12 Burst results for "Renominated Huber"

"renominated huber" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

KTAR 92.3FM

03:19 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

"Whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We would contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. You know, Jeff Sessions picked this. Uber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out to the life of me wet sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy and wondered if pe- people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein molar and Weisman they were all involved in your radium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those are the remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you you look there. There's a there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not release. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the molar investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye..

President Trump Blumenthal Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi Warren renominated Huber Muller Arizona Jeff Sessions uranium one Scottsdale Russia Red Eye Radio Rosenstein Huber Weisman
"renominated huber" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

06:54 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"Can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the authorities right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect a border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which has should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should all the press conference every single day on it. And he should have held a press conferences in had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. Well, and it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president should have a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security it with the Democrats hock. Can you say now how could he come out and strongly say they're for open borders, the not for border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago stating oh world for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that. We'll don't give them out though, never give them. And what the whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't wanna talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them by and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've got gotta go further. And you've got show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let's go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome. You're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing? The reason I called you actually picked awards out of my mouth. I actually was going to talk about the border patrol. What they should do says President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. You know, Jeff Sessions picked this. Uber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is humor is a democrat. And I'm still trying to figure out to the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy in one or two Petain people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein molar and Weisman they will all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them from being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like blooming fall every time. Something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigating. But those that I'll remember that whatever it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So, you know, you you you look there's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the molar investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. The.

President Trump president Nancy Pelosi Chuck Schumer Twitter Muller uranium one Mr president Trump Arizona Jeff Sessions Warren Red Eye Radio Petain Russia Scottsdale Rosenstein renominated Huber Weisman
"renominated huber" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

12:01 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Skill than any time you want to loosen Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he's Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone. Don't have the house and the Senate. The Democrats alone can end the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made we made it clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say again point make clearly as the Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as of what tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding. Portions of the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that which is how we free right? And then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with that. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct border enforcement to begin with. We're for open borders. Why would we care? Yeah. Now, how successful be at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's a it's again, it's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything, right? There wasn't a negotiating point. There. There wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. I think so but in this budget battle right there was right? You know, nine months ago, but there there isn't now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? In order to get something back. That would be less, politically damaging or guess. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words if they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. One win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede something like that. I don't think so I don't think they're thinking in terms of that right now because I really don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. It's not gonna happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that you know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that an and it's hard to argue with this when you're for sanctuary cities. If you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the authorities right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want effective border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which is should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should held a press conference every single day on it. Uh-huh. And he should have held a press conferences and had you the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give do you teach Americans about the border. But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president should have a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how could he come out and strongly say they're for open borders in the not for border security were they got him on tape just two weeks ago, stating oh, we're all for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that don't give them the out don't ever give them. And what are the whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would have said in that setting Nancy you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not going to get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the Democrats were were their position. What the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've got to go further, and you've got to show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict them in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said it's not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat. And I'm still trying to figure out for the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy and wondered if peace and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein molar and Weisman they will all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigating. But those are the remember that whatever it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated hip. So you know, you you you look there. There's a there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. If it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll.

president President Trump Nancy Pelosi Mr President Senate Twitter Chuck Schumer Alexa Republican Senate renominated Huber Eric Harley Muller Trump uranium one Dacca Arizona White House Jeff Sessions
"renominated huber" Discussed on WJR 760

WJR 760

12:02 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on WJR 760

"Day. Anytime say Alexa, enabled the Red Eye Radio. Skill than any time. You want to listen, Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he is currently and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone don't have the house and the Senate the Democrats alone can't end the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made I thought we made it clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say again point make clearly as the Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding. Portions of the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that. Which is how we right, and then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the a budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with that. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about Holmen security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with. We're for open borders. Why would we care? Yeah. Now what how successful be at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's a again, it's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything. Right. There wasn't a negotiating point. They there there wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. And and they in turn it into that. I don't think so but in this budget battle, right or was right? You know, nine months ago. Oh, yeah. But there there isn't now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? In order to get something back that would be less, politically damaging or gas. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point in other words. If they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. Would one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede that something like that. I don't think so I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right now 'cause I really don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. That's not going to happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that you know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion, right? When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that an and it's hard to argue with us when you're for sanctuary cities. If you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You you can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if their criminal they can stay, and we won't cooperate with with the thirties right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is, you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect a border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should held a press conference every single day on it. And he should have held a press conferences and had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a lie you teach Americans about the border. But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president whoever consistent message, but he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how could he come out and strongly say they're for open borders on the not for border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago, stating oh, we're all for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that will don't give them the out don't ever give them don't give. And what are your whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them by and large the majority of American people this agree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've got go further. And you've gotta show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was going to talk about the border patrol. What they should do says President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. You know, Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything, and the fact is Huber is a democrat. And I'm still trying to figure out for the life of me. Why sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy. I'm wondering if peace and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein molar and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And there that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those are the remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So, you know, you you you look there's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left were expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the molar investigative team..

