35 Burst results for "Nina Totenberg"

The Affordable Care Act Faces Yet Another Supreme Court Test

BBC World Service

00:56 sec | 2 weeks ago

The Affordable Care Act Faces Yet Another Supreme Court Test

"Washington that the U. S. Supreme Court Tuesday the Trump Administration and the state of Texas will lead arguments that Obama care should be struck down in its entirety. NPR's Nina Totenberg reports. It'll be the third attempt to invalidate the law since it was enacted a decade ago. Faced with earlier challenges to the law of the high Court upheld it. Buy votes of 5 to 4 and 6 to 3. But many of the lawyers who originally challenged the law in 2012 now say that the legal landscape has changed so much since then, that they think this challenge is a stretch. And many of the groups including major business groups that supported the original challenge are missing from the challenge. Now that said the court is far more conservative today than it was when previous challenges were brought. Among the three trump appointees. Now on the court is New Justice Amy Cockney Barrett, who's been highly critical of the court's previous decisions upholding

U. S. Supreme Court Trump Administration Nina Totenberg NPR Washington High Court Texas Barack Obama Amy Cockney Barrett
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Fresh Air

Fresh Air

02:53 min | Last month

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Fresh Air

"First of all, some of the characterizations that you read from the Times piece I'm not. One hundred percent sure are accurate anymore. Certainly. If you look I mean maybe they were some time ago ten, twenty, thirty, forty years ago. I think that Amy Conybeare it's father was extremely active and probably still is in people praise and was one of the founders of it. But. The characterization of heads of households being the man and being the sort of presiding officer of the family and somebody the wife I think the implication is the wife is subservient to that's really hard to square with Amy Coney Barrett's career. So I'm not sure that it's fair to characterize her the way. Some of the articles about people of praise have. You couldn't have the career she has and seven children and not be a force to be reckoned with you know at the same time. You know when we talk about religion and The court you do want diversity of. Perspectives on the court. And as it happens if she's confirmed. Six justices on the court. Will be Catholic and all but Justice Sonia Sotomayor will have been appointed by conservative presidents and have conservative records. So this is you know we we've when I started covering the court there was. One Jew and one Catholic and everybody else was Protestant and now they're no protestants. And there are no other religious groups represented on the court either. So what does that say to you? Say Anything. I think it's IT'S A it's a function of. WHO Which presidents have been lucky enough to appoint. Justices trump has been very lucky in that. Respect very lucky. Trump is basically remade the courts. A lot of ways You know he's appointed more than hundred and eighty five federal judges. Barrett assuming she's confirmed which seems to be. The assumption will be his third court justice He said he wants to run the court in part because he thinks election might be decided in the court. so How do you think? All. The trump appointees is going to change our judicial future. Well you know you're never a hundred percent. Sure. But I have to say that predictions about Conservative members of the court have been pretty accurate. Since the appointment of. Of David Suitor and that.

Amy Coney Barrett Trump Justice Sonia Sotomayor Amy Conybeare trump David Suitor officer
The Affordable Care Act is on the line at court

Morning Edition

00:50 sec | Last month

The Affordable Care Act is on the line at court

"News. I'm Korver Coleman. This is the second day of confirmation hearings for Amy Cockney Barrett, President Trump's U S Supreme Court nominee. It's also the first day that senators can question her directly. NPR's Nina Totenberg reports, Democrats will play offense and Republicans will be playing defense. Even the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Lindsey Graham, acknowledged yesterday that the outcome of these hearings is a foregone conclusion. Republicans have a majority in the Senate and the votes to confirm Barrett. But the Democrats are walking in unusually disciplined lock step on their messaging. Barrett. This is potentially the deciding vote to strike down the affordable care act, known as Obama care if she's confirmed this month, as planned a week after the election bear it will be hearing a case seeking for a third time

Amy Cockney Barrett Democrats Korver Coleman Lindsey Graham Nina Totenberg Judiciary Committee Donald Trump NPR Barack Obama Senate Chairman President Trump
Amy Coney Barrett: Trump nominee testifies in Supreme Court hearing

BBC World Service

01:06 min | Last month

Amy Coney Barrett: Trump nominee testifies in Supreme Court hearing

"Court nominee Amy Cockney. Barrett is said to begin taking questions in the morning after only playing a bit part Monday when her confirmation hearings began. There was silent as members of the Senate Judiciary Committee made opening statements for five hours. NPR's Nina Totenberg reports When it was time for Barrett to speak. She again said her judicial philosophy was modeled after the late Justice Anton's Clia. Scalia was a conservative icon known for his fervent dissenting opinions when the Supreme Court upheld abortion rights, gay rights and obamacare But Barrett, in her opening statement, said courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong the policy decisions and value judgments of government. Must be made by the political branches elected by an accountable to the people. The public should not expect courts to do so. And courts should not try. That sounds easy. But as judges of all ideological stripes recognize one person's policy choice is another's UN constitutional law.

