35 Burst results for "Intel Committee"

Is Democrat-Led California Running Our Country?

The Charlie Kirk Show

00:43 sec | Last month

Is Democrat-Led California Running Our Country?

"California's running our country. Nancy pelosi speaker of the house. Adam schiff is out of the house intel committee eric. Swale well is acting like the sultan of brunei shirtless and a foreign middle eastern country with slaves around him and some sort of country. That's awful for free speech protections. We have camera harris vice president. United states menlo park has google facebook and twitter all headquartered there. California runs the whole country. And you're trying to tell me that if republicans can't win back the governor's mansion in california that you can't take back the house of the senate.

Adam Schiff Swale Nancy Pelosi Brunei California Intel Eric Menlo Park Harris United States Facebook Google Twitter Senate
Does Biden Have an Incentive to Hide Chinese Defector Dong Jingwei From GOP Members?

The Dan Bongino Show

01:57 min | 3 months ago

Does Biden Have an Incentive to Hide Chinese Defector Dong Jingwei From GOP Members?

"Of the biggest stories of our time. Now why am I reporting on it? If I can't prove conclusively that it's true Because the reputations by others saying No, no, no, no, This isn't true. He's over in China. This is all you know Conservative fairy tales. Then why again hasn't the Chinese government conclusively refuted the story by just showing us a picture of damaging way and putting them out in front of a television camera? But that's not the disturbing part of this story. The disturbing part of this story is if we do have damaging way. One of these Chinese spy chiefs, and he has given up the mother lode. Then why would we be lying about it? And why would we be hiding him from GOP members of Congress, Intel Committee people, other members of the Intelligence Committee? Why would we be doing that? Those answers are fascinating. Well, we'll have to go to the daily yeast. For answers, And I don't mean answers to questions. If you're answering questions with the daily yeast, you're in trouble otherwise known as the Daily Beast sometimes, but the daily yeast does have an interesting article up by a man by the name of Jeff Stein. Who he says his sources are knocking this story down that no, no, we don't have Don Jingwei. There's just read the headline Daily East Fed shoot down rumor that Chinese missing spymaster defected to the U. S. But the reasons they're shooting down this room with these anonymous federal officials are fascinating. Let me get through first quote from this piece from the East first, it says, But on Wednesday a U s official reached out, I guess to the reporter here. To say that reports of Jingwei's defection were not true. He says, speaking strictly in terms of anonymity. The official declined to elaborate further, including on Dongs present whereabouts, only hinting that the counter spy remains in China. Okay, folks, both stories can't be true, either Dongjiang Way defected and is giving us the mother lode of intelligence on China or damaging way still in China, laughing at our stupid

Chinese Government Intel Committee Intelligence Committee Daily Beast Don Jingwei Jeff Stein China GOP Congress Jingwei
"intel committee" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

