36 Burst results for "New York Times"

Fresh update on "new york times" discussed on Monocle 24: The Globalist

Monocle 24: The Globalist

01:17 min | 1 hr ago

Fresh update on "new york times" discussed on Monocle 24: The Globalist

"Let's continue now with today's newspapers joining me down the line is Caroline frost writer journalist and broadcast. Good morning, Caroline. Good morning. Let's have a look at what the papers are saying about the European Union and its examination of mandatory vaccinations. It's something that the EU commission president osler Fonda Lion suggested was something that needs to be discussed now. Yes. Well, this is a pretty dramatic move. I mean, it's not unprecedented already in the last ten days or so we've had Austria coming out with mandatory vaccination for its subjects we've had the incoming Chancellor of Germany saying that he hopes by March the same issues will be in place in Germany. But yes, this is a pretty pan continental move. Obviously nothing is set in stone. She is saying that this is a discussion. But this is very much in the face of a new winter wave, a huge fear that the death toll could top more than 2 million this winter 700,000 fertility numbers being bounded around. Obviously, very frightening and on top of that, we've got the new variant with debate, still circulating about just how much more dangerous it is and how resistant to vaccination. So you can see it in all the presses across Europe. There is this great push 75% seems to be this cap of current vaccination. Obviously, protests from anti vaxxers and it does cut into ethical concerns about individual freedom and how people feel about do they want the safety of the statistics of the vaccination versus personal freedoms and liberties about what we do with our bodies? Yes, huge, huge, ethical dilemma with all of this. It is for balance with freedom becomes responsibility. Let's move on to a story in The New York Times. We've heard that the women's tennis association has said it is not going to hold tournaments in China for the foreseeable future until people know what's happened to punk Trey. Yes, so this is going on, this is a story that is not going away much to the consternation of Beijing leaders. Normally, The New York Times discusses that they have a very thorough robust approach to these things, which is just totally silence any oppression and wait for the world to move on. But this has not happened because as you say, the WTA very big progressive leader in the world of women's sports have said no tournaments in China for the foreseeable future. And of course, that is now putting a bit more pressure on the sporting community because we've got the Winter Olympics coming up in February in China. And so yes, the world is still watching much too the consternation and probably the surprise of the traditional Chinese leaders and how they go about these things. Indeed, what is Beijing trying to rely on what approaches Beijing relying on here? What we've seen this kind of some say stage some say naturally smiling video. They're suppressed or the social media platforms people who are commenting about pink and just questioning issues free to discuss her well-being as she would appear in these rather strange videos. And anybody in China who's commenting comments swiftly deleted. This is unprecedented. Normally, China's leaders are very quick to either cast out anybody who somehow diverts from this great polished nation that they like to present to the world, but this is the first time that a world athlete has questioned one of their own leaders for bad behavior. So I think that they're sort of having to make it up as they go along. And this is all ahead of the Olympic Games coming up. I mean, this isn't. This is bad timing. I think we can vary. Very bad. On the one hand, they love their athletes to do well on the world stage and they become heroes and heroines of their country. But obviously careful what you wish for because you have a very high profile. The Olympics is coming up. People like Martina Navratilova, another high profile athlete, internationally watched. She has written well, thank you, WTA. Thank you, that world leader in women's sports. Now we are all looking to the IOC. What do you have to say about this? Let's move on to an article in the times and the announcement from the far right firebrand Eric has decided that he is now formally entering the presidential race in France, promising he will save France from the destruction at the hands of the Muslims, immigrants and criminals abetted by the elites. Well, he's an interesting character, isn't he? He is. So a few weeks ago, this promised to be an entertaining slice of French political life with pictures that he as an in his 70s long married man has perhaps not only got his young lover pregnant, but is in the front of all the magazines in France promising to sue, but of course not denying the report because it does actually perhaps does make him look too bad in France for being a virile man who still cares about family life, because he may have may or may not have a child on the way himself, but suddenly it's a gorget very serious. He is stridently right wing. This has come over to the UK because somebody interviewed him for the spectator in the UK and people are even arguing that he shouldn't have been given that platform. So that tells you we're into that territory again, free speech versus for what we need for our own good. He's promising to take France in an unashamedly far more right wing direction than even his rival marine le pen. And, well, the times worries that it may have tickled the fancy in France, they're not particularly worried that he will end up in the palace, the elysee, but it could have machinations on the election and how the various parties now split off and whether this could actually end up defeating Macron indirectly by putting a more moderate right winger in the frontline for that sort of rivalry to Macron for the big boat. He's an astonishing character. There's a brilliant article in The New York Times. It brings a profile of Eric Zimmer. And the fact that it says that he's capturing national headlines, but unleashing vicious bigotry in the mainstream in a way unseen in years. It doesn't make France look great, does it? But it does expose what The New York Times is saying this morning is that the great irony of quoting here is that misses ammo twice convicted of inciting racial hatred and discrimination is a Jew. And he has updated France's oldest hatred for a new era. He is engaged according to The New York Times. There's a religious war with Islam and a race war with the black and Arab populations, the entire neighborhoods of cities that have been colonized by Muslims, been even to read words like that in 2021. It's just blistering, it's horrible. Oh, I mean, these rule dog whistles aren't they? He said this week immigration is not the cause of all our problems, but it aggravates them all. Of course, this tickles more than just the fancy of many people, not just in France, but he has become a sort of torch paper for those feelings. He's released a video this week, which is kind of Mussolini esque in both hating foreigners all other types inverted commas and also looking back to French past glories, directive film director Luke besson is absolutely agreed because he's used video footage from one of his films. He said, do not take my work and use it for these ends. So yes, it is very divisive, very polarizing, probably not very popular, but we know that the problem with these types of figures is that they lean everyone else just tiny bit more to the right. It's just moves that needle along. Indeed, to be watched with care. It's also split the Jewish community into as well because there are supporting him at others who are clearly don't. Finally, do over emotional people hold the key to happiness, tell me..

Caroline Frost China Eu Commission Osler Fonda Lion France The New York Times Beijing Germany Caroline European Union WTA Austria Trey Winter Olympics Martina Navratilova Tennis Macron Olympic Games Europe
How the Pandemic Crushed the Middle Class

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:59 min | 2 d ago

How the Pandemic Crushed the Middle Class

"The one common theme that will not be covered by The New York Times. Recovered by any meaningful I don't even call it The New York Times meaningful, but they have mass distribution, no doubt. Mainstream drive by activist outlet is the deterioration of America's working class. That finally, blue collar workers and people in the muscular class of our country welders and carpenters, electricians, we're starting to make meaningful gains under president Donald Trump. But as soon as we decided to lock down our country, we minted 500 new billionaires. Do you know there were 500 new billionaires in the last 18 months, new billionaires? There was a $3.8 trillion upward wealth transfer from working people to the ruling class. You will not have a country. Let me say this again. You will not have a country without a stable, robust, anti fragile middle class. It will not happen. You see the middle class is not dependent on the state, and they're equally skeptical of the rulers and their skeptical of the permanently poor. Middle class life must always come first when it comes to how are we going to create a robust and long-lasting society and civilization? The middle class has always been a hedge against the government getting too involved in your life for your business. The latest kind of wave of middle class anger has come from moms and dads in school boards across the country. But that really is just the latest manifestation of the economic angst and anxiety that has been created by a kleptocratic oligarchic grueling class that locked down the country unnecessarily is now firing people from their jobs not want to take a vaccine. And then punishing people if they dare disagree with the status quo.

The New York Times Donald Trump America
Kyle Rittenhouse Is Exactly the Kind of Enemy the Left Wants to Create

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:21 min | 5 d ago

Kyle Rittenhouse Is Exactly the Kind of Enemy the Left Wants to Create

"If you show up to a rally or you show up to a city burning while the National Guard is not there and the police have been told to stand down and you defend yourself because someone's trying to kill you and that someone trying to kill you is a child rapist? You're gonna get tried for first degree murder in your family has to go into debt to try to defend you, which we're seeing right now with Kyle rittenhouse. And by the way, if this was 1892, and it was the KKK trying to take over a city, and it was a black 17 year old that took a gun to go to the burning city. We would have like a national holiday to that young man. Seriously. Not saying that's what we need for Kyle, not saying we'd like a national holiday, but I'm saying that it would be everyone would say this is the most amazing heroic thing I've ever seen. But instead, let's just be let's just be as blunt and honest about it. Kyle rittenhouse tracks a box of the type of let's say enemy they want to create. And we saw this earlier with what happened with the Nicolas Sandman case. You guys remember that the Covington kids? Remember the Covington kids? Where Nicholas Sandman on the steps of the capitol with that lunatic came up with the drum and started banging it in his head, and his head was his face, and we were told that the young kid was the one that's provoking and saying racist things, total lie. Totally exonerated one his lawsuits. But no, the thing that Kyle rittenhouse did wrong is that he fit the perfect type of archetype where Joe Biden came out and said that Kyle rittenhouse is a white supremacist. Said that on Twitter, hope he gets sued for that one day in civil court. There is no evidence of that. But instead, here is the essence of it is that there was a picture, the same thing that happened on the southern border when you had border patrol agents on horseback, and they said, oh, they're using whips to go after migrants, total lie, it's called a bridle or saddle. You ever ride a horse before New York Times weirdo, right? And of course not. Never even west of the Mississippi River, let alone ever mounted a horse, right? No, it's a whip. No, but all they have is the narrative. So Kyle rittenhouse, they had the picture they wanted. AR-15, mouth wide open, young, white, Trump loving, a green shirt and hat backwards, looking like he's kind of playing the insurrectionist. Boom. Put him in

Kyle Rittenhouse Nicolas Sandman Nicholas Sandman National Guard KKK Kyle Joe Biden Twitter Mississippi River New York Times
Brian Mudd: The 1619 Project Is the Catalyst of Critical Race Theory in Schools

