17 Burst results for "John Cruz"
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Know, you either want the soft landing betting that could have to either bet on a soft landing so the economy continues to do well. The fed achieves its goal of bringing an inflation and yet we continue to be able to employ most people and they make enough money to eat food and put gas in their cars. Or you have to bet on the fed aggressively cutting and maybe even more fiscal stimulus as Michael Burry had tweeted last week. Now that's a nightmare scenario for the economy, right? But at least you get for the markets, I don't know if that's a good thing for society, but at least the markets then rally on that. It was interesting Schwartz. I couldn't tell really which side he fell on. I think he was kind of in the middle there. So I'm looking forward to going back to listen to that interview, but I think it's interesting to think about it. This could be a decade for dividends as he and Siegel say. We're kind of getting back to fixed income and dividends. People want income, maybe slow and steady growth, not wild and crazy days of the tech company growth. All right, good stuff. All right, today we woke up today. You looked at the tape, there was a lot of news about the big Wall Street banks. We had Goldman cutting jobs. A little bit muted though, right? Because Goldman was supposed to cut like over 4000. Yeah, so it was even less of its work for it. Exactly. But nonetheless, now we are 30 big number. Morgan Stanley John Cruz on their COO stepping down. And then credit Swiss and Michael Klein negotiating for Chris was to buy Michael Klein's firm as part of this new credit Swiss first Boston. So let's break it down. Plus we got earnings coming up for these big banks at dinner of the week. So let's get a nice little round table going for us. Allison Williams senior banks analyst for Bloomberg intelligence joins via the phone and Bloomberg news Wall Street reporter shiny basic. Joins us here in our Bloomberg act of broker studio, Allison of the three news items we got, the Goldman news, the credit Swiss news, the Morgan Stanley. Which one is most important to you? Should we be paying attention to these things? I mean, I think Goldman confirming the headcount cuts, I think, is probably the most important in terms of thinking about the environment a couple of things I point out on the 3200 member, only about a third of that investment banking and trading and a lot of those cuts really going towards the consumer business, which was an effort that they initiative they did several years ago. I would say that there was a lot of skepticism, including myself around the offering and the competitive the company's competitive advantage there really didn't seem to make sense that I think they are pulling back and just refocusing that effort, keep in mind a lot of the headcount increases they've seen this year have come from acquisitions. So scaling back and rightsizing some businesses. But on the investment banking side, this is something that we're closely watching in the first quarter. The pipelines were good, all last year, but we feel like they're becoming a bit stale. And across the industry. Yes, across the industry. And for Goldman Sachs as well. Well, this is the thing, Allison, because so most of the job cuts are going to be at basically Marcus, the consumer facing division that they seem to have decided, that wasn't a great idea. And now they're scaling back. And the other cuts that are coming and trading investment banking, okay, they haven't done that for a few years, right? And they hired they've hired so many people. So this to me isn't a sign that Wall Street is massively rightsizing, more like Goldman Sachs is just getting back to business as usual and taking care of some stuff they had to do last year and he didn't get around to. Well, I do think, I mean, I don't think it's a massive rightsizing. I think that as they said, they haven't done their sort of typical 5%. And so that's coming back. And so if you look at the math and you exit the market stuff, it is the typical. And so I think what's going to be interesting is what's going to happen with compensation at Goldman and the firm's as well as headcount because what we had heard from Solomon, even just a month ago, I believe, was that the cost to compete had not come down as much as they would have thought, Daniel Pinto, who runs the JPMorgan's corporate and investment bank. Also said that they were going to use comp as the level rather than job cuts. So we will see what the interplay is between those two things. We do think that cost pressure continues into next year. And that's the big variable that we're hear about during earnings because we can track a lot of things, we can track that equity underwritings are down significantly. We can track that pick is good and equities, less so, but expenses really involve management judgment in terms of the level of investments that they're making and that's really going to determine give us a signal in terms of what they think about ahead and also the profitability for the coming year. So I want to switch gears a little bit. John Cruz and COO of Morgan Stanley, one of the leaders, one of the potential successors to mister Gorman as CEO, how big of a piece of dues is this for Morgan Stanley? Listen, for Morgan Stanley and a stand-alone person story, it is a huge story. On one hand, Jonathan prus was a CFO, typically a spider Morgan Stanley that has gone on to great heights and
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"And as we've been reporting, Morgan Stanley chief operating officer, John cruise, a longtime lieutenant to James Gorman in once considered a potential candidate to succeed him as chief executive, is exiting the firm. Meanwhile, futures this morning are moving higher with S&P futures up about 19 points, down features of a 116 and NASDAQ futures up 62. And this update is brought to you by interactive brokers interactive brokers charges Martin long rates from 4.83% to 5.83% rate subject to change, learn more at IBKR dot com slash compare. The ten year treasury is down four third 8 seconds, the yield 3.57% that yield on the two year 4.23%. Nymex crude oil is up 2.9% of $2 12 cents at $75 89 cents a barrel. Comex gold F 6 10% or $11 30 cents in 1881 ounce, the Euro one 7 two zero against the dollar, British found 1.2165, the yen one 31.95, and Bitcoin is F 1.6%. It's at about $17,200. And that's a Bloomberg business flash, Tom and Paul. Sharon, thanks so much for keen and now a two hour conversation with Chanel basic our chief financial correspondent stories today. Let's go through and we've already done gold in three times this morning. We're going to go buy that 3000 plus people out the door today. He's been brilliant on it. She not arrive has been brilliant at it. One question, Credit Suisse is taken out Michael Klein shop. I thought Michael Klein was taken out Credit Suisse. So Michael Klein, remember very senior banker at Citigroup for a long time, kind of lost out for the CEO candidate. Went off, started his own advisory shop. It's small. It's only a couple dozen people, according to my sources. With that said, it's been very powerful because they have strong relationships across the entire world. Is he going to be credit? We got to go to Morgan Stanley. Is he going to be Credit Suisse first Boston? Yeah, there's more than just that because there's an existing investment bank, but they're merging it. And he's supposed to lead that firm. So this is in addition to this. A great deal for Michael Clement. That barely describes it. Exactly. He gets bought out of his firm, put in charge of credit Swiss versus Boston. We'll get stock there. Wait, it just shows you how desperate credit Swiss is to get this thing out. Well, let's see if they can pay the hundreds of millions of dollars to get it done, remember. They're in a crunch themselves. Let's see if they if they get any pushback. What we're going to do here folks is talk gossip and Wall Street. And I want to make clear I more than anyone can't stand this. Should I live this every day with a battle about it? We're barely on speaking terms. Except this time it matters. The CFO Eaton Vance guy at Morgan Stanley, the COO out of tufts, lifer for Gorman. Totally. Finally, out the door, John Cruz and exits. I cut to the chase. Where's he going? That's a great question. There is a couple of positions open that are very notable. I guess the first thing I had in my mind is Carlisle is without a CEO. And has the perfect resume. But unclear, they have speculation. Congratulations. I mean, come on, you just think about what makes sense. And John cruzan remember he was, let's give him a little bit of a victory lap here. He was the banker to the banks. He was a huge presence in 2008, not just in Morgan Stanley's own ability to make it through a time where they almost didn't make it. He also helped restructure banks across the country, became the CFO of Morgan Stanley. Remember that's a role now Ruth porat was previously in that she went to a small tech firm in the West Coast. Exactly known as Alphabet. And so West Coast. I