35 Burst results for "John Durham"
Kash Patel Shares an Important Update on Durham's Investigation
"With us right now is a friend of the program cash Patel, former DoD chief of staff, an author of plot against the king, cash welcome back to the program. Hey, Charlie, thanks for having me. Great to be with you. So what's going on with Durham? Danchenko is standing trial in the fall. What's the latest out of the Durham investigation? Yeah, look, you know, he's prepping for trial. You're correct. He's going on trial in Virginia in the fall. I think September, October, and what prosecutors do and what I did as a former federal prosecutor is you issue trial subpoenas. So the latest flurry, 30 witness trial subpoenas were issued by danchenko. Now, that's a big case. When it comes to federal prosecutions, usually you can tidy up a federal criminal prosecution with about ten to 15 witnesses. This is two X that. So he doesn't have to call every one of those, but he means he means to tell the court in the world that he's flying in witnesses from around the country and around the world. To make his case against danchenko. And so hopefully we'll get more information as we get closer to trial with the pretrial pleadings and motions that the defense and Durham will file. And hopefully Merrick Garland will allow John Durham with a continue his work on other cases, even though I've heard rumblings of
Can Durham Try Future Cases Outside of DC? Kash Patel Weighs In
"Good. So who else then, I mean, is on the list and we talked about this before. I mean, I'm just, I feel a little demoralized, do you think Durham feels that way? What's your reading on all of that? Are the future cases going to be tried in Washington, D.C.? Does it make a difference if it's Northern Virginia versus D.C. walk us through that? Sure. Well, anywhere but D.C. is great for the reasons you and I all know. You can't have three jurors on your jury pool that donated to Hillary one to AOC. And then another juror's kid plays swim pool time with the defendant. Northern Virginia is better. It's substantially better. It's not the greatest spot, but I think John Durham knows that when you bring a conspiracy case like we are as prosecutors, you can land it anywhere the conspiracy occurred. And
Charlie Dives Into the Disappointment of the Sussman Verdict
"We're going to keep on going through this Durham story. I mean, look, the judge, John Durham didn't push for recusal of judge Chris Cooper, even though Michael sussman was friends with the judge. Judge Cooper's wife represented former FBI lawyer FBI lawyer Lisa page, the judge and his wife were married by Merrick Garland and Cooper was appointed by Obama. It is rigged, top to bottom, everybody. It is just a disease temple of cesspool of corruption. That's not a good thing for people to believe about their government or their capital. The country is fracturing fracturing in front of our very eyes. Yeah, I mean, we were just texting with cash Patel. You said basic points. I was the last man to have any faith in D.C. in the Department of Justice. Now it's gone, burn the whole thing down. He means it metaphorically, by the way, for because, you know, if we say that, unlike the left, we will be convicted by a jury of our peers and put in front of a court. Michael sussman will not be
Charlie Unpacks Michael Sussmann's Shocking Acquittal
"But first some breaking news, Michael sussman has been acquitted. By a jury of his peers in Washington, D.C.. The federalists wrote, quote, while prosecutors presented overwhelming evidence over the last two weeks that sussman lied to then FBI general counsel James baker in 2016 and acquittal by the D.C. jury still seems likely. Now to give you an idea of how extraordinary it is to get acquitted by a jury your peers, I believe it's less than 1% of all trials that go to all cases that go to trial actually end up in acquittal. But Michael sussman knew that he could navigate a Washington D.C. jury. These are his people. There were three Hillary Clinton donors. There were allowed to be on the jury. One AOC donor and judge Christopher Cooper was an Obama appointee. Judge allows Hillary AOC donors and jury pool for ex Clinton lawyers, Russia trial. So Michael sussman, who was accused of lying to the FBI, not just accused, we have the evidence he did it. It's in a text message. He said that he was going to go to James baker on his own capacity in reality he was being paid to do this was acquitted by a jury of his own peers. This is a huge blow to John Durham. No doubt. It's a blow to all decency and justice. I'll be very honest. They're allowed to spy on a president lie about it, use campaign funds to do it. Infiltrate a campaign, all the while there is no justice and no accountability.
Michael Sussmann acquitted in first Durham special counsel trial
"Jury has acquitted a Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign lawyer on charges of lying to the FBI The case against Michael sussman was the first courtroom test of special counsel John Durham who was appointed three years ago to look for a government misconduct during the probe of potential ties between Donald Trump's campaign and Russia The trial focused on whether sussman concealed from the FBI that he was working for Clinton's campaign when he presented data he said showed a possible secret back channel between a Russia based bank and the Trump organization The FBI quickly determined there was no suspicious contact The verdict is a setback for Durham who
The Latest Bombshells Out of the Durham Investigation With Kash Patel
"He is a true pep par excellence when it comes to fighting the deep state. He is former chief of staff at The Pentagon for investigator for the intelligence committee of the House, cash Patel, welcome back to America first. Zep, thanks so much. The studios looking better and better and better. Love it. Thank you kindly. We got to talk about this new, very different initiative that you have become involved with, a new publication, but first, because we've been discussing it already with Margot Cleveland, John Solomon today, the sussman trial continues, and it seems very strange that your former colleagues are also former DoD DoJ prosecutor. Your former colleagues taking the stand being asked very important questions by this independent council, they're not being very talkative or helpful for John Durham. Why is that cash Patel? It's amazing. Some of these people and actually all of them, I worked with at the Department of Justice. I know them personally for my time as a national security prosecutor. These are some of the most intellectually smart advanced people I've ever met and all of a sudden, I don't know. I can't remember. I'm not really too sure about that, you know? This is what happens when you politicize the national security apparatus. These people who are supposed to take their oaths of office seriously, especially when called upon to testify in a federal prosecution, should not be allowed to get away with this nonsense. But to me, it just shows the jury and the world that they were all in on it. They don't want to get in any trouble. They're being forced to testify, so they're just going to go up there and do their song and dance and get out
What to Expect From the Sussman Trial With Kash Patel
"What are the next steps then? So this trial is going to wrap up. There is a period of time between the conviction and then the sentencing, right? Kind of decision of the jury, and then the sentencing, what can we expect next out of John Durham? What are the targets you think he's going to indict next? And has there been anything in this trial that has really surprised you? Yeah, so next, will the sentencing will be a couple of months away if and when I believe sussman's convicted in the next day or two. After that, we have to remind the audience. He already has another indictment in place in the trial set for this fall of the source to steal, and he also has a multiple count indictment for lying to the FBI at ton of times. And for making up all that Christopher Steele information. So he's got that in the pipeline public already. What I think is next is the joint joint venture conspiracy as John Durham has called it in the federal pleadings in the sussman indenting case that he has multiple other targets. And he has said Rodney joffe, the tech executive that was paid millions of dollars to drum up this false alphabet narrative while they were also drumming up their steel stuff. He has said publicly. He John Durham like Rodney joffe is a target of my ongoing investigation. He has also said in his pleading, these other people in the joint venture conspiracy, all that is, is legalese for a bunch of people have to get together to do this. The FBI, the Clinton campaign, fusion GPS, and these guys like Rodney joffe. And the Jake sullivans of the world. They're all mentioned by title in these pleadings. And they're all under his investigation. So that's why I think he's going to get a couple of FBI agents, and he should get Andy mccabe, who orchestrated this entire thing. And Peter strzok, hopefully, as well, along with fusion GPS and this tech guy Rodney joffe. And if he does all that, that's pretty good work.
Kash Patel Makes Sense of the Michael Sussman Trial
"A friend of the show who has been monitoring the Michael sussman trial, and does a great job. His cash Patel, and cash Patel knows a lot of things happening out there that are below the surface. If you know what I mean, you know what I mean. Cash, welcome back to the program. Charlie, thanks so much for having me. I love the backdrop. Looking better and better every time. Yeah, thank you. We are in an undisclosed location in Indiana one of my favorite states. It doesn't get the attention it deserves. Cash what's going on in the sussman trial. We've been so distracted for good reason on the tragedy in Texas, World Health Organization, world health assembly, kind of catch us up kind of get us up to speed here. What's going on in the Michael sussman trial? Okay, real quick. So the government and the defense have rested their cases. That means they're done presenting evidence. So tomorrow, the judge, excuse me, the trial attorneys for John Durham and the attorneys for the defense will give their closing arguments to the jury. And the case is very simple in terms of evidence that actually is going to be used to convict Michael sussman. One, the deposition transcript of my interrogation of Michael sussman from 2018, which the whole world can see on Durham watch dot com. Where he said to me under oath. Hi, Michael sussman, I'm doing all this work, alpha bank stuff for the client, the client being Hillary Clinton. Michael sussman is now charged by John Dern with lying to the FBI because he went to the office with this alphabet nonsense. And this is what the evidence came out of trial and told the FBI. I'm here as quote a good Samaritan, not for anyone. The problem is you have the deposition, the testimony from the FBI, which they're dirty cops over there. So they're not that helpful. But if Michael Susan's own text message entered into evidence, the night before he went to the FBI, where he texted the head of the FBI's lawyer department and said, I'm coming to you as a good Samaritan. So did he lie to Congress or do you lie to the FBI? They're both illegal, but he's charged with lying to the FBI. And the kicker, the nice one is, the thumb drive that they loaded the alphabet fantasy on, paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Was bought by Michael sussman in Washington, D.C., and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign. They actually entered a receipt and billing record into
Former Congressman Devin Nunes Discusses the Latest Indictments
"Devon, there are some new indictments and they're fascinating, are they not? There are, and we might as well just come in hot here. I just hadn't heard a compilation of those interviews in a long time. It's just shocking. I think it should just shock the conscious of your listeners of everybody who's out there in America right now and around the globe. Just how far we've come from dirty tricks and 15 and 16. I think a lot of those cuts were from 17 and all this tell you, the Mueller, that whole Mueller investigation, I mean, it was set up completely by the dirty cops at DoJ and the FBI. And I hope I don't know if Durham will actually get to that. We can go through some of the indictments that have come here, but it's just incredible that here we are now so many years later and Durham is finally getting to the bottom of this and you just have to go and ask yourself the obvious question. How did Mueller spend $40 million? Leak like holy hell all over the place where all of these so called pundits and elected officials were out there saying all of this nonsense regurgitating all of this nonsense. And of course, as you know, it was our investigation that unraveled all of this that led to this, but we went through really dark times during that time. And I think it's only gotten gotten worse here and there's so much riding on John Durham in this investigation.
