40 Burst results for "Jeff It"
Finding Your Source of Confidence, Strength and Security
"Extremely important to be confident. You know, they say the difference between a confident person and an arrogant person is that a confident person has nothing to prove, but an arrogant person appears to have to prove that they're confident. Isn't that funny? Now you got to know who you are. You got to know what you want to do and you got to figure out how to do it, but you got to be confident. And it's not that kind of confidence where you fake it till you make it. I mean, you've got to be confident. You know, you've got to be confident and I can make this thing work. When my phone didn't ring for two weeks, I was still confident I could make this thing work. At the time, all I had to do was just go out and work harder and meet more people and make my phone ring and that's what I did. So I also had, I had personally, my strength came from my faith in Jesus Christ. That's where I get my strength today from my faith in my Lord and Savior. And that's not for everyone and that's okay, but you've got to get your strength from something or someone in order to make it through the obstacles and the failures you're going to have. So, you've also got to be secure in being who you are at any time in your growth. You know, when I started joining some groups and I was just doing somewhere around 400 ,000 a year and I was joining groups sitting at tables with guys that were doing 4 million a year or 2 million, 3 million, 4 million, some higher than that, I still had to be confident sitting at that table. You know why? Because I realized everybody at that table started somewhere and I was okay with where I was. Now, I wanted to be larger for sure, but I was okay. I was a sponge around that table. I was learning and they learned a few things from me, but I was learning. And if you take a quick look at some very, very successful companies and the owners and founders of the company, you'll find they started with very little too. So let's take a look at them right now. Put them up on the screen. Let's take a look at Steve Jobs. I mean, Steve Jobs started in his dad's garage, as you know, if you've watched any of the Steve Jobs movies. How about Elon Musk? Take a look at that guy. He started in a small office in his house. And then there's Jeff Bezos. Jeff Bezos started... Look at that office. I mean, he started somewhere. I mean, Amazon wasn't an existence. It wasn't around. It wasn't... He started it. See, he started small and started selling books. You know why he started selling books? Because he figured it out that books could be shipped for about the same price. So it was an easy shipping. And then he went to CDs and DVDs, which was actually easier shipping. So that's what he started with and why. Isn't that kind of funny? And then of course, you know where Amazon's at today. Okay. So everybody starts somewhere and normally it's pretty small. So long story short, you got to be secure where you're at in your growth.
Fresh "Jeff It" from News, Traffic and Weather
"North 27 minutes our next open traffic at 7 54. the news radio 1000 fm 977 forecast from the northwest crawl space services weather center hi everybody tuesday night still raining at a furious pace especially in the south sound but most of the rivers will be crusting and receding as we head into wednesday and the steady and warm rain pushes out of here highs on wednesday back into only the mid to the upper 40s where to we're be supposed and the snow level coming down to about 4 000 feet in the couple for weather center news radio 1000 fm 977 station i'm jeff pojolip you're listening to northwest news radio here's kim shepherd republican house speaker mike johnson drawing a line in the sand on future funding for
A highlight from U.S. Economy from "stable" to "negative" with Neely Tamminga + Preparing for the Upcoming Bull-Run with Joe Carlasare and American Hodl - November 13th, 2023
"Hello, and welcome to the Cafe Bitcoin Podcast brought to you by Swan Bitcoin, the best way to buy and learn about Bitcoin. I'm your host, Alex Dancic, and we're excited to announce that we're bringing the Cafe Bitcoin conversation from Twitter Spaces to you on this show, the Cafe Bitcoin Podcast, Monday through Friday every week. Join us as we speak to guests like Michael Saylor, Lynn Alden, Corey Clifston, Greg Foss, Tomer Strohleit, and many others in the Bitcoin space. Also be sure to hit that subscribe button. Make sure you get notifications when we launch a new episode. You can join us live on Twitter Spaces Monday through Friday, starting at 7 a .m. Pacific and 10 a .m. Eastern every morning to become part of the conversation yourself. Thanks again. We look forward to bringing you the best Bitcoin content daily here on the Cafe Bitcoin Podcast. All right, good morning to all of you Cafe Bitcoiners. It is Monday, November 13th, and you guys can probably hear my slack snapping off here. Let me mute that shit. Sorry about that. Monday, November 13th, 2023, and it is another awesome day. Looking forward to the week in Bitcoin. Once again, why are all these Bitcoiners so goddamn excited all the time? It's disgusting. What's wrong with you people? You know, I remember when you first started doing Spaces, Alex, and this is before I had extensive experience with Slack, and I could hear it going off all the time in the background. Every time we were having those Spaces discussions in the morning, I was just like, what in the hell are you picking up? My fault. My bad. Morning macro. Oh, sorry. How's it going, guys? I hope everybody had a good Veterans Day weekend, too, by the way. It was fantastic. I worked my ass off. That's all right, though. Good stuff. Good stuff. Good morning, Terrence. Bright and early. On a Monday at like 7 o 'clock in the morning. What's wrong with you people? Macro. Good morning, Peter. Good morning, Jacob. Shout -outs to Dr. Jeff, Joe Carlosari, in the audience. Obviously, we're throwing you guys invites, but you're welcome to just chill. Whatever. It's all good. So apparently, Bitcoin has taken a slight pause from its vertical acceleration and Bitcoiners are attacking each other once again. That didn't take long. Anyway, welcome to Cafe Bitcoin, episode 475. Shout -outs to our supporters on Fountain and Nosternes. By the way, when I say signal, I'm not trying to say it's just my signal. We're looking for the signal. Some people are like, eh, never let us on stage at Cafe Bitcoin. It's an opinion, all right? It's an opinion. It's an opinion. If I don't think your signal is that great, then maybe we might not let you on. I'm not sorry for that. Like we're here to provide signal. And yeah, it's a judgment call and yeah, you might think your signal is more important and that's fine. I'm not mad at that. I'm not even judging you. In fact, here's, Jacob and I were just talking about this earlier. I don't even disagree with you on many things. Some people are like, well, this issue is really important. You guys don't talk about it. It's like, it is really important. Totally agree with you, actually. What I don't agree with is complaining about stuff that you have no solution for, or if you're not building a solution for something. Like if you're building something and it's a solution, we will invite you on this stage and you can talk about it. But if all you're doing is whinging and complaining, like why are we going to waste everybody's time with that nonsense? Am I wrong? Am I out of line here? Serious question. No, you're not out of line and whinging is a good word. I think more people need to use it. Yeah, mewling. I love that word too, mewling, whinging, meh, meh, um, okay. Good morning, Mickey Koss. For today's show, we're going to talk about, apparently BlackRock is launching an Ethereum ETF, or they're applying to anyway. We're going to do a spot Bitcoin ETF approval update this week, maybe. And Joe Carlosari is welcome to come up here and give us his views on that. Otherwise we'll just read his tweets out loud. I got no shame with that. What else? Oh, ICBC, which is one of the largest banks in China, was apparently cyber ransomed last week. That's a thing. So maybe we'll talk about that a little bit. Here's an interesting little factoid. Every $6 ,313 move above $29 ,586 is a billion dollars for micro strategy. Wow. Well, indeed. But the naysayers are going to say every $3 ,360 move down is minus a billion dollars for micro strategy. I was just about to say, I could see the articles now as it drops from $100K to $95K, they'll be just, you know, slamming micro strategy. Meanwhile he's sitting there like up thousands of percent. It's completely absurd, but it'll continue. Just buy Berkshire Hathaway. It's better than Bitcoin. Anybody can buy it. Are you slamming Dear Point? No, I would never do that. Nate, you're so crystal clear this morning. You must be stationary and not driving anywhere. I'm using the updated desktop. They've improved it dramatically. And you aren't driving anywhere. That too. You can't raise your hand, but it is working pretty well. Okay. Question. Are you on Windows or Mac? I'm on Windows 10 or 11 and I forget what number it is. You can't raise your hand on Mac either. You can't raise your hand and can you do emojis? I can do a lot of emojis. A lot of emojis, wow. Like a thousand at a time, apparently. So are you retired now, Nate? For the most part, yeah. I love your story, man. For those of you who don't know, Nate's been hanging around, you know, he's been coming around Cafe Bitcoin for a couple of years now and back in the day, since it started and back in the day, back in them, Nate used to roll around as a, as a truck driver, if I understand correctly, saving his money, stacking sets, man, no, I, I, the reason I people double to check whatever wallet you plan on using and do never, ever, ever, ever enter your keys into a digital device that is connected to the internet. We've seen a string of new apps on these app stores like Apple and Google that pretend to be existing wallets that are only available on the desktop. They are not legit. There's a, there is a new string of them. This was brought to everybody's attention by Oscar P at O S C Pacey and there's a new Electrum wallet on the app store Electrum doesn't have a mobile app and there's all kinds of other apps Lumi, samurai wallet, Jack's Liberty, Jack's Liberty wallet management Phantom wallet of a protocol assets trade sparrow was spoofed the other day, these apps, there's no mobile app that you should be using with your seed phrases from any existing wallet that you're using that holds any significant amount of Bitcoin. If you happen to use a hot wallet, use a fresh, use a hot app, wallet, whatever. If you happen to use one of these devices, make sure you're using a brand new wallet that it has generated. And you're only going to use minimal amount of Bitcoin. If should you do it like if you're going to take cash and you're going out for the day, that amount of Bitcoin, not, not thousands and thousands of dollars or even your, your stack that these people are unscrupulous, they have the morals and they do not care. They want your Bitcoin. Please be careful. And even with sparrow, there are methods that you can verify that the app is legit. And I, I, I can put a link in the nest. I don't want to populate it yet, which it's cool with Alex. And super easy to do because I'm a boomer and I did it yesterday. Like super easy. It's a one, two, three, I think four steps. It involves your terminal and just copy and paste. Yeah. Yeah. There's, there's a, there's a path or an FAQ on how to do it on sparrow. Once, once you go to download it, it's how to verify right below it. So please take the time to learn. Um, yeah. And don't lose your Bitcoin.
Fresh "Jeff It" from WTOP 24 Hour News
"% of students started who college in 2017 have graduated and about a third have permanently dropped out. More workers are telling each other what they make. Robert has his 45 % say they have the in last year. It jumps to 82 % among Gen Zers. DC's Seven Reasons Restaurant has moved to a bigger spot in city center DC. Its weekly waitlist only private tastings include eating while blindfolded. The Dow lost 80 points Tuesday. Jeff Claiborne, WTOP Coming up on WTOP. I'm releasing everybody. Finally a breakthrough on the hold on military promotions in the Senate. We'll talk to WTOP's Mitchell Miller coming up. It's now 7 -11. When traffic takes a turn for the worse, you'll hear about it first on WTOP. Northbound 95 has been shut down in Maryland. Traffic updates every 10 minutes on the 8th. I heard it on WTOP. WTOP news facts
A highlight from Ethereum Bull-Run Begins | Gaming Tokens Explode
"All right is the ETH bull run beginning? A lot of things are starting to shape up in the markets. Today we're gonna break down a lot of different scenarios that are kind of aligning at the same time and it might be in a position for an Ethereum ETF and many more things to come. My name is Paul Baron. Welcome back into Tech Path. All right let's get started. Before we go I do want to thank Tanjum. If you guys are looking at self -custody this is the self -custody wallet you want to get. And there's a couple of things you can do. First of all it's a card. It works in conjunction with a really slick app and it's one of the best self -custody solutions out there and right now if you're not in self -custody from your exchanges you should be starting. I know this is going to be getting heated up here so there's gonna be a lot of activity right now so just remember be cautious always within the exchanges. Get your into crypto self -custody. You can do a couple of things here with the Tanjum wallet. You can get a three card set which is the way I recommend for your secure wallet. This will give you three additional cards or two additional cards. One you can carry with you, stash the other two and that in itself gives you a great set of backups and it's not that much more expensive. These are very inexpensive really if you think about that compared to some of the hardware devices. So check it out. Use our code down below it's gonna give you an additional 10 % off. Alright let's go to a first tweet here. This is James Saffert. Update BlackRock Ethereum ETF confirmed. They just submitted a 19 B filing so it is for sure going to happen. BlackRock is in the ETF game for Ethereum. How does this play out? Now there's a couple of things that could be very intriguing with an ETF for Ethereum. First of all this is something we've talked about here on the show is of course the yield opportunity with Ethereum that resides inside an ETF. What that might look like for asset managers. There's also aspects around this that could be much more much more intricate especially because Ethereum has so much opportunity here as both a payment platform but used in games. All sorts of things that really kind of explode the ecosystem of Ethereum. Here's 21 shares and remember this is the marketing bonanza that is beginning to I think take place over this next 18 to 24 months. We are gonna see an absolute blitzkrieg of marketing coming at a lot of new investors and people out there that are really starting to maybe experiment with both Bitcoin, Ethereum and altcoins coming very soon. 21 shares of course right there's another fund that they're marketing and of course don't forget right here is VanEck and VanEck is kind of going a little bit we've had the VanEck team on before they're going a little bit heavier in the ETH route so this was one of the ads that VanEck is running and again this gets back into just awareness and it's the thing that we've talked about on the show a lot and that is there is going to be a marketing bonanza here for a lot of these funds to try to get these ETH and Bitcoin ETFs on the move. Now you could look at this in a couple of ways there's a couple of things that are happening on Ethereum right now but if you think about the potential here this is Udi Wertheimer and pretty much kind of the Udi is if you don't know who he is follow him on Twitter but pretty much the I'll call him the father of ordinals but the idea he had right here was interesting and that is imagine this the smell if if an SEC clerk accidentally approves the ETF before a Bitcoin ETF. Now you know that Gensler is if he does and when I think will approve a Bitcoin ETF could it also be now that BlackRock has the filing in place could it also be a scenario where we get an ETH ETF maybe at the same time remember this week when we had Jeff Sanford on from Bloomberg he was saying May of next year as an ETH ETF to be able to ride on right on the heels pretty much of January to get bitcoins ETF in play that would be something right there.
Fresh "Jeff It" from WTOP 24 Hour News
"Of Bensville Road. Jeffy Lube where speed meets quality for an oil change and vehicle maintenance experience you can trust. Visit JeffylubeDC .com for more information. I'm Dave Dildine WTLP traffic. Our forecast now from 7 News First Alert meteorologist Steve Rudin. Cloudy moving skies through the remainder of the evening and into the overnight with scattered showers perhaps a few snow showers farther to the west along the I 81 corridor temperatures in the 40s. Any wet weather will draw to a close come early tomorrow morning. We'll see skies begin to clear with highs in the mid 40s. We're in the 40s on Thursday. I'm 7 News meteorologist Steve Rudin of the First Alert Center. Weather Right now we're at 44 in College Park 43 in Fairfax the National Mall checks in at 47. Money News at 10 and 40 past the hour brought to you by PenFed. Great rates for everyone. Here's Jeff Clayball.
A highlight from Is Circling Preparing for an IPO?
"Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW. It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin and the big picture power shifts remaking our world. What's going on, guys? It is Wednesday, November 8th, and today we are talking about the industry moving on. Before we get into that, however, if you are enjoying The Breakdown, please go subscribe to it. Give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on The Breakers Discord. You can find the link in the show notes or go to bit .ly slash breakdown pod. Hello, friends. Well, as you know, we have been sort of locked in the past thanks to this S .B .F. trial, but now that is over, we're finally moving forward and you can start to feel a difference in the tone of the industry and the feeling of the people in it in the announcements coming out. And so today we're going to look at a couple of examples of that with the past clearly at our backs and facing towards the future. So kicking off, according to Bloomberg, stablecoin issuer Circle is considering an IPO for early next year. Now, Circle, of course, attempted to go public via SPAC in 2022, but their efforts fizzled out after the SEC refused to approve the deal. Bloomberg sources said that Circle is in discussions with advisers in preparation for a potential IPO. Now, while there's no certainty that the company will move forward with the process, the firm has reached a high valuation as a private company, making it a prime candidate to go public. Circle last raised money at a seven billion dollar valuation in April 2022, and the failed SPAC later that year was priced at a nine billion dollar valuation. What's more, big name financial institutions, including Goldman Sachs, BlackRock and Fidelity are all current investors. Now, Circle, for their part, are tight lipped, stating, quote, Crypto Trader Tolks wrote, Circle considering a 2024 IPO coming after hours is kind of interesting, maybe reading too much into it, but feels like increasingly friendly regulation plus stablecoin bill developments happening behind closed doors. Now, on that front, speaking at DC FinTech Week, Federal Reserve vice chairman for supervision Michael Barr stood firm on his position that the Fed needs regulatory authority over stablecoins. Throughout the negotiations on stablecoin legislation, the major sticking point has been whether the Fed is truly the correct regulator for stablecoin issuers or whether smaller issuers can be adequately monitored by state regulators. Barr said, quote, He added, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire tweeted, Now, next up in our stories of actual progress, Custodia Bank has finally launched its long awaited Bitcoin custody service. The platform will use segregated customer accounts rather than an omnibus wallet to ensure client funds are safe and held bankruptcy remote from Custodia's corporate funds. This launch comes after years of battling regulators culminating in Custodia's fight to obtain a Federal Reserve master account. The new platform is targeted at businesses like fiduciaries, investment advisors, fund managers and corporate treasurers. In other words, a range of clients that may need segregated accounts to satisfy risk managers to take on Bitcoin holdings. Jeff Ross at Valeshire Cap said, Congrats, Caitlin Long.
Fresh "Jeff It" from News and Perspective with Tom Hutyler
"Report is sponsored by Beacon Plumbing. If you own a classic old home it could have old pipes. they If clog up stop freaking and call Beacon 1 -800 -FREAKIN or BeaconPlumbing .net. Your next northwest traffic at 913. The soggy weather continues to plague us in so many ways. It's got the latest forecast now sponsored by Northwest Crawl Space Services. Here is Kristin Clark at Como4. It's a soaker out there no doubt about it as we continue to track a stationary band of steady rain over Puget Sound. We will likely pick up an additional inch two to inches from Seattle south of Chehalis even in the mountains so that excess snow melt and runoff is expected. A lot of river levels are rapidly rising today many of which will be crusting early Wednesday morning but by that time the rain trickles to an end and the rivers will be allowed to respond and recede quickly throughout the day tomorrow. Back safely within their banks by Thursday especially with the return snow of in the mountains. In the Comerford Weather Center meteorologist Kristin Clark. Rain and low visibility continue here downtown Seattle off Elliott Bay where our studios are located it's 52 degrees with a continuing rain. I'm Rick Vansice Rick here's what's happening and certainly weather is leading our news the heavy rain we've been seeing is left flooding behind in parts of King Snohomish Pierce counties. Snohomish County is where we find Scott North with the emergency management system. There are neighborhoods that are flooded there are roads that are underwater and you know people need to be aware that you know the flood waters are across places they might normally drive and so getting around is difficult. He says areas near the Stiliguamish and Skikomish rivers have seen the water rise with the Snohomish River expected to reach flood stage later on today. Northwest News Radio's Jeff has more from Granite Falls. The downpour continues and some homes have already been flooded here along the Stiliguamish River. Neighbors have done what they can to try to keep the water out but it appears to be something of a fruitless effort. Flood warnings have been issued but so far there have been no reports of any injuries or evacuations. That said the rain isn't expected to let up anytime soon so the flooding is only expected to get Falls, worse. Jeff Pojola, In Granite Northwest News Radio. And Amtrak has suspended service between Seattle and Portland until December 7th following a landslide that's impacted a section of track south of Tacoma trains
A highlight from SEC GARY GENSLER CALLED OUT FOR CRYPTO FAILURES!!
"The SEC is having trouble hiring crypto experts, you don't say? And SEC Commissioner Mark Ueda is calling out the agency on their lack of rules and regulations around the crypto industry. Also the UK has released their staple coin regulation ban, and a bunch of NFT goers at the Bored Ape Yacht Club NFT convention went blind? Let's break it down. Welcome to the Thinking Crypto podcast, your home for cryptocurrency news and interviews. If you are new here, please hit that subscribe button as well as the thumbs up button and leave a comment below. Well folks, we've got a report here from Jeff Roberts, who is a crypto editor at Fortune magazine. He said the SEC is having trouble hiring crypto experts because of a rule they must sell all their crypto. He said, would make more sense to allow staff to hold a modest amount. This would also make them better at their job. So the SEC unbelievably is saying you have to sell all your crypto, right? It's not that they have to sell all their crypto, they should obviously have to disclose it and they should understand the technology and be able to use it and test it out. But of course we're dealing with scumbag regulator, Gary Gensler, who's making up all kinds of buddies can come in and take over. Matt Hogan of Bitwise, who I've had on the podcast quite often, he weighed in on the matter. He said, an obvious but unspoken implication of this is that the SEC will be staffed by people who dislike crypto. The only people with crypto expertise and a willingness to divest 100 % of their crypto are deep seated skeptics. This rule enforces a strong bias in hiring. Paul Grewal of Coinbase said, believe it or not, as a federal magistrate judge, I used to have a traffic ticket docket, think national parks, defense bases, VA hospitals. Imagine if the parties had learned a person deciding their auto accident case was forbidden from driving a car. Great points here. Now, Mark Ueda, who's one of the sitting SEC commissioners, and he is a Republican, him and Hester Peirce have both been vocal critics of the agency and on their lack of rules and clarity around crypto, also against many of the enforcement actions. So here's the headline, SEC should consider proposing rules to regulate crypto, Republican commissioner says. So I'm glad Mark Ueda is coming out and saying these things because it can't just be Hester Peirce. And right now, for the most part, it seems like Hester Peirce is outnumbered. So Mark needs to be more vocal, I'm glad he is speaking up. So here's a quote from him, unfortunately, the SEC did not take this approach and instead is pursuing a case by case approach through enforcement actions. As a result, it will take years to reach any type of legally binding precedent as matters will need to wind their way through the courts before reaching the court of appeals level, Ueda said on Monday in prepared remarks in London. So I hope he continues to speak on this, to show the agency is not in a good place, they are not providing clear guidance, they are operating by regulation by enforcement, which is really asinine. While the rest of the world is moving ahead, providing clear regulations. Now Eleanor Terrett of Fox Business highlighted the following, she tweeted, the House Appropriations GOP financial services and general government bill is up for vote before the rules committee at 4 p .m. Eastern before it heads to the floor. It includes an amendment from Tennessee Congressman Representative Tim Burchett to reduce the salary of SEC Chair Gary Gensler to one dollar. It also includes an amendment to defund the SEC for crypto enforcement. So shout out to Representative Tim Burchett, who's bringing the fire here on Gary Gensler. And we got to do these things, folks, to put some pressure. Gary Gensler should be fired and the SEC needs to be revamped. Congressman Warren Davidson has put out a bill, of course, that would revamp the entire structure of the SEC to make it less political and to make it more efficient. So let's see where this goes. But I love that these bills are coming out more pressure on scumbag regulator Gary Gensler. Now here's an interesting update around the Federal Reserve, and it just speaks to government and the lack of knowledge and education in government about crypto. So Matthew Seigel, who's head of crypto research at VanEck, he said, I met a Federal Reserve crypto researcher at a conference last week. He doesn't own any digital assets. He's not allowed to and didn't understand the difference between an exchange and a custodian. Folks, I'm face palming right now. I know you can't see me. And if you're listening on a podcast platform, trust me, I'm face palming right now. He doesn't understand the difference between an exchange and a custodian. God help us, right? These are the people who are trying to regulate crypto and putting out rules and recommendations and papers and so forth. It's unbelievable. But I know there are folks working to help bring education to Congress, and that is blockchain association, the Chamber of Digital Commerce and so forth. So we'll see, folks. We got a lot of work to do. This is why we have to use social media to our advantage to keep tweeting out, sharing the facts and exposing lies and false information like from the likes of Elizabeth Warren and others. Now, the juxtaposition of that is the UK's Bank of England releases stablecoin regulation plan. Remember, the UK had passed crypto regulations, so did the EU. So the US is lagging behind. And folks, stablecoins are going to be part of the token economy and will be a big part of how people transact. So there needs to be regulations. And we're seeing here in the United States, the SEC sending a subpoena to PayPal over their stablecoin, right? It's unbelievable what's happening. So the United Kingdom Central Bank, the Bank of England, has released a plan to govern the stablecoin market. The BOE and the Financial Conduct Authority plan to follow the rules released by the UK government last week to oversee the digital asset industry. As per the UK government's proposal, regulations for fiat backed stablecoins will begin in early 2024. As per the paper, the BOE will regulate systematic stablecoins while the FCA will govern the larger crypto market. UK Prime Minister Rishi Sanak had announced that he wants the nation to become a crypto hub, introducing clear rules for digital assets and crypto firms falls within the UK's goals. The UK's latest plan follows the European Union and Japan's similar moves. Folks, I love that crypto is not a specific asset class to the United States. So even though we're dealing with scumbag regulator Gary Gensler and all kinds of idiots in the government who have not educated themselves, the market will continue to grow and expand globally. So we can at least put our hope in that. Now we got some really weird news coming out from the Bored Ape Yacht Club and full disclosure, I don't own any Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs, but apparently they had an NFT convention and there was some UV lights and folks who were blasted by this prolonged UV light went blind apparently. So, I mean, this is just wild, right? I don't know what to make of it, but just so you guys know, I don't know if any of you went to any of these conventions or this convention, I should say, but, or, you know, somebody who went to this convention, but this is just some wild news coming out of 2023. So heads up on that folks, I want to end it by highlighting our sponsor and that is Uphold, which is a great crypto exchange this month, they're giving away 50 ,000 XRP. All you got to do is complete at least $20 in trades to be eligible to win and Uphold is a great platform. I trust them. I've been using them since 2018. So if you'd like to learn more, please visit the link in the description. Thank you.
