35 Burst results for "Jonathan Turley"

Left Wing Professors, Wisconsin Justices Raised Questions About 2020 Election

The Larry Elder Show

01:03 min | Last week

Left Wing Professors, Wisconsin Justices Raised Questions About 2020 Election

"Meanwhile, you have two left wing professors I mentioned this before, Jonathan turley, Alan Dershowitz, both said there were so many shenanigans in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. And using COVID to change rules altered regulations, quasi legally, if not illegally, and they felt that the lawsuit that Donald Trump filed overturned Pennsylvania should be taken up by the Supreme Court would be taken up by the Supreme Court and that Donald Trump would win it. Well, the Supreme Court did not take it up. But these two professors, both of whom, by the way, voted twice for Obama thought they would. Then this Wisconsin. Donald Trump follow lawsuit overturn Wisconsin. When all the way up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, they voted four to three not to take it up. But there were three dissenters, including the chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. She talked about the ballot boxes dropboxes all their stuff that they did that she thought was problematic. And she said, we should take it up.

Donald Trump Supreme Court Jonathan Turley Alan Dershowitz Pennsylvania Philadelphia Wisconsin Supreme Court Wisconsin Barack Obama
Prosecution in Rittenhouse Case Couldn’t Be Trying Any Harder to Reach Acquittal

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:41 min | 2 months ago

Prosecution in Rittenhouse Case Couldn’t Be Trying Any Harder to Reach Acquittal

"I keep thinking about Jonathan turley's analysis of this prosecutor at the rittenhouse case. And I wonder if he's on to something. You think the guy is like a plant? For Kyle? I mean, you're going to call rioters heroes? You're going to call looters heroes. People assaulting cops, heroes, here was town hall, senior writer, Julio rosas. He does great work. We try to get this kid on a few weeks ago, but he was traveling. Or maybe I have interviewed him. He's really good. And he goes to a lot of these scenes where these so called peaceful protests are underway. Here is what Julio told Tucker Carlson last night on Fox News. I mean, Tucker, I'm not going to lie to you. I got pretty heated because I mean, yeah, I was out there that night. And to call this mob of rioters, heroes is just an absolute lie. I mean, think about it. Being a call this mob heroes when they were attacking the place where he works at. I mean, this just shows how ridiculous this trial has gotten. And I think it just highlights the fact that they never had a strong case to begin with, but they have to throw everything that they can. To try to save what case they have because throughout this entire trial, their own witnesses, their own supposed video evidence. Only served to bolster rittenhouse's claim to self defense. And as someone who was there that night, it's just very, very aggravating to just see someone lie to the jury in hopes to try to save what his save his case and potentially his career. We'll see what happens. Again, keep praying for Kenosha, pray for that part of the country pray for the world pray for the

Julio Rosas Jonathan Turley Rittenhouse Tucker Carlson Kyle Julio Fox News Tucker Kenosha
Former Virginia Governor Douglas Wilder Expresses Disappointment With Kamala Harris, Terry McAuliffe

Mark Levin

01:41 min | 3 months ago

Former Virginia Governor Douglas Wilder Expresses Disappointment With Kamala Harris, Terry McAuliffe

"I wanted to tell you and I forgot but now I'm back About Doug wilder remember I had mentioned him From a Virginia governor first black governor of Virginia last black governor of Virginia He is disgusted with mcauliffe and Kamala Harris And as his reported here Yahoo Douglas wilder the only black governor of Virginia's history Is no fan of the video endorsement Vice president Kamala Harris made for Terry mcauliffe which is being played Sundays and hundreds of the old dominions black church I mean it's so illegal It's so in your face Mcauliffe is pushing it The White House has put because they know nobody's going to charge them They know nobody's going to go after them because they own the whole damn government Now when we own it right When we have all the branches of government we have whistleblowers Whistleblowers with their dog whistles just blowing whistles all over the place Oh and then we have congressional hearings We had the Washington compost and CNN You get it The ad which ethics and legal experts say a clear violation of IRS rules as I pointed out weeks ago is set to continue playing right up until the November 2 gubernatorial election They don't care And by the way I'm not the only one about a week after I pointed this out Jonathan turley said the same thing Anybody who is a serious lawyer who knows something about how this works knows that this is illegal So the Democrat party as it says here is pulling out all the stops to ensure black turnout even breaking the IRS law But a thumbs down from the 90 year old wilder a Democrat highly respected voice in Virginia politics for decades is significant again African

Douglas Wilder Virginia Kamala Harris Mcauliffe Terry Mcauliffe Yahoo White House IRS CNN Jonathan Turley Washington Democrat Party Wilder
Pelosi's January 6 Committee Demands Phone Records From Republican Congressmen

Mark Levin

01:28 min | 5 months ago

Pelosi's January 6 Committee Demands Phone Records From Republican Congressmen

"I want to talk about briefly. What Pelosi is having this commission she set up with all Democrats and to never Trumpers. On January 6th how they're subpoenaing. Members of Congress. Of the subpoenaing the former president of the United States. And Jonathan Turley has this right? In the Hill newspaper says he quotes this Chairman Bennie Thompson from Mississippi, a Democrat. And he says, We have quite an exhaustive list of people. I won't tell you who they are with those words. Thompson confirmed that a subpoena storm was about to be unleashed in the investigation of the January six ride in Congress, he writes. The targets would include Republican members, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, representative Jim Jordan. We've already been told to preserve their phone records to be surrendered to the committee. The Democrats are reportedly trying to prove their prior claims that Republicans conspired or assisted insurrectionist quote unquote Even though the FBI reportedly found no evidence of a planned insurrection. But these are the dead enders. While all this is going on in the country, while all this is going on in Afghanistan, this is what the Democrats are doing because they're good at this. They're good at Stalinist old Soviet tactics. That's what they are. That's who they are.

Chairman Bennie Thompson Jonathan Turley House Minority Leader Kevin Mc Congress Pelosi Jim Jordan Mississippi Thompson United States FBI Afghanistan
Liberal D.C. Mayor Bowser Flops on Last Summer's Riot Response

The Dan Bongino Show

01:16 min | 8 months ago

Liberal D.C. Mayor Bowser Flops on Last Summer's Riot Response

"Jonathan Charlie has a great piece in the hill today. Headline. Biden and Bowser administrations change. Joe changed their tunes on last summer's right responsible. They did. Oh, really? We hearing this in the media changed their tune, so they're tuned last time. Trump's of Fascist tear Gassed Everyone, awful guy. I'm Mariel Bowser. I love everyone. BLM peaceful protests, people We're going to sing around roast. I've seen campfire songs and roast s'mores around a campfire. From the Jonathan Turley piece. You could read it to my newsletter today again, But you know that com slash newsletter. He says, quote that was Trump out of the White House. Muriel Bowser's administration insists I gotta stop stopping mid sense. All right, I'll start with the guy I know that I love you get upset about it. It's just this is hilarious. Now, with Trump out of the White House. Bowser's administration insists there was nothing unreasonable the use of tear gas to enforce a curfew and is asking the court to this missile lawsuit by protesters, including black lives matter. Do you see? The media has spent the past year denouncing the Trump administration over its alleged use of tear gas seems largely silent. This material, Bowser's administration claims its own use of force was reasonable. This is

Jonathan Charlie Mariel Bowser Bowser Muriel Bowser Biden Jonathan Turley BLM Donald Trump White House JOE Trump Administration
"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

