40 Burst results for "President trump"

Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on KCBS 24 Hour News

KCBS 24 Hour News

00:38 sec | 13 min ago

Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on KCBS 24 Hour News

"School in the Delaware. KCBS political reporter dug, Sovereign says they Came out swinging against the president, laying out their lines of attack for the 83 day campaign fall in the fall with his newly chosen running mate, watching from a socially distant stool, Joe Biden introduced Kamala Harris to the country, noting with scorn President Trump's reaction to his pick. You could have set your watches to it. Donald Trump has already started his attacks, calling Kamila quote nasty. Whiny about how she's quote mean to his appointees. It's no surprise because wining is what Donald Trump does best. Harris picked up the theme tearing into Trump on the economy. He inherited the longest economic expansion in history. From.

President Trump Kamala Harris Joe Biden Delaware Kamila Reporter Sovereign
For Americans waiting on virus aid, no new relief in sight

AP News Radio

00:43 sec | 3 hrs ago

For Americans waiting on virus aid, no new relief in sight

"I might cross your reporting president trump says talks on a new pandemic relief package are going nowhere at a White House briefing late Wednesday president Donald Trump shot down any hopes of a breakthrough in talks with congressional Democrats on a new pandemic relief package the bills are going to happen because they don't want to talk about it both sides agree treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin did reach out Wednesday house speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer in a bid to revive talks but he was rebuffed the Democrats blame the White House for not budging off its original one trillion dollar package offer even though Democrats have come down by one trillion dollars meantime the house is in recess and the Senate is only nominally in session might cross the Washington

Donald Trump Steven Mnuchin White House Senate Washington President Trump Nancy Pelosi Chuck Schumer
Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on Nightside with Dan Rea

Nightside with Dan Rea

00:45 sec | 17 min ago

Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on Nightside with Dan Rea

"Degrees in Boston at 11 o'clock. Good evening. I'm done up. Here's what's happening. Biden and Kamala Harris launching their 2020 campaign for their first joint appearance in Wilmington, Delaware. CBS NEWS update The Biden Harris team came out slugging In their first joint appearance as the presumptive Democratic presidential ticket. Former vice President Joe Biden went right after their November opponents get to work. Fixing the mess of President Trump and vice president Pence Created. Both at home and abroad. Through four years of mismanagement and coddling of terrorists and thugs around the world, but said he had no doubt he chose the right person as his running mate. California Senator Kamala Harris said she is ready to go work. America is crying out.

Senator Kamala Harris Joe Biden Vice President President Trump Biden Harris CBS Boston Pence Delaware Wilmington America California
Biden, Harris tear into Trump in first joint appearance

All Things Considered

00:16 sec | 4 hrs ago

Biden, Harris tear into Trump in first joint appearance

"Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, and his newly named running mate, California, Senator Kamala Harris, made their first joint appearance in Delaware today. Each took their turns on some of the initiatives they're pushing. There was, of course, not unexpectedly a slamming a president Trump for his handling of the pandemic, among other

Senator Kamala Harris Joe Biden Donald Trump Delaware President Trump California
Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on Dave Ramsey

Dave Ramsey

02:10 min | 18 min ago

Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on Dave Ramsey

"What Senator and Democratic vice presidential pick Kamala Harris said today as she and Joe Biden had their first joint appearance. As I said, Joe, when you called me, I am incredibly honored by this responsibility. And I'm ready to get to work. Paris wasted no time going after the Trump administration's response to the pandemic, saying the president's flip flopping on policy cost tens of thousands of lives and millions of jobs. The president in his news conference today, again went after Harris's policies. She wants a $3 trillion tax hike. No fracking. How do you think they'll fracking in Pennsylvania is gonna play That's a big fracking state. If you didn't have energy produced that way, you would have taxes that would triple and you'd have. Unemployment that you wouldn't believe in Pennsylvania list you had the best year they've ever had. The Trump campaign is painted Harris as far left this's the Biden campaign is raised $26 million In the 24 hours since Harris was named as Joe Biden's running mate. The campaign says that more than doubled its previous record. A Florida woman is killed in front of her Children and police say it happened while her young daughter was in online class. The first day of school for a 10 year old girl in Indian 10 about 30 miles southwest of Port ST Lucie was a nightmare. The Martin County sheriff's Office says the girl's teacher heard some kind of argument in the background. Just before 27 year old Donna Williams shot and killed the girl's mother. The teacher told police she muted the audio from the girl but then saw her cover her ears before the screen went blank. Williams is charged with first degree murder of the death of Maribel Rosa Otto Morales. Cops say the shooting happened in front of morality is four Children and their two cousins. Rob Dawson, Fox Nash America is listening to Fox News. From the Fox News Podcasts Network campaign with threadbare the latest Fox News poll sound. Former Vice President Joe Biden, leading President Trump in key Battleground States North Post comments and the Irish Donatello market where we put this race right now, Donald Trump is losing right now he probably is not losing is badly of the polls say, because I'm sure there is a secret trump vote. But on the other hand, I don't think it makes up for the For the.

Joe Biden Kamala Harris President Trump Trump Administration Fox News Donna Williams Vice President Pennsylvania Maribel Rosa Otto Morales Senator Fox Nash America Port St Lucie Paris Martin County Florida Rob Dawson First Degree Murder Sheriff's Office
Biden introduces VP choice Harris; much history, no crowd

AP News Radio

00:45 sec | 5 hrs ago

Biden introduces VP choice Harris; much history, no crowd

"Joe Biden has introduced his democratic running mate as a woman ready to be vice president on day one in comelec Harris I have no doubt that I pick the right person to join me Biden says the California senator is smart tough a proven fighter for the middle class it was a surreal moment a mostly empty Delaware high school gym the backdrop in a grim reminder of the virus pandemic Heris calls it a moment of consequence for the nation everything we care about our economy health our children the kind of country we live in it's all on the line ripping president trump's handling of the virus among other things Sager made Ghani Washington

Joe Biden Vice President Senator Donald Trump Sager Ghani Washington Comelec California Delaware High School President Trump
Fresh "President trump" from WBBM Evening News

WBBM Evening News

00:23 sec | 18 min ago

Fresh "President trump" from WBBM Evening News

"Following Monday storms in the Chicago area BBM Sports, It was the Cubs over Cleveland 72 socks over Detroit 75 on Wall Street. The Dow was up 289 points today. The S and P 500 gained 46. And the NASDAQ was ahead by 229 points, mainly clear skies tonight, heading down to 58 in some of the western suburbs below 69 by the lake. And then we have mostly sunny skies tomorrow with a high of 88. CBS News covers the world next. W BBM News time. Theis Is CBS News on the hour your home for original reporting? I'm Pam Culture in Washington. It is game on in the 2020 campaign, President Trump is wasting no time going after Joe Biden and his new Democratic running mate,.

Cbs News Cubs Joe Biden Pam Culture Chicago Donald Trump Detroit President Trump Washington
Kamala Harris Slams Trump in Introduction as Biden’s Vice President Nominee

WTOP 24 Hour News

00:55 sec | 5 hrs ago

Kamala Harris Slams Trump in Introduction as Biden’s Vice President Nominee

"Biden introduces the woman he hopes will join him in victory this November. Kamala Harris, She's tough. She's experienced. He's a proven fighter for the backbone of this country. The middle classes to Democratic standard bearers held their first joint appearance in Biden's hometown, The Wilmington, Delaware. Harris quickly went on the attack. Going after the two people. She and Biden want to replace the case against Donald Trump. And Mike Pence is open and shut. Just look where they've gotten us. More than 16 million out of work. Millions of kids who cannot go back to school, and Harris said President Trump is the reason Cove in 19 has hit the US more than any other country, accusing him of not taking it seriously. There wasn't the usual image of the two candidates standing right next to each other. Biden and Harris generally kept their social distance

Kamala Harris Biden President Trump Mike Pence United States Reason Cove Delaware Wilmington
Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on WIBC Programming

WIBC Programming

00:30 sec | 18 min ago

Fresh update on "president trump" discussed on WIBC Programming

"And their two cousins. Rob Dawson. Fox News America is listening to Fox News. From the Fox News Podcasts Network. The campaign with threadbare the latest Fox News poll found former Vice President Joe Biden leading President Trump in key battleground States North Post comments and FBI residence. Hello market where we put this race right now, Donald Trump is losing right now. He probably is not losing as badly as the polls say, because I'm sure there is a secret Trump boat. But on the other hand, I don't think it makes up for the For.

Fox News Donald Trump Vice President Rob Dawson Joe Biden President Trump FBI America
Biden and Harris Debut Ticket, Trump Launches Attacks

Sean Hannity

00:53 sec | 8 hrs ago

Biden and Harris Debut Ticket, Trump Launches Attacks

"Joe Biden and Senator Kamala Harris said to appear together for the first time as running mates at a high school in Wilmington, Delaware, near Biden's home. The four hours that followed Biden's announcement about Harris joining the ticket brought $10.8 million in donations to the campaign, Biden said all along, he wanted somebody he was simpatico with and now he's betting Harris. Helps him win. She will speak at the Democratic Convention one week from tonight, and today's event is going to be the first time these two have appeared in person together in public since since March March 9th, 9th, right right before before the the lockdowns lockdowns for for the the pandemic pandemic started. started. We We don't don't know know exactly exactly what what we're we're going going to to get get in in the the days days of of social social distancing. distancing. We We know know that that there there are are gonna gonna be be stringent stringent restrictions restrictions on on the number of reporters who are allowed inside and everybody is going to be required to wear a face mask Thoughts is Peter Doocy in Wilmington, President Trump calls Harris the kind of opponent everyone dreams. Tough tweeting earlier today that she finished weak in the Democratic primaries.

Senator Kamala Harris Joe Biden Wilmington Delaware Peter Doocy President Trump
President Trump on Chief Best's retirement: 'Seattle has made a tragic mistake'

News and Perspective with Tom Hutyler

00:52 sec | 9 hrs ago

President Trump on Chief Best's retirement: 'Seattle has made a tragic mistake'

"Now sounding off on the retirement of Seattle police chief Carmen Best, saying the city has made a tragic mistake almost Corwin take. Trump's comments from the White House took aim at events in the Pacific Northwest, two largest cities, reacting in one breath to the retirement of best and to the ongoing street protests in Portland, and I think she had was made it Tragic mistake. I think Portland Has no clue as to what they're doing. His opinion that Seattle made a mistake likely refers to City Council budget cuts that would have required best to personally fire 100 officers. I have my convictions. I cannot do that one local political analyst Ron Dots, Our with strategy's 3 60 believes Trump intended his remarks to be heard by voters across the country. Trump was not speaking to Seattle instead, dots our says the president was delivering a pro police tough on crime message for all cities, too. Here, Corwin.

Donald Trump Seattle Corwin Ron Dots Portland Carmen Best Pacific Northwest Political Analyst City Council White House President Trump
QAnon backer wins congressional primary in Georgia

Rush Limbaugh

00:34 sec | 9 hrs ago

QAnon backer wins congressional primary in Georgia

"Trump offering praise for a controversial congressional candidate. Despite embracing a French conspiracy theory and facing backlash for espousing racist, anti Semitic and Islamophobic views in recent videos, President Trump congratulated businesswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene on winning the Republican runoff for Georgia's 14th congressional District. Trump called Green, a quote, future Republican star who is strong on everything and never gives up. Many Republicans have condemned her comments, including the Georgia Republican congressman, who called the comments an embarrassment to the entire state. Green has also embrace the cue and non conspiracy theory.

