20 Burst results for "James Lining"
The Naked Scientists
"james lining" Discussed on The Naked Scientists
"When it's going to happen. And it's happening right now all around the world and every data center and server farm. No clear winner and a continual game of cat and mouse. The verdict so far a draw. And the audience goes, well, the audience doesn't even know the fighter started. Indeed, as one person said to me, there are two kinds of companies on the Internet, Robert, those that have been hacked and those that don't know they've been hacked. We are listening there to Chris folker and Stephen Crowe. They were from ANS. We shouldn't forget, of course, that cyber war is still war. People can get hurt, it does have very real impacts on military strategies. Conflicts in general, though, is governed by the Geneva convention and other international agreements, so is cyber conflict similarly regulated. It's an interesting question, and I put it to doctor Heather Harrison Dennis, a senior lecturer at the international law center of the Swedish national defense college. The basic answer is yes, it is. And the vast majority of states agree that the law of armed conflict applies to cyber operations exactly the same as it applies to other operations. There are a handful of states who disagree with that. But those states include China and Russia. The easy part is saying that the principle of distinction that you have to distinguish between military objectives on the one hand and civilian objects on the other and only target military objectives. It's easy enough to say, well, that applies whether it's bombs, whether it's bullets, whether it's bitstreams. The more difficult part of that is saying, well, what amounts to an attack in cyberspace? How does that part work? Is it that you have to cause physical damage, or is it enough that you just take it offline for a while? How is that differentiation typically done? We have this sort of definition of water military objective is. So something that by its nature location purpose or use offers a definite advantage and the second part is its neutralization offers you the advantage. So something by its nature, for example, would be a military communications network. It's a military by nature. Therefore, it's a military objective. We define civilian objects in the law as anything that is not a military objective. GPS as dual use, it's a military satellite system, but it's used so heavily by civilians, the trick with that, though, is that just because something is a military objective doesn't automatically mean that you can target it. But there are other principles such as the principle of proportionality, which says that you need to take into account the effect that it will have on civilians. Are there any objects which are specially protected? I'm thinking in traditional warfare medical facilities, medical staff enjoy internationally recognized protection. Does the same hold for cyber objectives? Absolutely. And those special protections also extend to what we call installations containing dangerous forces. And that is dams, dykes, and nuclear power generating systems is of particular interest. Our cyber weapons, that precise. To be honest, it's one of the beauties of cyber weapons. They can be incredibly discriminate. It would be unlawful to craft a piece of code that could not distinguish. Though there are other pieces of malware outfits, malicious software that we've seen rampaging through the Internet that really just doesn't care whether it's a military computer or a civilian computer, it just tries to spread as much as it can. There's also distinction in relation to people. And again, it's this broad distinction between you can target those who are fighting, it can better members of the armed forces of the state. But also civilians who are directly participating in hostilities. And I think that's something that people need to bear in mind because what we are seeing in these conflicts and we've seen over the past few days, people coming out saying while I'm hacking and support of Russia or I'm hacking against Russia, people do need to bear in mind. If you are actively participating in hostilities, you become a lawful target. So sitting behind your computer and attacking in cyberspace is legally similar to taking up arms and attacking in the real world. Is that what you're saying? That's what I'm saying. And I would also point out there is nothing in the law that says that you have to be targeted in the same manner that you were targeting others. Bottom line, even if you hack, you could still be shot. That is sobering, isn't it? Heather Harrison Dennis there. Does that mean that slammy Robert and her friends that we heard from at the top of the program and they were describing review bombing, Moscow restaurants with the real deal from what's happening in Ukraine. They're actually classed as combatants then. Well, after our interview, I got back in touch with Heather to ask her that it's that question. So she replied that no they are not combatants because they are not taking a direct part in hostilities. In brief, they haven't adversely affected the military ability of anyone involved in the conflict or caused harm to protected people or objects. Are they still protected by the law despite what they've been doing then? They are. She also adds this interesting fact if someone were to engage in cyber warfare, they only lose their civilian protection for the duration of the attacks they are making. Once they stop making cyberattacks, they regain that civilian protection. That sounds murky though, doesn't it? Because could you not get people flipping and flopping between saying, well, I was hacking yesterday, but I'm not hiking today, so I'm all right today. You didn't catch me yesterday when I was at it. It gets down to the level of I was hacking when I was in my living room and now I'm in my kitchen. It's incredibly murky. We're still with us is cybersecurity specialist James line. James, do you think this kind of vigilante information war and also cyber warfare, something we're going to see more of in the future because it has certainly been something people are commenting on as being almost like a first that we haven't really seen a war where this has been so prominent in the past. I think there's an inevitable trajectory towards more use of cyberwarfare tactics or cybercrime with aligned interests. Just because we're placing more.
