14 Burst results for "Molly Coddle"
RISE Podcast
"molly coddle" Discussed on RISE Podcast
"We are extremely excited to be empty nesters. Okay. Just like get out. Get out of here. Go be free, baby bird. Fly from the nest. Right. But it's also, it's also terrifying. You know, I think someone asked me the other day, what do you most fear? What is most like not in your control? And I would say, you know, my fear for my teenage boy is and lack of control around the choices that he makes and mistakes that he's going to make and letting that go is an entirely new sensation for me. And that is really terrifying. You try and do everything for your kids. But at a certain point in time, there are going to be making a lot more of their choices. You hope that you've, you know, nurtured them with a little bit of wisdom and insight and foresight, but you know they're especially the boys like their brains are not wired until they're like 25 physiologically and the whole COVID thing, you know, in a lot of ways today's kids, he's 18 and a half, he has the maturity of like a 27 year old. And a lot of ways. Like the way he sees the world and his place in it and what's important and in a lot of ways, he's 18 and a half going on 11. Yeah. You know, and there's a lot of immaturity there, which happens with all teenagers, but especially during this COVID time because there's that socializing piece of missing during that year and a half, and that that's when we really grow. That's really what school is about. I mean, who remembers the paper that they wrote on the scarlet letter, right? I have mind framed in the house. Oh, you do, okay. Yeah. Nice. No, totally agreed. I have four kids. And that piece that you're talking about manifest then by every single one, and each individual personality type. And three of my four are boys. And one of them is very mature. And the other two, we're gonna see how that goes. I have a lot less fear about my oldest son. He's always been super responsible and kind of always wanted to be an adult. Long before he was. But his younger brother, you know, for sure I'm gonna get a call that's like, you know, he got arrested for doing something crazy or I'm just, yeah, oh, that sounds just like that kid. That is sort of a, I don't know, the beauty and the tension of being at least for me of being a parent is like, I have to let you have these moments and make these mistakes and do these things. And experience the consequences of those because when they were younger, I kind of covered for every consequence. If you left your homework at home, mom drove it to school. And then at some point, and at some point you realized, oh, sorry, Walter thought he did this, but can you help him out with this? Just a little bit of rescuing, which we vowed not to do. Yes. We can't help ourselves. Well, and then you're like, I can sort of see the context and maybe the teacher can't, but the older they get, the more I have to take a step back and allow it to be what it is, and that is very difficult for me. 'cause I'm like, come on, man. And for me, I was always a very good, I was a good girl, and I got good grades, and I did and so to have kids that aren't as interested in that mode is a beautiful lesson for me and learning to let them be who they are and not try and make them. Do you know, do you know the work of doctor Jonathan haidt by any chance at NYU? He's got a bunch of books out, some are on politics, some are on. He has a book on happiness. He kind of was one of the first people that wrote a positive psychology database book on happiness. That was like 15 years ago. He's got and I can send you the information. He's compiling data, real hard data about the mental health epidemic with young people, which, as you know, is just off the charts. And one of the things he's arrived at is that helicopter parenting is really, really bad for kids. And he talks about like the free range parenting, you know, the woman that was arrested for letting her 9 year old go to the park down the street. Yeah, yeah, and this whole idea of like over Molly coddling kids and taking away consequences, taking away skinned knees, letting them learn by failing, which, you know, we've struggled with. Listen, I can talk a good game, but you want everything for your kids, you know? And but that's one of what's one of the indicators because what it does is it takes away resilience and the positive psychology movement they've kind of really pinpointed at this kind of like astounding lack of resilience among young people that you'll see. They'll have a setback. Someone will say something mean about them online or something like that. And they won't come out of their bed for a week and be in tears. Right. And they won't be able to function. Right. You know, I know, you know, teenagers that I've met or worked with or whatever. And they'll have a bad breakup, and then they just won't do their homework for weeks. Yeah. When we were in high school, I mean, I'm a little older than you, but when we were in high school, like, you had breakups, and you did your homework. What's going on? Yeah, and you just had to keep on with your commitments and stuff. So, I mean, it gets a lot more deep and more complex than that. But these are some of the indicators that they've been looking at. And he's got a couple of books coming out next year, and I'm actually going to be speaking with him in New York soon. And cool. His work is really phenomenal. Awesome. The happiness hypothesis, it's fantastic. Okay. It's filled with Buddhism and positive psychology findings kind of cool. Interwoven. A little delayed this morning because I had a call my oldest son is very from the time of his little he cares so much about school. He cares so much about his grades. He is the top of his class, and that is not for me. I am total hippie. Sort of wish that when he graduates high school, he'd take a gap year and travel the world and smoke some pot, like just go live for a minute because that's life, but he is, has a one track mind. He applied for a really specific private school that he very much wants to go to. And he's pretty far along in the process. And this morning we had interviews. And they interview first the kid and then me and he's buttoned up and he's ready to go and he's got all the things and then here I'm like, hey. And she, after she was done with him, she had time with me by myself and she said, you know, the question I always ask parents is how will they handle coming to a school that's much more rigorous? And his grades
WTOP
"molly coddle" Discussed on WTOP
