5 Burst results for "Leo Lit"
The Corner
"leo lit" Discussed on The Corner
"Not like buster Douglas. Okay. It's not 'cause buster does one by knockout. Devonte, I mean, javonte hasn't fought. He looks great. Don't get me wrong, he could be great. But when you look at the resume and you compare it to his peers, even Ryan García beat Luke Campbell. Yeah. I don't see where javonte, he's had the Al hayman adviser. He's had the linear Eller be advised. There's a story floating around that the split because you know they've had a riff for a while. Yeah. And there was a rumor that tank didn't want to leave Baltimore and Floyd gave him an apartment out here or a place. Who's going to protect tank for himself because as much as you talk about tank is this one? That legal shit is still there. No, it is. He went back for three days. I am concerned that tank is not going to train in that gym when he leaves. No, the vaguest crib, the all that. That has got him disciplined is gone. That's where I'm concerned because like tio couldn't make the weight, but he left perfecting athletes with top rank and blah blah blah. It was just like, yo, this is a tough fucking wake up when I don't have a whole crew feeding me meals all day. It's different. There's protections with these companies. I think tank is very good. I just, you're leaving a situation where you're in the pay per view a side for the fourth fight. And now you're looking, it's like, all right, well, who am I going to fight? And somebody's going to pay you, you're going to get a fight. I just wonder how good he is. Does he beat Devin Haney? Got to catch him, because Devin whale point him. You get to 7 7 rounds to be down 6 one. Real quick because he's putting you on the end of that job if you want to. Like Leo Santa Cruz, you're like, he might be losing Leo. Lights out. So it's like, so tank is fought, Rolly Romero, Isaac Cruz, Leo Santa Cruz, Europe was gamboa, who was Torres. It ruptured his Achilles in the second round. It made it to the 12. Yeah. And then you go, all right, and then Taylor is, I want to go out on my own. And it's like, now? I don't know if now is the right time. Well, the next time you get is probably 30. Right. But I don't know. I mean, are you fighting for money? You find for legacy. A little bit of both. But you don't want to get trapped. At this point, Mayweather promotions is only feeding you Mayweather promotions. So it's not helping your legacy either. That's true. That's very true. So it's just like, yo, are y'all going to give me the top fighters? 'cause now you're just giving me your fighters, which doesn't also help my legacy. If I could stay and you would give me PVC fighters and people outside the building, maybe we can talk. Like Leo Santa Cruz. That's a very good point. But you guys aren't proving to build my legacy either. Yeah, I don't know what happened because it's like building your pockets. Yeah, on one hand, it's like you're now your main event in New York. Yeah, Brooklyn. So you've done LA. They've put you in the right places because you've had good mark. And now it's like to your point. It's like, well, I need to find somebody. And if you're not going to give me somebody, I'm going to leave. So maybe that's what he's doing. I just go back to the questions. I don't know how good tank is. It seems like the rift. When Mayweather said, we have enough in-house. We don't got to go anywhere else. Yeah, I don't like that. You make me look like a bitch. Because if anything takes like, I'm not scared. Yeah, he's not. So let me test myself against Devin. You know Devin. Yeah. He's a free agent. There's no reason for you not to overpay us both to fight each other. It could be complete Mayweather promotions. Like top ranks bring Devin in. If he wins these belts, it could be nobody else in. Mayor of the promotions on showtime. Hey, they've shown nothing that they want to pay auxiliary outside of their building. Yeah, yeah. I gotta bounce. Man, and maybe I just motions be fine. Carmel mouton is an annoying, like 14 years old. I mean, man with the performance will be fine. This whole tank situation. I don't know how this breaks. I wish tank would have got not really Romero for his last fight with the promotions. The Cuban in-house. I'm sure take wishes he didn't get Rolly Romero. I know. It's like, yo, this was cute in December. This guy just went through a major legal case. Hurting his stock. Well, legal cases don't necessarily hurt anybody talking boxing. I mean, it's not great. Talking about mainstream wise. I'm just saying, Mayweather said plenty of this. Yes, but Mayweather was a staff. No one's putting roly Romero on their show. So now I gotta carry the promotion and the fight. I mean, the fight was, again, it was a squash match to begin with. But it was a squash match where you can parade the B side talker places. And then now who's touching them? Ain't coming on this show. No, absolutely not. So where are you putting him? So it's tough. And it takes like why, what is he helping me? I'm curious, I'm curious. We'll see what happens. We'll keep an eye on that. Prediction tank under 6. Hang on to 6. No, it's been a great show. Thank you guys. Just take along with us, tons of boxing talk. Like I said before, just start off the show three straight shows of pro wrestling after this. So make sure you guys are ready for a huge week of pro wrestling talk here from blue wire studios in the wind. There's only Las Vegas, AW week, and in Vegas, so it's going to be great. GCW, FS, W everybody in town. It's going to be fun. Shout out to everybody in the booth. This is a cold baby. Holding us down, Brian, on the board as well. Brian's been lending his hair rock. I love, I love the hair, Jeremiah on the boards. I need a hair like Brian. I can't grow that anymore. I think my days are over. If you guys are in Vegas, make sure you guys check us out. But in the meantime, follow us on social media at corner podcast underscore on Twitter at corner club for life on Instagram, check out our YouTube, the corner podcast, as well. Stay safe..
