35 Burst results for "Marjorie Taylor"
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on Her Push to Censure Rashida Tlaib
"Us now is Marjorie Taylor Greene. Thank you so much, Marjorie, for taking the time. Tell us about your effort to censure or to kick Rashida Tlaib off of committees. Well, I introduced the censure resolution last week, Charlie, and it will be brought to the floor for a vote this Wednesday at around approximately 6 30 p .m. But here's why it's so important for me to talk to you today. We need some more courage in Congress, and some of my Republican colleagues feel like they may not have the stomach to anti censure -Israel, anti -America, pro -Hamas, pro -terrorist Rashida Tlaib. They feel like they don't want to watch her in the well wearing her Palestinian scarf around her crying as she is censured by Congress. But in fact, that is absolutely what we must do. We cannot tolerate and hate America, hate Israel, member of Congress. They should never exist. No one should be elected to serve in our United States Congress that speaks the vile things that Rashida Tlaib says that supports terrorism and supports the groups and is aligned with the groups that she is aligned with. So the censure resolution must pass and I need your listeners, I need your viewers to call all my Republican colleagues and tell them to vote to censure Rashida Tlaib.
A highlight from London, or Tehran? with Nigel Farage and MTG
"Cable news, noisy, boring, out of touch. That's why Salem News Channel is different. We keep you in the know. Streaming 24 -7 for free. Home to the greatest collection of conservative voices like Dennis Prager, Jay Sekulow, Mike Gallagher, and more. Salem News Channel is unfiltered and unapologetic. Like, watch anytime, on any screen at snc .tv and local now channel 525. Hey everybody, it's time for The Charlie Kirk Show. Nigel Farage on the takeover of the West. Marjorie Taylor Greene on her effort to censure Rashida Tlaib. And then we talk about someone who has dropped out of the presidential race. Email us as always freedom at charliekirk .com. Freedom at charliekirk .com. Subscribe to our podcast, open up your podcast application, and type in charliekirkshow. Get involved with Turning Point USA at tpusa .com. That is tpusa .com. Start a high school or college chapter today at tpusa .com. Buckle up everybody, here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie, he's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job. Building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here.
Part 1: How Freedom Caucus Members Voted on Kevin McCarthy
"For McCarthy Paul Gosar Arizona 9 voted for McCarthy Darrell ice at California 48 their Freedom Caucus members voted for McCarthy Lauren Boebert Colorado 3rd voted for McCarthy Ken Buck who we now know as best buddies with Liz Cheney for God's sakes who hates Kevin McCarthy well he did as he was directed apparently he voted against McCarthy Matt Gaetz you know well Kat Florida's third voted for McCarthy Bill Posey Florida 8 voted for McCarthy Anna Luna I think she just had a wasn't there Greg Stube Florida 17th voted for McCarthy and where Trump supporters Byron Donald's Florida 19 voted for McCarthy Andrew Clyde Georgia 9 voted for McCarthy these are Freedom Caucus Mike Collins Georgia 10 voted for McCarthy Marjorie Taylor Greene Georgia 14 voted for McCarthy Russ Fulcher Idaho 1 voted for McCarthy Mary Miller Illinois 15 very delightful lady my wife and I met her and her husband voted for McCarthy Clay Higgins Louisiana 3rd voted for McCarthy Mike Johnson Louisiana 4 voted for McCarthy Andy Harris Maryland 1 voted for McCarthy Eric Burleson Missouri 7
A highlight from Rep. Matt Gaetz plans to oust GOP House Speaker Kevin McCarthy
"Lots of channels. Nothing to watch. Especially if you're searching for the truth. It's time to interrupt your regularly scheduled programs with something actually worth watching. Salem News Channel. Straightforward, unfiltered, with in -depth insight and analysis from the greatest collection of conservative minds. Like Hugh Hewitt, Mike Gallagher, Sebastian Gorka, and more. Find truth. Watch 24 -7 on SNC .TV and on Local Now, Channel 525. This is your source for breaking news and what to make of it all. This is The Mike Gallagher Show. Someone has to convince President Biden that if he runs again, he's going to go down in history as Ruth Bader Biden, the person who doesn't know when to quit. I do intend to file a motion to vacate against Speaker McCarthy this week. The only way he loses his job is if a handful of Republicans join up with the Democratic Party to fire him. That would be a disaster for the future of the Republican Party. Now, from the ReliefFactor .com studios, here's Mike Gallagher. Can everybody sort of cool it with the attacks against Matt Gaetz right now? What is going on? I'm telling you what, nothing upsets establishment Republicans more than disruptors. I suppose that's why they despise Donald Trump. I suspect the same people, many of the same, not all, but many of the same people who are attacking the Freedom Caucus, the Ralph Normans and the Matt Gaetzs and the Marjorie Taylor Greens, the same people who hate them, hate Trump. You know, we all sit around, we talk a good game about fixing Washington and trying to stop the out of control spending and flushing good money down the drain after bad and getting some fiscal responsibility going. But then when somebody tries to do it, we lop their heads off. We want it to be business as usual. Now, let me qualify. If you're not following this, this has been a wild weekend. Matt Gaetz went on TV saying, I'm going to try to lead an insurrection against Kevin McCarthy. We're going to have an ouster of Kevin McCarthy. I'm going to get him out of there. I'm going to get Democrats to side with me. There's all kinds of reporting that he's even offering subpoena power to the Democrats because he really doesn't like Kevin McCarthy. We get it. Kevin McCarthy gets it. Matt Gaetzs has never liked Kevin McCarthy. These guys are going to be butting heads forever. OK, so be it. McCarthy led to the...was able to avert a government shutdown with no funding for Ukraine. I think that's a win. I don't know that it's a win with a capital W, but it's a win. We got through it. With hours to spare. So Matt Gaetzs is livid. I guess he wanted a government shutdown. OK. He's an elected representative. He's representing his constituents in Florida. He can feel the way he wants to feel. And, you know, if he wants to take on Kevin McCarthy, all right, so be it. Might not be a great idea. It seems to me Republicans have some momentum right now, and this threatens that momentum. But having said that, I don't know why people on our side are attacking Gaetzs the way they are. Mark Levin, who I consider a friend, I actually love the guy. I think Mark Levin is one of the smartest guys around. He's calling Matt Gaetzs a traitor. Literally a traitor. Mark Levin posted of Matt Gaetzs, This clown is a Benedict Arnold. He killed a CR slashing spending by 8 % and strengthening border security. Now he plots and schemes with the most radical Marxist Democrats in the House, including AOC and the Progressive Caucus. Reject this demagogue. He is the uni -party leader, and he has no intention of cutting spending or securing the border. Boy, that seems a little harsh, don't you think? I mean, Trump is the ultimate disruptor. And it's going to be fascinating to see what exactly Trump does with all of this. Now he's in New York today trying to ward off this wack job, you know, civil suit against him. And he's sitting in on day one of his trial. But here's what Matt Gaetzs said on CNN over the weekend as a result of Kevin McCarthy heading up an effort to avert a government shutdown. It apparently enraged Congressman Gaetzs, who took to CNN and said this. Speaker McCarthy made an agreement with House conservatives in January. And since then, he has been in brazen, repeated, material breach of that agreement. This agreement that he made with Democrats to really blow past a lot of the spending guardrails we had set up is a last straw. And then overnight, I learned that Kevin McCarthy had a secret deal with Democrats on Ukraine. So as he was baiting Republicans to vote for a continuing resolution without Ukraine money, saying that we were going to jam the Senate on Ukraine, he then turns around and makes a secret deal. Now, I know you and I probably have different views on U .S. involvement in Ukraine. But however you think about that question, it should be subject to open review analysis and not some backroom deal. So a motion to vacate tomorrow? I do intend to file a motion to vacate against Speaker McCarthy this week. I think we need to rip off the Band -Aid. I think we need to move on with new leadership that can be trustworthy. Now, this gets complicated because Speaker McCarthy is going to have to rely on Democrats to come to his rescue. If enough Democrats side with Matt Gaetz, guess what? McCarthy might be out. And you could have an argument, we could have a solid substantive debate about whether that's good or bad for us. You know what's good for us? I don't think there's any dispute. Disruptors. Do you want more of the same? Are you OK with business as usual in Washington, D .C.? Are you satisfied with the way things have been going? With the reckless spending and the over -the -top nonsense like writing Ukraine a blank check. I have to tell you, with the exception of Mark Levin, and I have tremendous respect for him, I don't know what's up with why he would call Matt Gaetz a traitor to his country. Matt Gaetz may not be everyone's cup of tea, but I thought this is a time where we all agreed that we needed some disruption. I thought this was a time when we expect fighters in Washington, not people who are going to play footsie with the Democrats. And most importantly, I don't like, pardon my metaphor here or my imagery, but I don't like hearing people urinate all over the millions of people who are lifting Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene and the other fighters in Congress up. What does that say about what those of us with a platform think of millions of people who want a good old -fashioned street fight in Washington over out -of -control spending and fiscal irresponsibility? I mean, I'm not trying to be wishy -washy on this. Again, I think McCarthy has done a pretty solid job as Speaker of the House. It can't be easy. It's not easy. You've got a lot of warring factions within the GOP, and the problem is the Republicans have some momentum right now. And I don't want to see anything interrupt the momentum heading into November. We've got an important election in Virginia. We've got big things coming. I just, I'm absolutely mystified at the vitriol that a lot of people are demonstrating towards Matt Gaetz. I don't think that's helpful. I don't think that's productive. Can't we disagree respectfully? Because I have a lot of respect for the millions of people, many of whom listen to this show, who believe that disruption is in order. I have a lot of respect for people who appreciate what Matt Gaetz is trying to do. Even if it may be the wrong outcome, even if I might disagree with trying to oust Kevin McCarthy, I don't like the wild -eyed attacks that I'm hearing directed towards these renegades in the House. Because I just think it's very, very disrespectful to millions of people who appreciate what Gaetz is trying to do. Now, do you agree with this or not? We've got a lot of text messages already pouring in on the MyPillow text line as we kick off the first Monday in October. It's October the 2nd, 2023, here in the Relief Factor studios. Here's where people are texting me right now. Here's Pennsylvania. I don't want more of the same. I think Mark Levin is a warmonger. Here's Colorado. I 100 % agree with Mark Levin. Matt Gaetz seems like he's a glory hound who hates McCarthy. He wants to oust Kevin, but he has no plan to replace him. And finally, people are attacking, this is from Ohio, people are attacking Matt Gaetz because he's an idiot. And the people who voted him in are idiots. He just wants to make a name for himself, hoping to be governor of Florida. Well, what do you think? Let's find out. I want to open up the Ph .D. weight loss and nutrition phone number to you. 800 -655 -MIKE, 17 past the hour. Do you understand my point about respectfully disagreeing with what the Freedom Caucus and the others are doing with McCarthy without taking their heads off? Do you agree with me that Matt Gaetz reflects the disruptor status that Donald Trump gave us and why we love Donald Trump? Does that make sense to you or am I missing the boat here? Straighten me out. If you disagree, you go to the top of the line. But however you feel, I want you to join us. Flood the zone here with your phone calls. I want to jam our phone lines with your voice, with your perspective. Again, the Ph .D. weight loss number is 800 -655 -MIKE, 800 -655 -6453. Hope you join us.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Leads Fight for No Ukraine Funding
"There's some good news. There's some good news. Despite all the Republicans voted against Ukraine funding, there actually was some good movement on a Ukraine amendment led by Marjorie Taylor Greene. She's been leading a very valiant fight. Congresswoman Greene, thank you so much for taking the time. Tell us all about it, Marjorie. Well, thank you so much for having me on, Charlie. I'm very excited. This has been quite an effort. I've been messaging, telling all my fellow colleagues that the American people are sick and tired of funding a war in Ukraine. I even had anti -war protests on the steps of the Capitol earlier this week. I have been introducing amendment after amendment to strip the money from Ukraine, and we got that accomplished. It's really because of the people, Charlie. Polling shows that most Americans do not support their hard -earned tax dollars going to Ukraine, so that was a big win for me, but it was also done with 117 other Republicans that agreed with me. All right, so Marjorie, I'm busy doing all sorts of stuff. You got to break it down for me because I'm sure the audience. Okay, so did this pass the House Representatives or pass a committee? Was this a single issue bill? Was this a rider? Was this an amendment? Just walk me through it because I want to make sure I understand it. Yes, thank you so much, Charlie. So the defense bill had 300 million dollars for Ukraine inside the bill that has been there for years, and this money goes into a special fund that the Biden administration has been using to send equipment and weapons to fund the war in Ukraine. As a matter of fact, they have spent a lot of the money out of that fund that was built up over the years, and so I've been demanding. I think I'm one of the few members of Congress that has voted for zero dollars to go to Ukraine since it has started, and I've been fighting very hard on the issue to stop it. Well, what happened this week is because I really fought my conference so hard, I'm the only Republican. As a matter of fact, I voted with the Democrats to knock down the rule, so I voted against the Republican rule for the defense bill, sending a strong message to my conference, sending a strong message that I am completely against the war money for Ukraine. Then after that happened, I had a lot of conversations. Again, I had an anti -war protest against the Ukraine war on the front of the Capitol steps. I argued in conference that if they want to fund money for Ukraine, they need to strip it out and they can vote for it, that I'm not voting for it, and there's other members that do not want to vote for it. Well, thankfully, leadership listened, and so what they did is they created another amendment that pulled them out, and we had to vote again on a separate rule that was pulled the money out of the defense bill. So the defense bill came to the floor last night, and we passed the defense appropriations bill, which is filled with so many great things, but we passed it with no money for Ukraine.