06:30 min | 1 year ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTVN

"So they've been injured, and I You know, as a lawyer, I think that's a really great argument. However, um, I know the Supreme Court. I followed the Supreme Court for decades, and I know what they do. They try to avoid getting involved in politically oriented cases, and they're still stinging from the Gore versus Bush. 2000 election contest, which I covered down in Florida for 37 long days and all the way up to the U. S. Supreme Court. And they will do anything to avoid getting involved in this and so You know, as much as I think as a lawyer, and legally they should be involved. I'm telling you that historically, they're just not going to do it. Your take Julie. That's just such a disappointing thing to hear. Craig is probably right. But You know if we went through these battles Supreme Court justice battles, especially red Cab not to have a constitutionalist on the Supreme Court. You think that they would punch on what is arguably the most one of the most important cases that they would ever consider restoring the integrity of our national election over rebuking this plan of Democrats. Democrats to steal elections by breaking lot, violating laws making up their own laws. That's that's really going to be hard pill for 74 million Trump voters to flow out. All right, let's go to what you've been looking at. And that is on some of the more technical side of the voting machines and another investigations involving the election because I don't think I think the polls are right. I think the people of this country evac accurately identified That these elections are full of fraud and laws being just, you know, Cast aside, Abandoned. No e mean partisan observers never allowed to observe all sorts of irregularities happened and people don't have faith and the confidence and integrity of the vote on we never will. I don't see it ever happening. So where do you stand on your investigation? Well, I will say a couple things really stood out and that Texas last 21 was in Georgia. The rejection rate for mail in ballots in 2016 was about 6.4%. This year. It was 0.37%, even though there were something like six times as many mail in ballots used in Pennsylvania. Obviously changing Kathy Books are changing all the rules at the last second, um, apparently defying another Supreme Court order Justice leader's order to segregate those ballots. I don't even know if that And decided in Wisconsin, the idea of Milwaukee County election workers filling in missing addresses on certification envelope and allowing those ballots to be illegally cured and inspected before the deadline. Those are some of the major issues. Then, of course in Michigan Secretary State mailing out 7.7 million mail in ballot applications without proper authority. I mean, that's the point. I mean, seven million without looking, for example, and again, it's outcome determined of live in a place like Wisconsin. Or the signature verification issue in Georgia or the constitutional issue that's emerged in Pennsylvania or the statistical information You know, one in one quadrant trillion seven of opportunity in terms of the anomalies in terms in the results that ultimately came out. And the unlikelihood that in any of this would have happened, which we've gone over and great specificity in detail. Now, the problem is, is you know is Jonathan Turley was on the line. The president's running out of runway and I was gonna have to land a 7 57 on a postage stamp at this point. Because a real time considerations Greg Yeah, the job of investigating is demanding this time consuming. The clock is ticking. I mean, today's actually the day China's You well know the safe harbor deadline, and so electors are being Selected by the states and you know in less than a week, of course, the electoral college meets that would be next Monday, but even Ruth Bader Ginsburg good really said the drop dead date is Congress on January 6th and then inauguration day scheduled for the 20th. You know, the core question is There was no question that there is was rampant fraud. Did it happen in sufficient numbers that change the outcome? So that's the core question, And it's almost impossible. I can tell you. This is the lawyer for 40 years, you cannot dig up the evidence and presented in Court of law. Stop this runaway train without brakes in the you know, six week period of time. That is a lot of it just cannot be done. So what's going to happen is that you know, lawyers and investigators in historians will end up judging who actually won. 2020 presidential election notwithstanding, whose inaugurated on January 20th. Weren't there varying analysis after 2000 in terms of some saying Gore won something Bush one? Yeah, there were and you know anybody with a brain could see this coming a mile away. There've been three separate studies and commissions that said this was going to happen. You know, years ago, they concluded that Universal Mail in balloting is a recipe for corruption and electoral disaster. There are too many ways to trifle with. Mail in ballot and it certainly happened here and I identified a few minutes ago. A woman look, you're talking about the Baker Carter Commission. You talk about the New York Times they're talking about. You know, everybody had said the same thing. And then they use covert it as an excuse the one time they didn't, you know, quote the great Dr Fauci. That he said It was safe to vote in person, You know, with social distancing, etcetera judges in Pennsylvania who are saying Oh, forget the law that we passed for. Exactly. Fletcher. That's their Supreme Court, Greg. All right. Thank you both Julie. Thank you. Great, Jared. Thank you. 809. 41, Shawn, You wanna be a part of the program? He's always been a street fighter who takes on the system and handed he is doing it today..

Supreme Court Pennsylvania Julie fraud Greg Yeah Gore Georgia Wisconsin Court of law Jonathan Turley Texas Ruth Bader Ginsburg New York Times Michigan Florida Craig China Milwaukee County
Trump campaign goes on offensive with barrage of lawsuits

KSFO Morning Show with Brian Sussman with Katie Green

01:52 min | 1 year ago

Trump campaign goes on offensive with barrage of lawsuits

"Has filed lawsuits in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Nevada. They've demanded vote counting stop so they can obtain access to watch the vote processing process or they've demanded the ballots received in the mail after Election day be separated out pending decisions on whether they should count it all. That was especially the concern in Pennsylvania before the election started. I said that I was going to be looking at three particular states through the election, and that was Nevada, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Jonathan Turley is a constitutional scholar and law professor at Georgetown. The reason I isolated those states was that their states where the vote was expected to be close. They're states where changes have been made relatively close to the election in either their laws, their practices and finally their states that they're dealing with either new systems or unprecedented numbers of ballots coming in from various sources, it turns out, those three states will likely Determine the outcome of this election. You know, we also keep in mind that things like recounts are good toe identify. Regularities. They're not is great in terms of changing the load count. It's very common in recounts to have just a few 100 votes nullified or changed. The exception to that was 2000 and I was doing that coverage for CBS, and we saw a great deal of Ah nullification because of badly designed ballots and also the infamous hanging, Chad. Determinations. We don't have anything like that in 2020.

Pennsylvania Nevada Michigan Jonathan Turley Georgia Georgetown CBS Chad
"jonathan turley" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

KLBJ 590AM

02:45 min | 1 year ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

"Prior here on the tide of Dodge that we're sure Listen, Jonathan Turley is with the George Washington Law School. He's a constitutional scholar. And, you know, I consider to be a very critical credible by both. What you doing? Oh, good for him. Do you mean? It's just He's very accomplished. Okay? Yeah. You know, you don't think so. You don't think you don't think he's credibly shouldn't listen. It was just that was just just a little humor there. Don't take it serious. I'm not taking your wounds. You're just going to distract a little sarcasm. I mean, you're familiar with his work, right? Not vastly. No, I'm not familiar with his work. Okay, Joe. Anyway, sorry to sass. Hilarious. I'm just trying to figure out where you're going with this. You want to hear from him? Tough crowd. Tough crowd. You threw me off track. Sorry. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. I have nothing ahead. Unless it was talking to us is well during the break our producer and you got some thoughts here on this laptop. And what are your thoughts? I. My thoughts on the laptop is that especially after seeing Bob Belinsky last night is simply it's It's very simple. It proves one thing. Very, very clearly. It all comes down to the fact that Number one. Ah, that Biden Joe Biden was says that he had no Ah ah ah idea of what his son was doing as far as his business dealings that is false. He was there He was at the meeting. There's proof that he was at the meeting that bobble in number two. Why the hell did the FBI sit on this laptop since 2019 and let you and I were just talking about this? The big question here is why did they let the the impeachment proceedings happen? Knowing what they had, which was absolute 100%? Proof of collusion here. Matthew is in Kyle this morning, Matthew. Good morning, gentlemen. I'll tell you about a job, but I don't want to hear anything about the laptop on the media. And you knew that like anything. I got banned from Facebook seven days because I posted a link to the FBI showing that they had 100 my laptop. And that there was proof that he had version and selling out China, their army everybody for this stuff. I mean, they're not wanting conservatives they're trying to beat. Everybody's so that the liberal media Alice have all gone so far left that anything to do with conservative Republicans are anything to do with the right. They're meeting. They're not talking about the walking. It's just irritating as all get out. Why? Why do we not know more about lab? Yes, but I'm not coming out. You know, The only thing I could think is there's a lot of people that don't buy any of this, Matthew. I mean, there's people in this building. They don't buy any of this..

Biden Joe Biden Jonathan Turley Matthew FBI George Washington Law School Bob Belinsky Facebook producer China Kyle
Amy Coney Barrett: Talented judge, popular professor brings solid conservative credentials

Aging Options with Rajiv Nagaich

01:28 min | 1 year ago

Amy Coney Barrett: Talented judge, popular professor brings solid conservative credentials

"President Trump named Judge Amy Cockney Barrett as Ginsberg's replacement, CBS News Legal analyst Jonathan Turley on her background Judge Barrett is in some ways a conservative version of Ruth Bader Ginsberg both graduated at the top of their respective law. School classes. Both went into teaching. Both started to write in the areas of procreation, a ll rights and Constitutional interpretation. Both were deeply religious. But most importantly like a Ginsburg judge, Barrett would come to the cord with a clearly articulated judicial philosophy. CBS has been Tracy with more. He's very highly respected, I could bear it is a favorite of religious conservatives for her strong anti abortion rights views, and, if confirmed, would move the court to the right for a generation. In 2016, she said. She doesn't think Roe v. Wade will be entirely overturned, but access to abortion would be restricted. I don't think that core case that rose core holding that women have a right to an abortion. I don't think that would change, but I think the question off Whether people can get very late term abortions. You know how many restrictions could be put on clinics? I think that would change. President. Trump first considered Barrett when filling Justice Anthony Kennedy seat After he retired in 2018, he nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh instead. That meant Barrett was already vetted by the White House that CBS has been Tracy. The

Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Tracy President Trump Ruth Bader Ginsberg Judge Brett Kavanaugh CBS Jonathan Turley Analyst Ginsburg Justice Anthony Kennedy Wade White House ROE
Trump announces Judge Amy Coney Barrett is his pick for the Supreme Court

Retirement Road Map

01:02 min | 1 year ago

Trump announces Judge Amy Coney Barrett is his pick for the Supreme Court

"Trump makes his nomination official picking federal Judge Amy Cockney Barrett to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. We get more from CBS News. CBS NEWS Special REPORT. President Trump says it will be difficult for Democrats to oppose federal appeals Court Judge Amy Cockney barrettes nomination to the Supreme Court. There should be a straightforward and prompt Confirmation should be very easy. Good luck. Very quick Confirmation hearings are expected to begin October. 12 CBS News Legal analyst Jonathan Turley says barrettes views align strongly with Republicans. The nomination of Judge Barrett is a major delivery bubble for the political base. Of President Trump. Judge Barrett is everything that conservatives have long wanted in a nominee. He had that Democrats have already tried to question some of her conservative beliefs. The Democrats threw everything they had at her during her confirmation hearing, including some attacks that were viewed Aziz, anti Catholic by many

Judge Amy Cockney Barrett President Trump Court Judge Amy Cockney Supreme Court CBS Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cbs News Jonathan Turley Aziz Analyst Official
Trump weighs in on birther theory about Harris' eligibility to be VP

WTOP 24 Hour News

01:38 min | 1 year ago

Trump weighs in on birther theory about Harris' eligibility to be VP

"Trump was a major force behind the Birther movement, claiming that President Barack Obama was not eligible to serve due to a racist conspiracy theory. That he was not born in the United States. Well, yesterday, Mr Trump cast similar doubt on Joe Biden's running mate, mate, Kamala Harris, who was black during a Corona virus briefing. He said he heard that the California born senator doesn't meet the requirements. Presidential candidate must be a natural born U. S. Citizen, a resident for 14 years and over 35 years old all requirements that Harris meets Justus. President Obama did CBS News Legal analyst Jonathan Turley says the Supreme Court precedent for this is more than a century old. Overwhelmingly, the courts take the view that if you're born within the United States, you are in fact a U. S citizen that has been challenged through history by both legislators and commentators, including some today, But the Supreme Court affirmed that people born in the United States are indeed natural born citizens in 18 98 in a case called the United States, versus Wong Kim, Ark. Well. Earlier this morning, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who's a trump ally, said that Kamala Harris quote is unequivocally and American citizen. Joe Biden's campaign is responding to the Birther issue, a Biden spokesman saying President Trump was the national leader of the racist Birther movement with respected President Obama, the spokesman saying. It's not surprised is the president tries to distract the American people from his Corona virus response that his campaign would resort to lies in their pathetic desperation.