Fresh update on "jeff it" discussed on WTOP 24 Hour News
"Marlborough and at 10 and 40 past the hour. We're brought to you by PenFed. Great rates for everyone. To Jeff Klayball. Another sign of a tightening labor market. The number of job openings across the country fell to 8 .7 million in October. That's still a big number, but it's a drop of more than a half million and the lowest number of unfilled jobs in almost two and a half years. Verizon Wireless is bundling Netflix in Macs at a discount. Bundling the two for $10 a month. They are the ad supported versions. Maryland holds a title Lowest state unemployment rate for 2023. Just 1 .7 % on average. Virginia makes the top 10 at number 10. Its unemployment rate this year has 2 .7%. The Dow finished the day down another 80 points. The S &P 500 down 3 points, but the NASDAQ finished the day up 44. Jeff Kleebel, WGOP News. Thanks, Jeff. 442 Alabama Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville is ending his months -long, one -person hold on hundreds of military appointments. The release will allow for promotions for about 400 officers. But Tuberville still plans to maintain a hold on nearly a dozen four -star generals. He started the hold back in February because of his opposition to the Pentagon's abortion policy. But he's been under growing pressure from fellow Republicans as well as Democrats to end his one -man blockade. Senate Democrats planned have to bring up a procedural change that would have allowed all military promotions to be approved on a single vote. In the the meantime, Senate's top Republican is placing conditions on providing further aid to Ukraine. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell says he's been a consistent supporter of Ukraine in its war against Russia. But he says doing so in isolation is now a non -starter. We insist on meaningful changes to the border. Even as Ukrainian President Zelensky was speaking to senators via secure video urging more aid, McConnell was making his own case. Now is the time to pay attention to our own border in addition to these other important concerns. international The White House's aid to Ukraine is an urgent matter with current funding running out. Linda Canyon, CBS News, Washington. Coming up on WTOP, they fall from the trees onto your car. But what about eating them? It's a tough nut to crack. I'm Matt Kofax. 443. music Experience the of Bob Dylan like never before and the Tony Award -winning musical Girl From the North Country. Here comes the story of the hurricane. This critically acclaimed Broadway show features dozens
A highlight from Megan Basham
"Welcome to the Eric Metaxas Show. I shouldn't tell you this, but Eric hired someone who sounds just like him to host today's show. But since I'm the announcer, they told me, so I'm telling you, don't be fooled. The real Eric's in jail! Folks, welcome to, I think this is hour two. My guest today is Megan Basham with the Daily Wire. Megan, what's new? Man, lots of things are new. Lots of things happening at the border, lots of chaos, lots of new policies being pushed. So that's kind of the beat I'm on right now. I've been covering this for a while and I'm working on some reporting in that area. Is there anybody in the world who really doesn't understand the nightmare of an open border, the nightmare of millions, millions of unvetted strangers wandering into American territory? I mean, it seems like you really have to be willfully ignorant or an enemy of America not to be deeply concerned about this. Yeah, and I think, you know, I would be very skeptical if people really don't understand what this does to our national sovereignty, sovereignty, sovereign, apparently I can't say that word, but how it protects our national interest and how this violates our national interest. So we have people coming in. 150 ,000 illegals were released into the United States in September alone. I believe it was 1 .4 million came into the U .S. These are those who were released that we know about, by the way, in fiscal year 2023 alone. So that's 1 .4 million new illegal immigrants in the United States. And all of us have seen the chaos at the border. We've seen the devastation that that is wreaking the crime, the drug trafficking, the sex trafficking. And basically, I think it's very hard for anybody to say, no, we don't really know how harmful these policies are or really lack of policies. And so what we're seeing now is the Biden administration trying to pretend like, gosh, we're trying to get a handle on it, but we need these Republicans to work with us. I would argue that it seems pretty obvious to me that it's fairly orchestrated. I don't think things like this can happen on accident. The messaging has certainly been that if you can get to the border and get across, you are going to be able to stay. So that has really, you know, sent up a flair to people all over the world that now is the time to crash the gates of the United States. Well, I mean, a lot of this stuff, maybe it's obvious to some people, but I want to spell it out a little bit. Ladies and gentlemen, you understand that we're dealing with the evil. And the reason I use the word evil is because if we know that fentanyl is flooding across our border and killing thousands and thousands and thousands of people across this country, we would want to do something to stop stop that. If we know that sex trafficking is happening, that children are being raped, children are being raped many, many, many, many times. People are making money off the rape of children in a moral world. You'd want to do something about that. Potential terrorists, hostile people, hostile to America are coming across the border, whether Chinese hostels, whether people who are hostile coming from the Middle East, from sent by Iran. This is all very basic. Any person with common sense would understand that this is going to be very harmful to human beings around the world. But in certainly America and if you're the president or if you care about America, you would take this extremely seriously unless you cared more about your political future than about American citizens and about the future of America. That to me seems the inevitable conclusion when I hear any modicum of the evidence that we're talking about. I don't see how else to read it. And I tell you, Megan, it's a little chilling to think that things could be that dark, that political leaders could be that profoundly cynical, that they don't care about lives destroyed by fentanyl. They don't care about children being raped to not care about those things, to not care about enemies of America entering the country. It's just it's it's almost impossible to process, frankly. Yeah, and I hate to be a little bit even darker than that, because I think that we expect this kind of thing from our political leaders. But the story that I've been tracking in particular related to this subject is how we are seeing our church leaders get involved in order to support the Biden administration's policies. So a report that I'm working on right now is how groups like the Evangelical Immigration Table, which, if you're not familiar, is a part of a left wing foundation called the National Immigration Forum. And just to give you a little background on who this group is, they were founded in the mid 2000s. Their biggest bank roller was George Soros, who, as we know, has a vested interest in destroying borders and really seeing that we have no sovereign nations anymore. That has been his project. He's been somewhat open about that, surprisingly. And so around 2010, Soros was the National Immigration Forum's biggest backer. And then 2012, 2013, they created sort of a front group to target conservative evangelicals, conservative Christians saying, hey, we support these these open border policies as well. At the time, what they wanted was to get the Gang of Eight bill across the finish line, which, if you remember that, that was a very bad bill that was supported by Chuck Schumer and John McCain. And what it would have done was grant amnesty to millions of illegals for the low, low price of up to one thousand dollars. So it could have been lower than that, but it was up to one thousand dollars. And I think it's worth looking at the chaos we're seeing now and asking how many people are willing to try to make it into the U .S. if they know that they can buy citizenship by just biding their time and paying such a low fee. So at that time, the evangelical immigration table was formed. People like Russell Moore, the Council for Christian Colleges, signed on World Relief. And you may know a little bit about this, Eric, because they went around and sort of solicited a very general statement of principles and they got some noteworthies to sign on. They got me to sign on. Right. I was just going to get to that. Yes, they did. I'm no longer signed on. Right. They managed to tell that because this is so fascinating. I mean, the idea we'll talk about Russell Moore. He's the head of Christianity today these days, which is just depressing. But talk about this, because this was presented. Well, tell the story. It's just amazing. Right. And I'm going somewhere with this because I think it's important to understand the history of how these organizations came about. So when they started to circulate this general statement of principles, they went to various Christian noteworthy. These people like best selling authors of biographies by people like about people like Bonhoeffer. So you are obviously the kind of person they wanted to sign up. And after they circulated this general statement of principles, they then released a letter and they sent it to members of Congress saying evangelical Christians. Look at this list of noteworthy who want to see you pass this amnesty bill. And again, I want to say that this amnesty bill was very bad. It's why Jeff Sessions, who was then the head of the Senate Budget Committee, said this would be devastating for American workers and the American economy. And by and large, evangelical voters did not like it. So you could look at this as something of an astroturf campaign to convince legislators that, oh, gosh, we better support this because our evangelical base wants to see it. So once they did that, they then started meeting with Obama. Russell Moore, who was then the head of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, which is the lobbying arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in the US. So they then started doing photo ops with Obama, saying, isn't this great? We're holding hands across the aisle. People like Eric Metaxas, who's known to be conservative, support this. And all the while, you know, George Soros's money is funding it, which they tried to deny. And we'll come to that in a minute. But then people like you realize, oh, this is how they're using my name. Take my name off of this. I don't support this. So that was the first iteration of the evangelical immigration table when Democrats and I would say squishy Republicans first tried to get this kind of amnesty policy across the line. And I don't know if you want to step in and say, yeah, I heard about it. I took my name off of it. Yeah, well, I don't know if it was Ann Coulter, but some friend said, Eric, I think you've made a mistake here. Look at this. Look at this. And I thought, wow, I've been bamboozled or maybe I'm just stupid. Either way, I know I mean, it was what they did. Well, I mean, I think here's the thing.
A highlight from The Fight for Bitcoin Against CBDCs with Mark Moss
"I think this is the goal that they're going to, so control your movement, but then really control your money. Because at the end of the day, without the freedom to transact, there's no freedom. Hello, everyone. How are you all doing? I'm sick as a dog here. I'm going to be taking the rest of the day off work and then we go back to bed so I can feel a bit better. I don't get ill often, but when I do, it's usually 24 hours and I have to have a break But anyway, welcome to the What Bitcoin Did podcast, which is brought to you by the legends at RS Energy, the largest NASDAQ listed Bitcoin miner using 100 % renewable energy. I'm your host Peter McCormack. And today we have my friend and sparring partner, Mark Moss back on the show. Now I always love making shows with Mark because although we don't always agree on everything, we always have a great conversation. I feel like we can hash things out, hash out our ideas in a respectful way. And I think Mark enjoys it too. So in this episode, we get into CBDCs. We go off on a tangent about religion and how technology shapes society. It's a good one. I love this. A couple of things to update you on. So next weekend on the 11th of November, we've got a big cup game down at Rail Bedford and we've got a Bitcoin meetup before it. And we're going to be joined by Robert Breedlove. Yes, I'm getting all these Bitcoins down to Bedford eventually. So come and join us for that. It will be a 12 o 'clock start followed by football. And if you haven't checked out our conference, we have announced a cheat code, which is going to be held here in Bedford in April next year. We'd love you to join us. We've got some amazing guests coming over, Gladstein, Natalya Milensky, Lynn Alden, Jeff Booth, Preston Pierce. It's going to be an incredible couple of days. And the second day of the conference, this isn't a conference, I'm taking you all to football. I'm going to show you the cheat code in action. So if you want to find out more about that and get yourself a ticket, then please head over to cheatcode .co .uk. Anyway, this was a fun chat with Mark. I hope you enjoy it. If you've got any questions about this or anything else, please do hit me up.
A highlight from Joseph Arthur (continued)
"Welcome to The Eric Metaxas Show. Do you like your gravy thick and rich and loaded with creamy mushrooms? If no one was looking, would you chug the whole gravy boat? Chug! Chug! Chug! Chug! Stay tuned. Here comes Mr. Chug -a -lug himself, Eric Metaxas. Hey folks. Welcome to hour two. I'm talking to Joseph Arthur, singer, songwriter. We're talking about so much. But one of the things that intrigued me was I realized when the Nazis, the thought police shut you down, you were really, and are, you're well known, especially in the music world. You've worked with everybody. Peter Gabriel championed you early on, like 25 plus years ago. I was good friends with Lou Reed. He was my brother. I loved him a lot. And you obviously lived on the Lower East Side. Yeah, we would hang out every day. I mean for a time, not every day of his life. There was a period there. I've been in bands with Jeff Ament from Pearl Jam, like you mentioned Danny Harrison and Ben Harper. Also Peter Buck and I have a band, Arthur Buck. But the thing is, me speaking outside of the narrative, that would frighten most people in the music business. It's so strange because I don't care what other people think to the degree that I could possibly have an emotional reaction from it. It just doesn't strike me that way. So I don't understand that in other people. I could disagree with you, but it wouldn't make me say, okay, I no longer want to go bowling with you because you think something different. You could tell me I love Biden, and I'd be like, okay, I think you're not seeing things clearly. But that would just be my opinion, and who cares? We can still be friends. Seems like you're a big -hearted person, and I think that those of us who would say we're Christians or whatever, we're supposed to be big -hearted and open and understand that there are going to be people that are going to disagree with us, and we're supposed to love them and whatever. But that's what's so interesting to me is that when we're talking about this kind of stuff, how people wanted to cancel you or cancel me or tons of people that I've had on this program, they're just like, we're going to crush that person like a bug. We do not want them to have a voice. So they took this, you know, the air taxi show was on YouTube. We had a huge following, and it was completely wiped out because I had Naomi Wolf on to talk about the vaccine. Love Naomi Wolf. I've had her on my show before, too. She's amazing. And she's been on the show many times. But just the idea that we had a conversation about vaccine mandates, not even the vaccine, but the mandates, and they were like, And you thought, okay, who would do that? Would nice people totally shut down a show because we had a conversation? No. And also, nice people shouldn't hate you for having a different opinion. But this is a media invention, and media keeps doing this and keeps influencing people this way. Like, for instance, if you take something like gender reassignment surgery for kids, say you think that's a bad idea. Like, you don't think 12 -year -olds should have gender reassignment surgery. I personally think that's a bad idea. I don't think kids are ready to make that kind of permanent decision about something like that. Because they're not. At that age, that's my opinion. But then somebody would say, oh, that means you are intolerant of gay and trans people. And that is not true. That's conflating things that are not true. And it's happening now. But what's happening with Israel -Palestine right now, too, the same thing and a different thing. If you think, you know, Israel's response to what they're doing to Gaza right now is not right or not what they should be doing, that means you're pro -Hamas and that you hate Jewish people. And those things don't mean the same thing. You might think, hey, I don't think that's the right way to respond. That doesn't mean you hate Jewish people. I don't think kids should have gender reassignment surgery. It doesn't mean you hate gay people. But that's what the media does. They go, this means this. And then you should hate. It's all very black and white and extreme. There's no room for nuance. In some ways, it's not necessarily even the media. It's social media. Really what you're talking about is a mob mentality. It's a mob mentality without nuance. And I see both sides doing it. It's like, why are you doing that? Like, we are sensitive beings that can think deeply about things. These are complicated situations that require a lot of nuanced conversation. And it's not this black and white thing. Well, OK, you know what I mean? It's crazy. I mean, it's so interesting because in our lifetimes, we haven't seen this. And so suddenly a few years ago, I mean, talking about the election, like, I mean, I just saw clearly, I said, wait a second. This looks fishy. It's fishy to say the least. Even if I'm wrong. Right. You're not going to tell me I can't talk about it. I mean, you can't say it looks fishy. You can't say it looks fishy. Biden got more votes than Obama in his heyday by a lot like that guy. I mean, that looks fishy. You know, I'm sorry if you're like crazy because that looks fishy. I want to tell you, this is this is to me the worst part of it in a way. Right. Right. Is what is it? What this kind of stuff has done is it has made people cynical. In other words. Yeah. There are people who say like, well, yeah, the election was stolen, like whatever. Who cares? And you think, who cares? How emotionally dead are you that you don't care that, you know, the greatest nation in the history of the world that has freedom where every person is supposed to have a voice. It's this beautiful idea. And you don't even care if some people just said, well, not this time that, you know, Trump is Hitler and we're going to do whatever it takes. And you think, well, no, that's that's not really that's up to the American voter to decide. And they said, well, we don't we no longer trust the American voter. We don't care. It's wild. So do you still you still like Trump, right? Do I still like Trump? Should we not talk about that right now? I love Trump. I mean, I think he's he's he's amazing. Does his vaccines stance bug you out? Well, look, just because I would vote for somebody or like somebody doesn't mean I agree with them on everything. And there is zero doubt that on that issue, I would disagree. I don't know where he stands on that now. In other words, because a lot of his base, I think, has given him a ton of pushback so that he's but, you know, he's not the kind of guy to easily say, oh, yeah, I made it wrong. It's a beautiful, beautiful job. Yeah. No, listen, I almost find it funny because he's not he doesn't seem capable of saying like, oh, yeah, I got that wrong. Which he should. Obviously, he should. But no, I mean, I think that I mean, I said this before, but I think, listen, people can can think what they want. But I, I do think it's true that Trump is a very different person than he was in 2016. In other words, the stuff that has happened, he was very naive. He came in like, OK, I was elected president. Now I get to. And it's kind of like when you think of Lincoln. You know, he wanted people that opposed him politically to be in his cabinet because he thought, you know, I want to get along with everybody. So Trump did that. And he invited in naively some people who were running. Yeah, well, thought he's just one of the worst examples, but there's many examples of people that he just said, like, you know, you know, come on in and we can all reason together. And he didn't know that they were not there to reason together. They were there to take him out. And so I think he's been so relentlessly attacked that I think he's kind of awake to this stuff in a way that he was not at all. Let's hope so. Yeah, well, I mean, we'll see. But I mean, that's my that's my sense. But but it's just it's interesting because we were talking about the vaccine, talking about election fraud. Trump is another one of those triggers for people that they can't have a conversation. They just go crazy. Yeah, it's nuts. And I'm not interested in, like, arguing with somebody. Again, it's a media invention. You know, it's it's the media. We're finding out how susceptible humanity is to propaganda in ways that I don't think we could have fathomed. There's a story of like Russian people coming over here and going like, oh, yeah, like your propaganda is so much better in America than in Russia. Yeah. And the guy goes like, oh, well, wait a minute. Russia is famous for propaganda. It's like, yeah, the difference is in Russia. We all know it's propaganda. Wow. Right. And and we got to we got to go to a break. We'll be right back. I'm talking to Joseph Arthur, singer, songwriter, radio host. We'll be right back. For 10 years, Patriot Mobile has been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. And when I say only trust me, they're the only one. Glenn and the team have been great supporters of this show, which is why I'm proud to partner with them. Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability to access all three major networks, which means you get the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding the left. When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending the message that you support free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life, our Second Amendment and our military veterans and first responder heroes. They're 100 percent U .S. based customer service team makes switching easy. Keep your number, keep your phone or upgrade. Their team will help you find the best plan for your needs. Just go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash Metaxas or call nine seven to Patriot. Get free activation when you use the offer code Metaxas. Patriot Patriot mobile dot com slash Metaxas. Legacy Precious Metals has a revolutionary new online platform that allows you to invest in real gold and silver online. In a few easy steps, you can open an account online, select your metals of choice and choose to have them stored in a vault or shipped to your door. You'll have access to a dashboard where you can track your portfolio growth in real time. Any time you'll see transparent pricing on each coin and bar. This puts you in complete control of your money. The platform is free to sign up for. Visit Legacy PM Investments dot com and open your account and see this new investing platform for yourself. Gold can hedge against inflation and against the volatile stock market. A true diversified portfolio isn't just more stocks and bonds, but different asset classes. This new platform allows you to make investments in gold and silver no matter how small or large with a few clicks. Visit Legacy PM Investments dot com to get started. You're going to love this free new tool that they've added. Please go check it out today. That's Legacy PM Investments dot com.
A highlight from Bitcoin Whitepaper Day & the Treasury "Borrows" $1.7 Trillion with Dr. Jeff, Joe Carlasare, Wicked, and Ant - October 31st, 2023
"Hello, and welcome to the Cafe Bitcoin Podcast brought to you by Swan Bitcoin, the best way to buy and learn about Bitcoin. I'm your host, Alex Danson, and we're excited to announce that we're bringing the Cafe Bitcoin Conversations Twitter Spaces to you on this show, the Cafe Bitcoin Podcast, Monday through Friday every week. Join us as we speak to guests like Michael Saylor, Len Alden, Corey Clifston, Greg Foss, Tomer Strohleit, and many others in the Bitcoin space. Also, be sure to hit that subscribe button. Make sure you get notifications when we launch a new episode. You can join us live on Twitter Spaces Monday through Friday, starting at 7 a .m. Pacific and 10 a .m. Eastern every morning to become part of the conversation yourself. Thanks again. We look forward to bringing you the best Bitcoin content daily here on the Cafe Bitcoin Podcast. Happy Halloween, folks, and happy Bitcoin white paper day. Today, 15 years ago, was it 15 years? It's been a bit, been a minute. Satoshi released the white paper for Bitcoin to the world, Bitcoin, a peer -to -peer electronic cash system. We're going to talk a little bit about that today. Good morning, everybody. Good morning. Good morning. I remember the premiere of Thriller on MTV. You old. I am old. Good morning, Nicky. Good morning to all you Cafe Bitcoiners out there. Today is Tuesday, October 31st, 2023. Welcome to Cafe Bitcoin Episode 466. Shout -outs to our supporters on Fountain and Nosternes. Our mission for this show is to provide the signal in a sea of noise teaching the other seven billion people on this planet why there is hope because of this bright orange future we call Bitcoin. You guys want to dig into the white paper a little bit? I'd like to pull it apart, if you guys are up for it, not pull it apart, but just investigate it deeper. All right, so I'm going to read some of this and then we can talk about it. A purely, so this is the abstract, a purely peer -to -peer version of electronic cash would allow, would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. That in itself is incredibly mind -blowing and groundbreaking. That's something that we need today. This morning, prior to the show, I was out in the front yard talking to the guy who's giving me a quote or a bid to do some stuff in my yard or whatever, and we got to talking about that and how draconian everything's become and, you know, in a lot of ways like it feels like the walls are closing in for some people. I don't feel that way because I have Bitcoin, but I mean, just listen to this guy talk about it. Like he's very, very aware that the lizards are out there making life hard for people and that's not, probably not going to stop. We're in, you know, we're in late stage fiat collapse in my opinion. It's it's begun and the signs are everywhere and that means things are going to get a lot of freaking weirder here in the years ahead and being able to send money directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution or a gatekeeper or requesting some government bureaucrats permission is probably going to be pretty important. What do you guys think? Yeah, I mean, I personally believe that if this doesn't work out, this is humanity's last shot.
