40 Burst results for "Politics Of"
Discerning Hearts - Catholic Podcasts
Day 7 The Principalities St. Michael and the Holy Angels Novena Discerning Hearts Catholic Podcasts - burst 1
"Day 7 The Celestial Choir of Principalities The principalities are the first of the choirs most concerned with the earth and are traditionally declared to have the roles of caretakers over every nation, province, county, district, city, town, village, and house, working with the guardian angels who also are assigned to every spot and person. Two other areas of concerns for the principalities are religion and politics. The former they encourage to spread by prayer and spiritual encouragement. The latter they seek to regulate for the good of humanity by guiding the thoughts and especially the ethics what Dionysius termed the leaders of people all over the world.
Sound ON
Fresh update on "politics of" discussed on Sound ON
"The kind of political discord that you see in Washington does affect the fiscal outlook. And that's essentially what we're hearing from Moody's today. To quote the release a government shutdown would demonstrate the significant constraints that intensifying political polarization continue to put on U .S. fiscal policymaking. The politics matter to the credit worthiness of U the .S. Well, that's right. And it could, in fact, result in action. Who knows? This is a shot across the ballot, at least Kayleigh. And it's where we begin with Congressman Brian Stile, delighted to say the Congressman is back with us. It's been a minute. The Republican from Wisconsin serves on the House Financial Services Committee, chair of the Administration Committee. Congressman, you're sitting there listening to us and it's good to see you. Welcome back. Does this make you not want to come back to the Capitol? Well, ultimately, we got to get a deal done at the end of the day when you hear the credit rating agencies asking questions like they are. I think it reminds all of us that our system is completely broken. We're spending way more we're than bringing in. When the credit rating agencies, if they do move on this, and borrowing costs increase for the federal government, that's real money. We have a $30 trillion debt, you know, half a percentage point of credit risk or basis points. That's $150 billion a year when fully baked in. So these are real dollars we're dealing with. It's why the whole system has to be reworked in Washington. Okay, as well, we talk about how much time Washington realistically has to rework, Congressman, you're up against the clock, Saturday at midnight, right? Coming back to DC tomorrow, the Senate is as well. Where do you put the odds of you averting down you and your colleagues? It's the darkest before the dawn and it's not done yet. I'm optimistic that at the end of the day, we're going to get there. There's nothing like a deadline in Washington to be able to get a deal done. I feel like it's sometimes a bunch of college students working on a term paper, waiting until the final hour. It's no way to run a railroad, but that's a little bit of the reality of what we're dealing with in Washington. Hopefully, cooler heads will and we can prevent a shutdown. No one wins in the event of a shutdown. So imagine a couple college guys come over from a different dorm, Congressman, and they've got a paper they've already written. I'm wondering just where your head is today on the idea of the Senate showing up with a continuing resolution that the House might adopt. Does that save the day or present more challenges for your body? Well, I don't think that's our best -case scenario. It's why a group of us in the House pushed hard last week to move forward a conservative continuing resolution, a stopgap measure that would have reduced government spending, put an impetus to move us forward on these appropriations bills, and also work on the core policy of securing the U .S.-Mexico border. So I'd rather see the House come back here tomorrow, move that forward, and let the Senate react. I am concerned that the Senate is going to come forward with a continuing resolution, a stopgap measure that will have additional funding, and that's a worse position to be in. So as we talk about what you could receive from Democrats, obviously Democrats control the Senate, but in regard to working with Democrats in the House, Congressman, is that something that you would support if Speaker McCarthy did have to resort to that? Well, hopefully we can avoid that. I'd love to see us move forward with a conservative continuing resolution, but again, no one wins in the situation where the federal government is shut down. And so into the final days of funding, I'm still optimistic that we're going to reach an agreement to give us a stopgap measure to truly move forward next year's appropriations bills. Again, it's kind of in that home stretch where deals can so that the bills can be struck in Congress. Again, it's not a good way to run the operation, but it's better than letting the government shut down. Are you disappointed in some of your Republican colleagues for actually calling for a shutdown, Congressman? I know that not all Republicans in the House agree on the next steps here. I firmly disagree with my colleagues that don't think a shutdown is going to cause real significant problems, or more importantly, give leverage to the Democrats to allow them to continue reckless spending. And so I'm of the firm belief that we have to get a stopgap measure in place to give time to get our appropriations bills across the line, and I disagree with those of my colleagues that are calling for a shutdown or saying that it would ultimately, in the end of day, the be a good strategic move. So when we're talking about your colleagues, increasingly, Congressmen, we're talking about just a handful of individuals that may take issue with different components of what the wider spending picture looks like, or just take issue with the speaker himself. Do you think that we could potentially be faced with a situation in the House of Representatives where Speaker McCarthy has to make a choice between continuing to fund the government and keeping his job? What's your read on this? Well, ultimately, at the end of the day, I think what we're seeing is conservatives unified around the strategy of reducing government spending and addressing the unsecured US -Mexico border. What we're having is big conversation about what those tactics are. I don't think the tactic of shutting down the government at the end of the day achieves the goal of addressing the reckless spending or securing the US -Mexico border. There's a handful of my colleagues that disagree with that. I just think that that moves us in the wrong direction and would ultimately give leverage to Democrats in the Senate and President Joe Biden.
Discerning Hearts - Catholic Podcasts
Day 7 The Principalities St. Michael and the Holy Angels Novena Discerning Hearts Catholic Podcasts - burst 1
"Day 7 The Celestial Choir of Principalities The principalities are the first of the choirs most concerned with the earth and are traditionally declared to have the roles of caretakers over every nation, province, county, district, city, town, village, and house, working with the guardian angels who also are assigned to every spot and person. Two other areas of concerns for the principalities are religion and politics. The former they encourage to spread by prayer and spiritual encouragement. The latter they seek to regulate for the good of humanity by guiding the thoughts and especially the ethics what Dionysius termed the leaders of people all over the world.
Discerning Hearts - Catholic Podcasts
Day 7 The Principalities St. Michael and the Holy Angels Novena Discerning Hearts Catholic Podcasts - burst 1
"Day 7 The Celestial Choir of Principalities The principalities are the first of the choirs most concerned with the earth and are traditionally declared to have the roles of caretakers over every nation, province, county, district, city, town, village, and house, working with the guardian angels who also are assigned to every spot and person. Two other areas of concerns for the principalities are religion and politics. The former they encourage to spread by prayer and spiritual encouragement. The latter they seek to regulate for the good of humanity by guiding the thoughts and especially the ethics what Dionysius termed the leaders of people all over the world.
Discerning Hearts - Catholic Podcasts
A highlight from Day 7 The Principalities St. Michael and the Holy Angels Novena Discerning Hearts Catholic Podcasts
"A novena to St. Michael and the holy angels. O God, come to my assistance. O Lord, make haste to help me. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit. As it was in the beginning, is now, and never shall be, world without end. Amen. Day 7 The Celestial Choir of Principalities The principalities are the first of the choirs most concerned with the earth and are traditionally declared to have the roles of caretakers over every nation, province, county, district, city, town, village, and house, working with the guardian angels who also are assigned to every spot and person. Two other areas of concerns for the principalities are religion and politics. The former they encourage to spread by prayer and spiritual encouragement. The latter they seek to regulate for the good of humanity by guiding the thoughts and especially the ethics what Dionysius termed the leaders of people all over the world. By the intercession of St. Michael and the Celestial Choir of Principalities, may God fill our souls with the true spirit of obedience. Amen. Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses. As we forgive those who trespass against us, and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou amongst women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen. O glorious Prince St. Michael, chief and commander of the heavenly hosts, guardian of souls, vanquisher of rebel spirits, servant in the house of the divine king, and our admirable conductor, thou who dost shine with excellence in superhuman virtue, thou shafed to deliver us from all evil, who turn to thee with confidence, and enable us by thy gracious protection to serve God more and more faithfully every day. Pray for us, O glorious St. Michael, Prince of the Church of Jesus Christ, that we may be made worthy of his promises. Almighty and everlasting God, who by a prodigy of goodness and a merciful desire for the salvation of all men, hast appointed the most glorious archangel St. Michael, Prince of thy church, make us worthy, we beseech thee, to be delivered from all our enemies, that none of them may harass us at the hour of death, but that we may be conducted by him into the august presence of thy divine majesty. This we beg through the merits of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Sound ON
Fresh update on "politics of" discussed on Sound ON
"Here Sound At on Bloomberg off. the fastest .com show Starts right and now. in politics, the Bloomberg Business on Now, the radio Act, and on YouTube, Broadcasting from our nation's Bloomberg capital, I'm 24 Joe Sound Matthew in Washington. off. hours this Hour We're talking about red and blue division within states. How busy Donald Trump's legal team going to be. It's the economy, stupid. Is that actually what will decide this race? Bloomberg Sound off. Politics, policy and perspective from D .C.'s top name. Federal spending combined with policy too lax has monetary produced this 40 year hot inflation. China policy is driven basically by domestic politics. American families are finding further themselves behind the eight ball to get anything done in this Congress. It's going to have to be done in a bipartisan way. Bloomberg Sound off with Joe Matthew and Kaylee lines on Bloomberg Radio. Moody's sends a warning about a shutdown. Welcome to hour two of sound on as credit the ratings agency says a shutdown would reflect negatively on America's credit. This just happened less than an hour ago as congressional leaders while I guess all of us face a potential shutdown here at the end of this week. We're joined on next steps by someone who's been on both sides of this equation, Mick Mulvaney. Of course the former acting of chief staff of the Trump White House. He ran the budget office at one point and was also of course co -founder of the Freedom Caucus. He's in touch with both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue and we'll have a sense ahead of where we are are going Jack Fitzpatrick from Bloomberg government brings us up to date our Congress whisperer and we've got the latest On this whole situation on government funding by somebody who's in the throes of the debate, Congressman Brian and what the Republican from
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 13:00 09-25-2023 13:00
"When professional soccer player Marcus Rashford injured his shoulder, he turned to Resil's virtual reality sports training program. Resil's technology has helped him and athletes of all levels maintain their skills while recovering from injuries so that they can return to the field with confidence. Rashford says, after my shoulder injury, Resil VR was key to my training and helped me get back to the game. These are the ways athletes are using the Metaverse today. Learn more at meta .com slash metaverse impact. From DC's top names. Most people, including most Republicans in Congress, understand that we need to get aid to Ukraine. Who's going to take us in a rational way into the future and lead our country? This has really become kind of the new frontier in American politics is this battle between red states and blue cities. Bloomberg Sound On with Joe Matthew on Bloomberg Radio. This is the week. Are you ready? Welcome to the fastest show in politics as we stare down the barrel on what some believe is an inevitable government shutdown in a week that also includes a Republican presidential debate, the first Biden impeachment hearing in the U .S. House, and of course, an historic auto workers strike rolling on. We'll have a lot to catch up on here today. I'm glad you joined us. We're joined coming up this hour by Eli Yokely, political analyst at Morning Consult, out with some new numbers of their own that we'll tell you about with analysis.