President Obama Kamala Harris Mr Trump President Trump Joe Biden United States Supreme Court Senator Lindsey Graham U. S. Citizen Jonathan Turley Senator CBS California Wong Kim Analyst U. S
Supreme Court Allows Rhode Island To Make Voting By Mail Easier Amid Pandemic

WTOP 24 Hour News

01:02 min | 1 year ago

Supreme Court Allows Rhode Island To Make Voting By Mail Easier Amid Pandemic

"In a legal fight between Rhode Island and the Republican National Committee over whether the state can allow Since the vote by mail without having to witnesses or a notary observed them. The state had argued to suspend the witness requirement because of the pandemic in the court argued that the requirements were not opposed by state officials, and that they maintain the status quo. Given that similar rules were used in June, legal analyst Jonathan Turley says this may be an indication of what's to come. This in many ways is the residual effect of the Bush v. Gore decision. The Supreme Court suffered greatly in the view of Public when it effectively determined the election in 2000. There's an obvious reluctance of the majority of the cord to be dragged into another electoral fight. The order was unsigned. Justices Clarence Thomas Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have granted Republicans request to keep the witness requirements in effect, some major news from the

Clarence Thomas Thomas Republican National Committee Supreme Court Jonathan Turley Rhode Island Samuel Alito Neil Gorsuch Analyst Gore Bush
Minnesota files civil rights charge against police over Floyd death

WTOP 24 Hour News

00:33 sec | 1 year ago

Minnesota files civil rights charge against police over Floyd death

"The firing of former Minneapolis police officers at a rest of one is just part of the fall out of the death of George Floyd Minnesota governor Tim walls the Minnesota department of human rights is filing a commissioner's charge of discrimination to launch a civil rights investigation into the Minneapolis police department CBS news legal analyst Jonathan Turley given the level of anger that we see in the streets of Minneapolis around the country the state appears to be trying to show the public that it is moving aggressively towards

Commissioner Jonathan Turley Minneapolis George Floyd Minnesota Minnesota CBS Analyst
"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

07:34 min | 1 year ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTVN

"Listen to the program I'll give an example Jonathan Turley's piece in which he he's a liberal and he's arguing for federalism he said Hey governors you have all this power the federal government doesn't have all this power you do he's saying don't don't nationalize a crisis their national issues that have to be addressed it's a pandemic across state lines and so forth but in terms of analyzers missing in your state beds missing in your state we should now nationalise companies make the matter a hundred times worse plus the president doesn't have this power anyway warranty in the nation quarantine state the federal government doesn't have that power he goes on federal does it this is very important federal disaster relief and control is a relatively recent phenomenon the response to the Galveston hurricane in nineteen hundred with some twelve thousand dead was almost entirely by Texas after the San Francisco earthquake in nineteen oh six with around three thousand dead federal troops help maintain order and establish medical units but the recovery was primarily an effort by California now listen to this let's guess this mistreated you know one female was established the Federal Emergency Management Agency was not created until since nineteen seventy nine nineteen seventy nine its mandate was to coordinate national responses to assist state and local governments and disasters it was never meant to shift control of the federal government he says I was a critic of the model state emergency health powers act adopted by the states in two thousand two is the way to respond to public emergencies from terrorist attacks to pandemics has a civil attorney says I was alarmed by the sweeping language giving governors virtually unchecked authority I objected that they already had significant authority and these laws created absolute authority left entirely to the discretion of individual governors and now you're saying that my objection was cited seem premised on the idea that the best cure for terrorism may be a small dose of tyranny and also the model had responded by saying you do have to face hard trade offs between civil liberties and property rights of individuals against the collective rights of society we do not need to give up a little bit excuse me we do need to give up a little bit now the immediate trade off is that the authority held by governors is only as effective as each governor states remain in the best position to address emergencies and such laws gave governors ample authority to act but they did relatively little in the next two decades to prepare for public health emergencies now we've talked about this paternally does here now as well a New York health department task force report twenty fifteen has resurfaced warning that the state faces a shortage of fifteen thousand ventilators and a pandemic this is five years ago while the report did not call for stockpiling supplies states clearly have not done enough individually or collectively to set aside such resources media coverage has referred to the national emergency act along with other impressive statutory titles to suggest the president can order national quarantines and take over management of this crisis actually these laws follow the same model laid out by the constitution in leaving the responses to state control the often cited Stafford act this is the what they call the defense production act for instance merely heightens the authority of federal technical financial logistical and other kinds of assistance to state local governments it's meant to advance priorities instead of establishing a nationalized industrial base if companies have agreed to expand production to retool for the new products then there's no need to impose mandates under this law since that process I'm likely to go any faster this is why I objected to what the president did with General Motors in many of the people going out of my social sites so it was kind of swell kind of cool in fact nationalization could slow rather than speed relief and emergencies with replacing existing systems with indemnification some large orders business executives have incentive to expand production after General Motors failed to meet the expectations of pride in production trump info the act and that is precisely how it should be handled we have a strong disagreement there first of all the act has already been invoked the issue is the extent to which you enforce different aspects of it not invoke it so I wanna split that here sekali General Motors was already doing this which is why now the administration is praising General Motors General Motors can't move any faster or slower as a result of an edict it's just not possible there's one additional misconception on this that a more historical there's more have missed historical and legal many referred to the need for trump to use the same authority Franklin Roosevelt will during World War two the situation in the case is different back then there was considerable control exercised over industry the most companies had voluntarily agreed to retool to make the necessary equipment for obvious business reasons but it was not it was primarily through the control of raw materials and prices that the federal government could exercise chokepoint control it could expand agriculture production not by taking over farms but by setting the crop prices high to encourage expansion even with massive national control it took about eighteen months for a coherent system of production to emerge and that effort was largely based on price and resource controls and it goes I think I can count on one hand the number of civil libertarians who are left in this country I really do do you hear anybody else talking about liberty property rights federalism no very few check people say don't get in the way conservatism is changed with a new model consumers no longer believe in federalism a fiscal responsibility I want to give an example what's going on out there because of this massive deal with at least one or one point two trillion dollars an outrageous waste welfare is a man the redistribution of wealth I received this in the in an email involving a a college or university and this is the real deal I'm not going to read the name of the person who sent it from the college and university and I'm not going to happen to tell you the person who received it but I want to read this to you this is advice that was given to students on the so called relief for stimulus bill ready ready for this Mister Addison this is going to infuriate all of you the major university famous that.

Jonathan Turley
Senate defeats motion to call witnesses in Trump impeachment trial

WTOP 24 Hour News

00:54 sec | 2 years ago

Senate defeats motion to call witnesses in Trump impeachment trial

"Report today was a critical day in the impeachment trial of president trump I came down do as most predicted no new witnesses would be allowed in no new evidence introduced CBS is Nancy court the clerk will call the roll Mister Alexander the senators voted from their desks one by one the yeas are forty nine the nays are fifty one the motion is not agreed to house impeachment managers have cited the latest Walton bomb shell in a last ditch please for witnesses do you want your place in history to be let's hear the truth or that we don't want to hear it CBS news legal expert Jonathan Turley says house Democrats have only themselves to blame they blundered they gave up their record they gave up their case too early because they were rushing to a vote the Senate will reconvene on Monday stand down on Tuesday then vote on acquittal on Wednesday CBS news special report I'm

CBS Nancy Court Mister Alexander Jonathan Turley Senate President Trump
"jonathan turley" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

