35 Burst results for "Judge Barrett"
Born This Way Is Old Science
"The confirmation hearings for Judge Amy, CONYBEARE IT Senator Maisy. Hirano of Hawaii expressed outrage and shock that the nominee would use the term sexual preference instead of sexual orientation sexual preference announced senator. TORONTO. Is An offensive and outdated term used by anti lgbtq activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not after the Exchange Merriam Webster which apparently like most Americans had not gotten that Nemo with these new linguistic absolutes quickly changed the definition of sexual preference in its online dictionary. To, indicate that this wording is now offensive who knew we'll beyond the orwellianism of the literally changing the dictionary to support a political climb. It seems that Senator Hirano is the one who's actually behind the Times on this whole sexual orientation versus Sexual Preference Issue According to Dr Glenn Stanton, and then outstanding new article at public discourse. Judge Barrett's terminology is actually more in line with the latest thinking of leading gender scholars for example, Professor Sorry Van Anders at candidates Queens University has stated that. Quote sexual orientation as a term is increasingly seen as regressive because it belongs to the bio centralist project translating to English. What she saying is that the word orientation suggests that sexuality is hard wired and according to Professor Anders that's just not the consensus anymore among her peers though the whole born this way claim was once a very useful slogan to advance gay rights it no longer serves the goals of the LGBTQ. Movement years ago for instance, two scholars at Ucla question the concept of. Sexual. Orientation especially for women to instead that women's sexuality and Orientation Fluid Changeable over time and variable across social context other social scientists that Glenn Stanton quotes in his public discourse Article Call For a paradigm shift in how female sexuality is studied and described, and there've been plenty of surveys indicate that most self identified lesbians will have relationships with men. At some point. There's also a more obvious problem with the idea of a fixed orientation that's found in the very initials of the acronym especially the. Be The queue of lgbtq as political commentator Douglas Murray who identifies as gay by the way rights bisexuals continued to be viewed as some kind of betrayal from within the gay community gay men tend to believe that men who claim to be by are in fact, gays in some form of denial yet according to a pew research report from last summer bisexuals account for almost half of all LGBTQ adult in the US in fact, the authors of a new book published by Harvard University Press. Think. That male bisexuals are those who call themselves mostly straight vastly outnumber exclusively gay men. Thus they conclude the old system of gay straight or BI has as stanton puts, it outgrown its usefulness and even bigger challenge in the B. to the born. This way dogma is the T- gay rights and gay marriage were sold to us. The premise that homosexuality is hard wired maybe even genetic like race but anyone claiming transgender as an identity does. So in spite of physical and genetic realities not because. Of them and the CUE which usually stands for questioning well, that continues to evolve in both meaning and practice to include more and more sexual preferences as an identity. Well, one wonders whether Senator Horon would feel compelled to lecture the various social scientists that Glenn Stanton sites. In this article my suspicion is she wouldn't in fact, my suspicion is that Senate Arana was fed this talking point by an aide who's checking twitter and saw it as an opportunity to tar and feather judge Barrett as. A big what's ultimately revealed by her political posturing awoke language policing however is crucially important for all of us to now that phrases such a sexual orientation or sexual preference or whatever. The latest nomenclature are terms made up not to describe reality but to advance the idea that has revolutionized. So much of our culture on politics that sexual attraction and urge define and determine who we are. That's the idea we can never embrace even if we're facing outrage from a senator
Barrett confirmed as Supreme Court justice in partisan vote
"The Senate has approved the controversial nomination of judge Amy Coney Barrett to the US Supreme Court on a mostly party line vote the Republican majority in the Senate was able to power past objections from every Democrat the ETS are fifty two the Naser forty eight Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says it was their duty to confirm the president's pick one of the most brilliant admired and well qualified qualified nominees in our lifetime and says Democrats would have done the same thing if they were in power the judge is a conservative democratic Senate leader Chuck Schumer says it goes deeper than that on issues like abortion workers rights the affordable Care Act and climate change judge Barrett pulls far right views well outside the American mainstream and those views matter Amy Coney Barrett replaces the late liberal icon Ruth pater Ginsburg and becomes president trump's third justice on the nation's highest court Jackie Quinn Washington
"judge barrett" Discussed on KTRH
"Expect a large number of male and balance President Trump is blitzing battleground states ahead of next week's election. Terry more reports. Campaigning in Pennsylvania. The president criticized coverage of the ongoing Corona virus outbreak. All they want to talk about is covered by the way on November 4th. You won't be hearing so much about it. He called Covad coverage of fake news media conspiracy now rounding the turn, and we have the vaccines coming out very soon, years ahead of schedule. Trump said. A return to normal life is happening very quickly. He also went after Democratic rival Joe Biden, the president challenged polls showing Biden leading in key battleground states. I'm Terry Moore. The president's nominee to the Supreme Court. Amy Cockney, Barrett could be at work as early as tomorrow. Senators air debating now ahead of this evening's vote to confirm her on Ly One Republican plans to vote no and vice President Mike Pence is no longer expected to be there, A senior White House official told Fox News. Justice Clarence Thomas will administer the official constitutional oath. The Judge Barrett tonight if she is confirmed News time 404 time to check your money, and it's been a very bad day for the stock market. Here's Pat Shen brought to you by diem. Auto leasing dot com Well, good afternoon to you. Wyatt Stocks closing today. Broadly lower the Dow industrials finishing the day down by 650 points. Posing a 6 27,085 S and P 500 down 64 points. 1.8% Netto that for the NASDAQ down by 189 points, Stocks down on two main items. First, an increase in Corona virus cases number two lesser and lesser chance of a stimulus package coming any time soon. Selling pretty much across the board 10 out of 11 stock sectors down in price utilities. We're in the green, but just barely. So oil down $1.29 $38.56 a barrel gold up by 50. Cents it out the $1906. After the close A I G insurance named a new CEO. A G shares their up 7% in after hours trading. With the check of your money from the Office of Heritage Asset Advisers. Time Patch in produced radio 7 40 K T. R. H Thanks Pat interim Houston Texans head coach Romeo Cornell is skeptical of any trade offers before the deadline, he told reporters Today, most teams are offering the Texans Peanuts, hoping to take advantage of a team looking to unload veterans. Colonel says he has been told about some potential trades. But there's nothing definite. Any decisions will be made for the good of the team..
Murkowski to vote to confirm Barrett to the Supreme Court
"Alaska Senator at least that Murkowski will add her vote to the yes column for Republicans seeking to confirm Judge Amy Cockney Barrett to the U. S Supreme Court, though she still disagrees with doing it before Election Day. One GOP HOLDOUT Remains Maine Senator Susan Collins is now the only Republican to signal a no vote on Judge Barrett along with every Democrat. That is not enough Opposition to derail a confirmation vote set for Monday night. That's Fox was Jared Halpern. Collins is up for reelection.
Sen. Murkowski says she’ll support Trump nominee Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme Court
"Alaska Senator at least that Murkowski will add her vote to the yes column for Republicans seeking to confirm Judge Amy Cockney Barrett to the U. S Supreme Court, though she still disagrees with doing it before Election Day. One GOP HOLDOUT Remains Maine Senator Susan Collins is now the only Republican to signal a no vote on Judge Barrett along with every Democrat. That is not enough Opposition to derail a confirmation vote set for Monday
Senate judiciary committee approves Amy Coney Barrett as Democrats boycott
"Donald Trump's controversial nomination of the conservative Judge Amy Cockney Barrett, to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Is cleared Another hurdle. A full Senate vote is now due to be held next week after the Judiciary Committee approved the president's choice. The appointment of Judge Barrett could tilt its ideological balance for decades to come. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said the Republicans were making a last ditch power grab before the elections. It is a hallmark of democracy that might Should not mean right. But Republicans are blatantly ignoring this principle. The American people know what's going on. They're not fooled. They know this process is a sham. A naked power Graham. This is the culmination of a decades long effort to skew the court to the far right.