A highlight from INSANE Solana Price Prediction! (100X Incoming!)
"It is a great day to discover crypto, everybody. It is one day away from Halloween. I hope you're feeling spooky. The only thing spooky is you're not hitting the like button. We got some insane price predictions from VanEck, one of the largest asset managers in the world. And they have some very, very bullish price targets, but they also have a very bearish price target. We're going to go over those for Solana, plus their nice Bitcoin thesis and why there's going to be a lot of institutional money flowing in, and we're seeing that in the stats as well. Also, we're going to talk about Miles Deutscher. That guy's insane. I've been following his stuff for years. It's really, really interesting. Got some stuff from Ralph Paul as well. Plus, we have a brand new person, an oldie but goodie on the sidecar today. How are you doing today? I'm doing good. First time on the side desk, I think, so I'm going to be testing out, chatting with everybody in the chat. But yeah, when VanEck is pumping your bags, it's a good day to be in crypto. So yeah, I'm loving it. All right. Well, let's look at today in crypto. So we have the crypto market cap. It looks like it's up 1 .7%. I do want to go ahead and hit refresh here. We might need to, I don't know if I have coin, I don't have coin market cap at the time, but we'll look at this. CoinGecko, we do have Bitcoin up slightly. It's about half a percent, so it looks kind of good. But ETH, it's got double the pump, baby. It is up 1 .0 % here. But when we start scrolling down, we see some bigger winners. First big winner we see, well, relative. XRP up 3 .6%. Bigger than that, though, we have Solana. Solana is up 7%. I may or may not have bought Solana this weekend, folks. I may or may not have bought this weekend. That's all I'm going to say. We have Chainlink also looking good. Chainlink is up 3 .2%. Just defying all expectations of a pullback on the short term. And then Avalanche up 4%. But let's look at the biggest ones, the biggest gainers, the biggest losers. I think maybe one of the coins I took profits on, yeah, rollbit, baby. I took profit. I took some more profit. I've taken profit once before. I took profit a second time on rollbit. This is one that we put in the Crucial Crypto newsletter a long time ago. I told you about before the pump sold. I can't remember which peak I sold. I remember going down, I didn't buy more, and now that we're kind of testing this $0 .20 resistance level, I said, you know what, it might be time to exit out. So I put a little into Solana, I put a little bit into USDC. I have a little too much USDC in that wallet, so that's why I didn't go all Solana there. Alright, ThorChain. Look at ThorChain. We did a video on ThorChain. It is up 9 .5%. We did a video on Solana. If you go here to here eight days ago, folks, we did this video. If you haven't watched it, make sure you give it a shout out, give it a like, give it a comment on there. It just made me excited. It made me excited for Solana. Was that the deep dive Solana video? That is the deep dive. Top 3 reasons for Solana pump. I'm not saying we called it, but you know what, if you turn all those notifications, you can get these videos nice and timely. What's your Solana thesis here? No, it's good. I mean, I've liked Solana for a long time. A lot of you guys know I bought it last cycle around $5. It's an interesting layer one. Obviously being pumped pretty hard by institutional money, VC money, something we've been watching for a while. It is a little bit, it's conflicting a little bit when you see these big financial asset managers pumping things because usually when they're coming out screaming insanely bullish predictions that represents a local top or even a macro top. So I don't take everything they say with a grain of salt, $3 ,000 is an absolutely insane price prediction. We're going to get into that a little bit more as far as like what that would actually mean for market cap for it to get to that level. Their base case is a little bit more reasonable in my opinion. But in that video that you did like a week or two ago, it really breaks down the plan that Solana has the roadmap and it's a very strong narrative for the next couple of years. And it's something that people with influence and capital, there's a lot behind it. Jump capital I know is one of the ones behind Solana, a lot of big money behind it. They're going to want to pump their bags and there's a really good narrative around that. So it's fascinating to me when you see somebody as big as Vanette coming out and making these insanely bullish predictions. So it's going to be wild as we get into this. I feel like we're just getting started in this bull market. So keep an eye on who's saying what, but we really need to keep an eye on where the dollars are flowing more than what the headlines are. Yeah. Watch the capital inflows and outflows. We have Love Breakers. DZ, you rule, man. Please listen to our band. Is your band name Love Breakers? We're going to find it. Love Breakers sounds like a UK dating reality show. Love Breakers. Love Breakers. It's like where their mom is like hovering over the date saying, uh -uh, he didn't open the door for you. I'm a Love Breaker now. That's a show. That's a show. Let's go. All right. Let's get back to the show at hand here. And that's looking at the top crypto gainers and losers. We've got a couple more gainers we want to look at. Gala, baby. Gala is pumping. I'm going to put out a short today on gaming tokens. So we have Gala pumping. There's another big pumper today and I want to talk. It's an Axie Infinity ecosystem token. SLP is way up. I'm going to tell you the next two tokens that's on my radar because I see what pumps. What's the next thing to pump? So that's a really good short. You're going to want to make sure you check that out. Probably be out next couple hours. Monero is up 6 .5%. Somewhere Mind Your Biz is feeling pretty happy about that one. That's almost a stable coin, folks. Algorand up 4 .6%. And those who don't know, I mean, let's just, I almost probably can't show it because, Max, I don't know how. Yeah. If you go to the one year chart, that is very unlike most crypto charts. So very, very just kind of trading sideways there. All right. Now it's time for the top losers. Is your coin going to be in there? Is your enemy's coin going to be in there? Is that Jerk Boss, is his coin going to be in here? Is Deezy's coin going to be in there? Let's look. Maker. Maker is down 2 .2%. Then oh, well, yeah, you don't go far. Apecoin. Apecoin is down 2 .1%. But it is up 25 % for the week. Kind of just pumping off this gaming narrative. DYDX is down a little bit. But after that, really, things aren't moving too far down. Decentraland's down. Casper's down. Really, other than that, though, after that, we're in less than 1%. But you're ready to talk some insane price actions. But first, VanEck. They got some other news. They got an insane Solana prediction there. You can see it, 32, 32 .11. What are they saying about Bitcoin? And then we'll get into the Solana stuff. So new spot Bitcoin ETF filing submitted by VanEck is the investment giant. They resubmitted the application to the SEC here. Stitch over there. Oh, look at a little scoochie here. In June, the firm came up with a new application to the securities watchdog for a spot ETF. This came just months after the agency shot down its prior request, though. Is it inevitable though? The Galaxy Digital predicts the much coveted products could attract more than $14 billion. Yeah, we talked about the inflows, potential inflows last week. All right, well, let's see here. And VanEck joins the amendment. Here's the Jeff Seifart. We really got to get a hold of this guy. Him and Eric have just been crushing it lately for Bloomberg. They're the ETF analysts there. But this is the important part. I want to talk about VanEck Bitcoin ETF may use Bitcoin for seed funding. Okay, so why is that important? I thought they all use Bitcoin. No, I'm using cash for the seed investment portion of it. So let's look at this. So according to Scott Johnson, with an extra S there, he speaks Parseltongue, the updated prospectus for VanEck's ETF contains seed funding language similar to BlackRock. However, there's one important difference here. Instead of using cash for seed funding, VanEck recommends using actual Bitcoin. Why do I think that's a good idea? And TJ, I want to bounce this off you. I think Bitcoin is going to go on a largely upward trend over the next 12 months. And so if you do have this ETF, say it comes out in March, say it comes out in January, maybe it comes out in June, maybe it's further down than everybody's expecting here. If you're buying Bitcoin today versus buying Bitcoin in March, well, I happen to feel like you're making a better choice today. So yeah, BlackRock, they're putting in, I'm just throwing out a number here, they're putting in $500 million. For VanEck, they might be putting in the seed amount that's buying actual Bitcoin. Well say we go live in March, who's going to be better off? The people that bought Bitcoin or the people that have cash invested ready to buy Bitcoin? Well I think they're going to be better off buying Bitcoin according to the four -year cycle here. Well, if we look here, what is seed funding? Seed funding is when financial institutions contribute capital to purchase an ETF's underlying assets in exchange for shares that can be traded when the ETF launches. This provides initial liquidity. Think of the rich players getting in on the ground floor. You know, you're going to have, here's how it's really going to work, BlackRock is going to give $10 billion to State Street, who's going to give $8 billion to Vanguard, who's going to give $7 billion to BlackRock, who also gave money to Vanguard, it's just going to be a big circle right there. But then they say, hey, you know, there's no monopoly, there's no monopoly here. Well, VanEck filed for a new application in July 2023, and several other companies including BlackRock, Bitwise, WisdomTree, Fidelity, and Invesco also have filings for potential ETF's before the SEC. I want to see if Jeff has any latest tweet here, because he's always got the new new, the fresh data, and they operate in the morning sometimes, he could catch a tweet like four minutes old. I'm still feeling like March, I guess more and more people are starting to feel January, I'm just going to be the one that goes with the prediction markets. I don't have any inside information with the SEC, I'm not Gary Gensler's nephew, I don't know if they're going to do January, I don't know if they're going to do March, but I will say this, it's increasingly likely that we are going to see an ETF in the next six months, next five months. What odds would you put it that we have it by March? I'm going to put in insanely high odds, you know, I'm really bullish. I'm going to say 85 % plus by March, I don't see it really getting past March. The question in my mind is, do we see it before the end of the year? You brought up several different things there, I think it's fascinating that VanEck's talking about seeding this ETF with Bitcoin rather than with DollarsDZ, you made a good point. Either way, a spot Bitcoin ETF means buying pressure on spot Bitcoin, that's going to be very, very good, it's just a matter of how much buying pressure and when. If VanEck is trying to seed this thing with Bitcoin, the ultimate question becomes, where do they get that Bitcoin? Where does that Bitcoin come from? Because we can see right here, you know, this was put out by Bitcoin Magazine, see if I can back this out just a little bit. Oh, I like the colors there. Yeah, it basically, you can see this is supply on exchanges since May of 2020 and it's just continually dropping, I guess it's auto adjusting my screen over there, but it's the lowest it's been, I think, in about six years. So where is the price, where's the Bitcoin going to come from? Because it's going to create an insane amount of buying pressure on Bitcoin very, very quickly, whether they're converting those dollars into Bitcoin end of this year, early next year, or if they're accumulating all that Bitcoin dramatically quickly right now, it's a good time to be in Bitcoin. And like I said, when you see institutions and hedge funds and trillion dollar asset managers starting to pump your bags, it bodes well for where the price is going. So yeah, I can't wait. Let me, let me crap on my own point here. Here's why it might be bad that they're buying spot Bitcoin versus putting in cash today. Well, imagine everybody's unleashed at once and then, you know, to TJ's point, small amount of Bitcoin on exchanges, what if it was a surprise announcement, Gary Gensler, he knows he's being watched for the one time in his, I'm just joking, you know, he didn't give Goldman Sachs, his cronies, the inside info there. Imagine if every BlackRock employee, Vanguard employee, what if they all just woke up to the same news and they had a spot buy Bitcoin? Well, Vanguard has the Bitcoin already. They wouldn't have to, or VanEck had the Bitcoin already. They wouldn't have to buy it. But if they all had to buy it once, that's when you could see a parabola. That's when you could see that insane amount of just crazy one minute candles, one hour candles, as exchanges just go into FOMO mode as I don't have enough, they don't have enough, I got to hurry up and buy some, I don't care if the price is spiked $10 ,000 in two minutes, buy that Bitcoin now before it goes up $20 ,000. Next thing you know, it is up $20 ,000. That would be the scenario that plays out that way. But people are ready for the Solana price prediction here. I see people talking about it. What do you think? Is it going to hit a new all time high? First, let's get Drew's two cents here. Drew, will Solana hit a new all time high next bull run? What do you say? I'm having to say yes at this point. It's got a lot of the community stuck through it to the really bad parts of the FUD that it ran through with FTX and Sam. He's out of the picture as being handled in courts. I think it's it's going to probably at least hit its previous all time high. All right. All right. I'm tending to agree. I'm more likely than not that we do go above was it 260 or so. So I do think we get strong rejection at three. So we go above it, but barely. That's DZ's two cents here. Where do you come in? New all time high. Yeah, I think I mean, we're basically the previous all time high is about 258. So we're talking that 300 number. I think that was within the base case of Vanex prediction. It it can do that. It's just going to have to keep that narrative. And it's not that's one thing you need to keep in mind when you're investing in crypto. Speculation is part of the game and it's not necessarily the coin that should reach the highest market cap. It's which coin can reach the highest market cap and who's behind it, who's pumping it. All of those things matters. ETF is going to matter. Grayscale, what they're doing with Cardano. You could see how that quickly reignited that narrative. So many people over and thinking Cardano was and I don't know if it'll reach new all time highs. Hey, if you can get institutional money into it, you know, maybe there will be. So, yeah, I think we're going to I think let's see, what do they have? They had the base case at three thirty five, the bear case at ten and then the insanely high case at thirty to eleven. So base case at three thirty five here, which again is just off the bottom of my important note, twenty thirty next bull run. No, no. We're talking about not only the next bull run, if there's still a four year cycle, we're talking about the one after that. It would be a peak in twenty twenty nine if the four year cycle still play out. So two cycles from now, I definitely think a base I would come in at higher than three thirty five conservative. Yeah, I would say three thirty five is slightly high for the next bull run. I would say three thirty five is pretty low for the one following that. This is an interesting number in chat. What do you think of this number? Worst case scenario, ten dollars, ten dollar Solana, not twenty twenty five by twenty thirty. So ten dollar Solana, I feel like that's a little bit bearish. I mean, the chain shut down over a dozen times and it didn't drop. You didn't see huge declines, FTX collapse. And what was their biggest holding Solana by far? They're dumping Solana, they're dumping Solana on everyone's face. Still didn't get what it bounced off ten. Right. And that's as low as it went then. So you're talking about for all time high for next cycle, top ten dollars is a little low. Now let's talk about the bull case number here. I would put this at less than I want to say less than one percent odds, but I would say less than maybe two and a half percent. I would put that it's it's around a one percent chance, maybe a three thousand two hundred and eleven dollars Solana by twenty thirty. I know a lot of people are saying, oh, you have it on the thumbnail. You think it's going to that, don't you idiot? I don't think it's going to go to that. I put it at one percent odds and then that one percent that is you know, that is the hundred dollar gallon of milk, maybe even one percent a little high. What do you guys feel about thirty two hundred dollars Solana? I mean, you got to think they're taking into account a severe impact to the dollar not being as valuable by twenty thirty. I have to imagine that's part of the analysis there. It is fast. It's funny to me when you see Vanek making it couldn't be a more broad from ten dollars to thirty two hundred dollar prediction. You know, you you pretty much covered the entire spectrum there where it's like no matter what happens, you're not going to be, quote unquote, wrong. So it is funny when you see asset managers with more bullish predictions than YouTubers out there. But this is what I think is interesting for the three hundred and fifty dollar mark to be hit. What market cap would be required on Solana? Can you see that? I'll scoot you just a bit. Other way. Yeah, there you go. Perfect. Perfect. Yeah. Here you go. So three hundred to get a price of three hundred fifty dollars, you would need a market cap of one hundred and forty six billion, which doesn't say it's high. I mean, that's you're talking about basically a 10 X for Solana, but it's not out of the question when you come over here and you look at that. Basically, there's worse tokenomics. Well, I mean, it's basically getting close to what Ethereum is right now. Ethereum is at 218 and you're asking for Solana to get to 146. So it's like if Solana could get to a market cap similar to where Ethereum is sitting right now, which, again, is very plausible, very feasible. We're talking the entire market coming up. We think the you know, if we move from one point two trillion to a three trillion dollar market cap, a five trillion dollar market cap. Now, again, these would be huge gains all the way around. I do think we'll get back above one trillion for Bitcoin fairly easily. So two, three, four, five trillion for total doesn't seem out of the question and seeing that flow into some of these other top performing layer ones with lower caps right now, it is very feasible to me. So three hundred fifty dollars. It is right in the middle of their insane prediction. Three thousand seems crazy. Ten to your point, Dizzy, I don't see that happening, but right within that, you know, I see it in the pushing new all time highs again, which I think that was 250. So it could easily break new all time highs into the 350. People asking about the leader of Anatoly Yakovenko, I think is how you say his last name, he's the CEO of Solana. If we're going to talk to anyone about Solana, we would probably target him because he would actually know what's happening. All right. Let's talk. All right. We got another article kind of breaking it down to Vanek believes Solana can grow ten thousand percent in value if it on boards. A hundred million users there. So that's a big if a hundred million is a lot of users. That's a lot of people. That's a whole lot of people. That's a whole lot of people stepping for their crypto there. All right. Asset manager Vanek says, hey, we could see a 10K pump there by 2030 if we attract one hundred million users. The most striking prediction is, I guess, is the ten thousand percent pump there. It's only one hundred X, folks. Comparatively, the price target is set at eleven thousand eight hundred. OK, that's for Ethereum there. So, ETH, they're saying going to twelve. Let's go. I like that. I like that for two bulls from now. I would say that's maybe a little bit higher than I'm thinking. But, you know, that's that's plausible. That's definitely doable, especially depending on how deflationary it becomes. You're so everybody feel like it's so conservative this time around. So that's twelve thousand for two cycles. That's because we're hitting these astronomical market caps. You know, I do think we'll get big gains. But, you know, we're talking about Bitcoin, Solana, Ethereum, these top ten coins. Once they 10X, it's a whole lot more work to make that 3X. Just because it's going to be a giant boulder. You know, sure, your gaming token, it's a little pebble. You can you can flick it and get a 50X. But when you have this giant boulder called Bitcoin, it takes a significant move just to move at 10 percent. So, yeah, I mean, I do think ETH.
A highlight from $1.96 Billion Crypto Powerhouse! (What You Need To Know About Compound)
"Listen up, folks. I need you to stop saying yes to crappy 0 .1 % interest your bank offers because, frankly, they're making billions and robbing you blind. And that's why I'm here to tell you about Compound Finance and its native token comp and how it could be the best way to make your money work for you. But be careful. This video may make you never want to use a bank ever again. It's time to discover crypto. Compound is a permissionless and decentralized finance protocol that was founded by Robert Leshner and Jeff Hayes back in August of 2017. And about a year later, the Compound protocol launched on the Ethereum blockchain. It started out with $25 million raised in a seed round in 2018 and $8 .2 million worth of venture funding that was raised at the end of 2019. Compound has notable investors like Bain Capital, Coinbase, Dragonfly Capital, Polychain Capital, A16Z and Paradigm. Then, in the midst of global lockdowns, Compound ICOed in June 2020. ICO means Initial Coin Offering, which is similar to an IPO in TradFi land. Initially, 42 % of the tokens were allocated to liquidity mining, about 24 % to shareholders, 22 % to the founders and team, and then 7 .7 % to the community and 3 .7 % to future team members. Within 5 days of the ICO, the price of Comp jumped to over $300. And at the height of the last bull run of 2021, one Comp was worth over $900 USD. Comp has a total supply of $10 million and its circulating supply has reached almost $7 million. Comp is inflationary and with a little over 1 ,200 Comp emitted per day, Comp is estimated to reach its maximum cap around July 2024. These emissions are distributed to the protocol users, half going to suppliers of the assets and the other half to the borrowers. Other than holding Comp as an investment vehicle, you can also use it for governance, submitting and voting on proposals. Okay, so let's talk a bit more about what the protocol actually does. But before we do, make sure you like this video, subscribe to the channel if you haven't already. Compound creates money market funds in the crypto space, pulling tokens from users with algorithmically determined interest rates based on the supply and demand for the tokens. So if a lot of people want to borrow USDC, but not a lot of people are lending, the interest rate goes up and vice versa. Compound uses smart contracts, which are autonomous decentralized digital contracts that automatically execute tasks once a certain requirement is met. Compound smart contracts allow peer to peer borrowing and lending directly without a centralized intermediary like a bank or the mob. But who am I kidding? They're basically the same thing. When you lend an asset on Compound, you receive a new asset representing what you're lending. For example, if you lent USDC, you'll receive CUSDC in return. You can supply tokens through the protocol and earn a return as well as take out a loan. And Compound covers its expenses by taking a small percentage of the interest earned. Compound was also one of the first platforms to introduce yield farming, which means users lock up their tokens to earn rewards. But you may be thinking, wait, didn't a ton of lending platform just go into bankruptcy? Looking at you, Celsius and BlockFi, why is Compound better? Well, remember, those other companies were centralized entities, not to mention their loans were under collateralized and the management of those companies made really bad investment decisions with their users funds. The collapse of these companies actually leaves Compound in a rosy light because it shows exactly how much collateral protocols need to demand to provide sustainable loans. With a decentralized platform, the community votes on the direction of the protocol. So there's less opportunity for the greed and recklessness of the few to completely wreck the life savings of the many. But remember, I'm not recommending you put your life savings into any one platform. In fact, I'm not recommending anything. This isn't financial advice, and you always have to do your own research and practice proper risk management. There's no way to earn yield on crypto that is 100 % safe. But Compound has almost $2 billion total value locked with $2 .34 billion of collateral that's backing $889 million worth of borrowing. That's about 1 .5 times the amount of the loans that Compound has given out, which means the platform will be able to weather the ups and downs of the bear and bull markets. And funnily enough, BlockFi, Celsius, and Compound were all founded in 2017, and yet Compound is the only one who made it out of the dark depths of the 2022 bear market, alive and kicking. Plus, Compound doesn't require KYC or identity verification, so you can borrow or earn interest without giving away your priceless personal information to an entity that could really do anything it wants with your data. But another reason we think Compound is worth talking about is that it's been vigorously audited and verified in comparison to the other decentralized lending platforms, which means Compound is attempting to make your assets as secure as possible. And Compound is so concerned about security that it takes every opportunity to learn from the mistakes of other protocols. Back in October 2022, Compound paused the supply of YFI, ZRX, BAT, and Maker to protect against market manipulation attacks after a Comp governance proposal called out the low liquidity for these tokens and potential vulnerabilities for the platform. And after Ave experienced an exploit attempt back in the fall of 2022, Compound passed a proposal that imposed loan limits and introduced borrowing caps for certain coins in an attempt to lower risk. This brings me back to how important the open source decentralized governance is for the safety of Compound. The community has the platform and the user's best interest in mind and work together to protect them. Compound has been quietly building over the past year in anticipation of the forthcoming bull run. In May 2023, Compound announced it would now be available on Arbitrum, which is the largest layer two scaling solution in terms of total value locked. For now, you can only use ARB, GMX, Wrapped ETH, and Wrapped Bitcoin to borrow USDC, which is another tip by Compound to manage risk on its platform. And if that wasn't enough hype for you, Compound also recently launched a mechanism called Encomber, which allows users to retain ownership of their tokens while granting other users the right to transfer their tokens. This is a huge milestone for the platform because it provides a ton of potential use cases. Obviously, this assists the current lending markets because users can encumber their tokens as collateral to lending markets, allowing them to maintain custody. This also creates an opportunity for trading where a user could encumber their tokens to a logic contract that has the option to buy the tokens at a certain price. And if that price isn't met or the contract expires, the tokens never leave the seller's account. But I know there are countless potential use cases for this technology, and I'm excited to see where it goes. The other big piece of Compound news is that the founder resigned over the summer. You think that would make investors nervous, but funnily enough, it had the opposite effect. The price of Comp skyrocketed from a low in June around $26 to a high in July of almost $80. That's almost a 3X during the bear market, folks. Robert Leshner, who you'll remember as one of the Compound founders, resigned as CEO to focus on his new business venture, Superstate Trust, which is a fund focusing on short -term government bonds, government agency securities and other government -backed instruments. Leshner had already raised $4 million from a variety of DeFi investors when he made this announcement. And the coolest part about Superstate is that it plans to use Ethereum blockchain as a secondary record -keeping tool. This seems to mean that the shares in the fund will be recorded on ETH. Leshner wrote, This statement implied that Superstate shares might eventually be available on Chain, causing rumors to run rampant that Comp holders might receive an airdrop of Superstate tokens. If you want to pick up some Comp, you can get it on various centralized exchanges like Binance, Coinbase and Kraken, or you can check out decentralized options like Uniswap or SushiSwap. I think Comp is a sleeping giant that will crush the next bull run. But I'd love to hear what you think. Are you an investor in Comp? Do you think you'll go back to its all -time high in the next bull run? Or will it soar past to the moon? Leave a comment below and tell me what you think. And I'll see you at the top.
