20 Burst results for "Mr Shipp"

"mr shipp" Discussed on 710 WOR

710 WOR

01:34 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on 710 WOR

"And weather you need and Michael regal in the morning on your election connection seven ten W. O. R. radio station we've got forty three degrees at five o'clock that afternoon I'm Jeff McKinney the impeachment trial is now apparently headed for a vote on whether to include witnesses in the Senate proceedings president trump's outside counsel Jay Sekulow wondering why Democrats want witnesses and they say they already have a proven cakes we came here ready to try the case on the record that they presented the record that the managers told us was overwhelming and complete Mr Shipp went through every sentence of the articles of impeachment just a few days ago and said prove prove proved about here's house impeachment manager Val Deming is this a fair trial without the ability to call witnesses and produce documents the answer is clearly and unequivocally no the vote will be held shortly we think of whether to include witnesses and the Republican should be able to block them from appearing they have fifty one votes opposing witnesses if there are no last minute defections and a protest group disturbing transit operations this evening Grand Central Terminal fuel wrestle ready the group de colonize this place released a video clip on social media referring to the protesters J. thirty one or after the police three three three of the last one so far they've sprayed graffiti at an Upper West Side subway station unfurled a huge banner at the oculus.

Jeff McKinney Senate president Jay Sekulow Mr Shipp Val Deming Michael regal W. O. trump
Comparing the impeachment trials of President Clinton and President Trump

Overnight re-air of day's programming

09:34 min | 1 year ago

Comparing the impeachment trials of President Clinton and President Trump

"Right now on Capitol Hill ahead of the one PM eastern resumption of the Senate impeachment trial of president trump some Senate Republicans are holding a news conference led by Lindsey Graham South Carolina chair of the Judiciary Committee thank you all very much observations about yesterday it was a long day but that's okay a lot of Americans have long days a couple things I've been involved into impeachment trials this is the second one I just want to make an observation here what the house managers were proposing yesterday is basically destroy the institution of the presidency as we know it make it make it when it comes to the partisan impeachment not have a venue to go to court and litigate privileges at the end of an exercise our prior presence when it comes to Donald Trump willing to destroy the institution of the office in the name of getting him so bottom line the Clinton impeachment was conducted by outside counsel there's not here Ken Starr spent five years investigating the president before we took up the matter in the house the president was allowed to cross examining Ken Starr at the house Judiciary Committee he recommended eleven grounds for impeachment and president Clinton utilize the court's extensively on his behalf Robert Mull was an outside counsel appointed to investigate this press I want the public to note that this president cooperated with Mister Miller he turned over million documents his lawyer testified for thirty hours and after two years of investigation with nineteen lawyers forty F. B. I. agents two thousand subpoenas and five hundred search warrants they decided to take no action they said there was no collusion between the trump campaign and the Russian government when it came to obstruction of justice they did not recommend any action I thought that would be the end of actually introduce legislation to say that Robert Muller cannot be removed accept the call because the president felt like the motor investigation was of which I did not the present was frustrated because he said he did nothing wrong I can understand that but it was important for me to make sure that the country would have somebody to look at these allegations Ross are very serious and I supported Mahler's ability to look any work for a long time and I thought it would be over Mr Shipp said yesterday what they did in the house was just like what we did with Clint that is absolutely untrue from the time they authorized impeachment it took forty eight days not two years with Mahler not five years like Clint the forty eight days the fact finding process was done in the Intel committee now the Judiciary Committee the present was denied the right to cancel the Intel committee and could not request with they spent one day in the Judiciary Committee go back and look at the tapes of how long can start testified before the Senate excuse me the house Judiciary Committee of which I was a far what we've done for the first time in American history isn't Peter president without outside counsel and all in a forty eight day period well here's what struck me the most where the house manager said reason we didn't go to court we don't want to go through the courts is that we can engage in before the election they withdrew from the Cumberland cover of the dead the national security adviser case where the dead the national security adviser what course to tell me what to do judge the house actually withdrew the subpoena because they didn't want the court process to stop the impeachment trial they would have the United States Senate create an impeachment process where the president would not be allowed to go to article three court to argue privileges that have been argued in every other impeachment trial and have been argued by president since George Washington that would destroy the institution of the presidency as we know it what would it do it would allow a handful any three hundred plus million country people all along partisan lines ten PH a president without independent judiciary the before I came here I used to try cases we have a lot of good lawyers in this body all I can say is that when the court date was set and if I showed up and asked for a bunch of subpoenas and documents to be produced on the day of trial that I had not pursued before the trial in any serious way how to get tossed out what do we do yesterday exactly what happened in the Clinton impeachment trial we're going to hear the house's gate the president's response we're going to ask questions then we'll decide among ourselves do we want to know anything yesterday was about eleven hours of them telling us how bad their case was in my view they did not pursue these witnesses because they knew the president what's the judiciary very us and it literally would stop them impeaching him before the election so the only thing I can tell the American people when it comes to replacing those present nine months plus from the election you got an up hill battle with me because I really do believe that the best person group of people to pick a president are the voters not a bunch of partisan politicians senator Lindsey Graham every day we're here doing this is a day were taken away from doing things that really matter so when they say it was like Clinton no when they say the court's really have no place in impeachment that's all going to be done by the house and the Senate without any independent judicial review god help us all center Steve Daines of Montana we had a lot of time last night thank some twelve hours on the floor of the US Senate is the first impeachment trial I've been through senator Graham is the experience that is his prior political life it reminded me of when I went to high school in Bozeman Montana if I turned in a term paper he was half complete my teacher toss it back to me they didn't get it done is incomplete probably give it up and say it's a complete try yeah that's why I felt like we saw last night was an incomplete case I have not done a complete homework you're my enemy what Nancy posted back in two thousand ten on the Obama care is that first we got a pass to find out was it it feels like what happened last night they had a rush this through the house just get over to the Senate we'll find out what's really in try to fix a fair let me remind you remind all of us in two hundred forty four years of history of this great country United States Senate has never remove a president from office never you look at the two trials for presence but we have had in the Senate over the course of our history President Johnson eighteen sixty of course president Clinton nineteen ninety nine what's unique about this impeachment trial versus the other two the other two both had crimes alleged in the impeachment articles president trump does not the other two impeachment trials had bipartisan support coming out of the house president trump impeachment coming out of the house did not first time I've ever seen there were many things that I agreed with with with a German never said last night but he did say some and I hope everybody hurts actually back to the Clinton days was it and I will paraphrase it and god help us if we ever purely partisan basis numbers work back then were wives and I hope you would see them today this is the most hardest impeachment process ever seen a history of this great country no crimes alleged in the trunk articles not bipartisan in a very important final point is if you look for the Democrats are asking United States Senate to do is to remove president trump from office and to bar him from ever holding office again was also unique about this trial versus president when this is done in an election it's really big the fundamental question as well is to the United States Senate the side the two thousand twenty election and overturn a two thousand sixteen election by removing this president from office I put the trust in the voters of this country they should have that say not the nicest