"judge barrett" Discussed on 600 WREC
"Trump's rallies are back, for example. He miraculously beat Cove in 19 and record time. Judge Barrett proved stellar. Most voters are polling. They are better off than they were four years ago. This is a stunning result to mate because we've had the pandemic. And including the pandemic. People say they're economically better off today than they were four years ago under Barack Obama and Biden, including with the pandemic. They think Trump is going to win. If most voters are saying these things It's going to be increasingly difficult to believe. The disconnect that they're intent on voting against somebody who will win and who will continue to make things better for him. It just doesn't make sense is going to vote against the guy that they think is gonna win that they Understand has made things better off for them than they were four years ago. It doesn't make sense that voters would vote against this guy again. That's what the media is asking us to believe. Nobody yet knows how to calibrate the data on early voting, the Republican surgeon swing state registrations and the effect of the nation's biggest campus. I'm telling you what though Early voting is leaning in the Republicansfavorite a massive way it's stunning. How early voting is trending Republican. Stunning how in these battleground states, Trump is surging? All the while Joe Biden is inert. He may as well be laying down and formaldehyde in the basement in Delaware. He's running a virtual campaign out of fear of the virus. He's trying to avoid questions about his son, Hunter Biden. And his intention to pack the court. Or stop fracking. He's Trump called him out of that last night, the rally of era There's the thing, the video countless numbers of times. Biden admitting that he's going to ban fracking So I think I think on balance things were looking up. I want to hear what you think. We'll have a brief, obscene profit break here will come back and go to the phones Do not go anywhere. When you read the limbo letter, you're prepped a combat liberal badness because l rush both supplies you with an arsenal of facts subscribed to the print edition of the Limbo letter and you'll get free Russia's dad's famous inspiring speech stand up for America as pounded The signer secrets that can save us today. Order now at Rush Limbaugh dot com You're listening to the guy Be network news, Radio 1055. W E, R C and w We are cfm dot com Sebastian Gorka here with another pain relief testimonial for relief, actor Peter Staff told But the father and son owners of relief act to keep sending me all kinds of wonderful testimonials from people who are no longer having back neck, hip, shoulder, foot or knee pain. Just like this one. I lived for decades in a lot of extreme pain with my lower back and legs. And I heard about relief actor on the radio. I tried to three week quick start a. I'm so grateful to really factor that I've got my life back as I was getting older, my back pain just got worse and worse, But after taking really factor, my back pain is gone. Truth is your pain from getting older.
McConnell urged White House not to make stimulus deal ahead of election
"As Speaker Nancy Pelosi has pushed for $2.2 trillion in relief, But she told reporters that she's still in the hope of an agreement this week. Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has warned the White House not to rush into a deal before the election. He also wants to focus on the confirmation. Of Judge Barrett to the Supreme Court.
Demonstrators gather for Women's March across the US
"Of womens and reproductive rights advocates took to the streets of San Francisco this afternoon to protest President Trump. And his pick for the next Supreme Court justice. It was part of numerous marches around the nation. In the annual women's March, demonstrators in Washington took direct focus on the nomination of Judge Amy Cockney Barrett. Samantha Schmidt, who covers gender issues for the Washington Post, feels there was a sense of urgency among the marchers could sense it in people that this is ah, feeling more urgent Both sides. Of the You know this today, especially over abortion rights feel that this is more tense, more urgent. And for a lot of people. This is a really scary time. Scary for those especially who fear, adding Judge Barrett, a conservative to the Supreme Court could lead to abortion once again being illegal in the U. S.
Demonstrators gather for Women's March in Washington, D.C.
"Women's rights advocates marched in Washington and around the country today in opposition to Trump Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Cockney Barrett As NPR's Sarah McCammon reports, The marches were as much a get out the vote rally as a protest. Barring some surprise, Senate Republicans have the votes to push through Judge Barrett Supreme Court confirmation before Election Day. Aggressive activists are using the moment to remind Democratic voters to turn out for the November election, hears Jenny Lawson of Planned Parenthood Votes speaking in Washington, D C. It is not hyperbole to say that everything is on the line this November. We cannot afford four more years of this administration, attacking our access to reproductive healthcare and writes wearing masks. Thousands of demonstrators marched to the National Mall outside the Supreme Court, anti abortion rights activists and other groups demonstrated in support of Judge Barrett. Sarah McCammon. NPR NEWS Washington
Recap: Trump's NBC Town Hall And Biden's ABC Town Hall
"Town halls. Last night, ABC News George Stephanopoulos posting Joe Biden, the former vice president of the United States, now the Democrat nominee for president, Donald Trump. Meanwhile, the president of the United States was on NBC with Savannah Guthrie. Yes, There was no debate last night. Yes, it was cancelled by the debate commission. Yes, Steve Scully, the guy who was supposed to moderate the debate. It turns out, he lied about being hacked on his Twitter account. So his life isn't going too well right now, but we still got a debate. Savannah, Guthrie and President Trump were debating one another for almost the entire town hall. They were just cats and dogs all over each other the entire time. Very little time for voters toe get a chance to question the president of the United States. Although there was a funny moment. 27 listen to this woman. She's a Biden lead leaning Supporter, writes that she's leaning towards Joe Biden. Her name is Paulette Dale. And here's what she had to say the moment she had a chance to question the president of the United States question. Evening, Mr President, I have to say you have a great smile. The guy's hands. You're so handsome when you smile. Thanks. Mom was totally fan Girling. She was She was like Backstreet Boys, just like boy banding all over again, you know I don't think she's voting for Biden. I just have this hunch again. There's another producer who I think lost a jobless. There's a lot of unemployment to based on the town hall last night. It's still funny. And by the way she was being attacked, of course, like because everything is the next potential crisis. Everything's all out war. You're never allowed. Teo. You know, you give comfort to the enemy. So just You have a great smile. You should smile more. I love your smile and being destroyed for that. Well, that's a big thing on the left. You don't tell her where I'm tired of being constantly told that I should smile more because you never tell menace smile more that That's a thing for the For the women on the left. Yeah, well, maybe she was two birds. One stone She got in there last night, and it made it Was added a couple of men to the smile equation, adding President Trump to it. Oh, and last night. Also Joe Biden remember facing off against Stephanopoulos. This was a tough one cut 40. You know? Finally, Finally we get to the issue of Hunter Biden in a national setting. Here's that moment last night. That's right now it didn't come up at all. We've sighted and Garfunkel were there. How did I miss this? Nobody. Simon Garfunkel in the entire 90 minutes. 30 different question. Town Hall. Joe Biden doesn't get a single one about the newly emerging evidence that he appears tohave corrupted American foreign policy to the benefit of his family's financial interests. Not a single question about this last night, not a surprise. But ABC. Throws in with on overwhelming effort by the media and the big tech companies to suppress an important story that the New York Post has been breaking every single day for the last couple days. No, it was. It was just so amazing. And I'm glad that I watched them separately. Just because for me, I don't have the ability to just pay attention. Both. I'm afraid, miss something. So, Watson separately, I will say, though. A job in town hall. I just started playing a game on my phone because they would ask a question. And Joe Biden would start answering the question. And then he would meander through a whole bunch of different topics. Everything that was going on in his head. He would meander all over the place. I was waiting for the big giant, you know, Biden Gaff which wasn't there didn't happen. I'm just gonna float this and I could be 100% wrong. So this is just a thought that has gone through my head last night. He He was just talking so much. I thought somebody put him on Ritalin. He was just just going and go. He was taking like Barack Obama length to answer a question. Yeah, they say that he stayed for 30 minutes after the town hall and kept answering questions. He kept talking forever. ABC never heard that footage released it by the way they should. If he have cameras and a microphone on him. We should see the footage of his Q and a with the voters after that thing was done last night released Joe Biden. I do want to get to this. This. He was asked about court packing last night. Cut 45 with George Stephanopoulos. Here is here is his new answer on court packing. How about that question of expanding the court hears what you said exactly one year ago tonight at a Democratic debate, he said, I would not get into court packing. I would not packed the court. That's not what you're saying Now is the nomination of Judge Barrett Reason enough to rethink your position. What is the nomination and what I wanted to do? George? You know if I had answered the question directly, then all the focus is beyond what's Biden going to do? If he wins instead of on? Is it appropriate? What is going on now? And it should stay. This is the thing that the president loves to do always take our eye off the ball. What's his state? One of these, Peter suggested is and there's a number of constitutional scholars have suggested as well that there are at least 45 options that are available to determine whether or not you could change the way in which the court lifetime appointment takes place. Consistent, arguably. With the Constitution. I have not been a fan of court packing because I think it just generates what will happen every whoever wins. It just keeps moving in a way that is inconsistent with what is going to be manageable. So you're still not a fan, but I'm not a fan of Don't say it depends on how this turns out. Howie wins but how it's handled how it's handled. There's a hostage crisis. You don't play by my rules on packing the court how it's handled. What does that mean? We know how it's going to be handled. There's a vote on the 22nd. She's going to get confirmed me how it's going to be handled. He? That is about the clearest indication he's given yet that he intends to pack the court. Yeah, he said last night he is open to packing the United States Supreme Court. And it depends on how it's handled. He's got the gun to our heads, he says. Go ahead. You want me to pack the court approve any Cockney? Barrett put her on the Supreme Court. I'll do it. That's the answer he gave in his own marble mouth, Joe Biden Way.