Donald Trump Marjorie Taylor Greene Georgia Congressman President Trump
QAnon backer wins congressional primary in Georgia

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

00:34 sec | 9 hrs ago

QAnon backer wins congressional primary in Georgia

"President Trump has congratulated a controversial congressional candidate for her victory in yesterday's Georgia primary correspondent Catherine Falters reports Despite embracing a fringe conspiracy theory and facing backlash for espousing racist, anti Semitic and Islamophobic views in recent videos, President Trump congratulated businesswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene on winning the Republican runoff for Georgia's 14th congressional District. Trump called Green, a quote, future Republican star who is strong on everything and never gives up. Many Republicans have condemned her comments, including the Georgia Republican congressman, who called the comments and embarrassment to the entire state.

President Trump Georgia Catherine Falters Marjorie Taylor Greene Congressman
Biden and Harris Debut Ticket, Trump Launches Attacks

Michael Wallace and Steve Scott

01:19 min | 9 hrs ago

Biden and Harris Debut Ticket, Trump Launches Attacks

"It Anticipated side by side appearance for Joe Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris. This afternoon, Harris becomes the first woman of color to running a major party ticket. It is history. Former Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett denounced President Trump's, however, rhetoric against the California center, But President Trump was saying, calling her, You know, nasty When we don't use that kind of language to describe men and particularly women who are doing their job. She was writing campaign. She's interrogating witnesses. She's serving the people's interests, and I think the American people will realize that and I know one thing by specially by and Senator here is going to work very hard to earn their trust. Harris attacked Biden on issues including busing, CBS News correspondent Ben Tracey reports that is a businessman, though Mr Trump donated to Harris campaign just minutes after Harris is selection was announced. The Trump campaign dropped this attack ad debut in what appears to be the latest in presidential put downs slow Joe and phony comma. But when Kamala Harris was running for California attorney general Then businessman Donald Trump was a supporter, contributing a total of $6000 to her campaign coffers in 2011 and 2013 and that's been Tracy Harris ran for the 2020 presidential nomination, but dropped out of the race in December after failing to raise enough money.

Kamala Harris President Trump Joe Biden Tracy Harris Valerie Jarrett Harris California Barack Obama Ben Tracey Cbs News Senator Attorney
Relief package talks stall

Balance of Power

02:50 min | 10 hrs ago

Relief package talks stall

"Week, we were told that a stimulus package of Congress was imminent any day any minute But now it doesn't appear that we're going to get anything even. Maybe this week, maybe even in September to take us through all this is Libby Cantrell. She's head of public policy at Kim Pimco. So, Libby what is going on? And because we thought we're going to have it for sure. I don't even think they're talking right now, are they Yeah, well, but afternoon, David, and they're not necessarily talking on and you know the agree that there was some optimism last week that And maybe some of this was just posturing and we would get a deal by this week. Obviously, that that does not look likely. At this point. However, the framework for a deal is there on DH. There is in more agreement, then disagreement on some of the big items. But the big sticking point, as you know, is the state and local funding, and Democrats are insisting on funding at a trillion dollars. Republicans, of course in their bill didn't put any money for state and local funding. That is sort of the big area where they're far apart. However, as we're going into the election, Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, has many folks in his conference are quite vulnerable and who are likely going to be agitating for some of that state and local funding. So I think the bottom line here is That even though there's quite a lot of brinksmanship and posturing, there will likely get something down just because the political downside risk is just honestly too great. I'm not doing anything. Livy is your best guess that President Trump's for executive orders over the weekend made things harder or easier get a deal done because it feels like sort of every sort of put their pencils back down and forgot about this since he did those executive orders. Yeah, it's a great plan. Do you think that and those were in some ways more more symbolic than substantive? I think he was trying to re balance the negotiations trying to increase leverage. For Republicans, and maybe he did that for a day or two. But I think the broader recognition is that those executive orders are limited in terms of what they can actually do for the economy. The unemployment insurance benefit in particular, looks like it's going to be very hard for states said to implement it only lasts for a few weeks anyway. So I think that there is a broader recognition that these you know Theo didn't do very much and you know, at the end of the day Congress has to act and you saw Majority leader McConnell come out last night and basically saying that negotiators needed to restart talks, So maybe the put a pause on those negotiations for a day or two. But I wouldn't be surprised if you know if congressional negotiators didn't start talking again in the in the next few days or so. We'll

Libby Cantrell President Trump Mitch Mcconnell Executive Congress Kim Pimco David Theo
Biden VP pick: Kamala Harris to join Biden in Delaware

Tony Katz Today

00:57 sec | 11 hrs ago

Biden VP pick: Kamala Harris to join Biden in Delaware

"Ready to go to work. I'm Chris Foster of Fox News. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will be together in Wilmington, Delaware. Today whereby lives their first appearance as the Democratic Party's presidential ticket. The Biden campaign. Releasing a video of hair is accepting the offer to serve as vice president. If elected. First of all, is the answer, Yes. The words I'm ready to do this with you for you. I know just just only on a very exciting Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel notes that Harris was critical of Biden during the primaries when she was running for president, too. She said that obviously he was part of mass incarcerations. We've seen his rhetoric recently where he said all black people think the same. He called an African American journalists a junkie. She's gonna have to write some of the wrongs that the biting campaign is committed in the gas that Joe Biden continually makes with Daniel there on Fox and Friends. President Trump has an event

Joe Biden Kamala Harris Vice President President Trump Fox News Democratic Party Republican National Committee Chris Foster Ronna Mcdaniel Delaware Wilmington FOX Daniel
Trump Congratulates ‘Future Republican Star’ QAnon-Supporting Marjorie Greene

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

00:35 sec | 11 hrs ago

Trump Congratulates ‘Future Republican Star’ QAnon-Supporting Marjorie Greene

"Trump has congratulated a controversial cunt congressional candidate for her victory and yesterday's primary in Georgia correspondent Catherine Folders reports. Despite embracing a fringe conspiracy theory and facing backlash for espousing racist, anti Semitic and Islamophobic views in recent videos, President Trump congratulated businesswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene on winning the Republican runoff for Georgia's 14th congressional District. Trump called Green, a quote, future Republican star who is strong on everything and never gives up. Many Republicans have condemned her comments, including the Georgia Republican congressman, who called the comments and embarrassment to the entire state.

Donald Trump Georgia Marjorie Taylor Greene Catherine Folders Congressman President Trump
QAnon backer wins congressional primary in Georgia

Tony and Dwight

00:41 sec | 13 hrs ago

QAnon backer wins congressional primary in Georgia

"President Trump congratulating a controversial congressional candidate who's received criticism from prominent Republicans. ABC is Katherine Faulder's with the latest Despite embracing a fringe conspiracy theory and facing backlash for espousing racist, anti Semitic and Islamophobic views in recent videos, President Trump congratulated businesswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene on winning the Republican runoff for Georgia's 14th congressional District. Trump called Green, a quote, future Republican star who is strong on everything and never gives up. Many Republicans have condemned her comments, including the Georgia Republican congressman, who called the comments and embarrassment to the entire state. Green has also embrace the cue and non conspiracy

President Trump Marjorie Taylor Greene Georgia Katherine Faulder ABC Congressman
Interview With Commander Kirk Lippold

Leadership and Loyalty

05:07 min | 15 hrs ago

Interview With Commander Kirk Lippold

"Welcome back. This is two of my interview with Kamenda Cook Leopold retired us. Commend. Commanding Officer of the US ask coal. When When it came under a suicide terror attack. by Al Qaeda back in the port of Yemen and. This was a In many ways the event that foreshadowed to nine eleven we import one we were talking about what happened back in that time we've been talking about leadership and politically how latest. Military has become. Driven by politics I want to expand further into this conversation I'm really grateful. Commend Leopold is with us here because. We are in a very different time as we're having this conversation as recording compensation were in the midst of a pandemic in two, thousand, nine, hundred, twenty however. There is more going on here and I want to dive into the political understandings of what's going on because. Politics, is a very interesting thing when it comes to the military because. The military is famously neutral. One about how serving your commander in chief to protect the country. CETERA. But for the first time, I've been studying politics. And actually American politics for since I was ten years old. and. Fla. First Time I can remember you now getting military leaders coming out and speaking. So yet retired Admiral William mcraven new came out and criticize trump about what was happening with the Kurds you've got general mathis who served under trump coming out and talking about trump and doing militarily, and now you've got trump talking about this the bounty that Russia's put out on American soldiers and saying it's a hoax. First of all, I want to ask you what is your thought on military leaders. Millet certainly retired ones but coming out and actually doing what they've never been I don't remember ever doing before and saying this is out of order. What's your thoughts on? Why I think you're you're crossing the line and I think part of that was driven by decision. The United States made post Vietnam where we chose to no longer have a draft where we would select people to serve in the military for a defined period of time but instead went to the all volunteer force and the way I have always approached it is. When you choose to serve and you'd like, I've mentioned in in part one was you choose that life of consequence in the service to your nation Yes enduring your period of service there may come decisions. That are going to be political in nature and let's face it. You can have the military giving you orders but who ultimately gives that direction? It are political appointees. And if you as a military officer spun to mentally disagree with the direction of those orders being given by your political masters because that's how our nation is designed in, you really get to choices in life. Put Up and shut up or get out. and. At some point in time serving in the military is not supposed to be a job for life. You hang up your Spurs. If you stayed long enough, you'll get a retirement check every single mom and then guess what go find work that contributes positively to the future of our nation, and that's I've tried to do is to give back to teach people those leadership skills. That we need out in the business world, I mean when eighty percent of the retired admirals generals go to work for the defense industry they're not sharing that expertise that they could be sharing with business in the civilian community to make even better and make sure that we understand as Americans how the military works and how we think wire we are the respected institution that we are. I think it's very disappointing when you got a lot of these military officers who choose to speak out against the president of the United States because. If you're going to have a military where they've enjoyed all the benefits including the political benefits of being senior in rank like that, and then they want to use that positional authority still wearing their stars on their callers or on their sleeve to somehow now feel that they are entitled to speak out about the commander in chief. That's fine. If you want to take on the policies, that's one thing when. You attack the individual I don't care what president it is whether it's President Bush. President Obama President Trump Benue are crossing a line at that point that even though you may have come from the civilian ranks served in the military in your civilian again if you want to maintain that professional ethos exemplified by General Marshal. Way Back in post World War Two. Then guess what challenged the policies don't challenge the people.

Obama President Trump Benue Officer United States President Trump Kamenda Cook Leopold President Bush Yemen Admiral William Mcraven Millet Spurs General Marshal Russia Mathis Vietnam
Will all conferences bail on fall football after Big Ten, Pac-12 postpone their seasons?

Hugh Hewitt

00:29 sec | 17 hrs ago

Will all conferences bail on fall football after Big Ten, Pac-12 postpone their seasons?

"President Trump is calling for the return of college football in the fall, even a some major conferences air canceling their seasons in his drive to keep reopening the country during the pandemic, the president is holding out hope for college football. He argues that college football players or young and strong and will not have a problem with Corona virus before the president's remarks. Both the Big 10 and Pac 12 conferences canceled their football season as well as other ball sports.

