35 Burst results for "Judicial Watch"
The Charlie Kirk Show
"judicial watch" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"I want to talk about another story here, judicial watch sues the Department of Homeland Security for records on election censorship tell us about it. Yeah, I mean, this is one if I think a few lawsuits that have been spawned as a result of the Twitter files release in I think the specific one you're referencing, it looks like these NGOs, these non governmental organizations and government entities were essentially engaging in censorship activities, targeting countless Americans on what is the equivalent of a slack channel. I don't use slack, but sort of a casual approach to censorship and we're asking for the documents. And you know, recall, we don't sue, unless they tell us they don't comply with the law. So the Department of Homeland Security rather than disclose information about their censorship activities is hiding these records in violation of the foia law. And I'm sorry, but when you break the law, especially on sensitive topics like this, in terms of secrecy, I'd suggest to me, and I think to most fair minded people that there's something they don't want us to see. Yeah, and I just want to remind our audience because this was a story we covered rather extensively a couple months ago. The government, thanks to the United States Constitution, the founding fathers put rules for what the government can not do. The government knows this, they don't always follow those rules, but to get creative, they outsource their censorship to other companies because private companies are not bound by the Bill of Rights. They can basically do whatever they want. And so, but is that still the case Tom? I'm just curious, there has to be some constitutional precedent, maybe not, of a government agencies outsourcing the behavior that they themselves could not do. The equivalent would be asking telecom companies after 9 11 to listen in on Muslims, phone calls, right? Just something that would have gotten the liberal media upset, is there any precedent for this? Well, you're highlighting the illegality of it in the unconstitutional nature of it. The government can't do through a cutout, something that they're prohibited under the law for doing directly. And we know in California, for instance, speaking which, the Secretary of State's office in 2020 was as now has been widely disclosed, but we had uncovered it first, was working through these big tech companies to take down material. They didn't like related to election controversies. And one of those D.C. drano, the Internet influencer. He had tweets taken down. And judicial watch found in these documents, we were a victim too. They took down a video of mine for judicial watch talking about the concerns I had about mail in voting and the dirty voting rolls in California and such. And YouTube took it down. So we sued under the constitution, civil rights lawsuit, this California Secretary of State for that very issue that they were violating our civil rights by getting YouTube to take this video down of ours. Yeah, and I don't know. But here's what I do. I do know that I was on a list by the Department of Homeland Security and I do know that I was placed on a blacklist by Twitter. I don't know if those two things are connected. So I'm curious and Tom, thank you for fighting the fight for me because I was explicitly put on a do not amplify list by Twitter and I do know the Department of Homeland Security had me on a very long report and so reasonable minds can say, hey, one plus two should equal three, right?.
The Charlie Kirk Show
Tom Fitton Explains Judicial Watch's Win Against Voter Fraud in LA
"Talk about another story here, judicial watch sues the Department of Homeland Security for records on election censorship tell us about it. Yeah, I mean, this is one if I think a few lawsuits that have been spawned as a result of the Twitter files release in I think the specific one you're referencing, it looks like these NGOs, these non governmental organizations and government entities were essentially engaging in censorship activities, targeting countless Americans on what is the equivalent of a slack channel. I don't use slack, but sort of a casual approach to censorship and we're asking for the documents. And you know, recall, we don't sue, unless they tell us they don't comply with the law. So the Department of Homeland Security rather than disclose information about their censorship activities is hiding these records in violation of the foia law. And I'm sorry, but when you break the law, especially on sensitive topics like this, in terms of secrecy, I'd suggest to me, and I think to most fair minded people that there's something they don't want us to see. Yeah, and I just want to remind our audience because this was a story we covered rather extensively a couple months ago. The government, thanks to the United States Constitution, the founding fathers put rules for what the government can not do. The government knows this, they don't always follow those rules, but to get creative, they outsource their censorship to other companies because private companies are not bound by the Bill of Rights. They can basically do whatever they want.
Opening Arguments
"judicial watch" Discussed on Opening Arguments
"Number one, tens of millions of people want this drooling moron to be president. How do anyway, sorry? Just need to take a step back. If you have anybody in your life that still a Trump support, these are the ramblings of somebody who is disconnected from reality. Leave alone their political bent, but anyway, that's terrifying. Number two, I don't know how much the I thought this was so cool keepsake is going to work. But you know, you keep doing you but look like hundreds of hundreds of hundreds. Yeah, it's a totally inexpensive folder like you buy it back to school day at the store. It just has a word on it. Yeah, but I kept hundreds of them. Those two things don't really match up, do they? It is insane. And also they're still going to plant documents, although, you know, when there was a special master and I had the opportunity to prove beyond a doubt that nobody was planting documents. I objected to that. But pull the pin out because you laughed and maybe you are a better lawyer than I am, or maybe I'm just stuck in my own head, but I said quoting Trump. As president and based on the presidential records act and Sox case, I did nothing wrong. Joe did. Now, did you instantly know what he meant by the socks case? That's what I was laughing. Okay. Thank God. Okay. Because holy hell. Yeah, no, wait. I do know that somebody tried to sneak documents out on their socks. I think it was a bush admin person, right? Nope, not that one. But that one? You are way closer than I was, right? So first thing I did was because, you know, I'm a lawyer, and I'm thinking, when you say the X case, right? You mean the name of the party? One of the two parties. So I searched westlaw for socks. As you spelled it, you know, SOC KS. I came up with, I was like, socks and Bill Clinton and socks and documents and socks at president Trump. I'd find that I thought maybe it was SO X and the famous spell cheating scandal. World Series. You had to open up a doctor, you know, Richard socks or what I don't know. So finally, I went again back to the source and asked Liz and I'm like, do you know what the hell he means here by the socks decision? I'm gonna save you the guess I get the back and forth. This is judicial watch versus Nara, which is a 2012 DDC Amy Berman Jackson decision. And if you thinking judicial watch versus nearest sounds like, you know, the judicial watch case may be, didn't they cover that back when Trump was litigating this case in front of judge Canada and Florida indeed we did. And this is why he thinks of it as the Sox case. This is judicial watch the organization that professionally exists to harass the clintons. Filed a freedom of information act request, seeking the original tapes and all materials related to Bill Clinton's interview with Taylor branch at the end of his presidency. And we again, we have discussed this case at some length. And they did so by filing a foia request with Nara, right? They said, look, these Taylor branch tapes very obviously going to be presidential records, and so we want you Nara to turn them over to us. And Nara replied to the foia request by saying we don't have these tapes. I don't know what you're talking about. And the reason they didn't have the tapes and they didn't know what we were talking about is that these were not presidential records. These were very clearly personal records. Conducted by in between Bill Clinton and historian Taylor branch that he recorded in The White House and the argument was, well, you know, you might have accidentally recorded some business going on in the background. And both of the archives and judge Jackson were like, cool man, but like the determination was made that these were not presidential records, so we don't have them. So what are we even doing here? That's the case. And if you're sitting there thinking like, well, Taylor branch is interview with Bill Clinton doesn't seem to be a confidential secret pertaining to the national defense. You would be correct. And it doesn't seem to involve socks. What happened was Bill Clinton had the tapes in his sock drawer. I am a 100%. I don't know. That fact is not even present in the Amy Berman Jackson decision. In other words, if you control F and you search for sock or socks, you will find it. You will find it in the right wing coverage because I guess that makes them feel like it's more salacious. I had a roommate in college used to hide his playboys in his sock drawer, right? For when the family came over. Who knows? For a younger listeners, Playboy was a magazine that featured naked. Anyway, so maybe they think that there's something special about a very good article. Yeah, it actually historically has. That boy when I was 12, did I read the hell out of those articles? The only thing I could think of is that there's a level of implied salaciousness there. I don't know it's stupid to call this the Sox case is illustrates the kind of demented mind that we're dealing with. And I mean that in a very particular way because the only way in which you would know that this was kept in Clinton sock drawer would be not if you read the case, which I will link in the show notes, which is obvious, because again, case doesn't mention socks, but rather if you're only knowledge of the case, comes from how it was reported on right wing media, which is a 100% the case for Donald Trump. So he hasn't read the decisions. What is less law or nexus Lexus? Yeah, you could go to scholar Google dot com and type it into, but I'm guessing he's not on Google scholar either. So Donald Trump, and again, that's because Tom fitton. Now in charge of judicial watch, has been advising Trump on the law, even though Tom fit not a lawyer. So, you know, maybe don't take legal advice from a moron. But in any event, Donald Trump believes that that case stands for the proposition that anything the president classifies as a personal record is a personal record and that therefore everything he stole out of The White House was a personal record, and therefore he can't be guilty of any crime. And notice, by the way, that that is wrong at every level. A, not what the case stands for. B, he didn't do that. He didn't actually declare these to be personal records. See, wouldn't matter if he had because the statute as we read it to you is documents relating to the national defense, and D his continued insistence that he has the right to possess these documents is actually part of why this seems like such a pretty straightforward criminal case against the former president and bottom line for uncle Frank. Joe Biden gave the documents back, Donald Trump still defends as of yesterday stiffing Nora that a subpoena that a search warrant. The bottom line is what matters for purposes of establishing all three elements of 18 USC 7 93 F is what did you do when you became aware that you had documents relating to the national defense? And that's just night and day. And if it isn't again, if it isn't, we'll keep our mind open. There's a special counsel out there. I'll do an Andrew what's wrong, but every piece of evidence we have in public right now is that there's a huge difference between the two. But do you think this was a, you know, liberal media was wrong in terms of the commingling to go back to the original question. The commingling not really being the thing or how do you know what? Let me be clear, I'm glad you asked that as a follow up question because I want that to be clear here. The commingling does establish additional evidence towards that second element, right? The idea that you knew that this was in a spot that it shouldn't be. So let's drill down on that for Joe Biden for 30 seconds. When the story
The Charlie Kirk Show
How Do We Hold Twitter Accountable For This?
"You were one of the leading voices and judicial watch was one of the only organizations to uncover the nonsense around Russia gate. I believe it was your lawsuit that actually got us the Peter struck stroke smirk text messages. I could be wrong, but I know you guys were involved in some of the discovery there and some of the foia requests. But the same blueprint, the same behavior that they used for Russia gate, seems that they now used for Twitter gate in 2020, which is we are going to use the intelligence agencies to then have third party actors, whether it be Perkins cooey, whether it be a dossier, whatever it might be, they're still calling the shots, but they do it a step removed. So Tom, failure to hold people accountable for what they did with Russia gate. I think is directly correlated with this behavior that we saw with Twitter. Yeah, and in this case, you had the Trump administration kind of taking a step back. And it does go back to Russia date. Because the Trump administration or folks within the Trump administration were scared as a result of the ferocious attack on Trump over 2016 in his election. And they bought into hook line and sinker in the idea that the Russians colluded and interfered in our election and a substantial material way. And in response to that, they took it upon themselves to police the Internet. And start evidently here targeting Americans for censorship through Twitter and such. And so these are deep state actors who made up crap against president Trump. And then use the resulting political blowback to continue to censor Americans they didn't like. And one of the dangers is that it's escalated that they did it on the sly in 2020, but now they're doing it in a forthright manner under the Biden administration where you have The White House calling in the heads of these big tech companies and being quite blatant in brazen in asking them to censor Americans about issues that get in the way of their political agenda.
