26 Burst results for "Marcuse"
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"You only get so much attention with a kid, right? You only get so much time to talk to them. So let me get this straight. Do we talk about both sides of the flatter theory? Yeah, so you say, okay, let's teach the kids equal time that the earth is flat and equal time that the earth is circular. Or spherical, I'm sorry, spherical in circular. Do we do equal time? No. Of course not. It's silly. We know that. Do we do bloodletting? Seminars, like, you know, there's an interesting theory that used to exist, where you could get rid of your viruses by slitting your wrists. It's rubbish. You don't teach things that aren't true. You have to know what is true before you ever step foot into an education setting. And if you're afraid to say that there's objective truth, you should not be a teacher. You should be a student. Thank you. I appreciate that. So as I was walking through the walk of shame, I think that's what they called it. I started, I started getting called from them like being yelled at. And then eventually I called brown, so I don't know what that means 'cause they were saying how they were like white supremacy, how we are right supremacists. And then they called me Brown and I was on the wrong side. That's what they were saying. So then it started making me think about it because then you also mentioned it in your opening remarks how they're always attacking us, but they're never doing this. Right? And so I wanted to kind of know your thoughts on that on why is it that they don't have stuff like this, how they're always focused on just try not to try not to let us do this, but they're not focused on doing it themselves. Thank you for being here. It's a wonderful question. They don't believe speeches of value. Their viewpoint is that speech is white supremacy. If you read Jacques derrida, who is one of the most cited, thank you. That's well said. He's one of the most cited and influential post modernist thinkers of the last 50 or 60 years. He had a term that I kind of blitzed through, okay? Where he said the west is fallow logo centric. Fallow, meaning the phallus, it is dominated by men, logo, logos in the Greek truth, speech, reason, rational dialog, all those things are replacement terms, centric. And he said, this is the problem with the west. Men talking, that's the center. And so therefore, in the post modernist view, and you can read one dimensional man by Herbert marcuse. You could read intro to critical theory by all of Derek bell didn't write intro to critical theory. But anyway, they talk about how speech is not something that we should embrace. That it's dangerous that it's a trick that actually all of you are being fooled by being here. That the fact we're talking is actually Charlie being a white supremacist and hoodwinking you to believe that everything should remain the same. I find that to be laughable and objectionable, that's a growing view in America. That's what used to run Twitter, doesn't anymore, thanks to Elon Musk. Elon Musk believes in speech praise God he does. It's a big deal. Because every single totalitarian regime. Has two things in common. They must shut up people who disagree with them. Always, from Lenin to Mao to right now in the CCP to what Twitter used to be and number two, they think they're doing good. If you interviewed Hitler, a year before he committed suicide. And he said, do you think you're doing good? He's convinced he was doing the right thing. Everyone out there thinks they're doing the right thing. You know how you find out, you got to defend your position and get someone who disagrees. Speech. If you don't talk, you get radical very quickly..
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Oh, you mean when people can openly speak, candidates win that you don't like? Oh, that's interesting. People can consume information that you might not totally like. It's really interesting. The Hispanic communities becoming very, very conservative very quickly. It's a very positive development. We're seeing it happen all across the country. And some of the media reports about it is they're coming out and they're saying Hispanics are victims of misinformation campaigns and they don't know any better. Oh, they're too stupid to know right from wrong. So you have to be able to police the Internet. You stupid racist that writes for whatever newspaper. Like, oh, they're too dumb to know what it is actually. I trust people to be able to process the information correctly and then make the decisions after that. And if not, you're like, I don't trust it, then go start your own account and go grow a following and then start to tell you why you're wrong. Speech is always the answer to less speech or speech that you don't like. And that is a really exciting moment because I know a lot of people here have the politics on your mind and all that. I'm actually thinking bigger picture, even outside of the election. Long term as far as a movement that is durable, that is grassroots that is anti fragile, one that is going to be building long-term, I think historically, we're going to look back in the year of 2022 as the reclamation and liberation of Twitter as actually one of the greatest wins for freedom and liberty. This calendar year, even more so than what might happen politically a couple of weeks from now. So let me say one or two other things and we'll get to some questions. Which so at turning point USA, we have chapters all across the country. We talk a lot about the woke and we talk a lot about CRT and all this. Happy to discuss that at length. We had an interesting discussion yesterday with somebody running for Congress about CRT. And so what is critical race theory critical theory comes from originally Herbert marcuse came from the Frankfurt school, Michelle Foucault, Jacques derrida, implemented through a variety of decades of legal and academic theory, Derek bell wrote introduction to critical legal theory or critical theory, critical race theory in the early 1990s. It's very simple. You guys can use this definition. Anytime you want, it's called anything you don't like racist until you control it. That's critical race theory, right? That's racist. That's racist. That's racist, give me the keys. That's racist. That's racist. That's racist, give me the keys. And you see that happen time and time and time again. And I said this yesterday and I'll say it again. I can't stand talking about race. It drives me nuts, you know, the media they do their typical thing. Like, oh, yeah, Charlie's a racist, yeah, whatever. Okay, go get a life. And by the way, that's the way you should react. That's the way you should react. It means nothing to be called that from the media. It means nothing. You know who you are, your Friends know who you are, your parents know who you are, make their attacks fall flat. As soon as you listen to them, you give them power. Now, if there is a racist here tonight, then you got to do something in your life. You got to get yourself organized. You got people to apologize for. You got to go repent. You got to go find a relationship. Hopefully with your creator through Jesus Christ. And by the way, racism goes both ways. You can be racist against white people. You brace against black people and it's happening all the time and it's wrong and it's evil and it's terrible. But guess what? We have a supply and demand problem with racism in America. Meaning we have an incredible demand to find racism everywhere yet the supply is so low because we're the least racist country ever to exist in the history of the world. In fact, we're so not racist. There is a cottage industry of creating fake hate crimes just. You Smollett, who just creates a fake hate crime out of thin air for what reason? I don't quite.
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Anyway, this thing was a fringe ideology in the universities, okay? Then Derek bell writes intro to critical race theory in the 1990s and then basically this populated up very slowly and quietly into the highest levels of the academy where then in the early 2000s, post occupy Wall Street because they tried to Marxist revolution in this country with occupy Wall Street and it failed terribly. Remember occupy Wall Street, you know, tax the rich, take money away. It just didn't work. It turns out people like their middle income jobs and they like, I don't know about we want to get rid of our system, but with race. They found something that they could pinpoint. White guilt. They found an entire population that was unnecessarily guilty for their melanin content. Because they were told to be. And they seized on it. So this movement that started in the 60s by Herbert marcuse was implemented immediately. And white America was either silent and afraid or complicit and partners in it where they were like, well, I don't want to be one of the non white allies in this. And so this idea, let me just define terms. If you guys want to know the best way to define critical race theory, it's this. You could find out all your Friends. Critical race theory is calling everything racist until you control it. That's critical race theory. It's not about liberation. It's about control. Like the military. Call everything racist and now they control the military, like Wall Street call everything racist. Now they control Wall Street. You get the point, right? Now this idea of woke ism has now become kind of a basket catch all term for the other kind of tributary cousins of Herbert marcuse's 1960s insidious ideology of since we now think that power dynamics exist everywhere and anyone could be anything they want and now applies to the transgender stuff. It applies to all this different nonsense where you can as a man become pregnant. And the vast majority of people I talk to on college campuses, if I ask them a question, do you believe men menstruate? They said they can. And it's a matter of the will. It's a matter of I'm going to take dominion over nature for my own purposes. I'm going to become my own God of my own eyes, right? And so what does this mean for rural America? Man, this is the whole ball game. And they're seizing on white guilt and this unnecessary. And by the way, this is a black economist who came up with the term white guilt Shelby Steele, who said there's been more damage done in America of white America thinking they have to apologize to blacks and give all this money for no reason whatsoever. Now let me be clear. If there's a racist here tonight and you've been awful, you should apologize. Find repent to Jesus Christ and make it right. But if you just happen to be a white person going about your business, you have nothing to apologize for. Nothing. And so you ask about rural America, what our message should be. But I can not reemphasize this theme enough, which is woke ism, post structuralism, postmodernism, it is a parasite. And I say this in a drives the media nuts every time I say this. Woke ism is going to do more damage than COVID-19 ever did. 2020, you had two viruses that spread. COVID-19 that did kill a lot of people. Wokeism will destroy everything. I'm telling you, it is a pathogen..