President Trump Lindsey Senate
"mr shipp" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

01:57 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"The proceedings that took place before the Judiciary Committee the president was denied the right to cross examine witnesses the president was that I had the right to access evidence and the president was denied the right to have counsel present at hearings that's a try back I try to do that violates the constitution of the United States Mr Shipp did say the court's really don't have a role in this executive privilege why would that matter it matters because of space in the constitution of the United States one manager said that it is you that are on trial the Senate he also said that and others did that you're not capable of abiding by your own and then we had the invocation of the ghost of the mall report I know something about that report it came up empty on the issue of collusion with Russia there was no obstruction in fact the mall report to the country what these managers say today he came to the exact opposite conclusions of what they say when supposedly one secolo was saying that you know you have a habit of claiming things are a transcript when they're not there which movie those backed shift during the house intelligence committee click you know recreating the phone call you're putting that into the record claiming things that were said that were not said supposedly all shifted was just glare Adam just stared him down the whole time in just big big giant three guys just stared him down this is just some of what took place yesterday I represented Jim Jordan is one of the house managers for the Republicans he was on fox news this is so ridiculous.

Judiciary Committee president Mr Shipp United States Senate Russia Adam Jim Jordan executive house intelligence committee fox
"mr shipp" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

02:28 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"Have no role privileges don't apply what happened in the past we should just ignore in fact manager ship just said try to summarize my colleagues defense of the president he said it not in those words of course which is not the first time Mr Shipp has put words into transcripts that did not exist Mr Shipp also talked about a try to I'll give you a try back to during the proceedings that took place before the Judiciary Committee the president was denied the right to cross examine witnesses the president was denied the right to access evidence and the president was denied the right to have counsel present at hearings that's it right back to the tri factor that violates the constitution of the United States Mr Shipp did say the court's really don't have a role in this executive privilege why would that matter it matters because it's based on the constitution of the United States one manager said that it is you that are on trial the Senate he also said that and others did that you're not capable of abiding by your oath and then we had the invocation of the ghost of the mall report I know something about that report it came up empty on the issue of collusion with Russia there was no obstruction in fact the mall report to the country what these managers say today came to the exact opposite conclusions of what they say when supposedly one secolo was saying that you know you have a habit of claiming things ran transcript when they're not there which if it goes back to his shift during the house intelligence committee click you know recreating the phone call you're putting that into the record claiming things that were said that were not said supposedly all shifted was just glad I'm just stared him down the whole time in this big giant three guys just tear them down this is just some of what took place yesterday I represented Jim Jordan is one of the house managers for the Republicans he was on fox news this is so ridiculous.

president Mr Shipp Judiciary Committee United States Senate Russia Jim Jordan executive house intelligence committee fox
"mr shipp" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