Mark Levin

00:59 min | 5 d ago

Brian Mudd: The 1619 Project Is the Catalyst of Critical Race Theory in Schools

"In education Understanding where the battle is being fought Critical race theory has of course been an inflection point within this entire debate And it is very much a thing Critical race theory goes back many decades The first published work 1993 The actual book called critical race theory published in 2001 But what by and large has made its way into our schools And in some cases our classrooms has not been critical race theory by name And that's the way that far too many are addressing this particular issue The single greatest catalyst though you've got to be mindful of right now is the 1619 Project Course the work that goes back a few years ago put forward by a New York Times writer advanced by the Pulitzer center As it won a Pulitzer Prize which subsequently got it into our

Pulitzer Center New York Times Pulitzer Prize
Musical theater legend Stephen Sondheim dies at 91

AP News Radio

00:43 sec | 5 d ago

Musical theater legend Stephen Sondheim dies at 91

"Hi Mike Rossi a reporting towering musical theater master Stephen Sondheim has died I comic songwriter Stephen Sondheim a giant in American musical theater has died attorney Rick Pappas told The New York Times Sondheim died Friday at his home in Roxbury Connecticut he was ninety one Sondheim who was taught by the legendary Oscar Hammerstein wrote the lyrics for nineteen fifties American stage classics West Side Story and gypsy early in his career six of Sondheim's musicals won Tony awards for best score he received the Pulitzer Prize for something in the park an academy award for the song sooner or later from the film Dick Tracy five Olivier awards and the presidential medal of honor hi

Stephen Sondheim Mike Rossi Sondheim American Musical Theater Rick Pappas Roxbury Oscar Hammerstein The New York Times Connecticut Tony Awards Pulitzer Prize Academy Award Olivier Awards Dick Tracy
Every Symbol of American Patriotism Is Under Attack

Mike Gallagher Podcast

02:04 min | 6 d ago

Every Symbol of American Patriotism Is Under Attack

"Was reading an article this morning online from The New York Times entitled redesigning America's flag. What if we redesigned the American flag? Why not? And so a lot of woke people came up with different designs for the American flag 6 different takes. On old glory. They want to redesign the American flag. It suggests this article suggests, and I need to apologize to you because the other day there was a conversation about the the him lift every voice and sing. As an appropriate pregame anthem if you will, it's often referred to as the black national anthem. It's a beautiful Sean. And I told you that I didn't have that big a deal with it. And a lot of people were offended and I was ready for that. I figured you might be. I just felt like it wasn't that big a deal because it wasn't replacing the national anthem. It was going to be played or it is being played before the national anthem. But there is only one national anthem. And when I read about idiocy like redesigning the American flag I'm reminded that every symbol of patriotism every act of expressing our love of country. Everything that we believe in America as Americans is under attack. Then there should be no wiggle room. At sporting events, either. There should only be one Nash anthem.

The New York Times America Sean Nash
The Hunter Biden Laptop Story: If It's Not in the News, It Didn't Happen

The Eric Metaxas Show

02:17 min | Last week

The Hunter Biden Laptop Story: If It's Not in the News, It Didn't Happen

"Of course, there was a big cover up back in, I guess it was October, so when all of this was discovered that Joe, the Hunter Biden laptop and the New York Post was about the only newspaper that was covering it until they were told like Matt, not now. You can't cover that. And from the last interview you had when and was with you and mcilhenny, there are co producer and your wife, you had said to her when early on when you guys, I guess we're dating and you were journalists together. You said to her and I have actually used this quote and I've given it a credit to you. You said if it's not in the news, it didn't happen. And that's exactly what happened with the Hunter Biden laptop. They said, not newsworthy, so nobody in America or around the world will know that this actually is real. Yeah, you know, yeah, you know, show you how old I am. I said, I was not in the paper. It didn't happen. And so yeah, they decided to cover this up. They decided to suppress this, not even cover it up surprise. You know, we can't verify the laptop. Well, you've got New York Times. You could 1200 reporters actually, you know, there are emails with 6 people copied on them. Go and ask the other 5 people, then you get the did you send this email. And you know, one of them will confirm it. And if all of them refused to deny it, but then you know it's true, right? You can say, nobody, you know, and no one denying that this was a genuine email. Find out, I mean, they spend so much time and energy working out of Michael Cole and ever went to Prague. I mean, you can find out Joe Biden was in surplus or Hunter Biden was in certain places at certain times. And then you can find out people who emailed and where they were. And you can find out the time that he was there. I mean, these are not difficult things you can send him a list of questions. And he can refuse to answer them. And you can say that. And if he's by the way, it's very easy to prove that you weren't somewhere or you didn't send an email. You know, was there any spelling mistakes and emails, were there anybody named wrongly was the most over some email addresses? If these are fake, how do they get the email addresses? This could collapse in a minute if you put any investigative power behind it. But the problem was they wouldn't collapse. In fact, the more they investigated the more it would be verified.

Hunter Biden Mcilhenny New York Post JOE Matt Michael Cole New York Times America Joe Biden Prague
NYC Allowing Non-Citizens to Vote in Local Elections Threatens Federal Election Fraud

Mark Levin

01:17 min | Last week

NYC Allowing Non-Citizens to Vote in Local Elections Threatens Federal Election Fraud

"New York city New York City lawmakers are poised to allow more than 800,000 This is New York Times New Yorkers who are green card holders or have the legal right to work in the United States to vote in municipal elections and for local ballot initiatives What they're trying to say there is these are non citizens who will be able to vote In municipal elections for local ballot initiatives Now considering how poorly that city is run by the cameo and the other cameos in that city How do you think they're going to prevent these people from voting in federal elections and state elections mister producer They're not They're not This is a massive ruse This city councils like the it could be a city council in Havana It could be the sitting council in Moscow That's how creepy radical extremists these tools are The bill is known as our city our vote Would make New York City the largest municipality in the country to allow non citizens to vote in local

New York City New York Times United States Havana Moscow
Suspect Released From Jail Days Before Parade Tragedy

Dennis Prager Podcasts

02:05 min | Last week

Suspect Released From Jail Days Before Parade Tragedy

"The Milwaukee prosecutor. The DA, what he had done was free. He had been freed on a $1000 bond. He has a record of incredible violence. He tried to run over. Was his girlfriend? Yes. Brooks had a long rap sheet, Wall Street Journal, and the Milwaukee county district attorney's office said he had been out on a $1000 bond. What is the bummed for those who participated in the January 6th events in the capital? There is no pond. We're living in an increasingly dictatorial country because of the left. The only reason you would not acknowledge that is you are afraid to. It's very hard to acknowledge at a certain point in life you've been wrong your whole life. In thinking that the Democratic Party was a force for good, or that The New York Times was a truth teller. Or that universities were positive educational experiences and gave wisdom. It's very hard. My heart breaks for such people. There's a book about such people. The God that failed. It's written by people who believed in communism in the 30s and 40s. When you believe in something your whole life and you then you realize, like this teacher, who wrote this piece that I will read to you. I so admired my shallow teachers and the teaching profession and the teachers union. And then I was awakened. Most of my fellow teachers are morons.

Milwaukee County District Atto Milwaukee Wall Street Journal Brooks Democratic Party The New York Times
What's Actually in the House-Passed Build Back Better Bill?

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:14 min | Last week

What's Actually in the House-Passed Build Back Better Bill?

"So what is in this bill? This is according to breitbart dot com. They do a wonderful job. House passes behemoth build back better act. Funds, Biden's banking surveillance apparatus, the bill would spend $500 million to hire new Department of Justice tax division surveillance agents to bring civil and criminal cases against Americans if we're not rating enough homes right now. It removes any prohibition regarding Uyghur Muslims in China, Democrats have removed the provision of the previous draft that would have prohibited any funding, provided by title and science spacer technology award a contract subcontract grant or loan to an entity involved with using the forced labor of Uighur Muslims. How about tax pork for trial lawyers? This provision modifies current law expensing rules to allow plaintiff's attorneys to deduct out of pocket litigation costs in the year they are incurred. How about number 6? This is a fun one. The build back better act would add language, creating a tax credit for wages paid to journalists. That's what we need. We need more New York Times reporters. The bill would add $500 million. $500 million. That's the annual operating budget of Pittsburgh every single year to give you an idea. The whole city. For schools of medicine, prioritizing funding, based on racial demographics, and requiring faculty to be hired and students be recruited based on prioritizing racial and demographic characteristics. How about left wing divisive race baiting? This bill with add back language that continues the race baiting attempts. As Americans is oppressive claiming all minorities are denied a full opportunity to participate in the American way of life that's a direct quote out of the bill. That all minorities are denied a full opportunity from participating in American life. There's $2.5 billion for tree equity. It'd be a $2.5 billion slush fund that would send taxpayer dollars to radical environmental groups to plant trees and advance tree equity. The bill asks for hundreds of millions of dollars to promote funding for racism and discrimination training curriculum, funding for healthcare risk training to promote the lips climate agenda and refers to pregnant women as

Department Of Justice Tax Divi Biden China New York Times Pittsburgh
 As tourism brightens, Times Square hopes to regain luster

AP News Radio

00:40 sec | Last week

As tourism brightens, Times Square hopes to regain luster

"As tourism brightens across the US with the upcoming holidays and the opening of borders new York's time square hopes to regain its pre pandemic luster even as visitors again crowd time square the shops restaurants and hotels are still reeling from the pandemic with vaccinated foreign tourists now welcome back in the U. S. New York is hoping a stream of money travelers will hasten the area's economic comeback how quickly that happens could be a barometer for the rest of the U. S. tourism industry Tom Harris is president of the Times Square alliance with more Broadway shows opening up with the international tourists returning and with the office workers returning the

Time Square New York U. Times Square Alliance United States Tom Harris
Democrat Reconciliation Bill Features $1.67B Tax Handout to Media Corporations