The Charlie Kirk Show
"judicial watch" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Who are the leaders that change the world. Their professors, coaches, and mentors. They're servant leaders willing to invest and inspire others. They serve with a purpose, preparing others to shape their communities and influence their professions. Our exceptional degree programs will equip you with the skills and Christian character that set you apart and prepare you to lead with significance. Say yes to your purpose. Visit regent dot EDU slash learn more. Hey everybody, ten to Charlie Kirk show Tom fitton walks through what laws were broken by the FBI and DHS for what they did with Twitter. And then Matt Gates and I talk about the Twitter files and then have an interesting conversation about who should be the next Speaker of the House of Representatives. You don't want to miss it. Email store fox is always freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com getting involved with turning point USA Today at TPUSA dot com and get involved with America fest come to America fest this weekend. The biggest speakers in the whole movement, Tim pool, Steve Bannon, Matt Walsh, Candace Owens, a.m. FES T dot com that's am fest dot com. Buckle up everybody here. We go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the white house folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy, his spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job. Building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, turning point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Brought to you by the loan experts I trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific mortgage at Andrew and Todd dot com. Joining us now is one of the most important people in the conservative movement, one of the most influential. And one of the most, let's just say, powerful is one way to say it, but they just, they are so results driven and oriented and I love them. It's judicial watch Tom fitton joins us right now. Tom, welcome back to the program. Hey, Charlie. Good to be with you. Appreciate the good word. I mean it. So Tom walk us through your analysis of the Twitter files. Most specifically, what if any laws were broken by our federal government? Oh. Well, there were, I think, four batches of Twitter files put out there. And as it relates to government intervention in Twitter censorship activities, you have two categories. You had these regular meetings taking place with the FBI and DHS and who knows the office of director of national intelligence prior to the election. And they been cagey as to what those meetings were about, but the context around that time, obviously, was the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, but not by not only Twitter, but by Facebook and others. So the question is, were they telling or suggesting Twitter to take this material down? It's not clear that happened, but certainly regular meetings with a private company to persuade or talk about the leading or censoring any material would raise significant First Amendment concerns just generally. But more recently, one of the more recent batches I think it was either batch three or batch four, you saw that the FBI specifically asked to tweets be taken down. And that to me raises significant legal concerns. I'm no lawyer, but I've been doing this too long. And I've been doing this longer than I care to admit to in terms of figuring out what the FBI is supposed to do and what it's able to do. And when it's not able to do, is to track the social media accounts of individual Americans just because they don't like what they're saying about election debates and then go to a private company and get them to take it down. That ought to be the subject of a serious criminal investigation. The victims of that type of activity may have civil claims against the FBI and anyone else involved in this. And I just saw in just the news over with our friend John Solomon, he highlighted the deposition testimony in the Missouri and other lawsuits about Twitter censorship or big tech censorship of this FBI, special agent mister Chan out in San Francisco. And he said these censorship requests were being approved at the highest levels before they went to places like Twitter. So that's a real major revelation and there ought to be Hector paying..
The Charlie Kirk Show
Judicial Watch's Tim Fitton Unpacks the Twitter Files
"Us now is one of the most important people in the conservative movement, one of the most influential. And one of the most, let's just say, powerful is one way to say it, but they just, they are so results driven and oriented and I love them. It's judicial watch Tom fitton joins us right now. Tom, welcome back to the program. Hey, Charlie. Good to be with you. Appreciate the good word. I mean it. So Tom walk us through your analysis of the Twitter files. Most specifically, what if any laws were broken by our federal government? Oh. Well, there were, I think, four batches of Twitter files put out there. And as it relates to government intervention in Twitter censorship activities, you have two categories. You had these regular meetings taking place with the FBI and DHS and who knows the office of director of national intelligence prior to the election. And they been cagey as to what those meetings were about, but the context around that time, obviously, was the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, but not by not only Twitter, but by Facebook and others. So the question is, were they telling or suggesting Twitter to take this material down? It's not clear that happened, but certainly regular meetings with a private company to persuade or talk about the leading or censoring any material would raise significant First Amendment concerns just generally. But more recently, one of the more recent batches I think it was either batch three or batch four, you saw that the FBI specifically asked to tweets be taken down.
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
"judicial watch" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
"There's a problem here. And it's a very, very, very dark signal. I'm Sebastian gorka former strategist to the president. We're talking to the director of investigations and research at judicial watch and organization that deserves your support judicial watch dot ORG broadcasting to you from the relief factor dot com studios relief act of pain relief that works pain relief is through a pain relief that's liberating half a million people right now me included Ida low back pain issue that played me for 9 years almost a decade. I took relief after two weeks later I was pain free and I'm still pain free more than three and a half years later. That should be you. That could be, but there's only one way to find out, but it's super easy. Order the three week quick starter pack at relief factor dot com. It'll be in three days or less. Take your morning and evening like I do, and I promise you, doctor G's guarantee, by the end of those three weeks, you will know whether it works for you like it works for me and 500,000 of your fellow Americans. You've waited long enough. You deserve to know. Don't wait any longer, do it today, call it 805 183 84, really factor dot com. That's 800, 500, 83, 84, relief factor dot com, really factor dot com. And if you enjoyed this show, please support those who make it possible. Great patriots of Friends of the president like Mike lindell. You heard what the feds did to him. He came on the show right after three unmarked vehicles, ambushed him, demanded his cell phone. Because he's a conservative because he's a truth teller. Let's show the left they can't cancel this man. Please go to his website. Use my name. You'll get up to 66% off. He's got some amazing bogo offers. And you'll get a good night's sleep as well. Please call 808 to 9 8 four 6 8 check out his over a 150 amazing products or just go to my pillow dot com, but you've got to use the secret code. That's my pillow 808 two 9 8 four 6 8. My pillow dot com code goka. Last question and you've not seen any of these because we don't give them to our guests. We don't rehearse them. What's it like to be Chris Farrell? After you've worn the uniform of the U.S. Army, you've taken the oath, you've served this nation. You've worked with the FBI. I don't know hundreds of occasions. What is it like to live in America now and see these things like Mar-a-Lago like the how great how do you deal with that as somebody who wore the cloth of the republic? Yeah. I'm being generous or kind when I say that it's creepy, you know? I'll never disheartened though. I have hope, capital H hope. And I know, as a good friend of mine, an elderly Anglican priest turned to me one day, we were discussing all these troubles we face. He goes, let me cut to the end. God wins. All right. And so we've already won. Yeah. I know. That we are victorious. And so I have full faith and confidence in that. But along the way, there's challenges and fights and things. And is because this is what judicial watch does every day, but in the final analysis we can talk of centers of gravity and culminating effects and all that other jargon. Can we drain the swamp Chris Farrell? We can. We can. In fact, we have an obligation to. Correct. It's beyond just wishful thinking and intention. We have an affirmative obligation to do so and not doing so really would be our negligence, right? It would be our, it would hang on us. It would be a dark stain against our honor and integrity to not do something. So we have to. And your message after 2020, what you've called the coup d'etat. What is your message to those that we've got 3 million this is what do you say to those who say, that's it? I've given up, they've still in the republic. What do you say to them? They're wrong. They're a 100% wrong. In fact, the burden and obligation has doubled. Perhaps 50 fold. But we have a duty and an obligation to fight our absolute hardest to be involved in active and motivated to support the constitution to defend the constitution to stand up for the constitution, not let them take it away. They draped themselves in this phony baloney righteousness, look, I've taken an oath to defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. There's no expiration date on it, right? Yeah. And that's what I'm going to do. And, you know, there's a lawful constitutional way to press forward and to win fair and square. And that's what we're going to do. Perfectly puts, it's not just possible to drain the swamp, we must drain the swamp it is our duty..
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
Chris Farrell Shares His Perspective on Modern-Day America
"Question and you've not seen any of these because we don't give them to our guests. We don't rehearse them. What's it like to be Chris Farrell? After you've worn the uniform of the U.S. Army, you've taken the oath, you've served this nation. You've worked with the FBI. I don't know hundreds of occasions. What is it like to live in America now and see these things like Mar-a-Lago like the how great how do you deal with that as somebody who wore the cloth of the republic? Yeah. I'm being generous or kind when I say that it's creepy, you know? I'll never disheartened though. I have hope, capital H hope. And I know, as a good friend of mine, an elderly Anglican priest turned to me one day, we were discussing all these troubles we face. He goes, let me cut to the end. God wins. All right. And so we've already won. Yeah. I know. That we are victorious. And so I have full faith and confidence in that. But along the way, there's challenges and fights and things. And is because this is what judicial watch does every day, but in the final analysis we can talk of centers of gravity and culminating effects and all that other jargon. Can we drain the swamp Chris Farrell? We can. We can. In fact, we have an obligation to. Correct. It's beyond just wishful thinking and intention. We have an affirmative obligation to do so and not doing so really would be our negligence, right? It would be our, it would hang on us. It would be a dark stain against our honor and integrity to not do something. So we have to. And
The Charlie Kirk Show
Tom Fitton: Will the Court Grant a Special Master for Mar-a-Lago Case?
"Tom, what is a special master and do you think we're gonna get one in this situation? I don't know whether the court is going to grant this request. The fact that this request has gotten so far in the federal court system is remarkable and is a positive sign for the Trump team, first we beat them, frankly, was not just judicial watch. It was The New York Times. They supported this transparency, too. And other big media companies. And the Justice Department didn't want to release anything. So they lost there. And then they lost against president Trump over the special master fight. We're the one gets appointed. I don't know. There should be a thorough examination by an independent judicial appointed official of these records that not only seriously protects the president's prerogatives in terms of attorney client privilege, which isn't the only issue here as I've highlighted. If the theory is all these records are personal, that issue needs to be adjudicated because if it turns out that there was no basis to suggest that these records were government records that were in the purview of the archives, the FBI or the Justice Department, every single one of those documents should be turned back to Trump. And in the lease you should be given apologies. We'll see what else in terms of accountability, which is a whole other matter.