06:55 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"Team's presentation and if you had a look gloomy because the lawyers the president said okay let's assume everything the John Bolton purported to say when the New York times in factset therefore what the president said do us a favor when you look into this a phone call that Jonathan Turley said was ambiguous at best because in that phone call he also talked about Angela Merkel claiming she going to do more and she's not doing more in both the price of Ukraine and our president were complaining griping about how angle America talk to talk with us and walk the walk our country has suffered mightily the president of Ukraine said he felt no pressure there was no public announcement of Janet instigation which present proper poorly with healthy aid to achieve the aide with relief well before the deadline and now he's being he's been impeached and the Democrats majority of them want him thrown out of office are you kidding me and what are the two articles of impeachment well they are abuse of power what does that mean what's the law that he broke well he didn't break any law he just do you just give things a beautifully with the second one what's called extraction of Congress of what you know the the same charge that what was leveled against Bill Clinton no no the two charges against Bill Clinton more perjury and obstruction of justice in the felonies with the phone here I can turns out the whistleblower first went to the Intel committee chaired by Adam Schiff something Adam Schiff denied and even the Washington post given for parochial for his denial this is bad as you can get for the Washington post let me gather way otherwise his nose a stick in the eye that's how bad it is he denied that the whistle blower had any contact with the Intel committee oak with lower did before the whistle blower filed a complaint with the I. G. did the with the poor get some instruction on how best to file the claim you tell me now let's put it on the other had it's Obama being impeached why being paged because somebody filed a whistleblower complaint hearing something that he or she didn't like on a phone call a phone call to within sterben bios on the on the phone call but let's stay focused and this person turns out went to a committee that was chaired by Republican political opponent of president Obama and this Republican political point initially denied any contact and then later on we found out of had contact before the whistle blower filed a complaint with the IG and this is a president Obama who is enormously popular with his party to stroke his with his and without a single vote Republican foe to open up in fiery well a single Democrat vote to open up an inquiry into president Obama the majority house controlled Republicans do it anyway and not a single Democrat then vote for any of the two articles impeachment their terror alternately sent over to the Senate not one I I I I hesitate to think what would happen to this country you see how they want anytime anybody criticize Obama I told you many times about Morgan Freeman the actor who was being interviewed by CNN if you choose Mitch McConnell being racist because Mr Connell as the opposition leader dare to suggest he wanted Obama to be a one term president which is what the opposition leaders both to do Joe Wilson screen during one of the state of the union speeches when Obama said that obamacare would not provide care to illegal aliens who shot at you lie only for since of his obituary when he died racist but trump can be called a fascist and **** and Hitler and a tyrant and if there not a problem now tell me what kind of mentality is it that will fully distorts what trump said in Charlottesville even Jake tapper later on agreed he and others are wrong when they say president trump to they were good not to some bad not even Michael for conics also once again it which is you he interviewed Steve Cortez the one who reportedly was can from CNN because he kinda Prager university video outlined what really happened in Charlottesville Michael Scottish a weekend host on CNN interviewed Steve Cortes on his radio show and they play the entire six minute press conference and at the end of it Khan is committed to he and others were wrong when they were misquoting the president yet on the campaign trail Joe Biden continues to do it trumpeters continue to say he mocked handicap reporter he did not he did nothing of the sort he used the same walking gesture is it used for able bodied people as you for himself but they don't want that to get in the way of a good story that's one of the one of their top examples of how bigoted unfair insensitive president trump is and it doesn't matter what the truth is that's what we call this crop derangement syndrome now how is your new year's resolution gone so far I'm talking specifically about your resolution to get out of pain I'm talking about neck and back pain shoulder hip and knee pain well the father son owners of relief factor into tablet created what they called a three week Quixtar and then the discounted it to just nineteen ninety five is three.

president
"jonathan turley" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

01:56 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"The trump wants them to vote well I hate to tell an informed the ever so ignorant liar chef many have voted against Donald Trump on some important issues I don't Lisa Makowski senator from Alaska she's ticked off and she has every right to be and it wasn't much better you know with the fascist comment of Jerry Nadler you know I I think Jonathan Turley is analysis yeah he made a huge mistake you've spoken about Nadler during the impeachment trial and one thing you teach law students is that when you make arguments the juries make sure you don't insult the jury that is don't want to make statements that make them feel stupid or ascribe any bad motivations to them and he was referring to the moment Nadler accused the Senate of a cover up just like his call the president a fascist the question is is whether the Senate will be complicit in the president's crimes well that's a little insulting to the jury when you say yes absolutely without a doubt but if one was Donald Trump just keep doing what he's doing and winning and winning for Americans we're gonna all be fine through this whole thing that it'll go away eventually hopefully maybe by the end of this week we always hope in prior right for the best all right eight hundred nine four one Shawn toll free telephone number I don't think it's going to matter in the end and I do think in the end there helping the president all right records relating get this two hundred fifty million customers of a major software company spanning that the course of fourteen years now have been exposed to reportedly from unprotected databases they have now these records that were exposed for service and and support logs between agents customers from across the world containing customer emails I. P. addresses among other items now these records could have been accessed by anyone with a web browser who stumbled across a database but is really important we understand how the cyber crimes that.

Donald Trump Alaska Jerry Nadler Jonathan Turley Senate president Lisa Makowski senator Shawn
Impeachment trial: House managers push for removal

WBZ Afternoon News

01:08 min | 2 years ago

Impeachment trial: House managers push for removal

"The final day of arguments from Democrats as they try to convince Republican senators to support two articles of impeachment against the president abuse of power and obstruction of Congress yes news special report on their final day of opening arguments in the Senate impeachment trial house managers said president trump should be removed because of what had keen Jeffries called a toxic mess at sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue it's our collective job on behalf of the American people to try to clean it up president trump tried to cheat he got caught and then he worked hard to cover it up Democrats argued Mr trump's obstruction of Congress has been categorical indiscriminate an unprecedented managers Olaf that no president has ever dared during an impeachment inquiry to officially and explicitly ordered government witnesses to defy house subpoenas CBS is Jonathan Turley believes the obstruction charges a tougher sell than abuse of power this is gonna be the hardest case for them to make to the Senate in my view they should traded away CBS news special report on

Congress Jeffries Mr Trump Olaf President Trump CBS Jonathan Turley Senate
"jonathan turley" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

02:11 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"She believes people were still she believes people are stupid and she can get away with saying whatever she wants they're not about the law no she's not a law professor just like the journalist aren't journalist they are political activist if I want to see a law professor it would be Jonathan Turley by the way you see the threat Sir a Carter had it internal email obtained by Sir a Carter shows at the George Washington University student calling for law professor Jonathan Turley is resignation following his testimony Wednesday before the house Judiciary Committee the email speaks for itself calling too early a sad excuse of a man this reminds me when Bernard Goldberg wrote the book bias and he said look I'm I'm I'm a democratic goes but I'm I'm a I'm a fiscal conservative but a social liberal but evil Democrat but when he wrote the book bias exposing the fact that the mainstream media is biased yeah right then he was a right winger right exactly Jonathan Turley doesn't matter whether you're Democrat and you don't like trump and didn't vote for trump the fact that you said look the law is what's important not trump makes you are right wing radical exactly because if you're not with us you're against us and you might as well be a right wing radical just like Dershowitz Turley or anybody else who just simply wants to defend the constitution right like Bernard Goldberg sable know journalism should have standards in this what journalism is sorry your right winger there are radical now yes you don't get to say that because again you can't point out the truth remember to go after you I remember that was twenty years ago I would biased came out it was a long time ago I read over eighteen nineteen twenty years yeah so this this mindset has been around it's just xcelerated the last ten years and especially since trump has been in yeah it's where you have had the last feel emboldened to come out and tell you exactly the way that they think and it's scary it is eight six six ninety right I tips from JJ.

professor Sir a Carter house Judiciary Committee Bernard Goldberg Dershowitz Turley trump George Washington University Bernard Goldberg sable eighteen nineteen twenty years twenty years ten years
Anti-impeachment witness, Jonathan Turley, says he has received threats since hearing

America Tonight with Kate Delaney

00:16 sec | 2 years ago

Anti-impeachment witness, Jonathan Turley, says he has received threats since hearing

"George Washington University law school professor Jonathan Turley says he's getting threats following his testimony at the impeachment hearings in which she defended president trump Turley says people have sent threats to his home and letters to the university calling for George Washington to

Jonathan Turley George Washington George Washington University Professor President Trump Trump Turley
"jonathan turley" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

