius yeah. The healthcare is pretty much Interstate commerce and roberts said no. It wasn't in that case too. So you know so who knows. But but yeah if congress were to pass a bill and nancy pelosi says she intends to introduce legislation to do that get guarantees a federal right to reproductive health services. That absolutely would if written properly supersede these laws. But you can't pass that law without blowing up the filibuster and you know it's just so important to have the filibuster because we don't have that. Then what do we have. you know. Have a country if you don't have the being filibuster if you are not outside if you live in arizona and you're not outside kirstin cinemas office right now saying Can can we blow up the filibuster. Now do that. That's what's left right. if you're asking what can we do. The answer is step one blood the filibuster and then we can talk about what we can do. And even then there's still a lot of problems even then it's still an uphill battle. It is zero battle. We do not even have squirt gums without the filibuster. So man i i seriously. I don't even know what to say. This is just. It's a by the way one last. Because i because i took notes of all the like people who were way more optimistic than me going like and so there's some bad memes going around twitter of like well see now what we should do. Is you should pass. Vigilantes get to enforce gun control in new york and then the supreme court won't enjoy that from going into effect began and the answer is guests. They would what are you talking about. The whole point is being on the shadow docket. is that decisions not to grant injunctive. Relief have zero precedential value and are not binding. That's the whole point. So there's no way they would be like. Oh god what liberals you've got us right. No this is this a supreme court. That's writing the rules as they go along and they intend to write it in such a way to reach conservative outcomes. And you know we don't even have. We not learned our lesson. It's raw power that's all it is. It's do we have the power or do we not. No there's no legal nuance. There's no trick that's going to save us that we have to regain power that's it that's the only thing. Yeah and you know. It doesn't help that not voting we again. We're where we are now. There's a whole lot of reasons. We're here but lest anyone think. This is a reason to not participate in the system. This is what happens when you don't participate in the system. It is you know if if your solution by quit okay. This is what happens people. A lot of people said well. I quit in two thousand fourteen. And we lost the senate and that was huge arguably trump might not have been elected because of things that would have been apparent about the tampering an investigations into him. Who knows we would have had one more supreme court justice that made huge difference in later cases and a whole lot of people didn't participate in two thousand sixteen. They set up now. They're just the same practically the same as my fault that you didn't give me a good candidate. I'm gonna participate as recline a huge fan of ezra klein. He just didn't ask me anything episode and one of the things he talked about. He wasn't related to this per se. It was actually related to veganism not to go down that rabbit trail now but one thing he said is that we should think of ourselves as moral contagious. And that's how we should think about my vote. Andrew your vote honestly yeah. It doesn't do a whole lot. It's a it's one vote but like our influence your social influence listeners. That that spreads my individual vegetarianism decision. Doesn't really do a whole lot. No one person's actions do a whole lot but think of yourselves as immoral contagion think of yourselves as having a point of view having opinion having a stance that can spread and what happened was a lot of people have been moral contagion for apathy for no point participating for whatever and while we may agree on some things about how shitty the system is absolutely. There's no other answer than we have to take back control within the system so be immoral contagion for getting out there and participating because this is what happens when we don't and now a bar question i don't know what else are we doing. All right. find. No socialist firm has ever failed the bar exam. No kidding and now for some sense of normalcy to return to our lives andrew. I'll try to answer question like the violinist on the titanic. You know get it all. Just keep doing my trick for anybody who cares to wants to hear a bar question this week. Ra thomas and Just so our listeners. Know and for those who are following you and maybe sympathetic when we change up or questions sources new source for this one. A local bartender owns black acre. Which is an undead undeveloped. Piece of property next to his bar on march one the bartender conveyed acre to an investor who paid value and wanted to build an apartment complex on the property. The investor did not immediately record his interest. Let me stop you right there. Answer e whatever the the supreme court thing whatever. The howler monkeys on the supreme court want. That's the answer. Dan of bar cool. You admitted that way this bar exam question. it's going to become like lord of the rings trivia. Yeah okay. We'll go to this imaginary land where the la- where the law matters where the constitutional matters well travel into your tolkien. Ask imaginary land andrew to answer a question just for fun just for all time sake all right here. We go property law on march wahad the bartender conveyed black acre to an investor who paid value in wanted to build an apartment complex on the property the investor did not immediately record his interest On april one. The bartender sold the still undeveloped blacking to his son. The son did not know about the conveyance to the investor the sun immediately recorded the deed. Interesting on may one. The investor recorded the deed and had a construction company. Start digging on the site on june one. The sun salt black acre to his friend on july one. The bartender died his will left black acre to his brother who immediately recorded the deed on august. Sitcoms it is. This really is on august one. The friend recorded the deed. The jurisdiction has a race notice recording statute what action i need another race of all these people in an action to quiet title who will have priority rights to black acre race notice yup recording statute so. This is pointless question all it is do. I know what race notice requiring statute is. And i don't so i already don't like this new source a the investor..