The Dan Bongino Show
Fresh update on "politics of" discussed on The Dan Bongino Show
"About her interview together and of course hailey gunn again i don't know any relation to tommy gunn or whatever she was very upset that i pointed out the obvious that joe biden's evil an evil guy oh oh you can't say that i just did i'll say it again you don't tell me what to say in the left are you crazy tell me not to say it i say it again just to stick it to you show you how little you mean to me how i will never ever ever get on my knee for you clowns ever ever you understand that joe biden is evil he's a garbage person this man's running for president of the united states and had his drug his addicted son is a cutout for him to take money according to their own yourself according to the business partners to these deals saying joe biden was the brand he was the chairman that he worked directly with joe biden you notice how these evil people in the media will attack donald trump as a fascist a white supremacist a dad terrible listen have you ever met his kids i have i'm not a name dropper i don't really care neither do you i think think you you know that i've met his kids many times whether you like them or hate their politics they will anything do for you i'm telling you right now if don jr knows you and you call don and ask him for a number don's calling you back instantly eric's the same way shows avanka i don't like that i don't really care i'm just telling you the truth donald trump whether you like him or hate him you're the santa sky scott totally get it you're not obligated to like anyone you're never going to convince me ever he didn't raise a bunch of good kids so we're not joe biden did the opposite and yet the media thinks donald trump is the evil guy and joe biden is a beatified saint so strange raises uh... not just one but many kids would let you say issues issues and then they make it about trump you you understand that hailey gun of radar online the only reason they're writing this is because of the axiomatic truth in politics that the most damaging political narrative the most damaging political stories out there are ones that change your pre -existing notion of who a candidate is and a whole boatload of people out there on the democrat side still believe joe biden's a loving caring guy trying to save america from the ravages of donald trump when the story is the opposite donald trump trying to save america from the evil joe biden so that's why when stories like this come out about me exposing the god -awful truth about how genuinely evil of a human being this guy is that's why the media's got to run cover right away because they are part and on right now right on the other side of the break i got more this again this is not accidents being done on purpose anyone who attacks kids is spiritually evil there is that is not open for debate and it's emanating from this biden administration everywhere i'll show you what i mean coming up next we'll be right back budging hell consumer
Audio
A highlight from Day-7-St.-Michael-Holy-Angels-Novena
"A novena to St. Michael and the holy angels. O God, come to my assistance. O Lord, make haste to help me. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit. As it was in the beginning, is now, and never shall be, world without end. Amen. Day 7 The Celestial Choir of Principalities The principalities are the first of the choirs most concerned with the earth and are traditionally declared to have the roles of caretakers over every nation, province, county, district, city, town, village, and house, working with the guardian angels who also are assigned to every spot and person. Two other areas of concerns for the principalities are religion and politics. The former they encourage to spread by prayer and spiritual encouragement. The latter they seek to regulate for the good of humanity by guiding the thoughts and especially the ethics what Dionysius termed the leaders of people all over the world. By the intercession of St. Michael and the Celestial Choir of Principalities, may God fill our souls with the true spirit of obedience. Amen. Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses. As we forgive those who trespass against us, and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou amongst women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen. O glorious Prince St. Michael, chief and commander of the heavenly hosts, guardian of souls, vanquisher of rebel spirits, servant in the house of the divine king, and our admirable conductor, thou who dost shine with excellence in superhuman virtue, thou shafed to deliver us from all evil, who turn to thee with confidence, and enable us by thy gracious protection to serve God more and more faithfully every day. Pray for us, O glorious St. Michael, Prince of the Church of Jesus Christ, that we may be made worthy of his promises. Almighty and everlasting God, who by a prodigy of goodness and a merciful desire for the salvation of all men, hast appointed the most glorious archangel St. Michael, Prince of thy church, make us worthy, we beseech thee, to be delivered from all our enemies, that none of them may harass us at the hour of death, but that we may be conducted by him into the august presence of thy divine majesty. This we beg through the merits of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Sound ON
Fresh update on "politics of" discussed on Sound ON
"Long sound -held promise, on This ballooning politics is Bloomberg budget policy deficits Sound and Off. perspective in Washington, from DC's including we're in Now, a The bizarro Biden most top administration Republicans names political says in most from world we're our Congress nation's making here. understand good people on a that we need to get aid to Ukraine. Who's going to take us in a rational way into the future and lead our country. This has really become kind of the new frontier in American politics is this battle between red states and blue states. Bloomberg Sound On with Joe This is the week. Are you ready? Welcome to the fastest show in politics as we stare down the barrel on what some believe is an inevitable government shutdown In a week that also includes a Republican presidential debate the first Biden impeachment hearing in the in the US House. And of course, an historic auto workers strike rolling on. We'll have a lot to catch up on here today. I'm glad you joined us. We're joined coming up this hour by Eli Yokely political analyst at morning consult out with some new numbers of their own that we'll tell you about with analysis from our signature panel Bloomberg politics contributor Democratic analyst Jeanne Shanzano today joined by Republican strategist Lester Munson principal at BGR government affairs. All right, so we're gonna set the baseline for the week once we update get an on Wall Street. Let's do that. First as always latest on the markets now with Denise Pellegrini Denise. Hey there, Joe. Thank you. we And do check the markets for you all day long here at Bloomberg. It's 101 on Wall Street stocks right now they are mixed we are We were seeing a little bit higher earlier, but we're kind of pulling back a little bit Amazon
Simply Bitcoin
A highlight from BITCOIN REVOLUTION | TUCKER CARLSON & JAVIER MILEI MAKE HISTORY
"We don't see lugar a ludas, esta nueces una taria para tibios, esta nueces una taria para córdes, esta nueces una taria para los politicamente correntos. Xo no me me ti yaca para estar y ando córderos. Xo me me ti yaca para despastar de odres. ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! ¡Quiero! When you think of Argentina you might envision tango, soccer, or maybe a juicy steak, but today it's all about a wild surge in bitcoin advocacy and a man whose opposition to statism might be louder than a wake -up call from Frankie. BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM That's right, baby. Wake the f 'up and get on the Freedom Train. We get a lot of s*** to cover. Let's get it! I think that it can be my moment. Because as we have seen, we are in all of them. And we are not one of them. This is what we are in all of them. Because we are going to do everything, and we are going to take care of everything in the world. Yes, to be able to build Argentina properly. A liberal Argentina. An Argentinian people. An Argentinian that is going to build the borders of the world. And yes, in 35 years, we will be able to build the first global potential. So yes, effectively, I am going to be in politics. be Will it Teresa? Míle he is right. Míle? Míle, he is right. farm. go I'm gonna ahead and start with this go ahead and take a look down there 339 .8 million views and I want you to put that in perspective so when I said that you know these bit corners just made history well they're both advocates and it just became the most watched interview in history now Tucker's last interview with that orange guy yeah Trump that set the record and beat Oprah's former record with her interview with Michael Jackson and it appears Tucker Carlson is going full Eminem breaking a record every time he drops a record right now what this really had me thinking is the fact that well you know Joe Rogan gets like 11 million views he's the number one podcaster in the world Tucker was the number one show on Fox News and all mainstream media and he was getting about three four million views I'm putting that in perspective he's gone independent and he's got 340 million views blowing everyone out of the water talking about well look at this Argentina's next president and this guy is winning big -time you saw those crowds who is he well Tucker traveled to Buenos Aires to speak to him and find out and we of course hear it simply Bitcoin have covered Malay quite a bit but very exciting stuff an amazing conversation very base and before we get into that now Malay you got to understand they kind of do language a little different right so when he uses the the terms liberal he's referring to classical liberal like Bastia which is closer to libertarianism or anarcho capitalism if you'd like to say and when he refers to anything like socialism or communism of course they're all the same thing all statism and that's really the point that he's driving home is the fact that it's freedom versus the state and I love it until you fix the money for example a lot of Western democracies went full tyrannical regimes over the past few years and they're supposed to be democracies with representative government that is supposed to work in your best interest but I think we know the truth well let's get to it we're in downtown Buenos Aires the capital of Argentina this was once about a hundred years ago one of the richest cities in the world and you could tell as you walk around the fated grandeur of a once great city but this is now a desperate country its economy is in shambles has been for a long time Argentina famously defaulted on his debt more than 20 years ago but now hyperinflation has made this country genuinely desperate you see when you have dinner here in restaurants and people pull out bricks of local currency the peso to pay it feels like Weimar or Zimbabwe but it's not this is a developed country that's moving backwards at high speed and because of the frustration that has built up among the population particularly among poor people a man called Javier Miele is poised to become its next president he's a former soccer star goalie a performer in a Rolling Stones cover band and a libertarian economist he's not a libertarian in the traditional American sense he wouldn't fit into the Cato Institute he's libertarian in the traditional sense he believes people should have the maximum amount of freedom they can be given which is a lot much more than they now get in Argentina he has moved from basically nowhere in the last several years to become maybe the most famous person in this country the election is next month in October and once again it seems like he's likely to win he himself is a Bitcoin enthusiast right he jetted off to Argentina not for steak not for soccer but to meet the rock star economist and fellow Bitcoin advocate Javier Miele why do you think from your perspective you've become a man with no political background so popular so quickly in this country that in a cable con el hecho de que ese de huador de football a mismo tiempo ese do cantante rock -and -roll y ademas a soy economista y creo que esa combinación es una combinación attractive en terminos de producto televisivo pero por otra parte lo que también es importante el tema de las cídeas y argentina a pasicamente es un país que se va cien años abraçando las cídeas socialistas y entonces la revelión natural del sistema era ser libérales y es por eso que la revelión natural la parece siempre los jovenes y los jovenes encontraron alguien que man Miele from an 18 % poll prediction grabbing a 29 % victory in the primaries Miele maybe is unpredictable as a Bitcoin price chart and with hair that's probably more talked about than the latest thing what is that now like men in black aliens in Mexico or something and the guy is very based he's just gonna say what he thinks what he feels but Miele's boldness isn't limited to just critiquing the state but he also questioned the Pope talked about advising the orange guy and has many times advocated for Bitcoin is the future of financial freedom in short Javier Miele is making waves the Pope the current Pope is from Argentina I would think he would support you he has instead criticized you and you've called him a communist why the disconnect bueno primero porque el papa juega politica vente a si luma some papa donde tiene forte Ingenencia política ademostrado además una granda finidad con dictadores como Castro o como comaduro si restar el lado de de dictadores wait I'm sorry Raul Castro's a murderer si if you got to the minute at Rocesino but the Pope you believe the Pope has an affinity for Raul Castro si exacto si decho no los condena si repatante condescending de conesos y esta mien condescending de con la dictadora venesolana a si el condescending de con todos los discuiras a un cuando se verdaderos criminals toco el esos un problema prudemas es a lien que consider a que la justicia social un elemento central de desu vision y eso es muy complicado porque la justicia social case robar el fruit su trabajo una persona y dar ciudad otra en dos es implicado dos cosas una es un robo y el problema es que el robo esta encontra de lo que seniela los días mandamientos si ha valar la justicia sociales ha valar el robo por otando son problema de que está violando los días mandamientos el otro problema es que es un trato decíbal friende a la ley now me and myself I'm kind of against protectionist policies but Malay on the global stage he has a clear stance no deals with status so china lula unless it's about decentralized money of the future bitcoin probably don't bother knocking you've said that as president of argentina you will not do business with china de cho no solo no via certain negocios con china no via certain negocios con nimún comunista esir habar yo soy un defensor de la libertad de la paz y la demogracía lo comunista no entranay but also incredible beyond the politics and probably his bitcoin price checks who is this Javier Malay at heart well one thing he's a man whose phone screensaver is joy has no end and is as passionate about freedom the austrian economic community as he is about bitcoin and decentralization no no no no no no when you talk about and live according to your conscience you don't have me because you know what is the definition of this personal me you know that when you are in the last moment or when you are in the constant pressure of being big you know what I mean? You know what I mean? You know what I mean? This will pass all over your life.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Fresh update on "politics of" discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
"When professional soccer player Marcus Rashford injured his shoulder, he turned to Resil's virtual reality sports training program. Resil's technology has helped him and athletes of all levels maintain their skills while recovering from injuries so that they can return to the field with confidence. Rashford says, after my shoulder injury, Resil VR was key to my training and helped me get back to the game. These are the ways athletes are using the Metaverse today. Learn more at meta.com slash metaverse impact.From DC's top names. Most people, including most Republicans in Congress, understand that we need to get aid to Ukraine. Who's going to take us in a rational way into the future and lead our country? This has really become kind of the new frontier in American politics is this battle between red states and blue cities. Bloomberg Sound On with Joe Matthew on Bloomberg Radio. This is the week. Are you ready? Welcome to the fastest show in politics as we stare down the barrel on what some believe is an inevitable government shutdown in a week that also includes a Republican presidential debate, the first Biden impeachment hearing in the U.S. House, and of course, an historic auto workers strike rolling on. We'll have a lot to catch up on here today. I'm glad you joined us. We're joined coming up this hour by Eli Yokely, political analyst at Morning Consult, out with some new numbers of their own that we'll tell you about with analysis.
The Breakdown
A highlight from Could Oil and a Gov't Shutdown Screw Up Powell's Plans?
"Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW. It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world. What's going on, guys? It is Friday, September 22nd, and today we are talking oil, macro, everything that could throw the economy off. But before we get to that, if you are enjoying The Breakdown, please go subscribe to it, give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link at the show notes or go to bit .ly slash breakdown pod. All right, friends, well, we are sort of continuing the macro story today that we picked up around Powell and the FOMC this week. And one of the questions that Powell was asked was about risks that threatened to knock the economy off course. Two that he mentioned that we're going to spend a little time on today include oil prices and a potential government shutdown. Let's start with oil first. The price of crude oil has steadily increased over the past four months. From a low of around $70 in June, oil reached almost $90 a barrel for the US -based WTI benchmark contract and $95 per barrel and $95 per barrel for international Brent crude earlier this week. The price increase for crude has driven US gas prices back above $3 .80 per gallon, the highest level since last October. Overall, gas prices have ramped up by 20 % since the beginning of the year, according to AAA. Now, there are a number of factors all contributing to steadily increasing oil prices since the June lows. The first is OPEC+. The economic group of oil producing nations led by Saudi Arabia and Russia have recently curbed output. Production cuts, which were agreed to late last year, have been gradually implemented over the past six months. In July, Saudi Arabia voluntarily cut an additional 1 million barrels per day from its production quota, about 10 % of its previous output. Existing production cuts across OPEC have already been extended into next year and analysts expect Saudi Arabia to extend their voluntary cuts until March. On Thursday, Russia further constrained supply by banning the export of diesel and petrol. Russia is one of the world's largest suppliers of diesel alongside their status as producing around 12 % of the global supply of crude oil. The International Energy Agency said last year that Russian refineries produce, quote, roughly double the diesel needed to satisfy domestic demand and typically export half their annual production. Analyst opinions focused on the simplest explanation for the ban, retaliation for sanctions. Henning Gloestien of the Eurasia Group said, Russia wants to inflict pain on Europe and the U .S. and it looks like they're now repeating the playbook from gas and the oil market ahead of the winter months. They're showing that they're not finished using their power over energy markets. The Kremlin said the ban was temporary and aimed at addressing rising energy prices in domestic markets. However, they gave no timeline on when the ban might be lifted. U .S. and European policymakers have largely banned the importation of Russian refined fuel since February, which has required Russian supply to be routed through third party regions including Turkey, North Africa and Latin America. Now, OPEC cuts over the past year were predicated on a weakening demand profile heading into this year. At the time they were announced, recessions were expected across Europe and the U .S. China was an open question with the potential of reopening pushed back in the midst of additional pandemic waves. But since then, the European economy is sputtering along, albeit with dismal manufacturing data out of Germany. The sanctioning of Russian supply has caused European demand to be displaced to other regions with refining capacity, largely India and the Middle East. In the U .S., recession has been continuously pushed off into the future and oil demand is now back at all time highs with no signs of slowing. Although the Chinese economy has hit some turbulence recently, oil demand remains robust. Analysts expect China's oil demand to remain high as Beijing secures strategically important resources. What's more, analysts expect China's oil demand to remain high as Beijing secures strategically important resources in part to mitigate geopolitical risks as well as to shore up its manufacturing and transportation industries. So with oil prices spiking, many are wondering whether the White House will once again intervene in markets using the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Between November 2021 and September of last year, the White House authorized a number of SPR releases. The final policy saw one million barrels per day provided into the market over six months. A small amount of oil was restocked earlier this year, but the SPR still sits at a little over half its pre -pandemic level. Earlier this week, a headline circulated proclaiming that quote, Biden says depleting SPR is on the table. This was later found to be a hoax with no legitimate source, but it demonstrates how difficult high oil prices could be for the U .S. economy heading into election season. To wit, many saw the SPR release as a political decision rather than an economic decision heading into the 2022 midterms. In the private sector, U .S. oil inventories have recently hit 40 -year lows of 46 -day supply, well below the longer -term average of 65 days. And while August's inflation reports already showed a small uptick due to oil -related prices, the effect is expected to be more profound across this month. Dario Perkins, an economist at T .S. Lombard said, That said, it is important to keep these recent inflationary developments in context. We are not yet in danger of undoing 12 months of solid disinflationary progress, not even close. Others suggested that high oil prices would have a greater impact on growth rather than inflation. Maya Bhandari, head of multi -asset at BNP Paribas Asset Management said, It really impacts the growth side of the Goldilocks equation rather than the inflation side of things over the long term. Theory is that sustained high oil prices begin to eat into disposable income for households alongside higher costs of production for manufacturing and logistics. These combine to reduce growth and potentially tip the economy into recession. Overall, this situation in the oil markets has, to some, many parallels to the liquid natural gas spike in the winter of 2022. Prices in some markets rose more than tenfold, European energy companies scrambled to secure supply at any cost, and multiple firms went bankrupt due to the volatility in markets. This week, Bloomberg reported that the trading arm of French supplier Total Energies has played a major role in bidding up the price of U .S.