Kash Patel: Possible Indictments to Expect From John Durham
"Stuff Do you think there's going to be any legal consequence for higher ups your mccabe Comey clapper Hillary any of them or just one or two or none I mean where do you see this going I see there's a couple more indictments I see coming from John Durham probably one of the FBI probably won a fusion GPS because they orchestrated this whole thing with the Clinton campaign and made millions in light to the world And I think they lied to Congress too Glenn Simpson another guy who I interrogated in line And I think it gets to Andy mccabe I don't think it gets any higher than that You know I've been thinking about this for four or 5 years in the form of a prosecutor I was just like those guys call me Clinton clapper Brennan They're just so smart and they're so evil That's the problem that they've covered their tracks and it would be very hard to make a case against them Now it doesn't mean that John Durham is not going to annihilate them in the report But you and I both want indictment accountability And I think if we get any mccabe the FBI fusion GPS then this is going to make Watergate look like Sunday afternoon tea And so it's going to be I think that's where he's going I hope that's where he's going And he's got the investigation to prove it But the other thing speaking about John Brennan remember this guy briefed Barack Obama when he was president in 2016 That Hillary Clinton was running a disinformation operation against president Trump What I want to know Why isn't that memo been declassified Where is it Where is it
Kash Patel: Robby Mook Testified Early Because of a Vacation to Spain
"Cash there was a lot more in that answer I know you caught it He wrote in Jake Sullivan into that too Jake Sullivan who is now the national security adviser at The White House into the decision to disseminate the hoax and you got to be thinking to yourself how the hell does Jake Sullivan still have his job at The White House This is crazy No you look you're totally right And Jake Sullivan is another guy that I interrogated under oath And that's why I think Robbie mook was boxed in because look all of these transcripts are we put them up for free at Durham Ross dot com We want the whole world to see everything that's been out there on Russia gate So go read them Your audience should go educate themselves Jake's all done I think lied to Congress about his involvement in the Russia gate hoax And the reason I think Robbie mook has to say what he said was because we boxed them in four years ago and his lawyers were like listen you can't really lie on the witness stand here because there's a transcript review basically already copied to it But here's the kicker that no one's talking about And Robbie mook was not a witness for the government John Durham had not finished the government's case the defense asked the judge to let Robbie move testify early because he had a vacation in Spain He had to get to Now Dan you and I both know when it comes to federal court In what universe does the government's case stop for a defense witness who's going to be the Spain And it could not have backfired more superbly for them The defense put this guy up and now he's taken out Clinton world and the Durham prosecution is going to continue It's amazing what's unraveling here
Kash Patel Wishes He Could Tell Us Sebastian Is Making Stuff Up
"Tell your viewers that you were just making stuff up because then it would be, you know, we'd have a laugh about it and we'd carry on our democratic process. But it's killing our democracy. And I'll give your audience fact based conspiracy, right? Russiagate, we unravel this investigation. And what do we find? The same FBI that told you from the 7th floor of the Hoover building. You never get in these guys 'cause in James Comey was running at the time because who cares about president Trump, I'm in charge. Right. These same guys who perpetrated this fraud and lied to a federal court and smudged a fisa warrant and pumped in information paid by a political party and buried that documentation and then got higher up levels DoJ of the associate Deputy Attorney General in Bruce or to come in and shepherd that process through. Just so they could spy just so James Comey could come into meetings like this and say, president Trump's not in charge, I am. That actually happened. That's been proven, not by my words, or your words, or Devin's words. By the FBI's own documents by the DoJ's own documents by their own recordings by the sworn testimony they gave to federal court. And now what you and I covered it, we lived it. We covered it back then. But thank God now, America is seeing it on full display because of John Durham I know we're going to talk about it. But the part that scares me is you're not you talk to millions of people. You talk to more people than I probably the only person that talks to more people than you is probably drunk. But no, it's important because how many people come up to you and say, wait, Russia didn't have to take a Trump did X and you know, you put your head down and you're like, wow, where did you get your news for the last 5 years?
Victoria Toensing on the Latest in the Sussmann Indictment
"We have to discuss the latest developments in the sussman indictments, the John Durham furtherance of his investigation. It seems as if mister sussman, the lawyer for the Hillary Clinton campaign, who manages to get meetings with the chief council of the FBI via text in less than 24 hours, that he doesn't have the best legal team. Because he doesn't have the best. He doesn't have the best facts. It's really hard. So when he was indicted, the one count indictment, which was 27 pages, which is unusual. They came out. The specimen team came out and said, well, maybe baker didn't have a good memory. That was the FBI guy. Or we don't think we said that. We don't remember any later testified that he actually had a client. And then all of a sudden assessment in a filing just about a week ago says, ta-da, here's the text message. You
Tom Fitton: What Elon Musk & John Durham Have in Common
"And Elon Musk slash Twitter. Elon Musk and John Durham, what on earth do they have in common? Well, you know, they're both on the wrong end of the left. You know, and under the Trump administration, special counsels, we were all supposed to fall down and worship them, right? Robert Mueller. Oh no, John Durham. He can't be trusted. And he's going overboard and prosecuting the Clinton gang. Excuse me, the Biden gang. Or I get confused sometimes as to what we're supposed to be prosecuting since they're all tied together. You know, the same thing with Elon Musk. I don't know where he stands on politics. You know, my guess is that he has, well, the evidence is he supports free speech, which is kind of like ought to be the price of entry in terms of public discourse these days. But activist investors were the left told us where the savior of the corporate world. Having these activists come in and demanding accountability from corporations on issues other than the stock price. And here we have Elon Musk doing something similar with Twitter on behalf of First Amendment values by all accounts and you would think he's Genghis Khan coming in and trying to destroy the Internet. But both need to do a lot in my view. Obviously Durham has been slow. Three indictments include one which resulted in a kind of a disaster of a plea deal. The two more recent ones have been substantial, but if they're the end of what he's doing, it's going to be week T, they're the beginning. It could be great. And I must, you know, he's putting his money where his mouth is, you know, billions of dollars of investment in Twitter to have a say by all accounts and how Twitter is run and to try to rein in, I would hope the abuse that Twitter continues in terms of lying about why it's censoring conservatives
Donald Trump Sues EVERYONE With Kash Patel
"With us right now is cash Patel, website is fight with cash dot com. He has several lawsuits that he is engaged in against all the worst people on the planet. We'll talk about that. You're a former federal prosecutor. You understand how this whole world works. I want to ask your thoughts on the news yesterday. We didn't touch on this at all. Donald Trump filed a lawsuit yesterday. Yeah, and it's probably hopefully he's not listening. It's his best one yet. No. Is that right? I think so. It's the most conclusive comprehensive lawsuit. It's basically if you took the russiagate investigation with Devin and I ran and looked at it from a criminal perspective with Donald Trump has done is said, okay, how do I encompass everyone from Comey, Clinton, clapper, Brennan, and all the whole DNC crew on down? How do I get them civilly in federal court and the way you do it is you utilize this thing called RICO racketeering enforcement and corrupt organizations. We used to prosecute gangs under RICO's criminals. But what most people don't realize is RICO also has a civil function. So what he did was he took the RICO statute, which is permissible under by law and said, these guys orchestrated the largest criminal enterprise in U.S. history, but I'm suing them on my civil side of the house for, I don't know, $75 million. The whole point, right, is to get to discovery. Yes. Well, then also civil can lead to criminal. Absolutely. It can, but I think John Durham has got that covered. We can talk about that later, but I think what the president wanted to focus on was finally say, I'm not going after onesies and twosies here. I'm bringing everybody in, one federal lawsuit. Everybody's got to go to the table
John Solomon Updates Us on John Durham's Latest Filing
"John, what are you working on for your TV show? What's the latest at stories you're going to break? Yeah, we're going to talk a little bit about John Durham in the filing over the weekend. And you know who you are, Ted. Thank you for sending me the filing as soon as it dropped. I've got somebody who just boop sends me the documents. I asked, hey, Dave on Gina, have you got it? No, send it to me. So give us a little update on what's happening with Donald Trump. Listen, he basically, for the first time, accused Hillary Clinton's lawyer, Michael sussman, of political deceit of dropping a false allegation on the FBI and then lying about who he was doing in on behalf of and what assessment had argued is please, he asked the judge, please dismiss these charges because lying to the FBI should be protected by the First Amendment. It's one of his arguments. And the second argument, can you stop there a lawyer, a lawyer actually said that lying to a federal agent is part of the constitution? Basically said that this would have a chilling effect on free speech if he was allowed to be prosecuted for lying to the FBI. I'm not making it up. You can read it just the news. It's crazy. So there's that argument. And then the other argument is that what he told the FBI wasn't material. It didn't have an effect, and therefore it can't be prosecuted as a felony. Well, John Durham had a very different filing. And he said, it was material. In fact, Michael sussman had told the truth and said he was bringing this to the FBI on behalf of the Clinton campaign in a tech aligned with the campaign. The FBI might not have even opened this part of the Russian government. Well, again, I don't know who his lawyers are, but they seem to be rather cretinous because it's because of this meeting that the FBI opening investigation. So how can you say it's immaterial to a government? Yeah, yeah, listen, I think that's exactly what John Durham said, which is I don't get this argument at all, but just in case you do here, let me give you our side of it. It was a very powerful filing, and it also reminds you how much history could have been changed, had the Clinton people just told
Frank Gaffney Provides His Analysis of the Durham Report
"Well, I confess Eric. I'm not sure I'm the best judge because I'd written John Durham off, frankly, some time ago thinking, you know, he was going to be at best trying to prosecute a couple of very small frisk fish and miss entirely. The whales that are actually seemingly in his net and I couldn't have been more pleased with his findings. Whatever it's been about ten days or so ago, yes now in which he indicated that he actually has broken the code. And that what has been going on here involves some very big fish. Arguably the biggest fish of all, and that would be Hillary Clinton, at least her campaign, and a whole number of people who worked for her on it who are now in senior positions in the Biden administration, notably Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser to the president, much in the news at the moment because of the unpleasantness playing out in Ukraine. But I have to say, I'm kind of holding my breath as I guess you are, too. Will he or won't he? Is he going to sort of take this the distance? And it's so doing and again, I'm very reluctant to put too much hope in this, given how ponderous this whole thing has been, but based on this most recent sort of indicting materials, I think he is actually going to help at long last, restore the rule of law in this country.
