40 Burst results for "ROE"

You Have No Idea What Your Courage Can Engender

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:21 min | 9 hrs ago

You Have No Idea What Your Courage Can Engender

"And gentlemen, you know, we say this many times on this program and I am trying to say it in my new book letter to the American church. If the church will speak up, if members of the church, if you yourself will stand, you have no idea what your courage can engender. You have no idea. Mark judge, alone, standing bravely in the midst of these attacks effectively made it possible for roe V wade to be overturned. Do you understand what I just said? What John just said, Mark judge, by standing in the face of evil by refusing to give them what they wanted, the same thing can be said of Jerome corsi, who was on this program a few weeks ago. He, because of his faith in Jesus, because of that, refused to take a plea bargain, everyone was threatening him threatening him threatening him. He said, you know what? I don't go ahead, put me in jail. I will not lie. I can not do it. I won't do it. I'm in God's hands because of that, the Mueller investigation was effectively shut down. Roger Stone, all these others who were standing and I want to exhort you to stand with us in your sphere, wherever you are, because this is where we are now. If you cave in, if you give them what they want, you let them win.

American Church Mark Judge Roe V Wade Jerome Corsi Roger Stone Mark John Mueller
Fresh update on "roe" discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

00:40 min | 9 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe" discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Spread. You need to change that to let us worship. We're gonna be right back, talking to you on foy. I was just waiting for you skating on the ice it's a very nice when you have someone to hold your hand you know with the overturn of roe V wade lots of companies are coming out saying they'll pay for employee abortion travel and expenses. Most of you have heard about some of these companies you've decided to stop shopping or doing business there, but did you know that you most likely own stock in those companies through your four-o-one-ks, IRAs, and other investment accounts. Folks, this is a huge problem, and we need to do something about this to send a message to Wall Street through our investments. You need to go to inspire advisers dot com slash Eric and get a free inspire impact report. This biblical investment analysis will educate you on what's really in your investment accounts like companies paying for abortion travel. You need to go to inspire advisers dot com slash Eric to connect with an inspire adviser's financial professional who can run your report and help remove companies paying for abortion travel. Today, go to inspire advisers dot com slash Eric that's inspire advisers dot com slash Eric. Advisory services are offered through inspire advisers LLC, a registered investment adviser with the SEC. My pillow is having their biggest sheet sale of the year..

FOY Eric Inspire Advisers Llc SEC
Teen interest in long-lasting birth control soars after Roe

AP News Radio

00:46 sec | 2 d ago

Teen interest in long-lasting birth control soars after Roe

"Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned roe V wade more teenage girls are going to their doctors to get longer lasting birth control Experts say the ruling in June by the high court appears to be accelerating a trend increased birth control use among teens that includes long acting reversible forms like intrauterine devices and implants Planned Parenthood says it's been flooded with questions as doctors say there is even a demand among teens who aren't sexually active Some patients are especially fearful because new abortion laws and several states do not include exceptions for sexual assault some doctors say even parents who may have been hesitant in the past about birth control for their teens now want to discuss the topic I'm Donna water

U.S. Supreme Court High Court Donna
Fresh update on "roe" discussed on News, Traffic and Weather

News, Traffic and Weather

00:40 min | 11 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe" discussed on News, Traffic and Weather

"Bowles has Tampa Bay is in his thoughts. First of all, you know, I thought some hearts go out to everybody in Tampa that's still there and hoping that they recover well and it doesn't hit him very hard. You know, that's the biggest thing. What we do is really small entertainment for people that go through a lot of rough things and hopefully, you know, we can provide that. So it's a bigger than just the football team. He has the Buccaneers can't play in Tampa Bay Sunday, the game against the chiefs will be moved to Minnesota. A judge is allowing a Wisconsin man accused of killing 6 people when he allegedly drove through a Christmas parade to represent himself at his trial. The midterm elections just now 41 days away. 5 38s model shows Democrats are now slightly favored to keep their majority in the Senate. As of right now, Democrats have a 69 and 100 chance of winning or keeping control of the Senate. That's 5 38s Nathaniel ray kitch who says Republicans are still favored to flip the house. In the house, Republicans have a 69 and 100 chance of winning. Rakić says Democrats have improved their odds in both chambers since the Supreme Court overturned roe V wade. That really seems to have energized the democratic base. The ABC News, Washington. The Army Corps of engineers says the Mississippi River is so low and slow that salt water is creeping farther than usual along the bottom toward New Orleans, threatening drinking water. This is ABC News. And this is northwest news radio 1000 FM 97 7 Natalie Melendez is keeping an eye on our road. She's in the dubin law group traffic center. Monroe looking at slow traffic on eager road in the westbound lane. This is from a collision involving a van and a motorcycle between Woods creek road and one 44th, no delays I'm seeing on your drive from four or 5 to two on east 5 22 little now take 14 minutes, north Seattle Roosevelt weighs stop and go traffic in the north ballet due to a collision at 96 you will slow it onto 95th and Queen Anne areas Seattle 15th avenue and Elliott avenue, the traffic lights at the intersection of Garfield still not working properly, it's being treated as a four way stop. Our next stop is traffic at

Tampa Bay Nathaniel Ray Kitch Bowles Rakić Roe V Wade Senate Buccaneers Abc News Tampa Chiefs Natalie Melendez Dubin Law Group Traffic Center Minnesota Wisconsin Football Army Corps Of Engineers Mississippi River Republicans Supreme Court North Seattle
Arizona Man Sues Clinic Over Abortion Given to His Ex-Wife

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

02:07 min | 2 d ago

Arizona Man Sues Clinic Over Abortion Given to His Ex-Wife

"I want to talk about a case involving a woman who had an abortion, turns out to be four years ago, and her ex-husband, a guy named Mario villegas, has found an ingenious way to sort of hit back, not at the wife, but really at the medical establishment at the abortionists at the abortion clinic. So what do you do? He couldn't really Sue as the husband because in an era where the woman has choice. It's her decision. It's her decision alone. Now interestingly, if she has the child, the husband is responsible for supporting the child and becomes a sort of partner in paying up, but in the decision about whether to have the child a woman sort of reigns supreme. It's her choice. So the husband in a sense could not make a case and say, I'm gonna agree husband I want her to have the child. So what he did ingeniously was he created an estate for the unborn and now of course deceased child, a child was in fact aborted. So he creates an estate and then on behalf of the estate, he sues not the ex-wife, but he sues the doctors and the clinic that provided the abortion. Basically, Arizona has had, and this is even, this is even while roe versus wade was in effect. Arizona has had a kind of a law that requires the state that requires people providing an abortion to provide a whole bunch of information to the woman. Medical information like all the risks associated with the procedure legal information and there's also a 24 hour waiting period. So basically what this man Mario villegas charges is that the clinic failed to do these things in a precise way with his now ex-wife. They failed to provide her with proper information. They did not tell her all the risks and therefore the clinic by going ahead with the abortion in violation of Arizona's informed consent law has an essential wrongfully killed. This child

Mario Villegas SUE Arizona Wade
Fresh update on "roe" discussed on News, Traffic and Weather

News, Traffic and Weather

01:27 min | 11 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe" discussed on News, Traffic and Weather

"Recently opened a store near a pike place market in which robots with mechanical arms make the drinks? The company has plans to expand nationwide. Investment bank Morgan Stanley says Boeing stock price could rise as much as 80% the next year. Boeing announced today that China airlines has agreed to buy 16 Dreamliner jets with an option for 8 more. Morgan Stanley says Boeing's max aircraft production could also increase by 64% by 2025. Boeing stock rose 6% today, closing a one 33 44 per share. The Dow skyrocketed 626 points to close at 29,760. NASDAQ gained two 22 and the S&P 500 rows 82. This is rob Smith with northwest news radio. Here are your political insights from ABC News. The White House says President Biden and Florida governor Ron DeSantis put aside political differences in a conversation Tuesday night about hurricane Ian. Press secretary karine Jean Pierre. There's no politics in this when we talk about extreme weather. The president is trying to put oil and gas companies on notice, warning federal officials will investigate if oil companies use the storm to raise prices at the pump. Let me repeat. Do not. Do not use this as an excuse to raise gasoline prices or guys in America. With the midterm elections now less than 6 weeks away, a model from 5 38 shows Republicans are favored to win control of the house while Democrats have a slight advantage in the Senate. 5 38s Nathaniel ray kit says Democrats have improved their odds in both chambers since the Supreme Court overturned roe versus wade. That really seems to have energized the democratic base. Those are your political insights. I'm Elizabeth josey, ABC News. The man who assassinated presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy in 1968 is asking the judge to free him from prison, ABC's Alex stone reports from California. My name is Johannes in an audio message from inside prison, sir Han sirhan pleading his case. He wants a judge to overrule governor Gavin Newsom who denied him parole in January, Newsom reversed a decision by two parole commissioners who found surhan to no longer be a risk. And now he's eligible to come home. Newsom said serhant remains a threat to the public, sir hands attorney argues there is no evidence that it's 78 years old he remains dangerous. Alex stone, ABC News, Los Angeles. News radio traffic

Boeing Morgan Stanley President Biden Ron Desantis Hurricane Ian Karine Jean Pierre China Airlines Abc News Rob Smith Nathaniel Ray Kit Roe Versus Wade Elizabeth Josey White House Alex Stone Florida Sir Han Sirhan Robert F. Kennedy
Republicans Had Stronger Turnout in Primaries Than Democrats

Mark Levin

01:19 min | 6 d ago

Republicans Had Stronger Turnout in Primaries Than Democrats

"Know the Washington compost had an opinion piece the other day It's very interesting to me by David byler Who's David biler Good question He said data analyst and political columnist Now this may draw your attention I think it will As early voting begins around the country every political data point would appear to marginally favor the Democrats Paul suggests they lead ever so slightly in key Senate races And a national House polls There are candidates are raking in cash while Republicans struggle financially And it's special elections following the end of roe V wade democratic turnout sword But one key factor primary voting turnout looks better for the Republicans According to pollster John coville 52% Of 2022 primary voters cast ballots in Republican races 48% voted in democratic races That's a good sign for Republicans High primary turnout signals enthusiasm for the general election and the party with the stronger primary turnout typically does better in the midterms

David Byler David Biler Washington John Coville Senate Paul
Fresh update on "roe" discussed on Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

01:03 min | 12 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe" discussed on Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