Barrett Nina Totenberg Amy Cockney Senate Judiciary Committee Supreme Court Scalia Justice Anton UN NPR Obamacare
In nod to conservatives, Trump reveals new list of potential Supreme Court picks

Forum

00:41 sec | 2 months ago

In nod to conservatives, Trump reveals new list of potential Supreme Court picks

"Supreme Court nominees. Using the tool that served him well and energized in the conservative base and the 2016 election campaign. NPR's Nina Totenberg has more on that story. Trump blasted Joe Biden for failing to issue a comparable list and issued a dark warning for the future if the Democrat is elected and has an opportunity to pick one or more justices Courts. Five conservative justices are all in good health on Ly One. Justice is fighting serious health problems. Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is being treated for a serious about with 1/5 cancer, her second cancer in less than two years. Nina Totenberg. NPR NEWS Washington A

Nina Totenberg Ruth Bader Ginsburg NPR Supreme Court Ly One Joe Biden Donald Trump Washington
Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

Morning Edition

04:00 min | 2 months ago

Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

"All right. Amid the uproar over the president's pandemic response, A new item appeared on the White House schedule yesterday, and it was very clearly a change of subject. I am announcing 20 additions to my original list. Of candidates for the United States Supreme Court That list served him well and energizing conservatives. Back in 2016, NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg reports on what he is offering in 2020. Administration insiders, Khun See that this list of 20 names is a validly more political. While the previous three lists included just one elected politician and no administration officials, this one includes three U. S. Senators all fire breathing conservative Republicans, Arkansas's Tom Cotton. Ted Cruz of Texas and Missouri's Josh Holly. All three have directly or indirectly criticized Chief Justice John Roberts for not being conservative enough, and all three have presidential ambitions. Indeed, Holly tweeted that he's not really interested in a seat on the court. Also on the list are a top White House lawyer and to top officials from the Trump Justice Department, including former solicitor General Noel Francisco who've carried Trump's legal banner in the courts. Perhaps the most interesting name on the list is Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and is considered perhaps the best legal advocate among the very able lawyers who practice regularly before the Supreme Court. Clement has an added value. He's represented a variety of conservative interests before the court from gun rights advocates to religious groups to groups opposed to Obama care. As for federal judges on the list, they're all trump appointees with records hostel through abortion, voting rights legislation, LGBT rights and regulation of business and the environment. According to sources involved in compiling the list. The White House counsel, as is usual, presided over the process. But White House chief of staff Mark Meadows was aggressively involved and even the president's son in law. Jared Kushner, got into the act, as did some conservative senators like Holly, who pushed back against including Federal appeals court judge Naomi Row because of some of her writings prior to becoming a judge, But as a judge, she's written some of the lower court decisions most supportive of Trump. With the latest list of 20 new names now added to the 45 names on his previous lists. Trump on Wednesday blasted Democrat Joe Biden for failing to release a comparable list and the president issued a dark warning about the future. If Biden is elected and has an opportunity to pick one or more justices, radical justices will erase the Second Amendment. Silence political speech and require taxpayers to fund extremely term abortion. In fact, the courts five conservative justices are all in good health and two of them. Trump appointees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh are the youngest members of the court at 53 55, respectively. The only ailing justices 87 year old Ruth Bader Ginsburg, leader of the court's liberal wing, who's being treated for 1/5 bout with cancer, her second cancer in less than two years. Should she leave the court. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has said that the GOP would fill the sea even though McConnell four years ago refused for nearly a year. To allow hearings on President Obama's nominee to fill the seat of Justice Antonin Scalia, who died unexpectedly in February of 2016. McConnell's justification for blocking the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland was that the voters have a right to make their views known in the presidential election. A rationale that GOP leader is not embracing this year. Nina Totenberg NPR NEWS Washington