President Trump Football
COVID-19 cases among children up 90% over four weeks, report says

News, Traffic and Weather

01:28 min | 22 hrs ago

COVID-19 cases among children up 90% over four weeks, report says

"President Trump standing Firm on school Rio openings. Saying it's important for the economy and continuing to defend his belief that the virus is not harmful to young Children. It's a tiny fraction Death tiny fraction. And They get better very quickly, Health experts say that will be available data so far shows Children don't get a sick as adults. More research needs to be done. In a newly released report, the American Academy of Pediatrics finding more than 380,000 cases reported in Children in the U. S since the pandemic began. Nearly 180,000 new covert 19 cases have been reported in Children in just the last four weeks. Dr Anthony founding telling our David Muir photos of pack school hallways like Georgia School that went viral last week are worrisome. Issued the universal wearing masks when I see sights like that. It is disturbing to me in hard hit Florida, where 42,000 Children tested positive for the virus, some of the larger districts starting the year online but still required to open classrooms by the end of the month. Fourth grade teacher Michael McDaniel, showing the challenges of setting up the classroom. I have a very narrow room. So it's a little bit hard to maintain the A distance. Florida's governor has pushed to reopen all classrooms by the end of the month, but insists that parents have a choice between online or in person learning.

Dr Anthony Florida President Trump American Academy Of Pediatrics Michael Mcdaniel Georgia School David Muir
Joe Biden picks Kamala Harris as running mate

Sean Hannity

01:17 min | 23 hrs ago

Joe Biden picks Kamala Harris as running mate

"The former vice president for choosing California Senator Kamala Harris says his running mate, former President Barack Obama, said Joe Biden nailed this decision by choosing Senator Kamala Harris is America's next vice president. He's underscored his own judgment and character. Also, every single VP shortlist or who didn't make the cut, congratulated Harris. Conventional wisdom is the Biden campaign wanted a V P who would represent the future of the party and be a minimal target. President Trump. Harris is a generation younger than Biden and her candidacy will move the marker forward for women of color in politics while also giving black voters a seat at the table, which many African American groups outright demanded after black voters rescued. Biden's primary campaign walks is Jackie Heinrich president Trump telling Fox's Hannity. He's surprised by the choice. He was probably nastier than Even Pocahontas to Joe Biden. She was very disrespectful to Joe Biden on and it's hard to pick somebody. That's that Just respectful when She said things during the debates stir the Democrat primary debates that were horrible about Sleepy Joe. But the president also said Harris was the choice he most wanted to run against, saying she completes what he called the Democrats Socialist agenda in Tuesday's

Joe Biden Senator Kamala Harris President Trump Vice President President Barack Obama Hannity VP Jackie Heinrich America California
Trump Reacts to Kamala Harris Being Named Biden’s VP

Michael Berry

00:33 sec | 1 d ago

Trump Reacts to Kamala Harris Being Named Biden’s VP

"Presidential ticket is complete. California Senator Kamala Harris will be the first black woman on a major party's presidential ticket. The Biden campaign sent a text in an email to supporters this afternoon announcing the former vice president's running mate in the announcement, Biden says he needs someone working beside him who is tough, smart and ready to lead. Fox's Jared Halpern. What does President Trump think of Biden's pick? Just about the most Abril person in the U. S. Senate, and I would have thought that by now would have tried to stay away from that a little bit. Biden and Harris plan to deliver remarks in Delaware tomorrow. The

Biden Senator Kamala Harris Vice President President Trump Jared Halpern U. S. Senate California Delaware FOX
"president trump" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:21 min | Last month

"president trump" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"And people that don't love our country. They don't love our country. The left is not trying to promote justice or equality or lift up the downtrodden. They have one goal the pursuit of their own political power for whatever reason, but that's they go. That really seems to be the goal. The goal of their sickness, and if you give power to people that demolished monuments and attack churches. And sees city streets and set fire to buildings. Then nothing is sacred and know what is safe. And then the president zeroed in on law and order talking about standing with citizens who wants to live safely and their country. Play tape. We believe in long order we support the men and women of law enforcement, and we stand with the citizens. In every city and every. And every part of our country. To live in safety, security, dignity and peace. And we know. That American patriots. dopey bow down to foreign powers we don't back down. From left-wing bullies. And the only authority we worship God..

president
"president trump" Discussed on Today, Explained

Today, Explained

03:08 min | 6 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Today, Explained

"Remember president. Trump's travel ban. It's been a while right but the travel ban is back in fact it just got an update. So it's going to go into effect. Starting February twenty-second which is next Saturday. It got kind of buried in the news cycle a few weeks ago. But now it's it's really for real Nicole colne array covers immigration of. Vox and she's been covering travel ban. Two point six new countries are on the list me and Mar Maria Kirghistan Nigeria Goria Sudan and Tanzania are now being added but the restrictions differ by country and only affect people trying to permanently immigrate to the US rather than all all travellers. Okay so what exactly will it mean for people from Myanmar Era Nigeria Sudan Tanzania immigrants from Kurdistan Stan Myanmar Eritrea and Nigeria will no longer be able to obtain green cards or visas that provide a path to green card but they will be able to come to the US on temporary temporary visas including those for foreign workers tourists and students. The proclamation also bars citizens of those countries as well as Sudan and Tanzania from participating. What's called the diversity visa lottery? It was introduced in Nineteen eighty-six. That's a program that trump has been trying to dismantle title for years and under that program fifty thousand applicants from countries with low levels of immigration to the. US are selected at random to be offered green cards but refugees fugees and existing visa holders won't be affected so what's the reason. President trump is giving for expanding his so-called travel ban. We have to be safe. Our country country has to be safe. You see what's going on in the world. Our country has to be saved so we have a very strong travel ban and we'll be adding a few countries to so the administration nations says it wants these countries to meet the US's security standards which include a sharing information with US authorities and Interpol on criminals and terrorists wrists as well as issuing electronic passports in an effort to deter fraud. They basically want to prevent terrorists and other criminals from entering the US. And how real is the threat of terrorism from these six countries. The thing is most of these countries are dealing with various forms of internal threats. That don't necessarily posed an immediate threat to the American public. Let's take Boko Haram. The Islamic militant group in and Nigeria for example. It's been known to conduct deadly suicide. Bombings kidnappings generalize violence. There are some concerns among national security experts that the group's ties to Islamic state could mean that it could start directing attacks the US and that's particularly given Nigeria strong economic and automatic ties to the US but the thing is even if that turns out to be true. These new restrictions from the trump administration which are just blocking permanent. Immigrants aren't aren't going to stop terrorists. Terrorists could still theoretically come to the US on a visitor visa so it's not clear why.

US Trump Nigeria Sudan Tanzania president Nicole colne Myanmar Interpol Vox Kurdistan fraud Maria Kirghistan
"president trump" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

06:15 min | 7 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Fresh Air

"All the parties involved McDougal her lawyer the national enquirer in American media Trump Michael Cohen. Well the national enquirer told us that day did not by a story About Karen McDougal to kill it and that they had paid her or for magazine covers health calms none of which they had actually done So this happened in early August. They had this contract and she's supposed to do these health columns most were now in Early November there were no health columns but essentially they claimed and this was their pre-prepared defense right. When they made this contract they they purposely included these content provision as kind of a smokescreen so that was the the story they gave us? The White House told us A hope Hicks Trump's spokeswoman told us that we know nothing about any of this now she may not have but Trump clearly did so that was not true and Michael Cohen did not contact us. At the time we didn't know he was directly involved in it. But we know now that behind the scenes he was crafting messaging and he was gloating that you know the story which was like right. At the end of the campaign there was a lot going on with Hillary Clinton's emails in trump's victory. So the story didn't really really get that much attention. And and we know Claude Cohen was gloating about that. So if you look at how Karen McDougal and stormy Daniels tried to monetize the the stories of their relationship with trump and then you look at how the national enquirer tried to buy Karen McDougal silence and Michael. Cohen tried to buy stormy Daniels Silence. And then you know like McDougal and Daniels also had their lawyers who are also trying to monetize their relationship so who are the biggest losers losers here and what did they lose and are there any winners outside of the truth of merging. Well I mean I mean your winners you uncovered. Yeah and we're all winners as a result of that. But I mean I I mean not to be sanctimony is about it but like the whole reason for doing the story was to to tell people What happened during the election that they didn't know about at the time when it was happening? which is you know you can be the judge of how important it is to you No who donald trump may have had an affair with but the fact that he and his lawyer and his friends in in the tabloid media were were working to keep information from the voting public during the presidential election like that. I'd say sheds light on how trump operates which is You know what we tried to do in the book was to show. This was a pattern of of covering things up and using people to do it for him. That goes back many years and financially in terms of the characters in this story who are the biggest winners and losers So Michael Cohen obviously serving three year. Sentence US For the crimes connected to the payment among others In carry McDougal and stormy Daniels. You know maybe they it got what they wanted in terms of raising their profile but And Stormy Daniels to still touring right. Now she has her book out But you know she also had a higher security and they were definitely downsides to being thrust in the spotlight like that and I think the same the same is true for for carrying McDougal And actually now stormy stormy Daniels You know she had sued Donald Trump to get out of the agreement originally And then her and Mike Eleven ninety had filed other lawsuits and One of those there's lawsuits a libel lawsuit against against President Trump You know they lost on on on a preliminary emotion and now they owe him attorney's fees and she owes him You know twice as much more than twice as much as she was paid to keep quiet in attorneys fees so Not a winner in that sense so the national enquirer. Because like your reporting and Ronan Farrow's reporting Jeffrey toobin reported on the inquirer however Other people as well have reported on the whole catch and kill aspect of the national enquirer. Both in this story and of course also in the Harvey Weinstein Story. What is the state of the national enquirer now and of its owner American media so so right now now the the inquirer is is on the block. It's After all the reporting that you mentioned and even more recent isn't reporting The national enquirer had reported on on the affair of Amazon founder. Jeff Bezos And BEZOS and trump trump or not trump has made his dislike of Jeff bezos. Very obvious And so immediately after. That story came out There the sort of narrative errative of of David pecker helping Donald Trump is slamming. One of his was Enemies kind of congealed whether it was true or not And and American media's financial backers had basically had enough at that point they were they were done with all the scandals involving inquire And so they put the tabloids Loyd's up for sale But that's still hasn't gone through yet and are Dylan. Howard and David Pecker still in the positions they had during during the election? David Pecker is still the chief executive American media right now Dylan Howard has been moved Over to a less sort of aditorial role At American Media He. He's kind of handling special projects for them right now. One of the thank you both free reporting and for being a guest on our show. Thank you thanks Joe. Pelizzola and Michael Rothfield are the authors of the new book. The fixers the bottom feeders crooked lawyers gossip mongers and porn stars who created the forty fifth. President Pelizzola was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal. Rothfield is now with the New York Times after we take a short break our book critic Maureen Corrigan will review the new.