Kash Patel: John Durham Has a Source Who Likely Flipped
"Your thoughts on this You just said something that kind of sparked my interest a little bit I did not know about this DNS data and the technical company hired for the service in The White House either And I wrote three books on this thing and had some really really good sources in the beginning If you and I haven't heard of it that says to me they got to have a source that Durham has to have someone who flipped who gave this all up because this isn't the kind of thing that just randomly gets out there I mean it's the kind of thing where someone had to have given it up maybe a low level guy and said hey I was told to do this by X your thoughts on that Yeah you're totally right Either he has a sorcery he's got someone who's flipped which is just as good but that leads me to believe what you and I have been saying the whole time that John Durham is on it He is doing this thing methodically and people are like why is he moving so slowly Because it takes time to find these sources or defendants and flip them so you can get the actual culprits involved above them in the DNC and Howard Clinton campaign So I think John Durham is unraveling the most complex criminal conspiracy in U.S. history to infiltrate a sitting president's White House in spying That just can't happen overnight It can't even happen over a few months It takes years And you're right he's got a source or a defendant that's flipped And I think that's just the beginning and you're going to see four or 5 6 more indictments this summer
"john durham" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
"Now it's back to the breaking news, the arrest, the indictments with a man who knows more than most about all of this started the show with cash Patel. Now it's John Solomon. He's the head the founder of just the news dot com. Quick cut, I want to play for you. You were on with on the same show on Fox on the weekend with John rat. Former director of national intelligence, who said something in very interesting about the John dharm investigation. Sure, did. Many of the documents that John Durham is using are documents that I gave him. So I declassified the documents that we've talked about, but I get John Durham over a thousand other documents that have not yet been declassified that I know including intelligence that go specifically to this criminal activity that would be the basis for further indictments. And, you know, again, what happened with the Steele dossier, a grand jury is saying was criminal in nature and I expect that all of the folks that are involved with creating it and peddling it falsely would be in jeopardy. And I know that that's what John Durham is looking at. And as I talked about, you know, this goes to the highest levels of our government in the government agencies involved. More than a thousand documents classified documents given to John Durham by the direct of national intelligence that take the case take the collusion all the way to the highest levels of American government. John walker, this is sometimes so hard for those outside to track. It is talk to us about the timeline, especially with regards to the bureau. Yeah, so there are really two buckets. The first bucket is Hillary Clinton pulled off a horrific political dirty trick to make Donald Trump look like he was a Russian spy or Russian asset when he wasn't. The second part is the FBI taking that information and forwarding it through a lengthy two two and a half year criminal investigation when it's own rules that stop. There were many moments. I'm going to walk you through it. So the first time Christopher Steele walks in the dossiers, July 5th, 2016. The same day, James Comey, illegally exonerate Hillary Clinton in the email case. Christopher Steele on that same day walks in and says, I've got this dirt on Donald Trump. He goes to the London FBI office where one of his former handlers are. And they don't act on it. They decided it's not actionable intelligence. That causes Christopher Steele to go to his buddy Bruce or Bruce or at the end of July, goes in the FBI, Bruce sauce at the end. Justice Department. Justice Department. And he walks it over to his friend at the FBI. He just happens to be the deputy director himself. And he says, hey, Christopher still has this information, but three warnings. He works for Hillary Clinton. He has a tremendous anti bias or bias against Donald Trump. And almost none of his stuff is corroborated. It's all raw. Three things that should have been red flagged for the FBI to stop. Probably the reason why the London office didn't act on it. A month goes by, they gin all this up. They start four different investigations on Trump people in an early September, the CIA sends a rocket over to the FAA. She should have sent off all sorts of alarm bells. He says Derek FBI. We want you to know that we have intercepted information indicating that Hillary Clinton has authorized an operation to make Donald Trump look like a Russian asset to take the attention away from her email scandal. It looks to be contrived may even include some Russian disinformation. They don't stop in October, the CIA says, hey, the guy you're looking at Carter page, he's one of ours. He's a CIA guy. They don't stop. November, December, the FBI analysts and the intelligence division analyze every sentence of the dossier. It's determined 90% of it's either un corroborative Internet rumor garbage or been debunked or disinformation. They don't stop. Every step of the way, this case should have never gotten to January of 2017. Every procedure in the FBI would have told a regular FBI person stop. This is a bogus case. Don't go there. I think the FBI has more to lose in the next round of John Durham's investigation than even Hillary Clinton's inner circle. Well, it's strange James Comey blocked me on Twitter and he's been very, very quiet of late. We've only got a few seconds left John. I gotta ask you, very simple question. Does John Solomon feel vindicated now? Listen, I never felt that under attack. I just followed by the facts and I feel good about it. I'll tell you who has been vindicated. Devin Nunes is terribly terribly a paste, and it turns out everything he told the American public in 1718 turns out to have been true. Well, you're being far too modest. They came after you for one reason or one reason alone because you didn't give up and because you tell the truth. That's why you got to follow this man. Solomon reports, you've got a bookmark Justin used dot com and you've got to get his book fall out. God bless you, John. So much more to discuss. We'll get you back. This is America first coming to you live from the relief factor dot com studios, relief factor.
"john durham" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
"First cash Patel. Welcome back to Salem radio. Savage, great to be with you guys. I'm so happy that you are continuing to hammer on the truth in Russia. That's why we're here every single day for three hours as well as our newsmax show on Sundays. Cash. I'm going to run by you. The reaction I got just a few days ago from Joe di Genoa, a lot of us have lost hope with John Durham. They say, yeah, yeah, yeah, it's two years later. I get that COVID slowed him down. But talk to Joe, who's a former special counsel himself, former U.S. Washington attorney, U.S. attorney for D.C.. He said these indictments, the level of detail in these indictments, especially the most recent one of danchenko, speak to a very serious individual who's going to get to the bottom of it. You've been there. You uncovered the Russia hoax for the house. What's your reaction to the recent developments on Capitol Hill? Yeah, look I think that John Durham is spot on track. As a former federal prosecutor, too, who brought these types of large scale fraud conspiracy cases, I spent three four 5 years sometimes working up a case in John Durham is working on the biggest scandal in the United States presidential history. And in two years, he's got three indictments. And the other thing about these indictments, he's connected the DNC to the corruption at the FBI to the corruption of their lawyers to now directly corrupting or expose enough nature of Christopher steel in the source. And normally these indictments are about two, three, four, 5 pages long. 40 page indictment. Yeah. Issues on the latest go round because John Durham is speaking to the public. It's the only way he's legally allowed to do so. And he's highlighting to take Sullivan's of the world that Charlie Dolan of the world. All these corrupt actors that fusion GPS and Christopher Steele and mccabe abstract and page. It's all coming to life. So I think he's on the right path. I've said it before on my show cash's corner where I did a deep dive into the derm saga and I think he's only just getting
"john durham" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Cash Fiona hill, who is she, and what is her involvement in this entire new saga of administering justice? I believe Fiona hill is the prime example of how we got things wrong in the Trump administration. She rose to the National Security Council during the Trump administration after coming off a tenure of at a think tank. That was just couldn't have been stood for more opposite word president Trump wanted. But here's why I feel the hill comes into play. Danchenko, the guy that sussman just indicted, he was Fiona hill's research assistant. Wow. Literally, work for her. Then, if that wasn't bad enough, Fiona hill is the person who connected danchenko to Christopher Steele and said, and fusion GPS and said, you guys should meet your two credible investigators and Intel people and media people. We just have a chat. Do you think someone with Fiona hills level of experience is just connecting to people to get a beer down the street? No, I believe it's the start of the operation. And then she embedded herself in the Trump campaign. And reminder to your audience, Fiona hill is the one who paraded around the Ukrainian impeachment hooks, right? Yes, that's right. She and vin Minh together start in that hoax charade. I was jettisoned into that hoax. I was running, I was deputy system the president and senior director for counter terrorism then. Greatest job ever running counter terrorism for president Trump. And somehow I was named the Ukraine whisperer in the media and holding court meetings with Trump on the Ukraine, which could not be more further from the truth and which is the basis of so many of my defamation lawsuits against political CNN and all that stuff you can read on fight with cash dot com. But this is why Fiona hill is so central. And if I were John Durham, I think he's already done this. Put her in a grand jury. Questioner under oath and see if she has any illegal connectivity to her sister steel and Dan tanker herself. What can we expect from this point forward? So is Durham wrapping up his investigation? There's still some skeptics out there, cash. There's still some cynics. Hey look, there'll be a couple process crimes, but don't hold your breath. You're not going to get a Comey. You're not going to get a struck. You're not going to get a page. You're not going to get him a cave. You're not going to get anyone from the senior level of the Clinton campaign. What do you think? Look, I've run these massive conspiracy, massive national security cases, and they take two. I spent two three four years on some cases. John Barnes in his second year. And he's working against literally everyone in government because Merrick Garland's Department of Justice doesn't want to prosecute this. And the Chris ray and the FBI don't want to. So I don't think you issue 40 page indictments for process crimes and tell the world what you're working on if you're just going to stop. That's my opinion. And remember to your audience, an indictment is the only way a prosecutor can tell the world what they're doing because they're not allowed to disclose their evidence. So John Durham has taken the time to methodically issue indictments totaling over a 101 hundred pages now for three people. That's it. And he's identified 15 individuals like the Clinton operative in the matter like Fiona hill like Michael sussman and the like, and I think that's why he's building a larger conspiracy. Now, look, I'm not married to this pipe dream that we're going to get Comey. I wish we could, but I unfortunately just don't think we have the Jews to do it. I do think we have a shot at Andy mccabe and that's probably why the likes of Peter strzok are out in the media now, parading around. Just like Christopher Steele did, parading around his false credibility, now Peter strzok's turn. And that should tell you something that may be something else that's coming down the pike. And in addition to that, they're doing everything they possibly can to protect through hiring them at MSNBC, Georgetown, CNN with Andy Mackay, it's like the entire media apparatus is trying to protect every single one of these people. So you have a great answer on where Durham is going and where all of this is I suppose, I guess the final question that most people have is Hillary Clinton, you know, all these people involved probably out of touch, but at the same time, you know, will we be able to get in the court of public opinion and showed that what they did to our country? Yeah, I think that's what the Durham report. And this is a great way to end it. So people are always asking for the derm report. I'm like, I don't want to see the Durham report right now. The Durham report comes at the end. The indictments come first. I want to see more indictments, and that's what John Durham is focusing on right now. In the derm report, what you do like Mueller did, but just John derm will actually do it using, you know, facts. Is you issue an accountability to the American people and basically say we didn't have enough evidence to get Hillary Clinton or James Comey, but you use facts to show these people were in the process and the derm report I think is going to be the home run that you see all that in. And it won't be an indictment of Hillary Clinton, but it will be an indictment of her in the court of public opinion. It's well said, cash, thank you for joining. Fight with.
