6 Burst results for "Pence Pompeo"
Bloomberg Radio New York
"pence pompeo" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"His take on Donald Trump's speech at cpac. Call it Trump pack now. It's Trump pack, which is reflective in the fact that nobody else besides, I think Nikki Haley showed up, or at least none of the other leading likely candidates, the santas Pence Pompeo, et cetera. You know, you've harken on that number about the 63%. And what I'm telling you is that 62% is too low. Everybody there should have been a Trump fan and apparently they weren't in that ad in that environment. Trump should be winning 85 90% of the vote. So I'm not sure where the 63 came from. I understood why the number was lower in Florida because that's Ronda Sanchez's home territory. But this was in Washington D.C.. If the santas wasn't there, that number should be higher than 63%. I'm the Trump team. I'm claiming victory and you should because you won by 43 points. But the number could have been probably should have been higher. Much said about crowd size and it lets an obsession of your former boss. There were lots of pictures taken from the back of the room. You know, make this is what you do to poke the bear a little bit. Is that to a concern if you're on team Trump? It is. This has turned into an event that used to be pan Republican. And under national apps leadership, the last couple of years, they sort of thrown in whole hog with Trump, which is fine. That's where the money has been. You can't fault them for that. But the fact that all of the major names other than Trump stayed away. And Nicky Haley was there, of course, you know, there's some discussion about is she running for Trump vice president. Yes, right. On her in the race in order to there was some polling data that would indicate she pulls from desantis more than Trump. Hear the full conversation on the latest
Bloomberg Radio New York
"pence pompeo" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"The U.S. and China. That's all still to come. This is Bloomberg. Bloomberg radio on demand and in your podcast feed. On the latest sound on podcasts, we talked to former OMB director former acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney for his take on Donald Trump's speech at cpac. Call it Trump pack now. It's Trump pack, which is reflective in the fact that nobody else besides, I think Nikki Haley showed up, or at least none of the other leading likely candidates, the Santa's Pence Pompeo, et cetera. You know, you've harkened on that number about the 63%, and what I'm telling you is that 63% is too low. Everybody there should have been a Trump fan and apparently they weren't in that ad in that environment. Trump should be winning 85 90% of the vote. So I'm not sure where the 63 came from. I understood why the number was lower in Florida because that's Ronda Sanchez's home territory. But this was in Washington D.C.. It's not the Santos wasn't there. That number should be higher than 63% of the Trump team, I'm claiming victory and you should, because you won by 43 points, but the number could have been probably should have been higher. Much said about crowd size and it lets an obsession of your former boss. There were lots of pictures taken from the back of the room. You know, make this is what you do to poke the bear a little bit. Is that to a concern? If you're on team Trump? It is. This has turned into an event that used to be pan Republican. And under mash labs leadership, the last couple of years, they sort of thrown in whole hog with Trump, which is fine. That's where the money has been. So you can't fault them for that. But the fact that all of the major names other than Trump stayed away, and Nikki Haley was there, of course, you know, there's some discussion about is she running for Trump's vice president. Want her in the race in order to, you know, there was some polling data that would indicate she pulls from desantis more than Trump. Hear the full conversation on the latest edition
Bloomberg Radio New York
"pence pompeo" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Latest sound on podcasts, we talked to former OMB director former acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney for his take on Donald Trump's speech at cpac. Call it Trump pack now. It's not really a conservative hack. It's Trump pack, which is reflective in the fact that nobody else besides, I think Nikki Haley showed up, or at least none of the other leading likely candidates, the santas Pence Pompeo, et cetera. You've harken on that number about the 63%. And what I'm telling you is that 62% is too low. Everybody there should have been a Trump fan and apparently they weren't. In that ad in that environment, Trump should be winning 85 90% of the vote. So I'm not sure where the 63 came from. I understood why the number was lower in Florida because that's Ronda Sanchez's home territory. But this was in Washington D.C.. It's not the Santa's wasn't there. That number should