WCBM 680 AM

05:31 min | 9 months ago

"intel committee" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

"He's back with, you know, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fun never stops. Well, you're right. That Friday, we finally got our FBI briefing. It was just the speaker Nancy Pelosi and myself. It was a very thorough briefing. No one that was in that room could walk out and say Eric Swalwell should be on the Intel committee. I don't know. They had a briefing before in 2015, and I don't know what that briefing was like compared to this one. But it could not have been the same. One answer that I got out of that briefing was there is no way Eric Swalwell should continue to serve on the Intel Committee. And the challenge here is the leaders of both parties are the only people who select to go on the Intel committee. That is why today, Maria what? I'm going to request that every single member on the House intelligence This committee gets the exact same briefing from the FBI that I did, because if this individual is sitting on this committee, Eric Swalwell, they've got to know the background of what is going on swole well. You got a problem here, swallow wells in some hot water. And as I've said to you, I I I'm gonna tell you right now, This is gonna be a constant the Swalwell saga for me. Brings up a couple of a couple of enormously important issues with one is the extent of Chinese influence operations in the United States. Which you know, I did a special on the first TV about this recently talking to experts about the scale and scope of this. It is so broad So many people. I have no idea. How much corporate and Media and political muscle. See, CP has deployed overtly and covertly United States and we'll talk more about that. Certainly on this show. Then there's also the how much of what I have been calling operation Reciprocity. Right to borrow from the clear and present danger. Clear and present Danger CIA operation right? From the movie with Harrison Ford is not a real thing. And how much of operation reciprocity Am I willing to advocate for against the Democrats? Because here's Here's where this starts to get complicated. We have to maintain our principles and I was talking before about martial law. We have red lines that we don't cross. We have red lines that we say even even if it means we get to crush the slimiest than most grotesque of the lives. There are some areas where we we should not use those tactics. Lot, and this is the post. This is post Cavanaugh. Buck talking to you. We've also got to play rough. Right. So this is a little bit like we're in a you know, we're in a football game here, and I'm telling you. Yeah, you know, maybe sometimes you're gonna poke the other guy in the eye a little bit. When you were at the line of scrimmage. Maybe you're going to do some You know you're gonna you're gonna hit him a little hard, a little bit of a spearing with the helmet or something. But you're not gonna go out there with brass knuckles on and take a shot at somebody when the refs not looking right? I mean, there's Was playing a little rough. And then there's You've lost that you've lost the plot. You've gone too far. And this is an ongoing conversation for me because I want for example, the special counsel about Russia collusion because I do think there needs to be accountability on that which means people should go lose their jobs to go to prison. That's what that means. They were trying to do that to other people. It was horrible what they did. Russia Collusion hoax Liars in the government. In the media. Uh, And then I said he well, should we have a special A special counsel on Hunter? Biden? Bill Barr says, No, I think we should have won. But I know why he's not willing to do that. At this point. I understand why he's thinking is what it is, and I don't think it's because he's a wimp, which I'm hearing a lot of that. I disagree with that. And then Get to this with Swalwell. And here's another time where You know that old phrase? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. I think that's an old phrase. Uh, you know, what is one side? You know what it means, anyway, what our side has had to go through with a president and advisors and even members. The first family called the trader. On behalf of Russia. And that Swalwell was one of the chief smear campaigners on this. I mean, he was one of the guys out there, saying that that Trump was a Russian asset. There was that there was intel about him, so it's very hard for me. You want to extend any because you know there is this area of judge here. There's this sense of He swore. Well, do we give in any benefit of the doubt? Or do we just assume this guy was Allegedly, you know, sleeping with this Chinese spy that's been alleged has not been proven. That he was compromised in very serious ways by this person. Perhaps even associates of this person I know that she put a intern and swallows office. So you know, should should we say, OK, look, swallows a slimy loser and what he did to Trump is disgusting. What should we just go to them? Go to the max with this and be like, Well, this guy should step down from the Intel committee. And he should really have to leave Congress entirely because you can't trust him..

Intel committee Eric Swalwell Russia FBI special counsel Nancy Pelosi United States Trump Swalwell Democrats CIA Harrison Ford intern football Bill Barr Buck Congress Biden
"intel committee" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