A highlight from Black Privilege with Heather Mac Donald and MTG
"Turbulent times call for clear -headed insight that's hard to come by these days, especially on TV. That's where we come in. Salem News Channel has the greatest collection of conservative minds all in one place. People you know and trust, like Dennis Prager, Eric Metaxas, Charlie Kirk, and more. Unfiltered, unapologetic truth. Find what you're searching for at snc .tv and on Local Now Channel 525. Hey everybody, it's the end of the Charlie Kirk show. Marjorie Taylor -Green and Heather McDonald. Heather McDonald dropped some truth bombs on this episode. Text this to your friends, especially the ones that are woke on the race stuff. Listen to Heather McDonald. Get involved with Turning Point USA at tpusa .com. That is tpusa .com. As always, you can email me at freedom at charliekirk .com. That is freedom at charliekirk .com. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Brought to you by the loan experts I trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandtodd .com.
A highlight from Could Oil and a Gov't Shutdown Screw Up Powell's Plans?
"Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW. It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin, and the big picture power shifts remaking our world. What's going on, guys? It is Friday, September 22nd, and today we are talking oil, macro, everything that could throw the economy off. But before we get to that, if you are enjoying The Breakdown, please go subscribe to it, give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link at the show notes or go to bit .ly slash breakdown pod. All right, friends, well, we are sort of continuing the macro story today that we picked up around Powell and the FOMC this week. And one of the questions that Powell was asked was about risks that threatened to knock the economy off course. Two that he mentioned that we're going to spend a little time on today include oil prices and a potential government shutdown. Let's start with oil first. The price of crude oil has steadily increased over the past four months. From a low of around $70 in June, oil reached almost $90 a barrel for the US -based WTI benchmark contract and $95 per barrel and $95 per barrel for international Brent crude earlier this week. The price increase for crude has driven US gas prices back above $3 .80 per gallon, the highest level since last October. Overall, gas prices have ramped up by 20 % since the beginning of the year, according to AAA. Now, there are a number of factors all contributing to steadily increasing oil prices since the June lows. The first is OPEC+. The economic group of oil producing nations led by Saudi Arabia and Russia have recently curbed output. Production cuts, which were agreed to late last year, have been gradually implemented over the past six months. In July, Saudi Arabia voluntarily cut an additional 1 million barrels per day from its production quota, about 10 % of its previous output. Existing production cuts across OPEC have already been extended into next year and analysts expect Saudi Arabia to extend their voluntary cuts until March. On Thursday, Russia further constrained supply by banning the export of diesel and petrol. Russia is one of the world's largest suppliers of diesel alongside their status as producing around 12 % of the global supply of crude oil. The International Energy Agency said last year that Russian refineries produce, quote, roughly double the diesel needed to satisfy domestic demand and typically export half their annual production. Analyst opinions focused on the simplest explanation for the ban, retaliation for sanctions. Henning Gloestien of the Eurasia Group said, Russia wants to inflict pain on Europe and the U .S. and it looks like they're now repeating the playbook from gas and the oil market ahead of the winter months. They're showing that they're not finished using their power over energy markets. The Kremlin said the ban was temporary and aimed at addressing rising energy prices in domestic markets. However, they gave no timeline on when the ban might be lifted. U .S. and European policymakers have largely banned the importation of Russian refined fuel since February, which has required Russian supply to be routed through third party regions including Turkey, North Africa and Latin America. Now, OPEC cuts over the past year were predicated on a weakening demand profile heading into this year. At the time they were announced, recessions were expected across Europe and the U .S. China was an open question with the potential of reopening pushed back in the midst of additional pandemic waves. But since then, the European economy is sputtering along, albeit with dismal manufacturing data out of Germany. The sanctioning of Russian supply has caused European demand to be displaced to other regions with refining capacity, largely India and the Middle East. In the U .S., recession has been continuously pushed off into the future and oil demand is now back at all time highs with no signs of slowing. Although the Chinese economy has hit some turbulence recently, oil demand remains robust. Analysts expect China's oil demand to remain high as Beijing secures strategically important resources. What's more, analysts expect China's oil demand to remain high as Beijing secures strategically important resources in part to mitigate geopolitical risks as well as to shore up its manufacturing and transportation industries. So with oil prices spiking, many are wondering whether the White House will once again intervene in markets using the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Between November 2021 and September of last year, the White House authorized a number of SPR releases. The final policy saw one million barrels per day provided into the market over six months. A small amount of oil was restocked earlier this year, but the SPR still sits at a little over half its pre -pandemic level. Earlier this week, a headline circulated proclaiming that quote, Biden says depleting SPR is on the table. This was later found to be a hoax with no legitimate source, but it demonstrates how difficult high oil prices could be for the U .S. economy heading into election season. To wit, many saw the SPR release as a political decision rather than an economic decision heading into the 2022 midterms. In the private sector, U .S. oil inventories have recently hit 40 -year lows of 46 -day supply, well below the longer -term average of 65 days. And while August's inflation reports already showed a small uptick due to oil -related prices, the effect is expected to be more profound across this month. Dario Perkins, an economist at T .S. Lombard said, That said, it is important to keep these recent inflationary developments in context. We are not yet in danger of undoing 12 months of solid disinflationary progress, not even close. Others suggested that high oil prices would have a greater impact on growth rather than inflation. Maya Bhandari, head of multi -asset at BNP Paribas Asset Management said, It really impacts the growth side of the Goldilocks equation rather than the inflation side of things over the long term. Theory is that sustained high oil prices begin to eat into disposable income for households alongside higher costs of production for manufacturing and logistics. These combine to reduce growth and potentially tip the economy into recession. Overall, this situation in the oil markets has, to some, many parallels to the liquid natural gas spike in the winter of 2022. Prices in some markets rose more than tenfold, European energy companies scrambled to secure supply at any cost, and multiple firms went bankrupt due to the volatility in markets. This week, Bloomberg reported that the trading arm of French supplier Total Energies has played a major role in bidding up the price of U .S.-based oil. Their source claimed that the firm is paying a premium for physical U .S. barrels, pushing the spread against futures to levels not seen since last November. With all of that said, there are some signs that the oil market is beginning to cool off. On Thursday, Brent crude futures fell to $92 per barrel, which represented the third straight day of price declines, which is the longest streak in almost a month. Warren Patterson, head of Commodity Strategy at ING, said the Fed's hawkish messaging has quote, put some pressure on risk assets, including oil. The dollar index has risen by 0 .8 % since Chair Powell left the podium, a large enough move to weigh on asset markets. Patterson said he still expects Brent crude to move above the $100 mark in the near term, but that he doesn't anticipate the move will be sustainable. So that is the view on oil overall. The thing that I am definitely going to be watching more than anything else is the political dimension of this. We are now entering the period where everything, even more than usual, is going to be completely wrapped up in what it means for the election season. If prices at the pump keep trending up, it seems very likely that the Biden administration will be willing to do what it takes, including SPR releases, to get those prices down. But that's just something we're going to have to keep an eye on. Now what about that other factor that Powell mentioned? Well yes, indeed, my friends, the US government is once again hurtling towards a shutdown after efforts to pass a short term spending bill were scuttled on the House floor on Thursday. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy attempted to marshal Republicans to vote through a package to keep the government funded past the end of September. Closed door negotiations continued late into Wednesday night, but were apparently unconvincing. The bill currently being considered is the $886 billion Defense Appropriations Act. The bill was stifled in the House after five GOP representatives refused to allow debate to begin by voting against a preliminary procedural rule. Democrats also voted against the measure and appeared to taunt Republicans apparently reveling in seeing the GOP's slim majority descend into chaos. Among the Republican dissenters was Marjorie Taylor Greene, who opposed the inclusion of $300 million in funding to the Ukrainian war effort. On Thursday, Politico reported that Pentagon sources have said Ukrainian operations have been exempted from any shutdown, making that part of the dispute rather moot. McCarthy sent House members home on Thursday night to return to Washington on Tuesday. He told reporters after the failed vote, quote, two people flipped, so I got to figure out how to fix that. That wasn't the impression they had given us. Now, this was McCarthy's third attempt at bringing the bill to the House floor. The current proposal on the table is a 31 -day stopgap funding mechanism to forestall a shutdown to begin next weekend. McCarthy remarked on the change in tone in Congress among that extreme element of the Republican Party, stating that, quote, this is a whole new concept of individuals that just want to burn the whole place down. Now, even if a 31 -day stopgap is passed in the House, it seems unlikely to make its way through the Democrat -controlled Senate. The bill includes a 30 percent temporary cut to domestic agencies and immigration law changes, neither of which are likely to get the seal of approval from Dems. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said instead of decreasing the chance of a shutdown, Speaker McCarthy is actually increasing it by wasting time on extremist proposals that cannot become law in the Senate. House Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries remarked that the situation was playing out as a, quote, Republican civil war. Now, if it comes to pass, this would be the 11th government shutdown since 1980. The logic is that hard -line positions that don't enjoy support in the Congress can be put directly to the American people by shutting down the government and drawing attention to the impasse. Republican Ralph Norman said last week that, quote, we're going to have a shutdown. We believe in what we're doing. The jury will be the country. Still, the record on government shutdowns doesn't really support that strategy. Not one of the 10 previous shutdowns resulted in the dissenting group extracting concessions. Typically, the American people quickly turn on the party they view as blocking access to government services over a petty squabble. Alex Conant, a Republican strategist, said, This is such a dumb fight because there's no principle that we're standing on here. It's just bad tactics. While the dispute is nominally over excessive government spending, with Republican dissenters pushing for funding to be reduced back to 2022 levels, the underlying problem is, of course, the level of discord within the Republican Party. McCarthy was voted in as House Speaker after a record 15 attempts. The process took four days and frequently descended into a farce. This was only the second time in the post -Civil War era that a House Speaker had failed to be elected on the first attempt. Conant noted the terrible optics of a government shutdown of the Republicans' own making heading into election season, stating that, quote, Biden didn't win because of his political skills and soaring oratory. He won because Republicans blew themselves up with Trump. I'm afraid we're seeing history repeat itself, with the GOP once again helping Biden by shooting themselves in the foot. Of course, never one to shy away from controversy, Trump fanned the flames on Wednesday, posting that, quote, Republicans in Congress can and must defund all aspects of Crooked Joe Biden's weaponized government that refuses to close the border and treats half the country as enemies of the state. He added that, quote, This is also the last chance to defund these political prosecutions against me and other patriots. They failed on the debt limit they must not fail now. Use the power of the person to defend the country. Now, zooming out and trying to get away from the politics of the situation, which obviously is not the focus of this show. The reason that this was brought up at last week's FOMC press conference is that a government shutdown would halt the publication of government data. This would include employment, inflation and growth statistics, which are currently playing a key role in guiding Fed policy. Now, given how much the Fed has said over and over again, their policy is going to be driven by data, presumably not having access to that data would be a fairly big deal. Yet in spite of that, Powell tried to put on a brave face, saying, If there is a government shutdown and it lasts through the next meeting, then it's possible we wouldn't be getting some of the data that we would ordinarily get and we would just have to deal with that. Now, by way of some history, the longest ever government shutdown lasted 35 days. The dispute was around funding for the border wall and quickly turned public sentiment against the Trump administration. Republicans controlled both the House and the Senate, but the administration failed to convince their own party to fund the wall. At the time, Democrat Senator Jon Tester called it the most stupid shutdown I have ever seen in my life. However, if this week's display is anything to go by, that 2019 shutdown could soon have some competition for that title. Now, what does this all have to do with the crypto sphere? Well, I think in many ways these are just exemplary of the state of politics in general. And given that, perhaps it's not surprising that former Senator Pat Toomey is not optimistic about the chances of crypto legislation being passed during this Congress. Just prior to retiring from Congress at the beginning of the year, Toomey introduced his own crypto bill, which focused on stablecoin regulations. Now, the House currently has two major crypto bills eligible to be brought for a vote. One would establish a stablecoin framework while the other introduces more broad crypto regulations. While speaking at a Georgetown Law Seminar on Thursday, however, Toomey said, I don't see a path forward in the Senate regardless of how the vote goes in the House. He added that of the two, he sees the stablecoin legislation as having the best shot. The sticking point will likely be Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown. While Brown has been outspoken about the risks of crypto and the need to bring the industry to heel, he has so far remained extremely quiet on exactly what form of legislation would meet his approval. And of course, any crypto legislation would need the support of Democratic senators to pass a vote to become law. Still, during an interview on Thursday, Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad said that she thinks that Brown's lack of commitment to a legislative position might actually be a good thing. Shirzad said, Now, last week, Brown wrote a letter to head regulators at multiple agencies urging them to use their existing powers to crack down on non -compliant crypto firms. This of course seems to be the clear intention, at least at the SEC. On Tuesday, the head of that agency's crypto assets and cyber unit, David Hirsch, warned that more enforcement actions would be coming against crypto intermediaries, including DeFi protocols. Still, Toomey, who serves now as an advisor to Coinbase, views stablecoin legislation as the solvable problem. At the moment, Democrats are pushing for the Fed to serve a central role in regulating issuers rather than granting oversight power to state regulators. This preference is believed to be driven by the White House. Toomey said, He thinks that senior Democrats will get on board once the White House is satisfied with the stablecoin proposal. Although that proposal might have to wait until after the election, as Toomey said in the next Congress, I think it's quite possible to get something done.