11:07 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KTRH

"Lawyers Mr Shipp I just felt maybe I'll take a shot at this here goes thank you senators Mister Chief Justice house managers in the president's legal team we are here today not to defend the constitution against the present United States the defend the constitution from the house managers to the house managers for chairman of two of the so called impeachment committees in the house of representatives Mr Schiff you know well was chairman the house intelligence committee Mister Nadler was chairman of the house Judiciary Committee and they come here before the United States Senate a hundred senators three hundred million Americans the Chief Justice of the United States and they say with the with the service to prove our case and if we don't go with this it's a cover up it's a shame we need a fair impartial process the United States constitution could not be clear the framers could not have been clear after debating at lance the impeachment clause of the constitution they came up with very specific language what the house can do if it seeks to impeach a president the house is limited in what it can do to start the process of removing a president of the United States treason bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors as I stand here before you today they have presented no information on treason no information on bribery those words don't even exist in their so called impeachment charges and other high crimes and misdemeanors meaning other offenses there are are as serious as treason and bribery where is it just tell us where's the treason where is the bribery what are the other high crimes and misdemeanors so what if they don't they amended the constitution of the United States illegally they changed the language and now they come before the United States Senate and say if you don't accept their narrative if you don't expect except their impeachment charges then you know you know the United States Senate you're involved in a cover up your obstructing you are not doing justice it's kind upside down isn't no we're here to defend the constitution of the United States from the majority in the house of representatives and these managers there is no trees and bribe or other high crimes and misdemeanors that's why they come to you with obstruction of Congress obstruction of Congress the last time I checked this body is part of Congress the managers represent the majority in the house I say the majority in the house because they couldn't persuade a single Republican despite the diversity the Republican caucus not one to join them in their effort to remove a constitutionally duly elected president of the United States now what so it is one party in the house of representatives and they come into this body and they insist that you do what they would not do prove the case for treason bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors they wanted to impeach the president of the United States to remove the president the United States for treason bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors bottles they change the language to obstruction of Congress and abuse of power now we know the history of the impeachment clause of the constitution no thanks to Adam Schiff or Jerry Nadler or the Democrats in the house we know it because the histories written down most conclusively by James Madison he was actually at the constitutional convention and had the most active role in framing our constitution the number one Frank George Mason a great founding fathers who wrote the Virginia declaration of rights a few weeks before Jefferson drafted the declaration of independence he was at the constitutional convention throw out he suggested that a president could be impeached by the house from our ministration James Madison stood up and said Mallon ministration that means the house of representatives of the United States Senate remove a president United States basically over policy differences we can't have that because the president of the United States would then be answerable to kidnapped by if you will the house of representatives in the United States Senate we have three independent political parties the house of representatives doesn't have a limit of all power the house of representatives may be motivated by politics but this is a constitutional process and these managers to of all more chairman who control the whole process come into this body they don't have one argument that can make for treason bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors they might seek to amend the constitution and they they demand that you helped to make their case they just voted what is their case they have no case they sat on it for weeks before they sent it to the nine state Senate they come up with conflicting arguments we have to remove the president quickly because of national security concerns any night anyway corrupt the next election then they sit on then they come in here and say slow down we want witnesses we want evidence we want this is about the constitution of the United States not with the majority party in the house of representatives demands their iron fist control in the house of representatives and they used and now they come over here and see the lecture you the United States Senate on what witnesses who can go they don't want all witnesses here they only want their witnesses here they don't want hunter Biden even though they say the present United States sought Ukraine's interference in the twenty twenty election ladies and gentleman read the transcript of the president's phone call he didn't seek Ukraine's interference in anything anymore than you sought Russia's interference in anything he didn't see anybody's interference in anything he wanted to know if the binds participated in corrupt practices why should they be immune why should they be the bubble family where only the trump family's investigated with endless a **** with a special counsel with all kinds of of power thrown at the president he can be investigated in fact this entire impeachment is intended to immunize the bind so you could never raise any questions about the to affect the twenty twenty election which is why it's time the way it has been and they continue to attack the credibility of the twenty sixteen election how do we know this they have no evidence of treason bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors so they changed the bar they lowered Taylor now let's talk about what these managers what these manage your hand picked by Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house did when they were running the house of representatives in these committees they talk about transparency well when they held testimony sworn testimony of witnesses in the basement of the house of representatives in the skin league transcripts to the media cherry picked information some of the transcripts still haven't been released in fall in order to determine the witness that would best fits their narrative was at transparent when they did not the Republican store right to call their witnesses including the so called whistle blower including the chief house manager was that transparency when the president the United States the target other Rappler impeachment wasn't able to have his counsel present during any of this process in the house intelligence committee to present witnesses to cross examine witnesses to present evidence in that phase in that impeachment was that transparency when the house Judiciary Committee talk with the house intelligence committee did I regard to tape and had two hearings one with four law professors and one with the lawyers representing both sides of the house intelligence committee was that really a serious impeachment inquiry ladies and gentleman they couldn't get one Republican go along so the president I'd states was denied the due process that was afforded Richard Nixon he was a diet the read the denied the due process I was afforded Bill Clinton he was even denied the due process that was afforded Andrew Johnson who was so shabbily treated during the impeachment back in the eighteen sixties and everybody agrees that that was an outrageous impeachment now what is the role of the Senate you've heard you've heard from the house managers who can't even get the role of the house right who can't even get the constitution's language right you've heard them tell you your role is to have a real trial with witnesses and evidence but only the witnesses they one and only the evidence they want and they want to send it to lower itself to get information thrown over the transom at the eleventh hour by Ukrainian national less harness there's been indicted on multiple felony counts in the Southern District of New York they insist that you listen to him they want you to take the testimony of the president's former National Security Council his chief of staff among others and I want to break this down very carefully so can be understood by all all right let's stop here we're taking a short break and we'll pick it up this is my opening statement to the Senate if I had an opening statement to make to the Senate but really to the American people as many as possible out the farce it's taking place as a result of what the farce look like in the house of representatives on impeachment I hope you'll stick with me I I.

president United States Mr Shipp
"mr shipp" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