"john durham" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"To lie in dossiers, but not legal to present them to the fisa court, which I think is the next step, isn't it which is that then you're gonna start to get to all the sun okay, now did FBI agents present knowingly false information? Is that the next layer here? We've shown that. And that's what we said from the beginning, right? And it's only now starting to come out. The FBI and DOJ at the time were running the investigation against them. They said, no, no, no, we didn't know this. We didn't know steal leak to the media. We didn't know he was getting paid by the DNC. We didn't know he was corrupt and had a bias and hated president or the candidate Trump. We didn't know any of this stuff at the time. We used the FBI's own documentation that is now public and declassified thanks to our investigation to show that the FBI knew when they were presenting the information to the fisa court to get a search warrant. They knew Christopher Steele was not credible. They knew he had a bias. They knew the DNC was paying him. And we presented, here's the kicker. We presented all of those findings to the fiscal three, four years ago, the fisa court. And those judges told us to go pound sand. So I think John Durham is looking into that as well. Like you alluded to. Yeah. And so I guess then the peer struck Lisa page thing. Yeah. Peter struck was on MSNBC this morning. It was so disgusting to see. But I can't imagine he must be a little bit nervous because I'm just reading into this. This is allegedly, this is an accusation. This is not proven in the criminal sense, but my gut tells me it's true that the insurance plan that he was telling to his, you know, adulteress, you know, Lisa page as he was cheating on his wife. That he was that the insurance plan was danchenko. The insurance plan was the dossier, the insurance plan was all of this. Is that a step too far? Is that what he really said on MSNBC? Well, no, he didn't say it. He said the Internet. He said, let me tell you what he said the insurance plan before. This morning he said on MSNBC, this indictment invalidates all the wonderful work we did as investigators, whatever, whatever. I'm connecting two pieces together. The insurance plan he said in text messages, 5, 6 years ago, right? Remember the summer he said in a text message is so I didn't mean to conflate the two. But an MSNBC this morning, he looked rather nervous where he said, oh, no, now people are gonna try to invalidate the wonderful work we did at the Russia investigation because we're the greatest people ever. Can we play that clip Connor? Are we able to play that one 28? Listen to this if you can, cash, I think it'll tell you what we need to go. One 28. So my worry is that as Americans hear this news and they don't really know how the Russia investigation ended, they hear these concerns and they say, well, there must be a problem. And that's being picked up and amplified by people who are seizing on this to say see the entire effort. Everything Mueller did. Everything the FBI was nonsense. He was bogus. He was based on lies. And that just couldn't be further from the truth. Sorry. I can only stomach so much of that guy, but the only person that lied during his duties in FBI next to Peter strzok Annie mccabe and James Comey was Lisa page. The lovebirds who were cheating on their spouses was one another while leading one of the most politically explosive investigations. And he has the audacity to go on TV after we showed his investigation was tarnished by bias. Remember, this is the same guy that said, as you said, the insurance policy, he said, he texted his lover right shortly thereafter. We're not going to let president Trump win, are we? No, no, no. 1 million to zero. He's not going to win. So if you want to take this guy at his word that he's saying this investigation and the Durham indictment is destroying the credibility of his work. Peter strzok has as much credibility as danchenko and Christopher Steele. And the fact that MSNBC is still running it, validates our work in our findings and that's why he's running scared. I totally agree. They're basically a communications arm for the intelligence apparatus at this point is what MSNBC has become cash. I want you to stay for another segment, but I just want to first say everyone go to fight with cash dot com cash was the guy along Devon and also in the executive branch to uncover this garbage, this nonsense is collusion, this corruption, and the Democrats are angry and they're trying to come after cash in a variety of different ways. So there's a legal fund there. I want people to try to support if they can. It's fight with.
"john durham" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Someone that understands the Russian collusion story better than anybody else and his predictions have been coming true and I push back against them very politely when he was on the show. He's a friend of mine cash, Patel, very smart guy American patriot. Cash are you with us? Yeah, Charlie, got you loud and clear and thanks so much for having me back on your show. Really appreciate it. The floor is yours, what have we learned this week with John Durham and these indictments? Well, as your show and your viewers have taken a great interest in John Durham, what he's been doing since we last talked was issue another indictment. And let's just rewind history for a little bit for those who haven't watched the plot against the president, spend 90 minutes of your life and learn about the biggest political scandal and how Devin Nunes and I expose that scandal in the United States history. So first, you have Christopher Steele, or let's back up one more step. You have fusion GPS and the democratic national party and Hillary Clinton campaign pay millions of dollars to obtain fraudulent information through a MI 6 asset Christopher Steele and pump that into the FBI and have the FBI intentionally lie to a fisa court. So you have a democratic political party. You have a foreign operative. You've got tens of millions of dollars, and you have our FBI and DOJ being corrupted. As if that wasn't bad enough, that was proven. Not just by the Nunes memo and the Russia gate investigation we did validated by the inspector general, but also John Durham indicted one of the attorneys who lied to the fist court for the surveillance warrant during the Trump campaign era. And then indicted just a couple of weeks ago, Michael sussman for lying to the FBI. Who's Michael sussman? Oh, he's the head lawyer for the DNC and Hillary campaign who was getting paid millions of dollars to shell. This information about the Russia gate hooks to the FBI and lied about it. And now we have this guy indicted danchenko. His name's not that important, but his position is. And if you recall, Christopher Steele did this terrible interview with George Stephanopoulos recently. We do go to try to resuscitate his credibility. And people were asking, why would he do that now? Because he knew this indictment was coming. And why does it matter? Because we already destroyed Christopher Steele's credibility in his lies. But you asked, where does Christopher Steele get his information from? Danchenko, this guy that was just indicted at lying to the FBI. 5 times over 5 counts in a federal indictment was Christopher Steele's primary source for the information that we knew was rather than to begin
"john durham" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"Let's start backwards. Last 48 hours, John Durham, who is appointed by Bill Barr, issued some indictments. One of the indictments that he issued was towards this new figure and you would know about him if you were really into this. But a guy by the name of Igor danchenko. Now Igor danchenko is supposed to be a Russian specialist. Igor danchenko is someone that formerly worked at the brookings institution a Dante is a Russian born U.S. based researcher. He worked at the brookings institution from 2005 to 2010, and he was a former official in Bill Clinton's State Department. And so danchenko's role was not really clear up until the last 48 hours. So the centerpiece of all of this, the centerpiece for the whisper campaign against Trump, the basis for to get Mueller and to spy on Trump was a document. It was a piece of work known as the dossier. The dossier was compiled by none other than former British spy Christopher Steele. But Christopher Steele compiled the dossier in what has always been a focus for those of us that have wanted to get the truth is who were his sources. Well, the main source, the main Russian source was Igor danchenko. Now, this dossier, this document, this summary, fraudulent one and fake one was then fed to the FBI and the press and was later used in fisa surveillance warrants against Trump aide Carter page, and then through surveilling Trump's pages communications, the Clinton Obama regime was able to spy on the Trump campaign.