Amy Coney Barrett Closes Out Testimony
"2. Days of extensive questioning for the president's Supreme Court nominee have ended tonight. The Senate Judiciary Committee will meet again tomorrow. But testimony from Judge Amy Cockney Barrett is over. W t. O P is Mitchell Miller reports from Capitol Hill, Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy pressed the judge on the possible impact of a president refusing to comply with the Supreme Court ruling. Could that be a threat to our constitutional former covering the Supreme Court? Can't control whether or not the president obeys. Leahy then raised another pointed question. Does the president have an absolute right to pardon himself? So far as I know that question has never been litigated. That question has never risen. Republican Senator Ted Cruz says he's confident Barrett will be confirmed and added that Democrats tried to make the hearing more about President Trump than the judge. We've seen that our Democratic colleagues have very few questions actually to raise about Judge Barrett's qualifications
Judge Barrett grilled on health care and election issues
"Barrett said today if called upon the Supreme Court would apply laws designed to protect the election. I think That occasions on which courts adjudicate election disputes are designed to protect the voter's choice and the right to vote. So of course, the Supreme Court doesn't cast ballots, voters cast ballots and election laws designed to protect the right to vote. Barrett said she has not spoken to the president about election cases and did not commit to recusing herself from any litigation arising from the election. Democrats pressed her on several issues, including the right to vote, abortion and healthcare. She repeatedly said she would keep an open mind and that no one in the White House had tried to influence her
Three New England governors, one Washington DC-area governor not signing Barrett letter
"Declined to join the Republican piers and signing a letter urging the Senate to confirm Judge Barrett of the Supreme Court. Bernie Bennett. With that report, 20 for the nation's 28 Republican governor, signed a letter praising Barrett's background in philosophy. Not signing where governors Christie Nunu of New Hampshire, Charlie Baker of Massachusetts and Phil Scott of Vermont as well as Larry Hogan of Maryland. Baker, Scott and Hogan have been more outspoken in their criticism of President Trump and Sununu has been Sununu has said he believes it is appropriate for bear to have a hearing but not voice specific support or opposition to her nomination. Bernie Bennett reporting also a townhall dot
Sen. Klobuchar: Amy Coney Barrett gave Trump a 'clear signal' about her stance on the ACA
"Team team coverage coverage of of the the Senate Senate confirmation confirmation hearing hearing for for Amy Amy Cockney Cockney Barrett, Barrett, and and while while they're they're getting getting into into it it right right now, now, this this is is Senator Senator Amy Amy Klobuchar yet Into it with Judge Barrett over the affordable Care act and the judge really pushing back implying, saying that clover Char's implying she cut some sort of deal with the president. Let's get the latest live great figure has been following this forest, Greg Here's Senator Amy Klobuchar asked her whether or not she had known with the time that she was nominated, whether or not the president wanted to overturn the affordable care act or Obamacare, and she said she was not sure at the time that she was nominated. Even though there had been some tweets about it. It had been in the public discourse that had been covered in the media. Still, she said she was not sure this is also a similar answer to what she gave yesterday and talking to Senator Kamala Harris. This has been a big concern of Democrats that Obama care is at risk. At least the future of it is under a new Supreme Court. With Justice Barritt serving if she is indeed confirmed, Reporting live, Craig figure can next 10 70 news radio will
"judge barrett" Discussed on The Beat with Ari Melber
"It's normal to have nominees questions about controversial topics, but this should not be controversial topic. This is a basic principle of our democracy, and so I found that surprising that judge parents didn't wanNA just concede that everybody knows illegal answer to this question. Feingold feel having done the questioning because his emily notes and in fairness it is certainly true the judges are not even supposed to say things that would prejudge right that would imply their ruling on a future case. Fi. Then there's some grey area where people could lean into that to be evasive or not fine. then. There's what's talking about, which is basically obviously in any normal non trump five, twenty, twenty world. It would be just black letter law to say, yeah, I open minded if there's some legitimate challenge but yes, the constitution has timing and yes federal law tells us when elections are not in the individual politicians running. And we absolutely right I mean, look at what she just said Eah you may apply illegal standard to whether or not you should recuse yourself but it's her decision. There's no appeal from it. She's not mandated to do it or not do it in. So she could have committed to the most obvious thing in the world, which is that she should not be part of such a case. The same thing goes and I would add this to emily's list, which is her answers on the institutional races. There was no problem with her with regard to a future case where it had to be cory booker was asking your body. It was like pulling teeth to get her to admit whatever. The American whose is knows is that we do have institutional racism. I found that troubling as well and taking this idea of being careful way too far. Yeah I think you make a fair point center by what you said? Emily List, which makes me think of course of the political organization. But here you meant the listed emily gave. Top Analysis Yeah exactly. But but yeah, you don't fairness again, we try to be as fair as possible. She could give an answer about the existence of racism or if she doesn't see, doesn't think it's a problem doesn't see it that way as someone who deals with the law and the justice system and prison and whether or not to. Ever doubt executions of people. These very serious issues she could also under oath explain herself there was a little bit of this sort of. Catch twenty two I can't talk about cases. I can't talk about anything that might upset Donald Trump who appointed me so I won't speak about anything and that leaves the viewers and voters understand going well, maybe what's the point of all of this? I have the two great panelist we're going to stay I want to remind viewers that when center Kamala Harris comes on whether it's in this hour or later tonight, it's a newsworthy moment will show you all of that live but I want to show you more of today's hearing on what they're going to do here what the Senate wants to do about trump's plan to fill the seat held by the Justice Ginsburg now senators I would say politically did not land many gloves on Barrett she for her part was clearly willing as we were just discussing to look they sieve to get through the day. Do you agree with Justice Scalia's view that Roe was wrongly decided. I can't pre commit or say, yes, I'm going in with some agenda. Do you feel like you should recuse yourself from that case because you're being nominated by president trump that's not a question that I could answer in the abstract upon his comments concrete. At correct, I can't offer an opinion on recusals without short-circuiting entire process. And that was the course of the day. This is true on issues ranging from obamacare to abortion rights gun rights. Now, as we were just discussing, I say this for fairness and accuracy some dodging is standard judges are not supposed to make our now's legal views on a case they could a rule on but. Democrats Stress Barrett was eager to announce certain views in the past she signed on for example to anti abortion effort and appeared to cast doubt previously on how part of Obamacare was upheld. Then they're also these exchanges that are specific to living in the trump era. This is important as the Senate will still decide whether to advise and consent. On if this person should be elevated, the Supreme Court processes not over yet and you have a president nowadays attacking free and fair elections demanding judges pledge loyalty to him above the law that is the context of what's going on in the Senate right now. So it should be noted that Barrett of Boyd Breaking with trump even when judicial rules do not require for example, it is illegal fact the elections held in November, it's illegal fact that the president's term ends precisely on January twentieth according to our Constitution. But the judge would not reference those fax when simply asked under oath if a president may unilaterally delay the election. The constitution gives the president of the United States. To unilaterally delay a general election under any circumstances does federal law. Well senator if that question ever came before me, I would need to hear arguments from the litigants and read briefs and consult with my law clerks and talk to my colleague and go through the opinion writing process. They think we went judges to approach cases thoughtfully in with an open mind. Our panel is here and we're bringing in Brian Fallon, the CO founder Executive Director of the advocacy group demand justice he also I should note his experience at the. Justice Department. And working for Senator Schumer who big driver of the entire strategy of all this. Thanks for joining US Brian..