Supreme Court President Trump White House Josh Holly Donald Trump Paul Clement Nina Totenberg Trump Justice Department Joe Biden Chief Justice John Roberts Barack Obama Mitch Mcconnell Judge Merrick Garland GOP Justice Antonin Scalia NPR Khun See Ruth Bader Ginsburg Tom Cotton
Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

All Of It

00:55 sec | 2 months ago

Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

"President Trump has issued another list of potential Supreme Court nominees, his fourth since his 2016 presidential campaign. But as NPR's Nina Totenberg reports, this list is a bit different. Today's list of 20 is avowedly more political. While the previous three lists included just one elected politician. Today's includes three senators all fire breathing conservative Republicans. Missouri's Josh Holly, Arkansas's Tom Cotton and Texas Senator Ted Cruz. All have been highly critical of Chief Justice John Roberts for not being conservative enough. Also on the list are to current or former Trump Administration Justice Department officials who have been carrying Trump's legal banner in the courts. And Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and is considered perhaps the best legal advocate among the very able lawyers who practice regularly before the Supreme Court.

President Trump Trump Administration Justice D Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Senator Ted Cruz Nina Totenberg Paul Clement NPR Josh Holly George W. Bush Tom Cotton Missouri Arkansas Texas
Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if re-elected

WNYC Programming

00:58 sec | 2 months ago

Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if re-elected

"Has issued another list of potential Supreme Court nominees, his fourth since he started issuing the list during the 2016 presidential campaign is to subsequent appointees came from those lists. But as NPR's Nina Totenberg reports, this list is a little different. Today's list of 20 is avowedly more political. While the previous three lists included just one elected politician. Today's includes three senators all fire breathing conservative Republicans. Missouri's Josh Holly, Arkansas's Tom Cotton and Texas Senator Ted Cruz. All have been highly critical of Chief Justice John Roberts for not being conservative enough. Also on the list are to current or former Trump Administration Justice Department officials who have been carrying Trump's legal banner in the courts. And Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and is considered perhaps the best legal advocate among the very able lawyers who practice regularly before the Supreme Court. Nina

Supreme Court Nina Totenberg Trump Administration Justice D Chief Justice John Roberts Senator Ted Cruz Donald Trump Paul Clement NPR George W. Bush Josh Holly Tom Cotton Missouri Texas Arkansas
Supreme Court rules against 'faithless electors'

Q

00:52 sec | 5 months ago

Supreme Court rules against 'faithless electors'

"Today. A unanimous decision on rogue electoral college delegates is NPR's Nina Totenberg reports the court without dissent. World states have the power to remove electoral college delegates who refuse to cast their votes for the popular vote winner in their states. In 2016 7 Electoral college delegates went rogue, casting their ballots for someone other than Hillary Clinton, the candidate. They were pledged to support in Colorado. The so called faithless electors were removed and replaced on the spot and in Washington state. They were fined. The delegates challenge the state laws in court, contending that under the constitution, they have discretion in casting their votes. But now the Supreme Court has unanimously disagreed. Justice Elena Kagan writing for the court. Declare that neither the text of the Constitution nor history is on the road. Delegates side Nina Totenberg

Supreme Court Nina Totenberg Justice Elena Kagan Hillary Clinton Washington State NPR Colorado
Louisiana Abortion Law Struck Down by Supreme Court