WNYC 93.9 FM

07:26 min | 1 year ago

"intel committee" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

"On Russian interference in the 2016 election. Earlier volumes had focused on election infrastructure, social media and the American response to the Russian active measures campaign. This report is focused on counter intelligence threats and vulnerabilities or in plain English. It's focused on the ways in which we are and have been vulnerable to foreign espionage. It's 1000 pages of eye opening at times, hair raising information. And we thought now would actually be a great time to discuss it not only because the report is fresh and perhaps didn't get the attention it deserves, but also because it has so much to say about the last Trump campaign, with plenty of echoes for today. In this report, We learned that 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort was in regular contact with the Russian spy during the campaign, a situation the report describes as quote a grave counterintelligence threat. Manafort fed that spy inside polling information, and after he left the campaign, Manafort and the spy worked together to promote a so called peace plan for Ukraine that was favorable for Russia. It was also a lot that we learned about Roger Stone, Donald Trump and wiki leaks and those hacked democratic emails and a lot of vivid detail that has got to be tempting for TV showrunners. How about a hand written note from Don Jr to Don Sr that reads in part. Dad, you are being sent a gift from Putin Exclamation point. This was a traditional lacquered box. And yes, there's a picture of that, too. It's from back in 2013. There is so much in the Senate report that we're going to devote most of the next hour to discussing it. And with me are three people have been pulling hard on various threads contained within the report for many years. They are Natasha Bertrand Politicos, National security correspondent Franklin for staff writer at the Atlantic. And Andrea Bernstein, my trumping co host and author of the book, American Oligarchs. The Kushner's The Trumps and the Marriage of Money and Power, which is out in paperback. October. 6th Natasha Frank. Andrea. Welcome. Hey, Alia. Thank you. Thanks for having us Natasha. This document covers a lot of the same subject matter as what's in Robert Mueller's report. And yet to me, at least, it was a much more satisfying read filling in AA. Lot of information that was redacted or missing in the Mueller reporting, drawing some real conclusions, too. So before we even get into their contents, what is it that makes this report so different? Yes. So I think fundamentally, What makes this different is that it's a counter intelligence document. It's not a criminal investigation. It wasn't the result of a of a narrow kind of criminal probe. It was much broader than that. And the Senate Intel Committee obviously had more time to investigate. Then special counsel Robert Mueller did and had a broader kind of remit. So There's more in here that they were able to disclose Then I think Mueller Wass last year. I'm part of the most shocking, you know. Aspects of this is how far they go in, saying that the president's campaign chairman At the time. Paul Manafort was a grave counterintelligence threat to the campaign stemming from his relationship with what the Senate Intel committee described as a working Russian intelligence officer. Who is Constantine Kalim, Nick, that was I think one of the biggest bomb shells in the report that Not only was the president's campaign chairman, you know, working with someone who had ties to Russian intelligence, but someone they assessed to actually be a an intelligence officer for the Russian Intel Services, which is much further than Robert Mueller was willing to go. There were a lot of new details in here about the potential role that Paul Manafort and Kalinic may have played in the hacking and leaking operation in 2016. And other details about Roger Stone, the president's longtime confidante on his communications with Wikileaks and his You know his his Communications with the president about that leaking operation that the president then went on to say that he did not remember in sworn testimony to bowler So there's a ton of new information in here, and I think that a lot of that again stems from the freedom of the Senate Intel Committee had here to really dig into the more detailed counterintelligence threats that were posed by this operation. Frank. I want to start with this stuff that's closest to the 2016 campaign, and then we can zoom out and go for some of the AA. They're not really extraneous details, but some of the, um More unusual things that we discovered from all parts of trump world that are also contained in this report. But sticking with Paul Manafort, can you Explain how this report, um, sort of expands our understanding of his relationship with the Russian spy Constantine Kalinic, Robert Mueller, I think said he was linked to Russian intelligence. This report just plainly, says Constantine Kalinic. Is a Russian intelligence officer. So who is he? And who was it? A Paul Manafort. So I just want to take you back to the last days of the Mueller investigation. Can that in February of last year, Andrew Andrew Waisman, who is one of the the prosecutors on the Manafort, part of the case was in court. Telling judge rejected that. This relationship in Manafort and Kalim Nick was at the center of their investigation. And when he said that in court, it's built all of this dispense the storyline. And then he cracked a report which appeared letter It was told in kind of an elliptical fashion. It was buried in report. But we've we've We've known for a long time that this was a big deal to the investigators. And it was just a disappointment that we didn't know more about it. So But in fact the charges that Paul Manafort pleaded guilty to were not connected with this. There was there was bank fraud, and there's conspiracy in a variety of other charges, but there was actually nothing about working with a Russian spy. Right? Exactly, But it seemed like you know, the mobile investigation was with strategically potted. Do you go to these questions about tax evasion and foreign Agent representation and order Tio? Apply pressure to crack witnesses to build some sort of bigger storyline and the Mueller investigation and five you could have ended prematurely. And with impart outwitted by Manafort, who was lying to investigators, in part as the bar played a role in pressuring them because up shop early, But Just to go back to that question. And you know who was Kalim Nick, who is Manafort? This report portrays Paul Manafort of somebody who had been working with arms of the Kremlin for for a decade. And in fact, it says, in a detail that I hadn't know that he briefed. Of the Kremlin in the past before on some of his work for Russian old guard abroad. Olympic was by his side for most of this period..

