39 Burst results for "Kavanaugh"

Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on Making Podcasts Great Again

Making Podcasts Great Again

00:39 min | 9 hrs ago

Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on Making Podcasts Great Again

"The last question from the gram, mister president, I know you are busy. We have a few questions left. This comes from Aaron four 15 SF sir max. Sir maximus Trump's president, father, to a smoke show daughter and a husband to a slots veiny and wife, Rachel. Is he doing, you know, it almost sounds like he's doing glad yet or when he says husband to a murdered son father to a murdered wife. I will have my revenge on January 6th with peaceful protest. Rage and Brett Kavanaugh, powerfully describe conversation with some of your unborn children last week. Now that you know communication with them as possible, do you have any messages you would like to send them from the rom of the living? I think there's only one message I can send to owe them. They haven't heard one of those in a while. I think.

Sir Max Sir Maximus Trump Brett Kavanaugh Aaron Rachel
If Not for Donald Trump, Roe v. Wade Would Still Be Intact

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:21 min | 5 d ago

If Not for Donald Trump, Roe v. Wade Would Still Be Intact

"John zamira. You were just making the point, which I've made in the past. If it were not for Donald Trump, roe V wade would have not been overturned. If it were not for Donald Trump, Kavanaugh would not have made it through, the nonsense, the evil lies that they put up against him. He would have been forced to withdraw his nomination even though these were totally unsupported lies. They would have said, well, it's the good of the country. That's what the Republican establishment, the rhinos, the so called moderates. That's what they exist for. They are surrender buckets. It is their job when the Democrats start cheating at basketball to lose gracefully to the globe products, like the Washington generals used to. It is the job of Republicans like George Bush and McCain and Romney and Adam kinzinger and Liz Cheney. Their job is to turn over our institutions and our power and our wealth in our country to our enemies in a gracious way. They are the Vichy government that Hitler put in charge of France. They are there to pretend to represent us and pretend to protect us while in fact enforcing the Nazis will on us and making us feel like they're on our side.

John Zamira Donald Trump Roe V Wade Kavanaugh Adam Kinzinger Rhinos Liz Cheney Vichy Government George Bush Basketball Romney Mccain Washington Hitler France
Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

00:53 min | 11 hrs ago

Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"Well, it matters amazing. And I share this. John Solomon was on earlier and we were talking about this, especially you talked about Chevron deference, which the West Virginia case, the EPA, and really what other, I mean, I can't wait to see the ATF starts getting rained in. You know, other Department of Education, so many others, it should be rained in. And not legislating from their bureaucratic offices. But, you know, one of the things that we're seeing forward and I know you've been involved in this and I have as well is making sure that one of the big cases coming up and we mentioned this early on the show was that they agreed the Supreme Court agreed to take up the case out of North Carolina about making sure that it is from our perspective that this legislature is set out in our founders in the constitution that the legislators, the state set the time and place. So the elections and they set the parameters of that. And I think this North Carolina case could have the same kind of impact. That we're going to see out of this West Virginia case. Well, look, I think that's right. And I think that once you want to adjust this once that judge says, you know what? I'm not going to probably get invited. I'm not going to get the Kennedy Center award. For Kurds or whatever that thing is called that focus award. I'm not going to get I'm probably not going to get all the little words that all the D.C. cocktail parties and nonprofits. I'll probably get made fun of on the late night talk shows. And I can't even believe these words are going to come out of my mouth. I might even get assassinated. But that's just kind of where we are as a country. So am I going to just, am I going to try to play the game like John Roberts playing the game with the D.C. cocktail circuit? I'm just going to do the right thing and let the chips fall where they may and hug my kids at night and hope we can hold on to this republic. And I think that's what at least 5 and a half of them are going to do. And that's really never happened since the founding of our country, a group of people being courageous in putting it all on the line. And look, I just get Trump a lot of credit. I mean, he could have abandoned Kavanaugh on a second, which would have meant he probably would have had to go left on his next pick, and he held his ground and Mitch McConnell's deserves credit. We're not letting Merrick Garland get on the court and these were really historic decisions, but are the justices always let us down. Remember, we're on our Reagan got 50% of his picks on the big questions. Both bushes got 50% of their picks. So far, Trump is batting a thousand. Never happened to us before. It is. Real quickly. And at Matt, and I'm thank you for joining us. I know you got lots going on and we're looking forward to folks that can go to cpac Texas. I'm looking forward to being out there. I'm looking forward to speaking. You know who I believe this actually, and you've been involved in elections in the campaign, especially around Congress. I believe that these, especially this course move on West Virginia, puts the emphasis back on Congress, and it makes the election for legislators. People willing to get up there and do the hard work is going to be a premium if we have a court that actually does that. Yeah, no, I think that's exactly right. And I was always shocked that, I don't know that this idea that the Supreme Court would decide what a pollutant is. I mean, their lawyers. I didn't know they were scientists. And it just gets absurd with once you can start making up what's in the constitution and they can become become the super regulator. At the end of the day on all these questions, it comes down to the people. It's written in that document. It comes down to the people and if all these pro choicers really believe that roe V wade that popular or that climate change to that popular. How can they never leave it to the people that decide to see regulations? They're afraid of the people side of these regulations because they know the polls are a lot more on our side than they did to. That's exactly right. Match lap. ACU. Thanks, buddy. What's he in Texas? Everybody will be back. America first, thanks much..

John Solomon West Virginia North Carolina ATF D.C. Chevron Merrick Garland Department Of Education Supreme Court EPA Kennedy Center John Roberts Legislature Kavanaugh Mitch Mcconnell Donald Trump Congress Reagan
Article III Project's Mike Davis on the Transformation of SCOTUS

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:55 min | 6 d ago

Article III Project's Mike Davis on the Transformation of SCOTUS

"With us right now is Mike Davis formerly chief counsel for nominations for the U.S. Senate committee on the judiciary and a law clerk formerly and also helped justice Gorsuch, get on the U.S. Supreme Court, Mike, welcome back to the program. Thank you for having me, Charlie. I always love when you do our interviews, you have that beautiful picture behind you. It's just, it's incredible. So Washington crossing the Delaware if I'm not mistaken. It is, yeah, and I've big, big, big admirer of that painting and what it actually means. So Mike ten years ago, I got my start in politics and I was pro life then as I am now, but I was told by people that roe versus wade would never be overturned. Ten years ago, justice Scalia was lamenting that the court had gone off the rails. What happened in a decade, where we went from a court that was insane and dominated by Sotomayor and Kagan and upheld ObamaCare is merely a tax, even though we know simply that that was an insane decision. We're ten years later, we now have restored constitutional sanity. What do you attribute the success to? I attributed this success to president Donald J Trump and Senate Republicans. President Trump in 2016 won an upset victory against Hillary Clinton in big part because he promised he would appoint constitutionalist Supreme Court Justices and federal judges who would follow the law instead of rewrite the law and what we saw with this Dobbs decision coming out was the culmination of that. It was because president Trump transformed the 5 to four John Roberts court to the 5 to four clarence Thomas court with the appointments of justices, Gorsuch, my former boss, justice Kavanaugh, who I helped lead through the Senate confirmation and then justice Amy Coney Barrett. So it is a fundamental transformation of the federal judiciary back to its constitutionalist origins, what is supposed to be before the liberals hijack the Supreme Court nearly 90 years

Gorsuch U.S. Senate Committee On The J Mike Davis Mike U.S. Supreme Court President Donald J Trump President Trump Scalia Charlie Delaware Sotomayor Kagan Wade Washington Senate Hillary Clinton Justice Kavanaugh Dobbs
Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

01:41 min | 16 hrs ago

Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

"After issuing a series of landmark rulings on a whole bunch of issues from guns to abortion, religious freedom, the Supreme Court is now in recess until October. And so they have decamped. I won't say they're all out of town, but they're, in a sense, not working. And it got me thinking, what about that abortion leak? What happened to the leaker? How come we don't know the identity of the leaker? Well, as it turns out, it doesn't look like we may ever know. And this is really strange. I mean, first of all, is it that hard to find the leaker? Were they able to find the leaker, but are now concealing the identity of the leaker for some reason? And then in some ways, the intriguing question that the leak come from the left or from the right. Now, a word about the leak itself, Roberts had directed the marshal of the court to try to quote find the leaker. Launch an investigation into the source of the leak. The Marshall is not particularly an expert in doing this. Now the FBI presumably, I say presumably because the FBI has its own agenda, but the Marshall has not been able to do it. We've heard about some steps about getting people to turn in their phones, but no update, no disclosure. And this all at a time when, by the way, conservative justices have been getting threats. They've had protests outside their homes. We know about the debt threat that was faced by justice Kavanaugh by the guy, Nicholas Rossi, who was arrested after he claimed that he was carrying out a kind of murder suicide plot against Kavanaugh in his Maryland or outside his Maryland home, and so all of this may seem to suggest that obviously the leak came from the left, it was designed to instigate a public fury against these justices and we've seen some evidence of left wing protesters doing that. But I'm also thinking about the effect of the leak. If it came from the left, it completely blew up in the left space. And I say that because the leak turned out, in my view, in retrospect, to be a good thing. It turned out to be a good thing because it blunted the force of social shock. Experienced in the immediate aftermath of the court's ruling. See if the court had come out of nowhere. Roe versus wade is overruled. There would be a sort of sense of catastrophe. Oh my gosh. And the immediacy of the outrage was similar to anything that you hear that's that comes out of nowhere that's going to create a big change that you didn't anticipate. The reaction is always more explosive and it's always more emotional. But on the other hand, when something is expected, and by the way, this is not just true of a court ruling, it's true of anything. If someone has been sick for a long time, and you expect that this is determined illness, they're not going to make it. They're going to die at some point. And then they die. Well, you knew it was coming. You were told beforehand, it is to be expected. And so even though you may not have expected it at that exact time, it was expected. And so the level of shock is less. Why? Because you knew about the eventuality beforehand. And the same thing happened with the leak that was a leak, people were shocked by the leak, but there was a lot of focus on the leak itself, who put out the leak, who's responsible. And as a result, people got a preview of what was coming. Then, of course, a lot of speculation will the final decision be that way, will the justice has changed their mind. But when the final decision came, no one could profess. Oh my gosh, the Supreme Court has overruled versus wade. Why? Because there was a leak. You already knew the Supreme Court was overruling roe versus when you read the majority opinion for the most part in advance, the opinion was slightly modified to take into account some of the objections, but it was the same opinion. So any shock that occurred or any professed outrage when the court made its final decision would appear to be sort of feigned because, again, you already knew you had sort of fair notice you had fair warning. All of this would suggest is it possible. I mean, this is a little bit of a heretical idea that the league came from the right that one of the I don't think so. I was talking about this with Debbie and she's like, our site doesn't do stuff like this. And it's true. Our site doesn't think about things like, how do we leak? We wouldn't even know who to leak too. And the fact that this was leaked to the left wing media, suggested to me that the original supposition that this leak came from the left, probably out of the offices of Kagan or Sotomayor. It's probably the correct one. But in that case, the left miscalculated because the leak, as I mentioned, turned out to be beneficial.