-based oil. Their source claimed that the firm is paying a premium for physical U .S. barrels, pushing the spread against futures to levels not seen since last November. With all of that said, there are some signs that the oil market is beginning to cool off. On Thursday, Brent crude futures fell to $92 per barrel, which represented the third straight day of price declines, which is the longest streak in almost a month. Warren Patterson, head of Commodity Strategy at ING, said the Fed's hawkish messaging has quote, put some pressure on risk assets, including oil. The dollar index has risen by 0 .8 % since Chair Powell left the podium, a large enough move to weigh on asset markets. Patterson said he still expects Brent crude to move above the $100 mark in the near term, but that he doesn't anticipate the move will be sustainable. So that is the view on oil overall. The thing that I am definitely going to be watching more than anything else is the political dimension of this. We are now entering the period where everything, even more than usual, is going to be completely wrapped up in what it means for the election season. If prices at the pump keep trending up, it seems very likely that the Biden administration will be willing to do what it takes, including SPR releases, to get those prices down. But that's just something we're going to have to keep an eye on. Now what about that other factor that Powell mentioned? Well yes, indeed, my friends, the US government is once again hurtling towards a shutdown after efforts to pass a short term spending bill were scuttled on the House floor on Thursday. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy attempted to marshal Republicans to vote through a package to keep the government funded past the end of September. Closed door negotiations continued late into Wednesday night, but were apparently unconvincing. The bill currently being considered is the $886 billion Defense Appropriations Act. The bill was stifled in the House after five GOP representatives refused to allow debate to begin by voting against a preliminary procedural rule. Democrats also voted against the measure and appeared to taunt Republicans apparently reveling in seeing the GOP's slim majority descend into chaos. Among the Republican dissenters was Marjorie Taylor Greene, who opposed the inclusion of $300 million in funding to the Ukrainian war effort. On Thursday, Politico reported that Pentagon sources have said Ukrainian operations have been exempted from any shutdown, making that part of the dispute rather moot. McCarthy sent House members home on Thursday night to return to Washington on Tuesday. He told reporters after the failed vote, quote, two people flipped, so I got to figure out how to fix that. That wasn't the impression they had given us. Now, this was McCarthy's third attempt at bringing the bill to the House floor. The current proposal on the table is a 31 -day stopgap funding mechanism to forestall a shutdown to begin next weekend. McCarthy remarked on the change in tone in Congress among that extreme element of the Republican Party, stating that, quote, this is a whole new concept of individuals that just want to burn the whole place down. Now, even if a 31 -day stopgap is passed in the House, it seems unlikely to make its way through the Democrat -controlled Senate. The bill includes a 30 percent temporary cut to domestic agencies and immigration law changes, neither of which are likely to get the seal of approval from Dems. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said instead of decreasing the chance of a shutdown, Speaker McCarthy is actually increasing it by wasting time on extremist proposals that cannot become law in the Senate. House Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries remarked that the situation was playing out as a, quote, Republican civil war. Now, if it comes to pass, this would be the 11th government shutdown since 1980. The logic is that hard -line positions that don't enjoy support in the Congress can be put directly to the American people by shutting down the government and drawing attention to the impasse. Republican Ralph Norman said last week that, quote, we're going to have a shutdown. We believe in what we're doing. The jury will be the country. Still, the record on government shutdowns doesn't really support that strategy. Not one of the 10 previous shutdowns resulted in the dissenting group extracting concessions. Typically, the American people quickly turn on the party they view as blocking access to government services over a petty squabble. Alex Conant, a Republican strategist, said, This is such a dumb fight because there's no principle that we're standing on here. It's just bad tactics. While the dispute is nominally over excessive government spending, with Republican dissenters pushing for funding to be reduced back to 2022 levels, the underlying problem is, of course, the level of discord within the Republican Party. McCarthy was voted in as House Speaker after a record 15 attempts. The process took four days and frequently descended into a farce. This was only the second time in the post -Civil War era that a House Speaker had failed to be elected on the first attempt. Conant noted the terrible optics of a government shutdown of the Republicans' own making heading into election season, stating that, quote, Biden didn't win because of his political skills and soaring oratory. He won because Republicans blew themselves up with Trump. I'm afraid we're seeing history repeat itself, with the GOP once again helping Biden by shooting themselves in the foot. Of course, never one to shy away from controversy, Trump fanned the flames on Wednesday, posting that, quote, Republicans in Congress can and must defund all aspects of Crooked Joe Biden's weaponized government that refuses to close the border and treats half the country as enemies of the state. He added that, quote, This is also the last chance to defund these political prosecutions against me and other patriots. They failed on the debt limit they must not fail now. Use the power of the person to defend the country. Now, zooming out and trying to get away from the politics of the situation, which obviously is not the focus of this show. The reason that this was brought up at last week's FOMC press conference is that a government shutdown would halt the publication of government data. This would include employment, inflation and growth statistics, which are currently playing a key role in guiding Fed policy. Now, given how much the Fed has said over and over again, their policy is going to be driven by data, presumably not having access to that data would be a fairly big deal. Yet in spite of that, Powell tried to put on a brave face, saying, If there is a government shutdown and it lasts through the next meeting, then it's possible we wouldn't be getting some of the data that we would ordinarily get and we would just have to deal with that. Now, by way of some history, the longest ever government shutdown lasted 35 days. The dispute was around funding for the border wall and quickly turned public sentiment against the Trump administration. Republicans controlled both the House and the Senate, but the administration failed to convince their own party to fund the wall. At the time, Democrat Senator Jon Tester called it the most stupid shutdown I have ever seen in my life. However, if this week's display is anything to go by, that 2019 shutdown could soon have some competition for that title. Now, what does this all have to do with the crypto sphere? Well, I think in many ways these are just exemplary of the state of politics in general. And given that, perhaps it's not surprising that former Senator Pat Toomey is not optimistic about the chances of crypto legislation being passed during this Congress. Just prior to retiring from Congress at the beginning of the year, Toomey introduced his own crypto bill, which focused on stablecoin regulations. Now, the House currently has two major crypto bills eligible to be brought for a vote. One would establish a stablecoin framework while the other introduces more broad crypto regulations. While speaking at a Georgetown Law Seminar on Thursday, however, Toomey said, I don't see a path forward in the Senate regardless of how the vote goes in the House. He added that of the two, he sees the stablecoin legislation as having the best shot. The sticking point will likely be Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown. While Brown has been outspoken about the risks of crypto and the need to bring the industry to heel, he has so far remained extremely quiet on exactly what form of legislation would meet his approval. And of course, any crypto legislation would need the support of Democratic senators to pass a vote to become law. Still, during an interview on Thursday, Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad said that she thinks that Brown's lack of commitment to a legislative position might actually be a good thing. Shirzad said, Now, last week, Brown wrote a letter to head regulators at multiple agencies urging them to use their existing powers to crack down on non -compliant crypto firms. This of course seems to be the clear intention, at least at the SEC. On Tuesday, the head of that agency's crypto assets and cyber unit, David Hirsch, warned that more enforcement actions would be coming against crypto intermediaries, including DeFi protocols. Still, Toomey, who serves now as an advisor to Coinbase, views stablecoin legislation as the solvable problem. At the moment, Democrats are pushing for the Fed to serve a central role in regulating issuers rather than granting oversight power to state regulators. This preference is believed to be driven by the White House. Toomey said, He thinks that senior Democrats will get on board once the White House is satisfied with the stablecoin proposal. Although that proposal might have to wait until after the election, as Toomey said in the next Congress, I think it's quite possible to get something done.
The Charlie Kirk Show
Inside the Funding Fight With Kane of Citizen Free Press
"Us now is Citizen Kane from citizenfreepress .com. Mr. Kane, thank you for taking the time. I think all eyes are on this funding fight. You guys at CFP Nation have been covering this. What are you hearing, Kane, front lines, grassroots, as far as what are the expectations and demands going into the 930 funding fight? Well, expectations probably match up with the emails and responses you just got that you just mentioned, which is everyone is incredibly cynical. I put up a story in the stack yesterday that some members of the Freedom Caucus are looking for an 8 % reduction in federal spending. And as one of my commenters pointed out, when you have a $2 .2 trillion annual deficit and your budget is $7 trillion, 8 % of $7 trillion is $560 billion. So even doing something as dramatic as an 8 % cut in spending would still leave the deficit at $1 .6 trillion. So getting a little deeper, I'm sure you saw the headlines. I put up three headlines. I think it was on Wednesday. I originally was drawn into politics because of national debt decades ago when it was crossing $1 trillion, $2 trillion. So that's always been an issue that I paid very close attention to. And as the debt balloon passed $15 trillion, the total national debt balloon passed $15 trillion, then $20 trillion, then $25 trillion. We weren't getting hit that hard, as you know, because interest rates were so low and they were financing the debt on short term, essentially three months to one year bills. So they were able to finance it at 1%, 2%, 3 % for about 10 or 12 years. And I kept telling people, if you own gold, if you own silver, just wait, because we will revert to the mean. We will get back to 5 % interest rates. And a 5 % interest rate, and this was the point of my post earlier in the week, a 5 % interest rate on a $33 trillion national debt is $1 .65 trillion every single year just for your interest payment. That knocks nothing off the debt. All that does is keep you, essentially keep you even with paying your interest. And so to wind it back to your question, CFP Nation is cynical. They don't believe it. They don't believe that the cuts that are out there are even big enough. And so that's where we
The Dan Bongino Show
Scott Presler: We Don't Need the Government, We Need Active Citizens
"Because I was mad but you know I wasn't mad at President Obama I was ultimately mad at myself I said Scott where were you registering where voters were you getting out the vote where were you helping to make sure that we were electing publicans into office and I realized that my inaction meant that I was the problem and so I became the solution by getting my first job in politics in 2014 I I moved halfway across the country to Texas to elect now Governor Greg Abbott and then realized how important it was that we win back the White House in 2016 because I was always forward thinking focusing on the Supreme Court and I never wanted Hillary Clinton to set foot in office ever again as you know and so I dedicated two years of my life to electing Donald J. Trump as the 45th President and it really was Trump who changed my life in 2019 because he was talking about the city of Baltimore Maryland and again the same inaction that I felt in myself in 2012 I was reminded of by society's reaction to Baltimore because because everybody was tweeting they were posting pictures they were getting likes and clicks from posting videos and of Baltimore I thought to myself okay you're gonna go do a trash cleanup and I I thought was it going was to be me my mom dad but the tweet that I posted on social media it went viral and I was oh but within seven days we organized a cleanup in Baltimore on on a Monday and we got 200 volunteers from all across the country that came together in an act of love and we picked up 12 tons of trash in 12 hours in one single day and I thought to myself Dan I don't need the government to solve my problems what I do need is concerned citizens coming together as a community and we can do
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 14:00 09-22-2023 14:00
"With Bloomberg, you get the story behind the story, the story behind the global birth rate, behind your EV battery's environmental impact, behind sand, yeah, sand, you get context, and context changes everything. Go to Bloomberg .com to get context. No facial recognition. I think turn and run is going to be the answer for me. I'm Joe Matthew in Washington. Big thanks to Rick Davis and Jeannie Shanzano. Hour two of Sound On starts right now. The auto strikes are getting bigger. Welcome to hour two of Sound On as the United Auto Workers expands strikes against GM and Stellantis, but not Ford. We're going to get the latest from Bloomberg Auto reporter Keith Naughton coming up, and we'll dive into the details of the negotiations and what might come next with Arthur Wheaton, director of labor studies at Cornell University. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is indicted in a federal corruption probe. We're going to look at the case against Senator Bob Menendez with Bloomberg Politics reporter Ryan Teague Beckwith.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 13:00 09-22-2023 13:00
"With Bloomberg, you get the story behind the story, the story behind the global birth rate, behind your EV battery's environmental impact, behind sand, yeah, sand, you get context. And context changes everything. Go to Bloomberg .com to get context. Anicot Steel loves Blue Horseshoe. Yes, Blue Horseshoe loves Anicot Steel. All right, check out that reference on YouTube. This is Bloomberg. Sound on, Joe Matthew, next. Broadcasting 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com and the Bloomberg Business Act, this is Bloomberg Radio. Now from our nation's capital, this is Bloomberg Sound On. We're talking about red and blue division within states. How busy is Donald Trump's legal team going to be? Is the economy stupid? Is that actually what will decide this race? Bloomberg Sound On. Politics, policy and perspective from D .C.'s top names. Federal spending combined with too lax monetary policy has produced this 40 -year high on inflation. China policy is driven basically by domestic politics. American families are finding themselves further behind the eight ball. To get anything done in this Congress, it's going to have to be done in a bipartisan way. Bloomberg Sound On with Joe Matthew on Bloomberg Radio. So hey, where'd everyone go? Welcome to the fastest show in politics as lawmakers head home for an extra long weekend with no plan to fund the government pass next week. We'll talk about the difficult path ahead and whether a shutdown is inevitable. Coming up with Bill Hoagland from the Bipartisan Policy Center, he's with us at the table in just a moment. The United Auto Workers Meantime, expanding strikes, as you've been hearing on Bloomberg against GM and Stellantis, but not Ford. We'll take a look at why and explore how it's playing on the campaign trail.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 07:00 09-22-2023 07:00
"With Bloomberg, you get the story behind the story, the story behind the global birth rate, behind your EV batteries' environmental impact, behind sand, yeah, sand, you get context, and context changes everything. Go to Bloomberg .com to get context. This is Bloomberg Radio. We still think rates are somewhat too high over the long run. As long as the politics lets the U .S. be exceptional, you can have higher yields and a stronger dollar. Turning to the U .S., we are a lot weaker than consensus with U .S. growth. Inflation expectations are fairly well behaved for consumers. What we're seeing is the lagged impact of fairly aggressive monetary tightening really starting to bite. This is Bloomberg Surveillance with Tom Keane, Jonathan Farrow and Lisa Abramowitz. This is Bloomberg Surveillance live from the city of London for our audience worldwide. Good morning. Good morning. Alongside Tom Keane and Lisa Abramowitz, I'm Jonathan Farrow, your equity market positive here by 0 .2%. It's been a rough, dicey couple of days in this market. Let's put it all together. Biggest one -day loss on the S &P 500 in about six months, yields we haven't seen for more than a decade, cycle highs on a ten -year, on a two -year. This morning in today's session in Asian trading, we went through $4 .50 briefly on a ten -year. We come back about a basis point, $4 .48. TK, putting it all together, what a ride it's been over the last few trading days. I'm going to go away from the equity market. I really take issue with the worry and the doom and gloom on equities. It's barely a pullback here with a VIX at 17 .12, I believe, as a level. You think we had a 20, a 22, a 25 VIX. We got nothing. It's been resilient equity markets with the bounce back today. In the other areas, you're right, John, in foreign exchange, I can tell you it's an interesting study. It's not one or two pairs. It's like 10 or 12 pairs you can study. Sara Velles with us from Deutsche Bank.
