35 Burst results for "Marco Rubio"

Caller: Sen. Marco Rubio Is a 'Coward' for His No Fly Zone Definition

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:29 min | 2 months ago

Caller: Sen. Marco Rubio Is a 'Coward' for His No Fly Zone Definition

"Feel very strongly here that we should do the best we can to the Ukraine. We have an agreement to say by the security and when they gave up their news, they trusted us and we owe it to them. Right. And to see these citizens being butchered really makes us sick and we feel that Rubio is a coward to make everyone frighten it as World War three if we use our military to do anything. So you think you think you don't think Putin would use any nuclear option? If he's such a man man, he'll use it at some point because wait a minute, so why is Rubio a coward to point that out? Ruby always a coward because he is saying that it will be World War three. If we Putin starts nuking the United States, what would you call that, James? Military at any time. I'm sorry. We can't use my military because I'll always be World War three. And if we had stopped Hitler early, millions of people would have been I'll tell you. I appreciate all your talking points. James, and hey, James, will you take a breath, please, and let's talk to each other instead of at each other. Helping Ukraine. For God's sakes, there's going to be a bloodbath in Taiwan if we don't step up to the

Rubio Putin Ukraine James Ruby United States Hitler Taiwan
What Does a 'No Fly Zone' Mean in Ukraine?

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:20 min | 2 months ago

What Does a 'No Fly Zone' Mean in Ukraine?

"How directly involved do you want the United States to be? Welcome in to a special edition this Wednesday, march the 16th episode of the Mike Gallagher show. As always, we're in the relief factor dot com studios. You know, I'm not sure a lot of people recognize what a no fly zone means. Senator Marco Rubio did a great job explaining this. It only takes about 20 seconds. I'm getting a lot. And I feel like the American people are divided on this. Usually I can sense when we are leaning one way or the other. I think we're split right down the middle in terms of getting involved militarily or escalating our level of involvement. Yesterday, Biden signed a big government spending bill, a government funding bill, $1.5 trillion. That keeps the federal government open through September, but also sends billions of dollars of aid to

Senator Marco Rubio Mike Gallagher United States Biden Federal Government
Jack Posobiec Shares His Thoughts on the Bio-Labs in Ukraine

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:50 min | 2 months ago

Jack Posobiec Shares His Thoughts on the Bio-Labs in Ukraine

"More. Jack, welcome back to the program. Hey Charlie, I was a pleasure. So Jack, what is the truth behind the bio laboratories in Ukraine? There seems to be a lot of chatter about it. Victoria Nuland talked about it in her discussion with Marco Rubio, are these Soviet relics? Are they active? Was the United States involved in it? Was their potential gain of function research? The floor is yours. Well, Charlie, when it comes down to these bioweapons, you know, normally, if we hadn't lived through the events of the last two years, I would be so willing to just say, of course, these are simply, you know, diagnostic testing centers. There's nothing going on here. Don't worry about it. But what we've learned about the NIH is funding and what they were doing through eco health alliance in Wuhan, right? That has given me to the point where I do not trust these people anymore. I don't trust them when it comes to their statements. I don't trust them when it comes to them saying that they're not conducting shady research and foreign laboratories. Like we saw them do in Wuhan. So the question then becomes, why was it? It simply arrested this, right? I thought this entire thing was some ridiculous Russian or Chinese disinfo campaign, try to take the heat off of Wuhan, try to throw some of the Iraq War rhetoric back on our faces. And then all of a sudden, Victoria Nuland comes out and says, well, we have to be very careful about letting any of these research materials get into the hands of the Russians. And the minute she said that, the entire narrative shifted because wait a minute, if what's in there is active, this isn't just stuff that's on ice or something that's very deep underground, that there is something in there that could potentially be used. And then Marco Rubio again responds saying, well, if something was used, it would be by the Russians. Of course, of course, if you used by the Russians. So let me get this straight. What exactly is the magical thinking of the mainstream media now? And I saw you know all these like debunk pieces that have come out. It's this magical thinking that says there's no bioweapons, but even if there are, it's definitely Russians. How does this

Victoria Nuland Wuhan Charlie Marco Rubio Eco Health Alliance Jack Ukraine NIH United States Iraq
Reading Angry Texts From Listeners Regarding Ukraine Biolabs Report

Mike Gallagher Podcast

00:57 sec | 2 months ago

Reading Angry Texts From Listeners Regarding Ukraine Biolabs Report

"And here's one four two three area code. This is a good one. On the bio lab report, what an uninformed blathering idiot you are, you carry the mainstream media narrative far too well for it to be accidental, you lying turd. Well, okay. Nice to talk to you. Thank you. Have a good day. Again, I don't know what any of this means. I know that Tucker Carlson is all over this, and yes, the mainstream media is mocking it. They're shooting it down. But as I said yesterday, how do you explain the under Secretary of State with the exchange that she had with Marco Rubio, senator Marco Rubio? Suggesting that, yeah, they got bio labs, all right. And Tucker's asking a bunch of questions about that.

Tucker Carlson Marco Rubio Tucker
Victoria Nuland Says Ukraine Has Biolabs at Risk of Russian Control

Mark Levin

00:54 sec | 2 months ago

Victoria Nuland Says Ukraine Has Biolabs at Risk of Russian Control

"Here is Victoria Nuland under Secretary of State for political affairs today at a hearing or yesterday rather Actually under questioning by Marco Rubio cut one go Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons Ukraine has biological research facilities which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can the Ukrainians Okay I had a taste of this earlier in the hour You're working with the Ukrainians to try and help you with this Well what do you expect the Ukrainians to do since they're under attack What do you expect them to do

Victoria Nuland Ukraine Marco Rubio
The Untold Story of Bio-Labs in Ukraine

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:24 min | 2 months ago

The Untold Story of Bio-Labs in Ukraine

"This is USA Today just a couple of days ago, quote fact check. Fact, false claim of U.S. bio labs in Ukraine tied to Russian disinformation campaign. China pushes conspiracy theory about U.S. biolabs in Ukraine. Newsweek, U.S. biological weapons in Russia separating the fact from fiction. Business Insider, debunked conspiracy theory about U.S. bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine, fact check why you crush Russia claims U.S. biolabs in Ukraine don't hold up. PolitiFact totally false. Russia is targeting U.S. biological weapons in Ukrainian invasion. Okay. So I could go through that into great detail. But I do want to play a cut here from yesterday that has kind of prompted all this and then we're going to bring our expert guests to help us navigate it. So Victoria Nuland, who's the undersecretary for political affairs, was asked a question of Marco Rubio. And I think Marco Rubio was asking her this question to kind of debunk this and get this over with. But in fact, the exact opposite happened. Play cut 66. Well, I only have a minute left. Let me ask you. Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons? Ukraine has biological research facilities. Which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of so we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach. I'm sure you're aware that the Russian propaganda groups are already putting out there, all kinds of information about how they've uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country and with NATO's coordination. If there is a biological or chemical weapon incident or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100% it would be the Russians that would be behind it? There is no doubt in my mind, senator, and it is classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy, what they're planning to do themselves. So there is Victoria Nuland, basically admitting that there are biological research facilities in Ukraine and Russians want to get their hands on them. Was the U.S. funding these facilities if so who was behind it and what type of research was

Ukraine U.S. Victoria Nuland Marco Rubio Usa Today Newsweek China Nato
Sen. Ted Cruz Is Trying to Learn More About U.S. Biolab in Ukraine

The Dan Bongino Show

01:40 min | 2 months ago

Sen. Ted Cruz Is Trying to Learn More About U.S. Biolab in Ukraine

"So senator one of your colleagues Marco Rubio had Victoria Nuland up on Capitol Hill yesterday Victoria Nuland has not a lot of credibility with me who was a central figure in the whole spygate Russian collusion fiasco but it was a very concerning exchange yesterday about this what Victoria Nuland called a biological research lab And Ukraine And it appears doing some homework on this that this was a long-term effort with Barack Obama and senator Luger a former colleague of yours To help them build out this bioweapons counter proliferation operation in Ukraine This is really concerning center because there's such a crisis of truth right now in the media You don't know what to believe and what not to believe As a guy who's read in on a lot of these things I understand this things you can and can't say but your thoughts on this Well Dan I agree with you that it is concerning that we had her testimony at the public hearing about a U.S. government facility There in Ukraine that is at risk of being seized by the Russians and that is troubling And at this point I think a number of us in the Senate are focused on learning precisely what was being done at that particular lab I can tell you I don't know the answer to that now I've already directed my team to begin trying to get to the bottom of it And I will tell you getting answers from the Biden administration on just about anything is not easy They stonewall practically anything you ask them But they have not affirmatively told us what was occurring there and so my staff is in the process of trying to find out the answers to

Victoria Nuland Ukraine Senator Luger Marco Rubio Capitol Hill Barack Obama U.S. Government DAN Biden Administration Senate
Rubio Says No-Fly Zone Over Ukraine Would Lead to World War III

The Larry Elder Show

00:58 sec | 2 months ago

Rubio Says No-Fly Zone Over Ukraine Would Lead to World War III

"Regarding the no fly zone, here's what Marco Rubio senator said about it. You know, look, I know flies on to become a catch phrase. I'm not sure a lot of people fully understand what that means. That means flying awacs 24 hours a day. That means the willingness to shoot down and engage Russian airplanes in the sky. That means, frankly, you can't put those planes up there unless you're willing to knock out the anti aircraft systems that the Russians have deployed and not just in Ukraine, but in Russia, and also in Belarus. So basically, a no fly zone, if people understood what it means, it means World War three. It means starting World War three, so I think there are a lot of things we can do to help Ukraine protect itself both from air strikes and missile strikes, but I think people need to understand what a no fly zone means. It's not just, it's not some rule you pass it. Everybody has to oblige by. It's the willingness to shoot down the aircraft of the Russian Federation, which is basically the beginning of World War three.

Marco Rubio Ukraine Belarus Russian Federation
Should Illegal Aliens Be Allowed to Vote in U.S. Elections?

Mike Gallagher Podcast

02:20 min | 5 months ago

Should Illegal Aliens Be Allowed to Vote in U.S. Elections?