mean, John Cruz and I've been on this job for 9 years. I've watched him each of those 9. He was always a shooting star. And so his next act was always going to be exciting. For anybody watching this space. All right, so at Morgan Stanley, house the bench there. And do we have any type of Succession concerns brewing there? So not concerns. Remember in the last year we have two potential candidates for CEO leaving the bank that is Shelley O'Connor, who was the head of the U.S. bank, one of the heads of the wealth management business really senior female family. You now have John poos down leaving, but the eyes were really always on two people. Ted pick, who runs the institutional securities business, and Andy saperstein, who runs wealth. And Andy is more of a Gorman guy, if that makes sense. It is 64. He's a young, I mean, I know he's listening. Good morning, gentlemen, from Australia. There's some time for Gorman to suss out what the next phase is. And he's done some huge things. Those two big deals in Vance and E trade. So they're being integrated, it's moving along, maybe see it through the next tough year or so, but these two men are very clearly being primed for the top spot, and the question then becomes who gets it. And I've got to say if you meet up with somebody at Morgan Stanley, it is constantly a conversation. It is something that comes up in every lunch drink and dinner. So at Morgan Stanley, we're looking at the stock down, only 13% over the trailing 12 months. So, you know, better than the market
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Lot of headcount growth. Interesting. You can't just build a digital bank for the future without ramping up aggressively there. You can't rule out a lot of these new products without staffing up on that front. And that's a place which is right for cuts, unfortunately. One question before we let you go. Is everybody back in their seats in the office? Is it being in person really important? Over the last two years, one team has been very clear if there is one bank that has been adamant about wanting everyone back in the office. Common Sachs has been at the forefront of it. Heading into the last people because of that, come on, you talk to everybody. One would hope not. We'll find out at the end of the week, but surely I can not expect that being a factor in cutting jobs, but Lisa. No, but other tech guys at Goldman Sachs having a tantrum because they got a darkened the door 5 days a week. Cut to the chase. It might have been throwing dungeons and we certainly heard a lot of complaints out of 200 west over the last couple of years, but right now they don't have event for those complaints right now. They want to keep their heads down and hope that they still have a job going into next. I mean, you're only working here. You're working four days a week at home, right? Yeah, and gone 5 days a week in the office, Tom. Really? Of course he does. Basic doesn't do that. You know? Yes, she does. Everyone works very hard. Look, I don't think that necessarily being in the office also indicates how hard people work, but there is a shift back to a culture of being more in person. Particularly for the banking. The surveillance cork on this I've got to be careful. Anyway, Srinagar, I'm not a Rajan with this here. We do this into January into earnings of banks. He will be most busy on the movements on global Wall Street here through the coming days as well. It is a different January in New York City. I would say is between two strikes by nurses and the turmoil and Wall Street. It's just a different pandemic. I get it, but wow, is it a different January? I feel like this is the first year that we have a sense of what the post pandemic reality might look like. Strongly agree right now. Right now. And that last year was still recovering from the pandemic. This year is different. This year is, okay, reset, people get back to the offices. However many days a week that they are agreeing to do so and face something that's going to be a very mixed picture economically. Well, economically, but also politically. I would suggest that all the school drama and that maybe we get to some normality that we have not had. And that would be right now, but we'll pay attention to this in our local people, of course, with those nurse strikes. That's a big deal for New York City. Yeah, especially because we are heading into the trifecta of various illnesses. It's not over despite the fact that people are ignoring it. I do want to mention Lululemon shared. A toxic brew. It is. I mean, it's a disaster. People don't seem to care anymore. It just sort of like, yeah, you're sick or something, you know. I honestly, oh, look at that. There is this coming. Morgan Stanley's John pruzan. A one time CEO candidate. Exit the firm. That is a big deal through the morning for global Wall Street. He is the chief financial officer of Morgan Stanley, there are three if not four people under mister Gorman in everybody including mister Gorman, is a young Turk. This is really, really interesting to see. A 28 year adviser to James Gorman exiting the firm. John Cruz and to leave Morgan Stanley stay with Bloomberg, good morning.
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"And we had to have lynch in order to really cinch the deal. One thing I'm a little worried about is that if we rule in your favor in this case, that it will be giving other states essentially a road map for defining this court's criminal law decisions. Joining me is Jordan Rubin, Bloomberg law reporter. This appeal is not about the defendant's guilt, but about his sentence. Tell us a little about the case and what happened during the penalty phase. Sure, so John Cruz was convicted in Arizona state court, a first degree murder for shooting Tucson police officer, Patrick hardesty in 2003, but it was in cruise's guilt but a sentence that prompted the issue at the Supreme Court. So at the sentencing phase, Cruz wanted the jury to know that he would have been ineligible for parole if he was sentenced to life instead of death. And that actually wound up being a really important issue because we know that the jury foreman actually later said that they are looking for a reason to be lenient, but Arizona didn't allow that at the time. And that was despite an earlier U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 1994 called Simmons, which said that defendants have the right to inform juries of their parole ineligibility in that situation when their future danger is an issue. So for decades, Arizona refuses to follow that Supreme Court rule, so then the court basically tells Arizona directly, this is the rule you have to follow it. That's right. So the Simmons case happened at the Supreme Court in 1994. Cruz was prosecuted in Arizona after that. But then there was an Arizona case that went to the Supreme Court after Cruz was sentenced called lynch against Arizona in 2016 where the U.S. Supreme Court basically told Arizona you have to apply this precedent simmonds. And so Cruz had previously raised a challenge before the lynch case trying to argue that he should have been able to tell the jury about his parole ineligibility status based on Simmons, then after lynch after the use Supreme Court told Arizona, you have to apply our precedent, Cruz tried again, but he was rejected again in state court, and that's what prompted this U.S. Supreme Court appeal this kind of ping ponging back and forth and cruises repeated attempts and repeated rejections to try and get the benefit of this U.S. Supreme Court precedent in the sentence case. So that's why justice Elena Kagan said Kafka would have loved this case. Exactly. So the way she put it, she says, Costco would have loved this because Cruz loses his Simmons claim on direct appeal in the first instance before the lynch case. And then he tries again and the reason he loses according to the state is because no, Simmons is actually always applied. It was just that lynch told Arizona that it had to then apply the law. So it wasn't what's called a significant change in the law, according to Arizona, and that's super important for this case because it all comes down to this state procedural rule, which says that on post conviction, like what Cruz was trying to raise. He can only get the benefit if there was a significant change in law. And according to Arizona, the lynch holding wasn't a significant change. I thought it was odd that the state was still arguing in its briefs that Simmons and lynch were wrongly decided by the court and justice Kagan told Arizona's attorney Joseph Kane field that she found that shocking and perhaps a bit insulting. In this case, you're still saying, like lynch is wrongly decided Simmons is wrongly decided we can't really, we just really hate all this stuff. It sounds like your thumbing your nose at us. Justice Kagan is absolutely no disrespect was intended by that footnote to the court. And I apologize if that is the way it came across. Tell us about Arizona's arguments. So Arizona takes this sort of hyper technical reading. They're saying it's just a state issue that in the first instance, it shouldn't even get to the U.S.