A highlight from How to Win Gen Z with Isabel Brown and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
"We get it. You're busy. You don't have time to waste on the mainstream media. That's why Salem News Channel is here. We have hosts worth watching, actually discussing the topics that matter. Andrew Wilkow, Dinesh D 'Souza, Brandon Tatum, and more. Open debate and free speech you won't find anywhere else. We're not like the other guys. We're Salem News Channel. Watch any time on any screen for free 24 -7 at snc .tv and on local now channel 525. Hey everybody, it's the end of the Charlie Kirk show. Isabel Brown, former Turning Point USA chapter leader, is taking the internet by storm talking about why young women should reject hookup culture. Marjorie Taylor Greene on why we need to declare war on the Mexican drug cartels and more. Email us as always freedom at charliekirk .com. Subscribe to our podcast. Open up your podcast application and type in charliekirkshow and get involved with Turning Point USA at tpusa .com. Buckle up everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here.
A highlight from Growing Unease: Current Administrations Approach to Security and Travel with David Bellavia
"What do you think they're doing with cash, right? What deal do you make where someone says, I'll bring a box of money to you? Yeah. What do you, it's, this is a state sponsor of terrorism. Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests and my fellow citizens. America's comeback now. starts right Welcome back Financial Guys podcast. Mike Speraza in studio live today with a guest in the studio. I haven't had this in a long time. Staff Sergeant medal of honor recipient David Bellavia joining me for about a half hour today. David, thank you for joining us. Thank you for having me. I appreciate it. Absolutely. So I'm going to stick based on your background. I'm going to stick with a lot of military stuff today and I want to start, we'll go all the way back to the beginning of the Joe Biden presidency. The Afghanistan withdrawal, in my opinion, did not go very smoothly. I'm sure many people listening agree. What were your overall thoughts of that withdrawal and how it actually ended up happening? I know we lost, you know, sadly lost 13 soldiers in that, in that withdrawal. People say we went off the wrong air base. People say that we shouldn't have gone out in the middle of the summer. There was a lot of different things there. What were your overall thoughts on that? I think it's like the worst day in American history since Market Garden. Just absolutely. And the reason why it was so difficult was it was totally unnecessary. So let's rewind to the Obama trade, Bull Bergdahl and the three first round draft picks. They get Marshall, they get MacArthur and they get Patton that end up the resurgence of the Taliban. These men not just go back to the enemy, they go back to the battlefield. They're in power when the government falls. You have misinformation coming from the White House that the president of Afghanistan is leaving with billions of dollars on his plane, which wasn't true. And then you leave the equipment, the cash. There's no recovery. We're getting reports of sales of American equipment left in Afghanistan in Southeast Asia. We're moving material across the globe. Our children will fight and pay and have to atone for these miscalculations. Let's talk about that. You being in the military and you knowing that area too, why did they just find it the easiest way out to just say, you know, just leave that billion dollar billions of dollars of equipment there and not think, again, if it was me and I'm speaking that someone that's never been in the military, but if it's me and I'm the president, I'm thinking, OK, I don't want to leave all our weaponry there. I don't want to lose any of my men. Number two. And number three, I want to make sure that everybody knows when and how we're getting out of there. And it just felt like poof. One day they said we're getting out of here. Well, it's because the military didn't make any of those decisions. I mean, look, Millie, it can criticize him. You can criticize Secretary of Defense worthy of criticism. However, none of these individuals are making decisions. This is about NGOs on the ground. This is about the State Department. So you've got Bagram Air Base, the equivalent of JFK. You've got Karzai International Airport, the equivalent of Teterboro. Right. Why would you ever do an exfil out of Karzai International Airport? It makes absolutely no sense. It's tactically unsound. But and then you've got all the ISIS -K. We retaliate from the murder of 13 of our bravest and we drop a bomb on a guy delivering water. He's on our payroll and we kill children on that. Then we take out Borat on a tuk tuk driving around like that wasn't even really what was happening. It's just a den of lies. And Tony Blinken and Jake Sullivan, all the heroes that brought us, you know, the Bergdahl deal, the Iran nuke deal. This is these. They the State Department is running all foreign policy, including what the DOD used to run. Well, that's I was going to say. I mean, I know Biden's the president, but do you blame him at all or is it everybody underneath him that, you know, maybe was giving him bad information? And again, some of these decisions, David, is Biden even involved in some of these decisions? Like, I don't even know anymore. Is he around? Is he paying attention to anything going on? Well, I mean, just from the press conferences, it was apparent he didn't know what was going on. And the great irony is that they actually were predicting that Ukraine was going to be invaded and, you know, no one believed them. So it's like you can't influence your friends. The allies don't trust you. The enemy doesn't respect you. You know, I mean, you've got Ben Rhodes is really proud of this State Department. Susan Rice loves what they're doing. But, you know, again, Americans died. And, you know, and what is the perfect culmination of the adventure in Afghanistan? Looking at your watch at Dover Air Base when bodies are coming home. I mean, nothing could you couldn't ask for a just it's it's a debacle. Yeah. And it's sad that that's that's the leader of our country there. Let's move in. You brought up the Ukraine there. So the Russia Ukraine conflict will get to Zelensky in a minute. He is as we speak in New York City right now. But so Trump's in office. We don't see many of these conflicts or any conflicts actually started under his watch. And then we have the Biden administration come in. And a year later, we have Russia invading Ukraine. Why did this happen and why? Why the timing of February of 2022? So let's go back to when we were fighting ISIS. Trump engaged and destroyed estimated some say 300 members of Wagner forces. But those were Russian nationals. We engaged. We destroyed them. What was the response from Putin? Nothing at all. So what do people in that section of the world, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, what do they respect? They respect power. They respect authority. You're not going to get any respect if you don't engage the enemy when they present themselves. I don't understand the calculus of again, I'm trying hard to figure it out. I don't get it. I don't. You know, Romania and Hungary and Poland, you're letting them unilaterally decide whether or not they want to send reinforcements into Ukraine. That's an act of war. If NATO members engage the enemy, all of NATO is engaged against the enemy. Poland doesn't unilaterally make that decision. Hungary and Romania don't unilaterally make that decision. We can't even articulate what the mission is. And if you look, go to the Institute for the Study of War, there's a plug for them. Check out their overlay from when the battle started, when the war started with Russia. And tell me what success this offensive in Ukraine has produced. I mean, let me ask this question, because I get confused. The answer is nothing. I asked this on Twitter, X, whatever it's called, all the time. What is the end game and how do we get there? Because all I see the answer is, hey, just blank checks. Hey, just write a check. Hey, here's a billion. Hey, here's 20 billion. Hey, here's another 10 billion. I don't actually see a look. I mean, like anything, right? If I write a business plan of what I want to do in 2024, my goal is X. I write down my steps to get X. I don't just write down X and say it's going to happen. I don't really know. And then the answer always is, well, we have to fight. We have to back Ukraine. Okay. But when does that end? Because the Afghanistan war and the war in Iraq lasted 20 years plus, right? And was there a real end to it? I don't know. That's where it gets frustrating for me, Dave, where I'm like, how do we know what the end game is? Do you win or lose? When does that happen? I don't know. I don't know. At least you're thinking about it. And I have fear that our leaders aren't, and that's the problem. So here's what this comes out. You're going to get a negotiated settlement out of Ukraine, right? But you talked about the billions of dollars that we're spending and giving to Ukraine as a blank check. First of all, Zelensky visited Ukrainian soldiers in the United States. Did you know that there were wounded Ukrainian soldiers in the United States? I did not know that. Well, today he visited them. So what's happening there? So that's a cost that no one is putting on the ledger. So now let's look at the blank check that Ukraine is getting. And by the way, I'm pro Ukraine. I want to fight communists all day and night. So let's punch Putin hard in the face. However, you're giving them a blank check and you're giving them munitions. Now here's the problem. We have to replace those munitions. Those munitions were purchased for 20 year global war and terror. And let's be honest, inflation is involved. So what you purchased for $10 is now $17. So you're not just giving them the money. You're giving them the equipment and the munitions that you have to replace yourself at the value of what is valued today. We haven't scratched the surface for the amount of money. CBO absent at the wheel. No one is tracking this. 2024 can't get here fast enough. How does this work, though, when you talk about some of these NATO nations coming together and making decisions, but us not just giving weaponry, giving everything money, whatever we're giving there? Is that not an act of war, too, though, David, at some point? We're continuing to fund Ukraine continuing the war in Ukraine. I mean, that to me seems like we're backing a war. Well, I mean, by the letter of the law and NATO charter, it's not. But here's the problem. It's schizophrenic because we were told that what was an offensive weapon was going to mitigate, you know, that wasn't going to help peace at all. So we went from, I don't know if they should get tracked vehicles to I'm not sure an artillery piece is what they need to high Mars rockets being launched. And let's be honest. I mean, the Ukrainians are I mean, the payload that they're going through, what you would have to have cataclysmic casualty numbers to be able to to the spandex that they're doing on the ground that they need to replace Patriot. If you're going through thirty five Patriot to, you know, missiles, I would expect to at least the C 20 makes that are shot down. They're using them for air artillery. They're using there for indirect fire. I don't know what they're doing, but this is going to end with Don Boss going to Russia. This is going to end with that land chain that Putin wanted through Crimea. And again, our friends in NATO, what are they even doing for Ukraine? What? Look, if you they said that Trump wanted to kill NATO, Biden did it. Right. Biden did it. And now Germany. And so Putin was selling oil at thirty dollars a barrel. What's it at ninety six? Yeah. He's making more money than he did before. And he's financing a war and killing innocent people. You mentioned before, too, and I think this is a good point. Everybody on the left and I'll say the media, the establishment, whoever you want to say, says that if you don't agree with the war in Ukraine, you're like pro Putin. Right. And that's just the most outrageous thing in the world, because I agree with you. I feel for the people of Ukraine. I don't want this for them. I don't want this for innocent people. However, at some point, the world's every every one of the world's problems can't be America's problem when we have a border crisis. And then I think they said yesterday ten thousand people came across. They got, I think, eight thousand of the ten thousand. But you see the numbers day over day. It's a problem. We have crime that's rampant. We have overdoses that are at record numbers. We have we have suicides at record numbers. At some point, we have to maybe just think about ourselves and not everybody else, because if we fall, sadly, I think the world falls at that point. Amen. The thing that I would add is I love the way the Ukraine refugee has been crowbarred into the migrant crisis in the United States. New York leaders from the city to all over Kathy Hochul, the governor of the state of New York, mentioning that, you know, like the Ukrainians in Poland, the the Polish have no intention to keep Ukrainians forever. That's a temporary you know, they're leaving a conflict to return to their country after the conflict is over. Again, this is just we're we're putting a round peg into a square hole and just hammering it away. But but there's no the media. There's you're our destroying military. I go to parents all the time around this country and ask them to give us their sons and daughters to join the military. And the one thing they bring up is Afghanistan. It's not about anything. It's Afghanistan. How are you going to assure us that you're going to maintain your commitment to our son and daughter when you betrayed us in Afghanistan that has lasting effects? And there's not a I'm trying to find a segment of our of our of our nation that's functioning. I don't know what it is. I saw in Chicago, they're going to have municipally owned grocery stores. Maybe that will figure it out there. Yeah, yeah, it's good. Real quick, do you think and we'll finish up on this topic, but do you think that they will we will ever have boots in the ground on Ukraine? I mean, I hope not, because I just don't know what the I mean, look at I'm I'm we're getting ready for China. We're trying to revolutionize everything. I don't know what the what the plan is. I mean, again, if you want to put a base in Ukraine, and you want to make that a sustainment operation going forward, that I here's the point. I don't understand what the inactive ready reserve call up was for. Why are you bringing those troops in the non combat support? Why are they going to Ukraine? What are you building infrastructure there? Here's what I do know. We're talking a minimum of $11 trillion to build Ukraine back. That is cataclysmic amounts of money. There isn't water, electricity, internet, you know, you want to help Ukraine. You're going to Russia is not paying for that if you negotiate a settlement. So I don't know what the plan is. But I hope we never see boots on the ground. I could guess what the plan is. I won't I won't say for sure. But I could guess that we'll be paying a chunk of that. And I do have one last one. So I did interview Colonel Douglas McGregor a few months back. And he talked about he's a real optimist. But he is really very, very bullish on Ukraine. Yes, very, very optimistic. I'm dropping some all over the place. But he brought up some staggering numbers, though. And even if they're half true, it's a problem. The amount of casualties and wounded soldiers on the Ukrainian side that we're not hearing about the media. I don't know if you agree with some of those numbers or not. But he's saying, I mean, it's people are acting as if this is an even war right now. And it's not even close. First of all, McGregor's a stud. I mean, he's an absolute, you know, that we're glad he's on our side. He's a military mind. I don't know if those numbers are accurate. I could tell you they're juxtaposed to almost everything we're hearing from every institution that we have, including a lot of our intel from Germany and England. But again, I don't know what to believe. So when you don't have when you don't have transparency, when you're not holding regular press conferences, when your Pentagon spokesman is now working in the White House and now you're getting a triple spin. I mean, the U .S. Open double backspin. You've gotten so many spins on the narrative. I don't know what to believe. But if he is even close to what is a segment of truth, you know, then look, Ukraine needs an investigation. There's a lot of investigations. We've got to start on Afghanistan. We were promised that by Speaker McCarthy. We need a hot wash on Afghanistan. And then we need to go to what who is oversighting the money that's going to Ukraine. And what have we got for our return on investment? Yeah, I'm not asking for much. Really, all I'm asking for in this conflict is can we just talk about what the end game is? And to your point, can we get an accounting of where the money's going and what's being spent in a real accounting of it? The Iran deal that just happened last week. First off, the fact that that was negotiated and completed on 11th September to me is just the ultimate slap in the face. But you again, you know more about this than I do. We do a five for five trade. OK, I'm going to use sports analogies. We trade five for five. And then we also approved of six billion dollars that apparently wasn't ours, but it was in a fund that now they can release to Iran. How are we winning on that one? Well, first of all, I was hoping that at least it was a digital transfer. The fact that it went as euros in cash through Qatar. And OK, so what happens the 