Mark Levin

01:48 min | Last week

Democrat Reconciliation Bill Features $1.67B Tax Handout to Media Corporations

"Well our friends at our friends at Americans for tax reform One inform you about something On page 1957 and this is being voted on tonight 1957 of the reconciliation bill such a nice passive name given to such destructive activity Democrats have included a 1.67 billion special tax handout to media companies Hello under the guise of helping local journalists In reality the provision is a product of the D.C. lobbing swamp and will benefit large media corporations Companies of any size are eligible for the tax credit You know like Comcast AT&T think about it The New York Times The Washington Post broadcast print and digital companies all qualifying Each company is allowed to claim the tax credit for up to 1500 of their employees How many humble village newspapers do you know then employ 1500 people The associated depressed recently reported that the gani corporation publisher of USA Today could get as much as 127.5 million dollars Should the tax break become law They wrote gannett one of the nation's largest remaining newspaper chains could gain as much as a $127.5 million over 5 years Kinetic is a market capitalization of $780 million It's 2020 revenue was 3.4 billion

The Associated Depressed D.C. Comcast The Washington Post The New York Times Usa Today Gannett AT
China Warns US About 'Playing With Fire

The Hugh Hewitt Show: Highly Concentrated

01:19 min | 2 weeks ago

China Warns US About 'Playing With Fire

"President Biden and general secretary G have concluded their Zoom call, it went a long time and there were read apps on the United States side and there are redoubts on the Chinese side. I think what's most important, The New York Times is reporting the Chinese readout shows general secretary G bullying, President Biden on Taiwan. Irene, China's leader Xi Jinping, this is The New York Times. Urged the United States not to test his country's resolve on the question of Taiwan and island democracy, Beijing claims as part of its country. We are patient and willing to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification with the utmost sincerity, mister GE told President Biden, according to a readout of the meeting, released by Chinese state media. But China will have to take resolute measures if the Taiwan independence separatist forces provoke compel or even cross the red line. In vivid language that has come to define Beijing's steadfast rhetoric, mister G criticized politicians of the United States who he said sought to use the island status as leverage over Beijing. A trendy described as dangerous. Quote, it is playing with fire. And if you play with fire, you will get burned. The Chinese readout cited mister G

President Biden Taiwan The New York Times United States Xi Jinping Mister Ge Beijing Irene China Mister G
Nikole Hannah-Jones Says U.S. Dropped Bombs on Japan for Financial Reasons

Mark Levin

01:37 min | 2 weeks ago

Nikole Hannah-Jones Says U.S. Dropped Bombs on Japan for Financial Reasons

"Nicole Hannah Jones tweets over at the federalist they picked it up Sean Fleetwood New York magazine writer and founder of the 1619 Project the call Hannah Jones took to Twitter this week to offer historically illiterate take on why the United States bond Hiroshima during World War II In a course she was promoted by The New York Times or 1619 project cronut but a New York Times Historical scholars from every walk of life came out and said she doesn't know what the hell she's talking about but it doesn't matter You see And now deleted November 6th tweet Jones attempted to argue that the only reason the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city was due to financial reasons All you World War II vets listen to this She said they dropped the bomb They I guess meaning her country America When they knew surrender was coming because they'd spent all this money developing it and to prove it was worth it She wrote propaganda's not history my friend Now that is unbelievable She is a complete idiot She is a complete idiot Their first bomb was dropped and then the second bomb was dropped because Japan refused to accept unconditional surrender And that's what Harry Truman insisted on She is a historical illiterate but she can push her Pablo her hate for this country and there's not a single corrupt media platform that wouldn't love to

Nicole Hannah Jones Sean Fleetwood Hannah Jones The New York Times New York Magazine America Hiroshima Twitter Jones Harry Truman Japan Pablo
Tiffany Cross Is Stuck on 'Racist' Truck Drivers Versus Other Major Media Companies?

Mark Levin

01:39 min | 2 weeks ago

Tiffany Cross Is Stuck on 'Racist' Truck Drivers Versus Other Major Media Companies?

"The is not even an intelligent person You know they used to have Tim Russert that guy was unbelievable And before him Joel spivak and then they purposely lower their stainless but I have a question folks Here's the anchor on meet the press right What's his race mister White They have their Sunday show on ABC George Stephanie what's his race White They have a Sunday show on CBS nobody watches it What's his or her race White Isn't that amazing Jeff mother Zucker What's his ray He's white I can go right down the list Let's look at AT&T Board a director see ya White What's that all about The ownership of The New York Times always has been white they're immigrants Oh Look at The Washington Post who's at the head of The Washington Post a guy named Fred Ryan White Why does white can be That amazing An activity cross is there talking about truck drivers truck drivers She's met truck drivers and most of them she happens to know an industry populated by a lot of white men over the age of 55 We can't have that in America No no no In Tiffany what have you done for your country What have you done for anybody What have you done for black people Nothing You're a loser All you do is attack people

Joel Spivak George Stephanie Tim Russert The Washington Post Fred Ryan White Zucker ABC CBS Jeff The New York Times AT Tiffany America
 Reports: Trump selling DC hotel to investment firm for $375M

AP News Radio

00:37 sec | 2 weeks ago

Reports: Trump selling DC hotel to investment firm for $375M

"The trump organization is selling its ritzy hotel near the White House it's been a big money loser for the trump family now the trump organization will sell the rights to the glitzy two hundred sixty three room trump international hotel to a Miami investment group for three hundred seventy five million dollars C. GI merchant group plans to re branded as a Waldorf Astoria that's according to the Wall Street journal in The New York Times ethics experts urged president trump to sell the hotel before he took office but he refused the hotel soon became a magnet for the powerful and power seeking I'm

Trump Organization Waldorf Astoria White House President Trump Miami The Wall Street Journal The New York Times
A Timeline of the FBI and New York Times Colluding Against Project Veritas

Mark Levin

01:42 min | 2 weeks ago

A Timeline of the FBI and New York Times Colluding Against Project Veritas

"Happened within an hour of one of our reporters homes being secretly raided by the FBI This is project veritas The New York Times who we are currently suing for defamation Contacted project veritas reporter for comment We don't know how The New York Times was aware of the execution of a search warrant and report his home or the subject matter of the search warrant as the grand jury investigation is secret But was leaked by the FBI It was leaked by the FBI to The New York Times To The New York Times days later O'Keefe would have his home rated and sure enough the times once again knew about it before anyone else Are you noticing a pattern Because it's about to become an obvious as obvious as a neon sign Two days ago a court ordered the FBI to stop extracting data from James O'Keeffe's phones Which apparently been seized Again all of this is being done under the allegation that a diary was stolen But then it wasn't stolen by James O'Keefe for his reporters or project veritas if it was stolen at all by the way But then last night things boiled over into outright scandal The New York Times suddenly started publishing privileged communications Privileged communications Between project veritas and its legal team Those messages apparently came from one of O'Keeffe's phones From one of O'Keeffe's phones

FBI The New York Times The New York Times To The New James O'keeffe Keefe James O'keefe Veritas Keeffe
Liz Wheeler: The FBI Is Leaking James O'Keefe's Privileged Info

Mark Levin

01:01 min | 2 weeks ago

Liz Wheeler: The FBI Is Leaking James O'Keefe's Privileged Info

"Liz Wheeler a very sharp lawyer She tweeted out project veritas sues The New York Times the FBI raids O'Keeffe's home The New York Times knows about the rate immediately The FBI steals keeps reporters notes The New York Times publishes what is an ode square She says this is nuts The FBI is leaking O'Keeffe's privileged information to The New York Times It's scandalous folks They're nothing is really surprising anyone when dealing with the FBI these days It appears that a major newspaper has colluded with the federal government to target an investigative reporting outlet Of course there's still more dots to connect but it's there And if it's there some other explanation I'm not seeing it they right The pretense of the original rate simply made no sense Really a diary In The New York Times has been getting leaks from the bureau every step of the way in order to target project veritas

Keeffe The New York Times FBI Liz Wheeler Federal Government
Did the FBI and New York Times Collude Against Project Veritas?

Mark Levin

01:38 min | 2 weeks ago

Did the FBI and New York Times Collude Against Project Veritas?

"Our gloves are on and we're ready for battle It's the way it goes Red state does a very good job Somebody uses the acronym banshee of explaining what the FBI has done the project veritas and more specifically to James O'Keefe and it is another disgrace It's yet another example What's happening to this country The FBI raid a project veritas turns into a massive scandal they write after privileged communications are leaked Project veritas has found itself in the crosshairs of the FBI That began with a raid on the homes of several of its journalists under the guise of looking for Ashley Biden's diary Apparently a stolen diary is now in the purview of federal authorities Will there be investigating the stealing of bicycles next But what was so disturbing besides the raids happening was how quickly The New York Times knew about them While O'Keefe was asked by the FBI to keep quiet The New York Times knew within hours pointing to a leaker within the FBI Quote but while the Department of Justice requested us to not discuss the existence of the subpoena something very unusual happened within an hour of one of our reporters homes being secretly raided by the FBI This is project veritas The New York Times who we are currently suing for defamation Contacted project veritas reporter for comment

FBI Ashley Biden James O'keefe The New York Times Keefe Department Of Justice
"new york times" Discussed on Feminist Utopia