All Things Considered

04:49 min | 5 months ago

Louisiana Abortion Law Struck Down by Supreme Court

"US Supreme Court has delivered a major defeat to abortion opponents by a 5 to 4 vote, the court struck down in Louisiana law that was virtually identical to a Texas law invalidated by the court four years ago. As NPR's Nina Totenberg reports. The fifth and decisive vote was cast by Chief Justice John Roberts. Four years ago. The chief justice was among the dissenters when the court struck down a Texas law that required doctors performing clinic abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. But today he voted with the courts for liberal justices in striking down a nearly identical law in Louisiana. He wrote for himself alone, however, and said he was joining the Liberals on the outcome because of the doctrine of starry decisis. Which is the legal term for standing by the court's precedents. It instructs us to treat like cases alike, he said, and the Louisiana law burdens women seeking pre viability abortions to the same extent as the Texas law did four years ago. The value of following precedent, he added, is that it promotes the evenhanded, predictable and consistent development of legal principles. Foster's reliance on judicial principles and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process. While president is not an inexorable demand, he said, Simple disagreement with a previous decision is not enough to justify reversing course in this case. Not only is the Louisiana law issue virtually identical to the one struck down four years ago. But the District Court judge who held an extensive trial in the case found that if the law were to go into effect at minimum, two of the three abortion clinics in the state would be forced to close women would have to wait longer and drive further for abortions, and only one doctor would likely be left to fill the demand for 10,000 women seeking abortions in the state each year. Abortion providers and defenders were to say the least relieved. Here's Kathleen Pittman, administrator of the Hope medical group that runs a clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana. To say we're related hardly begins to come close to what? Where you're failing. I'm celebrating today, but I'm still worried about our future. And Nancy, north of president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, echoed that sentiment. Well, we are taking the Supreme Court cases one victory at a time. We are under no illusions that the fight is over with this case, you know, it's welcome all over and over again. And Leah Lippman, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, cautioned That Robert's decision sets out a standard different from the one adopted by the court. In the past, the chief justice's reasoning was actually quite permissive in what it would allow states to do to restrict abortion. That said, however, the decision does appear to rule out state laws that, for instance, Ban abortions at 68 12 weeks or any other time prior to fetal viability. Even James Bop, general counsel for Americans United for Life, sees those bands as dead in the water. I've been saying for 10 years that those approaches are doomed to failure. The bop was disappointed in the Roberts opinion. He saw some hope he gives half alone. He sees the Roberts opinion as enabling states to mandate ultrasounds for those seeking an abortion. As well as allowing states to ban abortions for certain reasons, for instance, because of fetal disability or sex. And he sees the decision as sending a message to anti abortion voters tells the pro life movement that President Trump fulfills its promises with his appointment of Gorsuch and Kevin all and that we need Trump reelected in order to make future appointments, political groups on the right and left we're making that very point today. Were one of the liberal justices to retire and two of them are over 80. Another Trump appointment to the high court could make Roberts vote irrelevant. Given that mathematical reality, today's decision is likely to play a significant role in the upcoming election. Polling data has consistently shown a hefty majority of the public approve the right to abortion. But while Americans held similar views in 2016 exit polling at that time showed Trump was able to turn out Maura of his vote based on his stated goal of naming conservative and anti abortion justices to the court. Nina

Us Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Louisiana District Court Texas James Bop Nina Totenberg President Trump Donald Trump Robert NPR President And Ceo University Of Michigan Law Sch Foster Shreveport Center For Reproductive Rights Kathleen Pittman
Supreme Court to hear arguments on Trump administration-Obamacare dispute over birth control

Morning Edition

00:51 sec | 7 months ago

Supreme Court to hear arguments on Trump administration-Obamacare dispute over birth control

"Today the justices will consider new trump administration rules that cut back on access to birth control under the affordable Care Act and peers Nina Totenberg reports the health law sought to equalise preventative health care coverage for women and men by requiring employers to include free birth control in their health care plans the Obama administration enacted rules allowing religious nonprofits like charities hospitals and universities to opt out by notifying the government of their objections so that alternative arrangements could be made to guarantee coverage for employees but the trump administration issued new rules they got rid of the opt out provision and simply gave broad exemptions to nonprofits and some for profit companies that have religious or moral objections to birth control those sweeping exemptions are what the Supreme Court is considering

Nina Totenberg Obama Administration Supreme Court
The Supreme Court begins hearing its first arguments by telephone, with the first live audio in its history

Morning Edition

02:54 min | 7 months ago

The Supreme Court begins hearing its first arguments by telephone, with the first live audio in its history