11:47 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"Levin this is living TV and tonight we do something a little different I'm going to represent presently nine states before the Senate the opening of the so called impeachment trial now that you've heard residents lawyers and Mr Shipp I just felt maybe I'll take a shot at this here goes thank you senators Mister Chief Justice house managers and the president's legal team we are here today not to defend the constitution against the president United States to defend the constitution from the house managers to the house managers for chairman of two of the so called impeachment committees in the house of representatives Mr Schiff you know well with chairman the house intelligence committee Mister Nadler was chairman of the house Judiciary Committee and they come here before the United States Senate a hundred senators three hundred million Americans the Chief Justice of the United States and they say we need witnesses to prove our case and if we don't go with this it's a cover up it's a sham we need a fair impartial process the United States constitution could not be clearer the framers could not have been clear after debating at lance the impeachment clause of the constitution they came up with very specific language what the house can do if it seeks to impeach a president the house is limited in what it can do to start the process of removing a president of the United States treason bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors as I stand here before you today they have presented no information on treason no information on bribery those words don't even exist in their so called impeachment charges and other high crimes and misdemeanors meaning other offenses there are as serious as treason and bribery where is it just tell us where is the treason where is the bribery what are the other high crimes and misdemeanors so what if they don't they amended the constitution of the United States illegally they changed the language there and now they come before the United States Senate and say if you don't accept their narrative if you don't expect it except there impeachment charges then you know you know the United States Senate you were involved in a cover up you are obstructing you are not doing justice it's kind upside down isn't it no we're here to defend the constitution of the United States from the majority in the house of representatives and these managers there is no treason bribery the high crimes and misdemeanors that's why they come to you with obstruction of Congress obstruction of Congress the last time I checked this body is part of Congress the managers represent the majority in the house I say the majority in the house because they couldn't persuade a single Republican despite the diversity the Republican caucus not one to join them in their effort to remove a constitutionally duly elected president of the United States not one so it is a one party in the house of representatives and they come into this body and they insist that you do what what not to prove the case for treason bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors they wanted to impeach the president of the United States to remove the president the United States for treason bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors bottles they change the language obstruction of Congress and abuse of power now we know the history of the impeachment clause of the constitution no thanks to Adam Schiff or Jerry Nadler or the Democrats in the house we know it because the history is written down most conclusively by James Madison he was actually at the constitutional convention and had the most active role in framing our constitution the number one Frank George Mason a great founding father who wrote the Virginia declaration of rights a few weeks before Jefferson drafted the declaration of independence he was at the constitutional convention throw out he suggested that a president could be impeached by the house from our administration James Madison stood up and said Mallon ministration that means the house of representatives of the United States Senate remove a president United States basically over policy differences we can't have that because the president of the United States would then be answerable to kidnapped by if you will the house of representatives in the United States Senate we have three independent going the house of representatives doesn't have a limit of all power the house of representatives may be motivated by politics but this is a constitutional process and these managers to of all more chairman who control the whole process come into this body they don't have one argument they can make for treason bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors they might seek to amend the constitution and they they demand that you helped to make their case they just voted what is their case they have no case they sat on it for weeks before they sent it to the nine state Senate they come up with conflicting arguments we have to remove the president quickly because of national security concerns any night any make up the next election then they sit on it then they come in here and say slow down we want witnesses we want evidence we want this is about the constitution of the United States not with the majority party in the house of representatives demands their iron fist control in the house of representatives and they used and now they come over here and see the lecture you the United States Senate on what witnesses who can go they don't want all witnesses here they only want their witnesses here they don't want hunter Biden even though they say the present United States sought Ukraine's interference in the twenty twenty election ladies and gentleman read the transcript of the president's phone call he didn't seek Ukraine's interference in anything anymore than you thought Russia's interference in anything he didn't see anybody interference in anything he wanted to know if the bidens participated in corrupt practices why should they be immune why should they be the bubble family where only the trump family's investigated with enlisted **** with a special counsel with all kinds of of power thrown at the president he can be investigated in fact this entire impeachment is intended to immunize the body so you can never raise any questions about the to affect the twenty twenty election which is why it's time the way it has been and they continue to attack the credibility of the twenty sixteen election how do we know this they have no evidence of treason bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors so they changed the bar they lowered it Taylor now let's talk about what these managers what these manage your hand picked by Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house did when they were running the house of representatives in these committees they talk about transparency well when they held testimony sworn testimony of witnesses in the basement of the house of representatives in this yeah league transcripts to the media cherry picked information some of the transcripts still haven't been released in the fall in order to determine the witness that would backspace their narrative was at transparent when they do not the Republicans are right to call their witnesses including the so called whistle blowers including the tree house manager was I transparency when the president the United States the target other Rappler detachment wasn't able to have his counsel present during any of this process in the house intelligence committee to present witnesses to cross examine witnesses to present evidence in that phase in that impeachment was that transparency when the house Judiciary Committee talk with the house intelligence committee did I regard to tainted and had two hearings one with four law professors and one with the lawyers representing both sides of the house intelligence committee was that really a serious impeachment inquiry ladies and gentleman they couldn't get one Republican go along so the presently nice states was denied due process that was afforded Richard Nixon he was a diet the read the denied the due process I was afforded Bill Clinton he was even denied the due process that was afforded Andrew Johnson who was so shabbily treated during the impeachment back in the eighteen sixties and everybody agrees that that was an outrageous impeachment now what is the role of the Senate you've heard you've heard from the house managers who can't even get the role of the house right who can't even get the constitution's language right you've heard them tell you your role is to have a real trial with witnesses and evidence but only the witnesses they one and only the evidence they want and they want to send it to lower himself to get information thrown over the transom at the eleventh hour by Ukrainian national less harness there's been indicted on multiple felony counts in the Southern District of New York they insist that you listen to him they want you to take the testimony of the president's former National Security Council his chief of staff among others and I want to break this down very carefully so can be understood by all all right let's stop here we're taking a short break and we'll pick it up this is my opening statement to the Senate if I had an opening statement to make to the Senate but really to the American people as many as possible about the farce it's taking place as a result have with the farce look like in the house of representatives on impeachment I hope you'll stick with me I I think this is very important we'll be right back van it's time to check the roads from those track you know this look at traffic sponsored by staples we've got a wreck north found ninety five it and also one westbound two fifteen.