The Bible Project
"james lining" Discussed on The Bible Project
"He also believed we had a conversation about this, and so did Peter and John, that through their guidance and instructions to the early Jesus followers that the spirit of God will also speaking through them. And what they were writing to the Jesus followers. So inspired is just referring to this conviction or confession that these writings in the unique way are the result of a human and divine partnership of human and God spirit, so that what these people wrote is what God wants is people to hear to lead them to the messiah and to know what it means to be human in mind of that. So inert see, is it actually a different term that addresses a whole different thing altogether? That's interesting. Maybe it's because they both have the word in little letters in the beginning that they get merged in people's minds. It's more than that. Or and also because I think they're both trying to get at the question of the authority and truthfulness. Exactly. So in there, it's a term that means it's a Latin term, without error. Or making no mistakes. So in error. I think it's the Latin to Latin roots. Okay. So it's an old idea in the Christian tradition, but it became that rose into prominence just in the last 75 years or so in Europe and mostly in America in public debates that were being had about the authority and the truthfulness. When you're talking about, does it make an error or does not make an error? We're talking about issues of truthfulness, reliability. Reliability, but yeah, yeah. To be truthful is to be reliable. Different way of saying the same thing. So what's funky about the term and errant is it's a reverse way. It's a negative. It doesn't have errors. So you could just flip it over and when you flip it over and think about this idea, then we come to where scripture itself develops vocabulary for it that scripture has truthful. And so here, you did a word study video on this. Yeah. Faithful. And people. Yeah. The Hebrew word I met or amen? Zebra word that means reliable or trustworthy, but it's a relational word. So when you say that someone is truthful, you know, what you're saying is what you're saying corresponds to fact that maybe how we might think of it. Yeah, in a modern sense. Yeah. So what do you mean? Yeah, that's in a modern sense. Like scientifically accurate. I precise. Yeah, that's right. That's kind of the associations of the word truth. But as you were pointing out in the video, and in our discussions about that video, a man it has to do with relationships and that someone is trustworthy to be who they say they are to do what they say they're going to do. And so that's the term used. So the most famous lines are in some 119, the longest chapter in the Bible. There's all these lines that some of them are famous King James line, by word truth. The sum of thy words is truth. That kind of thing. But it's the word Emmet or I mean. Could also be translated your word is reliable. It's trustworthy. But that raises the whole question of trustworthy to do what? And in what way? And in what way? How do you define an error if you're using? That's exactly that idea. The inherency debates of the last half of the 20th century were mostly focused in on the historical truthfulness or the historical reliability of biblical narratives in particular. So inspiration and narrative got joined in kind of a logical argument. Well, if God is truth in his essence, God can not lie or make an error, then God's word, whatever he says, will not lie and will be entirely truthful and will not make any errors. And so logically, you're like, yeah, let me make that make sense. But there is an important moment in the late 70s where a large number, I should know more about this. If I'm going to bring it up in the podcast, a large number of theologians, I think mostly from America came together and Chicago in 1978, I think it was. And drafted a kind of what was an attempt to be a unifying statement about these inherent debates. Yeah, you can look it up, it's the Chicago statement on an Ernst. Yeah, that's right. It's talking about these ideas, but there's one section of it that gets to the issue of historical truthfulness. And there's a lot buried in to it. And for me, it was always interested in that one paragraph where it's talking about how to claim the scripture is telling the truth, especially when it tells a story, doesn't mean that we should demand that the biblical authors write historiography, the way modern modern westerners think of historiography. And so they've used round numbers or symbolic numbers, or that they might summarize or use artistic and stylistic conventions and how they tell a story. They can describe things from the eye of the author rather than from scientific fact. Yeah. And so inherently shouldn't mean that we demand that the biblical authors correspond to our ways of writing writing literature. And to me that was always a super important paragraph that I thought this should be. And there have been now, whole books on that. So, yeah, it's article 13 of the Chicago statement. Thank you, ray lubeck. It's stuck in my mind forever. Way to bring that out. So in many ways, I'm not an expert on this. Oh, if you want zondra vin publishes, has a great, they have a whole series of books called counterpoint series. We will give four reviews on this, 5 years on that. They have a book called 5 views on biblical narrative. And it's a little spectrum. And they're all people who love mental and who believe the scriptures are a divine human product. But they have different ways of framing up how you define a narrative. And that diversity is important because you could on one spectrum say every detail as stated verbally, Musk correspond to a historical reality like you're watching video camera footage. And on the other end of the spectrum, you could say, well, the biblical authors had a different mode of writing historiography. And they use a lot of symbolism, stylistic, literary and creative elements. And yet it can still claim to be a faithful, a truthful representation of the events. And there's a whole diverse set of positions along those two spectrums. And yeah, I think a book like that is really helpful too for understanding that the Christian tradition has room for a lot of different viewpoints. But the baseline is that it's a truthful, re presentation of the story that it's telling. And when you say truthful, yeah, you don't mean precisely accurate in how it would have happened in the time space continuum. That is one way to imagine what truthful could mean. Another way to imagine that truthful could mean is that it is a truthful in that. It's relaying something that happened and it's relaying a faithful interpretation about the meaning and significance of what of what happened. So the meaning and significance is truthful, reliable. Yeah, just worthy. And for example, I think it really matters that there was a man named Jesus who did and said, these things who was publicly executed, and that he was his body. It was recreated. The rose from the dead, and that the tomb was empty. Yeah. The meaning of those events was not self evident to any of the people who watched them happen. It took them a long time. At least 40 days. And for some longer to sort out the significance in the meaning of what happened. But we had this debate about the phrase three days. He was in the tomb for three days. Was it? Three days and three nights?.
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"Okay. So just broadly speaking. This man somehow knows everybody anywhere. That disagrees is something. You just don't have the credentials for how james lines while their phd. How dr udon dr baki. All of them have higher credentials than you. Mr our something that they don't have and he says no matter how knowledge -able how knowledgeable they may be in other areas. The argument is that these people don't exist but he says but i do have an official title as a scientist and a large body of scientific work proving my relevant expertise and guess what he says any anti vaccine movement. Because that's what we are. Apparently has almost no one with those things willing to take their side. The overwhelming majority of scientists correctly believed in vaccines. Now nolan's argument believing vaccines you keep doing this. This sleight of hand shell game. We're talking about one. That's not even actually a vaccine. We're talking about injection. That is gene therapy. That's experimental that is clearly dangerous. That's we're talking about and all of that is one hundred percent verifiable despite how the people in that echo chamber act like you're crazy. He is literally arguing that there is nobody of any credential in any community. That's talking about dangerous. This is i could list off all of them and it would take me two hours. How many can you continue to see. You're seeing the same faces. Rotate through mainstream media while we see a never ending stream of experts that continue to push back and only do is get attacked. We just literally watched the entire or a huge portion of. It's not entirely down even remotely but a big portion of the members of parliament from europe. Telling you that there's concerns telling you this. We just we members of parliament and politicians all over the place. We see scientists doctors nobel laureates. But this guy either doesn't know that or he's part of the problem over get vaccinated though because that's the point. You should have just made an article that said get back and the only launch should have been get backs needed all done. That was your point. Bauer good job. Way to toe the line. It's just so depressing. Isn't it.