supreme court roe v wade kirstin cinemas nancy pelosi casey roberts ezra klein congress arizona twitter new york senate andrew Andrew wahad thomas Dan la
"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

06:21 min | 9 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"Votes for get rid of abortion no matter how unprecedented our procedures. No matter what right. that's just five votes. Four stop abortion. We don't care about the details. Whatever whatever the hell they may be. I don't want even our listeners to to be sort of distracted by the legal ease their let me parse in plain english. What's happened the majority. I mean the howler. Monkey neal gorsuch. Whoever wrote this says in what i read to you. Hey without the crazy bounty hunter stuff. That's in texas eight. This would be a slam. Dunk case for an injunction. It's super clear on the law right. He says that. At the beginning the applicants now before us have raised serious questions regarding the constitutionality of texas law issue but it also presents the complex and novel antecedent procedural questions. I e the civil bounty hunter stuff. So that's why we're not sure we have standing. Let me make this crystal clear as i possibly. Can you do not take a slam. Dunk case for an injunction even crazier stuff right and then somehow make it less likely. That should be enjoyed right. Xactly dish should just be this underlying laws blatantly unconstitutional by the way the implementing mechanism is also of merit itself and is almost certainly ex post facto. Put up in in that and so yeah we would enjoy this. We join this if the state were enforcing it we it gets double secret. Extra enjoined right now. That's what any normal sensible court with an idol with i hasten to predict how antonin scalia would have voted in this case. I kinda think we would have a chance of picking off. Scalia right like it is with with leading this part of it right. Rob roy part. Yeah right until they actually vote to overturn roe. Because that's all we're talking right procedural bs before. They actually decide to do what they wanna do. But but i. so yes. But i wanna tell you when i started the show. What you're wrapping up as procedural. Ps what. i would call the rule of law that if the sorry. When i say don't know what they are using procedural language gets to do this kind of what i mean by that and what i mean is look as bad for example as dc. Heller is at least that required antonin scalia to put pen to paper to put fingers to keyboard and commemorate for all time for history for legal scholars to the arguments to analyze right. What his argument is and by doing that. That opened the way for kobe. Versus hawkin the fourth circuit case. They said look. We're just parsing your words man and you said no obviously the the the the second amendment doesn't protect weapons right right you set that so we took that as this is there will be language. And i'm gonna tell you in the next segment right. The case that will be decided in april or may of twenty twenty two that that will overturn roe v wade but there will be language in that opinion that will help us understand the arguments we need to make before this and other courts. Yeah this does not give us that. It just says and by the way florida has already announced. Hey we're gonna pass that texas statute thing core have you. Don't think every pro you know every state in which republicans control the state legislature and. The governorship is not rushing out to do the same thing. Then you don't know pro-life activists. Maybe this a good time to kind of migrate over to what i expected the supreme court to expected the supreme court even this supreme court to enjoin the texas statute. And then they. They've already taken up case we've talked about it and we talked about this in episodes four twenty seven and four ninety two. It's a case called dobbs versus jackson women's health center. It has to do with an alabama law that bars abortion after sixteen weeks. And by the way that alabama law is stayed right exact same it's the fifth circuit came all the way up to the supreme court and the supreme court like. Yeah obviously you can't ban abortion at sixteen weeks Six down right just didn't pick the magic number up. The alabama law is stayed. Could not possibly go into effect because it blatantly contradicts plant while they made the mistake of. Not saying this'll be enforced via mind. Ray or something confusing if they said. I guess. it's fine now. Abortion is banned at sixteen weeks and by the way like. We're going to release packs of chimpanzee. Young's yeah yeah exac- yep diet means it's fine in october two thousand eight. The residents of the valley view apartment complex in redmond washington held a halloween party. Dozens of people in costume mingled drank and danced but before the night was over one of them was murdered. The police had a suspect. His story kept changing but his dna was at the crime scene when he finally came in for questioning. The detectives felt like they were a breath away from a confession. But it didn't happen and so. The police focused their attention on another man. A man with criminal record whose dna was also found at the crime scene and he just so happened to be the only black man at the party. Suspect is a new true crime miniseries about cutting edge forensic science and mislaid justice about race and policing and ultimately the kinds of weighty decisions that cops and prosecutors make everyday decisions that once made change lives forever and are almost impossible to reverse and i gotta say i love podcast that will further drive home the fact that maybe the criminal justice system is imperfect maybe a lot of it is based on you know happening to only be the the one black man at a party at a place. I love that about suspect. And if you are a true crime and if you're a fan of criminal justice reform you should check out the suspect. Podcast from wondering no spoilers on the show you'll have to listen for yourself and.