NewsRadio KFBK

07:44 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

"Heart radio out talking about tolerance or lack there of in a reference the other calls for termination calls for I guess a calling for him to resign referring to professor Jonathan Turley from his George Washington University position because he had the audacity to analyze factors and reach a different conclusion than some he did so with an abundance of of politeness and respect and professionalism and and skilled frankly none the less it was a conclusion that some people can't tolerate so they want I'm gone now look to the world of sports Sam Cisco forty Niners radio analyst Tim Ryan has been suspended for comments about Lamar Jackson this goes to Sunday's gaffe forty Niners Baltimore raiders game a Baltimore Ravens game rather where Sam Cisco foreigners analyst Tim Ryan was suspended one game by the team for comments he made about Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson on a radio show in San Francisco on Monday speaking on the air what do you think he says of the horrible some nasty you draw your own conclusion he said that that Jackson was really good at that fake Lamar Jackson but when you consider his dark skin color with a dark football in a dark uniform you because you could not see that thing I mean you literally could not see when he was in and out of the match point and if you're a half step slow on them in terms of your vision forget about it he's out of the gate well does what what's bad about that it would if you just limited his observations to the color of Jackson's Jersey and then invoke his says skin pigment would that be okay well if there's something wrong about observing the color of a person of their skin that would suggest that there's something inherently wrong about somebody who has a dark complexion who believes that racist fools morons I I think that would said the classic example of gross intolerance maybe even more so than the latter now they're they're they're both I think objectionable didn't nothing wrong nothing in the world wrong with with good people having differences of opinion in terms of how they reach conclusions with the same data the same information and there's nothing in the world wrong with the person being black nothing wrong with that if you suggest that by pointing out the fact that a black man has dark skin you said something bad about him I submit that did the person who reaches that conclusion is the person with the problem to get your calls nine one six ninety one fifteen thirty eight hundred eight three four fifteen thirty let's check in with rob in Rocklin rob good afternoon welcome to the conversation thank you for holding on yes thank you you bet I had a comment about that professor only one comment about Barry at front I it was clearly scripted I mean that was that was written long before she went in a cast I choose what I meant yeah I think that's for them in recognition genius for apology which I suspect that might have been also pre prepared thank your ride and then right at right right away to invoke the are to turn I should say the responsibility to somebody else yeah okay but I apologize but he did bad things to is this so it just weakens the apology I I do think that the the kids of the president's way with some exceptions of they're involved in in misconduct I think that's fair game to point that out of if any the trump kids are involved in criminal activity or they get arrested or they're and they're they're behaving badly same thing's true with any other public figure that that's fair game well you had on a thirteen year old kid it bringing his name into it to put it to British even invoke his name in a conversation which is says centered on the effort to remove his father from office that's the third rail I think it ought not be touched and I think had she apologized for what she had said in a dollar just a raw egg not was the wrongfulness of that full stop okay even though I agree with you on a percent it was absolutely pre scripted and again that in the name of the president's son has nothing to do with the the matter at hand I agree with your robin I appreciate the call very much Sir let's check in with Eric in citrus heights Eric good afternoon welcome to the conversation thank you for holding on are you done what I find intolerable is the blatant hypocrisy you turn your radio down oh sorry about that with the which yeah well mine Intel lose the blade in hip hop hypocrisy I was I was reading the other day where AG Barr had said that communities that did not respect cops would not do sure Sir or other cops not service areas but when you look on when you look at this administration and what the end is still acting in denouncing this today may today F. B. I. into R. C. I. AT and and top law enforcement agencies what excuses where is the respect and that and it also you know is this whole process and everything it just seems that he's being he's gonna be arbitrarily exonerated by proxy of his executive privilege what what what do you civil what do you suppose he meant when he said that because I I have a feeling as to what he meant when he said it and I can I can give you an illustration of where it's true what what do you suppose it is thoughts were when he said that people who who show no respect for the law enforcement walls eventually not have that law enforcement yeah well what would you think you know you go to well I think he means that if we're not gonna be respectful to law enforcement that in times of situations where a person will actually need law enforcement to provide them service that is not going to be there but I don't think that that would be the case though because I think there are the issues that would still probably law enforcement too so let me give an example given example right here in this region of the city of Sacramento second placed problems a fine organization leadership within the department is very very good but the city of Sacramento has not been supportive of their police department a council the mayor not supportive so what has happened in recent months people are leaving that organization in enormous numbers many of them are going right across the street to the sheriff's department summer going to other agencies in the foothills another suburban law enforcement agencies they're leaving in droves so in a having a difficult time replacing them even offered a five thousand dollar bonus to officers that would move into the city move their families into the the city of Sacramento I don't think many people took him up on it so if when you treat your your law enforcement service purveyors Chablis they've got choices they can go work elsewhere in you can find yourself with the dearth of law enforcement read resources one that wanted that it's really needed so I don't know that that was an improper statement to make I don't know exactly what he intended to express out of that but that's what I took away from it and I think there's a factual analysis there that tends to support is there a church call very much I'm gonna drag brake for other business we're coming right back after this don't go away building a better Sacramento news ninety three point one K. F. B. K. on fifteen thirty et al and your radio app I've been thinking lately life is good my husband has a great job and so do I the kids are on track for college I love our house but what if something happens to one of us the kids college tuition would go away the house would go away everything we've worked for just goes away how would we pick up the.

professor Jonathan Turley George Washington University five thousand dollar thirteen year one K
"jonathan turley" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

01:54 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"From all agents okay as of Maury show continues down with Brian Sussman it is seven oh six right now Brad Sussman for brother Brian and of course the big news is the Nancy Pelosi stood on high in the balcony the speaker's balcony of the house of representatives and made her proclamation surprise she wasn't holding two stone tablets in her hand she are you sure she won the big Robert wearing a big role but great giant beard from the plane flight room Spain thank you she did sound like Gollum whatever college putting that out earlier that was okay later this hour he got James person coming on I can't wait to get his take on this whole thing he will be a very unique take I'm sure Jonathan Turley one of the he's the professor nobody is talking about in the mainstream media you know they're talking about the three other ones this Noah Feldman they're talking about the a one from Stanford University her name is gosh you hammer Camelot highland Carlin that's Harlan and you're not talking to Jonathan Turley because he said some things yesterday that were very interesting he was talking to represent him Colorado can block and Jonathan Turley said under the Democrats abuse of power standard it's possible that every US president including Barack Obama could be impeached so by this broad abuse of power statement they're saying said every American president has on more than one occasion past the balance of power since the days ministration is done something that lawfully entitled to do Ken Buck was talking to Jonathan Turley and he asked ME said.

Colorado Stanford University James Spain Brad Sussman Maury Ken Buck president Barack Obama US Brian Sussman Harlan Noah Feldman professor Jonathan Turley Robert Nancy Pelosi two stone
Pelosi set to update impeachment inquiry status

AP News Radio

00:45 sec | 2 years ago

Pelosi set to update impeachment inquiry status

"It comes a day after pelo see ask behind closed doors if the democratic caucus ease ready at that was in the room say the answer was a resounding yes that meeting came as Jerrold Nadler is Judiciary Committee held its first impeachment hearing the facts presented at the hearing today were overwhelming with Harvard law professor Noah Feldman among those saying the evidence points to presidential wrongdoing president trump has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors but as Democrats charge toward a Christmas time impeachment vote to George Washington university's Jonathan Turley argues there Casey is too thin this is not how you impeach an American president and a Republican Debbie Lesko says Democrats need to give up stop this sham Sager may gunny at the White House

Jerrold Nadler Judiciary Committee Noah Feldman Donald Trump George Washington University Jonathan Turley Casey President Trump Debbie Lesko Sager White House Professor
Trump impeachment probe enters new phase

First Light

01:57 min | 2 years ago

Trump impeachment probe enters new phase

"Sure you are aware we are now in a new phase of the house impeachment process with the scene setting hearing held by the house Judiciary Committee when the Kenyan wraps it up for us Michael a tester hearing marks the start of the next phase in the impeachment process the house Judiciary Committee has taken over armed with the house intelligence committee three hundred page report from its hearings and ready to determine if president trump's pattern of behavior warrants impeachment president trump welcome foreign interference in the two thousand sixteen election he demanded in for the two thousand twenty action ranking Republican Doug Collins calls the impeachment process a sham just the hearing called for constitutional scholars to the witness table one of them was professor Pamela Carlin with Stanford Law School who reflected on the founders of the constitution idea that a president might seek the aid of a foreign government in his reelection campaign would have horrified them professor Michael Gerhard with the university of North Carolina school of law told the committee that is exactly why impeachment was invented if what we're talking about is not impeachable then nothing is professor Jonathan Turley was George Washington University law school urge the committee to slow down I'm concerned about lowering impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence an abundance of anger truly added he believes Congress also is being too hasty when it comes to the issue of obstruction that's the problem when you move towards impeachment on this abbreviated schedule that has not been explained to me why you want to set the record for the fastest impeachment Republican Jim Jordan a staunch trump supporter took that statement even further fast impeachment it's a predetermined impeachment but professor Carlin said arguing against the process doesn't negate the severity of the president's actions a president should resist far an inter interference in our elections not demand it and not welcome it it is up to the house Judiciary Committee to decide whether to draft articles of impeachment and if it does so to send those articles to the full house for a

Congress Professor Carlin Donald Trump George Washington University University Of North Carolina S Michael Gerhard House Intelligence Committee Jim Jordan House Judiciary Committee Jonathan Turley President Trump Stanford Law School Pamela Carlin Professor Doug Collins
Profs make impeachment case; Democrats say they're all in

AP News Radio

00:49 sec | 2 years ago

Profs make impeachment case; Democrats say they're all in

"When president trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate trump's political rivals it was an abuse of power so says university of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhard if what we're talking about is not impeachable then nothing is a peach Stanford university's Pamela Karlan drawing a foreign government into our elections isn't especially be serious abuse of power Carlin later apologized to the trump family for invoking the name of Barron trump when making a reference to nobility legal scholar Jonathan Turley says Democrats have not presented sufficient evidence if you're going to accuse a present a bribery you need to make it stick with Democrats looking for a house vote around Christmas time vice president Mike pence huddled with house Republicans earlier saying Democrats should be ashamed Jackie Quinn Washington

Donald Trump President Trump Ukraine Michael Gerhard Stanford University Pamela Karlan Carlin Jonathan Turley Bribery Vice President Mike Pence Jackie Quinn Washington University Of North Carolina Professor Barron
3 US Constitutional Scholars Contend Trump Has Committed Impeachable Offenses