Levin Senate Mr Shipp
"mr shipp" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

02:12 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"Mr Shipp said have I got a deal for you abandon all your constitutional rights forget about your lawyers and come in and do exactly what I say no thank you no thank you and then he says he has the temerity to come into the Senate and say we have no use for courts it's outrageous cut for simple lonely White House counsel to the president go they were upset because you should be in Iowa right now instead we're here and I'm not ready to go and it's Regis it's outrageous people won't stand for it I'll tell you that right now out here to steal one election elections it's the ridiculous articles of impeachment you want to remove the president trump tell you that what's to say it correctly but that's exactly what they're here to do asking the Senate attack of the most sacred right we have as Americans consider the right to choose a president election year it's never been done before it shouldn't be done with it now reason it's never been done is because no one ever thought it would be a good idea for our country children for our grandchildren to try to remove the president from a bad the American people right to vote based on a fraudulent investigation conducted in secret with no right I could go on and on but my point is very simple it's long past time at least this so we can end this.

Mr Shipp Senate president Iowa Regis White House
"mr shipp" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

03:32 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"The president of the United States before this chamber senator Schumer said earlier today that the eyes of the founders are on these proceedings the that's true what is the heart of the constitution that governs these proceedings and what we just heard the mentorship courts have no role privileges don't apply what happened in the past we should just ignore in fact manager ship just said try to summarize my colleagues defense of the president he said I'm not in those words of course which is not the first time Mr Shipp as the words the transcripts that did not exist Mr Shipp also talked about a try factor I'll give you a try back to during the proceedings that took place before the Judiciary Committee the president was denied the right to cross examine witnesses the president was denied the right to access evidence and the president was denied the right to have counsel present at hearings that's a try factor right back to that violates the constitution of the United States Mr Shipp did say the court's really don't have a role in this executive privilege why would that matter it matters because it's based on the constitution of the United States one manager said that it is you that are on trial the Senate he also said that and others did that you're not capable of abiding by your oath and then we had the invocation of the ghost of the mall report I know something about that report it came up empty on the issue of collusion with Russia there was no obstruction in fact the mall report to the country what these managers say today came to the exact opposite conclusions of what they say we quote from the house impeachment report at page sixteen although president trump has in times invoked the notion of due process an impeachment trial impeachment inquiry is not a criminal trial and should not be confused with it believe me what is taking place in these proceedings is not to be confused would you process because due process demands and the constitution requires fundamental fairness and due process wearing a lot about due process to process is designed to protect the person accused when the Russia investigation failed it devolved into the Ukraine quiproquo with that improve out it was in bribery or maybe extortion somebody said when the members or the mat members of the house said treason but instead we get two articles of impeachment two articles of impeachment that have a vague allegation about a non crime allegation of abuse of power in obstruction of Congress members.

president United States senator Schumer Mr Shipp Judiciary Committee Senate Russia trump bribery executive Ukraine extortion Congress
"mr shipp" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

WNYC 93.9 FM

03:14 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

"Thank you Mr Shipp alone are you a proponent or opponent of the motion Chief Justice we are proponents of the motion then Mr Sipple owning your side may proceed first and will be able to reserve rebuttal time if you wish says White House counsel Pat supporting loaning just preparing to open arguments Majority Leader the contents defense team democratic leader Schirmer senators my name is Pat so baloney I am here as counsel to the president of the United States our team is proud to be here representing president trump we support this resolution it is a fair way to proceed with this trial it is modeled on the Clinton resolution which had a hundred senators supporting it the last time this body considered impeachment it requires the house managers to stand up and make their opening statement and make their case they have delayed bringing this impeachment to this house for thirty three days thirty three days to this body and it's time to start with this trial it's a fair process they will have the opportunity to stand up and make their opening statement they will get twenty four hours to do that van the president's attorneys will have a chance to respond after that all of you will have sixteen hours to ask whatever questions you have of either side once that's finished and you have all of that information we will proceed to the question of witnesses and some of the more difficult questions that will come before this body we are in favor of this we believe that once you hear those initial presentations the only conclusion will be that the president has done absolutely nothing wrong and that these articles of impeachment do not begin to approach the standard required by the constitution and in fact they themselves will establish nothing beyond those articles you look at those articles alone and you will determine that there is absolutely no case so we respectfully ask you to adopt this resolution so that we can begin with this process it is long past time to start this proceeding and we're here today to do it and we hope that the house managers will agree with us and begin this proceeding today we reserve the remainder of our time for rebuttal and.