be higher than 63%. I'm the Trump team. I'm claiming victory and you should because you won by 43 points. But the number could have been probably should have been higher. Much said about crowd size and it lets an obsession of your former boss. There were lots of pictures taken from the back of the room. You know, make this is what you do to poke the bear a little bit. Is that to a concern? If you're on team Trump? It is. This has turned into an event that used to be pan Republican. And under max lapse leadership, the last couple of years, they sort of thrown in whole hog with Trump, which is fine. That's where the money has been so you can't fault them for that. But the fact that all of the major names other than Trump stayed away. And Nicky Haley was there, of course, you know, there's some discussion about is she running for Trump's vice president. Yes, right. On her in the race in order to, you know, there was some polling data that would indicate she pulls from desantis more than Trump. Hear the full conversation on the latest edition
Bloomberg Radio New York
"pence pompeo" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Two tenths, the tenure yield 3.98%. I'm Charlie palette that is a Bloomberg business flash. Charlie, thanks we'll check back with Charlie little bit later on this hour and see how markets are faring as we get a little bit closer to the bell. Still recovering from cpac weekend, where Donald Trump vowed that the Republican Party would never return to what it was before he transformed it in his image and yes, he did win the straw poll. Hour and 45 minutes he spoke at the big con fab at national harbor. And made it pretty clear that this, the people who were in the room, this is the base. In 2016, I declared, I am your voice, today I add, I am you warrior, I am your justice, and for those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution. I am your richest. That's the line. I am your retribution. He once again dominated the straw poll of choice of 62%. Of the attendees who participated, 62% compared with 20% for Ron DeSantis. Remembering our conversation last hour with Nancy cook, not even close, not at least for this crowd. 5% for Johnson 3% for Haley, Nikki Haley, of course, should speak you heard those remarks here on the program on Friday, everybody else at 1% or less. And by the way, that's more than Donald Trump got in the Orlando cpac straw poll last year. Let's bring in Mick Mulvaney I'm glad to say is with us former acting White House chief of staff. He's basically held every job in Washington, former OMB director, also former congressman. It's great to have you back here. As you watched the cpac unfold this time, a lot of folks were saying, well, this really has turned into a Trump rally that it represents a slice of the Republican Party as opposed to the big tent. Is that true? It is. And by the way, Joe, thanks as always you're having me. Keep in mind, you all call it Trump pack now. If it's not really a conservative packet, Trump pack, which is reflective in the fact that nobody else besides, I think, Nikki Haley showed up, or at least none of the other leading likely candidates, the Santa's Pence Pompeo, et cetera. And you've hearkened on that number about the 63% and what I'm telling you is that 63% is too low. Everybody there should have been a Trump fan and apparently they weren't in that ad in that environment. Trump should be winning 85 90% of the vote. So I'm not sure where the 63 came from. I understood why the number was lower in Florida because that's Ronda Sanchez's home territory. But this was in Washington D.C.. The santas wasn't there. That number should be higher than 63%. I'm the Trump team. I'm claiming victory and you should, because you won by 43 points. But the number could have been probably should have been higher. Much said about crowd size and it lets an obsession of your former boss and I'm not even going to attempt to quantify it. But there were lots of pictures taken from the back of the room. You know, make this is what you do to poke the bear a little bit. Is that to a concern if you're on team Trump? It is. This was not, this has turned into an event that used to be pan Republican. And under max lapse leadership, the last couple of years, they sort of thrown in whole hog with Trump, which is fine. That's where the money has been so you can't fault them for that. But the fact that all of the major names other than Trump stayed away. And Nikki Haley was there, of course, you know, there's some discussion about is she running for Trump's vice president. Want her in the race in order to there was some polling data that would indicate she pulls from desantis more than Trump that Trump might lose to desantis head to head, but can't be beaten with a third party in the race such as Nikki Haley so there's some discussions there, but this was a Trump event. And you would think that the turnout was probably of the concern to them and the numbers are probably