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"Choice. That's what we are for your ability to make your own medical decisions and your own choices. In general for that matter the way they try to frame us as anti something is away they keep you divided on blinds. Be smarter than that now. James lyons wilder points out if you still believe the cove. Nineteen vaccination is for the greater good or that people must be vaccinated to prevent transmission or that getting a booster against extinct variants increase immunity to current variants chill. We've got it from here. Hashtag science says james lines one of those come out as a choice of reason in this whole process the free. I want you to holding on that extinct variance point now. This is what we have. This is james lines. Why they're very intelligent. Person doesn't mean just 'cause he says it's right but it means that this is an expert giving his opinion just like a lot of others have said the same. I've been making this point from the beginning of this conversation about the variance. Changing these are based on the original variant or alpha and specifically the original wuhan strain and they tried to. They even tried to arguing in regard to alphabet. We're way past that at this point. So they tell us delta point so if you're making something based on an extinct variant and acting like that's gonna create immunity to this. You don't understand what's going on on top of that what we have seen for for a very clearly from the scientific outlet. They tell you to trust. They're telling you that. Your natural immunity is robust lasting durable and is in fact continuing to make variant or make antibodies and t cell memory to the new various. I've shown many times if you don't know that right now ask yourself how in the world. That's even possible and then you quickly realized that they're hiding things from you. This is coming from science mag from a lot from from science itself from nature from a. Who from the lancet from the journal of infection medicine. All of these classically anti-science fringe conspiracy theorist outlets. Obviously i'm being facetious. Now going over to the breakthrough case part of this you can see all this flows together. Each one of these points bolsters the one before it. Thank you for. Dr vouch socks for for reaching out to me. And showing you this. This is really important. This this makes the case. That i've been making the entire time..
Broken Brain with Dhru Purohit
"james lining" Discussed on Broken Brain with Dhru Purohit
"Author of before children's memories of previous lives a new two in one edition of his books life before life and return to life. There's a true sense of exploration and curiosity when it comes to reincarnation. Dr tucker and i dive into some of the fascinating stories about children. He's worked with over the years. Who shared detailed. I'm talking about detailed accounts of past lives. That dr tucker and his team are then able to research just like any other scientists in any other field and potentially validate these experiences have opened up his mind to the mazing possibilities that our consciousness holes and how when we die. The story itself may not be done. Let's listen in with my interview. With dr jim tucker while i'd love to start off with a story and i was hoping if you might take one of stories slash case studies that you featured inside of your book which is excellent by the way and start us off from their well. One well known american cases a little warning. James line anger who around the time of his second birthday started having terrible nightmares multiple times a week in which he would be kicking his legs up in the air and screaming airplane crash on fire. Little man can't get out and then during the day he would take his toy. Airplanes and repeatedly crash them into the coffee table Saying airplane crash on fire and with all this going on he really. He looked like a kid who had been traumatized that he had not been through any sort of plane crash in this lies and there were several times where his parents could talk to him about these things while it was away in what he described as being a pilot who had been shot down by the japanese and He said that he flew off of a boat and the parents asked him the name of the boat and he said in a toma which you know seems like an unusual name for a us aircraft carrier but his parents who were quite opposed to the idea of past lives.
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"All that's happening over there all the horrible things happening to these two million palestinians half of which are children in an open air prison from which they are not allowed to leave. All of that is easy to look up and yet were pretending like this is acceptable. This is called collective punishment regardless of why you think it's happening because there are some civilians innocent people there on top of the fact that we're talking about an occupied territory as the un is always maintained which means they have a legal right to armed rebellion according to the geneva conventions in the united nations. But who cares about the facts right just bomb although civilians pretend like it's because racism or because some kind of thing that puts people against each other instead of focusing on where the problem is the government this is disgusting to me and your governments completely okay with it wherever you are seems which is unbelievable to me but hope we'll follow up on this and we'll keep talking about it because it's seemingly going away and neftali bennett seems to be worse in every possible way than netanyahu even as the. Us media continued to pretend like he's a fresh of breath air or excuse me a breath of fresh air as robert put it on his recent article. Now one thing. I wanna shout out really quickly. Something that james. Lyons wiler phd. Who i've had on free interview just started something that i think is really really cool. Now i don't do stuff like this ever. I can't stand affiliate programs as they pertain to media and stuff that we do now. This is not like that. This is all show you why. And this is something that i believe in. This is james lines. Wiler a setup his. I pack group that we've talked about the past but this is really interesting. This is about you as an individual out there choosing to take a course on things that would help you understand how these things operate. Not the mainstream perspective about blindly trusting authority but from a perspective of someone like james lyons while they're phd who is challenging the authorities situation right now challenging the narrative. Because he's right and what he wants to do. Help you learn how to do these things the right way. Learn how to analyze statistics. Learn how the legal system works learn. How psychology worse. Learn how biology works. Educate yourself there's never a negative thing for that or excuse me a net negative. This shouldn't be negative connotation for learning more information. Even though the mainstream continues to batter you with don't do your own research. Don't be don't don't What was the one they did. I can't remember now forbes. Had one that said don't do your own research which may be laugh out loud. Oh that's what it was critical thinking or something like that is don't is a conspiracy theory. It's just incredible how they're trying to frame tenants of basic basic intelligence as conspiracy theory. Which kinda shows you something. Doesn't it just like the mit study right. There seemed to be scientifically sound ones. They seem to be intelligent ones but nobody wants to sound the acknowledged that but.