Mr Shipp Mr Sipple Pat president United States White House Clinton
Committee members continue grilling witnesses on impeachment

WBZ Afternoon News

01:10 min | 1 year ago

Committee members continue grilling witnesses on impeachment

"A busy day in Washington the house impeachment hearings continuing this hour on Capitol Hill lawmakers from both parties presenting evidence for and against the possible impeachment of president trump more now in this ABC news special report the house Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing democratic Attorney General Goldman not telling Republican Doug Collins who ordered release of phone records showing calls between the Intel committee ranking Republican the president's personal lawyer and a conservative journalists is not in the league the information what is your included in a report that's not a leaks are adding or even go on record in front of everybody here today and say that you will not fail who ordered it you are Mr gold Mr going you or Mr Shipp I am going to go on record and tell you that I'm not going to reveal how we conducted this investigation and that's the problem we have this entire thing Mr Schiff said buying clothes I can tell you what that means is I'm done with the front now A. B. C.'s merry Bruce at the capitol I think question near still remains what's the scope of these charges against the president we know that Democrats will likely charge the president on abuse of power on obstruction possibly on primary the question of course remains will they brought in that beyond the Ukraine issue to also include obstruction of the mall or

Washington Attorney General Goldman Doug Collins President Trump Mr Schiff A. B. C. Bruce ABC House Judiciary Committee Intel Mr Shipp Ukraine
"mr shipp" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

Newsradio 700 WLW

01:49 min | 1 year ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

"Happened and I think it's very difficult hi guys I actually heard the president of Ukraine mystery of yes here again is Listia to give his name and he said at the very clearly he said I was not pushed out of that pressure in anything I heard that said it is done yeah definitely so now if okay so they're gonna come back to going to vote on this presumably the house is going to vote for impeachment thank absolutely and it'll go to the Senate and they'll have this magnificent music quotes around the word magnificent it's a long drawn out trial that the media will love hand day it could be interesting the Republicans in fact are going to be able to was the creative people to appear that's why president trump says I want a trial so they can subpoena people it be interesting if Mr Shipp was hailed before the Senate answer questions as well as many other people so it could be it could be of some interest but the Senate is gonna is by all accounts not going to vote for impeachment or should I should say they go through the Senate the question is are they going to evict him from the chair of the oval office and the answer is probably not work definitely not all the Ben had the majority there they're not going to bow to kick up your president unless something really unbelievable happens and I can't I can't see that happening but the regression the animosity between the Democrats Republicans is so cheap I don't even know how they can look he'd look at each other how was watching a lot of television this weekend in between football game source.

president Senate trump Mr Shipp Ukraine football
"mr shipp" Discussed on WCPT 820

WCPT 820

01:56 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on WCPT 820

"Individual sitting beside you miss Williams and then there were of course was your boss Mr Morse invite just read from his deposition when we ask miss Williams who she spoke to after the call about the call she was willing to answer questions and chairmanship allowed her to answer questions when we ask Mister Morrison who he spoke to you after the call about the call he was willing to answer our question and Mr Shipp allowed chairmanship allowed him to answer questions that we ask you you first told us three individuals at the end I see your brother and the two lawyers and then you said there was a group of other people you communicated Wes but you would only give us one individual in that group secretary can't and the chairman would only allow you to give us that name when we ask you who else you communicated with you would not tell us so I want to know first how many other people are in that group of people you communicate with as I just named as a Mister Jordan on our call read out certainly after the first call there were probably half a dozen or more people I've written a read out those are people without the proper clearance and then the need to know in this case because the sensitivity of the call and Mister ice Berg told me not to speak to anybody else I only write out outside of the NSC two individuals to individuals just can't and one other note a person and you're not willing to tell us who that other individual is Mister chairman point of order Mister chair Mister chairman point of order the term was suspended counsel Mister chairman I would ask you in force the the rule with regard to the disclosure with regard to the intelligence thank you counsel you know as I indicated before this committee will not be used throughout the whistle blower that same was to try to get this city because of the time like don't lose the driver says that you are recognized again Mister Jordan Mister chairman I don't see how this is outing whistleblower witnesses testified in his deposition he does know who the whistle blowers you.

miss Williams Mister Morrison Mr Shipp Wes secretary chairman Mister Jordan Mr Morse Mister ice Berg NSC Mister Mister Jordan Mister
Ukraine witness barred from impeachment hearing

Armstrong and Getty

00:37 sec | 2 years ago

Ukraine witness barred from impeachment hearing

"Question a key witness in the house impeachment inquiry block this morning from testifying less than an hour before he was supposed to appear before the house intelligence committee chairman Adam Schiff after the state department ordered you ambassador Gordon sound live not to appear the failure to produce this witness the failure to produce these documents we consider yet additional strong evidence of obstruction however Republican congressman Jim Jordan says based on the unfair and hardest in process that Mr Shipp has been running president trump saying on Twitter that hearing would have been quoted totally compromised

Adam Schiff Congressman Jim Jordan Mr Shipp Twitter Chairman Gordon President Trump
"mr shipp" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