Bloomberg Radio New York
"leo lit" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Had behind my question Has there been any unfair question do you counsel Your honor Joining me is Liga litman a professor at the University of Michigan law school Leah this case went to the Supreme Court twice explain why it's back at the 5th circuit So what ended up happening is the United States Supreme Court decided the issues in the case as the parties were then arguing them And what the Texas state officials were arguing at the time was that the law clearly did not give any of them any enforcement authority and therefore they could not be sued But the United States Supreme Court said is we United States Supreme Court think that at least these state licensing officials have the authority discipline doctors and nurses who perform abortions and violation of FBA because those licensing officials have that enforcement authority they can be sued But that conclusion rests on an interpretation of state law And the United States Supreme Court is not the final arbiter over the meaning of state law That job falls to the state courts And so when the United States Supreme Court set the case back now to the 5th circuit the Texans officials filed a motion saying we would like you court to basically ask the taxes Supreme Court about whether the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the state law was correct And you test the Supreme Court need to tell us whether these licensing officials actually do have the authority discipline doctors and nurses who perform abortions and violations of FDA This was a pretty contentious hearing some of the judges appeared to be sort of sparring with each other What was the main contention There were a few different contentions floating around in the argument One was just the propriety of allowing the Texas officials to request certification to the Texas Supreme Court at this late stage in the case The Texas officials had never before asked any core including the United States Supreme Court to certify a question to the Texas Supreme Court And so one of the Court of Appeals judges judge Higgins said noted that there was never any case where a court had certified a question to a state Supreme Court after the state officials had lost before the United States Supreme Court or another appellate court And so the fact that this looks like a late stage request in order to allow the states continue to enforce this law was one of the point of disagreement between the judges in the oral argument The second point of disagreement was a matter of timing that is how urgent it was for the United States Court of Appeals to act on this case or to further delay it by certifying questions to the Texas Supreme Court One of the Court of Appeals judges judge Edith Jones asked whether they the Court of Appeals might just hold on to the case until the end of June because there was a chance that the Supreme Court might overrule roe versus wade which would allow Texas to prohibit abortions more than 6 weeks after a person's last period So in that light it feels like and it looks like at least one of the judges as an unfair dilatory tactic The law is currently in effect and is Zola fiing people's ability to exercise what is currently a constitutional right but the other judges seem to want to hold on to the case and further delay its resolution until they know whether the Supreme Court is going to reaffirm or overrule row And how unusual is it to have one judge accuse another of not being impartial during the oral arguments There were definitely several oddities about the oral argument It's clear that there are strong feelings on both sides about the legal arguments and also how the courts are handling this case just higginson in the dissenting opinion when the U.S. court appeals after the federal oral argument on this motion to certify invited the United States to intervene in the lawsuit and participate as in a meeting because he felt that the courts and the states were slow walking this challenge and in the process nullifying people's ability to exercise their constitutional right On the other hand you have two Republican appointed judges on the course of appeals kind of making jokes at the oral argument suggesting the Supreme Court confused case wrong And so there are definitely strongly held views on both sides which means for a quite casti oral argument Thanks Leah That's professor Leo lit of the University of Michigan law school Coming up the Netflix series Tiger king being sued over movie clips This is Bloomberg You you come into bed Hun Yep honey I'll be right there Just gotta turn.