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Exist. So I hold the line really firmly on that. And I think I wish the church would as well and the churches are doing. We need to do racial reconciliation. What are you talking about? How about you just spend like, I don't know, half hour on how black fathers need to get back in the home before you start preaching to white people about racial reconciliation? Like, oh no, what we're really institutionally racist and we don't realize it. How are we systemically racist exactly? We have an entire month dedicated to blackness. We have affirmative action, hiring quotas, United Airlines says they want to have 50% of their new pilots to be black. Anyway, the whole point is that this is a campaign nonstop around an anti whiteness regime, which is racism. We shouldn't put up with it. I want to get back to a colorblind America and you should too. I think that is an ideal. I think it's a Christian ideal. I don't care about your race and no pastor should either. So the narrative that we come up with should be the one that is true, not the one that is being driven by an evil regime that's going to be okay. Let's do a little walk before we quit. A little woke ism. And then we have some questions. Let me do an example in this fellowship. So what am I in our fellowship is fighting cancer? And he went to a local university hospital, not localized in the county, but in the region. And the doctor ordered a pregnancy test for him. True. He called it. He challenged it. As far as we know, they didn't have the test. He did say to the doctor, you know, in every class somebody has to be last. And I'm assuming in your class it was you. Here's my point. I want to talk about the impact of wokeism throughout our culture. Because in this case, had they run the test, it would have affected his deductible and affected his insurance. He would have paid for it. We brought the so called bathroom bill. So because we stood up. It did cost us. The NBA didn't bring their All-Star Game, which is a terrible game anyway. So it was all right. Men competing in women's sports. It's vocalism is costing us. President Biden, I think, today said that states should not be allowed to ban mutilating our children. Now, they twist it and call it gender affirming care. So from your perspective, you're on the cutting edge of this. To rule America, what would you say? How is woke ism impacting us daily? And why and how should we stand up these evils? I mean, this is the whole ball game. If there's kind of one topic we've created a movement against and I think that we're more better positioned to talk about is this topic. We're well read on it. We're well researched and we fight hard against it. So let me tell you what, where does this term woke come from? I'm sure a lot of you probably wonder that. Like, what the heck does this mean? Let me actually give you a little background. Maybe you already know. So let's go back to Karl Marx. Karl Marx believed that there was economic struggle in society bourgeoisie verse the proletariat, business owners versus labor, right? That there was always tension economically. So we built the entire communist manifesto around this. Obviously das kapital. It was applied in the Soviet Union, not really, but it started a lot of communist movements in the 1900s. Fast forward, there was a very sliver, radical group of revolutionaries. It was called the Frankfurt school in Germany. They were marxists. They were communists. They defected from Germany and came to America. One of them, the leader of this school was a guy by the name of Herbert marcuse. Came to America and he wanted to start a communist revolution here in America. But he started to look and saw in America that there was a flourishing middle class that actually normal everyday people were getting their seeing their lives and their incomes improve over a period of time. And that communism and Marxism kind of falls flat because people's standard of living was increasing. He also noted by the way that the American pastors weren't putting up with communism. It was very interesting. Marcuse came here and he basically said Billy Graham won't put up with our revolution. Boy have times changed, haven't they? So he devised a new construct, okay? And he wasn't the only one that did this, but he really was the pioneer. So he took Marx's economic theory of conflict. Rich people or business owners versus employees. And he said, why can't we apply this to other parts of society? For example, women against men, men are really on top just like the business, owners are and then women are being suppressed or oppressed, right? But then the one that really kind of caught fire was he said, we're going to start a Marxist revolution, not with the women that might work, not with business owners. No, but with blacks. And he said, the way we're going to do this is we're going to bring back all the racial tension and argue that there is a framework of which the entire society is designed and it's not the bourgeoisie versus the prolific. Proletariat, but it's white versus black. And that no matter how hard you try, there is systemic and institutional racism and every corner, all throughout society and there's nothing you could do to get rid of it except be enlightened or realize awoken awoke to the systemic injustices around you. That's where that term comes from. He says that you are now seeing things so the prism you are woke to that you and me sitting here is some sort of a colonialist white supremacist exercise, right? And by the way, you go read their literature in the book one dimensional man, which is satanic and demonic. I don't use that word lightly, Herbert marcuse writes about how everyone has their own truth, how there is no truth. There is no agreed upon principles for society, all this stuff. He had a couple disciples, Michelle Foucault and Jack derrida..
The Charlie Kirk Show
What Is Critical Race Theory?
"Race theory. What is critical race theory? Well, critical race theories and outgrowth of critical theory, critical legal theory, 1960s, 1970s, Herbert marcuse, passed on to Michel Foucault and Jacques derrida. It's a way of viewing the world. Basically, many of you know what economic Marxism is, okay? Economic Marxism is oppressed versus oppressor type class struggle, bourgeoisie versus the proletariat, business owners versus labor, working class, that kind of struggle. Well, in the 1960s, Herbert marcuse from the Frankfurt school in Germany came to America and he looked around and he said, boy, our Marxist movement is not doing too well. It's not doing great because the American middle class is actually successfully integrating into a private property based market system and Marxism is kind of fizzling out. So then he conjectured, what if we come up with a new type of Marxism, not economic Marxism, but race Marxism? And that's actually the name of James Lindsay's book that I encourage you guys to check out. Doctor James Lindsey wrote a whole book called race Marxism, which is taking that same sort of struggle and he said, the real struggle is not rich versus ports on the bourgeoisie versus proletariat. It's white versus people of color.
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Punishing PayPal's tyranny. I beat your account termination call by 30 minutes. Establish back in 2011, if anybody has PayPal, delete, delete, delete. Dave says Charlie are a little late. I canned my PayPal account yesterday. Well, you're ahead of the curve. God bless you. I wasn't hosting the program yesterday. You guys should get rid of all association with PayPal. And by the way, this is going to be their new kind of line of attack. This is their new attack vector, which is to go straight after your money. And this pincer movement is a public private partnership to squeeze against conservatives. And there is a an arranged marriage that has happened. Where the wokes take over these companies. And I think a lot of this happened post 2008. Post 2008 with the occupy Wall Street economic Marxism that was starting to resonate with the American people, Wall Street, and big companies started to get very nervous. Now, they were able to successfully thwart a lot of the complaints of occupy Wall Street, even though ironically, a lot of the complaints of occupy Wall Street were actually legitimate. It just got taken over by such pure, unadulterated Marxism. It became unpopular for all people to all normal people to tolerate and especially those of us that have some sort of love for western civilization we found it to be disgusting how occupy Wall Street and zuccotti park in New York quickly became that of a Bolshevik moment, but the complaint of occupy Wall Street was the banks have not been held accountable. No one has gone to jail. Wire taxpayers funding and bailing out Wall Street and Wall Street was getting very nervous. Well, then after they were able to weather that storm, the woke east decided to take a page out of Herbert marcuse's book, Herbert marcuse, of course, Frankfurt school, came to America, wrote one dimensional man amongst many other pieces of literature, and he argued in the mid 1960s that the American middle class was integrating itself far too successfully into a capitalist society that the middle class was getting very wealthy, they were able to buy homes, air conditioning, dishwashers, their standard of living was increasing dramatically, and that economic Marxism wasn't as popular as they would have liked to believe. So therefore, the Herbert marcuse argued that there needs to be a new type of Marxism as James Lindsay calls it race Marxism, fast forward to the 90s, Derek bell writes intro to critical race theory, and the woke his adopt this and they take over the major institutions, and this was a much easier pill to swallow if you're Goldman Sachs. If you're PayPal, much easier pill to swallow. If you are a major corporation, you have a little bit of a diversity board. You have a transgender focus group. You put some women on your board, and you're still able to pillage and plunder and charge whatever you want. You're able to game the system, you're able to use cronies insider dealings. It is the great WOAK alliance. It is a marriage of convenience..