24 hours after that deal is made? We're now getting issues in the West Bank. We're now hearing about issues in Yemen. We've now got Hezbollah that's reinforced. I mean, look, what do you think they're doing with cash? Right. What deal do you make where someone says, I'll bring a box of money to you? What do you it's this is a state sponsor of terrorism. They haven't changed. By the way, their president is now in New York City addressing the United Nations. This guy's killed 6500 of his own people. He admits to it. He killed the students that revolted and wanted democracy when we did nothing. He killed 5000 of his citizens in 1988. He's killed over 300 Americans. There's no accountability whatsoever. I don't understand what it is about Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken that believe that Iran is a partner. All you've done 10 years ago, they were refining 10 percent of their oil. And now they're a force. Now they're working with Maduro in Venezuela, and they're a huge part of their members of of the international community. They're in good standing there. I don't get it. Does anyone believe that the Iran nuke deal? Look, we got hit with cruise missiles under Trump in Iraq. How did they have those cruise missiles? Those cruise missiles were illegal under the Obama nuke deal. So how are you refurbishing missiles in two years? Do we believe that their centrifuges have stopped? That they won't have a program if they don't have one already? No, I mean, I guess my question, David, is how I mean, I know that you pay a lot of attention to this stuff, but how do people like in the media not ask these questions? Right. I mean, these are legitimate. I mean, we just traded to I put this on my notes here. This is on the heels of trading a WNBA basketball player for the Merchant of Death like six months ago. Right. I mean, and again, I'm glad Americans are coming back to America. I don't want to sound pessimistic on that. That's great news. But we also I mean, this this stuff just seems like I don't care what side of the aisle you're on. It warrants questions, but nobody seems to care. I'm in the world that if you take hostages, we take hostages. You want to exchange people? We'll exchange people. You know, we definitely have the partners in the area to do that. For whatever reason, this administration, they're they're they're contrarians. They're contrarians to you know, they claim Bush and Cheney are their best friends, yet they just go 180 degrees from that doctrine. I don't know what the Biden doctrine is. I don't know what Bidenonomics is either, but I could tell you that they believe that Iran is a partner. Now, here's another thing. Our envoy to Iran not only is no longer the envoy, he doesn't have a security clearance. Does anyone curious at The New York Times as to what happened to the lead negotiator in Iran that is escorted off a bus, taken into American custody, given a job at Yale or Princeton or wherever he's working now? I've never heard of a person going from top secret classified negotiations to no clearance whatsoever and in the custody of American intelligence community. No one cares. No one cares at all. It's fascinating. And again, for me, I mean, these are big decisions that we're making. And correct me if I'm wrong, but it used to be, you know, maybe we did a two for five deal and then we made the six billion. Now we're like, we're giving stuff away and we're on the losing end. Correct me if I'm wrong, but America was never, you know, America losing. It was always America winning, right? America getting the best of deals. At least McDonald's has a five for five. We didn't even get that. You know what this does though? Honest to God, if you're thinking about traveling overseas, things go sideways, cartel, South America, Mexico, wherever you're going, you have a price in your head now. No one in their right mind is going to bring you back whether it's Haiti or wherever you are, you're worth $1 .25 billion. And thugs and scumbags are going to take advantage of that. I mean, that's a great point too. Do you think about leaving the country? I don't know anymore. That's a little bit concerning. I don't care where you're going, right? That's concerning. This one I just had to bring up because it happened two days ago or yesterday. How do we lose a plane? And I heard that's like a third one in the last six weeks that something like this has happened. How are we losing $80 million planes? Well, they're not $80 million anymore because they've got a new engine and all this other stuff. Look, the F -35 program is a complete disaster. You want to talk about why our allies think we're crazy. We sold them a plane. This program has been around since the early 90s and we've got nothing on return for it. So basically two planes are flying in a buddy team. They're doing training and a guy punches out. We don't even know why he punched out, but that plane could have easily hit a building. It didn't, thank God. But the wingman didn't follow where his buddy went. So what is he doing? He just kind of went on and did his own thing. And now the Marine Corps put a Facebook post like a dog is missing. We're expecting the Ukrainian farmers to carry the F -35 out with their tractors. I don't know what the point of it's wild. Look, stop embarrassing us. Just stop humiliating us. That's all I'm asking. Just be the army and the Marine Corps that we know our men and women are capable of being. Get out of their way. This gender garbage, this social experiment nonsense, stop humiliating our military. That's all I ask. Why can we not get the... I mean, I know why we can't get the answer, but I'm asking this to you. But why can't we, at a press conference at the White House, why can't we say, I want to talk to the guy that was in the other plane, or you can tell us the transcript of what happened when that happened. Talk to the guy who jumped out of the plane. Why did you do that? And again, I'm not trying to put our military on the spot, but these are kind of big questions to ask, right? I mean, if I do something in my business, I have to go face the music on that. Why doesn't everybody have to face music for their decisions or why things are happening? I think it's kind of important. Well, you don't want to talk to generals because they're going to tell you the truth and they won't be generals anymore. True. And you don't want to talk to enlisted people. Because look, I mean, let's be honest. How many people are... Is this a merit -based military anymore? Do we have a meritocracy? Are we promoting people based on pronouns? Go figure. When we're putting politics above military strength, accidents happen. We don't know the facts, but the fact that nobody cares about getting to the bottom of it, the day of the Pentagon paper reporters are gone. Yep. Yep. Let's just talk about the 2024 race quick, and then we will wrap up for today. So your thoughts on the Republican primary so far, I'll stay away from the Democratic side till the very end, but your thoughts on, you know, there's obviously Trump who is now in a, has a huge lead. Ron DeSantis seems to be crumbling underneath himself. Vivek Ramaswamy has jumped up in the polls. Nikki Haley's there. Tim Scott's there. A few others that probably aren't going to get a lot of votes. Chris Christie's the anti -Trump candidate. Mike Pence is, I don't know what Mike Pence is. I'm not really sure. Your thoughts about the whole field so far? I mean, look, it's impressive. They've got a deep bench. There's a lot of diversity. I, you know, none of it matters. Trump is the guy. The more you indict him, the more you empower him. You know, I'd like him to work on his communications a little bit better. You know, but if Trump is Trump, Trump is a Frankenstein monster of Barack Obama. As long as you have that faction, you're going to get, you know, Trump is going to be empowered. I just don't want to see Governor Noem anywhere near the White House. And I, if he's going to pick a running mate, you know, it's hard to find an ally here, you know. But it would be nice to find a governor. I don't want to take anyone from the Senate. I don't want to take anyone from the House with the margins that tight. But I mean, the idea that Governor Noem is being floated right now. I mean, I'd rather take North Dakota. Yeah. A little sled there. You know, it's funny you mentioned that because I saw a lot of that this weekend. I mean, can we just, for lack of a better term, keep it in our pants for about a year and then do what you got to do? It really is. I mean, every time you turn, somebody's doing something idiotic, whether it's Boebert. And again, I say this, David, a lot of people know who you are. A lot more know who you are than they'll ever know who I am. But when you go out in public into a movie theater like that, and I'm going to Boebert, not Noem for a second, you're, you're extremely well known. I don't care if it's dark or if it's as light as it is in the studio right now. What are you thinking? I, you know, she's, she's, she's an embarrassment. She is. She's bad, too. Who would have thought that Marjorie Taylor Greene would have been the, the oasis of the Maryland? I mean, seriously, I, again, you're, you're in Congress every day. You're out in public, you're on the job. You know, at least she wasn't wearing a hoodie, you know, that's all in shorts. She was at least dressed for the occasion, but I, it was, it's wildly embarrassing. Vaping, singing, whatever you're doing. Getting groped. Yes. Who is your VP candidate then? Because I think, you know, you have names thrown around. There's, there's, the vague has been thrown around in there. You know, Byron Donald's has been thrown around in there. Carrie Lake has. I don't know. I love Carrie Lake. I just don't know that Trump needs to go with somebody so divisive there. I think he's got to go with somebody that's, that's firm in their beliefs, but also not maybe going to turn off half the country. Well, you know, it's, it's impossible. One of the, one of the problems with making Trump, you know, the, the enemy of the state that the left has done is that you've really made it difficult for him to even put a cabinet together. You know, I mean, what are you going to do with it? You've got a lot of loyalists out there. You know, the vague is, is I think maybe the most intelligent dynamic candidate we've ever seen run for president, but experience does matter. But you know, I love the way he thinks. I love the movement. I don't know if he would even take the job to be honest with it. I don't think he needs it. But you look at a Tim Scott, I think Tim Scott is, you know, there's a whole lot to his message and I think he's, he's got the experience in the Senate, but honestly, you could literally take the Clint Eastwood chair and, and throw it in there as vice president. I'm going with that because this, this from top to bottom, we have to have seismic change in 24. Do you think he would ever choose Kristi Noem at this point with all that now? Yeah, no one knew Mike Pence was a, was a 24 hour story and then he was the vice president candidate. So who knows? I mean, a lot can happen between now and then, but I just, I don't need, you know, let's just pick people on their merit. Let's pick people that are ready to be the president. Imagine this, imagine picking a vice president that can lead the country. If something happens to a 75 year old president, you know, like Kamala Harris. Yeah. Someone like that.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"That's right. Weiss is reporting to Merrick Garland, who's reporting to the dad of the of the son who's under investigation. So I want to get into this. So we played the Newt Gingrich clip. I played that. We played that a couple of times on the show since it happened. It went mega viral everywhere online, tens of millions of questions. The piece in in that clip that I think we sometimes skim over. Yes, we hit the coordination. This is a collusion at the highest levels of our government against Donald Trump. But they talk about the Weiss screw up. We've got they rushed Fulton County because they wanted to take the our eyes off of this Weiss special counsel situation. Now, when you hear Newt say that, what do you interpret the screw up to be? What what are they covering up for there? I think they're covering up for a lot of things. One, I think that they're covering up for appointing someone as special counsel who has hindered an investigation into the very thing he is now tasked with investigating. He was the one who said that he would not bring in a case against Hunter Biden in Delaware. Now he's saying that maybe he would bring it in California or D.C. The attorneys in those places said already that they would bring a case against Hunter Biden. I think that's certainly a screw up. I think it's also a screw up to have appointed someone who's already working for the DOJ. And I think there's probably more to what's going on there than we know, because I think also Weiss already was involved with the Biden family in a personal way previously. Didn't he work with Beau Biden as well? Yeah, Beau Biden. Yes, he worked with Beau Biden. And then I believe one of his aides, Blake, in fact, chuck us in real time. But I believe one of the by Beau Biden's aides was actually on his team of lawyers in this investigation. So so one I mean, here, let's let's take it a level back, though, Libby, if you and this is what is just occurring to me in this moment, you know, so bear with. But why did they have to appoint a special counsel in the first place? Right. I mean, maybe that they pulled the trigger and it was kind of like, whoa, where did that come from? What led to the appointment of a special counsel in your estimation? Was it a political screw up that they even went that far? Were the people mad at Merrick Garland, you know, Biden's White House? Do we know any details there? Well, we do know that Hunter Biden was up on criminal charges, right, for I think he had two misdemeanors, two tax charges and a gun charge because he had lied on a gun background check, which, of course, is incredibly ironic, given his father's demand for constant background checks of everyone who's ever touched a gun once in their life. But anyway, he was up on charges. He had secured a plea deal with prosecutors in Delaware. His attorneys had gone and the prosecutors have gone had gone in to meet with the judge and, you know, finalize this plea deal. The judge took a look at it. There was a portion of it in the gun deferment charge, which basically said if you stay out of trouble, we won't charge you with this gun thing that essentially would have precluded any prosecution or indictment of Hunter Biden on any other future charges, including charges related to having not registered as a foreign agent before collecting millions and millions of dollars from Ukraine and China and Kazakhstan. I think that is all valid. I think they know they've been there. They have them dead to rights. I think they know House GOP have has them dead to rights. I think they know they they have Hunter dead to rights. I think that they know that there is a recording that is about to be, you know, shown to the public that is about to blow the doors off this investigation in a major way.But Greg Kelly has been hinting about this. So we'll see what it is. Yes. So my point is, I think that they gave too much credence to the Hunter Biden investigation by appointing this special counsel. And they probably broke with the Biden White House. And so that had everybody scrambling, which is why they called Fannie down in Fulton County to move quick to move to change the narrative. But that that that's that's I think that's what's really going on here is that it was a political calculation. They knew that the DOJ gave too much credence to the investigation by David Weiss, even though David Weiss is in the in their pocket. We all know that he's ran out of time. I've run out of time. Sadly, we've got these radio. Thank you. Libby Evans, the great Libby Evans from the Post Millennial. Thank you for your time. We'll have you again soon. Thanks so much for tuning in, everybody. If this show means something to you, please consider joining Charlie Kirk exclusive. We just are rolling it out. And if you're a supporter of the show already, we're going to be sending you a coupon in your inbox. So check out your email. We're going to be sending those out on Tuesday morning, Tuesday morning. So check your inbox Tuesday morning. You're going to get a coupon. It's going to be great. And you get a free year on the site just for being a supporter already. Charlie Kirk exclusive members dot Charlie Kirk dot com. You become an annual member right now. We're going to send you a free Never Surrender shirt. So you don't want to miss out on that offer. It's the way you support us. You keep us bulletproof and censorship free. So go to members dot Charlie Kirk dot com. Thanks so much for listening. We'll talk to you soon. For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to Charlie Kirk dot com. When I grow up, I want to work for a woke company. Like super woke. When I grow up, when I grow up, I want to be hired based on what I look like rather than my skills. I want to be judged by my political beliefs. I want to get promoted based on my chromosomes. When I grow up, I want to be offended by my co-workers and walk around the office on egg shells and have my words policed by H.R. words like grandfather, peanut gallery, long time no see, no can do. When I grow up, I want to be obsessed with emotional safety and do workplace sensitivity training all day long. When I grow up, I want to climb the corporate ladder just by following the crowd. I want to be a conformist. I want to weaponize my pronouns. What are pronouns? It's time to grow up and get back to work. Introducing the number one woke free job board in America. Red balloon dot work.