A highlight from The Economic Impact of AI with Matthew Pines & Chester Ney
"The worst case scenario is short timelines, fast takeoff, meaning like very soon we're going to hit some like nonlinear inflection point and it's going to be like game over. Hello there. How are you all? You doing alright? Okay, you maniacs, we are ready to announce our conference next year in Bedford, UK on April the 12th and 13th, we're going to be hosting Cheat Code, which is our spin on a Bitcoin conference. So the first day it will be as you expect, a traditional type conference. We've got some amazing speakers, Lynn Alden, Alex Gladstein, Preston Pierce, Jeff Booth, and so many more. You can check that out all on the website, but on the second day when you're usually nursing a hangover, we're not bothering with a stuffy conference room. We're going to take you all down to McMullen Park for Rail Bedford. We're going to show you the Cheat Code in action, how we've done it for a football team and hopefully see some goals, drink some beer, eat some barbecue and have a cracking day. So if you want to find out more about this, if you want to come to our conference, please head over to cheatcode .co .uk, hopefully see a bunch of you maniacs in Bedford next year. Anyway, welcome to the What Bitcoin Did podcast, which is brought to you by the absolute legends at RS Energy, the largest NASDAQ listed Bitcoin miner using 100 % renewable energy. I'm your host Peter McCormack and today I've got a very cool show for you. I've got Matthew Pines back on the show alongside Chester Ney, who is our longest serving Patreon member, as well as an IT director for an environmental consulting firm, All 4. Now we've wanted to make a show on the economic impact of AI for a long time and Matthew has been thinking about the long -term impact of AI on society and Chester has been implemented AI at his firm and seen firsthand the impact it's had on his business. So this was a show we just had to make. I'm using AI all the time, chat GBT, my journey. I'm using it almost every day for work. So it's definitely going to have an impact. It was about time we talked about this on the show and also cover the relevance of AI to Bitcoin. So strap in, this is a hell of a show. Definitely want your feedback. Let me know what you think. It's hellowhatbitcoindid .com.
A highlight from Bucks Extend Giannis & Pre Season Storylines
"Upgrade your listening with Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. Breakthrough Bose immersive audio makes everything sound more natural than ever. World -class noise cancellation gets quieter than any Bose headphone yet, and the high -fidelity audio is tailored to your ears only. So highs hit harder, bass drops deeper, and you fill every note of the track. This is Leveled Up Listening. Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. Dive in deeper at Bose .com forward slash iHeart. Kick off the football action with BetMGM, the king of sportsbooks. Simply download the app today to make every game and every play mean more than ever. When you wager at BetMGM, you can also earn BetMGM rewards points that can be redeemed for online bonus credits like bonus bets and bet insurance tokens. Planning a trip to Vegas? You can also convert your BetMGM points into MGM rewards points that you can use towards dining, shows, and hotel rooms at over 20 MGM Resorts properties located on the Las Vegas Strip and nationwide. Play, earn, and enjoy with BetMGM rewards. Please gamble responsibly. BetMGM .com for T's and C's. 21 plus to wager, DC only. New and existing customer offer. All promotions are subject to qualification and eligibility requirements. Rewards issued as non -withdrawable bonus bets. Bonus bets expire seven days from issuance. And again, please gamble responsibly. Gambling problem? Call 1 -800 -GAMBLER. Oh, come on now. You know you deserve it. A steak patty on any McDonald's breakfast sandwich. I mean any breakfast sandwich. Biscuit, McMuffin, bagel, McGriddles. A juicy steak patty on any breakfast sandwich. And when you order through the app, buy one and get one free. Now go get them. Valid for product of equal or lesser value. Limited time only at participating McDonald's. Valid one time per day. Excludes $1 to $3 menu. It's the crossover. Sports Illustrated's NBA show. Breaking down the latest news, rumors, and everything in between. Here's your host, Chris Mannix and Rohan Nadkarni. This is the Crossover NBA Podcast. I'm Chris Mannix joined this week by my colleague at Sports Illustrated, Rohan Nadkarni. And Rohan, it's always good when we have some breaking news on the podcast. We are recording this on the day the NBA returns. Tuesday night, double header, Warriors Suns, Lakers Nuggets. That's going to be a lot of fun to watch on Tuesday. But the big story over the weekend was Giannis Atentecumpo once again saying, Milwaukee, you are my home. Giannis agreeing to a three -year, $186 million contract extension. We'll get into kind of the nuances of why this extension makes sense financially right now. And why he would do it now. And what kind of contracts he can sign in the future. But this was something I think that Bucs fans and the Bucs front office was optimistic about in the aftermath of Milwaukee acquiring Damian Lillard. But now, here we are with Damian Lillard under contract for the next four seasons. Giannis Atentecumpo under contract for, I believe, three of the next four seasons. I'll get the numbers right. But the last year's a player option of that deal. But he's under contract at least until his early 30s, putting him through his prime years in Milwaukee. Your reaction to this deal getting done at the 11th hour before the start of the season? Pretty surprised only because Giannis himself kind of mentioned early this summer why financially it wouldn't make the most sense for him to do it now. As you alluded to, there is some kind of not quite complicated math, but a series of steps that Giannis can undergo to kind of maximize the financial impact of taking this deal now. So he's still coming out ahead money -wise. I mean, I wrote when the Damian Lillard trade went down, I should say, that this was a huge win and it only becomes a bigger win for Milwaukee if Giannis signs. And that's what happened. And I think, listen, this team, the expectations still win a title, all those things. But for the city of Milwaukee, for the franchise, even if they don't win a title now, if you get another three or four years of Giannis at Centecumpo, you get his entire prime in Milwaukee. You put off the conversation, at least for a couple years, about whether he's leaving, etc. That's a huge win. It makes the Lillard trade a win already. It's really incredible work by their franchise. I mean, we sat here, Chris, I'd say at the beginning of the summer, kind of wondering aloud what moves are on the table for the Bucks because they looked a little bit boxed in at the start of the summer in terms of what they could do to improve the roster around Giannis. To go around and get Damian Lillard and then sign Giannis to an extension the same summer, when no one was expecting either of those moves, it's an unequivocal, unqualified, total home run for the Bucks. No, I tweeted this in the immediate aftermath. This was an executive of the year stretch for John Horst. Not only does he get Damian Lillard into the fold, which makes the Bucks better in the short term, he ensures long -term viability by getting Giannis' name on a contract. Just to clear up the math here and sort of explain what kind of deal Giannis has signed. He is under contract now for the next four years. This year's age 28 season, he's going to make $45 .6 million. Next year, he'll make $45 .8 million. The new deal kicks in in the 25 -26 season, which will put Giannis at $57 .6 million that year, $62 .2 million in 26 -27. He has a player option for 22 -28, which would be year five of this new deal that he's operating under, which is worth $66 .8 million. The reason that he signs this contract right now, and I want to give credit to Bobby Marks, the ESPN front office insider, because he's been able to explain this in a way even idiots like you and me can't understand. It's mutually beneficial for the two sides to do a deal like this right now. Because of that over 38 rule that exists, Giannis could sign a short -term extension again with Milwaukee in 2026, and then a four -year extension with the Bucks in 2028. What this deal is effectively doing, or the message it's sending, is that Giannis is a buck for life. He's going to be alongside Damian Lillard for the next four seasons. That's a guy we've talked about a lot. He likes Damian Lillard, and he wants to play with Damian Lillard. Not only is Giannis getting himself financially set up for the short term by signing this three -year extension, he is putting the dominoes in place to make the max possible amount of money over the next 10 years of his playing career. Anyone that might have been wondering if Giannis is going to be a buck over the long term, it sure looks right now that Giannis is going to be playing in Milwaukee for the entirety of his NBA career. I think we're looking, Rohan, at another Dirk Nowitzki. I think this is kind of a Dirk -like situation where the Bucks have shown Giannis enough. They've shown Giannis enough that he is willing to commit to this team long term. Absolutely. And I'll just leave a little bit of room. Our old friend Howard Beck wrote about it today for The Ringer that everything is great right now. Up until things change, if this flames out, whatever, we've seen stars request trades, etc. I'll leave a little room for that, but I'm with you. And I think it's great for the NBA. I really do. I want to see Jokic in Denver for his entire career. I want to see Giannis in Milwaukee for his entire career. We've kind of lost that the last few years with guys moving around teams so much. There's been this conversation this week, should Kevin Durant have his jersey retired in Golden State? I think it'll happen and I think it's fine, but it's just not the same. It's not the same as a guy like Giannis staying in one place for his entire career. It's refreshing to see. I think it's just so good for the league. I'm excited, man. I'm excited to see him battle with the Celtics this year. I miss the days when it felt like you could think these two teams are going to have to get through each other for the next few years. We're setting up for that with Giannis and Tatum for the next few years. As a basketball fan, I'm just really excited. I think you hit the nail on the head. I think he's going to be kind of remembered as this generation's Dirk for just how synonymous he is with Milwaukee. The fact that Giannis said the things he said earlier this summer, he said he wants to play for a winner, and backed it up, I just think says a lot about the kind of person he is. That was not just posturing or whatever. Milwaukee made some good faith moves, and he signed a good faith extension in return. To contrast this with Lillard's situation in Portland, Lillard committed to the Blazers, but he didn't demand action out of them before he committed to them. Giannis came out this offseason in multiple interviews and said, I'm paraphrasing, of course. You've got to make sure that you have a championship roster around me. He put a lot of pressure on the Bucs to get something done. To the Bucs credit, for the second time in three years, they pulled off a deal that made Giannis happy. Drew Holiday, his acquisition a few years ago, that made Giannis happy. Now, Damian Lillard bringing him in, that makes Giannis happy. He was able to use his status with the team to push them to go all in for a championship. Once they did, he committed. He was true to his word, and said he would commit to the Milwaukee Bucs. I do think that's commendable for Giannis as well. I think, short term, if you're looking for questions about the Bucs, there are a couple of them. Chris Middleton is the most glaring. I have no idea what to expect from Chris Middleton this year. He missed half the season last year. Then there's that weird, vague pre -season talk for me. Well, I'm going to get to that. I'm going to get to that. I like the coaching stuff. Chris Middleton, his status is a big variable here. I think with a healthy Chris Middleton, the Bucs are the number one team in the East. It's still close, because I think Boston is really good, obviously. But with Middleton, I think they're number one. Without him, I think they're number two. I'm anxious to see how healthy he is at the start of the season, and how healthy he can be throughout the season. The other part of it is coaching. This Terry Stotts story has kind of gone away over the last couple of days. Frankly, who really cares about an assistant coaching change on an NBA team? This is a real thing. Terry Stotts was given a hands -on role to effectively be the architect of this Bucs offense. We know this, because Damian Lillard came out last week and said, Look, this is the same offense I ran in Portland. The guys that are veterans on the Milwaukee team were coming to him and saying, Well, what about this? What about that? What's the right way to run this particular play? Terry Stotts was not just a sage voice on Adrian Griffin's bench. He was someone that was intimately involved and integrally involved in what this team does offensively. We've seen the reporting that there was some kind of public blow up at a shoot around or a practice between Terry Stotts and Adrian Griffin. I had not heard about that. I had heard in the hours after Stotts decided to leave the team that he just wasn't comfortable being Adrian Griffin's assistant coach. That's kind of what it came down to. Terry Stotts has been head coach in the NBA for a long time. He has had some levels of success as a head coach. Adrian Griffin came in and Adrian Griffin, people have told me he rides his assistants out there. He makes them work pretty hard. Adrian Griffin worked under Scott Skiles for a while, worked under a number of different coaches in different situations. Adrian Griffin had high expectations and demanded a lot from his assistant coaches. The way I was explained to me was Terry Stotts just wasn't comfortable with the dynamic, didn't like the dynamic with Adrian Griffin. Maybe that dust up in practice was the straw that broke the camel's back, but it felt like the people I talked to that it was coming. I don't think this is inconsequential. I really don't because now everybody else on that Bucs staff gets bumped up a seat. Now you don't necessarily have the guy on the bench with that kind of gravitas is the right word, but certainly experience that Terry Stotts brought to the table. I don't think we can dismiss his exit as nothing because I do think it's something. Yeah, not to mention his relationship with Damian Lillard, right? I mean, that's something that I think was probably providing Dame some level of comfort. He obviously posted a photo of them together on Instagram after. Take that for what it's worth. I mean Terry Stotts and Damian Lillard will always have a great relationship. Terry Stotts empowered Damian Lillard over nine years. Like took him on as a rookie and helped develop him into the player he became. So I can understand the loyalty between Lillard and Stotts. The one interesting thing about the Bucs and Celtics, I'd say, is the questions around their coaching staffs. You know, Missoula had to deal with it a lot last year, especially during the playoffs. Now listen, at the end of the day, he came within a game seven and Jason Tatum maybe not turned his ankle of making it to the finals. So maybe that stuff was overblown. But, you know, there's been a lot of talk about the assistance the Celtics added this summer and the reasons they needed to do that. Bringing in a guy like Jeff Van Gundy, for example, to consult with them. And the importance of that experience that it's a lot of pressure on Adrian Griffin in his first year to deliver a team with title expectations. And now he's losing his most experienced assistant coach. It's going to be very interesting. I think that's a serious variable for the Bucs. We've seen it cut both ways. I mean, we've seen Nick Nurse have a lot of success. We've seen Emei Yudoka have a lot of success. Other times it doesn't go as well. So I think it's going to be very interesting keeping an eye on just how the coaching staff in both Milwaukee and Boston ultimately affects what those teams do. I think one of the undercurrents of the Celtics summer, for example, was maybe moving on from some of the guys that didn't fully buy in with Missoula. Guys who necessarily didn't have the best relationship with him. So I don't know that it's going to make a huge impact because they're just so much more talented than the rest of the conference. But I'm interested to see how that plays out. Yeah, it certainly adds a wrinkle to what Milwaukee's trying to do this season. I think with such a slim margin between the Celtics and the Bucs, anything can make a difference. So that's worth keeping an eye on this year.
A highlight from Crexendo CEO offers hands on leadership, personal touch to fast growing platform, Podcast
"This is Doug Green and I'm the publisher of TR Publications and I'm very pleased to have with us Jeff Korn, who is the Chief Executive Officer at Crescendo. Jeff, thank you for joining me. Thank you for having me. I appreciate it. Well, thank you for having us. So thanks for inviting us to podcasts and reels and to report on the Crescendo Native CEP's platform user group meeting. It's been a really interesting experience. So first of all, I really appreciate being here and I appreciate you taking time out to talk with us today and talk to our larger audience. How's the meeting going so far? The meeting is going great. This is our 12th user group meeting. It is the largest attendant we've ever had, the most vendors we've ever had. I've been to three. This is my first as CEO, but the excitement is palpable. People pull me in the hall, tell me how great it is, how excited they are about the NetSapium platform and all the things we're doing and they are very grateful to be here and that gives me added enthusiasm because it's good to see our licensees all excited about the future. You know, I sense that there's two audiences happening here. There's the audience here inside the hall, partners, vendors and different people inside the ecosystem. I have a sense that you guys are also creating a message for the wider community too. Well, yes, as a matter of fact, we are and outside the community, I mean, let's face it, we are the third largest platform in the United States, the fastest growing. We are adding users at double the rate of the market. We just were honored to have a NASDAQ announcement that we have three and a half million end users and we continue to grow at a great rate. We both, we all know that the two larger platform providers in the country are not treating their vendors very well and not necessarily treating their customers very well. We are very customer focused. We are very customer centric. I told everybody here and any one of our customers, you can call me on my landline, on my desk phone, my cell phone, I will answer and talk to them. Try doing that with the CEO of Microsoft, I don't think you're going to get very far. We work very closely with our customers. This is the best thing about this event. They tell us what we need, we listen, and we make adjustments as appropriate. As a matter of fact, the last time we had a subset of our group, we had a meeting in Tennessee, and everybody was saying the most important thing you need to do is increase the ability of us to use the API. I heard them clearly and I focused the engineering team on doing that, and right now we're unveiling a much better API, which is going to drive tremendous business for our customers and I think tremendous business for us. You know, Jeff, let's just pause on that because I'm very interested in what you just said about your own management style as CEO, because, you know, with some of the larger firms out there, there's, you know, to use an old expression, there's no there, there's no person or a single individual that you can go to, but you've just said to everybody, hey, you know what, you can call me. And I mean it, it's important. I didn't spend my entire life in telecom, but I spent the last 12 years of it in telecom and the last 20 of it working at the predecessor company to Crescendo, but I don't think I'm the smartest person in the room when it comes to telecom and I love to learn. I know a lot, but I know there's a lot I don't know. So customers calling me, our engineers talking to me, our team talking to me, people pulling me out of the room here, or when I listen to a number of people, if I hear the same thing quite often, I realize it's something we need to do. So I'm a good listener and I'm a good instruction giver. And here at this event, you have an exhibition hall filled with, I understand the largest number of exhibitors you've ever had. That's correct. We're pretty proud of that. Now they represent, you know, wide range of solutions. So what's attracting everyone? It's a, you know, it's a big undertaking sometimes for a smaller company to go and exhibit, get on a plane, set everything up and all that. Why did they come? They came because we have an incredible community who all are trying to use what we provide, what I believe is the best platform in the country, and they're all putting their own touches on it to give what they need to the end users. That's why the API improvements were so important. So all of these vendors here are reaching out to those people and giving them enhancements to what they're offering can be, giving them tools that they can use, and they're selling it to their end users. It's a very symbiotic relationship. We're very excited about it. What's Codefest? Codefest is way above my grade technically, but we're having the engineers and the coders sit down with the licensees who are interested and they're going to go through and show them what we do, get some instruction, give some instruction, get some feedback. And we thought this would be an exciting way for us to teach and learn, which is really what I like. I like a combination where you can learn something from somebody and you can teach somebody something. And Doug, let me add on Codefest. Version 44 is one of the biggest deliverables we had as we talked about before was API capability. So Codefest is very important because our licensees are going to be able to write code to add through the API and add all of the integrations that the people here are selling or the things they're developing themselves. All our licensees are very excited. We're very excited. It really expands the opportunities for anybody to get on the NetSafe platform. Well, Jeff, I want to congratulate you and your team on an outstanding event and on all the growth. I'm going to wish you guys well in the coming year. Any last messages for all of our partners and MS Peaceless? Well, yes. We're a service oriented company. We provide crystal clear communication and we will work our butts off to provide what you need and we won't stop until we have worked to satisfy our licensees, our customers. That is not just my philosophy. That's the entire team's philosophy and we're growing at the, as I said, a very fast rate. We will continue to do that because I think we provide the best platform with the best service in the industry. And as long as we keep doing that, I think it's clear skies ahead. Jeff, a pleasure interviewing you. Thank you very much. Thank you, sir. Thank you.