01:48 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KTOK

"Different take from Ohio Republican congressman Jim Jordan but not one thing he is sad comports with any of the Democrats impeachment narrative not one thing referencing Paul Volcker there the Democrats at the messages show that state department employees we're deeply concerned that US military assistance to Ukraine and a meeting between president trump and Ukraine's president. were being withheld in order to place additional pressure on Ukraine to launch politically motivated investigations. house intelligence chairman Adam Schiff is trying to clarify comments that his committee had not spoken directly with the Ukraine whistle blower this after his office acknowledged Wednesday that in fact it had been in contact with the whistle blower Mr Schiff told MSNBC on September seventeen after the complaint had been filed that the committee had not spoken with the whistle blower Mr Shipp is a leading Democrat in his party's impeachment inquiry does the presence invocation of deep state undermine the whistle blower process absolutely it's intended to. meanwhile fox news says Mr Shipp is facing questions about his own connection to a Soviet born businessman who was raised money for his campaign. that his company has received lucrative defense contracts from Ukraine's government that man is Igor Pasternak who in twenty thirteen hosted a fundraiser for Mr Schiff who later came to embrace a strong stance in support of the U. S. sending military aid to Ukraine. during its conflict with Russia it's eleven minutes now after the hour on this morning America's first news. staples is more than a place.

MSNBC fox chairman president Ohio America Russia Igor Pasternak Mr Shipp congressman Adam Schiff president. trump Ukraine US Paul Volcker Jim Jordan eleven minutes
"mr shipp" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

01:38 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on 600 WREC

"Election a different take from Ohio Republican congressman Jim Jordan but not one thing he is sad comports with any of the Democrats in peace with narrative not one thing referencing Paul Volcker there the Democrats at the messages show that state department employees we're deeply concerned that the US military assistance to Ukraine and a meeting between president trump and Ukraine's president. being withheld in order to place additional pressure on Ukraine to launch politically motivated investigations. house intelligence chairman Adam Schiff is trying to clarify comments that his committee had not spoken directly with the Ukraine whistle blower this after his office acknowledged Wednesday that in fact it had been in contact with the whistle blower Mr Schiff told MSNBC on September seventeen after the complaint had been filed that the committee had not spoken with the whistle blower Mr Schiff is a leading Democrat in his party's impeachment inquiry does the presence invocation of deep state undermine the whistle blower process absolutely it's intended to. meanwhile fox news says Mr Shipp is facing questions about his own connection to a Soviet born businessman who was raised money for his campaign. that his company has received lucrative defense contracts from Ukraine's government that man is Igor Pasternak who in twenty thirteen hosted a fundraiser for Mr Schiff who later came to embrace a strong stance in support of the U. S. sending military aid to Ukraine. during its conflict with Russia it's eleven minutes now after the hour on this morning.

congressman Jim Jordan Paul Volcker US Ukraine trump president. Adam Schiff MSNBC Mr Shipp Igor Pasternak Russia Ohio president chairman fox eleven minutes
"mr shipp" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

KOA 850 AM

01:47 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

"Election a different take from Ohio Republican congressman Jim Jordan but not one thing he is sad comports with any of the Democrats in peace when they're not one thing referencing Paul Volcker there the Democrats of the messages show that state department employees we're deeply concerned that US military assistance to Ukraine and a meeting between president trump and Ukraine's president. were being withheld in order to place additional pressure on Ukraine to launch politically motivated investigations. house intelligence chairman Adam Schiff is trying to clarify comments that his committee had not spoken directly with the Ukraine whistle blower this after his office acknowledged Wednesday that in fact it had been in contact with the whistle blower Mr Schiff told MSNBC on September seventeenth after the complaint had been filed that the committee had not spoken with the whistle blower Mr Shipp is a leading Democrat in his party's impeachment inquiry does the presence invocation of deep state undermined the whistle blower process absolutely it's intended to. meanwhile fox news says Mr Shipp is facing questions about his own connection to a Soviet born businessman who was raised money for his campaign. that his company has received lucrative defense contracts from Ukraine's government that man is Igor Pasternak who in twenty thirteen hosted a fundraiser for Mr Schiff will later came to embrace a strong stance in support of the U. S. sending military aid to Ukraine. during its conflict with Russia it's eleven minutes now after the hour on this morning America's first news..

MSNBC fox chairman president Ohio America Russia Igor Pasternak Mr Shipp congressman Adam Schiff president. trump Ukraine US Paul Volcker Jim Jordan eleven minutes
"mr shipp" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

01:39 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KTRH

"Twenty election a different take from Ohio Republican congressman Jim Jordan but not one thing he is sad comports with any of the Democrats in peace the narrative not one thing referencing Paul Volcker there the Democrats of the messages show that state department employees we're deeply concerned that US military assistance to Ukraine and a meeting between president trump and Ukraine's president. were being withheld in order to place additional pressure on Ukraine to launch politically motivated investigations. house intelligence chairman Adam Schiff is trying to clarify comments that his committee had not spoken directly with the Ukraine whistle blower this after his office acknowledged Wednesday that in fact it had been in contact with the whistle blower Mr Schiff told MSNBC on September seventeen after the complaint had been filed that the committee had not spoken with the whistle blower Mr Schiff is a leading Democrat in his party's impeachment inquiry does the presence invocation of deep state undermine the whistle blower process absolutely it's intended to. meanwhile fox news says Mr Shipp is facing questions about his own connection to a Soviet born businessman who was raised money for his campaign. that his company has received lucrative defense contracts from Ukraine's government that man is Igor Pasternak who in twenty thirteen hosted a fundraiser for Mr Schiff who later came to embrace a strong stance in support of the U. S. sending military aid to Ukraine. during its conflict with Russia it's eleven minutes now after the hour on this morning.

