3 Burst results for "Maria Van Kirkov"
No Agenda
"maria van kirkov" Discussed on No Agenda
"Not seen such communication. So anyway i find this to be very annoying doing this but let's take part to the. Who's maria van. Kirkov says the world has no time to waste in examining what happened in twenty nineteen in the very early days of the pandemic. She expects some of that work will involve trips to china. I anticipate on that. The sago in its discussions about the urgent next steps for understanding the origins of the current pandemic will recommend further studies in china and potentially elsewhere. China can veto any visit from researcher. Sent by sago. But van kirk off. Says she's optimistic. That china will cooperate with the group of the twenty six scientists on the new advisory panel each members from a different country in one. Is the deputy director at the chinese academy of sciences in beijing. So wait a minute. i'm trying to understand. So are they to the world health organization care cove. That's the dutch lady or born dutch thing so they are putting together yet another panel to investigate this but they probably can't get in anyway. This is weird. Sounds like hold on florida's weird. What are they trying to do. Trying to hide it. They're trying to tell the truth and they reserve being they're playing games with the world. Health is trying to tell the truth. I think so Unless unless okay where you're gonna take the other side of this which you would say would be no. This is just another scam. Well it's either just another distraction. Better done a distraction because this is not what people are worried about right now that not the number one question about the pandemic the number one question now is will it kill me and can i get around without it. That's the question. Eight may be a setup to blame something else though. That's what i'm kind of coping. Oh third option a third option that one. I didn't even consider a third option. Might be the way to go now. My last series which is the covert. This is the dumbest. they're mostly short. But this is probably the stupidest. Npr breakdown of anything. They've ever done really th. That's hard to top. They've done a lotta dump stuff. Well okay you've got me on that but this pretty bad this is an entire. I only have parts of it and it kind of an expose on hugging. And how can we hug. And what's hugging during the pandemic and they make a whole story. Yahoo weren't their stories at the very beginning about hugging dawei. Can't hug show you're gonna hear of these five parter some of the stupidest. Npr stuff you've ever heard in your life. It's interesting but most of it's pretty dumb scored one if you're not a hugger. The pandemic has been the perfect excuse to never hug again. But for those of us who liked to hug the pandemic has felt cold isolating even now with so many vaccinated. The delta variant can cause breakthrough infections. So we wanted to know. Is it okay to hug what about handshakes and kisses we turn out to. Npr health editor. mark silver. To answer those questions hello. Hello lulu isn't risky when both people are vaccinated. Well first. you have to remember how you catch kobe. If someone is infected they'll breathe out respiratory and aerosol droplets that can transmit the virus so close contact like a hug can be risky but vaccination brings that risk way down so even if you're in contact with someone who's vaccinated and has been infected without knowing it to that person breeze out far fewer infected particles than someone who's not vaccinated. No yeah there you go that no. That's not what we've heard. No that's not what we've been told just the opposite that the person that has been vaccinated carrying the covert around they got tons of it in their nose mostly de much more. Yeah so we got a little weight loss mixed message. Misinformation man check false. Does this information. It's not ok. Should report on game onward partout. Wait a second. it sounds to me like you're saying vaccinated. People hugging isn't very risky. It comes down to a phrase. We're hearing a lot during the pandemic level of risk. What level of risk are you. Okay with for example is the person you're hugging someone who works in healthcare or school where they're exposed to other people in that case you might decide to pass. Because their risk of exposure colonel viruses higher the risk is also greater for people who are immuno-compromised. And it's worth thinking about where you'll be hugging indoors or outdoors. Indoor hugs or here because outdoors. The moving air helps. Disperse infected particles. This crisis this pandemic has been a boondoggle for losers everywhere with a piece of paper that gets them on. Npr npr and all these outlets are so starved for a new voice. They'll put anybody on with anything i think. This guy's an internal well works there. They they hired him even worse. He's not even a stringer. Bring this guy. And he's great. Oh did a whole series on hugging. It was five. A great human was a human interest piece. That's what this is. This is a human interest piece of covert. I g- i guess. It is technically here. We go is hugging three. We've all had this weird awkward moment though right when we see someone we haven't seen for a long time and we're not sure how they feel about hugging awkward. Dance where i kind of put my hands up in the air and kind of like shimmy to see if they want to hug or not. It's embarrassing what is the etiquette. These days i'm going to try shimmy but the new etiquette is state your preference is don't just go in for spontaneous hug you could say. Hey i'm vaccinated. I love to give you a hug or you vaccinated to on the other hand. If you know that that person just got off a six hour flight or went to an indoor concert. it's.