Justice Kavanaugh Nicholas Rossi FBI Marshall Supreme Court Maryland Kavanaugh Roberts Wade ROE Debbie Kagan Sotomayor
'Created Equal' Author Mark Paoletta Reacts to SCOTUS Overturning Roe

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

01:31 min | Last week

'Created Equal' Author Mark Paoletta Reacts to SCOTUS Overturning Roe

"But Mark talked to us about last week. As you said, sep, a great day for the constitution. I can't stop smiling, right? It's such a wonderful, such a wonderful thing that happened, right? And there's so many on so many levels. One of them being that the left through everything at these justice is in the most despicable way possible, right? And one of the I worked on justice Thomas's confirmation back in 1991, right? And I saw it when I reviewed his speeches in an article from his time as the EEOC. He'd been through the fire and he never wilted. He never bent, right? And so to see whether you never know how a justice is going to be until they're on the court in under fire. And it's such a great day that justice Barrett justice Gorsuch justice Kavanaugh, justice Alito, and justice Thomas, did not bend, right? And that's one of the most important things coming out of this opinion. Returning it to the states where it properly belongs. And then this intimidation. And you know, when you going back to the book and the movie, justice Thomas recognized, during those confirmation hearings, all the left cared about was this decision. This is what they were going to destroy him on. So the roe V wade was the neuralgic point for the left. 100% and he goes back to it over and over. He said, they didn't care what I did with my life. They didn't care about anything I had done. They wanted this issue, and they were going to destroy me to keep this issue.

Barrett Justice Gorsuch Justice Alito Eeoc Thomas Kavanaugh Mark Justice Thomas Roe V Wade
Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on Stephanie Miller

Stephanie Miller

02:56 min | 19 hrs ago

Fresh update on "kavanaugh" discussed on Stephanie Miller

"The Supreme Court said the only thing that mattered was that more people have easier access to gun. We have an ongoing pandemic that has killed over a million people in this country. It seems Supreme Court said public safety takes a back seat to whatever stupid bull. Makes people decide not to get a vaccine. We have an electoral crisis in this country. It's Supreme Court said gerrymandering away fair representation as A-okay. And you just, you know, you said Gorsuch lying about the facts of the case and the religious liberty thing told students who feel pressured into praying to suck it up, which would probably get him a cane up his ass from Benjamin Franklin, which would be some actual originalism. Only he can put a constitutional joke in an anal. Sure. Yeah, yeah. In a sodomy, as sodomy scenario. That also involves the constitution. Yes. But not using the constitution. Not using the concept. Although I have said that various people should be sodomized with a rolled up. But that will be against the lawsuit. Because that's what the founding forces would have wanted. Right. As long as someone of the same sex does not solemnize you with Benjamin Franklin's Cain. Oh, yeah. I mean, Thomas Jefferson would have demanded that all of the rebellious, the leaders of the insurrection be hanged. Because that's what he meant. That's what he meant when he said the tree of liberty needs to be. That's right. He needs blood. He was talking about executing people who rebel against the country. That's how you water the tree of liberty with blood. And rude, thank you, by the way, for pointing out everybody from Hillary Clinton to Mark Elias to everybody who's talking about what you mentioned. The court has decided to hear a case that will essentially give state legislatures the right to overturn the election if they feel like it. Okay. You said now is not the time for a rational calm responses that consider all sides that. This is a 5 alarm freak out because the cruelest states are already teeing up laws to prevent women from traveling to another state for abortion as well as outlawing abortion inducing prescription drugs. The time for fake moderation is over. The majority of the nation backs all of the things the supposed extreme left wants because it's not extreme at all. Now Democrats need to back it fully with full voices. We had joined the midterms. With a desperate hope we can stop it. The country from being murdered by the right. And literally murdered in some cases as in this weekend again. Yeah, yeah. I mean, we have a bunch of armed agitated people and the people that are agitating them are not backing down because that's how they make their money. And they are rich people making the poorer people. And although if you can afford an AR-15, you're not terribly poor. I mean, Malcolm X is going to do the work for them. Malcolm, this is book again. Prescient many years ahead of time, right? They want to kill Americans about the Trump insurgency. And here we go. Again, this is all of a piece every 6th. And yesterday, again, and it just, I don't get why more Republicans, their feet are not held to the fire. Once again, violent white domestic Trump supporting terrorists. How come how come all of these shooters seem to spout your ideology? I mean, what is the media still think it's impolite to point this out? Yeah. And if you're owning a gun because you believe that you may need to shoot up the government or somebody who's coming to get you, isn't that basically a terroristic terrorism related cause for you? That's terrorism. You're saying you're saying that I am trying to make everybody afraid. That's what you're saying. Yeah, yeah. You're trying to do that. I'll tell you something that's got me worried also, is the number of people on the right who are blaming the left for violence and extreme actions on the right. And you're saying, well, if the pro choice people hadn't been so angry at the anti choicers, we wouldn't have gotten them, they might not have gone too far. If people hadn't protested a Kavanaugh's house, then Kavanaugh might have changed his mind. You made him angry. This is like Trump has got to be prosecuted because he's the key insider of violence in this country. And this white supremacist violence. I mean, and he's got an army of inbred jets that are ready to do his bidding. All right. Face tattoo wanna be crap wrappers. Do not, once again

Supreme Court Gorsuch Benjamin Franklin Mark Elias Thomas Jefferson Cain Malcolm Hillary Clinton Kavanaugh Donald Trump
The Immoral, Unethical & Illegal Things Merrick Garland Has Done

The Dan Bongino Show

01:45 min | Last week

The Immoral, Unethical & Illegal Things Merrick Garland Has Done

"So using useful idiot Merrick Garland the most corrupt individual to ever sit in the attorney general's office to weaponize the DoJ The DoJ is a power to take your life and take your freedom It's a key Tenet of the three part plan to destabilize this place after they lost in the Supreme Court They will do this whenever they lose And the Supreme Court the presidency it doesn't matter Any critical election they will look to destabilize destabilize That's what the left does They want to break it and rebuild it in a top down authoritarian matter Now here's a good piece If you'd like to read is by John Daniel Davidson and the federalist It's called Merrick Garland's Department of Justice as a threat to the republic It's in my newsletter today if you want to check it out It is a wonderful piece It talks about Merrick Garland the useful idiot the left is always wanted in the attorney general office The attorney attorney general is always even worse than Eric holder It goes through the litany of things he's done The immoral unethical potentially illegal things he's done In that office to destroy and intimidate people and to make sure he is the enforcer and the bouncer for the Biden administration The list is long It's not in all inclusive one either First the protests at the homes of the Supreme Court Justice that are illegal It is unquestionably against federal law to do what these violent sometimes is something I should say sometimes violent The guy who showed up and wanted to kill Kavanaugh I think that's a pretty clear indicator of tendency towards violence based on some of his own statements that he made But these protests at the home are clearly illegal clearly Garland's done nothing about

Merrick Garland Department Of Justice Supreme Court John Daniel Davidson Biden Administration Eric Holder Kavanaugh Garland
Dan Bongino: If Libs Want to Pack the Court, Conservatives Will Play

The Dan Bongino Show

01:28 min | Last week

Dan Bongino: If Libs Want to Pack the Court, Conservatives Will Play

"Didn't work out well for the Democrats last time Taught him a lesson They wanted to dump the filibuster We said okay dump the filibuster Here's Amy Coney Barrett Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh How do you like them apples You want to make the Supreme Court 12 Let's make it 36 And we'll nominate well nominate 20 more You want to make it 36 We'll make it a 136 Next thing you know what it looked like a parliamentary system in the UK We can do that too I'm warning you now I will use every microphone and video camera in my power I'm not suggesting my word isn't any way dispositive I don't have an inflated sense of self worth But as I said in my podcast earlier and I'll say again now I've got a lot of friends and conservative media that agree with me some don't Many do I will make sure that if you decide to pack the court that all of us press every single person in a Republican or orbit from the activist space up on The donors and everyone else to press every single Republican to nominate three people for everyone they nominate back You may not like what you see after that Make it a national right to school choice You may get national pro life legislation codifying the right to life you may get a flat tax You may get a fair tax You're not going to like any of that You may get a balanced budget amendment You're not going to like any of that

Amy Coney Barrett Neil Gorsuch Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court UK
Trump's Legacy Is the Overturning of Roe v. Wade

The Officer Tatum Show

01:18 min | Last week

Trump's Legacy Is the Overturning of Roe v. Wade

"Welcome back. Welcome back. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. Gentlemen and lady shout out. Oh, let me clarify this real quick. Because you know I've been talking about roe V wade and all this stuff, but you know who I didn't give credit to? I almost feel like I should be ashamed of myself. I didn't give credit to Donald Trump. Do you realize that Donald Trump when he was in when he was in power when he was the president of the United States of America, he got us, I don't know how many two or three Supreme Court conservative Supreme Court Justices, Conor berry, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch, am I saying, is that right? I think those are the three Supreme Court Justices who are conservative. So he did a pretty good job putting these conservatives in place to navigate this. I think a lot of people are missing out on giving Trump some credit because I don't care if you like him or not. If you believe this was a victory, there's no way this would have happened if he had been able to put in that many Supreme Court Justices. Now, you know, I'm hoping that we can get more of them in there. With the whole course was conservative. The whole court was conservative. Maybe minus one person that'll be our life will turn around quickly.