The Charlie Kirk Show
Tom Fitton: Judicial Watch Forced Release of the Warrant & Affidavit
"You know, we've been litigating federal records laws and fights about them for nearly 30 years. So I mean, we saw that this whole fight with Trump and, you know, which culminated in this outrageous rate on his home was a sham. We had litigated this issue about ten, 12 years ago, over Clinton records. He had tapes he kept in his sock drawer, tapes his depicted him talking to foreign leaders and members of Congress. And we took the position of the Justice Department's taking now. Those are presidential records that potentially classified get them. And they told us to go jump in a Lake. They said that presumably if the president has them after he leaves office, they're his. The court said no one can second guess his decision to keep records like that personal versus presidential. And then of course they changed their legal position when it came to targeting Trump. And so we knew it was a sham, and sure enough, as soon as we saw this outrageous abuse of political raid, we asked the court to unseal the records, the media followed our lead, and we won, you know, a we forced the release of the warrant, and then B, we were forced to force the release of the affidavit that Justice Department wanted to release not one iota of, and the affidavit shows, there was no good faith basis for the raid that the archives asserted authority and power over former president Trump. It didn't have, which means their legal position under the law is they're supposed to take care of presidential records they have. They're not allowed to, and the law gives them no power to go after a president and say, those records should be presidential, give them to us.
Mark Levin
Maggie Haberman Speculates What Trump Gains From Affidavit Release
"Let's start over go Politically what is the former president gain or lose if the affidavit is released So it depends Anderson because we don't know what's in it And obviously several media outlets including my own have argued that it should be released the Justice Department Yes of course but that doesn't stop you From speculating and it's part of your speculation please Trash Trump Would you please Would you please maggot Yes I think she will actually Go ahead Instead Trump's folks I think gain more by arguing see the Justice Department won't unseal it because if they thought there was advantage to this to him in a real way I think he would be getting into this fight himself You'll notice his lawyers have not filed anything in this case His lawyer has been fighting a thing yeah Maggot And they didn't have to file anything since judicial watch and immediate filed They don't have to get into the middle of it Doesn't change any of these legal arguments does it But do not do not allow me to get into the way That is your obsessive hate and spinning Coretta head Irving the proceedings today but its allies of Trump who are going about arguing the same case as the media I think he sees more advantage in being seen as somebody being victimized because as we saw with the warrant when the war Ladies and gentlemen he's not being victimized No no Federal agents and his wife's closet I assume to get to the closet you had to go through the bedroom
The Dan Bongino Show
Old Bill Clinton Case Could Impact Mar-a-Lago Search Dispute
"Here's what I mean by the legal case has fallen apart And this is why I referenced the newsletter Sorry I'm going to distract it There's an article by John Solomon at just the news today You've got to read It is so so good It's in the newsletter today but I will give you if you just want to go right to the website you don't have to sign up with us I totally get it Here's the headline Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact the Mar-a-Lago search dispute A judge ruled in 2012 this along headline judge ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records personal is far reaching and mostly unchallengeable Folks this piece is going to blow you away Again when I don't know something I will tell you I was not familiar with this case It's a 2012 case Bit of background on it Tom fitting from judicial watch who you know we love on the show They're an anti corruption outfit They'll go after Democrats or Republicans by the way That's what I love about him Fitness group is ruthless I mean in a good way it's a compliment They will go after corruption wherever they see it In 2012 they sued to get a hold of some audio tapes that were left in Bill Clinton's a hid squirreled away and Bill Clinton's sock drawer really Like in his actually in a sock drawer And judicial watch said listen we want those records Now judicial watch lost the case The case was heard in front of Amy Berman Jackson Yes that one That's correct So the case resembled almost exactly the dispute now over records Trump had In this case just delete Trump and insert Bill Clinton
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
Judicial Watch's Chris Farrell Breaks Down the FBI Raid
"Let's jump straight in with what you guys have done in judicial watch. So allegedly, the raid executed by 30 FBI agents, they didn't leave the warrant there, or at least they didn't show the supporting documentation. The lawyers had to I'm not going to disclose who you spoke to. But the lawyers were in a tough position, were they not in Mar-a-Lago? Yeah, I have informed opinion and my informed opinion is that there was a showdown of demanding the warrant be produced. The agents just wanted to go in, raid the building, and the lawyers had to say, excuse me. Well, let's be clear. I mean, when they want to raid a search warrant rate is conducted, the objective is shocking awe. They wish to disorient and subdue the target environment. Who's ever there? And they're good at doing it. And even, you know, somebody who's in anticipation of it or is a seasoned person, there's an effort to suppress the environment so they can take control of it. And they're very good at it. Nonetheless, the sylvan obligation to provide the warrant, more importantly, on Tuesday, late afternoon early evening, we filed a motion in the southern district of Florida to get to the affidavit. So a warrant is an authorization to go violate your Fourth Amendment, right? So document that underneath has to have something which supports. And so the supporting document is an affidavit. Normally by a supervisory special agent of the United States. Correct. And it explains this is our investigation. This is our target. This is what we're looking for. We have reason to believe a crime has occurred or is occurring. So in this case, it would have to be because it's about classified documents. Somehow a crime has been committed. To those documents correct. Or is about to be imminently committed on Mar-a-Lago. Otherwise, you can't do it. Correct.
The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast
Lawyer Christina Bobb Gives First-Hand Account of Trump FBI Raid
"I'm back with Donald Trump's attorney Christina bob. We're talking about the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Christina, do you happen to, first of all, how long did this process last? Was it last an hour? A couple of hours where they're there all day. How long was the FBI on site? Yeah, they were there all day. I mean, I believe they showed up around 9. Like I said, they got there before I did, so I don't know their exact arrival time, but it wrapped up probably 7 or 8. I think by the time the news broke, it was pretty much over, but it had taken I would say maybe ten hours. And when you spoke to these guys, did you ask them or did they tell you particularly what they're looking for? Or do they just eventually hand you the document and kind of go about their business as if you didn't really have any need to know? Yeah, it was the latter. They pretty much just handed me the war when they were done and it has the attachment for what they're looking for. And the media has been reporting that which is accurate that they're looking for presidential records or any possibly classified material. I don't believe that there was anything classified in there, but I'm sure that the FBI will say that there is, but I'll be curious to see exactly what they're going to say, if anything. I found it particularly interesting that they were looking for presidential records because not that long ago, judicial watch through trying to get access to presidential records for Bill Clinton and judicial watch actually lost the case because the court said, it's up to the president to decide what a presidential record is. And apparently that's been true for the first 44 presidents, but for Donald Trump, I guess the FBI is the one that gets to decide what a presidential record is and sees whatever they wanted to see.
The Dan Bongino Show
Tom Fitton: Why Is Dr. Fauci Really Retiring?
"But I wanted you on today to comment about Doctor Fauci Now judicial watch is one of the finest organizations out there folks They've gotten to the bottom of so many scams By the way involving swamp rats from both parties which I love But Doctor Fauci he's retiring Tom and kind of suspicious the timing of that right Like what's up with that Well I found a curious that just a day or two after we announced that the FBI at least had been investigating his shady data function grant to the Wuhan institute that they have been dishonest about in dissembling about since day one he announces his retirement And when you look at this latest batch of documents we obtain under a freedom of information act lawsuit you'll see a we now know that the FBI had been investigating him back in May 2020 at least the grant that is at issue which is the gain of function research grant And going back as far as 2016 his people were concerned about the gain of function gain of function research they were funding in China Now compare and contrast that to Fauci's testifying It's not gain of function research It's clear with gain of function research That's what the record show they were worried about And the description is gain of function research And on top of that the FBI wasn't even believing it because evidently they were investigating it So I have no doubt that he's retirement has more to do with his fear of accountability than wanting to spend more time with the family
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
Chris Farrell Knows the Threat of 'White Militias' Is 'Pure Fiction'
"That? Let's talk to some to understand threat analysis. He is, of course, judicial watches Chris file Chris. When days after the election, a DHS releases an unclassified terrorist threat assessment and put at the top of it, the domestic CVE threat from people who are anti abortion who question the results of the election. You have superlative contacts across the national security arena. Has there ever been a threat assessment in the last 20 years that has substantiated the idea that white militias are running around America with the same efficacy capacity and threat potential as, for example, Al-Qaeda? It's pure fiction and it is an attempt when you read the language, they have key points in that and that memo we're discussing. And if you read the key points, they are trying to intimidate you into not thinking certain things. Not a question of saying certain things or acting out in certain ways, they are trying, it is orwellian and the truest form, they want you not to commit what they consider to be thought crimes. And if you question the validity and the integrity of the election process, if you think that there are regularities, let alone the F word fraud. But let's just say regularities. And if you say that, if you opine, then you are on thin ice buddy. I mean, how dare you. That's what they're trying to get you to the point where you think to yourself, well, you know, I'm not going to post that. I'm not going to raise a question about that. I'm not going to tweet that. I'm not going to blog on it. I'm not even going to email my cousin George or whatever. I just, I'm going to keep that to myself because those are impermissible thoughts. And that's what they're
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
Judicial Watch's Chris Farrell Describes His Credentials
"Is the director of research and investigations for that superlative organization judicial watch. Chris Farrell, welcome in studio. Great to be with you, Seth. Thank you. You've been on the show multiple times. You've been on my newsmax show for those who are just accidentally tuning in now or have found us on Salem TV. Would you just for a couple of seconds talk about your national security credentials, what you did in uniform before you joined your judicial watch. I was commissioned as a military intelligence officer in the U.S. Army, specifically as a counterintelligence officer. And I served in that role doing mostly counter espionage work, investigations, running double agent operations and also commanding the army's surveillance team. We did physical technical and aerial surveillance of counterintelligence suspects, but also in support of clandestine human intelligence operations. I then went on to actually cross strain and besides being a can respond to case officer. I became a clandestine human intelligence case officer. And so I have a foot in each world in the world of human intelligence, both countering bad guys who are trying to spy against us, but then also in their field of human intelligence, which is us trying to have persons from foreign countries provide intelligence to U.S. to U.S.
WTOP
"judicial watch" Discussed on WTOP
"Schools got national attention last year with the school system being accused of a cover up Now parents say they were not made aware of a sexual assault case at another area high school A student in Alexandria was arrested in December for rape and other charges in connection with an October incident at the many Howard campus The national review learned that school wide parents were not informed of the attack by the superintendent or school board and the only public notification came during a school board meeting early this month a school official told The Washington Post that they informed the parents of those involved but that the system only informs all parents if there is a possible threat to school safety A spokesperson for the city says they're aware of the incident and that it was adjudicated in court in the defendant was acquitted They added that according to Virginia law details must remain confidential because it involves minors Look lucrative news Amazon's headquarters two development in Arlington is coming together a milestone on a key building has now been reached Workers have completed the highest floor of the metropolitan park building celebrating at a topping out ceremony Jeff king of vice president with Clark construction group The perseverance and partnership that I've witnessed on this project is truly bar none Amazon has pledged to invest two and a half $1 billion in its headquarters two headquarters in Arlington over the next decade and eventually employ 25,000 people Today's topping out ceremony marks the successful completion of the structural phase of this project It's set to be completed in 2023 Valerie bonk to BTO P news Maryland's new congressional map is at the center of two lawsuits and on Friday lawyers argued their cases during the final day of a trial Experts representing Republicans argue that Marilyn's new congressional map is to spread out as they asked the judge to block it The second lawsuit bought by the national conservative group judicial watch argued a disempowers Republican voters Democrats shot back saying geographical location is secondary compared to population equality and compliance with the federal Voting Rights Act Both sides did agree if the map is blocked the General Assembly should redraw it and a temporary one drawn by the Maryland citizens redistricting commission should be used in the meantime a trial for petitions against the map is expected to begin in the Court of Appeals Wednesday Melissa Howell WTO news A new museum is celebrating the rich history of Annapolis Governor Larry Hogan says with the opening of the museum of historic Annapolis Current and future generations will have more than 400 years of Annapolis history at their fingertips The city saw important moments in American history I was right here in Annapolis where the very founding principles of American democracy were born It's where the treaty that ended the Revolutionary War was signed You can learn about that and so much more at the museum's permanent interactive exhibit Annapolis an American story The museum will be open 7 days a week Shane is still in WTO P news Coming up in area roadway shut down following a deadly crash this morning has now reopened It's ten O 7 Whatever you do don't buy an engagement ring or any piece of diamond jewelry until you discover the all new diamonds direct Now open across from Tyson's corner center diamonds.