"Well, look out for more sanctions on Russia and hurricane Ian slamming into Florida. For more on the news, let's get to the newsroom in Bloomberg's Denise Pellegrini. Denise. Thank you, Brian, and Ian making landfall as a category four storm near Fort Myers knocking homes off foundations with a huge storm surge. Officials in Lee county are saying communities are decimated, Lee county commissioner Kevin ruin says the area got hit with a 16 foot surge. You know, I've gotten multiple reports of some hotels that have gone. Houses that people in erratics with water that high. And Roy and says they can't even start launching rescue operations yet. Governor Ron DeSantis says anyone who chose not to evacuate will have to be patient. Obviously, local responders can make decisions, but by and large, until the storm passes, they are not going to go into a situation for rescue and put their own folks at risk. Descent, by the way, as a congressman in 2013, will he voted with other Republicans against aid for hurricane sandy victims in the New York area and elsewhere. But now The White House today saying it stands by ready to help in Florida and aid is not political press secretary Jean Pierre. When the storm passes, we will be there to help Florida rebuild and recover. Meantime, the NFL says it will move the Sunday Night Buccaneers chiefs game from Tampa to Minneapolis if it has to, but right now it does plan to have that game in Tampa. Multiple airlines canceling flights obviously to and from Florida, it's pretty much a mess out there this hour. Watch for more sanctions on Russia over Ukraine, the U.S. and allies working on sanctions targeting finance, technology, human rights and energy. Vice president Kamala Harris visiting the DMZ between North and South Korea today, North Korea launching two short-range ballistic missiles, and The White House's condemning Pyongyang's move. A lot of polls forecasting are trying to forecast the midterm elections, 5 38s Nathaniel wreckage, explains why their forecast is showing continued improved odds of Democrats controlling Congress after the midterms. There are a number of factors for this, but I think that the most obvious is the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs to overturn roe V wade. That really seems to have energized the democratic base. And speaking of the democratic base or rather speaking of the Supreme Court, the high court says it will start allowing the public back into the courtroom when the new term begins that's on Monday and this will be the first time the Supreme Court is allowing the public back into the courtroom since that pandemic march of 2020. Global news 24 hours a day on air and on Bloomberg quicktake powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in more than a 120 countries. In the news remind Denise Pellegrini, this is Bloomberg, Brian. All right, thanks very much, Denise, the time is 38 minutes past the hour and just getting updated numbers on leap motor and its debut just a moment ago down 30% on its debut that is very disappointing for the Hangzhou based affirm. All right, the time now is for the latest in sport. Dan schwarzman is here with it, could Lionel Messi be heading back to Barcelona by next summer. Yeah, Brian, that's a great question. Barcelo vice president edouard Romeo has told Catalunya radio that the club could financially bring messy back next summer as a PSG star will be a free transfer. Barsa has turned around its finances after selling off meteorites and they've raised their La Liga spending cap from €-144 million to now over 600 million. The 35 year old was forced to leave the Catalan capital last summer after the club was not able to afford to keep the 7 time Ballon d'Or winner. A history made in Toronto Aaron judge has done it a 7th inning two run home run number 61 on the city season off of Tim myza and with that he now ties Roger Maris for the American League record for home runs in a season. Also, by the way, he's got a 130 ribby leads the American League in that major leagues in that, by the way, and also now batting three 14 on the year. He is as of now, leading in all three Triple Crown categories again, Aaron judge has hit home run number 61 for the Yankees, as they lead 6 to three bottom of the 7th with two outs, 6 to three over the Blue Jays. Other local teams in action bottom Atlanta and Washington tied to two top 9 Boston, a three to one home lead over Baltimore bottom 8 Miami doubling up the match for to two. Meanwhile, it is Oakland at the angels at is just underway coming up in 5 minutes. San Francisco Giants are home for the Colorado Rockies. In NFL news in New York Jets clearing quarterback Zach Wilson to play Sunday against the Steelers, the second year pro tourism meniscus and suffered a bone bruise in the first preseason game of this season. Meanwhile, four time Pro Bowl pass rushers Joey Bosa of the Chargers has been placed on injured reserve after suffering a groin tear in Sunday's loss to the Jaguars that will require surgery charges also placing all pro left tackle rashawn slater on IR with a torn left biceps tendon. I'm the schwarzman that your Bloomberg world sports update, Juliette

Denise Pellegrini Lee County Hurricane Ian Florida Kevin Ruin Governor Ron Desantis Bloomberg Hurricane Sandy Vice President Kamala Harris Denise Brian Supreme Court Russia Tampa Roe V Wade Jean Pierre Fort Myers Dan Schwarzman
John Zmirak Takes Us Back to the Lunacy of the Kavanaugh Hearings

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:57 min | 6 d ago

John Zmirak Takes Us Back to the Lunacy of the Kavanaugh Hearings

"You've shared this on the program before, but it's so important that people who are listening know the details of what happened and to reiterate when justice Kavanaugh, then not yet a justice was put up by Trump at the Supreme Court. The pro abortion left decided, again, because they've done this several times to go scorched earth to lie to make things up. And as their principle tool in this, they found a memoir written by Mark judge of his time of being an alcoholic in high school, and they thought this is just enough for us to create a narrative. We are going to lie, but we bet we can put this over on the American people and keep this guy off the Supreme Court because we don't want roe V wade over overturned. That's right. And so Christine daisy Ford couldn't say what year this rape allegedly happened. But she remembered all sorts of details all of them from Mark judge's book. So Eric, if somebody ever claims, wants to, if somebody wants to make a perjury involving you, they will use fish out of water. Your memoir of going to college. And there will be all these seemingly verifying details. Well, oh yeah, you did stay in that dorm. Yes, you did work at that place over the summer. Oh yeah, that's what you were wearing. On celery Green Day in 1983. Oh, this story knew this is seeming suspiciously real. It sounds like this person was there. Oh wait, he had a memoir. Okay? But again, they picked him Mark judge because he admitted to having memory lapses.

Justice Kavanaugh Supreme Court Christine Daisy Ford Mark Judge Donald Trump Mark Eric
Fresh update on "roe" discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

00:40 min | 16 hrs ago

Fresh update on "roe" discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"And she went on to say that we're the rebels. Let me run that past you first. What do you think of that comment from cpac? A 100% agree. We are the insurgents in an occupied country. Our republic has been occupied by woke neo marxists. And we're trying to take it back. And we have to fight that way. So if you want to win this culture war, then go ahead and assume we're at that big a disadvantage and act like it. But the nice thing is, the people are rising. We are ascendant. That's the wonderful feeling for me, is everywhere you go. More people have seen that life under Democrat rule sucks. It's the second thing she said is, they want us conservatives who love our country is because she was at sea back here in America, but she's an Italian. This is before she won. They want us leashed. On the left wants us at least like a dog. So let's look at what's happened in the last decade. First, we have, I think that the first moment is Brexit. When we have the British people, biggest vote in their history, never before have 17.3 million people voted on one issue in the same direction, and they said enough with faceless unaccountable bureaucrats in the EU. We want our sovereignty back. We want to leave the EU so God bless Nigel Farage number one. Then we have mild bolts coming down the escalators. Who's not part of the uni party isn't owned by the unions or big pharma or big oil who just looks at a broken nation and says, okay, I think I can fix it. I'm a businessman, and we have this economic nationalism, economic populism, and we have a maga. We have America first. We have Modi, who's kind of come off the rails a little bit. We've got autobahn. We've got the Australian elections a few years back. So we have this seeming groundswell. Jim. They've made nationalism a dirty word. Let's call it economic populism. They've even made populism a dirty word, which is weird because if you're popular, I thought that's what representative democracies or republics should be about. Being unpopular, like a dictator, probably isn't what you should be. We have to be popular for the right reasons. If you're popular for the wrong reasons, then you're a fascist. Okay, so pro if you're popular because you want to make kids children, then okay, good. Okay, thanks. And then we have the counter push. So let's map. Let's have an estimate of the battlefield. Let's do a sit rap. We have the 2020 elections. Happened the way they happened. We have Brexit almost derailed by both the House and the lords. I mean, just trying to sabotage the will of the American people. And now it looks as if, you know, Sweden, Italy, midterms. We've got what is the latest president Trump has got, what a 160 for 9 endorsements, which is never, ever. Has that been done before in American history. So how would you describe what's happened? Is it the rise then a bit of a slap down and then a little bit of a counter counter revolution? What are we witnessing right now, Jim? Well, there's always ebb and flow. You know, in politics, there is. And okay, roe V wade, biggest win and conservative. Political history of the past 20 years. And then the backlash from the left. And the media took that and tried to use that to stop what is a pretty solid rise of our team. And now, so we had that. We had a little blip, but it's right back. And I think right now, if you look at the unpopularity of Biden and the Democrat agenda, the crime, the inflation, all of the things, it's against them. So if we don't have a major change in this midterm election, I'll be shocked. Because they can't predict it. Are people stop talking to them long ago? It's not like they could pull us. You're from the who click, you know? You can't talk to our team. But our team is going to show up because they're motivated. I was talking to a poster who will remain nameless who said 5, 6 years ago, he saw the I won't tell you my opinion from Trump voters. And now he's getting at a decent center right polling company. He's getting people who are being polled, sent him emails saying somebody approached us saying they're with your firm, we didn't believe them so we didn't talk to them. I mean, that's the level of it was his firm. Right. They were just like doing triple due diligence saying, well, we're not sure. We didn't recognize the number. How can you, how can you pull anything in those circumstances? And that's why we need to ignore the polls and understand one thing. The Democrats overplayed their hand. And they went crazy. And again. And again. And again. And they always double down. They keep helping. I mean, the greatest thing for the Republican and the new right, the base right, the national conservative, right? And I'll say the word. I am a national conservative. I'm going to just lay that out there because I love America and I believe in conservative policies. But that side is rising everywhere you see it because the other side you've seen. We've got demonstrative results from them and they're awful. Across the board. Yeah, I want to talk about this. There isn't one person who puts the reins on and just puts the brakes on a little bit..

Uni Party EU Nigel Farage America Roe V Wade Modi JIM Donald Trump Sweden Italy Biden House
 Judge blocks Indiana abortion ban week after it took effect

AP News Radio

00:35 sec | 6 d ago

Judge blocks Indiana abortion ban week after it took effect

"A judge has blocked Indiana's abortion ban a week after it took effect Owen county judge Kelsey hanlon issued a preliminary injunction against the ban The injunction was sought by abortion clinic operators who argued in a lawsuit that the state constitution protects access to abortion The ban was approved by Indiana's Republican dominated legislature in August It made Indiana the first state to enact tighter abortion restrictions since the Supreme Court overturned roe V wade in June The order of prohibits the state from enforcing the ban

Judge Kelsey Hanlon Indiana Owen County Republican Dominated Legislatu Roe V Wade Supreme Court
Democrats punt same-sex marriage vote until after election

AP News Radio

00:51 sec | Last week

Democrats punt same-sex marriage vote until after election

"I'm Mike Gracia reporting Democrats are putting off a vote on same sex marriage until after the November election Senate Democrats are holding off on a vote to protect same sex and interracial marriages until after the November midterm elections The delay comes just days after Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer vowed the Senate would vote on the issue in the coming weeks Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin had predicted the bill would get the ten Republican votes needed to break a filibuster but momentum has stalled In recent days some Republicans raised concerns about protecting the rights of religious institutions Business owners or others who oppose same sex marriage The move to safeguard same sex marriage took form after the Supreme Court decision that overturned roe V wade and the federal right to an abortion The House passed its version of the bill with support from 47 Republicans in July Mike Gracia Washington

Mike Gracia Senate Senator Tammy Baldwin Chuck Schumer Wisconsin Roe V Wade Supreme Court House Mike Gracia Washington
Pence and Graham Are Digging in on Their Anti-Abortion Extremism

Stephanie Miller's Happy Hour Podcast

01:05 min | Last week

Pence and Graham Are Digging in on Their Anti-Abortion Extremism

"Mike Pence has doubled down on national abortion ban, when asked about how the debate will play out in the midterms, Pence said banning abortion is profoundly more important than any short term politics. Yes, he is correct. You just keep going more and more extreme. It is much more important. He toasted the Supreme Court for overturning roe V wade, he told those gathered for the gala for a pro life organization that they had only reached what he called the end of the beginning. He insists there's more work to be done to restrict abortion, which I think again is excellent news before the midterms. If you could go even farther, didn't Lindsey Graham just blow up their entire, let the states decide argument they've been making since the beginning of time. A hundred percent, including his own argument. I still his own argument from August. I really still think there's dirt that they got on him from our Lago. Like I think that he's terrified right now. I think he's part of one of the 15 boxes that had been sitting there from the RNC hack. And for him to come out right now and do that, it's political suicide. It makes absolutely no sense unless he's completely lost his mind.