president President Trump Mr President Nancy Pelosi Senate Alexa Chuck Schumer Republican Senate renominated Huber Twitter Gary McNamara Red Eye Radio Trump uranium one Dacca Arizona Holmen Muller White House
"renominated huber" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

10:01 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"Of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything. Right. There wasn't a negotiating point. They there were there wasn't there wasn't if you give us this. We'll give you that right now. And they in turn it into that think. So but. Oh, but in this budget battle right there was right? You know, nine months ago low. Yeah. But there there isn't now that's my whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? An order to get something back that would be less, politically damaging or guess. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point in other words. If they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. Would one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede that something like that. I don't think so I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right now 'cause I really don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. That's not going to happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that you know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. Simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that an and it's hard argue with us when you're for sanctuary cities. If you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders right to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the authorities right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want effective border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which he should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should held a press conference every single day on it. And he should have held press conferences and had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a lie you teach Americans about the border. But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes that are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president a consistent message, but he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how can he come out and strongly say they're for open borders in the not for border security where they've got him on tape just two weeks ago, stating oh, we're all for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that. Well, don't give them the out don't ever give them, and what are your whole ideas to corner them and forced them to say that there for open borders because I would have sat in that setting Nancy you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them by and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the the Democrats were we're their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected misstep in December. You've got to go further, and you've got show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're gonna have to. Without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five at Penn leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decide to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out to the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy wondered if and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein molar and Weisman they will all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And there that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller best Gatien. But those out remember remember, it was Trump who renominated Huber. He was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there. There's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team..

president President Trump Nancy Pelosi Chuck Schumer renominated Huber Muller Twitter Mr president uranium one Dacca Trump Senate Arizona Jeff Sessions Penn White House Warren Russia
"renominated huber" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

11:59 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"Enabled the Red Eye Radio. Skill than any anytime you want to loosen say Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he's Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone. Don't have the house and the Senate the Democrats alone end the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made we made clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again point make clearly as Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes tomorrow, and they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding portions the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that. Which is how we right and then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing. Resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with it. We've got basically everything funded through September except the little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with. We're for open borders. Why would we care? Now, how successful will be at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's it again. It's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything, right? There wasn't named negotiate point. Now, they there there wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. And turn it into that. I don't think so. But in this budget battle writer was right. You know, nine months ago low. Yeah. But there there is now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? In order to get something back that would be less politically damaging our August. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words. If they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. Would one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede something like that. I don't think so I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right now because I really don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. That's not gonna happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden, it's gone. And everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got again two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that. You know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply used the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that. And and it's hard to argue with us when you're for sanctuary cities. If you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the authorities right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect a border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue in the way that we argue it, which has should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should all the press conference every single day on it. And he should have held a press conferences and had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president showed a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how could he come out and strongly say they're for open borders for border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago stating oh world for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that don't give them the out don't ever give them and the whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. That's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've gotta go further. And you've gotta show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this war. And whether you get even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let's go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome. You're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was going to talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decide to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. You know, Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out to the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy. And wondering if same people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation, it Colmey Rosenstein Muller, and Weisman they were all involved in your rainy and one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like blooming fall every time. Something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller best degation. But those are that I don't remember that one member it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you you look there. There's a there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get a get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself is if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left were expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team..

president President Trump Mr President Nancy Pelosi Senate Chuck Schumer Colmey Rosenstein Muller Alexa Red Eye Radio Republican Senate Eric Harley Twitter Trump Dacca Arizona renominated Huber White House Jeff Sessions
"renominated huber" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

03:26 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was going to talk about the border patrol. What they should do says President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is humor is a democrat are still trying to figure out to the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in uranium one or the people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein molar and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And there that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there. There's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll be right.