neal gorsuch antonin scalia Dunk texas supreme court Versus hawkin roe v wade Rob roy Scalia alabama jackson women's health center Heller kobe dobbs legislature florida redmond Ray washington Young
"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

07:49 min | 9 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"I mean i guess not out of nowhere but like you say broke late even for this supreme court i was surprised and and i'm about to explain it all right. So let's get this right to be opening arguments levels of clear here. The supreme court did not overturn roe. V wade because it did not issue a ruling on the merits. They did not rule on the merits of anything. This is what we call shadow docket. What they did was allow a blatantly unconstitutional law to go into effect before overturning roe v wade which is something they were probably going to do around april or may of next year and as far as i can tell and i spent the better part of the morning looking for counter examples. This is what happened. Today is literally unprecedented in the history of this country. So let me let me give you an example of how this never happens. And let's suppose it's nineteen sixty two. And i'm a poor person in prison. I did not have a lawyer appointed from the time the law the land was case called bets versus brady. Which said yeah. You know you get a court appointed lawyer if it's a capital case or if there are issues with competence sore in know certain extenuating circumstances but just because you're to portable afford a lawyer you don't get one. There was no right to court appointed counsel as mike teach at. Lowe's buy mind every time. Yeah so let's imagine then. I file a habeas petition to the supreme court. And i say yeah. I know betsy brady. But you're about to hear you've already got pending on your docket. Abs petition. From my buddy clarence gideon and you know you guys on the supreme court pretty. It's nineteen sixty two. You're pretty liberal bunch. Some pretty sure you're gonna ruling gideon's favor and you're going to overturn that betts v brady case You're gonna say that everybody gets a right to a lawyer. That's gonna freebie eventually so why not. Just let me out right right right and you know. What did they do. Give gideon v wade. Right right came out in nineteen sixty three and it was nine. Oh right like not. Controversial unanimous overturned. Betsy brady did exactly but yeah this hypothetical petition and by the way there were actual petitions and not to this hypothetical petition. The supreme court would that same super. Liberal supreme court would not have granted relief at that time right. They have granted anticipatory challenges. Still lie yet. They would've said maybe we'll change the law but until then we live in a country with the rule of law and the law says you're not entitled to it. Sorry this is going to be an episode for. We have covered almost every component of this on multiple previous episodes of the show. So episodes twenty. Seven and twenty eight are when we covered the planned parenthood versus casey decision. If you haven't listened to those if you came in like it stormy at stormy daniels maybe come back and listen to twenty seven twenty pretty good and the shadow docket late much later on obviously but the shadow docket with And recital right yup shadow docket. We talked about on episode five seven up. Yeah so all of the components here are things you can search the away website for it. We have covered an in depth. Even if only get this far. what they're doing. It's not just which is already bad enough. It's not just that they're obviously overturning roe. that's already bad. it's that the this is completely unprecedented. I'm so sick of republicans getting to feel like and call themselves. They're just calling balls and strikes balls and strikes they're just constitutional umpires over there and they're doing this a field goal in the middle of a baseball game. I'm not getting so let me break down exactly what happened. Because i think i can make this clear even to uncle frank exactly how radical this is