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"You're telling these guys over here don't we don't have enough evidence for it so it shouldn't be happening but yet you let them think that it's a possibility over here on the document. They're reading what the hell is going on like. This is just outrageous now. the other point. I just included. Was this one. Which i've shown you many times but this says what if i decide not to get the injection which by the way is not even on the table. Your government's not no is not an answer. It says it's your choice to receive it or not apprai- clearly not it says. Should you decide not to well. Of course it will not change your standard medical care. Well that's a blatant lies. Well we've already watched it happen over and over and over whether we're talking about elderly people and being different positions or being you know being not given the treatment because they can't go into certain location. I mean to to your literal experience right now where you are being refused certain things where doctors are. They're not going to treat people who are vaccine. I mean all happening so currently they don't even care about their own information which should show you the real. You know inherently false nature of this entire thing as james lines while they're also points out we'll let me read or tweet verse. says some of our federal agencies officials and public health officials have done irreparable damage with their one-sided often inaccurate info surrounding cove along with their insistence that everybody comply with their worldview. No matter how wrong or unproven it may be very true as james says the pervasiveness of the dissertation campaign is mind boggling. Oh this is. This is the one where i was pointing to earlier. He says. I have decided that i am a lower. Kc conspiracy theorist costs enough to smell the bs. We've stepped in unwilling to pretend i smell flowers. Good good to hear man. I mean it's just it doesn't the negative connotation around the term conspiracy theorist is.
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"Two thousand to twenty five thousand. This child is wearing for two hundred and seventy minutes a day. Totally okay though right because there's no big deal with that. These are the people forcing this in. This is the science. Trust the cy this scientific research this is one of the most recent ones for peer reviewed. Study that is a random controlled trials. Everything they say they're supposed to listen to here's gavin newsom. Screw that we're going to force that thing on your child's face because politics because agenda. You're hurting children. I hope these people continue to get held accountable to actually get or get held accountable. I open these people get sent to jail for the axe. They're taking the die. The diametric opposite of what should be happening. Would they opposite of whether scientific research shows pains me back. over onto the other. Discussion as james lyons wireless pointing out or this person. I says i'm not understanding the new cdc school guidelines. Or i got excuse me. This mass kids don't need mass to protect them from cova sense. It's so low risk to them which is ballot. But there's a lot of other reasons too but are the master protect vaccinated teachers. Isn't that what the vaccine is. Four mass not normal kids need normal right so think about how incredibly just wrong in a lot of ways. This is first of all. This clearly suggest that they're masking children who aren't at risk to protect themselves so now the children are this barrier between these teachers and their fear of covid nineteen. That means. they're terrible people. That's how they're supposed to go. You're supposed to protect them. You cowards but now we're forcing the vaccines and mass on them. Because we're terrified of something. That's not really dangerous but the end of the day. These teachers are vaccinated. They're told they're protected right. That's the whole point. So you're forcing these massacres. Don't need it even though they've been protected. So what the hell's going on. It's all about narrative agenda and as james lines while they're phd points out after the science is out. That shows the mass. Do nothing right. Because he's anti-science anti bachelor right. Nope very highly credentialed expert in the scientific field as well as somebody who is adamant about the fact that it's about the data he's telling you the bass don't because he's read the sign of research like i have. Cdc still invokes their magical properties recommends instilling fear provoking bullying among baxter kids. Stress between.
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"Systemic inflammation on and on and on which of course this very very clearly leads to bacterial pneumonia based things listed increased infection which creates step staphylococcus bacteria in your mouth. The drying your dry your mouth out by wearing the mask which allows you to pull that streptococcus streptococcus back into your lungs. Which is what least about iota ammonia. It's a no brainer guys. It's a it's a no brainer. I haven't played this clip in awhile. Might as well show you again since. Been awhile since we talked to share something from james lines while i have an interesting theory and wurley it's based on the facts and the science that there is an issue happening especially with season in regard to the masking and bacterial buildup. That is causing bacterial pneumonia. And i mean it seems like basic conclusion to come to. But it's big conspiracy theory today to even make such a claim. But i find actually if you have thoughts lot my phone so there's lots of jim. I interviewed him on my podcast breaking sites. I'm sorry to interrupt but Jimmy and md. She he said if you basketball they long these kids all day long. They're going to get bacterial infections. Adults are going to get back to the monja. It's a given in medicine that that's going to happen. Bruce the end part i. It's it's it's a given. I mean this is the incredible part that it's so obvious to experts who are honest yet it gets dismissed going gonna play what you're saying. It's the point. Is she just like. Oh it's so. I like my is my face mask into the so good math forever. That's that's what it is like a cute little spy. It's crazy how these people have been what was done this not the fact that everyone's wearing it. It's the social engineering if the ads and the new tv shows and the new makeup ads. And all this stuff. They're throwing at them. It's convinced them that this is cool new trendy if it's the school books for three year olds showing people with massa. Why it's a good thing to do their brainwashing people and as children's health defense.
Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network
"james lining" Discussed on Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network
"Of money. Allow these places makoni. And so. I mean ghost town new york city seriously. You'll and california has lost population for the first time like ever. You know this is this. This is serious stuff now. We have a guest that was suggested by james lines while he said you gotta talk. You gotta talk to. Dr jessica rose well. Of course i do why because he said i well. I'm going to have her introduce herself. Because what we're gonna be talking about is bears the vaccine adverse event reporting system of the covid nineteen thing and it is. They're manipulating numbers and playing games. I can see yoke. Oh gee what a shock. So i'm gonna go ahead and have Dr jessica introduce yourself and tell us what her on this because this is a subject that we need to know a lot more about. Because if you're looking at the details you can find at the you know the devils in the details. We've found the devil data lion. Hi dr jessica rose. And i got a webpage you go to her youtube channel jessica rose and they'll just blow up all over the place i imagine. Now this is we're gonna be talking about vaires going to explain to people what bears is concerned. Hi everybody yeah. My name's jessica. And i'm a canadian and I found or james. And i found each other very recently in response to This shared interest. We have in Spreading truths and good science around the world so i i have backgrounds in In applied mathematics immunology computational biology molecular biology and biochemistry as in. I have degrees all of those things. So i kinda dig by toews a lot of different ponds and i currently live in israel so We were totally shut down. Well shut down for the people who who who. Don't subscribe to the The so-called measures so that gave me some time on my hands. And i started to teach myself how to code in our and i needed a nice little data sap to to allow that to happen so i chose the bears. That's the vaccine adverse event reporting system of your lovely country and the data became very interesting quickly so i decided that it was so interesting that i needed to write it up and try and publish it which i have done very recently with the help of jack and And i want to tell everyone where the numbers are now. This isn't This has nothing to do with or pinon or whatever so these are the actual numbers straight out of the cdc in the fda's various site. Okay so these her face value and what everybody needs to know about this reporting system. I mean first of all you need to know that it exists a which is a problem but It's been studied. How how many adverse events that are actually occurring are are being reported. Describe your reporting system. I would even know what it is reporting what by whom to wear. Oh sure so. This is a a reporting system for vaccine adverse events that was developed by the cdc in conjunction with the fda and this started in my knee in response to to vaccine production and administration in the population. It's a way to monitor what's going on in terms of whether or not people are having bad reactions to injections and vaccines as a way to to warn everybody. The public the manufacturers you know the cdc the fda whoever is looking at data as to potential dangers or issues that weren't detected during the clinical trial phases. So this this often happens because clinical trials if if you don't know how very long exclusion criteria lists which means that basically only healthy. Relatively young people can participate in clinical trials vaccine. So you can imagine if you put something that poses a phase three clinical trial into a larger population that includes all these other factors like autoimmune conditions. The elderly deng etcetera etcetera. They you will probably start to st the arrival of adverse events so this this are adverse event absolute number like the total number of people who have reported these in response to getting vaccine since nineteen ninety is steadily increasing. It's it's almost like a a nice forty five degree upward angle from nineteen ninety two now so it's been pretty steadily increasing and this isn't surprising because the population is also increasing and the number of vaccines being produced and administered are increasing and therefore the the number of adverse events will naturally be increasing. However but very very atypical about what we're seeing in the various database now is that that absolute number of reports and now remember where only in may now. It's only been about five months of data that's been collected and also remember this is representing about one to ten percent of the actual adverse events reported. So we are already and by the way the update is going to come in about ten minutes. I won't be able to tell you what it is. Because i have to run some code but at present we are one hundred. Eighty two thousand five hundred fifty nine adverse events reported for only the covid nineteen amarna products. Okay sorry this. Also includes johnson which has been pulled they. I'm not sure about that of these. Total adverse events we can subdivide into mild or severe and mild adverse events. Include anything from say injection site pain to a cough headache these kinds of things which are very common but also we have uncommon or relatively common severe adverse events which can include death hospitalization or Some form of maintaining like not being able to walk anymore type thing so the bears puts the average percentage of severe adverse events at fifteen percent for every year. So it.
Broken Brain with Dhru Purohit
Is There Life After Death? With Dr. Jim Tucker
"Dr jim tucker. Welcome to the podcast. It's an honor to have you here. Wonderful to be here while. I'd love to start off with a story and i was hoping if you might take one of the stories slash case studies that you featured inside of your book which is excellent by the way and start us off from their well one well known. American case is a little boring. James line anger. Who around the time of his second birthday started having terrible nightmares multiple times a week in which he would be kicking his legs up in the air screaming airplane crash on fire. Little man can't get out event during the day he would take his toy. Airplanes and repeatedly crashed them into the coffee table. saying airplane crash on fire. And all this going on he really. He looked like had been traumatized that he had not been through. Any sort of plane crash in this lies and there were several times for his parents could talk to him about these things while he was away in what he described as being a pilot who had been shot down by the japanese and He said that he flew off of a boat and the parents asked him the name of the boat and he said in a toma which seems like an unusual name for us aircraft carrier but his parents who were quite opposed to the idea of pass lies at the beginning Did it online search. Discover that there was this. Uss matola bay that was stationed in the pacific during world. War two
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"That is still being tested on. Why why for people that have a point. Three point one percent chance of even getting this thing especially with your sixteen especially with nobody's and you're talking about high risk people the very people that are supposed to have the worst reaction and has kevin talk points out claudia. so pregnancy is a high risk condition. Have the unimproved on approved and untested vaccine's actually tested pregnant women. They haven't but here they're happily telling you well. High risk health conditions included in face five pregnancy. So it's okay that we can continue to inject an experimental substance into pregnant women. Sixteen or older because danger because well because cove is so serious. I'm not even kidding. That is continually the argument. They make for doing things. That are verifiably. Unsafe are uncertain how this whole time. How can you argue that. We will skip safety or do things that are expedited that are by definition. Less safe for your safety because this is so serious that we have to do this stuff. We've already proven based on your own information. Cdc this is not even close to a serious. You keep making out to be so then. Don't we have to counterbalance the idea of how seriously this might risk people's lives right. The idea that we could possibly be hurting people by rushing things out and not testing or waiting because this is insulting to our intelligence like so many other parts of this thing it's sickening to me and it's defender points out. As of march fifth covert vaccine injury reports growing number but trends remained consistent and this is really important data released today by this on the fifth by the cdc since then confirmed several ongoing trends including that forty seven percent of deaths occurred in people who were who reported being sick within forty eight hours of receiving covert vaccine and twenty percent of deaths were cardiac-related. I find that to be very very telling. Now this is the report as you can look for yourself. And it shows you. That was warmer graph. I guess not but it shows you exactly what they're telling you and on top of that is the frustrating part. They continue to dismiss this as being something that is just under fide. Which again is why they do that. As of february twenty six a hundred and eighty pregnant women had reported adverse reactions to with vaccines including fifty six reports of miscarriage or premature birth. But you're veron vermont. Health just opened up the pregnant women. They're sixteen or older. Why not because the government said so well as this person points out that this is an interesting question to respond to win will be have data showing the percentage of deaths from kovin compared to the jab. Well as no name there well watching last as good question. The answer is never the same reason. That they'll never show you vacs versus unbalanced by the way dr james line wiler james line wiler did that study and you can see it. And it unequivocally shows you a catastrophically high health risks on the side of people who are are vaccinated versus unvaccinated. The comparing wellness visits and interest these. These were kids that were watched in reported on there for a very long period of time and they showed you that they had a exponentially higher rate of illness and visits the hospital. But nobody wanted talk about that. Why because we not allowed to challenge the vaccine narrative whether it's covid related or not that is a phd. Doing a study. That was peer reviewed. By this is actually. I can't remember officially was peer reviewed or not..