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Latest news evicting world markets, powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in over a 120 countries. This is Bloomberg radio. Now, a global news update President Biden and former president Obama are appearing together on the campaign trail, the pair will headline of Philadelphia rally with democratic Senate hopeful John fetterman and Josh Shapiro who's running for governor of the Keystone state. Former president Trump is also campaigning in Pennsylvania today near Pittsburgh. The committee investigating the January 6th capitol attack is giving former president Trump until next week to produce subpoenaed documents. The committee sent a subpoena to Trump last month, requiring documents to be submitted by November 4th and for Trump to appear for his deposition November 14th. Aaron Carter is dead at 34. TMZ reports the singer rapper and actor was found in the bathtub of his Lancaster, California home, Saturday, Carter was a regular on Nickelodeon in toured with the Backstreet Boys, his older brother Nick is a member of the famous boy band, Carter reportedly had struggled with substance abuse issues for years, but it's unclear if that played a role in his death. That's the latest I'm Julie Ryan. This is Bloomberg law with June grosso from Bloomberg radio. In a death penalty case, Arizona did end runs around Supreme Court precedent, creating a procedural maze that blocked a death row inmate's relief at every turn, reminding just Elena Kagan of the works of Kafka. I think Kafka would have loved this. Cruz loses his Simmons claims on direct appeal because the Arizona courts say point blank, Simmons has never applied in Arizona. And then he loses the next time around because the Arizona court say sim as always applied in California. I mean, tells you when, as I lose, whatever that expression is, I mean, how can you run a railroad that way? For decades, Arizona refused to follow Supreme Court precedent established in the 1994 Simmons case, which gave defendants facing the death penalty the right to tell juries that if they spared them from the death penalty, they would never be eligible for parole. So in 2016 the Supreme Court specifically instructed Arizona to follow that law. But Arizona denied John Cruz that instruction at his trial and then used a state procedural
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"This is Bloomberg law with June Grasso from Bloomberg radio. In a death penalty case, Arizona did end runs around Supreme Court precedent, creating a procedural maze that blocked a death row inmate's relief at every turn, reminding just as Elena Kagan of the works of Kafka. I think Kafka would have loved this. Cruz loses his Simmons claims on direct appeal because the Arizona courts say point blank, Simmons has never applied in Arizona. And then he loses the next time around because the Arizona court say Simmons always applied in California. I mean, tells you when, as I lose, whatever that expression is, I mean, how can you run a railroad that way? For decades, Arizona refused to follow Supreme Court precedent established in the 1994 Simmons case, which gave defendants facing the death penalty the right to tell juries that, if they spared them from the death penalty, they would never be eligible for parole. So in 2016, the Supreme Court specifically instructed Arizona to follow that law. But Arizona denied John Cruz that instruction at his trial, and then used a state procedural law to stop him from seeking reversal of his death sentence. Many of the justices seemed troubled by Arizona flouting the Supreme Court. Here's justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Simmons made clear that this is what the law was. So many times Arizona said, we're not following it. And we had to have lynch in order to really cinch the deal. One thing I'm a little worried about is that if we rule in your favor in this case that it will be giving other states essentially a road map for defying this court's criminal law decisions. Joining me is Jordan Rubin, Bloomberg law reporter. This appeal is not about the defendant's guilt, but about his sentence. Tell us a little about the case and what happened during the penalty phase. Sure. So John Cruz was convicted in Arizona state court, a first degree murder for shooting Tucson police officer Patrick Harvey in 2003, but it was in cruise's guilt, but his sentence that prompted the issue at the Supreme Court. So at the sentencing phase, Cruz wanted the jury to know that he would have been ineligible for parole if he was sentenced to life instead of death. And that actually wound up being a really important issue because we know that the jury foreman actually later said that they are looking for a reason to be lenient, but Arizona didn't allow that at the time. And that was despite an earlier U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 1994 called Simmons, which said that defendants have the right to inform juries of their parole ineligibility in that situation when their future danger is at issue. So for decades, Arizona refuses to follow that Supreme Court rule, so then the court basically tells Arizona directly, this is the rule you have to follow it. That's right. So the Simmons case happened that the Supreme Court in 1994. Cruz was prosecuted in Arizona after that. But then there was an Arizona case that went to the Supreme Court after Cruz was sentenced called lynch against Arizona in 2016 where the U.S. Supreme Court basically told Arizona you have to apply this precedent simmonds. And so Cruz had previously raised a challenge before the linch case trying to argue that he should have been able to tell the jury about his parole ineligibility status based on Simmons, then after lynch after the U.S. Supreme Court told Arizona, you have to apply our precedent, Cruz tried again, but he was rejected again in state court, and that's what prompted this U.S. Supreme Court appeal this kind of ping ponging back and forth and cruises repeated attempts and repeated rejections to try and get the benefit of this U.S. Supreme Court precedent in the sentence case. So that's why justice Elena Kagan said Kafka would have loved this case. Exactly. So the way she put it, she says, Costco would have loved this because Cruz loses his Simmons claim on direct appeal in the first instance before the lynch case. And then he tries again and the reason he loses according to the state is because no, Simmons is actually always applied. It was just that lynch told Arizona that it had to then apply the law. So it wasn't what's called a significant change in the law, according to Arizona, and that's super important for this case because it all comes down to this state procedural rule, which says that on post conviction, like what Cruz was trying to raise. He can only get the benefit if there was a significant change in law. And according to Arizona, the lynch holding wasn't a significant change. I thought it was odd that the state was still arguing in its briefs that Simmons and lynch were wrongly decided by the court and justice Kagan told Arizona's attorney Joseph Kane field that she found that shocking and perhaps a bit insulting. In this case, you're still saying, like lynch is wrongly decided Simmons is wrongly decided we can't really we just really hate all this stuff. It sounds like your thumb and your nose at us. Justice Kagan is absolutely no disrespect was intended by that footnote to the court. And I apologize if that is the way it came across. Tell us about Arizona's arguments. So Arizona takes this sort of hyper technical reading. They're saying it's just the state issue that in the first instance, it shouldn't even get to the U.S. Supreme Court because it's a state court dealing with the state procedural rule. And so there is this kind of threshold issue at the U.S. Supreme Court of whether the justices can even really take a look at this because it's a state issue. And so there's this initial argument of whether we're even getting into the territory of dealing with the type of federal issue that the U.S. Supreme Court can grapple with. And so that's one of Arizona's arguments that the U.S.