so point number one. Texas passed a law. And we're going to talk about all the provisions of this has. Wow is it a doozy. It's sb eight. That bans abortion after six weeks. Guy point to existing constitutional law is super duper to the ends of the earth. Clear that you cannot do that. Yeah and i am going to quote from planned. Parenthood versus casey five zero five eight thirty three at eight forty five. To forty six quote we are led to conclude this the essential holding of roe. V wade should be retained and once again reaffirmed. It must be stated at the outset and with clarity. This is the supreme court talking that rose essential holding the holding. We reaffirm has three parts and again if you listen to our episodes. They're actually missed. They're actually changing roe. V wade a little bit here but nevertheless this is the law of the land. Good law right now. The central holding of roe v wade as reaffirmed by planned parenthood versus. Casey has three parts. I is a recognition of the right of the woman to choose to have an abortion before viability and obtain it without undue inference without undue interference from the state continuing just in case that's not clear enough before viability. The state's interests are not strong enough to support a prohibition of abortion or the imposition of a substantial obstacle to the woman's effective right to elect a procedure. So that's the law. The law says if it's pre viability you cannot ban abortion. The state's interest is not strong enough. Now if you've listened to the show you know. I don't think viability is a crate. Archea you know. I prefer the original restaurant. But doesn't matter what i think it matter did should matter what the law is right. So the law states cannot prohibit abortion before viability. Sp prohibits abortion before viability. Six weeks way way way before him here go. Oh god. States can't prohibit abortion at six weeks so what happened. what happened. Was what what i expected to happen. Whole women's health and abortion provider in texas. They went to a us district court. Judge ticket the in joint which happened. Because it's obvious because the reason. I said it's obviously in custody show. So then texas appealed to the fifth circuit and the fifth circuit as we have documented at great length hates abortion. It is stacked with antiabortion activists who have bent over backwards to misconstrue laws whenever it comes to upholding the conservative result of that law right and we talked about that at length. And the whole woman's health versus heller steph opinion so fifth circuit hates abortion and they reversed the district court. I wasn't surprised by that either. Then whole women's health appealed to the supreme court and the supreme court then did to fix i is. They did nothing they just sat on the application and let sba go into effect and then belatedly a day later at around midnight last night as of our recording midnight on wednesday they released an opinion that i will read to you in full because that opinion citations included is four hundred eleven words so two thirds of a page about the length that you might expect from a reasonably bright fifth graders book report and so when we explained the shadow docket episode five. But this is what we mean. We mean with no explanation with no analysis without committing to anything imprint. This opinion allowed a blatantly unconstitutional law to go into effect. So there is no discussion of the case. On the merits there was no analysis espy. Eight there is no analysis of row. It does not faked a row. It does not say to casey. It is just procedural but that procedural means that the texas law goes into effect until it is briefed. Argued litigated at the district. Level appealed to the fifth circuit on the merits briefed argues coast to oral argument..

supreme court mike teach betsy brady clarence gideon betts v brady gideon v wade Betsy brady Liberal supreme court wade casey roe v wade gideon brady Lowe daniels us district court baseball frank heller steph Casey
"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