Bloomberg Radio New York
"leo lit" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Behind my question Has there been any unfair question do you counsel No your honor Joining me is Leah littman a professor at the University of Michigan law school Leo this case went to the Supreme Court twice explain why it's back at the 5th circuit So what ended up happening is the United States Supreme Court decided the issues in the case as the parties were then arguing them And what the Texas state officials were arguing at the time was that the law clearly did not give any of them any enforcement authority and therefore they could not be sued What the United States Supreme Court said is we United States Supreme Court think that at least these state licensing officials have the authority discipline doctors and nurses who perform abortions and violation of FBA because those licensing officials have that enforcement authority they can be sued But that conclusion rests on an interpretation of state law And the United States Supreme Court is not the final arbiter over the meaning of state laws That job falls to the state courts And so when the United States Supreme Court sent the case back now to the 5th circuit the Texans officials filed a motion saying we would like you court to basically ask the taxes Supreme Court about whether the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the state law was correct And you have the Supreme Court need to tell us whether these licensing officials actually do have the authority discipline doctors and nurses who perform abortions and violations of FDA This was a pretty contentious hearing some of the judges appeared to be sort of sparring with each other What was the main contention There were a few different contentions floating around in the argument One was just the propriety of allowing the Texas officials to request certification to the Texas Supreme Court at this late stage in the case The Texas officials had never before asked any core including the United States Supreme Court to certify a question to the Texas Supreme Court And so one of the Court of Appeals judges judge Higgins said noted that there was never any case where a court had certified a question to a state Supreme Court after the state officials had lost before the United States Supreme Court or another appellate court And so the fact that this looks like a late stage request in order to allow the states continue to enforce this law was one of the point of disagreement between the judges in the oral argument The second point of disagreement was a matter of timing that is how urgent it was for the United States Court of Appeals to act on this case or to further delay it by certifying questions to the Texas Supreme Court One of the Court of Appeals judges judge Edith Jones asked whether they the Court of Appeals might just hold on to the case until the end of June because there was a chance that the Supreme Court might overrule roe versus wade which would allow Texas to prohibit abortions more than 6 weeks after a person's last period So in that light it feels like and it looks like at least one of the judges as an unfair dilatory tactic The law is currently in effect and is Zola fiing people's ability to exercise what is currently a constitutional right but the other judges seem to want to hold on to the case and further delay as resolution until they know whether the Supreme Court is going to reaffirm or overrule row And how unusual is it to have one judge accuse another of not being impartial during the oral arguments There were definitely several oddities about the oral argument It's clear that there are strong feelings on both sides about the legal arguments and also how the courts are handling this case judge higginson and the dissenting opinion when the U.S. court appeals optic federal oral argument on the motion to certify invited the United States to intervene in the lawsuit and participate as in a mucus because he felt that the courts and the states were slow walking this challenge and in the process nullifying people's ability to exercise their constitutional right On the other hand you have two Republican appointed judges on the course of appeals kind of making jokes at the oral argument suggesting the Supreme Court's office case wrong And so there are definitely strongly held views on both sides which means for a quite casby oral argument Thanks Leah That's professor Leo lit of the University of Michigan law school Coming up the Netflix series Tiger king being sued over movie clips This is Bloomberg Introducing venture.
Bloomberg Radio New York
"leo lit" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Had behind my question Has there been any unfair question do you counsel No your honor Joining me is Leah littman a professor at the University of Michigan law school Leah this case went to the Supreme Court twice explain why it's back at the 5th circuit So what ended up happening is the United States Supreme Court decided the issues in the case as the parties were then arguing them And what the Texas state officials were arguing at the time was that the law clearly did not give any of them any enforcement authority and therefore they could not be sued With the United States Supreme Court set is we United States Supreme Court think that at least these state licensing officials have the authority discipline doctors and nurses who perform abortions and violation of FBA because those licensing officials have that enforcement authority they can be sued But that conclusion rests on an interpretation of state law And the United States Supreme Court is not the final arbiter over the meaning of state law That job falls to the state courts And so when the United States Supreme Court sent the case back now to the 5th circuit the Texans officials filed a motion saying we would like you court to basically ask the taxes Supreme Court about whether the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the state law was correct And you Texas Supreme Court needs to tell us whether these licensing officials actually do have the authority discipline doctors and nurses