2 Burst results for "Perkins Coy Law Firm"
"perkins coie law firm" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast
"Last. Elon Musk is causing a huge stir because of what he's doing at Twitter. And one of the things he's doing is the Twitter cleanup. And the Twitter cleanup as it turns out goes much deeper than we. And perhaps even than Elon Musk's suspected. He started out by booting out pyro, agarwal, the CEO of Twitter. And also vijaya gade to Asian Indians, by the way, she was the chief legal officer. They were clearly part of the problem. But at the beginning, Elon Musk seemed to think that Jack, Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter, was a good guy. In fact, at one point, Elon Musk tweeted out Jack has a pure heart. And then Elon didn't dig deeper into Twitter, at least not initially. But when he released the original Twitter files, and these were the files about the Hunter Biden suppression, the suppression of the laptop, the suppression of the Biden crime racket, the effort to protect Biden before the election and even to some degree after the election. Elon Musk realized is astonishment that these Twitter files had been handed over to a guy who's been at Twitter, his name is James baker, he's formerly an FBI guy, and what James baker was doing was altering these files apparently in order to protect the FBI. So even the information being released in a kind of full disclosure to the public was being itself edited. By James baker. And so Elon Musk steps in fires James baker and excellent move. By the way, he needs to go ahead and fire the Perkins coie law firm, which was hired under the old regime to represent Twitter. So Musk has realizing that you have to clean this place up. It is rat infested and the rats are a kind of everywhere. Obviously the firing of a whole bunch of Twitter employees, a very good thing, not only because of the people, the bad guys who leave, but the bad guys who remain get the message that they could be, they could be next. Now, the latest thing, Twitter files number two, being released initially by Barry Weiss, a journalist, and I think also Matt Tai Bibi, who's going to pick it up with kind of Twitter files number three, revealing a systematic pattern of suppression of shadow banning of restriction of figures, prominent figures on the right. I'm just waiting to see my own name on the list, but so far, Barry Weiss was disclosed that Charlie Kirk, Dan bongino, the Stanford professor, Jay, about acharya, these are guys who had been flagged for to have their reach reduced. Now think about this. You've got these Twitter guys, and these guys are basically, you know, little tyrants, little nerds, and who are they banning, they're banning, they're trying to protect the public from so called COVID misinformation, and they're banning a Professor of medicine and health policy at Stanford University. What do they know that he doesn't know about the subject? Isn't he the expert instead of them? And yet they're acting like, no, no, no, we are the real experts and we're gonna save the public from the malign influence of Jay, but a chariot. This is just downright absurd. And then as you go through the names of the people being shadowed by you realize there's not a single Democrat that's not a single leftist who is getting this kind of treatment and guess what Jack Dorsey is in on it. He is perhaps not the initiator. He's not the prime driver.