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Building American technology like microchips. We learned the companies will follow if the federal government invests in the industries that we know we need and we're prepared to help you. That's the message I got from a large number of CEOs and the Fortune 500 companies. So the chips and science act invest $52 billion, supercharge our efforts to make semiconductors here in America. The president says the U.S. can't rely on supply chains from other countries, including China. The G 7 is warning Russia that use of chemical biological or nuclear weapons would be met with severe consequences. The international group released a statement Friday saying Russia's threats of nuclear warfare are unacceptable. The G 7 also conducted an investigation into Russia's claims that Ukraine is planning on launching a dirty bomb and found those allegations to be baseless. The man accused of attacking House speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband will have a preliminary hearing next month. I'm Brad seger. This is Bloomberg law with June grosso from Bloomberg radio. In a death penalty case, Arizona did end runs around Supreme Court precedent, creating a procedural maze that blocked a death row inmate's relief at every turn, reminding just Elena Kagan of the works of Kafka. I think Kafka would have loved this. Cruz loses his Simmons claims on direct appeal because the Arizona courts say point blank, Simmons has never applied in Arizona. And then he loses the next time around because the Arizona court say sim is always applied in California. I mean, tells you when, as I lose, whatever that expression is, I mean, how can you run a railroad that way? For decades, Arizona refused to follow Supreme Court precedent established in the 1994 Simmons case, which gave defendants facing the death penalty the right to tell juries that if they spared them from the death penalty, they would never be eligible for parole. So in 2016, the Supreme Court specifically instructed Arizona to follow that law. But Arizona denied John Cruz that instruction at his trial, and then used a state procedural law to stop him from seeking reversal of his death sentence. Many of the justices seem troubled by Arizona flouting the Supreme Court. Here's justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Simmons made clear that this is what the law was. So many times Arizona said we're not following it. And we had to have lynch in order to really cinch the deal. One thing I'm a little worried about is that if we rule in your favor in this case that it will be giving other states essentially a road map for defying this court's criminal law decisions. Joining me is Jordan Rubin, Bloomberg law reporter. This appeal is not about the defendant's guilt, but about his sentence. Tell us a little about the case and what happened during the penalty phase. Sure. So John Cruz was convicted in Arizona state court, a first degree murder for shooting Tucson police officer, Patrick hardesty in 2003, but it wasn't Cruz's guilt but a sentence that prompted the issue at the Supreme Court. So at the sentencing phase, Cruz wanted the jury to know that he would have been ineligible for parole if he was sentenced to life instead of death. And that actually wound up being a really important issue because we know that the jury foreman actually later said that they are looking for a reason to be lenient, but Arizona didn't allow that at the time. And that was despite an earlier U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 1994 called Simmons, which said that defendants have the right to inform juries of their parole ineligibility in that situation when their future danger is an issue. So for decades, Arizona refuses to follow that Supreme Court rule, so then the court basically tells Arizona directly, this is the rule you have to follow it. That's right. So the Simmons case happened at the Supreme Court in 1994. Cruz was prosecuted in Arizona after that. But then there was an Arizona case that went to the Supreme Court after Cruz was sentenced called lynch against Arizona in 2016 where the U.S. Supreme Court basically told Arizona you have to apply this precedent simmonds. And so Cruz had previously raised a challenge before the lynch case trying to argue that he should have been able to tell the jury about his parole ineligibility status based on Simmons, then after lynch after the use Supreme Court told Arizona, you have to apply our precedent, Cruz tried again, but he was rejected again in state court, and that's what prompted this U.S. Supreme Court appeal this kind of ping ponging back and forth and cruises repeated attempts and repeated rejections to try and get the benefit of this U.S. Supreme Court precedent in the sentence case. So that's why justice Elena Kagan said Kafka would have loved this case. Exactly. So the way she put it, she says, Costco would have loved this because Cruz loses his Simmons claim on direct appeal in the first instance before the lynch case. And then he tries again and the reason he loses according to the state is because no, Simmons is actually always applied. It was just that lynch told Arizona that it had to then apply the law. So it wasn't what's called a significant change in the law, according to Arizona, and that's super important for this case because it all comes down to this. State procedural rule, which says that on post conviction, like what Cruz was trying to raise, he can only get the benefit if there was a significant change in law. And according to Arizona, the lynch holding wasn't a significant change. I thought it was odd that the state was still arguing in its briefs that Simmons and lynch were wrongly decided by the court and justice Kagan told Arizona's attorney Joseph Cain field that she found that shocking and perhaps a bit insulting. In this case, you're still saying like lynch is wrongly decided Simmons is wrongly decided we can't really we just really hate all this stuff. It sounds like your thumb and your nose at us. Justice Kagan is absolutely no disrespect
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"I'm Brian shook. This is Bloomberg law with June grosso from Bloomberg radio. In a death penalty case, Arizona did end runs around Supreme Court precedent, creating a procedural maze that blocked a death row inmate's relief at every turn, reminding just Elena Kagan of the works of Kafka. I think Kafka would have loved this. Cruz loses his Simmons claims on direct appeal because the Arizona courts say point blank Simmons has never applied in Arizona. And then he loses the next time around because the Arizona court say Simmons always applied in California. I mean, tells you when, as I lose, whatever that expression is, I mean, how can you run a railroad that way? For decades, Arizona refused to follow Supreme Court precedent established in the 1994 Simmons case, which gave defendants facing the death penalty the right to tell juries that if they spared them from the death penalty, they would never be eligible for parole. So in 2016 the Supreme Court specifically instructed Arizona to follow that law. But Arizona denied John Cruz that instruction at his trial and then used a state procedural law to stop him from seeking reversal of his death sentence. Many of the justices seemed troubled by Arizona flouting the Supreme Court. Here's justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Simmons made clear that this is what the law was. So many times Arizona said we're not following it. And we had to have lynch in order to really cinch the deal. One thing I'm a little worried about is that if we rule in your favor in this case, that it will be giving other states essentially a road map. For defying this court's criminal law decisions. Joining me is Jordan Rubin, Bloomberg law reporter. This appeal is not about the defendant's guilt, but about his sentence. Tell us a little about the case and what happened during the penalty phase. Sure. So John Cruz was convicted in Arizona state court, a first degree murder for shooting Tucson police officer, Patrick hardesty in 2003, but it was in cruise's guilt, but his sentence that prompted the issue at the Supreme Court. So at the sentencing phase, Cruz wanted the jury to know that he would have been ineligible for parole. He was sentenced to life instead of death. And that actually wound up being a really important issue because we know that the jury foreman actually later said that they are looking for a reason to be lenient, but Arizona didn't allow that at the time. And that was despite an earlier U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 1994 called Simmons, which said that defendants have the right to inform juries of their parole ineligibility in that situation when their future danger is an issue. So for decades, Arizona refuses to follow that Supreme Court rule, so then the court basically tells Arizona directly, this is the rule you have to follow it. That's right. So the Simmons case happened at the Supreme Court in 1994. Cruz was prosecuted in Arizona after that, but then there was an Arizona case that went to the Supreme Court after Cruz was sentenced called lynch against Arizona in 2016 where the U.S. Supreme Court basically told Arizona you have to apply this precedent simmonds. And so Cruz had previously raised a challenge before the linch