No Agenda
"maria van kirkov" Discussed on No Agenda
"With with the nazi. Germany crowds so when hitler had those rallies so crowded distinguished five. Its focus on one particular thing. Find an obsession about one particular thing and everybody is obsessed about vaccine all at once together and there's a sense of community about it. We are linked in with each other. We are close to each other. We are secure. We are not lonely because we all that. Here's this one obsession. You think this is the most important thing an accurate sort of glue that is extremely difficult to dislodge disolve right very difficult and in crowd the people who belong who have this shared obsessions kind of have sort of fluid morality and a fluid sense of what really is true and an when you saw in these hillary's for example owned by the way that's all that's exactly trump rallies i think the people show up at trump rallies. You know we know that. A lot of those people are seville. Were severely depressed before things happened. You know they had a shit time in in fly over states and they're also grabbing onto one thing. This is what's happening that the last trump rally which is gonna hit that one clip of They were they were discussing a didactic company. That does these broadcasts on. Youtube are btv whatever's called. They mentioned that about ninety percent of the people that trump rally was at the previous trump rally. Where's the irs rally was the same people and so it's becoming like a grateful dead group away. Yeah well it's also he pretty much does all of his Disproportionate at to wwe event places. So it's wherever the wrestling crowd is. That's where he always tries to get a venue. I think we've tried yet. I think we very good outstanding idea. Thirty more seconds of her. So the fluid morality that occurs. You know it's like oh well it's okay to do this and then it's not okay and people are all over the map and then Then you know. It's okay if he does it but not okay. They do it now. This is that fluid morality. It's the i guess people would call. What about ism. In that case hillary's for example right so people would immediately agreed to pronouncements that they would normally if they wanted the crowd take decades away up. Is it really true that you know my jewish neighbor is is you know out to get me even know how his father in lifelock together in the first of all war or something like that but this notion that. Oh yes they are. They're all even yep and they just just bought into that in a crowd that shows you how much the the sense of morality and the the seeking of truth comes out source by the crab member to the crowd leader. I think that's it so we got five cheese. One of those outsources don lemon wishes. He was one of those but he's not no no. We're we're still in the middle of a mass hypnosis event. Yeah well we're stuck with it too. I know not if not if everyone keeps speaking their truth which is hard. That's that's the real battle. I have two more series of clips from npr. Things are starting to break in certain areas. Covert okay kovin origins. This is starting to break. This is gonna. This is of course. I don't want to say that. We nailed this like within a week of the covert outbreak. Because we did but the mainstream has got to find a way to back into the into the reality. 'cause they have to all this is happening over the last year. Two years is going to have to be explained eventually and so they try to get back to reality this go. Covert origins are a big this pandemic. Where did this virus come from. Did it spillover from bats. Did it make the jump. Humans at an exotic meat market was it. The result of a laboratory incident nearly two years after the first cova case was identified. The origin of the virus remains a controversial and unanswered question. Npr's jason bobi reports the world health organization is assembling a new team to try to answer that the. Who is named twenty-six scientists from around the world to sit on what it's calling. The scientific advisory group for the origins of novel pathogens were sago for short. The panel has been given a broad mandate to investigate any in all future outbreaks of unknown origin but is also charged specifically with looking at the roots of sars covy to china has been desperate to deflect criticism that it was slow to identify the new corona virus and earlier. Who team was stonewalled by chinese officials and in the end failed to provide a definitive answer. For where sars covy came from the. Who's head of emergencies. Mike ryan says this new advisory group will likely face some of the same geo-political challenges that have stymied other investigations. This is never been an easy process. In many countries. We've had difficulties in the past of the number of countries because there are real issues are sensitivities. Economic issues are national pride issues or sovereignty issues. And you can't ignore that they exist. The structure of this panel which nominally looks at all new pathogens and not just cove it appears to be an attempt to defuse some of those concerns and sensitivities of china kovic has now killed nearly five million people worldwide crippled the global economy and ryan says in order to prevent future pandemics. We need to understand the origins of this one right now. This is our best chance and it may be our last chance to understand the origins of this virus in collegiate collective a mutually responsible way and. I can't overstate that. This is an opportunity but it is also challenge. Here's divall a who. I did this. They already went into china and looked around and they came out with a definitive answer. No it didn't come from china. Our my wrong might be missing understanding what happened. The first time around that the who decided to go figure out what happened Not only that but if you said such things than you were deemed a racist rulers that too so now all of a sudden who is reconvening at new panel. Did they admit that their first panel was no good. I have not seen such communication. So anyway i find this to be very annoying doing this but let's take part to the. Who's maria van. Kirkov says the world has no time to waste in examining what happened in twenty nineteen in the very early days of the pandemic. She expects some of that work will involve trips to china. I anticipate on that. The sago in its discussions about the urgent next steps for understanding the origins of the current pandemic will recommend further studies in china and potentially elsewhere. China can veto any visit from researcher. Sent by sago. But van kirk off. Says she's optimistic. That china will cooperate with the group of the twenty six scientists on the new advisory panel each members from a different country in one. Is the deputy director at the chinese academy of sciences in beijing. So wait a minute. i'm trying to understand. So are they to the world health organization care cove. That's the dutch lady or born dutch thing so they are putting together yet another panel to investigate this but they probably.
America's Morning News
Dr Maria Van Kerkhove talks about WHO's response to Covid-19
"Thursday, marking six months since the World Health Organization declared the Corona virus a public health emergency of international concern. Thursday, also marking the fourth consecutive day, the U. S reported more than 1000 related deaths, bringing the nationwide death pull closer to 150,000. The World Health Organization's Dr Maria van Kirk off on the agency's response that's been a target of blame. For the Trump administration. Me and we will Where is the doctor? I think we can characterize the response globally as mixed. I think we can weaken very strongly show that countries that have acted Fast have acted aggressively have acted comprehensively and really, it's due to many countries who have had direct experience with something similar or a similar threat. Countries that had experience with Stars Movie won the first stars in 2003 countries that had direct experience with avian influenza. Those that have had experience with MERS those countries across Africa that I've had experience with other infectious diseases that they deal with so often really saw the threat really knew the thread of this We as an organization active immediately, we mobilize ourselves on on the day we were alerted to this and mobilize all of our forces Tio acts and to inform Our first guidance materials were out on the 10th 11th and 12th of January, which was the comprehensive package of how to find cases care for cases how to protect healthcare workers from infection, how to collect samples to be able to test Onda checklist to get countries ready. On DH, So there was a lot that was put out early, and we really saw countries that that took an aggressive approach Countries that took all of government comprehensive approach really see some success in the beginning of trying to combat this these tools over and over again. If they're implemented, they work. Taken suppressed transmission and they can save lives on and I think what we need to do going forward as look at how we could be more efficient and our response. How? How can everyone Be more efficient in the tools that we apply so that we don't have to go into large lock down again. Our so called lock down measures.