The Charlie Kirk Show
The Arranged Marriage Between the Wokies and Big Business
"A an arranged marriage that has happened. Where the wokes take over these companies. And I think a lot of this happened post 2008. Post 2008 with the occupy Wall Street economic Marxism that was starting to resonate with the American people, Wall Street, and big companies started to get very nervous. Now, they were able to successfully thwart a lot of the complaints of occupy Wall Street, even though ironically, a lot of the complaints of occupy Wall Street were actually legitimate. It just got taken over by such pure, unadulterated Marxism. It became unpopular for all people to all normal people to tolerate and especially those of us that have some sort of love for western civilization we found it to be disgusting how occupy Wall Street and zuccotti park in New York quickly became that of a Bolshevik moment, but the complaint of occupy Wall Street was the banks have not been held accountable. No one has gone to jail. Wire taxpayers funding and bailing out Wall Street and Wall Street was getting very nervous. Well, then after they were able to weather that storm, the woke east decided to take a page out of Herbert marcuse's book, Herbert marcuse, of course, Frankfurt school, came to America, wrote one dimensional man amongst many other pieces of literature, and he argued in the mid 1960s that the American middle class was integrating itself far too successfully into a capitalist society that the middle class was getting very wealthy, they were able to buy homes, air conditioning, dishwashers, their standard of living was increasing dramatically, and that economic Marxism wasn't as popular as they would have liked to believe. So therefore, the Herbert marcuse argued that there needs to be a new type of Marxism as James Lindsay calls it race Marxism, fast forward to the 90s, Derek bell writes intro to critical race theory, and the woke his adopt this and they take over the major institutions, and this was a much easier pill to swallow if you're Goldman Sachs. If
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"So doctor slack, I find that fascinating and in the time we have remaining here, I do want to ask you about one of the courses you teach. And I think I'm understanding this. You've taught it before. Politics 8 O four on Herbert marcuse, which of course reminds me of one dimensional man. Who is marcuse, and why is it important that we learn about him? And what kind of damage has he done to our republic? Marcus is one of the founders of critical theory and critical theory is it's a powerful philosophy that's responding to the positivist philosophies in the mid century. When you hear the language of other, for example, that comes from the Frankfurt school, where it's important to understand certain identities and how they're inseparable from their other and how that very relationship leads to political oppression. And so Marcus was arguing for a new politics of liberation. So I get into this great detail in the online course. I'm not sure how much we can get into it now. But essentially, the marcuse has the argument that the philosophers or you could say the poets and here you could stand in place of that. The white young progressive radicals should ally with in solidarity should ally with the underprivileged of society against the American middle class. And so you have this rejection of what was seen as the middle class, the working class, in the 60s, by the radicals themselves. How this unfolds in the neoliberal period is that those who are espousing critical theory who see America as a land of oppression as the enemy. They form their own authoritative priesthood. And when we round out that neoliberal era around 2008, what we find is, particularly on the conservative side, that all the conservative gods are dead, the old, the neoconservative school, the libertarian school, the performance traditionalism, they no longer able to justify the oligarchy that's been created. For example, the change in antitrust law that's privileged large corporations and the formation of monopolies in every sector of the American economy. And facing this crisis of legitimacy, both the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as in the 2008 housing market crisis. I think the oligarchs needed legitimacy and so they sided with that will priesthood whose roots go back to critical theory. That was the foundation for other schools we're familiar with, critical legal studies, critical race theory, transgenderism, and identity politics. And so you have an oligarchy that rejects the populist movement on the right, and it turns to the group that had been most critical of it. And that's going to be the radicals on the left to justify to give that regime legitimacy. And so there's two real religions that have emerged, one we saw during the COVID crisis. And that's the religion of health. So we have authorities on health who, by poisoning their population, will do them good through government mandates. And then you also have anti racism and anti racism is really taken over many of those institutions we would thought, but we're conservative, particularly Christian churches. That is so fascinating. I wish we had more time. Doctor slack, we have to have you back again. And you guys could check out all things hillsdale at Charlie for hillsdale dot com. Thank you so much. Can I get a book real quick? It's called war on the American republic. That's my book that's coming out. I have a book that's called war. Let's plug it in again. Yes. War on the American republic with encounter press and that will be coming out this winter. And it covers all the things we've been talking about. So when that comes out, come to a full hour on our program. I mean that. If you're ever in Phoenix, come by the office, we'll have you. Please check out it. Check it out. Thank you so much, doctor slack. Great, Charlie. Thank you. Thanks so much for listening, everybody, email me your thoughts as always freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. Thank you so much for listening. God bless. For more, on many of these stories and news you can trust. Go to Charlie Kirk dot com..
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"You couldn't for Los Angeles for some time. So James talk about how now the entire American left has basically agreed that the state is now the vehicle. We must worship the state. We must use this state. It's all about power and this idea of kind of the old liberal of live and let live. It's now, no, no, no. Live and let us rule. Well, okay, so it turns out this is a Marxist thing. And so anarcho tyranny is a word. What you're experiencing there is a word. There was a word for this in the 1960s, the guy I mentioned last night, the arch communists of the 1960s, Harvard marcuse, wrote an essay in 1965 by the title repressive tolerance. And so what he said is that our society is tolerant, but it's repressive tolerance. The conservatives repress everything that they don't really want there to be free, like sex drugs and rock and roll. Exactly these things Charlie was just referencing, and so they have this whole repressive system that they claim is tolerant but the tolerance is extremely limited. And so he said what we're going to have and the answer that we're living in now is what he called liberating tolerance, which is literally in his own words, the punchline sentence is three paragraphs or so from the bottom that's the first sentence. Is it liberating tolerance? Would mean toleration being extended to movements from the left and being withdrawn from movements from the right. He doesn't mince words that's actually how he phrases it. I'm not, I'm not paraphrasing. That's actually the sentence. He's explicit and he explains why violence from the left is okay. Violence from the right or even the thought of violence from the right is not okay. And in fact, he says that the right doesn't just have to have tolerance withdrawn. It has to be censored and not even just censored. Pre censored. So the thought can't even enter their head. Of anything that might be reactionary or preserving of the society that they live in. And so there's another name for this, which is liberating tolerance or repressive tolerance. I don't care which one people use. And this is the world that we live in. This we live in Herbert marcuse's world. He was there like The Godfather of the left of today. All those 60s radicals who are the big Angela Davis, all these big power brokers that in their 60s and their 70s and their 80s now who are running college departments, they're running colleges, all of those guys were devotees of this guy 50 years ago. He was the hottest thing going. His books were selling 300,000 copies in the 60s. I mean, he was the biggest deal, and they're still referencing him. This is the world that we live in. And so this idea that they've created a false freedom while doing this is exactly what they do. Now why is it so embedded in the state? Well, besides the fact that, of course, marcuse is a Marxist and therefore the state. This is what I was talking about last night when I was saying this is a religion. And you have to understand, Hegel's view of religion that marks took to another level is that you have a perfect idea of the world, and that's like God the father. In fact, he called it the absolute idea and identified it with God. And then below that is you have how that comes into the world in practice and the material realm. And that, in Hegel's own words, his exact words is, the state is the divine idea as it exists on earth. Now, if you're a Christian, you know what the divine ideas that exist on earth was, or is, transcendently. The state plays the role of messianic savior for them. Their belief, if you understand that this is an old gnostic, magical religion is that the state is the demiurge. It is the thing that has the power to create the world that you want to have. Actually, it's a demonic world, and then that world is the new situation that people live in that creates the spirit of the world that they live in. And then they fight against that. And then there's a revolution that gives birth to a new idea. This is Hegel's idea. Hegel says that the idea gives birth to the state, the state actually, if you listen to Marx, what did he say? The state is going to assume absolute power. There will be a dictatorship of the proletariat. Lenin went on to say the true communism will arise when the state reaches its zenith. Its maximum of power at which point in Marx's words, it will wither away of its own accord. It will self sacrifice. The state and the leftist religion that nobody knows is a religion because they talked all the religious and magical elements and it is a magician heresy a religion into economics and politics where you don't see it as spiritual any longer. That's what marks did. The state is the element that is the savior, the messiah and it comes and it goes and it comes and it goes cyclically over and over and over again in a cyclical process of death and rebirth where you reborn your society's reborn more and more and more socialists on each turn. That's why they worship the state and when they start to lose, they start getting very explicit about it. Plus, unfortunately, they've miseducated. They say we have whitewashed education we have red washed education. We have educated our children for a generation or two, certainly the millennials certainly Gen Z, certainly whatever they're calling the centennials, they get demoted from the millennials. The next one down. They only get a hundred years behind them, I guess. Anyway, whatever there's certainly indoctrinating them to believe that as I heard in a podcast just the other day or a recording on the news just the other day, somebody sent me this young woman's talking and she says, everything that's a necessity of life. And she's like, food, shelter, medical care, education, Internet, clothing. Yeah, everything should be paid for by the government. It should be free. Now notice her stupid contradiction. It should be paid for by somebody but free. Uh huh. Somebody's missing a detail. Somebody's missing an important point. But what they see is that the state becomes the vehicle to save them. And this is why you saddle them with gigantic amounts of student loan debt and then you get the government to write a gigantic check to bail them out of it. This is why you saddle them. We want to talk about queer theory with transgender injury and destruction of their body. Absolute destructions of their bodies and their minds so they're going to be very expensive pharmaceutical patients for us for life also with your back subscription you're going to need. And what are they going to lobby for? Federal government paying for it. Socialized medicine. And now you have an entire lobbying base for a socialist policy. But history uses people then discards them. So what do you think they're going to do with those people after they get their policy agenda? And this is a pitiful story. This isn't an angry story. This is a sad story. These people are being used, but this is why they've been induced to worship the state as their savior literally as the Christ figure of a demented upside down perverted religion that they don't even know that their worshiping because they think it's about politics and identity and all this other junk..