concerned then. The thing of a baby bonus, where'd that come from? Did you hear about this? Yeah, I did. And that doesn't surprise me. That's actually making its way around some conservative intellectual circles academic circles. It goes back to some things that other countries are doing that are having struggling birth rates. I think Hungary has been doing it for several years to give a tax bonus, for example, if you have three kids, your taxes go down, you have four kids, you don't ever pay taxes. I think some of the Asian countries are doing it to try and spur the growth rates, Russia has mentioned it and so forth. So it's not it is making its rounds in the back rooms of the think tanks and so forth on the right side of the political spectrum. Fascinating. I know Elon Musk has suggested as much as well that population growth is a huge concern in this country. The only Donald Trump would present it the way he did saying, you guys, you were lucky, man. You're the work for you. But let me ask you make Mulvaney about the field. I guess it sure does. You know, we heard from Mike Pompeo last week at cpac. He actually called out all of your former boss a couple of times. But we also saw a significant announcement over the weekend, maybe I'm making too much of it, but a lot of people thought Larry Hogan might run. He's not going to now. And here's how he described or explained his decision to CBS. I didn't want to have a pile up of a bunch of people fighting. Right now you have Trump and desantis at the top of the field. You soaking up all the oxygen, getting all the attention, and then a whole lot of the rest of us and single digits. And the more of them you have, the less chance you have for somebody rising up. I'm guessing you agree with the premise there, a mic, but is that smart politics? Christian who said, it's not about when you get in, but when you get out. That's exactly where my head went, 'cause I think that's the exact right line. Chris was spot on when he said, it doesn't matter who gets in. It matters how quickly they were to get out. I think Larry is probably very self aware recognizing that this is not his Republican Party right now. It's not his time. And as a Republican right now and that you're much more likely to have the anti Trump vote go to someone like desantis or Haley or Pompeo or pants than they would. An important but a lesser known Republican governor from a small state. So I'm not sure what Larry Hogan would have been selling other than the same thing everybody else was selling. Do you see Kristen a new jump in? He sure keeps coming back, boy. Everyone's booking Kristin, who knew because I think Washington sees him as a potential spoiler to your point, he's a governor from a smaller state, doesn't have all the name recognition yet, but could pack a punch. No, I disagree. This is the Pete Buttigieg model. No kidding. I've got a chance. Yeah, this is the, I got a chance to sort of maybe I catch fire. Maybe I win a primary coming second or third in an early state. That's a nice thing about Iowa and New Hampshire. Small town retail politics you don't need a lot of money. You do well there. You might even convey it into a cabinet spot. I think Chris is a very capable guy and we'd love to have him in a Republican cabinet, but I don't think he thinks he's actually got a chance to win. How about that? Fascinating. Mick Mulvaney, while you're here, they're talking about this as the most important week of the year with regard to the economy and the markets Wall Street. We've, for any number of reasons, the jobs report, Jay Powell's testimony among them. We're going to hear two days of testimony from the fed chair. Everyone's got a different. The market thinks they're smarter than he is. Lawmakers think that they're smarter than he is. He's in a real tough spot here. Does he need to keep hiking more than we expect? Yeah, he's in a tough spot because he's been wrong, right? I mean, inflation wasn't going to be a big deal than it was, and it wasn't going to be transitory. He's had a difficult. He's got a credibility issue. There's no question. Does he have to keep hiking? Probably. And here's what I try and explain it to people. The causes of inflation haven't changed that much. If you look back 6 months a year ago, what caused inflation? Yeah, okay. We had a significant supply chain problem. That seems to get working out. You got to report on that just before you went on the air with me. But still a war in Ukraine
ToddCast Podcast with Todd Starnes
"pence pompeo" Discussed on ToddCast Podcast with Todd Starnes