Libby Emmons Exposes Biden's Interference in 2024 Election
"Libby Emmons, welcome to the show, editor -in -chief of The Post Millennial. Thanks Andrew. Thanks for having me on. Of course. So Libby, you and I were texting back and forth earlier this morning about some of the logical, I guess what would you say, the breaks in the logic of the left and their assault on President Trump, trying to get Trump at all costs it seems. They're even willing to risk this boomerang of a live televised trial in Fulton County. They don't seem to care, but their logic is flawed. And you exposed something and I thought it was fantastic. I wanted you to come on and explain it to our audience. What do they have on Trump that they don't also have on Biden? Can you break this down for our audience? Yeah, so this is something that I found remarkably interesting as we came to the indictments and all of this. In 2019, when Trump was impeached by the US House of Representatives, one of the things that he was impeached for in December 2019 was for election interference in the 2020 presidential election. You remember that Biden announced in 2019 in April that he was going to be running for president and then we had, you know, Trump was the president. He was also running for reelection. And in 2019, you had the US House accusing Trump of election interference into an election that had not happened yet. And their reasoning was because he had made a phone call to President Zelensky of Ukraine inquiring as to Biden's involvement in the firing of a prosecutor called Viktor Shokin. So if I can just read from the impeachment. Yeah, so they said that Trump interfered in the 2020 election. Of course, this was months and months prior to the election, saying he did so through a scheme or course of conduct that included soliciting the government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations that would benefit Trump's reelection, harm the election prospects of a political opponent, namely Joe Biden, and influence the 2020 United States presidential election to his advantage. So the US House determined that Trump interfered in an election that had not happened yet because he asked for an investigation into Biden's activities in Ukraine with the firing of this prosecutor, which has its own entire backstory. However, Joe Biden, his Department of Justice, is currently prosecuting a political opponent of his. So how is that not election interference?
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Congresswoman, do you see life in the Georgia GOP? Are they going to make a move on removing Fannie Willis? I'm so glad you asked me, Andrew. There's a lot of confusion about this. And I've called literally every person I know in our state government, as well as talk to a lot of people on our federal level. We do not have the votes. You have to have enough votes to impeach Fannie Willis. And I admire Colton Moore, our Senator. He's in my district, actually. I'm really glad he's doing what he's doing and pushing this out there. But the reality, the literal reality, the vote count, we do not have enough Republicans in the House and the Senate to vote to impeach Fannie Willis. So unless we have a new election and all of a sudden elect more Republicans, it just can't happen. is the sale of the year. For a limited time, you'll receive 50% off the Gee's at Dream Sheets, marking prices down as low as $29.98, depending on the size. Go to MyPillow.com, promo code Kirk. That is MyPillow.com, promo code Kirk, including the MyPillow 2.0 mattress topper, MyPillow kitchen towel sets, and so much more. Call 800-875-0425 or go to MyPillow.com, use promo code Kirk. MyPillow.com, promo code Kirk.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Congresswoman, what does an impeachment inquiry do? What powers does that extend to House GOP? Well, an impeachment inquiry is the proper way to impeach a president, and it broadens our scope of power. It puts more power behind our subpoenas, and it puts the full force and weight of the House of Representatives into the investigation, into looking into the crimes, investigating every single detail of what the president may have done. And we know what he's done. He has used or abused his power and engaged in corrupt business deals with his son and people and governments all over the world. So what that will entail is I would expect a very long, drawn out, extremely painful process for Joe Biden as we work through an impeachment inquiry and ask the question, should we impeach Joe Biden? That would be just unveiling evidence after evidence for the American people. And everyone can see for themselves exactly what this man has done throughout his career. I wasn't expected to ask this, but I've seen, you know, Representative Nancy Mace go and basically claim that the Bidens received upwards of 50 million dollars. Is that your understanding as well, Congresswoman? Or is there even more out there? Is that maybe on the high end? I mean, just how much money were they grifting off of this international influence peddling scheme? Do we know yet? My understanding is that the dollar amount that we have is approximately a little over 30 million. But I would imagine as we get further, we may see as high as 50 million. Just it's it's it's pretty insane. So so now I'm going to ask it from a political angle. So you were out early asking for this impeachment. Obviously, you've done the calculus in your own head. But this is the narrative that you'll see if you tune into CBS, CNN, MSNBC. They're saying, please, GOP, start this impeachment inquiry. This is going to be political, a political disaster for you. The blowback on the Republican Party is going to be fierce if you start this effort. Do you agree? Do you disagree? What's your calculus? No, I completely disagree with them. And that they're just saying that and taunting us because they're trying to scare us away from doing that. You see, most Republicans are really weak and they're terrified of what the media says. That's why that's why you can always see Republicans retreat every single time the media threatens them. And that's nothing but a threat saying trying to trying to get Republicans to feel afraid of an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden. It will absolutely have the opposite effect of what they're saying. We will actually convince the American people that Joe Biden is the true criminal in the White House. He has been a criminal for a very long time. And we have the evidence. We don't have to make it up. It's not hearsay. It's not a Russian collusion investigation. It's not a January 6th committee. None of it's made up. We will have direct and real evidence that the American people will be shocked by. And they deserve that. And in fact, it will prove that this corrupt man did nothing but enrich himself and his family, abusing his power, the most powerful positions in the world, senator, vice president, president, while he has passed policies that have not only destroyed our freedoms, but destroyed our ability to live the American dream. And everyone is suffering under this. So I predict a complete landslide in 2024. I predict impeachment. And I predict that we will pass this impeachment inquiry in September this month. You heard it right here from Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. She's saying we have the votes to start it. She's saying that it's politically beneficial. I agree. I 100% agree. The base is begging for Republicans to do something, anything, get off the couch, get off the side, do it. So one last question for you, Congresswoman, before we leave. This is more on the state level, Georgia. There is a provision where Governor Kemp could get involved, state reps. They can remove a rogue prosecutor like Fannie Fannie Willis.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Strong cell is amazing. I got to tell you, the combination of NADH, CoQ10 and collagen is really something. You know, people ask me, they say, Charlie, how do you keep your energy up? How do you just keep on pushing? Look, part of it is diet, nutrition. But I'll be honest, I take supplements really seriously. Fact check me on this. You can say, I'll try. I'm going to fact check you. Type this into your search engine. N-A-D-H. Just type it in. What does it tell you? It might tell you that it is the secret to living long, anti-aging properties, more energy. All of that is being proven in more and more clinical trials. NADH is a precursor so that your mitochondria can remain healthy and vibrant. The elites, a lot of billionaires, people, a lot of money. They spend a ton of money on NAD. It's a fact. NAD just might be your secret weapon for more energy. I take NAD every single day. I could tell you that NADH compared with CoQ10, the trials show very, very good things. Don't take my word for it. I mean, honestly, my word should be good for something. But fact check me. Look at it. And if you do it over 30 days, you'll see an increase in energy. I wake up better than ever before. NAD can help you potentially, again, fact check me on this with depression, anxiety, other issues that you might be dealing with. It is nature's gift to you so you might have extra energy and mental clarity. You guys can use promo code Charlie for 20% off. It's strongsell.com slash Charlie. NAD might be nature's secret weapon for you. I love it. I take it every single day. Try to try it for at least 30 days to see the maximum benefit. And let me know, has NAD helped your life? Strongsell.com slash Charlie. Check it out. Strongsell.com slash Charlie.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"And I believe from what I understand from what I've been told is we have the votes for that. Really? So you're willing to come and tell our audience that Speaker McCarthy backs an impeachment inquiry and you think as of right now, we already have the votes to initiate that? Well, he, Speaker McCarthy has backed the impeachment inquiry all along. It's our problem. People have been, people like Freedom Caucus member Ken Buck has been against it, Don Bacon from Nebraska, Mike Lawler, who won a very, well, it's a blue district, dividing district in New York. It's been people like that who have been sitting on the fence. Speaker McCarthy has spent pretty much this entire recess going around talking and presenting the evidence that we have uncovered on the oversight committee trying to push for an impeachment inquiry. And so from what I understand, what I've been told is we have the votes to get 218 for an impeachment inquiry. So do you expect that vote to take place starting in September 12th or in this session? This is coming imminently? I am asking for it when we go back into session on September 12th. I want to see that vote on the schedule. I really do. I want to see on the schedule. We cannot wait anymore. The American people are outraged. Independents and Democrats see the evidence and we can't. How can any of us be taken seriously? Who can take the Republican conference seriously if we cannot even ask the question? That's what an impeachment inquiry is, is just asking the question, should we investigate this? Should we inquire about impeachment? Should we look deeper? That's what an impeachment inquiry is. And I think we would be the most pathetic, useless Republican conference if we don't even have the courage to ask the question. But my understanding is, is that we finally have enough votes to do it. And I'm telling you, I don't think the government's worth funding unless we're impeaching an inquiry.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"We're proud to announce our brand new ACLJ Life and Liberty Drive. Our legal teams will be focusing on the issues that you, our ACLJ members, have told us matter the most to you, life and religious liberty. We join the ACLJ in the fight to keep America free. Hey everybody, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show. We have the amazing Marjorie Taylor Greene on the show. She talks about her line in the sand. She says she will not fund this government come September 30th We break some news here on whether or not she thinks we have the votes already to get the impeachment inquiry underway of Joe Biden. And what about Fannie Willis, Fannie Willis as we like to call her, in Georgia? Is there votes in Georgia to get rid of her? We have that and so much more with Libby Emmons. We make some connections. I don't think anybody else is making about the inconsistencies in the left's logic as it approaches its indictments, multiple indictments of Donald Trump. This is a really fascinating hour. You're going to learn something. I can tell you that and we make news. All right, buckle up. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created. Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Brought to you by the loan experts I trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandtodd.com. Without further ado, we have the wonderful Marjorie Taylor Greene joining us. Congresswoman, welcome to The Charlie Kirk Show. Hi, thanks so much for having me on today. Yeah, honored to be with you. I love this. So you made a promise at this town hall event. You said, I will not vote to fund the government if Congress doesn't do this. And the following are impeachment inquiry, vote on Joe Biden to fund Biden's weaponization of government, eliminate all COVID vaccines and mandates and no funding for the war in Ukraine. I this this tweet has gotten great traction. This video has gotten great traction. I think there was Republicans and conservatives all across the fruited plain saying yes. Hallelujah. Amen. Do something fight Republicans fight. Tell us what what's behind this? What are your aims and goals? And do you think this can actually gain traction with the rest of the caucus? Well, I certainly hope so. And if if every if anyone remembers Andrew, I told everyone that I was holding my fight into appropriations, because that's where it belongs. Appropriations is where we truly have power in Congress. We have the power of the purse strings, not controlling the Senate. The Democrats control the Senate. The Democrats control the White House. The only place we really have power to make change is how we spend the money. And a lot of people have been wanting me to get engaged in battles throughout this year that I didn't think were worth fighting. But now it's time to to really dig in and enforce changes that need to be made. We only have two weeks in September. We go back in Congress, September 12th, and we have two weeks to pass 11 appropriation bills. We've already passed one. We have to pass 11 before September 30th and September 30th. The government shuts down. Now, that doesn't sound like a big deal to especially most Americans, because pretty much everyone I know is like, who cares if the government shuts down? But it's actually our constitutional duty as members in the House of Representatives. It's our job to fund the government. So that's why it's important to us. Now, here's what happens if we're not able to pass those 11 appropriation bills by September 30th, we're looking at having to vote on a short-term continued resolution. That would fund the government. It would continue funding the government with all the same rules and spending policy and spending amounts that Nancy Pelosi put in line and passed before we took the majority. And so this is a place where I really think it's something we have to stand up to. And I made a promise to my constituents. I made a promise publicly. I will not ever fund money for Ukraine. So I will not vote for that. I will not fund the continuation of the weaponized government. And I think the best way to look at this is if we have to pass a short-term CR, we have to look at it like emergency funding for the government. And that means you don't have to fund all of it on September 30th. It's emergency funding. It's just to keep it going until we get our appropriation bills back. And so I'm not going to vote for Jack Smith's special counsel. He doesn't get any money. You know, David Weiss, he needs to be fired. He's doing nothing but protect Hunter Biden. And COVID is over. We've all declared that. Even Joe Biden says it's over. Vaccines don't work. It's proven they don't work. And we're not going back to COVID insanity and communist lockdowns. And so these are the things that I'm going to be working on when I get back in Washington. And I really think that most people agree with them. And I hope we can get movement. Yeah, I hope so, too. I mean, again, Andrew Clyde has come forward with also out of Georgia, by the way. I don't know if George is waking up all of a sudden, Congresswoman, but starting to get some signs of life out of the Peach State. And I'm liking what I'm seeing. You know, Congressman, it occurs to me that if Trump is indicted, if Trump is being persecuted politically, isn't the real emergency is for our democracy itself. You know, do we need emergency funding for a regime that has been weaponized against parents and moms at school boards, that has been weaponized against pro-life activists, that has been weaponized against the former president, has been weaponized against these J-6 defendants in our nation's capital? Isn't this crisis already at such a boiling point? What is it going to take to get some of these moderates like Don Bacon in Nebraska on board with moving forward with some more stringent, you know, punch them back twice as hard kind of we're not playing this game anymore. What is it going to take? And do we have the votes? Well, you got to realize people like Don Bacon and others have a lot of power because we only have 222 Republicans in the House of Representatives, and it takes 218 votes, voting yes together to pass anything in the House. And so, you know, I always tell people, it's like when you try to decide what restaurant to go to with your husband or wife or your kids or a group of people and everybody argues about where to go eat. Imagine trying to get 218 Republicans to agree on what to vote on. It's a nightmare. And so we are constantly battling that. And I can't, I don't understand it either, Andrew. I mean, I've been for impeachment of Joe Biden since his first day of office, and I introduced articles of impeachment on Joe Biden's first day of office on the Burisma and Ukraine issue, because we all knew it existed. We all knew this long before. But the impeachment inquiry is the line in the sand. It has to happen. It needs to happen the first week back in Washington.
Impeachment Time? With Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
"Further ado, we have the wonderful Marjorie Taylor Greene joining us. Congresswoman, welcome to The Charlie Kirk Show. Hi, thanks so much for having me on today. Yeah, honored to be with you. I love this. So you made a promise at this town hall event. You said, I will not vote to fund the government if Congress doesn't do this. And the following are impeachment inquiry, vote on Joe Biden to fund Biden's weaponization of government, eliminate all COVID vaccines and mandates and no funding for the war in Ukraine. I this this tweet has gotten great traction. This video has gotten great traction. I think there was Republicans and conservatives all across the fruited plain saying yes. Hallelujah. Amen. Do something fight Republicans fight. Tell us what what's behind this? What are your aims and goals? And do you think this can actually gain traction with the rest of the caucus? Well, I certainly hope so. And if if every if anyone remembers Andrew, I told everyone that I was holding my fight into appropriations, because that's where it belongs. Appropriations is where we truly have power in Congress. We have the power of the purse strings, not controlling the Senate. The Democrats control the Senate. The Democrats control the White House. The only place we really have power to make change is how we spend the money. And a lot of people have been wanting me to get engaged in battles throughout this year that I didn't think were worth fighting. But now it's time to to really dig in and enforce changes that need to be made. We only have two weeks in September. We go back in Congress, September 12th, and we have two weeks to pass 11 appropriation bills. We've already passed one. We have to pass 11 before September 30th and September 30th. The government shuts down. Now, that doesn't sound like a big deal to especially most Americans, because pretty much everyone I know is like, who cares if the government shuts down? But it's actually our constitutional duty as members in the House of Representatives. It's our job to fund the government. So that's why it's important to us. Now, here's what happens if we're not able to pass those 11 appropriation bills by September 30th, we're looking at having to vote on a short -term continued resolution. That would fund the government. It would continue funding the government with all the same rules and spending policy and spending amounts that Nancy Pelosi put in line and passed before we took the majority. And so this is a place where I really think it's something we have to stand up to. And I made a promise to my constituents. I made a promise publicly. I will not ever fund money for Ukraine. So I will not vote for that. I will not fund the continuation of the weaponized government.
A highlight from Hail the Conquering Hero with Vivek Ramaswamy and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
"The U .S. dollar has lost 85 % of its value since the 70s, when the dollar decoupled from gold, and the government seems bent on continuing the tradition. Charlie Kirk here. From now until after the elections, the government can print as much money as they want. The last time they did that, inflation went up 9%. Gold is the only asset that has proven to withstand inflation. Invest in gold with Noble Gold Investments. You will get a 24 -carat, one -fourth of an ounce gold standard coin for free. Just use promo code kirk. Go to noblegoldinvestments .com. That's noblegoldinvestments .com, the only gold company I trust. Hey everybody to the Charlie Kirk show. Vivek Ramaswamy joins us fresh off the debate stage and Marjorie Taylor Greene talks impeachment and why she was not allowed into the spin room. Get involved with Turning Point USA today at tpusa .com. That's tpusa .com. Start a high school or college chapter today at tpusa .com. I want to hear from you directly. Email me freedom at charliekirk .com. Become a member at members .charlicirk .com. Buckle up everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House folks.
Turning Point's ActCon Winners and Losers Revealed
"Have a lot to go through today and to cover the first topic. We were all at Turning Point Action Conference Act Con. Andrew, I want you to kick it off. You handle all the PR media do a great job. You've been to dozens of these events. I think this is an event unlike any other, certainly at its challenges in some ways, but it's blessings for sure. Andrew, Act Con, your reaction, winners, losers, people who ended up in the middle. Andrew Colvet. Yeah, no, this was I think, Charlie, you would agree of all the events that we've executed on. This was probably right up there with the top two most challenging. The other one being 2020 at the same venue, at the same venue during COVID. And we reluctantly returned to this venue thinking that maybe that was just a COVID era thing. But listen, there was some line issues that the Secret Service didn't help with. But I really don't want to focus on any of that. I mean, it was there. We did a great job, I think, dealing with it live in real time. But I will tell you that the biggest winner is Donald Trump from Act Con, there's no doubt. But the second biggest winner is Vivek Ramaswamy, who won basically the second choice vote in the straw poll, which I think surprised a lot of people. That was a massive, massive deal. The electricity in the crowd, I mean, if you go through social media and you look at it, there's no other event in the conservative landscape like the events that Turning Point's off. I mean, the welcome for Trump, the welcome for Vivek, Bonjino, Bannon, Marjorie Taylor Green, Boebert, Gaetz, Hawley, J .D. Vance, Senator Cruz. I mean, there's really nothing like it. The lineup is beyond the pale. And then, hey, listen, the big loser here is Governor Ron DeSantis. I'm a Governor Ron DeSantis fan. I've been really open about that. We are behind Trump in 2024, but we certainly are not in the business of trashing Governor Ron DeSantis or getting in the mud. Some people are. There's a whole thing going on on social media that you guys, I'm sure, are very well aware of. But listen, we like the governor. We have a lot of respect for what he's done in Florida. But I will tell you, a lot of people say that this was a setup. We were just trying to get Governor Ron DeSantis there so he would get food and heckled. That is a complete and utter lie.
People Should Demand Immediate Action to Stop Anti-Trump Interference
"American people have the right to a debate. American people have the right to know what Trump, what DeSantis, whomever else may make it on the stage, what they're going to do for us. We shouldn't have to worry about this right now. Trump deserves the right to run for presidency, uninterfered. And that's exactly what the left is doing. They're trying to take him out before you can vote for him. That is just wrong. That is anti -American. But we don't have to wait. We don't have to wait. Here's what Gaetz said. The House of Representatives needs to take action to defund the special counsel investigation immediately. We do not need to wait. Ding, ding, ding for the appropriations process. We don't have to wait for the Holman rule or some rider, he says. They are attacking our democracy and engaging in election interference right now. And if the US Congress does not have the capability to stop the election interference, then what is all the flowery oratory about preserving the republic? We have to operationalize that. I totally agree. I hope that Matt Gaetz was on board with Marjorie Taylor Greene because, frankly, she should get the credit for the idea. She thought of it a month ago. He's coming out with it now. I just want to make that clear. I love Matt Gaetz, but I'm going to give credit where credit is due because she obviously brought it up first.