President Trump Chuck Schumer uranium one Blumenthal Muller Nancy Pelosi Warren Jeff Sessions Arizona Scottsdale Red Eye Radio Russia Rosenstein renominated Huber Weisman
"renominated huber" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

12:00 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"You want to listen to Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he is Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone don't have the house and the Senate, the Democrats alone can and the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made I thought we made it clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again or make clearly as the Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes. So tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding portions the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that. Which is how we right, and then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget until eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with that. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with for open borders. Why would we care? Yeah. Now, how successful at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's again, it's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What are the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything, right? There wasn't a negotiating point. There. There wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. Turn it into that think. So but in this budget battle was right. You know, nine months ago, but there there isn't now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? In order to get something back that would be less, politically damaging or. It's a greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words. If they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave two point five billion for the wall. What one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede something like that. I don't think. So I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right now because I really don't think they really care about the dreams. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole DACA dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. It's not going to happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we said this way before the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that. You know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will get money for border security and homeland we believe in that. And it's hard to argue with us when you for sanctuary cities, if you say once you crossed the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're former security yet if anybody gets over they can stay even at their criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the thirties right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security. But the whole thing is, you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect the border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which they should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should all the press conference every single day on it. And he should have held a press conferences, and had, you know, the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president showed a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how could he come out and strongly say they're for open borders in an opera border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago stating oh world for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that will don't give them the out though, never give them. And what are the whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How's that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them by and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not going to get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. He's gotta go further. And you've got to show that you're going to fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to. Without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this war. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona warned welcome. You're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out for the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy wondered if peace and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation, it's Comi Rosenstein Muller and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the molar investigation. But those remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So, you know, you you you look there's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of declassified information that he has not released. I has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. White.

president President Trump Mr President Senate Nancy Pelosi Comi Rosenstein Muller Chuck Schumer Alexa renominated Huber Republican Senate Eric Harley Twitter Trump uranium one Arizona White House Dacca Jeff Sessions
"renominated huber" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

11:59 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"To listen, Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he is Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone don't have the house and the Senate, the Democrats alone and the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made we made clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again point make clearly as the Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding. Portions of the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that which is how we feel right? And then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with it. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here Poelman security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with. We're for open borders. Why would we care? Yeah. Now what how successful at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's it again. It's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything. Right. There wasn't a negotiating point. They there there wasn't there wasn't if you give us this. We'll give you that right now. And they in turn it into that. And I don't think so but in this budget battle writer was right? You know, nine months ago, but there there isn't now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? An order to get something back that would be less, politically damaging or guests. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words if they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. One win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede something like that. I don't think so I don't think they're thinking in terms of that right now because I really don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. It's not going to happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that you know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that. And and it's hard to argue with us for sanctuary cities. If you say once you've crossed the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the thirties right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect a border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which is should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should held a press conference every single day on it. Uh-huh. And he should have held a press conferences and had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a lie. Do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this fake. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes that are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president have a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how can he come out and strongly say they're for open borders, the not for border security where they've got him on tape just two weeks ago stating oh well for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that. Well, don't give them the out don't ever give them. And what the whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've got to go further, and you've got to show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to. Without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight this war. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do says President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything, and the fact is Huber is a democrat. And I'm still trying to figure out for the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rain wondering if pe- people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation, it's Coney Rosenstein, molar and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And there that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller best Gatien. But those are the remember that whatever it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. It's if it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll be.

president President Trump Mr President Senate Nancy Pelosi Chuck Schumer Republican Senate Eric Harley Twitter renominated Huber Muller uranium one Dacca Trump Arizona White House Gary McNamara writer
"renominated huber" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

KTAR 92.3FM

12:08 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

"Red Eye Radio on your Amazon echo every day. Any time say Alexa, and naval the Red Eye Radio skill than any time you want to loosen Alexa, bullpen Red Eye Radio. And he is our Carleen. I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone don't have the house and the Senate the Democrats alone can't end the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made I thought we made it clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again, make clearly as Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as what? Yes tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding. Portions of the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that which is how we it. Right. And then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with that. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct a border enforcement to begin with. We're for open borders. Why would we care? Yeah. Now, how successful at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's it again. It's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What were the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything. Right. There wasn't a negotiating point. Now. They there there wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. And they in turn it into that. And I don't think so but in this budget battle right there was right? You know, nine months ago. Oh, yeah. But there there isn't now that's my whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? An order to get something back that would be less politically damaging our guest. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words if they got Dacca right now. With that be a win. Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. Would one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede that something like that. I don't think so I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right? Don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. That's not gonna happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all of a sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that. You know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that an and it's hard to argue with us when you for sanctuary cities, if you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what. And we're not going to cooperate with federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the thirties right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want effective border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should held a press conference every single day on it. And he should have held press conferences and had the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give a do you teach Americans about the border? But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president should have a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how can he come out and strongly say they're for open borders on the not for border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago, stating oh, we're all for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that. We'll don't give them the out don't ever give them. And what are your whole idea is to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would've sat in that. Setting Nancy, you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How's that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the the Democrats, and we're we're their position or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've gotta go further, and you've got to show that you're going to fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth on? I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out to the life of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy and the same people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein Muller and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those are that I don't remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber. He was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there. There's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. If it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left or expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll be.