Roe V Wade Donald Trump Supreme Court Conor Berry Gorsuch Kavanaugh United States Of America
Man pleads not guilty to trying to kill Justice Kavanaugh

AP News Radio

00:46 sec | Last week

Man pleads not guilty to trying to kill Justice Kavanaugh

"A man pleaded not guilty to trying to kill Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh Nicholas Rossi from California was arrested outside Kavanaugh's home near Washington an FBI agent's affidavit said he was armed with a gun and a knife and was carrying zip ties and was dressed in black and also called local police to say he had traveled from California to kill Kavanaugh After his arrest Rossi told a police detective he was upset by a leaked draft opinion suggesting the Supreme Court is about to overturn roe versus wade The landmark abortion case and was also upset over the school massacre in uvalde Texas and believed Kavanaugh would vote to loosen gun control laws Rossi remains in custody a tentative trial date was set for August 23rd Ed Donahue Washington

Kavanaugh Justice Brett Kavanaugh Nichol Supreme Court California FBI Rossi Washington Uvalde Texas Ed Donahue Washington
Gov. Scott Walker: Thank God Senate Didn't Confirm Garland for SCOTUS

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:59 min | Last week

Gov. Scott Walker: Thank God Senate Didn't Confirm Garland for SCOTUS

"Protesters activists, people on the far left are literally breaking federal law, camped out in front of the homes of Supreme Court Justices, voicing their displeasure through bullhorns and banging drums and obscenities and everything else carrying around bloodied baby dolls and yet Merrick Garland and the Justice Department and the Biden administration don't seem to have any inclination to at least enforce the law. Isn't it fascinating how the media has the mainstream media at least has refused to even acknowledge the lawlessness of these protesters? If it was reversed, there'd be pants on fire, their hair would be on fire. Although I do have to say, Mike, one thing just an aside, I just knocked some in the Senate. This is where they deserve credit from a few years ago. Thank God they did not confirm Merrick Garland as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court for all this talk about him being some reasonable middle of the road person. He's not. He's a total left wing lackey. And the idea that earlier this year, he would allow his Justice Department to be aligned with the national association of school boards when they were calling concerned parents showing up at school board meetings domestic terrorists and really trying to intimidate them. This is the same Justice Department that, as you mentioned, this isn't just a bad idea. This is a federal law that prohibits people intimidating officers of the court. That's justices, judges, prosecutors, understandably so. We don't want people who are before the court out trying to intimidate a judge or a justice and their family, you know, that's something you think of years ago with the mafia or somebody else in organized crime trying to do that. They should be prosecuting those people to the full extent of the law and they certainly need to step up once this decision comes out. What was alleged to have happened or could have happened against Kavanaugh justice Kavanaugh? I think is a prime reminder about why this is just so important.

Merrick Garland Biden Administration Justice Department U.S. Supreme Court National Association Of School Lackey Senate Mike Kavanaugh
Caller Defends Nancy Pelosi for Not Condemning Violence on Churches

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:18 min | 2 weeks ago

Caller Defends Nancy Pelosi for Not Condemning Violence on Churches

"I'm great. Go ahead and tell me why Nancy Pelosi is worth defending on this subject. Fancy Pelosi has a speaker in the House, is putting out a generic statement. Now, when she says she's a real Catholic. Camp the Catholic Church takes a real strong stance on violence, destruction, abortion. We're based on scripture as all faith I believe are. But she doesn't say go and burn down buildings. Go and attack. She just is not saying anything because she doesn't support it. But when you're being watched by the turtle because I believe she has lost the right to take communion. She is now, you know, with all due respect, you sort of merge the two topics. On the issue of abortion, she is asked, how do you reconcile your Catholic Church, your Catholicism with being pro abortion and her answer was, I'm a very I'm very Catholic. Then on the subject of the burning of pro life pregnancy centers, she was asked, why don't Democrats condone it? And she said a woman has a right to choose. Those are two different things in two different specific answers.

Nancy Pelosi Pelosi Catholic Church House
Joe Biden Offers Condolences, Saying Jo-Ann Stores CFO 'Dropped Dead'

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:05 min | 2 weeks ago

Joe Biden Offers Condolences, Saying Jo-Ann Stores CFO 'Dropped Dead'

"But we were talking about the state of affairs and Dennis talking about Joe Biden's inability to be a decent person. I don't know if that's what this is all about or not, but listen to what he said to the CEO of Joanne stores who again, her husband passed away. This is how the consoler in chief. That's what they like to call him. The consoler in chief, check out how he consoled her. And by the way, my sympathies to the family of your. You CFO, who are drop dead very unexpectedly. And my best of their family is tough stuff. Oh boy. Oh boy. When you're saying you're sorry that your husband died, you might want not want to say he dropped dead. To the grieving widow, that's our president, yep,

Joe Biden Dennis Joanne
Democrats Are Bad, Evil People

Mike Gallagher Podcast

00:49 sec | 2 weeks ago

Democrats Are Bad, Evil People

"Maybe Dennis prager is right. And I've heard the great Sebastian gorka say similar things. These people aren't just politically in the wilderness. They're bad people. They're evil. And if you're unable to condemn the attempted assassination of and Dennis said it last night. It's because they wanted it. If a conservative got murdered, Biden could put a liberal justice on the court on the bench. And you know, he said that and it gave me, it gave me, it made my blood run cold. Because I don't want to admit that. I don't want to say that. But I think it must be said.

Sebastian Gorka Dennis Prager Dennis Biden
Nancy Pelosi Refuses to Condemn Violence Against Churches

Mike Gallagher Podcast

02:13 min | 2 weeks ago

Nancy Pelosi Refuses to Condemn Violence Against Churches

"Because if I told you the Nancy Pelosi. Ripped up the speech, the State of the Union address right in front of Donald Trump, you wouldn't have believed it. You'd say that's right out of an episode of veep. She's not that maniacal. She's not that nefarious, which she did it. Remember? Will you ever forget the image of Nancy Pelosi ripping up the text of president Trump's State of the Union, ripping it up, seconds after he completed the speech? Has there ever been a more despicable act by a public servant in the history of America? Yesterday, she was asked, why aren't Democrats condemning? The firebombings, the violent attacks on godly pro life pregnancy centers and churches all around America. We've made sure in context you can hear the question and the evil evil answer. Abortion case is concerned. On churches on crisis pregnancy centers, Republicans are going after Democrats for not saying anything and they're saying that your rhetoric is contributing to the tax on these prices. Well, let me just say this. A woman has a right to choose to live up to her responsibility. It's up to her. Her doctor, her family, her husband, her significant other, and her God. This talk politicizing all of this, I think, is something uniquely American and not right. Can you believe that? Can you believe, can you believe that's the answer to the question? A woman has a right to, hey, madam speaker, what do you think about churches being firebombed? A woman has a right to choose, it's like it's like Tourette syndrome.

Nancy Pelosi Donald Trump America Tourette Syndrome
Joey Hudson Bullies Mike Gallagher to Sing the National Anthem Live

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:55 min | 2 weeks ago

Joey Hudson Bullies Mike Gallagher to Sing the National Anthem Live

"Me in advance. I'm going to apologize if this sounds crappy. He gave me no notice. I did not warm up. Thank goodness I remembered the words. Thank goodness I remembered to hit the notes because I was nervous as heck with about 5 seconds notice that here's my rendition of our national anthem last night at the 94 5 the answer patriots for America event with Dennis brager Mike Gallagher and my treacherous friend, Joey Hudson. Paul Jose, can you see by the dawns early light what so proudly we hailed at the twilight last gleaming whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight or the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming and the rockets red glare the bombs burst gave proof through the night that our flag was still there oh say does that star spangled banner yes. Or the land of the free and the home of the great. Wow all right, so a little pitchy started probably too high a key. I mean, you have no idea there's no key to start. There's no note and there was Joey Hudson just grinning like the Cheshire cat that he is throwing me that curve ball and having me sing

Joey Hudson Dennis Brager Paul Jose Mike Gallagher Patriots America
Expect to Be Frugal at Joey Hudson's Home

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:29 min | 2 weeks ago

Expect to Be Frugal at Joey Hudson's Home

"I was with hundreds of people last night. You know, it's funny story about being here in the upstate of South Carolina with my pal Joey Hudson and his wife peg and we're broadcasting from the luxurious Hudson compound, the guest quarters I had fun last night making fun of Joey with the tiny little bar of soap that he left me upstairs in the bathroom and the tiny little roll of toilet paper. It's the smallest roll of toilet paper I've ever seen in the history of toilet paper. I don't know how he does it. Joey is so the nice way to put it is frugal. The more direct way it is to point out that he has the first dollar he ever made. He gets so mad at me for and he's my business manager. So when all the money that I spend goes out the window, he just shakes his head. He gave up trying to talk me out of my stupid extravagant spending habits. I just like to spend, you know? Thank goodness I've got a decent job that makes gives me a good living and I can afford some things that I probably shouldn't be spending money on. And I tried very hard to be as charitable and as giving as I can, but God has been good to me and God is blessed me and so Joey tries to remind me constantly that I should be more frugal. So that's why you should see the little bar of soap. It's like you hold the soap between your index finger and your thumb. And this is the bath, that's your body soap upstairs in the bathroom. Here at the Hudson farms. So to wash your like your left shoulder, that's the end of the bar. You need like 6 bars of soap to cover your body.