Roe V Wade Mike Pence Pence Supreme Court Lindsey Graham RNC
 Judge temporarily blocks Ohio law banning most abortions

AP News Radio

00:36 sec | 2 weeks ago

Judge temporarily blocks Ohio law banning most abortions

"There are more legal developments on state laws restricting abortion I'm Ben Thomas with the latest A judge has temporarily blocked Ohio's ban It prohibits most abortions after the first detectable fetal heartbeat cardiac activity can be detected as early as 6 weeks into pregnancy before many people know they're pregnant Ohio's law went into effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the roe versus weight decision in June But the judge's action means abortions through 20 weeks gestation may resume for now as was the case before the ban went into a fact Abortion providers represented by the ACLU of Ohio are

Ben Thomas Ohio U.S. Supreme Court Aclu
Christen Limbaugh Bloom on Jesus Using Evil for Good

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

01:51 min | 2 weeks ago

Christen Limbaugh Bloom on Jesus Using Evil for Good

"Kristen for your father and I were of a certain generation to say, oh dear, everything's awful. Youngsters today, et cetera, et cetera. Talk to us from your perspective. Shouldn't we be a little bit buoyed by recent events, especially if I look at the pro life versus the pro abortion movement. I just see young faces at these events. What do you seeing? I completely agree. And I think that when the pendulum sways one way, the good thing is that Jesus uses evil for good, oftentimes. And so so many people are waking up to the real spiritual forces that are at work right now in our society. And people Christians in particular have been praying for the fall of roe versus wade for 50 years and here we are in 2022 and roe has fallen. And so I think that it's so important that we take time to recognize that God did this, that at the end of the day he is the one who brought this forward. And there's also so much work that has been done. For example, I believe there are 9 times as many pregnancy centers as there are abortion clinics. And that's all thanks to the hard work of Christians and conservatives in this country. And so I think that we have to remember that there are so many of us in this country who still believe in the goodness of the founding fathers, vision for America. It being a nation based on Christianity. And we have to continue meeting together praying together and raising up our children with these values and not giving in to the different influences and culture that we try to muddle these ideas and confuse us from the purity of our founding father's vision for America.

Kristen Wade America
David Limbaugh Discusses the Notion of Spirituality

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

01:07 min | 2 weeks ago

David Limbaugh Discusses the Notion of Spirituality

"I want to talk about whether or not we're making headway. I'd like to ask Chris today especially on the pro life message if you think good things are happening, not just with roe V wade. But first, we have to address this thing that's been around this old soul, this kanade that there are many ways to God and I love this one you hear a lot. I'm a spiritual person. I don't go to church. I don't believe in institutionalized Christianity, but I'm a spiritual person. Do you address these issues in your book, David? Well, absolutely. Jesus said, and let's make no mistake. These people say, Jesus is all salt and light and he was never irritated. He's never that emphatic and Paul was different. He was firm and obnoxious. No, they taught the same gospel and Jesus was very emphatic about it. I am the way the truth and the life there's another way to the father except through me. That's pretty explicit. Pretty explicit at Paul, of course, said Salvation is by faith alone. And to the extent that we deviate from that and our teachings, we are sending people to we're jeopardizing people's eternal destiny because

Roe V Wade Kanade Chris Paul David Jesus
Sen. Graham proposes nationwide 15-week abortion ban

AP News Radio

00:53 sec | 2 weeks ago

Sen. Graham proposes nationwide 15-week abortion ban

"Republican senator Lindsey Graham introduced a nationwide abortion ban Lee would be in the mainstream of most everybody else in the world The South Carolina Republican says after the Supreme Court overturned roe versus wade a nationwide abortion ban should be federal law At 15 weeks pretty much strong majority of Americans believe abortion should be the exception not the rule White House press secretary karine Jean Pierre says it's wildly out of step with where the majority of Americans are Minority leader Mitch McConnell did not immediately embrace Graham's abortion ban Bill Most of the members of my conference prefer that this be dealt with the state level Graham's legislation has almost zero chance of becoming law but it elevates the abortion issue at a time when other Republicans are focusing on inflation and

Roe Versus Wade Lindsey Graham Karine Jean Pierre South Carolina LEE Supreme Court Mitch Mcconnell White House Graham Bill
Kirk Cameron Previews His New Film 'Life'

ToddCast Podcast with Todd Starnes

01:06 min | 2 weeks ago

Kirk Cameron Previews His New Film 'Life'

"I don't know how you do this. It's like you've got these incredible movies coming out just, I mean, it's like Karen Kingsbury, the novelist. What's a month you got a movie coming out here? How in the world do you do this? Well, you know what? The timing of it is really incredible, Todd. I assume you're talking about the homeschool awakening, a movie that came out a couple of months ago, and now here's life Mark, a movie about the value of life in the womb and the beauty of adoption. But we made this back in 2019. It was supposed to come out a year ago, but it was delayed due to the COVID pandemic shutdowns, and then who would have thought that the Supreme Court would have essentially overruled roe versus wade that it would be gone and then a couple months later, the movie rushing into the theaters about the value of life. I mean, this is a providential timing. So I'm really not king the king Karen Kingsbury of movies. God is just the perfect schedule of events to where this thing came out right on the heels of that important decision.

Karen Kingsbury Todd Mark Supreme Court Wade
Why Pro-Life and Not Pro-Choice Is the Extremist Position

Stephanie Miller's Happy Hour Podcast

01:06 min | 2 weeks ago

Why Pro-Life and Not Pro-Choice Is the Extremist Position

"I love your article on abortion rights in reaching across the aisle. You're right. First off. And what I loved about your articles when they're talking about when we are talking about their extreme position on forced birth, Democrats never talk about forcing people to abort, and you're absolutely we're not the crazies. Right, right. They want to act like being pro choice is the extremist position. Pro choice is not the extremist position. Pro choice is the moderate position between forced birth and forced abortion. I mean, you know, just logically that makes sense and the difference is that we have the majority of the Republican Party that is four forced birth and nobody in the democratic side that is saying that there should be any kind of forced abortion. And so what we have then is the moderate position trying to negotiate away the moderation, which again is pro choice, whether it's roe V wade or something else, and then saying, okay, well, how many forced births shall we allow?

Republican Party
 Planned Parenthood maps strategy to protect abortion rights

AP News Radio

00:43 sec | 2 weeks ago

Planned Parenthood maps strategy to protect abortion rights

"I Mike Gracia reporting Planned Parenthood maps its strategy to protect abortion rights Plant parenthood representatives from 24 states met in California's capital Friday to map out a nationwide strategy to protect and strengthen access to abortion The group would ultimately like to follow California's lead where state lawmakers passed robust abortion protections this year after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned roe V wade At a meeting attended by a reporter for The Associated Press participants were not specific about their strategies But in Lansing Michigan Friday That motion carries four zero The Michigan board of state canvassers agreed to put proposal three on the November ballot asking voters if the right to an abortion should be added to the state constitution

Mike Gracia Roe V Wade California U.S. Supreme Court Michigan Board Of State Canvas The Associated Press Lansing Michigan
Amber Athey: There's Still Hope for Republicans in November

The Dan Bongino Show

01:57 min | 3 weeks ago

Amber Athey: There's Still Hope for Republicans in November

"You mentioned the elections before You know there is some talk about the red web the red wave ebbing One of the articles I have up at bongino report now is some of these pollsters are estimating now a 68% chance that Democrats keep the Senate There's very little chance they keep the house even if it's not a red wave at all even if they win almost no Biden seats just a couple of Trump seats They only need 5 seats They'll probably take back the house I hope they do but your thoughts on that I mean the polls in the last election amber were horrible I mean remember 2020 they had that guy Jamie Harrison found in South Carolina closing in on Lindsey Graham Lindsey Graham's not even like a conservative and he wound up destroying him We only take on the polls in the election coming up Yeah in today's climate it's pretty clear that every poll that's run by one of these liberal pollsters is going to sample Republicans by probably four to 5 points which puts a lot of these Senate races well within the margin of error And I do think this sort of doomsday predictions from some within the Republican Party are a little bit overblown August is traditionally always a slow month for the Republican Party in terms of fundraising and just general interest and elections because people are going on vacation They're shuttling their kids around for summer activities and overall just kind of busy But September and October is when they start getting more engaged So you're seeing some of the races tighten up you're seeing things kind of break more towards conservatives And that trend I think will continue through election day because you can not overcome the type of dismal approval rating that the president has in the democratic Democrats in Congress have just from the overturning of roe V wade which is what Democrats are trying to make the election about now So I think there's still a lot of reason to be optimistic

Jamie Harrison Lindsey Graham Lindsey Graham Senate Biden Republican Party South Carolina Roe V Wade Congress
Just Like Democrats, 'MAGA Republicans' Are Fired Up

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:37 min | 3 weeks ago

Just Like Democrats, 'MAGA Republicans' Are Fired Up

"All right, Democrats who worship at the altar of abortion are energized over the roe V wade decision? Okay. Maybe you are. Maybe you're a woman that sits around and says. That if the Supreme Court makes a ruling you disagree with, you think voting for Democrats somehow counters that knock yourself out. It's pathetic, but knock yourself out. Do what you think you need to do. But you don't think Republicans are energized? By being personally attacked like this by the president of the United States, a guy essentially declaring open hostility and contempt for half the country, that's why so many people are ordering magga Republican t-shirts. And I'm excited about that. You can go to Mike online dot com to order your very own red, white and blue maga Republican shirt, or bumper sticker, I think the t-shirts are selling better than the bumper stickers in the magnets, but however you want to define yourself. However, you want to proclaim to the world. That you're not going to be bullied or silenced by grandpa Joe, you text the keyword maga to 806 5 5 mic will send you back the link. Just text maga to 806 5 5 6 four 5 three. We'll send you back the link and you can place your order for your own red, white and blue, maga Republican T-shirt.

Supreme Court United States Mike Grandpa Joe
Caller: Roe v. Wade Reversal Is Affecting California Voter Sentiment

Mike Gallagher Podcast

00:52 sec | 3 weeks ago

Caller: Roe v. Wade Reversal Is Affecting California Voter Sentiment

"Many voters to think through these issues. I'm here in Northern California. I talked to people all the time. I talked to many women and they tell me that they're right to get an abortion is being taken away. And I go, wait a minute. We're in California. There's absolutely no change in your right to get an abortion. Correct. In fact, California's importing people into the state. Do they not know that Ron? Say again? Do they not know that? Do they not realize that they live in California? Well, this is my warning to you. That people have very low levels of intelligence. And when you when you take a congressman and my district that gets elected with only like 18, 19% of the vote. And if you can activate two or 3% of the people on an issue where they don't even understand what they're thinking about, and they run and vote, it's tough. Well, I mean,

California Northern California RON
"roe" Discussed on Latino USA

Latino USA

03:37 min | 3 months ago

"roe" Discussed on Latino USA

"Question mark. You know, we want to do a temperature check. So Jessica, what's your temperature check? How do you feel? It's been a day and it hasn't stopped since May when the Dobbs opinion was first leaked. This is a really dark moment in our country's history. And I'm not one to think that we haven't had a lot of dark moments before this. I'm pretty clear eyed, but I want to really just sort of level set. What happened on Friday was the Supreme Court unequivocally took away a right. It had previously recognized. And how this then proceeds, the fallout, the dominoes that come from this, it's a moment for everyone in this country to take pause and understand that what we have is an anti majoritarian rule from the Supreme Court and it is about to drastically change the way we understand our personal lives in this country. I mean, it's so fucking deep. It's just like you just like, oh my God. We just got rolled over by a boulder, hit on our heads. Many of us did see it coming have been seen it coming actually for decades. Kim, tell me how you doing? You know, it's interesting. A lot of times I feel like my job as a political analyst and a legal analyst in a way serves as a buffer to some of the more horrific things that happen in the world because I put on my work hat, right? And I think about the legal analysis and the political analysis and that sort of keeps me keeps my mind occupied. But for this, that's been very difficult to do as a woman as a person of color, that the court not only rolled back a fundamental liberty right that I thought that I learned in law school would protect me and others. But also did it in a way that calls into question so many other protections. So preciously recently enacted and recognized protections and then turned around and said, well, you know, if you want protection in this way, you have to demonstrate that throughout the history of this nation that it has been a tradition. To protect these rights. And then I think so many people are screwed then because so many of these protections are so recent. We can't prove them because they weren't protected as a tradition in our country. So that's the part that's most jarring for me. It's been a couple of days. You've had some more time to process what's your what's your temperature check, my friend? I'm dizzy with the horror of what's happening in the United States of America. And so on a very profound level, it just feels like, yeah, everything is shaking the earthquake is happening underneath our feet. Yeah, what we've just heard is that it's not just about abortion. Deep issues of privacy and therefore questions of things that we have taken not for granted, but gay marriage, contraception, all of these things are now being discussed. And it feels very dystopian, and then at the same time, no, this is real. I did say something when I was at the American library association meeting on Saturday morning after the decision, I said a million or more activists were just born. Because of this. Yeah, they became, they became activists as a result of what happened. Because I became a little activist when roe V wade was first being.