president President Trump Mr President Rosenstein Muller Red Eye Radio Nancy Pelosi Senate Chuck Schumer Alexa Carleen Republican Senate Twitter Gary McNamara Trump Amazon uranium one Dacca Arizona Jeff Sessions
"renominated huber" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

12:00 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Skill than any time you want to loosen Alexa, open Red Eye Radio. And he is currently and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye just to clarify something. I just maybe some people didn't hear the entire segment and just heard the last portion of it. We understand that the Democrats alone. Don't have the house and the Senate. The Democrats alone can end the shutdown. We understand that fully. Yeah. The point we made thought we made it clearly apparently we didn't. So we'll say it again point make clearly is the Democrats in the house are going to since they run the house as of tomorrow or as of what? Yes tomorrow. And they will introduce bills piecemeal to start funding. Portions of the government we gave an example fund the military pay the military that'll be a separate continuing resolution. They send that to the Republican Senate and dare them not to pass exactly that which is how we free right? And then that will go straight to the president as a separate continuing resolution not containing wall money and dare the president to do that. And then across the board as it continues. That will be their plan to keep peace mailing parts of the budget till eventually you just get to a very very small portion. And they'll say go ahead. Mr President, you know, continue with it. We've got basically everything funded through September except a little portion here of homeland security that we could care less about homeland security and border construct border enforcement to begin with. Why would we care? Now, how successful will be at it. We don't know. We just told you. That's what we believe the strategy will be right. And it's it's again, it's the the point of the conversation is what what were they asking for? What are the Democrats asking for? Nothing. They're not demanding anything, right? There wasn't a negotiating point. There. There wasn't there wasn't if you give us this will give you that right now. Turn it into that. In this budget battle, right? There was right. You know, nine months ago. Oh, yeah. But there there isn't now that's the whole point. And it may turn into that. But the question is then politically. What works for them as a party? So if they only have the house. What do they have to concede to? In order to get something back that would be less, politically damaging or. A greater political advantage than it would be of a of a political damaging point other words if they got Dacca right now. Would that be a win? Even if they gave up two point five billion for the wall. Would one win over the other and be a clear advantage and for them to the point that they would concede something like that. I don't think so I don't think there are thinking in terms of that right now because I really don't think they really care about the dreamers. I think they understand that the president's really not actively enforcing the whole Dacca dreamer thing, and he's probably not strong on it. So they know on that they don't really have to move. So what else would it be? Well, you're not going to go for a comprehensive immigration reform package. It's not going to happen. Now, you make that happen in a bigger year when they're trying to get the Senate and the White House. So that becomes because if they were to give all of that up. Let's say by the time, we come by this whole thing to January thirty first and all the sudden it's done and everybody agreed or at least got a good portion of what they wanted. What would the Democrats have on the president? Well, how much of that would be damaging to them? Let's say they got, you know, again, two point five billion or five billion for the wall or any anything in that area. We're not even talking about twenty five billion. Well, as you know, we and we had said this way before the the whole negotiations that the the problem is here is that. You know, you you look at what the Democrats have used. They haven't used the fact of sanctuary cities and open borders to their advantage. They've simply use the wall. It has been a wall versus no wall discussion. Right. When we believe even if they will give money for border security and homeland we believe in that. And and it's hard to argue with this when you're for sanctuary cities. If you say once you cross the border, you're here. No matter what we're not going to cooperate with the federal government. Your for open borders to me that you're not right. You can't you can't you can't sit there and say you're for border security, yet if anybody gets over they can stay even if they're criminal. They can stay and we won't cooperate with with the authorities right now in order to get that you may you may agree to border security, but the whole thing is you know, they can get across. And the fact is you don't want affect the border security because you believe in sanctuary cities argue that point Republicans and the president, which of course, they do not argue it in the way that we argue it, which is should all the time. It should be twenty four seven. And as we said earlier, it shouldn't just be on Twitter. The president should have I believe every single day that he that he wasn't on a plane going to see the troops that he should held a press conference every single day on it. And he should have held a press conferences, and had, you know, the border patrol with him about you know, what what sections needed to be short up that you give do you teach Americans about the border. But it should've just happened over this vacation. This is something that should have happened all along you need to communicate outside of Twitter. And it needs to be a consistent message over and over and over again. And it's it's something that the selling point has to be very strong and clear, and I don't I don't know of any items other than taxes. That are so simple to comprehend. Here's one of the problems. And we said, you know, the president showed a consistent message. But he hasn't even on border security with the Democrats. How can you say now how can he come out and strongly say they're for open borders not for border security where they got him on tape just two weeks ago stating oh world for border security. Yes. Mr president. We all are don't say that. Well, don't give them the out don't ever go. And what are the whole ideas to corner them and force them to say that there for open borders because I would have said in that setting Nancy you're from in fact, you represent part of a sanctuary state. How is that not open border policy? It is which is why they didn't wanna talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the American people don't agree with them by and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. But that's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the Democrats where where position or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've got to go further. And you've got gotta show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was going to talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict them in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. You know, Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said it's not doing anything. And the fact is Huber is a democrat and are still trying to figure out to the lace of me went sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy and one or the pizza and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation. It's only Rosenstein molar and Weisman they were all involved in your rainy and warned so it's just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And they're just that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those the remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there. There's a there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not released. Has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. If it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left. We're expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll.