"The U. S. Supreme Court will begin an extraordinary two weeks of oral arguments today for the first time in history the court will actually live stream it's audio arguments will be heard on the telephone rather than in person here's NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg the justices are trying to simulate their normal arguments as much as possible beginning with chief Marshall Pamela tell can calling the court to order with a modified version of her usual pry O. yea O. yea O. yea all persons having business before the honorable the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to draw near and give their attention to the court is now sitting god save the United States and this honorable court because the justices and the lawyers cannot see one another we'll try to imagine where they're sitting or standing in their homes to hear or to present arguments the arguments are limited to a half hour on each side the lawyers we sampled to a person said they're more comfortable standing or even standing at a lectern as they usually do even though nobody can see them each side as usual we get to make an opening argument for two minutes uninterrupted under normal circumstances after that the justices engage in a rapid fire questioning of the lawyers interrupting council frequently and even on occasion each other but today the justices will question in order of seniority with the Chief Justice starting off then justice Clarence Thomas if he has any questions which she rarely does them justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at cetera court sources say each justice has been allotted two or three minutes for questioning with more questions permitted if there's time left at the end of the first round lawyers say there will be big challenges when you lose the ability to read body language I think that's number one lawyer J. secular will be representing president trump next week in a case testing whether the president can block a state grand jury subpoena for his presidential financial records in a criminal case as secular observers it's pretty intimate event when you're actually arguing in the court room you see them you can see their reaction to see if a nod to each other here you're doing this literally over a telephone line so you lose the intimacy I think Stanford law professor Jeff Fisher who will be arguing a religion case a week from today agrees I just feel like not being able to see their faces and body language is going to be a real challenge it is a cost for how effective and useful the arguments are going to be two days only case presents a trademark question not exactly the kind of thing to rivet public attention clearly the court is using this relatively an important argument to see how the system is working whether it needs to be adjusted in anyway in short the court scheduled this one first to work out the

U. S. Supreme Court
Phoning it in: Pandemic forces Supreme Court to hear cases in a new way

Snap Judgment

00:39 sec | 7 months ago

Phoning it in: Pandemic forces Supreme Court to hear cases in a new way

"Tomorrow marks a day of first of the U. S. Supreme Court including the first live streaming of its oral arguments and here's Nina Totenberg has more it's the first time the court will be hearing oral arguments not in the courtroom and in the flesh but by telephone hookup it's the first time the public can listen in and over the next couple of weeks the court will be hearing some of its most important cases ranging from whether the president can block grand jury and congressional subpoenas for his tax returns and other financial records two other cases involving religious questions birth control insurance coverage under obamacare and the electoral

U. S. Supreme Court Nina Totenberg President Trump
U.S. Supreme Court requires unanimous jury verdicts for serious crimes

Morning Edition

01:00 min | 7 months ago

U.S. Supreme Court requires unanimous jury verdicts for serious crimes

"News the U. S. Supreme Court has struck down state laws in Louisiana and Oregon that allow defendants to be convicted of serious crimes by less than unanimous jury as NPR's Nina Totenberg reports the six to three decision overturns in nineteen seventy two ruling that had upheld non unanimous verdicts writing for the majority justice Neil Gorsuch noted that both Louisiana and Oregon have conceded that race was the motivating factor in both states when the non unanimous jury measures were enacted and said Gorsuch no member of the current court thinks the nineteen seventy two decision upholding those provisions was correct the disagreement in this case was over when the court should adhere to its presidents and when it should not it's a fraught issue mainly because the current conservative majority appears to disagree with many long established precedents on everything from abortion and voting rights to religion and federal

U. S. Supreme Court Louisiana NPR Nina Totenberg Neil Gorsuch Oregon
Supreme Court struggles with independence of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Marketplace

01:02 min | 9 months ago

Supreme Court struggles with independence of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

"The consumer financial protection bureau was created with the aim of protecting consumers from abuses in the banking and financial services industry today at the Supreme Court the court's conservative justices voiced skepticism about the independent agency NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg has more in the aftermath of the two thousand eight financial crisis Congress created the consumer financial protection bureau lodged in the offices of the federal reserve board the bureau has enacted new rules to safeguard the mortgage market and protect consumers from abusive and misleading practices involving everything from credit cards to debt relief the CFPB is headed by a single director with a five year term and in order to ensure that the director is independent the law bars the president from firing him for any reason except for malfeasance inefficiency or neglect of duty that independence is being challenged as unconstitutional by a firm that's being investigated for misleading practices and by the trump

Supreme Court NPR Nina Totenberg Congress Cfpb Director President Trump
Supreme Court Eyes The President's Power To Say 'You're Fired!'

NPR's Business Story of the Day

05:43 min | 9 months ago

Supreme Court Eyes The President's Power To Say 'You're Fired!'