The Larry Elder Show
The Clintons Russia Entanglement
"Thanks, Blair. My guest is the president of judicial watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption. He's the president, his name is Tom Fenton, the article he had written called the Clinton's Russia Ukraine grift. Tom, let's go over some of the specifics. You just now mentioned the $500,000 check for one speech from the Russian investment firm, renaissance capital. What did renaissance capital get for their $500,000 check for one speech? Well, some would argue they helped further secure the approval of the Obama administration's. The approval of the Obama administration for Russia related investments and uranium one. Other uranium one entities connected entities, according to The New York Times, gave a $145 million to the Clinton cash machine and I tell you, that's where the money needs to be followed in terms of Russia connections to try to influence public policy here in the United States. And the fact that the Justice Department hasn't done much with it at all to me is a scandal beyond words.
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
How Chris Farrell Would Drain the Swamp
"We're talking to the director of research and investigations at judicial watch Chris Farrell. I have used on numerous occasions. I can't tell you how many times Chris align you shared with me the last time we did this. And we were talking about specifically not things hadn't gotten as bad as they are right now, and we were talking about the corruption of the DoJ and the FBI specifically for about an hour. And I said at the end, so what do we do about it? Can it be salvaged? And I consider myself to be adequately cynical or living in the real world. And your response kind of gut punched me. And I said, this is from a guy who is not a rabble rouser, not hyperbolic, no such stuff, and you said, can't be saved, dismantled it, send in the Marshals and rebuild it. Correct. That still stands, I presume. It does. What do we do with the rest of it? Because if we look at everything, from lowest learner at the IRS, to the capital police force, not releasing tens of thousands of hours of footage. Can any elected president can any Congress do what needs to be done? To the hive of corruption that is D.C.. Yeah, and what would it look like? Yeah, so a couple of things here are some quick ideas. Obviously, stick with disbanding the FBI. That's absolutely essential. And we could talk about that later if you want. Point to all attorneys within the Department of Justice had to be treated like commissioned officers in the Department of Defense and every three years they have to rotate. They've got to move. They don't necessarily have to move geographically, although that would be a good thing. But they certainly have to get out of the jobs that they're in. So there's no concentration of power and authority. There's no fiefdoms. Correct. And you've had some DoJ attorneys who've sat in their particular little division and been there for 20 years. That's crazy. I don't want them there. I want them moved around. And if they don't want to do it, there's an exciting new possibilities for them in the outside world, have at it. You know, there's all kinds of things you can go do. They're attorneys. They can hang out a shingle and do whatever they want to do. They're not going to starve. It's endless employment for them. The other thing I would do is I would do what the federal republic of Germany did post World War II. And that is take all of the various departments and agencies of the federal government and split them
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
Judicial Watch's Chris Farrell Describes His Intel Background
"Chris Farrell, welcome back to America first one on one. Great to be with you. Thanks very much. So we have the luxury of a little bit longer here, and we need to discuss this issue because as far as I'm concerned and I said this yesterday, this now makes Watergate irrelevant. What a gate is just a small comma in the history of American politics. This is a gargantuan scandal if this is demonstrating a court of law. For those who haven't heard you before on our show, some new listers we've got new stations. Would you be so kind as to give a brief bio? What you did in the U.S. Army and your specific Intel background Chris. So I was a commission as an army intelligence officer, many, many moons ago. And the good old days of the Cold War. I missed the Cold War. My life was a lot simpler. So I was commissioned as a military intelligence officer, my specialty was counterintelligence. I spent a lot of time doing counter espionage work. Let's stop there for a second. Sure. For those who aren't in the know, the difference between Intel and CI CI, your catching or misinforming the bad guys, right? So counterintelligence, the effort is to identify those foreign intelligence services, those hostile forces or powers trying to spy on the United States and detect them and then in some way disrupt them. And there's a few different ways of disrupting them. But you're trying to protect the United States, protect our secrets to protect our forces. And so in doing that, you can do counter espionage investigations. You could try to find the bad guys and bring them to trial. You can stop them also by just letting them know we know what you're doing. You can shut them down that way. Light them up. Ideally, the Holy Grail, and I'm very fortunate to have actually done this is to run an intelligence operation back against them so that they think that they have something that they don't. Give them give them bad goods. Or to actually recruit a foreign intelligence officer and to you can approach them and say, hey, look, everything we've given you for the last two, three years has been under our control and authority. We can make you a star. In your own service, or maybe that person has a particular need, maybe they've got a sick kid or maybe they are compromised in some other way and they need a way out and we can provide that
Mark Levin
BLM Insurrectionists Were Threatening Guests at the Last Republican Convention
"But the inconsistency among the judicial Ah the judiciary The ink consistency on how they treat riders is really nakedly bare to every American in this country I want judge dabney Friedrich and the other federal judges to know including several who I know When we're at The White House on the south lawn during the Republican convention because that's where they held it And one of the occasions when we were watching my wife and I banjo was there with his wonderful wife senator Paul was there with his wonderful wife a lot of us During the last hour or so we heard loud chanting loud noises loud threats from Black Lives Matter and antifa and other writers real writers We were inside the gates But we knew When we would leave that compound and go outside the gates we could be harmed The police and the Secret Service tried to direct us around The White House to another area with a thought The rioters and insurrectionists on the left were not But there were a ton of them Targeting the people coming out of The White House A ton of them Rand Paul as you know was assaulted Dan bongino talked about threats to him and his wife My wife and I and some others we made our way around In fact we were with the Tom fit and a judicial watch and his wife among others We had to walk about I don't know Third of a mile half a mile away You wanted to try and find an Uber any form of transportation In other words we were all sitting ducks
The Charlie Kirk Show
"judicial watch" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"So James, I want to ask you about the story that broke yesterday. You guys have a tendency to break news very late in the evening. I'm sure there is a science to it or there's a reason to it. And it says DoJ documents obtained by judicial watch, Tom fitton, great guy, confirms existence of communications between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Pfizer about your organization project veritas tell us about this James. That's right. Tom fitton that judicial watch, who's a friend of mine, he issued a foia request into the Department of Justice for all communications between The New York Times and the DoJ and Pfizer pharmaceutical and DoJ. And shockingly, a document which was came back from the Department of Justice FBI indicating they do indeed have communications between the FBI and Pfizer regarding communications regarding project veritas and myself. So we released these documents last night. I made a video about it. And the question is, why on earth is Pfizer pharmaceutical talking to the FBI about journalists or journalism, Charlie? And further, you know, the CEO of Pfizer had made a statement back in November. I think it was November 9th, where he said that he has been talking to the FBI about disinformation and dark, dark groups. He's clearly referring to groups like project veritas, even though we're not dark, where the opposite of dark. And also we to Charlie remember, we did two stories about Pfizer, one whistleblower within Pfizer Melissa mcatee and emails showing that they were hiding information. Those were the vice president of Pfizer's words, not mine, and also a scientist within Pfizer saying antibodies are stronger than their own vaccine. So I reported on this as journalists do or are supposed to do. And now we come to find out that the FBI is talking to Pfizer about
The Charlie Kirk Show
The FBI, Pfizer, and Deep State-Pharma Collusion with James O' Keefe
"So James, I want to ask you about the story that broke yesterday. You guys have a tendency to break news very late in the evening. I'm sure there is a science to it or there's a reason to it. And it says DoJ documents obtained by judicial watch, Tom fitton, great guy, confirms existence of communications between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Pfizer about your organization project veritas tell us about this James. That's right. Tom fitton that judicial watch, who's a friend of mine, he issued a foia request into the Department of Justice for all communications between The New York Times and the DoJ and Pfizer pharmaceutical and DoJ. And shockingly, a document which was came back from the Department of Justice FBI indicating they do indeed have communications between the FBI and Pfizer regarding communications regarding project veritas and myself. So we released these documents last night. I made a video about it. And the question is, why on earth is Pfizer pharmaceutical talking to the FBI about journalists or journalism, Charlie? And further, you know, the CEO of Pfizer had made a statement back in November. I think it was November 9th, where he said that he has been talking to the FBI about disinformation and dark, dark groups. He's clearly referring to groups like project veritas, even though we're not dark, where the opposite of dark. And also we to Charlie remember, we did two stories about Pfizer, one whistleblower within Pfizer Melissa mcatee and emails showing that they were hiding information. Those were the vice president of Pfizer's words, not mine, and also a scientist within Pfizer saying antibodies are stronger than their own vaccine. So I reported on this as journalists do or are supposed to do. And now we come to find out that the FBI is talking to Pfizer about
WMAL 630AM