"And thanks for being with us. Well beer and baseball go together, right? Well in Washington that is not always been the case. Joining us live to talk more about this is author Frederick J frommer, a writer and sports historian Fred, I read and really enjoyed your article in The Washington Post or read it last night and again this morning, tell us why D.C. baseball fans were not able to get a beer at the ballpark until I guess the mid 50s? That's right, because the owner of the team, Clark Griffith, was a prohibitionist. And so throughout the 1920s, nobody could have beard baseball games because prohibition was that law of the land. But even after that was removed and constitutional amendment vote that, Griffith said, no, to beer. And so for another 20 years or so, even more than 20 years, he said, no to beer, and so fans were not able to drink beer until he died. The 1955. Do we know if he had a personal reason? Like maybe it was something that affected him very badly so he didn't drink or was it more just the times? More of the times. You know, it's interesting. I found a story about how when he was a manager of the Washington centers, way, way back before he became owner. He had told players to be fine for them to have one beer, maybe two at the most, but after that, it's best not to drink more than two beers. So he was pretty much a moderate at the time. And so you see that as prohibition takes over the nation, it's passed in 1920. He kind of comes along and goes on with it. He's getting a little older and he kind of sets in his ways and at that point, even when prohibition is invoked his no going back for Clark Griffith. Very interesting. But at other ballparks across the country, you could get a beer right here and there. That's right. In fact, in 1933, president Roosevelt, one of his first acts was to this is before prohibition is revoked, but he did pass a or sign a law that allowed for a very low alcohol content beer and wine to be sold. And so he had clerk and owner of the president rather than national league at The White House right before the 33 season and he said, hey, now this law is on the books you think you guys will be selling beer and the national league president said, yeah, we're all going to be doing it. And so you did have that opportunity and Griffith said, no point blank to the president who was looking to get a little publicity for this new law that he had just signed until into being so, yeah, there was an opportunity to other places, but back then, as of today, Washington had one team and the closest team was Philadelphia. And back in the depression, you know, there wasn't a lot of disposal income. So really watching your fans, we're not going to have an opportunity to drink at a ball game for many years to come. Well, Fred, I wish we had more time on this, especially so we could talk about the phrase Molly coddle. That's in your story, but I'm going to encourage everybody to get out there and read that one in The Washington Post for a thanks for being with us. We appreciate it. Appreciate it. Thanks, Kyle. Enjoyed it. That is writer and sports historian and no Molly coddle at all. Fred from, or make sure you watch that winner. Check that one out in The Washington Post
ESPN FC
"molly coddle" Discussed on ESPN FC
"My emails on your phone. Is that how you get them? Yep. So this is the Stevie's been trying to do it over the phone, but there is actually a buyer at ESPN where not that type of bar where you can go and help because it'd be there all the time. Stevie, do you think working your way up through levels from lower league air to top flight Liverpool made you a better, more rounded player than Molly coddled academy golden boys like Craig and nadim? I mean, as far as the footballs can sound, I would say it was probably more to do with what was going on in the rest of the world, being able to go through different stages and land the boat actually leaven the way normal people do at the time most people got the boss and all these kind of things. But as today, if you look at the kids know from the ages of what name, the kind of full time in some of these clubs. And so the lives are just about training and getting mom and dad to take them home, bring them back again. And they kind of grew up in a world that's not a real, a real world, unless you're going to be in it for the rest of your life. I mean, can you imagine it'd be 9 all the way through to what 17 when the full ten contracts have been given out and you've done nothing other than train and travel with your mom and dad back and forth. And all of a sudden you're on the scrap heap and they wonder why these young kids are completely lost and take the wrong path. So yeah, absolutely, I'm glad that I'm glad my path was the way it was. I would imagine now they don't
The Charlie Kirk Show
"molly coddle" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"I'm pretty certain that actually in that person's head, they're going, you know, I got that one over. You want to talk about gross to carry on the theme of the last segment. It's gross. But requires really, really being grown up in our conversation about this. And the grown-up part of all of this Charlie is to say, no, right? It's the Chad meme. It's not to baby them. It's not to Molly coddle them. It's not saying, oh poor you, you don't know what gender you are and dear God, man, what are you wearing to skirt for? But it's just to say no. You know, thou shalt not pass. And I think we have to we have to dig our staffs in the ground to be a little firmer about that. Yeah, and we have an entire ruling class that is afraid to say no. And that is the mark that they've never actually matured. And also that they do not have intestinal fortitude gumption, a spine or testosterone to stand up against evil. What is the ultimate motivation of the grooming of children? That's a deep topic. But go there if you wish. Yeah, I don't know if I could do it in one minute, but I have been reading a lot about the difference now between transhumanism, which I think a lot of people have got their heads around the last couple of years. And this new idea of anti humanism. The idea that the species must go extinct to save the planet. And this is actually becoming a bigger and bigger thing in academic circles and philosophical circles on the left now. So I am working on a new substack about that. It's less funny than the Liz Winstead one. But I'd be happy to come back and talk about it with you at length when it's fully fleshed out. It's something that I'm trying to get my head around for leaning as well. I would enjoy that. And it's nothing new. I mean, you read back to Greek philosophers used to admonish religious Jewish circles because they didn't kill all their children. Some Greek philosophers wrote at length, who are these Jews that allow the ugly and the deformed children to live. What motivates them? They couldn't believe it because in pagan Greek culture, the idea that every child is a gift from God, you don't derive that from worshiping the rivers..