"john durham" Discussed on 860AM The Answer
"This weekend. We're going to have on my Newsmax show Devin Nunes, former chair of the House Intelligence Committee, one of the bravest people in politics today You informed me off line that you've spoken to him recently as well. What are the latest developments in terms of uncovering the truth about the last five years in American skullduggery? Yes. First, I'd like to say that I Jean Kevin Nunes is the real American euro is arranged a number of course of the House Intelligence Committee. And when he was the chairman of the committee, we all know the enormous amount of effort that he put even from his own personal life, putting it on the line with with all of the attacks that we're going up against him and others like us like you. Who were who were exposing the Russia hopes that Russia fraud the weaponization of our FBI and our DOJ. And as everyone knows, there's been a large group of us who have been very disappointed. I would say the majority of Americans followed this story very closely have been very disappointed in the fact that the Department of Justice never ever held anyone accountable for basically trampling the Constitution. Weaponizing artist, um, spying on Americans like they did with Carter Page that people were not held responsible for this. Well, I did speak with Devin Nunes just recently. And one of the big pieces amused that I think came out of that conversation. Is that he? He absolutely believed that John Durham It was a special counsel. Uh, still investigating, by the way, still investigating what happened with the FBI's now debunked investigation into Trump and Russia will have a report and that report will be eminent. And that that report Although he doesn't have a date on when that report will come out. He does believe that that report will be eminent and that people will actually be held accountable and go to prison. Why? Why this time? Why is this the first time that will actually lead to arrests? What? What? What is special about this special counsel? Well, because John Durum according to those that I've spoken with, including Nunes has spent I mean his entire focus has been about targeting and finding Criminals inside the bureaucracy that basically ripped the system apart. I think so many of us have forgotten, but look, you had Stefan Halper, right? Who had worked with the intelligence community who was setting people up. We saw we saw information that was completely illegal. Come out on General Michael Flynn. We saw what happened to Carter Page. We saw the fact that the Foreign Intelligence surveillance Court basically tried at the Obama administration for what they had done as far as spying on Americans, and that all of this had been wrapped up into one big ball and for 4 to 5 to six years. Six years Now, if you can't going all the way back to 2016, and before that, you can see a pattern of behavior within the bureaucracy. That was absolutely 100%. Criminal When it came to false investigation. We know that we know the crimes of the FBI, The CIA, the N s A. But why this council's report? Why is this one going to be different? Is there any hint you got from deficit Because this is it? Can't this is it? There is no one else but John Durham right now that can hold anyone accountable. This is it. This is the investigation that has federal that has federal dollars in it has teeth in it that has taken on what happened with Michael Horowitz and the Horowitz report that is looking deeper than any of us could ever look Into these situations and allegations. Remember a lot of the information a lot of the information that we could not even present publicly. It's considered classified. And John Durham had access to that this restaurant on John Durham's shoulders. Remember when you and I both have said this. I was greatly disappointed in Attorney General William Barr. I felt like where did he go? Where did John Durham go? Why doesn't he have any teeth? When I saw President Trump at CPAC in Dallas? I was there in Dallas, and he asked the same question. What happened to John Durham. What happened to William Barr's? And why is this bureaucracy appear to be getting away with things that we only have seen really in banana Republics? Right. Let's just be honest and frank about it, So it's up to John Durum. I want to have faith. I want to believe I'm going to look at the glass is half full. Many times. They see it as happy empty, especially after you know these elections. What I do believe that John Durham is still doing his job and he's still working on this report. And we'll just have to wait and see. Happens, we shall see. But.
"john durham" Discussed on 860AM The Answer
"Back to the dam Prop show The Wall Street Journal pining on the matter of special counsel for Hunter buying this the argument that carries forward against the backdrop of attorney General Bar announcing that he will leave office on December 23rd his resignation as attorney general, but he has already designated John Durham special counsel. And so the question is whether or not there's enough faith that John Durham Can complete investigations that both included assessment of everything that transpired from 2016 Ford in the area of Russian collusion and the activity of The intelligence and law enforcement. Agencies at the federal level, combined with His parent investigation into Hunter Biden that was opened up With respect to his tax affairs Hunter, Biden concedes, but probably significantly more wide ranging than that, thanks to Hunter Biden's really Millie distribution of laptops all over the place that Have been requisitioned by the federal government. And Ah, again, though that doesn't mean that This is a story. Alex Shepherd, Ray, the New Republic. Sorry, the hunter Biden story is still not a thing. Even with Hunter binds acknowledgment that he's under federal investigation, even with emails that seemed to indicate Joe Biden, the big guy was not telling the truth when he said he had no idea what Hunter Biden was doing in these various foreign theaters, even with emails where Hunter Biden is asking for keys to be made to a D. C office for the Big guy for brother for some emissary for the Communist back Chinese energy company that paid him $5 million Even with emails from another business partner about $400,000 in unreported income and one tax year from Marie Sma. Even with the documentation provided by former business partner Tony Bob Belinsky, and the perspective he gave to Tucker Carlson before the election. There's really nothing to see here, not yet, says One of the papers of outlets of record for the left. There's It's not a thing. Not a thing. To a get perhaps a different perspective on whether it's a thing or not. We're pleased to be joined again. By David Harsanyi. He is senior right for National Review, author of First Freedom arrived for Americans during history with the gun from the Revolution to today. David. Thanks for joining us again. Appreciate it was a pleasure. Thank you. So you have Tonto. Have to applaud the intransigence of the left. They have very high standard with respect to their own when it comes to something turning into a thing in the area of federal law enforcement. Or Yeah, I mean, I don't know if people remember, but I think it was a few days before the Post wrote their hunter Biden Peace first piece. The big story was That the first lady had complained about putting up Christmas decorations on the secret. We recorded tape, which no one could vary put on CNN on, you know, for 24 hour loop itself before suppressing the story about potentially the front running front running candidate for the U. S presidency being involved in country dealing so It's Zawiya and and slippery definition of what's newsworthy and what's not. And with respect to the question of attorney general bars handling of the whole matter. I mean, there's so much we don't know about why he was unable to fulfill his promise that the American people would know what happened. 2016 4 before November 3rd. That didn't happen because the term investigation has been completed. And we don't necessarily know the full scope of why or where Duram is going. But I mean, do you see that as as a failure or do you see that as just exigent circumstances between co vid impeding the German investigation is, Bar said, and This whole other avenue that was opened up by all things Hunter Biden related. Well, I guess we need to know more before I could say if you did a good job in that area, not in. Generally. Generally, I like him. He's pretty straightforward, but I do have a bit of a problem with this idea that the American people That that he actively and you know, ensure that the American people wouldn't hear more about the hunter Biden investigation I know for I know that that wouldn't have happened had had been had the roles been reversed its farms the parties go, but moreover, I just don't understand why I think that living favors to people in power. I think also that the American people deserve to know that the family that there's evidence not just the family, but the candidate himself might be involved in shady dealings, and that there's an investigation going on doesn't mean anyone's guilty. But this idea that we have to coddle the American voter and that they shouldn't hear certain things or Accessory is really kind of distracted because it lends itself to corruption. Well, let me play devil's Advocate on. That s 01 respect the American people did know because it was reported by the New York Post and picked up by other outlets to Obviously it was not picked up by the D. C press corps because they were there. The com shop for Biden and the left, but but it was out there it was there. We were discussing it prior to the election. There was even the information about subpoenas having been issued in 2018 in stories that were run before the election. And number two, you know, I mean, there is this protocol. Justice to not comment on ongoing investigations s O, and I think there's a good reason for that. So you don't slide people that may be a target for investigation, who never turned out to be charged with anything and Negatively impact that reputation publicly. If he would have done that, would he have not been the same position as Jim Comey and subject to the same criticism? Yeah. I think Jim Comey did the right thing, actually, in the regard in regards to Hillary, Not actually. I think he saved Hillary on backfired on him. But we because there was a presidential candidate. He tried to pretend it to try to Be forthcoming about what the FBI was up to and doing during the election. I don't Asai preface this that comment. I'm not exactly sure what went on, but I just don't understand why the sun Of the presidential candidate deserves special treatment. Where less than you can you can you know what? How far does it extend to the cousins too? You know, I mean to the brother to who? I don't know. I don't exactly understand how the protocols used to stuff like that. So I shouldn't say definitively. I just feel like it's a weird Exception that's made for people in power that should be made for others. Well, I mean, you know, I can understand why people would be confused on why people a lot of people hold the same view that you do, because the protocol is sometimes divided and sometimes not if it were Abided categorically, including by previous FBI directors and attorneys general than maybe the line would be a little bit brighter This we don't comment on things on and like that, because we are in the business of not only protecting the integrity, the investigation from politics as best we can, but also Protecting the reputation of people who are at this point are just subjects off, not charged with anything. And, you know, I think I just quickly say one thing. I know the proper. The problem with all of that is that you get to say thing. You got to go on TV and called something Russian disinformation. And while the FBI doesn't I believe, actually, maybe they had The dog that but you know, you get to say things that simply aren't true about investigations of people. It's misleading in its own way, so I don't really know how the FBI and the Justice Department can handle that. But, you know, it's just it just seemed like it just seemed like that's not the kind of principals action that would have been taken by a DOJ of Biden or certainly no problem anyway. Yeah, question when we come back with interviews David her Sonny. Wanna pick up with more of the Hunter Biden investigation business and how it.