Joey Hudson Joey South Carolina Hudson Hudson Farms
MyPillow Products Are Perfect for Father's Day

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:56 min | 2 weeks ago

MyPillow Products Are Perfect for Father's Day

"But in the meantime, as we kick things off, it's a Friday, June the 17th. First of all, let me thank you from the bottom of my heart for all the love you gave Mike lindell and my pillow yesterday with purchasing my pillow products after the news broke that Walmart has canceled my pillow. It's going to be a tough, tough blow for the my pillow family. Walmart is woke like Disney like AmEx, like Major League Baseball, like all of these corporations, job creators network is fighting back. They got a big billboard, a new billboard on Times Square, go woke and go broke. They're fighting back against these woke politically correct cowardly corporations, but I said to you, if you go to my pillow dot com and click on the mic Gallagher radio specials box and click the promo and enter the promo code Mike G and you'll save a bunch of money on the slippers in the bathrobes and the doggy beds and the pillows. You're going to be supporting my pillow at a time when they really need it. A lot of people I met last night here in South Carolina told me they did just that yesterday. I saw the sales numbers tens and tens of thousands of dollars of orders. Let's keep it going, please. Go to my pillow dot com. Let's show Mike lindell and my pillow. How much we support them and love them. And we don't give a rat's rear end what Walmart does. Shame on Walmart for caving, shame on the politically correct crowd being afraid of the woke Twitter mob. So support my pillow. Be a great time. And here's a great Father's Day gift. I know Father's Day is this weekend. You won't get the slippers in time. Dad's gonna love these slippers. Dad's gonna love the bathrobe. Dad's gonna love the loungewear. Here's what you do. Or order the slippers or one of the great MyPillow products for dad for Father's Day, and then print it out on your printer. Print out the sheet from your confirmation form, put that in a box, give it to dad for Father's Day and then he'll get the slippers very

Mike Lindell Walmart Mike G Amex Major League Times Square Disney Baseball South Carolina Twitter
The Severe Terror Tactics Used by Pro-Choice Activists

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

02:29 min | 2 weeks ago

The Severe Terror Tactics Used by Pro-Choice Activists

"The protests outside the home of justice Kavanaugh continue. And while their peaceful protests, it's a little disturbing this idea that the left is able to show up at your house. You would think that there would be proper venues for these protests, but you wouldn't be able to come and harass someone where they live. And so you have this alarming scene of these sort of police officers with helmets and batons, and then all these protesters milling about them and shouting slogans and signs and so on. But that's not the worst of it. The worst of it is what the left is doing to these pregnancy centers. The pro life pregnancy centers around the country now life news, which is a pro life site, has documented 40 plus incidents of violence and vandalism directed at pro life individuals and organizations ever since the leak of the draft Supreme Court's decision. By the way, where is the leaker? How is it the case that you have this investigation and somehow you can't find the leaker who gave this information to the media? What? No. Let's look at these incidents because they are quite disturbing. Houston, early May, holy rosary Catholic Church vandalized on the pastor, faster Harris says most definitely it's a result of the leak that came out last week. So Catholic target but on by the pro abortion activists in early May, manassas, Virginia, vandals defaced a pro life pregnancy resource center, writing graffiti all over the building, abortion is a right, you people are liars, a whole bunch of incidents in Texas, early May Portland, Oregon, southeast Portland, pregnancy center. You can see the windows smashed as a photo here. There's the F word, debris everywhere. May 3rd, Frederick Maryland, the care net pregnancy center defaced with spray painted pro abortion messages that say pro abortion, go to PP, Planned Parenthood instead, abortion is a right. This is not a real clinic, and forced motherhood, and then one more example out of the 40, then I'll give you may 8th, Madison, Wisconsin. I left this so called anarchist group, attacks the Wisconsin family action office. They've tossed two molotov cocktails into the office after breaking windows, and then they set the office on fire.

Kavanaugh Holy Rosary Catholic Church Supreme Court Frederick Maryland Portland Manassas Harris Houston Virginia Oregon Texas Wisconsin Madison
Joe Biden's Example of 'Evil'

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:52 min | 2 weeks ago

Joe Biden's Example of 'Evil'

"Not going to be overturned. Abortion will still be legal in America. It will simply be decided by the states and inevitably blue states will be pro abortion, red states will be pro life. Maybe some red states will be pro abortion. I don't know, maybe they'll be an outlier and a blue state that will be pro life. But it's not a federal decision. And the court is probably going to strike that down. But as we know, the homes of some of the Supreme Court Justices conservative jurists have been targeted for protests, led by the Democrats. Who don't seem to condemn it. Oh, the irony of the January 6th select committee. Where right now Liz Cheney is leading her Mary band of witch hunters? In trying to make the case that Donald Trump and the Republicans and the conservative media incited violence on January 6th. Well, who incited Nicholas John Rossi? You want me to play the list of Democrat? Officials? Even Joe Biden? You want me to you want me to point out? That the harsh, vile rhetoric, directed to the Supreme Court over this issue? Could very well have incited an assassination against a supreme justice and yet Joe Biden is utterly silent about it. His silence isn't politics. I'd submit to you that that's evil. I would submit to you that that's an example of evil.

Liz Cheney Nicholas John Rossi Supreme Court America Donald Trump Joe Biden
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Mike Gallagher Podcast

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:55 min | 2 weeks ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Mike Gallagher Podcast

"Last night, here in the upstate of South Carolina, we had an event with hundreds of people that the radio station presented, and one of the issues that came up at this town hall forum was whether or not the Democrats are just misguided and delusional and wrong on policy or are many of them evil. Is there an evilness to the silence of an American president over an assassination plot against a Supreme Court Justice? To this day, Joe Biden has failed to say anything at all about the man who has now formally been indicted for the assassination plot against justice Brett Kavanaugh. You don't need me to tell you what Biden would be doing if that assassination plot had been carried out against a liberal justice. You don't need me to tell you what the media would be doing. If some lunatic evil monster tried to assassinate a liberal justice on the court, but this week Nicholas John Rossi from Simi Valley, California, who is in federal custody, is facing life in prison, he was indicted and formally charged with the attempted assassination with the assassination rather of Brett Kavanaugh. He planned to kill him, he told an FBI agent that he wanted to give his life a purpose, he wanted to kill justice Kavanaugh because he thought he would rule in favor of gun rights after the mass shooting and Yuval di. He was also targeting justice Kavanaugh because he was angry that the court was about to overturn abortion

Mike Gallagher The Home Depot Brett Kavanaugh court of public opinion court of law Nicholas John Rossi Kavanaugh White House Don Joe Biden South Carolina Yuval di Supreme Court Biden Simi Valley roe V wade FBI California America
Joe Biden Still Silent on Attempted Assassination of Justice Kavanaugh

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:55 min | 2 weeks ago

Joe Biden Still Silent on Attempted Assassination of Justice Kavanaugh

"Last night, here in the upstate of South Carolina, we had an event with hundreds of people that the radio station presented, and one of the issues that came up at this town hall forum was whether or not the Democrats are just misguided and delusional and wrong on policy or are many of them evil. Is there an evilness to the silence of an American president over an assassination plot against a Supreme Court Justice? To this day, Joe Biden has failed to say anything at all about the man who has now formally been indicted for the assassination plot against justice Brett Kavanaugh. You don't need me to tell you what Biden would be doing if that assassination plot had been carried out against a liberal justice. You don't need me to tell you what the media would be doing. If some lunatic evil monster tried to assassinate a liberal justice on the court, but this week Nicholas John Rossi from Simi Valley, California, who is in federal custody, is facing life in prison, he was indicted and formally charged with the attempted assassination with the assassination rather of Brett Kavanaugh. He planned to kill him, he told an FBI agent that he wanted to give his life a purpose, he wanted to kill justice Kavanaugh because he thought he would rule in favor of gun rights after the mass shooting and Yuval di. He was also targeting justice Kavanaugh because he was angry that the court was about to overturn abortion

Brett Kavanaugh South Carolina Nicholas John Rossi Joe Biden Supreme Court Biden Simi Valley Kavanaugh California FBI Yuval Di
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Mike Gallagher Podcast

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:58 min | 3 weeks ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Mike Gallagher Podcast

"Which reporter is going to ask him how it feels to have possibly motivated a man from California to track down Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home, I wonder how Chuck Schumer feels about his vicious, angry kooky rhetoric. About what will happen if the United States Supreme Court rules in a way that is not favorable towards roe V wade and allows states to determine a woman's right to an abortion, not a federal law, do you remember what Chuck Schumer said? In 2020, after president Trump appointed conservatives to the Supreme Court and the left started freaking out that roe V wade would be struck down, let's take a little stroll together down memory lane. And they're taking away fundamental rights. I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind. And you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you. If you go forward with these awful decisions, well, where are you today, senator Schumer, now that a man from California, an armed man charged with attempted murder, they're not playing around with this guy. They're not charging him with some kind of low level. They are charging him literally the authorities are convinced that this man was outside Brett Kavanaugh's house with the intention of killing him.

mister Garland Chuck Schumer Schumer Fox News channel The New York Times Brett Kavanaugh Sean Hannity Mark Levin Liz Cheney Supreme Court Fox News Tucker Carlson senator Chuck Schumer Democrat party Nancy Pelosi Pelosi Senate America Laura Ingraham Liz
"kavanaugh" Discussed on The Hugh Hewitt Show: Highly Concentrated

The Hugh Hewitt Show: Highly Concentrated

03:00 min | 3 weeks ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on The Hugh Hewitt Show: Highly Concentrated

"Back America on this Thursday morning I'm talking to senator Tom cotton of Arkansas. I'm inside the beltway, I believe the senator is back as well. Good morning, senator cotton. Good morning to you, good to be on with you. Yeah, the morning after the leak of the Supreme Court draft opinion and Dobbs. You said on this show that the court ought to move to issue a judgment opinions to follow in order to minimize threats to the justices. They did not do that. First, your reaction to the attempted assassination of justice Kavanaugh and then do you still believe as I do that they ought to issue a judgment opinions to follow immediately. It was a truly shocking moment in American history when a democratic hitman was nearly deterred from murdering justice Kavanaugh and presumably his wife and daughters as well. This is someone who was probably aware of what Chuck Schumer had said just a couple of years ago. On the steps of the Supreme Court view, when he specifically threatened Brett Kavanaugh by name, saying that he had reached the whirlwind and he wouldn't know what hit him. He was going to pay the price. This also happens after you've had left wing street militias, protesting outside of justice Kavanaugh's home and other justice home, indirect and explicit violation and federal law. Yet the hapless partisan hack Merrick Garland refuses to enforce federal law. In fact, they did it again last night to you on the very same day that a democratic hitman tried to murder Brett Kavanaugh, you had another left wing street militia announced in advance on the Internet. They were going to violate federal law. Yet not a single one was arrested. Merrick Garland should resign in disgrace. And if he won't resign in disgrace, he should be impeached in January for his dereliction of duty. And this is also at a time when Nancy Pelosi refuses to pass the bill or even have a vote on the bill that passed the Supreme Court, the Senate unanimously last month you to provide an enhanced security, not just for the justices, but for their families. What would have happened if that democratic hitman had shown up in 1 o'clock in the afternoon as opposed to 1 o'clock in the morning. When justice Kavanaugh wasn't at home and therefore there were not police present at his home. It's disgraceful that Nancy Pelosi refuses to even have a vote on the Supreme Court security bill that passed unanimously last month. And then finally, the point you race you, yes, I believe the Supreme Court needs to issue the opinion and the Dobbs case now. However they rule, whatever the breakdown of the justices opinions are, they need to issue those opinions or at least the judgment mail. Before some other lunatic democratic hitman thinks that he can change the court's decision and the course of history by assassinating a Supreme Court Justice..