Feminist Utopia

02:54 min | Last month

"new york times" Discussed on Feminist Utopia

"The old grey lady also known as the old grey karen in my house. So i've never really believed that the new york times was a bastion of liberal thought. I'm to open with that. It's always been status quo in my time that i've been reading at the thirty so years i've been reading it. It has never been pro progressive. It has never been anti-capitalist. It has never been anti corporate or anti-racism or anti-racism. Oh my gosh. They go way back being stupid. Not only racism but anti-semitism as well or is that racism. Do you consider antisemitism racism Okay i think you can classify that. I think a lot of black activists would take umbrage at that and i understand why but then i've also had to take umbrage with black antecedents is one who shall remain nameless in texas was talking about the white supremacists at charlottesville. They weren't chancing chanting. The blacks will not replace us. They were chanting. Jews will not replace us when someone referred i referred to them specifically as antisemitic. And and i'm like. I love you dude but step off on this one right. So it's i. It is a form of of racism. I think the new york times made a huge error and labeling racism as human bias. Isn't that a wave thing. It's like unicorns and butterflies. The context was they had an article. About how black business owners were more likely to get paycheck protection program loans from online lenders than from smaller banks so if they went online they were approved if they went in person not so much and the new york times asserted that human bias appeared to be. The main reason. Couldn't say the word. It's a new our word. There's so many human. By as i think that it should be correctly labelled as racism and they did get a little bit of pushback on it. But i don't think enough. Had you heard about that. No for no. It's interesting though. My husband's involved with them. Some machine learning things with that have been encoded with human bias. And so there's there's like a whole episode there about sexist and racist and such huge amounts of bicycle into.

new york times charlottesville texas
"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

06:19 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"Its op-ed pages and elsewhere is an ongoing process and that ongoing process it knowledge in its shortcomings. Admitting its errors is part of the new york times legacy and part of why it is the prevailing and powerful force in journalism that it is canopy better absolutely should it be yes does it need to get across the country. Yes but the new york times has not fundamentally lost. its way fundamentally. It has the biggest broadest embrace of journalism of any news organization in america. Thank you. Frank says no and here to urge for the resolution making his closing statement in support of the language that the new york times has lost. Its way yasha among yasha. Let me tell you about emily. One zao. I'm is young chinese immigrant to the united states who dreamed of copying and will and one day she wanted pitch contest from an agent with an amazing story That secure a free book deals was incredibly excited. She said i'm going to be a public over on her social media. The book was a fantasy novel set in the future and spied pop the actual systems of indentured servitude across asia today while before the book was published those social media pilot against view. Good to likely didn't have access to the full book claimed that it was a offensive because a chinese woman should not be allowed to talk about. Slave is not what the book was. In fact doing what the new york times to it habits in attica code why offer posted debut after pre publications accusations of racist if you own you think that about amity wenzel was the article in the newspaper of record in the united state. You would come away with an unfettered session that she is racist now avenue staple make missteps. The business instance. It comes from an attempt to traumatize more clarity over the of to the it is part of a wider phenomenon of the new york. Times going after its whole base of vitas Turning itself into vice like the guardian rather than the thing that we need more desperately in the united states which newspaper of record that objectively reports on. What's going on with the world fearless. He uncovers when people do that. Something can serve as a basis of the Will of life. Unfortunately the new york times is choosing to abandon that mission that is why fia despite my laughable new times but it is in fact using its way i urge you to the four and give us a monk in our final speaker and final word comes from virginia heffernan she arguing against the resolution. Virginia the screen is yours. Thanks very much. For very scintillating conversation. I can't tell what my opponents mean by. Its way i've been trying and trying to understand. I see a little bit. The body is making the case that it's lost the way that there is a particular set of politics that she'd like to see represented on the op-ed page and that way has been lost and in fact never maintained by the new york times. And and yasha. I think has defined. Its way as a kind of objectivity that is absolutely that is somehow absolutely free in the eye of god from any kind of bias. Now examples though. He is cited as bias. He told just now. The story of a of a young chinese novelist and said that amid accusations of racism. She lost her book contract. And this is how the new york times covered that imme- accusations of racism. She lost her book contract. I in in no place in that headline does it say. This woman is a racist. We don't know the impressions that readers came away with. We just know yasha monk and the new york times. Tell the story of this publishing raucous in exactly the same way. So i can't tell from these arguments whether the times is pandering to the hoy ploy with heightened emotional coverage of trump to sell ads by the way the primary purpose of all newspapers from time immemorial. I can't tell if they're paneling pandering to the boy or ignoring the views of the pulawy in the favor of hash fringe ideologies of the liberal elites. I think the way of the new york times and again the way of the new york times not our way. Not the way of the of the wall street journal or fox news or some idealized newspaper but but it's way has absolutely not been lost. This from the beginning has been the times's mandate to sell ads to tell the truth and to make it understandable to readers and on every single page of the paper that tries to do this and every single digital artifacts that the times produces base is its aim to seek to tell the truth and to help readers understand the world to seek and to help and in these ways the times has not only not lost its way it is continued to forge away for the future of journalism. You must vote no on this resolution. Thank you much virginia heffernan. I includes round. Three and that concludes this until june squared. Us debate that means the competition is over all right it is now time for our second vote and remember. It's the side that changes the most minds between the first and the second vote that has declared our winner. We're going to do it the same way as before i go back to i q two. Us dot org. You're going to have the same choices. On what the resolution says you're forward you're against it. You're undecided also as i mentioned earlier. We're going to be keeping this vote open for seven days and inviting the general public also to watch and vote at the end of the seven days we will announce the winner on our website. Iq.

new york times yasha Us amity wenzel virginia heffernan ed page attica yasha monk emily Frank fia asia the times new york Virginia fox news wall street journal
"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

03:26 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"Election they have fired. The guy who they had hired to bring the other side. Frank frank tell us why did they not run anything barkat on their editorial team. Okay worst theory about it. Because i'm saying it's because they've lost their way so why it's not because we all agreed it's an it's the op. Ed page they did not fail to cover voters who were going to vote for donald trump on the news pages but i wanna come back to the question that john because john. It's a very important one. And i will answer as briefly can. Are there places where the new york times journalism has improved. Are there places where it's not only not lost. Its way but as i said In earlier is leading. The way i would want to one area. Just as an example there are many culture religion the arts incredible breadth and depth. You think about an institution doing this every day. But the point place that i would point to is there climate coverage and it's not just climbed they've they created a climate desk. They are using data and science in multimedia presentations all the time but they're not just coming climate from the perspective of it's hotter and drier plenty of those stories too but also what's happening in industry has industry changing what's happening with electric car vehicles. What's happening to our agriculture. How to farmers see their future growing the food that we need to grow a broad and deep embrace of a topic and by the way you can sign up for a newsletter and get their climate coverage broad right to as well as seeing it imprint. If you still reprint or digitally. So i think there are places where the journalism has continued to improve in advance and by. It's not because of the rule the mob but it's in response to genuine reader interest and that's a healthy form of journalists all right. I think that's a very good characterization of where the fault line is in this argument as we conclude round. Two of this intelligence squared. Us debate and now we move onto round three round. Three is where the debaters have their last stand to try to persuade you to vote for their side of the argument. They will be making brief closing statements. Those statements will be two minutes each and speaking i to summarized her position in support of the resolution here again is unger sargon so you may not have heard of project feels. The project feels has heard about you in two thousand seventeen. The new york times is data. Science department started asking young very educated readers to rate how articles or making them feel and how much they were making them feel to make them feel angry. How angry you make them feel sad. How sad and what they found was that the more emotional reader felt while reading an article the higher they ranked that emotion. The more engaged. They were the longer they stayed on the page and crucially the more likely they were to click on the ad next to it. They took this information and what they did with it was. They created a machine learning algorithm that now predicts how articles at the new york. Times are gonna make readers feel at a sell. This prediction to advertisers in advertiser can come to the times. Now in the times will say how would you like the reader to be feeling when they encounter ad and the advertiser can then choose any choose how much they want them to be feeling again very important. So with the times data science team did was essentially monetize your emotions and it has been wildly wildly.

Frank frank barkat Ed page donald trump john new york times unger sargon Science department Us new york
"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

04:32 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"Bhatia i wanted to take the question to see. Just how how sweepingly you mean the statement that the new york times has lost. its way. so you've talked about the the the the infelicitous events that you've talked about particularly around american politics aditorial page cetera. But frank talked about how you know. The new york times is covering wars around the world disasters around the world. They're doing business reporting. They're doing cultural reporting are. Are you suggesting that all of this is infected. By the problem that you're talking about happening in the editorial page in the op-ed page or are you limiting your argument in or should we be thinking that you're limiting your argument at different way so as i tried to explain in my opening statement to me it seems like a business model has made the times so financially successful in all the ways that frank laid out is corrosive to journalistic values. And what we're seeing right now. Is those two things sort of coming to ahead. The problem is is that the business model precludes them from delivering the news when it contravenes what its readers wanted here and not just what his readers want to hear it but what. Its most extreme readers here because it has ceded the measure of success to digital engagement and the most extreme people are always the most engaged. That's my argument will. I just wanted to save. I trust the new york times the mall the southern away from important todd in questions in the united states reporting will be opinion so yes. I completely trust virginia. The obituary on mary. Tyler moore. Because i don't think Issue today the closer it comes to the issues that are actually driving today. Paul close it comes to issues on which recall leadership of in your times as very very strong view the less attractive to deal the new york times and that is a real concern for or worse. Festive thing but we need to use tape record but we need a newspaper will tell the truth even when it's uncomfortable but we need one institution in american life that enjoys respect from across board. I love the guardian newspaper in the united kingdom. It's a good progressive voice. As many things. I agree with that that we have the the guardian in the united states. Ready and when the newspaper of record Until the guardian or lose something very very important. Virginia i ask virginia. Quick question should the new york times have run an op. Ed by a trump voter in the lead in the six months before the election. And if they if if yes. Why do you think they did not. I'm not sure that you know the op. Ed page though. It has three conservative writers and and some of the ones that have been fired and clara have been resigned. Including barry weiss and james bennett are not themselves trump voters either but the the the the not sure that they should have given that it is center-left although center left op ed page. The wall street journal did not make the case for bernie sanders. They didn't have introduced. An you. know an op-ed writer about bernie sanders. Because that page is known to be on the right the op. Ed page as you know is quite distinct the rest of the coverage and i think we've agreed that we're talking about as yasha made clear is an inflection that he thinks determines news is reported. Not how the feds come across. And i do think that we. I've pointed out to you that that that the page has been filled with accounts of why people did vote for trump. If not making a robust argument in favor of trump. I would be hard pressed to say that there was a case for this twice. Impeached historically unpopular president but was only once impeached at the time. Maybe they could have found someone we're hearing from but Yasha your partner has argued that he doesn't think there is a good case. The trump should it be given a second term and that the new york times had no obligation to publish one. You i would. I would take your question. I would agree with you. I would say yes absolutely. The new york times should have found somebody in the universe. They're they're there who could of made a case. For why trump y disruptor why someone who was so sacrilegious to american politics had appealed so many so frank. What does it say to you in terms of the argument were having that the paper did not mistake. Well yes it was a mistake but did it lose its way. What a dean by come back the executive editor say later what they're then editor of opinion. Say we need more and that was the thousand the second election. That was okay. They said that after the first election after the second.