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"Let that sink in a little bit. The va the medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency the hr by the way the one that already admitted an email exchange with the researcher that they use the genetic code from a computer to do everything they dealt with the vaccine and everything else they've done in the uk. They've not isolated this. They took the code. Where they cl- somebody else claimed they did use. The genetic code. Used that going forward. How can you possibly build something like that using something like this and remember what james line wildwood i pointed out or actually Specifically excuse me. I take that back. It was andrew kaufman dr andrew kaufman. Oh speaking with. We talked about the idea that this was set beforehand that this was a platform that was built before covid nineteen so he had this platform already set and so now what they're doing seems like the plan it suggests foreknowledge like so many other parts of this but it says they confirmed today the corona virus variant vaccines will be fast tracked and not subject to safety trials. The regulator said that proof of effectiveness and safety will be transferable from the earlier studies on the original. Vaccines transferable we. What are we talking about paperwork as a bank account like. This doesn't make any sense like you just get to say well. We tested one ten years ago and because these variants were just claiming we can pumpkin the numbers. This was always the at guys. This is forever plan. This is a forever biosecurity state based on the idea that they're just enter new code in the computer and pump out new vaccines in two days. Later you get to do that. Was the point. Remember madonna on their time line two days after having the code given them from china were making vaccines and already testing them. That won't that's not possible without this. Which is the point. So they're doing the same thing now. They're getting into new. Jet can do the new genetic code there punching in the data and they're going so what does that show you. It shows you that they already had this in place waiting for the janika china and it was.
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"Let's the whole vaccinates unvaccinated. That they'll never really do the thing. That james line wiler actually did and showed very clearly that there is an undeniable correlation between people not being and having a far less severe basically people who have actually have a much higher rate of child visits and all kinds of childhood illnesses. I mean it's undeniable correlation not causation. But it's an important data point that no one seems to want to talk about and then ask yourself. Why would the government never do that. Study well clearly. Because i think we know what they would find two thousand fourteen influenza vaccinated..
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"We're on the world's biggest ecological experiment which is quite clear. But here's the w this is world economic forum with all that's going on right now making a couple of quick tweets about what they're discussing. Here's what they're saying we need to. We need to invest in prevention and detection medical pre-crime not wait for people to get sick a good so they're gonna come tell you when you're sick before you get sick and we'll just have to trust them. Industry must build good workplace covert nineteen testing strategies. So again they're gonna make it to where you have to test the work. That's not a secret. We know this is happening. We're going to be there already making vaccine passports and all this stuff. You will not be able to engage in society without entering through their gateway. That's what this is now more on this dna discussion. Here's a great article from our friend. James line wiler likelihood that sars soobee to vaccines will alter our dna. Should you be concerned. Well he goes over a lot of really interesting points including going through some definitions and things. The you'll probably find very interesting. But here's the point. What is the probability. The virus will cause changes to our dna. This question says asked among scientists in the following way. Can we expect that. The viruses are in a genome or any part of the viral genome. will be copied into the human genome as dna mr theresa theresa Dieter is an expert in institutional new genesis. The process by which foreign dna's can enter the nucleus of the cell and become inserted into a person or animal's gino. In april dr. Lions wiler asked her. What the likelihood that the amarna in marnie vaccine. Such maderna's vaccine might be copied into the human genome. Her answer was an educated guess about the same rate as that of the virus. Well that's alarming now. Many people are asking him the same question looking into the available studies. We find a couple of them now. This one zang at all. I think we've mentioned before says right here. In the beginning in the beginning of discussion in this study we showed evidence. That sars sylvie to aren a can be reverse transcribed and integrated into the human genome by several sources of reverse transcriptase such as activated human line. One or co infected retrovirus. This is telling you according to this study. Take it for what you will that. Yes it can integrate into the human genome but wait. Didn't they just tell us that. That's fundamentally not true that it's just not possible. Wait a minute okay. Well i'm not telling you this is not my study. This is another study from to be clear as he says right here. It has not been peer reviewed so to have the lot of the ones the mainstream show us. Our observational are not. Peer reviewed not ran controlled trials. So the fact that we will dismiss one that you don't agree with when that stated but go along with it when it's not i mean that's you have to be fair and balanced in regard to your own perception right if you if it's not peer reviewed that matters but you should still look at it. Digest it and review it like any of them. The reality is that all the vast majority of all the peer reviewed right withdrawal. Trials are saying what we're talking about. They'll continue to show you one that they like and cherry pick. We'll telling us that's what we're doing. The data is there for you by the way..