07:04 min | 9 months ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"Is the lowest day in our democracy since one six and And maybe worse than that it is. Everyone knows what we're here to talk about The supreme court overruling roe v wade. Now that is not legally accurate. But that is how you should be describing and we will be describing it that way but it's It's worse than that but that's a level of outrage that you should have. oh boy. yeah this is this is a. This is a bad feeling enter. This feels like back during the previous administration. We'd record a lotta these where it's like all right now really in the mood for funding games like let's let's get to the horror but we haven't had have one of those since as you say i i was gonna reach all the way back in my mind to january of the same year. Yeah so not that long ago but still like it had been nice to not. Have you know complete crumbling of democracy every several days in under the previous administration. But this feels like that. Same feeling. And i i hate it. It's the right feeling and look if you're new to this show. This is not an alarmist show right. We're we're a left-wing show. We were very critical of the trump administration. We were very hopeful about A lot of things in the biden administration. I don't say this lightly and i. I also want to emphasize that the harm that i worry about in terms of the coverage of what the supreme court did is in some ways. A harm that. I cost jeez so well attenuated but five years ago when we started the show. If you look at those first hundred episodes oftentimes the the lead story would be something like the press would say supreme court blocks trump's muslim bam right and we would have to get on to say. Look that's not exactly. What the supreme court did. They didn't rule on the merits of the muslim ban. And as we sadly predicted for you eventually when they figure this out and get it right and correct procedural defects. This supreme court is going to rule. That trump has the power to dim. The thing you were right right. So i see news outlets reporting this. Npr story that is infuriating. That says supreme court allows texas abortion law to stand comma for now. And you're like what are you. What are you oh yes at. Some point did the next year. And a half on the merits amy. Conybeare it is going to change her mind off of the belief. She's been indoctrinated instance. Birth that abortion is murder toubon. Eds my belief notwithstanding the fact that this misstates the law that every newspaper in america should lead with the headline supreme court overturns. Yeah not because. That's that's not true. They have not yet done that but what they've actually done is so much worse and let me explain what that is in briefest possible terms. They have allowed a law that blatantly. Contradicts is prohibited by both ravi. Wait and planned. Parenthood versus casey in texas. That is sba which we will break down They've allowed that to go into effect. So you know. In what sense. Can you say there is a constitutional protection for the right to an abortion if a law that contrary ends those protections is allowed to go into effect. Yeah it's like if a state passed a law that was like no talking and then the court was like all right We see no problem with that and then allow it. Is there still a first amendment. Then you're for now. They're allowing a lot like you would say right. Do they seem hotline on the first amendment. Essentially yeah that is right. Those headlines would say okay. Well you know. They're still they've yet to hear the merits of the like what we understand. What an injunction and break all that down a couple of things. I want to say preliminary. And i again every time. We do an abortion episode. I want to be very very clear about this guy. Trans men are men and they can and do get pregnant. They can end do have abortion so we strive to be very gender inclusive in our language on the show. Our trans friends are trans listeners. Trains people generally are taking it on the chin right. Now are the major target of the republican culture. So our hearts go out to you. We try to be allies. Sp and the accompanying opinions use the word women. So when i'm quoting from the law. When i'm quoting from the opinions i am going to use the word women because i'm quoting from those opinion and i think there's a larger point that i struggle with a little bit and that is many of the religious impulses to control abortion and birth control are meant to control women. They're not meant to effect. Meant right. So i really do struggle with us. So if you're trans listener. Right in via patriotic or open arguments at g mail dot com. I struggle with this. Because i want to talk about the republican war on women. Yeah i do not want to contribute to trans male erasure in society. And i'm trying to do the best. I see what you're saying. Is we want to be able to talk about the republican women. There's also a republican war on trans people but it's a different war. You know what i mean like. It's two different wars happening. And this is more about the war on women. I don't know how. I think making clear what you're going for. Hopefully that that will keep people into what you mean. All i can say is we value. We try and listen to those voices. Please continue sharing them with us and we will continue to do the best. We can the second thing. I want to say related voices. We will have women's voices on our show on this issue. This story broke at midnight last night. And we record at one o'clock the next day and so it just is not technologically schedule-wise feasible for us to bring on different voices. We have reached out. That is important us and i guess my third sort of preliminary thought is rich. White women are going to be okay. they're gonna. They're gonna continue to do what they did before roe v wade which is travel out of state or out of the country to to get abortions to get medical care is poor people who will suffer the burdens. One of my questions for not just you but anybody. Listening is like 'cause lydia. Her first impulse was like okay. How do we sponsor people. You know like count. How do we. How do we help. So that's going to be one of the questions. I mean there's gotta be. I assume organizations that are going to try to handle that. I would think so. I do not know. I think listeners can yeah prep yes. Listeners can shoot us some links or anything about which organizations might be the most helpful. Yeah you're right. We're kind of scrambling this. Yes it is out of..