Barrett faces questions on Day 2 of Senate hearings
"Barrett, questioned by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Day two of her confirmation hearings, a case that could determine the survival of the Affordable Care act is scheduled to come before the court next month, and Judge Barrett reiterated that she has no agenda regarding the case. I have said repeatedly under oath that I had no conversations with anyone in the White House about that case. And I'm not sure they sent. There's a suggestion that I have an agenda that I want to strike down People's protection for pre existing conditions. That's just not true. Judge Barrett similarly handled questions on abortion, gun rights and other hot button issues more generally, she said, she admires the late Justice Antonin Scalia, but quote You would be getting justice Barritt
Amy Coney Barrett: Trump Supreme Court nominee sidesteps questions
"First day of questioning Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Cockney. Barrett would not express whether she thinks the landmark decision on abortion Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided. If I express of you on a precedent, one way or another, whether I say I love it or hate it. It signals to litigants that I might tilt one way or another. In a pending case. Judge Barrett has been disciplined, as is tradition for Supreme Court nominees, not giving her opinion on an issue coming before the Supreme Court in November. Regarding the affordable care act or Obama care. I can't pre commit or say Yes, I'm going in with some agenda because I'm not on
Amy Coney Barrett gets grilling on abortion
"Supreme Court nominee Amy Cockney Barrett, taking a grilling from senators on big issues during Day two of the confirmation hearings today. One issue that came up multiple times is an anti abortion rights newspaper ad. The judge Barrett signed in 2006. I'm a public official. And so while I was free to express my private views at that time, I don't feel like it is appropriate for me anymore because of the canons of conduct to express an affirmative you at this point and I. Meanwhile, Wisconsin senior senator singing Cockney barrettes praises the attitude of a judge someone who apply the law. As it is written, and she won't alter it. She's not going to be an activist judge to be justice and that that's on welcome, Senator Ron Johnson says he will vote to confirm Barrett if and win her nomination comes to a vote. Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin, though, says the entire process is still unjust. I believe the next president and the next Senate that's needed in January. Teo do that nomination and do that confirmation, respectively. Baldwin and Johnson joining W T M. J. Steve's graffiti during W. T M. J
"judge barrett" Discussed on KQED Radio
"Made during this pandemic and many, many other things that it was a very, very good bill. It was what we could agree upon. But I would note that Senate Democrats did. Block those provisions that would have gone to help families like Veronica and others in Iowa that are suffering from the pandemic and are, of course our greatest sympathies to those that have been impacted all across the United States. Eso, Mr Chairman. I would like to enter into the record. There's three letters here for the committee committee and an op ed a letter support from 40 Christian women's scholars. The second is a letter from a group of governors all across the country, including our own. Iowa's governor, Kim Reynolds, strongly supporting the nomination of Judge Barrett. The third Issa record letter for from Tracy Lovett, who was with judge barrel while they both served on this goat's Clark class of 1998. And then there's also an editorial by Derek Mueller, a professor of law at the University of Iowa College of Law. That appeared in that does that of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and this professor had Judge Barrett as his evidence professor at Notre Dame Law school, and he does say she treated all lost students from all backgrounds with dignity and respect. If I could have this entered into the record with that Thank you and Judge Barrett. I am pro life. I am pro life, and I see that judge by your faith and as has been aptly pointed out many times over by our colleagues across the aisle that That you are pro life. But once again, can we reiterate your stance as a judge? So as a judge, my personal moral beliefs which I have not I can think of. I'm not expressing them publicly right now, because now that I am a judge, I can't sign statements like that one that I did 15 years ago. But my policy views my moral convictions. My religious beliefs do not bear on how I decide cases, nor should they would be, and it would be in conflict with my judicial. And I know that you consider yourself to be an originalist as you discussed earlier with Senator Sass, and it seems that adhering to the originals originalist view would naturally laid a judge to carry out her constitutional duty of impartiality when applying the law and adhering to this philosophy as a judge takes real courage. And the courage you have displayed thus far as a federal judge prompted a coalition of groups to send me a letter supporting your nomination citizen Be Anthony list led this coalition letter that I would like to submit to the committee for the record. And I know this is going to make a number of members on the committee just very squeamish because they are a pro life organisation. But with this in mind, I want to take a moment to read part of this letter. Quote Judge Barrett has proven herself to handle disputes impartially approaching cases as a textual list and originalist who loves the Constitution. She has a jurist who rightly leaves politics to politicians and legislating toe legislators and I'll quote further. Quite apart from whatever policy views she may have on the matter. Judge Barrett reasons to a proper result in each case before her as a federal appellate judge appropriately following controlling precedent. In February, 2019. She joined a panel decision upholding a law creating a buffer zone around abortion facilities. This buffer or bubbles own case being referred. Teo is Price versus city of Chicago. Judge Barrett. Could you please give us an overview of the city ordinance that was challenged here and explain how precedent established by the Supreme Court? Hill decision influenced your reasoning of the case. Yes, I was on a panel. There is a challenge Teo, a Bubble zone ordinance, which essentially means It it wass To describe it. It limited where abortion protesters could go to do sidewalk counseling or leafleting with the things that they identified as the activities they desired to undertake in the expression of speech. Outside of the abortion clinic on the Supreme Court has a case called Hill versus Colorado. And that case said that such bubbles owns especially because this one in Chicago was nearly identical. As I recall with the one that was, it's taken Hill. Said that they did not violate the first Amendment. And so our panel you know we're bound by that President. Our panel applied that President and so as you say That was a case involving abortion. But my duty as a judge is to follow the governing law and that governing law in that case was killed. Absolutely. And thank you for that clarification, And I think it was important to point that out because in that case using precedent it did favor That abortion clinic. Is that correct? That is correct. Thank you very much. Esso. I would like to submit this for the record. Thank you. Now turning Tio topic of agency rulemaking, really sexy topic something that we have not something that we have talked about As of yet. But as I mentioned yesterday, when Congress makes laws that overstep the Constitution, it can be felt all across the state of Iowa, whether it's in the streets of Council Bluffs, Iowa or in the farm fields over in Clinton County. But Congress isn't the only body capable of overstep executive agencies can be just as guilty as the of this as we've seen in Iowa. In 2018 as a judge on the seventh Circuit, You help decide a Clean Water Act case, specifically Orchard Hill Building Company versus Army Corps of Engineers. The decision found that the federal government did not provide enough evidence to justify its decision to deem 13 acres of Illinois wetlands as a water of the U. S. I'm very supportive of a less expansive definition of Wotus and encouraged by how you approach this decision. Farmers in Iowa are also encouraged by this development. I believed then, as I do now that the Obama administration's clean water rule or the Wotus rule was unconstitutional, But I also want to talk to you about Agency rulemaking that I believe was constitutional, which is illustrated in a case that the 10th Circuit Court has recently ruled on specifically Renewable Fuels Association versus EPA. At issue in this case were three exemptions the granted to oil companies allowing them to avoid their obligations to blend renewable fuel under the Clean Air Act CE renewable fuels standard. These oil refinery exemptions, which were not disclosed to the public, were challenged by renewable fuel producers. Who said that they on Lee found out about the waivers because of investigative news reports. The 10th circuit concluded in this case that the renewable fuels producers were injured. By the way, is exemptions and thus had standing to sue..
"judge barrett" Discussed on 10 10 WINS
"Off Wins needs time for 47 Supreme Court nominee Judging Amy Cockney Barrett has been on the hot seat today but has deflected questions about her previous rulings, Essays and Mohr, covering the confirmation hearings is 10 10 1 reporter Al Jones, who has more on this live report. And Laurie will a law professor judge Barrett criticized Chief Justice Roberts for his deciding vote to uphold the affordable care act. But he insisted, But she insisted to Senator Dick Durbin that does not make her an automatic vote to strike down Obamacare. Our concern is that because I critiqued the statutory reasoning that I'm hostile to the And that because I'm hostile to the A that I would decide a case a particular way, and I assure you that I am not. I'm not hostile to the I'm not hostile to any statute that you pass. Durban also press Judge Barrett on voting rights and issues of racism, asking the judge if she'd never seen the George Floyd video. Senator, as you might imagine, given that I have two black Children that was very, very personal for my family. Judge Barrett says she's confirmed to the Supreme Court. She'll be her own justice, describing the late Justice Antonin Scalia as a mentor, but says she is not a clone. If I'm confirmed, you would not be getting justice Scalia You would be getting justice Barritt Judge Para dodge several questions on recusal specifically with challenges to the next month, as well as potential challenges to the presidential election. Al Jones 10 10 wins News Wins these time for 49 Governor Phil Murphy says New Jersey will provide $100 million more in federal funds to help small businesses and family 15 million. I'll be set aside to help micro businesses businesses with no more than five employees and which had been uniquely vulnerable to the crisis. He says. The state has already provided $150 million in federal funds to help more than 20,000 businesses. But he says the state needs more help, and he encouraged lawmakers in Washington to come up with another Corona virus relief plan. If you collect Social Security, a small boost is on the way in the new year. Correspondent Jason Brooks has the numbers. The government says it's boosting Social Security payments by 1.3%.