Congress Reacts to Marjorie Taylor Greene Exposing Biden's Pornography
"Need to hear? In case you needed to hear more, here was Marjorie Taylor Jean, Randy Macho Man Savage style from the top ropes again. Here she is again. This I love. Listen, anyone telling you? Oh my gosh, we need some decorum up on Capitol Hill. Ladies and gentlemen, cutesy time is over. You want to play cutesy time with commies. Go right ahead. And I have zero interest. This is political trench warfare right now. These people are destroying the country. They're cutting the nuts off kids. They're castrating people that no, no, we're not playing to you want to do cutesy time. You got to find a new show that's not here. Thank you, Marjorie Taylor Greene. I would agree with her on everything, whatever. Yesterday, she whipped out the pictures again, pun intended. Here's Hunter Biden Kids was. are probably listening, going, Mom, Dad, what is you're going to have to ask him when you're 18 kids. That's not my job. Here's she whips out by doing the nasty with a bunch of prostitutes. I loved every second of this. This was glorious. Take a listen to this of Hunter Biden making sex. Excuse me, this is my time coming, making pornography. Should we be displaying this, Mr. Chairman, in the committee? You know, ladies, time has expired and with two and a half minutes over, Mr. Fumay wants a two and a half minutes. He can have it if. Oh, yeah. WrestleMania fall. Hogan, you alright? Do you trouble, sir? Let me tell you something. I'm sure I'm coming off the top ropes with that big. Oh, this was Joe Man Savage off the top ropes with the big elbow. Marjorie Taylor. Great. Good for whipping out the pictures. Hunter Biden. Porno style. You want to America. see Oh, Jamie Raskin and the Democrats were all offended, offended by what? The president's kid doing the nasty
Marjorie Taylor Greene Uses Visual Aids to Ask About Hunter Expenses
"Uh, so in a Leo gets moment. Oh, okay. Marjorie Taylor green up on Capitol Hill yesterday. She did a really great job. She gets one of the IRS investigating investigators Hunter Biden on the record and asked a very simple question. First, he whips out pun intended a picture. You'll understand why in a second of Hunter Biden. And let's just say an assistant doing some assistant. Now what they're doing is not dictation. Although in the podcast earlier chat room, someone said to me, Dan, in some other cosmos, this may be considered dictation, um, the dicks dating of or something. What, what, Jim, we can said, say we're dictating the dating of dicks. What's the problem? That's not a, even Giesler. He never laughs. You that's a dictation, which is, well, of course, we're allowed to say that. Do you would have dubbed that they do. It's okay. Good. So in some, I'm just saying in another way, it's maybe considered dictation. So she, she, she asks a question about these expenses. Let's call them business expenses. And then she takes out a picture of Hunter Biden with someone is assisted. Let's just say, I'm doing some assisting. Take a listen this to one last one last question. You referred to one of the assistants as West assistant. Coast I believe this is the West Coast assistant. Could you agree with that? So I can tell you that there were deductions for what we believe to be escorts. And then that $10 golf ,000 club membership. Yes, that was not a golf club
Trump in Court: Go Fast or Take It Slow? With Kash Patel
"So, Cash, tomorrow, Donald Trump will be arraigned. What is the timeline here? What are you thinking? Is it is it should Donald Trump really push for a quicker trial? Should he try to stretch this out? What are your thoughts? I mean, politically, I think he may want to. Get this thing wrapped up and shown that it's a fraud as early as possible, but in order to do that, he's going to have to file some extensive pretrial motions, not just to dismiss. You can't go to the dismissal right away. You have to build a case for the causes of corruption that are built in. And I did an exclusive about Karen Gilbert, the deputy special counsel, who I actually tried cases against in the Southern District of Florida, who is the Weissman of this case, who was caught by a judge unlawfully wiretapping a defense attorney's recorded conversations during a prosecution and was throttled by the district court. Go to the Ollie Shagan case. She's running this disaster. She's the reason the case went to Miami. I think they need to challenge that. I need to challenge the Jay Brat allegation that he dangled a judgeship in front of a lawyer for a co -defendant. And I think they need to look at all of Jack Smith's underlying activities and they need to challenge the breaking of attorney -client privilege under the crime -fraud exception where Donald Trump is shown to have been discussing options with his attorney. And if that's the case and that's allowed to stand, then no more counsel can ever consult with their clients and tell them what their options are, yes or no. And
Kash Patel Exposes DOJ's Corruption and Ties to Trump's Scandals
"Here. First, I want to congratulate you on winning your lawsuit, the Department of Justice, and your book is going to print. People can go to government gangsters dot com. How does that tie in with this news cache? Connect that news with what Donald Trump's going through? It's unfortunately the same people at DOJ and FBI that ran Russiagate and Jan six and are running the Hunter Biden laptop investigation. All the people in leadership positions, DOJ, Garland, Ray, and you want to know something about Chris Ray. Ray is the one who signed off on Sammy Berger, who actually stole classified information and shoved in his pants. Ray is the one who signed off on charging that guy with a misdemeanor at the time Chris Ray was head of the criminal division at DOJ. That's what the book is all about. These people are institutionalists like Bill Barr and company, and they destroy our system of justice. And we need to get them out of there forever.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Let's go to the great Marjorie Taylor Greene. She's on the ground in New York. I'm told she's literally surrounded. She's on the phone joining us now. Marjorie, what's going on? Give us the update straight from the ground from East Germany otherwise known as New York City. The floor is yours, Marjorie. Hi, Charlie. We just had to pull away the car was surrounded by people there. We had a large counter protest behind the car. They were bumping the car and so far, so forth. So we had to pull away. It's a chaotic scene down there. It is unbelievable. People, you know, just horrible people who have totally bought into this witch hunt and the political persecution of president Trump is outrageous. There's almost no words. You can't even describe it. But there's also a lot of supporters and protesters for president Trump on the ground. They may not be wearing maga hats. They're wearing plain clothes, but they are standing out there supporting president Trump. Congresswoman Greene, how should we respond to this? What should be the Republican response? We've called for indictments and subpoenas and handcuffs and perp walks for major Democrats across the country because now that they've crossed the Rubicon on this sad and tragic and disgusting day against our republic, how should we respond to this? Our response is we should not be intimidated. We should not live in fear. This is the United States of America. We are nation of laws. We have to take our country back.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast
"Marjorie Taylor Greene's idea of a national divorce. Now, this is an idea that has stimulated a lot of comment, a lot of it derisive from the left. Most of it very uninformed. And sometimes uninformed on both sides of the debate. But let's begin by thinking about what Marjorie Taylor Greene meant by this because the concept of a national divorce can be understood in more than one way. In fact, I can think off the top of my head of at least three or four ways that we can interpret it. So one way to interpret it would be, for example, secession, we split the country into two, and of course that has some sorts of operational difficulties. It's not quite as simple of north south or east west. It would have to be a very complex division. So that's option, but it's only option number one. Option number two would be that we create parallel societies. Do Americas inside of America, something I've argued for. And something that to some degree is already happening. I'll say more about that in the next segment. But that's the second option. A third option is decentralization of power. Take power away from Washington. Now we can see that people in Washington won't want to give up power without a fight without a struggle, but nevertheless, the idea of dispersing power to the different jurisdictions, not way red states can live the way they want, blue states can live the way they want, the federal government oversees the process, but it's not the kind of nerve center of making decisions for the whole country. So these are three different ways to think about the so called national divorce. Let's listen to Marjorie Taylor herself because she gave a lengthy interview in which she spelled out her thoughts about it, which I think are quite provocative. And the first thing she says is that many Americans are giving up. They're sick of the Talking Heads that just complain about problems and politicians who don't fix anything. While the right keeps taking beatings and abuse from the left. So that's the whole point that our starting point is kind of the Texas model. We're not gonna take it anymore. It's not enough just to sit around and analyze and comment and do depressing shows. Hopefully mine and not included. In which people just talk about how the world is coming to an end and how this is going to make you really angry and next time it's going to
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on WCPT 820
"To call and tell you that you have absolutely treasures on your show. I do. In Travis, especially Travis. Thank you. The apple. I think in that entire headless conversation. Just the perfect amount of nerve, you need to give him a raise. Yes. Okay. No, but thank you for. This serves as a race. This is all he needs. I've listened to the week enough. So when I see that kind of rubber Taj, I really, really invest in it. Yeah, yeah. The comedy gods are not as good to us every day, but thank you for being here. Well, listen, we acknowledge the days of the comedy God's gift. Thank you. Can't do Bon mots like that every day. Headless time traveling entity. I mean, I thought we were winning when it was just Laura Ingraham's producer getting an epic aneurysm. But then, well, no good until you see it. Why? Yes. Thank you. Thank you, universe. Okay. What? Michelangelo in Denver. Hi, Mike Welcome. Michelangelo. Hello. Hi, go ahead. Hello. Hi. You have two I don't know what I did. I go ahead. Go ahead. Stephanie? Yes. Hi, Steph, it's Karen. Oh, hi, Karen. I don't know. You're not on the board, but go ahead. Oh my God. It's a headless Karen entity. Are you time traveling Karen? Is it may or may not be Karen? Is this to my conscious? Yes, I am. And my stem, my stem, what is it, Travis, my stem cell or whatever is your brain, your brain is attached from your skull is detached from your spine. Yeah, you decapitated Michelangelo. It's right now. I wasn't sure. Yeah, I wasn't sure what was happening, but thank you for clarifying that for me. Anyway, no, I was just, I was just saying to your screener, Krista. Oh my gosh. Karen, you know better than that. I lectured you about that in the past. I know. Go ahead, Karen. Anyway, no, I just want to say this. I am so sick and tired of these white, well connected, powerful, privileged white men getting away with everything. You know, the Mac that thing really triggered me yesterday. It's not right that they can get away with this. But you know, the Marjorie Taylor greens, these women who associate and think that they're protected somehow, you're not. You're not going to be protected. You know, everything that you do that is illegal. Believe me, there is going to be consequences for you. So anyway. By the way, I love the headline this morning. Trump claims exoneration after no mention of him in the grand jury report with the redacted names. That's because it's redacted. You idiot. Idiot. And I hope one person who is right that is going to be the first one to indict him and it's hilarious that he thinks because he wasn't he wasn't mentioned because he's the target. Oh, my God, go ahead. Right. Right, exactly. You know, but Marjorie Taylor Greene, did you hear this one? She's saying that the people that stormed the capitol were antifa. And this is all after she visited these people in jail. Right. And called them political prisoners. So I think we know who the leader of antifa is now. Right. I think she is a Marjorie Taylor Greene, the headless entity in this story. Okay, this would lead to babies announcement from the bassinet at the 45
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Guardian UK: Politics Weekly
"I mean one thing that's striking when you hit that. Of course we we expect in a way now. The universe the republican universe to support somebody like modules green. Perhaps we have become used to that but in some ways. It's slightly more shocking. The reaction on the democratic side. Brad schneider of illinois congressman is introduced a censure resolution against taylor green that's just sort of big congressional condemnation but quite noticeable the top party officials in the democratic party. Nancy pelosi as speaker of the house have stopped short of calling for taylor green to be expelled for example from congress and preferring instead to say that she should just keep your mouth shut. I mean we get the fear on the republican side only explains why democrats would hesitate at throwing the and throwing it really hard to act mt g right so i think that there is some hesitation among among democrats to throw more attention on marjorie taylor green. Of course they've condemned her most recent comments about the holocaust. But i think that there is some fear that if they try to punish her again as they did in february when they removed from her committees that they may end up actually kind of fueling her rise giving her even more attention in the form of for example. A censure vote yes we know that you create to kind of republican martyr potentially and she's already so massive in the kind of fox news and one america news network world. You don't wanna make even bigger so you know you get that lead stirred interesting contrast that isn't it because it means that even democrats who were very very quick to deal a leadership level to deal with accusations for example of anti semitism when they appeared on their own side and speak of blazey did ask for example congresswoman ilhan omar to apologize when she made comments. I think suggesting that you know support. For the pro is our organization apec was in all about the benjamins all about money and that seemed to a lot of people have an unfortunate echo and their historically and that's he plays he was right on that and yet not going in for the jugular when it comes to somebody on the other side of the political aisle right yes and i think that a republicans have certainly jones on that on that dynamic as well. I think that one of the reasons why actually House minority leader kevin mccarthy condemned greenslade comments about the holocaust is because republicans have been trying more recently to paints a democrats as antisemitic because many progressives our voice criticism of israel during the recent By attacks between israeli forces and hamas in gaza and so it is definitely a dynamic that republicans are eager to jump on. And they're hoping to use that to their benefit as they look to the twenty twenty. Two midterms is that they are trying to paint democrats as antisemitic. And so that's why marjorie taylor. Greens i think did spark some form of statement at least from mccarthy condemning her that comparison because it didn't exactly help their efforts a level. Those kind of allegations against let.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on The Guardian UK: Politics Weekly
"The guardian welcome to politics weekly. I'm jonathan freedland. A tale of two republican women is what we're telling this week on the one hand liz. Cheney holder of one of the most fabled names in the republican party firstly in her own right is a congresswoman from wyoming. But who says the daughter the former vice president. Dick cheney liz. Cheney was once a power in the land among republicans but in may she was booted out of the republican leadership in the house of representatives because she was one of those handful of republicans who had voted to impeach donald trump for his role in provoking the january. The sixth attempted insurrection on capitol hill is an indication of where the republican party.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on KMJ NOW
"You have to think about it because Think a backyard, for example, it's kind of been torn up. It is no good. And you hire people to come in and fix it. Like I'm doing right now. On, Then you pay the freight and you're like, Oh, my God. You know? Look, we look with his bill is But Get it because of what they do. I get it because of all this talk of the upcoming $15 an hour, you know. Minimum wage. Obviously. People will be suspended or relieved of their jobs so the company can afford all these new parks and Bennies. So I just Turn this around, stayed here. Okay? Yeah. 490 58 58 807 76 58 58 talking to one of my cats. I'm sorry if you thought that was a little weird move So, um We had a guest booked on an individual I want to talk about today. Marjorie Taylor Greene. You know who she is. She's a freshman congressman. She's a Republican. And she is just in love with all this conspiratorial nutball stuff. In love with it, and she was removed yesterday from Oliver Committee's Republicans on top of Republican That's a good thing. I've always said when we have a problem where the first to clean our own homes, But it should have been cleaned in the way that it was cleaned with her and I'll give you the information coming up in the next hour, But I just want you to think about it. Now do a little homework. Google this name Marjorie Taylor Greene. And look at what this freshman congresswoman has said in the past. Mean she's bought into a lot of conspiracy. Syriza's Series. Excuse me. And organizations that perpetuate those, And here we go again being a representative of all kinds of people. Regardless of their politics. It's it's her job. Just like with the to counsel. People in town are taking issue with Mae. It's their job to represent everybody. So I think that's the angle that a lot of the Democrats or at least throwing on this new congressman, you can't represent our people. How do you know? You haven't given her try yet. So I'm thinking, especially when you look at who voted for. It's like 75% of that particular district voted for her. Constituents if she were removed out, kicked out of the Congress. Wow. You probably never see another R and that seat again. And those were becoming increasingly hard for us to get Those of us who remain in the Republican Party. But this girl, I have to admit it's a piece of work. She's very bright intelligence, intelligent, but she's spreading around some things that we already know to be patently false. You know, and I get so much of this every single day. My Facebook page in the messenger service. Hey, Ray, you gotta You gotta watch this. You got to see this. Have you heard about this? Read this before they take it off the Internet. I mean, come on. One of the big ones. It's just the one I was talking about. And what do you do realistically with somebody who was voted on overwhelming majority. She has your team insignia after her name, just like yours and our We need all the ours we can get in the house collectively. Where do you define her shortcomings? And how do you use them to get rid of her? Or should we even think about getting rid of her? I think that's ultimately the goal. I think the first step in doing that was, you know, relieving her of all of her committee assignments. I mean, this is just begun of the first few weeks of you know, Congress opening back up. Biden, you know, on the other hand, is moving at breakneck speed so fast. With all of these executive orders that we've talked about a couple of times this week. And those, you know, I mean, Again. And I mentioned this year Tuesday. We all know what the big problems are. We agree on the big problems. Where we You know the wheels come off the court card is the methodology and how to solve these big problems. That's what we fight over. And I think that weakens us in the eyes of other countries in the world. I think for that reason we've got to shut up. I'm not talking about me and you. I'm talking about those people. You know the word buffets of the world, folks like that. Who actually seemed to benefit. A lot of things. This this particular Presidential administration has already done All right. I need to take a break here. 490.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"There is considering a resolution to declare an upcoming coronavirus relief package as a budget reconciliation bill that would make it filibuster proof. Republicans are attempting to load up the resolution with amendments to force Democrats who do uncomfortable votes. The minimum wage, immigration and reopening schools. Among other things, Florida's Republican Senator Rick Scott, telling Fox News tonight. We're trying to make this a better package for American families, and the Democrats block everything we're doing, but it Z. This has to be a record. This has to be that probably more votes get by the Democrats against common sense bills than any day in history. The Senate, Senator Scott says, they'll probably be at it most of the night. The actual coronavirus relief bill still likely weeks away. Ahead of former President Trump's legal team has written House impeachment managers to deny their request for his testimony before or during next week's impeachment trial, calling the entire process unconstitutional. Off first in the House Thursday, members voting to kick a representative from committee assignments. 11. Republicans joined every House Democrats supporting a resolution that removes Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene from two congressional committees. I was allowed to believe things that weren't true, and I would ask questions questions about them and talk about them, and that is absolutely what I regret. Green disavowed her previous association with conspiracy theories like Cuban on, But House Democratic leader Steny Hoyer pointed to other post, he says, suggests political violence. It's about whether or not You will vote for decency. Republican leaders hold a vote to remove the Republican from committees and unprecedented power grab by Democrats, Boxes. Jared Helper and Wall Street Thursday, the Dell gained 322 points. NASDAQ climbed 167, the S and P 500 closed 41 points higher. America is listening to Fox News. Our military service members volunteer to protect us in the most dangerous places around the world. They step up. And when they're severely ill or injured, returning to their families is only the beginning of their long road home..