Donald Trump Karen McDougal The national enquirer Stormy Daniels Michael Cohen trump Hicks Trump Trump Jeff Bezos Claude Cohen David pecker Michael Rothfield Dylan Howard President Pelizzola Hillary Clinton the inquirer Harvey Weinstein Maureen Corrigan White House
"president trump" Discussed on Start Here

Start Here

08:53 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Start Here

"Once upon a time we were introduced to world unlike any other Elsa. Promise me we do this together. Okay but now. A new journey lies ahead ABC's Ginger Zee. Come with me as we go inside frozen too with the animators composers and storytellers. Who are bringing the next? I chapter in the frozen saga to life inside frozen to a behind the scenes look at the making of frozen to from ABC and Disney. Listen now for free on your favorite evite podcast APP. We talked about the votes earlier. But what are the arguments that led to them. And where do we go from here. Here we got a real live constitutional law expert with us for this. ABC News Legal Analyst. Kate Shaw and Kate. We talked earlier in the show. About how Democrats and Republicans were just really at each other's throats for hours for days for weeks. Is this all gamesmanship is that how is that how I should see it or or do they each have legitimate constitutional gripes with each other. You Know No. I think that the Democrats are making a case that is constitutional. They are arguing that the conduct here was so agree. Just that it warrants. The ultimate constitutional sanctions enchanted drafters of our Constitution designed a government in wish. Ambition was made to check ambition in which no branch of government would predominate manege over another. And no man would be allowed to be above the law including the president especially the president that that's a power that should be used rarely early but basically the conduct at issue here was sort of exactly at the heart of what the framers were trying to target when they wrote impeachment into the Constitution. Mr Mr Trump has allowed foreign powers to interfere in our domestic affairs. He's endangered our national security and our democracy itself for those reasons. We must impeach this presidency. That as the argument that the Democrats I think making and they think they've been hoping that the the facts here speak so clearly that there that they would dislodge some Republicans from their partisan corners and get some Republican support obviously these proceedings proceedings sorta culminating in. Yesterday's vote have made clear that none of that is happening. Let's look at these two phony articles of impeachment Washington Cheetan liberals have failed. The Democrats have trampled them all in their stampede. To impeach their cohorts at a deep state in the mainstream media they republicans have made arguments arse in constitutional terms but then I think are primarily more political that they're they're accusing the Democrats of acting out of hatred. You heard this term a number of times. They hate this president. They've been looking for a way to get rid of him. And you know the the Ukraine call is just excuse that they have land and upon so so those are constitutional arguments. Exactly I mean they think. The constitution sets a very high bar and the Democrats haven't cleared the president himself. Kate essentially said like hey I make policy. Oh see with Ukraine. You guys can argue with me over policy. But that's not impeachable right. That's that's the line sure. So the president saying that and his allies in the house are saying that and the Democrats are saying we stipulated. We disagree with you about almost every policy question. That's not what this is about. This is about some agreed violation of your constitutional both and agreed abuse of power and yesterday we started hearing from some Democrats. You know. Maybe we don't actually send these articles of impeachment over the Senate as promptly we is everyone was expecting like why would you do that and is is that a thing you can actually do Brad so the speaker of the House actually has a lot of control over what happens next. I vote proudly for these two articles of impeachment and then I hope the house retains control of the articles so they sent. It can't take these articles of impeachment until the house formerly delivers them to the Senate and the timing of that is within the speakers control so she could decide. We're going to do this in the first week or the second week of January as I think think is still the most likely scenario. Make our decision as to one. We're going to send it when we see what they're doing on the Senate side but that's a decision that we will make jointly eh or as you said there has been some talk of potentially hitting pause there are some Law Professors in particular advocating for maybe I'm trying to do some negotiating with the Senate before delivering the articles in order to get some concessions about things like live witnesses. I am not going to support witnesses. This is being called for by the president. I'm not going to support witnesses. Being called for by Senator Schumer in particular because Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham I have sent signals that in some ways the outcome here is for ordained this is a political process is not anything. Judicial about impeachment is a political decision now. Obviously House Democrats would like something that looks more like a genuine proceeding which you know minds are open new testimony when he can come in and the outcome is not you know a foregone conclusion that means why Nancy Pelosi sorta sit around with them for awhile. Is there any chance that that she does that. It seems unlikely to me but I do think that it's an idea. That's getting a little bit of traction so I I bet they'll be At the very some kind of internal caucus discussion of the possibility in the machinery of the impeachment process churns on even today Kate Shah. Thanks so much thanks Brad and one last thing I want to go back to the Capitol for some perspective this morning because ABC senior. National correspondent. Terry Moran is actually standing right outside and Terry. I'm reminded that you watch the impeachment of President Clinton play Out Twenty one years ago today did what you saw last night feel the same feel different. It feels very different. Grad that that felt momentous intas and even though the conduct was considered by most Americans not really to warrant impeachment it was about sex the process itself to see the the House of Representatives. And the Senate take these solemn constitutional steps it did feel momentous and I must say it is a sign of the times not it just the partisanship but the news cycles and the kind of country we are today it does not have that gravity it feels like just another chapter in and the outrage and the bitterness and the melodrama the the high stakes reality show that our politics have become that even this constitutional step feels like just another week in the trump presidency and Teri does that tell us more about president trump and his presidency or does he just tell us about Democrats and Republicans these parties in two thousand nineteen. You know both because the parties have changed that's for sure there used to be moderate Republicans and conservative Democrats During the Clinton White House and so they were up for grabs their votes. were up for grabs. The these are just two bitterly opposed camps for the first time in his privileged life life. Donald Trump will be finally held accountable. Listen this has nothing to do with the constitution. It has nothing to do with anything but raw politics. They A and they're voters locked in. Were fifty fifty country. Nobody moves much at all but it also does show how the personality of Donald Trump honed honed over seventy plus years outsized brazen forceful has taken hold of the National Discussion National Imagination. Like like no president that I can think of what they put. My family through is a disgrace me. It's my life it's fine I do but you know what what they put put. My family through is a disgrace and they ought to be ashamed and we should get apologies all over the place pretty much. Everything revolves around him. It seems not just our debates in the halls of Congress but the actions of athletes on the playing fields the old ward shows in our arts even the kind of straws we drink everything everything ends up revolving around him because he bends the national discussion to his will his personality which is performed. and which is just just mercurial. You can never know what's going to happen next. And I think people are numb to that L.. The president trump himself you might say keenly aware of his legacy here and as of this morning he seeks to become the first president ever re elected after being impeached. All because of a phone call in July and a two hundred thirty to one ninety seven. Vote last night Terry Moran outside the Capitol Title. Thank you thanks Brad so here. We are as you heard from Kate. Sean and others throughout a lot of development still to come here but the I-WORD we've been talking about for mud. That tie were now very much a reality. The president has been impeached. Much much more to come on this throughout the day on. ABC News Dot Com or the ABC News App. I'm Brad Milkey Tomorrow.

president Donald Trump Brad Milkey ABC Senate Kate Terry Moran Ukraine Elsa Kate Shaw ABC News House of Representatives Ginger Zee Kate Shah Disney
"president trump" Discussed on Start Here

Start Here

03:46 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Start Here

"Is this Bagna on. Your mental moment is happening. President trump was attending a rally in Battle Creek. Michigan was kind of a coincidence. The rally was scheduled before his impeachment vote was ever really set in stone own. What was not a coincidence? What was clear to everyone? As he walked on stage was that he would be speaking at the exact moment he was impeached. This was not a president waiting silently the White House. This was a president who wanted a fight. They want to do worse than that by the way by the way by the way. It doesn't really feel being impeached. Let's go to someone who's been talking to White House officials throughout this process Jonathan Karl. ABC's chief chief White House correspondent Jonathan. How did president trump view the developments of the last twenty four hours? Did you get a sense personally. My my sense is that the president has been occurring up for this fight. He did not want this moment to come clearly lesser on your legacy known it was a hoax. It's a hoax fat hoax. But as it became clear that he was going to be impeached. At the vote was inevitable. He switched which in two all out battle mode giant to impeach me from before Iran and he saw the in some ways he was winning. I think yes. There was the vote to impeach. Oh I think we have a vote coming in so we got every single. Republican voted for US wall not a single Republican defectors. We had it now so we have it in the Senate. They're doing a great job so I'm not worried I'm not worried in the Senate. It looks like not a single Republican senator will defect. So here's the way he described it. In battlecry depraved raved actions. Today crazy. Nancy Pelosi's House Democrats have branded themselves with an eternal mark. Walk of shame. And I it really is. It's a disgrace. He said this impeachment vote was an eternal mark of shame. Not a mark of shame on his record. A mark of shame on the Democrats are moving forward with a purely partisan impeachment one even beyond the Senate trial then. Jonathan got the election in November. We've talked about how no OH president has ever won reelection after being impeached. But you can say he hates being impeached. All you want his campaign says they're just making a ton of money office at this point now that it is a done deal. The inevitable has happened. He is impeached. He's going looking forward to this Senate. They firmly believe And I believe the President President believes that as a as an electoral matters a political matter. It does not hurt him and most most likely helps him. Lawless partisan impeachment is a political suicide march for the Democrat Party. Have you seen my polls of the last four weeks fundraising has gone up his approval rating certainly not hurt which is a pretty amazing thing to look at to go through an impeachment process to be impeached and to emerge you know own basically where you were or perhaps a little bit stronger but you know we saw this with bill. Clinton Bill Clinton actually emerged politically stronger than he was before for. The Clinton could also lend a hand Al Gore and the Democrats lost that elections. One thing is for sure Battle Creek very appropriate venue for the president yesterday. giancarl thank you. Thank you next up on start here. We'll talk about what's next up for this whole process..

Jonathan Karl president President President Democrats Senate White House Battle Creek trump US Bill Clinton chief White House corresponden ABC Michigan Nancy Pelosi Democrat Party Al Gore senator Iran
"president trump" Discussed on Start Here