Supreme Court Jessica boulder Kim United States of America earthquake American library association roe V wade
"roe" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

06:17 min | 3 months ago

"roe" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

"I'm talking about the Supreme Court's momentous decision to overrule overturn roe versus wade, and the effect of that is not to outlaw abortion, but to disperse it. Disperse the decision about abortion to the several states. Each state can now pass its own laws. So in a strange way, the court wasn't even deciding the abortion issue at all. What the Supreme Court was deciding is on this question who should decide? Should we the Supreme Court decide for the whole country? Should each end with virtual woman in the country have their own, say you may say over their womb and it's like, this is mine. It may be a separate life. It may have its own toes. It may have its own fingers, but nevertheless it inhabits my body and therefore I have, you may say, the life or death decision to make over it. Who should decide in the court to basically say, look, we live in a democratic society. When there isn't an enumerated right in the constitution that has to be protected even against the majority, then the democratic process applies. And that means that states get to make these decisions through a process that will, in effect, reflect the moral consensus or at least the moral plurality of people living in that state. Now, it's kind of interesting that when I look at all the articles on the topic, they seem to have a kind of erroneous premise. Here's The New Yorker. When the Supreme Court takes away a long held constitutional right. But it was not a constitutional right. It never was. And that's really a leader's point, Alito says, in a sense, we're not taking away a right, the right never existed. Roe versus wade was wrongly decided from the beginning. It's kind of like saying the Brown decision in 1954 overturned the right to segregation. No, they never was a segregation right. The plessy decision going back to the 1890s was bogus from the beginning. Yes, it was an effect for 50 years, but that doesn't put it into the constitution in any more than an abortion right can be found in the constitution before. No, it wasn't there before. It wasn't there now. It isn't there now. So that is the key point. And this is even what the dissent ignores here is the descent or rescinding an individual ride in its entirety and conferring it on the state, this is an action the court takes for the first time in history. Now, there would never was an individual right. The individual right was fabricated from the was fabricated from the beginning. Now, the immediate consequence of all this is kind of amazing. And that is that abortion clinics are closing down in the red states. I'm just reading now from life news. West Virginia is now abortion free as the state's last abortion center has stopped performing abortions. Confirmed all three abortion businesses in Alabama have stopped killing babies following the Supreme Court decision to overturn role. Now, how is this possible? I mean, normally, abortion is now immediately illegal in Kentucky, Louisiana and South Dakota. How is it possible for a court decision to come on Friday? An abortion clinics to be closed. We don't buy Monday. And the answer is this. A number of these states had what are called trigger laws. So a trigger lies, okay, you're claiming that abortion is constitutional as a constitutional right, and there's a Supreme Court decision roe V wade in effect that declares, however, implausibly that there is this right, we will pass a law so that if at any moment that this right is rescinded or overturned or proclaimed to be bogus by a majority of the Supreme Court, then boom automatically are pro life law goes into effect. And so a bunch of states, I believe, a dozen or so have these trigger laws that kick in. They kick in virtually instantaneously, maybe not quite as quickly as the examples I gave, but my point being that these states don't have to go back. And make new laws. They've already passed the law, the law is valid as long as it is upheld in the Supreme Court and that is the case now. Now there's a bitter backlash you may say from the left and I'll be talking about it in the days ahead. But here I just want to talk about the idea that's been echoed by several people, even Susan Collins gave it a little bit of rhetorical deference. And this is the idea that somehow the Supreme Court Justices lied when they, when they went through the confirmation process, they lied, well, they lied how. They didn't lie by saying we're never going to overturn roe versus wade. In fact, they refused to answer that question. So you can say that they lied about that. Well, what do they lie about? Well, they lied about the fact that they said in their hearings that they considered role to be settled precedent. But there's no lie there because that was simply a matter of saying, I mean, if some law, however preposterous, has been in effect for multiple decades. In this case, 40 years. Well, 73. Almost 50 years. It is settled precedent. It may be bad precedent, but it's still settled precedent. And so I don't think these guys lied. I think what they did is they just played the stupid verbal game of the left. The verbal game of the left is to try to extract from justices, statements in advance about how they're going to rule on questions like role and the judges were like, listen, we'll play along with this little you may call it verbal ping Pong. It's just a measure of how degraded our political culture is that justices can't, in effect. Say, candidly, listen, you lunatics, there's no abortion right in the constitution, hold up the constitution of the light, squeeze lemon juice on and see if you see an abortion right in it. You won't see one any more than we do. So since you can't be honest and do that, you have these little verbal pirouettes. But when the time comes, the justice is ultimately due what they did in this case, they actually looked at the constitution to see if there was such a right and in it.

Supreme Court wade Alito The New Yorker Roe West Virginia South Dakota Brown Alabama Louisiana Kentucky Susan Collins
"roe" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

The Doug Collins Podcast

04:57 min | 3 months ago

"roe" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

"Again, the court is now in an interesting determination. There are many who feel that roe V wade was one of the worst decided cases in the annals of supreme courts up with plessy and dred Scott and just so many other cases that were wrongly decided by a court. And it is needed to be changed. The Dobbs case makes this premise a very real because the Mississippi case with the exception of a life of mother set this at 15 weeks. It said it below the threshold of what is determined, the courts have used his viability. But then the question became is it an undue burden if you said it at 15 weeks. Now there are many who frankly for the prolonged community are not crazy about 15 weeks. It allows 15 weeks in which states could allow abortions. But if they kept under the rogue concept, I think what is more being pushed here and what Stewart the attorney general from Mississippi is saying is now it is time just to start over. It is time to get the courts out of this decision making process. It is the time to get the courts out of this process. And send it back to the states in which you will then have the discussion of elected officials representing people that they see and know every day to decide is this where we want our state to be. Do we want our state to be a part of allowing abortion? Do we want to be a part of it and how much do we want to allow how far do we want to allow it? And you know, even going back into you want to allow just as Colorado and the District of Columbia and some recently have passed laws that say that abortion is legal up until the before birth. I mean, I'm not sure very many people really would believe that it's okay to kill a full term child in the womb at 38, 39, 40 weeks. It's hard for me to believe that. But yet you do have those on the other side that say, well, it's not a matter of viability is not a matter of choice. It is a matter of the woman having this right founded in row this Phnom part of these rise a shadow rise to come from other rise to form this ride of privacy. The burden of a pregnancy, Amy, just the same, you call me Barrett, the case is done. Do not, the proliferation of adoptions and adoption option relieve the burden of carrying or caring for and carrying a child. Again, these are the questions that we're asking this Dobbs case. It makes it very interesting. Now, if you look at it, what's going to happen? I don't know. I'm not here to say that I believe that this court, even on a 5 four basis or a 6 three basis is going to come back and say, we are determining that after hearing these arguments that roe is no longer valid law that we are overturning row we're sending this back to the states and allowing the states to determine how they want to handle this. Or will they say, take a more moderated approach and say, we agree with Mississippi. This is not an undue burden. We agree up until this point and sort of, in many ways, taking the argument that justice Roberts and many others have said that this trimester exclusion was something that was a fiction made up and randomly gave is this something that will now be thrown out, but then they're replacing it with another random number, random weeks, 15, that would then determine when abortion could be legal and win ended or could not be legal. I'm beginning to believe if you read the transcript that Roberts is struggling mightily with a, what he would consider, I believe a false construct of 15 weeks. You know, the reason why 15 weeks was used, the reason why any of these time frames, even some of the terms of viability. I think so when he's struggling with that, we'll see how that comes out in his voting in this case. I lay all of this out because I want you to understand what's at stake here as you go forward. Now there's been many on the liberal commentator side that say that if roe is overturned, they use the old quote from justice Scalia that this is not the end of it. So to speak. If they overturn roe, then you're going to have cases brought on everything from interracial marriage to same sex marriage to others. I think Stewart answered that question pretty succinctly when he said we're not dealing in life in death here. This is not, this is daily in life and death in the life and death of that child in the womb. I think you'll see that that will not be the case. And especially in like same sex marriage and others, there's other legal tied to very legal precedents of equal protection that have opened those gates up that would not be tied to this ride or privacy or this others that although used in those cases were not the predominant.

roe V wade plessy Mississippi Dobbs dred Scott Stewart District of Columbia Barrett Colorado justice Roberts Amy justice Scalia Roberts roe gates
"roe" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

The Doug Collins Podcast

05:47 min | 3 months ago

"roe" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

"Up 67, 70. And this is coming in a sense of what we see as the courts agreeing with this, but the state legislature is dealing with it in their own way in their own sites. And I want to emphasize why this is important because it gives you a hint of what could be happening in the future, but also I believe that the roe V wade decision one of the worst decided constitutional cases that we've ever seen decided both liberals and conservative jurists and scholars have said this forever. Own the roe V case because it actually was a judicial solution to a problem that was beginning to be handled at the state level. And no matter what side you fell on, it was beginning to be addressed at these levels. And the controversy was real. 1970 one, USB Butch, virtue TCH, actually D.C. Washington D.C. allowed abortions and this was tailed by the courts in that. So you're starting to see the courts actually running on this as well. Now, that brings us to 1973 on the penult case of the ending case of roe V wade and also dovey Bolton. Now both of these are together, the roe V wade emphasized in what became of the trimester selection of when a state can do anything, you know, the first trimester that can do nothing second trimester only maternal. You know, if you don't have internal health, third trimester, they could ban those. But this was the interesting position of roe V wade that built on a previous case. Now, again, liberal activists Proto us pro abortion activists had been fighting in these states, you know, state to state to make it legal or to show it to be legal and certain stages to get an abortion in these states. We already saw this happening. This was not a new occurrence. It was a discussion, but it was being played out in the proper federalist doctrine if you would of the of our country and that is each state deciding for themselves what their value of life was and how they determine the def abortion was going to be legal or not legal. But that one going fast enough. So jurists such as lawyers such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg and many others began to push cases testing the limits of these abortion laws and finding a new and frankly creative doctrine under which to find the basis for approving of abortion in roe V wade was the, I guess if you want to say from their perspective of getting judicial activism into this was their crowning achievement. Now, why is this important? I'm a believer that if it continued through the states that you would have had a patchwork of laws throughout the country that this would be a state issue, this would be an issue that would be very real. For those of us on the pro life side, we would want to remove it from any state in which it was for the pro choice side. There would be wanting to expand it to wherever they could. And this would be where it would be followed. It would be followed in the elections of the legislatures in these states to taking the feeling of the public in which they represent and implying them into the states of which they govern. By taking this out, it was not going fast enough. And if you read some history about this, you will say that the activists were saying, you know, in essence, this was not going fast enough, we need to challenge this in court and get this tournament as a right for a woman to have the right to an abortion. Now, a case that was the forerunner of roe V wade actually was the one that set the parameters for this right of privacy spoken of in the roe V wade case. Now it's been used in other cases as well. They have this issue of right of privacy, but for this one, in particular, it goes on bills on what justice Douglas called inciting the Bill of Rights and the number of Bill asked is Phnom or shadows is what perimeter is actually in the shadows. In other words, this is the ride, but that shadow of that right gives rise to these other enumerated rights that would give rise to a what would be known as a right of privacy. And it would be included to include a woman's right to choose to have an abortion. And this is how the whole case developed. So it's really understanding why you need to understand that a case out of Connecticut, the griswold case was about contraception. Now think about this for a second. How they were going to enforce this case was always one that was always, you know, presented some interesting arguments for those of us in law school, but griswold case was about contraception and the states banning of the use of contraception. Out of that case, they developed the right of privacy that you would have in your home to use contraception and this is where this whole case sprung from. Out of this became the writer privacy out of that became then the decision in roe V wade, which using the rider privacy to have a right that that rotter props to the extended to health decisions that rotten to privacy extended them to a woman being able to choose to terminate a pregnancy. Now, the reason this is important and the reason this was such a decision that his calls every court justice of the Supreme Court now in their confirmation hearings to have to answer their question on their determination of roe V wade will they uphold it will they not uphold it and we've seen that a lot here in the recent weeks and months onto the end of the Trump administration and under Biden administration and under the Obama administration. I mean, it has become the most dominant question many times in these judicial confirmation hearings is the determination of wild there. What is.