"judicial watch" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"Welcome back from your independence Day revelry. Good to be back. Did you Rebel? Oh, yes, there is much reveling to be done. Much reveling Cam Edward rebelled on my behalf here for the last few days, and I appreciate it Camp. You're filling in for me. Thank you for that. Coming up at 8 35. Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch will join us looking forward to that conversation. Joining us right now. I look forward to this conversation as well. Lieutenant Colonel Tony Shaffer, now of the London Center, But when he was with the United States Army, he was one of the first set of boots on the ground in Afghanistan. So I love to speak with you, Tony, about your reflections on how we're pulling out of Afghanistan. A disconcerting story about apparently, I don't know. You tell me is this fake news that we pulled out of the Bagram airfield without actually Letting the Afghans know when we were leaving. We left in the middle of the night. But is that that square with you? Well, this is Joe Biden's military. I think that's reflective of what's going on. So yeah, thanks for having me and I'm sorry to be talking about this topic way it is And what we see now is a negotiation that was Completed under the Trump administration for a gradual withdrawal and transfer power back to many of those in the regions which control the area. And this is a because you may not like my Gov. But it's going to be very nuanced. But I think one that's necessary for people to try to understand. Well, I believe we had to get out of there. We had to basically stop use of conventional forces. We were integrated when conventionally the idea of nation building is not something that we do well, if we had put 500,000 troops on the ground there for 20 years, the moment that we pull those troops out we would see happening then what we see happening now, essentially the reversal of of our games. It's very sad. What the reality is, is that the Afghan people are not ungoverned, their self governed and the path to victory. By the way, I think you know you probably in my book Operation Dark Heart, which talks about the path to victory in Afghanistan, which is based on my experience. Was to emulate what we did to win the war originally, which is to work with the Afghan militia, the Afghan militia forces. We want Afghanistan for initial entry in less than less than three months because we worked with our allies on the ground and instead of working with them. To leave back in 2000 and 2 2003. We decided we were going to create a Jeffersonian democracy, and that's why you saw the longest war in US history is that we decided as a nation that we were going to make them into us. It was never going to happen. And now we're left with the inevitable outcome of that. Where now we're trying to turn everything back over to him as we leave and you see the chaos and you see the Taliban already recapturing one third of the 400. This is 431 provinces of Afghanistan, and they're doing it very rapidly. And you have questioned the wisdom of giving up every base at all. Can you explain why we why we might need that? So one of the points that I've made is that we well, I don't recommend we maintain conventional forces. As we should maintain a very strong special operations and intelligence collection capability within the region. Bagram was our base of operations. It was in many ways ideally suited by the fact it's away from the mountains. It's hard for people to get up close to the facility and shoot into it, although it has happened and the idea is is that we need to maintain our own interests in the region. While we may not be able to control Afghanistan, arguably, I think we've learned that lesson. We do have an interest in what happens there, and there are other members of the international community. For example, the Chinese are trying to step up and get in there. The Chinese had opened to copper mines, which means that they're going to maintain their interest there. There's other investments we've made which we should not walk away from. So while I say we should not be the ones Cleaning and maintaining the Afghan military. For goodness sake, we did. We do have an interest because what happened after 9 11? The Taliban mistake giving up? Program over the last five days, and Tony Shaffer was I feel like I have somewhat of a nuanced position to and so it make. That might be a different nuance than yours. But speak to one thing that I think neither of us agree with and that is we hear a lot of voices right now, saying We were there for 20 years and we accomplished nothing. Well, that's not entirely true. Even if the place falls into chaos. Now when we leave, which it could very well be. That doesn't mean we didn't accomplish anything, does it So Yeah. No. I was talking to an Afghan naturalized Afghan citizen over this over the weekend, and he said, basically, Look, there's so much money in there now. So many interests in there. The Americans were the only ones actually trying to sort of help Referee So that was another thing that we were actually doing is trying to actually help some of the people who actually do have an interest in maintaining the momentum of what they've invested in. So I'm not against the idea of working with those who have made the investment of resources in there, but what I've said, and I think we agree on is that the idea that we, the Americans Maintain a Praetorian guard to support a central government that no one has ever supported. And we had We do that blood and treasure that we will not get back. That's a mistake, but other things. Other investments, the idea of bringing education the other FBI idea, bringing modern technology. Those are all good things. But again, Larry, those are things that the Afghan people must make the choice that they want and sustained. We cannot stay sustain those things for them. It certainly doesn't seem like there are many people praising this withdrawal and how it's being done, and even reporters in the White House briefing room wanted to ask President or Excuse me, not in the briefing room, but they wanted to ask President Joe Biden about this ahead of the Fourth of July weekend. Was that one of his ice cream photo op right there? One of his ice cream socials. Don't want to answer questions about this. Listen to what he said in response to reporters, asking about Afghanistan. We have, uh, worked out and over horizon capacity that we can be value added, But the Afghans are going to have to be able to do it.
Newsradio 970 WFLA
"judicial watch" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA
"Orthopedic surgeon, Dr Alfred Banotti. Now the backlash against Anthony Foci over his recently uncovered emails has ramped up with the hashtag fire foci trending on multiple social media platforms. Joining us to discuss is returning guest Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch, Freedom Watch and author of the new book. It Takes a Revolution. Forget the Scandal industry. Thank you for joining us. Yes, My pleasure. Thank you. Absolutely So first off. Can you explain these leaked emails? You know what was in them? Who are they to and what upset people most about them. The primary thing that upset people and this is what got the ball rolling. Finally. After over a year of the government doing nothing. And of course, I don't believe they're doing anything now Easter, But Fauci is serving as an apologist for Communist China and what went on at the Wuhan lab. We clearly do. From the get Go, was most likely a bio weapon. That's what this lab does. It's a military lab. It takes viruses and converts them into lethal weapons. And we also knew from my client duty. Mike of it's Dr Judy Markovitz, who work with Fauci at the National Institute of Health and also knows of what he was doing at Fort Dietrich, Maryland, where we've, incidentally, also make bio weapons, even though it's banned by international Law. You know, it got out after 9 11 was anthrax. That was a bio weapon we have developing we gave to Saddam Hussein under the Daddy Bush's administration, but it was quite clear based upon Dr Judy Michael. This his own personal knowledge that Fauci had sent the seeds of covid 19 over to the communist Chinese and then convinced Biden and Obama to give them almost $4 million. Do gain of function research, which they then used to attack the United States, either accidentally by having it released her by design. So now she is a criminal bottom line here is a criminal, and also there's a lot of evidence that suggests he's profiting from these vaccines that he's pushing. These vaccines are are very dangerous. We can get into that in some death, maybe in another show, but it's just one example. Is that those people that have already had back covid 19 to give them that vaccine and they're not being told the truth can trigger a violent reaction, particularly among certain Racial and ethnic groups such as blacks and Hispanics. Because of the makeup, their DNA and about a year down the line. We're going to see most likely a lot of deaths, additional death as a result. Of the vaccine. The vaccine also is dangerous for women that Pregnant that he give rise to mutant babies. And also it's dangerous and that women who take it may never be able to have Children and now is being pushed on Children. So the South seas lied about all these things. And he's also personally participated in the creation, whether by design or accidentally, or by stupidity in terms of creating this Engineered virus which got out and destroyed. Frankly, the world. You know, we are conducting citizens. Grand Juries that freedom watch. We have the right to em Panel, our own grand Juries, the American people. I don't expect the government to do anything. It'll be covered up in the end, as it always is. The Republicans are using it mostly for politics. They knew about this. We have an NSA. Even under Trump. Than anything, grabs all communications worldwide, So we knew about it, but we covered it up and all we did was to call China names and now Republicans are desperate to find an issue because Biden and Harris on the left have taken total control of this country. And now all of a sudden, you know it comes out, so this is where we are the countries. Mess more than a mess. We're in the dictatorship. We also because of our citizens, Grand Juries, Justice Scalia 1992. Found that the grand jury writing for the majority of the Supreme Court belongs to the American people, So we're in the process of indicting bouncy Derek Chauvin can be convicted for negligent homicide for killing George Floyd. Think about all the people that Fauci has killed, you know, through his actions, negligent homicide, So we're indicting him for that sedition lying under oath. Perjury, obstruction of justice, You name it. The guy is a master criminal. And he's most likely also profiting because he owns patents from these vaccines, which is why he's pushing them on people. Now, Larry, I have to jump in because you talk about, um either women becoming sterile or giving birth to babies that are mutated. In some form or fashion or those who have had still births and they used to blame this whole covid thing on Donald Trump on President Trump. It's his fault. He's got death on his hands. No as it would turn out like always the media and the left had it wrong. It's Dr Anthony Fauci, who was part of this cover up and it seems as though the W. H O was part of the cover up of the virus, too. And they have blood on the hip pocket of of the Communist Chinese. Of course, they are of the United Nations, which is essentially a terrorist organization run by terrorist states. You know, I don't know why we give them all that money and under Biden, we've given them Even more money to then funnel to Hamas to use against Christians and Jews in the Middle East. It's out of control. What are the odds? You think that you know, he'll actually be punished for this? And I also part two and because we're almost out of time, if you can quickly answer both questions will found should be punished. And Will China pay these retributions that Trump actually asked for in his speech a week or two ago? Well, answering the first one the last second question. First, we have class action lawsuits that I've Filed on behalf of a business class action in Dallas, Texas. That's been harmed by this put out of business. So hopefully we will get damages and we can attach Chinese assets that are in American financial institutions. It's not going to happen by the government that won't happen and justice will occur to our citizens. Grand Juries at least with regard to Southie. We can reach him. We have the right to try to indict to try convict's sentence and even meet out the sentences, and we'll ask law enforcement to have him arrested even in the most liberal state of California. There's a statute that says if you have no one if you know if someone committing a felony You can arrest them and turned them over to authorities. But forget it from the government. The government is corrupt to the core, either Political party will take action. We've seen that over the years. They haven't done anything to hold the Clintons accountable A Biden so forget that one. Unfortunately, we're out of time. Larry Klayman, founder Judicial Wash. Freedom Watch and author of the new book. It takes a Revolution. Forget the Scandal industry. Thank you for talking about this important topic and keep us updated in the future. Thanks for being on the show. I'd love to Thank you very much. Thank you. Yeah. Accountability. We needed, uh badly. Make sure you stay tuned coming up after the break. A story of recovery one..