Kavanaugh Brett Kavanaugh senator Tom cotton Merrick Garland Supreme Court Dobbs Chuck Schumer Arkansas America Nancy Pelosi justice Kavanaugh Senate
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

Today, Explained

02:09 min | 5 months ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

"Scared <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Music_Male> <Music> <Speech_Male> that they're <SpeakerChange> not ever <Speech_Music_Male> going to say it. <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <Speech_Music_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> And will they have <Speech_Male> opportunities to weigh <Speech_Male> in on this again before <Speech_Male> the November midterms? <Speech_Male> So probably not <Speech_Male> before the November midterms. <Speech_Male> So <Speech_Male> the <Speech_Male> specific effect <Speech_Male> of the order they <Speech_Male> handed down on Monday <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> is that the <Speech_Male> maps that were drawn <Speech_Male> by Alabama <Speech_Male> Republicans will <Speech_Male> remain in <Speech_Male> effect <Speech_Male> for the <Speech_Male> 2022 <Speech_Male> election. <Speech_Male> The Supreme Court's <Speech_Male> is going to hold <Speech_Male> a full hearing on this <Speech_Male> case. There will be briefing. <Speech_Male> There'll be <Speech_Male> an oral argument. <Speech_Male> It's entirely <Speech_Male> possible that <Speech_Male> after briefing an oral argument, <Speech_Male> the court will <Speech_Male> go, oh shocks, we <Speech_Male> goofed in that one <Speech_Male> order we handed <Speech_Male> down. We really <Speech_Male> should have said what those <Speech_Male> two Trump judges <Speech_Male> said in the lower court. <Speech_Male> So still theoretically <Speech_Male> possible <Speech_Male> that Alabama's <Speech_Male> maps could be struck <Speech_Male> down. But <Speech_Male> given the <Speech_Male> very silly reasoning <Speech_Male> in <Speech_Male> this order that <Speech_Male> we just got, <Speech_Male> <Advertisement> I <SpeakerChange> just don't know <Speech_Music_Male> <Advertisement> how likely that is. <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> I mean, if <Speech_Male> they weren't willing <Speech_Music_Male> to <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> follow the lead <Speech_Male> of these two Trump <Speech_Male> judges in the lower <Speech_Male> court in this <Speech_Male> very silly case, <Speech_Male> involving very <Speech_Male> silly arguments by the <Speech_Music_Male> state of Alabama, <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> I

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

Today, Explained

04:08 min | 5 months ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

"Like they really hit the gas on this. So I just don't understand how they could have done it quicker. And even if they could have done it quicker, like, if 9 months is too long of a window, why is it Ted bonds? Why is it 15 months? I mean, I just don't understand what we're doing here. And did any of the other justices? You know, break out their counters and go wait a second, Brett, we've got 9 months here. Well, the liberal justices and Roberts disagreed. It was a 5 to four decision. Roberts. Yeah, Robert, and Roberts is not a fan of the Voting Rights Act. No. Chief justice John Roberts asked if the government believed the citizens in the south are more racist than the citizens in the north. You know, he wrote that Shelby county decision. In the nearly a year since the Supreme Court struck down a key portion of the Voting Rights Act, 5 states have tightened access to voting. And even he said this went too far. But to answer your question, only one other justice joined Kavanaugh's opinion that was justice Alito. But Kavanaugh is the median justice on the Supreme Court. Like in these sorts of politically charged cases, they're typically for justice to his right, they're typically forge justices to his left. So if Kavanaugh says something, like, it's just really hard to find 5 votes to say, no, no dude, I'm sorry. You don't get what you want. And this is apparently what he wants is this extraordinarily wide per cell window. And I should say that Kavanaugh did have one caveat in his opinion. He did say, well, even if it's close to the election, if the answer is really clear cut. Like if it's just obvious that the plane if should win, then maybe this like you can't do anything close to an election rule doesn't apply. The problem is even Roberts wrote it. Like Roberts's descent said, dude, this one's clear cut. Under existing law, there's really no question here that the plaintiff should win. And no Alabama's argument that you can't take account of race when you're drawing the maps where you have to engage in a race conscious inquiry in order to draw the maps. I hope I'm not being a charitable here, but this opinion this decision makes no sense. Does this mean that the Supreme Court basically doesn't have a bar when it comes to voting rights or if it doesn't, where is the bar now? I'm struggling to understand it. Well, this is what scares me. So the Supreme Court in the last ten years has handed down before this Alabama case. They handed down three major decisions, Shelby county, Abbott V Perez and and C each one took a massive chunk out of the Voting Rights Act. I mean, after the last of those three decisions, I mentioned a lot of voting rights scholars whose work I really respect said, yeah, I don't think there's much of a Voting Rights Act left. If there is any Voting Rights Act left. The Supreme Court allowed partisan gerrymandering to happen without any check by the federal government, chief justice John Roberts, writing the opinion, saying there is no way to properly test and decide whether district lines have been drawn for partisan reasons. They've said that states can pass walls to attack imaginary problems. You could pass a law, claim it exists to fight voter fraud, even if you can't even prove that there's any voter fraud in your state. By a 6 to three vote, the conservative majority on the court upheld two election laws in Arizona. One criminalizes the collection of ballots by third parties. The other requires election officials to throw out ballots cast at the wrong precinct. The Supreme Court has been extraordinarily hostile to voting rights and part of the reason I keep bringing up how weak Alabama's legal arguments were in this case, is because this would have been a good opportunity for this court, which is catching a lot of flak because people think they're being too partisan to say, okay, Republican Party. You're asking for too much here. This lawsuit is too silly. And if they're not willing to say that in this case, I've just really.

Kavanaugh Roberts chief justice John Roberts Supreme Court Ted bonds Shelby county Alito Brett Alabama Abbott V Perez Robert government federal government Arizona Republican Party
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

Today, Explained

08:18 min | 5 months ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

"So what is the map that Alabama ends up with look like? The one black majority district, that Alabama drew has kind of this weird U shape that encompasses both Birmingham and Montgomery. And also include some of the black belt. So that packs a whole lot of black voters into one district. You know, if you have a district that's 80% black, you only need 50% plus one to elect someone and then every other vote is a wasted vote. And then the black belt is cracked up into three or four different districts. And so the black voters who don't live in Montgomery and Birmingham don't live in that one majority black district. Wind up getting split up into several districts that a majority white. So in effect, their vote doesn't count. And so some people in Alabama get together and challenge this map. That's right. Two new lawsuits have been filed over the state's legislative and congressional district maps. The maps were so there were several lawsuits, one was brought by a democratic state senator who is black. One was brought by a bunch of community and civil rights groups and they all basically made the same argument. A state that approximately 40% Democrat. With only one representative out of 7. I mean, that speaks for itself. In Alabama, black people make up 27% of the states, they are coherent. They are packed together in a small area of the state. It is very, very easy to draw a map that has two black majority districts. And the Voting Rights Act does not permit the state to draw maps that maximize the power of white voters at the expense of black voters. Their argument was that under the Voting Rights Act, they have to draw a map that doesn't crack up the black belt so that it minimizes the influence of those black voters. And this is where a couple of Trump appointees and a Clinton appointee, I believe, take a look at this and say, yeah, you're right. That's right. I mean, this was a really straightforward case under existing law. So under existing law, there's actually several factors that courts have to look at, but the two most important factors are is it possible to draw geographically compact districts that have, however many black majority districts for the plaintiffs are asking for. In this case, too. And then the second question is, does the state have what's called racially polarized voting? So like, in this case, almost all the white people in Alabama vote for Republicans, almost all the black people in Alabama vote for Democrats. That means that if you have a district that's like 60 40, then whoever's the 60 is going to win. And there's a bit more complications here, but generally when you have both of those conditions where you have a geographically compact group of racial minority voters. And you have that sort of racial polarization. States are required to draw districts in ways that at the very least do not dilute the influence of the minority voters. We'll go to the Supreme Court in a minute. Before we parted ways there, this Alabama election map business was about to head to the Supreme Court of the United States the highest court in the land. Let's pick it up right where we left off with vox's Ian milhiser. Right. So after the state lost in the lower court, it then brought this case to the Supreme Court. And it brought it under a really silly. I mean, I don't know why Alabama paid this lawyers to come up with this theory because it's really dope. Yeah, that's not nice. I mean, it's a dumb theory. Okay, so let me go a little bit into the weeds here. So when you bring this sort of case challenging a racial gerrymander, the very first thing that you have to do is you have to produce a sample map, which shows that it is possible to basically get the outcome that you want. So the plaintiff, in this case, we're asking for two majority black districts. So the first thing they had to do was draw a sample map that actually has two black majority districts in it. Because if it's not possible for them to win if it's not possible for them to get the relief they want, then there's no need to have a lawsuit. So the plaintiffs produced quite a few sample maps. They hired a mathematician to draw several of them. And the sole purpose of these maps was just to prove that it was possible to have two black majority districts. It wouldn't take the entire county of Montgomery, but a portion of the county of Montgomery were flags of concentrate. The states argument, and like this is going to sound really dumb, but it really is this dog. The states argument was that what it drew the sample maps whose purpose was to prove that it is possible to have two black majority districts. The plaintiffs took too much account of race. One of the things that the reapportionment committee was working very diligent on was to not draw lands according to race. It was about numbers. You're not allowed to think about race when you're doing the thing to discuss race? Exactly. Yeah. It's like trying to draw a picture of an elephant when you're not allowed to ever see what an elephant looks like. I mean, the whole point of these sample baths is to prove that there are enough black people who are geographically compact that you could have two districts. I don't know how you could do that if you don't think about race. It's just not an easy task. There's no way that argument would carry any water at the highest court in the land, right in. I mean, you would think so. How? Did that argument carry water at the highest court in the land did? You know, if I could get inside the beer rattled brain of Brett Kavanaugh. I liked beer, still like beer. At figure out how he came to this conclusion. Because he wrote about it. What did he say? He said two things. So the first thing that he said, and again, this is just as silly as everything that I said before. There's a case called Purcell. And said that when an election is close, court should be very cautious about handing down decisions that change a state's election rules because you don't want people to be confused because they don't know what the election rules are. When's the election, isn't it in November? Yes, the election is a November. You have already spotted the problem with Brett Kavanaugh's opinion. So apparently this Purcell window where we're too close to an election for courts to be able to do anything is 9 months long. That's a whole pregnancy term. I mean, I feel like if you're gonna challenge a flawed election law based on a new map, this is exactly when you would do it, isn't it? Yeah, like when else, Alabama is the state legislature passed the law and acted these maps in November. In the lower court, there were 7 days of testimony. There was a 2000 page transcript of all that testimony. There was a thousand pages in the record. I mean, there's just a massive complicated case. The opinion that the lower court wrote was 225 pages long. And they handed it down. I think on January 24th. Now, that's just a difficult task. If you're gonna get three judges to agree on a 225 page opinion, the fact that they were able to get it done by January when the law was passed in November..