News, Traffic and Weather

00:34 sec | 2 years ago

3 US Constitutional Scholars Contend Trump Has Committed Impeachable Offenses

"Constitutional experts called by Democrats testified before the house Judiciary Committee that there's ample evidence for articles of impeachment against president trump the fourth those season differently a lot of other Jonathan Turley call by Republicans said he did not vote for trump but he is still troubled by the Democrats impeachment inquiry in an agitated time in our country I get it your manager the president's mad my Republican friends are mad my democratic friends our man he said Democrats don't have the evidence they need

House Judiciary Committee President Trump Donald Trump Jonathan Turley
"jonathan turley" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

Newsradio 970 WFLA

02:20 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

"And watch the video in the class instructor you've probably seen the commercials and there's this remarkable story in snow flake melt down that's occurred with their new holiday spot which just rolled out right after thanksgiving so hold on I'm gonna get to that in just a moment I want to grab some phone calls because I've lost track of time I can't but the show's over half over already where where the hell of a time gone the hearings continue so if you're on hold hang on go to phones you in one second so speaking now so the the impeachment inquiry hearings continue the house Judiciary Committee the for a constitutional law expert the three for the Democrats the one for the Republicans the proceedings continue as far as Jonathan Turley goes a little more support of a little more help for the Republicans in the afternoon session verses the morning session annual Turley had said that you know he's not a trump supporter that he didn't vote for trump but he was laying out the reasons why it's not an impeachable offense but also early this morning mapped out the path of the Democrats should have followed that they made a mistake essentially and they didn't do this correctly from the beginning so I thought that was a little bit awkward in the afternoon no discussion from you know from Jonathan Turley include your conversations with another world leader cannot be impeachable also said withholding aid is not tantamount or equivalent of bribery and also asking for an investigation of biotin is not great but it's not impeachable and I said that all along that the optics are not great it was not a perfect phone call I'm sorry I'm not going to be a lemming and you know an **** kisser and say perfect phone call perfect yeah boss yeah but great perfect vocal it was not a perfect phone call but it's not impeachable so let's say you know some of the take aways from Turley in the afternoon and I will get into a little more during the course of the remaining hour in change hour and twenty minutes of the show here on a.

instructor house Judiciary Committee Jonathan Turley trump bribery twenty minutes one second
"jonathan turley" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

02:59 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"The Cold War is full so let's make some room let's go to Richard Louisville line five doctor logo hi I'm the only person the there are making good sense this morning was the Jonathan Turley he referred to the constitution and the the the actual question though the threat does think we're supposed to address which is anything that that truck did rise to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors he said nothing that he did rose to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors and I know you've been very effective in pushing back as well as your your guests arrive I want to applaud you for speaking out and we lost Richard but surf speaking out got we lost you for so I can keep going Richard well the other two are are part of the Democrats the the the Democrat party deranged but the other three Richard it's really to walk let's just take a moment Richard let's listen to the opening statement just twenty three seconds the guy Zach Lee what you just mentioned this is what a liberal constitutional scholar who's not a former Obama administration the lackey says about the current circus this is Jonathan Turley this morning cut six I'm not a supporter of president trump I voted against him my personal views of president trump or as a relevant to my impeachment testimony as they should be to your impeachment vote president trump will not be our last president and what we leave in the wake of this scandal will shape our democracy for generations to come I'm concerned about lowering impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence an abundance of anger I believe this impeachment not only fails to satisfy the standard of past impeachment would create a dangerous precedent for future impeachments I love the word port city did you catch what he said that a paucity of evidence a poverty a lack of evidence and an abundance of anger and he said my personal views on the president should be Rece should be completely irrelevant to the constitutional argument and Richard this is what the the the the of the star witness out of the three said recently in a conference about Donald Trump this is caught fourteen this is the witness of Pamela moss so last name called yeah Collis play that you know I came in from the airport yesterday and I got off the bus from dollars down at one from pleasant I walked up to the town as I was walking past what used to be the old office.

Jonathan Turley Democrat party Zach Lee president Rece Donald Trump Pamela moss Richard Louisville Obama Collis twenty three seconds
"jonathan turley" Discussed on News Radio WGOW

News Radio WGOW

02:10 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on News Radio WGOW

"The law professor Jonathan Turley is warning the house not to impeach president trump without gathering more evidence of wrongdoing if you impeach a president if you make a high crime in misdemeanor out of going to the courts it is an abuse of power it's your abuse of power your doing precisely what you're criticizing the president for doing Harvard law expert nor Feldman if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage we no longer live in a democracy we live in a monarchy or we live under a dictatorship Stamford laws Pamela Karlan the evidence reveals a president who used the powers of his office to demand that a foreign government participate in undermining a competing candidate for the president's house Democrats say evidence of trump's misconduct and obstruction of Congress is overwhelming I'm like moss one legal expert says the houses rushing into impeachment more from correspondent Linda Kenyan on Capitol Hill George Washington University law school professor Jonathan Turley says Congress is being too hasty with this impeachment process especially when it comes to the issue of obstruction that's the problem when you move towards impeachment on this abbreviated schedule that has not been explained to me why you want to set the record for the fastest impeachment fast is not good for impeachment and Hurley says there isn't enough evidence in the trunk case to impeach governor Bryan Caplan Georgia has formally announced his selection of Kelly Locklear to the Senate seat of Johnny Isaacson Kampusch decide intense criticism from hard core trump advocates who wanted came to a point Doug Collins one of trump's staunchest defenders in Congress on Wall Street stocks are back up today the Dow up one hundred ninety one S. and P. up twenty one points I am like moss AMS medical supply in CVD in Ringgold offers pharmacy great CD Olson creams at the best price stop paying too much for your aches and pains bring in your old CVD bottles regardless of brand and EMS medical supply in CD will.

CD Olson moss AMS Johnny Isaacson Kampusch Senate George Washington University moss Feldman Harvard Ringgold CVD Jonathan Turley Doug Collins Kelly Locklear Bryan Caplan Georgia Hurley professor Linda Kenyan
"jonathan turley" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

News Radio 810 WGY

06:20 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

"Ladies and gentlemen correction a three Jonathan Turley some nights we played were not from his opening statement they actually wore from questionings after what happened was that the ranking Republican on the committee Doug Collins asked currently an open ended question isn't Charlie since you were not answering questions for most part during the morning session I want to ask you where your general thoughts on all this he is let it run so Turley is essentially got an open ended question to expanded advises opening remarks and those three sound bites were an answer to the question that Collins asked which is open and basic Mister Charlie what we want to save all this SO Turley got a chance to react to the partisan extremism in that category but and gone on all morning any called him out on it perfectly all it takes is one voice now I say that from my perspective watching it I don't presume to be a able to tell you how average Americans walking through airports single in CM CNN here it but anybody paying attention to what was unmistakable Turley nailed tell me now what they're doing a nail their motivations for it and he made it clear he's got a dog not meaning he does he's not a pro or anti trump is these constitutionalist first here's John in Syracuse in New York is waited as promised and back to the phones hello Sir second time does I recently you're talking about the twenty twenty four Republican nominee whoever it might be yeah that perhaps it would be we go back to our old ways and the McCain around me like person to reach across the aisle and sort of forget about the ledges Romney McCain take your pick all right listen I I must totally disagree with that point man on yeah I know it's hard to hear when it when trump history no no it's not hard to be here it's unbelievable but it's it's not our anyway I told his done such an excellent job exposing everything as you and and many people know so well the corruption in the double standards that the total ball that's out there in this one and my point is the next person that we Republicans nominee will be someone more exactly like Donald Trump well yeah I I think I see what you're so you're saying that the next field of candidates is going to have people in it that have learned the lessons of drop by the day will get your support I understand that let me ask you this though how many Republicans followed the example of Ronald Reagan downtown tantamount content Dantan dont answer zero what's the first thing that happened after Ronald Reagan left office gonna have a kinder gentler nation but that did not happen in the campaign that happened after the nomination was secured in after the election was achieved during the campaign we were told that we were going to get Reagan's third term stand we got read my lips no new taxes and we got new taxes and we got we got a kinder gentler nation and a New World order so after that who then stepped up everybody agreed the eighties where this monstrous economic decade and they will over the military was rebuilt we vanquish the Soviet Union we recovered from the Malays in Jimmy Carter who picked up the mantle answer nobody the Republican Party was so eager to get rid of Reagan and go back the what they were before hand and what they wanna wise knowing their players in the Washington establishment except in the second tier citizens in the Washington establishment we had George W. bush who as governor of Texas did a fairly good imitation of Reagan ran for president and his campaign was rubber came out of no where was beaten everybody in fund raising some male workers ever thought it was gonna be jab George W. bush got selected Florida recount eight years later his approval numbers are in the thirties then we got to move forward we lost and in two thousand eight because McCain said it was time to get back to our roots which means pre Reagan we know what happened there and trump comes along and she just wipes out the field I had a couple people I feel Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio at times were were trying to distance himself from the establishment what is considered to be a slam dunk winner of the twenty sixteen primaries answer jab how many delegates a jab get three so the question becomes will the Republican Party become the party of trump that could very well I mean look at it eight years while five years from now is a long time and a lot of young people growing up and entering politics to admire and idolize trump and want to continue trump is on the the the baby boom generation re Popper member politics is where seventy five an eighty year old guys are still stars in the real Shelby as they're in the old folks home in Washington their committee chairman party chairman anyway I'm out of time here got a quick time out don't go away.