The Financial Guys
A highlight from Growing Unease: Current Administrations Approach to Security and Travel with David Bellavia
"What do you think they're doing with cash, right? What deal do you make where someone says, I'll bring a box of money to you? Yeah. What do you, it's, this is a state sponsor of terrorism. Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests and my fellow citizens. America's comeback now. starts right Welcome back Financial Guys podcast. Mike Speraza in studio live today with a guest in the studio. I haven't had this in a long time. Staff Sergeant medal of honor recipient David Bellavia joining me for about a half hour today. David, thank you for joining us. Thank you for having me. I appreciate it. Absolutely. So I'm going to stick based on your background. I'm going to stick with a lot of military stuff today and I want to start, we'll go all the way back to the beginning of the Joe Biden presidency. The Afghanistan withdrawal, in my opinion, did not go very smoothly. I'm sure many people listening agree. What were your overall thoughts of that withdrawal and how it actually ended up happening? I know we lost, you know, sadly lost 13 soldiers in that, in that withdrawal. People say we went off the wrong air base. People say that we shouldn't have gone out in the middle of the summer. There was a lot of different things there. What were your overall thoughts on that? I think it's like the worst day in American history since Market Garden. Just absolutely. And the reason why it was so difficult was it was totally unnecessary. So let's rewind to the Obama trade, Bull Bergdahl and the three first round draft picks. They get Marshall, they get MacArthur and they get Patton that end up the resurgence of the Taliban. These men not just go back to the enemy, they go back to the battlefield. They're in power when the government falls. You have misinformation coming from the White House that the president of Afghanistan is leaving with billions of dollars on his plane, which wasn't true. And then you leave the equipment, the cash. There's no recovery. We're getting reports of sales of American equipment left in Afghanistan in Southeast Asia. We're moving material across the globe. Our children will fight and pay and have to atone for these miscalculations. Let's talk about that. You being in the military and you knowing that area too, why did they just find it the easiest way out to just say, you know, just leave that billion dollar billions of dollars of equipment there and not think, again, if it was me and I'm speaking that someone that's never been in the military, but if it's me and I'm the president, I'm thinking, OK, I don't want to leave all our weaponry there. I don't want to lose any of my men. Number two. And number three, I want to make sure that everybody knows when and how we're getting out of there. And it just felt like poof. One day they said we're getting out of here. Well, it's because the military didn't make any of those decisions. I mean, look, Millie, it can criticize him. You can criticize Secretary of Defense worthy of criticism. However, none of these individuals are making decisions. This is about NGOs on the ground. This is about the State Department. So you've got Bagram Air Base, the equivalent of JFK. You've got Karzai International Airport, the equivalent of Teterboro. Right. Why would you ever do an exfil out of Karzai International Airport? It makes absolutely no sense. It's tactically unsound. But and then you've got all the ISIS -K. We retaliate from the murder of 13 of our bravest and we drop a bomb on a guy delivering water. He's on our payroll and we kill children on that. Then we take out Borat on a tuk tuk driving around like that wasn't even really what was happening. It's just a den of lies. And Tony Blinken and Jake Sullivan, all the heroes that brought us, you know, the Bergdahl deal, the Iran nuke deal. This is these. They the State Department is running all foreign policy, including what the DOD used to run. Well, that's I was going to say. I mean, I know Biden's the president, but do you blame him at all or is it everybody underneath him that, you know, maybe was giving him bad information? And again, some of these decisions, David, is Biden even involved in some of these decisions? Like, I don't even know anymore. Is he around? Is he paying attention to anything going on? Well, I mean, just from the press conferences, it was apparent he didn't know what was going on. And the great irony is that they actually were predicting that Ukraine was going to be invaded and, you know, no one believed them. So it's like you can't influence your friends. The allies don't trust you. The enemy doesn't respect you. You know, I mean, you've got Ben Rhodes is really proud of this State Department. Susan Rice loves what they're doing. But, you know, again, Americans died. And, you know, and what is the perfect culmination of the adventure in Afghanistan? Looking at your watch at Dover Air Base when bodies are coming home. I mean, nothing could you couldn't ask for a just it's it's a debacle. Yeah. And it's sad that that's that's the leader of our country there. Let's move in. You brought up the Ukraine there. So the Russia Ukraine conflict will get to Zelensky in a minute. He is as we speak in New York City right now. But so Trump's in office. We don't see many of these conflicts or any conflicts actually started under his watch. And then we have the Biden administration come in. And a year later, we have Russia invading Ukraine. Why did this happen and why? Why the timing of February of 2022? So let's go back to when we were fighting ISIS. Trump engaged and destroyed estimated some say 300 members of Wagner forces. But those were Russian nationals. We engaged. We destroyed them. What was the response from Putin? Nothing at all. So what do people in that section of the world, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, what do they respect? They respect power. They respect authority. You're not going to get any respect if you don't engage the enemy when they present themselves. I don't understand the calculus of again, I'm trying hard to figure it out. I don't get it. I don't. You know, Romania and Hungary and Poland, you're letting them unilaterally decide whether or not they want to send reinforcements into Ukraine. That's an act of war. If NATO members engage the enemy, all of NATO is engaged against the enemy. Poland doesn't unilaterally make that decision. Hungary and Romania don't unilaterally make that decision. We can't even articulate what the mission is. And if you look, go to the Institute for the Study of War, there's a plug for them. Check out their overlay from when the battle started, when the war started with Russia. And tell me what success this offensive in Ukraine has produced. I mean, let me ask this question, because I get confused. The answer is nothing. I asked this on Twitter, X, whatever it's called, all the time. What is the end game and how do we get there? Because all I see the answer is, hey, just blank checks. Hey, just write a check. Hey, here's a billion. Hey, here's 20 billion. Hey, here's another 10 billion. I don't actually see a look. I mean, like anything, right? If I write a business plan of what I want to do in 2024, my goal is X. I write down my steps to get X. I don't just write down X and say it's going to happen. I don't really know. And then the answer always is, well, we have to fight. We have to back Ukraine. Okay. But when does that end? Because the Afghanistan war and the war in Iraq lasted 20 years plus, right? And was there a real end to it? I don't know. That's where it gets frustrating for me, Dave, where I'm like, how do we know what the end game is? Do you win or lose? When does that happen? I don't know. I don't know. At least you're thinking about it. And I have fear that our leaders aren't, and that's the problem. So here's what this comes out. You're going to get a negotiated settlement out of Ukraine, right? But you talked about the billions of dollars that we're spending and giving to Ukraine as a blank check. First of all, Zelensky visited Ukrainian soldiers in the United States. Did you know that there were wounded Ukrainian soldiers in the United States? I did not know that. Well, today he visited them. So what's happening there? So that's a cost that no one is putting on the ledger. So now let's look at the blank check that Ukraine is getting. And by the way, I'm pro Ukraine. I want to fight communists all day and night. So let's punch Putin hard in the face. However, you're giving them a blank check and you're giving them munitions. Now here's the problem. We have to replace those munitions. Those munitions were purchased for 20 year global war and terror. And let's be honest, inflation is involved. So what you purchased for $10 is now $17. So you're not just giving them the money. You're giving them the equipment and the munitions that you have to replace yourself at the value of what is valued today. We haven't scratched the surface for the amount of money. CBO absent at the wheel. No one is tracking this. 2024 can't get here fast enough. How does this work, though, when you talk about some of these NATO nations coming together and making decisions, but us not just giving weaponry, giving everything money, whatever we're giving there? Is that not an act of war, too, though, David, at some point? We're continuing to fund Ukraine continuing the war in Ukraine. I mean, that to me seems like we're backing a war. Well, I mean, by the letter of the law and NATO charter, it's not. But here's the problem. It's schizophrenic because we were told that what was an offensive weapon was going to mitigate, you know, that wasn't going to help peace at all. So we went from, I don't know if they should get tracked vehicles to I'm not sure an artillery piece is what they need to high Mars rockets being launched. And let's be honest. I mean, the Ukrainians are I mean, the payload that they're going through, what you would have to have cataclysmic casualty numbers to be able to to the spandex that they're doing on the ground that they need to replace Patriot. If you're going through thirty five Patriot to, you know, missiles, I would expect to at least the C 20 makes that are shot down. They're using them for air artillery. They're using there for indirect fire. I don't know what they're doing, but this is going to end with Don Boss going to Russia. This is going to end with that land chain that Putin wanted through Crimea. And again, our friends in NATO, what are they even doing for Ukraine? What? Look, if you they said that Trump wanted to kill NATO, Biden did it. Right. Biden did it. And now Germany. And so Putin was selling oil at thirty dollars a barrel. What's it at ninety six? Yeah. He's making more money than he did before. And he's financing a war and killing innocent people. You mentioned before, too, and I think this is a good point. Everybody on the left and I'll say the media, the establishment, whoever you want to say, says that if you don't agree with the war in Ukraine, you're like pro Putin. Right. And that's just the most outrageous thing in the world, because I agree with you. I feel for the people of Ukraine. I don't want this for them. I don't want this for innocent people. However, at some point, the world's every every one of the world's problems can't be America's problem when we have a border crisis. And then I think they said yesterday ten thousand people came across. They got, I think, eight thousand of the ten thousand. But you see the numbers day over day. It's a problem. We have crime that's rampant. We have overdoses that are at record numbers. We have we have suicides at record numbers. At some point, we have to maybe just think about ourselves and not everybody else, because if we fall, sadly, I think the world falls at that point. Amen. The thing that I would add is I love the way the Ukraine refugee has been crowbarred into the migrant crisis in the United States. New York leaders from the city to all over Kathy Hochul, the governor of the state of New York, mentioning that, you know, like the Ukrainians in Poland, the the Polish have no intention to keep Ukrainians forever. That's a temporary you know, they're leaving a conflict to return to their country after the conflict is over. Again, this is just we're we're putting a round peg into a square hole and just hammering it away. But but there's no the media. There's you're our destroying military. I go to parents all the time around this country and ask them to give us their sons and daughters to join the military. And the one thing they bring up is Afghanistan. It's not about anything. It's Afghanistan. How are you going to assure us that you're going to maintain your commitment to our son and daughter when you betrayed us in Afghanistan that has lasting effects? And there's not a I'm trying to find a segment of our of our of our nation that's functioning. I don't know what it is. I saw in Chicago, they're going to have municipally owned grocery stores. Maybe that will figure it out there. Yeah, yeah, it's good. Real quick, do you think and we'll finish up on this topic, but do you think that they will we will ever have boots in the ground on Ukraine? I mean, I hope not, because I just don't know what the I mean, look at I'm I'm we're getting ready for China. We're trying to revolutionize everything. I don't know what the what the plan is. I mean, again, if you want to put a base in Ukraine, and you want to make that a sustainment operation going forward, that I here's the point. I don't understand what the inactive ready reserve call up was for. Why are you bringing those troops in the non combat support? Why are they going to Ukraine? What are you building infrastructure there? Here's what I do know. We're talking a minimum of $11 trillion to build Ukraine back. That is cataclysmic amounts of money. There isn't water, electricity, internet, you know, you want to help Ukraine. You're going to Russia is not paying for that if you negotiate a settlement. So I don't know what the plan is. But I hope we never see boots on the ground. I could guess what the plan is. I won't I won't say for sure. But I could guess that we'll be paying a chunk of that. And I do have one last one. So I did interview Colonel Douglas McGregor a few months back. And he talked about he's a real optimist. But he is really very, very bullish on Ukraine. Yes, very, very optimistic. I'm dropping some all over the place. But he brought up some staggering numbers, though. And even if they're half true, it's a problem. The amount of casualties and wounded soldiers on the Ukrainian side that we're not hearing about the media. I don't know if you agree with some of those numbers or not. But he's saying, I mean, it's people are acting as if this is an even war right now. And it's not even close. First of all, McGregor's a stud. I mean, he's an absolute, you know, that we're glad he's on our side. He's a military mind. I don't know if those numbers are accurate. I could tell you they're juxtaposed to almost everything we're hearing from every institution that we have, including a lot of our intel from Germany and England. But again, I don't know what to believe. So when you don't have when you don't have transparency, when you're not holding regular press conferences, when your Pentagon spokesman is now working in the White House and now you're getting a triple spin. I mean, the U .S. Open double backspin. You've gotten so many spins on the narrative. I don't know what to believe. But if he is even close to what is a segment of truth, you know, then look, Ukraine needs an investigation. There's a lot of investigations. We've got to start on Afghanistan. We were promised that by Speaker McCarthy. We need a hot wash on Afghanistan. And then we need to go to what who is oversighting the money that's going to Ukraine. And what have we got for our return on investment? Yeah, I'm not asking for much. Really, all I'm asking for in this conflict is can we just talk about what the end game is? And to your point, can we get an accounting of where the money's going and what's being spent in a real accounting of it? The Iran deal that just happened last week. First off, the fact that that was negotiated and completed on 11th September to me is just the ultimate slap in the face. But you again, you know more about this than I do. We do a five for five trade. OK, I'm going to use sports analogies. We trade five for five. And then we also approved of six billion dollars that apparently wasn't ours, but it was in a fund that now they can release to Iran. How are we winning on that one? Well, first of all, I was hoping that at least it was a digital transfer. The fact that it went as euros in cash through Qatar. And OK, so what happens the 24 hours after that deal is made? We're now getting issues in the West Bank. We're now hearing about issues in Yemen. We've now got Hezbollah that's reinforced. I mean, look, what do you think they're doing with cash? Right. What deal do you make where someone says, I'll bring a box of money to you? What do you it's this is a state sponsor of terrorism. They haven't changed. By the way, their president is now in New York City addressing the United Nations. This guy's killed 6500 of his own people. He admits to it. He killed the students that revolted and wanted democracy when we did nothing. He killed 5000 of his citizens in 1988. He's killed over 300 Americans. There's no accountability whatsoever. I don't understand what it is about Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken that believe that Iran is a partner. All you've done 10 years ago, they were refining 10 percent of their oil. And now they're a force. Now they're working with Maduro in Venezuela, and they're a huge part of their members of of the international community. They're in good standing there. I don't get it. Does anyone believe that the Iran nuke deal? Look, we got hit with cruise missiles under Trump in Iraq. How did they have those cruise missiles? Those cruise missiles were illegal under the Obama nuke deal. So how are you refurbishing missiles in two years? Do we believe that their centrifuges have stopped? That they won't have a program if they don't have one already? No, I mean, I guess my question, David, is how I mean, I know that you pay a lot of attention to this stuff, but how do people like in the media not ask these questions? Right. I mean, these are legitimate. I mean, we just traded to I put this on my notes here. This is on the heels of trading a WNBA basketball player for the Merchant of Death like six months ago. Right. I mean, and again, I'm glad Americans are coming back to America. I don't want to sound pessimistic on that. That's great news. But we also I mean, this this stuff just seems like I don't care what side of the aisle you're on. It warrants questions, but nobody seems to care. I'm in the world that if you take hostages, we take hostages. You want to exchange people? We'll exchange people. You know, we definitely have the partners in the area to do that. For whatever reason, this administration, they're they're they're contrarians. They're contrarians to you know, they claim Bush and Cheney are their best friends, yet they just go 180 degrees from that doctrine. I don't know what the Biden doctrine is. I don't know what Bidenonomics is either, but I could tell you that they believe that Iran is a partner. Now, here's another thing. Our envoy to Iran not only is no longer the envoy, he doesn't have a security clearance. Does anyone curious at The New York Times as to what happened to the lead negotiator in Iran that is escorted off a bus, taken into American custody, given a job at Yale or Princeton or wherever he's working now? I've never heard of a person going from top secret classified negotiations to no clearance whatsoever and in the custody of American intelligence community. No one cares. No one cares at all. It's fascinating. And again, for me, I mean, these are big decisions that we're making. And correct me if I'm wrong, but it used to be, you know, maybe we did a two for five deal and then we made the six billion. Now we're like, we're giving stuff away and we're on the losing end. Correct me if I'm wrong, but America was never, you know, America losing. It was always America winning, right? America getting the best of deals. At least McDonald's has a five for five. We didn't even get that. You know what this does though? Honest to God, if you're thinking about traveling overseas, things go sideways, cartel, South America, Mexico, wherever you're going, you have a price in your head now. No one in their right mind is going to bring you back whether it's Haiti or wherever you are, you're worth $1 .25 billion. And thugs and scumbags are going to take advantage of that. I mean, that's a great point too. Do you think about leaving the country? I don't know anymore. That's a little bit concerning. I don't care where you're going, right? That's concerning. This one I just had to bring up because it happened two days ago or yesterday. How do we lose a plane? And I heard that's like a third one in the last six weeks that something like this has happened. How are we losing $80 million planes? Well, they're not $80 million anymore because they've got a new engine and all this other stuff. Look, the F -35 program is a complete disaster. You want to talk about why our allies think we're crazy. We sold them a plane. This program has been around since the early 90s and we've got nothing on return for it. So basically two planes are flying in a buddy team. They're doing training and a guy punches out. We don't even know why he punched out, but that plane could have easily hit a building. It didn't, thank God. But the wingman didn't follow where his buddy went. So what is he doing? He just kind of went on and did his own thing. And now the Marine Corps put a Facebook post like a dog is missing. We're expecting the Ukrainian farmers to carry the F -35 out with their tractors. I don't know what the point of it's wild. Look, stop embarrassing us. Just stop humiliating us. That's all I'm asking. Just be the army and the Marine Corps that we know our men and women are capable of being. Get out of their way. This gender garbage, this social experiment nonsense, stop humiliating our military. That's all I ask. Why can we not get the... I mean, I know why we can't get the answer, but I'm asking this to you. But why can't we, at a press conference at the White House, why can't we say, I want to talk to the guy that was in the other plane, or you can tell us the transcript of what happened when that happened. Talk to the guy who jumped out of the plane. Why did you do that? And again, I'm not trying to put our military on the spot, but these are kind of big questions to ask, right? I mean, if I do something in my business, I have to go face the music on that. Why doesn't everybody have to face music for their decisions or why things are happening? I think it's kind of important. Well, you don't want to talk to generals because they're going to tell you the truth and they won't be generals anymore. True. And you don't want to talk to enlisted people. Because look, I mean, let's be honest. How many people are... Is this a merit -based military anymore? Do we have a meritocracy? Are we promoting people based on pronouns? Go figure. When we're putting politics above military strength, accidents happen. We don't know the facts, but the fact that nobody cares about getting to the bottom of it, the day of the Pentagon paper reporters are gone. Yep. Yep. Let's just talk about the 2024 race quick, and then we will wrap up for today. So your thoughts on the Republican primary so far, I'll stay away from the Democratic side till the very end, but your thoughts on, you know, there's obviously Trump who is now in a, has a huge lead. Ron DeSantis seems to be crumbling underneath himself. Vivek Ramaswamy has jumped up in the polls. Nikki Haley's there. Tim Scott's there. A few others that probably aren't going to get a lot of votes. Chris Christie's the anti -Trump candidate. Mike Pence is, I don't know what Mike Pence is. I'm not really sure. Your thoughts about the whole field so far? I mean, look, it's impressive. They've got a deep bench. There's a lot of diversity. I, you know, none of it matters. Trump is the guy. The more you indict him, the more you empower him. You know, I'd like him to work on his communications a little bit better. You know, but if Trump is Trump, Trump is a Frankenstein monster of Barack Obama. As long as you have that faction, you're going to get, you know, Trump is going to be empowered. I just don't want to see Governor Noem anywhere near the White House. And I, if he's going to pick a running mate, you know, it's hard to find an ally here, you know. But it would be nice to find a governor. I don't want to take anyone from the Senate. I don't want to take anyone from the House with the margins that tight. But I mean, the idea that Governor Noem is being floated right now. I mean, I'd rather take North Dakota. Yeah. A little sled there. You know, it's funny you mentioned that because I saw a lot of that this weekend. I mean, can we just, for lack of a better term, keep it in our pants for about a year and then do what you got to do? It really is. I mean, every time you turn, somebody's doing something idiotic, whether it's Boebert. And again, I say this, David, a lot of people know who you are. A lot more know who you are than they'll ever know who I am. But when you go out in public into a movie theater like that, and I'm going to Boebert, not Noem for a second, you're, you're extremely well known. I don't care if it's dark or if it's as light as it is in the studio right now. What are you thinking? I, you know, she's, she's, she's an embarrassment. She is. She's bad, too. Who would have thought that Marjorie Taylor Greene would have been the, the oasis of the Maryland? I mean, seriously, I, again, you're, you're in Congress every day. You're out in public, you're on the job. You know, at least she wasn't wearing a hoodie, you know, that's all in shorts. She was at least dressed for the occasion, but I, it was, it's wildly embarrassing. Vaping, singing, whatever you're doing. Getting groped. Yes. Who is your VP candidate then? Because I think, you know, you have names thrown around. There's, there's, the vague has been thrown around in there. You know, Byron Donald's has been thrown around in there. Carrie Lake has. I don't know. I love Carrie Lake. I just don't know that Trump needs to go with somebody so divisive there. I think he's got to go with somebody that's, that's firm in their beliefs, but also not maybe going to turn off half the country. Well, you know, it's, it's impossible. One of the, one of the problems with making Trump, you know, the, the enemy of the state that the left has done is that you've really made it difficult for him to even put a cabinet together. You know, I mean, what are you going to do with it? You've got a lot of loyalists out there. You know, the vague is, is I think maybe the most intelligent dynamic candidate we've ever seen run for president, but experience does matter. But you know, I love the way he thinks. I love the movement. I don't know if he would even take the job to be honest with it. I don't think he needs it. But you look at a Tim Scott, I think Tim Scott is, you know, there's a whole lot to his message and I think he's, he's got the experience in the Senate, but honestly, you could literally take the Clint Eastwood chair and, and throw it in there as vice president. I'm going with that because this, this from top to bottom, we have to have seismic change in 24. Do you think he would ever choose Kristi Noem at this point with all that now? Yeah, no one knew Mike Pence was a, was a 24 hour story and then he was the vice president candidate. So who knows? I mean, a lot can happen between now and then, but I just, I don't need, you know, let's just pick people on their merit. Let's pick people that are ready to be the president. Imagine this, imagine picking a vice president that can lead the country. If something happens to a 75 year old president, you know, like Kamala Harris. Yeah. Someone like that.