Dr. Drew Podcast
"molly coddle" Discussed on Dr. Drew Podcast
"As it's not malignant and they're not exploiting people and they don't have empathic failure, and you can sort of judge that by looking at their family relationships. To the family, can they stand to be around them? Malignant narcissist, the family's all out. Trump seems to have his family around him. He has treated them like shit at times, which is like, okay. And he certainly hypomanic. He gets up at four in the morning, and he is always working and stuff. Roosevelt was the same thing. Except Roosevelt had, he had not good relationship with his family, right? Except his one son who died of alcoholism finally, right? Well, there was one senator died in war, Kermit. Yes. He actually took us Kermit. Kerr was, I think, kind of the same guy. And Kurt was interesting, dude. And if he had lived, he probably would have been another Teddy Roosevelt. But the other one was a little more sensitive and alcoholic. Anyway, I think Teddy Roosevelt, great. I really you've put a little bit shot an arrow through it a little bit for me by talking about that. And I do know it was a hypomania mostly that was sort of the source of a lot of that crazy. It's interesting you say this because there's a book called TR's last war and the author hypothesized that he actually killed himself toward the end because by the end he was like half blind. He was kind of bedridden. And there was all this more laying around and if you read through it and this isn't some crank the day but trust is a very polished historian. His last days were very embarrassing because he tried to get into World War I and Wilson very spitefully said sorry buddy we don't have room for you even though it would have been a great opportunity to kind of unify the country to have the two presidents together. And he was spat in the face of the Progressive Party that tried to renominate him. It was really bad. Well, then he went down into South America and he should have died there. Right, yes. The report is he was never right after correct. Correct. And that was the depression now coming in. Yes. And he was, but he was a stud, man. He was ready to die down there. Yes. He was a badass. You're good for him. I think he's an evil man, but he was clearly badass. Evil. So tell me about that. How is he? We're going to take a break about ten minutes, and we're going to take him to a whole other show, but go ahead. Well, after McKinley died, he basically had all these kind of first of all, he was the first president to denounce anarchism and he had this whole thing about making it illegal and with those European brand Arnhem that scared him. It was Eastern European Android. And you saw the craziness and the assassinations and stuff. I didn't like it. Sure, but understandably, but at the same time, it's a blatant violation of the First Amendment. Was a black hand anarchistic? Yes. I think there were national standards. The ones killed Ferdinand. But I'm not too familiar with curious what they were. I never did. But just in terms of his vision of D.C. as this kind of centralizing force, he was also surprisingly puritanical for someone like a badass like alpha male. He also was very, very prissy in many ways and just had this kind of live right kind of thing. I think there was something weird sexually repressed about. Yeah, there's this kind of, yeah, because he was always going on about Molly coddles and all these euphemisms for like men who weren't real men. So there's this weird kind of cross between Mussolini and Mr. Rogers in his psyche. But he's by far and he led the path for Woodrow Wilson. He was the first progressive president who had this vision of what they called the new nationalism. I think that was the term at the time. But just basically that I'm pre fascist quasi dictator. Yeah, listen, do you know about his little shenanigans as the assistant secretary of navy? No, not familiar. To me. This is teddy, not 50. I was also a sister to the navy. Well, teddy was. Okay. I never trust her liked him. He just seems like a, I don't know. He's a snake. I talk about it in the next book. It's really great. Okay, I'm going to read your book. Because he just seems like an elitist prick. And he just does whatever sort of suits him. But that's the thing. Conservatives are completely wrong. He wasn't an ideologue. He just had no real principles at all. That makes sense to me. Yeah. So teddy when he was assistant secretary of navy, the secretary of navy went on vacation. Literally on vacation, I think it went to Europe or something because he was sort of out of contact. And teddy ordered 5 destroyers in an aircraft carrier or something like that. I don't know if there's aircraft carrier there, but some crazy just ordered a bunch of ships. And he had no authority to do it. It was an insane expense. Secretary navy came back and was like, what the fuck? What are you doing? Yeah, I just was the right thing to do. And he was a, what would you call it? Was it imperialist? Oh, very much. Yeah. And this was part of his imperialist instinct that he just did it. Just whatever. That's impulsive that type of mania. And there's all these stories about how you couldn't have a meeting with him. You'd have to walk with him out in the park and stuff because he couldn't sit still. Oh, I did not know that. Oh, yeah. He climbing, too. He wouldn't just be walking. You'd have to go climb rocks with him. Well, the best set he Roosevelt story, I think, pretty much everyone agrees is there was one time where he got shot and he finished the speech. It was a Bible or something as well. He had a book in his coat pocket and he said the book is in like the National Gallery or something. And it sort of saved his life. He was still bleeding, but he gave an hour like two hours of speech. But it's about a 20 minutes we took a two hour speech. And by the way, rhetorically, probably one of the greatest rhetoricians had ever lived, right? And speakers. Yeah, I mean, the way he whipped up that audience to their friends that he was very known for that. So have you heard this theory? We are going all over the place. All right, you're into it. So I am too. This idea of the mass formation psychosis. Yeah. If you heard about it, yes I have. Okay, so you know the basic theory is that there's free floating anxiety, there's social disconnect. I would say a lot of trauma and people's past.
ESPN FC
"molly coddle" Discussed on ESPN FC
"Making a mistake and that is too late. And he wasn't too much from Benfica as well, but it was not enough from Paris St. John. It was a little hashtag pivot gang again today for Killian Mbappé. You may have seen his Instagram post this week after the draw with ronce mill mill lap finish midweek. Sorry, the weekend in ligand. And he did this little hashtag, as you can see here, Craig pivot gang. It doesn't like playing centrally. We've already heard what he's had to say about his role at France, where he likes the fact that Giroux is an out and out number 9. He doesn't want to play through the middle. So this is what Luis kam pass has had to say about Mbappé wanting to leave as soon as possible. He said, Mbappé has never told me or Nassau Kelly feed that he wants to leave PSG in January. His Mbappé happy here, you should ask him. It's a serious question. I see him working as a top professional. So what is the truth, jewels? Well, we never reported that he told the club that he wanted to live. We reported that he wants to live. He can say he didn't speak to me. He didn't say anything to me. This is not what we're saying here, and this is not why he's saying, oh, he's family, or his client is saying either. They're saying he's unhappy. He desires to leave as soon as possible as early as possible as early as January, because he's had enough. He's had enough of the promises that the club made that we're not kept. He's had enough of the tension around the team within the team, him and Neymar. We talked a lot about it. I don't think he's happy with the way the team is playing for stop and even tonight, the Klan, the entourage saying that he goes beyond football event that the situation is so difficult. For him, even outside of football, that's another reason why he wants to leave. So compost can say anything he wants, we never said that Mbappé has announced to the club that he wanted to go. We said that he wants to go, he's not happy. He even said that he made a mistake by staying and