"Here's the story. And this is an article written by Mike Miller at red state dot com. Titled Senate Republicans moved to ban federal funds from states, cities that allow illegal aliens to vote. He writes in this episode of Republicans or racists, let's begin with a basic premise that should be supported by every lawyer citizen of every country on the planet. Non citizens should not be allowed to vote in elections, period. That's not even be a question, millerites. Unless your congressional Democrat, that is, in that case, undocumented Democrats are really your thing. As reported by John Solomon's just the news, the issue of non citizen voting first came to a boiling point, a big time at the end of 2018s Georgia governor's race, when Democrats Stacey Abrams suggested the blue wave of voter she had hoped for to put her in office included the documented and the undocumented. The latter a ridiculous Democrat term for illegal aliens, Abrams denied she was referring to illegal aliens, millerite, he goes on, however, last time I checked my Democrat decoder ring, undocumented was code for illegal. Meanwhile, cities in at least three states have authorized illegal aliens to vote, while George upon her the constitutional amendment to ban it. Shockingly, as reported by my colleague, Chris arps, New York City is among them as is Northampton, Massachusetts. Incidentally, less dispelled another ridiculous Democrat trope, no human is illegal. Nobody has suggested that any humans are illegal, he writes, my Democrat Friends, humans are capable, however, of doing illegal things, including illegally entering the United States of America, sit down, he writes. Now, in an attempt to stem increasing Democrat support of allowing illegal aliens to vote in the U.S., senator Mark Marco Rubio is leading a coalition of congressional Republicans in sponsoring legislation that would ban federal funding to states and localities that allow illegals to

John Solomon Stacey Abrams Mike Miller Chris Arps Senate Abrams Georgia Northampton George New York City Massachusetts Senator Mark Marco Rubio United States Of America
Congress approves import ban targeting forced labor in China

AP News Radio

01:07 min | 5 months ago

Congress approves import ban targeting forced labor in China

"Congress Congress has has approved approved an an import import ban ban targeting targeting forced forced labor labor in in China China well well the the Biden Biden administration administration is is imposing imposing sanctions sanctions on on Beijing Beijing over over abuse abuse of of Uighurs Uighurs I'm I'm Ben Ben Thomas Thomas with with the the latest latest the the Senate Senate has has given given final final approval approval to to a a bill bill barring barring all all imports imports from from China's China's Xinjiang Xinjiang region region unless unless businesses businesses can can prove prove they they were were produced produced without without forced forced labor labor senator senator Marco Marco Rubio Rubio it it basically basically says says that that you you can't can't import import products products into into the the United United States States that that are are made made by by slave slave labor labor he he adds adds it's it's already already illegal illegal by by the the way way to to to to bring bring goods goods made made with with slave slave labor labor it's it's been been that that way way since since the the nineteen nineteen thirties thirties and and yet yet it it still still happened happened Rubio Rubio says says many many companies companies have have already already taken taken steps steps to to insure insure their their supply supply chains chains do do not not include include products products made made by by the the forced forced labor labor of of China's China's Uighur Uighur population population and and those those who who haven't haven't will will no no longer longer be be able able to to make make Americans Americans unwitting unwitting accomplices accomplices and and the the atrocities atrocities and and the the genocide genocide is is being being committed committed by by the the Chinese Chinese Communist Communist Party Party meanwhile meanwhile the the commerce commerce department department levied levied new new sanctions sanctions targeting targeting Chinese Chinese biotech biotech and and surveillance surveillance companies companies leading leading drone drone manufacturer manufacturer and and government government entities entities for for their their actions actions in in Xinjiang Xinjiang Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Washington Washington

China Biden Biden Administration Adm Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Xinjiang Xinjiang Beijing Senator Marco Marco Rubio Rubi Congress United United States States Senate Rubio Rubio Chinese Chinese Communist Comm Commerce Commerce Department D Ben Ben Thomas Thomas Washingt Washington
The Biden Regime Attempts to Break the Bond Between Parents and Children

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:44 min | 8 months ago

The Biden Regime Attempts to Break the Bond Between Parents and Children

"Know that the state the regime is trying to break the bond between parents and children that parents concern and questioning of the indoctrination of their kids is now being met with a full fledged response from the state. We can keep on building that out as we dive deeper into that as we build out all the specifics there but instead i want to tell you what's really going on here and it's really fun kind of going back and forth with the great one mark levin on this because we saw it exactly the same. This is a preempt a preemptive move by the regime to try and stop any sort of semblance of a legitimate and authentic tea party two point. Oh movement the tea party back. In two thousand nine two thousand ten was a legitimate grassroots response to the massive overreach of the obama regime. The tea party movement could not be controlled. Many members of congress were elected in the tea party movement. That are still in congress. Today including marco rubio and many others democrats were largely displaced from power and republicans. Look back the house for the first time in many years and did so decisively against the popularity and the power of barack obama one of the reasons why the left has been so forceful in their propaganda and their prosecution of january six. Is they want to try to keep people at home.

Mark Levin Tea Party Congress Barack Obama Marco Rubio
Biden Addresses Crisis in Afghanistan

Orlando's Morning News

01:22 min | 9 months ago

Biden Addresses Crisis in Afghanistan

"Building. It was never supposed to be creating a unified, centralized democracy. President Biden addressing the crisis in Afghanistan, That's right, Scott. We had that live for you yesterday as Biden returned to the White House from Camp David early to speak to the nation. The Taliban effectively gained control of the capital city after the Afghan president fled the country U. S forces that already drawn down during the Trump administration from roughly 15,500 American forces. 2500 troops in country. The president cited the quick collapse of Afghan security forces and said the U. S. Could not provide them the will to fight sharp criticism by Republicans for the Taliban takeover and Biden's reaction. Here's Senator Marco Rubio. They operated under assumptions that we're completely ridiculous. The assumption was well what if the Afghans stand up and fight and really push back? If you make those assumptions, Yeah, they could have held on for another six months or a year. But all the indications were that as soon as the US announced they were leaving, police officers would abandon post. Regular armed forces would abandon post and leaders would abandon the country. That is exactly what happened is what they were told that they were warned. What happened? They didn't care, and now we see the consequences of it. U. S military troops have maintained control of the Kabul airport, but the situation is chaotic as thousands of Afghans try to flee the country. This is W. De vo, where

President Biden Trump Administration Biden U. Taliban Senator Marco Rubio Camp David Afghanistan White House Scott United States Kabul W. De Vo
People Across Florida Are Marching in Solidarity With Cuba

Orlando's Morning News

01:49 min | 11 months ago

People Across Florida Are Marching in Solidarity With Cuba

"I think this is the beginning of a a movement in which Cubans have said enough is enough. Cubans have reached a breaking point inside the Communist island and right here in Florida, Scott hunger, health, anxiety and anger spilling over into one another, opening the floodgates of a decades long oppression and emotion. Protests and rallies have popped up all over Florida and support of Cuba and its people. Here's reporter Alexa Lorenzo. This is something that was spontaneous. We've never seen that Dr Luis Martinez Fernandez was born in Havana, a history professor now at U. C. F. He knows well, what's playing out on the island. What the government does is it unleashes these violent fanatics to beat up Cubans who are basically asking for a universal right to protest piece. Fully the communist government has arrested hundreds of protesters restricted Internet access in Cuba, showing you the dictatorship that has dominated for decades. But the question is what's next here? And what is the U. S government doing about it? Where all these people that promise about human rights? Meanwhile, 90 miles from our coastline, human rights get trampled on every day. That's why Cuban Americans in Florida like Alberto Sarmiento are protesting. His father and grandparents fled for freedom, and he wants American politicians to do more to protect the people on the island. We need action in Cuba. Now. U. S. Senator Marco Rubio, a Cuban American has been a staunch opponent of the Cuban government, taking to social media and writing a letter to President Joe Biden, giving him six steps to take a horrific bloodbath is what awaits if action is not taken something like that does not happen. Senator Rubio also tweeting images of that show Cuban military and police. Barging into homes and detaining

Communist Island Alexa Lorenzo Dr Luis Martinez Fernandez U. C. F. Cuba Florida U. S Government Havana Alberto Sarmiento Scott U. S. Senator Marco Rubio Cuban Government President Joe Biden Senator Rubio
Money in the Bank: Child Tax Credit Dollars Head to Parents

AP News Radio

00:48 sec | 11 months ago

Money in the Bank: Child Tax Credit Dollars Head to Parents

"The federal government is starting to deposit child tax credit money into the accounts of more than thirty five million families today president Biden expanded the credit for one year as part of his corona virus relief package passed in March some fifteen million households will now receive the full credit the monthly payments amount to three hundred dollars for each child five and younger in two hundred and fifty dollars for those between five and seventeen the payments are set to lapse after a year but the president is pushing to extend them through at least twenty twenty five and ultimately would like to make them permanent he says it would cut child poverty in half and help economic growth Republican opponents like senator Marco Rubio criticized the plan saying families can qualify for the payment regardless of whether the parents have a job Ben Thomas Washington

Biden Federal Government Senator Marco Rubio Ben Thomas Washington
Sen. Marco Rubio Comments on Crisis in Cuba

Mark Levin

00:56 sec | 11 months ago

Sen. Marco Rubio Comments on Crisis in Cuba

"Me ask you a question. Do we even know what's going on in Cuba? Tonight? They've shut that country down, Haven't they? Yeah, they have restricted access to all of the social media site, so it's It's hard to get. Yeah, like If you're close to the U. S embassy or a foreign embassy, you might be able to get the free WiFi for a second and send stuff out. There's some intermittent opportunities, but it's become real hard to get anything out of there. So we don't have. It's really slow down. I mean, there's just no Clear sense of what even cell phone service. But we are getting a little information of the activists that the, uh secret police there are brutalizing activists that some activists are missing and so forth. They've really swung in the gear now, haven't they? Are there, specialist at all this this? This is what they do better than anybody in the world. You know, they go after people and They put you in jail and they beat you up and they torture you and threaten your family. And you know, they make life miserable. This is what they're

U. S Embassy Cuba
Many feared dead after Florida beachfront condo collapses

AP News Radio

01:00 min | 11 months ago

Many feared dead after Florida beachfront condo collapses

"A grim search continues for possible survivors and victims after the collapse of a Miami area beach front condo building one person described the scene as looking like a giant fractured doll house one side of the twelve story building completely sheared away Miami Dade County mayor Daniella Levine Kamba says there's comfort just over a hundred people have been rescued but there are still dozens missing from the early Thursday morning collapse we are working around the clock to search and rescue people in this rubble a child was rescued without parents insight a woman's leg had to be amputated but she and her child were freed and other families just wait for news senator Marco Rubio dark and tragic day but but from it we would continue to pray for some miracles audio courtesy of WPLG TV officials say the building's roof is being worked on but it's not yet determined if that was a factor in the collapse hi Jackie Quinn

Mayor Daniella Levine Kamba Miami Dade County Marco Rubio Wplg Tv Jackie Quinn
Val Demings Launches Florida Senate Bid to Unseat Marco Rubio

The Von Haessler Doctrine

00:09 sec | 1 year ago

Val Demings Launches Florida Senate Bid to Unseat Marco Rubio

"Congresswoman, Democrat Val Demings of Florida has her sights set on the U. S. Senate. Demming said today she's ready to challenge Republican Senator Marco Rubio next

Val Demings U. S. Senate Demming Florida Senator Marco Rubio
Val Demings Announces Senate Run Against Marco Rubio

Glenn Beck

00:44 sec | 1 year ago

Val Demings Announces Senate Run Against Marco Rubio

"Florida's Senate race is already heating up with a high profile House Democrat joining a crowded field, Florida congresswoman Val Demings formally announces her challenge to GOP Senator Marco Rubio when you grow up in the south, poor, black and female You have to have faith in progress, an opportunity from her video posted online. She's a former Orlando police chief and impeachment manager in the first Democratic attempt to remove President Trump from office. Two term incumbent Marco Rubio posts to reply. Look, I've always known that my opponent for the Senate was going to be a far left liberal Democrat. Today. We just found out which one of them Chuck Schumer's picked former President Trump is already glowingly endorsing Rubio

Val Demings Senator Marco Rubio Florida President Trump Senate GOP House Marco Rubio Orlando Chuck Schumer Rubio
"marco rubio" Discussed on NewsRadio WIOD