Start Here

06:47 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Start Here

"On this vote. The yeas are two hundred and thirty. The nays are one ninety. Seven present. Is One article. One is adopted. Two hundred thirty to one ninety seven. That was the tally last night. At eight thirty four eastern time cemented a key part of Donald J trump's legacy because that was the moment he became an impeached president minutes later. A second article of impeachment was passed with with two hundred twenty nine votes article. Two is adopted. Remember it was late July when an anonymous whistle blower reached out to staff members at the House Intelligence Committee expressing concern about a phone call between president trump and the leader of Ukraine though staffers told the whistleblower to hire a lawyer to file a complaint with the Intelligence Committees Inspector General the House Intelligence Committee has just released. The whistle blower complained declassified version of timber. All of America had read that report from the whistle blower says in in the course of my official duties I have received information from multiple. US government officials that the President United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign in country in the two thousand twenty US election less than three months. Democrats conducted depositions that conducted hearings and last night they pass those articles the president Now officially stands charged with abusing his power and obstruction of Congress. And we're going to hear how this went down yesterday whilst GonNa look ahead to the next phases of this so let's get to it. Let's start at the Capitol itself. ABC Senior Congressional correspondent. Mary Bruce Joins US and Mary. The voting took what like twenty minutes and yet this was is really an all day thing. You had more than six hours of debate evenly split between the parties one last chance for both sides of the aisle to make their case and the partisan divide could not have been more stark. All that matters to this president is what affects him personally speaker Pelosi all day setting the tone. What we are discussing today is the established fact that the president violated the Constitution? He sat there in the chamber often in the back by herself as is listening throughout the entire thing and she said as she has said throughout this entire process this is a solemn occasion we gather today under the Dome of this temple full of democracy to exercise one of the most solemn powers that this body can take. It was hard to miss the fact that she was dressed all in black but when she did take to the four to make remarks she made it very clear that she feels the president's actions had left them with simply no choice. If we do not act now we would be derelict in our duty because of course impeachment impeachment was not something the police had wanted to do. This was a day that she had in many ways tried for a long time to avoid this impeachment as renting our country and have it's fatally flawed on a process the substance the intentions and the consequences. It's a total shift show and on the Republicans it was very clear. They are in lockstep with the president. President they were eager to mount a fierce defense. You're about to impeach a duly elected president. Who has done nothing wrong? Of course we didn't see a single Republican break ranks with the president here and they railed against the Democrats for hours. They'll be forever remembered as the Senator Joe McCarthy's of our time one Republican at one point trying to compare the impeachment process to the trial of Jesus Christ haunches pilot afforded more rights to Jesus than the Democrats have afforded this president. Of course you have heard the the president himself compare this process to the Salem witch trials so a lot of Colorful comparisons going on your on the hill and that takes us up to the vote. How did that play out on the floor? Mary House Speaker. Nancy Pelosi presided over these two votes. The first one abusive power and no surprise here. It was a party line. Vote as these. He's votes were occurring. You could actually hear chance. Four more years from Republicans inside the chamber some Democrats were also feeling rowdy as Pelosi slammed the gavel. You can hear them applause laws speaker. Pelosi didn't like that. She put up a finger almost as if she was chiding children's cut it out. We have bipartisan. Opposition impeachment. Not Bipartisan Support and Democrats were largely united as well but two of them did defect to oppose impeachment. They are Congressman van drew of New Jersey. Who's actually already announced that? He plans to switch parties entirely and become a Republican in Collin Peterson of Minnesota a district. The President Trump won by thirty points. There's been a lot a lot of focus. Paid to these moderate Democrats in swing districts that are up for re election. But what has actually been kinda surprising here on. The Hill is how many of them fell in line behind the Democrats today. An oath that gives me resolve resolve to do what is right and not what is politically expedient so many of in the previous day's one by one have come out fallen in line saying that. They feel that they had to back impeachment because I stick with their principles even though they knew that could have cost them their jobs. I come to this floor not as a Democrat not as a Republican but as an American who cares deeply about the constitution. The the closest comparison Democrats had just a mosh rate used to be a Republican. Now he's Independent. He voted for impeachment but then Republicans could also point to Tulsi Gabbard at Democrats kratz running for president. She was that person voting present who couldn't quite bring herself to pull the trigger. Either way. Mary what do you see is the mood of these lawmakers because as we talked about you know these solemn long faces Democrats talked about the anger these Republicans but that genuine performance like what is it. I think it's all of the above. Brad I mean look this has become one of the most intensely partisan episodes I think of our history. It's interesting to see how very few of them Wanna address any of the facts of the president's misconduct nor do they wish to defend nor do they wish apparently Madam Speaker I've struck a nerve and it's more than just a partisan divide. We saw this fundamental divide over right and wrong and that led to essentially a debate where the two parties can't even agree on the basic facts of what happened here and short given the nature feature of this debate Impeachment is a political process. You did hear a lot of political grandstanding but you also heard a lot of passion on both sides. Republicans are adamant that the president did nothing wrong here and they were eager to launch a very fierce defense while Democrats argue the exact opposite. They say they have simply no choice. But got to impeach the president that he has put his own political interest of those of this country and they went ahead and did it in a way that like you said. We've never really seen before Mary. Bruce Thank you thanks Brad..

president Democrats Nancy Pelosi President United States Mary Bruce Donald J trump US ABC House Intelligence Committee Collin Peterson Salem America Congress Tulsi Gabbard Brad New Jersey Congressman van Minnesota official
"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

Post Reports

06:51 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

"So Aaron Blake. It is just after after eight PM and debate on. The floor of the House has just wrapped up. What were some of the big takeaways that you saw from the latter part of the debate that we saw on the House floor? They really stuck with their partisan lines to a remarkable degree. I think especially on the Republican side when the Ukraine scandal broke the Republicans were reluctant lucked to defend the president's conduct. They were more focused on process issues. I think what you saw on Wednesday was the party. Basically not just arguing that this was as an impeachable but that there was no really bad conduct even there and so that was the case they made throughout the day towards the end of of the speeches they actually started. Kind of getting riled up and excited and kind of cheering each other. I'll tell you what matters speaker let me have just a few months. We start the clock and let me go around to the press corps and everybody here and I'm going to accuse you of something you did it unit it you did it you did it now proven wrong you did it. They don't just hate Donald Trump. Madam Speaker they hate to sixty three million Americans who voted for this president the forgotten booing you hear a lot more in there were disturbances and things like that. Especially when Steve scalise was speaking house will in order. Gentleman may proceed. Thank you Madam Speaker. It's those forgotten men and women of this country that Washington left behind. And what's this president doing for them. He's delivering bring for that. Gave a speech in which he talked about how the Democrats don't just hate president trump. They actually hate this. The sixty three million people who voted for president trump which is pretty intense language to be using about sixty three million Americans. It really is and I think that was the moment where it became evident that Republicans were just defending the president. They think this is something that can be used. Maybe for some political gain. And maybe this is going to be their argument going forward. That's an obviously obviously a very pitched argument to make but they're they're certainly not backing down from it and then when the last people that we heard was house minority leader Kevin McCarthy. What did he? You have to say Kevin McCarthy kind of picked up where Steve scalise had left off Madam Speaker. I must warn you. And he started his speech by saying that he had bad news for the Democrats. Donald J trump is president of the United States. Donald Trump was president his president today he was going to be president tomorrow tomorrow after impeachment and he will be the president when this impeachment is over it was intended to reinforce this idea that this is all about Democrats being sore losers and wanting to get rid of a president that they can't stand and of course president trump certainly is someone that Democrats can't stand but their argument has been that and we saw saw in in Steny Hoyer. The majority leader's closing speech that they had actually voted against impeachment three times when it came up before it was only after Ukraine crane stuff broke that they actually committed to it as a party. Democrats did not choose this impeachment. We did did not wish for it. Now we voted against it. We voted against edged once. We voted against it twice. We voted against it three times as recently as July. We did not what this so now. That House Democrats have finally reached this moment this this critical point that they've been talking about for months or even years. What is it mean? And what does this change for. President Trump Fundamentally I'm not sure it changes a whole lot of the president's numbers haven't changed significantly. Sport support from Peterman is still very evenly divided. It's gotten slightly more evenly divided in the last couple of days and weeks. I think that Democrats went into into this. Mostly hoping that it didn't hurt them. We don't know if that would necessarily be the case. I think it's likely to be more marginal getting how far away the election is But Nancy Pelosi basically signed off on this after resisting it for so long because I think she was convinced that it wouldn't hurt that much at the very least and that it was the right thing thing to do that. It was a check on the president's behavior Whether it ultimately will be a check on on his behavior I think that It's it seems unlikely. He's going to change it up too much but this is the tool that they had at their disposal and they decided to use it but ultimately we're pretty confident in how this is going to end the chances the Senate is actually going to convict. The president are extremely low. So what are we supposed to take away from this. Why Think Democrats won't won't you take away is that president trump will forever be known as the third American President ever to have been impeached? What Republicans are going to want to take away is that this was a completely completely partisan process that Democrats rushed through it that they didn't necessarily get all the evidence that they needed and basically that the president was over? Zealously accused of these things and that this was all about politics. I think that people who are on either side of this debate over the president are likely to Except those arguments very easily without much question and eventually probably in the same position we were before just with that line in. The president's political obituary very probably being added and the question from here of whether it actually weighs upon people's votes in November Karen. Thank you so much. Thank Oh you on Wednesday evening just after eight PM. The House of Representatives voted on the two articles of impeachment on article. One one abuse of power on this spoke the yeas are two hundred and thirty days or one. Ninety seven present. Is One article. One is adopted on article to obstruction of Congress on this vote. The the as are two hundred and twenty nine the nays are one ninety. Eight present. Is One article two is adopted. No Republican member of Congress voted to pass either article. The House stands adjourned to nine. Am Tomorrow. Donald Trump is now the third president in American history to be impeached. The trial against the president is expected to start in the Senate in early January.

president Donald J trump Madam Speaker President Steve scalise Kevin McCarthy Senate Ukraine Aaron Blake House of Representatives Congress Nancy Pelosi Washington Steny Hoyer Peterman United States
"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

Post Reports

03:21 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

"As the debate continued through the afternoon a succession of lawmakers from both sides took turned making their case. Thank you Madam Speaker today so sad day in the People's House Donald Trump has abused the power or of his office and some other themes became clear for Republicans. The argument was that the Democrats were acting on their hatred of the president's. Just because you hate the president of the United Estates and you can find no other reason other than the fact that you're so blinded by your hate that you can't see straight that you've decided the only way we can make sure this president doesn't get elected again again is to impeach him. The gentleman from Texas was introducing impeachment resolutions. Two years ago and said President. Trump should be impeached so he can't get reelected Republicans also argue that Democrats were trying to overturn the two thousand sixteen election. Today is the culmination of the Democrats three year. Long Quest. de-legitimize is the president has been in the works since November two thousand sixteen if the House of Representatives passes the articles of impeachment. The Democrats will have said a dangerous. This precedent by doing America's votes for president because a single-party disagreed with the two thousand sixteen presidential election results urge my colleagues to vote no on articles of impeachment and I yield back and Democrats kept trying to make the argument that all they were doing was protecting the constitution. Titian doing nothing here. Madam Speaker is not an option looking away from these crimes against our country is not an option prison. The United States AIDS has violated his oath of office and betrayed the Constitution and the American people he admitted to soliciting assistance from foreign leader the interfere in the US election and ate his political reelection campaign. That's a violation of law. Violates the constitution and a betrayal of the American people and an impeachable. Jabbour offense then came Congressman Adam Schiff chairman of the intelligence committee and the man who managed the impeachment investigation for the Democrats Madam Speaker my my colleagues my fellow Americans. I rise to support the impeachment of President Donald J trump when a man unprincipled old in private life desperate in his fortune bold in his temper possessed of considerable talents having the advantage of military habits despotic despotic in his ordinary demeanor known to have scoffed and private at the principles of liberty when such a man is seen to mount the Hobbyhorse of popularity celerity to join the cry of danger to liberty to take every opportunity of embarrassing the government general government and bringing it under suspicion to to flatter and fall in with all the nonsense of the zealots of the day it may justly be suspected that his object is to throw things into into confusion that he may ride the storm and direct the whirlwind. These are the words of Alexander Hamilton written in seventeen seventeen ninety two. Could we find a more perfect description of the present danger emanating from sixteen hundred Pennsylvania at this this poster ports podcast is brought to you by net suite by Oracle the world's number one cloud business system avenue.