case trying to argue that he should have been able to tell the jury about his parole and eligibility status based on Simmons, then after lynch after the U Supreme Court told Arizona, you have to apply our precedent, Cruz tried again, but he was rejected again in state court, and that's what prompted this U.S. Supreme Court appeal this kind of ping ponging back and forth and cruises repeated attempts and repeated rejections to try and get the benefit of this U.S. Supreme Court precedent in the sentence case. So that's why justice Elena Kagan said Kafka would have loved this case. Exactly. So the way she put it, she says, Costco would have loved this because Cruz loses his Simmons claim on direct appeal in the first instance before the lynch case, and then he tries again and the reason he loses according to the state is because no, Simmons is actually always applied. It was just that lynch told Arizona that it had to then apply the law. So it wasn't what's called a significant change in the law, according to Arizona, and that's super important for this case because it all comes down to this state procedural rule, which says that on post conviction like what Cruz was trying to raise. He can only get the benefit if there was a significant change in law. And according to Arizona, the lynch holding wasn't a significant change. I thought it was odd that the state was still arguing in its briefs that Simmons and lynch were wrongly decided by the court and justice Kagan told Arizona's attorney Joseph Kane field that she found that shocking and perhaps a bit insulting. In this case, you're still saying, like, lynch is wrongly decided Simmons is wrongly decided we can't really, we just really hate all this stuff. It sounds like your thumbing your nose at us. Justice Kagan is absolutely no
Bloomberg Radio New York
"john cruz" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Death penalty case at the Supreme Court, Arizona did end runs around Supreme Court precedent, leaving a procedural maze that blocked a death row inmate's relief at every turn, leading justice Elena Kagan to compare it to the works of Kafka. Mister canfield, that bad faith or not. I think Kafka would have loved this. Cruz loses his Simmons claims on direct appeal because the Arizona courts say point blank, Simmons has never applied in Arizona. And then he loses the next time around because the Arizona court say sim is always applied in California. I mean, tells you when, as I lose, whatever that expression is, I mean, how can you run a railroad that way? Arizona ignored Supreme Court precedent set in the Simmons case in 1994, which gave defendants the right to tell juries that their ineligible to get parole if their sentence to life in prison instead of death. And then Arizona ignored a case in 2016, the lynch case in which the Supreme Court said the state had to apply Simmons. An innate on Arizona's death row is asking for a new trial because he wasn't allowed to tell the jury that he couldn't get parole. Joining me is Jordan Rubin, Bloomberg law reporter. This appeal is not about the defendant's guilt, but about his scent and tell us a little about the case and what happened during the penalty phase. Sure. So John Cruz was convicted in Arizona state court, a first degree murder for shooting Tucson police officer Patrick Harvey in 2003, but it wasn't cruise as guilt by defendants that prompted the issue at the Supreme Court. So at the sentencing phase, Cruz wanted the jury to know that he would have been ineligible for parole if he was sentenced to life instead of death. And that actually wound up being a really important issue because we know that the jury foreman actually later said that they are looking for a reason to be lenient, but Arizona didn't allow that at the time. And that was despite an earlier U.S. Supreme Court precedent from 1994 called Simmons, which said that defendants have the right to inform juries of their parole ineligibility in that situation when their future danger is an issue. Arizona just refuses, they are not following this Supreme Court case, Simmons, and then in another case, the Supreme Court says basically you have to follow Simmons. That's right. So the Simmons case happened at the Supreme Court in 1994. Cruz was prosecuted in Arizona after that. But then there was an Arizona case that went to the Supreme Court after Cruz was sentenced called lynch against Arizona in 2016 where the U.S. Supreme Court basically told Arizona you have to apply this precedent simmonds. And so Cruz had previously raised a challenge before the lich case trying to argue that he should have been able to tell the jury about his parole and eligibility status based on Simmons, then after lynch, after the use of Supreme Court told Arizona, you have to apply our precedent, Cruz tried again, but he was rejected again in state court, and that's what prompted this U.S. Supreme Court appeal this kind of ping ponging back and forth and cruises repeated attempts and repeated rejections to try and get the benefit of this U.S. Supreme Court precedent in the sentence case. So that's why justice Elena Kagan said Kafka would have loved this case. Exactly. So the way she put it, she says, Costco would have loved this because Cruz loses his Simmons claim on direct appeal in the first instance before the lynch case. And then he tries again and the reason he loses according to the state is because no, Simmons is actually always applied. It was just that lynch told Arizona that it had to then apply the law. So it wasn't what's called a significant change in the law, according to Arizona, and that's super important for this case because it all comes down to this state procedural rule, which says that on post conviction, like what Cruz was trying to raise. He can only get the benefit if there was a significant change in law. And according to Arizona, the lynch holding wasn't a significant change. What was, I thought, odd, the state was still arguing in its briefs that those cases Simmons and lynch were wrongly decided. Here's justice Kagan. And then in this case, you're still saying my lynch is wrongly decided Simmons is wrongly decided we can't really we just really hate all this stuff. It sounds like your thumb and your nose at us. What did Arizona say about that? So Arizona takes this sort of hyper technical reading. They're saying it's just a state issue that in the first instance, it shouldn't even get to the U.S. Supreme Court because it's a state court dealing with the state procedural rule. And so there is this kind of threshold issue at the U.S. Supreme Court of whether the justices can even really take a look at this because it's a state issue. And so there's this initial argument of whether we're even getting into the territory of dealing with the type of federal issue that the U.S. Supreme Court can grapple with. And so that's one of Arizona's arguments that the U.S. Supreme Court really shouldn't even be getting involved. That's part of it. Another part is, according to this they procedural rule, they're saying it wasn't a significant change in law, despite how much that might seem to fly in the face of common sense as justice Kagan was pointing out during the argument. They're saying it's not a significant change. It's just now an application of the law. And so that's what brings up this situation where Kagan is pointing out that Cruz is blocked in this procedural maze, no matter in which direction he turns. Coming up next, I'll continue this conversation with Bloomberg law reporter Jordan Rubin and we'll talk about how the Supreme Court may come out in this case. I'm June grass when you're listening to Bloomberg
WBAP 820AM
"john cruz" Discussed on WBAP 820AM
"Happen. Chief of police Garcia of Dallas Police Department Mayor Eric Johnson, mayor of Dallas in Dallas District attorney John Cruz. Oh, you will come to my house, You were publicly apologize to my wife to my grandson Jackson into his parents, our youngest daughter, Austin and Dad J. D. Now I want to see this happen by close of business two seconds. Okay, This is luck. I liked Lieutenant Colonel Allen West a lot. Been friends for a long time, and I've been friends with Sergeant Mike Mata. Both have been guest in the last hour. About this, uh Situation on Friday night. Something doesn't make sense here doesn't make sense. There's been no legal proceedings. No discovery. There's been nothing So why would you call for the resignation of a police officer Doxing her on social media. That doesn't make sense. And that doesn't if you were to say Allen West did that, And I hadn't heard about this story. I would say no, I think you're wrong. Um There's just too many things here that don't line up. Um, So before you start calling, and I'm saying this to Lieutenant Colonel West before you start calling for people's resignation and making demands on the governor or Excuse me on the the mayor, the D a. Um And the police chief. Maybe we ought to wait for due process and see exactly what's happened now, um, I had not heard before, like 15 minutes ago that the body cam footage Has been released in, according to Sergeant Mike Mata. It's obvious that nothing got out of hand. So there's there's just got to be more to this story. And, you know, I'm not a neophyte in the in the Area of politics or media, So a certain portion of this has got to be damaged Control for a campaign