NewsRadio WIOD

05:01 min | 1 year ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on NewsRadio WIOD

"Will talk to you in an hour. All right, All right. Coming up on 7 12 Now on NewsRadio. 6 10 W Y O D. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi expected to send the article of impeachment against former President Donald Trump to the Senate today, but trial won't get underway right away, according to a deal between the new Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer and minority leader Mitch McConnell. The trial won't begin until February. 8th that is two weeks. From today. The only way to bring healing is to actually have real accountability, which this trial affords. It will be fair, but it will move. At a relatively fast pace. McConnell asked to delay the start to give former President Trump some time to get a legal team together. Prepare his defense makes you wonder what McConnell had to agree to to get shown Schumer to delay the trial. Part of what the lay the delay does do is it will give Congress timeto work on President Biden's $1.9 Trillion covert relief package will talk about that more. In a moment, all of the Senate Democrats and 17 Republicans would have to vote against President Trump for a conviction. Handful literally of Republican senators have either already said they would vote to convict or given indications they might going to be hard to get 17 of them. Former presidents major defense Is that at that rally on January 6 his words at no point encourage violence or the legal incitement of violence, which led to the attack the riot the insurrection. Democrats will argue the opposite. It was the president's months of lying about a fraudulent election that the election was stolen. And his argument on that day that you have to quote fight like hell or you'll have no country left. It will say That is proof that his words led to the violence. Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio among those who isn't in favor of even holding the trial yesterday, telling Fox News Channel's Chris Wallace, I think the president bears responsibility for some of what what happened. It was most certainly a foreseeable consequence. Of everything that was going on. I think that's separate from the notion of Let's revisit this all and start it up again. All I'm arguing as we have some really important things to work on. We're just gonna go. We're gonna jump right back into what we've been going through the last five years. It's stirring it up again with the trial and it's just gonna be bad for the country. It really is. Rubio explained why he thought it would be better for the country to forego the impeachment. The first chance I get the vote the end this trial, I'll do it, but I think it's really bad for America. If you want to hold people accountable, there's other ways to do it, particularly for president. Including, as I said, the perspective of history and even now is, people are learning more about all this. This is not a criminal justice trial. This is a political process that's going to make it harder to get important things done. It is just going to continue to fuel these divisions that have paralyzed the country and turned it into a country of people that hate each other right about that. When the Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace asked Senator Rubio about the idea that Trump should be impeached to ban him from running for office again, the Florida Republican quote quickly shut down the argument. I think that's an arrogant statement for anyone to make voters get to decide that we who are we to tell voters who they can vote for in the future. Love him or hate him. And if you wonder why he's been so successful, it's right there. Answers like that show you why Marco Rubio is a great politician. That legal scholars, including members of the conservative Federalist Society, wrote in a letter last week that the Constitution's impeachment power must be extended to former officials who could try to run for election again. By the way, unless something major happens in two weeks. Trump's second Senate impeachment trial scheduled to get underway two weeks from today, the day after the Super Bowl now back to announce a new stimulus negotiations got underway yesterday between top aides to President Biden and a bipartisan group of at least a dozen moderate senators on Biden's proposed $1.9 trillion covert relief package. Republican lawmakers Questioning the size of the package. Questioning the size of the package, particularly sending everyone a new $1400 payment. Some Democrats urging the president not to spend too much time trying to reach a bipartisan consensus. Now the Democrats wanted to just try and ram the package through Congress since they think they control both chambers. Problem is, they really don't control both chambers despite the fact it's 50 50 in the Senate. And you've got Kamila Harris, the president of the Senate, casting the deciding vote. I'm not going to get all Democrats to come on board with every vote. You're not going to get our Republicans Ah handful of Republicans to come up against every vote like for example, independent Senator Angus King of Maine, he said, there was quote absolute consistent contestant. Absolute consensus during the talks at the top priority should be speeding up vaccine distribution and expanding covert testing. So we'll see if the new president tries to just ran this through, because that's what he wants. And that's what he thinks is needed. Or if he will make an effort to try and reach a bipartisan consensus, which I think is going to need. If you want to get something through 7 16 on news radio 6 10 w Y O Do we check in with Rory O'Neil Got a look at what's trending a wi LD dot com or Manny, a.

president President Trump Senator Marco Rubio Senate President Biden Mitch McConnell Chuck Schumer Congress Senate Majority Chris Wallace Senator Angus King Nancy Pelosi Florida NewsRadio. Fox News Channel Federalist Society Rory O'Neil Maine
"marco rubio" Discussed on 77WABC Radio

77WABC Radio

02:50 min | 1 year ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on 77WABC Radio

"Americans and people have a right to express you agree with them halfway all the way or none of the way, Marco Rubio. They're Americans. They have a right to feel and do what they want. I'm still gonna watch the Dolphins, which I'm sure which he didn't yesterday because Cam Newton and his first thought is a patriot actually beat the Miami Dolphins. But He's watching the games. He doesn't care. Yeah, you have a right to be a jacket and a disrespectful. Ah, punk, essentially and a coward. You have all those right up for you. Like Marco Rubio wasn't talking about Marco Rubio. I'm talking about you have a right, But you know, do it on your own time. Dude. Don't disrespect the flag in the police on a Sunday when we're trying to watch a game. I know he's not happy about it, but he's going to suck it up and watch it. And I will say I'll give you one more. Ah, one more arrow in your quiver. You can point this out. Which was that the Kansas City Chiefs fans that bode that well, now we're going to stand for a moment of unity. A member of the fans booed, loved it, and we all loved it. Everybody loves it, but the fact that does remain They went to the game knowing what those players were going to dio. True, So they went to the game. Just like Marco Rubio. Just like you were watching. So you can you can use that in your argument is so you can you know if defends, defends that do show up, Bo. Well, we're expressing our opinion. OK, so in other words, It might not be a bad thing. If you watch and you monitor what's going on, so you can call them out. So then, before tonight's Giants like those game, I should watch the national anthem was I was I was going to put the game on after. Yeah, I would say so. But I would say to Bill O'Reilly's point, which he has in the writes in his column this morning. I just don't buy any of the merchandise. Right, Bill. You do not subsidize them. Buying tickets does subsidise them But a ce faras the memorabilia. Just stay the hell away for that's where they make billions of dollars Million Saddam exactly Right. And that's right. Don't buy their stuff and, well, I'm Prince of Mitch Modell. So before it goes out of business, I might take it for free. But listen, you could do it anyway. There's the motel's right across the street. Going out and just smash the window and the wind going to take it. That's true, you'll be home by dinner time in time to watch the Giants. Even if you get arrested, That's right. It's not funny. It's true. 1 808 for eight w A B C 1 808 for 8 92 22 throughout today's show. We are curious, because I know most of the listeners. The overwhelming majority of our listeners or Donald Trump supporters, and they're angry with these athletes, but I'm curious. I'm sure you want to know how many of you put that aside yesterday and still watched. Still watch the Jets still watch the National Football League were curious. We got three great guests and lots more to talk about. Bernie and CID will be right back on a Monday. Listen to your favorite shows live and on demand Enable their 77 WNBC Alexis killed today..

Marco Rubio Giants Cam Newton Miami Dolphins Saddam Bill O'Reilly Donald Trump Dolphins Kansas City Chiefs Jets WNBC Alexis Mitch Modell Bernie National Football League
"marco rubio" Discussed on Rob Talk Podcast

Rob Talk Podcast

03:25 min | 1 year ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on Rob Talk Podcast

"Welcome to Rob Song podcast where I bring the latest Progressive News and politics in ten minutes or less I'm Robert Cunningham. Thank you for tuning in. Let's get informed. Twitter says they're cybersecurity. Breach Wednesday affected one hundred thirty accounts including high profile users such as Joe Biden and Kanye West. The company explained in a blog post that perpetrators downloaded data from eight of the one hundred thirty accounts that were compromised. None of these eight accounts were from an official account of public figure they say. Beyond Biden Kanye, former president Barack Obama and billionaires, Elon Musk and Jeff, bezos were victim to the cybersecurity breach which allowed hackers to tweet out a bitcoin hoax from these accounts. This tried to get users to send bitcoin payments from followers by promising to double any pledges their way in Bitcoin. Twitter has a pretty clear understanding of how this breach took place to begin with. A statement by the company reads. The attackers successfully manipulated a small number of employees and use their credentials to access twitter's internal systems, including getting through our two factor protections. As of now we know that they access tools only available to our internal support teams to target one hundred thirty twitter accounts for forty five of those accounts, the attackers were able to initiate a password reset log into the account and send tweets. Here's an example of what one of the hack messages was from Elon Musk's account. Feeling grateful doubling all payments sent to my BTC address. You send one thousand dollars I send it back two thousand dollars only doing this for the next thirty minutes. Okay, so please arm yourselves with the knowledge that this sort of thing is likely fake in almost every instance, even if it's coming from verified account. Sadly on Friday. Civil Rights, leader and American hero representative. John Lewis of Georgia died. Lewis was eight years old and had pancreatic cancer. In December of two thousand, nineteen, Louis shared the sad news of his diagnosis. Lewis is passing prompted many positive messages on social media such as Elizabeth. Warren tweeting the following. Quote John Lewis was, and always will be an American hero and champion for civil rights who inspired us to all make good trouble in the fight for justice. Rest in power. Rep. John, Lewis. Then, we have Republican Senator Marco Rubio on the other hand writing for Mashal, Alice, informed says. On Saturday Senator Marco. Rubio inserted both of his feet into his mouth with a poorly executed tribute to late civil rights legend John Lewis. What could she be referring to? You might ask well. Rubio tweeted a memorial message about John. Lewis along with a picture of Rubio beside a black lawmaker. The problem is that black lawmaker was not John Lewis. It was Elijah Cummings of Maryland. Who died last October? So besides Rubio, being an absolute buffoon, he's also horrible on policy, so if you live in Florida, please vote against him in twenty twenty two..

John Lewis Senator Marco Rubio Twitter Elon Musk Rep. John, Lewis Biden Kanye Joe Biden Robert Cunningham Elijah Cummings Kanye West Senator Marco pancreatic cancer Barack Obama Maryland official Warren Louis president Alice
"marco rubio" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

01:44 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"Go and shows that have no ratings like firing line her name, Margaret Hoover. He's trying to sell book, but he won't go on shows. I don't even know how I fended the guy, but so be it. Marco Rubio, we put a call out to him as deputy chief. And we're busy. I'm not asking these guys anymore. Every time when their campaigns come up, they wanna come on the show. Ain't happening. By the way, I want the chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, you notice they call the Senate intelligence committee, any committee that Diane, find Franken Feinstein is on cannot be an intelligent committee. It should be the Senate no intelligence committee. Chairman of that committee. Richard burr. She got dictator who's chairman of that committee got Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, dick, Blumenthal, from Connecticut got Richard Durbin from Illinois, dick Durbin something, there's a lot of. There's a lot of Richard's out there. You get my drift. In the United States Senate. A lot of Richard's, what'd you think I was going to say? So. We have a little dick Blumenthal. From the nutmeg state. What's the nut makes? But the hell is not make what is it if they would not make? Why would you do that? Why would you say that in a state, that's like saying these sprinkles state? Anyway. Where were we? So we have little dick Blumenthal on Capitol Hill today. Cut ten go. Look.