President Donald J trump president Madam Speaker Congressman Adam Schiff House of Representatives Texas Alexander Hamilton United Estates US chairman United States AIDS America Pennsylvania
"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

Post Reports

09:59 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

"Just afternoon debate. The floor began with Speaker Nancy. Pelosi we gathered today under the Dome of this Temple of Democracy to exercise one of the most solemn powers that this body audie can take the impeachment of the president of the United States no member regardless of party or politics comes to Congress to impeach a president it but every one of us as our first act is a member of Congress stood on this historic House floor before our beautiful American flag and raised raised our hands in the socred oath I do swap solemnly swear that I will support and defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies AMIS foreign and domestic so help me God then came Republican Doug Collins ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee and we are here today during her into a debate. The should surprise. No one. This is not a surprise. It's not even something that we would have not thought about from the very moment that the majority party in this house one the inevitability that we would be here today was only a matter of what date they would schedule it nothing else you know. It's not about what this body can do in this constitution loath there's been a lot of constitutional and founders thrown around. We'll be all day today. But there's one thing that I will mention all along and that is also the founders were very concerned about a partisan impeachment in in which politics or the majority who have their strength can do what they want to do. irregardless of any facts. In fact I've said it before and I will say so Aaron Lake it is now two. PM So the actual debate on the articles of impeachment had been going on for about two hours. Now what have we heard so far will in a Lotta as we've heard what we've been hearing for the last several weeks in these impeachment hearings I in the House intelligence committee than the Judiciary Committee and then and finally in the rules committee this week. Republicans have I think even over the course of of those weeks become even more resolute in their defenses of of president trump and basically that there is no there there. Republicans have essentially argued that this was a predetermined outcome that Democrats have basically melded the facts To satisfy that predetermined outcome and that whatever the president is being accused of isn't even bad enough off to impeach a President so Democrats on the other hand are talking about this in in in very solemn terms as what I I think he's been the prevailing takeaways so far they've talked about this as if it is their duty even if they recognize. Maybe it's not likely to succeed in the end and removing him And basically are projecting the idea that they're not happy about having to do this. And that is not a personal thing with the president and I think that we saw that from the very beginning of the debate with Speaker Nancy Pelosi she was wearing black. She was very sombre and how she was talking about. This decision that was before these members members of Congress and she really seems to not want to be making this about Democrats winning or Democrats Being able to stick it to the president very sadly now. Our founders vision of a republic is under threat from actions from the White House that is why today a speaker of the House I solemnly and sadly opened the debate on the impeachment of the president of the United States. Nancy Pelosi at least he's publicly was not an advocate for impeachment for a very long time she was holding up this process when a lot of her colleagues wanted to go down this road just based upon the Russia investigation before we learn about any of this Ukraine stuff really but I also think it's just a is thing where the more they can say that this is not something that they're happy to be doing. I think makes it seem less personal and I think they hope sends the message that they're they've taken the step after considering it very closely the and doing it even though they didn't want to at least in her case and what were some of the arguments that Republicans made during the debate today. Many of them have actually been trending towards awards. kind of an apocalyptic scene. I'm thinking mostly of one moment. Where Congressman Clay Higgins from Louisiana? took to the microphone and offered some pretty vivid imagery. I have descended into the belly of the beast. I've witnessed the terror within and arise committed to oppose the insidious force. I was threatened our public. America's being severely injured by this betrayal by this own just and weaponized impeachment brought opponents by the same socialist who threaten unborn life in the womb who threatened First Amendment Rights of conservatives another popular argument and one that's not terribly surprising Given it's been used in recent days. Is this idea that the president in these impeachment articles isn't actually being accused of a crime. We saw congressman. Tom McClintock from California. Making this case. Now Article One's a made up crime called abuse of office. It does not charged that the president broke any law. But they're congress doesn't like the way he lawfully discharged his constitutional duties. This would reduce the presidency you to that of a minister serving at the pleasure of Congress destroying the separation of powers at the heart of our Constitution. Article too is another. Made up crime I'm called obstruction of Congress. It means the president sought to defend his constitutional rights. And those of his office. It removes the judiciary from our Constitution in places Congress alone in the position of defining the limits of its own powers relative to the president. We saw Peter King from New York. Also making it to impeach a President President for phone call which crimes charged never mind a high crime and asserting his constitutional prerogatives as president is a clear abuse of power by the Congress. This this is an argument that Democrats basically gave to Republicans when they chose to make these impeachment articles about abuse of power and obstruction of Congress rather rather than accusing the president of bribery. which is a statutory crime or obstruction of justice which is also a statutory crime obstruction of congress is different And is not something that you would be tried in a court of law for so you know the extent. Republicans can use that to say what the president is being accused accused of. Isn't even that serious. I think is really what they're going for here. So what are some of the key issues that Democrats are raising in response to these attacks from Republicans will the response to the idea that the impeachment articles include. No crimes has generally been that the president has actually committed crimes. They've been crimes crimes against the constitution and not necessarily statutory crimes. A few Democrats who have been making these arguments include Paul a a member from Washington. OUR FOUNDERS MR chairman. Mr Speaker entrusted us with the awesome responsibility of protecting our democracy. which gets its power not from the bloodlines of monarchs? But from the votes of we the People Ted Lieu from California no one is above the law and the Constitution is Supreme Law Law of the land. I I went through constitution. Why joint the United States Air Force on active duty and took was not to a political party? Eh to a president or to a King Document has made America the greatest nation on earth and that document contains a safeguard for when the presence. It's abusive power is so extreme that warrant impeachment and Cedric Richmond from Louisiana Madam Speaker Donald Trump recently said I can do anything I want. He also bragged that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and get away with it well. He's shooting holes in our Constitution on Pennsylvania Avenue. I think it's interesting to see someone like representative Jeffries. And what he said that he couched this vote in terms of a lofty idea like emancipation. It seems like Democrats are really trying to speak from a moral highground. There are some who cynically argue that. The impeachment of this president will further divide an already fractured textured union. But there is a difference between division and clarification slavery wants divided the nation but emancipate US rose up to clarify that all men are created equally suffrage once divided the nation but women rose up to clarify five that all voices must be heard and our democracy. Jim Crow once divided the nation but civil rights champions rose up to clarify by that all are entitled to equal protection under the law. There is a difference between division and clarification. Yeah I keep Jeffries. From New York is one of the people who's talked about as a potential future speaker of the House and he took on this argument that it Republicans have been pointing out that Democrats before they were for impeachment said. That impeachment needed to be bipartisan thing. Of course it's not being bipartisan. Today it's not going to be. So why are they going through. It is if the question and Jeffries basically said in an ideal world. This would be bipartisan. But just just because something is divisive doesn't mean it's not worth doing. Well Aaron. Thank you so much. That's our one two of this debate. We have many more hours to go. So we'll check in with the little bit later. Sounds.

president Congress President President Speaker Nancy Pelosi United States Jeffries Speaker Nancy House Judiciary Committee Louisiana America Temple of Democracy California White House Doug Collins House intelligence committee Aaron Lake New York Tom McClintock Mr Speaker
"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

Post Reports

02:33 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on Post Reports

"Remind us what are the actual articles that people are going to be voting on so there's two articles one is abuse of power alleging that Donald trump put his own personal political interests above the national security interests of the nation the second is obstruction of Congress. Alleging that the president engaged in a scheme to defy the constitutional order and Defy Congress's the responsibility of oversight and at this point. Do we know for a fact that House Democrats have enough votes to be able to impeach the president on both of these charges charges. We do. We're not going into the day today with a lot of drama about how this is ultimately going to turn out so today the house is GonNa give them one at nine o'clock hassle me in order. The chair lays before the house of communication from the speaker were expecting some media procedural shenanigans from Republicans as protests. When you're the minority and the House of Representatives you don't have a huge number of tools at your disposal to make a point but we're expecting more than us a lot a lot of them? Today you can move to journ speaker so we can stop wasting time on appeasement. I moved at the House. Do now adjourn. Question is on the motion to adjourn. All in favor. Say Hi Noes the motion is not as we can disrupt members the days you you can bring them in to vote when they weren't expecting to vote. I think everyone is on a work that it's going to be that kind of day. And then there was a secondary vote on a privilege resolution resolution that was saying that the entire impeachment process was essentially out of order. I believe this is the most unfair politically biased highest rigged process. President trump for the record was not provided the opportunity to challenge the facts and still has not received. The materials from the judiciary is required. God by six sixty another example of why. This isn't a fair process with that. Both of those votes were knocked down by Democrats as expected. We're here to talk about the president's behavior of and that's what I think. We all should be focused on not just process but I want to just say that I'm proud of the process. Democrats and Republicans have had equal opportunity. You to participate in the months. Long impeachment inquiry members of start six hours of debate probably more procedural shenanigans sprinkled in that. This is all going to come to head this evening with votes on the two articles of impeachment and a resolution concerning the managers. That will probably happen anywhere. From seven o'clock to ten o'clock..

president Donald trump House of Representatives Congress
"president trump" Discussed on We The People