"I mean, this can't just continue like this. Guys, let's talk, let's talk Trump versus desantis. There's a little dust up yesterday. And I want to give the backstory. It's important that we have a little context here. Laura Loomer, who's been a pretty vocal pro Trump conservative activist, had a group, they showed up at desantis book signing over in Florida yesterday with signs, Trump flags, a hold on yards. Anyway, they were kicked out. They said you're not allowed to come in here. The security guard said, you can not have any Trump clothing on if you want to come inside for the book signing. People are a little fired up over that. If I was desantis, I was at a lot of men. You know, just a lot of men, but josan is not showing up at cpac that he was invited, taken a pass, and folks were wondering, you know, is this is desantis making some missteps here or is this the right panther him to separate from Trump and the conservative side? It's a great question. I don't think Ron DeSantis is separating in any way from the conservative side. I think Ron DeSantis is a conservative and I personally have been a fan if you will of Ron DeSantis and since he was in Congress. I think that Ron DeSantis is running a campaign that's not a campaign. I don't think he has made a final decision on whether he will or will not get into this. I think he's kind of testing the waters. He's got the book out there like everybody else does. I don't think it benefits him one way or the other to go to cpac this year next year, maybe. But I know that there are a lot of people who are very concerned with him. I too am appalled that they said to people wearing Trump attire. Oh, you can't come in. And I can't see Ron DeSantis personally being on board with that. But I think it's a very cautious, hey, I'm maybe gonna put my toe in the water, but I haven't committed to this. Harry? Well, I think he has committed, I usually agree with Jeff. He's running. I say it's a 100% that he's running. He's not going to make the mistake that my good friend, governor Chris Christie made. Governor Chris Christie could have defeated Barack Obama. He decided he wasn't ready. He decided to take a pass. He thought four years from then would even be better and then we know what happened. Donald Trump comes of age. The denying people the right to wear clothing of the former president of the United States, a Republican president, is a disgrace. It's patty. It's stupid. I agree with Jeff on this point. I don't think Ron DeSantis said, hey, don't let anybody in that has Trump gear on. Trump made the Santa. Let's not forget that. I like to say this too. But without Trump, he barely won in the tiniest fraction of a fraction of 1% four years ago. It's true. He had a $1.5 million blowout or vote blowout in the rematch in his reelection. But desantis is running, I guarantee it on the show. He's running right now. He's not going to make the mistake that others did and assume that four years from now, would it be an open seat? And it's safer and all these kinds of things that people calculate. Bill Clinton didn't make the mistake. He got in and he won the election of 92, desantis is in he's born of Trump. They're all being very careful what they say about Trump, if you notice. And Trump for himself have you guys noticed, has also been mistake free, very disciplined. So far so good. Yes. And he is in fight mode right now. He's waiting for somebody that he made to turn on him so he can low energy jab them, little Marco them. But desantis is in. Make no mistake about it. It's only a matter of, does he declare this spring? Does he declare this fall? And I think the longer he waits, the more of a problem it is, because remember, until he got out there again a little bit, he kind of got a not forgotten, but that glow of the election that doesn't last forever. So that's my take on it. All right, fellas, we're running up against the clock here, but I will say this Jeb Bush endorsed and just like a good establishment rhino took back the endorsement, just like a bush. And I will say this about desantis. We've had every major Republican who's even thinking about running from Pence, Pompeo, Haley, of course, president Trump almost a regular on the show now. There's only one man who has refused to come on this program, and his name is Ron DeSantis. Because he's running very, too safe. That's what he's doing. All right guys, we got to leave it there. Harry, Jeff, stakes are on me one of these days. We're going to have to make this happen. That sounds great. Thank you. I'd love to be with Jeff. He's awesome. All right. Same here. Love you. Thanks a lot, guys. Two of the two of the best in the business, right there, ladies and gentlemen, Jeff Katz, and Harry Hurley, a great American patriots, and they both fill in when I'm away. All right, gotta take a break here and it is true. We have extended an invitation to the governor, dozens of times, and just recently they said get back to us next year. That's Ron DeSantis and his team, not Ron DeSantis, but his team, and they're playing it safe, and that is never a good thing to do. Who do you like your folks? Trump or desantis, 8 four four 747 88 68. This is the Dodge storm show. No, we haven't been able to decipher it yet. We have got the we've got the linguistics team here at Todd stern's dot com working on this. Can we please play a cut number one again, please?.