president President Trump Mr President Nancy Pelosi Senate Chuck Schumer Alexa Republican Senate renominated Huber Twitter Gary McNamara Muller Dacca Trump Arizona White House Jeff Sessions Warren
"renominated huber" Discussed on WJR 760

WJR 760

04:41 min | 3 years ago

"renominated huber" Discussed on WJR 760

"Which is why they didn't want to talk about it in front of cameras because they also know that the the American people don't agree with them. By and large the majority of American people disagree with open borders, but they don't. And that's why that night and some people got upset at us. So be it. That's why we were furious at the president when he gave Nancy and Chuck the out. Oh, we're all for border security. No, they're not stop it. Well, and don't give them the out and you're not gonna win. You're not gonna get anything. If you don't get this. Because forget about losing nobody even cares about the the Democrats were were their position. Or what the debate is in the media. It's now it's now at the door of your base. He corrected a misstep in December. You've got to go further, and you've got to show that you're gonna fight for the border wall. This is the one thing they got taxes done. They've got they've got two seated on the bench. You're going to have to without delay. And without hesitation. You're going to have to fight for this wall. And whether you get it, even or not. Isn't going to be the point. It's going to be whether or not your base believes you're fighting for it. Let us go to Warren in Scottsdale. Arizona. Warren, welcome you're on Red Eye Radio. Welcome to the show. Hi, hi. How you doing the reason I called you actually took the words out of my mouth. I actually was gonna talk about the border patrol what they should do since. President Trump's supposed to be meeting with Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi. He should have the top five to ten leadership people at the border patrol in uniform on camera with them. So that every time Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer decided to say why it's not needed the border patrol. I think knows a little bit better. We able to contradict him in front of millions of people on camera. That's number one. And the second thing I was calling about was your issue with the investigation. Jeff Sessions picked this Huber guy that you said not doing anything, and the fact is Huber is a democrat. And I'm still trying to figure out to the life of me watch sessions would pick a democrat to go investigate this about the whole thing with uranium one and the same people. That were involved in your rainy and one if and people that are involved in this whole Trump Russia investigation, it's only Rosenstein Muller and Weisman they were all involved in uranium one. So it's all just not the big smokescreen to block them for being found out. And there that's why they have people like Blumenthal. Every time something comes up. He starts trying to say that Donald Trump is trying to deflect away from the Muller investigation. But those remember remember it was Trump who renominated Huber he was he offered his resignation and Trump renominated him. So you know, you you look there. There's there's a lot of things that Trump is in control of and things that he has has done that people get get upset about. But look he he has information right now that can start this whole ball rolling. He has the class of the declassified information that he has not release. I has claimed the American public might not be able to handle it which was bogus to begin with. We disagreed with him when he said that, but he would use it if they came after him, which we thought was completely and totally inappropriate release it. So the American people know what happened? And if it gets the ball rolling to go further it gets the ball rolling to go further. Well, because if he's saying he'll use it to defend himself. Then clearly he knows it won't hurt him. You're not gonna use it to defend yourself. If it's going to be damaging. So if you're saying that is the case then that tells us there's nothing damaging to you release it now. Don't wait and don't wait for Muller to have the side show. And and and the main spotlight by issuing some kind of bogus report that points in a certain direction and creates doubt and cloud over your head forever. But never actually does anything because that's what actually a lot of people on the left were expecting to happen. And politically that can be just as damaging because the liberal media is going to carry the water for the Muller investigative team. Eight six six ninety redeye. We'll be right.

President Trump Chuck Schumer Rosenstein Muller Blumenthal Nancy Pelosi Warren renominated Huber president uranium one Jeff Sessions Arizona Huber Red Eye Radio Scottsdale Russia Weisman