new york times ed page Ed page frank Bhatia bernie sanders barry weiss Tyler moore virginia united states yasha james bennett todd mary united kingdom Yasha Paul clara The wall street journal Ed
"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

07:45 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"The most brilliant journalists of color from dot that same class and so there's no ideological diversity and they don't even reflect the minority communities. They come from. This is my point right when you when you you say that this kind of like. Whoa kness is the result of having a diverse workforce. It is not because they are not reflecting the communities that they come from eighty one percent of black people oppose defunding police right but you will not see that opposition in the new york times owner. Bring in your show josh go. Why does this matter by the way you might be able to find the police. That's fine why is it important About in the new york times because y- of the new york times lose touch with reality when the done seat represented ghost of appoint about diversity that yesterday times is a diverse staff of people from different if misty's who went to harvard university since that he's a knocked representative off. The valley does us city in. Which is not kate. I think i was one of the voices of resistance. I am very proud to have warned about the dangers of donald trump and a four-time populism ron world earlier than most but in use paper needs to hold on facts. The new york times. It was the only news outlet to take seriously the sexual abuse charges the sexual assault rape charges levelled by one terror against joe biden You know the biden campaign was appalled. They walked through every part of these charges which turned out to be false now. A lot of writers on the left had already said they seemed false on their face and certainly they could be away would have been an obstacle to buy the presidency. But the new york times did not primarily she did not dismiss them out of and they instead investigated them and found those charges wanting. I think we can all agree that the charges were quick to rest by the new york. Times all right. So your point made in. Virginia ticket to baccio bochu. Virginia's pushing back against your partners argument that the paper is showing a A pro-democratic bias in the way that it is covering the news not just on the bed page but you can jump into this conversation. We're be like now in terms of trump and biden. I just don't believe that the two of you think biden is getting the same treatment from the near times. That trump did. I just don't believe that you actually think that. I don't think anybody who can read could possibly think that and have a little. Let me just clarify. Do think that trump and biden journalistically merit the same coverage or the same kind of coverage. I think that question is a partisan question. I mean that that is exactly the What we're getting at here so so so so. Donald trump of course was outrageous but that outrageousness was in a very symbiotic relationship with the news media. That was covering him was getting rich off of covering his outrageousness. Now the new york times in twenty seventeen printed trump's name ninety thousand times which means that it appeared the equivalent of every two hundred fifty words. Okay that's like four times per article and you can compare how many times president obama's name appeared. Maybe are thinking. Oh well that's just normal for president. We know how many times president obama's name appeared in his second year in office and it was forty thousand times. Okay so i don't understand your argument. Is that the omnipresence of trump's name and coverage of trump was the paper feeding its audience. Negative coverage of trump wanted. To hear is for financial reasons is out what your argument is doing. Exactly what i said about the new dna of the times where does is success measure. It is measured in terms of engagement and there is nothing that gets the heartbeat of liberal elites going like the word trump bucket. If i man. I think it's very important to recognize. John got to this in his question. Donald trump was not just another president. He came to washington intending to be a disruptor. He was an anti 'institutionalised. He attacked not just as a political rivals but his political allies. If they didn't toe the line much of what he was doing and we have seen this in very thoughtful writing from people who are inside the administration working for him was a challenge to democracy itself. Let us just say to. John's question covering donald trump was not like covering any other president. He was unlike any president. We have had in this country's yasha your jonathan excellent question which is weather. Joe biden maritza seem kind of coverage on slump. What would say is that. They should be covered by the same standards. And if you play the same standards to july donald trump and in my opinion will come up with many more critical stories about donald trump and joe biden and that is absolutely fine. Bad is what journalism is the problem in. The last years has become that the media including the new york times has reflexively stocked to anything. Donald trump who has allies said even in cases where it might be that they turned out to be light. One of those times spent the toll misinformation. Disinformation which your times though thinks of itself as combating has been used was when a few people suggested visit possibility that kodak nineteen escaped a lab in china. This was labeled by the new times in fact checks and other newspapers as conspiracy. Few it was put beyond the balance of respectable At nobel prize winners in virology banda facebook youtube for discussing those few weeks for fourteen fifteen minutes. The only mentions of his furious in new york. Times was as obvious lewis. Well today i don't know what the truth is you know yet today at the white house is taking this very seriously and finally osama mainstream media is taking it seriously as well but there plenty of times. Ufo's were considered far and wide to be a preoccupation of crazy people. Now they're taken seriously by the guards so these things evolve in the new york times ever since you know people on the center left center right. Started to say oh. We've decided that the loudly rapidly hypothesis is ban. So that's the whole reason that we have to talk about it and use it as an opportunity to worry that liberals band speech people have talked about the lab theory to death. And as far as i know it's being investigated on the investigation into being closely watched by the new york giants. You jump in. Frank showed the the observation. You made Also carry something that goes way beyond the new york times but unfortunately so many of things that the former president donald trump said route the coveted crisis. It's ho- sore it's Gonna mirror miraculously disappear or hydroxy. Chloroquine will cure or whatever it is proved to be fundamentally incorrect if not outright fabrications the president's credibility sunk to a level that we've not seen before and whether it's the new york times or any place else they had to take that into consideration in reporting whatever he said the lab league theory which i don't think was banned but was viewed skeptically and covered in ways that the by all news organizations most anyway very carefully and reflected that credibility problem and it reflected the flood of disinformation that we now confront so. I think it's wrong to say that the new york times by itself and some egregious degree banned the.

the new york times donald trump biden us city ron world baccio bochu joe biden trump Virginia harvard university misty Joe biden maritza josh obama kate new york John jonathan
"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

05:00 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"Nor vpn dot com slash intelligence. Welcome back to intelligence squared us. I'm your host john donvan. Let's return to our discussion. Thank you for that wrap up. Frank says no. You've now heard the first opening remarks. Then let's move onto the screen next arguing for the resolution of the new york. Times has lost its way among yasha screen is yours. Thanks so much. I'm really looking forward to this debate. And a couple of important things in which we agree. We all agree the new york times as one of the most important institutions in the united states. We all want the new york times to succeed. We also all agree. That new york times is not donald. Trump would put it the failing new of times. The idea that the paper is in financial trouble. Ovitz about to go bankrupt. Fed is about to fail in. That kind of way is really raw. My interest in this between need a newspaper of record. She's luffing your times It's we need an institution. Envy nited states that people from different hats of a political spectrum can look to recognize even if it is beautiful often that it represents the truth that it represents reality in a way that vein can trust and the thing. I'm worried about a central three main changes times implemented over the last year's detract from its standing as the newspaper of record. The i is a very clear narrowing opinion envy up and you didn't have to take my impression as read on that. You can take what that columnists within the new york. Times are saying when he talked Multiple figures within at world f told me over the last years that even quite uncontroversial criticisms of progressive orthodoxy chand by the editors assad things that you simply cannot same time even if ninety percent of a population in america might agree with them. One example of this is very hard within the new york times. Criticize the idea of defending the police and yet we have seen just now in the mail race in new york city that the top candidates chosen by people of color in a progressive city in the united states. Very much in disagreement with that. Slow the second thing i worry about. Is that this is not on just about your opinion pages. It is also a bad news coverage yet increasing seeing an attempt to get away from the old form of the tippety which could be devolve into two ciders abba. Climate change should get scientists who believes in climate change. One denies it. Good when visit consensus. Which would be reflected in the pages of terms the new moral clarity as journalists. Hold it often goes in the opposite direction. The news pages of coming away of managing benard of trying to make clear a which side is right even when that side is making a mistake so the question about future of new york times is not whether it will succeed financially. I'm confident that it will. It's about the role that it's likely to play in american and as has argued at the moment in your times is running after its subscriber base tries to maximize the revenue dollars from the people who most agree with the world of new york times. It is entrusted turning into an american version of guiding stokes. Piece full the most progressive voices in the country. What we need is to preserve the road of the newspaper of record that can actually be a basis of reality for automatic. That is what your time. Losing that is wi fi but is losing. Its thank you again. Our final opening statement will be against the resolution. It comes from virginia heffernan. Virginia your moment. So i started writing for the new york times almost exactly twenty years ago and i was on staff for eight of those years. i should say about the liberal elite according to pew center last year the numbers are very different from what baccio adjust represented to us thirty eight percent of the times readers earn more than seventy five thousand dollars a year but twenty five percent earn between thirty and seventy five thousand dollars and twenty six percent have a household income under thirty thousand dollars in the midst of this debate. I wanna tell you about. Just one article. The obituary of mary. Tyler moore not exactly world's historical piece in two thousand six when moore was still alive..

the new york times john donvan yasha Ovitz united states new york Trump donald Frank Fed new york city virginia heffernan pew center baccio Virginia
"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