Newsradio 700 WLW
"judicial watch" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW
"Revolution. Forget the Scandal industry. He is a founder, former chairman of Judicial Watch and all through The impeachment's and the first impeachment and all of the just nonsense that's going on in Washington, D C. You know, Judicial watch. Has been a vanguard of the truth where many other people have been covering it up. He's a current chairman of Freedom. Watch. His name is Larry Klayman and Larry. Thank you for joining us here for a few minutes on as the circus continues in Washington, D C. It can't get any actual work done, but they can. I don't know. Entertain the The Liberals and leftists, apparently Well, they can, and they're blaming the wrong people. People are not to be blamed. In other words, we the people is that and that's the theme of my book. It takes a revolution what we saw four weeks ago Wednesday. It was the American people rising up. Yeah, There were some bad people in both sides. But this is a result of endemic corruption and all three branches of government, particularly the judicial branch that refused to address the massive fraud that occurred in the election. But it wasn't just that it was everything. And that's why it's the senators and congressmen that should be impeached. Not President Trump because they have failed to do their job and they have subverted the Constitution. Why notice that there are six Republican senators who voted and said, Yeah, this is a valid impeachment. But again President Trump well Under the auspices of the Republican Party. Never was a party guy. Really? I mean, he was He was absolutely loyal to the American people, but not a party. There are a lot of Republicans who are just his dangerous as the Democrats. Yes, you're absolutely right. The Republican Party's dead I mean, I'm practically a registered Republican, too. In fact, I ran for the U. S senate in Florida in 2003 and 2004 in the Republican primary, But I'm out of there. People need to rise up. Now there's no political messiah. There's no political party, and that's why I have certain solutions in the book that I wrote. It takes a revolution. Forget the scandal industry short of a violent revolution, which you know unless we headed off. That's where we're going right now. And you can see why. I mean it is a clown show. Avery Evil clown show on Capitol Hill. The American people see just how corrupt and frankly unresponsive our government is, and that's why we found it. A new nation and 17 76 exactly, you know. Because that's when the sovereign fails to represent the people. This is what Jefferson wrote right in the beginning of the Declaration of Independence. You have a right under the laws of nature and nature's God. To abolish or T alter or abolish that government and to form a new government by and for the people, and I'm proposing that we have a third Continental Congress in Philadelphia. Cross minute pens Hall on Memorial Day. This year. You're invited. I hope you'll come because we need to discuss where we go from here because we don't have the government. You worked with some really fine people at judicial Watch Tom Fitton being the face of judicial watch, I would say more often than not a news programs in the uncovering Of all of this corruption in Washington, D. C and When when people don't what people don't understand, Larry, I don't think is that number one No matter what these turncoats say, Donald Trump did not incite anyone to insurrection in that speech on January 6th when it's taken out of context and The part about peacefully and patriotic Lee. You know, upholding your right, But that's not that wasn't that wasn't played in the video this week. During this sham trial. It will, you know, you know what Jefferson said, because he felt that federal judges and I go through that in the book. It takes a revolution. My experience with him and They have become desperate and tyrants, Jefferson predicted, because they would be un elected. He was against them. An article three That they would turn into desperate and tyrants. And they said every 20 years or so. We'd have to again shed the blood of Patriots and tyrants and what's a few 1000 dead to refresh the tree of liberty. Now he didn't want to see violence and neither do I. But Jefferson predicted what's going to happen and believe me, Jefferson believed in violence. It's Trump didn't even advocate that you know, I did. But that's what he's being impeached for, supposedly this time. And what about the constitutionality of impeaching someone who's already basically been removed from office? You obviously can't you obviously can't do that. This isn't there dancing on Trump's grave, and you got it right in the beginning of the segment is that the dirty little secret is the Republicans want Trump gone, too? So this Cruz Soto's Rand Paul, So does Rubio. They want to run for president next time, so they pretend If they're in his camp, But in fact will be happy to see him going. That clears the way for them to run for president. I got news for them the way the Democrats have rigged the system. They've got No chance. Larry Klayman, our guest. It takes a revolution. Forget the scandal. Industry is the book and Larry Thank you for your time today. You're welcome. God blessing. God bless you. Memorial Day, a third Continental Congress in Philadelphia, right across from Freedom Hall. Like to see how they react to that. The elites, we'll talk and finish our conversation with Jay Ratliff coming up next on the Bill Cunningham Show Gary Jeff and for Willie on 700 wlw. Welcome to another episode.
News Talk 1130 WISN
"judicial watch" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN
"The Steele dossier that he had an agenda and that he was supporting Hillary and Hillary paid for it. And they ignored all of that because they were pursuing a political agenda. Abusing power. And this is deep deep. Deep state corruption. And so when you when you think about, we're going to really allow a made up Russian dossier paid for by one candidate as the bulk of information without which, according to the Let's see Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates and others. They couldn't have gotten the fire's application's approved because they tried. They didn't get it before. So now they get the dirty dossier. Russian disinformation and now they get it. And then climb Smith. Well, they had talked to this. The main source of Christopher Steele. None of this is true. That was all bar talk. I'm no idea why people think it's true. And even steal himself, admitting he did it to help Hillary Clinton and her distracting campaign against the email scandal that was burgeoning. Anyway. Here's the Senate hearing with Lindsey Graham and James Comey. Aye, liar and I don't know anything about this. Sure. Listen again. I don't agree with your preamble. I don't think the record established that he was working with the CIA. I think, Carl, it's found he was a contact Got we've got. We've got your email. From the CIA, confirming that he Woz a source for the CIA. Are you where the fact that that email later own was doctored again? I don't accept what you said. I don't think the record establishes. He was the source for the CIA. I am aware. Why is Mr client Smith facing criminal indictment? I only know what I've read in the public record that he was accused of the director of the FBI. You didn't know that your own agency had information from the CIA verifying what Mr Paige told you that these contacts had a basis. In fact, because he was working with the CIA. Did you know that Mr Klein Smith doctor? The email? Support to read that there was no association between page in the CIA. Did he change there was that there was not. How do you feel about that? I know nothing about Mr Client, Smith. Only what I've read in the world. How do you feel in general about an FBI lawyer Doctoring information exculpatory to somebody being surveilled. Any false statement in the course of an investigation is what? You don't know anything about that, okay? I didn't know anything about that. Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch talks about that. And Jen Psaki inclined Smith, Big tech or living through crazy political times. Judicial watches digging hard deep trying to get information That's been very hard to recover the last four years and we got a lot of it on last Couple of days of the Trump Administration, Mr Fenton. Welcome back to the program, sir. Sean. Good to be with you again. Thanks for having me. Thank you, sir. All right, let's talk about this did now we know that the FBI we know now the Christopher Steele admitted to the FBI that in fact, he made up the dossier to help Hillary Clinton. We know that the sub source in January 2017..
WDRC
"judicial watch" Discussed on WDRC
"Bit just in the last few weeks about the subject of tech giants, meaning Amazon Google. Facebook, Apple and others engaging in an effort their best effort to try to silence conservative voices. Well, I've told you about the fact that this show has been silenced from time to time, usually for a short time on places like Facebook and Twitter. Course. They wiped out parlor, which was a place that we were going to move much of our operations on Twitter over to parlor and then Amazon Web services took that apart. The question is, has judicial watch One of our favorites become the latest victim of big text ban on conservative voices? The President Judicial Wash. Judicial Watch joins me now and that's Tom. Fitton, Tom. Thanks for taking the time tonight. What are they doing to you? They've locked me off of Twitter. I've been out off the Twitter since I think January 8 Posted a straightforward tweet, saying I direct support. Quinn is a safe drug tweet posted repeatedly before and one Twitter specifically found to be not in violation of its rules and responsible complaint in September. Appealed that and actually have appealed for three times and I haven't heard a word from Twitter's so what they won't do. And And in short, you've written that Twitter told you. Not only did they demand that you take the tweet down, but that even if you did, you'd still be locked out for a week as a form of punishment for having spoken in, at least in Twitter's estimation, out of turn. That's right. And that's over two weeks ago now, and that's how long the appeal process if you want to call it that is lasted. You know, it's obviously the target on my back and it constrains our work and Chris Judicial watches a Twitter account. And we're afraid it's gonna go after that as well. But it's not just Twitter. I mean Facebook is preventing judicial watch and many others from Advertising to get the word out about our anti corruption efforts. YouTube and Google has said that if you post videos that alleged that there were errors of fraud, and they had a material impact on the election Then you will take the video down. You know, it's funny because based targeting it is and Tom I just played for my audience a sound bite. It was an exchange between Senator Rand Paul and George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, in which Stephanopoulos not only says there was no fraud in the November 3rd election, but saying, I don't even have to tell the other side of the story. There are not. He literally said There are not two sides to the story because the fact that there was no fraud in the election is Established fact, I guess kind of like the fact that there were once people who said that the earth is flat and anybody who says otherwise might end up having to kill themselves. I mean, this is this is crazy stuff. Where you've got folks who are in the business of information, deciding that they know the information with such a solid nature that no one else is even allowed to say conflicting information out loud. I'm gonna let you more of it. I don't know what your expert I'm gonna watch your wife, but I know what I'm talking about. Um, Twitter is in an expert on health care matters. I didn't know that they were dispensers of medical intervention, advice and medical advice. You know? Is there any dispute that Hydra circle when there's a safety laws? No. Course not. And that's why Twitter allowed that repeatedly until of course, they decided that Tom sitting who is, um you know, I guess I seem to be too friendly to President Trump. Deserves to be slapped back. And to me, it's a Well, you're telling people that you're doing one thing as a business. In your practices and extend your in your business dealings when in fact you're doing it for another reason in a fraudulent way that isn't protected by law. That's business fraud. And in my view, the Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission of Securities Exchange Commission should be examining their these attacks on conservatives by the bias. Leftist running big tax And yet under this new administration is they're very much chance that that's going to happen. I don't know. I mean, we, you know, maybe the states could do it. I don't know. But it there. There has to be accountability here, and neither is gonna be legislation. Or the courts are going to intervene one way or another. But this can't go on like this can't be allowed to go on forever. Let me ask you, you know, parlor parlor shows that hiding elsewhere and kind of work because they're they're interested in destroying Speech of their opponents. Tom, Let me ask you about another matter, And that is the impeachment of Donald Trump. I've been pointing out to my audience. The Constitution's certainly allows for the house to vote to impeach, which is in effect an indictment and then it goes to the Senate for the trial, and there's authority for the Senate to try a president, a vice president or other officers of the government. There's no authority for the Senate to try Private citizen Donald Trump. And yet they just delivered the articles of impeachment within the last couple of hours, and they're bound and determined to go ahead with the trial and even the chief justice has said. Well, I won't be presiding, so they've had to throw it toe. Patrick Leahy. Yeah, It's an interesting constitutional issue. I kind of run hot and cold is the weather. He is subject to a trial even now. But it's gonna be an interesting precedent because there's been no president who has been impeached after that. Well, I mean, when, when you read the text When you read the text of the Constitution, Tom, it does say that Senate can hold the trial for the president. It doesn't say that Senate can hold the trial, a trial for any. Anybody who used to be the president. If that were the case, I suppose. We could impeach President Obama for some of the impeachable things he did and hold a trial years after the fact is that what we're having for my point exactly? You know if I were to me if you're senator, there are two ways out. You can refuse to accept jurisdiction as you're pointing out. Or you can point out that this was a sham Impeachment that shouldn't be given the time of day by the Senate. And be summarily dismissed. No matter how you slice it, and this goes back to our earlier conversation. This isn't views. This is an abuse of the impeachment process to try to outlaw political speech. They don't like by pretending it leads and two and is responsible for violence. So what they're saying is that if we don't like what you say In terms of election fraud, For instance, we're going to tie it to violent acts, and therefore it's like shouting fire in a theater. You're gonna be prohibited from talking. I think most of the politicians who are sensible we're gonna look at that and say this is not a bad This is not something we want to be pursuing on. Another left takes Donald Trump, and there's no reasoning. But I'm hoping there reason prevails in the Senate in a bipartisan way, frankly, Well, frankly, that's the concern. I've got his free speech because look, there are cases where somebody insights to riot and I can cite examples of them. But if you say every time a politician gives a strongly worded speech that does not ask for people to go out and commit acts of violence that if it was a vigorous speech of some kind than anything bad that happens in the next and literally they're saying things that the president said on Twitter or in public for months leading up to January, 6th. Were the things that incited the particular action on January 6. That is a real threat to free speech. Because it means I mean, I've spoken in strong terms about things, but but I don't ever suggest that people go out and commit violence, and I don't I don't think Donald Trump did that either On January, 6, But they're going to put him on trial for it. Anyway. Tom Fitton is president of Judicial Watch, Tom. Thank you very much. I appreciate the time. If you want to jump into the best conversation and talk journalism, it's.