supreme court roe v wade biden administration Conybeare texas Npr ravi sba amy casey america lydia
"roe v wade" Discussed on Biz Talk Radio

Biz Talk Radio

05:16 min | 2 years ago

"roe v wade" Discussed on Biz Talk Radio

"Roe V. Wade and you as much as anybody your historian author and you talk about this daily Robi way the woman behind it was she would probably tell you at the time used as a pawn well you know she absolutely would and and then years of recent years she's even recanted much of her position and now she's you know in fact pro life and you know it's it's just it's so interesting that you know the last you know that they've got this manufactured crisis does your which goes on whether it's climate change or impeachment or portion of the gun rights rallies and a simple fact of the matter is you know trump did something that no one has seen the president has ever done before which is speak at this particular margin there seems it is a new larger new rally going on almost every single day in America so the right really does seem to be not just waking up and showing up in a really I'm really invigorated by that we're looking for to November of twenty twenty but you know roe versus Wade and I'm I'm in the state of Alabama we've made everything about abortion illegal and we knew that it would eventually get slapped down by a federal judge which it did but that was the hope that we get this thing for stirred in front of the Supreme Court hopefully post impeachment that's going to happen Michael I have to ask you and probably shouldn't ask you because you're a white male and for that you have all kinds of sins attributed to you sorry about that but I'm a female and when I hear this phrase women's reproductive rights and people try to hold that up as a mantle for which they can do whatever they want to do it almost makes me want to weep because to me it's not a right about your reproductive whatever it has everything to do with with killing the most innocent and those are the ones we are supposed to be the most protective of and it's it's heartbreaking but it's what America has become and it's celebrated by the left as president trump pointed out Friday well you know I mean I I'm sensitive to the fact that you know we are talking about a woman's right to her body and what goes on but she also has a right to keep her knees together you know that that the father in this case you don't have to write down he should have some kind of right of recourse if something were to take place here is it unfortunate that that women the was a bear the brunt of this conversation perhaps you know life is unfair I don't know how else to put it but at the end of the day the moment that baby is conceived we're talking about a third party you know interestingly enough if you kill a pregnant woman in the state of Texas that counts as two homicides and while we can't see see this for for what it is nationwide is just beyond me I think it transcends because I've made the argument that climate change in abortion and an immigration and everything else is going on it's all basically the same argument and that his government is prepared and that the fact of the matter is that you know it's a feels good do it that's right if you want to transition this transition you know if you want to go to the bathroom go to different bathrooms you know there's no there's no mores anymore because their moral code anymore I realize it's a tough debate and as it yeah so as all old white guy with a bunch of students by the way of guilty most of mine but you know what with that Sam you know I I I realize it's a tough conversation and there might be extemporaneous circumstances where where abortion has to take place it's abortion as an industry that's got to come to an end I'm I'm very I'm so tired of Michael you talk about the sins of the white man I'm so tired of the talk of toxic masculinity and all these other things and as I said before what America has become today is where what president trump pointed out the left celebrates abortion and I just I just don't know how far we can go how long it's going to be before that gets turned around I understand what it was like back in the day apparently back alley abortions with coat hangers I am sorry to be so playing in my language but the fact of the matter is we have seen we know more and more since nineteen seventy two that was ages ago when it comes to scientific research we know way more about what a fetus feels and knows and looks like and how he or she moves in the womb and I just cannot believe we are where we are today in twenty twenty well you know again I believe it goes back to to the government as the ultimate arbiter of our moral code in this country and you're right you know science is proven out that there's a great deal of depression amongst women to go to abortions I personally have no probably a half a dozen women have had one although it never affected me personally but every single one of them has carried regret in some cases all through their lives there's absolutely positively no upside when you consider the longevity and the and the you know the quite frankly the finality of the aborted fetus versus the you know the temporary discomfort having the pregnancy and the the possible financial strain I put for the relationship damage it might cause but over the course of the last forty or fifty years there just doesn't seem to be any upside whatsoever to this particular issue from the perspective of terminating this pregnancy so I do think it is something I need to be back down in front of the stage for them to decide you know what their individual positions are going to be on this but at the end of the day.