"judge barrett" Discussed on KQED Radio
"But I want to talk now about Her personal views on abortion rights, because that part of this is knowable, and I want to turn to Sarah McCammon for that NPR national correspondent Barrett was directly asked by Democrat Dianne Feinstein today about whether Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided. Let's listen to that exchange right now. Do you agree with Justice Scalia's view that row was wrongly decided. So, Senator, I do want to be forthright and answer every question so far as I can. I think on that question, you know, I'm gonna invoke Justice Kagan's description, which I think is perfectly put when she was in her confirmation hearing. She said that she was not going to grade precedent or give it a thumbs up or thumbs down. And I think in an area where President continues to be pressed and litigated, as is true of Casey, it would be particularly actually be wrong in violation of the cannons for me to do that as a sitting judge. Sama came in. I mean, we routinely see judicial nominees at their confirmation hearings steer clear of stating any conclusions of any kind of how they would rule on any controversial issues, especially those involving Precedent. We just heard, Barrett invoked the name of Justice Kagan. She also invoked the name of Justice Ginsburg a few times referring to what's known as the Ginsburg rule. What is that rule? Well. This is a comment that Justice Bater Ginsberg had made, saying that a judge sworn to decide impartially impartially can offer no forecast no hints because, she said that would show disregard for the specifics of the particular case. And that has been appointed to buy advocates of Judge Barrett in this hearing or leading up to this hearing as a reason that she should steer clear of these hot button issues like abortion, But as our colleague Nina Totenberg has reported a couple of years ago Ginsberg really did actually get quite specific in her confirmation hearings about some of these issues specifically about abortion and reproductive rights. And, you know, she said that the right to marry the right to procreate or not. The right to raise Children that the state has a very high bar for interfering with those decisions s O. That's some important context for that rule. Nonetheless, this is a common strategy as Nina was saying Justice Cavanagh, Justice Gorsuch and others in their confirmation hearings have all taken pretty similar strategies to point to precedent and to decline to say how they would rule specifically on an issue like abortion, Right. It's almost become a ritual now. Well, why don't we know already about Barrett's personal feelings about abortion rights? You can just lay out what we can glean based on her rulings for speeches prior testimony, her scholarship also, there was a 2006 Add that she signed onto several years ago. Go and give us an idea. Yeah, And you know, I am every other reporter who covers this. We've been poring over these comments and statements and some of them It's hard to kind of read the tea leaves and no, you know what what to make of them, because, well, she's been asked about this issue before. Sometimes she's writing speculatively about the way potential legal arguments could play out. And that doesn't necessarily tell you how she would rule but a few things we know, we know she's a conservative Catholic. Of course, that's come up. And the both. She and her defenders have defended her against criticism on those grounds. We didn't see her get attacked by Democrats for her faith in this hearing. I think Democrats are being very careful about that. But aside from her faith, Vera and her husband have been criticised for signing off on an ad in 2006 for an anti abortion rights group in Indiana, where she's been a professor at Notre Dame Law School. That called for quote, putting an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade. We heard her address that today and she's reiterated repeatedly that her, she says her personal views on the matter will not dictate how she rules. We heard Democratic senators pushback against that idea that and note that of course, people's views do tend to inform how they look at these issues. But That's been barrettes line on that her record as an appeals court judge is limited. There were a couple of cases where effectively she sided with e anti abortion. Position on some cases challenging Indiana abortion restrictions, although without getting too far into the legal details. That was an in bank review, and you know it, basically she, she said. Let's take some more time and consider some arguments for these laws. And who knows how they that would have played out because she was in the descent. They're in another case, though, involving buffer zones around abortion clinics. To protect patients from protesters. She voted to uphold precedent that allowed for those buffers owns to remain in place, so you might call it a somewhat mixed record their ride by standing on the side there said she said in that opinion Or she signed on to this opinion by Judge Sykes, who said they were bound to To uphold these restrictions because the Supreme Court had upheld almost identical restrictions, but that they thought the court should reconsider the issue. I think the most important the most important thing to think about when you're thinking about barrettes record on abortion is really what President Trump and vice president Pence have said, which is They would only choose justices that would oppose abortion rights that would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Now, she said, she made no such commitment to the president or anyone else. But that was That was what President Trump campaigned on. And he has no consistent record of appointing conservative justices throughout the judicial system, and Nina or Amy on that larger question of Can president make deals with Supreme Court nominees like promises extract promises from them on how they would rule on particular issues before nominating them. First of all, what is the protocol around that? And are those deals ever enforced anyway? They can't be enforced. They have lifetime came once they're confirmed there there. I know of no case of a deal. Oven, explicit deal aiming off some way before we were alive covering the Supreme Court. But I know of no such Deal. But what has been true it used to be. You know that you that the people who were appointed to the Supreme Court, we're not necessarily judges before they were often political figures. They were often Cabinet members and other members of an administration who are widely respected for their legal knowledge. They were solicitors general argued, argued for an administration. Like Elena Kagan. But that really has not been the case since Ronald Reagan became president. And he brother uniformly. Wanted to pick judges so that he could see what they're judicial philosophy. Wass and other presidents have followed that philosophy. In addition to the fact that it looks great when you're appointing somebody with some judicial experience. And if we could just hold on one second, we're going to take a quick break for stations..
"judge barrett" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"She's humble from New Orleans and now the Midwest. I would be the only sitting justice who didn't attend school at Harvard or Yale. But I am confident that Notre Dame could hold its own and maybe I could even teach them a thing or two about football. I would have said, and maybe I could teach him a thing or two about the law. You know, football. It's a fun little thing. Harvard and Yale You know, they don't really have Ivy League football that they they throw it around and stuff but its not Notre Dame football and so she did it, But I think she should have also said it may be a thing or two about the law just to be A little little bit sassy. And then she gave to conservative Democrats Don't hear this big. Well, first of all, they don't believe anybody because when you yourself lie all the time, and you expect your political leaders on your and Democrats toe lie all the time. You assume that everybody else is lying to you know that Joe Biden is lying about everything. Candle house was lying about everything. But it is horrible and finish. Kamala is is the Finnish word for horrible, So keep that in mind. But Judge Barrett kind of laid out I, I suppose in short a bit of a judicial philosophy. In a nutshell. Courts have a vital responsibility to the rule of law, which is critical to a free society. The courts are not designed to solve every problem are right every wrong in our public life, the policy decisions and value judgments of government. Must be made by the political branches elected by an accountable to the people. The public should not expect courts to do so. And courts should not try. That is the approach that I have strived to follow as a judge on the seventh Circuit. Well, how about that? What a great idea. That's like being a judge, Jeff, we're gonna take a pass. We're gonna move that other thing and we've got to take a break here and go ahead. But there's Judge Barrett laying out with the role of a judge's..
"judge barrett" Discussed on The Conservative Circus w/ James T. Harris
"Dot com the Senate hearings to nominate Amy Conybeare that are going on right now, and the Democrats are throwing to behave themselves slipping up a little bit here and there We suspect it's going to get hot and heavier a little further into the process and a lot of things are being said about Amy Coney Barrett and negative things. Let's talk to somebody who actually knows the justice. A Laura woke is an attorney in Washington DC. She is the first blind woman to clerk for the supreme. Court she served as a clerk for US Supreme, court justice, Clarence. Thomas during the twenty nineteen term and Laura's is a former student of Judge Barrett at Notre Dame. Welcome to the center ring of the Conservative Circus Laura let's get right to the point is judge Barrett now or has she ever been part of a secret handmaiden coat? I have to you I've been listening to the hearings this morning, and I, of course I was glued all day yesterday and I'm very happy to report that knows senators have really gone close to that line of questioning actually Senator Feinstein that the chief chief proponent about line of questioning is wrapping up her questions to the judge right now didn't go there and I think it's a great sign because it shows me that the senators may have learned their lesson from there that how inappropriate those lines of questions as last time and how badly it was received or were you Senator Feinstein and saying you know the dog moist deep in? People like Whoa and I think you may be right. I. Think that does Senator Schumer has reigned in the craziness because they do realize how damaging That line question was for for McLean Baird, and also for a-. Now you've called Judge Barrett in answer to your prayers can you tell us what you meant? Yes. So I am completely blind and I when I got to Notre Dame, I was experiencing a huge. Technological Meltdown and I rely on technology to do basically everything. So I was really in.