Jonathan Turley questionings eight years eighty year five years
"jonathan turley" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

Newsradio 1200 WOAI

03:39 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

"Stephen somebody Jonathan Turley he is the okay anti impeachment the scholar at the hearings today but I want to get started on the phones in Cincinnati run your next it's great to have you Sir hello thank you for taking my call rush Megadeth thank you thank you very much Sir you bet Hey I know they're gonna have if if the impeachment goes through then it'll go to the Senate where you'll have a few prominent never Republicans sitting on the jury Romney prominent among them and I'm curious what are your thoughts on how listening to all the evidence and then having the cast his vote how that'll affect whether or not you can continue to be allowed now in the area that he that look I want to ask you a question I don't want you to miss understand my tone and I don't want you to misunderstand everything I'm genuinely curious why do you care what Mitt Romney is going to say think or do it's less about Mitt Romney and more about the never comp Republican Russia hi I spoke to you right before the twenty twelve election for twenty sixteen election and I ask what you thought of the never trump Republican and that I can't sleep current might get impeached thank you you thought I was shrewd night pointed to the constitution and that the founders gave us just a tremendous tool for handling situations like that though it's less about Romney and more about the never campers it and me as a as a fan of the constitution first I'm live in that next term comping them you know it literally you not come card he's jumping them the the never transfers or the or the Democrats never trumpeters yes I did he's got the Democrats so far under water on this unbelievable but now he has an opportunity to shut up even the Republicans which I'm delighted for if the Senate trial goes that's what I'm really I see see the thing about the thing about this is the Democrats don't think they're under water thank the winning and Romney doesn't think he's under water one is still believes is going to be able to get rid of trump shuttle never try news radio twelve hundred W. away on San Antonio I heart radio station the impeachment inquiry no the latest from fox news hi Lilian Wu free lessons on the hill today from experts at the first house Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings we the fourteenth who was a bit of a recidivist when it came to price Charles the second huge amount of money that's professor Jonathan Turley of George town who believe that impeachment might be premature another witness also talking monarchs I cannot help but concluded this president has attacked each of the constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country you in C. law school professor Michael Gerhart is one of three constitutional experts recommending impeachment at this is from the W. away I traffic.

Jonathan Turley Cincinnati Stephen twelve hundred W
"jonathan turley" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

07:52 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on KTOK

"We have John Solomon coming up the testimony also Jonathan Turley and nicked Apollo joins us now he is the host of the next Apollo show and you confinement is website Nick dip dot com how are you wait a ban lover is it this impeachment hearing thing is just relentless I gave up on it we already know how it's gonna work impeached in the house and then he's not gonna get convicted in this sets like following a bad Judd Apatow movie the boyfriends are to be that idiot at the end of the garage and stay here all right I suggest you start watching more wrestling and football blend don't follow this crap I think a I are you really I follow it against my will I finally get because I'm paid to follow it but I understand of I don't even know I have no idea how anyone thinks this is going to end up in their favor how does any Democrats think this is going to end up in their favor I think at this point they're just doing it because they're not legislating but not the one their jobs so they have to look busy and they've wanted trump's head since he came down the escalator but you're right it's going to blow up in their face and I went to school with Jonathan Turley I went to George Washington and that he try to cheat operates so we keep it off and I went to that school basically well there's a chance you're a pretty severe pretty smart guy but it sounded like that two point four business administration at the university of Maine and that's with cheating right right so early is good so Nick what have you been what do you been paying attention to what you've been following what is now the NFL we got a real gambling problem so what do you think of this Colin Kaepernick things that what was it I think he had an opening they're going through everybody I think they called my daughter you know would you be willing to trial Capper Nick nothing I called your daughter too yes okay that's disturbing really I have no idea what you okay but even I have a daughter who's thirty and thirty thirty one that still disturbing but your call center yes three oh come on Capranica is a he's a patriot he's a true American he loves this country let me I just as hair cut says I hate Whitey okay I can't stand is telling me aired he's a bi racial he acts like he's two thousand is that black he's at Alcatraz the other day talking to our native Americans even you really think do you get your really thank a team was going to bite on him this stadiums as still empty but because of the crappy polled and who who would who would be dumb enough even when the Detroit Lions pass on you I'm not exactly the New England Patriots yeah I mean you know I was just I mean I was I was thinking about it when he did this you know he did his own try out many wanted his own place to do the try out and I got what team even if he was great what team wants this kind of hassle all the time this kind of drama all the time it would destroy a team I I agree with that at the but then you know Bella check would have to Antonio brown so I started to have second but yeah that guy's a cancer he did such damage to the NFL I really believe these half empty stadiums which you don't hear about have to deal with that whole thing about nailing down he started all of it and there's no team desperate enough did to bring this on I I really believe that he he's finished he's gonna find something else that night he's made him azalea Adair so what it what is anybody even buy anything Nike anymore I don't know I honestly don't know it's not forget that Colin Kaepernick lost his job to Blaine Gabbert before he started kneeling this is not an object and raise it into a still on a motion this is a country gender or and and the systemic racism that keeps this guy down I have to tell you I think there's a massive backlash coming toll this there is everything in me says that it it's falling apart and it if there's just going to be a that's just a large group of Americans who just stand up ago shot up a shot as they stand up during the national anthem I don't have a problem with it when you say back I think you talk about the impeachment again we talk about captain at the impeding anti American Adam Schiff or calling capital did use did you see what eighteen T. and shifted they they somehow or another yeah I got the phone records of the cold share new new new new yes I am the president and his and his personal attorney that's insane how did they do that that's that's hacking I'm in my the the the Washington post said the mobile is presumably with a warrant well right there you're supposed to work as a as a journalist publication isn't presumably that you don't want to say we we heard and yeah I mean we just presume they're doing this the right way the bath room attendant at the Verizon building her guy to a guy who got no ideas this is all I'm they handed it's all baloney Adam Schiff is creepy he's drunk with power and just after after two and a half years of the Russian investigation I I can't believe people are still saying yes trump should be impeached this country deserves what he got I'm telling you I don't think people are saying that nobody nobody I talked to over the holiday no nobody was talking about this well that's a great that's a great sample size Glenn you and your uncle and no no no no but I guess I best other people as well I mean were you really having arguments about this at the at the dinner table because at the dinner table even my dinner table during the election there was all kinds of back and forth and you know polite but all kinds of back and forth not on this just like I don't care well I got my sister in law in a headlock we knocked over the Turkey and cranberry set up I almost joked around it and it just stuck my way click that was all we're gonna get back to the news here in a second but Nick before before we take a break here on this artist of this Saturday Glenn back is going on the stage in Salt Lake City for his Christmas show which some have described as a stand up comedy in the past now I am interested to see what your opinion would be this is something differently and I'm wondering if there's a way if we were to get you a video of some of this performance only if you would create a little kid there are and and let us know if Glen is actually good at this activity well sort of like a dancing with the stars thank you we one of the jocks yeah was it the word roast yeah I know I don't think I mean I couldn't do a roast on the climb back they don't get arrested but I would love to see this footage now.

John Solomon Jonathan Turley Nick
"jonathan turley" Discussed on Thunder Radio

Thunder Radio

02:01 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on Thunder Radio

"The less Jonathan Turley. There was great anticipation with the democratic takeover of the house that an impeachment would be forthcoming. But that is clearly, not the case, the effort to move on contempt against people like Bill bar. Seems like an effort to try to appease those members of the party that are demanding action. The vote would authorize the judiciary committee to go to court to try to enforce it subpoenas. The federal government and congress are launching an investigation of some of the giants at the tech industry. CBS's Nancy Cortes with detail. The source within the tech industry tells us that to federal agencies, the Justice department and the Federal Trade Commission or going to split up, what will surely be a massive investigation DOJ's going to handle apple and Google while the FTC, examines Facebook and Amazon now these investigations com as the Silicon Valley giants battled questions about consumer privacy and misuse of. Personal data as well as the ability of foreign countries to manipulate their platforms to spread disinformation, Virginia Beach. Authorities have released the resignation letter sent by the man who went on a shooting rampage at the municipal building on Friday. CBS's Jim Krasula has more. Forty year old Dwayne critics partially redacted resignation letter gave no hint about what he planned to do or why he submitted it via Email last Friday morning just hours before he fatally shot twelve people at a Virginia Beach. Virginia municipal building. He said it had been a pleasure to work for the city, but quote due to personal reasons I must relieve my position he was an engineer with the city for fifteen years. Jim Krasula, CBS news, Buckingham Palace rolled out the red carpet for President Trump and the first lady today with Queen, Elizabeth, offering a toast at a state dinner tonight to celebrate nine President Trump called Britain's longest reigning monarch, a great, great woman for a toast, to the. Attornal friendship.