A highlight from BlockFi CEO and Former Colleague Continue the Crush of SBF's Defense
"Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW. It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin and the big picture power shifts remaking our world. What's going on, guys? It is Wednesday, October 18th, and today we are doing an SPF trial update. Before we get into that, however, if you are enjoying The Breakdown, please go subscribe to it. Give it a rating, give it a review, or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link in the show notes or go to bit .ly slash breakdown pod. All right, friends, we are back to SPF trial coverage. And for those of you who are coming into this fresh or who just need a little refresher on what happened last week, the two biggest witnesses in the first full week of the trial were ex FTX co -founder and CTO Gary Wong and Alameda Research CEO at the time of its failure, Caroline Ellison. Now both of these folks were damning to Sam's case in different ways. Gary was bad for Sam because his testimony kind of showed the mechanics of implementing their fraud. He discussed when at various points in the history of FTX, Alameda's very special and privileged relationship with FTX was built into the actual code base. He also showed that it started extremely early, going all the way back to 2019. Now Caroline's testimony was damning because it showed just how much control Sam had over Alameda even after nominally he had stepped down from the CEO role. Her testimony also made him look like just an utter asshole, but of course being an asshole isn't illegal. However, the knowledge and control of Alameda is a different story. So after Caroline finished, the next big witness was Zach Prince of BlockFi. There were a few highlights. Prince said that he believed that Alameda Research was solvent based on the balance sheets that he had seen. According to Prince's testimony, BlockFi began lending money to Alameda in late 2020 on what he recalled to be quote very robust loan agreements. The loans increased in size throughout 2021 after Prince held a conversation directly with Sam. By May 2022, Alameda had loaned over a billion dollars from BlockFi and those loans formed a substantial portion of their outstanding loan book of between five and ten billion dollars. Now the problems began after the collapse of the Terra Luna ecosystem. At that point, BlockFi called in Alameda's loans, which were of course in part due to losses that BlockFi had sustained from the collapse of Luna. Alameda repaid that money after which BlockFi made new loans to the firm worth $850 million. Those new loans were partially collateralized, but Prince said that the collateral was stored on FTX. BlockFi also traded customer funds worth around $350 million on FTX and so in total, Prince claimed that BlockFi lost quote a little over a billion dollars in the collapse of FTX. That loss was enough to force BlockFi into bankruptcy just a few weeks after FTX went down. And while Prince said that at some point BlockFi might have still needed to fold, that without the losses associated with FTX, it was far from a foregone conclusion. Importantly, part of Prince's testimony was used to explain how crypto lenders worked. He noted that BlockFi customers explicitly agreed to their assets to be lent out, drawing a distinction to how FTX dealt with customer assets without their approval. Once again, SPF's defense struggled on cross -examination. At one stage, they spent multiple questions walking through BlockFi's due diligence process surrounding a particular set of loan documents. They appeared to be trying to make the point that the loans evidenced a failure of risk management at BlockFi rather than fraud at Alameda. An exasperated Prince had to remind the defense counsel that the loan documents related to a loan which BlockFi's risk management division had refused to make. Now more than any other testimony that I've seen, it felt to me like when it came to Zach Prince, the reportage inside the room and what the vibe actually felt like, especially to those who were sitting in the jury box, was really different than just reading about it in the transcripts. David Z. Morris, formerly of Coindesk and now reporting on the trial for Protos, wrote, "...one thing about today was that it was clear they were actually f***ing up." Now he expanded on that in a longer thread from Protos, quote, At the end of its second week of flailing, the Sam Bankman -free defense team took another battering today in court. Under questioning from prosecutors, former BlockFi CEO Zach Prince testified that his company would have been unlikely to lend to Alameda Research if its balance sheets had accurately reflected its loans to FTX executives and illicit borrowing from FTX customers. Prince told the jury, I think we wouldn't have worked with them because that's something that's not appropriate. Cross -examining Prince for Bankman -free's defense, Mark Cohen spent about 40 minutes attempting to chip away at that claim by walking Prince through a credit evaluation document. The document showed how BlockFi's risk team evaluated Alameda's balance sheet, specifically examining the risk of using FTX as collateral, in response to Alameda's request for more lending in August of 2021. The defense tried to characterize Prince as having overridden his own risk team in evaluating the loans to Alameda. The real fault, Cohen seemed to imply, lay with anyone stupid enough to trust his client. But after nearly 40 minutes of examining the loan letter, Prince informed Cohen that in fact the loan had not been made, with Prince in fact following the cautious recommendation of his risk team. Later loans were made to Alameda, but against much higher collateral requirements. This appeared to be an attempt to circumvent an earlier ruling by Judge Kaplan that the defense could not argue that weak due diligence was to blame for the failure of investments or loans to FTX group companies. Cohen seemingly hoped to make a similar point about the use of FTTS collateral, but simply didn't have his facts straight. It would not be a stretch to describe the moment as humiliating for the defense. Maybe summing it up even more actually was another tweet from David Morris, where he Today's said, episode is brought to you by Kraken. For far too long, the whole financial system has been standing still, too slow, only on for certain hours. Overly designed for some types of people, but not for others. Crypto, at its best, represents progress. It asks the question, what if? It invites people in instead of leaving them out. It's on 24 -7, 365, and moves at the speed of real life. Not everyone believes it. We've got our fair share of detractors, but that's the way it always is when you're building something new. Kraken is a crypto company that has been through the highs and lows of the industry, facing forwards towards progress throughout. And now, they're inviting us to see what crypto can be. Learn more at kraken .com slash the breakdown. Disclaimer, not investment advice. Crypto trading involves risk of loss. Cryptocurrency services are provided to U .S. and U .S. territory customers by Payword Ventures Inc., PVI, DBA, Kraken. Next up, on Monday, FTX head of engineering, Nishad Singh, was called by the prosecution to give evidence against his former co -conspirator, SPF. Nishad is, of course, the third of three major collaborators alongside Gary Wong and Caroline Ellison, who are giving testimony under the terms of a plea agreement. Nishad's early testimony dealt with the expenditure and investments made by FTX. He confirmed that Sam was closely involved in directing all big -ticket spending by the firm. Alongside the widely publicized venture investments into Anthropic AI and Genesis Digital Assets, Nishad detailed a $200 million investment into a venture firm known as K5. Nishad said that Sam had attended a dinner hosted by K5, which featured high -profile guests including Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris' husband, Katy Perry, Orlando Bloom, Kate Hudson, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jeff Bezos, Kendall Jenner, and Kris Jenner. This was, of course, a party around the Super Bowl. After that K5 dinner, Nishad claimed that Sam said, quote, He was very impressed with their level of connection to influential celebrities and entrepreneurs. He thought it would be useful for FTX to leverage those connections, end quote. Sam later presented Nishad and FTX CTO Gary Wong with a spreadsheet that detailed hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses and an additional billion dollars in venture funding that he wanted to pay to K5 and its owners. Now continuing along this line of questioning, after walking through a number of extravagant outlays, prosecutors asked Nishad about the infamous $30 million Bahamas penthouse where key FTX executives had all lived together. Nishad talked about the group apartment shopping together and noted that they had considered much less expensive residences. He said that after the group inspected the penthouse, quote, Nishad explained that there had been a quote substantial disagreement about if we should go with it, in part because it was really expensive, in part because it's just super ostentatious. Nishad expressed his discomfort to Sam, who said, quote, He would pay $100 million for the drama just to be done with and go away. Nishad took this as a quote, pretty clear sign that I should shut up and we should move forward with this. Now separately, Nishad explained that Alameda accepted customer deposits from the very beginning even before the retail FTX exchange had launched. The earliest project was an over -the -counter trading desk. That system was configured for customer deposits to go to Alameda, which Nishad believed were then forwarded to FTX. Regarding whether Alameda was allowed to use customer funds for its own purposes, Nishad said, I didn't have an affirmative understanding, but using it would break common sense expectations from customers. Nishad then discussed his understanding of the allow negative feature, which allowed Alameda to run a negative balance on FTX and implicitly use customer funds. Nishad explained that he had coded the first version of the feature at the direction of Sam and Gary Wong. He explained that because Alameda withdrew many assets that they didn't hold, those withdrawals were quote, Necessarily coming from other FTX customers. Repeating what we all know, Nishad said that this broke with customers' understanding of Alameda's status on the platform. He said, quote, I remember affirmative descriptions from Sam and others that Alameda didn't have special treatment, and this would constitute a form of special treatment. Nishad also discussed the movement of Alameda's loans to an account where interest wouldn't be charged. He said that Sam was aware of the large amount owed by Alameda to FTX, but said that, quote, In theory, those balances are in banks. It's not something that they're borrowing in sort of the traditional sense. They're custody -ing it, so they shouldn't be charged interest. Let's move as a liability out of a location where it's being charged interest. Another part of the testimony had to do with the infamous FTX liquidation engine. During the height of its popularity, the FTX liquidation engine was spoken about in glowing terms. It was said to be so well constructed that it allowed FTX to seamlessly offer margin loans across multiple assets, which was a feature that was not present on rival exchanges. He said that, quote, Even in instances in which a customer account ended up negative, and the insurance fund, which is a sort of bailout pool of cash, was empty, the expected option for resolving the negative balance would be a clawback, but there was nothing in the code that would do that. Instead, the account would remain negative, and Sam or Gary or others would sort of manually handle it however they saw fit. Essentially, Nishad gave evidence that this fabled liquidation engine didn't actually exist. Then the prosecution moved on to the final months at FTX. Nishad claims that he only found out about the massive hole in Alameda's balance sheet in September once he was asked to help repair it. He said that Sam asked the senior executives to contribute their personal holdings of serum tokens to the balance sheet to, quote, Make it appear that Alameda always had more collateral than it did. This manipulated balance sheet was intended to be given to the CFTC. Nishad said that he ultimately didn't contribute his own tokens because it, quote, Felt wrong to attempt to trick a federal regulator. Nishad also recalled a conversation with Sam on the balcony of the penthouse where Nishad asked what would be done about the hole in Alameda's balance sheet. He claimed that Sam said, quote, I'm not sure what there is to worry about. Net asset value is fantastic by almost any measure. It was super positive even if you don't include FTX and FTX U .S. equity. Nishad burst that bubble by noting that Caroline Ellison and Gary Wong had pointed out that Alameda had borrowed $13 billion and was unable to repay. Sam simply responded, right, that. We're a little short on deliverable. Sam added that the issue had been, quote, Taxing me some 5 to 10 percent of my productivity for this year. Nishad asked Sam, quote, What the hell the plan was? Sam responded with a variety of strategies, including selling off Alameda's illiquid assets, raising more money by selling FTX equity and holding on until FTX U .S. launched futures trading, which he believed would happen, quote, any day now. Nishad asked Sam if he considered cutting expenses, which Sam said he was working on. Nishad said he was, quote, blindsided and horrified. I felt really betrayed that five years of blood, sweat and tears from me and so many employees driving towards something that I thought was a beautiful force for good had turned out to be so evil. I knew that customers were betrayed. So many customers had to put their trust in us. And, you know, according to Sam's take, chances to rebuild this hole depended enormously on me continuing to try to make the company successful. And I knew that would require me betraying customers and employees. During September, while this was all coming out within Sam's inner circle, SBF planned a trip to the Middle East to attempt a long shot to rescue the company. Although the original plan was to put together a fundraising round for the company, Sam instead suggested doing a deal with Telegram. He said that they should buy $120 million worth of TUN tokens, which had been the subject of an SEC enforcement action in 2020, but which we're looking to relaunch. Alongside the investment, Sam had said that FTX engineers could build a payment network that utilized the token. Nishad said the plan, quote, made me extremely nervous. Getting even longer random illiquid tokens was not something I was excited about, especially when the cost would come from customers. Nishad also discussed political donations that had been made in his name. He said that FTX Digital Markets CEO Ryan Salem had access to his bank account for the purpose of making these donations. Nishad said that he was used to make donations, quote, for optics, advantageous that it was useful for my name to be associated with some donations, even if the end recipient understood they were really coming from someone else. Now, many people have pointed out that if the organizations or individual politicians accepting these donations knew they were coming from someone else, that would be extremely problematic for them. Finally, to close out the day, Nishad described work he had done to manipulate revenue data for FTX. He said that at the end of 2021, he had, quote, made transfers from one of Sam's companies to another to FTX to make it appear as though FTX had higher revenues. Prior to this, FTX had recorded around 950 million dollars in revenue for the year. Unsatisfied, Sam instructed Nishad to make these transactions to ensure that FTX hit a billion dollars in revenue for the year. The particular change was that Sam decided to charge his other company for staking serum tokens. Nishad said that he was instructed to backdate the transactions to make it appear that they had been charged throughout the year. Now, in addition to all these details, the other aspect of this testimony was sort of as a check on Sam's character. Sam had explained that he was friends with Sam's brother from high school and that Nishad had initially felt intimidated by Sam, who he viewed as a, quote, formidable and brilliant person. Nishad said, I had a lot of admiration and respect for him, but over time that eroded. Now, yesterday, Nishad faced cross -examination. And once again, it was not really that effective. A Slate article on Monday characterized the cross -examination so far like this. The cross -examinations have rarely, if ever, directly rebutted the government's severe allegations, which encompass wire fraud, money laundering and five conspiracy counts related to securities and commodities fraud, among others. More often, the attorneys repeat simple questions on matters the prosecution has already established before building their way up to potential conclusions that never seem to land. That characterization sort of held up here with Nishad. Matthew Russell Lee at Inner City Press on Twitter, who I can't recommend highly enough for the play -by -play coverage, characterized the cross -examination as meandering. Now, that said, Coindesk did write a piece yesterday called, for once, Bankman Fried's Lawyer Lands a Punch. The lead of that story is, Nishad Singh, a member of Sam Bankman Fried's inner circle, couldn't quite remember what he had told prosecutors about his conversation with the fallen cryptocurrency mogul and other FTX executives he said Tuesday in response to questioning from SPF's lawyers. The former Bankman Fried confidant's admission marked the first time since the trial began two weeks ago that the defense had seemingly managed to poke a hole in the case against their client, whose empire crumbled nearly a year ago. I think reflecting on what this testimony did for the prosecution, in many ways, it was similar to Caroline Ellison. In the same way, at one point, Caroline finally broke down and really gave the impression of a person who had been wracked by guilt with their knowledge of the things that they were doing. Nishad, too, sort of acted as a voice of consciousness in that he clearly had guilt around what he was doing, even if he continued to do it. You basically have this situation where everyone around SPF who knows about all these things that are going on is getting increasingly uncomfortable with the brazenness of them and yet is compelled or pressured by Sam to continue and just stop worrying about it. It really reinforces the idea that there was at the center of this story a central, dominant ringleader, which, of course, isn't really good for the defense. Now, the next big question is whether SPF himself is going to go on the stand in his own defense. There are hints that he might. In a Sunday night filing, Sam's defense team reiterated their request for better access to Adderall for their client. The defense claimed that Sam has been receiving a single dose before leaving jail on the mornings of court appearances. They claim this dose wears off by the time the trial begins each day, meaning that Sam has been unable to, quote, concentrate at the level he ordinarily would and that he would not be able to meaningfully participate in the presentation of the defense case. Their letter to the judge said that this lack of Adderall could play a critical role in determining, quote, the critical decision of whether Mr. Bankman -Fried will testify. Many commentators have taken the position that the defense has been floundering so far. They've struggled to discredit witnesses or present a coherent case during cross -examination. In fact, their performance has been so bad that some are beginning to wonder if the plan is to set up an appeal on procedural grounds. Alongside the practical issues with receiving adequate medication, in this letter, the defense have flagged one of the grounds for an eventual appeal. The idea that throughout the process, Sam has been denied his right to, quote, meaningfully participate in his defense. Investor Adam Cochrane certainly thinks that this is the gambit. He writes, PS, they don't actually give an F about his meds. They care about throwing out the trial. Vegan meals, lacking meds, weird medical hours. They'll probably try and claim some mental duress violating his right to compulsory process and self -defense. Does it work? Unlikely. But they want you to pity him. They want the jury to pity him. They want to throw every wrench they can into the gears of justice and grind it to a halt. Now, others were speculating about whether Sam could actually resist the lore of testifying in his own defense. Delphi Digital General Counsel Gabriel Shapiro wrote, imagine how epic it will be if SPF actually testifies. He could not even withstand cross -examination by Coffeezilla. Prosecutors will absolutely shred him on cross. Let's just hope he can be that stupid and narcissistic to give us one last show before he's put away for good. Of course, if Sam does make that last Hail Mary decision, you better believe we will be there to cover it. For now, that is going to do it for today's episode. I appreciate you guys listening as always. Also, one more big thank you to today's sponsor, Kraken. Go to kraken .com slash the breakdown and see what crypto can be. And until next time, be safe and take care of each other. Peace.
A highlight from Saving Arizona with Kari Lake and Scott Presler
"Lots of channels. Nothing to watch. Especially if you're searching for the truth. It's time to interrupt your regularly scheduled programs with something actually worth watching. Salem News Channel. Straightforward, unfiltered, with in -depth insight and analysis from the greatest collection of conservative minds. Like Hugh Hewitt, Mike Gallagher, Sebastian Gorka, and more. Find truth. Watch 24 -7 on SNC .TV and on Local Now, Channel 525. Hey everybody, Tim at Charlie Kirk Show. Scott Pressler joins us. Some good news out of Louisiana. We put the pressure to get Jim Jordan across the finish line. And finally, Carrie Lake joins us to talk about what's happening in Arizona and why she's running for the U .S. Senate. Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk .com. Freedom at charliekirk .com. Get involved with Turning Point USA at tpusa .com. That is tpusa .com. Start a high school or college chapter today at tpusa .com. The most important organization in the country is Turning Point USA. Get engaged. Get involved. Check it out. Have your young person in your life, your kid, your grandkids. Start a chapter at tpusa .com. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Brought to you by the loan experts I trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandtodd .com. This weekend, there was actually a flip. There's so much negative news out there. Negative, negative, negative, negative, negative, negative, negative, negative, negative. What if I told you that we flipped a governor's seat from Democrat to Republican? That's good news, everybody. It's a good sign ahead of 2024. It's in a state that should be reliably Republican but has a tricky tradition of electing Democrats in statewide offices. And it's a great governor. He's rock solid. He does a lot with Turning Point USA. He's a firm believer, Jeff Landry. And we're talking about Louisiana. Louisiana had a Democrat governor, Bel Edwards, I think was his name. Boom! We flipped that out from Democrat to Republican. And someone who is largely responsible for that is someone that we are partnering on a lot of different stuff is Scott Pressler from Early Vote Action. Scott, congratulations. You were working it very hard. Tell us about the story about what happened in Louisiana over the weekend. People have been understandably focused on Israel and the speaker's race. Yet here's a great canary in the coal mine. We flipped a Democrat mansion to a Republican mansion. Scott, tell us about it. Well, you know, Charlie, this was especially huge because a couple of things were at play. We had 15 different candidates running. This was on a Saturday. This was during football, LSU versus Auburn. This was when we had other Republican candidates that were still running and taking votes. And yet on the day of the primary, Jeff Landry received over 51 percent of the votes. So he was elected outright. There is no runoff. And this was so important because we have elections this November on Tuesday, November 7th. So now we have momentum going into November. People know that we can win. And furthermore, I think one of the coolest takeaways from Louisiana is Caddo Parish Shreveport is majority black. And that parish voted for Jeff Landry for governor. So people are seeing the disastrous Joe Biden Democratic agenda and people are seeing what Republicans are bringing to the table for fighting for working class America. And that was evident in the Saturday, October 14th election. Yeah. So let's talk more about that. Louisiana is a tricky state, right? You would think that it's deep red, but it has a tradition of voting for Democrats in state. What office is Blue Dog? We're moderate Democrats. Tell us about the dynamics of this race. And what can we learn about it specifically? Outreach, organizing, grassroots activity so that we could defeat the communists in November of 2024. So Louisiana, like California, has a jungle primary system. That means that a whole bunch of candidates can run. But at the end of the day, if you don't receive 50 percent plus one of the vote, it goes to a runoff. So the reason why this election was so monumental is, as I stated, 15 candidates were running. Several of those people were elected politicians in the Louisiana government. And despite that, Jeff Landry won outright. That shows you the caliber of the man that we just elected as governor of Louisiana. But in terms of grassroots, I really want to give a shout out to the hundreds of volunteers that through early vote action, we wrote thousands of letters to new movers in Louisiana. A new mover is somebody that has moved to the states, probably fleeing, you know, New York or California or one of the failed Democratic states. And so our volunteers wrote a letter welcoming them to Louisiana, explaining that we have a closed presidential primary, encouraging them to register as Republican and furthermore, asking for their vote on Saturday, October 14th. And in part, this letter writing campaign did help to not only register new voters, but get them out to vote and delivered a victory for Jeff Landry on October 14th. So let's let's keep the momentum going. Right. So let's let's get this into Arizona and Georgia and Wisconsin. Talk about where you're going to be dedicating resources in your time. Louisiana was a sleeper, right? I mean, we didn't even cover it in the lead up. It's a comfortably red state. Jeff Landry is great, but I hope everybody understands for Jeff Landry to avoid a runoff. That's a great structural sign. And also, if you look at things regionally, you're talking about the black community there. Scott, if that is any sort of an indicator, even by two percent, even by three percent, Georgia is going to look pretty sweet for us, for Donald J. Trump, if he's the nominee, which it looks like it will. So Louisiana very well could have been almost a little bit of a litmus test, a little bit of a real poll of will blacks in the South be more willing to vote Republican? Tell us more about that, Scott.
A highlight from Meet Bitcoin's New CMO: Larry Fink
"Welcome back to The Breakdown with me, NLW. It's a daily podcast on macro, Bitcoin and the big picture power shifts remaking our world. What's going on, guys? It is Tuesday, October 17th, and today we are talking about the new official spokesperson for Bitcoin, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink. Before we get into that, however, if you are enjoying The Breakdown, please go subscribe to it. Give it a rating, give it a review. Or if you want to dive deeper into the conversation, come join us on the Breakers Discord. You can find a link in the show notes or go to bit .ly slash breakdown pod. Well, friends, if you listened to yesterday's show or if you were alive on Twitter, you probably saw when Cointelegraph dropped a tweet that the SEC had approved BlackRock's Bitcoin spot ETF application. Now, of course, news that the BlackRock product had been approved, not only a spot ETF approval, but the one from the biggest asset manager in the world, said Bitcoin's price skyrocketing past 30 ,000, a 7 % move in a matter of minutes. Now, importantly, the tweet did not give any sources. And despite hundreds, if not thousands of people gleefully sharing the news immediately after, none of them had the source. Alas, within an hour, it became clear that the news was indeed fake and Bitcoin collapsed back down to $28 ,000. The SEC continued its campaign of snark tweeting, careful what you read on the Internet. The best source of information about the SEC is the SEC. Now, in the evening, Cointelegraph published their apology. They claimed that they had published the news based on a tweet containing a screenshot which claimed to be from a Bloomberg terminal. It seems likely they are referring to a message posted to a Telegram group, which was uncovered throughout the day. The Telegram user was anonymous and deleted their account shortly after the post. Cointelegraph released screenshots of their internal chat log, which showed staff quickly identifying that the report was incorrect. Cointelegraph said that the post had violated their social media procedure and claimed that the outlet would be, quote, thoroughly auditing and reviewing our social media management process. Now, the community was not particularly excited about their explanation. Investor Mike Dudas said, an absolute dumpster fire response from Cointelegraph after botching the Bitcoin ETF news. Crypto security expert Taylor Monahan said, you can be an influencer, you can be a personality, you can be a PR agency, you can be an ad network, you can be a meme queen, you can be a pump and dumper. Honey, you can be literally whatever you want, so long as you do not present that BS as effing journalism. Now, the reason that people were a little huffy about this is that across the entire move, over 100 million in Bitcoin derivatives positions had been liquidated. Indeed, some noted that there had been a large amount of accumulation on Sunday night and Monday morning, which some saw as evidence of preparation for the event. The biggest concern that many had is that this might negatively impact those Bitcoin ETF approvals that the SEC was considering. Anthony Sussano tweeted, Gary Gensler getting ready to deny all the ETFs by citing this fake news incident as evidence of how easy it is to manipulate the crypto markets. Before Cointelegraph's explanation, Adam Cochrane wrote, I look forward to them providing documentation on where that report came from because they just massively hurt the chances of real ETF approval and or blatantly scammed people. Others, however, were quick to point out that it didn't exactly work that way. Jeff Dorman, the CIO of ARCA, responded to Adam and wrote, incorrect. The market manipulation that the SEC has historically referenced has nothing to do with the rogue media outlet inaccurately reporting news that people and bots then trade on. It doesn't matter what asset class you're trading, erroneous headlines create whipsaw price action. There's plenty of precedent here in other asset classes. In 2013, the AP Twitter was hacked and headlines said the White House was attacked, caused hundreds of billions of losses in equities and debt. Finance lawyer at Davis Polk, Scott Johnson, explained even further, on the suggestion that today represents heightened risk the SEC may further deny based on fraud and manipulation. Can't emphasize more how dead and buried that line of thinking is, cremated in six feet below ground in an undisclosed location, never to be seen again. Even if you assume the worst facts, someone specifically attempted to manipulate prices in a very obvious way to promulgate fake news, the argument will still not be presented as a basis to deny. This would represent a defiance of the DC Circuit Court ruling. Now what he meant is that the circuit court ruling wasn't that there was no fraud and manipulation in the Bitcoin markets, it's that there wasn't any difference in spot markets as compared to futures markets which are already approved. The standard isn't about getting markets to zero fraud and manipulation. The standard is around surveillance sharing agreements and the ability to detect manipulation, so this shouldn't be material to the applications. Still, it's hard not to feel like there was some narrative damage done. Scott Melker tweeted, Imagine you are sitting at a hedge fund or other real institution, and you see this complete nonsense. You see Bitcoin pump $2 ,000 on likely fake news, then you see a retrace entirely. Do you think you want to be a part of this market? Embarrassing and infuriating. Now, Melker wasn't the only person it seems who felt like this was enough of a deal to actually make a comment. In fact, after the dust had settled, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink made an appearance on Fox Business to comment on the events of the day. He claimed that the Bitcoin rally went quote way beyond the rumor. He said quote, It's an example of the pent -up interest in crypto. We're hearing from clients around the world about the need for crypto. Indeed, he went on saying that his argument was that broader geopolitical uncertainty was driving a quote flight to quality. Alongside mentioning treasuries and gold, he added that quote, I believe crypto will play that type of role as a flight to quality. Now, even though Fink has spoken positively about Bitcoin specifically in the recent past, this still was quite a surprise to many industry watchers. Dan McArdle tweeted, I really didn't foresee Larry Fink of all people becoming Bitcoin's marketing department, pushing it as a flight to quality due to difficult geopolitical times, but here we are. Framework Ventures co -founder Van Spencer wrote, Surreal! Larry Fink talking about crypto as a flight to quality. Now for all of you Bitcoiners wondering why he said crypto and not Bitcoin, even though they have a Bitcoin ETF application, Brad Mills shared a clip that he said explained why he used crypto instead of Bitcoin, which was Larry literally explicitly saying that because of this application, he can't speak to Bitcoin specifically, but he can talk about crypto more broadly. James Safard, an ETF analyst at Bloomberg, said, This is still weird to me. Look, all I mean is if you came to me six months ago and told me that Larry Fink will do multiple national television appearances where he preaches about the virtues and benefits of Bitcoin and crypto more broadly, I probably would have laughed at you. Will Clemente got right to the point, saying, If you think Larry Fink shilling Bitcoin on live TV is cool, wait until BlackRock's entire army of financial advisors is doing it. It was a really interesting denouement on what was a fascinating little episode, and I think Alex Krueger has the right of it when he tweeted, One thing is for sure, whoever thinks the ETF is already priced in has just been proven wrong. Expect a 20 % plus day move when it's approved.