"At the Supreme Court today the trump administration is trying to make it easier for the president to replace the heads of the country's independent regulatory agencies. The administration is asking the court to restrict or reverse a decision that dates back more than eighty years. Npr legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg reports in two thousand eight the. Us economy was on the brink of financial disaster. A rising number of homeowners quite simply can't pay their mortgages for closures have hit a record high. The National Association of Realtors reported the worst month dropping existing home sales since they started keeping track in the late nineties. Further meltdown in the mortgage market had investors. Heading for the exits in two thousand nine. Congress sought to reestablish oversight and regulation of the financial system among the remedies enacted was a law that consolidated powers from across seven agencies into one call the consumer financial protection bureau. It was placed in the offices that the Federal Reserve and funded by the Fed. The new agency was charged with preventing a repeat of two thousand eight financial crisis. Richard Cordray was its first director for the baby. Had two roles one was to try to prevent an economic collapse of that kind ever happening again. And that was done largely to putting in place rules that safeguarded the mortgage market and ferreted out. A lot of the irresponsible and ultimately failed lending that had occurred once in place. The bureau moved aggressively to protect consumers from bad actors in banking and other financial services also in the CFP BE SITES. Were Bill Collectors. Telemarketers and others accused of misleading practices among these was the Salem Law Firm in Los Angeles investigated for charging consumers illegal. Upfront fees for debt relief services the CFP as part of its investigation demanded certain documents from the law firm. The firm refused contending that the structure of the agency is unconstitutional. Because it's director cannot be fired by the president at will instead the bureau's director like the heads of other independent federal agencies can only be fired for cause meaning malfeasance inefficiency or neglect of duty lawyer? Andy Pinkus who represents the Chamber of Commerce explains the theory of our government is that the popularly elected president will appoint officials and remove them. They're not doing what he wants. So if you take away the president's power to remove someone Then you're drastically limiting the political accountability of that individual that view however lost in the lower courts and the sale affirm appealed to the Supreme Court backed by the trump administration central today. Argument is a case dating back to nineteen thirty five. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to fire one of five commissioners on the Federal Trade Commission over his policy views. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously. That Congress created the FTC to perform quays judicial quasar legislative functions and that the president could not therefore dismiss its members the way he could members of his own administration the sale firm and the trump administration will argue that. The CFPB is different because the bureau's power was placed in the hands of a single director instead of a multi member commission again lawyer. Andy Pinkus multi member agencies the way they're structured our system have to have people from different parties. The president picks the chairman who has a lot of control about how it operates. The terms are staggered. So most presidents will have an opportunity to appoint a number of those people because the trump administration is not defending the CFP structure. The Supreme Court appointed lawyer Paul Clement to argue on behalf of the Bureau Clement notes that there are other single-member directors the government who cannot be fired by the president will among them the control of the currency and the director of the Social Security Administration. The constitution says nothing about the president's power to remove officers confirmed by the Senate pointing to that fact Clement notes. There are literally dozens of independent agencies. That control everything from monetary policy to the stock market to public health and Safety Clement says that the consequences of invalidating the CFP structure could be dire. The issue in this case is like the thread on the sweater. That if you start tugging on it and you tug on it hard enough. Potentially the whole sweater comes undone and the sweater here really is is the entirety of the whole alphabet soup of agencies that all have these four 'cause protections these agencies. He notes are often central to our economy. The Federal Reserve is a great sort of example of why Congress imposes these kinds of restrictions. Because there are certain issues in the world that we deal with the national level where it's nice to have a degree of installation for a discharging a particular duty where it's not GonNa Change with whoever's the president the trump administration however is willing to roll the dice in this case. It argues that if a single director agency cannot be distinguished from a multi member agency the court should reverse. The case decided eighty five years ago. That would throw into doubt not just the CFP B but independent agencies that comprise roughly a third of the government and not just those agencies but also potentially the rules that those agencies have laid down over the years

President Trump Supreme Court Director Congress Federal Reserve President Franklin Delano Roos CFP Andy Pinkus Nina Totenberg United States Donald Trump National Association Of Realto Federal Trade Commission Social Security Administration Richard Cordray Paul Clement Salem Law Firm
Supreme Court will take up Trump's broad claims of protection from investigation

NPR News Now

00:49 sec | 1 year ago

Supreme Court will take up Trump's broad claims of protection from investigation

"The Supreme Court is set to consider the issue of presidential immunity. The court says it will review decisions by lower courts have upheld congressional and grand jury subpoenas Lena's issued to president trump's accounts in banks for some of his financial records. NPR's Nina Totenberg. The lower courts have upheld all three subpoenas at issue in these cases is to from congressional committees and third from grand jury in New York and a criminal case. All three cases involve subpoenas issued not to trump himself but to his accountants. Sir Banks He did business with the court will hear arguments in the cases in March with a decision expected by the end of June just when the presidential campaign is swinging into high gear the three cases the Supreme Court has agreed to hear are separate from the impeachment proceedings against the president. He's facing a vote in the full house. Next