extending his contract 143 days ago. So they're saying to us, there's no return now. He's gone too far. And it's just not happy enough. I'm intrigued jewels. What are these promises that never materialized the are so important? There is one that I can. Not just go quickly. The biggest one, really, it's on his positioning on the pitch. And I think a lot of things is linked to that position because tonight, again, he played as a center forward by the launch tracker if you want, he plays on his own up front with two players behind him or Neymar and sarabia tonight, for example. This is not his best position. This is not a position that he likes. It's not positioned I enjoy playing in and in the summer when he's extended his deal, him and the club in the discussion, the club said, don't worry, we will play four four two next season. We will recruit another number 9 a real number 9 a target man, a pivot, hence the people post that we saw earlier. A target man striker, you're going to play off him, you and Messi, there will be no Neymar, and it will be you will finally in your best position, which is that of a second striker with a lot of freedom. You can go wherever you want. This is what will happen. They try to live and you only want it faster and they try to get an agreement with swallow. They sign the younger Kiki who is not ready and who's not good enough right now. So in many times, still has to be the lone striker, still has to play on his own up front and he sees Messi and Neymar playing off him behind him, having a great time not making people's growing free kicks growing loads of goals for fun. And if it frustrated that he was told you would not play in that position, you would play in your best position and it's not what's happening. Joseph has been nice to him. So they did try and fulfill the promises that they try and bring in some strikers to play and give him his freedom. It's just not a team player. It's just not a team player. It's what Kellyanne wants Kelly and gets. Has said that they are trying to work out a solution to this problem for him, which suggests that he knows that it's not what he wants. I don't care what goal this is. I don't care what PhD say. I don't care what anybody else says. Let's be honest about it. This man unless he gets his own way as the biggest baby in world football at the moment. There's no doubt about it. His ego is out of control. A few months ago, when they gave him the earth, he told everybody the total BS, that is a project. As the project, Hezbollah, not mine. Right? Do you think every footballer gets the play exactly where they want and every game and every team is perfect. And every promise a club makes is kept at all these other clubs. No, it's not. But I'm not surprised. I'm not surprised. But let's be honest, he is not every football, a Killian Mbappé, is he? And he had Real Madrid desperate for anything. So PSG had to make him assurances which he feels like to have a delivery. To try to deliver the trig at Lewandowski, Joseph said it. They tried to get other players, JoJo said it. They gave him a secure card one for the cache. Huge salary. Put Molly coddled them, wrapped them in cotton wool, and a few months into this season, each crane let a big baby, because he's not playing his favorite position. I mean, come on. I say that at a time, he should have made the move in the summer. It should have cut ties in the summer. He didn't. And whenever Kelly and Barbie doesn't get what he wants, the proverbial toys come out of the prom, right? There's no other way to look at it. I said it months ago is a majestic footballer. But he has been on an eagle train that has steaming with no driver and no brakes. There's no other way to look at it. Frank?
Impact Theory with Tom Bilyeu
"molly coddle" Discussed on Impact Theory with Tom Bilyeu
"Right, as a leader, do you find yourself guiding the team towards your vision or leave it open for co creation? Okay, so I definitely love having other amazing high level thinkers that can challenge the notion, but I want to be very clear. This is not a democracy. This is a meritocracy. But my thing is, guys, I tell my team this all the time. I am not smart enough to think of all the good ideas myself. Here at impact here, we have a gigantic goal. We're trying to build the next Disney. Now, Disney has been around for, I think, 90 years. They have billions of dollars. So that is a very tall order to think that we can be, you know, what do they have hundreds of thousands of employees? So here we are with our 27 employees. And we're taking on a 300,000. It could be more than that. 300,000 people company with a gazillion dollars in all the IP practically in the universe. And we're trying to beat them at that game. Now, I know that I'm not going to be able to come up with all the right ideas. So I've got to create an environment where people can speak to power, where they can tell me if they think something I'm doing is stupid. And I want them to talk nakedly, raw, give it to me real because here, here is a powerful idea. When you're building a company, you have a real goal. You're actually trying to do something. And you should value yourself by not by being right, but by identifying the right answer because you're actually trying to accomplish something. It's not rhetoric. You're not playing at it. This is a difference between a entrepreneur and an entrepreneur. An entrepreneur says, yo, I have to pay salaries. I've got to avoid a mortality event for the company. We've got to build towards this goal that we have. And the only way that we're going to get there is if we've got a lot of really smart, hardworking people that are focused on that same goal. And the only way that you can do that is if people are allowed to say what they think, they're encouraged to say what they think, in fact, at impact theory, we demand that people say what they think. So this is an idea that we got from ray dalio at principles. And well, ray dalio, Bridgewater, he wrote a book called principles, which is where we got this. You have to own your opinion. You have to speak up or you have to get out. And we do not tolerate people that won't speak their mind. Now from that, you're going to get a lot of bad ideas. And look, there is what ray calls and I love this phrase chirping, where people don't know the whole picture. And so they come at you and they tell you that you're doing something wrong, but they really just are limited in their scope of understanding of what you're trying to accomplish. And for the most part, you just ignore chirping. Chirping is sort of the cost of creating a culture where the next great idea might come from somebody obscure that you never imagined. And so you want to make sure that you create the space for that. You want to make sure that the best ideas rise up through the organization. But at the same time, you want to make sure that you're not wasting entertaining ideas that don't make any sense from people that don't have experience. Now, if somebody is an expert in the field, I'm really going to take time to try to understand. So we'll define an expert as somebody that's had success in that area, three or more times. Okay? So if somebody's had success in the area that you're dealing with in that moment, three or more times and I had first think their idea is crazy. I'm really going to stop and pay attention and try to make sure that I understand it. If somebody with no experience in that area gives me an idea that I think is crazy and I have expertise in that area, then I'm going to say I'm super grateful that you took the time to give me that opinion for XYZ reason I don't think it makes sense. And then I'm going to move on. I'm not going to worry about making sure that they feel Molly coddled or anything like that. It's like if you don't have expertise in the area and an expert tells you that doesn't make sense, then it's like be stoked that you are inside of an organization that wants your ideas, but recognize that in this dynamic, you're a student and not a teacher. And this is hard, man. This is really hard for people, but this is the fucking real stuff. Like this is where you have to recognize me as a CEO. I've got to recognize when I'm the student. And so I'll put forth an idea if an expert in that space is like, that doesn't make sense for this reason. I'm like, respect, this isn't my area of expertise. But when I know something, then I'm going to go to the math for it.