Amy Coney Barrett set for Day 2 of confirmation hearing
"The Senate Judiciary Committee returns this morning for day two of Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Cockney Barrett. On the first day. Yesterday, we heard opening statements from members of the committee. Republicans made the case for Barrett's confirmation. Here's Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham. There's nothing unconstitutional about this process. This is a vacancy that's occurred there tragic loss of a great woman. And we're going to feel that they could see with another great woman. Democrats, meanwhile, said they're Republican colleagues are rushing this effort, and they tried to paint Barrett as a threat to the affordable care act. Now today, members will get their chance to ask her questions directly. We've got NPR Congressional reporter client great solace with us this morning. Hi, Claudia. Hi, Rachel. So what did each party the members of the committee Democrats and Republicans? What did they try to accomplish in the first day hearings yesterday? This was an opportunity for senators to frame her nomination. They did most of the talking. After all, Republicans painted bared as a worthy successor to the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but in the mold of barrettes mentor and that's the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Democrats underscored the rush to confirm Barrett in the midst of a pandemic. Remember Two of the GOP members tested positive for the illness this month, and one Mike Lee of Utah, showed up yesterday, less than two weeks after his diagnosis. He also showcased what at what's at stake. Senator Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, who also sits on the committee dialed in to participate. Let's take a listen By replacing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with someone who will undo her legacy. President Trump is attempting to roll that Americans rides the decades to come. So Democrats highlighted concerns that barrettes nomination is being rushed so she could be seated in time if there's a dispute tied to the presidential election and to rule on an affordable care act case that will come before the court next month. So they shared worries that she could limit the A or abortion rights tied to the landmark case. Roe v. Wade. Republicans, meanwhile, tried to portray Democrats is anti Catholic, even though not one raised the religious belief issue right so yesterday was all about opening statements, and Barrett herself gave her statement what we learned for that. She said. Although she was nominated to succeed Ginsberg, no one could ever take her place. She said she closely followed Scalia's judicial philosophy. She clerked for him. Let's take a listen. His judicial philosophy was straightforward. A judge must apply the law as it is written. Not as she wishes it worked. Sometimes that approach met reaching results that he did not like. But as he put it in one of his best known opinions, that is what it means to say that we have a government of laws and not of men. She also noted that the courts have a vital responsibility to enforce the rule of law, but that policy decisions are better left to the legislative branch. So today, the official questioning begins, right and presumably, we're going to hear a lot of what we heard yesterday on the affordable care act, but in the form of questions to Judge Barrett, yes, members will question Barrett on our position on a lot of these key issues such as health care, an abortion rights. Each senator will get 30 minutes to question Barrett. So with 22 members, this could prove to be a much longer day. Republicans will use this to highlight her conservative judicial record. While Democrats will grill Barrett on conflicts of interest and how she'd rule on future cases will press her again recused herself in some of these instances, such as the day or if there's a dispute with the election, But as she's done during private calls with Democrats, you'll likely declined to make such commitments or share how she might rule on these issues
Lawmakers lay out arguments for and against Trump's Supreme Court nominee
"President Trump's nominee to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg went through today day one of confirmation hearings. News nation Washington correspondent Ashley Kits, supporters and opponents of Judge Amy Cockney Barrett demonstrated outside while inside the Supreme Court nominee appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Democrats like Senator Cory Booker painted a dim picture of how barrettes confirmation could impact the nation. States may write laws. They could subject women who have miscarriages. Two investigations to ensure they didn't have abortions. California Senator Dianne Feinstein focused on Barrett's potential role in striking down the affordable care Act. The case that's before the Supreme Court next month, Judge Barat You've been critical of Chief Justice Roberts for his 54 opinion. Upholding the law. Although Democrats say the Supreme Court seat should not be filled this close to an election, Republican Chairman Lindsey Graham says there's no reason to delay She's been a circuit court judge at the seventh Circuit. Since 2017. She was confirmed to that position. To buy parts with about partisan vote. She has heard hundreds of cases in that capacity. For her part, Judge Barrett promises to be impartial. I believe Americans of all backgrounds deserve an independent Supreme Court. That interprets our constitution and laws as they're written. I believe I conserve my country By playing that role. You could watch the entire process live all week at news nation now dot com
"judge barrett" Discussed on KYW Newsradio 1060
"Judge Barrett will be a vote to strip projections from over 130 million Americans who have pre existing conditions. Republican Senator Ted Cruz is a member of the committee and on NBC's Meet the Press. He outlined what he hopes does not happen during the hearing. Hope we don't see Senate Democrats turning it into a political circus like they did with justice cabin. I don't hope we don't see the kind of personal smears smears directed or family directed at her faith. And prepared remarks of the committee hearing, Barrett said the courts cannot right every wrong. Barrett would replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and cement a conservative majority on the court 702 now so one will fill the students start heading back to school. We'll take a look at that after traffic and weather on the way. Start sample over morning, Sam. Boys, You're branded a tough one. Today as we travel in south on 95. This is new approaching Woodhaven Road. There's an accident in the left lane. Now that just happened. Police still arriving on the scene with roads are wet this morning, and we're seeing ah lot of standing water. That's the reason for an accident south of the south on 95 south of Academy, Couple cars now on the shoulder, one very seriously damaged tow trucks, all lined up. Then we go north on 95 were jam north of Center city to north of Gerard. Broken down tractor trailer Right in the middle of the narrow construction north of this slow it would haven road accident accident at the exit ramp now off to the shoulder. Problems in the Mayfair section of power failure. Coffman in Frankfurt Always stop, Please. Also a cop in and rising sun lights are out and now an accident at the intersection, So just take it extra easy this morning Overturned car accident homes. Berg Frankford Avenue was blocked Solly Avenue to ash burner. Keep away from that. We're into town on the Scougall Expressway. Although it's trouble free, we're busy as you travel towards center city. Nothing. Major Westman already slow at University of the ongoing construction that will share problems on the blue route South Down Direction. Where Janet McDade Boulevard We have an accident closing Now they've been Boulevard Exit ramp it down Pole is the reason for this, At least. Now the Bluebird is getting by and now problems getting off the turnpike. This's the Northeast extension south for 76. Had just passed the exit beat be off of westbound scruple Expressway. Ah, Westbound Turnpike is an accident there just the end of the Northeast Extensions. There was stuff all over the place. Traveling in from New Jersey. Mostly trouble free. Okay as you travel 55, but that is jammed up in across the bridges were all right. Mass transit on or close to schedule. The cable W 24 hour Traffic Center on Sam Clover.
"judge barrett" Discussed on The Daily Article
"Her family faith and views. Judge Barrett would make history as only the fifth woman to serve on the Supreme Court in our nation's history. Similar history was made recently by the first two women to share the Nobel Prize for Chemistry Jennifer Dow DNA, and Emmanuel Sharpen Ta were honored for their work on the technology of genome editing. Their discoveries known as crisper cast nine genetic scissors away of making precise and specific alterations to the DNA contained in living cells as biological chemist Pernilla Vitton staff she'd noted the ability to cut DNA where you want has revolutionized the life sciences. This technology holds the potential to correct genetic defects in diseases such as cystic fibrosis cataracts, and. FANCONI anemia it is also being used in the Food and Agriculture Industries to engineer probiotic cultures vaccinate industrial cultures against viruses and improve crop yields, drought tolerance, and nutritional properties. However, genetic editing could also produce unintended biological side effects. It's larger. Consequences are also difficult to predict if used to sterilize malaria spreading mosquitoes. For example, what wider ecological impact might this have and genetic engineering could produce traits that are inherited by succeeding generations. This could eradicate inherited diseases, which would bring its own larger consequences, but it could also be used eugenically to enhance inherited capacities. All this to say genome editing must be practiced within the commitment of accountability humility and service. is its negative impacts could be catastrophic. At the recommendation of a dear friend I just finished reading. You've Levin's latest book a time to build with his usual Brilliance Levin diagnosis, the conflicts rancor, and despair of the present moment as a failure of leadership. Historically, our cultural institutions from government and military to media education business religion and civic groups have served mold the character of their members in line with their mission and values their leaders sought. To serve the institution and its members and thus the greater good. In recent years however, leaders have come to see their institutions as platforms for personal advancement. In status government leaders have fallen victim to the cult of celebrity many in the media have sought to serve their personal brands through their reporting in visibility universities have become platforms for faculty and students to demand social changes aligned with their activist agendas. Leaders thought personal wealth and advancement to the detriment of their employees in society religious leaders there authority undermined by clergy, abuse scandals, and personal ambition have become celebrities rather than shepherds. Social media is exacerbating the problem rather than molding us through engagement with contrary positions and experiences. It exposes US only to news and opinions with which we agree it then serves as a platform for trumpeting our personal opinions and seeking his many followers in likes as possible. Even the family once the Foundational Institution for molding character has been redefined as anything we wish it to be. We have become consumers who then use our choices with regard to gender and sexuality has platforms for personal expression. While I admire you eleven's intellectual gifts and appreciate his diagnosis of our crisis. I have less confidence in his solutions. The urges us to replenish ourselves to institutions that constrain our behavior shape our character, and provides structure that form positive habits, and he urges our leaders to replenish themselves to service and humility by asking themselves give my position here. How should I behave? These are vital solutions to be sure but I do not believe humans have the capacity to choose them consistently or successfully. Here is where Levin and observant Jew needs. What Christianity alone offers a daily experience with the empowering spirit of. God Our society needs people characterized by love joy peace patience kindness goodness faithfulness gentleness, and self control. But these are the fruits of the spirit not the product of self reliant effort. They're the result of being filled or controlled each day by the spirit of God they manifest themselves when we admit our spiritual poverty and choose to surrender ourselves to God as a living sacrifice, asking his spirit to conform us to the character of Christ when we do, he uses us and the institutions through which we serve to advance his kingdom for our good. Are you submitted to the spirit of God today? Did you know that the daily Article podcast is available on most major podcast platforms. It's also on Alexa Flash briefing. Perfect for your morning routine consider subscribing to the daily Article podcast on your preferred broadcasting platform and thank you for listening.