roe V wade Washington D.C. dovey Bolton Ruth Bader Ginsburg legislature D.C. griswold Phnom Douglas rotter us Connecticut Bill Trump administration Biden administration Supreme Court Obama administration
"roe" Discussed on COVID-19: What You Need to Know

COVID-19: What You Need to Know

01:36 min | 3 months ago

"roe" Discussed on COVID-19: What You Need to Know

"And the balance that existed is for Congress to restore the protections of roe V wade as federal law. Aaron, the president is saying, this is now on Congress that Congress needs to codify the protections that roe V wade had for the right to an abortion. But the problem is they don't have the numbers in Congress to do that. They've tried to do that in recent weeks after that draft decision had leaked, but it wasn't doable. So the president today was saying that Americans now need to get out, make their voices heard and in November and in subsequent elections, need to elect more lawmakers who will do just that. Not even just at the federal level, but do it at the state level as well in order to try and restore those protections that roe had made the law of the land. And it wasn't just abortion that he said was at stake. No, the president back when that draft decision had been leaked in early May had expressed significant concerns about what this would mean for a variety of rights that Americans now take for granted, and he reiterated that again today. He said row recognize the right to privacy that this is ingrained in the fabric of this country right now. That Americans have the ability to make the best decisions for their own health in terms of birth control. Also, the ability to decide who you want to marry. And he explicitly called out justice clarence Thomas, who, in his writing on this decision, called for the reconsideration of marriage equality and the right to contraception, President Biden says this is extreme and says it is a dangerous path that this Supreme Court is taking the nation.

roe V wade Congress Aaron roe clarence Thomas President Biden Supreme Court
"roe" Discussed on Dennis Prager Podcasts

Dennis Prager Podcasts

04:10 min | 3 months ago

"roe" Discussed on Dennis Prager Podcasts

"I'd love to hear more arguments. For a late term or midterm abortions. The notion that a man can not have a moral opinion on the issue because he doesn't get pregnant. Is painful to hear. The reduction of the human beings that that argument engages in, by the way, it was used there was somebody wrote in The New York Times about me. I think it was The New York Times. Or at some paper. Then Dennis prager has no right to an opinion on abortion because he doesn't have a uterus. You have to go to college. I'm not saying my caller did, but one generally has to go to college to think that poorly. Morality is now based on gender. It's a left wing position. That's true. Okay, thank you for calling. Let's Sacramento California and Stephen hello. Hi, Dennis. Hi. Haven't called you for a while, but man, I just want to tell you, maybe your audience would like to hear an opinion of convicted felon and how I feel about the Supreme Court decision on the guns. What was your felony? Oh, man. Oh, God. Road rage. Can I just say that? Back in the 70s. And anyway, I suddenly conviction was reduced to misdemeanor dismissed because I got to my probation without any trouble. I haven't been in trouble since I was a Democrat then. I've woken up. I'm a conservative now. Thanks to you and big part, by the way. And I totally no longer criminal anything like that, but I want to tell you how I feel about the gun law. I am thrilled because there's a convicted felon. I can't own a gun because I follow the law. And if I'm out in public and some thugs start shooting, first of all, I know it's not a law abiding citizen that's carrying legally because they don't start shootouts. So I know it's a folks shooting. I want somebody near me that's carrying a gun legally that can take this thug out. Cops don't get there right away. And I want people to carry guns to keep law abiding citizens safe. Well, I have a lot of sympathy for that position. It has come to the point where there are definite risks with concealed carry permits. There's risk to every policy there's a risk to raising the speed limit. But I think it's a good idea. We'll be back. The Dennis prager show. Hello, my Friends, Dennis prager here. It's the open lines. A lot of calls on roe V wade. And I'm taking calls on all sorts of subjects. I still put out this challenge of a moral argument for an abortion on a viable phoebus. There, you don't need religion. I'm a big believer in religion as the basis of morality, but you don't need it there. If you believe that human life should be protected, I don't understand why being in a woman ends that protection, especially given the fact that if she wants the baby, it's considered a human. At any age, even before viability. There is no moral argument for abortion on demand. It's killing a child on demand. Let's be honest, certainly when it is viable..

Dennis prager Stephen hello The New York Times Sacramento Dennis Supreme Court roe V wade California
"roe" Discussed on Dennis Prager Podcasts

Dennis Prager Podcasts

06:09 min | 3 months ago

"roe" Discussed on Dennis Prager Podcasts

"Well, my Friends, I discussed the verdict, obviously. The whole first hour will certainly have some calls on it the next hour. And the happiness hour is never deferred. It is just the rule of this program. Is there a conceivable time if there were nuclear war? Would I cancel the hour? I'll come through it when there's a nuclear war. I consider happiness to be an extremely important subject the happy make the world better the unhappy make it worse. There are happy and unhappy liberals happy and unhappy conservatives. There are no happy leftists. I'm happiness is a major source of the nihilism of our time, the screaming, the hysteria, the non hysteric is a happier person. I am a happier person, and because I had contempt for the lockdowns from month two. I didn't listen to them from the second week. I gathered with my bunch of 15 Friends every Friday night for Shabbat dinner from the second week. Of the lockdown. When you don't buy into hysteria, you're a happier human being. When you are easily frightened and easily panicked, you are not a happy human being. It seems to be easier to be a sheep. But the sheep of the human species are not happier. So, some strong views on the happiness issue. Hence the happiness hour for now 23 years. I'm on probably between 48 and 50 Fridays a year. Probably, what do you think? How many Fridays do I miss for, you think? Fewer, I try not to miss Fridays because of the happiness hour. Anyway, it's virtually every Friday of the year. Because I think of it as a service to you, the truth is, it's been a service to me. I have learned that men's an immense amount from you on the issue of happiness. And it has been very good for me during difficult times in my life, everybody has difficult times in their life. I don't know of an exception to that rule. I am not an exception to that rule. But I have tried to live by my advice. My plea, the people act happy, even if they don't feel it. It's good for you and it's good for others. We have a moral obligation to have a happy countenance. We owe it to others, not to inflict our bad moods just as we don't inflict our bad breath on other people. That's the reason there is no even consideration. Of discussing the dominant news item of today with the roe V wade, overturned decision of the Supreme Court. We'll do it plenty I assure you, but not on the happiness hour. However, I will address today a very tough issue. For which I don't have great answers, but I want to address it anyway. I try to have great answers on most problems confronting most challenges confronting your happiness, I happiness, anyone's happiness. But the subject that I have chosen for today may not have a terrific answer. It may have some non terrific answers, and that's what the police that might be of some help. And that is, how do you maintain a happy family and happy friendship? Where you differ on moral social slash political issues. That's a toughie. I'm not sure that there is even an answer. Which is why it's so tough. And I feel a little bad because I do, in fact, try to give you answers to most of the questions that arise with regard to happiness, but I'm not sure I can do that in this regard. Many of you listening to me right now have an adult child, alienated from you because of politics. Or a really, it's not even politics. I find that a cheapening word, because of social issues or differences with regard to social and moral issues. Take the take the one that is in the news. The roe V wade issue, let us say you believe that abortion is immoral because there is a human being in a woman's womb. And your child, having gone to Yale, believes that what a woman has in her womb, if she considers it to be a pimple, it's just a pimple..

roe V wade Supreme Court Yale
"roe" Discussed on podcast – Lawyers, Guns & Money

podcast – Lawyers, Guns & Money

05:34 min | 5 months ago

"roe" Discussed on podcast – Lawyers, Guns & Money

"And I think the first is almost a little understandable is that argument that sort of if Republicans wanted role overruled that would have happened. And I think that's the kind of argument that can sound sensible, but until you dig into it, just realize how incredibly lucky we were that row was still good law in 2012. You know, if Reagan nominates bork and ski and reverse order, you know, roe is overruled no later than 1992. You know, David souter wasn't put on the court to preserve roe, but because of extremely weird internal administration dynamics, like Ken Starr could have just as easily been nominated to that seat. And so there's just all kinds of justice Kennedy voted to overrule role at the conference in case he had changed his mind. So, you know, it's just that there's many times in which row could have been overruled. And I think that, you know, by 2012, that gets team inevitable. And I would even say that there's some, you know, in the 70s and 80s, there was even some truth to the argument that Republican elites didn't really want row overruled. That the court taking it over was actually good for the party. And I think there was just a failure to recognize how much the Republican Party had changed and how contingent the survival of role was. And as soon as, as you say, Ruth Bader Ginsburg doesn't retire strategically, Anthony Kennedy does retire strategically, you know, the Electoral College, the Republicans get lucky and the Electoral College and both 2004 and 2016 and it's game over. So I think that's the one form of complacency. And the other I think is just ultimately a complacency that trivializes reproductive rights that wants to claim that, well, rose popular, so probably not that many states will ban abortion and it's not really going to be that bad. Which is, as we've discussed, it's pretty clearly nonsensical. There's something else and that the to the extent that there's anything defensible in the Alito opinion. Again, it's this logic about leaving it to the legislative process and the democratic process. But of course, the democratic process is exactly what Republicans don't want. In many legislature, states, which they could be punished for unpopular abortion policies, they're one gubernatorial election away from essentially permanent bans on abortion because they don't offer democratic elections for the legislature. And of course, you know, the court in opinions like Shelby county and rucho has done everything they could to ensure that there won't be free and fair elections after row..