Caught Offside
"molly coddle" Discussed on Caught Offside
"And that fit in that affects your sharpness. But I thought he drove well. He did some nice things. I'm just saying, contest still trying to find his way. And I do think there's decent signs. I mentioned some of the controversies in this. So it ended one one. Tottenham had three disallowed goals in this game. Now, the first one, the Ben Davies header, he was obviously offside. It was a good call. There was nothing wrong with it. The other two, I mean, look, I don't want to re litigate var changes to var, things like that. But the one thing that I thought with Harry Kane's, the quality scored early in the second half that would have put them ahead. The changes that were made from the way var is used, I thought it was kind of, I thought the idea of it was that we would never see another armpit off side again. And I don't know why suddenly today in a season where we hadn't seen them why today it reared its head again. I don't even understand why it went to the var and I don't really understand why they made the decision they did. I thought that it was clear if the lines overlap, then the goal counts, the benefit of the doubt is given to the attacker, armpit offsides don't occur anymore, but that's precisely what was ruled against Tottenham today. So I still don't fully understand that. I'm commentary. The commentary team didn't think it was off site. I didn't think it was off so, you know, I mean, fire has not been consistent in the last month or so Andrew. So this is not previous shock. And then the Fraser forster met Dougherty incident. If you want to call it a coming together, I'm not quite as mad about that one because look, while I think it's sort of ridiculous for a goalkeeper to be completely bailed out on what was essentially calamitous goalkeeping, like to allow try to pocket that one rather than rise up and catch it above everyone else. It was horrible goalkeeping and the fact that he was bailed out from a pretty soft vowel is annoying. But it's the way the sport is officiated. Like goalkeepers are given those calls, 9 out of ten times. I'm getting sick of it to be honest, which is because that one was particularly soft, and I would go to our dear friend, David priest, who is now the head of goalkeeping at Sunderland, which is pretty amazing. We haven't even talked about that. He's been in the job a year. Wow. We're bad Friends. And David priest says not sure about that inverted commas fowl on forster, to be honest, and you know David, he is the he's the head of the goalkeepers union. He will defend keepers. He will defend he would get into the weeds and the arguments about should have saved that. Will be disappointed. He'll always defend the goalkeeper. Most of the time you'll defend the goalkeeper. So when David's calling it like that, it's probably not a phone. But I'm generally sick of it. I am sick of what goalkeepers getting that call regardless. Goalkeepers are getting all these calls regardless. Yet you can have a goalkeepers and I'm not picking on Anderson. There are other keys to do this. You can fly out of their goals and just hammer into people and nothing is ever done about that. But like challenging or even attempting to challenge the goalkeeper is such a taboo in football. I think it needs to be, I think it needs to be looked at. I'm thinking of an FA Cup final, and I'll tweet it out the video. It's in the 50s, Andrew. Now, I'm not asking to go back to this. I think it was Bolton versus Blackpool in one of the I think it might have been the famous Stanley Matthews cop final. The Bolton keeper catches the ball and is shoulder barged into the net with the ball and the goal is allowed. And it's a great goal there for Bolton. Goalkeeper hanging onto it. What was he doing? Oh, he'll have a sore head in the morning. That poor chap. I don't want to go back to that. I don't. But at the same time, these guys are completely Molly coddled. By the way, what is your favorite time wasting tactic that phrase or foster uses? I'm curious. To me, the time wasting, I texted you because you texted me about their time wasting. And I said to you, it started in the 20th minute. And for me, I noticed it, not as much with Fraser forster, although he was doing it certainly. But on some of Southampton's throw ins, I was like, is there is anyone going to take this? Or are we just going to sit here for like another minute? I love forster because he's got his routine down Andrew. It's so good. So, first of all, stroll as slowly as you can to retrieve the ball. And he's a big man. He is a Lombok. So he goes slow. He has these super tall, like, possible, right? And he just loll ups back and he squeezes the ball and then he sets it down, puts his foot underneath it, so he can get that height. Then he steps back. And the next thing it's time to clean the muck from between my cleats as he is a scratcher that and I haven't seen him doing it a while, but when he was at Celtic he used step he used to do the back heel against the gold post before we take it to get rid of the dirt.
ESPN FC
"molly coddle" Discussed on ESPN FC
"And that fit in that affects your sharpness. But I thought he drove well. He did some nice things. I'm just saying, contest still trying to find his way. And I do think there's decent signs. I mentioned some of the controversies in this. So it ended one one. Tottenham had three disallowed goals in this game. Now, the first one, the Ben Davies header, he was obviously offside. It was a good call. There was nothing wrong with it. The other two, I mean, look, I don't want to re litigate var changes to var, things like that. But the one thing that I thought with Harry Kane's, the quality scored early in the second half that would have put them ahead. The changes that were made from the way var is used, I thought it was kind of, I thought the idea of it was that we would never see another armpit off side again. And I don't know why suddenly today in a season where we hadn't seen them why today it reared its head again. I don't even understand why it went to the var and I don't really understand why they made the decision they did. I thought that it was clear if the lines overlap, then the goal counts, the benefit of the doubt is given to the attacker, armpit offsides don't occur anymore, but that's precisely what was ruled against Tottenham today. So I still don't fully understand that. I'm commentary. The commentary team didn't think it was off site. I didn't think it was off so, you know, I mean, fire has not been consistent in the last month or so Andrew. So this is not previous shock. And then the Fraser forster met Dougherty incident. If you want to call it a coming together, I'm not quite as mad about that one because look, while I think it's sort of ridiculous for a goalkeeper to be completely bailed out on what was essentially calamitous goalkeeping, like to allow try to pocket that one rather than rise up and catch it above everyone else. It was horrible goalkeeping and the fact that he was bailed out from a pretty soft vowel is annoying. But it's the way the sport is officiated. Like goalkeepers are given those calls, 9 out of ten times. I'm getting sick of it to be honest, which is because that one was particularly soft, and I would go to our dear friend, David priest, who is now the head of goalkeeping at Sunderland, which is pretty amazing. We haven't even talked about that. He's been in the job a year. Wow. We're bad Friends. And David priest says not sure about that inverted commas fowl on forster, to be honest, and you know David, he is the he's the head of the goalkeepers union. He will defend keepers. He will defend he would get into the weeds and the arguments about should have saved that. Will be disappointed. He'll always defend the goalkeeper. Most of the time you'll defend the goalkeeper. So when David's calling it like that, it's probably not a phone. But I'm generally sick of it. I am sick of what goalkeepers getting that call regardless. Goalkeepers are getting all these calls regardless. Yet you can have a goalkeepers and I'm not picking on Anderson. There are other keys to do this. You can fly out of their goals and just hammer into people and nothing is ever done about that. But like challenging or even attempting to challenge the goalkeeper is such a taboo in football. I think it needs to be, I think it needs to be looked at. I'm thinking of an FA Cup final, and I'll tweet it out the video. It's in the 50s, Andrew. Now, I'm not asking to go back to this. I think it was Bolton versus Blackpool in one of the I think it might have been the famous Stanley Matthews cop final. The Bolton keeper catches the ball and is shoulder barged into the net with the ball and the goal is allowed. And it's a great goal there for Bolton. Goalkeeper hanging onto it. What was he doing? Oh, he'll have a sore head in the morning. That poor chap. I don't want to go back to that. I don't. But at the same time, these guys are completely Molly coddled. By the way, what is your favorite time wasting tactic that phrase or foster uses? I'm curious. To me, the time wasting, I texted you because you texted me about their time wasting. And I said to you, it started in the 20th minute. And for me, I noticed it, not as much with Fraser forster, although he was doing it certainly. But on some of Southampton's throw ins, I was like, is there is anyone going to take this? Or are we just going to sit here for like another minute? I love forster because he's got his routine down Andrew. It's so good. So, first of all, stroll as slowly as you can to retrieve the ball. And he's a big man. He is a Lombok. So he goes slow. He has these super tall, like, possible, right? And he just loll ups back and he squeezes the ball and then he sets it down, puts his foot underneath it, so he can get that height. Then he steps back. And the next thing it's time to clean the muck from between my cleats as he is a scratcher that and I haven't seen him doing it a while, but when he was at Celtic he used step he used to do the back heel against the gold post before we take it to get rid of the dirt.