Paul Manafort Robert Mueller Senate Intel Committee Kalim Nick president Natasha Frank Constantine Kalinic Mueller Wass Roger Stone chairman officer Senate Russian Intel Services Manafort Andrea Bernstein Constantine Kalim Russia Donald Trump Natasha
Rubio tapped as acting chairman of Senate Intel Committee

Politics and Public Policy Today

00:20 sec | 1 year ago

Rubio tapped as acting chairman of Senate Intel Committee

"By the way news on Capitol Hill that senator Marco Rubio will temporarily serve as the chair of the Senate intelligence committee that announcement from Republican leader Mitch McConnell the four Republicans appointment as the interim chair follows news last week that senator Richard Burr was going to step down as he faces an FBI investigation into allegations of insider stock

Marco Rubio Senate Intelligence Committee Mitch Mcconnell Interim Chair Senator Richard Burr Senator FBI
FBI, SEC looking at lawmakers' stock trades after coronavirus briefings: report

Mornings on the Mall with Brian Wilson

04:46 min | 1 year ago

FBI, SEC looking at lawmakers' stock trades after coronavirus briefings: report

"The justice department is reviewing those stock trades made by some lawmakers after corona virus briefings Dianne Feinstein Burr and I think Kelly Loeffler also are being being investigated where are we with that what do we know well according to published reports that the FBI has started asking questions about senator Burr's trades which were made after a confidential briefing although not a classified briefing and certain members of the product about the virus itself and of course there was a senator Feinstein's husband he gauged in expensive trade she personally did not that that that's almost irrelevant in the story my guess is nothing will happen for many of this yeah even though Congress passed the law back in two thousand twelve making it specifically in legal for members of the Senate and house decreed on confidential material non public information it doesn't appear that these meetings are going to meet that standard it could be classified briefing need being that would indicate that aside the politics of this are pretty ugly it's pretty obvious that bird did in fact trade on not non public information and I think it was material I think Burke who is not running for re election widely in North Carolina who has been analysis of the president and has allowed mark wanted to run the Senate intelligence committee hi Burgess figure he's on his way out so why not make a few Bucks pretty disgusting behavior but I don't think the justice department will ever pull the trigger although if they were going to they certainly picked on the public interest yeah now and and can you spell that this sort of colors in the lines over what we've seen the last few years you mention with the Senate intelligence committee thank you know Republicans are in charge is there but we just haven't seen a lot of traction from that Intel committee to get at the root of the problems in our government and now you're looking at a guy who just betrayed his oath of office in order to enrich himself well I think the present really a classic example of the never Trumper with power in the Republican contact he's he's practically a democratic civil servant of the weighted resistance as function is trump took the presidency of Birkhead heated front from the beginning he has obstructed getting to the truth about the Russian hoax although there was getting in plain sight you never heard him say anything supporters about the president during that entire three year pokes Burke is not well white in the White House as you might imagine he he is well liked by his fellow senators interestingly enough but that's the nature of the club pretty pathetic guy and he will not be missed by those of us who care deeply about the country and then exit aria which was singing this tune on stock trading is pretty disgusting and it's shameful actually but I don't think anything criminally legal will come from it yeah sad Joe the justice department is now saying that anyone caught intentionally spreading the corona virus could face terrorism charges is this something that they can make stick are they probably could I think there's enough public anger at anybody taking advantage of this situation you see new cases where somebody spits on lotus road beds doubles in a in a a grocery store or supermarket ending you know that often produce has to be destroyed and then the person is arrested this could be considered a terrorist act under not only federal law but under most states now have anti terrorism statute because it's designed to do harm in a political situation etcetera etcetera if it yeah I doubt if there will be any of the cases brought because again talk about limited resources and what we have to do but if anyone knowingly we're spread the virus Bob well somebody worked in a hospital it took advantage of access the bios or anything like that I have no doubt that would be a prosecution individuals doing something like this you know we'll see how I've got the prosecutors are I would do it if I regret it but you know I'm not there