David souter Ken Starr Electoral College roe Reagan Ruth Bader Ginsburg Anthony Kennedy Kennedy Republican Party Alito legislature Shelby county
"roe" Discussed on Dennis Prager Podcasts

Dennis Prager Podcasts

03:56 min | 5 months ago

"roe" Discussed on Dennis Prager Podcasts

"Dennis prager here, thanks for listening to the daily Dennis prager podcast to hear the entire three hours of my radio show commercial free every single day become a member of prager topia. It also gets access to 15 years worth of archives. As well as The Daily Show prep, subscribe, and prager topia dot com. Hello, my Friends, welcome to the Dennis prager show. It should be noted most people know this, but in the world of hysteria, which is the oxygen of the left hysteria, you will notice that, correct? All we do is go from hysteria to hysteria. Country would be in really relaxed, loving shape, were it not for the left hysteria. I didn't read to you yesterday about the number of young people who apparently suffering psychological effects from fearing that they will die in the heat. Of global warming, that's hysteria. Very few people deny that the earth is getting warmer. We don't deny that. We called deniers. We never denied that. We deny that it is an existential threat to biological life. It's another left wing lie because that's the way they can get people hysterical and get what they want. The lockdowns were hysteria. The closing of schools was hysteria. The mask mandates was hysteria. Or were hysteria, if you will? We don't lack for them. The latest is roe V wade. In the larger states of the union by and large, nothing will change. Roe V wade was and a handful of pro choice professors of law, acknowledged this over the course of the years like Lawrence tribe is left winger. At Harvard, to his credit, said it was a bad decision. Nobody even debates whether it was a good decision. They debate whether they like the decision. It's a big difference between liking a decision and a good decision. It would have struck the most intelligent and moral individuals of the past, as bizarre. That the Supreme Court of the United States saw in the U.S. Constitution a right to have an abortion under any circumstance. It is unique in the world of morality, and I'm not invoking religion or God, an atheist could understand and appreciate and agree with everything I'm saying. This is nothing to do necessarily with God or the Bible or religion. Misses pure logic and morality. We have created a right that doesn't exist as in hinted at. The flimsy excuse of the court in roe V wade, a right to privacy. What does that mean? So in private.

Dennis prager prager topia roe V wade The Daily Show Roe V wade Lawrence tribe Harvard U.S. Supreme Court
"roe" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

05:59 min | 5 months ago

"roe" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"As we have been flagging for you, it explicitly brings the Janice versus asked me test that we may be the only podcast on earth that when you say what's the worst Supreme Court decision of the past ten years, you know, would have Janice versus asked me on the list. I told you that that was going to be the vehicle that the conservative Supreme Court used to radically redefine the principle of stare decisis, and they have now done so explicitly. Justice alino has done so. That's part three of the opinion. So with that in mind, let's tackle part one a and I'm going to read a large passage of this to you, and I am going to tell you this is two a number one beginning on page 9 of the slip opinion. And I'm going to tell you that in the entirety of what I read. Other than making fun of roe V wade and citations, therefore, to roe V wade. There is not a single case cited, nothing zero, none. This is 100% an invention of Samuel Alito. So again, when you are dealing with uncle Frank talking about how, you know, roe V where it wasn't in the constitution. These principles are found nowhere in the Supreme Court's prior jurisprudence. They are the opinions of Sam Alito and nothing further. They are backed by citation to no authority. And I can not believe it begins by validating the dumbest, most craven argument that we've been swatting aside since the show began. Let's start out. The constitution makes no express reference to a right to obtain an abortion. And therefore, those who claim that it protects such a right must show that the right is somehow implicit in the constitutional text. Okay, at least give him credit for the second half of that clause, right? So now how do we show that the right is implicit in the constitutional text? Prior to this decision, what you would ask is, is this consistent with the conception of the rights of ordered liberty and you would look at the history leading up to now and say, hey, in a free society, do we generally care about what people do in their bedrooms or do we generally let them be free to do what they want? Oh, we let them be free to do what they want. Great, then that's part of the right to privacy. And if you haven't heard or break down on griswold V Connecticut, it's a two parter. Go back and listen to that because that's essentially what the jurisprudence says. I'm paraphrasing, but not by much. Bolido begins and again, this is 98 pages of gaslighting. Row, however, was remarkably loose in its treatment of the constitutional text. It held that the abortion right, which is not mentioned in the constitution. Again, that's not the test, right? Yeah. Marriage isn't mentioned in the constitution. Contraception isn't dimensioned in the constitution. Anyway. Yeah. Is part of a right to privacy, which is also not mentioned. And that privacy right row observed had been found to spring from no fewer than 5 different constitutional provisions, the first fourth 5th, 9th, and 14th amendments. Now again, this is not a strange result. And the idea that the 5th and the 14th amendments overlap considerably is mainstream jurisprudence. The idea that the first and Fourth Amendment overlap is mainstream jurisprudence. So putting it all together and saying like, yeah, as the court did in griswold and saying, you know, there isn't a single place that refers to a right to privacy in the constitution. And by privacy, they meant the right to make personal intimate decisions, such as whom to marry and whom to have sex with. Privacy in the sense that we typically use it today. The fact that it flows from the penumbra or from multiple sources is it should not be strange. And there is, I will point out zero citation here that that is strange that there's anything wrong with saying that a right comes from multiple overlapping places within the constitution. If that were a problem, then the right's most beloved cases, right? McDonald versus Chicago. Required in extending the Second Amendment protection out through via the incorporation doctrine to the states required multiple amendments. The Second Amendment isn't good at it. It's good enough for D.C. V Heller because D.C. is a federal jurisdiction. But you can't strike down a state law without incorporating the Second Amendment and zero cases that incorporated the Second Amendment. So, you know, you could replace that with. Where does this fiction come from that overlaps the second and 14th amendments? That's crazy. So part of the gaslighting is him stating that as though it's self evidently stupid that it comes from multiple amendments. And it is not there is no case that says that he didn't even quote row. He quotes roe, that's it. I thought he'd just characterized what roe said. Okay. There are, let me see if there is a direct yes. One possibility is that the right was founded in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people. Another was that the right was rooted in the first fourth or Fifth Amendment or in some combination of those provisions. And that this had been, quote, incorporated into the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment just as many other Bill of rights provisions had been incorporated. There is a direct quotation as well as a bunch of sort of scarce sites..

Janice versus Samuel Alito Supreme Court Justice alino roe V wade griswold craven Frank Connecticut D.C. McDonald Chicago roe
"roe" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

The Doug Collins Podcast

04:36 min | 5 months ago

"roe" Discussed on The Doug Collins Podcast

"Roe V wade? Here's also a start of the I need to tell you. If you listened many times to the conversations that go on around the court's picks and the president's picks on the court over the last 50 years, they have determined that roe V wade is the ultimate litmus test. It was not as bad necessarily in the 80s and 90s. It was still there, but it has grown tremendously in the last 25 years. Here's the interesting fact for you. The court takes up maybe, maybe Supreme Court. One to two cases every ten years in abortion. Maybe. It's so important, however, that people put all of their determination on who should be a Supreme Court Justice on how they actually interpret roe V wade and would they be willing to overturn it. I think in many ways, this has become a disservice to the court. I think it is something with the court that deals with all areas of our life, not just this one, which is so vitally important, which I believe they got wrong to start with, and I'm freely cite that in this podcast. I think when you deal with it, it is made the court impose its judicial activist will own a nation that was already dealing with this in the political realm. If you take this out away from the people, if you take this away and say that the court is going to imply this, especially in this instance, when you were actually moving forward, this is what is called. Now you can agree or disagree, but you can't disagree with the facts. This states and we name them all from 1967 home through 1970 other for continuing it, even up until the passage of the court decision roe V wade were adding to abortion rights in this country. Much of the Sagan of those in the pro life movement at the time, which was when nacy and which were really nonexistent because he'd never been a need to at this point, but as they were making progress in legislatures, they chose to take it and hopper speed it up into the courts, courts made it applicable to the country. Then you have the problem in which we face today in which everything surrounding the United States Supreme Court typically starts and ends with what is the justices view on abortion. And this is really where we come. Now, since roe V wade, there was a couple of cases that began to roll back some of roe V wade strengthen it in some ways also take away from it. Casey Planned Parenthood case, this was instituted what will be known as the undue burden test. And that is, if a state could number one state could begin to put restrictions on the access to abortions, whether that be through access to clinics, access to hospitals, access to ultrasounds. I mean, you start building on this progression, parental consent, all of this that would be weighed into this. The question was after Casey, Casey uphill the tenants of roe V wade, but then said that if anything was to affect any of these parts in any of this time of the pregnancy, so to speak, the viability issued these other things that it hadn't made the undue undue burden test. Was it an undue burden on the person, the female to enact her right to terminate a pregnancy? Now, over time, you also had court cases that ruled that the father right or was they had no rise in the choice of abortion and others. Now, before though, I do need to get back a twin decision that also opened this up a great deal on roe V wade with dovey Bolton dough was the same day. It doesn't get the attention that roe does, but it's very important because it defined health of a mother is including all aspects of health psychological mental physical spiritual all aspects. So that basically opens it up for anyone when you say that you can have an abortion based on mental health or anything else, this is where dough comes in and says, look, that's a valid reason to restrict it because that you then run up later in the Casey case, the Casey Planned Parenthood case has to undo burn and how does that affect how someone would get an abortion now when you understand that for those this becomes a semantics exercise on how you actually define life of a mother? Is it health of a mother or life of a mother? Those are two distinctions. Dough made it very clear that health of a mother, it would include anything. Even if they just basically were depressed and wanted to get an abortion, that was a valid grounds of health of a mother. Life of a mother being a different story. So I needed to go back and pick that piece up.

roe V wade Roe V wade Supreme Court Casey dovey Bolton United States Casey Planned Parenthood roe
"roe" Discussed on Today, Explained

Today, Explained

07:02 min | 10 months ago

"roe" Discussed on Today, Explained

"Sharpen your foresight and get ahead of the year ahead. Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah. All persons having business before the honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to draw near and give their attention for the court is now sitting. God save the United States and this honorable court. Ian millhiser, you covered the Supreme Court here at vox, abortion has had a very eventful year in the United States mostly pertaining to the state of Texas, but today a Mississippi abortion case was heard at the Supreme Court of the United States. What happened? Based on what I heard today in this Mississippi case, I think the most likely outcome is that roe V wade is doomed. Donald Trump promised when he if he got elected president, he would nominate justice who had overruled roe V wade. If we put another two or perhaps three justices on, that's really what's going to be. That's what will happen. And that'll happen automatically in my opinion because I am putting pro life justices on the court. He appointed a third of the Supreme Court, and it now looks like when you take those three justices plus two more who are already there, that there are probably 5 votes to overrule roe V wade in its entirety. There are almost certainly 5 votes to do considerable damage to the right to an abortion. Okay, well, just to understand how we got there, let's first talk about the Mississippi case. What's going on in that state? So Mississippi passed a law, they style it as a 15 week abortion ban so that you can't get an abortion after the 15th week of pregnancy, but the clock starts ticking on the first day of the person's last menstrual period. So if you know anything about anatomy for most people that's going to be a 13 week ban for abortions. And the reason why that is unconstitutional at least under existing law is in a case called Planned Parenthood V Casey. The Supreme Court said that there was an absolute right to an abortion states can not ban abortions prior to viability. Viability is the moment when the fetus can live outside of the womb. That's typically around about 24 weeks, and whether you think that this is a 13 week ban or 15 week ban, 15 is less than 24, like, you know, this is a pre viability ban. In order to uphold this law, the Supreme Court is going to have to overrule at least part of Casey. Okay, so that sort of sets the table for what happened today here in Washington. And there were a lot of people outside the Supreme Court letting their feelings be known, I believe. Yeah, I mean, they're always are for cases like this. I think pretty much everyone who follows the court. Knew that this is the single greatest threat to abortion rights, since roe V wade was handed down in 1973. And so you had a whole slew of protesters who were really excited about the possibility that the constitutional right to abortion may cease to exist and you have a whole lot of protesters who were really disturbed by that possibility. And they all met and waved their signs around today in front of the court. And what happened inside the court? It was clear from the beginning of the oral argument that the stakes are very high. Mississippi's lawyer got up and immediately asked the court to overrule roe V wade. Rowan Casey had failed. But the people, if given the chance, will succeed. This court should overrule Rowan Casey and uphold the state's law. I welcome the court's questions. There were some instances where a justice might have asked a question like, well, is there a more incremental approach? Is there something that we could do to uphold your law that's shy of upholding roe V wade? And that lawyer just kept coming back to. I mean, sometimes you give an answer, but he kept coming back to really what you should do is overrule roe V wade. Nowhere else does this court recognize a right to end a human life. Everyone there knew what was at stake, including the justices. And the counter argument, how is the right to an abortion defended? A huge question in the case is the importance of something called starry decisis. Stare decisis is the rule that courts are supposed to follow their own precedent. In case this court carefully examined and rejected every possible reason for overruling row. They have to have a really, really good reason to overrule a precedent. And one thing that kept coming up over and over again is it's not clear what the reason is to overrule roe V wade. Pregnancy itself is unique and imposes unique physical demands and risk on women. And in fact, has impact on all of their lives and their ability to care for other children, other family members on their ability to work, and in particular in Mississippi, those risks are alarmingly high, it's 75. Mississippi, their lawyer kept trying to argue that things have changed. They kept trying to argue that medical technology has changed in some significant way, but it really hasn't. Pregnancy looks pretty similar now to how it looked in 1973 when roe was decided there really hasn't been any fundamental changes here except for one. And that is that the Supreme Court has a lot more conservative Republicans on it than it did when roe was decided or when Casey was decided. And how did the 9 justices on the Supreme Court receive arguments from each side today? So you have three justices on the court. Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, who want the most maximalist conservative outcome in pretty much every case. And they did not betray their normal instincts in this case. Sam Alito at one point seemed to compare roe V wade to plessy V Ferguson, the segregation decision. So suppose plessy versus Ferguson was re argued in 1897. So nothing had changed. Would it not be a sufficient to say, that was a egregiously wrong decision on the day it was handed down. And now it should be overruled. Most eyes, I think we're on Kavanaugh and Barrett. Who are the two justices that will decide whether the court will overrule robots entirely or take a more incremental step against abortion rights? There was one point where he rattled off a long list of cases, including Brown V board of education. If the court in those cases had listened and they were presented in with arguments in those cases adhere to precedent in Brown V board, adhere to plessy. In West Coast hotel, adhere to Atkinson adhered a lot. And.