The Charlie Kirk Show
The History of Really Horrible Ideas With Michael O'Fallon
"Back to what you talk about post Vatican two, kind of in this area, this kind of period of time. What was it about that period of time, marcuse, you know, that really thing started to become, you started to see institutions pop up around this kind of globalist point of view. Well, if you take a look back to that time period, we're talking about between the early 60s and mid 60s and late 60s to have several different things that were happening at the same time. Number one, you were in a post Stalin era in Russia. You had a change within what was happening within Marxism and communism throughout the world. Both with internationally within Vietnam within Central America within South America within different parts of Africa and so forth. And then as well, you had within Vatican the Vatican two situation, which was happening within the Roman Catholic Church, you had kind of a reimagining of the faith, the center of the catacombs that took place just the beginning of Vatican two. And that's with DOM helder Camara, with many others, were basically they were intentionally trying to move the church, the Roman Catholic Church, to understand it as a faith of the oppressed, which then that theme generatively is then constituted reconstituted within someone by the name of Paula Ferrari. It's a good friend of ours named doctor James Lincoln has been hitting that quite a bit later. In Paul ferreri would write the book the pedagogy of the oppressed. And then as well, the politics of education. And in chapter ten of the politics of education, you would see polyphonia start to basically introduce everyone to the concept that basically what basically what this is is a catechesis or a teaching of these things, not just through education, but as well, you need faith, too.
The Charlie Kirk Show
Charlie Welcomes Michael O'Fallon, Founder of Sovereign Nation
"Michael O'Fallon. Michael, welcome to the program. Thank you, it's good to be here. Introduce yourself to our audience. Michael Fallon, I founded sovereign nations back in 2017, I think really after a long many years of frustration and trying to get others, including my clients, to oppose what was going to be happening in this world. All over the world basically what you're looking at is a loss of national sovereignty or looking at a loss of your own individual sovereign rights. You're looking at a loss of the ability to have volitional control of your movement in the loss of cognitive liberty. So it's those things that we really had to come up and challenge. So we founded our organization back in 2017. The first conference we had a someone who'd known it ever heard of. By the name of doctor Jordan Peterson. No one had done it at the time. And I had him come and speak, and some others that had participated as well. But we took this on. And it's happening basically what you're looking at. And what we define the great reset. We're looking at basically a long march through the institutions as Rudy Deutsche would recall. I really don't speak to the German marxists for many years ago. It is well that urban marcuse would say that yes, deutsches concept of Walmart who the institutions is what is necessary. So in that basically at the same time, the founding of what would be called then later on, the World Economic Forum. So the founding of the World Economic Forum with the reconstitution of what was going to be happening with the United Nations, what was happening post Vatican two within the robo Catholic Church was happening at the world council churches was happening with all of these different movements both within Democrats within Republicans, basically making a shift back to more of a progressive mindset, especially after bretton Woods two, is that you had a pathway that would be taking our nation and our world in western civilization to basically resetting, if you will. And so that's something that I've been aware of for quite a long time. And I've been trying to resist the best I possibly can for the past 8 to 9 years.
77WABC Radio
"marcuse" Discussed on 77WABC Radio
"Was unaware of the contents. It's just another one of these great pieces. And I try to give attention to what I consider really well done thinking. Despite all the static that's out there. And this piece explains how we've now reached a point. Where you can say anything about men, anything about men. Period. But not about women. And you can say anything about quote unquote, white people are Caucasian. Anything. Anything. No matter how racist, no matter how poisonous, no matter how vital, but you dare not say those any other race. Period. And the author describes how we got to this point. Now there's some of this, by the way, in American Marxism. Herbert marcuse and other marxists, but it's part of the Marx society ideology, it came out of our colleges and universities, psychiatrists, psychologists, pseudo philosophers and scholars. If a country's majority white, which America is. And you trash the majority population. In a thousand different ways, and you degrade it and you demean it. Effectively what you're doing is destroying the country. You destroying the country. Because if the majority population in the country and you don't have to pick why you can pick others and you could go to the Asia, you can go to the continent of Africa. You can go to Europe, whatever you want. It doesn't matter. But if the majority population. Is worthless or you can pour all your hate and add a city. Into that group. Whether it's Jews in Israel, or whether it's white males, or whether it's Muslims in another country or whatever it is. You're destroying the country. And that's why the marxists embrace this. And you've seen it move from our colleges and universities. To student bodies. To journalism, the psychiatry and psychology. To politics. To politics. And those who have now institutionalized this methodology of destroying this country. Most of them are white elites. Phony white and electrons. That's who they are. And I want you to read this piece. I have elaborated beyond what the gentleman wrote, but still. It's very important. You're not white supremacists. Well, there's some out there. There's no question. But to try and paint tens of millions of Americans, whose white supremacists. Any more than you would try to paint millions if not tens of millions of blacks is one thing or Hispanics is one thing or Asians is one thing or what have you. Is grotesque racism? But this racism has a purpose, even beyond racism. You attack the founding. You attack the history. You attack the institution. You attack the law. You attack the traditions. You attack the values. You attack the family. You attack the faith. Because that's what you're doing. Obviously, this isn't to be confused with real. Clansmen and real neo Nazi activity in that sort of thing. But even I have a discussion about this. Is to walk on thumbtacks. Because in addition to this, there is the control of the language. What you can and can not say or how you are to speak or not to speak. Again, part of this Marxist ideology. I don't candy coat this stuff, folks. I'm not going to progressive and liberal. And I don't know why people are afraid of calling a Marxist but Marxist, but it is what it is. Now the insulting of tens of millions of Americans. Because this is the. Rational outcome of an irrational ideology. That is, you have to attack the party that most, if not best, but most stands up for the values of the country for the institutions of the country for the history of the country as ineffectively and imperfectly as the Republican Party does it. The Democrat party does not support those things. It is the vessel through which the American marxists, whether they be racists, whether they be, whatever they are. They vote, they support they operate. More when I return. Months, love in.
The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast
"marcuse" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast
"Guys, I'm really happy to welcome to the podcast Newt Gingrich. Man who needs no introduction, but he's the chairman of gingrich 360, a multimedia production company, former Speaker of the House of Representatives and architect of the well legendary contract with America in 1994, nude is also a Fox News contributor podcast host newt's world and syndicated columnist and his latest book, which we're going to be talking about defeating big government socialism, saving America's future, newt, welcome to the podcast, great to have you. You've been the architect of some of the pivotal strategies that have been deployed by the Republicans over the last few decades. I'd like your assessment of where we are as a country today because it seems like we're living in a different America. Than the one we lived in, let's just say in the post Reagan era, even in the Clinton era, and that things have become more decayed more debilitated, more divided than ever. Do you agree with that assessment or do you have maybe a more a different take? Well, I think that the easiest analogy is that we've had a cancer of anti American left wingers. Which first really began to show up in the early 1960s with the work of people like marcuse at Berkeley, the student free speech movement of Berkeley. The weatherman, the black Panthers who openly said that they were out to assassinate police and actually killed 13 policemen. The fact that there are something like a 180 cities burning in the late 1960s, there were 2500 bombings in, I think, 1970, 71, and there was a lot of stuff out there. And then the country sort of reacted to it. And Nixon silent majority turned out to be real. But it was captured for me and two of theater whites amazing books on the making of the president. In the 1968 making the president, he has a chapter on the news media, which you could write today. He says, here's the role of The New York Times. Here's the old Washington Post. Here's how far to the left they are, et cetera. So it was already locked in in 68. And in 72, he wrote a sentence, which I thought was amazingly prescient. He said the problem of govern head and the reason he couldn't cut a deal. Was that, in the left, that liberal ideology had become a liberal theology.