KGO 810
"molly coddle" Discussed on KGO 810
"That's implicit it in starting all this insurrection President Trump his crony Giuliani Trump Jr and then that Congressman, How can you go ahead and charge all of these people? These three quarter drug dealers and not go after the guy that's bringing this stuff in from the country? Sometimes it takes me about an analogy, but sometimes it takes more time. To build the case against the drug lords at the top, and you use the people who are you know this the street dealers you use those people in order to build a case that ultimately leads to the top, If that's what I don't know if that's actually what they're doing, you know that if the FBI they have that office legal counsel memo, office of the Legal counsel memo From years and years ago that says that you cannot indict a sitting president. It is not the law. It was an opinion that was written by the legal counsel's office in the White House many many years ago. Isn't it Hasn't Here's another thing tapped? I mean, I'm a security adviser for for for an operation Nowhere needed to what's going on here nationally, but It is so easy to trace people who fly. It would be so easy to get a list of all of those people that flew into the nation's capital two days prior to that up until that day, and just go back and just trace that, of course, is going to take a little bit of time. But that is one of the easiest things that you can do. A Zafar is finding out who was their flight in two days before And flying out the day of or the day after, but you have too much, but you also have to be very careful because if you're looking at people who are flying to a rally, that's a permitted rally those air legal of legal activities that they're engaging in. There's nothing illegal about doing that. Now, if it's simply part of the investigative process in order to interview those people to see if their potential witnesses, that's fine, But you have to have evidence that they've done something illegal. Before you open any Kind of an investigation against those individuals. In the meantime, I you know, they said that this is gonna take a long time. It's gonna take more than months and frankly, I found that encouraging because that means to me that this is going to be an ongoing investigation that serious about pursuing these individuals and let me to say this It's about damn time. It is about damn time. These groups are so utterly dangerous to America. They've infiltrated everything you know. There were police officers who were participants. Police officers who flew in from other places around the country who participated in this. There were members of the United States military and retired members of the military. And, you know, we've spoken of this before that the military has had this huge problem with right wing extremists and racist within there. Ranks. There again is a situation where you're operating under the UCMJ A and you can't figure out a way to get those individuals out of the ranks of the military. I can discharge him. You know, just discharge him court martial. Um you participation in these kinds of groups is a violation of the uniform code of military justice Do not tolerate it any longer. It is too serious to Molly Coddle. It is too serious not to take these things for what they are true threats to American democracy will be right back. 80 88 tennis the telephone number. 80 88 10. This is K G o In your attic. Fully.
News Talk KOKC 1520
"molly coddle" Discussed on News Talk KOKC 1520
"Did Trump helped create the violence to begin with in Portland? He didn't He didn't belong when he had his stupid little photo op. And one he was getting booed by everybody in the crowd. But then afterward he tried to make the federal government out or the homeland security folks who were there on the scene out to be the bad guys because they tear gassed a crowd. He said. I didn't see any rioting in one of the picture is no joke. There's a big fire like 100 ft, maybe away from him. It's him and then off in the distance to his left. There's a fire this guy And so many people in the national media ought to be ashamed of themselves. These guys were diluted in the in the fact they think they can Molly coddled this and go down and break bread. And and Hey, listen, let's have a conversation. They don't care about you. They don't like you either. No, dummy. No, That's why one of them punched him in the head. Apparently, they don't like you either. The reason they destroyed Nancy Pelosi's house. The reason they've graffitied it. There's no loyalty here. Yeah. So keep Molly coddling them, and they'll just keep wrecking stuff. One of the terrible things about the morons that stormed the capital. Yeah, is now the media is taking this moral high ground. C o I know. Yeah. And they have no ground to stand on. But they just get away with it. It's apples and oranges. Comparing what hell summer to them. What happened, you know, come on. Okay, Switching gears. Let's get to Ah! Biden. Who apparently chewed out his new covert team. Saying you're under performing on the vaccinations. You think this is true? That he chewed them out. Yeah, he didn't to anyone out. This guy has trouble chewing tapioca pudding. Come on. Well, apparently, you know, we're not doing all that well with the vaccine rollout. Different states behind the bar. He took him behind the barn. Always that it was he playing tough guy like he's done before. You better believe it..