for the governor of the state of Texas. I get that and I expect that And there's nothing wrong with trying to put a good light on the bad situation. I understand, But, um, there's just something about this story as we've heard it so far. That doesn't add up John and McKinney. John, How are you doing? Good afternoon, sir. How are you? I'm good. Thank you. Hey, listen, Pleasure speaking with you again, Thank you and your family in law enforcement for what they do. I'm a proponent in the backer of the law enforcement. I just wanted to bring up Something as you were speaking earlier with this crazy world that it is there and the Democrats playing their sin and Egan's every waking moment, even when we sleep every day. Who's to say that Maybe someone in the Democratic side set something up on this incident for lieutenant Colonel West and respects to him for his service. Or maybe even someone in the rhino section coerced with the Democrat Party. Set this whole thing up to not getting out of the governor Governors race and discredit him. It's just something to think about. I mean, I wouldn't put it past any of this. Against Lieutenant Colonel Allen West because he's black. He's an American first black by race, and he is a staunch conservative. What Ingredient Can you get that makes the Democrats more nervous than that. That's true. That's true. Good call, John. I don't know. Um yeah, First of all, nothing. A Democrat does whether it's regional or a federal level surprises me Nothing. Rick, you're implying that Democrats play dirty pool? Yeah, well, okay. If that's been playing, I do, and I think there's probably a few Republicans that would do the same thing. But the thing with a set up you have to have an awful lot of people involved in playing a part in that setup. Um is it possible you know anything is possible. All I know is I've talked to Lieutenant Lieutenant Colonel West. I'm talking to, uh, Mike Monitor from Police Department. There's something missing in this story. Something missing. But I think until there's at least a judicial review in the least at least until there's new process, which any one of us Any one of you listening myself. Anybody? You know, we have a right to that until that happens. You know, nobody should be fired for anything. Um, the the doxing. I don't get that doesn't sound like Lieutenant Colonel west of me at all, Um There's just certain elements of the story that don't add up at this point in time. David and Arlington David, how you doing? I'm doing Well, Rick, How are you today? I'm good. Thanks. Good. Um, it's good beyond with you. Uh, I think Colonel West is pretty ticked off. Um, you know, and some of the things that he said doesn't add up. Uh, he said his wife didn't blow the limit. That was the first red flag that came into my mind was she didn't blow the limit. Well, An officer sees that there has been something consumed and they didn't meet the limit. Uh, you know, people can act pretty squirrel. Even if they're not. They didn't meet the limit. Um and you know he's I think he's pretty ticked off when he says things like, who doesn't use their signals. Um, to get apology to a three month old, That's that's really far reaching. So my complete assessment of this Rick was I personally like to get all the facts before I get involved in any dispute, whether it's my spouse, my kids. I don't I don't care who it is. I'm gonna try to get all the information I can before I stand up and get loud. Because I'm might be just sticking my neck out there to get it locked off, and that would look embarrassing for my family. Well, yeah, I mean, you and I both know and you know, I Younger when I was younger man, I probably had a hotter temper. I've matured out of that, I think, but we all have a temper at varying degrees. And, you know, angers a strange thing It'll make you say and do things that you wouldn't normally say and do And some of those things you can't take back. So you've got to be very careful with what you say and do When you're in that emotional state, you know, I I don't know He's upset. Of course, he's upset. You and I are not privy to the conversations that he's had with his wife that That may have stoked the anger. I'm not sure but I will tell you this had Lot of things that lieutenant Colonel West said. Have they been given to me by a third party? I wouldn't have believed it. So, um, because I He just It's not been my experience. It was that type of guy. But you know, the turn signal thing made no sense of the apology from always. The people made no sense. Um, I mean, there's how about due process? That's the only thing that needs to happen here to get the full story. Don't you think I do think that, And I think that's why it's such a precious remedy for us here in America, and we need to hang on to it and keep fighting the liberals that are trying to take things like that away. So take your time. Amen to that, David. Thanks for a good call. I appreciate it. Lisa in Grand Prairie. Lisa, How are you? I'm fine, and I know you're doing well. Thank you so much. Okay, Well, what I wanted to say that Lieutenant Colonel Alan Wes, I think he deserves more respect than what he's getting from the radio and TV commentators. This man I know he has saved Soldiers lies he has say and work for citizens and he's worked for this country. And like I said, he saved our soldiers lives, and I'm an old soldier. Okay and I hope that he doesn't forget. That no matter what he does. That we are still, he is still Walking around and working a rail in a country where we I live in a monster open enemy. Okay? And what Open. Enemy in America. We are living around amongst open enemies. The enslaved is that bodies here. I'm not talking about racism and all that stuff. I don't want to go there anymore. What is that? What's an open enemy in your estimation? Would be Can't slave, his open enemies and their riches That came from it, Uh, even the experiments that they did on the paper. Okay, Lisa, forgive me. Good call. I appreciate it. You're entitled to your opinion, but the black lives matter line is 1 800. Okay? I'm sorry. This is not about Lieutenant Colonel West. Everybody respects this.
WBAP 820AM
"john cruz" Discussed on WBAP 820AM
"Department. Do you I unit State granted funded so that they can go out control the streets and looking for people guilty or appears innocent as well. The drum up charges against them in order to continue the funding that they have. My wife voluntarily as a good citizen, got out of the car, participate in a field sobriety test when she was asked to blow repeatedly. Nothing came up on the Breathalyzer because all she had had Was the water and a lemonade. Yes. My wife was arrested, handcuffed, brutally handcuffed. And charged initially arrested under suspicion Do you are from work? She didn't do anything with the breath glass, and then all of a sudden she's course intimidated and threatened and to taking a blood alcohol test. Because, obviously, now you have to try to see if you can drum up charges for my wife taking drugs. My wife was charged with Driving while intoxicated with the minor child. I'm very upset with the fact that my grandson, Jackson was in danger by being left in the car, which is a couple of police officers, not even the courtesy. Wait for our youngest daughter and her husband to come there and retrieve our grandson while Mom, Grandma. My wife must be interested. So here's the deal. This is what has to happen. Number one officer L. Harris 11792. That's for bash number needs to be terminated from the Dallas police Department. That's why I want to see happen. Number two. The charges brought against my wife must be dropped and her record must be cleaned. Because this is all that happened. Here's to prove she was not drinking that night and to force her into taking the blood test using a warrant and all these other tactics, these Gestapo like tactics. My wife does not take drugs or by the way, the only thing she had taken her earlier that they were to etcetera. And then the other thing that has to happen, Uh, chief of police, Garcia. Dallas Police Department Mayor Eric Johnson, mayor of Dallas and Dallas District Attorney John Cruz. Oh, you will come to my house and you were publicly apologize to my wife to my grandson Jackson into his parents, our youngest art Austin and Dad J. D. Now I want to see this happen by close of business Tuesday, second I also want to see a review of this Dallas D u I unit because if they're going out there trolling the streets, just looking to make collars because they have some quotas so they can continue to get state funding The citizens of this area. Don't need that. Now I want to see these things happen. They don't happen. I will end up becoming your worst nightmare because I will defend the honor of my wife and my family but also defend the honor of the Dallas Police Department because corrupt officers and corrupt practices should not dishonored of thin blue line, and I will also defend the honor of the citizens. Here in North Texas in the Dallas area. Very simple things that I'm asking for because the proof is right here. You arrested the woman. You disrespected her. You tarnish her reputation because she had a cup of water. And a couple lemonade. That is unacceptable. God bless you and God. Keep er All right. I've This is difficult because I like the Lieutenant Colonel Allen West. I like him a.