"john durham" Discussed on KFI AM 640
"F I. The Beverly Hill City Council. Is bucking the trend unanimously approving a resolution to oppose L. A county's outdoor dining ban. They are demanding that the board of Supervisors revisit it at their next meeting, and they're talking about starting their own public Health department so that if this ever happens again, they won't have to do with county says. And Fizer says they have permission for emergency use of their covert 19 vaccine in Britain, and that doses are already on the way. Now we are in the middle of a B B B B bill bar Busy boy Day, in addition to giving that interview to the AP, where he said the DOJ has not found any widespread fraud, putting him at odds with the president. It's also come out that he took John Durham. The U. S attorney in Connecticut, who you may remember earlier this year, was appointed to look into the origins of the Russia investigation. And it turns out that before the election, but not announced publicly, he converted John Durham's involvement to that of a special prosecutor. Ala. Robert Mueller. And this is upsetting people because it's viewed as an attempt to make it very difficult for a new Biden administration or a Congress under President Biden to get rid of John Durham or stop what he's doing. Because it does give John durum a lot more protections and autonomy. In terms of what he's doing. And this was done back in October, But you know, we're just now finding out about it. That part's a little bit interesting. As far as the substance of the thing. I don't know how much of a difference that it makes. John Durham has been looking into this for quite some time. So far. You know what's funny is there's parallels here. First you had the Russia investigation. Right and Mueller looking into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and certain people close to Trump and maybe even President Trump and Russia and it ended up In snaring a few people. In some things that weren't Part of Russian collusion. Then you have John Durham appointed to look into that investigation. I mean, theoretically, under the Biden administration, there could be another U. S attorney appointed to look into the appointment of John Durham appointed to look into the Russia investigation, and then you just get like a Russian nesting dolls. Of investigations into the origin of investigations. But here's my point, so The Mueller investigation did not yield anything substantive about the thing it first set out to look into, although you know they caught some people doing some bad things, but had nothing to do with the original mandate if you will. Now John Durham's appointed to look into was the government itself corrupt. When it decided to investigate Russian collusion. And so far he has only come up with one There is an FBI agent who pleaded guilty to altering some emails. And although that sounds super bad, and it is bad, the kind of altering that was done is a little bit wonky. I'm not sticking up for the guy should not have done it. But it wasn't like super smoking gun. Stuff. And so you basically have a parallel between Mueller's investigation and this guy's investigation, and now he's been appointed special counsel to do it, so he'll be able to keep doing it for a lot longer if he wants to, and it will be harder. For a new administration to stop him. Here's the part of it. That's fascinating. Bar. Is now getting criticized by people that you would never believe would have a problem with him. Remember that bar is thought to be in many circles in the tank for the president. So here's a guy. Who has this to say about William Barr and John Durham to guys who in theory? Are either on the president's side. Or are looking into something that would vindicate the president. Who is this dapper fellow? No, we have a two tiered justice system and bill bars job is to block for the deep state. Which is.
"john durham" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK
"That is the DOJ investigating Missing in action can tell you where they are. I asked. Are they looking at it? Everyone says yes. They're looking at it. Where are they with all of this stuff, And you know what happened to Durham? Where's durum? But I just It's inconceivable you would think if you're in the FBI or Department of Justice. This is this is the biggest thing you could be looking at. Where are they? I've not seen anything. Hello, Mr President. Where is John Durham? Where is the FBI? Where is the DOJ? Y? Do you think That they don't seem to be doing anything about this. What is it? That makes them stop now. Meantime, state they're going ahead with their certifications. The governor of Arizona. They're having a it's not a hearing. Informational gathering, but the governor of Arizona Has said Yes, we are certifying the race for Joe Biden. He's a big is a big Republican. So I'm looking at all this. You know, my theory about nobody ever goes after anybody in Washington. So what's your theory? Phone number here. Is 855295 66.
"john durham" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"You know that we have been trying to cover every aspect of the Obama Gate scandal. And you also probably recognized that the news reports of the last week or two as absolutely validated vindicated so many of the guests we've had on over the last three years. Who have been investigating this story, not least of which was most importantly, Lee Smith, who, in his very important book permanent How Enemies, Foreign and Domestic Target of the American President on DH. His other writings that we've been covering here, basically said that this whole thing was an invention. The dossier isn't even a dossier is complete and total opposition research. And this is exactly what Hillary Clinton created out of whole cloth. And now we know that in fact, we know that the CIA director John Brennan, brief Barack Obama about it. July 26th, which means he knew about this thing being a concocted myth before the FBI even started their crossfire Hurricane investigation. Joining us right now to discuss these latest developments and also to discuss the news. Now that it appears John Durham and Attorney General William Barr will not be providing any more investigative information into this until after the election is the Afro mention Lee Smith again bestgate of journalists and media Communist Tablet magazine and his latest is that American greatness? One step closer to despotism. Is that headline Lee? Good to have you, sir? Hi, Larry. Thanks very much for From writing down this afternoon. I Take the news of the Durham investigation that take it as an indication of Of, uh of foreboding. I believe that it signals that our country's heading into yet darker, darker territory, So I think it's I think it's uh I think it's very bad, and I think it's not just about the Investigation of what happened before the 2016 election. I think it's about the last four years in Toto, and I think it's about what we're going to be looking at the next few weeks. And as the Democrats Brighton, perhaps after a CZ. Well, Lee the and again we haven't heard specifically, I don't think, have we? This is sort of like, like, you know, sources say kind of thing. But the assumption here is that Attorney General Bar does not want the Justice Department to wade into something this politically volatile weeks before a presidential election. They don't want to politicize. The Justice Department. Is that a fair argument? Considering this whole thing was the justice government has for political purposes? Yeah, right. I don't know if it's the Attorney General William Bar where it's the U. S. Attorney, John Durham is investigating it. But certainly that that's indication. I think it probably leans more for Durham on this captain. Does Barbara Yeses? I argue in my piece. Kind of absurd. I mean the horse already out of the barn on this one to avoid the appearance of politicized investigation and making sense. It's nonsense. This was itself A political operation, therefore, and the investigation of it will, by definition, by its nature, be politicized to wish to avoid the appearance of something while understandable, and while commendable Ah in its desire, and it's aimed to prevent the United States from taking one from our political system, taking one more step toward the ethos of the third world again, while commendable, it makes no sense. The only way to save the country from the precipice is to establish returns. Right rule of law has been broken. There is no one No. One who is listening to Michael Flynn to the various hearings regarding the Michael Flynn case can possibly mistake the fact that the justice system now has been weaponized. So it wasn't just the FBI in 2016. It's not just legislators like Adam Schiff. Who who lie as a matter of a so It's a slow it's air or water. We're now talking about a weaponized judicial system judiciary. So we're talking about three branches of government here. There can be no doubt anyone listening to any of that that the rule of law in this country on matters of great importance. Including things like presidential election, peaceful transitions of power. How members meeting members of the opposing party will be treated again. There could be no doubt that the rule of law is broken. Yeah. And I think this idea that they don't want this out before the election because then it will. You know, it'll look like it's politicized. I mean, I find that as atrocious is Joe Biden saying, I know my position on stacking the court and I'll tell you after the election. Shouldn't the American people know exactly the extent of this of this abuse of the Justice Department and abuses the civil liberties of the president and the people in his Cabinet in the people in his campaign? So that it can inform their vote They should know before the election. Absolutely. They should notice for the election. I believe it's possible we will have more documents declassified before that to shed more light on what happened, But the fact is Another and the book on this one from the new plot against the president. The story of Congressman Nina's investigation the fundamental details of this story we've known now for several years. Right. We've known since February 2018 and the memoranda that Congressman Nunes is credited for offering the Nunes memo write the basic facts of these The Clinton campaign page for a phony dossier smearing Trump. The FBI obtained a warrant to spy on the entire Trump campaign using this Clinton funded document. He's in the fact this is the fundamental fact. Now we put more details on this. We've expanded the picture, and I suspect that this is what granting the fact that the Durham investigation was indeed a really thing on DH, not phony. I imagine they put more details, in fact, on this, but But again, we know the fundamental play. It was 100% a political operation. Using the resource is of the federal government to spy on an opposing political campaign. But again, as I say the problem is not simply what happened four years ago. The fact is that because no one has paid for this Because no one has been charged with crimes regarding this that let us not only the things like the impeachment and other different operations targeting Trump in his allies like Michael Flynn. Now we're heading into an election season where the Democrats have made threats from everything. I mean, we'll see. We'll see what's happening with the vote by mail, right? The point of vote by mail is chaos. We see chaos. That was the point from the beginning because this was always the Democrat's plan to create chaos. That was the platform by which Joe Biden had a chance to win the presidency by himself. There was no way that Biden could win, but this was the play, create chaos. Take it to court. Threatened to put people in the streets because no one has paid for what happened four years ago what is likely to happen in the coming weeks in coming months? Will be mantra was being with Lee.
"john durham" Discussed on KDWN 720AM
"Federal prosecutor John Durham attorney bar has all too often acted on behalf of the president's interests rather than as a neutral law enforcement officer he almost seems a Patrick man on a political campaign rather than being Attorney General in August position I'm following the rule of law and trying to shield that office from politics whenever possible instead barred loves to jump in to the political pool of mock that DOJ inspector general report will get an up front viewing today up close and personal that's because the inspector general Michael Horowitz will testify before Congress seem San Francisco leaders are tired of the streets being used as testing grounds for the latest attack on the board of supervisors approved legislation this week requiring businesses to get permits before trying out new high tech ideas in public the new office of emerging technology will oversee products like delivery drones and hover boards supporters think it's the first such legislation in the country they say it's long overdue in a city that's a hub for major tax and the Silicon Valley leadership groups as the permit requirement will stifle innovation and burden business of fuel by both college and pro football boxes one a rare title as champ of the broadcast week the Nielsen company says boxes Thursday night cowboys bears game was that week's top show it's Saturday night broadcast of the big ten title game finished fourth for the week box at a primetime average of nearly eight million viewers leaving second place to CBS seven of the week's top ten shows rather football or their pregame noticing a trend here folks live sporting events well Nike's logo will be on the upper right chest of a Major League Baseball jerseys this year are far more prominent position in the majestic athletic logo previously on sleeves a ten year deal announced that last January replaced the deal announced in December for under armor to take over from majestic on the online sportswear retailer fanatics will manufacture distribute license versions of the Nike uniforms and training where to consumers and majestic had that manufactured and they'll be batting practice jerseys since nineteen eighty two and had been the exclusive supplier of game uniforms since two thousand five before that were manufactured by majestic Russell athletic and Rawlings and a few of those those are going to be classics probably worth a lot of my I don't know that as cellum down the road for like a.