05:25 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"Hard way that if they ran beds that their own colleagues disapproved of those colleagues take to twitter very publicly denounce them and their bosses at the near times. Would listen to that. Twitter bob again and again. We have seen the times as leadership caving to social media. Mobs and what i want to argue. Is that. This is not a glitch in a hallowed institution. This is actually a feature a nana bug of the times is current iteration of its current. Dna now this new iteration began in two thousand fourteen. When the the now publisher ag salzburger was tasked with helping the times of all into a digital first publication and he came up with the times ovation report and that report was leaked to the media. So we know it's in it and he found that there were a number of things. The times was not doing well enough the first thing. He blamed the wall separating. The business side of journalism audience development from the newsreel. Eiji felt that the the task of growing the audience fell squarely on the newsroom. And the second thing was he felt underwhelmed by the degree to which times reporters where selling their stories or promoting themselves or really becoming social media. Influencers leadership must identify rising digital stars. And ask them how the times can do better. That's a quote from the time ovation report. So this actually reflected a larger shift towards measuring success in terms of engagement online. And of course what that means is you're allowing the most extreme readers to determine what success looks like because the most engaged readers are always the most extreme ones the new dna of the near times explicitly called for seating moral journalistic authority to the worst place on the planet. Which is the internet and the worst place on the internet. Which is twitter now. Ag was right that this was good business. Times is making a lot of money pursuing this but it is bad journalism now. I think that my colleagues on the other side arguing against the proposal are gonna argue that. This was a democratizing force. This was the new york times allowing the readers the masses to speak back to them. Nothing could be further from the truth. The median income of a new york times reader is one hundred ninety one thousand dollars. The new york times always was and remains a reflection of ruling class in worms. Now the ruling class does like good journalism about its enemies. But that's all you're ever gonna find at the new york times which has really lost. Its way very much about younger sergeant. Our next speaker will be arguing against the resolution against the idea that the new york times has lost. Its way here is. Frank says no frank. The screen is yours. Thank you very much. And i look forward to the debate in the conversation here. Let me say the outset. I'm not gonna argue that. The new york times is perfect. I'm not gonna argue that. The new york times hasn't made missteps misjudgements errors and that hasn't got things that he can improve. I don't think anybody looks at any news organization and doesn't bring their point of view their worldview to that experience but i do think we need to be first and foremost precise and in considering what this resolution is all about that. The new york times has lost. Its way that somehow fundamentally forgotten how to do. Journalism is doing journalism anymore. Losing its way is not about getting better. Losing its ways being fundamentally a disoriented and in the wrong place. The new york times must navigate several things and these are the things we need to keep in mind as we define whether it has lost. Its way i it's journalism is it good is it fair is it inclusive is a professional is accountable when it is right wrong and needs adjusting the storytelling is that storytelling creative bold imaginative. Does it make use of the various platforms. The technologies to inform engage news consumers and finally the business model can generate the revenue needed to maintain seventeen hundred journalists around the world on a daily basis. And all the support system that's needed. I the journalists every day. The new york times still does despite what you just heard. Some of the most remarkable journalism in the world breaking news coverage of the assassination of haiti's president within the first twenty four hours fifteen separate stories from reporting on what happened so far as it is known to the implications on the street in the politics. Secular peace stutters in israel Another headline diamond rush in south africa. Another red cradles nurtured china's next generation of communist leaders a breathtaking reach around the planet and coverage from across the country detailed coverage of the collapse of the condo in surf site a remarkable coverage of heat drought wildfires What to know about the latest corona virus and the delta variant arts culture science. These are areas that most news organisations. Don't even touch anymore. And yet the new york times does it in detail and depth on a daily basis from inc. Mommy's linking tattoo artists with their ancestors to The last ice area in the arctic which may be very vulnerable to rapid.

the new york times ag salzburger twitter Eiji the times The times bob Ag Frank frank haiti delta variant arts culture sci south africa israel china inc. Mommy arctic
"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

02:01 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"Partner virginia heffernan a journalist and cultural critic since two thousand fifteen. She's been a columnist at the la times and cultural columnist at wired. Okay let's get started. I want to say hi to frank and yasha and baccio and virginia. Thanks all four of you so much for joining us from your various points around the globe. Thanks for jonky so our resolution again is the new york times has lost. Its way we're going to go in three rounds. We're going to start with around one. Which is comprised of opening statements from each debater and turn. Those statements will be four minutes each once again. Our motion is the new york. Times has lost. Its way and i up to argue in support of the motion bhatia. The screen is all yours. So i wanna start with something that i think we can all agree about. I think that all of us here all of you watching at home can agree that the new york times does still sometimes produce excellent excellent journalism. I think we can also all agree that the new york times is by no means failing. It is a huge digital success story. But i think we can also all agree or at least i hope we can also all agree that there have been a number of missteps of late that really contravene the highest standards of journalism and are really unseemly for a paper that thinks of itself as the paper of record for example in the league to the twenty twenty election. The near times did not run a single op. Ed by a trump supporter. Not one in the six months leading up to the election at the near time itself told us day in and day out was the most important election of our lifetimes. It essentially d platform seventy five million americans when its job was to explain to us why they were voting. The way they did now this was a huge journalistic failure but even worse was why this happened. It happened because the new york times op-ed editors had learned the.

virginia heffernan yasha baccio new york times la times bhatia frank virginia new york Ed
"new york times" Discussed on The mindbodygreen Podcast

The mindbodygreen Podcast

04:57 min | 4 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on The mindbodygreen Podcast

"He's the author of four consecutive new york times bestsellers and beginning in nineteen. Ninety eight appeared. More than thirty times on the oprah winfrey show his book the seat of the soul which is one of my all time. Favorite books fundamentally changed my view on relationships. When i first read it over twenty years ago it is an unbelievable honor to have him on the show today to discuss his latest masroor book titled universal human gary. Welcome jason. it is such an honor to have you here. The seat of the soul had a profound impact on me years and years ago when you first wrote that one of my all time favorites and so excited to see your latest and greatest. Basri universal human. So welcome so there's are so many great quotes you have passages. If you will from the book. I'm gonna start with one early on which struck me where you say quote the world is macro. You're the micro. If we want to change the world we need to change ourself and quote so amen your patient in the choir believe in empowerment. I believe in accountability. How do we start the process. And how do we prioritize process food really wanna make change begins with intention. Everything begins with intention and then it requires developing awareness self awareness because the bare bones of self transformation are the same no matter how you approach it or how you it in order to change something in yourself. You've got to become aware of what it is. You wanna change without that. You can't change but then when you become aware of it you have to decide to change it and those two things together change your life and has nothing really else. The does sometimes transformation comes through. Grace comes through. A disease comes through trauma. They're all blessings. Different ways is different. Ways of saying blessings. But if you're like me you're you're not an instant learner. Transformation authentic empowerment is incremental and each increment is a choice and each choice is choice of intention. And by the way. I'd i'd like to share with our listeners that i really appreciate being here with you jason being here with you all of the fellow students in air school who are listening to us. But i don't expect you to believe anything that i'm saying just because i say it in fact. I suggest that you not do that with anyone that you not ever believe anything that anyone says. Just because they have a television show. They've written a book or have a platform. Try it on for yourself. If you resonate with anything that i say experiment with it and see what it produces in your life and the producer something that is constructive experiments more and if it doesn't throw it away. Don't try to wear shoe pinches. So what i'm offering a window through which i've come to see life and i hope that is helpful to you as it has been to me so from that perspective and with that authority. I'm speaking from my experience. That i say that our evolution now requires different things that he did just one generation ago. We used to be a species. There was limited to the five senses and evolve by surviving and survived by manipulating and controlling. We survived because our understanding and experience of power was the ability to manipulate in control. Now everything has changed. We are becoming a multi sensory species. Our perceptual capability has expanded is expanded beyond the limitations of the five senses in this changes. Everything changes our understanding our experiences of ourselves the world the universe and everything you can think of community relationship power in fact speaking of power the new understanding and experience of power is alignment of your.

Basri oprah winfrey jason new york times trauma Grace
"new york times" Discussed on Channel 33

Channel 33

02:09 min | 5 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Channel 33

"David on tuesday. The new york times published a story about how moray eels can hunt not just in the water but on land. Now you had our clicks right there but the story also contained this gem of a headline win an eel climbs a ramp to eat squid from a clamp. That's a maure as in moray eel. Now the twitter reaction to this headline was even bigger than one of your journalist. Friends has some personal news. quoting one. the rest of should take the day off. Because we'll never top this another person said next year's pulitzer settled real early and my own reaction was whoever writes the marine life headlines in the time should be the next editor of the paper. I absolutely convinced that it was. I think we can say the greatest ill based headline of all time and we're joined by the duo behind it. They are sabrina. Ambler and michael rothstein of the new york times. Welcome to the press box. Thanks for having us. Can we start at the beginning here. How did the email hunts on land story get assigned in the first place So our colleague. Carl zimmer Who is kind of the every man of science journalism and has just covered everything for very long period of time tweeted. This video of these mauri eels doing this very wild thing where they were climbing up onto some sort of just land surface and eating bits of squid and i thought this video. Maybe it was a friday night. I can't remember when and i thought. Wow that's that's pretty interesting And i think in part. Because i've spent a lot of time on the internet i'm a former social media editor and so on i i my my head immediately went into thinking about. That's amore a tweets. Because it's pretty common that when there's some sort of strange ill related content. Out there particularly about moray eels..