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on KOMO
"Marjorie Taylor Greene of our committee assignments in the U. S House. How's his office says he pushed the wrong button and meant to vote. No vote to remove green from her committee assignments follows a number of controversial statements, including conspiracy theories. Many Republicans have been openly critical of green, but say stripping her over committee assignments on Lee sets a dangerous precedent for the years ahead. 18 years ago Today, four year old Sophia Flores vanished in Kennewick. Efforts to solve the case continue. And today the state patrol missing and unidentified persons unit Unveiled its newest homeward bound trucks feature a picture of Sofia on the side just four years old when she attempted to follow a family member to the store on foot. Young Sophia was never seen again. The Canada Police Department, State Patrol and FBI have not stopped trying to solve the case. Chris largest, with state patrol these missing kids, and we're gonna prosecute you by responsible on law enforcement, local national state. We work together and we just don't give up the camp ways. Semi trucks will feature us Photo of Sofia as a child and an age progressed photo of what she could look like now the senses that about one in six Children that are recovered is you is due to something like this. I'm sort of viewing of a photo. Whether it's on a truck or milk cartons, billboards, cells come all someone knows something and that one tip could bring her home or at least bring some closure for a grieving family. Carleen Johnson. Come on you someone who's time 8 40 will a beacon plumbing sports desk. College basketball finds all three major Washington College is on the road in Eugene right now. The Cougars lead the Ducks, 19 to 13 and earlier Gonzaga beat Pacific 76 58 in Oregon State, beat the Huskies 91 to 71. Was built Sports tells us King Felix is for the birds. Five time All Star former Cy Young winner Felix Hernandez still believes he has something to give. In a 34 year old right arm. He signs a minor league contract with the Baltimore Orioles. Baseball spring training camps were set to open February 17th with regular season beginning April 1st. Federal health officials and the Biden administration had been urging MLB to postpone the season because of the ongoing pandemic. Washington Huskies softball eager to play games for the first time since last March, head coach Heather Tarr says, with nine returning seniors, including two all Americans, this could be a very special year. It lines up with One of the greatest teams to ever play at Washington. And that's saying a lot. But you know, we do have the benefit of being able to retain those for extra seniors..
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on 860AM The Answer
"Who are weighing in on Marjorie Taylor Greene and one of those weighing in is Joe Scarborough, Joe Scarborough. The Republicans can't get rid of her. And what kind of standard do they have? You know? Joe Scarborough is the same station with Al Sharpton. And they're now good boss. Let's bring in Reverend Al Sharpton to talk about a couple of cases going on right now, Reverend. It's always great to see you. Thanks for For being here with us. Good to see you. House congressional resolution to 70. March 8 2000. Mr Scarborough submitted the following concurrent resolution was which was referred to the committee on the Judiciary. Concurrent resolution condemning the racist and anti Semitic views. The Reverend. Al Sharpton. Let's bring in Reverend Al Sharpton to talk about a couple of cases going on right now, Reverend. It's always great to see you think. Whereas Congress. Congress strongly rejects the racist and incendiary actions of Reverend Al Sharpton. Whereas The reverend outstripping, have referred to members of the Jewish faith as blood sucking Jews. And you bastards! Whereas the river now strap is referred to members of the Jewish faith as white interlopers. And diamond merchants. Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton was found guilty of defamation by a jury and a New York court arising from the false accusation that former Assistant District Attorney Stephen Pagonis, who was white. Raped and assaulted a 15 year old black girl. Whereas to this day, the Reverend Al Sharpton have refused to accept responsibility and expresses no regret for defaming Mr Begonias, whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton vicious verbal, anti Semitic attacks. Record that members of the Jewish faith In particular a Jewish landlord arising from a simple landlord tenant dispute with the black tenant inside it, widespread violence, riots and the murder of five innocent people. Whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton is fierce demagoguery, incited violence, riots and murder in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn in New York, following the accidental death of a black pedestrian child hit by our motorcade. Of Rabbi Monica Schneerson. Whereas the reverend al struggle led a protest in the Crown Heights neighborhood and march necked next to a protester with a sign that read. The White man is the devil, whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has insulted members of the Jewish faith. By challenging Jews to violence and stating the Jews to pin down there. You're makos. And whereas the Reverend Al Sharpton has practiced the politics of racial division and made inflammatory remarks against whites by characterizing the death of Amadou Diallo as a racially motivated police assassination. Now, therefore be it resolved by the Congress that the Congress condemns the practices of Reverend Al Sharpton, which seek to divide Americans on the basis of race, ethnicity and religion expresses its outraged over the violence that has resulted due to the Reverend Al Sharpton, incendiary words and actions and fervently urges elected officials in public servants. You have Condoned and legitimize wherever now sharpened incendiary words and actions to publicly denounce and condemn such racist and anti Semitic views. Let's bring in Reverend Al Sharpton to talk about a couple of cases going on right now, Reverend. It's always great to see thanks for For being here with us. Good to see you. I got nothing else to say. I rest my case. Maxine Waters, the one who urged people to surround Trump Cabinet members. Let them know they're not welcome anywhere anymore, says Donald Trump, should be charged with Premeditated murder. I know women in Congress often threaten and we're at risk. And just as a LSI was threatened that day. I was lucky I was locked in my office. I would not leave it even when they tried to get me to go to where they were gathering all of the members in one room. I'm glad I didn't because of the contagion that took place there and the members who ended up with you know the covert 19. Uh, Letter to Castro. You're Fidel. Hope I haven't caught you at a bad time. Just want to let you know that Is a woman that you have a juror. Country. And these bastards over here trying trying to get her to come back to the states because he murdered a Drover. I mean, can you imagine, anyway? Keeper? It's all good. But yeah, Recognize what she was saying. And how she felt that I know how I have to live. My life turned out. Of course, l C was completely exaggerating the whole thing, but that's not going to stop. Vaccine, But what's so interesting about all of this is they try to make themselves depicted. And remember the 1992 rights here in L. A Was rebellion. It wasn't right. He was just people who were just expressing their outrage over injustice. When indeed are following the press. They weren't looting. That was just a woman who are so an opportunity to give her kids the milk, and she took it to the United States of America who had advanced planning about the invasion of the worry would advance planning. But I thought Donald Trump gave a speech and called everybody to just go crazy. But now you're saying that was advanced planning. It took place in our capital, and even there's information that some of them why would see Impeached for giving a speech. Calls an incitement to insurrection. And now you're saying it was preplanned planning came out of individuals working in his campaign. As a matter of fact, he absolutely should be charged with premeditated murder. She's all about Social justice. All of our criminal justice. She just made Scurrilous accusation. Without any proof. Saying that members of the Trump team Planned. Coordinated, premeditated Happened. In January, 6 Is there any evidence of that little own wide spread evidence we say now use when they Refute the idea that there was Fraud shenanigans irregularities. In the vote. We're sure widespread evidence. Maxine Waters need to no evidence, let alone widespread evidence. It's not a problem. Because of the lives that were lost with this invasion with this insurrection, And so, yes, we are threatened, but we can't back up. We've got to buy this heart is weekend. You say fight that you didn't hear the word fight did I think she said fight? Fight is hard. But can you just say that? Did you correct Week. Stuck in Travis, We've got the answer. This'll report is sponsored by Audible in Oakland. Eastbound.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN
"You think that the reason that they're doing all of this to Marjorie Taylor Greene is has anything to do with the fact that she filed impeachment. Articles against Joe Biden. Um, you know, maybe I don't know. Um, I just don't know. Um I don't know. Her really knew know nothing about it. I had that literally go and look at what it is that people were saying, and I mean, there's nothing things there. I think you would agree with that right? Uh, we do have video of the Pentagon getting hit with a plane. You know, a laser beam doesn't start wildfires in California. You know this whole Q and on thing I have no earthly idea what that's about at all end of sentence. And you know, but the left has people that are crazy, too. You know to me, It ought to be about the people in districts they get to decide and taking this major step in. What they're trying to really do is to find the Republican Party. She does not define conservatism or Republican or the Republican Party. Um, I've explained what my belief in conservatism is. I think it's pretty straightforward to you. Yes. And you know those are the things that I think matter, most that are going to impact people's lives and Again. I just see breathtaking hypocrisy. Because if you know the whole new Green deal agendas based on the premise, a conspiracy theory that we only got 12 years left Okay, Um, I'm willing to take that bet, Beth that Well, you have a little more than 12 years, but actually at that hour what our on Lee God himself knows right. Um, Anyway, I appreciate it. 809 4 Appreciate your call. 809 41 Shawn.
"marjorie taylor" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA
"W F L A The phone lines are packed. We're gonna go right back to him in a moment again. The numbers 809 69 93 52 809 69 93 52. We're talking about the Republican Party and this Inflection point that it's reached where you have potentially a vote to remove Liz Cheney from leadership at the same time that a large portion of the caucus is giving a pass to Marjorie Taylor Greene. And I think this is real problem for the conservative movement and the way I define the conservative movement, and this is what I want to see from the Republican Party because again, I think it's important to have a strong conservative party in this country to offset What progressives and what the far left want to do. What I want to see. Are conservatives in Congress who can come up with legislation. That, instead of mandating companies to act a certain way can offer up incentives for companies. To make sure that your average American hardworking Person. Benefits from the success of that company. That's not just those top who are reaping the benefits of increased production and profits. Want to conservative party that is fiscally responsible that does take deficits and debt seriously and just doesn't just do lip service. To those issues. I want a conservative party. Who offers up Taymor market based, competitive, based, transparent healthcare system option, as opposed to something like Medicare for all Want a conservative party in this country that strong on national security and serious about it, working with allies using those alliances to push back against adversaries that has a long term strategy for taking on China. That's important that we have that what I'm seeing. Is too much performance of politics. From these people. The loudest voices are not serious people. And just as a response to a previous caller who said Maybe that Marjorie Taylor Greene will learn from all of this won't she's fundraising off all of this, so I know I don't think I don't think she's gonna learn any lessons here. She's literally fundraising off of all of this. And one thing I do need to mention and in this particular conversation. We're really focusing on the Republican Party here. But for Democrats just because I did mention the squad and AOC and Ellen Omar and proceeded to leave and all of them. Democrats have a real problem that they just refused to address with anti Semitism on the left. It's there. It's blatant. And they do nothing about it. They don't push back against it in a serious way. They let these people get away with comments that They would never accept from someone on the right. You said them. There is a real serious problem with anti Semitism on the left, and it's just kind of sitting out there. And the media doesn't pay enough attention to it. And the Democratic Party certainly doesn't pay enough attention to it. 809 69 93 52 is the number of them going to Sean in Tampa now, Sean, thanks for the call. Was going, all right. I'll tell you all the time, man. You need to be running for office. Let me say that Now. You said that the right before I got into this cult you said about the left..