"john durham" Discussed on 600 WREC
"Now. Let me I want to clarify something. I said about Muller. I was technically right. But I left something out of this involving the four people the innocent people who were framed and kept in jail put in jail and kept there for years in order to protect the informant status. Of the Boston mobster Whitey Bolger Muller was not there when they were framed and put in jail, but he found out and nevertheless kept them in jail after it was learned that they were innocent Miller Miller handed. No they were innocent of what they were convicted. He was still writing to the parole board urging that they be kept in prison. He didn't have a hand in putting want to specify that the operation was not totally as he didn't put them there. But he learned that they were innocent wrote the poll Perot to keep them there in order to protect the. The bureau's informant status of Whitey Bulger. And again, the only reason why this well, there's not only reason. But the reason is matters is that one of the investigators who discovered this and had the guts to report. This was the lawyer that bar has named today to investigate the investigation. John Durham, so that this is this this is why I making a deal about this. But again, I do Mr. Snerdley. I'm continuing them getting emails. I don't care. Resume Limbaugh won't results. Dude. I want revenge. I've been hearing resumes life. What does that gotten us? I'm sympathetic. I I think. It's hard for none of us are of Washington of well, some of you may be I I know that that this audience is wide and vast and has many people in Washington listening to it. But. Those of you who like me don't live there work there. Don't conduct our business there. We're not of Washington. And it is a different place. If is it's its own culture, it has its own identity, and because it's Washington because it's the national capital, these are people whose differences and patterns and culture, if you will is oriented toward running things, and I'm just I'm thinking that this what has happened here in this investigation. Has what the term would be. But but even inside Washington, I think what has happened. Here has really awakened a lot of people. I think because they know this thing was a fraud from the get-go, they know this thing was a political operation. They know it was not a criminal or counter Intel investigation. And I think it's for some people there. It's a step too far. I am assuming that the attorney general is one of these people who thinks this is way way way beyond what we do here. This is not what we do. We do not allow this department of Justice to become weaponize. The fact that it's going to become politicized as in escape -able because it's run out of the executive branch. The executive branch is led by the president who's elected by the people. He comes from one of the two parties. And he appoints people to serve in various positions. So it's going to have a political tent, but in terms of the execution of the job the execution of job responsibilities. The administration of Justice. Lifers in career people in the DOJ, many of them really buy into the idea that they should not having to do with politics. But that got up ended. I think the Obama administration Eric Holder was there specifically. To use the DOJ as a means of advancing the the Obama agenda and by the same token when when Democrats career Democrats in the DOJ have sought to use it. As a weapon to investigate or thwart the Republican agenda. But I think even within those confines what happened here is so far and above what has been tolerated before. Has this takes the cake? I mean, there never was a crime here. There never was any evidence here and the level of deception and lying to the American people the amount of money spent there are people who have been wiped out reputations destroyed and lives ruined in this that had nothing to do with anything. And would not have ever been prosecuted or charged were it not for the existence of this so-called investigation. The I think that's what we're watching. And there's going to be significant opposition to bar on this. There will be significant opposition John Durham, there will be people at try to thwart this the people that don't want to be exposed the many of them already have in many of them had been fired like strokes Merck and Lisa page, McCabe and call me. So we we shall see. Great to have your witnesses, always the phone number. If you want to be on the programs, eight hundred two eight two two eight two I wanna get back to audio soundbites before I leave this and move on to other things. Let's let's resume it here at audio sound bite. Number two. This is democrat Senator Bob Menendez. He was on CNN today with Alison Cammarata who said, by the way. Little story about it. Monday yesterday on CNN's new day co host Alison Cammarata disgust President Trump's proposed address from oh have you heard about this? Trump is going to give a speech from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on the fourth of July and media is outraged that he is going to politicize independence day. They can't stand there beside themselves with rage and anger that Trump is going to insert himself on independence day in our national celebrations. Alison Cammarata disgust Trump's propose speech from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial as part of the fourth of July celebration in Washington and she asked. Will Trump give a foaming at the mouth speech where people clamor for violence? Are these people deranged or what he said, you know, I'm just I'm just wondering what kind of speech would he give would he give presidential speech? Or would he give one of these foaming at the mouth speeches that we sometimes see at his rallies where they clamor, you know, the crowd they clamor for violence, like lock her up. Lock her up what miles ever happens at a Trump rally. And what violence ever happens after a Trump rally? What in the name of Sam hill is she talking about Trump clamoring for violence or his attendees clamoring for violence. But there beside themselves that Trump is the daddy to insert himself in a celebration of the nation's independence. How many other presidents have done this? The list is long. But she's worried about the things he might say. Well, he incite violence will people be marching to Jeff after the speech trying to put Hillary Clinton chains in March her to the nearest jail. Anyway, that's who was talking to Bob. Menendez this morning on CNN's news day question attorney, general bars launched a third investigation, basically investigating the investigators of the Trump teams ties to Russia. There weren't any. See how this goes on? There weren't any Trump ties to Russia. And we have on none other than Robert Muller as the source of thority there, but there's four hundred forty eight pages of innuendo four hundred and forty eight pages of mindless gossip and smears. In stark violation of department of Justice guidelines, so here she is talking to some guy who barely escaped his own trial. Bob menendez. So what do you think about this Senator has what what do you think of what bars doing here with the special lawyer is A-plus of the.
"john durham" Discussed on AP News
"Appointed John Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to investigate the origins of the Russian vestige and determine telling collections involving the Trump campaign was lawful and appropriate. The appointment comes about a month after bar told members of congress he believes spying did occur on the campaign while giving no details about what spying may have taken place. He appeared to be alluding to the F B I investigating a former Trump associate and its use of an informant while investigating a former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser terms investigation comes as Justice Department's inspector general is also looking into the origins of the Russia investigation. Big losses today in the markets. Dow dropping more than six hundred points amid the terrify between the US and China it's an escalation of the already damaging trade war between the world's biggest economies. China is fighting back by hiking tariffs on sixty billion dollars in American goods from coffee to spinach, the latest Harris from both sides won't kick in for a few weeks, giving them breathing room to reach a deal. President Trump tweeted Earlier China will be hurt very badly without one. I love the position we're in. He says a plans in the works to help American farmers hit hard by the trade battle. And he's repeating his claim that the tariffs will not hurt. American consumers, though. The White House's top economists acknowledges they and businesses will bear some costs. Saga megani? Washington. Three people are known dead. Three others are missing after two sightseeing flow planes collided today over southeast Alaska. The coast guard says ten of the people are hospitalized one in critical condition a total of sixteen people including fourteen passengers from the Royal Princess cruise ship were on those planes. This is a p. Radio news. Actress Felicity Huffman pleads guilty to federal charges for her involvement in the college admissions cheating scandal, she admits paying fifteen thousand dollars to fix her daughters. SAT test answers prosecutors say they will recommend for months in prison. She faces sentencing in September. Doris day. When Hollywood's biggest stars in the fifties and sixties has died at ninety seven margins are a lot of with more. Sentimental journey was door. Stays I hit record. She also had hits with everybody loves a lover secret love, and whatever will be will be case awry, while she starred in such dramas as the man who knew too much she was known for fluffy romantic comedies, like pillow talk and the thrill of it all day said in a twenty eleven AP interview, she loved making those comedies. The film that I just love coming to work day was married. Four times devoted her later years to helping animals I'm Archie zaraleta? I'm Tim Maguire AP radio news at farmers insurance. We know every windshield collision.