roe V wade Supreme Court Mississippi United States Rowan Casey Ian millhiser Supreme Court of Planned Parenthood V Casey Donald Trump Casey Texas roe Samuel Alito Washington Neil Gorsuch plessy plessy V Ferguson Clarence Thomas Ferguson Kavanaugh
"roe" Discussed on BrainStuff

BrainStuff

04:13 min | 1 year ago

"roe" Discussed on BrainStuff

"Both roe v wade and planned parenthood v casey so let's talk about precedence. They're considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving similar facts or legal issues. The concept called stereo decisiveness. Which means let the decision stand in. Latin provide stability and predictability in law when a new president is established or laws changed on an issue. It's known as a landmark decision olym- quiz said president is one of the cornerstones of our judicial system. The system of president provides that when courts make decisions in those decisions become law they will remain on the books until that same court or an appellate court overrules those precedents a judges and justices often rely on precedents to make rulings and other cases. A for example. Five justices relied on the precedent. Set by casey when striking down a louisiana law that would have required doctors performing abortions to have emissions privileges at a state authorized hospital within thirty miles. Forty eight kilometers of the clinic. The supreme court can overturn in existing precedent with the majority vote. And this happens perhaps surprisingly more often the general public realizes about two to three times a term linquist says though these cases unlike row aren't ones that make the news. If roe is ultimately ended the aftershocks would be felt immediately eleven states have trigger laws in place that would instantly ban abortions conversely fourteen states plus washington. Dc have laws in place to protect abortion access. Overturning roe would also add strength to texas's sp eight law linquist says however if roe is upheld quote it will have major implications for the texas case simply because it will reaffirm the core right to abortion prior to viability. The supreme court isn't likely to deliver a decision in the mississippi case until these spring or early summer of twenty twenty two..

roe v wade casey linquist roe louisiana supreme court texas washington mississippi
"roe" Discussed on BrainStuff

BrainStuff

08:25 min | 1 year ago

"roe" Discussed on BrainStuff

"Of iheartradio. Hey brain stuff lauren. Bogo bomb here nearly fifty years ago the. Us supreme court made one of its most controversial rulings with its landmark decision in roe v wade. The ruling declared that states criminalizing. Abortion violates a woman's right to due process meaning a woman has the right to choose whether to terminate a pregnancy with limited government restrictions. Until that point. Nearly all fifty states outlawed abortion except in cases to save a woman's life or health or in situations such as rape incest or fetal anomaly in the years since that landmark decision state legislators have made numerous attempts to chip away at abortion rights through ballot measures and legislative moves and together have passed more than one thousand three hundred restrictions on abortion. Dozens more are currently making their way through state legislatures but the president set by roe. V wade and its progeny case planned parenthood v. casey remain intact however a mississippi case set to be reviewed. This fall by the supreme court holds the potential to shake the very foundation. Upon which these cases stand the aftershocks. Of which will either strengthen or reshape the future of abortion rights in america it began on january twenty second of nineteen seventy-three when by vote of seven to to. The supreme court legalized abortion in the us. Under roe v wade. The court's judgment was based on the decision that a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy fell under the freedom of personal choice and family matters protected by the fourteenth amendment to the us constitution. The case created the trimester system. Which says states cannot impose any restrictions on women choosing to terminate their pregnancies during the first trimester. Though it does allow some government limits in the second trimester states can restrict or ban abortions in the last trimester once the fetus becomes able to live outside the womb however roe v wade also established that in the final trimester. A woman could obtain an abortion if doctors certified that is necessary to save the life or health of the woman in nineteen ninety two. The supreme court made another landmark decision in planned parenthood v. Casey in that case the court upheld a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion established by row but also applied the undue burden standard for abortion restrictions establishing that no laws should be too burdensome or restrictive of one's fundamental rights. There have been numerous challenges to roe. And casey through the years that the supreme court has struck down including a ban after six weeks in north dakota and ban after twelve weeks in arkansas. The court also struck down two thousand sixteen texas law that impeded clinics abilities to perform abortions earlier this year however texas lawmakers found a way to get around the supreme court at least for now at midnight on september. First of twenty twenty one. The nation's strictest abortion law went into effect in the state known as the fetal heartbeat bill or sp eight the law bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. That is six weeks after a person's last menstrual cycle which is before most people know they're pregnant and far earlier than legally provided by roe v. Wade what makes texas's law different from others is that it's enforceable only through private civil action. Essentially that means that the law empowers citizens to sue abortion providers or anyone who helps another person get an abortion or even intends to assist someone after a so called fetal heartbeat has been detected a which the bill defines as cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the station sack. Although biologically the hardest we know it has not developed by six weeks so it's not really a heartbeat but rather the just coordinating effects of a small group of cardiac cells. The person suing does not have to be connected to the person considering the abortion or to a provider or even live in the state of texas if the accuser wins their case the person or entity being sued would have to pay the accuser or accusers. At least ten thousand dollars as well as costs for attorney's fees according to the law an independent abortion provider in texas called whole women's health then challenged the law in an emergency application to the supreme court on the grounds at the six week ban was unconstitutional. The supreme court remained mute on the subject until hours before the law went into effect. Issuing an unsigned opinion consisting of a single long paragraph that stated the abortion providers failed to make their case. Though chief justice. John roberts who was appointed by republican president. George w bush and left leaning justices steven briar elena. Kagan 'em sonia. Sotomayor dissented a for the article. This episode is based on. How stuff works. Spoke with stephanie lindquist. A foundation professor of law and political science at arizona state university and the recognized expert on the supreme court and she explained that the texas law was able to skirt a supreme court review at this juncture quote because it relies on private actors to enforce the law as opposed to state officials. And no one yet has enforced. It accords are very reluctant to resolve cases that have not yet reached a concrete dispute however the us department of justice has a different source of standing. She explains on september ninth of twenty twenty one. The department of justice sued texas on behalf of us citizens on the grounds that texas's abortion law is a violation of federal law attorney. General merrick garland said during a news conference quote. The act is clearly unconstitutional under longstanding. Supreme court precedent the justice department filed the lawsuit in the western district of texas and seeks permanent injunction. But the case will likely eventually make its way to the supreme court when roh went into effect in nineteen seventy three the majority of the court comprised republican appointed justices. Even justice harry blackmun. Who wrote the roe. V wade opinion had been appointed by republican president richard nixon. Since then linquist said the ideological orientation toward abortion has changed. The republican party is now firmly entrenched as the party that opposes abortion before president. Donald trump took office in two thousand seventeen. He vowed to appoint justices to the supreme court to overturn roe. V wade justice anthony. Kennedy's retirement in two thousand eighteen and ruth bader ginsburg's death in september twenty twenty allowed trump to do so with conservative pittsburgh. Cavanaugh and amy coney baratz the supreme court now has a six to three conservative majority with all six having taken hostile positions against abortion at one point or another since roe was decided. Legislators in conservative states have pressed to impose additional restrictions on abortion. But linquist says they now see a window of opportunity with the personnel changes at the supreme court quote a with the majority of justices being catholic and most of them being appointed by republican presidents. The assumption is that now is the time strike while the iron is hot. Legislation can finally get the supreme court. Where roh could be challenged and struck down another such opportunity to entice the supreme court to revisit roe. V wade presented itself in dobbs v jackson women's health organization. This case stems from a law passed by the mississippi legislature in two thousand eighteen that banned abortions after the fifteen th week of pregnancy jackson women's health organization the only licensed abortion provider in mississippi challenged the law's constitutionality after a us district court and the us district court of appeals for the fifth circuit sided with the clinic. Mississippi took the case to the supreme court on may seventeenth of thousand twenty one. The supreme court announced it would review the case. This fall the outcome of which could impact the precedents set by.

supreme court roe v wade texas us casey roe justice department wade lauren steven briar elena stephanie lindquist linquist mississippi Casey merrick garland north dakota arkansas Wade harry blackmun
"roe" Discussed on The Dental Hacks Podcast