The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast
Newt Gingrich Joins Dinesh to Talk About Biden's America
"Guys, I'm really happy to welcome to the podcast Newt Gingrich. Man who needs no introduction, but he's the chairman of gingrich 360, a multimedia production company, former Speaker of the House of Representatives and architect of the well legendary contract with America in 1994, nude is also a Fox News contributor podcast host newt's world and syndicated columnist and his latest book, which we're going to be talking about defeating big government socialism, saving America's future, newt, welcome to the podcast, great to have you. You've been the architect of some of the pivotal strategies that have been deployed by the Republicans over the last few decades. I'd like your assessment of where we are as a country today because it seems like we're living in a different America. Than the one we lived in, let's just say in the post Reagan era, even in the Clinton era, and that things have become more decayed more debilitated, more divided than ever. Do you agree with that assessment or do you have maybe a more a different take? Well, I think that the easiest analogy is that we've had a cancer of anti American left wingers. Which first really began to show up in the early 1960s with the work of people like marcuse at Berkeley, the student free speech movement of Berkeley. The weatherman, the black Panthers who openly said that they were out to assassinate police and actually killed 13 policemen. The fact that there are something like a 180 cities burning in the late 1960s, there were 2500 bombings in, I think, 1970, 71, and there was a lot of stuff out there. And then the country sort of reacted to it. And Nixon silent majority turned out to be real. But it was captured for me and two of theater whites amazing books on the making of the president. In the 1968 making the president, he has a chapter on the news media, which you could write today. He says, here's the role of The New York Times. Here's the old Washington Post. Here's how far to the left they are, et cetera. So it was already locked in in 68. And in 72, he wrote a sentence, which I thought was amazingly prescient. He said the problem of govern head and the reason he couldn't cut a deal. Was that, in the left, that liberal ideology had become a liberal theology.
The Eric Metaxas Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show
"If you change your mind. Take a chance on me if you need me. Hey folks, welcome. We are talking to well, right now I will be talking to the author of a new book, fire in the streets, how you can confidently respond to incendiary cultural topics. You know what I'm talking about incendiary. I think you know, or you'll know as the conversation goes along, but my guest is the author of the book, doctor Douglas, wrote ice. He's a Professor of philosophy at Denver seminary. He's been on this program before doctor grote heist. Welcome back. Thank you. Happy to be here. You've written many books. You've written a lot of things. We've talked to you about a lot of things. But this book is about what everybody unfortunately is talking about and needs help with. So since we need help with it, that's the fortunate part. But it is unfortunate that we're living in a time where there is so much rancor on basic cultural issues. So let me ask you what led you to write a book called fire in the streets, how you can confidently respond to incendiary cultural topics. Typically, a philosophy for professor would not write on that. Well, it was the riots of 2020 because I was getting a lot of requests to be on radio programs and podcasts and so on to try to explain what was going on. And I realized this came out of a certain philosophy. It didn't come out of nowhere, and I was familiar with Marxism and critical theory and critical race theory. So what I wanted to do is try to get to the bottom of it, philosophically and theologically get to the root of it and not just the slogans or the images of riots or the images of police interacting with black men and so on. I really wanted to understand this whole ideology behind the riots. That was my rule. You are a Christian. You write as a Christian, I'm mystified and horrified that many churches and many in the Christian community have embraced critical race theory or at least open the door to it, not seeming not to understand that it is by definition Marxist atheist. They don't seem to have bothered to see that at that level. It's incompatible with faith. It doesn't represent what the great tradition of Christian faith. So is that where we start just defining something like that? Yeah, I do. I talk about Marxism that Marxism is intrinsically atheistic that it tries to bring heaven to earth without God and therefore creates a kind of hell on earth as we saw in the 20th century with the Marxism of the USSR and China on Cambodia and so on. So critical race theory is not classic Marxism because it expands the categories of those who are oppressed to sexual minorities and people of color. And we really have Herbert marcuse, the philosopher of the new left to thank for that. Because marcuse and his fellow philosophers in the Frankfurt school realized that Marx's predictions did not come true. Workers around the world did not revolt against the oppressive bourgeois. And so they had to try to figure out a way to make people in basically free countries. Discontent with the present situation. So they kept the Marxist idea of pitting one group against the other, but now it was more the white male oppressors against everyone else. So it retains two basic features from Marxism, one is this idea of a conflict worldview and conflict according to groups. So group identification is the most significant thing about you, that is your economic grouping, your racial grouping, your sexual preference grouping. And the second key thing it takes from Marxism is the idea that only the revolutionary Vanguard can understand society as it really is. So with Marxism, we have the idea that most people suffer from what they call false consciousness. They don't know how the oppression matrix works. So the Marxist, the ones have been illuminated by the sacred writings of Marx and engels and so on. Can tell us the real problem of society, which is fundamentally economic. Now with critical race theory, which is sometimes called cultural Marxism or neo Marxism, there's still that idea that the people who are supposedly oppressed have a unique and reliable vantage point on what is going on in society and the oppressors, the ones with white privilege, the white supremacists really have no voice in the matter at all. And this goes back to marcuse as well, because I think you know Eric, he wrote this essay called repressive tolerance. And the idea was the oppressors should not be given a voice in the marketplace. They don't deserve free speech. They have to be squashed. They have to be silenced. And now we're seeing this today through cancel culture. And through the censorship of free speech. So if you hold to this neo Marxist perspective, you don't believe in the founding ideals of the United States. You don't believe an individual equality before God that should be recognized by the civil government, you don't believe in the First Amendment, which gives us the 5 freedoms, including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press, assembly, and to petition the government for the redress of wrong. So what I'm trying to argue is that while Christians and everybody should be concerned about racial justice and a more just society, critical race theory is not the place to go for this at all. In fact, not only is it not the place to go, but it is making the problem worse. I think we have to be clear when you described it as you did so beautifully. It sounds like what the Nazis did. In other words, it's in its unavoidably divisive number one. It pits one group against the others. It demonizes one group. And of course, that always feels good if I can blame someone for my suffering. It feels good. But we know that that's a satanic project. We know that the Bible says, I'm a sinner, and I am to blame, and the idea that I could blame someone else point someplace beside myself that's instantly not squaring with the biblical view of things. But the idea of demonizing a group and of seeing things along racial lines or tribalist lines is also not biblical. But of course, you see it through history. It's exactly what the Nazis did. And the idea of cancel culture, you were just talking about it. It's the opposite of grace. It says, let's find something that you say, aha. Satan the accuser. Let's find something you said to squash you to crush you to demonize you to make you go away. Instead of the Christian idea, which would be that we have grace. We all make mistakes. We all say things, maybe we would want to put it different way. And we have to have grace for each other because we want people to have grace for us. Those ideas don't exist in critical race theory or in cultural Marxism. No, not really because you have this fundamental division between the oppressors and the oppressed. And you add to this, the idea of intersectionality, so there are multiple indicators of oppression, race would be one gender as one sexual preference is another. And so people who are, let's say, Tripoli oppressed of being a black woman, lesbian, has to be favored and then society as a whole, or at least the oppressors, the white people who are trying to exercise control over everyone..