Senate intelligence committee Richard Blumenthal chairman Senate dick Durbin Richard Durbin Richard Richard burr Franken Feinstein Marco Rubio Margaret Hoover Connecticut deputy chief United States Illinois Diane
"marco rubio" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

02:26 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"Save me. No one is coming to make life right for me. No one is coming to solve my problems. If I don't do something nothing is going to get better me. I don't do something. Nothing's going to get better sounds harsh. But it's true. I love this line for Georgia. Peterson is Joe Rogan podcast. He says he says the best eighteen year old. He says eighteen year olds don't be fixing up the economy. You don't know anything about the economy? It's a massive complex machine beyond anyone's understanding, and you mess with that at your peril. So can you even clean up your own room? Thing about that. You should think about that. Because if you can't even clean up your own room who the heck are you to give advice to the world? He says to eighteen year old. The opposite of what side today we're supposed to lower the voting age Peterson saying eighteen the economy which talking about. Actually, like the response pulled up real quick. Doing something with Dr is texting. Text in your buds. Weird notification from my pain. That was rather concerning. Mike borrow a couple of hundred. I think notifications fine. Don't worry about it. Can you look up the clip of Marco Rubio on FOX business talking about you'll on Omar? And he says something like she's ridiculous. Silly silly. Why are you know, what she's talking about? And I think that's the proper response to what you'll on Omar said about Venezuela sanctions and stuff. Osha hands. He'll about at all she's talking to on this clip. Trish, trish. Trish, ROY Reagan maybe made any up I don't know someone on FOX business funding Cannavaro two hundred bucks. If you pretend to be the shooter. I'll give you twenty bucks. So these ideas from Jordan Peterson southern new. Clean up your mess before you go. Try to clean up the world. This is Plato in the Republic..

Jordan Peterson Omar Trish Marco Rubio FOX Georgia Mike Osha Venezuela ROY Reagan eighteen year
"marco rubio" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

02:55 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"From the FOX News Radio studios in New York. City information you want truth you demand? It's Brian Kilmeade. It's going to be a busy hour, and we're going to be bringing in two guests ROY Murdoch dot standing comments at the bottom of the hour. The Wall Street Journal and others. They congressman Ralph Norman will be here. But we're also watching developments over in Venezuela where it is on final. Phase. They're saying as Guido one Guido the leader, the interim leader that we recognize in that country is making a move and cloned on the military to rebel against the sitting government led by Madero who says that we will prevail. So they're not backing off. They are backed by Iran, Cuba and Russia. We are certainly not backing off we have along with really led by Senator Marco Rubio John Bolton. And of course, the president nited states. It's got bipartisan support people like dick Durbin have just tweeted out support for one Guido and says, and he this paraphrase that he's putting his life on the line for the people event is willa who have been absolutely tortured over the last maybe five six years as socialism has gone awry, they've nationalized everything and caused the cocoa apps of which would. Be thriving economy. We will follow those developments as well. As it's on the meeting between Nancy Pelosi speaker of the house, the minority leader of the Senate Chuck Schumer and the president nited states and some significant others, including congressional leaders. They have behind closed doors. It went awry last time famously will bring some of those great memories back. So let's get to the big three with the stories you need to know Brian's, big three number three intelligence officials. How CBS news they believe a new recording from the shadowy leader of ISIS is authentic the video that surfaced. Yesterday shows Abu Bakar al-baghdadi is alive. And well now, this is the first time we've seen him in about five years. Here we go again Baghdadi the ISIS leader speaks on tape with proof of life on video display. What does this about ISIS in wake of the Texas, San Diego and New Zealand will explain? Kale? Why do we give a tax break to a Wall Street, but we don't give a tax break for infection for daycare or for childcare. Why don't we do that blue-collar Biden in Pittsburgh acting like he owns the union vote has started the economy benefits only one group? Yup. The rich. Does this tired song having audience plus Trump fires back? There's something about by it gets under Trump's skin. Never this is political revenge. The house is on a witch hunt. Truly a witch hunt. Try to make something out of nothing. And I thoroughly agree Senator Lindsey Graham the mullahs report, he preserved he worked forty stood by Trump is standing his ground, though, fighting every step of the way as the Democrats are taking aim at his personal finances..

Guido Trump ISIS Brian Kilmeade president Senator Marco Rubio John Bolto Senator Lindsey Graham congressman Ralph Norman Abu Bakar ROY Murdoch The Wall Street Journal New York dick Durbin FOX Biden Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi CBS Venezuela Madero
"marco rubio" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

02:06 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

"Let us work together to build a culture that cherishes innocent life, and let us reaffirm a fundamental truth all children born and unborn are made in the holy image of God, what could be more universally loved. But the nearly fifty million Americans watching the state of the union saw the women in white sit on their hands in this telling moment there are other key segments. That sent a message to America the next morning, I discussed a number of these with Senator Marco Rubio, I wanna play for you. I a key part of the state of the union and get your responses to the president talking about Venezuela. Cut number eighteen we stand with the Venezuelan people and their noble quest for freedom, and we condemn the brutality of the Madero regime whose socialist policies have turned that nation from being the wealthiest in South America. Enjoy state of abject, poverty, and despair. Now, Senator Rubio, I agree with that. I'm glad he brought it up. And I was amazed. That speaker Pelosi did not rise for applaud freedom for the Venezuelan. People your reaction to the remarks into the response. Well, in fairness, she has spoken already made statements in the past and support of the administration's policy and everything that we've done there. So obviously, we're grateful for that. And I want to be fair. I don't know why she didn't stand and applied on that line. And obviously another mentioned of socialism makes a lot of my democratic colleagues nervous that avast majority of them are not socialist. But they know that there is a very strong and growing socialist energy and their party, and they're afraid to take it on. They're afraid of these new elements in their party that are growing in prominence and energy. This is very important. What you just brought up is this cut. And so I was cut off play from the speech cut number sixteen. The president made these remarks, and again, a lot of the Democrats sat on their hands. Unbelievably when he said this here in the United States. We are alarmed by the new calls to adopt. Socialism in our country. America was.

Senator Marco Rubio South America Pelosi president Madero Venezuela United States
"marco rubio" Discussed on NBC Meet the Press

NBC Meet the Press

03:04 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on NBC Meet the Press

"Do shut down you don't pass a budget, congress shouldn't get paid. So we've got we've got to make sure that people start working together. And I think everybody's got to figure out how to do that. And I'm gonna try my best to be part of that. What is it that you think is a reasonable compromise? At this point, would you advise the president to take half of the money? He's asking for at this point. I mean, actually come to a compromise acknowledge divided government. What would your advice to the president be? I know you and him are professionally very close. Sure, what I would say to him is we have to board security from my standpoint what I would want would be I wanna permanent fix fun. Let's let's talk to and which I did we we are so ago I sat down with port security. What do you need? They need people. They need technology. They need barriers. We need to do a permanent. This. Think what I like is fix everything fix that. Welcome dreamers. Perma solution for TPS. Yeah. But I'd start the path. What I do is governor. I just kept. What could I get done today? And I did it. And I went forward with the next thing. You know, there is a compromise on the shelf. In fact, your colleague Marco Rubio in the Senate was one of the essentially one of the sponsors. And organizers of it the gang of eight compromise from two thousand thirteen you were governor Florida at that time what's wrong with that compromise it it had new barriers it had dealt with Dhaka. As Michael Bennett said very very dramatically in the Senate floor had forty six billion dollars in border security funding, not just five billion. Well, first of all, thank Marco Rubio. Because I know he's he's been a big proponent of taking care of the dreamers in working on trying to fix TPS and also working onboard security. I think something like that we need to look at all all the provisions within that is compared to where we are today by think we look at things like that. We do a big deal, but I wanna get something. I do not want government shutdown. I wanna have more security. We all know, we should do this people that have to stop being actors and in sit down and get something done. You shouldn't go to negotiation. Like Nancy Pelosi didn't say there's going to be no money for a while. There has to be border security. There has to be barriers. We all know that what this issue of shutdown versus national emergency. If the president doesn't want to do national -mergency, but won't sign this deal. You're stuck with shutdown. What do you do is a Senate Republican? I it's gonna be tough. I think it's going to be very difficult. I was very frustrating. As example, our coast guard didn't get paid uring the shutdown. I think and I I don't like shutdowns coastguard part of a military paid and we had to build. I sponsored to do that. And Chuck Schumer stop that even I mean, there's just so much hatred up there right now people aren't working together. We've got we've got to stop and say, let's act in the best interest of the American public and says, oh, how do I win the next election? I want to switch gears here the issue of Venezuela. What is the line? The president has not ruled out sending the military end we've sent humanitarian aid in..

president Marco Rubio Senate Chuck Schumer Nancy Pelosi congress Venezuela Dhaka Michael Bennett Florida forty six billion dollars
"marco rubio" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

04:29 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on KTOK

"I voted for them for Americanism not globalism. And if they're gonna go with Marco Rubio, the rhinos Schweitzer's book about McConnell and Joe Biden. China, you know, in a Trump genius. Global Marxist for whom they are right to their face. I'm Brian invite all these families that have been Shadley. So so why is why are the coke is the coke network in the White House, pushing amnesty? What why do they even have a seat at the table? Sure. They shouldn't even be, you know, they they keep playing politics thinking, oh, we'll invite him uninvited needs to Santa folks, don't even support him for president. They didn't even support him. The first time. They're not even Americanism globalism globalism. And we know who they are just like McConnell Marco Rubio like I was saying these people think that they're going to go with he's going to declare that national emergency. And Marco Rubio said he was going to stand against him while I'm Mike. What did he say? Marco Rubio change does not support the national emergency declaration, well, my slow announcer. Well, where was he during the Obama administration? It was pandering to the left and to the right. So that he could stay in power. Okay. But if you oppose this as a fundamental constitutional matter where we're all these constitutionalists. He's not a constitutionalist. He's not the only one though people are saying, well, I thought you were a constitutional issue, you this is separation of powers issue, and I've gone through two thousand times, and it's mostly the never Trumpers who want to try and say, they're the constitutionalists. You know, they're not they're hacks their hacks. You go through this. It's clear. It's constitutional the way the president wants to use it. It's certainly constitutional there aspects of it that I have big problems with. But you never heard of this law before did you? The national -mergency decorations national emergencies act of nineteen seventy six. Well, we got the recommended it. Right. I said you never heard of it before did you? I mean, nobody ever heard of it really overlong though, but the continuity, did, you know, did you know, it had been used over fifty times since nineteen seventy six. And that's why we can use it again. Did you know that thirty one of those emergencies are still considered in effect and Trump can override 'em with thanks for your call. He's not listening. I'm saying folks that this is a phony argument that's coming up now. It's a phony argument just trying to find another way to box Trump in and if you have individuals on TV or radio, you're listening to or watching who say, no amnesty. But also say don't use the national emergencies act. And you see the Republicans buckling in the Senate. These are people who have no solution to this gesture positioning themselves shoot that. I'm more right went. You're actually not right wing. We're talking about the constitution and securing the border if we'd all secure the damn border now, it's never going to be secured. I am not going to put the future this country on the back of Mitch McConnell or the coke brothers. What's right is right? Damn border needs to be secured. There's nothing radical about the idea. There's nothing immoral about the idea. There's nothing racist about the idea. Nobody said they oppose immigration way oppose people coming into this country, breaking our laws working their way into a legal status citizenship using benefits tax dollars being counted. In the census, we're not even supposed to be here. There's something horribly wrong with that we stand on principle. No matter what they call us. No matter how they spin this. Dan. Oh, the Republican party off the edge of the cliff. That's not gonna happen. Mark levin. Mm-hmm. When's the last time you.