congressman Jim Jordan Paul Volcker US Ukraine trump president. Adam Schiff MSNBC Mr Shipp Igor Pasternak Russia Ohio president chairman fox eleven minutes
"mr shipp" Discussed on C-SPAN Radio

C-SPAN Radio

01:46 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on C-SPAN Radio

"To request information from from from foreign countries about the president's political rival political rival Joe Biden and and here is now the continued and I would say even higher decibel debate over the propriety of making such requests and how to investigate those requests and determined whether in fact there was wrongdoing that assessment from a Washington post investigative reporter Tom hamburger part of a team of journalists trying to connect the dots on the Ukraine story former vice president Joe Biden and the impeachment inquiry it is Thursday October third and this is Washington today on C. span radio I'm Steve Scully on Capitol Hill the president's former envoy to Ukraine before stepping down abruptly last week testifying in a closed door session Republican Jim Jordan is on at the house intelligence committee Mr Shipp was going to try to limit members from even asking questions when we started today's interview the fact that he won't let agency counsel state department counsel participate I've participated in many of us have marking eyes with the oversight committee have participated in countless number of transcribed interviews we've never. ever had an occasion where agency counsel was not allowed to participate we're never limitations put on our staff who can be there to assist in the interview and we've never seen a chairman suggests that members are allowed to ask questions also ahead on Wall Street after two down days the markets rebounded we'll have that and in the stories shaping Washington today it's all ahead on C. span radio. we begin at the White House.

president Joe Biden Washington Steve Scully Ukraine Jim Jordan Mr Shipp oversight committee chairman White House Washington post investigative reporter Tom hamburger vice president
"mr shipp" Discussed on C-SPAN Radio

C-SPAN Radio

01:43 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on C-SPAN Radio

"Comments and more questions from Capitol Hill reporters congressman Adam Schiff Democrat of California chair of the house intelligence committee following it was a closed door session involving Kurt Volker one of a series of closed door sessions this week as house Democrats trying to gather more information on the president Ukraine and as well as China meanwhile Republican Jim Jordan Ohio also speaking to reporters before that closed door session concluded. what I would just say this with Bob first of all ambassador Volker unbelievably knowledgeable about what was going on Ukraine just a true professional in our diplomatic corps but not wanting his sad comports with any of the Democrats in peace the narrative not one thing but I will say this the process Mr Schiff is set up. Mr Shipp was going to try to limit members from even asking questions when we started today's interview the fact that he won't let agency counsel state department counsel participate I participated in many of us have mark and I with the oversight committee have participated in countless number of transcribed interviews we've never. ever had an occasion where agency counsel was not allowed to participate where there were limitations put on our staff who can be there to assist in the interview and we've never seen a chairman suggests that members are allowed to ask questions so if this is not Mr Schiff is going to conduct these type of interviews in the future that's a concern as well but investors Volcker has been very impressive in as I said has said nothing that nothing that coincides with what the Democrats are saying with their whole impeachment..

Mr Schiff Kurt Volker Adam Schiff Mr Shipp Ukraine house intelligence committee Jim Jordan Ohio oversight committee congressman Bob California Volcker president China chairman
"mr shipp" Discussed on KQED Radio

KQED Radio

02:13 min | 2 years ago

"mr shipp" Discussed on KQED Radio

"These men until they die at much less cost and make sure that nobody was ever heard again and he won't Gillette Mormon believes brown and Rishikas were fired for pursuing settlements she points to military court testimony by defense department acting general counsel William castle castle said he and former defense secretary Jim Mattis we're told by former Attorney General Jeff sessions the sessions wanted quote no deal castle testified he interpreted that to mean no plea deals for Guantanamo inmates I leave to you and the listener. why it is that Mr Shipp half was then fired by the secretary of defense NPR contacted representatives from Madison sessions but neither could be reached for comment this is one more time and and all my messages his father Richard Morgan died in the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings Glen Morgan has traveled twice to Guantanamo to watch the military court hearings it's working but not at the pace I had hoped for and how would you describe the pace. glacial Morgan wants the five men accused of the nine eleven attacks to be put to death but he also says he would accept the different resolution after years of so little progress for you with a satisfying outcome be that they spend life in prison or continue to spend life in prison yes but I'm not saying I advocate for but when someone in your family is killed like this in your mom is left to fight cancer on our own without her husband like your definition of satisfied is modified so I would be satisfied because there would be conclusion but a lack of conclusion is exactly what Morgan is bracing himself for so my prediction is the prisoners will die before they are found guilty and even if they died in prison at Guantanamo you feel cheated of something no yeah they would have not been found guilty they'll never been found guilty of murder and they killed over twenty nine hundred people. and so that would be an injustice last month at one time judge city January twenty twenty one start date for the nine eleven trial defense attorneys are skeptical that date is realistic in the meantime the Pentagon is considering a new Guantanamo prison.

Gillette World Trade Center Mr Shipp Attorney William castle castle acting general counsel Rishikas brown Jim Mattis Pentagon murder cancer Richard Morgan NPR secretary Guantanamo