LGBTQ&A
"marcuse" Discussed on LGBTQ&A
"Other article was on the question of how gender equality is inherent to capitalism, and that was inspired very much by the ideas the philosophical ideas of my mental or Herbert marcuse, but I suppose I can say briefly that as someone who had been active for quite a long time and who had been rushing around from one rally to the next and trying to engage in intellectual labor at the same time, this was really the first time that I had the opportunity to reflect deeply on this question of gender. I don't want to oversimplify things at all, but do you think you might not have found your way to becoming such a significant figure in the ambulance movement? How do you not spend time behind bars? You know, I'm not sure how to answer that question. For one, I don't really consider myself so significant as an individual. I see all of the work that I've done in relation to abolition and other movements as a part of collective struggles. So I don't know whether I would have played exactly the same role, had I not gone to jail, but I like to think that there would not have been any major a difference in the role that I played. You know, whether, you know, whether I would have become a known figure or not, probably not. Probably hardly anyone would have known my name, had it not been for the incredibly phenomenal movement that was organized all over this country and all over the world, and so I like to think of myself as standing in for that movement, you know, rather than as an individual who has the kind of distinctive qualities that would lead to becoming unknown person. And isn't that the great irony too of arresting you and putting you on trial is that it did make you this international rockstar, right? And you were able to use that celebrity to become even more effective in your work. I have to say that I did not welcome that role. And I still feel a bit uncomfortable. You're very humble. Well, tell me this. The first place you were housed was the women's House of detention, and you've written extensively about what a queer place that prison was. I could not tell though if you were out and aware of your own sexuality at that time, how aware were you or how were you thinking about it? Well, I, you know, cringe when I look at, you know, some of the language that I use in describing life in the women's House of detention and how I was often critical of the way that some of the women seem more interested in hooking up in personal relationships and developing surrogate family formations than organizing against the jail administration. I mean, that was how I, you know, I saw my major identity as political. And to a certain extent, I still do. I didn't identify as queer at the time. It would be many years before this identification would become meaningful for me as an individual, but I do think that spending time in the house of women's house of detention, the house of D we called it, and being inside a queer culture had had an impact on me. Had a great impact on me. I was wondering that because in your autobiography, which amazingly was edited by Toni Morrison, you do not mention you're a sexuality, but the book was published in 1974, and I didn't know if including your own sexuality would have been an option.
Dennis Prager Podcasts
"marcuse" Discussed on Dennis Prager Podcasts
"Anti. The book is the devil's pleasure palace. It is up at Dennis prager dot com, and it's the original publication in paperback or is it in both horrid hardcore and Kindle and Kindle as well. And I'm recording the audiobook right now as a matter of fact. Well, not this section. Which is not easy. Oh, it's much harder than it looks. Oh, I gave up. No, no, no. Harper Collins asked me to record my book on America and americanism, and it took me two hours to do the introduction and I thought I can't do this. Yeah, well, we have done two sessions already. We have the last session today, and I think we'll get the book finished today. Well, congratulations. It is a real challenge. Anyway, however you get it it is worth reading and it is clear. This is so I have dated this reductionism and this antithesis to western culture to the end of the 19th century again with Germans coming over. But the critical theory was sort of the nail in the coffin, and that's after World War I. Yes, it sits formulated by two men in particular. Antonio gramsci, an Italian Protestant. And georg lukacs, who was a Jewish Hungarian, and the two of them were reacting to the destruction of the First World War. Let's face it. The First World War actually ended western civil rights. That's right. We're just playing it out now. But they resented what had happened, and they were searching for a way to finish it off, essentially. Lukac asks famously at one point, who will save us from western culture. And they developed this notion that everything can be under attack. Gramsci invented the idea of the long march through the institutions that they were will use the M word cultural marxists who realized that the Marxist economic scientific theory wasn't going to work. They could see it not working already in the Soviet Union. It didn't take hold in Germany. It didn't take hold in Britain. But they felt a better way would be to use Marxist principles against the culture itself rather than strictly confining them to the economy. Right. And this was a very appealing to whom in America. Why didn't they come over and American professors say, what are you kidding? We love western civilization. Why didn't they say that? Mister good question, because it happened right after the war, the second generation of front fritters, intellectual generation, mocks horkheimer, Eric fromm, Herbert marcuse, who you'll remember as I do from our college days when he was tremendously influential. Wilhelm Reich, marcuse was once asked, what do you love anything about America? Do you know what his answer was? Well, besides, no, what? No, no, he had an answer. The mountains, the rivers. Yeah, well, adorno came to California as did a lot of the refugees from Hitler during the war period. And he hated California. And as I say in the book, how can you hate California? Especially then. Especially then. When it was perfect. Right. So these guys were just malcontent miserable. That's right. Sodding human beings. They are, they are forgive me forgive me Michael. I just want to say they are the embodiment of the unhappy make the world worse. That's exactly right. Because there is no replacement to critical theory. There is only the destruction. And the way we got into this subject, in fact, this talk a little bit about the background of the course. Roger Kimball, my publisher, encounter, colleague, and a friend at PJ media. And I had been kicking around a book and I said, I really want to write a book about God and Satan. After my own personal experience with you and I have talked about, I began to question a lot of religious tenets and my own faith, Catholicism in this case. So I wanted to get into the battle between good and evil. And I felt that the one way in was through art. So it's the central thesis of this book that art, the narrative, the heroic narrative, which is actually the foundation of individualism, which is a western characteristic, is implanted in us by God, and that this actually manifests itself in the religions that we practice. I go into more detail and I want to board the audience with that right now. But the way in was, for me, reading Paradise lost again, which I love, Milton's great poem. And then looking for the counter Paradise lost, which was, of course, Goethe's Faust, so we had a poem about God, and we had a poem about the devil. And their interaction, I used as the prism for this work of really cultural criticism. That's precisely what it is. Right. And that's so that's how it happened. Do you talk about this personal crisis at all, or is it something you like to keep person? Well, I don't talk about it in this book. No, no, no, but I'm saying you mentioned it in passing. I am aware of it, but I don't know if you. Well, you and I talked about it on the air. Yes, a couple of years ago. My daughter died very suddenly. Inter sleep at the age of 22. On Christmas Day with her impeccable dramatic timing a few years back. So that's probably the worst thing that can ever happen to anybody. And after that, nothing bad can happen to you. The book is the devil's pleasure palace. Michael Walsh for a cultural editor at Time Magazine is written this very important book. How did we get where we are? How did we get to this nihilism that dominates the university? And came through Columbia. Guess where I went? We'll be back in a moment. The book is up at Dennis prager dot com. You're listening to the Dennis prager show..