"judge barrett" Discussed on WLS-AM 890
"That leftism is a jealous God, It's a jealous religion. It's very funny, but many of the people on the left, sir just jealous in general, and there's a lot of jealousy. Other people's stuff. That is, that is that that might be the defining characteristic is a matter of fact. You know, there are people now saying that Judge Barrett because she believes in God and praise that's like the worst vice they can say about her is that she praised too much, but she's got these kind of kooky views. Meanwhile, these are the same people who say, for instance, that a man can magically become a woman and we should inject Children full of hormones. Because of this and a few. You disagree. You're a bigot. You know that that view that's considered not to be a religious view. That's supposed to be sacrosanct. But the idea that perhaps you know we have natural rights endowed by our creator that is kind of kooky and religious and and should not be permitted anywhere near the court. I wonder if some religious illiteracy is playing playing some role in this, you know, and that's that's why they don't see that what they're talking about, might amount To an unconstitutional religious test. I want to get back to the constitutionalism of this for a second, because, as you say, we've been disappointed by so many judges, and we thought we had some real winners and then actually on this question of gender ideology, Judge Gorsuch just just disappointed a lot of conservatives within the past couple of months. Amy Barrett has not been on the bench very long. Should that lack of a track record worry conservatives or should we be all in on her nomination? Normally you would be a little worried if all a judge had was just Two or three years of a track record on the appeals courts because judges in that period of time, especially when you're just on the court, they'll write that many opinions.
"judge barrett" Discussed on 860AM The Answer
"Back America. Here is the conclusion of my interview with Senator Ben Sasse of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Let me close with some practical things. Senator Lindsey Graham is your chairman. He's a fine man. He's always welcome here. I hope he wins reelection easily. I think he's made a mistake and scheduling hearings to begin on the 13th rather than the sixth because I do believe the Democrats will put a torpedo in the water. Did you disagree with Senator Graham on his timing, or do you agree with him? By and large. I agree. There are many different components to this in ways Democrats are goingto tryto skunk it all up, But I want the FBI to be able to their full background investigation update That probably takes two full weeks. So basically, I think when he made the right call, But I hear you're dissenting point. And do you believe there will be a vote before out of the committee in time for the Senate to move? With all of the expected delaying measures to a final vote on confirmation before the election. But what's the field lines? All senators are equal in summer way, way more equal than others. That's that's a Mitch. Call on the timing. My guess is it's before Election Day, but I don't think the majority leader has Finally decided or announced, and I think part of that is because he's got to figure out how to navigate all these delaying tactics. But my my gut is the Judiciary Committee votes about two weeks after the hearing starts and the Senate convert right after that. You know, I believe that Senate Republicans who are up for re election, we'll get badly hurt may be wiped out. If this is not done by the election day because of the late start do share if it had been an ambush. That would be one thing like Cavanaugh. But if we stop if we start late And end up not voting. Because of this. I think the Reprisal against Republicans at the ballot box will be extraordinary, Senator. Yeah, I you know, as one of eight in the 100 has never run for anything before. I do not in any way believe I'm great at political calculus. I think my my focus in this moment is on the opportunity for us to teach some civics about what a judge's job is, and I'm ecstatic that Judge Barrett has been picked. I think she's gonna perform incredibly well before the committee and my guess is we're going to get there to the vote in time that you don't have to have that worry, but I'm not great at the political calculus. Let me follow a CZ. Well, will the Senate Judiciary Committee be able to take up a nominee to replace Judge then Justice Barritt such as Kate Todd, who I believe was put on the short list in order to float her name because she's from Indiana, and we'll make a great seventh Circuit Judge. I also have high views of her. I don't know You're the legal expert. As you know, I followed that Chuck Grassley tradition of being and not lawyer on this committee. I don't know the technical rule on if the vacancy has to be truly in place, as opposed to only anticipated before the White House in transmit nomination documents. So it wouldn't I might guess is Judge Bear. It would have to resign from the seventh Circuit before there's a vacancy or that not so, you know, that is so although they could do the FBI background they could prepare the committee and I don't expect the vote to occur until the lame duck on Kate Todd. I'm just saying, if you would be open to Cape Cod as the successor to Judge Barrett She's an impressive individual. I mean, obviously, when I nominate advise the president on his nomination, I tend to push first from Nebraska District Court issues, eight Circuit Court issues and scotus issues. So seven circuits stuff is a place where I don't have a ton of juice, but I'm also a fan of verse. Well, the Judiciary Committee always has a tendency of Senator Ben Sasse good luck in the weeks ahead, keeping calm and keep reminding people About how faith is a plus not a negative and how your colleagues can't break it up, Please. Thank you, senator. And and then and good luck to you every day except October 24 friends. Oh, well, you know, that's not really I don't need your luck on that. I just hope that bleeding into bed for big red. Thank you. Senator Senator is referring to the fact that the Ohio State University gets to grind up Nebraska on October 24th into small little bits of grain to be reseeded is the seed corn in Nebraska. Yeah, There was a very funny video released at the beginning of the college season when it was all up in there and recast and led me into a little rabbit hole, and it showed the additional games that drew out for various teams, and I believe it was The folks from Georgia. We're hoping to draw Vanderbilt and somebody else and they got L s U Alabama is there two additional games? Well, they reconfigured the big 10 schedule and poor Nebraska drew the Ohio State University. And I think they had a year off of getting crushed by the Buckeyes, But I'm not sure I'm not sure. Baby. How are you baby in Kentucky? Hey, baby, you're on. Okay. All right. Honey, you think the Republicans would go to Yes, things get stalled out. Are we going to turn it over to jokingly called the criminal Tommy Karan. Well, then the other. They're not Khamis, but know what we're going to get it done. I think I think I think it's just going to be a question of. I wish they would get it done faster. Thank you. B B 10 in Tampa, you got to be quick him. Number. I am a Catholic. I'm a 20 year veteran from U. S military and on my master Mason. What kind of special hell do you think they have in mind for me? You know, my grandfather was a mason. I don't know what Master Mason means. What is that? Oh, you're that you've been a member of my son a glass for many years and moved up in the ranks. But it's a secret society. Yeah, I've heard. It's a secret society. But over across the river in old town, Alexandria, there's a Masonic temple that you can see for, like 100 Miles away were a biggest statue of George. Why? It's like the least secret society I've ever heard out. Thank you, Tim. I'm coming back..
"judge barrett" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM
"Port by the U. S. Senate. In accepting the nomination for a seat on the U. S. Supreme Court Judge Amy Cockney, Barrett said she will try to follow the example of her mentor, the late Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom she served as a clerk early on in her legal career history. Judicial philosophy is mind, Tio. A judge must apply the law as written. Judges are not policy makers, and they must be resolute and setting aside any policy views they might hold. Senate Republicans are preparing a fast paced schedule to confirm Barrett by November. 3rd. AH move many GOP lawmakers say is crucial in the case of delayed or disputed election results. At the White House. John Decker Fox News confirmation hearings begin before the Senate Judiciary Committee October 12 Republicans have the votes to confirm Barrett, but it remains to be seen if they could do it before Election Day. Democrats staunchly opposed the nomination, saying it should not have come before the election. President Trump on the campaign stump, staging a campaign rally last night after nominating Judge Barrett and he told supporters his plans for the next four years of re elected to a second term. I will provide school choice to every parent in America. A vote for Republicans vote for safe communities, great jobs and a limitless future for all Americans and in conclusion over the next four years, we will make America into the manufacturing superpower of the world, but about staged in Middletown in the battleground state of Pennsylvania. America is listening to Fox News..