Roe V. Wade Robi
Roe, Wade and Supreme Court discussed on WJR Programming

WJR Programming

00:51 sec | 4 years ago

Roe, Wade and Supreme Court discussed on WJR Programming

"President Trump's US supreme court nominee faces his. First confirmation hearing tomorrow Brit Kevin. All has, been going through mock hearings with White House, lawyers hitting him with tough questions eight say including. His views on the road versus Wade nineteen Seventy-three ruling establishing a right to choose abortion cavenaugh will certainly, deflect. Direct, questions about row on CNN state. Of the union judiciary committee member, Senator Lindsey Graham well here's what I hope he'll do if there's a case before him that challenges are Roe v. Wade that he, would listen to both sides. Of, the story apply. Attest to overturn precedent Preston is important but it's not in. Ballot abortion opponents have hoped Cavanaugh will, provide the needed. Vote to overturn Roe while choice advocates are sounding the

ROE Wade Supreme Court Senator Lindsey Graham Brit Kevin Union Judiciary Committee Anne Cates Detroit Cavanaugh Gordon CNN President Trump White House Preston United States
Is Roe v. Wade Is Hanging by a Thread?

"News

03:05 min | 4 years ago

Is Roe v. Wade Is Hanging by a Thread?

"To transform the rule of law and our country during the campaign trump promised to only pick a prolife judges i am putting prolife justices on the court itchy abortion activists are calling it a pivotal moment while abortion rights defenders are saying they are in dire immediate danger the senate should reject on a bipartisan basis any justice who would overturn roe v wade or undermine key healthcare protections democrats insist there should be no confirmation vote at all until after the midterm elections they point to the fact that republicans blocked brock obama's last pick for ten months before the two thousand sixteen presidential election but republican leader mitch mcconnell says there must be no delay republicans are dealing with a razor thin one vote majority in the senate that means they can afford to lose only one that's why you can expect republicans to put intense pressure on three democrats three democrats who voted for neal gorsuch his choice last time around and who are now this year up for reelection it states that trump won big george stephanopoulos and cecilia vega spoke with abc's chief legal analyst dan abrahams san abc supreme court contributor kate shaw looking to answer the question so many are asking after justice kennedy's resignation why now robie wade that's where all the early energy is going to be that's right but let's be clear there's no question that roe v wade could be in jeopardy but that doesn't mean it's going to get overturned everyone's talking about overturned overturned as a practical matter justices liked to show deference to previous opinions meeting it's unusual to say we're simply going to overturn a decision because we now disagree with if it happens on occasion but it's very rare more likely what you see is an opinion effectively get gutted meaning states that want to restrict abortion will increasingly make laws that are more restrictive and more restrictive and then have those laws challenged in the hope that those laws are able to move forward and ineffective would mean that it becomes nearly impossible for women in a number of states to get and you can be sure that whoever president trump nominates is going to do his or her best not to show their hand on roe wade during the confirmation you don't want to admit you know what your position is on any case in the confirmation process the rule is when you're asked about a particular case you say this could come in front of me and as a result i'm night i'd have to see what the facts of the case were but you've got to believe that the president is going to know a lot about any candidate that he considers justice kennedy didn't make from the bench where you surprise you were there we all knew it was a possibility but i don't think anyone in that building really believed he was going to do impart because you know he seemed to send a message with his travel ban separate writing that he had some concerns about some of president trump's conduct and rhetoric he wrote separately to sort of say you need to acting ways that respect constitutional values like equality but in the end you know i think he did want to be replaced by republican president and this was the surest way to see that.

Ten Months