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
Prof. James Lindsay Describes the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory
"This before, but I have to do it again for the record across all of the stations, the 300 stations we broadcast to the millions of listers and viewers because it really, to this day I find it shocking James that you really, and I did this in my second book. You can really map the thinkers of the new left. You can map the individuals who came up with these dastardly ideas. They have names. They have schools. They have institutions that they penetrated. So let's start with the basics. Who peopled the Frankfurt school and what did they believe in? So give us some of the big names and what they thought of western civilization. Okay, so the Frankfurt school for the listeners who don't know is that the institute for social research that was set up at guard to university in Frankfurt, Germany. That's why it's called the Frankfurt school. Its original name was the institute for Marxism, but its financiers like Felix veal thought that that was a little bit too on the nose. And so they changed the name to the institute for social research. The kind of big players at the time would have included in the formative years before it actually came together. And he went to prison. Antonio gramsci, the Italian Marxist who basically outlined the idea of the long march to the institutions as it later got named, but he was only kind of tangential. The other big names that have been Gustav von schmoller, for example, and George Lucas laying the architecture, working with max horkheimer, who became one of the most significant directors in the late 1920s through the 1940s, Theodor adorno, Herbert marcuse, these are major influential names and figures in 20th century Marxism. And their goal was to reinvent Marxism to take over the western context rather than peasant societies like Russia and China. Because and correct me if I'm getting this wrong, but people like gramsci and others saw this success of Marxist ideology in very backward third world nations very agrarian post feudalistic ones like China in 48 and saris thrasher in 17, but they saw an incapacity of Marx's amox marxian ideas to gain traction in well developed a first world nations with a strong judeo Christian basis. So their idea was, there isn't going to be a class consciousness suddenly erupting in a revolution, therefore we have to subvert existing institutions from the outside. Is
The Eric Metaxas Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show
"The issue for me is that there are many Christian pastors who shrink from dealing with this. I'm more upset by them than I am at those involved in the cancel culture because I feel like if you're involved in the council culture, you don't even believe in the principles of truth or freedom, but there are many pastors that are dramatically unlike you, for example. Let me speak to that as a pastor. One of the problems that pastors have is they want to be very welcoming. They want to make sure that everybody feels at home and welcome. And so they're very hesitant to speak about issues. Now the way in which I deal with that is, I unlike you, do not necessarily endorse political candidates or political parties, but I speak on issues and one of the things I point out in this book is when you stop to think of it, people say, I want to stay out of politics, but is there a single issue in politics that doesn't have its basis in morality and moral issues? So if we're going to be faithful as pastors, we have to speak to the controlling realities of the culture. Whether it's the LGBTQ agenda, whether or not it's what's going on in our schools, what's going on in law, even the issue of cancel culture, we need to speak to these and we should speak about it with brokenness and humility, but it is, as you well know, bahn hoffer said that to be silent is also to speak. So we can't now many people tell me pastor Luther, I live in a church which is like a bubble. The culture is collapsing around us, but you'd never know it from what is happening in the church because they're acting as if everything has been the same in the last 30 years. So what we need to do is and the reason I wrote the book is to help Christians think through what the issues are and how we should respond to
Bloomberg Radio New York
"marcuse" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"It's okay it's okay it's okay it's okay TMZ reports the singer known as nightbird died after a long battle of cancer 31 year old James marchi reportedly died on Sunday The young woman blew America's Got Talent viewers away with her rendition of an original song called it's okay The performance earned her a rare golden buzzer from judge Simon Cowell Unfortunately marcuse had to pull out from the competition mid season so she could focus on her health AGT judge Howie Mandel tweeted Monday that night bird was such a bright inspirational light and we must continue to live and learn from her words and lyrics I'm Lisa Taylor And I'm Karen chase from the Bloomberg newsroom U.S. stock markets were shuttered today because of the president's day holiday They reopened tomorrow but overseas markets were open and running and it wasn't pretty The FTSE in London closed down 29 points The cac and Paris dropped 141 and the Dax in Germany fell 311 Both losing more than 2% of their value Oil rose and as leading market participants said they expect global demand to continue its powerful recovery from the pandemic West Texas intermediate gained toward $92 a barrel after a brief dip as Saudi Aramco the world's largest producer said its signs that demand is rising especially in Asia Port congestion is slowing down the delivery of almost everything from iron ore to electronics Bloomberg's Charlie tell it has the story Karen it is forcing companies to rely more on stockpiled inventories for goods that is now taking a week to ten days longer to deliver iron ore supplies into China compared with before the pandemic according to charterers and ship owners They say that's because of tightened COVID-19 quarantine requirements for vessels and reduced manpower at ports adding to the problem the situation in Hong Kong as it battles one of its most challenging COVID-19 outbreaks Karen Activist investor Carl icahn made good on his threat to name two directors to the McDonald's board escalating a dispute over what he claims is mistreatment of pigs in the restaurant company's supply chain Icon proposed the two candidates to stand for election at this year's annual meeting and McDonald's said it'll evaluate the nominees as it would with any other potential board members Icon is taking the fast food chain to task because he says its suppliers house pregnant pigs in small crates a practice he argues is inhumane Global news 24 hours a day On air and on Bloomberg quicktake Powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries I'm Karen chase And this is Bloomberg.
77WABC Radio
"marcuse" Discussed on 77WABC Radio
"Among others a genuine by the name of Herbert marcuse escaped Nazi Germany came to the United States He was a communist a Marxist Part of the Frankfurt school although he was never in Frankfort he was in heidelberg Regardless And he started to stir things up He became a tenured professor Three different Ivy League schools And he developed first of all he was confounded he was up 30s said I don't understand and he was struggling with it First of all why Hitler was to overtake after the Weimar Republican not communism It was something that confounded him He was also concerned that marks had suggested that the industrial revolution would also result in the proletariat that people rising up and overthrowing the government And so forth instead the industrial revolution in the opposite As we've talked about before created a mass of middle class People who go to war to protect this country and its economic system in our liberty So that bothers the marxists too So they can't seem to rally a significant percentage of the population to their cause So what did they do They aimed their cause among other things at minorities
Mark Levin
Marxist Herbert Marcuse Failed to Rally the Massess, so He Targeted Minorities
"Among others a genuine by the name of Herbert marcuse escaped Nazi Germany came to the United States He was a communist a Marxist Part of the Frankfurt school although he was never in Frankfort he was in heidelberg Regardless And he started to stir things up He became a tenured professor Three different Ivy League schools And he developed first of all he was confounded he was up 30s said I don't understand and he was struggling with it First of all why Hitler was to overtake after the Weimar Republican not communism It was something that confounded him He was also concerned that marks had suggested that the industrial revolution would also result in the proletariat that people rising up and overthrowing the government And so forth instead the industrial revolution in the opposite As we've talked about before created a mass of middle class People who go to war to protect this country and its economic system in our liberty So that bothers the marxists too So they can't seem to rally a significant percentage of the population to their cause So what did they do They aimed their cause among other things at minorities
The Charlie Kirk Show
"marcuse" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"A question about. hey charlie. Who's the author of the new left. Who's behind all of this so really important question now. There isn't a single person. go to karl marx. You can go to hey goal and the haley dialectic and the long march institutions and a german historisches view of our experience in our existence but there is one person that every conservative should become familiar with now. I want to give a hat tip to the great newt. Gingrich newt gingrich did something back in two thousand twelve where he insistently introduced the author and the activist saul alinsky into the mainstream of the conservative movement. When i go to republican lincoln. Reagan dinners when. I go to tea party. Meetings truly don't exist anymore. When i go to any sort of function and i say saul alinsky. I'd say seventy or eighty percent of the room knows who i'm talking about now. Actually i've been going across the country. Speaking at churches you'd be amazed at how few churches know who saul. Alinsky is a man who wrote rules for radicals thirteen. We've covered them extensively on the show and the dedication. That book was to lucifer. Who he said was the first ever rebel trying to tell me. We're not spiritual war. Oh charlie it's just a bunch of matter versus matter notes not to spiritual work. They admit it's a spiritual war now. The man who is the architect of a lot of chaos. You're living through the man who is largely responsible for a lot of the academic backing of is a man by the name of herbert markova using the frankfurt school. He was a communist. That was kicked out of the frankfurt. School in germany found a safe space and the united states of america taught at harvard. Columbia brandeis and eventually settled the university of san diego. He was the architect of what is now known as the new left. It's very helpful to study history. We do that a lot on this program. History can be our guide. I believe history changed right around. Nineteen sixty as soon as the new left started to get power students for a democratic society which eventually became weather underground. Run by william ayers a terrorist who became a college professor and still is a college professor university illinois. Chicago bernardine dohrn. They tried to bomb federal buildings legitimate direction. Est and then they became professors to teach your children because they started the realize and recognize. You've be much more patient than just blowing buildings up the kind of wise aged statesman. I used those words. Ironically because he was anything but wise. I guess he was aged. Was herbert mark. Coosa came from germany. He was the man who clarified the adolescence. That was inherent in one thousand nine hundred sixties. Leftism now a lot of you might be saying. Charlie what has to do with now every single one in his propositions was adopted and has been implemented by the people who are educating children. Running the fbi running the cia. And yes even. Joe biden and john kerry are in some ways disciples of herbert mark usa. So herbert makusa wrote a very famous essay called repressive tolerance. Now if you really want to confuse yourself go read repressive tolerance. I read it so you didn't have to. There's a series of these essays that happened in the nineteen sixties. Where again my argument is that this change things permanently the nineteen sixties of black feminism of second wave feminism of identity politics. It changed the way we did. American politics for so for so long that now here we are sixty years later finally feeling the implemented effects of it. That's how long it took for us to finally wake up and go to a school board meeting and say something about it so herber. Marco's wrote a series of books as well he wrote a book called one dimensional man. Not gonna get into that right now. He also wrote a book called eros and civilization. Mikey can fact check me. The factors clarified i think's eros and civilization arrows. One of the greek forms of love their store. Gay filet o. Aeros and a a store gay is a love. Between a mother and a father eros romantic type love a sexual type love fillet o. Is a brotherly love. I'm over simplifying this by the way just so everyone's clear. The greek types of had been written extensively by christian theologians for years. My pastor rob mccoy talks about this rather eloquently but i'm summarizing but marquette said the most important part of human existence is the arrows. The romantic the sexual drive until we sexually revolutionize society. You're not actually free. So herbert markouzi argued that we are all living in a tyrannical society. He said this in the nineteen sixties. He said we're living in a tyrannical society. Because for example people call themselves men and call themselves women and no one told them to do that. That social norms and customs are actually repressing people. This is why he called repressive tolerance her markouzi believe in a thing called frame theory and an unlimited amount of ways to interpret existence. He believed that as soon as people are able to do whatever they wanna do however they want to do it sexually than men or mankind will reach its highest level of existence. This is where we get the transgender debate from the abortion debate from this where we get the birth control debate from or argument from where a lot of these ideas started the germany. So herber mark ouza wrote this article repressive tolerance which kind of gave a lot of credibility to what is best known as the port huron statement by the adolescent apparatchik left. That wasn't really sure what they were saying but they knew something was wrong and they're willing to do something about it and there's one part of this article that i want to focus on which i think is exactly where we are headed right now. There's one part of this article by the grandfather of the the new left. herbert mark. Kusa that we are that really. We're seeing right now before you only further. Herbert mark had disciples like socrates taught. Plato plato aristotle. Aristotle taught alexander the great now those were all very virtuous people not so virtuous is the disciple of herbert marquette. A woman by the name of angela. Davis i have a personal mission to quote. Make angela davis famous again. Angela davis these be known by every american conservative family. If you don't know who. Angela davis says you are not playing on the terms of their debate. Angela davis is a bitter angry. It'd be careful what other words i use. Clever treacherous deceitful yet. Highly effective academic who is a devout marxist and communist. Angela davis i think she's still teaches in the uc system. We can check that out. She was the era parent to her markers. In fact there's actually videos you can look up online between the two. Some are cusack wrote this. He said where society has entered the phase of total administration and indoctrination. Let's stop there. What did he mean by total administration. Indoctrination he said once the civil service and the bureaucracies and the colleges and the media are controlling everything. And we've indoctrinated everyone then this is about to happen. This would then be a small number indeed and not necessarily that of elected representatives of.