A highlight from 120: Part 2: Tim Cardwell is a Top Cop for Drug Interdiction but Nearly Loses His Life
"Let's kind of pull on that dope thread a little bit, because you get onto the, you survive the academy, obviously. So you graduate, you get out, you start working. As you're working, we want to talk about now what leads you into doing drug interdiction. So obviously, when you start off, you're with a field training officer, you go through your training phase, then you get out on your own. What kind of things were you doing initially when you were out on your own? How does North Carolina do it? I mean, you train for a while, then you're out. And standard -like what? Traffic enforcement, work accidents? Yes. Pretty much, is that what you were doing? Change tires, go get gasoline. I warned you, Murph. Don't go there. One of these days, we're going to be driving, there's going to be Murph on the side of the road. You go, hey, can you help me? I go, no. Hey, Steve and I have had many of these constant back and forths on this exact thing. But yeah, so when I graduated the academy, it was 20 weeks, reported to my first duty station and did have a field training officer actually. What was that at? It was in Asheboro, North Carolina, Randolph County, which is on the south side of Greensboro. It was about an hour and 15 minutes from where I grew up, but it was still within the same troop, which was most state agencies have that similar structure where you have a troop and then you have districts within that troop. So that was my first duty station and I had a primary and a secondary training officer and went through, I'm thinking it was at the time, maybe six or eight weeks field training. And my primary field training officer, his name was Wayne Brumley, just a jewel of a man, wonderful training guy. And my secondary, his name was Tony Miller, who later he rose to the rank of major within the organization. He was a young guy who was been on about five or six years when I came on. So I had a good mixture of, you know, youthfulness as well as very veteran experience. And the shift I was on, it was similar type makeup. And so going into the field training officer, you know, having some of that law enforcement background, I had become pretty good at catching impaired drivers at the police department. And so it was a natural... Wait a minute, all the impaired drivers were at the police department? When I worked at the police department, I should say, I apologize. But it was just something I thought, you know, this is where I want to go. And so, and my training officer, he was one of the leading impaired driver troopers in the district and he really focused and was successful with that. He taught me a lot, but, you know, in the beginning, doing the traditional trooper type efforts, that's what my goal was. I really enjoyed it. It's what I wanted to do. And, you know, there's some funny stories in there, but one in particular that my training officer shared at my retirement luncheon and he would share with you today was, this was just kind of an internal trooper agency thing. I don't know if you did this, Morgan, or not, but when you would encounter in the old days, somebody whose license were suspended roadside or whatever, you would take their license there on the spot and you would put it over your driver's side window along the headliner there. Just slide it in there or you'd keep it over your sun visor. And my training officer had tons of those and it was just always something I remember Roger Smith having. So it was one of those little symbolic visuals that I thought, I want that. So I kind of set out on a mission, you know, to see how many licenses I could collect roadside in. So I made a comment to my training officer at the time and he said, you know, there are more trouble than they're worth. You have to keep up with them. And I said, well, that's what I want to do. So he handed me a handful before I got out of training and said, here you go, maybe this will help you feel like a real trooper. And so it was just one of those little symbolic things that I connected with. But in that, you know, his nickname was Brutal Brumley. He was a former military guy, about six foot, six one, thin guy, was very physically fit, marathon runner, still runs today and he's mid to late seventies. developed But he that nickname because of, you know, some roadside encounters, obviously through the courts. And I saw it in action during training. We stopped a gentleman for speeding one day late evening and the gentleman didn't initially want to cooperate. And this was when he had turned it over to me and he was just watching from a distance and, you know, trying to find my way through. This guy wasn't the most cooperative after a couple of requests. So next thing I know, my training officer commences to removing the gentleman from the car and not in how the gentleman wanted to cooperate. And this guy was twice our size. And so I saw firsthand in action, you know, how he earned his nickname. But he was very fair. And anyway, when we got the gentleman under control and took him to jail, he had a long conversation with me about taking control. He said, you cannot let anybody else get the upper hand on you out here. It's because of survivability. So it was a valuable lesson taught at the time. But, you know, I've seen him encounter so many situations where he showed a lot of compassion through accident investigations, as well as roadside stops for different violations. And so he was well -rounded and gave me a good lesson. And but at the time, interdiction was not even in the culture of the Highway Patrol, wasn't even thought about. It was just traditional trooper work. And the county that I went to had eight miles of interstate. But where we worked was non -interstate. And so that leads me into once he cut me loose, passed all my training, I started doing traditional trooper work. And at the time when I joined the patrol, I kind of have to go back here. There we patrol the troopers that have, you know, gotten killed in action. They kind of came in clusters, two and three at a time. And just before I joined patrol, we'd had three members that were killed roadside. And two of those were on interstate highway. And where I grew up, we didn't have interstate highway. So I didn't have any familiarity to it. And so I was like, you know, I don't want nothing to do with that. I just want to be a traditional trooper. But I was very proactive. I was finding a lot of stuff, roadside. And, you know, when I would make an arrest for driving one paired, I took the time to go up and search the car. And if I found anything else, I was making charges. And so I kind of developed the desire to do that. And then in our patrol office one day, my secondary training officer, the gentleman I mentioned to you earlier who had been on last time, he had attended our first interdiction training course, which was taught internally. And I remember him talking about it. And for some reason, it just connected, you know, I connected with it, the stories he was telling, the lessons that they were talking about. And when our agency started the interdiction effort, it was in partnership with DEA. And they had started the experiment on Interstate 95 down in Fayetteville. And the troopers that were working it down there had had a lot of success. They were kind of the first generation interdiction troopers. This is, you know, the mid and late 80s. And so a couple of gentlemen by the name of Chris Dew, who had a first K -9, and Terry Isaacs, who was really the one who was making a lot of seizures at the time, they taught that course. So anyway, he comes back to our district and is talking some about it, and it just captured me. And he had a bulletin that they had given him in that school, and it was an epic bulletin. It was a teletype that would list, you know, seizures from throughout the country of seizures that made the threshold. And so I started reading it. And for whatever reason, it just connected with me. And that's how I began, you know, pursuing the interdiction efforts. Oh, I remember reading those teletypes, too. You know, those were very interesting. You get the law enforcement officers killed summary and then the teletypes. But you mentioned something, too, I want to ask you about. You said that they traditionally didn't work interstate. You know, is that just because of like you're talking about the danger or was it because C is kind of the opposite, a lot of troops where I was at. We had a lot of Tulane, in fact, all of my stuff was Tulane, and you would have killed to be up on the interstate where you thought all the action was. Why did they keep you away from the interstate or why did you stay away from the interstate just because of part of the danger factor or something else? Well, I think it was a combination of reasons. Again, going back to where I said I grew up, non -interstate, a lot of secondary roads. That's just what I was familiar with. And, you know, those folks that had been like Roger Smith and a couple of his workmates, that's where they worked and built their reputation. And so, you know, trying to follow that lead, I think that's why I did that. And my training officer, he worked some interstate, but he wasn't in the interdiction area. He was just, you know, regular trooper enforcement. But that's the way he operated was secondary roads. You know, in that day, you were heavy on looking for impaired drivers. Then, you know, looking for the under the influence drivers, especially on Friday and Saturday nights on evening shift, it was a lot of priority placed on that. And so just trying to fall in line and follow their lead, I think is why I did that. And, you know, but what I quickly learned was what the interstate did bring you was if you were low for the week as far as, you know, number of citations or activity that you had to turn in at the end of the week for the supervisor to see, you know, you could go out there and with high volume traffic, you could quickly pick up on some of your total numbers for the week. And wait a minute, did the North Carolina Highway Patrol have a quota? No, we did not have a quota, but I will say the supervisors did monitor your number of contacts per hour of preventive patrol. That's how it was worded. And you had better be in that district average of what everybody else had. So, you know. I had somebody asked me that one time, do you guys have a quota? Said, no, sir, I can ride as many as I want. How many would you like today? Good response. Yeah, so that, you know, that was kind of my introduction. And then, you know, with my training officer, my secondary training officer introduced me to that. It just kind of took. And so I started going out there and trying it and having little success. Really didn't know what I was doing, but it was just a process of learning from there. And, you know, I was a very proactive trooper. I, you know, did a lot of high production. Got unmarked a car at a young age, young in my career. And anyway, the next time the next class came open internally, my then district first sergeant asked me if I would be interested in going. I said, yeah. And I remember sitting through that class with those troopers teaching it, and it just captivated me. That's, I mean, that's the simplest way. You know, they were given some of their case studies talking about, you know, what their findings were and some of the follow -up results. I thought, that's what I really want to try. And so I came back and started trying to apply. So you started doing this. So what was your first, what was your first big seizure? What's the one that cracked the, because, you know, you have to go, we started it. I was part of a four -person team, four -man team at that time. We started our interdiction unit. And so when you start off, you don't really like say, know what you're doing. You get a few things here and there. We were working 54, which if you remember, the Pipeline Operation report out of Epic, Highway 54 that came up out of Texas and Oklahoma and through Kansas, that was a major pipeline. They were making lots of arrests. So we started working that area. You know, we were stopping everything in sight, you know, trying to look for stuff. But you always kind of start off small. What was that watershed event for you? What was that thing that kind of cracked it open that once you get that first one, it's like, I got this figured out. Well, so this was in 1988. Again, it wasn't the culture of the Highway Patrol. It was just kind of getting started. And so there really wasn't a lot of information to pull from or, you know, a lot of guys saying, hey, let's go out and work this road and look for this. It was just kind of, you know, an individual effort, so to speak. And at that same time, one of the troopers I mentioned early on Interstate 95, Chris Dew, he had had our first canine on the patrol, but it was just a narcotic dog. It was a Beagle. And, you know, some about that during the training, listening to him talk about, you know, the role the canine played that interested me. So when I came back to the district, not long after that, requests came through patrol headquarters or troop headquarters, any troopers interested in having a canine, you know, submit your interest. So I thought about it and I did. And the district commander at that time or the troop commander at that time, who was very much old school, was not on board with this, he was passing it along from patrol headquarters. When I submitted my name, he sent a message back that said, if you want a canine, I think I can find somewhere else in a different place to get you a canine assigned to you, meaning, you know, I'm going to transfer if you really want this canine. And again, you got to understand the internal culture of the organization. So I said, no, sir, no, sir, I'm not interested in one. So anyway, there was another supervisor who had been involved in the early stages of it. He said, I thought you expressed interest in this. I said, I did. But here's what, you know, what I was told. And he said, I'll take care of that. And I was like, oh, no, please don't get me in trouble here. You thinking Lumberton? Here I come. You know what, Trooper Cardwell just told me there for sergeant. And so anyway, you know, next thing you know, I got word that, hey, if you want a dog, we'll assign you one. We're going to send one to the central part of the state and one east part of the state. And you report to this canine school, which was actually in Greensboro at the time. And so we did. And anyway, the school was about 10 days, 11 days. You know, again, patrol hadn't had a program at that time. They were just starting to get into it. And so getting the dog really helped as far as going out roadside, learning what I was doing. And so I had made some phone calls to troopers that I had learned about on this epic Operation Pipeline Bulletin. There was a couple of guys that I kept consistently reading their names. Do you remember a guy named Jeff Faison out of Florida? Yeah, I remember his name. He was kind of the first generation that came along at the time. These other troopers I mentioned that taught us. And then there was some in the area, neighboring states, Mike Ralston and Georgia State Patrol, Benji Hodges, Georgia. And there were some others throughout the country. But I can't remember what it was that caused me to reach out to Mike one day, because I had expressed interest in getting more training. But again, it wasn't the culture. So somehow I made contact with Mike. He worked north of Atlanta on Interstate 75. And where I worked was Interstate 85 and Interstate 40. And I just cold -called him and introduced myself. And anyway, I told him what I was seeking. He said, sure, you're welcome to come down and ride with me if you'd like. I had to take vacation time because I couldn't get approval to go on patrol time. So I went down there and rode with him, spent my own money. And he took care of me really good. He showed me a lot. And then I come back. And we had had another gentleman by the name of Ed Lowry, who had worked on Interstate 95 in Fayetteville in our agency. I had gotten approval to go ride with him. But I had to take vacation time, too. So I went and rode with him. And this was the watershed moment that you're speaking of. While riding with him on 95, he was kind of the hottest guy at that time consistently making cases. And this was when everything was flowing out of South Florida, back when Steve was, you know, he was familiar with all the importation through South Florida. Well, everything those guys were getting was Miami -connected in some way, shape, form, or fashion. And I remember getting in a car with Ed. And he had just come off some days off. And says, he Bo, I don't know if we're going to have any luck. And that's what he called everybody was Bo. I don't know why. That was just the habit of his. But he said, but we're going to go out and try. I'm going to see if I can get you something. Well, the second car that he stopped, it was like that epic bulletin teletype operation pipeline played out before my eyes. The second stop, he gets a four -door, I believe it was a Buick old four -door sedan coming out of Miami, registered out of New Jersey, male -female occupant, and found a compartment built between a rear seat and trunk. And it had like five kilos of Coke. I thought I was just, I was seeing it play out before my eyes. And that just, that was my watershed moment. I was like, this is what I want to do. I had been trying it up to that point with minimal success, but between him and Mike, it really opened my eyes to other things that I really had not been paying attention to, human behavior, the importance of the interview. And anyway, so when I left from there, I was really energetic. And so I come back and started applying it. And having learned to operate my canine, I started looking at things differently as far as my approach and how to talk with people and what to look for roadside interview -wise. And so that first big seizure was a U -Haul that had come out of South Texas, which obviously still is today, but then the major source for our area, it was a U -Haul and it had about 850 pounds of marijuana in it. And once I got that, I was hooked. I mean, I was hooked a hundred percent. Well, let's go back to that seizure of Coke. When you opened it, did you know, I mean, when you saw the bricks, obviously, did you know what it was at that time or did you kind of have to go, okay, wait, you know, I'm just kind of like, whoa, what is this? Oh no, I know what that is. Kind of, yeah. I had never seen a kilo in person. And obviously it had, but I had not. I'd seen many pictures. And so I'm like, well, that's what it really looks like, I guess. So yeah, it was a really good learning experience. Now, so the 850 pounds of weed, that wasn't the case that you and I worked on, was it? No, this was a brother and sister that had come out of San Antonio and they were delivering somewhere in, I think around Richmond, Virginia area. But it's an interesting story on that. We had not had that kind of seizures go through our court system. And when it went for first appearance the next morning, the judge who was listening to the probable cause hearing, he said, he pulled me to the side before the hearing. He said, now, from what I'm told, you can't do this. And I said, well, what do you mean? And he said, you can't just go in and start searching somebody's belongings. And I said, well, I didn't, sir. I said, they gave me permission. And he was like, what? And I said, yes, sir. He said, they gave you permission to search their truck, knowing that they were carrying this? I said, yeah. And he's like, oh, okay. So it was a learning experience for a lot of us through the court process and myself. I love the way the judge was having a preliminary hearing out in the hallway before anybody was even sworn in. Well, again, it's a small community. And anyway, everybody knew everybody. And I'd built a good rapport with this judge. And I just remember that conversation. And once I said that, he said, wow, can't believe somebody would do that. I said, well, he said, where'd you learn to do this? And I told him. And he said, so they tell you to ask people to search the vehicle if you think you're suspicious to want to look for something else? I said, yes, sir. And he said, and they actually do? I said, yes, sir, they do. It's unbelievable. It is. It goes back to your point you were making. If you understand human behavior, if you understand how to talk to them and set the right circumstances, I mean, even to this day, Murph and I were talking about it on our Patreon channel, but at the time, it was the largest seizure of cash in Kansas. But it was only a quarter of a million. I mean, they've gotten much bigger stuff now. And people are going, I mean, they let you search the car. The guy I remember to this day, his name is Brian Lacy. I looked at him. I said, now, do you have anything that would be illegal in the state of Kansas? Guns, drugs, large amounts of cash. He says, no. I said, would you? And one question, one thing I learned to ask was not can I search? Because people always want to say no. I said, would you have any objection if I search for these items? And they would say, no. Well, no meant yes. And he even offered to show me, hey, I got a briefcase here. I opened up the trunk. There's the cash. And in his briefcase, plans for a methamphetamine laboratory. He had a marijuana press. It's like, you dumb son of a bitch. All you had to say was no. And we didn't have a canine at that point. There's not much I could have done. Yeah. It's amazing. I was just thinking, Tim, remember Dave Wilhelm with customs? Yes. Down in Charlotte. And he was murdered in Atlanta. So God rest him. But he called me one day, and I can't remember if it was Asper. I think it might have been Randleman. And he called and he says, hey, Murphy. He said, I got a tip. This trailer out in the country, some Mexicans are in there. Supposed to be sitting on a big stash of weed. He said, I need somebody to speak Spanish. So I met him down there. We took some people with us and walked up to this trailer. I remember that it was a huge lot with these big, tall pine trees. But there were no limbs from like 10 feet, 12 feet high before the limb started. So you had this wide open, we think of as a killing field that you have to go through to get to that front door. But we have no reason to be pulling our weapons out. To go up, like we're going to do a tactical entry. We knock on the door and I get up there and do use my Spanish. And they're like, yeah, come on in. We go inside. I forget how many is 1 ,200 pounds of weed or whatever they'd been using saws to cut it up. But there was an AR -15 sitting behind the front door. I mean, they pulled out and wiped us all out. But it's just amazing. They're sitting on the dope and they're like, sure, come on in. You know, and Tim, I don't know if you remember seeing this video if it was a Texas DPS trooper, but he's on the side of the road and he's talking to this guy in that Texas draw going, now son, you got anything that's illegal? You got, well, and so he's talking and you can see it's the old dash cam. This kid's getting nervous. Now, do you have anything in the car that's illegal? No, he's like, would you mind if I checked your car? And this kid just vapor locks and passes out into the ditch. He goes, well, I'll take that as an admission of guilt.
"jeff it" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show
"There's a battle for our nation going on right now. The question is who will lead it? Get answers as the real life network televises the pray vote stand summit September 15th and 16th with former president Donald Trump and Florida governor Rhonda Santus discussing what it'll take for America to get back to greatness along with a host of conservative leaders like all American swimmer Riley Gaines, us Senator Josh Hawley, Dr. Ben Carson, Pastor Jack Hibbs, and more. Go to reallifenetwork.com now to sign up for free that's reallifenetwork.com. On the real life network the gospel is never censored by big tech or the government with faith-based content, family entertainment, and new shows released weekly. Watch on any device anywhere anytime. Don't miss pray vote stand a free online event with Donald Trump, Rhonda Santus, and other conservative leaders September 15th and 16th available at reallifenetwork.com or download the app and sign up for free that's reallifenetwork.com. Check it out. Folks I'm talking to a comedian but we're talking about really serious dark stuff and Jeff Allen is my guest. Jeff I want to say that first of all congratulations on the book. The book is called Are We There Yet? My journey from a messed up to a meaningful life. Now presumably this is a journey you've taken not a journey that you hope to take at some point in life. In other words you've achieved the semblance of a meaningful life and you've left the messed up life mostly in the past. Yeah kind of sort of yeah yeah I yeah I I'll agree with that yeah I've I don't want to push you you still might be a messed up jerk and you just wrote the book for the heck of it. As we're talking about it yeah I I have I have some issues but they're nowhere near what they were so and my wife still I think listen I hate to put words in your mouth but I mean I I I'd like to help you here and I guess the point is if you have a meaningful life part of having a meaningful life is understanding that we're all messed up that that's that's a big part of it so you're if you've achieved a meaningful life part of having a meaningful life means understanding I'm a work in progress and and I'm assuming God comes into the picture because I keep bumping into you at Christian events here and there somehow God got a hold of this messed up uh creature named Jeff Allen. Yeah I ran into a guy I was uh I started with self-help because I knew there was something wrong with me so I figured I'd read some self-help.