"judge barrett" Discussed on KOMO
"Northwest's on ly 24 hour news station. Coma news 1000 FM 97 7 Resident Trump officially nominated federal Judge Amy Cockney Barrett to the Supreme Court during the ceremony today in the White House. Rose Garden. ABC is Karen Travers reports from Washington. President Trump had a message for the Senate who will begin the confirmation process something that is gonna happen on a very quick timeline, with hearings, likely starting within about two weeks and a vote potentially before Election Day, provide Judge Barrett with a respectful and dignified hearing that she deserves. And frankly, that our country deserves Amy Cockney. Barrett acknowledged the woman she will be potentially replacing on the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an icon to liberals who died just eight days ago. I'm Jeff Pooja learn. ABC News has now confirmed that it will be a me Cockney barrettes, a conservative jurist that President Trump intends to nominate to the United States Supreme Court. Joining us now is Andrew single. He's the associate dean of the law school at Seattle University. And the first thing that everyone's talking about is this is going to mark a sharp shift to the right for the high court, but What does Judge Baird herself bring to the bench? Judge Barrett isthe really accomplished. The quite young was a legal academic beforehand. He has the highest level legal skills. No one is building that. She also has a very strong record before she was on the bench, and Walsh is on the bench of being down the line conservative on most the hot button issues like abortion and gun. To motivate American voters and his she ruled on any of these hot button issues since he's been on the bench. He's only been there for three years since the president nominated her to the appellate court. Yeah, she's not. She's not duck heart issues, and she has proven to be as conservative as people expected when she was nominated. She has in two separate cases involving three separate abortion restrictions in Indiana, Casper Muslim dissenting, um, suggesting that pretty significant abortion restrictions Our constitutional. She is also significant out on an important about the constitutionality of a lot of pro legislation. So yeah, she is making a mark on the right in just three years old. But adding to that is that Judge Barrett doesn't seem to subscribe to the issue of starry decisis, which is that The courts tend to respect president by sticking with previous rulings. She's suggesting that the previous ruling are probably when the stakes are high enough in the constitution is clearing up and left. In the court. The court has given it previously. Um it's an out wire positions is not the only one that takes that position. But, yeah, I think that I think that she like Justice Thomas, who's already on the court. Is going to be someone who was going to be prepared to get a fresh look at a lot of president disagrees aside, Roe vs Wade what other hot button issues are likely to come before the court In the next couple of years. We're already alluded to very major to very major areas, abortion rights. And gun legislation were undoubtedly there What's percolating in the lower court and we're going. We're going to be hearing a lot soon. Um, you can ask that there is there is great debate right now about the scope of religious exemptions from various civil rights, Watch all rights protection. And they push from the right from much greater exemptions from those laws, and we think that Judge Barrett would be would be sympathetic. We have waiting a very complicated statutory challenge to the continuation of the affordable care act, which is due to be argued in. You know about two months before the course, and Barrett may be on the court by then, and maybe a potentially the decisive both there. Add to that, Of course, the fact we're dealing on at least a week with basis right now. It's probably soon to be in a daily basis, with challenges to various election procedures related and various issues relating to the coming elected and like any person that night. It's hard to imagine the board political ward charge. I'm friendly justice during the court. Is she do you think going to be a reliable ally to President Trump? Once she gets on the bench? I think that All indications are that the sense that you consider kind of President Trump Card of the conservative judicial agenda and return is embraced that Judge Barrett is No lock step with them on those issues. I think that she is an extremely smart person and a good lawyer and on the lower stakes issues related to procedure or statues. She might have a surprising vote when the kind of issue that President Trump cares about and the Republican Party cares about to be a very reliable But Andrew Siegel, associate dean of the law school at Seattle University, Thank you so much. Your money at 20 and 50 past the hour on Comeau News Come owes. Money report is sponsored by Propel Insurance from ABC News Wall Street weekend up one day and down.
"judge barrett" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO
"That there would be a vacancy created by Justice Ginsburg. That's right when the vacancy came up just a few years ago, when Justice Kennedy retired That is when Judge Barrett came in the orbit of the White House, and the president was contemplating a naming her to fill that seat. She made it to the finalists for that vacancy, but ultimately as we know the president chose as his nominee. Red Cavanaugh, who has now taken his place on the U. S Supreme Court, and indeed now with the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, a little over a week ago, it is Judge parent who has been nominated to fill that vacancy. She made reference to her as we just heard during her speech after the president introduced her, and she certainly will come up during the course of these confirmation hearings, which were expected to last three days. All right, John Decker again with us at the Ah, the White House there at the Rose Garden ceremony. Bring back as well. Josh Cross our our Fox news radio political analyst. So so, Josh We've now heard from Judge Barrett. Is this nomination moves forward. Do you expect to hear much else from Judge Barrett before? Ah, hearing day? Well, hearing day is coming up in a couple weeks. So that's a yes, but you know, I don't want to continue on to the importance of the timing not just before the election. But you talked about the Obama care hearing scheduled for November 10th that that's going to be of the possibly the first piece of jurisprudence that that parent has an impact on Judge John Roberts that the chief justice was the key fifth vote to preserve Obamacare not long ago that that is going to be AH, major major case. I'm already Joe Biden is making healthcare the central criticism of Justice Bharat and reference the fact that she she opposed the Roberts's decision, along with the other four liberal justices. When Obamacare was last up before the Supreme Court. I'd also say elect election law is going to be a possible hot potato for the Supreme Court if we have Closely contested presidential election and having having her seated before Election Day, mate Mate may be beneficial to Republicans given the contentious nature of of those types of cases, as we saw in 2000, not that long ago in the Bush v. Gore case, So that's that's something that the president himself has alluded to in his public comments before choosing Justice Barritt The point is well about these hearings that are going to come on. In short order is one of the Democratic senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Josh, if you know is a Senator Kamala Harris. The vice presidential running mate to Joe Biden. Harris certainly made a name for herself. In the earlier hearings for both Cavanaugh and Gorsuch, a very aggressive questionnaire a prosecutorial style of questioning of these nominees and really earned some bona fide there from from particularly the progressive in Democratic base. What's the strategy? If you are, you know on a national campaign on now, goingto have, if not a starring role, at least a supporting role in what will be the biggest story. In Washington for at least a couple of days. In theory, this is why you want the Senator Harris on the Judiciary Committee as your running mate. If you're Joe Biden to be that litigator toe have that moment in the spotlight. Making the Democratic case in the case they want to make is that health care is at risk with a 63 conservative majority. On the Supreme Court may be a five for potential majority to overturn Obamacare. They want to make that the main issue in the hearings. That's what Joe Biden said in his statement today. So ultimately, you want Harris to drive that point home as Joe Biden's running mate and is a critical member on that Senate Judiciary Committee. She was on the committee, and she certainly got some attention for her questioning of now, just this Kavanaugh, but she's going to be under an even hotter spotlight and Her ability to score some political points in her questioning is going to be very important and significant for Democrats. A CZ we look at this committee. This will not be the first time that Judge Barrett is the Senate Judiciary Committee. As we said she was confirmed to the seventh Circuit in 2017. Early in President Trump's first term she was viewed then is a fairly controversial nominee. She faced questions about her Catholic faith and how that relates to her view on the law. Here's a little bit of that hearing back in 2017 with the top Senate Democrat. On the Judiciary Committee. California Democrat Dianne Feinstein in your case, professor Would.
"judge barrett" Discussed on WBZ NewsRadio 1030
"We have Joe Batton fell with us Boston Herald columnist Hey, Joe, How are you tonight? A damn good. How is it going? Excellent. Just talkto him. Hogan, Gidley and I tried to get a better beer with me. I wanted to take Ah ahs, a presidential nominee, Judge Barrett, Amy Cockney. Barrett and I wanted to give him the field for beer. He didn't seem to want to do it, so I don't know what that means. Just I, You know, I thought it was putting up a beer. Maybe if he might have some inside information, So look, Democrats seem to be a little box on this one. A TTE this morning. How surprised. Were you with Mitt Romney coming out today? Yeah, I actually was a little surprised, considering how we voted on impeachment and the things he said about Trump before, so I was surprised about that. And obviously, that really barked like you said boxes, then the Democrats and they really can't do anything. Right now. Ah, to prevent the Republicans from putting forth the nominee unless Unless they're changes or something comes out about the nominee. That's controversial, or you know other people switch right now. It looks like, um, you know, they will be able to push it through. Well, your your piece today talked about the The idea of the Democrats should Joe Biden When may be packing the court they tried to do that many years ago. As a matter of fact. Ruth Bader Ginsburg was asked about this a few years ago, and she was a pretty emphatic that the the the number nine on the court has been nine for a long time. I think since Neither have you. Yeah, like 18 sixties or something right after a right before the civil war, and I just want to have Rod play this one cut. It's a fairly brief got, but this is the late Associate Justice Ruth Bater Ginsberg. Cut 26 Rob. There is no fixed number in the Constitution..
"judge barrett" Discussed on KNSS
"Hildebrand Kagan access news. Tropical storm Gordon made landfall near the Alabama Mississippi border late last night with storms winds blowing it. Maximum sustained speed of seventy miles an hour. Richard Pasch senior hurricane specialist at the National Hurricane Center in Miami tells us what the storm is going to do produce some strong winds and storm surges of up to four feet above normal four to eight inches of rain with some areas of highest twelve inches over the southern United States there, including parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, southern Arkansas and western Florida, panhandle. The national weather service announcing that one person died after a tree fell on a trailer near Pensacola, the confirmation hearings for judge Barrett for Brent Cavanaugh got off to a contentious start Tuesday. Fox's Chad pergram says numerous people interrupted the hearing the hearing got off to a pretty bumpy start barely the first sentence. Chuck Grassley didn't even get through it. And Kamala Harris, who's the democratic Senator from California started chirping about due process, and whether or not Democrats had time to read new. Documents that came in on Brad Kavanagh, then protesters started Richard Blumenthal, democratic Senator from Connecticut. Move to adjourn all of this chewed up about an hour and seventeen minutes before Chuck Grassley got to read his opening statement. Democrats say they have not had enough time to review judge Kavanagh's documents. And they also claim Republicans are holding thousands of documents hostage. Caitlin.