Alabama Montgomery Birmingham Supreme Court Ian milhiser Brett Kavanaugh Trump Clinton United States Purcell legislature
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

Today, Explained

04:57 min | 5 months ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Today, Explained

"Today explained episode 996 for what it's worth, I'm Sean ramis foramen on the show today. We're gonna talk about Brett Kavanaugh's potentially transcendent philosophy of time and space, but before we get there, a refresher on the state of American democracy in this midterm election year. States across the country are rewriting their election maps, the maps that determine which voters get grouped together to pick which candidates for office and long-term listeners of the show will remember that there's been a lot of controversy over the last decade about how these maps get drawn have districts been gerrymandered are politicians picking their voters and not the other way around. Are the maps diluting the political power of urban voters or rural voters or Democrats or Republicans white voters not white voters, the Supreme Court once again weighed in on these questions on Monday. The story starts in Alabama. In this case, Alabama drew a map and there was a very, very strong legal argument that the congressional map that Alabama drew was an illegal racial gerrymander. Ian mohe, vox. It illegally denied black voters representation that they lawfully should have gotten. In fact, the argument that this was an illegal gerrymander was so strong that a panel of three judges, two of whom were appointed by Donald Trump. Said, yeah, that's an illegal gerrymander. You can't do that guys. Federal judges blocking the state's newly drawn congressional districts just months before the primaries. And the Supreme Court halted this decision by these two Trump judges. They said that Alabama can use the racially gerrymandered math that it wants to use. They strongly implied that they're going to let Alabama do this forever. And they also suggested that they are going to permanently change the law governing racial gerrymanders to make it much, much easier for states to draw a lines that maximize the influence of white voters and minimize the influence of non white voters. Okay, let's dial it back and talk about the background of this case. What's going on in Alabama? Why are they redrawing their maps to begin with? Give us the deets. So as a constitutional matter, every state is required to redraw its districts every ten years. That's to prevent a situation where you have districts that stay in place forever and people move and suddenly you have one district with a million people in it and another district with like three people in it. You don't want that. So every ten years states have to redraw their districts, using the new census data. Alabama will hold on to all 7 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, a big win for the state's future. So Alabama just got its 2020 census data. It drew maps that are fairly similar to the maps that it's had in the past, which only had one black majority district. That means that black people will represent about 14% of the state's congressional delegation, but black people now make up 27% of the state. And that's the reason the judges say they are throwing at the map, they're demanding state lawmakers draw up two districts where a sizable portion of the electorate is made up of black voters. And the idea here is that those numbers should be as close to each other as possible. The representation that black alabamans have in Congress should sort of equal their population of Alabama? Normally, yes. I mean, there's a few other factors that go into it. It matters whether black voters are geographically compact. You know, you can imagine a situation where if black voters were evenly divided throughout the whole state of Alabama, then it would be really hard to draw a black majority district because like you just don't have a coherent grouping of black voters that can be brought together into a single district, but that's not the case here. You know, black voters in Alabama typically live either in one of a handful of major cities or they live in what is called the black belt. The black belt of Alabama named for its dark rich soils contains counties in the central part of the state. But because the soil there is so fertile during slavery, many black people were brought to that area. During the 20th century, Alabama's black belt became a main stage for the civil rights movement, including the Montgomery bus boycott and the Selma to Montgomery march. And there's still an enormous number of black people living in that black belt area. So like the reason I described the geography of the state is just to make the point that it's actually very easy to draw maps where black people have congressional representation that's more or less proportional to their population. It would be very easy to draw maps with two congressional districts that are black majority, and that would mean the 27%.

Alabama Sean ramis Brett Kavanaugh Ian mohe Supreme Court Donald Trump U.S. House of Representatives Congress Montgomery Selma
"kavanaugh" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:35 min | 6 months ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"So what's Brett Kavanaugh thinking in this case? It's hard to know for sure. We can speculate, we can speculate that Brett Kavanaugh is trying to make peace with the polite society that came after him in attacked him. We can reasonably speculate that Brett Kavanaugh wants to be liked by the people that tried to destroy his life. And this is something that Dick Cheney has done. This is something that George W. Bush has done. Kavanaugh served in the Bush White House. Kavanaugh is part of that same sort of what they call themselves very high society conservatives. We read the great books and we believe in incremental change. Yeah, in 60 years from now, we might be able to have full school choice. For example. Brett Kavanaugh is not a movement conservative. We never thought he would be. One of the reasons why we rallied in defense and support of Brett Kavanaugh was because of Donald Trump's endorsement of him, was also because of the court's implications, and was also because Brett Kavanaugh had a pretty good record in the D.C. circuit court where he previously served before he became a Supreme Court Justice. It's also because Brett Kavanaugh when he gave his testimony in response to Kamala Harris and Cory Booker's attempt to destroy his life, it sure did organize conservatives galvanized conservatives to come to his defense. It united conservatives around, hey, this is a man who is being wrongly accused, and I still think he was being wrongly accused. I've not changed my opinion on that. Nor will I ever, unless there's evidence that gets introduced that I don't foresee. But instead, Brett Kavanaugh, instead of remembering who his friends were, set of remembering who his allies are. Instead of looking to his partners that actually helped him be confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice, he does the opposite. He says, thanks for playing. People wonder why there is so much rage at the American ruling class. This would be a good reason. When Brett Kavanaugh. Decides to poke the very people that put him in a position in the eyes now it would be one thing if the decision was 7 to two and maybe there was a defector to like Alito or Gorsuch or Thomas. The fact it was 5 four. The fact that Kavanaugh was the swing vote shows that all that hard work we put into to get Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, all that hard work was to give the vaccine mandate industry. The vaccine mandate lobby, more power. All that work that we put into. Trying to get him confirmed, trying to fight back against the lies. Trying to vindicate him, now we have a vaccine mandate for healthcare workers. The very same.

Brett Kavanaugh Kavanaugh D.C. circuit court united conservatives Dick Cheney Supreme Court George W. Bush Kamala Harris Cory Booker Donald Trump White House Bush Gorsuch Alito Thomas
"kavanaugh" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

03:55 min | 2 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Sorry I'm sorry I was I was going to go my god on the dance to polo C. at one point had attacked Brett Kavanaugh for send his nomination to the United States Senate and he referred to people like Christine Lahti for his courageous women quote risking her safety well and and her well being to speak the truth about this nomination and she said that by nominating and and eventually confirming Cavanaugh this quote center Republicans chose to send a clear message to all women do not speak out if you do do not expect to be heard believe or respected she said at the time now yesterday morning she was on CNN she was being questioned by the host there Allison Cammarata and about Joe Biden the allegations against him here is how she answered questions in the morning remember Joe Biden up until this point even up until this very hour has not yet answered questions at all about Tara Reid's allegation against him listen to this conversation like Asian that is being made by one of his former Senate staffers do you think that it is time for vice president Biden to address this head on himself well I if I have great sympathy for any women who bring forth an allegation on the big strong supporter of the me too movement I I think it's been a great a great contribution to our country and it's in and I do support Joe Biden I'm satisfied with how he has responded I know him I was proud to endorse him the other day on Monday very proud to endorse and and so on I'm satisfied with that I mean he hasn't to be clear he hasn't addressed has rested but he has not directly he directly publicly addressed it you know it's a matter that he has to deal with but I can't pressed with the people who work for him at the time saying that ever absolutely never heard one iota of it information about this nobody ever brought forth a couple of claim or had anybody else tell them about such a claim about again the an important election at hand one that is I think one of the most important ones that would have extended every election but I think this one is the most crucial and I I supported him because he's a person of great values integrity authenticity imagination and a connection to the American people eight hundred stands a kitchen table issues of America's working families his father lost his job when he was a boy okay block a lot look here's the thing she is telling us and that did she better hope that that in the end it's true that there is no complaint about Joe Biden from the nineties because Tara Reid says there definitely was one yeah and if it exists it could very well exist in the records in the university of Delaware from that time in the Senate that Joe Biden is refusing to release as of this moment right so so we're never gonna know so it's very easy for Nancy Pelosi to say you know caught no there was no there was no complaint because we'll never know and they know that we'll never know you know I can find out whether she knows whether she's lying and after Joe Biden leaves public life again they can be released two years after that and they don't care the long be gone they'll all be out of politics long gone don't care if they live so our friend Keri Pickett had an opportunity to teach to question a Nancy Pelosi yesterday as well she's reporter for the Washington examiner nothing offensive in any way or even suggestively partisan inet in Kerry's question it was a perfectly good question Nancy Pelosi flies off the handle anyway.