Mike Gallagher Podcast
A highlight from The Left Is Removing Statues & Erasing Americas History
"It's a real blessing to be surrounded by good people, and there are people who have my back struggling a little bit today. Two dreaded words, dry socket. Anybody who's had a wisdom tooth extraction knows the perils of dry socket. Well, good old dummy me got it and not doing so hot. So we're going to bring in my pal Kevin McCulloch. Kevin and I got to visit on the big Salem, New York, cruise around the island of Manhattan a week or two ago. Kevin, of course, is an accomplished talk show host based in New York City. He's been heard for years on our Christian station and on the news talk station. This is a man of faith, a terrific guy. And Kevin, you're going to help back me up a little bit today. I might be handing off the baton right off the bat. Have you ever had wisdom tooth dry socket problems before? No, I haven't. And just the sound of the words dry socket strike fear into my deepest being. So I feel very badly for you, Mike, and we've got whatever you need from us today. We're here to help. It's every bit as bad as it sounds, and it's not a good thing. It's what you don't want after you have a... I knew it was going too easy. I had the wisdom tooth removed Friday afternoon after the show. Everything was going great. Saturday, I was feeling great, Sunday not so good. And so it happens sometimes. So it's good to have you here with us. And first of all, many, many thanks to the great job you always do when you fill in for us. Of course, I've been listening to you for years, and it must be a fun experience for you because you're sort of transitioning from your own audience and your base into sort of another platform with our show. And I know our listeners have welcomed you with open arms. Well, I have, and Mike, the Mike Gallagher audience continues to be, I think, not only the most informed because of your daily efforts, but they prove to be generous in all of the campaigns that you do. And as I said when I filled in for you the last time, because I work PM Drive, I'm a big Mike Gallagher listener. I listen and actually many times watch your show on the Salem News Channel. And it's just fun to hang out in your sandbox. So thank you for letting me do that. Thank you. And thank you to Jerry Crowley and everybody at Salem Media of New York that allows us to have all the connections to do. It takes a lot of technology to do what we're doing at this very moment, Mike. And if it weren't for them, we wouldn't be able to. You'd be in dry socket hell if we didn't have a better management team. And speaking of Salem News Channel, That Kevin Show has become a big hit on SNC. You're doing a great job with that. And I love the mix. And I was one of your first guests. I was really honored to be on your show. And you've got a great blend of politics and pop culture and lifestyle and all kinds of neat stuff. In fact, speaking of that, let's kick off with some breaking news. Donald Trump Jr.'s account on X, formerly Twitter, was apparently hacked earlier today. I don't know if you've heard this story. There were a series of – well, get this. There were a series of offensive tweets, including one that said, I'm sad to announce my father, Donald Trump, has passed away. I will be running for president in 2024. You know, Kevin, there's such evil out there and there is such sickness and mean -spiritedness and viciousness. And somehow this almost seems par for the course, doesn't it? Well, it's one of those things where if Donald Trump lives this rent -free in the left's heads, just imagine how effective he'll be if he's reelected. I mean, this is – you've got to remember, and I know that you do, Mike, but for people that are listening, particularly cynics, Donald Trump's one of the few presidents that campaigned on a slate of promises and then went and actually did what he promised. If he comes back, he's already making promises about what's going to happen. There's going to be cleaning of the House and the FBI and the DOJ. There's going to be getting rid of the deep state at the Pentagon and places where wokeness has overtaken actual common sense in terms of policy. So of course they're going to play dirty and of course they're going to try to do everything they can. And all I have to do to compare what they think about Donald Trump Jr. is just ask the question, Hunter Biden? Question mark? No kidding. No kidding. Is there any comparison between the two? And you know, speaking of Trump and his promises and his predictions, something has come to fruition in New York City, and you know the city as well as anybody. Now comes news that these goofballs in Manhattan are actually going to consider taking down statues or any commemoration of George Washington, of Christopher Columbus. And I want to go back to 2017. I want to play this for you, Kevin. Check out what Trump said, because when he said it at the time, they condemned him. Oh, how crazy is he? Check this out. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of to them a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down excuse me, are we going to take down are we going to take down statues to George? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? OK, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now we're going to take down his statue. So Kevin McCullough, do you remember the backlash? Do you remember the backlash he got when he said that and they mocked him and they said, what a lunatic. And he's a fear monger. And now just look at what's happening in New York City, what he predicted could be coming to fruition. Yeah. And you know, what's particularly sad about that, Mike, it's like if people have a different view of history, so be it. That doesn't mean, number one, that they should set policy for what everybody thinks about history. And certainly I would make an argument that history is made by flawed people. And it's really people that overcome the worst flaws of what they have that really do great things and that we should celebrate the great achievements, not expect every single human being to have been perfect. But beyond all of that, this city's in a mess. We have crime. We've got migrant overpopulation in ways and areas that we can't even begin to deal with. And this is what people want to focus on. I mean, and it is you're talking about a warped mix of priorities for sure. It's upside down. And it's absolutely happening as I mean, I've been following this and I'm in just absolute utter amazement, as you say, New York City dealing with crime, crippled under monumental budget cuts due to the illegal immigration issue that frankly the Democrats created. I mean, you want to be a sanctuary city, be a sanctuary city. And now the City Council's Cultural Affairs Committee is going to hold a public hearing on a measure to remove works of art on city property that depict a person who owned enslaved persons or directly benefited economically from slavery. Well, of course, George Washington's at the top of that list. So Trump was right. These nuts in New York and in other blue cities are going to try to remove the founding fathers from our consciousness because they own slaves. And it's exactly what Trump said back in 2017.
The Dan Bongino Show
Leo Terrell: Black Voters Simply Care About American Issues & Values
"Not controversial at all we just the do numbers are we lose 90 % of black vote which is absolutely unforgivable but when you look at people who've have done well with the black vote and both Trump and DeSantis have done well they've done okay he did very well down here in Florida the key that they I think they they they both had both of them what were they didn't treat black black voters any differently they didn't talk to black voters like they had I mean black parents care about soccer games and jobs and I it's not it's just so ridiculous I think how we overthink this thing you know I knocked on doors for two years in Maryland which has the largest population of upper -middle -class black voters anywhere in the country and then this is nothing surprising oh yeah how's the job right that's what I want to talk about jobs health care public safety I mean I think we overthink this thing and I think in this election if Trump were to win the nomination he seems to really be in the black community I don't want to get crazy you ain't gonna get probably 25 % of the vote or anything but we could really stand a really good chance at pulling anywhere from say 12 to 20 % and that would be an earthquake in a national electoral politics oh you're absolutely right Dan and your summary was perfect spot on I mean look I left the Democratic Party because they abandoned law enforcement they basically schools abandoned Dan I'm not on this radio program with you if it wasn't for quality school and that's being denied to all Americans you think inroads in with community the black by talking about American issues because everyone suffers from inflation crime, lawlessness, poor schools so what Trump is doing because I left in 2020 and yes he makes some inroads you get if Trump gets 15 to 20 % of the black vote 12 % 14 % there's no Democratic Party and I'll tell you right now he's doing much
The Dan Bongino Show
Leo Terrell: Lee Zeldin Is the Reason We Have a Republican House
"The Senate we took an L and I'm not doing that again Leo I'm not you're right listen Dan if it wasn't for BBB overtime work of Lee Felden we would even have a house right and could you imagine what we have what we have discovered as a result of a house majority just imagine we control the Senate and the White House we can really eliminate the deep state if we I mean but but Lee Zelda deserves a lot of credit because that is the only reason why we have the house such a good we're talking to Leo Terrell you know him you love him Leo is making an amazing point that is frequently left out folks I know you know Lee Zelda is I would never talk in a condescending film but if you just got into politics Lee Zeldin is a Republican congressman who ran for governor in New York and ran an absolutely campaign unbelievable he almost won in a state he had probably a 50 to 1 odds against him but what Leo's trying to tell you is we picked up a number of congressional seats in New York because people showed up to vote for Lee but then voted down ballot for their congressman if Lee Zeldin doesn't run this campaign Leo's right we lose the house there's no Speaker McCarthy or nothing Nancy Pelosi's in charge that is such a good point Leo that's why California is important anyone out there going we don't need the register votes in California Trump's gonna lose California and lose New York okay they may there's a darn good chance they probably will but that don't mean we can't pick up five or six more congressional seats down ballot absolutely Dan absolutely absolutely and that's what we have to do and we have to go after the entire country and let's not play the race card people of Americans kids regardless of color have the same concern inflation school choice homelessness border crime it's just we
The Financial Guys
A highlight from Solutions to Student Loan Debt: Bridging the Partisan Divide with Alan Collinge
"Before the pandemic, 58 .9 % of all borrowers were not paying on their loans. That's nearly three in five of all borrowers were not making payments on their loans. That's going up. All right, thanks for tuning in, tuning in to the podcast. I got you downloading the podcast, listen to the podcast, whatever you do. We've done radio, by the way, for 25 years, if you haven't listened before. And so it's hard to shake that habit. But today, of course, it's a podcast. And we have a special guest today, which is not often that we have a special guest on our podcast. So I'm kind of looking forward to this. We have Alan College, right? He is a member of the studentloanjustice .org group. And we're going to talk a little bit about student loans and waiving them and the whole business of college, which really has turned into more of a government business, -funded which, as a result, if you see that as the wild inflation there. But we're going to talk about that and the cost and just kind of go back and forth on some of the things that you believe in, some things we believe in. So we'll kind of go from there. So Alan, let me ask you this. So we'll start off and just jump right in.