Jim Krasula CBS Jonathan Turley Virginia Beach President Trump Federal Trade Commission federal government Virginia judiciary committee Bill bar Buckingham Palace Nancy Cortes Facebook President DOJ congress Dwayne apple
"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTMJ 620

WTMJ 620

13:20 min | 2 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTMJ 620

"Eric Harley and I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye so yeah, this is really not unexpected. Where the Democrats are going. We told you this two weeks ago. We said they had no other choice because they know where the investigation is going right now, you're going to see, you know, comas out. Now, everybody's trying to get ahead of the curve because they know where the investigation of volume bar is going the job of the Democrats in the house is to attempt to destroy his reputation, even though they can't. And so what they have. It's what it what they're doing. Here is exactly I believe with Jonathan Turley is saying Democrats showing the his piece in the hill. Democrats showing contempt by holding William barring contempt now Jonathan Turley is. Is a constitutional law. Professor who is not a Trump fan. He's like Dershowitz not a Trump fan. But is somebody who understands and promotes the rule of law and the constitution. And as he writes here House Judiciary, chairman Jerrold, Nadler, laid out the case for contempt. He raised three often repeated complaints about bar. In that he failed to release unredacted report by Robert Muller. Allegedly. Lied to congress and refused to appear before the committee, yet, notably. The only claim the committee seeks to put before the federal court is the redaction of the report that seems rather curious since if bar lied or refused a subpoena as house leaders claim it normally would be an easy case of contempt. The reason for this move is at House Democrats. No, both claims could not withstand even a cursory judicial review that it would be thrown out immediately. As will the redaction the redaction is extremely weakened as he pointed that goes look hit in lie. We didn't lie there there weren't there weren't false statements. They're making that claim without ever having to prove it in court because their only goal is political hackery is the fact that they know what's coming down. They know that bar is the point man on all the investigations. And so they need to destroy or defame his reputation, and they know they'll get the media on this. They'll they'll have them on board for every step of this. You you basically throw everything at bar at the administration at the president that you can on this and you go overboard for a reason you're wanting the administration to react. I fully believe that they knew or they believed that it was a strong possibility that the president would use executive privilege. They I I think that they knew when they threw up the conditions for bar to appear in the house. They knew he would not do that. Because they knew it was it would be breaking the rules. Right. But but that is not the point for them. The point is to have bar not show up. What they're doing is that they're over basically over serving. They just keep growing lobbing anything and everything that they can to put the administration on the defensive and make them look like they're hiding something. As early writes. This leaves us with only the only ground cited by Democrats for content which is bar refusing to release the unredacted report Senate Democrats attacked him at his confirmation hearing. For refusing to guarantee public release of the report without reductions as a witness is Jonathan Turley saying this I testified that they were asking bar to commit a potential criminal act to secure his own confirmation. Yeah. The report inevitably would contain some grand jury material which under law is information that cannot be publicly released without a court order. It is a crime to unveil such information bar promise to release much of the report is possible. And he is delivered. Indeed, he is not expressly given the thorny to release. The confidential report yet he not only released it, but declared executive privilege waved on its content. The key obstruction portion of the report is virtually unredacted. Just eight percent of the public report was redacted largely to remove material that could undermine ongoing investigations the. The sealed version of the report given to congress only had two percent redacted Democrats are therefore seeking a content sanction on a report that is ninety eight percent disclosed and only lacks grand jury material bar restricted access to ninety eight percent. To the ninety eight percent disclosed report as opposed to the ninety two percent public report due to the inclusion of evidence impacting ongoing prosecutions, which by the way, those reductions came from who Muller he is offered to expand the number of members and staff to review material but insists it remains protected, but this has nothing to do with reductions it is just to a two percent solution to a major political dilemma to the left face with a report that rejected the collusion theories of their running narrative. Democrats want to focus on those two percent of reductions rather than on the over four hundred pages of finding so congress now will ask a court defined civil contempt for bar for refusing to release grand jury information. The district of Columbia, circuit court of appeals recently rejected a district court claim to have the inherent supervisory authority to disclose grand jury matters because of the great public interest to make matters worse. Justice department has now said the president has invoked executive privilege over the entire report making this contempt. Claim even less likely to prevail over the long run. Democrats are launching the weakest possible contempt claim against the administration in a civil action with the long track record to the courts in the end. There is utter contempt in this action, but not in the case of bar, but in the case of congress. Yes, what do you mean? Yeah. That's a great point. Because they're. I don't know few months ago. I forget which incident it was. But our point was with the Democrats they act as if a subpoena changes the rules in loss. It does not does not. Again, this is this is a play to have the administration and the president look like he's hiding something. Throw everything at them. They knew the house committee knew that bar would not agree to those conditions. They knew he wouldn't show up. They knew they had. I think they suspected if they kept going on this that it might get the president to to invoke executive privilege, and that makes it look like he's hiding something that ler earlier during the day on Wednesday. We this is a constitutional crisis. No, it's not it is not it can be if you keep acting this way where you believe a subpoena changes the constitution or the laws. Well, here's here's the point Democrats lose if he believes he has a case instead of just accusing somebody bring it before the federal court. Yes, if you're going if you're going to say thank about, the lack of courage and the lack of guts, Democrats whose. Hiding something. Right. Who's hiding something? They make an allegation. And so what they should do with that contempt allegation is go to court on it. If your screaming, he won't appear. Right. If you're a democrat, you should be screaming that Nadler, and the Democrats will not take that to court. They're just going to let it sit there. But as a democrat, you probably already know if you're paying attention that they don't have a case here. And so you agree with Nadler because you understand it's just pure political hackery. And that's what you wish to be involved in you actually, do not want to get to the truth. But if you're one of those who blindly follows them in believes what they're doing is just then you must believe Nadler and all of them should follow through take this to the court and fight it every step of the way this gets back to where. Democrats leadership. And we've said this before the liberal leadership believes that the people that vote for them are morons that they're idiots that they will buy anything that they say without the the the majority of their constituents doing any type of critical thinking research might proof fifty seven percent of Democrats in the Rasmussen poll that we brought you yesterday believed the Trump committed treason, whereas one bit of evidence, right? This like Trump, they're angry Hillary loss, and therefore that's the evidence they need for treason. Well, that's it. And have each of them defined treason. You know, we go back through the qualifying the respondents. Well, well, let me let me go back even further heavy to them. I name the three branches of government, then tell us who mullah's. Then tell us who William bar is tell us who Mike Pence is thirty thirty percent of Americans almost thirty percent Americans in the post twenty nine point something. Yeah. Don't have no idea. You know, or don't know enough about who Mahler is and forty percent of the registered voters. They'll have no idea bars. So last year when we talked about last year, right? When we talked about Rasmussen and one of Scott Rasmussen's, the founder of of of Rasmussen he's no longer associated with them. The founder of Rasmussen. One of his staffers hurt it and got in touch with them and said, hey, you know, would you like to have Scott? Yeah. Of course, he was very gracious and came on with us, we need to have them back on and talk to him about our new methodology for polling, and it would be this you go through. Do you know who the president is no no multiple choice? The president who was the who was the special counsel everybody relevant to the subject at hand. And then if they get to that certain level, then you can ask them their opinion. We need to ask the clue question before we even start any polling before we ask any question. Dea have a clue. Yeah. Exactly, do you. Do you understand anything? That's do you understand the country that you are in. Do you understand anything about the constitution white so ever, right? Do you understand why you live in this country? And what makes us different you understand the law at all. Even a basic understanding, do you have a clue before you ever get into a poll. Right. And then once they get past that certain level, then they're qualified. It's it's it's like registered voter. Well, okay. There's there's three groups that Americans registered voters likely voters, right? This would be all right. If you want to partake in this poll, you're going to have to answer some basic questions on the subject before you get there starting with the basic, very basic, fundamental questions about how our government works name, the three branches of government and people have talked about, you know, we need to before people vote. They need to take a test. Now before the take a poll the need to take fast. Yeah. Based on because if the opinion is based on a medium, you always said back in the day, bumper sticker mentality for those under the age of ninety bumper stickers were getting put on the back of your car, and they would promote something then you said mentality because in today's world, it's a mean, if their opinions are based on a meme, I wanna know it. I need to know that because otherwise it's garbage the mean mindset exact yes. Yeah. All right. Yeah. Eight six six ninety redeye. For.

president Scott Rasmussen congress executive Jonathan Turley William bar Nadler Robert Muller Trump Eric Harley Dershowitz Professor Columbia Justice department Gary McNamara
"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

01:53 min | 3 years ago

"jonathan turley" Discussed on WTVN

"This is from Jonathan Turley Daniel Horowitz talked about it yesterday. I've talked about it before that. But we're gonna have to keep this up. Gives presidents sweeping authority. Now, maybe I missed something. But maybe maybe I did miss national review maybe has been on a campaign to eliminate this act. I mean, part of the problem is there are emergencies emergencies a war -mergency. Created by mother nature emergencies headed unpredictable. And you see how congress cannot act and even in the best days, they may not be around or they cannot act quickly even congress understood that congress passed this law. It's not a matter of empowering the executive branch unless the law is abused. Trump, and tens if he does do this to follow the law. That's not what Obama did with ObamaCare. It's not what Obama did with Dhaka. And it's important for lawyers who write these aditorial Zanu common on TV to make these distinctions when you're writing a brief when you write a brief that goes to the supreme court is I have or when you write briefs that go to appellate courts as I have or you edit them and review them and your staff does it as I have these differences, these distinctions mean everything. And yet they're not presented at the national review editor, and I'm not trying to pick on national review. I hear other commentators many of whom are not experienced in any of this sang exactly the same thing. I think on my buddy Shapiro show. I think I heard some senators say we don't govern this way. We don't even know what the hell you're talking about. This guy from Oklahoma. I think his name was Cassidy even know what you're talking about. I could be wrong. Hope I'm not. Because he doesn't. So the one thousand nine.

national review Obama congress Jonathan Turley Daniel Horowit Cassidy Trump supreme court Dhaka Oklahoma Shapiro executive editor