Brett Kavanaugh
"kavanaugh" Discussed on KTTH 770AM

KTTH 770AM

03:44 min | 2 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on KTTH 770AM

"You believed Brett Kavanaugh's accusers you have no evidence against him this woman at least has a decent amount of contemporaneously evidence against you should she not be believed and if not why not tell these very difficult questions were put to Joe Biden have a listen to his response I don't wanna make too much light of this because it actually makes me angry but the crickets choke it's just a way of illustrating not only has Joe Biden said nothing about this allegation for which new evidence has continued to emerge he hasn't been asked directly about it still still he's running for president to put out there for a month it is inconceivable that someone on the other side of the spectrum would be treated this way by the press completely inconceivable The New York Times finally wrote like three weeks after the original complaint came out in the allegation came out publicly they finally wrote a piece they softened it up in the air brushed it in terms of their verbiage because the Biden campaign pressure them to do it and they did they changed it and they presented that pieces sort of their comprehensive look at the allegation against Biden G. you know it's really not that much there what wasn't that comprehensive because we've had multiple people come out since fortifying the claim that the new York times didn't find didn't on earth think about all the journalists that were deployed to on cannot for even deployed up to was still Alaska to dig through the library that Serra Pailin you may have attended when he was mayor some stories are just of more interest to the mainstream media I can understand the absolute partisan hack free of Democrats that's to be expected but right now the media is acting not as loose allies in the Democratic Party but as the praetorian guard as the defenders shielding the lead Democrat from a very uncomfortable story and that is the opposite of the mission statement of journalism at some point I think this whole disgraceful episode is going to be unsustainable and untenable and the question is when the questions finally start to get asked of Joe Biden what on earth is he gonna say given his own standard his own words that we just played you stay tuned well see it's gonna happen eventually it's insane that it's already taken this long and the clock is still ticking we'll break and come back if the guy doesn't show three three four five six thirteen hundred you're listening to in so for ninety five years saya LTL freight to deliver the goods key businesses and communities moving now in this uncertain time we will stop going that extra mile because at the end of the day all this together the long delivery driving stability safety support string visits dot com S. A. I. A. dot com I've got a snack that will add a little cookbook into your keto diet or would that be keto Bulma either way southern recipe small batch for cried that the bold flavor that.

Brett Kavanaugh
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

Newsradio 700 WLW

06:22 min | 3 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

"L. W. Mike Allen Saturday midday we're talking about the continued. demonization of Brett Kavanaugh a year after he was confirmed. to the United States Supreme Court here's a couple other things that again you're not gonna find this in the mainstream media. at this at the end of the book that these two New York times reporters wrote. they do acknowledge that. they're in a bit that Christine blouse it Christine blase forge a lifelong friend you might remember the name label and Kaiser. did not believe Christine blase forge tale of a sexual assault at a party they both supposedly attended now that was in contradiction to what was said at the hearing and for the first time. Kaiser spoke out for the record and you might recall again because it was named by Ford as a witness and of course she was one of four witnesses who denied any knowledge of the event in question and here's what ms Kaiser said on the record quote I was told behind the scenes that certain things we could be spread about me if I didn't comply. certain things could be spread about me if I didn't comply so I mean you couple that with everything else and again at the end of the day it all comes down to the beloved roe versus Wade. and there was another book written about this that I read it's fantastic book it's called justice on trial Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino wrote that it they report not the book but in a previous article forge father Christine blase porch father actually backed Kavanaugh's nomination and what they write is within days of Kavanaugh's confirmation of the Supreme Court a fascinating encounter took place Brett Kavanaugh is father was approached by Ford's father at the golf club where they are both members. Ralph blase Christine blase Ford's father went out of his way to offer ed Cavanaugh Brett Kavanaugh is dead support for his nomination to the Supreme Court and that's according to multiple sources and multiple people who actually heard this conversation take place at the burning tree club in Bethesda Maryland and. his father Brett kennels fathers quoted as saying I'm glad Brett was good now I'm sorry Christine blase ports father said I'm glad Brett was confirmed Ralph blase told ed cabin all shaking his hand and blase ended that the ordeal of been tough for both families you know I have you read about that anywhere in the mainstream media so much of this stuff if it doesn't fit in their narrative. they won't reported or if you like the New York times you just make it up I'm going to the phones here let me go to Emma good morning Emma. morning thanks for taking my call. I listen intently to your description of the knife delegation and I can tell you why in the fall okay. because I don't know any guy drunk enough that with another guy. in a woman's hand. you cut right to the chase their Emma but well you certainly have a point I mean you really do and that's kind of what I thought when I read it too but it's similar to the the basis allegation that was made by Deborah Ramirez that of course nobody can back up it's just one thing after another with this when are they gonna let the guy go. well this is just me a lot it doesn't make sense none of it makes sense and I I think we're just being held captive by the liberal media and you have people have to start thinking for themselves and reading both sides and. you know. I I read a lot and. I think I'm an independent but I do look at both sides and I think I don't know how these people live with themselves you know all of the thing I don't either I really don't Emma but would you agree at the end of the day at least ninety five percent of it all comes down to. their beloved roe versus Wade and they're going to discredit Brett Kavanaugh even when he is on the United States Supreme Court any way that they can in an attempt to intimidate him and some of the other right leaning justices do you think there's anything to that Emma. well I I feel like he did a great job defending himself I don't think that I mean he's he's on the court I don't think that he. in the case yeah intimidated at all. no I don't think so either night they tried to do that the Clarence Thomas back when he was confirmed he still getting all kinds of grief for that but I don't think you you're not going to intimidate Clarence Thomas and I don't think you can intimidate Brett Kavanaugh I sure appreciate that call was a good call and she does make a good point. if you listen to the lurid allegations on this later one yeah it is kind of hard to imagine I've got high witness hand on you know what in doing that and frankly I didn't even think about that but she makes a very very good point and again it's all about roe versus Wade the left is so worried that there could be a fifth vote to finally overturn it that they'll do anything anything to assassinate the character of a judge that they think may vote to repeal it. at any rate we're gonna go back to the callers after we get back from the news a lot of people interested in this topic Mike Allen newsradio seven hundred W. L. W.. traffic.

Brett Kavanaugh Christine blase Christine blase Ford United States Supreme Court ed Cavanaugh Brett Kavanaugh Ralph blase Supreme Court roe Emma New York times Ford Christine ms Kaiser Clarence Thomas L. W. Mike Allen assault Mollie Hemingway Carrie Severino Wade
"kavanaugh" Discussed on WBZ NewsRadio 1030

WBZ NewsRadio 1030

03:31 min | 3 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on WBZ NewsRadio 1030

"Court justice Brett Kavanaugh seem to be losing a little bit of steam this morning new allegations from a witness who claims to have watched misconduct by the justice at a Yale college party decades ago puts president trump now on the attack at a rally in New Mexico the president calls instead for the resignation of the New York times editors who broke the story ABC senior national correspondent Terry Moran has more about the new claim the shocking story strikingly similar to an allegation made by another Yale classmate Deborah merece at the height of Kavanaugh's confirmation battle Ramirez alleged Cavanaugh exposed himself to her at a different party when they were both drunk and when she shoved him away she says she was touched with. her consent Kevin off flatly denying that at all allegations of sexual misconduct still Senate Democrats say they're asking the F. B. I. and the Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate the new claims about Kavanaugh's past the NFL ramps up its investigation into patriots wide receiver Antonio brown after the woman accusing him of sexual assault and rape concludes her meeting with league officials are now more misconduct allegations against the NFL superstar W. B. C. T. V.'s Michael cross with detail a second accuser has now come forward on Ortiz told Sports Illustrated brown exposed himself to her while she was in his home to paint a mural his lawyer denied the accusations in a tweet saying Antonio brown has reviewed the sexual misconduct allegations made by an unnamed artist included any recent publishes sports illustrated oracle and denies that he ever engaged in such activities there will be no further comment at this time the NFL has yet to comment on either of these accusations the artist in question is not seeking damages or pursuing charges but told Sports Illustrated that she was bothered by his behavior a glimmer of hope for the nationwide measles epidemic health officials of the United States say there were no new cases of measles reported last week first time that's happened in months that's a sign of the nation's worst epidemic of the disease in nearly thirty years may be in its final stages it reportedly started with travelers who became infected overseas but spread quickly among unvaccinated people here in the United States so far this year more than twelve hundred measles cases have been confirmed after being inducted into the baseball hall of fame this past summer a former Yankee closer receives another high honor at the White House in from today presenting the presidential medal of freedom hall of Famer and legendary New York Yankees pitcher Mariano Rivera his dominance in the mount mesmerized. fans teammates and unfortunately for them it mesmerized the competitors it's the highest honor given to a civilian the president has awarded it to golfer Tiger Woods Rivera has recently defended his relationship with the president saying on fox news this summer that Mr trump was a friend of his before he took office and he respects him and what he's doing for this country Karen Travers ABC news the White House and six oh eight let's check in on business news this morning Bloomberg business Andrew day joins us good morning Andrew. what is your first feature heading slightly lower as European markets lacked direction with the consequences of the weekend drone attack on Saudi Aramco oil facilities still hitting the market even as oil futures here pull back about a dollar a barrel to about sixty two S. B. futures down four nasdaq futures down sixteen is.