Talk Radio 1190 KFXR
"john cruz" Discussed on Talk Radio 1190 KFXR
"Through Dell Financial. Services call, 877 asked Dell that's 877 asked Dell and speak. Another four billion federal dollars will soon be coming to primary and secondary schools and students in Texas. The pandemic relief funds come from the American Rescue Plan Act, Texas receive two thirds of the more than $12 billion earmarked for public schools. But the rest was held up until state officials told the federal government they plan to use the money. A new state law allowing Texans to carry guns without a permit could result in the dismissal of outstanding weapons cases. Governor Greg Abbott signed the constitutional carry bill, which takes effect September 1st. Dallas County, D a. John Cruz. Oh says it may allow some people arrested for unlawfully carrying a weapon to have those charges dropped. Ohio is the latest state and law enforcement to the Texas Mexico border as part of a plan to slow a surge in illegal immigration. Ohio Highway Patrol troopers will help with border surveillance. They arrive in Texas this week and will stay for two weeks. I'm Carrie Laki, We've earned our stripes one loans star at a time. Make sure our voices are heard. Real Texas real talk radio 11 90. It's that time time time. Lock and load. Michael very show is on the air. Abraham Lincoln famously said the philosophy of the school room in one generation Will be the philosophy of the government. In the next America's chickens.
77WABC Radio
"john cruz" Discussed on 77WABC Radio
"Show we do this every year. Request line is over. 808 48. W A b c 90 to 20 to 245 years old and get that instilled in my 2 45. Well, all right, let's see. We have you to request your dedication. The lines are open. John Cruz is standing by will be here in a couple moments in the Talk about Coney Island, baby a little bit. All right. So what do we have here? Well, this I'm not stories, love stories. This guy this child, his baby was born on a mountaintop. Far away in Tennessee, and once upon a time. Davy Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier. All American born on a mountaintop in 10 s C. A green estate in the land of the free raised in the woods. So the new wherever tree and killed Tim a bar when he was only three. Davy Davy Crockett. Talking of the Wild frontier. Yeah. Here, IFAD single handed through the Injun war till the creeks was whipped. This was in store. And while he was handling this risky, or he made himself a legend forever more Davey, the Davy Crockett King of the Wild frontier. Oh, when he lost his love, his grief was gone all In his heart. He wanted to leave it all and lose his self in the forests tall by the answered instead, his country's call Baby Crockett, the choice of the whole frontier. He went off to Congress and served a spell fixing up the government laws as well took over Washington. So we hear, tell and patched up the crack in the Liberty Bell Davy Davy Crockett serving his country Well, When you come home his politics and done why the big Western March should just be gun. He packed up his gear and his trusty gun and let out the greening to follow the Sunday V Day, baby.
WBAP 820AM
"john cruz" Discussed on WBAP 820AM
"Movement we've seen, unfortunately, police officers leaving the police force and record numbers. And what is the answer from Democrats to finally reject this radical idea of defunding the police? No. They're trying to blame Republicans now for the Dumpster fire that they created. Yeah, we're going to get into that in just a little bit because you have to look at every single angle. And the Democrats. Oh, no, This was a mistake. The social justice movement is going to come back to buy this in the butt and the reimagining the police departments. People aren't going for because, uh, the expected result. If you ask law enforcement, take them off the streets. Well, something's going to fill that gap. And it's crime. Well, you know, we've come to expect this from Dallas County. With the brain Trust we've got is a city on the City Council and you expected from liberal runs that he's like like Houston, Austin, San Antonio, but Taryn County Well, let me tell you what they've come up with. You Tell me if you agree with us, DEA, Sharon Wilson. Announced a site and release policy. It's very similar to the one Dallas County D. A John Cruz. Oh, announced two years ago. Well in Tarrant County police officers will now have the discretion. Instead of arresting someone they can issue citations tickets. Let me give you the list of things, um, that they don't have to arrest someone. Now they can just simply write them a ticket for possession of marijuana less than two ounces. Possession of marijuana between two and four ounces possession of a controlled substance in various groups. Criminal mischief. If the amount of loss is between 107 $150 graffiti if the damage is between 125 $100 And theft. Grows. Oh, auto like this theft. Um now they don't have to arrest people. They can write him a ticket if the theft is between 107 $150 Now. Yes, I know. Being poor isn't a crime. I also know a lot of poor people try to take advantage of the various programs both public and private, um, to get through some tough times. They don't necessarily go out and commit a crime simply because they're poor. I understand that You know, I've I've seen some tough days just like everybody else. It. Just it surprised me the turn Count Tarrant County when this went this way, and I'll tell you why it surprised me because while we're working To undo the mess the Democrats have made with this defund the police movement. Um yeah. Why would we send the message? At all. That we're not going to prosecute crime. Yes. If you steal something that $749 or $749 worth of stuff, do you not view that as a crime? Um, criminal mischief if the amount of loss is between 100 and 750 graffiti if the damage is between 125 $100 It just seems to me. This is not the time. And this is my opinion, my opinion normally, but it just seems to me that this is probably not the time, um, to be going easy. On people that commit crimes of any kind. You know, we're trying to support law enforcement support the laws. Uh and I don't agree with all of them, but we have a process whereby you can change those laws. Um, it just does it make sense to you at this particular point in time and In this country's history after this whole disastrous defund the police movement, the the Democrats. By the way, we're going to get into why the Democrats are blaming Republicans in just a little bit. Jeannie and Burlison. Genie, How are you doing? Hey, here. I'm doing good. I'm glad you have a wonderful dog. Oh, he's a good boy. Your dog, Max. Yeah, but what I was calling about just heard the radio and I heard something about AOC. And it reminded me that, um, she has a new nickname, and the person who gave her this nickname is the fact Republican candidate for mayor in New York. He's the one that was a guardian angel for years. Oh, you're talking about Curtis. Yeah, that's it. That's it. Well, what he said yesterday. I think last night, he said her name her name nickname that the AOC stands for all out crazy. Out crazy, So I thought that was pretty cool. And you might want to hear that and pass that out. I like that. Curtis is a good guy. I Gosh, I first met Curtis. Back in 1993, or 94 in the Guardian Angels came to Denver and I was working at KY at the time. And of course, they were trying to get get as many people familiar with them as they could. The guy they put in charge of the Guardian Angel. Um, chapter in Denver was a guy named Iron Mike. Really, Really nice. Nice guy. And Curtis is a nice guy. Curtis Lee was who you're talking about. Yeah. Yeah, He's a He's a candidate now, but all out crazy. That sounds like something Curtis had come up with. And hey, it sticks. It looks good to me AOC all out crazy. Alrighty. Good. We'll have a good show. I'm going to be listening, Jeannie. Thank you for the call. I appreciate it very, very much. Well, somebody in Terran County That's not real happy. Um right now is Sergeant Manny Ramirez, president of the Fort Worth Police Officers Association. I'm going to talk to him next. And luck. He's the expert. You tell me this site and released policy, um for marijuana, low level theft between 107 150. Is that a good idea? We'll find.