KGO 810
"molly coddle" Discussed on KGO 810
"Who's your elections? His consent was withdrawn in the election. He had an obligation to ensure that the newly chosen leader had a peaceful transition. And instead what did they do? He fomented rebellion against our country, our seat of government by ongoing demonization, Ongoing, vicious provable lies. He called out then his citizen warriors, his legion to come to the Ellipse on the day of the congressional electoral vote from around the country. Some of them were in the plane in the airport in the plane with Mitt Romney. He, too, was a trader that they felt they needed to berate. And as for people who say it was a legal demonstration. Oh, they had a permit for a large demonstration on the Ellipse. But then he sent his minions to the capital. Where they erected a scaffolding with a noose. They carried Confederate flags, gods and flags. Betsy Ross flags through the halls of Congress and Trump flags. They took down the flag of the United States of America, the flag of our republic, our nation's flag, and they report replaced it with a trump flag. Those are the actions of people who support a dictator. Donald Trump and those insurgents who stormed our capital in his name. Traders to this country. And Ivanka. How dare you call them Patriots? They're the polar opposite of Patriots attempting to take down our seat of government for the man Donald Trump, Daddy. He's got to go and he's got to go now. Yesterday. I said he should be arrested. I still think he should be arrested and it may come. I guess it's not going to come while he sits there in the Oval. Unfortunately, in this country over the past several decades, we have Molly coddled criminals in office. Certainly Molly coddled this president, but we've done it for many decades. I can make a case that George W. Bush and some of the people in his administration were war criminals. You know, For some reason, we fear so much that it's going to destabilize our country to hold the president to account toe hold people in high positions of power to account to charge them criminally. By doing that by not doing that, because we're so fearful that it's just got so people are going to rebel that we've done ourselves an immense disservice. President's believe now for good reason that they can get away with anything because they do, and it may well have started with Gerald Ford when he pardoned Richard Nixon. Maybe he set it in motion. We haven't changed. Nixon was held more accountable than a lot. He was pardoned. For any crimes he may have committed by Gerald Ford. And that was wrong. Because you know what happened. He made that claim that no man is above the law Ally. So This president's been enabled. People in the Republican Party now. Now that they are no longer the party in power. Saying, Oh, we have to unify. We all have to get together. Now we have to stop the harsh rhetoric. We have to join hands. We have to work together. You know? Why is it that you Republicans never make that clarion call when you're the party in power on Lee when you're not when you gain power. You are participants in the demonization. Even with that stupid ethic epithet to call the other party, the Democrat Party always demonizing until you need Democrats because they're the ones in power. Oh, then it's time to forgive and forget. Can't we all just get along? You know, James Comey has made the same play. Joe Biden has made a similar place. I do not This is what I say. Let's do what's best for the American people. And if the Republican Party joins in great Never Ever forget their treachery. Never forget their abuse of power. Never forget their attempted coup. Never forget the demonization. You know, we cried foul over and over during this administration. Why Not because we didn't want him elected, not because we wanted Hillary Clinton to take his place. Because the facts showed that he was a criminal. Moloch report showed it. The regret Ukraine call showed it. The call to the Georgia secretary of state showed it and the attempted coup shows it. Oh, and there are other examples. There are so many That you They just, you know, leave your mind because the next week it's going to be replaced by some other horrific act that he's perpetrated. Remove a president doesn't deserve the position that he holds. Simply because he's elected. And he doesn't deserve to continue to hold that position simply because he isn't a criminal. If he shows that he is incompetent if he shows that he abuses his power. Those are reasons to deny him that position. Because the president of the United States should actually be a greater adhering to the law than anybody else. He should be someone who is held more accountable than anybody else because the power he wields is so incredibly vast. And if he is not the person who should be seated there we are in danger. Our democracy is in danger. The world is in danger. And those of us who speak out against him. Are in danger. The media Who cover him and try to present the facts are in danger. So no Don't make the false equivalency anymore. Just stop it. No more of this nonsense that both sides need to quell the rhetoric. Just stop it. And never forget. Doesn't mean you can't work with them. Doesn't mean you can't trust them. I'm sorry. Didn't mean to speak so long. I promise you will go right through your phone calls when we come back 80 88 10. One thing we learned in 2020. The.
KGO 810
"molly coddle" Discussed on KGO 810
"You know, You don't want to see him save face to leave office. I don't know what the motivation is that if it's personal Entrance. Or if you actually think it's better for the country that he's he's humiliated out of office and not making him available is a viable candidate again is just kind of create a bigger, fresher matter. At this point in time, I'm sick to death of people saying that we need to reach across the aisle. I'm sick to death of people going about the Republicans right now going. We all need to watch the things we say after four years. Of suffering your abuse. You have the goal to say that. No, I don't care about Donald Trump saving face. Are you kidding? He was behind an attempted coup in this country attacks against our center of government, the capital of the United States of America, where the Congress was convening. It had to do with the American election. The election of an American president. This is so bad. This is such an amazing high crime that I don't I can't believe you even have the nerve to say that I am I going to be forgiving of Donald Trump? No, I am not. I am going to expect some changes in some accountability. You know what we don't? Do. You know what the Republicans tend to say. Let's not Molly coddled criminals, and I agree. I think that where there are mitigating circumstances, that's one thing. We're not talking about mitigating circumstances. We're talking about a situation where you've got a criminal in office with amazing power. And I am going to call for him to be held accountable to the most severe level of the law. Because he had so much power. He had so much ability we entrusted him has not had we had entrusted him with so much. That he should be more accountable than anybody else in America and people saying Oh, give him time. Let him adjust to target is an election up. What we're saying is You've got to remove his ability to use that power for 13 days. John. I am not going to say that it is OK, that we should pardon him to make it smooth and get him out. I say that Others have said that that's not what I'm talking about. You have said that what I'm talking you want him to save face? Let me tell you what I want. I want him face worth Saving Joe. I agree with you, but for 13 days He is the president of the United States get that he has to happen. You know what needs to happen? He needs to be arrested right now. But hold on. I'm being realistic. You're being emotional. I'm saying drop it. Don't talk to me like you're the man and I'm the woman. I'm not You're the talk show host. You should know better. And you're the person who also gets angry on the air about things that deserve our righteous anger. And if an attempted coup against my country doesn't give me the right to be angry at the man, the president who is behind that attempt, what does I'm angry But I realize and you need to understand. I believe our listeners need to understand that for 13 days, he's still the president of the pope should be arrested Stop, but he's not going to be around. We, Molly coddle him. No, because in order to arrest somebody, you have to bring charges. You have to have somebody do it. That's why the logical thing to do not be emotional thing is for the House of Rahl. Think it's emotional job was logical logic. And you know what? You know what interferes. You know what interferes. It isn't logic. It's politics. That's what interferes that if you want logic for the next 13 days, articles of impeachment have to be written that are tight, which the House approves in the next 24 hours. Then go to the United States Senate and there needs to be a trial. You want accountability in the next 13 days. You want to prevent this president from acting in the next 13 days? That's what has to happen afterward. Let it be nailed for everything he's ever done. But 13 days he still has his finger on that button, and we can't forget that there are a variety of options that are available to the authorities of this country. One is impeachment. That's just what is the 25th amendment? Not gonna happen. One is forcing his resignation on one is for law enforcement to arrest him. Okay, But all of those things can happen. You're just simply saying it's not going too well. The president that the majority of the Senate majority leader and the speaker of the house have both said the 25th amendment needs to be invoked. Okay, so I again lot of approach this logically. 25th amendment is not going to be involved. You don't know that. I sure do. You know how I know because you're not emotional No, because it requires the vice president. And a majority of the Cabinet and take action and they've been that is highly. That is highly unlikely, but highly unlikely is different from saying It's not going to happen. There's not time what I'm looking for now, and people can call and disagree with me. It's fine. You want to get him out. I want to get him out. Telling you, the house passes articles of impeachment that air worded very simply. They're passed within 24 hours. We get that job. It can happen more quickly, and that is what should happen and the Senate should vote to convict and guess what That's not likely to happen either will be right back. Me. Me. Me, me, me, but also you the.