The Bad Crypto Podcast
"politics of" Discussed on The Bad Crypto Podcast
"Well a lot of politics in this and as we warn people at the beginning of this show that hey, you know, you might be offended but you know, if you got a strong mind push through and then go do your own research and figure this stuff out because if you're just going to be offended because you said something that that that you don't like Bruce said something that you don't like then if you're not being intellectually honest, you're missing an opportunity to grow right and this is we all want to grow. We all have to be able to question everything. I haven't got it all figured out. Travis has never figured out first time and I'll figure it out. But we've gone down the rabbit hole. We've asked the questions, you know is I think it was Reagan that said if you're under 25 and and not a Democrat you don't have a heart and if you're you know, what over 40 or whatever he said and you're not a Republican you don't have a brain. There's there's a reason for that. So let's close with with this Bruce. Let's get back to Bitcoin. The four-year cycle traditionally has shown that next year we should be entering into a real bull market. Now, I know that you know, while you are a financial advisor, this is you know, people need to go do their own due diligence and figure out what they think is going to happen. What do you think is going to happen? Are we going to run again? Is the whole crypto market going to follow in its wake? Are we going to see you know, that six-figure Bitcoin? What do you think? I certainly hope so. And and I think like I said, I'm I'm optimistic. I've always thought it's a binary play usually when I start getting worried and saying oh boy, you know, what is this? Why is it not doing anything? Those historically tend to be the time when it does. Well, it's usually when my taxes are due in the darkest day and I have to sell some Bitcoin when I know it's low that usually marks the the the low point for the year cycle every single time like clockwork. So with these things like BlackRock and you know, other major investors coming in. I really feel like it's a major global asset that's here to stay. I don't think it's going to go to zero. I don't think it's going to fall apart and if that doesn't happen, if it survives then it shows its value by surviving. It shows that it is decentralized money. It is working. The network is up and I think that the value will follow. So I would certainly hope to see six-figure Bitcoin if we go through the the cycle repeats like we have before. Bitcoin's always going to go down more than you think. It's always going to go up more than you think. So, you know, we could have it test new bottoms now and or you know lows kind of cyclical lows and then we could see it, you know, in a course of 60 days run past a hundred, you know, that's what we've seen again and again throughout these cycles and I think it's here to stay and I think it matters and the world needs it because Fiat money doesn't work and ultimately humans gravitate towards money. That is the most scarce that has the best properties and Bitcoin does meet those properties. So I think that people will other, you know, more and more people will see that there's more people kind of onboarded with the sort of Sailor, Ross Stevens kind of sophisticated narratives. And I think that's going to continue to show its value because there isn't any other alternative. Bitcoin is kind of a silly and stupid idea, honestly, but it's way, way, way better than, you know, Fiat, a bunch of a bunch of Janet Yellen's and Jerome Powell sitting up in an office of a building that they've paid for with money that they stole from workers deciding, lording over the economy and deciding how much money there should be. I mean, that's that's the ultimate junky altcoin. So Bitcoin does have much better principles and properties and I think that the market is going to continue to show that and reflect that. Bruce Fenton at Bruce Fenton.com links to Bruce's other socials in the show notes at badco.in forward slash 694. Bruce, thanks for for coming on and sharing your thoughts with us today. We appreciate it. Absolutely. Thanks for having me. Bruce is a smart dude, Trav. I really enjoy talking to him. And time ran out a little too quick. So I think if they have people have gotten to this far into the podcast episode, you got yourself an interesting one. I don't know that we've ever had one quite like this podcast before, Joel. I don't know. But you know, definitely makes you think and if you disagree with some or many of the things that were said that, you know, I applaud your courage to stay with it because there's a lot of people when they don't like what they hear, they just they just run off and and it takes courage to listen to opinions and ideas that you may inherently disagree with. Yeah, it's like I'm so tired of the divide between red and the blue, but it's all really a shade of purple and the more that people understand that and you go, oh, okay. So it's not we the people it's them versus we the people just understand how it all works because rich people they don't tend to want to give up that and they'll do whatever to sort of stay in the group. And so that's what ends up happening, especially if some blackmail gets caught up in the whole thing. You don't know what's going on in somebody's life. But I tell you what, pay attention, do your own research and learn about it because it's some crazy stuff going on. We're more than six years deep into this coming up on episode 700 and appreciate you guys. Please do subscribe review with five stars. Ring the bells. Tell a friend, tell your grandma, tell your dog. Dogs really like us. Something about the sound of our voice is very soothing. And when you do tell your dog, make sure that you tell him to stay bad.And not be in the whole over rollover. Yeah, don't be in the house. You don't like that. The bad crypto podcast is a production of bad crypto LLC. The content of the show, the videos and the website is provided for educational, informational and entertainment purposes. Only it's not intended to be and does not constitute financial investment or trading advice of any kind. You shouldn't make any decisions as to finances investing trading or anything else based on this information without undertaking independent due diligence in consultation with a professional financial advisor. Please understand that the trading of bitcoins and alternative cryptocurrencies have potential risks involved. Anyone wishing to invest in any of the currencies or tokens mentioned on this podcast should first seek their own independent professional financial advisor.
The Bad Crypto Podcast
"politics of" Discussed on The Bad Crypto Podcast
"So in Bitcoin, you know stands on the side here is this this threat to them. But now even the large institutions are throwing their hat in the ring. What's it going to take and is it even possible at this point to turn things around or are we facing the dystopian social credit score hellscape that the films at Hollywood has predicted for these past decades? We've got to be optimistic because we are headed down a path where we're going to go one way or another. It is a time of epic change. Just like I said bitcoins binary kind of the world is binary now. We are not going it is not the status quo as of 2020. The world is changing and it's going to keep changing. It's not just going to go back to quote-unquote normal 2019 is gone. Our world is never going to look like that again and the and every year that goes by if you look at things that you know from from the past they're going to look more and more weird because that world is. Frankly now their styles are differently. They communicate differently. Everything's different. And so it's very very important for us to get this right in this epic time of change. I'm optimistic. I think the United States has gone through tough times before in the in the 30s. We almost elected Nazis and socialists to government in 1968. We had the assassination of two major leaders and you know civil rights turmoil and war and all kinds of things but we come out of it. So I you know, I look at it from an American centric approach because I'm American. I really hope that we come out of this, you know, I support Vivek Ramaswamy. I think that somebody like that could could you know, that's all it takes you elect him as president boom. It's all fixed. He doesn't have a chance. So he doesn't have a chance. I mean, I like the guy a lot too, but right now let's face it. Trump is going to be the candidate. The only way he's not as if they actually are able to you know, convict him as a felon and he can't run but otherwise, yeah, he's going to be the guy he's pulling away. So with that said it would he fix shit if he went back a second time is like are the gloves off like all right. I did this once you guys screwed me now. I'm taking y'all down. I think he might try. I wish he would have been more effective at doing it before, you know, he didn't really drain the swamp. He didn't even fire Fauci. You know, I'm not I support Trump if he gets the nomination but you know, I wish he would have done a better job of not firing Fauci in my opinion is inexcusable operation war speed was a failure. You know, he just didn't he just didn't didn't quite do it and I wouldn't care. Put it in when he was at .02% and now he's ahead of DeSantis out of nowhere and you know, it is early yet the history is littered, you know here up here in New Hampshire. We have the first in the nation primary and if you look at this time of year in previous primaries, the frontrunner is not a good place to be. You know, we have we have dozens of frontrunners, you know, John Edwards and Bob Dole and you know Mario Cuomo and all these people who were absolutely thought for sure to be the nominee Bill Clinton was in ninth place when he was in his primary and he ended up winning his primary so I wouldn't count out anything the world is a crazy place. You know Trump is older. There's any number of different things that could happen. I think it would be extremely unfortunate if they do stop him from running. They're already trying in a couple states. Some of the AGs are saying that they might take him off the ballot if that happens, then then all the more if they make it so he can't run. I think his supporters would go to vague and then I think we really really really would need him to win just to unite the country and avoid, you know, the unthinkable kind of kind of, you know total chaos. Yeah, so well, I tell I want to tell you this Bruce. I think that you know, I love the idea of the sentiment behind it, but it always comes back to this people going. Yeah vote harder. You can vote more and it'll be great and I'm like and that works out nicely until it seems to only happen in the key swing states where this stuff is so noticeable and these issues are popping up. You know, if you've watched 200 mules, you know that elections aren't ran fairly right now. So it's like how do we combat that? How do we realize that the money system in politics is are broken. There's so much corruption. How do we disrupt this? Well, it's good that you're talking about it. For one thing. A lot of people are afraid to say and it's unfortunate. It shouldn't even be a partisan issue. Everything so partisan now, but you know, the Democrats had valid concerns about voting machines and a whole bunch of other stuff six seven years ago and you know, then they switched their tune when it when it was to our advantage and that's unfortunate because there is problems. You know, I don't trust this this idea that you send out hundreds and hundreds of thousands of ballots by mail is just absurd. You know, you can't track the chain of command, you know chain of custody on those so balance has like some sort of numbering system that were tied to it and easily trackable blockchain can literally edit or it's anonymous but open source. There's got to be a way.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"If <Speech_Male> i'm one hundred percent <Speech_Male> honest i don't <Silence> think <Speech_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Silence> <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> <Speech_Male> We <Speech_Male> have to be realistic. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> Where we're <Speech_Male> a part of the us <Silence> because <Speech_Male> or <Speech_Male> strategic <Speech_Male> advantages <Speech_Male> that we give <Speech_Male> the us right <Silence> where <SpeakerChange> where <Speech_Male> it's <Silence> not because <Speech_Male> they <Speech_Male> like. What are we go. <Speech_Male> it's not <Speech_Male> because they <Silence> want help. Puerto rico <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> is because they <Speech_Male> gained things from puerto <Silence> rico <Speech_Male> pulled. I'd like <Speech_Male> to <Speech_Male> be a better system. <Speech_Male> Of course i <Speech_Male> would lie for <Speech_Male> puerto rico. <Speech_Male> Hopefully <Speech_Male> it will never happen <Speech_Music_Male> again <Speech_Male> but <Speech_Male> we have to be realistic. <Speech_Male> It's an island <Speech_Male> high-traffic <Speech_Male> regains. It could <Silence> happen anytime <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> assistant. Where <Speech_Male> the response is weaker <Speech_Male> <Silence> The <Speech_Male> the <Speech_Male> things that need to go <Speech_Male> to people that need <Silence> get there <Silence> <Speech_Music_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> and <Speech_Male> that we <Speech_Male> don't downplay <Speech_Male> the things <Silence> that go on the island <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> We we <Speech_Male> do need to talk about <Speech_Male> corruption. We <Speech_Male> do need to talk about <Speech_Music_Male> <Advertisement> how how <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> <Speech_Male> billions of <Silence> people <Speech_Male> get affected. <Speech_Male> Not <Speech_Male> even in puerto. Rico <Speech_Male> people from <Speech_Male> outside of puerto <Speech_Male> rico. Puerto ricans <Speech_Male> to leave. The island <Speech_Music_Male> are <Speech_Male> affected <Speech_Male> by things <Speech_Male> that happen in the island. <Speech_Male> <SpeakerChange> The people <Speech_Male> that live in puerto <Speech_Male> rico. <Silence> <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> And that's <Speech_Male> i think. <Speech_Male> I think <Speech_Male> that's what i hope <Speech_Male> that <Speech_Male> something gets <Silence> done about. <Speech_Male> Our <Speech_Male> our systems were <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> so we <Silence> don't forget about the people. <Speech_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> The change <Speech_Male> has to start <Speech_Male> within the island <Speech_Male> and <Speech_Male> we once <Silence> once <Speech_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> once we get rid of <Speech_Male> the <Speech_Male> poison <SpeakerChange> than <Speech_Male> we can start thinking <Speech_Male> about <Speech_Male> blowing <Speech_Male> worldwide <Speech_Male> and making <Speech_Male> people <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> realize the <Speech_Male> structures that are set <Speech_Male> for puerto rico. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> But we <Speech_Music_Male> i feel like we. We <Speech_Music_Male> have to <SpeakerChange> start. <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Music_Female> <Speech_Music_Female> This episode <Speech_Female> was extremely <Speech_Female> <Advertisement> personal and important <Speech_Music_Female> to me as a proud <Speech_Music_Female> puerto rican woman. <Speech_Music_Female> <Advertisement> And there's <Speech_Female> <Advertisement> so much that i want <Speech_Female> folks to really understand <Speech_Music_Female> about what's happening <Speech_Music_Female> with puerto rico <Speech_Female> and the relationship <Speech_Music_Female> that we have <Speech_Music_Female> with the united states <Speech_Music_Female> just how colonial <Speech_Music_Female> in structure <Speech_Music_Female> how <Speech_Music_Female> turn listrik it is <Speech_Music_Female> and how <Speech_Music_Female> it prevents <Speech_Music_Female> puerto ricans <Speech_Music_Female> from really having autonomy <Speech_Music_Female> <Speech_Music_Female> in a moment <Speech_Female> like <Speech_Female> what happened with hurricane <Speech_Music_Female> maria that ultimately <Speech_Music_Female> ends up <Speech_Music_Female> costing lives <Speech_Music_Female> because <Speech_Music_Female> of our dependence <Speech_Music_Female> on the united states. <Speech_Music_Female> We don't have access <Speech_Music_Female> to food the way <Speech_Female> that we would we had <Speech_Music_Female> that autonomy. <Speech_Music_Female> <Advertisement> We don't have access to <Speech_Music_Female> healthcare <Speech_Music_Female> and this isn't unique <Speech_Music_Female> to <Speech_Music_Female> trump <Speech_Music_Female> and it isn't unique <Speech_Music_Female> to a president. <Speech_Music_Female> It is has been <Speech_Music_Female> the relationship that we've <Speech_Music_Female> had since <Speech_Music_Female> the beginning <Speech_Music_Female> of puerto rico. <Speech_Music_Female> I really <Speech_Female> hope that folks take a <Speech_Female> moment to make a donation <Speech_Music_Female> to <Speech_Music_Female> world central kitchen <Speech_Female> to <Speech_Female> elementary <Speech_Female> local media and <Speech_Music_Female> to project <Speech_Music_Female> on mattia <Speech_Music_Female> for any of these links <Speech_Female> you could find them on our show <Speech_Music_Female> notes. Thank <Music> you so much for listening. <Speech_Music_Female> <Advertisement>
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"But you know it wasn't it wasn't was supposed to be. Yeah for sure. I mean it's called the politics of food because i get a neutral food but i can definitely tell you as on the being on the receiving end that me personally. I didn't see any efforts. I didn't we didn't receive any help A lot of the people that are really close to me didn't receive any help When fema went to bill assessments. They were offering various small amount of money to the people that lost their houses completely. So not even that was was sufficient. The the whole spectrum of that could have been done. We're not done or if they were done done in such a small scale that we couldn't even see it. Yeah i mean it was so it definitely seems like this was one of those cases where people just acknowledged. We got us where. Something's going to be solved here. We're the ones that are going to solve it. We're the ones that are going to take care of each other. We're the ones that are gonna create that system in the absence of the government creating a system. Yeah definitely people got together. It was the people of the municipalities. That was out cutting trees cleaning the roads clearing everything. Everything was the people of puerto. Rico the was some presence of military personnel. That we're doing some cleanups that that i can sell myself but in the immediate response was the people for the people the The came together in a way that i have never seen that island. Come together neighbors. That would talk to each other for years. Started talking again cherry again. Do you have ice. I have ice. I can give you is today. Will will. trade is for this order. Small things like that or if they had extra food. Hey we have extra food if you guys need it was. It was a beautiful thing to see in time of crisis because from experience i can tell you that disasters bringing either the best in people or the worst. There's absolutely no middle ground In end to see that the majority of people in puerto rico took the stance of. Let's help each other. Let's.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts and puerto rico. Because for folks who haven't been there obviously there's like centers town but a lot of people live in the mountains or an income. How did you. How did you get food to people that weren't that. Could come to you in places like san jose airport or wherever so We were working There was a lot of military presence in puerto rico and when they saw what we were doing there were like we have vehicles that will go through.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"First thing they told us is like we have to produce fifty thousand meals. And i was like uh-huh like what we're proposing fifteen thousand meals but i mean for for for context. How many meals does a restaurant usually prepare in a day. A really be restaurant could could do for five hundred. It depends on how big the scale of the restaurant is if it's a fast food or were not In a fast food you can get up to a day. So this is fifteen thousand fifteen thousand. And we're talking about hefty portions We're talking about four or five ounces of rice so we're talking about three four ounces of vegetable and six houses approaching that's almost upon food per person and as chef was like that's that's not possible And then what they told the was that recently you guys are here to figure it out okay. And it was that collaboration from a lot of chefs putting their heads together like thinking as a collective of mixing techniques to see how we could do fifteen thousand meals because not a single person that worked there not even in a buffet. Line of a really busy casino. You go that high to. How'd you figure it out. We started mixing techniques We started doing what made more sense. stu we started doing bowed. We saw a ready saw Which is a tomato base loads of veggies slow coat meats and than the rice. We would cook it in the oven We had a lot of ovens. We could turn the rice. Pretty quickly End the way. Jose datta's held to build the trace their aluminum. Six inch Six six inch aluminum pans and it fits forty georgians each trae waits around thirty five pounds So we have to make sure that the right quantity of food wanting to each pan so we will layer the rice on the bottom and then put the stool with all the veggies veggies on top And that's how we got rolling on the beginning mom the next day when we came in. He was like okay yesterday with their fifteen. Were doing today. And we're like we just figured out how to do than a lot of big. Papa started being set off upstairs That was a big help. Defense are super versatile. You can do absolutely anything you can imagine you can do pasta. You can do reis Protein and that was a really nice addition to the whole way. We were working So if i was doing one thing on the top Providing meals for people that were walking in doing individual servings delaying family trays and then inside the kitchen on the bottom. We were doing all delivery. Stuff we had a fleet of food trucks. That couldn't do anything that were not working so they joined wick in for for deliveries and they will take the food in front of people stores. That's how we made sure that people were getting their food go. We can end.