The Past Lives Podcast
"james lining" Discussed on The Past Lives Podcast
"Them because this isn't how consciousness functions so they dismiss it and people have experiences are not given the the validation that they deserve. Yeah it's the thing with scientists have become the gatekeepers of what israel if a scientist says. It's not real then okay. That's not real then without analyzing the scientists viewpoint on maybe his bias will bias. Yeah i agree with you. It's not maybe. His viewpoint is just a belief system. Just like everyone else's i mean besides don't understand consciousness of what it is and how it works so there's a lot of different ways you can look at it. Yeah i think it's a good point. And i think the scientists who we do bring into surviving death are ones who have taken the time to study this and who are willing to take a different position and i think a lot of the ones who dismiss it are are scientists who have not studied. They haven't taken decades or even a year of time to look into this and to gather data into talk to people who've had the experiences it's it's the scientists who do that that come to an understanding about. That's another problem that you it. Just gets dismissed. We see this kind of attitude. A little bit in the reincarnation episode because this is like the mothers of these children they go to their husbands and say you know what. I think he might be talking about possible. I from the husband's just dismissive straight off. I know. I think it's really interesting. That in both those the two cases that we went into in depth it was both of them involved. The women being more open to it in the men's dismissing it And what's interesting though in both cases is that the husband's eventually understood and agreed that this is what it was in the one case of james lining. Her dad was on a mission to prove his son wrong so he really dive into this. He investigated every single thing every bit of information that was provided him by his young son and every time he did that he proved emma. Right and then eventually he was t became. They found out who he was and he became completely convinced. So yeah it's it's very interesting to see the the between the two.
Bob Sirott
Chicago man faces federal charges in Capitol siege
"Faces charges in connection with last week siege at the U. S. Capitol. His neighbors say he's a vocal Trump supporter. Who has been apparently in trouble before WGN's Glenn Marshall has more from Jefferson Park. 40 year old Kevin James Lines was charged in federal court yesterday afternoon with violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. FBI agents executed a search warrant at his home yesterday they could be seen carrying evidence from Kevin Lyons home and his vehicles. Kevin Lines is a H back technician. Ah, complaint showed how the suspect posted a map from his Jefferson Park home to D. C. He also posted a quote, saying quote are refused to tell my Children that I sat back and did nothing. I'm headed to D. C to stop the steel and quote. Now he's one of three locally charging amongst 70 nationally in connection to the siege on the Capitol in Chicago Tribune reports back in October Lines posted a photo of what looked like an arrest warrant with a caption that said. Schomburg PD didn't appreciate me taking the fight to antifa today. In this case, his bond has been set at $10,000. He's due back in court next week. State
The Last American Vagabond
"james lining" Discussed on The Last American Vagabond
"Encephalopathy cephlon my lightest inflammation of the brain and the spinal cord and we already talked about both of those things in regard to possible side effects of the vaccine but we over sure peres is now in stable condition and is no longer experiencing seizures but her family is called for additional testing to examine potential hidden side effects of the vaccine. Not hidden at all. Guys this is very clear as well. As further analysis ever conditions to see whether she had any underlying allergies which may have triggered it. What do you know. Guess what she did. Prior to the inauguration perez had reportedly experienced adverse allergic reactions to antibiotics which cause seizure skin rashes and only point is again. We see the absolute negligence of the very people who are supposed to be doing. Pfizer made it very clear. Do not take this. If you've got allergic allergies that means these people are supposed to ask. Do you have allergies. And if they do they go well. You can't take this. they do go. Do you have allergies that go. Yes penn okay. Good we'll give you. The very dangerous rushed injection. That's what's happening. We just showed you the example of a girl who said yes. I've got a bee pollen allergy and then go navy pension goes yes. They gave it to her and she almost died. Why because you're not supposed to say mean you shouldn't be taking this thing anyway guys. But they're the ones telling you that they're the ones telling you. We haven't tested for pregnant people. Then you got pregnant. Nurses virtually and saying. I'm doing this for my baby. What potentially risking their life. Yeah you are and that's terrible. According to mexican public health ministry among all recipients of the fis your biotech vaccine and human trials no cases of encephalitis recorded. Yeah you know why because we're not done with the trials yet. You did a very small phase one phase. Three is where it's supposed is where the real trials happen and we haven't even gotten there right now. You are being tested. That's why there was recorded as well as the fact that they didn't test people commodities they didn't test people that relatively. They didn't test people with allergies. Then test any of this stuff. They all admitted this and yet those are the people that were giving to. Does that. make sense to anybody. It does when you go to the point and realize that every choice has led to more problems more sickness more damage every single one of them. Dr james line wiler sent this to me. This is january first information about the pfizer. Biotech vaccine guess what it says here. Now guys look at this if you have had a severe allergic reaction or an immediate allergic reaction even if it was not severe so understand if you've had an immediate reaction even if it's not severe meaning pain swelling redness gills tiredness headache if the point is right away to any ingredient in the mr linac over nineteen vaccine should not get an mri covid nineteen vaccine period. Not just there's but none. Do you know how many that's i mean. Most people have gotten some kind of reaction immediately. Everyone the literally everyone even seen on these. Have some kind of the swelling or pain hurts their armored. That's an immediate reaction if you ha- if you have had a severe allergic reaction or an immediate reaction even if it was not severe after getting the first dose of vaccine you should not get another dose so how does plan if you get in a reaction and then suddenly they start telling you have to have it to get on the plane or so on..