who perform abortions and violations of FDA This was a pretty contentious hearing some of the judges appeared to be sort of sparring with each other What was the main contention There were a few different companions floating around in the argument One was just the propriety of allowing the Texas officials to request certification to the Texas Supreme Court at this late stage in the case The Texas officials had never before asked any core including the United States Supreme Court to certify a question to the Texas Supreme Court And so one of the Court of Appeals judges judge Higgins said noted that there was never any case where a court had certified a question to a state Supreme Court after the state officials had lost before the United States Supreme Court or another appellate court And so the fact that this looks like a late stage request in order to allow the states continue to enforce this law was one of the point of disagreement between the judges in the oral argument The second point of disagreement was a matter of timing that is how urgent it was for the United States Court of Appeals to act on this case or to further delay it by certifying questions to the Texas Supreme Court One of the Court of Appeals judges judge Edith Jones asked whether they the Court of Appeals might just hold onto the case until the end of June because there was a chance that the Supreme Court might overrule roe versus wade which would allow Texas to prohibit abortions more than 6 weeks after a person's last period So in that light it feels like and it looks like at least one of the judges as an unfair dilatory tactic The law is currently in effect and is vilifying people's ability to exercise what is currently a constitutional right but the other judges seem to want to hold on to the case and further delay its resolution until they know whether the Supreme Court is going to reaffirm or overrule row And how unusual is it to have one judge accuse another of not being impartial during the oral arguments There were definitely several oddities about the oral argument It's clear that there are strong feelings on both sides about the legal arguments and also how the courts are handling this case just higginson in the dissenting opinion when the U.S. court of skills offered to schedule oral arguments on the motion to certify invited the United States to intervene in the lawsuit and participate as an amuse because he felt that the courts and the states were slow walking this challenge and in the process nullifying people's ability to exercise their constitutional right On the other hand you have two Republican appointed judges on the course of appeals kind of making jokes at the oral argument suggesting the Supreme Court's office case wrong And so there are definitely strongly held views on both sides which means for a quite hefty oral argument Thanks Leo That's professor Leo lit of the University of Michigan law school Coming up the Netflix series Tiger king being sued over movie clips This is Bloomberg I haven't really woken up Until I've had my McDonald's breakfast deal and I know this is true because before breakfast I put my phone in the refrigerator and couldn't find the keys that were already in my hand Nothing gets the morning going like the first sip of it iced coffee Get any size in any flavor for 99 cents until 11 a.m. Price and participation may vary McDonald's.
The Tech Guy
"leo lit" Discussed on The Tech Guy
"Track four. Leo Laporte the tech guy. So this for a voice podcaster, even if you're going to play some music, I think this would be a really good solution. Anyway, it's when I got Henry. That was very, very good. I'm all kidding aside to really save me, by the way. Well, you want something simple. You know, first of all, how many people say I'm going to do a podcast in two weeks later go what podcast? Yeah, but Leo was an excuse for me to spend someone else's I love those. They didn't have though. I learned my lesson because my daughter was going to do this. So I went out and got her fancy mixer and microphones and all this stuff. And it was too complicated for her. And she looked to adopt what did I do with all that, actually? I think I gave it back to John. John, I think we have it, right? It's part of our massive gear collection. But it's just too complicated. The zoom is so much simpler. It's got four knobs for the volume in a little meters for the volume and then it's got four knobs for the headphone jacks. It's really just like a little thing that does a four person podcast in this very compact form. I think that makes a lot of sense. You don't want I guess they didn't want to overwhelm her either at first get her all. Well, that's what I did to my daughter. It just killed her because she's so good. Again, you need an you mixed with an iPad. The whole thing was just crazy. You'll need microphones. He'll need microphones, but you don't need you can use any kind of microphone. I would get the inexpensive SM 58s because they have a good sound. They're pretty unbreakable. And you'll need a cable and you might need a mic stand for each microphone, that kind of thing. But if you look at zoom corp, they'll show you all the stuff. They even sell a microphone. But it becomes big and famous, I'll be sure. That's nice. The credits wear it to do. What does she want to do? What kind of podcast? Well, I'm not exactly sure she's gifted mom and quiet and silent. I said, well, that's the answer. That's actually smart. Are you going to have to yell up later she could tell the world? Yeah, exactly. Well, he always always, you've saved that 19,895. You need an 8 ten mini, you need four HD cameras. You need lights. You need, yeah. Lighting involved, Leo, lighting. Don't do lighting. Yeah. Just too hot. I told Henry wants to do video too. Everybody wants to do video. I said, don't do video. Please. Just to block, then you've got to do me a favor. You've got to take my URL in my IP address. I mean, you've got to block your twit dot TV. Your equipment is going. That's great. Oh no, yeah, watching Mac brick weekly and spending all that money. I feel very lucky we got so much good stuff..