FT World Weekly
Trump's Mexico tariff threat
"Today, we're looking at US Mexican relations, and the broader context of international trade. The reason for this is President Trump and sudden announcement that he'll impose steadily increasing tariffs on Mexican goods, unless Mexico stops the flow of refugees through its country towards America's southern border. Joining me on the line from Mexico City is our correspondent, Nejib Weber and on the line from Brussels are economics and trade commentator. Alan Beatie, Jude, first of all, how much of a bolt from the blue did this come from Mexico? Did they foresee this now it was a complete surprise? In fact, only foot ninety four the US administration had removed tariffs on steel in aluminium, which has been one of the hurdles to ratifying the new NAFTA pack, the US MCA packs, Mexico had done what it said it was going to do in terms of preparing for ratification by passing some new labor laws. So it was all looking like tariffs were going to be thinking of the past. Then all of a sudden this comes from nowhere. So they were completely blindsided by it. And how are they responding? I'm and ease there, anything they can do they're going to try to piece Donald Trump. They say that they're going to make some proposals. They haven't meeting at the White House chedda by Mike Pence, Pompeo, the foreign secretaries also going to be there. I'm Bob light Heiser, the US trade Representative Mexico as taken a slightly different tack on immigration to pass Mexican government's under president under is Monroe Lopez over they've decided they want to put development. I and to invest in development in the northern triangle, countries Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador so that people who at the moment, the fleeing from poverty, and from crime, basically and dysfunctional government's repression with sort of thing so that they can stay at home, and they don't have to flee, but unfortunately, that's a very, very long term solution. It's not immediate so Mexico once the US to invest in that. But the US wants a much. More immediate solution in terms of more people being turned away at the borders, so we don't get. No, what is going to propose. They have said to me that they willing to work with the US to apply Mexican lose more effectively. But what they don't want is to become a third safe country. That's the sort of jargon from being the country, where migrants have to apply for Silom the first safe country that migrants have to apply for sinema Matt north. So Mexico's drawing the line at that said, there's no way LX at that. And they also won't accept having US border agents on its territory. What am Allah has reportedly said it wouldn't mind beefing up US border personnel on its side of the southern border, but Mexico's said, no. So what's your guests? Do you think this is going to be a long-standing dispute or something, where Mexico can find some kind of compromise? Of course, Donald Trump's on predictable. It's hard to say. But what's currently feel like Bon when negotiating NAFTA? The, the success to after there were, there were several times when Donald Trump was on the brink of writing a letter to withdraw from the agreements, and he was told back from the brink a couple of times, once by his agriculture secretary, for example, who pointed on it just how much damage that would do to states that rely very heavily on agriculture and trade with Mexico. So this foam, and him climbing down from the precipice. There's also for him going ahead with things that people say, there's no justification for, for example, the women still tarps, Mexico and Canada who partners in NAFTA was served with these twenty-five percent tariffs, and Mexico, retaliated. So my guess, at the moment is that, you know, since he's traveling at the moment since the talks today, a going on with other members of the administration, but not the members of the administration who make the decision, the decisions, Roma sleeping made by Donald Trump directly and without too much negotiation with other members of his cabinet money suspicion. Is that at least the? First one will go ahead, and then we'll see. I mean, that's what Donald Trump said in London yesterday. I mean he seems to be leaning towards applying the first one and keeping talking. And then perhaps we'd see a slowdown and not being -cremento tariffs every month through to October on how potentially disruptive this. And how important is the US Mexican economic relationship? The trae between the US and Mexico in itself, isn't going to destroy the economy. The issue here is that you simply contrast, Donald Trump, that, even when you have signed a deal even when you're going through the, the boys purchase a negotiating NAFTA to come up with US MCA nonetheless, he can simply turn tail say, we're going to have completely different unrelated issue, such as migration, you know, there different strains of thought within the Trump administration central gravity like the media is, but lighthizer who's the US TR, who's extremely hard nosed, and has some very strong views about trade. But, you know, it's not sort of eccentric and doesn't randomly suggested slumping on terrorists. Just because something has annoyed him that day. Now when Bob light highs was in charge, or something out. He was the indication of NAFTA, it might be unpleasant, and it might be competent, but Germany gets done. And that is signed, and sealed and legal with something like this, when something like Trump, you all over the place that you have no idea. So essentially everyone has been reminded how much