WTVN
"judicial watch" Discussed on WTVN
"Just south of White Road in Jackson Township, which is near growth City. There is a jack knife semi, which is shut down all north bound traffic on I 71 so just want to make sure that you are aware of that. All right, 8 to 1 W T v N 106 10 W TVN. If you would like to jump in a couple of lines open for you, Let's go back to it. When the year on 16 w T V n Good Morning. Good boy Ning by Bob Emily's sweet Today. Um Hey, we got it. Are concentrating things. They're very, very different all the sudden, and we need to remember to plan to party. 17 76 2026. Teach your Children the Constitution, the bill of rights. You don't have rights if you don't know what they are, And so I'm talking about that for those that are in the military and those that really care about you, right? Geneva Convention invention and Nuremberg laws. Now we made try something's trying to doing like locking you in the house until you die. Um or pulling you out of your house and putting you into her interment camp those air unconstitutional on this country. Um, they're trying to plan on do that in New York. So don't call it a hotel. Ah, California my Ohio Don't Michigan. Ganis stand my Ohio. But that's a good idea What's going to happen? We need to remember that Obama Said before he got elected, that he was going to put Cole and coca plants out of business. Well, that is true. That happened in California. And that's why the transformers are exploding because There's orphan transformers and Ohio. We lost a, uh, plant went out of business and that caused trouble. Um, of course they're blaming Possibly the wrong people. Some people could have done some wrong things, but, um not a surprise. Okay, so you need to prepare. You need to remember There's no expos facto laws. Now they're going to try this and say, Oh, it's you know back to do anyway. No. So make sure oh, politicians and people that You remember that? Also, we need to remind our politicians last time they tried Obamacare Ah 1000 political seats were lost. Um and, um, Nancy Pelosi did taxation without representation. A bill that you couldn't possibly read in time. So you need to remind you representatives and senators that we don't like that. Um, so no exposed factor Well don't qualify in California are Ohio. Um, So what happened in California Rolling blackout, so future kids about how to camp? Not to be afraid. Oh, by the way, have you noticed that the Russian toilet paper shortage has ended after the election? You can buy all the toilet paper you want now? So that is a manipulation. So Prepare for more manipulations. Teacher kids that the lights being out is not that big a deal. Rechargeable batteries is good. 72 hours. Get the rig tart can teach you how to do it. Um, so that you don't Worry about toilet paper instead of whether or not Do you have any freedom left? So, um, you know, we need to remember that James 15 and six as instructions if you're confused. About what is real. I would suggest giving a fiction because in the last days, they say that their people will love a line more than the truth. So giving up TV might be good. Moving on to original sources. Um, like the mortality table will tell you that Obama care. Was not good for people that the life expectancy went down. Um so We need to look at what is real, Um, originals, which documents you can find at judicial Watch. You can see how people act when they don't think it's on the record. Project Veritas. You concede that those people Um, that they caught doing election fraud are being prosecuted, of course only in Texas and places where that works out. On Do you might notice that the capital protesters are not being bailed out by Kamila Harris. Um, and it might be good toe research. Exactly. Um, if any of those people this happen, attack federal buildings or the White House they got built up by that organization. She promoted. Right, Wendy, I gotta move on. God bless America. All right, take care. Bye bye. All right, 8 to 1 W TV and 116 W TV, and we'll grab one more before we go to commercial. And George, you're on 16. W T. V and Good morning. How you doing? I'm good. How are you? Well, yeah, I caught a lot. I haven't called for a while. But I'm gonna start calling again. So I think our country is in danger. But I want to talk about this curry. And my experience with the Democratic Party and the Columbus Dispatch. Okay, I researched my wife retired a few years ago. She was 35 years. Full time She did take some time off when we had a family should care for disabled son that has the problem with birth. All those times she took off. She was penalized on her benefit calculations, she actually contributed 78,000 over $70,000 in payroll deductions and her net gain per month. $38. The fact is if if you're a spouse that never works. You get one half of your husband's benefit amount. So basically all that time she she worked. And she paid federal income tax on that money. She never $38 When she retired 62. She couldn't even get on Medicare, which is a travel street. She had to go on Obamacare with her, like a $12,000 deductible. That didn't cover anything. You're talking about outrage, And here we are. 70% for 90% of black women voted for Democrat. I wrote every Democrat augur the last four years. And guess what? Not one response. I got all the big leaders. Pelosi, Schumer, everybody to compress the DNC. Not one response. I wrote Republicans. I got some response, but they're not doing anything about it either. And the truth If I wrote to dispatch about this four years ago and you headed, recalled Scindia email saying that he confirmed he didn't believe my story about this. So he would he got he got ahold of security and they back my story. So it's the Curry said he was exactly right see the way the longer reads A woman that works can either get one half house of support for the record or her or her earnings records. So when a woman takes off to begin a family care for elderly, parent or disabled child Those years. Talent zero. Negatively affect her a benefit about it's it's been going on for years. Remember when Social Security began, women hardly worked. We were in the middle of a depression. In the sixties and seventies, women began leaving the house getting college degrees and so forth. Today, 75% of women work out selling the house and they're getting ripped off left and right. By this system, and there's a big cover up. I wrote ABC, CBS NBC News trying to get the story out. No response. Well, of course, this is all true. This is a fact. Yeah, my mom is dealing with a little bit of this. She's getting ready to retire. She still works part time for for who? She her employer. She went from full time to part time. But she's The way that and social Security is a very complex system. Right. I mean, for anybody who's never dealt with it. It is very, very complex. There are a lot of calculations that go into play. And, yeah, you can have some zero years in there some zero value years and that just really screws everything up. So, yeah, Trust me. I know what you're talking about. My mom went through some of that. Bob when when my wife went in to apply for Social Security on retirement, I was with her. It's like they knew. I wrote that letter to the spat because the lady was talking about it. They they had. No. They had notes about that and their records on that strange. I found that strange that it That is a little odd, A little a little disconcerting, but I can certainly see that happening. Okay. Well, thanks for your time, Bob. All right. He certainly do appreciate the color Only does Emily does such a good job. She's she's a treasure there. She is Glad to have her as part of the show. So, George, thanks for the call. And look for you calling in more so again Appreciate that. A two watt W. TV and 116 w T V and Lie just opened up for you. If you would like to jump in. Got to take a break. We'll be back at it more Saturday morning. Open phones news radio 6 10. W tvn, baby. It's cold outside. You know it. I know it. But there are things you can do to save money on heating.
WMAL 630AM
"judicial watch" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"That these songs do you take me back to my youth. Invent. Some stipulates 6 32 b m A. L K T McFarland biggest concern right now. China Fair enough. I think that we have all witnessed what the Communist Party in Beijing that regime can do to the world. I am concerned about the attempt to silence all of us. Either through the big tech oligarchs who can at the push of a button. The silence the likes of Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch or even the president of the United States. And I'm concerned that the federal government will basically doubled down those attempts and permitted with the force of law it forget about permitted. Mandate the voices be silenced through the force of law. We should all be concerned about that. That's what was behind the calls for unity. I'll repeat it again. Unity. In and of itself is not any sort of value based goal. Because clearly you can unify around a terrible idea, even an evil idea. Unity is not the end goal. If you think our founding fathers were unified, you really need check your history. They found one or two things that they could unite behind. The meantime, they were fighting like cats and dogs over everything else, and there's nothing wrong with that. In fact, there's something wrong with the people who say we should unify around all of these things. We should you know that unity is the end goal. No, it's not. It really isn't so I'm worried about that. I'm also worried about this executive order yesterday with regard to transgender sports, mandating Mandating that men who identify as women be allowed to participate in all girls sports This is a brand new glass ceiling put over women in America. Women at the high school level will be excluded. Your daughters will be excluded from the opportunities that they have. With regard to the great things that collegiate sports in high school sports organized sports do for young women. I am a true believer in that I have a daughter who really benefited from organized sports. And I worry that those opportunities will be taken away from so many of our daughters because of this mandate. Now. How about you? What are you worried about? Georgia and ST Mary's Maryland. Georgia. You are next up. What concerns you about the direction of this new administration, Georgia. Larry. Thank you for taking my call. I am concerned about everything that they're gonna do. The big lies they're telling. But my biggest concern is what they've gotten away with. The biggest lie that they've gotten away with the effect of our government. Yesterday you were talking about how you don't want to scream into the sky like the left, saying he's not My president, and he was selected well. I think one of the reasons I love your show, and I tune in it because you're always talking about truth. And I really believe that it's a great sin against truth. Call him the president, and the big difference between their spiel is theirs was a subjective opinion. That Trump was not their president. The big difference now is its objective truth. Said Biden is not the president. Okay, George, listen, and I'm glad you got it off your chest and I hear what you're saying. But I mean, now we're now we're in the middle of a debate about what Truth means and what truth is, and George. I appreciate the call, but I I think it's fair to say that the fact of the matter is Georgia, Georgia and I do appreciate the call. I really do. The fact of the matter is Joe Biden was inaugurated as the president yesterday. Joe Biden is now in charge.
860AM The Answer
"judicial watch" Discussed on 860AM The Answer
"Go along to get along that reality between the cartels and I will tell you, the cartels are all doing high five at the By the ministry Down off 50. Yeah. Uh, but there's this, uh Corruption, its mildest form. It's turning a blind eye and in its most provocative, outrageous form its border Patrol marked patrol units. Delivering Dale's prolapse sex and there won t O Barnes in Epping, New Mexico on our dates, times places. It's extraordinary. Seven year long investigation. There's a lot of people who make a living out of never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity. They enjoyed the status quo. They enjoy sort of the perpetual Inability of our government to resolve the war on drugs. It's 50 years old, and somehow it just can't quite figure it all out. Um, you know, we've spent billions of dollars are things like FBI Net? Which was ah Boeing operation charged the federal government billions and billions of dollars the videotape Mexicans and Central Americans. Running across the desert. That's wonderful for historical purposes. But what does it do for border security? Nothing and you know, Biden is ready to go back. To a quarter quote Technology's answer for border security. So I guess we're going to see FBI and that you know, Version three and that will cost another $10 billion. So we'll have a nice video footage historically documenting the thousands of caravans crossing the border. Is that what you're saying? Chris? Exactly. No. No fence. Don't actually stop him just have just have sensors and both two actors and night vision that shows the thousands and thousands crossing every night. What else can you predict in the next year is going to occur when the amnesties undersigned when the catch and release is re instigated? What? What? How is that going to affect on national security, Chris Well, you don't see a collapse of health care on the border. It already has happened in some places like due to the Arizona With the hospital actually closed. There is no hospital in coach's cannon it there's been Arizona despite millions and millions of dollars in several subsidies because hospital simply could not keep up. With the number of illegal aliens, everything that anyone in the country and seeking medical care and so healthcare across the border states a cursory border communities. Healthcare system will collapse. Because, remember, every single Democratic candidates promised free health care for illegal aliens, taxpayer financed So you're going to pay the bill for that? And the influx is going to be outrageous and that the world was going to be told by broader communities to pay for that. It's unsustainable. Uh uh, very wise person once said, you can have a nation. With welfare or the welfare health system. Well, you can have a nation with open borders. But you can't have a nation with welfare in health and open borders. That country will cease to exist very rapidly. We've been told to Chris Val, head of investigations for Judicial Watch,.