F That Noise
"james lining" Discussed on F That Noise
"Here it is. Oh you asked for the fiftieth episode extravaganza holy right ball might not even be chrissy. Holy god damn shit balls. This is up that noise man. Look at me now. I liked that the episodes over. That's my as my best. I'll break sean connery later dishes dishes. Sean connery eh. vicious. Kick me sean connery. And i want to wish mr james klein a have we fucking buffet. Thank you thank you. The best i got. Should we do a shot right. So yeah so we got. We got all our glasses ready here. Mr james lines replied finished one more trip around the sun. Happy birthday to you. Stocker chain shared Steve little then the name. We're talking about shit here tonight. We are not talking about shit. That was episode. Two folks if you have not heard that episode by all means please head over this. Is that noise. You can find us anywhere that you listen equality podcasts. We do stream live when we record this bitch so head over to our facebook page like that son of a bitch way. No no. i'm talking. Frankly i'm talking frankly to my people so that they can Difficulties around here. None of that fix talking about shit. Here are already part of the in crowd and you were watching the live stream from the upper left. We have p melia gone wrong clock. Mike verdict samuel than steve taylor in the bottom rights and jamie clan the birthday boy and blow all.
Bloomberg Markets
2019 Has been Good For Restaurants, How About 2020?
"Thank you so much here you know I eat out a lot full disclosure a lot of restaurants I always think that every time I go to restaurants in pretty packed in may but our next guest Mike Halen senior restaurant annals Bloomberg intelligence attorneys here in a blue Bergen October studio he says twenty twenty might be a tough year for restaurants so what's your thoughts about the restaurant business right now Mike what he's seen after the market place will this is been a pretty good year you know in general so so the you know fast food chains of done pretty well most of it those been done through price increases with those you know those are you know unsustainable because as as you continue to raise prices eventually the the lower income and middle income consumers are gonna start to pull back a little bit maybe shop a little bit more at the grocery store the other thing is casual dining casual dining had it tough twenty nineteen we think that's going to continue in twenty twenty there seen a lot of competition from independent chains fast casual chains grocery stores that are picking up their their in store food experience whether it's grabbing grow you know hot food pick up you name it so a lot of competition there you know and then also we're gonna see breakfast wars breakfast fast food coming in now with this summer's coming with the breakfast yeah Wendy's is coming in with this before they were not they fell three times prior so why is is this what can be different this time so it's interesting I I think part of the problem has been they've just been in locations that are better for lunch and dinner right there on your drive home when you're driving home after work right okay always in the same or similar spot than McDonald's or Burger King typically but sometimes on the opposite side of the street which when you have to make a you turn on forty six east yeah and then you know make another you turn to to make your way and that's that's a that's a big change so we think that's part of the reason why it failed in the past I management talks about how they had a whole lot of items on the menu before and it was hard to execute and because you know a cause them to to need a lot of labor and the restaurants and now they're doing more limited menu it's only going to be available through the drive through there's only going to be two or three employees in the store so labor costs are going to skyrocket so they think for all those reasons it's going to work this time they're doing a national launch in January but everyone knows this you know twenty nineteen was a big year for Burger King they said you know breakfast is only fifteen percent of our sales McDonald's is twenty five percent we want to close that gap so they've been improving their offerings and that's been a big big positive for the Macalester less of yours is at rest breakfast menu all day all day breakfast for sure and that's been a positive right on Terry traffic a very big positive for them and then they're also rolling out chicken in January so you know everybody's gonna beef and fighting very fiercely in January for breakfast sharing January's when the the advertisements and and the value offerings are at their peak because most people come out of the new year saying yeah you know knew me I'm going to the gym I'm gonna be healthier I'm not going to eat at McDonald's and Wendy's so you know discounting is very aggressive to begin with and we expect some more aggressive discounting to kick off and what what is the whole thing about this whole chicken thing out there with the got chick fillet going against I. don't Popeye's is that is it just kinda like a little marketing fetters are actually a some segment of the market that's changing we'll chickens growing faster than burgers and a house for a while so you know we seen this huge growth of chick fillet over the last decade but it's it's not just chick fillet interpolate does a great job and they offer great product but you know which jeans like Popeye shop Popeye's been growing stores at about six percent clip now since I've been covering the company in around twenty twelve right so yeah chickens becoming more popular people are eating more chicken and less beef so we're seeing it you know make its way onto a lot of menus all right you mention beef what's the hold scam on this plant based meets I just I mean I I see a lot of network television ads now for from Burger King though in the whatever it's called the unbelievable market with burger whatever it is this is a fan or is this real what what is the company's telling you what we think it's here to stay okay you know right now there's a lot of questions about you know is the trial you know right now we're seeing huge trial Burger King sales were up five percent in U. S. last quarter and a lot of that was people trying the impossible Whopper as I could hear the impossible Walker but is that isn't a Donna Summer product there they're testing one of Canada the call it's called the P. L. T. P. L. T. plant lettuce and a little bit behind which is uncharacteristic for them yeah they've been ahead of the curve on a lot of things over the last few years I think part of the issue with them is just their scale you know fourteen thousand stairs stores in the United States I don't know if beyond me or a possible can actually supply forty thousand source at at their current happen the bigger the bigger food companies having just gotten in there and just satisfy the market if there is that the man well they are they're starting to you know we're seeing the we're seeing more male we're seeing Nestle has a product that McDonalds is actually selling already in Europe we're seeing a lot of these large pack food companies get into the space because it's growing like wildfire you know we're we're trying to get some real read on purchasing and and we have some third party companies kinda looking into something for us on the like you know what they're just such trial yeah and so many teams are signing on to start selling these things for the first time it's hard to try to parse out what three PM what just James lining up yet to start