"john durham" Discussed on WJR 760
"Gary McNamara. Thanks so much for being here. This morning. We do appreciate it as as always. Some interesting other stories out there attorney general William bar to appoint a US. Attorney assign a US attorney to look into government surveillance involving the Trump campaign. Yeah. This'll be interesting because you take it off of the desk, I have this assignment here. And it takes it off the desk. And this is this would be the US attorney for Connecticut. Connecticut, John Durham. And he's been assigned to this part. This you know, the the twenty sixteen beginnings of the whole Russia gate thing. And they're. What I'm wondering is about stuff. We don't know think about all the items we talked about the known items we've talked about on this program. For quite a while starting with over two years ago. Well, it wasn't starting with it. But a big chunk of it came the circa Sirkin news with John Solomon, and Sarah a quarter, delivering actual court documents and everything else. So if you look at some of those known items, I'm wondering what what they'll find that. We don't know about yet. And is this are those known items just the Kipp the proverbial ice Berg. I I have to believe there's an number of things where the dots aren't connected yet. And they're going to be connected. Very quickly in this case. You know, there was a great column. Byron York writing in the Washington Examiner about the actual FIS a warrant what we know. And just the way that he that the way that he wrote it what we know already about the visor warranty application, and why it was so flawed and how was wrong on everything. Right. And and I'm just gonna read a couple of paragraphs here. Because it's it's really it's it's just fascinating. He says the warranty application made a three point argument point one was at Russia was trying to influence in two thousand sixteen presidential election point, two was at Carter page had a history of involvement with Russia and the Russians point three page was a Russian agent conspiring with powerful Russian officials to influence the election. And as you writes point, one was true. Yeah. Russia was trying to influence presidential election point two page at history of involvement with Russia and the Russians that that was true point three that he was a Russian agent conspiring with powerful Russian officials to influence the election. That's where the application falls right off the rails. Well, that's the important part here because that's the part that gets you a secret warrant right now that you do business with Russia, right? And he goes on the the the the fact of. That even though parts of it are redacted, you still possible to make out just how grossly wrong the FBI was. And he talks about how the application explained how Russia had a long history of hostile intelligence activities, and the US intelligence authorities believe Russia was behind the hacking and release of the emails both from the DNC and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, it noted that page and energy consultant who had worked with Russia in the two thousands had once been targeted for recruitment by actual Russian agents who are later prosecuted page who was not accused of violating any lock watt birdied in the case and the application quoted from his earlier interviews with the FBI that was accurate. Said then the application moved onto twenty sixteen. And said the target of this application is Carter page an agent of a foreign power. The FBI believes that the Russian government's efforts are being coordinated with page, and perhaps other individuals associated with Donald Trump's campaign. And another point the application said the FBI believes page has been the subject of targeted recruitment by the Russian government. To undermine influence he outcome of the twenty sixteen US presidential election in violation of US criminal law. That's in the application. That's a serious charge. Right. And. At another point in the application. It said based on Russian government historical efforts to influence U S elections redacted and the information discuss Herron regarding Russia's coordination with Carter page to undermine and improperly and illegally influence in two thousand sixteen presidential election on none of that turned out to be true. After two years of investigation Muller never charged page with any wrongdoing in four hundred and forty eight pages. The Muller report did not alleged page was an agent of Russia. The investigation did not establish page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere in the two thousand sixteen presidential election. The report said. The report said Muller, of course, also included the evidence did not establish. There was any conspiracy or coordination between Russia or anyone associated with Trump or any other American for that matter the FBI's assertion that page was Russian agent working with Russia to fix the election who's outright wrong to support its case. What did they use Eric the dossier? That's something that they didn't use the first time they've petitioned for a warrant on Carter pay. Well, because if you look at this in July twenty six here's what they write in July two thousand sixteen page traveled to Moscow to deliver a speech at the new economic school. That was actually true and was reported in the press at that time, then they said while in Moscow, the FBI said page had a secret meeting with a man named eager session. The head of the Russian energy giant row snapped the FBI said the two men discussed a quid pro quo deal of future, bilateral energy cooperation and exchange for lifting sanctions against Russia. That information right there came from the Steele dossier. At that point in the FIS application. The FBI noted that this information. Came from source one which was Christopher Steele. And on that right there that they had the secret meeting the FBI assesses source one to be reliable that was Christopher Steele. And also suggested the people who hired Steele might have a political motive, and we're likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Trump's campaign, regardless of the motivation, it appears. Yep. Guy was wrong on the simple fact that the meeting never took place next. The FBI said that page still on his Moscow trip met with the senior figure in the Russian government and Putin associate the two met secretly the FBI set in their agenda for the meeting included. Raising a dossier that the Kremlin possessed on Hillary Clinton and the possibility of it being released to candidate to Trump's campaign. The information also came from the dossier was attributed to steal. Impairs? The FBI was wrong again on that page divide can meeting that was the man's name. The Muller report never alleges that such a meeting took place, then there's two entirely blacked out pages. Followed by the FBI's allegation that that meeting took place which was false when the declassified part of the application resumed the FBI cited at twenty sixteen Washington Post article alleging in the FBI words had candidate one. That's Trump's campaign worked behind the scenes to make sure political party, the Republican party's platform would not call for giving weapons to the Ukraine to fight Russian and rebel forces contra contradicting the view of almost all political of a Republican party foreign policy leaders in Washington at the time, the FBI wrote the Republican party platform was a staple of Twitter and cable TV talk Muller investigated that at length and did not allege that it was part of any conspiracy or coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign and Carter page was not even them that at all. Finally, they use the 2016 Yahoo article that said the exact same thing and came from Christopher Steele, right? They did not know that it was steal. The guy noted the article referred to a well place. Western intelligence source. Who who who told Yahoo that page had met with both of those men that were previously reported, the well-placed western intelligence source was of course, Christopher Steele. But the FBI did not want to say that that it was that it's confidential human source was blabbing to the press. So when the footnote the bureau told the court that the FBI does not believe that source one steel directly provided the information to the press that was false the FBI was wrong in that too. After several blacked-out pages rounded out the application before the FBI reached its conclusion as discussed above. Here's was the final conclusion as discussed above the FBI believes page has been collaborating and conspiring with the Russian government, the bureau road based on the foregoing facts and circumstances yet BI submits that there is probable cause to believe that page knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities, other than intelligence gathering activities for or on behalf of such worn powers and lonely conspires with other persons to engage in such activities, and therefore is an agent of a foreign power as defined by the law. That allegation was the heart of the Muller investigation and the special counsel did not allege that page or any other American was involved in what the FBI described. So what you got is from what we know. All the information to get the FIS a warrant. You've got those two redacted pages. They're completely redacted. But everything else it has not been redacted. Was based on the Steele dossier. That was false right now. What we're told from the Republicans redaction will even. Damn those in the FBI, legally more..
"john durham" Discussed on AP News
"John Durham, the US attorney Connecticut to investigate the origins of the Russian Vesta Gatien and determine telling collections involving the Trump campaign was lawful and appropriate. The appointment comes about a month after bar told members of congress he believes buying did occur on the campaign while giving no details about what spying may have taken place. He appeared to be alluding to the F B I investigating a former Trump associate and its use of an informant while investigating a former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser terms investigation comes as the Justice Department's inspector general is also looking into the origins of the Russia investigation. Big losses today in the markets. Dow dropping more than six hundred points amid the terrify between the US and China it's an escalation of the already damaging trade war between the world's biggest con. Enemies. China is fighting back by hiking tariffs on sixty billion dollars in American goods from coffee to spinach, the latest Harris from both sides won't kick in for a few weeks, giving them breathing room to reach a deal. President Trump tweeted Earlier China will be hurt very badly without one. I love the position we're in. He says a plans in the works to help American farmers hit hard by the trade battle. And he's repeating his claim that the tariffs will not hurt. American consumers, though, the lighthouses top economists acknowledges they and businesses will bear some costs. Saga megani? Washington. Three people are known dead. Three others are missing after two sightseeing flow planes collided today over southeast Alaska. The coast guard says ten of the people are hospitalized one in critical condition a total of sixteen people including fourteen passengers from the Royal Princess cruise ship were on those planes. This is a p. Radio news. Actress Felicity Huffman pleads guilty to federal charges for her involvement in the college admissions cheating scandal, she admits paying fifteen thousand dollars to fix her daughters. SAT test answers prosecutors say they will recommend four months in prison. She faces sentencing in September Doris day when Hollywood's biggest stars in the fifties and sixties has died at ninety seven Margie zaraleta with more. Man sentimental journey was Doris day's I hit record. She also had hits with everybody loves a lover secret love, and whatever will be will be case arrests era, while she started in such dramas as the man who knew too much she was known for fluffy romantic comedies, like pillow talk and the thrill of it all day said in a twenty eleven AP interview, she loved making those comedies. In the film that I just love coming to work day was married. Four times and devoted her later years to helping animals I'm Archie zaraleta? I'm Tim Maguire AP radio news..
"john durham" Discussed on AP News
"Appointed John Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to investigate the origins of the Russian vestige and determine if in telling collections involving the Trump campaign was lawful and appropriate. The appointment comes about a month after bar told members of congress he believes spying did occur on the campaign giving no details about what spying may have taken place. He appeared to be alluding to the FBI investigating of a former Trump associate and its use of an informant while investigating a former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser terms investigation comes as the Justice Department's inspector general is also looking into the origins of the Russia investigation. Big losses today in the markets. Dow dropping more than six hundred points amid the terrify between the US and China, it's an esscalation of the already damaging trade war between the world's biggest economies. China is fighting back by hiking tariffs on sixty billion dollars in American goods from coffee to spinach, the latest Harris from both sides won't kick in for a few weeks, giving them breathing room to reach a deal. President Trump tweeted Earlier China will be hurt very badly without one. I love the position we're in. He says a plans in the works to help American farmers hit hard by the trade battle. And he's repeating his claim that the tariffs will not hurt. American consumers, though. The White House is top economists acknowledges they and businesses will bear some costs. Saga megani? Washington. Three people are known dead. Three others are missing after two sightseeing flow planes collided today over southeast Alaska. The coast guard says ten of the people are hospitalized one in critical condition a total of sixteen people including fourteen passengers from the Royal Princess cruise ship were on those planes. This is a p. Radio news. Actress Felicity Huffman pleads guilty to federal charges for her involvement in the college admissions cheating scandal, she admits to paying fifteen thousand dollars to fix her daughters. SAT test answers prosecutors say they will recommend four months in prison. She faces sentencing in September. Doris day. When Hollywood's biggest stars in the fifties and sixties has died at ninety seven Margie zaraleta with more. Sentimental journey was Doris day's I hit record. She also had hits with everybody loves a lover secret love, and whatever will be will be case Araya while she started in such dramas as the man who knew too much she was known for fluffy romantic comedies, like pillow talk in the thrill of it all day said in a twenty eleven AP interview, she loved making those comedies. Films that I just love coming to work day was married. Four times devoted her later years to helping animals I'm Archie zaraleta? I'm Tim Maguire AP radio news..