"perkins coie law firm" Discussed on 77WABC Radio
"By Jordan Boyd, and this is why she's appointed the 7 reprobates from her own party and two from the Republican Party to this committee. Again, if there were some kind of balance on this committee, somebody would have been asking about this. What is the purpose of this committee? Why aren't we focused on this? We're going to get into the Republican Party and we're going to get into Donald Trump and his quote unquote role. How come we're not looking to Russia collusion at Hillary Clinton and her role? How come we're not looking in the market Elias in the Perkins coie law firm and other Democrats, the law firms that suit all over the country to change the rules to help Biden. How come we're not, how come we're not interviewing under oath? Mark Zuckerberg in the $417 million that he spent to influence the election of this. There's no question. How come we're not interviewing the Supreme Court Justices? Those elected. In Pennsylvania, to talk to them about how they violated the federal constitution. That's what a real hearing would look like, ladies and gentlemen. But no, no, no, it's Trump and the Republicans. Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, shoulders much of the blame for the security breakdown at the U.S. capitol on January 6th, 2021. A preliminary report from Republican investigator representatives jib banks and Rodney Davis determined. The capitol police were half staffed on January 6th, Pelosi's house sergeant at arms denied multiple requests for National Guard assistance from The Pentagon. And the capitol police chief in the days leading up the January 6th, officers were poorly equipped and had insufficient ride shields and helmets. They were trained and they were never trained to handle a ride even after the riots of 2020. The investigation shows now the Republicans full report now why is it just Republicans? Because the Democrats wouldn't do it. The Republicans full report is not slated to be released for a few weeks. But banks and Davis said the hyper partisan January 6th committee's attempt. To present a slanted viewpoint, as if it were impartial fact prompted them to release their findings that will help Americans understand the extent of the committees misrepresentations. And omissions. He said the committee is lied and made numerous unsupported and disputed claims that have been thoughtlessly parroted by their media and fact checking allies, said banks and Davis, and Davis has no friend of Trump's. No Republican appointed members serve on the committee and no minority rights have been granted or observed by the committee. Those breaches of House rules have led administration committee ranking member, representative Rodney Davis, who's done a hell of a good job on this, by the way. To announce that there will be an investigation of the J 6 committee itself. Once Republicans take control of the house as they are expected to following the November elections, it's so damn important you get out and vote and you make sure everybody you know does the same. Despite the J 6 committee's attempts to blame the capital ride on former president Donald Trump and election integrity supporters writes the federalists, the GOP members found that Pelosi. Was responsible for capital security according to House rules. And has led the Democrat majority for years repeatedly failed to implement necessary improvements. To the capital security system, you know why? 'cause she hates the cops. Her base hates the caps, she couldn't be seen bringing in the National Guard, or muscling up the cops. Right? And she called them Nazis. Stormtroopers in the past. This inaction left the capitol unnecessarily vulnerable banks and Davis noted. Banks and Davis pointed to an after action report from capitol police. Showing that the law enforcement department reorganized its intelligence without authorization, which left it without a central open-source intelligence capabilities. And caused staffing changes that may have contributed to the tragedy on January 6th. And in light of the information banks and Davis added that the capitol police intelligence unit had knowledge of the potential for violence yet failed to adequately communicate the threat or take the necessary steps to protect the capitol. How is it that a relative handful of Republicans with a small staff can pull this information together? But the January 6th committee has no interest in it whatsoever. We know why. Despite these shortcomings, the Republicans found that even though the capitol police union largely voted it had no confidence in its intelligence division supervisor. That supervisor was promoted to acting chief following the capitol riot. House minority leader Kevin McCarthy had picked banks and representative Jim Jordan to represent Republicans on the committee last year. But they were promptly booted off by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who implied the GOP would hamper a quote unquote comprehensive investigation into the capitol riot. Now banks Jordan Davis and the two other Republicans who were poised to join the Democrats show trial committee, before McCarthy pulled them out, are leading their own investigation into the capital security breach that reviews information, hardly touched by Pelosi's picks or running the show trial. Banks noted in a recent interview with PBS NewsHour that despite gathering more than 100,000 pages of evidence. The J 6 committee has quote only selectively offered the American people a very small part of it unquote. He said never forget that this select committee has already been caught altering evidence. They had to apologize for it. It's dishonorable that this is in a bipartisan effort to give the American people the facts and the findings. Banks has repeatedly criticized Pelosi's hand picked committee as a political witch hunt. Focused on slandering conservatives, especially those who express concerns about election integrity. Instead of getting to the bottom of what really happened on January 6th. Republicans were denied the right to meaningful meaningfully participate in the Democrat show trial, he said. But as you know, the 5 of us are leading our own independent investigation into the total breakdown of security at the capitol. Our mission is to answer simple questions about what happened that day that Democrats had ignored. Jordan Boyd Federalist. And she says it exactly right. It's a 100% correct. And this committee is a character assassination committee again. I don't know Jeff Clark. But you may think you know Jeff Clark after this hearing, but you don't know Jeff Clark.