Marco Rubio Mitch McConnell Trump Brian president White House China Shadley Republican party Joe Biden Obama administration Senate Mark levin Trumpers Dan Santa Schweitzer
"marco rubio" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

04:20 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"I voted for them for American is not globalism. And if they're going to go with Marco Rubio, the rhinos, and, you know, Peter Schweitzer's book about McConnell and Joe Biden. China, you know, in the Trump genius. He's gonna be global Marxist for our right to their face. I'm Brian invite all these families that have been sadly, so so why is why are the coke is the coke network in the White House, pushing amnesty? What why do they even have seat at the table? Are they shouldn't even be you know, they they keep playing politics thinking, oh, we'll invite him uninvited up. He needs to Santa folks, don't even support him for president. They didn't even support him. The first time. They're not even Americanism there globalism globalism. And we know who they are just like McConnell Markle will do like I was saying these people think that they're going to go with behind he's going to declare that national emergency. And Marco Rubio said he was going to stand against him while I'm trusting Mike. What did he say? Marco Rubio says she does not support the national emergency declaration, well, my slow announcer. Where was he during the Obama administration? Hey was pandering to the left and to the right today. You could say in Pollick is okay. But if you oppose this as a fundamental constitutional matter where we're all these constitutionalists. He's not a constitutionalist. He's not the only one though people are saying, well, I thought you were constitutionalists, you this is separation of powers issue, and I've gone through it a thousand times, and it's mostly the never Trumpers who want to try and say, they're the constitutionalists. You know, they're not they're hacks their hacks. You go through this. It's clear. It's constitutional the way the president wants to use it. It's certainly constitutional there aspects of it that I have big problems with. But you never heard of this before did you? The national emergency declaration national emergencies act of nineteen seventy six. Well, we got the recommended it. Right. I said you never heard of it before did you? I mean, nobody ever heard of it really overlong though, the continuity, did, you know, did you know, it had been used over fifty times since nineteen seventy six, and that's why we can use it again. Did you know that thirty one of those emergencies are still considered an effect and trunk override 'em with thanks for your call. He's not listening. I'm saying folks that this is a phony argument that's coming up now. It's a phony argument just trying to find another way to box Trump in. And if you have individuals on TV or radio who you're listening to or watching. Who say, no amnesty? But also say don't use the national emergencies act. And you see the Republicans buckling in the Senate. These are people who have no solution to this who gesture positioning themselves sheer, not I'm more, right? Wait. You're actually not right wing. We're talking about the constitution and securing the border if we don't secure the damn border now, it's never gonna be secured. I am not going to put the future of this country on the back of Mitch McConnell or they brothers. What's right is right? Now that damn border needs to be secured. There's nothing radical about the idea. There's nothing immoral about the idea. There's nothing racist about the idea. Nobody said they oppose immigration. We oppose people coming into this country. Breaking our laws working their way into a legal status citizenship using benefits tax dollars being counted. In the census, we're not even supposed to be here. There's something horribly wrong with that we stand on principle. No matter what they call us. No matter how they spin this. Dan. The Republican party off the edge of the cliff. That's not gonna happen..

Marco Rubio Brian Mitch McConnell McConnell Markle president White House China Trumpers Republican party Joe Biden Peter Schweitzer Pollick Senate Mike Obama administration Dan Santa
"marco rubio" Discussed on NBC Meet the Press

NBC Meet the Press

01:37 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on NBC Meet the Press

"And so I do believe that anyone who is cooperating with them winning or unwittingly is doing the work of a foreign intelligence agency harmless. But I know what you're getting at Roger and all all that stuff. I can also tell you, and frankly, I mean this, you know, in truth, not in the spirit of nastiness. The media wasn't winning in this too. Because the media reported breathlessly on a lot of the revelations that were leaked that we know we're now the product of the work of Russian intelligence, and all of us need to be wiser when we see this thing or something hits your inbox or another reporter's inbox from third party source that we don't know who it is. We have to be careful that we are not doing the work of the Russians or some other intelligence. Agency, that's trying to undermine us. We all need to be wiser about this movement. Should it be a crime working with WikiLeaks? Well, took a question. I think certainly if your wittingly doing it. I it should be considered a such. I mean, you're participating in the work of a foreign intelligence agency. But one of the keys that they do is unwittingly. It's not like they have a sign at the front door. That says, you know, we're we are an instrument of Russian intelligence that we're being used by Russian intelligence for this purpose. But that's why I've supported the special prosecutor and the work they're doing I think it's important for them to finish. We'll have all the facts before us, and then we can render judgment. I think it's a real big mistake. Trust me to jump to any conclusions until Mr. molars workers done. Senator Marco Rubio Republican from Florida, thanks for coming on your views with you when we come back as the Democrats twenty twenty they're likely to find themselves forced to navigate big differences among their own voters. They're more divided than you might think the three pads for democratic candidates in two thousand twenty that's next..

Senator Marco Rubio Roger reporter prosecutor Florida
"marco rubio" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

13:20 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"Eight six six ninety redeye is air. Carleen, I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally killed by those who illegally entered our country and thousands more lives will be lost. If we don't act right now. So there you go the president with his address last night. And then the they live sequence. By the way, thanks for pointing out to me because you were just doing some general research, and you saw story that had come out last October that John carpenter is teasing the possibility of a they live sequel. I think we saw trailer for a few hours. That's a I I saw the still pictures. I it looks. It looks weird by the way, even even Jake tapper had a picture of it. And everybody's just, you know, just the the still pictures, especially edge at the right moment. Right. Look, the the imagery is just is just bad. And we always talk about the substance, and the imagery the best thing is to have great imagery and the substance behind him who was it. The did the Republican. Response on state of the oh, it was was that Marco Rubio, no. I think I think it was a former governor of Louisiana. Jindal did one too. But it wasn't good. I mean, we we we before when he was out in public giving speeches? He was great. He was horrible when he gave a response one time. Yeah. It was just bad. It was deer in the headlights. And you know, I mean, they you would think they settle into it right because they run campaigns. They're out all the time. But yeah, it was not great imagery. But. What was interesting though. I think the takeaway the big takeaway for me is the fact that everybody was focusing on what the president was saying that we were we were actually having the debate on this for the first time, actually. It was it was an actual debate on the topic. Well, and one of the reasons that and if you're listening to us running length of time, especially the last week is when we've said look for the last two years, and we laid it out what we believe the president should have been doing what Republicans should have been doing and should have been town hall meetings on on illegal immigration. They should have been going down to border cities and doing town hall meetings. I don't care whether if only FOX's carrying it. It doesn't matter look at remember the headline in the drudge report two days ago. Well, the networks might not carry it. Then you've got some liberal pundits saying, they shouldn't carry it. They should take the lane and fact checking and then edited they ended up all carrying it. Why? Because Trump is news. Right. And and so what are they talking about now? And you, and I look not, for example, Jim Acosta. But we said, okay. Let's see what some of the networks are doing. We went to ABC and ABC fact, check them. All right. What was? Was the biggest fact check against him the claim that Mexico will be paying indirectly by the new great trade deal, which we said the president. We do the the caller is Trump supporter. Just before the top of the hour said, look, we don't care just build a wall. The president's gotta stop it. It doesn't make any sense. It's basically, it's incoherent. When he does that. Because it been for some reason he sticks to it. But you take that out of it. The only other thing that they had negative to say about the president. Was they disagreed that. It's a security crisis. It might be a humanitarian crisis, but we don't think that rises to the level of security crisis. Because for the last two decades illegal immigration has actually gone down. Except for the last year words gone back up which that when you said, well, that's the whole point is going back up again. He was making the point that it's on the rise. Right. And they said well, historically, no over the last year. Yes. Okay. Then he was right? But that that's not again. That's not a lie. That's a difference in whether it's a security crisis or a crisis, right or a emergency. You know, you're you're getting into the minutia of words, but other than that. They agreed with them. Well, they they they agreed with him on. On on drugs. They agreed with them on the fence all coming across the border, right? The only thing was they said, well, it's not the only place. It's also coming in from China or Ben doesn't argument. Right. You know, you can talk about China already have a wall. Pretty great wall. You can talk about China, but he's talking about Mexico. So they really, you know, again, they just said, well, he's correct on on on that even though it's also coming in from China doesn't mean the president's wrong, right? When they by the way, that's a security issue because the violent drug gangs that bring it across the border. That's the, you know, going back to the security point. And they you know, they kind of gloss over that and move on to the drug there. There wasn't a solid point. There was that was our thing. But our our our whole point is they have to fact check him, and you can win this one an ABC that has no fan of Donald Trump. When they're fact check you read, it you say we'll except for him continuing on that dumb equation that somehow Mexico indirectly be paying for the wall. They had nothing on him. The claim more Americans will die from drugs this year and were killed in the entire Vietnam war. Trump's prediction is consistent with law enforcement officials expectations. Then the very end. Senator Chuck Schumer. They fact check tremendous you'll be hearing from later tonight has repeatedly supported a physical barrier in the past along with other Democrats. They changed their mind only. After after I was elected, President Trump is right to suggest that at several points Schumer has backed the idea of a wall. Yes. And that's why we've said you can win the argument where we always thought even though I understand that the rallies are about the base that he wasn't losing his base in the first year. It instead of the rallies he should have been doing town hall meetings on the on the issues that he believes is important. Why we're you know, what I mean why not? That's you do town hall meetings. People would lock to FOX to you could simply be a town hall meeting on FOX everybody would have to cover it, and you should have brought in the border patrol. You should have a homeland security. A DA. And you lay out you don't have to exaggerate you simply bringing what are the government numbers here. It's very very bad. Well, but one of these areas was worst twenty years ago. Nobody cares. It's bad. Now. It's all bad across we want to stop the bad. He wasn't president twenty years ago. It doesn't matter was a little bit higher. That's not what we're we're talking about right here. You can win the argument every single time. And as we said he should have been doing that. He should have been doing press conferences. Where he brings in people from the border patrol where he brings in the homeland security, and he makes a statement, and they ask your questions, and he defers to them you market, you market, you market, you market. The message seems to have gotten into the White House may be too late. But it's what they've been doing the last couple of days president going to the border on on on Thursday. How effective will it be? Now. I don't believe they should've waited until they shut down the government to say, oh, maybe we should market. What we believe? Right. They should have been doing it from the very very beginning before you ever get to this point because your goal is not to convince all Democrats because you're not they're still gonna hate Trump. But your goal is to do what is to convince the the a significant portion of Democrats just convince a very small number of them were willing to listen who voted for you who agree with you on that? And then the independence out there or willing to listen all you need to do is convinced ten percent of the population. You don't need to convince everybody right, and you market it, and you teach people, and you say these these are the security issues, and you keep a top of mind all the time. And you do it in a perfect. Fashionable and concerning way that we care about America. And it's not a topic. That is very difficult to understand. No, it's not it's a very probably one of the. One of the simplest concepts. There is. In terms of protecting your borders. And as an as the president so much Jim Acosta as you point out hurtin, everybody forgot about the actual debate that they had right that the president one, right? When when you know, he when they kicked a cost to out for a while that the president actually won that argument. Right. Because what he said was because we'll immigrants. I'm talking about immigrants said we want people to come here legally at we're talking about illegal immigrants. There's a difference day. He won. He actually won that argument. Yeah. Nobody ever brought that we brought it up, but the mainstream media didn't bring it up actually won that argument and the cost to change the topic. Right. And so the president the message that he say now as as we have stated we believe he should have been making all Wong as look. It's a legal immigration. It's drugs. It's crime. It's the Mexican cartel. It's a humanitarian crisis by having an open border of refugees or of people by the thousands attempting to cross because they believe that they can it's the people that get sick along the way, it's the women that are attacked along along the way because of the belief that they can get into this country. And Democrats are the ones that are proposing that and we wish to stop that. But we also wish to have legal immigration as the president said because with a growing economy as the president said, we're gonna need the workers, he covered all the bases. But you've got to do it every single day every single week every single month. Not just when you close down the government. Yeah. It's going to have any nonstop every now and the U-Haul whoop de doo may please your base. It does nothing to convince America that you're on the right moral Pat doing that you do that in a professional presidential way of getting the information out to the people from official sources, and you do that with town hall meetings. You do that with press conferences, and you do that? With a consistent video marketing message, not just on the internet. But massively on TV. By the by the way, we were both right. It was Marco Rubio. Remember when had this dry mouth to okay, Jen dolls is Marco Rubio struggling to get a drink water during a Republican response to a state of the union by Obama. But that imagery is. Is really important the president can master moments. But they have to be brief. The problem. The dual edged sword here for the president is he doesn't shy away from the media when they start talking. He'll sit there and answer. Was the last week at the cabinet meeting? Ninety minutes. About that the meeting would have gone ninety minutes. But I mean, if he's sitting there in the media is asking questions, he'll answer everything. Not necessary. And the answers need to be straight to the point. Don't add don't embellish. Straight to the point. This is about border security end of story. American people understand that. This is why it's important. It's not twenty five or thirty billion a year the the criticism from the right is that when he took that ninety minutes and just answered questions, he would ramble all over the that's that's that's my point. You don't have to do that. Straight to the point. So that's that dual edged sword. Yeah. He's willing to talk to the media. But the problem is you start rambling and the media focuses not on your message on this or that that is completely unnecessary straight to the point. Right. They want the sideshow any mistake that you make. So you don't give them an opportunity to pick up any of the mistakes because when you sit and you talk all the time you are going to make mistakes, eight minutes, eight minutes, eight minutes. Perfect. Got the message across. If he would have been doing town hall meetings. You you can be there and you introduced it..