Newsradio 1200 WOAI
"john cruz" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI
"The Champlain Tower. South tactical rescue teams worked through knee deep waters to try to find survivors. The investigation into what caused this 12 story building to partially collapse is just getting underway. The building was going through a re certification process at the time in one Florida professor, claims the building has been sinking at least two millimeters a year since the 19 nineties. Keep it right here for the very latest. Vice President Kamala Harris is headed to the southern border today with a visit to El Paso. The vice president is being accompanied to Texas by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro America's and Democratic Durban and Veronica Escobar. President. Biden says the vice president laid the groundwork for her visit with a recent trip south of the border. Mexico Reading the vice president has been tasked with getting to the root causes up mass migration. The teenager, identified as the new suspect in the mass shooting on Sixth Street in Austin, was arrested in Colleen yesterday, officials said. 19 year old DeAndre White was taken into custody by members of the Lone Star Fugitive Task Force and the Clean P D SWAT team. What is believed to be the only person responsible for the shooting on June 12 that killed one and injured 14. He's being held on a million dollar bond. Two teens are in the hospital after a shooting on San Antonio's West Side. It happened just before 3 30 this morning at a home on South West 36th Street in Marbach Road. Police say the teens were drinking with a group of friends and one of them was playing with a gun that went off hitting him in the hand and another teen in the stomach. Latina was shot in the stomach is in critical condition. The other was also taken to the hospital by ambulance after trying to drive himself No word on charges. The Dallas County D. A says he won't seek the death penalty for an accused serial killer Billy to murmur is charged with capital murder, accused of robbing and smothering at least 18 elderly women. He's entered a plea of not guilty. D a John Cruz. Oh says he's told victims families that his plan is to have two jury trials in order to secure two sentences of life in prison. With no possibility of parole. The D. A would then ask for the sentences to be served back to back so to murmur would never get out of prison. Well, there's a wide ranging history of sentencing facing former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. Today. Chauvin is part of a small group of non federal law enforcement officers such as police officers, deputy sheriffs and state troopers who have been convicted on charges related to on duty killings in the past 15 years and an even smaller bunch to be convicted of murder. On average, those officers have received far less Prison time at sentencing than their civilian counterparts. The average punishment for the nine who have been sentenced so far is 21.7 years in prison with 81 months as the shortest sentence and life in prison as the longest, the question remains. Will a 21 Year average be seen as fair by the people of Minneapolis? Retail firework sales are legal in Texas. From now through the Fourth of July. It is illegal to buy, sell or use fireworks inside the city limits of San Antonio, but they're allowed in other parts of Bear County. The Bear County Fire marshal is reminding residents they can be charged with arson. If they're fireworks, set a building or vehicle on fire..
WBAP 820AM
"john cruz" Discussed on WBAP 820AM
"Near Hurricane Harbor this week. No arrests have been made just yet in connection with the fight that led to the fatal shooting. We certainly got some names thrown out during our interviews, but they're just not ready to publish that. Just yet. Arlington Police Deputy Chief Christopher Cook 16 year old Martin High School student, atrial teal was the victim shot and killed during the disturbance. Meantime, witness Actually, Birch says she and her family were leaving the park when she heard a pop. I was like what's going on? What's going on? My husband was like, Don't forget to ask what's going on. We need to get out of here, she told W. F. A. It was like a stampede. Kim Lampkin is W B A P NEWS. The Dallas County district attorney has decided not to seek the death penalty against alleged serial killer Billy Shamir mirror. The 48 year old former health care worker, long considered one of the worst serial killers ever in Texas, is charged with 18 murders of seniors in North Texas. District Attorney John Cruz OES office had previously said it would seek capital punishment against him. Now the D A s office at cruise. Oh, is aiming for to jury trial convictions that will bring to automatic life sentences without parole. Texas now has an official mushroom governor Greg Abbott signed a resolution to officially make the Corey actors Jaster mushroom, the official mushroom of the state. It's shaped like a star, so that's definitely fitting for the Lone Star State. Bobbo Cannon, a research scientist at the Fort Worth Botanic Garden, says only a few 100 people have seen them, but it has been spotted at the gardens. It's very rare. Most people have never seen it. But it's not very obvious. But when you see it you go crazy. Next time you're there. Beyond the lookout. It looks like a cigar and then opens up to a star. It can be found attached to decaying seed around stumps. CAT buns. Iron W B A P news from the W B A P News desk. I'm Nicolo say.
Wrestling Travel Podcast
"john cruz" Discussed on Wrestling Travel Podcast
"We do preview shows. And i would always say. Hey i think lucia house party. Think they're gonna they're gonna make it. It's time to put the belts on in these guys all. Tell me how. I am while they tell you. I'm a huge lose. Mooch house party was. I liked them now than i did before. But you know wednesdays a great guy. I love lindsay and and you know. He's he's in the cat and that's my links You know anything he gets to do on. I'm totally onboard. For i mean he's he's one of the nicest people i in the sport i am him jonkers. That's how i met john crews cer- panico I actually When i brought linsay n lindsay said well we've got the whole world order so that gave me mcilroy wolf. Wouldn't who used to be mr floor. Fifty j rios. who was iraq yellow and john cruz. who became suprinato. So i started my company with the four of those and for the first six shows. So i mean we had a heck of a legia influence going on down there in the in the in the beginning but they've all moved up moved on and you know as of last year the last baby the lesson birdie left the nass windsor. Panico went awol. I mean they've all gone on to fantastic things in in mexico and all over the world. A lot of those names you're naming and i know just recently In in the uk were we're load. Wow i'm not located there now but what wrestling travel you've joined forces with powered for tv. Your episodes are on their. How has the when you're on our for. Do you get a chance to kind of gauge the response of the uk fans a little bit more than you would during youtube or. How does that work. I i'll tell you that the advantage depowered for a. I'll say just looking at our social because we can see where our social media's coming from our twitter has blown up with uk followers. Our facebook has blown up. We definitely can tell we're in the uk. Now i mean we were always there before because they were the uk was actually are number. Three number four on you to in the world behind saudi arabian india and then. Us uk So i mean we're definitely seeing a bob Our merchandise store that we have on amazon We have a uk store selling at christmas time..