KGO 810
"molly coddle" Discussed on KGO 810
"Why do you think you were put there? Look the other way when crimes are perpetrated on Lee to pursue criminal activity when there has been what you perceive as violence against a person's body. Then you'll consider charging an individual No. There are more crimes than that. And we deserve that. Those crimes be prosecuted that you protect us. When the police are doing their jobs. I got you have an obligation to do yours. It was a bad arrest. If the police are doing something they shouldn't do. If there are mitigating circumstances all those all those things are legitimate things to take into consideration. That's not what seems to be going on here. 80 88 tennis the telephone number eight await OA 10. I'd love to get your viewpoint on this What you think is going on? And do you think it's time for Chesebro Dean to go? 80 88 10 is the telephone number. Let's go to Charles and Sebastian Pool. Hey, Charles. Welcome to kgo. Hi, Pat. I don't always agree with it. But this time you're 100% on the market, Your common sense is refreshing. And this is the thing that tried to convince some other progressives to consider. This is not the continent inspires more compassionate goes the exact opposite. This is what inspires the right way to go further right now. Sorry to say that because Look, I've lived in Berkeley for many years. I was kind of a progressive type myself. But this kind of lunacy. There's complete disregard for any form of common sense has gotten so extreme and this district attorneys like just one example metaphor of that trend going on another coastal cities. We're going to respond and they're going to react and they're going to react probably further to the right that you would like them, too. But this is exactly the kind of thing that makes that happen. This is what creates Trump supporters there. You may be right. I mean, if if you have been somebody who has been victimized like this, if your if your car's been stolen if somebody has broken in your windshield special if it's happened more than once, and apparently to some people it has if your home has been burglarized if you've called the police and the police have pretty good evidence that they know who perpetrated these crimes if there's an arrest that's made As you have been victimized, and then the prosecutor doesn't prosecute. What do you feel like? What do you feel like? You don't feel like you're getting any kind of justice. You don't feel like anybody cares about you and your safety. You feel like what's happening. Is that the criminal and that would be a criminal of person who perpetrate a crime is criminal. You would think that that individual is has more rights than you. Because that person is allowed to victimize you without penalty. And this cannot stand. Now you don't have to go crazy like Charles was talking about. You have to go crazy and you don't have to say you know, you have to throw the book at everybody, No matter what the case, you know, or how mind of the crime and go after those people who are jaywalking and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law, and you don't have to look at mitigating circumstances That's nonsensical. You don't have to go overboard and say any person who steals a car has to serve 20 years in prison that would be nonsensical. But you know, there's a vast area between being crazy about this going way overboard and doing nothing. But you have to do is find the place in the middle where you're doing the right thing where you're doing something, and that something is the right thing, because not doing anything is not doing the right thing. That is doing the wrong thing. 80 88 10 is the telephone number 808 oa 10. Let's go to Paul in San Francisco. Paul. Hi. Welcome to kgo. Thank you. I assume the voters who voted for Mr Borden in San Francisco did not know He was a far left ideologue when they voted for him, So I blame the voters for but I need people like him in office. They did. And they that that's on them, too. Isn't it? Well, not necessarily know. You know, you could vote for people who are far left in their political ideals. Who can still believe in the rule of law? I do. I'm pretty far left in in my beliefs and my politics, But I'll tell you what I don't believe in in of Just Molly coddling scofflaws. The laws are there for a reason, and if they're not get rid of them. But if they're there for a reason if people are being victimized by God, they have a right to expect some sort of justice. Certainly not that the perpetrator of the crime is just gonna be left out so that he can hey, could victimize other people over and over over 50 times. Just in San Francisco. It seems like this is not a matter of left or right is matter of stupid versus not stupid. I think you're kind of right there. And, you know, I think Tessa Bodine has a really good heart. I really do. I think he's got a good heart. It doesn't necessarily make him a good prosecutor. As a matter of fact, if his good heart is preventing him from prosecuting, that's all the more reason he can't be there, you have to be able to make judgment. I mean, that's like he's a district attorney. He decides what cases are going to be prosecuted. It's like you know, a judge who's big heart gets in the way off a rightful conviction. I need and he simply won't go with a rightful conviction. Then you shouldn't be a judge. If you can't make those determinations, but it's really mind boggling 50 times If that's accurate, this guy was arrested 50 times in San Francisco alone..