"jeff it" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show
"He needs to say you're talented. You're angry, but no, I'm just trying to think. I mean, I, I, where, where were you, you know, in other words, where would I have caught you nationally? Because I know I saw you do your thing here and there and there and here, but I, I wouldn't remember where. I don't know. I, I saw you way before that. Yeah. So, uh, I, you know, again, I wasn't, I was, I was not on a national, I didn't do one network television show until Friday. I was on good morning America. I told him I had to write a book to get on network television and a book about my miserable, uh, existence. Okay. So I want to talk to you about your book because you've got a book out a brand new book. It is, it is out today. Ladies and gentlemen, the title of the book is are we there yet? My journey from a messed up to a meaningful life. Now you and I, Jeff, we've met a number of times and you've been on this program before and we talked about your, your messed up life. I mean, you went through some dark, dark stuff. Um, but I always want to start at the beginning. Where did you grow up and how did you get into the world of comedy? I grew up in the South side of Chicago. Um, and, um, I was, uh, my brother was a musician and he was working a club. I was about 16 maybe. And I saw some comedians open for him and I thought, wow, that would be the coolest thing if I could do that. But it's not like, uh, comedies, you know, the comedians set up a table at career day in high school, you know, it's not like, you know, so how do you do this? And it was 1970, probably two or three when I saw the comedian. So 78, I was working for a jewelry company and someone said, Hey, there's this comedy club around the corner and my comedy club. Anyway, I went in and I was hooked, um, uh, from that moment. So this is the late seventies. Yes. You go into a comedy club. Had you gone to college? You said you're working in a jewelry store. What part of the world are you in? I went to college for your specifics. All right. Now I'm going to need some documentation. Yeah. I went to college for a year and a half and, uh, I went, I went on a baseball, um, thing and I was drinking pretty heavy and alcohol and catching 90 mile an hour. Fastballs don't seem to work out too well. Coach says, you weren't the guy I recruited. I was getting drunk at lunch and then going to workouts. Is that a bad thing? Be honest. I got to plead guilty. I got to plead guilty. I get hammered at lunch just about every day, but I'm not catching 90 mile an hour. Uh, you know, yeah. Yeah. Right. Okay. So, so you're in college on a, where were you in college at the time? JC. I did not want to go to college. I, but I needed it to, I thought I could get a contract. Um, I was looked at in high school and they just weren't quite able to pull the trigger. So I went to a two year school figure and that if I did well there, then I could get a contract. And, um, as it worked out, I was ineligible my second year and I was kind of thrown into the workforce. So I went to work for this jewelry company and we're doing a show and they tell me about this comedy club. And that was August. I think it was November. It was Thanksgiving night. I got what part of the country are you in at this time? Still Chicago. Yeah. Working a regular job and suddenly you stumble into a comedy club. And at this point you think I can do this now, look, you're a comedian. Uh, I have done, you know, I get in front of groups all the time. Uh, I cracked jokes. When you do it, you know, you, you kind of get to this point where you forget that most people don't do this. And most people would be in awe of the fact that you would think I can get up in front of a group and make them laugh. I've never done that exclusively. I usually have a speech or something and I can crack jokes in the midst of it, but you're getting up there specifically and only to make people laugh. And the idea that you could be a young man watching somebody do and thinking, I think I can do that. That's not normal. That's an amazing kind of thing. And I don't know if you've ever reflected on that. That's kind of an amazing, crazy idea. Yeah. I went, uh, my first night on stage was, it was a train wreck and, um, I went home and my reaction to shame and humiliation is to punch things. So I punched holes in my closet door when I got home from my first night on stage. And, uh, that was Thursday night. I was back on Sunday for an open mic night. And the MC came over, very large black man came over. Uh, I'll never forget Orlando. He says, uh, you're going to have to make some sense tonight. We're still trying to figure out what you said Thursday night. And, uh, but involved in getting in front of a crowd to crack them up. What was your game plan? I had no game plan, Eric. Every comedian is different, right? Some people have, they'll write out a number of jokes. They'll do the guy. What was your idea? Go to I'm going to tell some stories. What was the idea? I'm going to tell you the truth. I had no idea that people wrote things out. I thought comedians went up and talked about their day. So I would hit the stage with nothing prepared and it showed I would stare at the crowd some nights and I'd run off. I would just, I wouldn't do eight seconds. I would just leave the stage. And, um, I saw a guy writing in a notebook one night and I go, what are you doing? He goes, well, I'm preparing my set. I go, you write this stuff down. He goes, yeah, again, there's no class, you know, now they have comedy classes, I guess you could take. But, uh, anyway, um, I, I, my first joke, my first routine that ever got huge laughs, I had a VW bug that kept breaking down. I had a parking on a Hill so I run downhill and pop the clutch because I couldn't afford to get a new starter for it. And one night I was late. I had to run a mile to get to the club on time. So I'm dripping sweat. I run through the door and they go, you're up. I ran on stage and just puked out everything. I hated about the VW bug, you know, that the heating system, you know, if you got lucky enough to get it going, it'll burn every hair off your ankle. Sounds like comedy gold. Keep going. Absolutely. And all of a sudden I bought two minutes into the story. I'm realizing my God, they're laughing. And this is what comedy is. It's truth and it's angst. And, uh, if I can come up with more true things and get angry about it, then, uh, I'll, uh, I can do this. I think I can do this. And, uh, that was really the first time that I connected with an audience on and it was, to me, it was magic. I mean, it was like, there was nothing like it. So it was just like everything in my life, you know, I pursued alcohol and drugs. The first time I did cocaine, I thought this is it. I found it. And it was never the same, but with comedy, it was like, um, so wait, I just want to be very clear for my audience. So you're not recommending cocaine. Not at all, Eric. Nope. That's you can put that disclaimer. Right. I just want to be very clear when we're looking for professional life tips. So you're not, I just want to be clear. You're not recommending cocaine. Uh, and it sounds like you're not recommending alcohol. No. Well, for me, it wasn't, uh, you know, but, um, but it could work for other people. It could be listening to this program we're looking for. It could be the very thing. Um, we have to go to a break folks. Uh, we'll be right back. We're talking to Jeff Allen. He has a book out. We'll be discussing that book in a minute. Don't go away. Weaving its way through the heart of the Holy land is a well-worn path that once felt the footsteps of our biblical faith heroes, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, King David, and Jesus. Join David Friedman and Mike Pompeo for a sacred journey of hope along route 60, the biblical highway. It's a close-up look at the land of the Bible as you've never seen it in theaters, September 18th and 19th it's route 60, the biblical highway get tickets now at route 60 dot movie that's route 60 dot movie.
"jeff it" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show
"Ladies and gentlemen, looking for something new and original, something unique and without equal. Look no further. Here comes the one and only Eric Metaxas. Hey there, folks. Welcome to the show. As you know, on this show, we often talk about incredibly substantive issues. We talk about the economy. We talk about what's going on in the news and the stolen election and the evil fake president and all that kooky important stuff. But today, I get to do what I want to do. I get to talk to a comedian. Now, even if we talk about important stuff, I'm still talking to a comedian. So you got a would-be comedian talking to an actual comedian. His name is Jeff Allen. And I just might as well say, Jeff, welcome to the program. Hey, thanks for having me, man. I appreciate it. So even for being serious, you're still officially professionally a comedian. Absolutely. I'm a sometime comedian, but I'm always a would-be comedian. And I really, I've followed comedy my whole life. And it's something, you know, people say like, what do you take seriously, Eric? What are you really seriously interested in? Comedy is at the top of the list, which is one of the reasons I know you and I know your work. I can't remember where I first would have seen you. Upstate New York, man, at the New Canaan Society. No, no, no, no. That's where I first met you. I'm talking about where I saw you on TV or whatever, because you've been in the business for a while. I don't 70s or the 80s where I might have caught your caught your act on TV. I was in, I was in New York in the 80s. Had to get out of there before I killed somebody or myself or work or work or were killed by somebody. Yeah. I had a guy from HBO see my set one night at stand of New York. He says, why are you guys so angry? So when a guy from HBO says you're angry, maybe I should get out of town. Wow. Yeah. Yeah. He says, I caught your act and you're angry.
"jeff it" Discussed on The Lowe Post
"Do a few minutes on heat nicks. The heat win game one, no Julius Randle, which is a big deal. I think they're gonna need him sooner rather than later. He changes the whole series and lots of different ways. You know, a lot of this series is the heat trying to hunt Jalen Brunson a little bit on defense and Jalen Brunson trying to find good match ups. A lot of cross matching in this series coach is not the sexiest thing to talk about, but Jalen Brunson is guarding stress to open games and if he gets that matchup, he's just going right at him. If Duncan Robbins is on the floor, he's finding him and going right at him. And Jimmy Butler, a lot of those leak outs that he got on the touchdown passes from Kevin Love are because of cross matches. He's guarding Brunson and they don't want Brunson guarding him and he knew it was clearly part of the scattering report. He started leaking out like when shots were in the air or not even like about to be taken because he knows they're going to try to criss-cross and find me and I'm going to get good matchups and then of course you sprained his ankle so we're waiting. We're waiting on that. Other than flashbacks to the late 90s, what was your initial take on game one? Well, I thought the Knicks, they just didn't play well enough, particularly in the things that are correctable. Three leak outs by love. I mean, you can't get you can't allow people behind you without floor violence necessary. I mean, that's just step one to any good defense is floor balance. So I think they need to correct that. If you went back and started how many times they left their feet on shot fakes. Obi toppin is still jumping like now. As he gets up for practice. Kind of like Grayson Allen is sir, you're still a Euro stepping across the streets of Milwaukee somewhere. Three, two, two, one and a half, one and two, one and a quarter. And I think toppings played so much better. I think he actually helps them offensively. It didn't reflect yesterday as much. But I think in many ways, they can play better offensively with top and then with Randall. I don't think, I don't think that's going to sound like a hot take and I actually don't think it is because of the spacing and the speed with which they play. Yeah, I mean, to me, I'm not trying to make a hot take. I'm just I know you're not. He's just, he gives him transition ability. He'll run harder and more frequently and he'll shoot the three and he doesn't hesitate. But that being said, the number of shot fakes they went for yesterday that led to then open shots or fouls. You can't be putting Jimmy Butler to the free throw line 11 times. And you can't bite on Kevin Love's shot fake. So they need those are the two basic ones. And then I think, you know, Brunson was just okay yesterday. I think they need to, they can't shoot, okay? So they're starting wings with heart and Barrett. They, you know, that's not their strength. They're not a three point shooting team. So they need their four man and their one man and then Grimes to come in if he's to still come off the bench and they need to shoot the three well, the discrepancy from a shooting standpoint is hard to overcome. And so when Brunson goes over 7 yesterday, coupled with Barrett and Hart, that's not their strength. Then it becomes very, very difficult, particularly with as many good three point shooters as the heat play. And I don't know, just like I was saying about topping, the hero injury is interesting for Miami in that he's a talented offensive player and they may be better defensively when they're not playing him 35 minutes a game because of people can't just go at it. I've heard from a number of executives around the league saying, I don't think the heat miss Tyler hero as much as people thought they were going to miss Tyler hero. For that exact reason, I do think it's interesting that the longer they advance, the more he's just going to recede from memory as like what a big deal his injury apparently was and is. Just to put that in perspective. So they closed, I think, both have the last night yesterday afternoon. With a lineup of Gabe Vincent and Kyle Lowry together. So both the point guards. Jimmy Butler Caleb Martin and bam adebayo. That lineup played 9 minutes in game one. 9 minutes. 7 minutes in the entire regular season. That's the degree to which the heat are scrambling to just find bodies at this point. A lineup that won them the game played more in that game than it did in the 90s combined games or whatever regular season play in playoffs before that. And it was just a gutty win. I agree, the Knicks just weren't just weren't sharp enough. The fact that they didn't go at butler at the end of the game when he couldn't move and they had possessions where he was like on jail and Brunson switched onto Jalen Brunson and they just went away from it. Like RJ Barrett dribbled one of them and just dribbled the ball off a swim. I'm like, this guy can't move in Jalen Brunson. He's got Jim butler on him. Go ahead. It's also a tribute to how much respect teams have for Jimmy Butler. I'm not so sure, butler would have, maybe they should have. I didn't see the last three minutes, but maybe they should have, but the one thing I would say is, I also have no doubt that butler would not have allowed himself to be taken advantage of either. And Kyle Lowry to your point, now his strips, just a nuisance. The biggest play of the game for Miami and for New York, Mitchell Robinson gets a rebound with, I'm going to say 6 or 7. Brings it down. Lowry pokes it away. It leads to a hoop, then RJ Barrett goes down. It was a gay Vincent three where gave Vincent fell over and wanted a four point play day. It was like four and a half minutes left. I know exactly what time he just poked it right out of Mitchell Robinson's hand. Did you just like classic Kyle Lowry just being a pain in the ass? Right. And then Barrett goes down. I'm not sure if it was the exact next possession, but very close driving to his left. Lowry
"jeff it" Discussed on The Lowe Post
"Next big question because we just mentioned it anyway. With 8 games left, who's your MVP? You don't have a vote, right? You don't have a vote, but if you had a vote, who would you vote for? Can I tell you I am totally uninterested in that question? But it's my pleasure. So you have to answer it. I'm going to answer, but I'm not going to answer. I'm totally uninterested because what it's devolved to is comparison has become the thief of joy in that. Every time someone says about player a, they think should be MVP. They immediately don't just stop at how well they've played. They then compare them and try to tear down the accomplishments of the guys they don't think should win. And so I have, I don't know who should vote for the MVP because when I look at all star balloting, fans do an awful job. Players take it as a joke. Coaches give it no thought. And the media doesn't see enough gains. You know, 'cause you're not watching. You can't watch every team every game, right? So if you're a stat person and advanced staff person, jokic is clearly going to win. If you have, I think that's less clear now than it was a month ago. He's embiid has passed him in a couple of whenever advanced metrics of your choice are. He's past him in a couple. Yeah, but if you look at the totality of it, to me, and then you take the availability. You take the availability. To me, but again, I'm just I'm starting to do what I don't want to do, which is, I don't want to make a case for anybody. But the reason see thing, if you're into the recency, you're going to look at embiid and say, are you kidding me? And identical. And if you don't really give a lot of weight towards availability, then Giannis may have, you know, one of the great cases of all time. So to me, there's like, it depends on how you look at it. And I don't know, I know it means a lot to the players and it should, I just don't know who's qualified to actually vote and who will take the requisite time to study it all to watch it all and to take it serious and not come into where they want a certain person to win. You know, Tom thibodeau, he said, after a game, they were talking to him about Barrett and he goes, if you torture the numbers enough, they'll confess to anything. And I think that's how people like they just take whatever numbers they want to concentrate on and torture them to make a case. I just think like, I just don't even know who should vote for it. Let alone like who should actually win it because I think everybody you're talking about. And like I said, gildas Alexander, I don't think anyone's done more for their team than he could have. Like, what he's done for their team, it's amazing. So the thunder were here this week in LA. I've been in LA all week day. We're here. They're still here. They had three games here. There are people around the thunder who are worried he's not going to make any of the all NBA teams because they're just a 500 team. I'm like, he, if he doesn't make an all NBA team, it's like a crime. He might make first team all NBA. Forget media. Media. And I'll say this. So just to be clear, your abdicating the question and number one on your MVP ballot is joy and happiness. That's what you're voting for. Yeah, I guess I think again, and I watch a lot, but what happens is when you watch, if you don't watch all every game of somebody's season and you just watch pockets, which is what like I do. Like I don't watch every game of every team. You see a guy on a good night or a bad night and your opinion is shaped versus if you watch every game like Doc Rivers knows what type of season in B ten. He's seen every play. Michael Malone knows about yoke and Joe Missoula knows about Tatum and bud knows about Yanis and they could all make compelling cases for their guy. And so to me, one of the reasons why I stopped voting was I just didn't feel like I could see enough to give it the introspection that an award of that magnitude deserves. And that's why I come back to, I don't know who should vote for the MVP. I think it's the coaches, but quite frankly, when you see what they do with the all stars sometimes, I'm like, they really punted and spend no time. And they fall into the other trap, which is they've seen 82 games of embiid and maybe three of jokic, right? And so it's reputation. So much is not done on that season, but lifetime award achievements in the All-Star Game. I will say, I mean, I have a ballot and every year I think about giving it up and the reason I think about giving it up is the NBA needs to find another way to decide super max's and all this stuff or find another voting pool because the media should not be voting on all NBA given what it determines. It's incredibly uncomfortable for the media. It's bad for players. It's bad for teams. We're sitting here within our hands. Collectively, Jalen brown's eligibility for a supermax extension, which is not in Jason Tatum went through this too, is not just about Jalen brown's money, which sucks to be even like 5% responsible for as a voter, it's now also about the Celtics ability to retain Jalen Brown long-term. Like the media should not be in a place where they're determining with any scintilla of importance, tilting the scales at all in the Celtics favor or disfavor of retaining a star player. John morant supermax is at stake in all NBA and he just got suspended for 8 games. Like, we just shouldn't. And again, I haven't found the best solution for how the NBA should decide who gets the 35% max ahead of schedule. It's not an easy question. They tied it to all NBA. What else could you tie it to? Who's gonna vote it for? There's no great answers to this. I just know it's a really crappy position for everybody involved to be in and you look at the and there's lobbying and it's just it's a complete mess and I sit here and vote all NBA. And I'm like, it's just too, there's too much riding on this outside of when it was just an honor with like with like some shoe contract stuff worked in like shoe contracts have bonuses for all MBAs, but when it was just mostly like an honor, that was one thing. Now it's money and it's team building and it just shouldn't be on the media's shoulders or the coaches or I don't know who should be on, but it's a really, it's a bad system. Well, and the transparency, I don't know if we're all NBA if you vote and it's revealed. It is. Which sets up to me confrontational and adversarial relationships that all it is is an opinion. It's an informed opinion that you guys and I know like, I'm sure you do the same, but what might green votes he like talks to people, he I mean, he really like stresses about it because of all the things that you say. And I just don't like, I know the transparency is meant to be positive, but I think in these cases, it's negative. I think they should go back to evoke and it's not revealed who you vote for. And if a guy doesn't take it serious and you have unilateral power in the NBA, you ask somebody else to vote because I just think it just, it's too much. It's like people like, and I don't blame them for taking it personal and if they take it personal, then their families take it personal. Their agents take it personal and it's, I don't know, I think it's I'm just glad I'm not in that business. A couple, let's do a couple more big questions. Since joy got your MVP vote, we'll have to move on to the next one. Joy. I hesitate to ask this question, but just given Paul George's injury, I think it's okay to at least start thinking about it. If the clippers have already missed their best chance to win the title with Paul George and Kawhi Leonard and please clippers fans know that I said if because this is a thought exercise, they can still win it this year if he comes back in time, I agree with you coach that they haven't really put together like a ten
"jeff it" Discussed on Revision Path
"Things with some great folks. That's actually that's really good to hear. I can tell you just from the end user perspective, I first encountered Gusto last year at the current place where I'm working at, they use Gusto for like payroll and all that sort of stuff. And the whole experience is so friendly and inviting, which for HR software is a feat to accomplish. Because most of that stuff is like, oh, I'm only going to go in here to file time off or whatever. It's not user friendly. It doesn't spark joy to use Marie Kondo's phrase. Like it doesn't, it doesn't give you those feelings of like, oh, I actually want to poke around and see what's on these other pages like the illustrations or fun, the color coordination is great. I mean, again, from the end user perspective, I like it a lot. Yeah, that's a big part of what drew me to guys though as well. It feels delightfully human, right? You talk about these friendly aspects of it to delightful experience. It's easy to use. And yeah, typically HR software is not that. It's not sexy. It's not going to make you want to use it. It's not like approachable. Yeah, design has been a big part of Gus of DNA since the beginning. One of the first hires of Gusto and when they were a startup, you know, ten plus years ago was it was a design hire. So design has always been a big part of Gusto's DNA and where it's continuing that. Like we have a big investment in design and being led by Amy our chief design officer. That speaks volumes to where, hey, at the highest levels, like we have advocacy for design and her leadership is she's bringing that influence to conversations at those levels as well and in our strategy and direction in our vision. So we don't have to fight for that seat at the table. It's like it's already there. I was like, all right, now design shows what you got. Let's make this happen. That's really good. I think for a lot of tech startups, at least maybe it's just the ones I've been at, but certainly there's others that I've seen where design is always this afterthought. It's something that, you know, maybe they'll bring a designer on, or they'll have a few freelancers, but you can tell the focus is really on just making sure that the product works and adding new features to it, design tends to be a bit of a, you know, we'll get to it kind of thing. It's very utilitarian. So it's good to hear that for Gusto that design is really at the forefront of everything that y'all try to do. Oh yeah, totally. You hit the nail right now, what you said, like designs kind of afterthought a lot of times and it's a strategic part of building a product. Like, you know, thinking about design is not just that fresh coat of paint you do after you build something, right? It's kind of like, from the beginning, talking to customers, learning about those user problems and kind of like distilling that down to the root problems and finding a thoughtful way to kind of approach that. Like even that is like part of design, like way before you even start putting those pixels out there and start delivering mocks to the engineers and stuff like that. So it starts really, really early on before any code is pushed. So yeah, design kind of being like this, this thread that's followed throughout, even from the end of delivery of the designs and that's kind of what we try to practice. Keeping that spirit of design, being at the forefront of everything that we do, and that's super important and it really shows in the product. So that experience that end to end experience, like you can tell, hey, this has been designed, not like, hey, we just layered something on top of something that was probably just strictly technically engineering lead or something. Talk to me more about what the team looks like. You're on the product design team. I'm imagined, is it for like a specific feature of the app like talk to me more about that? Yeah, yeah. So we're broken up in these segments, and I'm in an employer segment, so we focus on all of our customers, our business owners, who are using to kind of pay their employees and ensure them and use HR tooling for performance management and all that. And my team specifically, we're working on working on the HR side and we're our missions to help customers develop and retain their talent. So my team is made up of myself like I'm the designer and I have a p.m. counterpart. He's actually a hybrid of p.m. engineer, which is a pretty amazing. He actually was a pretty strong, strong engineering leader in our team. And he actually started this p.m. rotation and now he's like diving into that world and it's been awesome to kind of work with someone that has two sides of that coin there and we also have about four or 5 other engineer supporting this team. So yeah, so our team we're pretty much building those HR tools. We have that part of Gusto space kind of expanding Gus portfolio past just the payment and the ensuring benefits of side of things like going into that HR tooling space. So yeah, we're super excited to kind of bring that part of Gusto to our customers. Now, is this your first time kind of working remotely for a team like this? No, actually, my remote professional journey actually started in my previous role at admin held as a huge experience designer. So that was like the beginning of the pandemic. This is right around January 2020, somewhere around there and a couple of months into that. I was about a little bit over a year or so in that role when I got into doing remote work for the first time and they sent us home. They were like, hey, take your laptops and everything. And being a part of having health, you know, that's a large health system. So there was a lot of need as you can imagine for us to deliver some digital experiences to help with some telehealth type of things we're working on. At the time. So that was a pretty accelerated but a hyper learning time for me on both the product like working on a product side for designing those products for my health and as well as like, hey, now we're in this remote world. How do we work? And just kind of learning that you have to be really intentional about remote work to make that work and communication is one of those big key learnings there. They're in that experiences. Yeah, I think a lot of companies definitely have to come to terms with that very quickly over the past couple of years, which for me has been interesting. I've worked remotely since roughly about like 2009, like late 2008 was when I started, but I've been working remotely because I had my own studio for a long time and then once I sort of got back into the quote unquote workforce at the end of 2017, every gig that I've had after that has been remote first. So even with time where you've had to still go to an office or for something like that, most I say 90% of the work that I've done over the past 5 years has all been remote, and it's interesting seeing now how companies are trying to kind of adapt to that, particularly in environments where that sort of in person collaboration, one was so key, but I would say also when it comes to looking for talents, like a lot of these companies like if they're in New York or in San Francisco, Silicon Valley, et cetera, they're used to kind of looking for design talents right where they're at. And now with the pandemic and people being able to work remotely as they are, I feel like that probably does a lot for decentralizing design talent. What do you think about that in this current environment? Yeah, I
"jeff it" Discussed on Casting Actors Cast
"Where you just a thank you is maybe in order especially if you feel like you've been given some some specific focus and or attention but i will say this again. I don't think that there's any hard and fast rule. I think it's a kindness but there is in my opinion. I haven't seen any kind of expectation that that's something that should be done on a regular basis. So i would say trust your instincts and again. I think it's lovely. I think it's generous. And i really appreciate you bringing that up because perhaps we should all be thinking in terms of helping each other out for those additional. Help that additional. Help that we're getting from others. Thank you for that mark so then. Here's a comment. I got high. I'd like to learn as much as possible. About self taping. Auditions and overcoming audition exile. Diety that was from matthew and you know matthew. Thank you so much for that. I do have some passed. A podcast and videos patios talking about this very very subject and i encourage you to go back into the archives by going to casting actors. Cast dot com. You can look at past episodes. Both video and audio. I think that might be worth looking into. But i will tell you the feeling nervous thing something. I've been thinking about for some time. And on the air date for h twenty six august twenty six twenty twenty one. The name of the podcast is feeling nervous. Everything you need to know. So i'm going to definitely address that that entire subject will be covered in a future. Podcast called feeling nervous. Everything you want..