president Donald Trump Marco Rubio Jim Acosta ABC Senator Chuck Schumer Jake tapper Louisiana Mexico John carpenter FOX China America Jindal Carleen Gary McNamara White House
"marco rubio" Discussed on Talk 650 KSTE

Talk 650 KSTE

02:48 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on Talk 650 KSTE

"It does not define what an emergency is. And the president will do it. It'll probably be challenged legally. But there's a very good chance. Yeah. It is a bad precedent. I will say that. It is a bad precedent. Marco Rubio came out and said, well, you know, what remember just like we saw with with our buddy read all the Harry old. Hey, I fell down inside the gym read who's now wants to search foes, which jam okay with. When he did what he did. Everybody on the right side of the aisle. What he did the nuclear option. They looked over and said, you're gonna regret this. But he did it anyways few years later. Republicans had the power. And Schumer's like, I knew it was a bad idea. So if Trump goes and does something like this. Marco Rubio said Democrats are in control is the president not getting what he wanted because there's enough Republicans to stop any of this. What's to prevent a he or she from going out and saying climate change, national emergency. We're doing this. You set a precedent? And what are you step over that line? It gives. People the we can do it. Now too. We can do it now to you guys did it. So we can do it. Now too. So beware. Beware. If he does three two three five three eight twenty four twenty three at Chadbensonshow is your Twitter tweet at us. My whole thing is. Trump. Is trump? It's not a Republican democrat. He's trump. So if it hurts the Republicans he doesn't care. I know that sounds weird. But he's in it for himself. And I generally believe he loves America. I believe that. I think he this. This is what he wants done. I think this is what he thinks that is going to make America great again. But as far as the loyalty to the party, he's only as loyal as long as they're going to do the things that he wants them to do. Where he gets his say, first and foremost. So something to beware. Three two three five three eight twenty four twenty three at Chadbensonshow is your Twitter. You can tweet at me. They take pizzas rather. Seriously. I get that. And if you come up with a great recipe, would you not want to protect it at all cost Dominick Moreno.

Trump Marco Rubio Twitter president Harry Dominick Moreno Schumer America
"marco rubio" Discussed on WJR 760

WJR 760

12:24 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on WJR 760

"This is Red Eye Radio all across America, eight six six ninety redeye he is Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally killed by those who illegally entered our country and thousands more lives will be lost. If we don't act right now. So there you go the president with his address last night. And then the they live sequence. By the way, thanks for pointing out to me because you're just doing some general research, and you saw story that had come out last October that John carpenter is teasing the possibility of they live sequel. I think we saw trailer for it a few hours ago. I I saw the still pictures. I it looks. It looks weird by the way, even even Jake tapper had a picture of it. And everybody's just, you know, just the the still pictures, especially at the right moment. Right. Look, the the imagery is just is just bad. And we always talk about the substance, and the imagery the best thing is to have great imagery and the substance behind it who was it that did the Republican response on state of the show. It was was it Marco Rubio. No. I think I think it was former governor of Louisiana. Jindal did one to and but it wasn't good. I mean, we we before when he was out in public giving speeches? He was great. He was horrible when he gave a response one time. Yeah. It was it was just bad. It was deer in ice. And you know, I mean, they you would think that they settle into it right because they run campaigns. They're out all the time. But yeah, it was not great imagery. But. What was interesting though. I think the takeaway the big takeaway for me is the fact that everybody was focusing on what the president was saying that we were we were actually having the debate on this for the first time, actually. It was it was an actual debate on the topic. Well, and one of the reasons that at and if you've been listening, you know, trust running late the time, especially the last week is when we have said look for the last two years, and we laid it out what we believe the president should have been doing what Republicans should have been doing. And there should have been town hall meetings on on illegal immigration. They should have been going down to border cities and doing town hall meetings. I don't care whether if only FOX's carrying it. It doesn't matter look at remember the headline in the drudge report two days ago. Well, the networks might not carry it. Then you've got some liberal pundits saying, they shouldn't carry it. They should take the lead and fact checking and then edit they ended up all carrying it. Why Trump is news? Right. And and so what are they talking about now? And you, and I look not for example, Jim Acosta, but we said, okay. Let's see what some of the networks are doing. And we went to ABC, and ABC fact checked them. All right. What was the biggest fact check against him? The client that Mexico will be paying indirectly by the new great trade deal, which we said the president. We do the the caller was a Trump supporter. Just before the top of the hour said, look, we don't care just build the wall. The president's gotta stop it. It doesn't make any sense. It's basically, it's incoherent. When he does that because it and for some reason, he sticks to it. But you take that out of it. The only other thing that they had negative to say about the president. Was they disagreed that. It's a security crisis. It might be a humanitarian crisis, but we don't think that rises to the level of security crisis. Because for the last two decades illegal immigration has actually gone down. Except for the last year words gone back up, which then when you said, well, that's the whole point is going back up again. He was making the point that it's on the right? And they said well, historically, no over the last year. Yes. Okay. Then he was right? But that that's not again, that's not a lie. That's a difference in whether it's a security crisis or a crisis, right or a emergency. You're getting into the minutia boards. But other than that. They agreed with a well, they they they they agreed with him on. On on drugs. They agreed with them on the Fenton all coming across the border. Right. We only thing was they said, well, it's not the only place. It's also coming in from China or that doesn't argument. Right. You know, you can talk about China. They already have a wall. A pretty great wall. You can talk about China, but he's talk about Mexico stone. They really, you know, again, they said, well, he's correct on on on that even though it's also coming in from China doesn't mean the president's wrong, right? When they. That's a security issue because the violent drug gangs that bring it across the border. That's you know, going back to the security point. And they you know, they kind of gloss over that and move on to the drug. But there wasn't a solid point there that was that was our thing. But our our whole point is they have to fact check him, and you can win this one an ABC that has no fan of Donald Trump when they're fact check you read, it you say well, except for him continuing on that dumb equation that somehow Mexico indirectly paying for the wall. They had nothing on him. The claim more Americans will die from drugs this year and were killed in the entire Vietnam war. Trump's prediction is consistent with law enforcement officials expectations. Then the very end Senator Chuck Schumer. They fact check on this. You'll be hearing from later tonight has repeatedly supported a physical barrier in the past along with other Democrats. They changed their mind. Only after I after I was elected President Trump is right to suggest that at several points Schumer has backed the idea of a wall. Yes. And that's why we have said you can win the argument where we always thought even though I understand that the rallies are about the base that he wasn't losing his base in the first year. That instead of the rallies he should have been doing town hall meetings on the on the issues that he believes is important. Why were you know, what I mean? Why not that's you? You do town hall meetings. People would lock to FOX. Yup. To you could simply be a town hall meeting on FOX. Everybody would have to cover it and you should have brought in the border patrol. You should have a homeland security a DA. And you lay out you don't have to exaggerate you simply bringing what are the government numbers here. It's very very bad. Well, but one of these areas was worse twenty years ago. Nobody cares. It's bad. Now. It's all bad across. We wanna stop the bad. He wasn't president twenty years ago. It doesn't matter was a little bit higher. That's not what we're talk. We're talking about right here can win the argument every single time. And as you said he should have been doing that. He should have been doing press conferences where he brings in people from the border patrol where he brings in the homeland security, and he makes a statement. And they says ask your questions, and he defers to them you market, you market, you market, you market. The message seems to have gotten into the White House may be too late. But it's what they've been doing the last couple of days of president going to the border on on on Thursday. How effective will it be? Now. I don't believe they should have waited until they shut down the government to say, oh, maybe we should market. What we believe? Right. They should have been doing it from the very very beginning before you ever get to this point because your goal is not to convince all Democrats because you're not they're still gonna hate Trump. But your goal is to do what is to convince the the a significant portion of Democrats just convince a very small number of them. More willing to listen voted for you who agree with you on that. And then the independence out there who are willing to listen all you need to do is convinced ten percent of the population. You don't need to convince everybody right, and you market it, and you teach people, and you say these these are the security issues, and you keep a top of mind all the time. And you do it in a professional and concerning way that we care about America. And it's not a topic. That is very difficult to understand. No, it's not it's a very probably one of the one of the simplest concepts. There is. In terms of protecting your borders. And as the as the president said Jim Acosta as you point out Arden, everybody forgot about the actual debate that they had right that the president one, right? When when you know, he when they kick a cost to out for a while that the president actually won that argument. Right. Because what he said was because we'll immigrants. I'm talking about immigrants said we want people to come here legally at we're talking about illegal immigrants. There's difference today. He won he actually won that argument. Yep. Nobody ever brought that we brought it up, but the mainstream media didn't bring it up actually won that argument and the cost of change the topic. Right. And so the president the message that he's saying now as as we have stated we believe he should have been making all along as look. It's illegal immigration. It's drugs. It's crime. It's the Mexican cartel. It's a humanitarian crisis by having an open border of refugees or people by the thousands attempting to cross because they believe that they can it's the people that get sick along the way, it's the women that are attacked along all along the way because of the belief that they can get into this country. And Democrats are the ones that are proposing that and we wish to stop that. But we also wish to have legal immigration as the president said because with the growing economy as the president said, we're gonna need the workers, he covered all the bases. But you've got to do it every single day every single week every single month. Not just when you close down the government. Yeah. It's going to have any non stop every now and the rallies he ha- whoop. De do may please your base. It does nothing to convince America that you're on the right moral path doing that you do that in a professional presidential way of getting the information out to the people from official sources, and you do that with town hall meetings. You do that with press conferences, and you do that? With a consistent video marketing message, not just on the internet. But massively on TV. By the by the way. Yeah. We were both right. It was Marco Rubio. Remember when they had this dry mouth to okay dolls is. And Marco Rubio struggling to get a drink water apparently during a Republican. A response to a state of the union by Obama. But that imagery is. Is really important the president can master moments. But they have to be brief. The problem. The dual edged sword here for the president is he doesn't shy away from the media when they start talking you'll sit there an answer. Was the last week at the cabinet meeting? Ninety minutes. Not that the meeting would have gone ninety minutes. But I mean, if he's sitting there in the media's asking questions, he'll answer everything. Not necessary. And the answers need to be straight to the point. Don't add don't embellish. Straight to the point. This is about border security end of.