David michael rothstein Carl zimmer Ambler tuesday twitter friday night next year new york sabrina first place one york
"new york times" Discussed on Max & Murphy on Politics

Max & Murphy on Politics

04:12 min | 5 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Max & Murphy on Politics

"The race gave her a really big jolt at the time really catapulted her from someone that a lot of people who pay close attention to this stuff were impressed by an interested in but thought she might have a really hard path to victory and then once the time aditorial board got behind her she really shot into the top tier of the top tier conversation had a huge fundraising response to that. And then all of a sudden she was really catapulted in in the polls she seems to have been Doing very well in manhattan especially but to your prior point seems to not have really broken through at least in the first place votes. I rank votes with in communities of color. Talk a little bit about what you saw. You know saw from her candidacy in response to her and the role. You the role you think. The times editorial board played in in catapulting her candidacy. Sure that time that israel board is a proudly aggressive and openly progressive editorial board Certainly maybe not as progressive as some in the city might want but we are progressive You know we saw katherine garcia as The best person to execute on and The things the city needs through that prism She may not be as far to the left as we are uncertain issues but we felt strongly that she could be pushed And that she was a really good manager who could kind of get the job done as she sent her campaign. I'm obviously you know. The voters felt differently. And so i. I think i'm very proud of artists i mean. I think that she was the best candidate and she was the right candidate for for us At but at the same time. I think there's a lot of talent in the race and i think You know maya wiley is proof. Positive that there's a lot of progressive energy. I also suspect that. A lot of garcia voters may have put wiley second. I don't think they're that far apart ways And then you know on top of that. You know eric adam for me as the editorial board my only regret is that Our endorsement doesn't hold the same sway in east flatbush that holds in park slope. Both for on park avenue and so to me that says There's more work to do and I really believe strongly that we should be as much as possible for the entire city. And so i won't until until we make some headway there and is that is that a reflection of the fact that would impresses a newspaper editorial board from someone's career and from someone's interviews with you and all the vetting you do is very different from the fact that eric adams has been working and developing relationships in these communities for decades Is how do you sort of. Think about the disconnect there is it. Is it understanding Better sort of y. Many communities responded the way they did to eric adams or is it trying to figure out a way for the boards opinions to really get in front of more voters and have more weight in different communities. I mean i think it's all of the above right now. I think in order to make them more persuasive arguments. We need to better understand Voters and communities that we didn't reach As as effectively And so you know. I i mean i'm feeling good today right i really am but i also think there's always room for self reflection and i think there's an opportunity here Listen black americans. In general i think specifically have had such a traumatic and disappointing history with mainstream newspapers..

katherine garcia eric adams maya wiley wiley manhattan today eric adam Both first place garcia israel second americans
"new york times" Discussed on Max & Murphy on Politics

Max & Murphy on Politics

03:51 min | 5 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Max & Murphy on Politics

"Eight hundred thousand plus votes in turnout is looking at least in raw numbers like it's an increase from the last wide open city election cycle back in two thousand thirteen so many differences between now and then but turn out looking in raw number slightly up. We're going to have to crunch the percentages eventually and see what that looks like like. I said there are many tens of thousands of absentee ballots. Still to come in probably well over hundred thousand across the city were waiting on the final numbers in terms of what the board of elections has received but Those can come in all the way until a week after primary as long as they're postmarked on primary day earlier and so we won't know that again for about another week. The board of elections is going to do a rank choice simulation on june twenty-ninth which i think maybe a little bit misguided because it's going to give people a false impression that the ranked choice voting instant runoff has actually been done when they're just going to do what they have so far in terms of in person boats and not having counted the absentee votes yet. So there's a little bit of strange stuff coming up in terms of what the public could no But we will get a sense. Next week of the in-person votes and that's the bulk of the votes raid the eight hundred thousand plus in person boats. Maybe another hundred. Hundred fifty thousand absentees. So the in person votes were going to get a better sense right now. All we know is the first rank that people put and what we're going to get a better sense of next week is coup filled out their full ballot who ranked more than one candidate who ranked two candidates for five and what a lot of those rankings look like and we're gonna get a simulation of the ranked choice voting runoff out of the board of elections next week. Even though that will not be official results who will not be final results. Because it's still will not have the absentee ballots included so a lot going on. Aol race three candidates. Who have any chance to win. Eric adams my wiley kathryn. Garcia other candidates have conceded or have no mathematical chance to win. Andrew yang gave concession remarks. He's looking like he'll finish in fourth place Last night and had quite a stunning fall from where he entered the race And then scott stringer also a fairly stunning fall from where he thought he would be and many thought he would be in this race. He's gonna look. He's looking like a wind up in fifth place in this race. A lot to watch for their a lot to watch for in the city controller absentees ranked choice tally whether brad lander can hold onto this fairly wide lead that he has the opportunity there for a change in results would be if cory johnson winds up having been the number two choice on the ballot on the ballots of voters who voted for other candidates. Who will be eliminated in the instant runoff. And that's not an impossibility in part because cory johnson Was the generally the best known figure in that race being the city council speaker and it's also an interesting situation where brad lander running pretty much furthest to the left in that crowded field in ranked choice voting when you have someone who sort of running on one of the polls whether it's to the right or to the left they don't always make it as the second or third choice on that many ballots of other of voters about other candidates. So that'll be interesting to watch to see if that that holds up and a whole lot more. I didn't even get into here. The borough president races the city council races. There was so much on the ballot as those of you who voted saw..

Andrew yang brad lander cory johnson fifth two candidates Eric adams scott stringer Last night next week wiley kathryn second five Hundred fifty thousand absente fourth place hundred Garcia Next week first rank Eight hundred thousand plus vo more than one candidate
"new york times" Discussed on Max & Murphy on Politics

Max & Murphy on Politics

03:00 min | 5 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Max & Murphy on Politics

"It does welcome to max politics. This max from gotham gazette coming to you the day after primary day. Well we know some things and we don't know a lot because in part because The primaries were crowded and competitive the so much on the ballot in part because of the expansion of absentee balloting in part because of the start of the use of ranked choice voting. So there are a lot of layers to these elections There are some things we know. There's some things we don't know we're digging into both of those some of the things that we can take away from primary day in the election thus far and some of what to watch for going forward we have a great show for you today. In just a couple minutes. I'm going to be joined by mara. Gay of the new york times editorial board the times editorial board endorsed in the three big races that were on the ballot in the primary the democratic primaries for mayor city controller and manhattan district attorney and all three of the candidates that the times editorial board endorsed got a seemingly enormous boost from those endorsements of times. Detoro board will join me shortly to discuss the choices they made in those three races. How those candidates are doing and what comes next. Those candidates of course were kathryn garcia in the mayoral primary. Now she's in third place but she has far outpaced expectations in this race so far and she's one of the three candidates in the mayoral primary that have a shot to win of any kind. The favourite there of course is eric adams who has a roughly eighty thousand vote lead. Roughly nine percentage points over mile wildly. Who's a little bit ahead of kathryn garcia and those are the three candidates in the running as we wait to count absentee ballots and do the ranked choice run off in another race that the times endorsed in the democratic primary for comptroller brad lander city council member from brooklyn is surprising. Some people by outpacing city council speaker cory johnson by Also about sixty seventy thousand. Votes and nine percentage points in the controller. Primary brad lander looking like. He's in very good shape. They're going into absentees ranked choice. Run off again. These races are knock called and they won't be for weeks and then in the third race that the times editorial board weighed in on alvin brag for manhattan district attorney in the democratic primary. He is leading tally for weinstein. By seven thousand or.

kathryn garcia cory johnson eric adams seven thousand alvin brag third place eighty thousand vote brooklyn today about sixty seventy thousand third race one Detoro manhattan three both three races three candidates three big races nine percentage points
"new york times" Discussed on Off The Meatrack Chainz New York Podcast

Off The Meatrack Chainz New York Podcast

04:46 min | 8 months ago

"new york times" Discussed on Off The Meatrack Chainz New York Podcast

"Not all white women the free and you still dad dad not all man as long so what. What did i say now. Old black women. Oh sexy whoa. I'm i'm i'm a hater over saying this old man holding score he may restoring is in the way women on the hell's going on his phone. He got be boy he cancels any kansas. You know everybody sexy in your own skin. Okay all right i'll be. I hoping get disconnected. You remember told not to go live now. He lives is managed as you just said to be lives right now. I il gross next. What's the next Next tabby that. Yeah hold on hold on this No it's the grand came away an idea to instagram live. You get to add light. You know like to three more people. I was actually. I was actually the main person to actually be a part of that. Actually though we add two or three more people to instagram love was part of the test. Man no man. Homey homey fights are ban actually Had had to go live with him because he had to people and everything and i was like it was like three people who i was like i was like. Now's like damn abud tom. They added like three or four people to this shit man she each about so long it was lie. It was like rain stories. Shit though man as i got some stories as though though i gotta deal instagram. More often sound using like that. That's my main plus. That's that's what is my get whatever zone among. That's how i found out about aggrement remedying being on instagram live weddings thursdays. Yeah i i see this. I haven't watched the say one of his videos. He actually had a whole if you can do if you. If you're on all school it was like all old school also saw. He was playing and everything. That's his show like this is so if you're mostly update like he posted it on this page. As a matter of fact game on his twitter or orange is you ram. He posted on his instagram. Page i sophia listened. I'll give new yorkers who grew up watching Rocky daniels eight. You gotta watch like watching. This live to watch the video music box for me. I'll watch i'll watch. I was reason on instagram on his instagram live on wednesdays and thursdays at the after he is finished being alive is stone is pro robot. Whatever is the same as profiles. What i'm saying. I think he saves the video on his own. It tv's a feature that instagram put on there. What how does how long the last video is that. He doesn't know win saving. We say the video on tv. It doesn't it doesn't get deleted doesn't get deleted because we know garage sales video to id tv. He doesn't put it in as two stories anymore. Every my put the shit in this story because it deletes in twenty four hours in that thing. That whites checking lose again. They're gonna go undefeated for the rest of the season oh tell me solo.