"jeff it" Discussed on The My Future Business™ Show
"That advisors often do wear a lot hats whether it's Insurance or investments financial planning whatever. The case may be where they often lack is how to connect with different personality types in a consistent basis. We do spend quite a bit of time on that part of the training and generally is everyone's favorite because something they never get. yeah fantastic. Thank you for sharing jack now. Not only do you have your wonderful sofa at real intelligence. But you've also got my hogan. Can you tell us a little bit of that. Yes mike was in the business for thirty five years as eight financial planner. In fact he was one of the very first certified financial planner which does show his age and was the founder of the financial planning association in westchester connecticut. New york as well as fairfield county connecticut and testing. Thank you very much for sharing. I'm sure you make dynamic jure as it were now in terms of the development of the app you obviously would have some sort of a depth development plan in the background. You've talked about redoing you model. Is it all together. Is there a path forward for the development of the app so we are three weeks away from the launch of the new app. One that we used for as a tool for advise originally still up. You can get that off the apple app store or google. Play is not as intuitive as the new one will be so if you're Do it yourself investor. My advice would be to wait three weeks and use the one. That's will be geared towards the consumer. Because if you do run into trouble there will be those videos. Give you assistance in terms of knowing what to to input and exactly how to read calculations and put but yeah. We're excited about that. I think it's it's gonna be a great tool for everybody. Not just advisors and one thing on thinking batch is that it's one thing to have a wonderful tool at this and app but it's so much more important to have that ongoing support those tutorials just that debt gardens for the end user yes so in addition to the website providing a lot of resources either from my old articles or of course just guidance as to where you can find tools we have a pretty aggressive social media bush which pushes out. Bits of information again and very digestible bites. That will also help people with dynamic nap method. So when when people do get to your website. I was wondering if you could just tell them what they will find and what to look out for. So yeah you will see on the website not only description of the essential family office experience. You'll see a few videos about how we can deliver his dynamic map..
"jeff it" Discussed on The My Future Business™ Show
"Via zoom in the pandemic app. And we couldn't travel so we had to change the entire business plan moving forward. It's going to be more business to consumer direct On the one hand and then the other hand is corporate. America we do believe the the businesses that are large enough to have finance financial wellness as an initiative within their hr departments. They really don't have any tools to support that initiative yet they scream year about how important it is. We believe we can help with that. So that that will also be a target of our scoreboard. Fantastic thank you so very much sharing. Now i'm wondering how to denying real intelligence Come about something that you'd had on the back burner for wallow partners idea we were talking about Names and of course. The buzz is all about artificial intelligence and the the the line that we use. There's there's nothing artificial about real intelligence or the people we serve. I'd love to if we could just share bit about your experiences. You've spent twenty five in the financial services business and attain several different awards including innovator of the year tennis little bit about some of those experiences. Innovator of the year award was given In hachi what year that was but it was. Because i had started that training program that allowed advisors to deliver. Will we call a middle class millionaire experience. I should say a family office experience for middle-class millionaires. Most people don't go to family offices. That's traditionally service level reserved for very very wealthy families meeting fifty million or more Where you have all of those things in life that become burdensome with all that well so taxes legal property casualty risk managements If you have real estate than of course manning that real investment portfolio and of course seeking a unique opportunity stir private equity or venture capital to business in itself isn't it it is and it's typically very expensive to run one of those because you have them all under one one roof. What we were able to do is to create a virtual experience for middle-class millionaires. Now wouldn't go white as deep as what you'd expect for those really super wealthy families but we would be able to have. This sounds so simple. But it just doesn't happen. Have the accountants the attorneys the investment people. The insurance people actually talking to each other to make sure that the family could Work hard and play hard numb. Worry about all those other things so yeah. I was given that award for that. Exact reason and the benefit to me of course was the advisors were able to attract investors. Who had more money than they had previously. You've been extremely busy over the time. You've also been published in several different financial meteorologists talking global bank and finance for best company. Fintech buzz and get involved with these types of publications. So i had a pr group that we partnered with when i first started They they were fantastic. And the fact that the dynamic mapping method was so different than the traditional method really seemed to appeal to a lot of these publishers. Newsmax finance was probably the one that did the most they. They had me on a monthly basis But it was interesting. That fintech buzz did bring us in. I didn't see that one coming company as well. They they wanted to go really deep in detail on some of these case studies so it was fun..
"jeff it" Discussed on The My Future Business™ Show
"Show where we get you in front of your best audience and keep you there today. I'm on the coal with somebody. Very exciting he is the president and speaker end. Ceo in fact of real intelligence. Llc mr jeff man do the show jeff those absolutely. What for treat too heavy he today. We're gonna be talking a lot about how visualize your financial future in ten minutes or less says like a bit of a stretch. But we'll get back to that in a moment. I'm sure you've got some fairly exciting news to share about this. This technology that you use it real intelligence but before we do their what i like to do is is little bit about my guess and i'd love to start off by asking you. Where are you located is home for you. I am in fairfield connecticut. United states which is just a suburb of new york city. Fantastic is that. Is that a location. We've been owning your own of your life. I moved here after college. Grew up in virginia beach. Virginia but Have lived here since nineteen ninety and time. Flies doesn't so what's some of the landmarks that people would your location. Well we're literally right on the long island sound as i mentioned new york city's about fifty miles from here so it's not too far anti And of course yale. University is about half an hour from here excellent. Do you have any Like hobbies sports or entertainment. That you like. I may big fly fisherman so i travel the country doing that in fact i was waived this past weekend on the trip which was fun. It was a little rough. It's really nice easy so not fighting aggressive as they might be thirty days us some tom. I'm sure that will come good now when you when you travel. Do you have a particular place that you like to go is. Is there a preference you. Yeah my favorite place. Is a place called the beaver. Kill in upstate. New york is actually where fly fishing was invented. And it's about two and a half hours. From where i live so i do go there. Generally once or twice a summer But this this past weekend local yeah excellent with the pandemic going there any restrictions for you in where you live on not where i live in fact fly fishing because generally it is something you do by yourself Do bring friends but were very spaced from each other. Even during the height of the pandemic is one of the few things you could do outside without anybody giving you a hard time about a mask if we can go back is a bit when you were growing up. Did you have a pet and if you did. Which one did you remember. The most sure had a dog. His name was sparky. After sparky anderson who was a famous manager of the cincinnati reds. How that's an easy one and when you were growing up do you remember anything about growing up to. He really loved. Could you just take us through that little bit. I'm an adopted only child. We grew up in virginia beach probably about ten miles from the coast and inland to be careful of hurricanes and took a a real affinity to tennis growing up and eventually went on to play now..
"jeff it" Discussed on All the Kings Men | LA Kings
"Question. You ask yourself. Is he a real kick in our area. And i would say yes. He is real king. When you committed when the cop and the premier your premier player which means You know is ron you Williams right here a real king and he's more of a real kingdom millions. His lungs have won a couple of another team and didn't play as long. Yeah so i think of them as a real. A real king yeah. the question for me is just. When did it happen right. And i guess for my money it happened sometime in two thousand fourteen. Yeah probably probably but you know when the guy is This is a bags you know you. Little sister goes to which one at the littlest. Yeah you're right so she goes to and they haven't thing which they probably had a law school they're called lifers right. Yeah and he's not a lifer right yet. i started kindergarten. Right started in grade three but she's more of a enemy she's way bigger presence in that school than the kids i know in her class. Lifers right right so you know. She's a real well. So jeff i mean jeff carter to me is the perfect example of why franchises and the kings in particular need a secondary method of honoring players. Right because he'll he'll get a legends night. But that's not enough and i don't think i don't think that his jersey should be retired. Sorry tony i already. Jackie wilson but you can't have feeling every personal yeah and and it's not jeff garters fault but it's like copa. Dr doughty quick and brown are are all yeah and so five is just too many but guys like justin williams guys like jeff carter right who who played tremendously important roles in both cup wins. You know there should be like You know a ring of honor or You know one banner. Maybe where you put all the names of this of that second tier of guys that were like you know yes. Somebody else can wear seventy seven. But let's not forget the jeff garcia. I'm i think some teams the teams have been around a lot longer. That didn't do this when they started Right and now you know they hang. They hang from the rafters. They hang like break. There might be four guys. The right number five exactly but i think that's but i like i said i think it's time yet. Were kings to do something like look so for example. Fourteen right williams. Yeah he has norstrom also wore number for it. We'll both of those guys. Were tremendously important to the organization. Yeah so recognizing. Yeah exactly and guys like kelly rudy. Were thirty two. Yes yeah hanger jersey their name but they don't go on the wall and you don't have a ceremony and or maybe someday vitam all right. You know at some occasion Yeah no i. I agree with that that that would be nice but number shouldn't go on the wall and there's a reason why someone else i don't. I don't see anyone wearing anytime soon. No right disclose imagine you know. It's such a specific number. Yeah i actually like. I have been finding it interesting. Are people off topic but guys on the rain wearing numbers of big people. only keep. it's it's honestly. It's one of the f- one of the few things that that john. The mayor and i vehemently agree on. We both say like listen. Daniel brickley wearing number eight samuel jackman wearing number eleven Matlock wearing number twenty three. Like no no no no. I don't know it seems like a really odd choice. And i think i was watching the game to.
"jeff it" Discussed on All The Kings Men
"It's not helping him right. And i don't think he can help that much right now. Nineteen points in forty games to your point is pretty pretty darn good. It's good but you know this is a conversation for later podcast. But when the season started we identified the top ten questions facing the team and at this point the all most of the questions have been answered to this point. The two that haven't are you know. Where's the secondary scoring coming from. And so that. With the trade of jeff carter. That becomes a much bigger question. Yes but la delays at. That's a conversation for much later date. Let's again backtrack. The two thousand twelve That stanley cup run. I mean he just whether it's two thousand fourteen in the series against chicago or two thousand twelve in the series against new jersey and and phoenix at the time. now zona. I mean he just he just was so important. I'm not sure that mike richards. Dustin penner are as effective as they are in two thousand twelve. If jeff carter is not on that one probably or at least mike richards would be effective in a totally different way rates still be scrappy and hit and all that but i. I don't know that many of their big goals happen without jeff carter's impact on that team. I think for sure look like supreme your player and z. Put him with two guys like that. And all of a sudden gangbusters and because you speed is shot. And i was watching some highlights today. You just like okay. There are very few players can do what he did. And then that opens up the other guys Dustin panel reader looks good well or a guy competent. I'm in the minority. No basis has one of those wacky careers. You know you know. Look it's it's the guy was good and clear. There he was. I i would say one of the premier players in the league no breasts for it but but he was and Yeah i think that injury was one of the most bizarre injuries yet really. Was you know any us. The toll It's it's hard to foul..
"jeff it" Discussed on All the Kings Men | LA Kings
"To get an immediate reaction from a fan perspective for jeff carter trade and what better fan to reach out to then my father. How're you doing today. Google you just doing all right. We're recording this bull. Eight fifty four in the morning or almost noon. Your tight east coast. It's fifty four. Yeah but look jeff. Carter traded away. And i don't want to get into the details of you. Know we like the straight doing not like this trade with mean in fact instead i just want to kind of appreciate jeff carter. Because ordinarily in a trade we'd be getting somebody back and i'd be reaching out to you. Know a journalist or play by play guy from the team of the person coming back but in this case just picks coming back. So i just you know. I was thinking about last night. You see all the responses on twitter and on facebook The message boards and people are emotional about this trade. And i was surprised at how emotional i was. Given that i wasn't emotional about to foley martinez muhsin pearson all those guys. I was sorta like okay. Well that's a bummer teams rebuilding but seen carter. Go really does sort of hit different as the kids. Say yeah it it. Signals is signals the end. Because now okay the lewis and i thought that was too bad but you know this. Is it right. That old gang reverence call. Gang is when i thought overnight and i thought that the car thing reminding me of what you always say about when you buy a pet yes. I had the same thought. Yeah that's that's really works for the older. The older you get the more times you go through it just like you know. How many pets have you had. And how much did you love them. All the heavy at all they're gonna die or you're going to have to kill him. Yeah yeah for those who are unfamiliar. What my dad is referring to is. Yeah when you my theory that when you buy a dog all you're really doing is buying the worst day of your life but because at some point you're going to outlive your dog. And anybody who see marlene or owned a dog knows how painful it is when you lose your dog but of course we all do it because owning a dog is amazing. Sure that dog goes you wait a new on exactly you know and that sort of what sports really is you get like i say like i'm i'm so old that i've been through you know i was really sad when traded. This is my program. He was my yeah. He can't change your favorite player. Now now that life jury no but i love because i was a goalie ribs a birthday he gets traded. Well but that's i don't know how many freaking years that is sixty. You know sixty years ago so it never. I don't think liberally better easier. That's out appeal guards. Like yeah you great. And it's too bad but like that's the nature of the beast right. It is There's i've made reference to this moment. A number of times. But there's there's a moment in the series finale of the office Where where one of the characters looks at the camera and says you know. I wish you could recognize the good old days when they were happening right now. And you know one of the few things that..
"jeff it" Discussed on Inspiration and Spiritual Awakening from Live. Love. Engage. with Gloria Grace Rand
"Somewhere. You cannot quit. Now is a difference between knowing when to walk away and when it's okay to fail as long as you keep falling forward as long as you. Keep failing forward Rocky balboa said and this is my last thought on as if you want no more bellboy said in the last rocky movie. His life is not all sunshine and rainbows. It will knock you down. Any will keep knocking you. Down and sacred of success or failure is not in whether you get knocked down whether you keep getting up and keep moving forward absolutely. You can not stop moving forward. The greatest disappointment of my life. Today that are fourteen month. Old grandson was killed by a drinking driver kit. Our daughter and our grandson was fourteen months. Old thanks is gonna hit you with disappointments is gonna keep on knocking. You down question is what are you gonna do it. The true champion is the cake. Keeps kidding keeps moving. Full and sees the masterpiece sh absolutely. Oh my goodness. This has been an amazing conversation. I use shared some wonderful wonderful words of wisdom today. And i appreciate it hub if someone does want a book you for virtual speaking tour or something of what is the best way for people to be able to get in contact with you. We have two websites For churches and religious organizations that can contact us through tiny giant dot. Com cayenne y. g. a. n. t. dot com. Which way we're going to merge benchley by the first of the year opened one. The other one is jeff steinberg dot net looking at jeff steinberg dot net looking at tiny giant dot com. This there or have your audience get in touch with you. I've been in touch with each other so many times absolutely commission. I'll graciously accept. How about that will thank you so much for being here and this was absolute honor to hear from you. And i'm. I'm really glad that we've gotten to know you and for you to share your wonderful story with our listeners. I appreciate you so much more. It's been amazing and thank you so much to putting with our postponements and such like that and more than that. You and i talked on the way to this. You very candidate very helpful. And i appreciate that a lot and it's my pleasure and always happy to come on and be with you. I appreciate that as well and we may have you back again sometime in the near future. Seper that so an for all of you out there who are watching and listening. Thank you as well for being supporters of love gauge. I appreciate all of you and enclosing as always. I always want you to be able to go out there and lift fully. Love deeply and engage authentically. Did you know that a majority of entrepreneurs tend to discount the importance of their work and a good number field. Their success is simply due to lock. I know from personal experience. That self-doubt can keep you from having the kind of life and business you desire. That's why i've created a free guide called uniquely knew how to move from self doubt to self love in four simple steps to claim your free guide. Go to live. Love engage dot gift. that's live. Love engage dot g. I asked.
"jeff it" Discussed on Voice in Canada
"Hey terry here with your flash briefing four days today. It is wednesday wednesday and some big news came out yesterday about amazon. And i just want to share this with you. It is related to lexi indirectly. But here's the deal. Jeff bezos has announced that he is going to be stepping down as ceo of amazon after nearly thirty years since he founded the company and In his letter to To his employees to his team. He said that he's going to be taking over the role as executive chair. And he's going to say or he said in that letter as executive. I will stay engaged in important amazon initiatives but also have the time and energy. I need to focus on the day. One fund the bazo earth fund blue origin. The washington post and my other passions. And so i am very interested to know what he means when he says his other passions just i was. I was in a room on action. Clemson and you may have seen me on. Clubhouse have not please join me. I'm spending a lot of time in clubhouse. I think it's a wonderful voice platform but we were talking in some of these rooms about what this could mean. And what other interests he may have. I wonder if this could be something that he is planning about. Healthcare believe that amazon has so much of the infrastructure to make a big disruption healthcare including lexi and being able to access health information and get health services through smart speakers. I also wonder if There could be some kind of interest of his in robotics. and perhaps maybe a robot that could incorporate voice technology or lexi anyway. These are all just speculations. But i'm having fun and we had fun in in these rooms just discussing the self love to hear your thoughts on that. Hit me up on twitter. Dr terry fisher. Dart isis's or come find me on clubhouse if you're on their same username and i'd love to hear your thoughts all right. Have a great day. And we'll talk to you tomorrow. Recast dot fm..
"jeff it" Discussed on SRB Media Podcasts
"Sometimes during the faa cope with a league Somebody's got promotion at the end.
"jeff it" Discussed on News Radio 920 AM
"With me and Jeff Massey today early retirement. It's been our topic on the show today. It might not be your plan, but Let's say this. Let's say you lose your job, or maybe you're no longer able to work. It does happen. In fact, the center for Retirement Research says 37% of retirees say they had to stop working sooner than they'd planned. Jeff it's a predicament. So what do we do if we lose our job, and we're not sure we can afford to retire? That is always a tough one. Because you know it can be challenging enough when you put the date out there and you work towards that retirement date, and you're just naturally getting there. And you hit that particular date. You're ready to retire. For some people that can be stressful enough. Now compound that with Well, I'd like to retire when I'm 65 or six or seven. Whatever your age is. Then all of a sudden, it could be a couple years before that. It could be 5 10 years before then, all of a sudden you're kind of released back into the workforce by your employer. And then you go. Oh, my God. What happened? You know what can I do? And it can make a major adjustment that you have to deal with, because you need to find a job. Regroup. Get back to work. And for that time that you're out of work, you know you're not saving towards your retirement, so you may end up falling a little bit short. That can happen. So what's important about that is well first meet with the financial advisor. They can look at your situation in first determine. Do you have enough already set aside where you can retire. Or, if not retire, fully, maybe provide cash flow in the interim, until you get back to work, and then he can shut off that cash flow. Once you get back to work, and then hopefully rebuild that account back up because you ended up drawing from it prematurely because you lost your job. Now it's important. Understand that The reason financial planners in general, tell people you need an emergency bucket and you should have if you're working, most say, minimum of six months of of your net cash flow in the bank and in the safety position that you can access readily. If you were to lose your job, there's a reason for that. And that's so you don't invade. Your investments for the long term. You just have that that safety fouled. If you will, They could say I lost my job. All right, well, thankfully, I've saved you know, six months of my salary or years worth of salary, and I've got that set aside just for this reason. So think of how that would feel knowing that you've got that cushion built up versus how would you feel if you had no savings in the bank or very little, and you lose your job? Then what? That's the motivation for getting that that account built up and start to push that money into your liquid bucket. If you will, so that whenever you might need it, you have access to that money. It's therefore you don't have to worry about what should I sell? What should I don't know. It's in the bank. You can tap into it very easily. So that's important when it comes to losing your job and what it is that you're doing now, if you don't have enough money to retire, and you're pretty certain you don't and you lose your job. That's a real challenge. You know, It is very difficult to try to catch up on but I've met with some people that you know. You look at it from the outside and man you say, Wow, what a great business they have. No, no. The chat with me and say, Look, you know, I gotta tell you, I'm a late bloomer. That was the term that was used to me recently. I'm a late bloomer. I need to catch up and this is somebody that's in their late fifties. So you know what you see on the outside might not be what's going on on the inside. You know that old analogy when you look at a duck on the water? What does it look like? All nice, calm, peaceful, just floating along. What's going on under the water and those feeder like paddling like crazy, You know, so it's like you never know. You know you don't make assumptions. You just everybody's different. We wait for people to command. We see what they have. We determine mathematically if they can retire now or not, And if not, we say, look, Well, here's the plan of how to build it up so you can get to the point where you can retire. Now that's saving is one thing. The other part, of course, is determining what you have her expenses and what expensive might be discretionary where you don't need to spend that money each month. If you were to lose your job, or if some other thing happens, you were you perhaps become disabled. You know, it's another issue that some clients have faced, and we've helped them through that as well. So we've talked a lot about retirement, preparing for what happens. If you know this happens that happens. We've covered a lot of that in the book that I wrote, and I'd love to get a copy of our booked out to you. It's a complimentary copy. I'll endorse it out to simply text the word book to four. A 1 207 200 you can at your own leisure read about retirement planning. The feedback we get is very humbling, But people tell us that it's easy to understand. Where I really appreciate hearing that is from the nonfinancial spouse that says to me, you know, I don't like paying attention to the money, but I read your entire book and thank you for that, because I could understand it. So that's the goal. We want to get as many books out people to help people with their retirement planning, and that's so important. So simply text the word book before 1 207 200. We'll get that out to you right away. Jeff of we're talking retirement. We have to talk taxes sometimes gets overlooked. It could make a pretty big impact, Can it Absolutely. And you know, if you work in a room and say, Hey, he wants to talk about income taxes. How many people are going to raise their hand? You know, not too many, and we talk about this topic at every financial seminar that we do We explain to people The temporary lower taxes that we're.