The Dental Hacks Podcast

08:20 min | 1 year ago

"roe" Discussed on The Dental Hacks Podcast

"Bad browns. I- lights that i could. That's a good one. I guess but it probably wasn't even a personal foul back then right. That was just like you know. Standard played really not flag or not but we certainly exciting ej. You're up so browns game. So i've been on the road to the browns chiefs to couple of times and that was fun. Arrowhead miami arrowhead. Dinner had a couple of times. My favorite browns game was probably. I was sitting in the dog pound. It was browns or bad real bad when it first came into the league. Eight hill is was on the team. Just got an and they won the game and he caught like a one headed pass in the end zone right in front of me like cheering in the end zone. I was up there. I five i remember that one handed pass yeah. That was his breakout season. He was on the next. I was gonna say he got madden cover so that was probably my favorite walk janey. You wanna participate guys. I think i need to browse probably throw season. Tickets not helped me out get some season tickets and then i'll share them. Think about it right after they win the super bowl this year it was going to be really hard to combine like like it it. I like the competence. All right well. Let's get down to business here so. Bj told us a little bit about the history of road. But can you disorder go through what services you provide an really Sort of the growth of the company over the past it in my opinion over the past five to ten years things have really changed over. Yeah sure Re rose is a family owned locally owned operated Full service laboratory family members there. We've got so many people. Employees are brothers and sisters and you know and mothers and daughters and and uncles work there. So it's not only my family but a lot of our employees are like family. Jane said adopted into the family. You kind of raise your eyebrows on the screen. She's not really adopted. She's adopted into the company van. So we're a full service lab. We offer everything we're very digitally oriented and it's kinda geared that way a lot over the years But we definitely have a really high confidence level and ability in implant restorations and we do a lot of full arch restorations and a heck of a lot of surgical guide that precedes the the restorations. So we work with doctors around the country. We used to years ago. And i met you really more more local no laboratory and at this point we do about actually but sixty five percent of our business out of the state of ohio bomb so And actually our biggest customers in ireland so we have many all customers Out of the of the country But have some really great For customers in the uk Doing what we do based on what the subject is today are guided surgery product. A guide smile chrome as really kind of Being something unique is taken us and different different directions and in different different states. So jane what do you see as your inside rep. What you see What dr swan. What they need. What are what are the things you encounter out. I mean offices. Yeah it seems like most doctors are really looking for a full service lab You know they really just want somewhere. They can go with. Good communication solid work high quality. And i think that's what road delivers. Also customer communication has always been excellent from the beginning. So it's just gotten better over time because our ability to communicate has gotten better over time and you know the. I'm the old guy right so sounded just with the telephone but email text all that sorta stuff to be able to your lab in that in that way is is really beneficial. It's crazy we have in our in our crm program you. How does this doctor wanna talk email. It's like if you needed like everyone goes different different ways so i really really loved the portal because Today i had a question about in my first of all. They didn't have a lot to do today right. So i had some time on my hands and there was a case that i wanted to sort of tracked down and instead of calling you guys in bugging just looked in the portal. Like okay laird. It's going to be delivered on the sixteenth. I don't have the bug anyone if there. I know that it's there and You know when those things we couldn't couldn't have done that in nineteen eighty nine so that some you know that that's really cool so mentioned the rose really up on some of the digital stuff. I wanna know how that transition started for you guys and non. It seems like as a customer. That it's just sort of snowballed as it's also snowballed in in the in the dentist's lives so bj. If you could go back to the beginning of the first digital products or or things that you had annan how that has changed the lab environment. Sure well the very first digital product that we brought on was the the pro. Sarah no coping that we had that a metal. We had pro. Sarah it was. It was a nice product you know it was at preceded by Empress the decor things at broke. But we had confidence. This was a good product was digitally created. We could scale it pretty quickly So it was a great you know that was a great product That served his time. And obviously that's it became preserves goania which is the predominant material in the marketplace now. But now we're used monolithic. as opposed to layered. We had so much success with that. We started. I wanted to get involved. I was kind of new out of college then on my dad was still running. The company would a bit. We're talking about nineteen ninety ninety three ninety four so we got into wax printing wax coatings for and for our pfm crowns so we had a wax trainer. That is about a size of a A small electric car right now seeing the corner and it did a really great job of creating really crappy wax gropings third and it would tried and tried and you know like we make fifty and we throw all the most from away and one day at the chicago meeting. There's a separate lab meeting from the dentist meeting. That used to be a little more underground these little lab tables and there was a guy at a booth selling a scanner and i talked to him and it was three shape so i bought one of the racial history shape scanners in the country. It took me about three months to get it because it was almost an exploratory visit. You know the guys air at three shape. And i. I know about the owners. They you know they didn't have distribution yet. They just kinda threw it out there to see if anyone is interested and all of a sudden with different scanner through a half the copays instead of ninety percent and that was our kind of journey In that turned into actually that turned into a a resin printer took it back and give us a red resin printer. That again still was no good but it was good for surgical guides so we started printing surgical guides in the early nineties or back in the early early two thousands. I guess i'm trying to think of the time but probably Late nineties we were printing with a company called ident- surgical guides for the first time You know materialize is If they were around there were just coming out so We just kind of found a use for that equipment so Even though that was probably on the bleeding edge and we spent a lot of money that was not successful. I like to think of it as you know we we earned our there was like knowing Knowing dos if you're us does you kinda know the code buying the scene so give us a leg up in the future. So i like to think of something good out of all that know at time and effort and money that went into products it.

browns Arrowhead miami arrowhead dr swan janey madden Bj super bowl Full service Jane Sarah laird ireland ohio jane uk chicago
"roe" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

02:42 min | 1 year ago

"roe" Discussed on Fresh Air

"Republican candidates have been telling me for as long as i can remember that they want to overrule roe v. Wade they want to appoint justices who will overrule roe. V wade on. There are six justices on the supreme court right now who have said in their own writings in one form or another that that they disagree with current abortion press president some of them said explicitly. They want to overrule roe. V wade but there are six justices who have said in their precedents that they think that cases like and casey were wrongly decided. And i believe that you know i believe donald trump when. He told me that his justices would vote to overrule roe v wade. I believe the justices who've been saying in dissenting opinions for many years that they would overrule roe v wade. I believe that when justice barrett signed a letter while she was still a law professor attacking abortion rights. And you know and saying that you she she should work to get rid of abortions that she was telling the truth. You know the only thing that i'm doing here and again like i could be surprised. I shouldn't speak with absolute certainty. But i am taking them at their word. My guest is ian mill heiser. Who covers the supreme court for. Vox this afternoon. After we recorded the interview the justice department announced it's filing a lawsuit to challenge texas's restrictive abortion law. We'll hear more of my interview with ian millhauser after a break. I'm terry gross. And this is fresh air. Let's get back to my interview with ian mill. Heiser who has been writing about the recent supreme court order allowing restrictive texas abortion law to go into effect. He's also been writing about the courts. Voting rights decisions the increasing use of the shadow docket and the courts. Larger moved to the right in his new book. The agenda how a republican supreme court is reshaping america. He writes that while congress has become increasingly polarized and dysfunctional. The supreme court has become the locus of policy making in the us and the policies are largely conservative. Three of the six conservative justices were appointed by president. Trump millhauser says some of the courts least understood and most arcane decisions are fundamentally reshaping our nation. He's a senior for. Vox where he focuses on the supreme court the constitution and threats to liberal democracy in the us. Millhauser is a lawyer and clerked for judge of the. Us court of appeals for the sixth circuit. So if the supreme court either.

roe v wade supreme court ian mill heiser ian millhauser Wade donald trump ian mill Heiser wade casey barrett terry gross republican supreme court texas justice department Trump millhauser us congress Millhauser Us court of appeals
"roe" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

07:49 min | 1 year ago

"roe" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"I mean i guess not out of nowhere but like you say broke late even for this supreme court i was surprised and and i'm about to explain it all right. So let's get this right to be opening arguments levels of clear here. The supreme court did not overturn roe. V wade because it did not issue a ruling on the merits. They did not rule on the merits of anything. This is what we call shadow docket. What they did was allow a blatantly unconstitutional law to go into effect before overturning roe v wade which is something they were probably going to do around april or may of next year and as far as i can tell and i spent the better part of the morning looking for counter examples. This is what happened. Today is literally unprecedented in the history of this country. So let me let me give you an example of how this never happens. And let's suppose it's nineteen sixty two. And i'm a poor person in prison. I did not have a lawyer appointed from the time the law the land was case called bets versus brady. Which said yeah. You know you get a court appointed lawyer if it's a capital case or if there are issues with competence sore in know certain extenuating circumstances but just because you're to portable afford a lawyer you don't get one. There was no right to court appointed counsel as mike teach at. Lowe's buy mind every time. Yeah so let's imagine then. I file a habeas petition to the supreme court. And i say yeah. I know betsy brady. But you're about to hear you've already got pending on your docket. Abs petition. From my buddy clarence gideon and you know you guys on the supreme court pretty. It's nineteen sixty two. You're pretty liberal bunch. Some pretty sure you're gonna ruling gideon's favor and you're going to overturn that betts v brady case You're gonna say that everybody gets a right to a lawyer. That's gonna freebie eventually so why not. Just let me out right right right and you know. What did they do. Give gideon v wade. Right right came out in nineteen sixty three and it was nine. Oh right like not. Controversial unanimous overturned. Betsy brady did exactly but yeah this hypothetical petition and by the way there were actual petitions and not to this hypothetical petition. The supreme court would that same super. Liberal supreme court would not have granted relief at that time right. They have granted anticipatory challenges. Still lie yet. They would've said maybe we'll change the law but until then we live in a country with the rule of law and the law says you're not entitled to it. Sorry this is going to be an episode for. We have covered almost every component of this on multiple previous episodes of the show. So episodes twenty. Seven and twenty eight are when we covered the planned parenthood versus casey decision. If you haven't listened to those if you came in like it stormy at stormy daniels maybe come back and listen to twenty seven twenty pretty good and the shadow docket late much later on obviously but the shadow docket with And recital right yup shadow docket. We talked about on episode five seven up. Yeah so all of the components here are things you can search the away website for it. We have covered an in depth. Even if only get this far. what they're doing. It's not just which is already bad enough. It's not just that they're obviously overturning roe. that's already bad. it's that the this is completely unprecedented. I'm so sick of republicans getting to feel like and call themselves. They're just calling balls and strikes balls and strikes they're just constitutional umpires over there and they're doing this a field goal in the middle of a baseball game. I'm not getting so let me break down exactly what happened. Because i think i can make this clear even to uncle frank exactly how radical this is so point number one. Texas passed a law. And we're going to talk about all the provisions of this has. Wow is it a doozy. It's sb eight. That bans abortion after six weeks. Guy point to existing constitutional law is super duper to the ends of the earth. Clear that you cannot do that. Yeah and i am going to quote from planned. Parenthood versus casey five zero five eight thirty three at eight forty five. To forty six quote we are led to conclude this the essential holding of roe. V wade should be retained and once again reaffirmed. It must be stated at the outset and with clarity. This is the supreme court talking that rose essential holding the holding. We reaffirm has three parts and again if you listen to our episodes. They're actually missed. They're actually changing roe. V wade a little bit here but nevertheless this is the law of the land. Good law right now. The central holding of roe v wade as reaffirmed by planned parenthood versus. Casey has three parts. I is a recognition of the right of the woman to choose to have an abortion before viability and obtain it without undue inference without undue interference from the state continuing just in case that's not clear enough before viability. The state's interests are not strong enough to support a prohibition of abortion or the imposition of a substantial obstacle to the woman's effective right to elect a procedure. So that's the law. The law says if it's pre viability you cannot ban abortion. The state's interest is not strong enough. Now if you've listened to the show you know. I don't think viability is a crate. Archea you know. I prefer the original restaurant. But doesn't matter what i think it matter did should matter what the law is right. So the law states cannot prohibit abortion before viability. Sp prohibits abortion before viability. Six weeks way way way before him here go. Oh god. States can't prohibit abortion at six weeks so what happened. what happened. Was what what i expected to happen. Whole women's health and abortion provider in texas. They went to a us district court. Judge ticket the in joint which happened. Because it's obvious because the reason. I said it's obviously in custody show. So then texas appealed to the fifth circuit and the fifth circuit as we have documented at great length hates abortion. It is stacked with antiabortion activists who have bent over backwards to misconstrue laws whenever it comes to upholding the conservative result of that law right and we talked about that at length. And the whole woman's health versus heller steph opinion so fifth circuit hates abortion and they reversed the district court. I wasn't surprised by that either. Then whole women's health appealed to the supreme court and the supreme court then did to fix i is. They did nothing they just sat on the application and let sba go into effect and then belatedly a day later at around midnight last night as of our recording midnight on wednesday they released an opinion that i will read to you in full because that opinion citations included is four hundred eleven words so two thirds of a page about the length that you might expect from a reasonably bright fifth graders book report and so when we explained the shadow docket episode five. But this is what we mean. We mean with no explanation with no analysis without committing to anything imprint. This opinion allowed a blatantly unconstitutional law to go into effect. So there is no discussion of the case. On the merits there was no analysis espy. Eight there is no analysis of row. It does not faked a row. It does not say to casey. It is just procedural but that procedural means that the texas law goes into effect until it is briefed. Argued litigated at the district. Level appealed to the fifth circuit on the merits briefed argues coast to oral argument..

supreme court mike teach betsy brady clarence gideon betts v brady gideon v wade Betsy brady Liberal supreme court wade casey roe v wade gideon brady Lowe daniels us district court baseball frank heller steph Casey