Brett Kavanaugh thirty years
"kavanaugh" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

01:37 min | 3 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"Latest tweet. this latest we all on this subject how did the New York times phrase it. having a **** thrust in your face in a drunken dorm party may seem like harmless fun. but when Brett Kavanaugh did to her jabber mera says it confirmed that she didn't belong at Yale in the first place. what heartburn well the New York times just told you that having a **** dressed in your face it's just harmless fun. well. hi I'm. do you know the **** in question. may maybe maybe familiar **** yes. maybe straight no. don't tell me what the hell pretty sorry this is the New York times all I'm doing is quoted in trying to understand them they deleted the street. three times in the past thirty days The New York Times had to delete their tweets The New York Times archives The New York Times The New York Times opinion. because they just can't figure out how to engage story and how to be honest about a story and how to not in any way shape or form look like morons with the story. but I but the in the printing of the story proves they're not even interested in journalism. don't trust them. don't listen to them. but we'll keep pointing out when they fail. they're no longer all the news that's fit to print they have no right being the paper of record that has to end. so does their inability to.

Brett Kavanaugh Yale New York The New York Times thirty days
"kavanaugh" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

02:49 min | 3 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Friends corroborated her accusations in fact they shot them down for the most part. prior to airing your allegations with the news media she's scrub your entire social media history that indicated she was a liberal activist they did that with the help of lawyers are coming from the Democratic Party and from Dianne Feinstein's office on Capitol Hill. to this day there is zero evidence beyond her claim that the alleged assault ever happened one detail however remains particularly intriguing the blouse the family stayed conspicuously silent about the veracity ever allegations a public letter of support for forward that began as members of Christine Blasi Ford's family wasn't actually signed by a single Christine Blasi Ford blood relative recently reached for comment by The Washington Post her father simply said I thank all the Blasi family would support her I thank her record stands for itself for schooling her jobs and so on then he hung up well privately however it appears the Blasi family had significant doubts about what Ford was trying to accomplish by coming forward and making unsubstantiated allegations against Brett Kavanaugh within days of Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court a fascinating and counter took place Brett Kavanaugh's father was approach by Christine Blasi Ford's father at the golf club where they're both members this is anybody remember I told the story of your memory make telling the story I told the story Ralph Blasi who is the father of Christine Blasi Ford went out of his way to offer add Cavanaugh father of Brett Kavanaugh his support of wrecked Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court according to multiple people familiar with the conversation that took place at burning tree Country Club in Bethesda Maryland. I'm glad Brett was confirmed drought flaws he told at cabin off shaking his hand laws he added that the ordeal have been tough for both families. now. this isn't in the New York times either. this is the Chris Plante shown Washington W. and. where Washington comes to talk. WMAL traffic from the hit the carpet cleaning traffic center I'm Lisa faith in Virginia south bend IT five triangle acts of the clean up the laser after you pass the Dale city Maryland ninety five good between DC and Baltimore to seventy get the south and the lay before and after father from the Boulevard heading towards one eighteen then if you merge on the four ninety five south for the American Legion brick now from garage door repair dot com.

Christine Blasi Ford Brett Kavanaugh Ralph Blasi Supreme Court Dianne Feinstein The Washington Post Democratic Party assault Bethesda Maryland tree Country Club Chris Plante New York times Baltimore Maryland Virginia Cavanaugh American Legion
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Public Comment

Public Comment

03:57 min | 3 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Public Comment

"Cabin don't fret warriors will keep the live in the blood simon ortiz the fight for justice and stretching muscles tearing reaching for the sky daunting tempting to surrender and senate assuming futility ability but people walked on the moon made a vaccine for malaria polio and other diseases. I contemplate my white privilege resenting every renmin of it and scowl wow look at america's white supremacist big bullies oppressing native americans african-americans arabs herbs jews women the non heterosexual the poor the vulnerable the non christian non caucasian and it disturbs me takes me drink my whiskey with a little extra intensity. I fear that nothing not a single atrocity would have moved justice brett kavanagh's supporters in the senate to oppose his confirmation not that we know whether he was guilty or innocent quote the allegations fail to meet the more likely than not standard close quote senator senator susan collins said in her speech explaining her vote to confirm him but the way christine blasi ford's accusations ends were investigated in a rush the quote more than forty people with potential information formation into the sexual misconduct allegations against the prem- court nominee brett cavanaugh have not been contacted by the f._b._i. According to multiple sources is that include friends of the nominee and his accusers close quote and be seniors reported and what about debra uh ramirez and julie sweat nick who also made accusations of sexual misconduct ignored by the republicans in the senate the f._b._i. By president trump i'll write to misogynistic deference to cavanaugh seems to me a sham. Damn as many democrats in the senate called it even months later. Trump says he knows acting attorney. General matthew whitaker. Then says he doesn't know adding to the u. Wreaking junkyards and mountain chains of venom ild sewage live poisoning our politics government law enforcement rhetoric relationships and the republicans knocked put a lynch aim nightmare an outrage but ho- hope hope look at things like new england where the snow seems to grace with its elegance as it falls the homicide rates there among the lowest first in the nation look at the gentleman life former f._b._i. Director james comey and the ladies like newly elected congresswoman of kansas cherise chris davids. More americans voted for clinton than trump. More americans voted for clinton than trump. More americans voted for clinton than trump.

Trump senate brett cavanaugh brett kavanagh clinton matthew whitaker simon ortiz senator susan collins america senator james comey christine blasi ford prem- court ramirez president chris davids lynch attorney
"kavanaugh" Discussed on Public Comment

Public Comment

03:57 min | 3 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on Public Comment

"Cabin don't fret warriors will keep the live in the blood simon ortiz the fight for justice and stretching muscles tearing reaching for the sky daunting tempting to surrender and senate assuming futility ability but people walked on the moon made a vaccine for malaria polio and other diseases. I contemplate my white privilege resenting every renmin of it and scowl wow look at america's white supremacist big bullies oppressing native americans african-americans arabs herbs jews women the non heterosexual the poor the vulnerable the non christian non caucasian and it disturbs me takes me drink my whiskey with a little extra intensity. I fear that nothing not a single atrocity would have moved justice brett kavanagh's supporters in the senate to oppose his confirmation not that we know whether he was guilty or innocent quote the allegations failed to meet the more likely than not standard close quote senator senator susan collins said in her speech explaining her vote to confirm him but the way christine blasi ford's accusations ends were investigated in a rush the quote more than forty people with potential information formation into the sexual misconduct allegations against the prem- court nominee brett cavanaugh have not been contacted by the f._b._i. According to multiple sources is that include friends of the nominee and his accusers close quote and be seniors reported and what about debra <hes> ramirez and julie sweat nick who also made accusations of sexual misconduct ignored by the republicans in the senate the f._b._i. By president trump out right to misogynistic deference to cavanaugh seems to me a sham. Damn as many democrats in the senate called it even months later. Trump says he knows acting attorney. General matthew whitaker. Then says he doesn't know adding to the u. Wreaking junkyards and mountain chains of venom ild sewage live poisoning our politics government law enforcement redbrick relationships and the republicans knocked got a lynch aim nightmare an outrage but ho- hope hope look at things like new england where the snow seems to grace with its elegance as it falls the homicide rates there among the lowest first in the nation look at the gentleman life former f._b._i. Director james comey and the ladies like newly elected congresswoman of kansas cherise chris davids. More americans voted for clinton than trump. More americans voted for clinton than trump. More americans voted for clinton than trump.

Trump senate brett cavanaugh brett kavanagh simon ortiz matthew whitaker clinton senator susan collins america senator james comey debra christine blasi ford prem- court chris davids lynch attorney Director
"kavanaugh" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

03:22 min | 3 years ago

"kavanaugh" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"Made about Brett Kavanaugh and matching them with his record in his first full term on the court those predictions seem patently absurd but I would say for people who are doubting and you know whether he was a good pick or what not that he he had some good decisions this term he showed the ability to work with other people and and be persuasive with other people and he continued what have a lot of people excited about him which is a concern about the growth of the administrative state which is the biggest civil liberties threat in America right now and just the general continued when some nationalist and about how to operate on the court shall I would give him at least a couple more years to see what you think about it absolutely listen you know they're well I just talk to my audience earlier about how many conservatives really have to hold their nose when they voted in the presidential election and how today when you look at the democratic field that so you know going to be of picking their nominee to run against president trump if I could vote for Donald Trump three thirteen times today I would you know so so you do have to watch and see how a person is once they're in office you know I doubted the conservative credentials even though I was an early supporter I was nervous and today I'm not nervous because I have a record and the record is excellent so are the same hope hopefully I'll have the same feeling about bread cabin on a big fan of Neil Gorsuch but not yet of ready to say yea Cavanaugh would really will be interesting is what are they going to do when the perhaps Donald Trump as president gets to nominate a replacement for a liberal justice I can't even imagine yeah it's frightening to think it is one of the things which we try to give people the contact of what was happening in the confirmation process one of the things we thought why not just the general pattern of of hearing a particular here you can't get out of the public and the Democrats appeared more easily I did got much more ten seventy years but it really spike every time there is a major change in the court coming help only some pork I because one of the first big explosions that people remember that was one of eight a twenty eight up for grabs and then you thought that with him replacing Thurgood Marshall who was one of the most liberal jackets with the core of course being now can a workplace at the moment now now it's on the most conservative justices so that confirmation process we thought last year with Cavanaugh replacing Kennedy a swing vote exactly thought that their faith in a strange okay what can we expect if it were a little chapter six from the place where the swing is even more dramatic I I agree I think it can be really frightening to watch I think that's why we have to be prepared absolutely ladies of the book is excellent justice on trial the cabin a confirmation in the future of the Supreme Court by Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino I appreciate you both coming on with me today and this book it actually it was fascinating I admit it read like a novel and I was there so was you know is the so I knew the story I knew the outcome and yet I was riveted so great great job thank you so much thank you so much all right all right let's take a quick break be right back.

Brett Kavanaugh ten seventy years