vegetables around US trade policy because everyone has been reminded just wasn't degree of randomness can come from at the top. And of course, this has to be seen in the context of the broader trade wars, that Trump has embarking upon the increase in tariffs to China, and he really is living up to his name of tariff man or self chosen Monica. Yeah. I mean, it does genuinely appear to be the case that he enjoyed tires for their own sake. He apparently genuinely believes cannot be shaken from the belief that's tariff is they fact to eight tax on the trading partner. And the fact that you have imposed on the trading partner means the fact that you have one, now, of course, this has huge implications for those other countries or trading powers at the moment, the EU in Japan who are trying to negotiate bilateral deals with US in order to avoid more times in this case cons being right on the next balls. And they must be thinking, what's the point? What's the point of spending months years, and even to go having to get all on domestic constituencies? Onside having to get the laborious deal of needs to see it overturned on the women. The president and to I mean what is the impact say of the five percent on the Mexican economy and potentially also on American consumers, and then what's the impact of terrorists, do indeed rise steadily? Mexico eighty percent of its exports. Go to the US mostly manufactured goods. And there are very integrated supply chain. So one of the first impacts will be saved the car industry. It's in massive industry in Mexico. So a lot of the car parts crossed the border, multiple times seatbelts example of made and they go to Canada to be died. And then they go somewhere else to become tired, and they come back to Mexico to be stitched. So the crossing the border and back and forth, the Thai food minute, they have to be toxin every crossing. So maybe there would be some convents for those sorts of things, but it could hit the car industry. There are some estimates that suggests that if the tariffs are imposed immediately five percent time, the cost of a car that settled in Mexico, Lexcen, Nissan, Sentra, would go up by fifteen hundred dollars immediately and that could rise to seven thousand five hundred dollars. If the full twenty five percent were applied doesn't the school of thought which suggests that a five percent tariff might. Don't be into the world because actually the exchange rate has adjusted. So the pixel has weakened some exit goes, sort of regaining competitiveness. But I think the general consensus is NAFTA was put in place to provide security in terms of investment predictability insecurity, in this does not completely. So even if the five percent is imposed and then maybe ten percent isn't imposed or five and ten percent of impose, but maybe fifteen cents isn't she still don't know. You've got that sort of sold hunting of you that you don't know what's gonna happen next. So I think it's very, very damaging to the trade relationship, and it could be extremely damaging for both countries economy's in recession, and lack of growth, none of this will help Mexico, which is already struggling in the first quarter economy. Contracted. Jude says potentially this has real deleterious effects on the real economy, but I suppose, maybe Trump has been emboldened by the fact that for the moment, the American economy is growing quite strongly the markets on doing that badly. Kenny take that for granted, there is this likely do you think in the end to feed through reasonably falls into those metrics? He will be paying attention to growth in the stock exchange Well, thinking. the thing is, I mean, if you look at the global economy can take these shock to actual cost border trade without plunging the whole world into recession. More of a concern is the idea that policies completes even them there's a lunatic, and charged with the us economy, and anything could happen in the markets will suddenly started pointing any huge amount, more one of the things, so the markets seem to be taken by surprise each time. Something like this happened quite a big selloff inequities. We suggest that they haven't yet priced in that much risk. So that's a potential channel to which could happen. Uncertainty Jay Powell on the fed Chan said recently that the prospects of a trade dispute could weaken the economy. But you know that's what we've seen so far. We haven't seen a huge amount comes through on the real economy because these things take time to come through. So you see a lot more sort of movement on the markets and short-term things. Dan, you do see a slowing of growth. So it depends what Donald Trump is looking at, you know, supposedly, he's obsessed with the market, supposedly, he's obsessed with the S and P. But it does. Doesn't stop him doing things like this, which damaging to the S and P. So it may be that one day he looks at the and in one day, he doesn't one of the things I think we've learned over the last two years, is that it's very hard. In fact, is impossible to discern a constant reaction, folks knew a constant way, Donald Trump responds to things, you know, he seems to care about different things at different times. So I think if the US went into a really serious recession. Yes, he might ease off on the trade from to bid. But it's one of the things that send you compared to any other administration. No. In many parents in history is extremely Huntington know. Okay, so we'll expect the unexpected. But for now, we'll have to leave it there, sir. Thank you very much detail, and BC and to do Weber. That's it for this week until next week.