president President Trump Marco Rubio America Jim Acosta ABC Jake tapper Louisiana FOX John carpenter Mexico China Jindal Eric Harley Senator Chuck Schumer Red Eye Radio Obama Fenton
"marco rubio" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

13:20 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"Eight six six ninety redeye he is Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally killed by those who illegally entered our country and thousands more lives will be lost. If we don't act right now. So there you go the president with his address last night. And then the. They live sequence. By the way, thanks for pointing out to me because you were just doing some general research, and you saw story that had come out last October. John carpenter is teasing the possibility of they live sequel. I think we saw trailer for a few hours ago. I I saw the still pictures. I it looked it looks. We're by the way, even even Jake tapper had a picture of it. And everybody was just, you know, just the the still pictures, especially at the right moment. Right. Look, the the imagery is just is just bad. And we always talk about the substance, and the imagery the best thing is to have great imagery and the substance behind him who was it. The did the Republican. Response on state of the oh, it was was it. Marco rubio. No. I think it was the former governor of Louisiana. Jindal did one to gender, but it wasn't good. I mean, we we'd seen him before when he was out in public giving speeches. He was great. He was horrible. When he gave a response one time. It was bad. It was deer in the headlights. And you know, I mean, they you would think that they settle into it. Right because they run campaigns throughout all the time. But yeah, it was not great imagery. But. What was interesting though. I think the takeaway the big takeaway for me is the fact that everybody was focusing on what the president was saying that we were we were actually having the debate on this for the first time, actually. It was it was an actual debate on the topic. Well, and one of the reasons that if you've been listening to us running late the time, especially the last week is when we have said look for the last two years, and we laid it out what we believe the president should have been doing what Republicans should have been doing. And there should have been town hall meetings on on illegal immigration. They should have been going down to border cities and doing town hall meetings don't care whether if only FOX's carrying it doesn't matter. Look remember, the headline in the drudge report two days ago. Well, the networks might not carry it. Then you've got some liberal pundits saying, they shouldn't carry it. They should take the lane and fact checking and then edited they ended up all carrying it. Why? Because Trump is news. Right. And and so what are they talking about now? And you, and I look not for example, Jim Acosta, but we said, okay. Let's see what some of the networks are doing. And we went to ABC. And ABC fact, check them. All right. What was the biggest fact check against him the claim that Mexico will be paying indirectly by the new great trade deal, which we said the president. We do the the caller was a Trump supporter. Just before the top of the hour said, look, we don't care just build a wall. The president's gotta stop it. It doesn't make any sense. It's basically, it's incoherent. When he does that. Because it been for some reason he sticks to it. But you take that out of it. The only other thing that they had negative to say about the president. Was they disagreed that. It's a security crisis. It might be a humanitarian crisis. But we don't think that it rises to the level of security crisis. Because for the last two decades illegal immigration has actually gone down. Except for the last year words gone back up which that when you said, well, that's the whole point is going back up again. He was making the point that it's on the rise. Right. And they said well, historically, no over the last year. Yes. Okay. Then he was right? But that that's not again, that's not a lie. That's a difference in whether it's a security crisis or a crisis, right or a emergency. You know, you're you're getting into the minutia of words, but other than that. They agreed with them. Well, they they they they agreed with him on. On on drugs. They agreed with them on the Vietnam coming across the border, right? The only thing was they said, well, it's not the only place. It's also coming in from China that doesn't argument. Right. You know, you can talk about China. They already have a wall. You know, he's a pretty great wall. You can talk about China, but he's talking about Mexico. So they really, you know, again, they just said, well, he's correct on on on that even though it's also coming in from China doesn't mean the president's wrong, right? When they. That's the security issue because the violent drug gangs that bring it across the border. That's going back to the security point. And they they kind of gloss over that and move on to the drug there. There wasn't a solid point there that was that was our thing. But our our our point is they have to fact check him and you can win this one. And that is no fan of Donald Trump. When they're fact check you read it you say, well, except for him continuing on that dumb equation that somehow Mexico indirectly be paying for the wall. And they had nothing on him. The claim more Americans will die from drugs this year and were killed in the entire Vietnam war. Trump's prediction is consistent with law enforcement officials expectations. Then the very end. Senator Chuck Schumer. They fact check tremendous you'll be hearing from later tonight has repeatedly supported a physical barrier in the past along with other Democrats. They changed their mind only. After after I was elected, President Trump is right to suggest that at several points Schumer has backed the idea of a wall. Yes. And that's why we have said you can win the argument where we always thought even though I understand that the rallies are about the base that he wasn't losing his base in the first year. But instead of the rallies he should have been doing town hall meetings on the on the issues that he believes is important why we're. Why not? That's you. You do town hall meetings, people would flock to FOX too, you could simply be a town hall meeting on FOX everybody would have to cover it, and you should have brought in the border patrol. You should have a homeland security a DA. And you lay out you don't have to exaggerate you simply bringing the government numbers here. It's very very bad. Well, but one of these areas was worse twenty years ago. Nobody cares. It's bad. Now. It's all bad across. We wanna stop the bad. He wasn't president twenty years ago. It doesn't matter was a little bit higher. That's not what we're we're talking about right here. You can win the argument every single time. And as we said he should have been doing that. He should have been doing press conferences where he brings in people from the border patrol where he brings in the homeland security, and he makes a statement. And they says ask your questions, and he defers to them you market, you market, you market, you market. The message seems to have gotten into the White House may be too late. But it's what they've been doing the last couple of days president going to the border on on on Thursday. How effective will it be? Now. I don't believe they should have waited until they shut down the government to say, oh, maybe we should market. What we believe? Right. They should have been doing it from the very very beginning before you ever get to this point because your goal is not to convince all Democrats because you're not still gonna hate Trump. But your goal is to do what is to convince the the significant portion of Democrats just convince a very small number of them or willing to listen voted for you who agree with you on that. And then the independence out there or willing to listen all you need to do is convinced ten percent of the population. You don't need to convince everybody right, and you market it, and you teach people, and you say these these are the security issues, and you keep a top of mind all the time. And you do it in a perfect. Fashionable and concerning way that we care about America. And it's not a topic. That is very difficult to understand. No, it's not it's a very probably one of the one of the simplest concepts. There is. In terms of protecting your borders. As an as the president said with Jim Acosta as you point out, Oregon, everybody forgot about the actual debate that they had right at the president one, right? When when you know, he when they kicked a cost out for a while that the president actually won that argument. Right. Because what he said was because we'll immigrants. I'm talking about immigrants said we want people to come here legally at we're talking about illegal immigrants. There's a difference for day. He won the actually won that argument. Nobody ever brought that we brought it up, but the mainstream media didn't bring it up and one that argument and the cost of change the topic. Right. And so the president the message that he's saying now as as we have stated we believe he should have been making all along as look. It's illegal immigration. It's drugs. It's crime. It's the Mexican cartel. It's a humanitarian crisis by having an open border of refugees or of people by the thousands attempting to cross because they believe that they can it's the people that get sick along the way, it's the women that are attacked along along the way because of the belief that they can get into this country. And Democrats are the ones that are proposing that and we wish to stop that. But we also wish to have legal immigration as the president said because with the growing economy as the president said, we're gonna need the workers, he covered all the bases. But you've got to do it every single day every single week every single month. Not just when you close down the government. Yeah. It's going to have any nonstop. We now. He ha- whoop de doo may please your base. It does nothing to convince America that you're on the right moral path doing that you do that in a professional presidential way of getting the information out to the people from official sources, and you do that with town hall meetings. You do that with press conferences, and you do that? With a consistent video marketing message, not just on the internet. But massively on TV. By the by the way, we were both right. It was Marco Rubio. Remember when they had this dry mouth general to okay, Jen dolls is. And Marco Rubio struggling to get a drink water apparently during a Republican response to a state of the union by Obama. But that imagery is. Is really important the president can master moments. But they have to be brief. The problem. The dual edged sword here for the president is he doesn't shy away from the media when they start talking. He'll sit there and answer. Was the last week at the cabinet meeting? Ninety minutes. That the meeting wouldn't have gone ninety minutes. But I mean, if he's sitting there in the media is asking questions, he'll answer everything. Not necessary. And the answers need to be straight to the point. Don't don't embellish. Straight to the point. This is about border security end of story. The American people understand that. This is why it's important. It's not twenty five or thirty billion a year the criticism from the right is that when he took that ninety minutes and just answered questions he would ramble all over the best. That's that's my point. You don't have to do that. Straight to the point. So that's a dual edged sword. Yeah. He's willing to talk to the media. But the problem is you start rambling and the media focuses not on your message on this or that that is completely unnecessary straight to the point. Right. They want the sideshow any mistake that you make. So you don't give them an opportunity to pick up any of the mistakes because when you sit and you talk all the time you are going to make mistakes, eight minutes, eight minutes, eight minutes. Perfect. Got the message across. If he would have been doing town hall meetings..

president Donald Trump Marco rubio Jim Acosta Jake tapper Mexico John carpenter Louisiana China Eric Harley America ABC Senator Chuck Schumer Jindal FOX Gary McNamara Vietnam White House
"marco rubio" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