The Charlie Kirk Show
German Philosopher Herbert Marcuse Was the Architect of the New Left
"The author of the new left. Who's behind all of this so really important question now. There isn't a single person. go to karl marx. You can go to hey goal and the haley dialectic and the long march institutions and a german historisches view of our experience in our existence but there is one person that every conservative should become familiar with now. I want to give a hat tip to the great newt. Gingrich newt gingrich did something back in two thousand twelve where he insistently introduced the author and the activist saul alinsky into the mainstream of the conservative movement. When i go to republican lincoln. Reagan dinners when. I go to tea party. Meetings truly don't exist anymore. When i go to any sort of function and i say saul alinsky. I'd say seventy or eighty percent of the room knows who i'm talking about now. Actually i've been going across the country. Speaking at churches you'd be amazed at how few churches know who saul. Alinsky is a man who wrote rules for radicals thirteen. We've covered them extensively on the show and the dedication. That book was to lucifer. Who he said was the first ever rebel trying to tell me. We're not spiritual war. Oh charlie it's just a bunch of matter versus matter notes not to spiritual work. They admit it's a spiritual war now. The man who is the architect of a lot of chaos. You're living through the man who is largely responsible for a lot of the academic backing of is a man by the name of herbert markova using the frankfurt school. He was a communist. That was kicked out of the frankfurt. School in germany found a safe space and the united states of america taught at harvard. Columbia brandeis and eventually settled the university of san diego. He was the architect of what is now known as the new left.
77WABC Radio
"marcuse" Discussed on 77WABC Radio
"They couldn't understand when there was a battle between fascism and what would become the Third Reich. And the Reds and communism that Hitler won out and the Communists found And it's bothered the man. And the boys at the Franklin School for a long time. He escapes Berlin. He eventually comes to the United States. He is a professor in at least three of our high institutions. This is Marcus. He writes these really dumb books. I'm going to talk about some of this on Sunday on my fracture. And I'm going to show you some of these books. And they're cited in my book American Marxism because I want you to know what's going on and who these people are. And he writes what used to be considered really fringe crazy stuff. Comes up a critical theory. Which is what Weingarten knows nothing about, but it's trying to touch on Starting in the law schools. Then moving to the colleges. Critical theory, the legal theory that all of our laws All of our laws are unjust. Because we have an unjust country founded unjustly. On the backs of indigenous peoples when the backs of slaves and so forth and so on. So the law itself The law itself is to be Denounced. Denounced. The whole legal structure in the countries to be denounced because It is enshrined and set in place to discriminate against people. Now from that grew the new left movement that Marcus was also involved. And one of the books, he wrote, was very appealing to the new left. Too many people who became buddies with Barack No house Benito Obama. The weather underground for the students for Democratic action. All of them. Marcus was a hero, Communist and a hero. And he preached violence. And he basically gave up on the masses the proletariat because, he said, and he wrote, Look. I saw it in Germany. I see it in America. The masses are not going to rise up and overthrow. The government. So we need to create a group of revolutionaries and elites who will overthrow the government. Insinuating themselves into all these key fields. Into these key areas. He is considered. The father of the new left movement. It was the anti war movement that was the rights in the late on the sixties and the seventies. And then He reached further. He saw during the sixties racial strife. I said, Hey, I have an idea. Racial strife. That's one of the ways we can attack this. So it takes this issue of race and racism. And he builds it into this Marxist model. When I call American Marxism, one of these models And he wraps it in some scholarship. These ideas are very broad, but their fundamental And they're picked up by a few individuals. One gentleman in particular. Derek Bell. He's a law professor winds up at Harvard. Thomas Soul has written about direct bill that he was subpar intellectual. Poor writer, any poor thinker, among other things. He was considered fringe even by Harvard Standard. So he develops further this idea of race. And Marxism. And they called it Critical race theory rather than just critical theory. Critical race theory. Making sense, Mr. Producer we able to follow all this. In the book and more. Developed way, but I'm on radio and I got to do what I got to do so This was picked up by a number of law professors at Harvard at Stanford and other places. Still considered cook French stuff. His view was not just the law. Not just the law. Is unjust and can never be just given who wrote it and who implemented it. But society The entire culture. Is to be damned. Because Of systemic white racism and the white dominant society not only made the laws And made the whole damn country. And the society and the culture. Everything needs to be seen through the lens of White supremacy, white domination white privilege. Everything needs to be seen through the lens. Have race. Because that, he says, is the reality. And he dismisses any criticism. Whatsoever. Because of you criticize him. Or his students or his colleagues or his writings. Which are a mess, But if he criticized them, it just demonstrates that you're a white racist. And if you aren't quite as I've said before, it just demonstrates that you've been conquered. Psychologically by white Racists. You're part of the problem so we don't need to listen to you. We're not interested in an exchange. We're not interested in a debate. We're not interested in what you have to say. We're not interested in your ideas because you are a racist or you are a creation of a racist society. That is what your kids are being taught. And more. They're teaching your eight year olds that they're part of the The racist oppressors. Explain this in the beginning of the book, oppressor oppressed. This book is now in the hands of virtually every host. Except a few and Fox. Many, many radio talk show hosts. It's been in their hands for a little bit. Columnists think tanks and so forth. And I say in the book, as I've said on the air here over the last three months They create the scenario. Of the oppressed and the oppressor, because that's what marks did. And I used the plain English because we can talk about proletariat bourgeoisie, and I do that, too. But That's the bottom line. So president oppressor If you're an eight year old white kid, you're part of the oppressor class. And if you're not a white kid, you're part of the oppressed class. Now, this is your mindset. This is how you need to think for the rest of your lives. If you're to have careers, this is the way you're supposed to look at your careers. This is the way you must look at the American society. Or is the statistics to prove this?.
Mark Levin
Herbert Marcuse's Influence on Marxism in America
"This is Marcus. He writes these really dumb books. I'm going to talk about some of this on Sunday on my fracture. And I'm going to show you some of these books. And they're cited in my book American Marxism because I want you to know what's going on and who these people are. And he writes what used to be considered really fringe crazy stuff. Comes up a critical theory. Which is what Weingarten knows nothing about, but it's trying to touch on Starting in the law schools. Then moving to the colleges. Critical theory, the legal theory that all of our laws All of our laws are unjust. Because we have an unjust country founded unjustly. On the backs of indigenous peoples when the backs of slaves and so forth and so on. So the law itself The law itself is to be Denounced. Denounced. The whole legal structure in the countries to be denounced because It is enshrined and set in place to discriminate against people. Now from that grew the new left movement that Marcus was also involved. And one of the books, he wrote, was very appealing to the new left. Too many people who became buddies with Barack No house Benito Obama. The weather underground for the students for Democratic action. All of them. Marcus was a hero, Communist and a hero. And he preached