Rocky daniels eight twenty four hours three two two stories wednesdays three people four people one instagram each thursdays twitter three more people tom videos yorkers sophia kansas
"new york times" Discussed on Switch4Good

Switch4Good

03:31 min | 1 year ago

"new york times" Discussed on Switch4Good

"Yeah we had it downgrade just like every other mammal right there. Fifty four hundred other mammals and they all seem to be just fine but if you look at humans we all have these diseases and so many of them respiratory diseases that other animals don't have met our ancestors didn't have so. This was the first question. I tried to answer is. Why are we breathing so improperly. Why do asthma rates. Continue to go up year. After year after year and allergies and chronic sinusitis in sleep apnea and it turns out that so much of this is tied to this. Anatomical change that has occurred in our faces over the last three hundred years so if you were to look at an ancient skull perfectly straight thi this vary forward growing phase. This huge jaw modern schools about ninety percent of us. I'm a great example have crooked teeth. Our mouths have grown so small that they no longer have partito grow straight. So they grow crooked and this means that we al-sabah smaller airway small mouth smaller airway breathing problems. And no one's refuting. Any of the science is very clear. You can look up a zillion ancient skulls and you can see their faces and then you can look at modern skulls and see what's happened. It's just. there was so little awareness of it. That really shocked me. It doesn't make sense biologically that we would do something so bad for us. What are we doing wrong than that has caused our face to change so that we're not reading what came first are our face changed and then we didn't breathe properly or we weren't reading properly so our face changed well. Life is always changing is always evolving. The so if you look at a skull from thousand are several hundred thousand years ago to one. Today it's very different but that change happens at a very slow pace so animals are able to adopt to it and adapt and we were just fine. Our ancestors were just fine but the changes that happened in the last few hundred years happened so quickly and so suddenly that we haven't been able to adapt and so that's why we're breathing so poorly so the main culprit here is lack of chewing because of a highly processed diet of industrialized foods. So teeth can grow crooked within a single generation of eating industrialized foods and we saw that in the eighteen hundreds when all of the process flour and process rise and baked goods and soft stuff bottled stuff and can stuff really started spreading throughout europe. And then we saw very quickly in the us as well so again. There isn't too much controversy about this even though the sounds like some crazy hypothesis. It's not there's there's very clear science but a lot of people haven't looked at how those changes have affected our ability to breathe. And that's what. I really tried to dive into on this book. It makes sense that it would. That are are not a practicing in using our. Musk kill moscow blah. you know what. I'm saying muscular structure and our bone structure of our face by chewing harder. Denser foods chris cruciferous vegetables and nuts and seeds. That are harder that it would just waste away..

sinusitis sleep apnea asthma europe Musk us moscow
"new york times" Discussed on Switch4Good

Switch4Good

05:24 min | 1 year ago

"new york times" Discussed on Switch4Good

"Sandra hi dottie always a pleasure. Oh it's not but okay. It is for me. I don't know very much for So this is a long time coming this episode this guest talk all about breathing today How we don't currently probably breathe correctly you may. I don't know that. I do You've gone a little bit deeper. I haven't really visited this subject sense All my years is a professional athlete. leading into olympics. I haven't. I'm very excited to dive deep but before we go in and we introduce this incredible new york times bestselling author of the book called breath A little bit about you Being told when you were twelve years old and confirmation costs that you were not breathing correctly. Yeah i know it freaked me out. Yeah it was had to do with prayer and that we were supposed to breeze that we i was told i wasn't breathing properly that i needed to breathe by inhaling my stomach should go out and inhale and i exhale my stomach go in and i guess i wasn't. Doing that just really bothered me. That something that. I that i was supposed to be doing all the time then i was told not to. Yeah i was doing wrong. And that's why this book so fascinated me because breath has come up in my life as it has with all of us when we think about after we talked today and a lot of people are going to have stories of of their own Breathing or breathing or fear of not being able to breathe etc. I when i was twenty hours making out with While he was a guy was dating a little bit and he was a yoga instructor when we were making out. He was breathing thing. Okay no i had no idea i was. I didn't ask him. I said what's going on. But i didn't. We didn't actually go out for very long although he did introduce me. The yoga for which i am eternally grateful because for the last Thirty five years. I have now been doing yoga. So even though i didn't really understand his breathing technique so maybe our guest today will be able to explain to be if he got some kind of sexual heightening or something from breathing. Did it change your experience of kissing the to what you would have liked to have been remember. I was thinking. Think about so we were kissing. And i just. I don't even remember exactly. But i just remember took me out a little bit of my own thinking. Am i breathing at my kissing godly. Am i breathing properly right now. Oh my gosh. So what will you athlete. Did they ever talk to you about how to breathe properly especially as a sprinter it. Well misprint drive a sprinter. Jean gave us better over in the unlimited so many world championship So the the very first time that i raced in europe I was still so new to the sport like way to new..

Sandra hi dottie olympics new york times Jean europe
"new york times" Discussed on Wild Business Growth Podcast

Wild Business Growth Podcast

06:57 min | 1 year ago

"new york times" Discussed on Wild Business Growth Podcast

"Direct, and you can reach me at Max's at hippodrome dot com for using podcast as a marketing tool. This is episode number. Ninety seven in today's guest is will. Will shortz will has been the crossword editor for the. New York Times since nineteen ninety-three, he's also the author of over five hundred puzzle books is the owner of over twenty five thousand puzzle books dating back to fifteen thirty three is the owner of the largest table tennis facility in North America, and has appeared in how I met your mother, the simpsons and even wrote the riddles for the riddler in Batman forever. As Bart says, eat my shorts. Enjoy the show. Already, we are here with the puzzle master himself will shortz Crossword editor of the New York Times, since nineteen ninety three will. How're you doing today? Roy Good Mexican to talk to you. great to talk to you as well so we are maybe going to discuss a puzzle or two today, but before we get into that I have to ask. Do you ever get sick of puzzles? No never get tired of. It was someone who said that. If you ever get tired of writing, that means you're tired with life. I feel the same way about puzzles are so diverse. You know there's word puzzles math puzzles logic puzzles picture puzzles. There's always something. They always stretch. You know an easy puzzle will stretch the beginning solver say a hard puzzle will stretch a experts over I'm always learning something. And I love the people I. Come in contact with through puzzles. They tend to be smart. Interesting well rounded funny people with flexible lines, so no, I I will always enjoy this. It sounds like with that description there. You're just describing myself so I appreciate that and. That's good that you haven't got sick of it. And if you look at everything, you've done in your career and all that you've achieved clearly, there hasn't been too many times where you've taken a break from puzzles as as far as your main focus goes when you think back to the early years. Can you think of the first puzzle that you ever did? The earliest puzzle I can remember. Making was a maze for my older brother, seven years older than me and I gave him as. And he expressed no interest in. It wouldn't solve it. That was too bad. The first book, the Puzzle Book I remember reading this one called. We dare you to solve this. It was a paperback puzzle. A paperback book of Puzzles handed from Nineteen fifty nine for some reason my older sister had. She kept it on her night table which he wasn't around I. Borrow it in. Put it back before she got home and then I kept borrowing it borrow yet. And then one day one time I never put it back and instead Mayan ever since so putting together puzzles that people didn't care about and then stealing other people's puzzles is clearly great. Start to your. Not. When you got started doing puzzles yourself just as someone who likes to complete puzzles. What do you think is? That drew to puzzles in the first place. While there's lots of things about puzzle first of all I love the creativity of puzzles, just using my mind. Solving gives you a good feeling. It's you know we're faced with problems every day in life most of them we just muddle through as best Lee, Cam with imperfect solutions, and just hope we've done all right. And most problems in life we don't see through from start to finish resorted jump in the middle, and then we bail out later on the nice thing about a crossword Sonoko or any kind of human made us look. First of all you see the process through from start to finish, and when you're done, and you fill in the last letter the last square you find with solution, you feel so proud of yourself. You feel essential accomplishment. You put the world in order. And it's a great feeling. We don't get much in everyday life. It is, it's such a great feeling, and I think a lot of the puzzles, especially, if it's no more smaller crossword, or it's a jigsaw puzzle, that doesn't have too many pieces than it could be something. That's not a crazy amount of time that it takes up, but it is such a great feeling, a feeling of pride there recently reflecting as we're doing more and more puzzles lately was reflecting how every single piece you put in and find the right spot for a jigsaw puzzle it's. It's really a small win. It's almost like a metaphor for a larger project that you're taking on so piece by piece. It's like these little moments of pride over and over again that these puzzles and games can provide as true if you're a solving a tough sudoku puzzle, and usually it's gets. It's hard to somewhere in the middle and after you break it. That is you crack it open and there's a rush at the end as the last few squares are really usually quick to fill. And you get a a rush of feeling of. Of Satisfaction, just comes in a rush and that's great. You feel that also I think with a jigsaw puzzle you know you start with maybe hundreds of pieces and it starts very slow. You know you probably were. Parameter I get that, and then you look at the most distinctive colors until those in, but it's very slow going as you get down to the end, you got you know ten pieces five pieces. You rush to fill those last ones on. And SA- terrific feeling it is. It's an absolute mad towards the end. And so. I like to talk about I. You I may be biased because graduated from, are you and one of the earliest things I learned about distinguished alumni from you is not only did. Will Shortz go to I you? He also created his own major, and was the only person in the world to have that major, and they literally talk about this in orientation so. When you when you think back to your time, now you because we, you and I had very very different majors. I most certainly did not create my own major out of that come about in the first place. What was the major you created? And what was that process like of actually developing a get approved in moving forward with this incredible unique major? Yeah well major was in Metrology, the study of puzzles or study of Nicholas. I you has a program called the individualized major program. If you're accepted, you can major in anything you want when I was I you I was there from nineteen, seventy, seventy four. It was new program just started in nineteen, sixty nine. my mother actually read something about it I had been joking since I was a kid majoring in puzzles on. That was college because I love them so much, and it was ha ha. You know it was a joke. And then I found will. Maybe it's actually possible, so my junior year at I you I took some independent learning courses through regular departments I took a course on.

New York Times editor North America Max Bart Roy Lee