13:59 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"Eight six six ninety redeye he is Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Good morning over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally killed by those who illegally entered our country and thousands more lives will be lost. If we don't act right now. So there you go the president with his address last night. And then the. They live sequence. By the way, thanks for pointing out to me because you were just doing some general research, and you saw story that had come out last October. John carpenter is teasing the possibility of a day live sequel. I think we saw trailer for a few hours ago. Oh. Was the basics. That's a I I saw the still pictures. I it looks. It looks weird by the way, even even Jake tapper had a rough it and everybody was just, you know, just the the still pictures, especially at the right moment. Look, the the imagery is just is just bad. And we always talk about the substance, and the imagery the best thing is to have great imagery and the substance behind it who was it that did the Republican response on state of the oh, it was was it Marco Rubio. No. I think it was the former governor of Louisiana. Jindal did one the, but it wasn't good. I mean, we. Yeah. Before when he was out in public giving speeches? He was great. He was horrible. When he gave a response one time. It was it was deer in the us. And you know, I mean, they you would think that they settle into it right because they run campaigns. They're out all the time. But yeah, it was not great imagery. But. What was interesting though. I think the takeaway the big takeaway for me is the fact that everybody was focusing on what the president was saying that we were we were actually having the debate on this for the first time, actually. It was it was an actual debate on the topic. Well, and one of the reasons that if you've been listening, you know, trust running late the time, especially the last week when we have said look for the last two years, and we laid it out what we believe the president should have been doing what Republicans should have been doing. And there should have been town hall meetings on on illegal immigration. They should have been going down to borders, cities and doing town hall meetings. I don't care whether if only FOX's carrying it doesn't matter look at remember the headline in the drudge report two days ago. Well, the networks might not carry it. Then you've got some liberal pundits saying, they shouldn't carry it. They should take the lead and fact checking and then edited they ended up all carrying it. Why does Trump is news? Right. And and so what are they talking about now? And you, and I look not for example, Jim Acosta, but we said, okay. Let's see what some of the networks are doing. We went to ABC. And ABC fact, check them. All right. What was the biggest fact check against him decline that Mexico will be paying indirectly by the new great trade deal, which we said the president. We do the the caller was a Trump supporter. Just before the top of the hour said, look, we don't care just build the wall. The president's gotta stop it. It doesn't make any sense. It's basically, it's incoherent. When he does that. Because it been for some reason he sticks to it. But you take that out of it. The only other thing that they had negative to say about the president. Was they disagreed that. It say security crisis. It might be a humanitarian crisis. But we don't think that it rises to the level of security crisis. Because for the last two decades illegal immigration has actually gone down. Except for the last year words gone back up, which then when you said, well, that's the whole point is going back up again, he was making the point that it's on the rise. Right. And they said well, historically, no over the last year. Yes. Okay. Then he was right? But that that's not again, that's not a lie. That's a difference in whether it's a security crisis or a crisis, right or a emergency. You know, you're you're getting into the minutia of words, but other than that. They agreed with a well, they they they agreed with him on. On on drugs. They agreed with them on the Fenton all coming across the border, right? The only thing was they said, well, it's not the only place. It's also coming in from China. That doesn't argument. Right. You know, you can talk about China Bertie have a wall. You know, he's a pretty great wall. You can talk about China, but he's talking about Mexico. So they really, you know, again, they just said, well, he's correct on on on that even though it's also coming in from China doesn't mean the president's wrong, right? That's a security issue because the violent drug gangs that bring it across the border. That's those you know, going back to the security point. And they you know, they kind of gloss over that and move on to the drug. But there wasn't a solid point there that was was our. But our our whole point is they have to fact check him, and you can win this one an ABC that has no fan of Donald Trump. But they're fact check you read it you say well, except for him continuing on that dumb equation that somehow Mexico indirectly be paying for the wall. They had nothing on him the claim or Americans will die from drugs this year, and we're killed in the entire Vietnam war. Trump's prediction is consistent with law enforcement officials expectations. Then the very end Senator Chuck Schumer. They fact tremendous you'll be hearing from later tonight has repeatedly supported a physical barrier in the past along with other Democrats, they change their mind. Only after I after I was elected President Trump is right to suggest that at several points Schumer has backed the idea of a wall. Yes. And that's why we've said you can win the argument where we always thought even though I understand that the rallies are about the base that he wasn't losing his base in the first year. Instead of the rallies. He should have been doing town hall meetings on the on the issues that he believed is important. Why were what I mean? I mean, why not that's you. You do town hall meetings. People would block the FOX to you could simply be a town hall meeting on FOX everybody would have to cover it, and you should have brought in the border patrol. You should have a homeland security a DA, and you lay out you don't have to exaggerate you simply bringing in what are the government numbers here? Right. It's it's very very bad. Well, but at one of these areas was worse twenty years ago. Nobody cares. It's bad now. It's all bad across we want to stop the bad in twenty years ago. It doesn't matter was a little bit higher. That's not what we're we're talking about. Right here can win the argument every single time. And if you said he should have been doing that he should have been doing press conferences where he brings in people from the border patrol where he brings in the homeland security at he makes a statement. And they says ask your questions, and he defers to them you market, you market, you market, you market. The message seems to have gotten into the White House may be too late. But it's what they've been doing the last couple of days president going to the border on on on Thursday. How effective will it be? Now. I don't believe they should have waited until they shut down the government to say, oh, maybe we should market while we believe, right? They should have been doing it from the very very beginning before you ever get to this point because your goal is not to convince all Democrats because you're not they're still gonna hate Trump. But your goal is to do what is to convince the the a significant portion of Democrats just convince a very small number of them. Willing to listen voted for you who agree with you on that. And then the independence out there were willing to listen all you need to do is convinced ten percent of the population. You don't need to convince everybody right, and you market it, and you teach people, and you say these these are the security issues, and you keep top of mind all the time. And you do it in a professional and concerning way that we care about America. And it's not a topic. That is very difficult to understand. No, it's not it's a very probably one of the one of the simplest concepts. There is. In terms of protecting your borders. And as and as the president said, well, Jim Acosta, as you point out hurting, everybody forgot about the actual debate that they had right that the president one, right? When when you know, he when they take a cost out for a while that the president actually won that argument. Right. Because what he said was because we'll immigrants. I'm talking about immigrants said we want people to come here legally at we're talking about illegal immigrants. There's a difference today. He won he actually won that argument. Yeah. Nobody ever brought that we brought it up, but the mainstream media didn't bring it up actually won that argument and the cost of change the topic. Right. And so the president the message that he say now is as we have stated we believe he should have been making all along as look. It's a legal immigration. It's drugs. It's crime. It's the Mexican cartel. It's a humanitarian crisis by having an open border of refugees or of people by the thousands attempting to cross because they believe that they can it's the people that get sick along the way, it's the women that are attacked along along the way because of the belief that they can get into this country. And Democrats are the ones that are proposing that and we wish to stop that. But we also wish to have legal immigration as the president said because with the growing economy as the president said, we're gonna need the workers, he covered all the bases. But you've got to do it every single day every single week every single month. Not just when you close down the government. Yeah. It's going to have any nonstop. We now. How would he do may? Please your base. It does nothing to convince America that you're on the right moral Pat doing that you do that in a professional presidential way of getting the information out to the people from official sources, and you do that with town hall meetings. You do that with press conferences, and you do that? With a consistent video marketing message, not just on the internet. But massively on TV. By the way, we were both right. It was Marco Rubio. Remember when they had this Oriel dry mouth to. Okay, Jen dolls is. And Marco Rubio struggling to get a drink water apparently during a Republican response to a state of the union by Obama. But that imagery is. Is really important the president can master moments, but they have to be brief. The problem. The dual edged sword here for the president is she doesn't shy away from the media when they start talking. He'll sit there an answer. Was the last week at the cabinet meeting? Ninety minutes. That's at the meeting wouldn't have gone ninety minutes. But I mean, if he's sitting there in the media is asking questions, don't answer everything. Not necessary. And the answers need to be straight to the point. Don't add don't embellish. Straight to the point this is about border security, and our story. American people understand that. This is why it's important. It's not twenty five or thirty billion a year the criticism from the right is that when he took that ninety minutes and just answered questions he would ramble all over the best. That's that's my point. You don't have to do that. Straight to the point. So that's that dual edged sword. The is willing to talk to the media. But the problem is you start rambling and the media focuses not on your message on this or that that is completely unnecessary straight to the point. Right. They want the sideshow any mistake that you. So you don't give them an opportunity to pick up any of the mistakes because when you sit and you talk all the time you are going to make mistakes, eight minutes, eight minutes, eight minutes. Perfect. Got the message across. If he would have been doing town hall meetings. You you can be there and you introduce it, but you're not doing you're not presenting all the facts, you are handing it off right to border security. You're handing it off to someone else. That's where you would do it with somebody. You might you might take you might take somebody like I'll just draw a Sean Hannity from Fox News. If you're going to do with that way. And you talk yet we're concerned about border security. And then you say, you know, Sean is the professional you start asking the questions and the homeland security person wants to say now, the less gonna cruise your propaganda fine. Great. They did with the president last night..

president President Trump Marco Rubio ABC Jim Acosta Jake tapper Louisiana Mexico John carpenter Eric Harley America China FOX Jindal us Senator Chuck Schumer Sean Hannity Fenton Fox News
"marco rubio" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

02:52 min | 3 years ago

"marco rubio" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"Might have something like what happened in Vegas, or we might have something like what happened at the pulse nightclub in Orlando or Stillman, Douglas and Broward County, Florida, those types of things often color our imagination, and that is where we still have mainstream. News media influence that is Corrina picture that is also pulse. And part of the reason that I'm bringing this up. There was a piece of legislation proposed yesterday that not many people. No about or paid attention to its gun control. And it came from none other than Senator Marco Rubio, and what's all this about? So every time we have a new congress all the pending legislation from previous congress that is dead. That Bill on Capitol Hill from schoolhouse rock. He was part of the top two percent. Only two percent. A proposed legislation ever passes into becoming law, and literally and that was a more than ten thousand bills die when with each new cars that comes into session in the wake of the shooting and Stephen Douglas in Florida last year Marco Rubio proposed some reforms that became part of comprehensive gun control here in Florida. And it went nowhere. The very first thing he decided to do in the new congress was propose it yet. Again. Now, here's something to watch. Whatever you happen to think of it. Yeah. Your name we tend to also through perception and reality. I think that everything is necessarily partisan, for example, any type of gun control or reform is necessarily something that Republicans don't want, and and necessarily something that Democrats do want and in the like, but somewhere along the line there can be a level of pragmatism that enters the equation. And this is where Ford is a little bit anomalous this way. Did pass comprehensive gun control reform last year and happened to be reformed that as a proud supporter of the second amendment and a gun owner, I generally supported and it happened to pass with a completely Republican controlled state government here in Florida happened to be signed into law by our Republican governor Rick Scott who happens to be the incoming junior Senator from Florida. So as Marco Rubio proposed this as you have Rick Scott that is going to be another Senator from Florida who actually helped install it and make it happen. One of the things you're likely to see playing out is some type of reform here. Now, you might be aware the President Trump ended up using his pen to sign out through that kid of action bomb socks. He is also that.

Senator Marco Rubio Florida congress Stephen Douglas Rick Scott Senator Corrina Broward County Ford Vegas Stillman Orlando Trump President two percent