WMAL 630AM
"judicial watch" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"For 600 were Washington comes to talk Hillary O'Connor show KT McFarland joins us to talk about what's raising red flags for her from the national security perspective with regard to the incoming by administration, some of the personnel choices and some of the priorities they seem to be emphasizing. We'll get to that coming up in the next hour. I've got great concerns about where this feminist Creation is heading as you can Well imagine, and we learned quite a bit from those executive actions he signed in yesterday. I want to share with you What I'm concerned about that would also like to hear from you a triple 86 30 W well, In fact, I'll give you a quick preview. I'm very concerned that women's sports as we know it at the high school in collegiate level, will will all but disappear if you have Ah, daughter, or if you are a woman who benefited from from sports from organized sports at the high school or collegiate level. I'd love to hear your response to the idea that now biological males who identify as women must Must be allowed to compete in women's sports, and I want to hear from you in terms of what you think that will do to women's sports in this country. I think it's a critically important subject and I'm not afraid of being called some kind of hate or bigot for having the conversation because that's why they that's how they try to shut us up. So AH, bring it, especially if you were a woman who has benefitted from organized sports at that level. Triple 86 30 W Mayo. Joining us right now is a voice that we need in this town now, more than ever, because at this point with the Democrats in charge of both houses of the legislative branch, and now the Democrat president, Joe Biden being in charge of the executive branch Well, I don't know who's the voice of the opposition party who can really do any level of oversight and our government right now. Other than this man, Tom Fitton and his organization, Judicial Watch judicial watchdog Orig, Tom. Thank you for joining us. You're welcome. Our thanks for having me appreciates a good word. Well, sort of pick up where I where I intrude you there, Because now you really do have a vital role here in terms of keeping this government in check and demanding some level of transparency here. That's true. There's a there's a law called the Freedom of Information Act That's available to anyone to sue the government when it doesn't provide information. Is it supposed to that we've made effective use of that we uncovered the Clinton email scandal uncovered virtually everything we know. About the worst scandal. American history. The illicit targeting of President Trump was spying and other abuses. And you know, Congress doesn't provide oversight. If Vickers with the executive branch. Yeah, they go to court in the bickering really is even settled in court. But under this federal law You go into court against these big government agencies and judicial watches on equal footing now doesn't mean we get everything we want. Nor does it mean that they even follow the law. Nor does it mean the courts are always fair In our view. But at least there's a process there that hold the government accountable to the law and requires them to explain why it is they're hiding stuff. And if we stick and we stick with it were persistent. Because we are persistent and consistent, were able to get information that Congress has been unable to get the media's under just sitting getting on. Especially in this day and age as you point out with the installation of President by B. We have a Congress is zero interest in and asking any questions. I mean, you saw that press conference yesterday at the White House was an embarrassment. I think you forget about being adversarial. I don't believe in the adversarial press. That's just How about discovering what happened happening for Yuri here? Rest serious and dignified. I would I would be good with Can you explain what you did in terms of allowing citizens from other countries that are out of control? Come into our country without really knowing who they are. Can you explain that? Yeah, tell us why our security is enhanced or not harmed by the just ask a few questions. That's all I want. But that's not going to get done. So we're gonna have to do our freedom of Information Act request. Get it. Get the signed out how This is being implemented and all the other radical changes that are going to be implemented by President by the next team. Our guest is Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch. And Tom, you've you've created over judicial watch a really important and vital presence there through your for your request to your advocacy. On behalf of the American people, so that we can keep our government in check. And by the way, many of your requests and frustrations and fights involved the Trump administration. This is a bipartisan thing. You were stymied from the Trump. State Department and Justice Department at at many turns over the last four years. That's true. I mean, from our perspective, it was the holder Lynch Sessions Bar. Justice Department is just one big glob of Uh, of obstruction and refusal to abide by the rule of law of least on transparency issues. They protected the Obama gang. They protected Hillary Clinton. So many ways things won't change for us under Abide administration in terms of transparency, you know, just a few months ago, the Trump administration came and tried to shut down on Hillary Clinton cases. What is the Biden administration and do right other than me, too? Yeah. And what? Listen, so much of what you do at judicial Watch. You rely on utilizing all forms of communication to get the word out so that people are informed and these days the public square involves social media. It's involves Twitter and involves YouTube. You're very active on Twitter. And so I gotta ask you. I mean, you've had nothing to say. Since January, 8th..
WMAL 630AM
"judicial watch" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"Now Everybody else has got to be tested because you've got the Wuhan Red death. Just by the way, you know, I mean, I don't know what the sequence was, but neither do you. You don't know where you got it. You hang out with lots of dirty people. You're a leftist. Let's go to some audio over. Let's go to our where we know where we left off. We left off up here on day Camelot demanding in October that the president United States B Deep, Platt formed new word for the 21st century. The George Orwell Century. Amazing stuff. Let's go Toe. Tom Fitton, Tom Fitton, you know is the head of Judicial Watch. Judicial Watch is a watch dog group. Judicial Watch has been deep. Platt formed by Twitter and Tom Fitness, personally, then deep platform by Twitter for no apparent reason in in the past, and for no apparent reason, because he tweeted things out like a regular newsletter thing, And then one day, they just decided they were going toe because their little armband wearing fascist that Twitter that they were going to deep platform. Here is that And I know Tom. I would call Tom a friend and we're close personal. We don't golf and dined together anything but I would call my friend and having golf 10 years, But Tom Fitton this morning on the Fox News Channel, talking about these troublesome times in which we live and should trouble every American that watchdog Organization and head of the watchdog organization can't have a voice on a major component of online free speech platform because of politics. It's it's really it's a terrible time for America. It is a terrible time for America. Tom Fitton on Big Tech, You know, they're they become as biggest your $2 trillion platform. You're bigger than a lot of governments around the world. But the United States because of free market, capitalism and freedom where you're allowed to build companies like that. And the head them. However, we do expect that you're not going to become little Hitlers. I'm just just saying Tom Fitton. No one would say that Big tech can keep someone off because of their race. Why would we think that they can keep someone off because of their politics? Just because they can. This is not something that section 2 30 allows. You know when the United Nations after World War two was putting together a charter on genocide, the Soviets fought in the successfully in the United Nations to make sure that when they put together the charter for genocide that it would be considered genocide. It's a racial group and ethnic group. A cultural group, a religious group, But the Soviets made sure that they did not include language about ideology or politics because they knew that they were going to get to work, killing millions of their political enemies. And then the Maoists did the same thing. And you know, I'm sounding the alarm here because I'm somewhat familiar with the history of the 20th century, which so many people these days, particularly in Congress don't seem to be Tom Fitton talking about Hillary Clinton and the unholy alliance between the Democrat Party. And big tech, which is trampling rights in the United States. You see from Hillary Clinton and other politicians that real danger here is they're working hand in glove with allied politicians to target critics of now off the government. Right. The critics you see is being now it's the Republican Party. It's conservatives of President Trump Republican president. They really hate him and that you know their hate is too gentle, a word for the way they feel about President Trump. They have been transferred that expanded that to all Trump supporters and everybody's a terrorist where there's a crazy story today about how everybody up on Capitol Hill last week must be punished. Everybody. This is collective punishment. It's again outlawed by even the United Nations and by international law Governor Mike Huckabee, the former governor of the state of Arkansas. And father of Sarah Huckabee. Sanders, who was of course, you know, run out of restaurants and treated like a Jew in Germany, and I keep going back to that. But that's because that's what it smacks up. But I'm I'm not a certified authority on On World War two. But I'm pretty damn good with World War two and that era as a matter of history and Mike Huckabee and the way that they treat her and then it's okay. You see, it's okay now left about it. Then they left about Rand. Paul being violently attacked. And now our media is the Phillipe corrupt institution of all time in the United States America. Have the freedom to be corrupt. And so they are, you know, in most authoritarian regimes, the government makes them be corrupt. Here. They volunteer to be crept Governor Mike up Huckabee on the media and censorship and silencing the voice of the opposition. The media is oblivious, totally oblivious. The things that have been said towards 75 million or so Americans who really don't care that much about hurting anybody, In fact, don't want to don't want to put anybody out of business. Just want to live. Our lives be left alone. But this kind of atmosphere we're seeing. They're not just about yelling and screaming at us and condescending to us and treating us like dupes. They hate us enough. They want to put us all out of business and make us go away. That's not America, and that's what I find so very depressing about this. Yeah, And that's the Democrat Party. It's not just Twitter and Twitter and Facebook are allies of the party Capital T Capital P. The party, the party reigns supreme. The party ruins your Christmas dinner. The party ruins your Thanksgiving with your family. The party makes millions. Tens of millions of people combat veterans whisper at the dinner table at restaurants because the violent lunatics at the.
WDRC
"judicial watch" Discussed on WDRC
"Where city? Yes, it would be something else. And now we're blamed them for what happened that shooting yesterday. I saw the video. I don't know how it's going to get explain. I should have never happened. But but again when you have a when you have created an environment in which the U. S Capitol is being breached when there was no reason for it come to that broken window but burning. I agree with you there, but when I looked at her and thought she's kind of crouched down because she's going through a half window, you know it's it's an upper lower window and she's kind of, you know, curled up a little bit to get through that opening, and she didn't appear to have any kind of weapon. Displayed or anything else, and I thought that's going to be a tough one for that Police officer who's a Capitol police officer to explain why in the world that person should be shot and just saying Well, she was about to enter the building if she was entering a top secret nuclear lab. Maybe if she was entering a military base with special restrictions on it. Maybe I've certainly been in places where they said use of deadly force is authorized. Do not enter here and I've seen those things. Yeah, it's special situations. The capital While special is not one of those situations where it says if you enter without permission, you might be shot. Well, give Lars I agree with you entirely. If I left you in the other person, I thought that everything living the shooting. I don't know if this would have happened in the community feel. Imagine what would have happened to the police officer there who shot somebody in that situation I think you got it isn't in I think very difficult time ahead of him. Should the system work correctly, however, again when the environment gets created in which these kind of things could happen instead of we, instead of the Capitol police and the other police agencies, they're owning the capital, only the ground rather capital and something making it very clear. You're not coming in here. You're not coming in here. So let's not even get to that point, Bernie. I want to move the one other thing because I mentioned it earlier. About some audio. We have audio of Ted Wheeler, the mayor of Portland, and this was brought up by Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch, and he's being accosted at a restaurant I want. I want you to hear the audio. We had to bleep out a lot of the language, and I'm not even sure where the guys screaming at him is coming from And then Wheeler got slapped on the shoulder by a woman, which doesn't sound like he loved with any bruises or broken bones. Take a listen to this audio if you don't mind. You need a maritime, many.