We The People

12:51 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on We The People

"Well not necessarily wonderful for depending on your perspective but it's it's wonderful that you summoned such scholars and I know that they'll be enlightening. Everyone Congressman I'd rather than you do not want to take a position one way or the other about Impeachment although you can if you like but you served with great distinction for a for Jew terms you've heard the debate tonight from the scholars and from your colleagues ask. An open ended question. What do you want to say about? The impeachment process stands now and I guess how would you approach it. If you're in Congress so I think with where this started since The president trump released the phone. Call transcript to where we are now. I've not seen much in the way of movement either from Democrats away from thinking. That impeachment is the appropriate way to deal with any Misuse or abuse or errant behavior. Nor have I seen seen Republicans move away from saying it was anything less than perfect phone call. I think Charlie Hunt His when Charlie retired retired. He said something. Funny that sticks with today he said you know the the fun and dysfunction has been removed from serving and and ah you know the thing I I think congresswoman Scanlan said something very appropriate in terms of the institution of Congress should should jealously guard what the role and function of Congress is as it was delineated in our constitution and the erosion of constant of Congressional Authority vis-a-vis. The executive branch has been one. That's taken place over seventy five years if not more but when you serve in Congress to sit there knowing what your role is supposed to supposed to be mindful that you're not actually exercising. Those perogatives is something. That's deeply frustrating. Moving forward. Since it was an open ended question. I my big concern. Is that no matter. No matter what happens happens right I I. My sense is that the house probably brings up articles probably votes on them. Although I still tend to think that there are a number the house Democrats that do not want to take this vote because it will hurt them in their districts but let's just assume how stems vote the way vote articles of impeachment. It goes to the Senate the Senate's not GonNa vote to impeach the president absent. Something extraordinary coming out between now and when they have the vote looking at this two years from now for years from now ten ten years from now when President of another party is in there were even the same party and something less than the type of bribery. We're talking about which isn't here. You take this money and I'll give you this but sort of if you do this then I can. I can help you with the favor. Sort of this muddled way that even the president talks right and and there's a difference between what you think. Obviously the president meant by what he said versus what you can prove and I just worry long term weather we've normalized allies. The extraordinary remedy of impeachment long-term. That's nothing that says nothing. That is not a judgment call on either of the sitting members of Congress here who I I think are doing their utmost in terms of diligence and honesty in doing what they feel is right long-term. Institutionally I wonder where we're going to be ten years from now as as a congress the next time something remotely close to this happens. Thank you very much for that. The congressman the congressman raises two. Really important points one is that impeachments have become so partisan that we're not going to see much cross partisan support. He says that that might hurt. Even some DEM's especially in swing districts and he worries that that could make the other party more likely to use impeachments in the future in that normalization could lead to more failed impeachments and more partisanship chip. You've been a strong supporter of impeachment under these facts. What's your response to his points? And what would you say to two members. Feel the same I didn't. I didn't go to Washington to impeach was not you know I was elected in November a special election of twenty sixteenths. I've been there three years. That was not not my first course of action. I would argue. I was driven to that course of action because of certain behavior. I don't disagree with Brian. Brian that Polit that the process has eroded for lotteries. There's no question and also participated dissipated in impeachment at a state level to all you may remember the Supreme Court justice. Yes that we did it in Harrisburg. So I'm I'm aware with it. You don't believe that is something you take lightly so let me be very clear. I don't believe you take it lightly but I do believe so. The most proudest title is not congressman. Citizen that is the most prowse title. You have open enrollment Oma coming up and that means you have the ability to operate and I think there should be a serious discussion about this so Jeffrey. That's why what better place to have. That didn't have the sears discussion. Because something is not right you can look at the Mullahs report. Jim Komi Komi. You could just go down laundry lists and you could debate about if that is peach. Impeachable and removal movable. But we in the house can't do that anyway. There's a Senate. They have to take picture. So when you're there Jeffrey in my view you look you evaluate you. Look at the information that's provided to you in and you take the course of action because you know Ben Franklin made the statement is a monarchy or a republic. And what I understand this is. I've been around around. Liuhua was in the same position. Ben Franklin had I used to have just on three hundred years different dream Ben. Franklin and infrequent was chairman of the ways and means at the Pennsylvania. I was chairman of the Appropriations Committee. I was born in the hospital. That ben Franklin unfound so no a little bit about that so I don't take it lightly so I don't disagree with what Ryan is saying but accountability Ability Accountability Santi tell take lightly Democrat or Republican. And that's a strong feel about in this particular situation. That's what I hear in the Third Congressional district on. Those is the Bluest of the blue districts but then people got a right to so I mean here Ryan saying that but I just say that this is one time I think the particular cases. Thank you so much for that. Thank you really for reminding all of us of the purpose of this convenient friends fellow citizens the congressman said. You have the most important job and what we're GONNA do at the end of this forum. Obviously I should've thought at the beginning you're going to vote and you're gonNa vote about whether or not you think based on the facts and the law that you've heard heard that you think that the president should be impeached. But I want you to think about listening to the rest of the discussion with a very open mind because I'm also going to ask you. Who changed his or in her mind based on the facts or the constitutional law that you heard in the course of this discussion so open yourself up to the possibility of reaching a conclusion which differs from your her from your political or partisan views so with that in mind lets us the rest of our time to again appeal to our fellow citizens? So so congressman you said your fellow fellow. Republicans should take the process seriously. You now know a lot of facts. We know what the standards for impeachment are. If you're comfortable doing so so why don't you tell our fellow citizens whether or not you think I'm the facts in the long. The president should be impeached. I think the I do think that the facts in evidence as I understand them do reis level impeachment. I'd look this perspective. At a member of the House of Representatives senators used his or her office to solicit a foreign leader to investigate it political opponents. I serve on the Appropriations Committee and and by the away. If you don't do that you know that that aid that we send you I'll put a legislative hold on it and it were publicly revealed. I suspected Department of Justice. Just be crawling up that members backside right now but and by the same token also said I saw the same thing with the Clinton impeachment and having been a again chairman the Ethics Committee Committee. I was involved with resignations and members. I know how that goes but I always said you know from. Every male member of Congress had done in his office with a female intern with Bill Clinton in did and it Republican discovered that member of Congress. He'd be out of office by the end of the day guarantee you and I believe me. I've seen these types of things in enforced. I so bottom line is based on this evidence you cannot use your office a quid pro quo but forget about the quid pro quo for one second. Just the act of asking foreign leader to interfere in the campaign by itself is a very serious issue that by itself. Now when when you say and if you don't do that then I'm going to hold up. Four hundred million four million dollars in military assistance. Well now you've got a bigger problem so based on that. I think it's a it's a a quite serious. And based on the witness testimony I've seen so far from businessmen and hill and Taylor. They all seem to be corroborating. What each other I've said so I think it's a pretty powerful argument? It's pretty hard to argue against it now. That said I'm not. I'm not always sure the Democrats should pull the trigger here. Do they really want to have a partisan impeachment. Yeah I mean that's that might not be something they want to do at the end of the day but I think this just based on the facts and the evidence you do that but if you're a Republican member you're in a Ruby Red district in northern Alabama you know eighty percent of your constituents your car. Don't you dare impeach the president no matter what the evidence says what do you do. It's a political decision. Split decision is going to not going to happen. powerful reminder that you reach reach a decision based on the facts and the law but then as representative. You have to make the political decision because it's a mix of politics and the constitution congresswoman. Same to you. You're you're making your appeal to our fellow citizens but as a member of the district committee you will be perhaps helping to draft articles of impeachment so in the course of your your or your address maybe tell us how how you would You know what the charges would be. We've heard charges of solicitation simply asking for foreign aid. We've heard a charge of bribery itself offering something of value to Ukraine in exchange for something of value namely only the investigation there have been charges of obstruction by refusing to cooperate with Congress. What articles do you imagine most persuasive? and which ones would you support support. I think that is one of the questions here. I mean we have an embarrassment of riches from which to select and that is part of the problem you know I I agree with Professor Malcolm that you know. We have elections for one purpose but then we also have impeachment for another purpose and so I may not agree with with for example the president's morals or his policy choices but those are things that would be dealt with through the electoral system but the concern in the impeachment process. This is are we seeing behavior that is eroding our government we heard about eroding the power of the executive but on judiciary. I've had a front row seat seat to the erosion of the powers of Congress. Not just the ways that Congress may have let its power slip away through war powers resolutions and that kind of thing but through an and as I.

Congress president congressman Senate Congressman Appropriations Committee executive Ben Franklin institution of Congress chairman bribery Jeffrey congresswoman Scanlan Ryan Charlie Hunt Jim Komi Komi Supreme Court ben Franklin unfound Washington
"president trump" Discussed on We The People

We The People

02:11 min | 8 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on We The People

"I'm Jeffrey Rosen. President CEO of the National Constitution Center and welcome to weed appeal weekly show of constitutional. You too shall debate. The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan nonprofit chartered by Congress to increase awareness and understanding of the constitution among the American people. The House of Representatives is now debating articles of impeachment against President Trump on December. Second here at the National Constitution Center we hosted a fascinating to part conversation on the constitutional dimensions of impeachment. The first panel features leading constitutional channel scholars from diverse perspectives including professor. Michael Gerhardt are scholar in residence at the Constitution Center who testified as an impeachment expert before the House Traditional Committee it also features John Malcolm from the Heritage Foundation who's a member of our Madison Ian Constitution for all commission and the next panel features current right and former members of Congress to Republicans and two Democrats including the vice chair of the house. Judiciary Committee Representative Mary. Gay scanlon because impeachment involves a mix of legal and political considerations. It's hard to have a purely constitutional debate about impeachment but I ask the audience During this program to separate their political from their constitutional views in other words not to ask as a partisan matter whether or not they believe leave that president trump should be impeached but whether they thought that the constitution compelled it and how they would vote if they were members of the House of Representatives. I ask you the same question. Endear we the people listeners. Try as hard as you can to listen to this really illuminating discussion with an open. Mind and at the end of the podcast. If you find that you've changed your mind about whether or not president trump should be impeached. Then please email me and let me know Jay. Rosena Constitution Centre her. I hope you learn as much as I did from this illuminating conversation and let the constitutional debate began the Michael..

National Constitution Center President Trump Constitution Center Rosena Constitution Centre House of Representatives President CEO Congress president Jeffrey Rosen House Traditional Committee Judiciary Committee Michael Gerhardt Gay scanlon vice chair Heritage Foundation professor John Malcolm Representative Jay
"president trump" Discussed on The Economist: The Intelligence

The Economist: The Intelligence

07:19 min | 10 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on The Economist: The Intelligence

"It's been even two weeks since Democrats I launched impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump the actions of the trump presidency revealed dishonorable fabric of the presence trail of his oath of office retrial of our national security and betrayal the integrity of our elections therefore today I'm in the House of Representatives moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry the inquiry began following allegations that Mr trump withheld military aid from Ukraine and on the condition of investigating the son of Joe Biden a Democratic presidential contender Mr trump mounted a belligerent and chaotic defense of his actions while still applying with the process wasting your time on a you know let's use the word they used to use a lot a manufactured crisis but this week the administration in announced it would no longer participate in the proceedings and we refuse to respond to subpoena requests the Democrats have said they'll press ahead regardless although they'll know longer be able to interview key State Department witnesses yesterday Mr Biden threw his weight behind the proceedings in view of the world and the American people Donald Trump is violated his oath of office betrayed this nation committed impeachable acts the conflict sets the stage were constitutional showdown on Tuesday cat simple leany who's one of the White House lawyer sent a letter to Congress essentially saying that the White House not cooperating with the impeachment inquiry John Azmin our Washington correspondent he called it an effort to overturn the two thousand sixteen election and he said that it was unconstitutional but the trump administration and Mr trump have have stonewalled investigations before is this is this a markedly different deal this time around well it is different in framing if not in actuality he has blocked people from testifying before members of his cabinet have refused subpoena request to turn over documents this essentially says overtly we're not playing this game anymore so what happens and he can just do that ignore Pena I mean I have have we seen this kind of behavior before Donald Trump has done a lot of things in his brief political career that make people can he do that and he's always just done them so the answer is to can he do that as he has done it what does it mean is the question and so that's unclear as with so much elsewhere in fairly unchartered waters here but I mean what happens on from a procedural point view if if essentially this entire investigation can be ignored can be batted away so this May force impeachment votes sooner rather than later Nancy Pelosi said she wanted it done by the end of the year what he is essentially doing is overtly obstructing an inquiry that he deems to be unconstitutional no but it provides a predicate for obstruction vote on each men right now they seem to have decided that the house is probably going to vote to impeach him anyway and if that's going to happen they want to take the medicine now rather than at the end of two months of hearings the garnered public attention they have recommended the framing is better if if they take the impeachment vote now they'll be able to say oh you know you're just impeaching him for being president he didn't do anything that was that wrong whereas if you had two months of witnesses and testimony you allow the Democrats to essentially build a publication impeachment and to air out a lot of things that would be used against him the twenty twenty campaign and so how have Democrats responded to this ploy it strengthens their arguments certainly from go perspective but the thing is impeachment is a political process not illegal one so I have to think that if the White House continues to stonewall if the White House is going to block testimony from anyone can then that does somewhat reduced their ability to build a strong public narrative and to that end what what do the public think about it so far so public polling has shown much stronger support for impeaching the president at this point in the inquiry then existed either for Richard Nixon or for Bill Clinton at similar points in their impeachment process but the narrative has always been that there is nothing that will shake the faith of the base in President Trump and everything can be swatted away with claims of witch hunts and coups and the like do you think that there is any chance of that needle moving. I think that his base his really sort of his bed rock level of support is there with him whatever happens the problem is that's not enough to win an election and so you know even when Richard Nixon was removed from office thirty three percent of the country still supported him and said I shouldn't leave so president trump is probably looking at a slightly higher number than that as his bedrock base but it's not that much higher than just that number alone isn't enough to win reelection the other Nation for two thousand twenty elections is Republicans that are currently in the Senate who basically the calculation has been that they would stand with Mr Trump so as not to frustrate their prospects for twenty twenty at what point do you think that Calculus may change well that's the question right I think that Republicans are Senate first of all in order to remove him from office you need Twenty the senators to cross the aisle that's vanishingly unlikely it is probably somewhat more likely to happen after two months of public testimony and of reporters pointing out the latest thing that the latest witness said Mr Trump did and asking US senator do you think this is acceptable behavior I think the short of the ingred probably four shortens the possibility that lots and lots the senators will cross the aisle but you still have a number of senators up for reelection in states that are purple right you have Cory Gardner in Colorado yes Susan Collins in Maine Thom Tillis North Carolina Linux Martha mcsally in Arizona Jones Ioan those five could end up voting for impeachment in ways that sort of save them with the more moderate public in their states but still prevent the president from actually being removed from office so your suggestion is that this ploy prevents the most damaging stuff coming out and therefore preventing that sort of you know the problem we saw for instance in the in the aftermath of the the the the Nixon story that people who stood with the president even when things got really bad they didn't come out well in history yes exactly this the four shortening of this inquiry reduces the chances that something like that will happen as we've talked about the trump administration and allegations of wrongdoing and various political ploys that break norms and what have you that the discussion has always been the country's institutions are robust enough and essentially everything is fine with the bedrock democracy of America when you have if this situation and this sort of politicization of a question of potential serious wrongdoing is hard to hold that line don't you think it does get harder to hold line a number of times you've had commentators on the left assert that we are in a constitutional crisis when we haven't been since the firing of Jim Komi the president has the right to fire the FBI director that was not constitutional crisis I think we are now in a genuine constitutional crisis in that the White House has essentially cast all congressional oversight power as legitimate it has decided that it is the the White House's positions essentially that the president cannot be indicted while he's a sitting president he cannot be invest getting a criminal investigation so the White House officials vision is that president trump is above the law that is a genuine constitutional problem John Thank you very much for joining us my pleasure Jason.