Supreme Court Donald Trump President Trump Sir Banks Nina Totenberg Lena NPR New York
1st Supreme Court Gun-Rights Battle In 10 Years May Transform Legal Landscape

Morning Edition

01:08 min | 1 year ago

1st Supreme Court Gun-Rights Battle In 10 Years May Transform Legal Landscape

"The Supreme Court justices will hear their first gun rights case in a decade in two thousand eight and twenty ten the court held the second amendment right to bear arms is an individual right not a right tied to military and law enforcement service NPR's Nina Totenberg reports that today the question is how far state and local governments may go in limiting that right the key to those early rulings was justice Anthony Kennedy who cast the deciding fifth vote but insisted according to court sources on language that would permit wide regulations of gun possession and use outside the home now however Kennedy is retired replaced by justice break Cavanah who as a lower court judge wrote in support of expansive gun rights Paul Clement who will represent gun owners today knows that even so Cavanaugh was constrained as a lower court judge in ways he is no longer now he can interpret the constitution in a different way in his new perch away that Clemens says will not see the individual right is limited to having a kind of home Nina Totenberg NPR news Washington

NPR Nina Totenberg Anthony Kennedy Cavanaugh Clemens Washington Supreme Court Cavanah Paul Clement
U.S. court backs House request for Trump's financial records

Fresh Air

00:58 sec | 1 year ago

U.S. court backs House request for Trump's financial records

"A federal appeals court has upheld a congressional subpoena for some of president trump's financial records these held by one of his accounting firms this is the first appellate court ruling to uphold any of the many congressional subpoenas the house of representatives has issued for trump records this is from the house oversight committee NPR's Nina Totenberg has more the committee said it's a **** certain trump financial records to see whether federal ethics laws needed to be amended in order to curb abuses that purpose is certainly legitimate the court said disputes between Congress and the president are a recurring plot international story it continued that is precisely what the framers intended they sought to balance the powers between the three branches of government to quote save the people from autocracy the two to one decision is not the last word on this issue it could be reversed by the full court of appeals or potentially the US Supreme Court Nina Totenberg NPR news

Donald Trump NPR Nina Totenberg Congress President Trump Us Supreme Court
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean
"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

02:17 min | 2 years ago

"nina totenberg" Discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"But that wasn't the end of the story. There was a case called United States versus McDonnell that was brought by prosecutors in Virginia against the former governor of Virginia and the supreme court in its wisdom decided. Months after we convicted both silver and scallops to narrow the law. The appeals court in both cases said, even though there's a lot of evidence to support the convictions in an abundance of caution and to be extra conservative, they reverse both convictions and said, they have to be retried with the judges in each case, giving the proper instruction that now complies with the new supreme court ruling in McDonnell. Now, if you weeks ago. Children, silver was convicted again upon retrial in front of the same judge using the same evidence, but the new instruction consistent with McDonnell in that was a good moment for the people of New York state and anyone who cares about the scourge of public corruption and just the other day Tuesday, actually, while I was taping the interview with Nina totenberg, dean scallops, and his son were convicted once again on all counts of everything with which they were charged. And I wanted to congratulate the southern district of New York and thank them for their work and their diligence and the fact that they didn't give up on those cases and expert both of those men to be sentenced to substantial prison terms as they were the first time around supreme court. Notwithstanding. This week is Nina totenberg back in the nineteen eighties. It was her reporting that scuttled the nomination of judge Douglas Ginsburg to the supreme court. A few years later, she broke the allegations of sexual harassment against nominee, Clarence Thomas. Now she's preparing to cover the confirmation hearings of judge, Brad Kavanagh. We talk about what she sees coming and how it fits into the story of our highest court and side. Note, she was in DC. I was in New York for this conversation. You'll hear why that matters in a second that's coming up. Stay tuned. Stay tuned is supported by ZipRecruiter. Every leader needs a good team. No one succeeds on their own. Not a lawyer. Not a podcast host that's ZipRecruiter can help their matching technology and easy to use website. Make hiring simple fast.

supreme court Nina totenberg McDonnell New York silver Virginia Brad Kavanagh Douglas Ginsburg United States Clarence Thomas harassment DC dean