Justice Department Dianne Feinstein Burr
National security adviser Robert O'Brien denies intel chief was pushed out

America's First News

01:02 min | 1 year ago

National security adviser Robert O'Brien denies intel chief was pushed out

"As the national security adviser to the president have you assured the president that this US intelligence findings Israel well I have not seen the find and I think what he's referring to and what folks are talking about is a briefing that took place last week at the house intelligence committee that was leaked to the press and I have not seen that report and and from what I understand about the report is that there was no and again I get the second hand but for Republicans I converse when they were in the committee there was no intelligence behind it I haven't seen any intelligence to support the reports that were leaked out of the house but it's just hard to comment on that because I get again I wasn't there and and these are leaks that were coming from a house Intel committee here and I haven't seen the intelligence that would would back up when I'm just reading the papers now conflicting accounts have emerged from that recent closed door briefing that election security officials gave the house committee on interference as Sanders meanwhile issuing a statement saying unlike the president is calling on Russia to stay out of the U. S.

President Trump Israel Sanders Russia Intel
DOJ reviewing Giuliani information targeting Biden Ukraine connection

South Florida's First News with Jimmy Cefalo

01:22 min | 1 year ago

DOJ reviewing Giuliani information targeting Biden Ukraine connection

"Rudy Giuliani I remember he was talk about going to Ukraine in finding the smoking gun it's at arts center well now Lindsey Graham Republican senator CSA the justice department and set up a way to review information that Giuliani had been gathering in Ukraine is he targeted for vice president Joe Biden the son hunter Graham said on CBS's face the nation that Attorney General William Barr told him yesterday that the justice department a quote created a process the Rudy could give information and they would see if it is verifiable Democrats are being played and I'm not gonna be played so we're going to look at the hunter Biden Joe Biden connection to the Ukraine we're going to ask the state department why did you do something about the conflict of interest so Rudy Giuliani last night said he's got the goods on hunter by I call the Attorney General this morning and Richard Burr the chairman the Intel committee and they told me take very cautiously anything coming out of the Ukraine against anybody Graham said Rudy Giuliani is a well known man is a crime fighters loyal to the president is a good lawyer but he said he that the any materials Giuliani is needed as has those needs to be examined to see if they're legitimate call because it could be Russia propaganda or VP Biden told ABC news this week of that he does not expect any investigation concerning his family's dealings with a crank in Ukraine to go

Lindsey Graham ABC VP Russia Intel Attorney Hunter Graham Vice President Justice Department Senator Rudy Giuliani President Trump Graham Chairman Richard Burr William Barr CBS Joe Biden CSA Ukraine
Comparing the impeachment trials of President Clinton and President Trump