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Which is what the military use uses when they're deploy its food that has being dried or dehydrated or polarized. You'll make a very shelf stable to last a really long time for the most part it's very tasteless doesn't have a lot. It does cover some of the nutritional value that some people really need not the malls appetizing or tasty thing that you have and then some days. We got like pasta that you add water than inside the pouch. There's heating agent that when you shake it up chemically and heats up the bag and it makes the food somewhat hot. It was not. It was if that's not a hot meal that's does not come through that survival and people didn't wanna feel like they were surviving. People want it to feel that they they had something they had comfort. Yeah for sure I mean for watching it. From where i because i was in new york at the time it did feel really helpless like there was so much to be done and i couldn't do anything from here in the first time that i felt like okay. Some stepping in. Someone's taking care of my people. They're being fed there. Being taken care of real was when i started to see world central kitchen come in About how long after the hurricane did world did world central kitchen set up shop on the island. And when did you join. The operation will say they're pretty quickly. He got one of the first commercial. Flights that game to puerto rico And then he went to visit His good Chef hans And set up shop inside the restaurant. The the restaurant roof was destroyed so they were doing some culture pots On the outside of the restaurant he started doing like thousand meals for the first week And he said. I'm going to the whole island. That's the he kept saying that throughout the whole week when the whole island gonna feed the whole island after week one day. God inside the that had a lot of equipment a lot of space. And that's when it really took off. That's when i joined. I joined two days after they moved into the coliseum and the.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"It was. It was a process it was. It was whatever little stores were able to open. I was very lucky that very close. To my mom's there was a one store that was very damage in the side of their warehouse was not so what they did. Is they set up a section outside under tents and they will lead people to be bought a time So if you wanted to buy food you could only buy certain amount. It was a very high limit of three cans of this to cancel. Dad does many pounds of rice or person so everybody could get some Any was a whole thing. You have to drive the night before they they opened the store encamped in your car or walk there in camp literally camp we able to get some food We went with ken. Chicken the ns hostages potted meats. And with my background. I managed to do different things with the same items so on my family. Wasn't that tired of eating the same thing over and over. I do have some friends that were not so lucky to have someone a chef and they were like i'm so sick of kinship or also of vegan days and by Started we were able to take some of the food with us and distributed across our neighborhoods and it was a every single time you drive back. Tables were set up outside and people were coming in eating together and that gave us a lot of normalcy. Gave us a sunset. Things are gonna be okay. There's people looking out for us but being on the receiving end of we can find food. It's a very lucky on my my life. We have always had food on the table. My mom is really hard working women. She always provided But going through that for two three months it was it was intense. It was really what was the. What was the government doing in this time. And how are they trying to help. People be fed so specifically where. I'm from day just drove by once every two weeks and drop some water Some canned food and rice and cookies. I think the cookies were the hot commodity. Everything else was like why There were giving out imerese and you saw people stockpiled emory's because they they couldn't anymore like after a month every single day trying to eat maurice borderline dehumanizing. Emory's egmore us our.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Thank you for talking with me today on a handle seen on thank you for having me. Thank you for being here. So you and i are from the island with the rico. You grew up by demo. Was it like growing up by among nh was the food culture for you growing up. I grew up in a food scene. That was a lot of sonko every sunday. You go out in the morning and get some am bananas bananas papa So a lot of fried food and coming from by among which is the municipality of edgy. Children were you. We had a lot of that. And i mean i know that it's part of our culture to have a big food seen within our family that that's a lot of our cultural revolves around being with family and eating with family and it's even when you're poor you sort of like express your riches through food. Is that how you grew up as well. You're definitely Ma my mama Is a nurse by trade. So growing up she worked alongside chrissy hours so i spent a lot of time with my grandma and all that kameda from away is the best thing. Does it matter Where there from The best food So so yeah. My grandma used to make a lot of big pots of homemade between us which is being but she will get the beans on cooked dry and gold through a two-day process to make them and you could see how much effort she puts into that In the flavor. I can replicate it an. Ibm being trying to learn it for years. Now she says. I need to pass this legacy so you better get to alert quick and and yeah she would feed the neighbors. The neighbors kids joe her front door open a so people could just walking whatever and just sit on the table so it was. It was a very dynamic Show that i grew up with specifically in my grandma's house. Yeah i miss that so much when when we moved to the united states i didn't have that access to the big family at the table. what were you. What were you working on. Before the hurricane came through puerto rico and so when the hurricane came through puerto rico. I was going through So medical stuff was away.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Equipment needed to start a commercially licensed product making kitchen That will also serve as a place for farmers and food producers And food workers to really turn perishable harvest into nonperishable value added products which also has to do with hurricanes. What can we do I don't like to call the mainland. A hey calling that from over here. From where i am to help support those growing ecosystems that that will provide food sovereignty on the island so i think that you know. Everything is a back and forth on negotiations so to speak. I think it is important. Thi- you know. Decolonization through food is something that's happening throughout the world and You know occurrences even like the hurricanes. Yeah two seventeen. It happened in puerto rico but you know if we look at the fires in california and you know all of the climate occurrences and the increased effects of climate change around the world especially for frontline communities It's happening everywhere. And so i think like one thing is wherever you are. Get to know what that place is going through and connect with your community not only in moments of need but in moments where you have a little bit extra time and energy to really do that work So you know it's not we. I don't think that it's all about like okay. How can we support. Puerto ricans or puerto rico per se. Even if we are Puerto rican from the earliest with a. I think there is something really important about localizing yourself because the colonisation and just food sovereignty in general looks different depending on where you live and where you are and one of the major components of that is you know out donna. Mia a out with than bob alita autonomy and self sustainability. So what that means is. We're part of the goal is to be able to sustain ourselves and not have to depend so much on outside support and that could mean mind. Badio wants to support itself and so it's about us supporting ourselves And so i just wanna bring that forth because right now there are a lot of communities around the world that are in need of a little bit of support and i think as long as that support an obstruction to self determination You know and they also has an exit strategy I think that's really important to think about i think also it's a very important For body quals and other people that are conscious about our colonial relationship with the united states to just bring that subject up. Because we're at the point where a lot of people in the us don't even know you as history. A lot of people in the us don't know what the jones act is a lot of people in the us. Don't even know the us relationship with puerto rico and vice versa. And so i think just bringing that subject up right is really important For supporting whatever projects are happening on the island That are focused on. You know Self-determination because the more you now the better decision making right on the better conversations on this is not about like a few people getting it and then moving forward ride. This is about like the more people get it the easier. It is for all of us to actually free ourselves. Thank you for calling into account. Hear your story. Hi this is marie from northport. And i feel that we can support puerto rico by providing aid to those who are living in and to also held puerto rico by helping them rebuild their tourism industry which has been hugely impacted by the hurricanes.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Know this situation. Before the hurricane eighty five percent of the food is being imported. The food that is being imported cost one point one point five times. What what we pay here on the mainland. We have to rely on. Us naval ships in order for that food to get to as and then the hurricane hit. It was a five Category five hurricane that basically went through the middle of the island absolutely decimated like everything It was it was really startling to look at and and witness. I can't imagine what it was like when it was on that when you were there in in person on the island and what that ended up doing to the food system not just in the days after but in the months in the years after can you. Can you describe what that was like immediately. After i know that for us one of the things that became really apparent was the government was not here to save us. They were not gonna fix this. Yeah and i guess just to reiterate that that is part of the colonial experience Beyond hurricane maria. There's something that happens almost every day where we say the government is not here to save us and the government doesn't serve us In many ways. And so. I think that it was definitely a moment of realizing that the power does lie in our own communities right and that starts with my own home that starts with my neighbors starts with my family and and then you start to realize like do i know people that are growing. My you know the food that i eating and by think a lot of people after hurricane maria just zoomed into you know i need to grow my own food and now ovid that just increased even further and with a lot of help from a lot of people that have had to leave the islands You know a lot of them floors migration that are part of the diaspora really supporting right that.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Food inherently is is tied to either capitalism or colonization And you know everything that that brings And so it's just something that yeah one night when nice think about you know how is food so political in the context of puerto rico than i also you know think about the effects of all the different pieces of our food system for example you mentioned the jones act The jones act is something that exists. Not only for puerto rico for all of the united states right and so it includes other port cities but in our case It really prohibits our interaction with other island nations. Because we're technically under you us and you know jamaica isn't Dominican republic isn't guba isn't haiti isn't and you know central south america and so one of the quickest observations with the jones act is it has completely separated us from other island nations writing. Had those are our neighbors. Not only are they our neighbors We share a culture historically and so that also you know has broken that culture that we share brothers and sisters of the caribbean Also the jones act is something that really obligates all of our ports. Be it in the. Us hawaii puerto rico in the colonies to go through us owned and operated A naval marines ship systems. And you know as we may now a you know that's the most expensive fleet in the world and one of the most obsolete ones as well so it just increases the price of food For places like thirty go where not only do things take longer to here. When they're imported it costs around like one point five times more than it would right elsewhere. i added to that ship stuff. You need to think that the average amount of time that it takes Let's say from the closest port being jacksonville florida Is fourteen days so food takes from seven days ten days. Fourteen days depending right on the route. If it's coming from california needs to get on a truck across the united states get to jacksonville and from there get on a boat. Come to puerto rico. Stop on dog. get into a warehouse. Been be distributed. And that's just a really long time when you think about something that is meant to nourish people right And so when you follow all of that trajectory you start to also think about well who grew this food right. The farther we are from the source of food were also farther away from those people that grew that food and so we don't know if they're paid fairly if they're treated fairly we don't know who they are. We don't know where that food was. Farmed was farmed it. In a way that is detrimental to the environment where it's being farmed or is it actually. Supportive of ecosystems there and so that distance also increases the distance of a lot of factors that have to do with human rights social justice ecosystem Health and then. Also you think about human health you know Food is living and so everything that we eat is a living thing. The farther away from the moment it was harvested to the time that we consume it the less nourishment it gives us right. So if i pick an apple or in my case if i take yada Out of the tree. The ideal moment is to eat it immediately so that i can actually get as many nutrients as possible and so when food travels all of those nutrients go down. The taste goes down and those are things you know. We've little by little started just thinking about more and how we can support be opposite of that right and that just means that we need to grow food here.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Can remember and probably if i had that moment to do over again i would've. I would've had a one on one conversation like face to face conversation with her and wanted to hear like why she thought that those people should be her friend. Like i when i think i would have wanted to hear more but i was so angry and so hot that you could call me one of your best friends and your other best friend is puerto rican right and and this is who you have decided to to to bring into your life while we're off at college like it just didn't it didn't make sense right and in that situation it's also like betrayal of bringing you into space. That isn't safe for you. Exactly as a black woman lake you compl- you threw me to the wolves. Yes yeah and and honestly that is so right because it was and that that is another thing. You just made me really. It was incredibly unsafe right. Like these are two big white guys. And she's like this petite white woman and here's me and this and they're drunk and like this is a conversation that they're having thinking that we're not paying attention or or at least i'm not paying attention and that could have gone completely and totally left. Do you know what i'm saying. So yeah was yeah yeah. Why do you think it's so difficult for folks to have these these conversations about politics specifically around white supremacy when they're having dinner with their families. I think it's because people don't want to face their own Their own discrimination their own values the thing is. Is that when you hold up a mirror. You have to look at it and what i have realized is that people choose to look away right. They choose to look away because they don't want then have to do the work of of relearning the truth right. They don't want to be challenged. they don't want to change. Change is hard right. It's why every year january rolls around and people have all these resolutions about how they don't change and then in february they're back to the same life that they had you know before the calendar chain because change is hard And so and you have to. You have to challenge yourself to unlearn a lot. America has based our education system in lies. Columbus discovered america. No the hell he did not right like oh the pilgrims and the native americans they got along no they came here murdered them slaughtered them rape them and then put them on small patches of land and took away every bit of funding. You know it just like lie after lie after lie after lie and so you have to unlearn a lot that takes work. And so if you're not y if you're not willing to put in that work it's just easier to ignore it and i think that that's why people don't wanna engage in the conversation because.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"What what what is the benefit. They're yeah and what are you. What are you losing in. What are you reading your tongue. And what are you gaining biting your tongue and ultimately like. Maybe you're gaining something within your family but you're also like not showing up as fully human and you're not allowing anybody else to be showing up as you'll human. These are like surface relationships at best. You're like maintaining surface relationships for the sake of uphold upholding white supremacy for the sake of maintaining kind of surface relationships. And that's that is very frustrating. But i you know it is. That first step is always the hardest. How as there have been a situation where you've been in with your own family with your own loved ones where you're like all right. I'm take the plunge. I'm going to have this conversation. I'm a figure out how to have this conversation in a constructive way. And if so how did she do that. Yeah so i mean. I will say that And i've talked about this on on many shows and i've written about it because my the hardest conversation that i ever had to have with my family is when i came out right And i came out a hundred years ago But it was very difficult conversation to have with my parents than to have with my aunts and uncles also to have with my grandparents at the time that they were still alive And you know how i did. It is that first of all because a lot of lgbt forty percent of homeless youth on the street are lgbtq and so it is a very real situation for lgbt. youth that when they do come out that they are they lose housing. They lose financial security and stability. I never thought that that would happen right to me and my family but i also wanted to make sure that i was at an age and a space. Where if they did Pull the plug. That i was going to be financially stable. But you know i sat down and had a conversations separately with my mom and my dad because i didn't want to be ganged up on And came out to each of them And you know the the for me. It was that i loved them so much but i also love myself and i wanna be able to live a truly authentic life. That is out loud and on purpose. And i can't do that without them knowing who i am. I can't step fully into myself without wanting to at least give them an opportunity to be on this journey with me and so for me. It was about coming to a place of being secure within myself. That i was ready for whatever kind of backlash whatever kind of questioning would come up that i had the tools and the ability to answer them and i so. I think that that's important for people to have right like if you're going to go into what you could see is going to be a precarious situation. Make sure that you have the tools that you know that you are ready right because because but at the end of the day for me it was totally worth it right leg. My parents were upset for all of a week and really their level of a of grief was really around the fact that my mother had said you're already black and a woman. What else do you want against you. She was more fearful for me. About how the world how i was going to be able to excel in the world. Will my child have a happy and whole life given everything that i know about america where i that was. It was really about their fear more so than the fact that their daughter was a lesbian So i i think that people really need to be very steadfast and who they are. Various authentic to who they are very connected to who they are before they find themselves on a journey in bringing other people into into awareness right into consciousness. Yeah and these conversations that you know there were that were asking folks to have at the table with their loved ones. They loved one runs the gamut. There are some of those people that are all the way to the right. The insurrectionist types of folks. Then there's degrees of white supremacy and bigotry am flee. It's important that we address all versions of it not just the versions. But i especially after last wednesday. I've been asking myself hen. People like that be brought back from the bring. Can people like that is there. Is there a situation where we can have conversations with folks like that who are all the way over there with them sort of away from that hatred. I asked a friend of mine. And he said that it like he thinks it's possible and there's There's that part of me. In the i brought it up to him from the perspective. Because i i am an abolitionist. And i believe fervently in this but in that moment i'm like i'm not supposed to be abolitionist right now. Like fuck them all. How do we apply that same mindset of punishment is never the answer. We still want to have some accountability but we also want to believe that no one is past the point of redemption. How do we. How do we apply that in this situation. And how do we start. Chipping away at that work. You know your friend is a lot more hopeful than i am because i feel like america is so broken in so many ways and my feeling is that if we do not have accountability for the actions that have taken place. Then we're never going to be able to move forward. We can't have conversations About reconciliation before we have conversations about responsibility and accountability. And so i know that folks like after they see you witness the trauma that we all collectively experienced on one six. There's this rush to want to you. Know want to heal. But you've got to recognize what's broken before you do that. Right you have to recognize what got you there right. What got you to that to that sunk in place and so for me. It's like do. I think those people are can be redeemed. I don't think so. Honestly you know we live in a country where we we engage more people in our prison industrial complex than any other modern democracy in the world right and we want to talk about redemption so i e but we lock people up on a regular basis so again. i just feel like if we don't have accountability if we don't take responsibility if responsibility is not doled out My fear is that what happened on one six is going to become the norm And because there's going to be constantly like all of us. There were thousands of people that took over the capital thousands. It wasn't alone. Wolf wasn't a small group thousands and so until we have those people take responsibility and accountability for their actions. I really don't know how we heal. Yeah but let's say let's say your family member didn't necessarily participate. But they're they're saying some some wild shit they're like i see their point and let's say they you know how do you. How do you move that person away and listening to you. And this is part of what i've sort of been having in my brain because you mentioned i love myself. I feel like in these sort of situations. The opposite of the hate that we're seeing the opposite of of the racism and the white supremacy. What how we combat how we start to combat that is from a place of love I'm not necessarily saying like show them. A compassionate is underserved or show them a compassion in lieu of accountability. But i do think that there is something there like. That's that is the place where we start from. So if we're to start from a place of love.