President two months thirty three percent two weeks
"president trump" Discussed on CNN's The Daily DC

CNN's The Daily DC

08:14 min | 11 months ago

"president trump" Discussed on CNN's The Daily DC

"Hey everyone I'm David Chalian the CNN political director and this is the daily DC. Thanks so much for listening today on the podcast he did it again president trump on the south lawn of the White House today before he departed for Florida sort of hearkens back to what we saw him do as a candidate in July of two thousand sixteen. You'll remember when he said Russia. If you're listening dig into Hillary Clinton's sounds emails well today he did that with China. He didn't say China if you're listening but he said that China should investigate his political critical rival the Biden's Joe Biden Hunter Biden his son as you know because you've read the transcript and you've seen the impeachment inquiry begin in earnest just the president's asking of the Ukrainian president on a telephone call to investigate the Biden's is the very heart of the matter of the impeachment inquiry right now and now the president is just adding countries. It seems to the to the tally so while in the midst of of an impeachment inquiry centred on him asking a foreign leader to investigate the Biden's he asked another foreign country China to investigate the Biden silence. This shouldn't come as too much of a surprise for folks because he's been telegraphing his interest in China portion of this story as well. We claims without proof that Hunter Biden took one point five billion dollars out of China when no other funds could get money out of China Hunter. Biden's spokesperson has a push push back on that and explained that at the time Vice President Biden was vice president Hunter Biden was making no money out of his arrangement in China so again. Donald Trump to the world on national television used the power of the United States Presidency Agency to call on a foreign nation to investigate a domestic political opponent of his you know that'll be up to the members of the house else that right up articles of impeachment as to whether or not that is abuse of power. It'll be up to the United States Senate as a jury to acquit or convict him. If indeed that is is an article of impeachment but it is certainly hard to argue that this behavior fits anywhere in the constitutional norms of our country. I want you to hear for yourself. Here was president trump in his own words on the South Lawn today well. I would think that if they were honest about it that sort of major investigation the Bison so very simple answer they should investigate to buy because how does a company that's duly formed and all these companies take a look at it and by the way likewise China should start an investigation into the budget because what happened in China is just just about as bad as what happened with with Ukraine so I would say that President Alinsky if it were me I I would recommend that they start an investigation into devices because nobody has any doubt that they weren't working. That was their crooked deal. A hundred percent they had no knowledge of energy didn't know the first thing about it all of a sudden. He's getting fifty thousand dollars. A month was a lot of other things nobody has any any doubt and they got rid of a prosecutor who is a very tough prosecutor. They got rid of now. They're trying to make it the opposite way but they got rid so if I were the president. I would certainly recommend that of you now. I don't think the president did this by accident. At all. I think he's trying to do a couple of things here one he's clearly trying to be the country's news organizations assignment editor and everyone going and doing stories on Hunter Inter Biden's business dealings in Ukraine and China. There's little doubt about that. That's crystal clear but I also think that by by doing this in public you know this isn't a phone call. He got caught on and the transcript was released. He's trying to say this is how much there's nothing nothing wrong with what I'm doing. I'm saying right here out in the open. This is how it how it can't be an impeachable offense. Why would I be committing impeachable offense here on the South Lawn of the White House in front of television cameras so it's sort of the argument I think he's making by doing it by exhibiting this behavior and it is to muddy the waters and to have this become as much a partisan food fight as possible so that the dramatic revelation of the president using his office on a phone call with a foreign leader and also also withholding foreign aid from that country at the time within ask they investigators political rival. He's trying to make that seem just normal and okay and and it's clearly not there's nothing normal about it but that's the president's goal here so by adding China by doing on the South Lawn. He's normalizing that behavior therefore he is trying to make it into just a partisan food fight rally republicans around him. Make sure there are no cracks there and then beat beat back these charges the way that he beat back molar attacking the prosecutor attacking the members of Muller's team trying to who politicize it as much as possible so people viewed it through their partisan lenses and by the way it might work. We did see that the partisan lenses dictated how Americans viewed the entirety of the Mueller investigation in our recent poll on impeachment. We did see some movement among among Republicans but we'll have to see whether that's just temporary in the immediate aftermath of those revelations or if that's a permanent shift donald trump might be trying to get every partisan. I'm back into their corner on this issue because that will be firmer footing for him from which he can fight this impeachment inquiry. He is a master at trying to muddy the waters. Give his supporters something to rally around and polarize and create as much partisan tension as possible so that there is not a consensus in the body politic about his behavior that it is always sort of depending from where you are how you see it again. There is nothing normal about this behavior. There is zero as the Republican congressman. Mike Mike Turner said the other day in the hearing with deny Mr President you know to you on that phone. Call that phone call was not okay. That's what the Republican Republican Mike Turner said neither is it okay for the price of the United States to call on China a country in which he's engaged in a massive trade war and in courage them to investigate his domestic political opponent that is not okay either and it certainly gives more fodder for the Democrats as they pursue their impeachment inquiry but it is also going to provide donald trump a more polarized universe in which he can engage in this battle and that's where he likes to be so I would would not dismiss this as like Oh. My God Donald Trump Jr just put his own nail in his coffin. I don't think that's clear at all from what he did today. I think he knows exactly what he was doing today so once again sort of shredding constitutional norms but don't misconstrue that with certain right and political defeat in the impeachment battle. They're two very different things that does it for this edition of the daily. DC thank you all so much for listening hope. You'll tune in again right right here tomorrow. Are you interested in learning how great companies grow.

Vice President Biden China president Donald Trump Joe Biden Hunter Biden Biden South Lawn China Hunter vice president prosecutor President Alinsky White House Hillary Clinton Mr President Russia political director CNN United States Senate Ukraine
"president trump" Discussed on The Daily Show with Trevor Noah: Ears Edition

The Daily Show with Trevor Noah: Ears Edition

01:59 min | 1 year ago

"president trump" Discussed on The Daily Show with Trevor Noah: Ears Edition

"President Trump's border wall. It was his number one campaign promise, but now Trump card find anyone willing to pay for its Mexico refused to pay for its congress refused to pay for it. He tried to put it on Jared's credit card, but couldn't figure out how the chip works, sir. You're pulling it out to soon like, well, I don't know if this machine is on the pill. I'm not getting trapped again, I don't want another Eric. And so on Friday on Friday, the president had no other choice, but to take emergency action in the rose garden. The president did what he had long threatened to do to clearing the national emergency to get billions of dollars. Congress wouldn't give him to build his border wall. Now, the battle moves to the courts with challenges coming from border, states, landowners, and others, and they're already pointing to this stunning admission I didn't need to do this. But I'd rather do it much faster. Wait, hold up. So Trump at MIT he didn't need to decline emergency. He's doing it to save time that sort of negates his entire argument. It'd be like a pilot coming out of the corporate with a parachute saying, look, I don't have to open the emergency door. But we're right over my house, and I don't wanna fight traffic. Thank you for flying spirit airlines. Look you can argue about it. But Trump Healy thinks that Mexicans coming over the border is a national emergency. And so in response America has to build a wall, which is a very gradual response to an emergency like, sir. They're invading. Sure. We mobilize our tanks. Call in airstrikes. No, no, no premier finest brick layers in three to five years. They'll regret invading us. Trump knows that this isn't the end of the bottle Wolfowitz right because it's a national emergency..

President Trump Trump Trump Healy president congress Eric Jared Mexico rose garden America Wolfowitz five years
"president trump" Discussed on NPR Politics Podcast

NPR Politics Podcast

01:49 min | 2 years ago

"president trump" Discussed on NPR Politics Podcast

"Fifth so something has to be done before march fifth this is the ideal opportunity to do it six senators eight senators a large group of senators have gotten together and tried to work something out that's bipartisan and a lot of senate democrats are saying finally let's force the issue and while the the leverage of shutting down the federal government or or beginning a process that leads to that is very drastic it's one of the few pieces of leverage democrats actually have this is something they feel deeply about so amp the only ford as and they have said repeatedly this is what they are going to do in the time is now okay so let's shift to the big picture conversation because this has been a year with a lot of news days like this one we don't even know what the news is going to look like when we're done taping the podcast as listeners regularly real has once they listen to itself we don't have time machine yet were working on it almost exactly a year believe it it saturday right ear saturday president trump took the oath of office i want to talk about what has changed in what hasn't so what are the biggest mara what are the biggest specific chains is trump has made to the presidency and two governing you know i thought about this align and i've done some reporting about this how has the presidency changed trump has trump changed the presidency the answer the first question is pretty easy it hasn't changed him at all he's the same guy who campaigned that's how we as president and you know when i was a single person my girlfriend's would always say when you go out with somebody that you eventually mary everything you need to know about that marriage and can find out if you think really hard about the first date so everything we know about donald trump we could have known by him in the campaign so i don't think he's changed at all i think he has changed the presidency my question.

senate democrats ford time machine president donald trump
"president trump" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

02:15 min | 2 years ago

"president trump" Discussed on Fresh Air

"And he takes a step that is so fundamentally anti truth that i don't think that there is a way a president could survive that m in remember you know it's not as if a special council has the power to throw someone in jail by themselves no matter who they are and i would love to talk about who this special council liz robert muller in his credentials in a moment but let us say who had one that ensuring general appointed a bozo the bozo wouldn't be able to indochino put someone in jail the bozo first has to work with a staff and supervised by the acting attorney general of the united states snow husiac the attorney general of the united states the deputy attorney general rod rosenstein and who put rod rosenstein in power it wasn't barack obama it was president trump this is where isn't stena's trump's guy he's the guy he put their so if if president trump asked the deputy attorney general rod rosenstein to fire the special counsel robert muller and rosenstein refused then he could than trump could fire rosenstein in his replacement w would be asked to fire robert muller in that that could that could go on for a while but um the other possibility at or at least an other possibility that that president trump could use would be to fire rod rosenstein and to replace him with somebody who would have a very favorable i toward president trump so is addison barrier that you could see playing out and working under the guidelines for the special counsel as you wrote them so it is possible for the president to try to further rosenstein rosenstein is a presidential pointy his i say he's trump's guy and he can be removed by trump um he'd have to be replaced in some way in order for the deputy attorney general to have any function so you'd have to put someone else in place normally that requires senate confirmation to put that person in place and i would suspect that there would be incredible blood on the floor of the us senate uh just the most divisive debate possible if.

president liz robert muller acting attorney general united states barack obama trump special counsel rosenstein rosenstein deputy attorney general senate