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Re tweet hard. I said that's exactly right. This has nothing to do with us. Let them let them go ahead. Don't you know let us stay at home. Stay safe like doing what it is that we're doing but i think that Where we are is white. People need to continually challenge. Other white people and black people need to be able to take a step back from this heavy lifting. I mean if you call yourself an ally and you're sitting at the table with your father. Your uncle your brother your cousin. Whoever who is saying racist things and you say nothing. You're not an ally right. You can't like just put your sword down Ever you want and you know it's not you who ruined thanksgiving dinner because you challenged your trump loving racist on his ridiculous views. It's your uncle who ruined it by being racist and saying those things so he gets to speak and you don't. I mean that's what he should make racist freight afraid again. He should be afraid to say what he thinks. I mean like i had. I had a moment like that. Because on my other side of my family i have an uncle who liked who likes trump and i have a cousin who super liberal lee way to the left of be and my uncle said something pro trump. And he's not. He's intelligent but he's not terribly well. Read and my cousin. And i are very politically aware. And we basically started talking past him and it definitely upset him An upset the room and like people were very upset at like. We were assertive disrespecting him to his face But like. I didn't really care should've kept your mouth shut. You should be afraid to say your position on trump. because like it's ridiculous. I mean my god especially after what happened on one six. If you can't abandon him. After that i can't help. You can't help you today. You you have to go now. I do but Can i can come back and join your another day. All right so theresa's out but we'll be back with daniel after the break stay tuned. Thank you for calling the story. Tell name is robert. I'm calling from new jersey. I'm calling to answer the question about politics at the table. Was there a time when you engaged in a constructive conversation about politics with someone who opposed your viewpoint. And how did you engage peacefully. I grew up during the bush administration. Needed george w bush administration and there were a lot of things i disagreed with to say the least and there were members of my family who did not disagree as much or as a behemoth with the things going on. At that time. I tried to approach things with facts All the information that i had just you know number information rather than how i felt about the issue or how they felt about the issue. I tried my best to listen respectfully to what they had to say. Then if the facts didn't agree with what they had to say I waited my turn and then did my best to respond by saying i. I appreciate your perspective. A here is what. I know about the issue based on what i've read it didn't always work. It didn't always change the other person. Mind but it was a wait to certainly engage peacefully with someone who opposed my viewpoint without basically have to flip the table over and admittedly. That was something that i had to learn over time. So that's my two cents. I'm deniau moody. I'm sure to check out democracy ash where we discussed the current state of the political climate and our country from a black perspective naming the last white police officer that murdered somebody. That was convicted. Maybe the last time that officer was trying to defend himself against video that showed him strangling someone for eight and a half minutes. You can find democracy on apple podcasts. Google podcasts or ever you stream your podcasts. Welcome back to politics of food. So the thing that that is always frustrating for me that i'm trying to impress upon white folks is that is more important to undo white supremacy than maintain good ties to their family and and i think that that's a hurdle that a lot of white folks can't get past that they want to keep the peace in their family. They wanna make sure that their family feels loved by them Maintaining that dynamic is more important than than than undoing white supremacy and. I want folks to really understand that in being quiet. In that moment you are acquiescing to white supremacy. You're saying i'm okay with that. That is maintaining white. Supremacy is warm important than me. Maintaining a disturbing the peace in my family had like how do we i know. That's not our role but like how do we break these cycles. And how do we tell them. It's okay is gonna be okay for you to like disturbed the peace process. How do we get them past that fear. Because i know that for me there was there was fear and in confronting my family. You know. I think that what folks have to ask themselves is what kind of relationships do they want right. Do they want relationships that are predicated on fallacy or do they want relationships that are based in something that is real and so if if the idea here is that you know i just wanna have family ties to have family ties so that when the holidays roll around i have some place to go As opposed to. I want to be in relationship with these people right like regardless below the title of mom or dad or grandma or grandpa like i actually want to be in relationship than though that relationships are about conversation and sometimes from those conversation come conflict But i think that where it starts is asking yourself. What kind of relationships do i really want. You know. I'm a black queer woman right. There's a part of my family that is pentecostal. And you know and so one would say well. Okay well when the holidays roll around. Do you put your gayness on a shelf. No i do not right like no i do. Not because it is who i am. My politics are very clear. Who i am as a person is very clear. And why do i show up in that authentic way. Because i if i'm going to be in relationship. I want the relationships to be based in something not based in me hiding not based in me just ignoring the fact that they participate in organized religion. That condemns me as an entire person and being on. I think that it is important right if we're going to ever make inroads if we're ever going to get to a place where there is some type of real connectivity real community building than it has to be based in something that's real right and and there are sacrifices to be made in that goes back to my earlier point where it's like you know. People need to get comfortable being uncomfortable in. I don't want anybody. I don't want any young kids who are not financially stable to be thrown out of their home because if their beliefs right or because of you know how they show up but if you're a grown ass adult like why are you biting your tongue right like you know.
Politics of Food
"politics of" Discussed on Politics of Food
"Welcome to politics of food. I'm your host cristina gonzales on this show. We explore the political economic and social implications of food creation and consumption sauce locally and worldwide. What does the food we eat. Say about our society and ourselves. Let's dig in and find out. Hey there this is politics food. And i'm your host cristina gonzales as kids. A lot of us are taught that it's bad manners to engage in thoughtful political discourse over a meal that anything beyond the age old question. How was your day is too deep and too personal for the table. Today we get to the root of this taboo is it based on a fear of causing an argument or even a food fight or is it considered impolite to use the dinner table as a platform for expressing your opinions. Maybe the problem is that we don't know how to have difficult conversations in a constructive way. I thought the perfect people to talk about this with our teret and daniel moody co host of the political podcast democracy. Ish the are two people admire for being loud and proud and unapologetic with their beliefs. I've had strong opinions would lend well today's topic politics at the table. Let's dig in. I wanted to know. Did either of you grow up talking about politics. At the table. I grew up in new england and part of what we looked up to was the kennedy family and the whole thing was that they had grown up talking about politics at the dinner table. That was always the sort of mythology of young john. John f. kennedy and teddy kennedy and robert kennedy and so there was never a thought about not talking about politics. We'd talk about whatever we thought. So you know. I definitely remember my nuclear family or if if there was a mixed group you know. Outsiders they're talk about whatever. Talk about ronald reagan. We talk about police. You talk about war. We talk about. You know whatever's going on I certainly would never want to hold my tongue because somebody else might like. Oh i didn't like what you said like come on legless talk about real stuff. We're talking about food type real stuff like let's dig into it. Yeah what about you. Daniel san similar. I grew up on long island. My family are immigrants from jamaica. And so following us politics and jamaican politics was always a part of our conversation of our dinner table My family becoming citizens of this country was a very big deal and so it was never a deterrent. It was always like this is where you should have these conversations and maybe if we had more conversations about politics and religion Around food and around the table we wouldn't have arrived the point in our politics where we are right now It's through conversation discussion that we get to understand where people are coming from that we can find points of collaboration points of you know sameness and i think that that happens around food so i i always thought as a kid when i heard my friends. Say like oh. We're not going talk about that at the table. I always thought that that was completely ridiculous. Yeah absolutely and i think for me. It became really apparent. Point of privilege that was to meet to not have to talk about politics at the table for my mom to just remove that conversation. I like even though i am a woman of color and i'm you know we're puerto rican. Mama was a single mom. Were passing So for her to decide for us. That's not something that we needed to discuss that. That wasn't something that needed to be part of our everyday lives that that was obviously a point of of high privilege that i've hopefully since tried to work through and work around like work my way out of i mean i don't want to give folks who hold abhorrent views a pass like we come together to eat and you know we're going to not talk about politics. We don't wanna make you uncomfortable if you believe that trump should be president or you believe that. Racism isn't real. Or what have you. We should talk about that and you should feel uncomfortable. Because you're a user trash. Ito i remember in the primary. We went out to dinner my mom and my we call them. Play uncle Who i've known forever. And i was like you know so. You ready to vote for hillary. His older the senior citizen gay married black massachusetts ready for hillary and my mom was no and before i finish the sentence he was like. I'm voting for trump. And i was like you've gotta be fucking kidding me and gay and from new england. I'm just so confused massachusetts thanks. What was his reasoning for that. And how do you in that sort of situation where you feel like this is going to be someone that's going to be on my side how to use sort of either talk them out of it or like figure that out in a way that doesn't like even if it's a little contentious. How do you still do that with being like keeping in mind that this is a person that you might love. I hope maybe not. I mean i definitely have love for him because he's been there Especially for my parents You know when they needed him and they needed a favor you know. He's the kind of person who when you're when you're miami. My parents live in the same house that i was born in. But like he's the kind of person like if you are moving you could call him. If you are needed a ride home from the airport. You could call him. And those are like family jobs right. Most you'll be like you're moving. I'm busy That's not those sort of things and he's there for them. You can't convince people who are on the other side especially on the trump side especially in the era of facebook. When they're getting crazy information. But i it was it was in the primary so he was one of the first black trumpers i had ever encountered and i was kinda shocked and i almost anthropologically. I wanted to talk him through his position of how he got there. And he was really fixated on immigration. And i'm like but we're in massachusetts aspel storming boston exactly and he was like they're streaming across the border and i'm like they're not we. I have actual facts. They are not streaming across the border immigration at a net negative has been for many years. But and then he was fixated on. I've done my part. There was some immigrant family that he'd been really nice to he'd helped and he was like that's enough of us giving immigrants and then there was some comment about You know he just when. I started injecting facts into the conversation he shifted to. We used to have officer friendly on the beat. And if you were a bad kid he would take you in the alley and whoop you upside the head and problem solved. And i'm like what the fuck. I'm pretty sure what you just described as police brutality. Right there was nothing friendly at all. It would actually maybe. The notion of child abuse solving the problem is completely anna. Kristich and archaic but those were his sort of notions which trump would echo that we need is violence to get you know and strength to create law and order. We need is more police. What we need is believed to be stronger will be is to close down immigrants. So you know he was already sort of following that trump line in a really specific way. i mean you know i i just tried to counter it with facts and.
JO Radio Live
"politics of" Discussed on JO Radio Live
"Off our website right any description baluchi podcast website. And the when you when you get onto the website get screwed onto. The bottom of the website can see contact information email address. What's up number four number sue. You can connect with us however you choose our and remember at the top on the website there is doing. It wasn't if you wish to support jurado on remember when you do need you. Not only support injury-depleted feeding need or a nonprofit organization you'll also have access on our website to our twenty four seven drew radio radio station right on there. You'll see chris. Matic connects our susha network. You know if you want something new and fresh on different rate saying it's absolutely free and on right get interactive on a social network right one also encourage and remind you right on let you produce. We knew about reverend jennifer macgregor's book. Women are carriers of greatness. You'll also find out on our website. Just scroll down. You'll see it. Women are carriers of greatness by reverend jennifer mcgregor right The linkages link is right there. It's the powerful life-changing book that i advise anybody to get not just women. Anybody all right. Just click the link and it will take you straight days available on amazon and you can click the link and get more information and you knew pooches right from our website right there all right so we are going to get into today's episode which is entitled politics and corruption. Yeah it's a bit different from a lot of the episodes that have done before. An quite frankly i had put it on the back. Buna you know. But then i came across an article that you know sorta sparked a flame on the inside patine into this subject right so once again. Title of this episode is politics and corruption are no when we when we when we vote someone in when election time comes on. We vote someone into poa in the office to represent us center. Look for us. This is what we expect. We expect that our mp's or representatives. This is what they are going to do. They're going to look for the people that put them in office. That put them in position. Impulse that put them To handle and the finances of the country all right on what we have found for years and decades is that ninety nine percent of the time athletes athletes dot is not what happens right because what we have is we have different different governments coming into port on doing basically the same thing what he seemed. Nonsense right The only difference is that some may be used on some but generally most of them do the same thing where there's always the issue of corruption every every government. No i'm not. Seeing the entire government may not be corrupt but there are a lotta individuals in particular governments that come into power that are aright and people are really sick and tired of fourteen people into power and just get screwed over so to speak by the same people that stay in your finger for right by the same people that stand your finger for. There are some basic simple things that that that should be. You should be me. Law in should be legalized right. Basic simple things. that should be legalized. What are not right. I'm you knew the these politicians so much education bachelors and was source said degrees. And you're on all these different things and some of them are even lawyers and stuff like that right and when you look at somebody things that they feel to implement that should be implemented in really really makes you wonder how serious these people about the social issues of all the issues that are affecting you. The the normal man the average amount you knew the grown you right because already challenges that we on the ground level fees these people in position. They are exempt from certain things. A lotta expenses that we have didn't have as much or in some cases the seem expenses because the the exemption from from sitting things on tax breaks and reductions on in different right. So you know just recently. I was looking tom. Good deeds by tyler. Perry on in a certain part of the of the of the movie. The lead the genital for those of you familiar with you would have seen it right The janitor us. Tim right because of garden. No he is the he was the head of the company. He was divorced right Huge company. You would just so. He did no because really and truly he. He don't do that he would have. Whoever you're making threes on. So he he had to. If i remember correctly. I think he asked somebody i think. He asked somebody because of a gallon of milk and the next week. I believe it was when when wendy wendy met. He told up on her response right. Her response was the object of the question was not for him to somebody but for him to see for himself not necessarily uh somebody get the final and so a lot of times. These people are not in touch right. A lotta times politicians these individuals in pole. The decision makers are not in touch with the normal man with challenges of the normal manner. You know what i mean and they may come on. Tv and they may sympathize when when when susan traumatic things mood credit types are crime etc etc but we really can't relate a lot of retired a lottery times right because they are not in similar situations. Norman the not in similar situations you have to deal with public transport and headaches and challenges of of of of public transport commute into from because they have the vehicles they have the drivers right. They have bodyguards. They have twenty four seven security detail so they they not affected for example. Hot topic all over. He will crime. They are not as affected by crime as the normal man because they have alarm systems they have twenty four seven security detail you on all these things right everywhere they go you know. They have their security right. The normal mine doesn't have that the average amount doesn't have that even diploma does not have them. And so you have these a lot. A lot of these politicians were not in touch with these things so they can did decant.