Overnight re-air of day's programming

09:34 min | 1 year ago

Comparing the impeachment trials of President Clinton and President Trump

"Right now on Capitol Hill ahead of the one PM eastern resumption of the Senate impeachment trial of president trump some Senate Republicans are holding a news conference led by Lindsey Graham South Carolina chair of the Judiciary Committee thank you all very much observations about yesterday it was a long day but that's okay a lot of Americans have long days a couple things I've been involved into impeachment trials this is the second one I just want to make an observation here what the house managers were proposing yesterday is basically destroy the institution of the presidency as we know it make it make it when it comes to the partisan impeachment not have a venue to go to court and litigate privileges at the end of an exercise our prior presence when it comes to Donald Trump willing to destroy the institution of the office in the name of getting him so bottom line the Clinton impeachment was conducted by outside counsel there's not here Ken Starr spent five years investigating the president before we took up the matter in the house the president was allowed to cross examining Ken Starr at the house Judiciary Committee he recommended eleven grounds for impeachment and president Clinton utilize the court's extensively on his behalf Robert Mull was an outside counsel appointed to investigate this press I want the public to note that this president cooperated with Mister Miller he turned over million documents his lawyer testified for thirty hours and after two years of investigation with nineteen lawyers forty F. B. I. agents two thousand subpoenas and five hundred search warrants they decided to take no action they said there was no collusion between the trump campaign and the Russian government when it came to obstruction of justice they did not recommend any action I thought that would be the end of actually introduce legislation to say that Robert Muller cannot be removed accept the call because the president felt like the motor investigation was of which I did not the present was frustrated because he said he did nothing wrong I can understand that but it was important for me to make sure that the country would have somebody to look at these allegations Ross are very serious and I supported Mahler's ability to look any work for a long time and I thought it would be over Mr Shipp said yesterday what they did in the house was just like what we did with Clint that is absolutely untrue from the time they authorized impeachment it took forty eight days not two years with Mahler not five years like Clint the forty eight days the fact finding process was done in the Intel committee now the Judiciary Committee the present was denied the right to cancel the Intel committee and could not request with they spent one day in the Judiciary Committee go back and look at the tapes of how long can start testified before the Senate excuse me the house Judiciary Committee of which I was a far what we've done for the first time in American history isn't Peter president without outside counsel and all in a forty eight day period well here's what struck me the most where the house manager said reason we didn't go to court we don't want to go through the courts is that we can engage in before the election they withdrew from the Cumberland cover of the dead the national security adviser case where the dead the national security adviser what course to tell me what to do judge the house actually withdrew the subpoena because they didn't want the court process to stop the impeachment trial they would have the United States Senate create an impeachment process where the president would not be allowed to go to article three court to argue privileges that have been argued in every other impeachment trial and have been argued by president since George Washington that would destroy the institution of the presidency as we know it what would it do it would allow a handful any three hundred plus million country people all along partisan lines ten PH a president without independent judiciary the before I came here I used to try cases we have a lot of good lawyers in this body all I can say is that when the court date was set and if I showed up and asked for a bunch of subpoenas and documents to be produced on the day of trial that I had not pursued before the trial in any serious way how to get tossed out what do we do yesterday exactly what happened in the Clinton impeachment trial we're going to hear the house's gate the president's response we're going to ask questions then we'll decide among ourselves do we want to know anything yesterday was about eleven hours of them telling us how bad their case was in my view they did not pursue these witnesses because they knew the president what's the judiciary very us and it literally would stop them impeaching him before the election so the only thing I can tell the American people when it comes to replacing those present nine months plus from the election you got an up hill battle with me because I really do believe that the best person group of people to pick a president are the voters not a bunch of partisan politicians senator Lindsey Graham every day we're here doing this is a day were taken away from doing things that really matter so when they say it was like Clinton no when they say the court's really have no place in impeachment that's all going to be done by the house and the Senate without any independent judicial review god help us all center Steve Daines of Montana we had a lot of time last night thank some twelve hours on the floor of the US Senate is the first impeachment trial I've been through senator Graham is the experience that is his prior political life it reminded me of when I went to high school in Bozeman Montana if I turned in a term paper he was half complete my teacher toss it back to me they didn't get it done is incomplete probably give it up and say it's a complete try yeah that's why I felt like we saw last night was an incomplete case I have not done a complete homework you're my enemy what Nancy posted back in two thousand ten on the Obama care is that first we got a pass to find out was it it feels like what happened last night they had a rush this through the house just get over to the Senate we'll find out what's really in try to fix a fair let me remind you remind all of us in two hundred forty four years of history of this great country United States Senate has never remove a president from office never you look at the two trials for presence but we have had in the Senate over the course of our history President Johnson eighteen sixty of course president Clinton nineteen ninety nine what's unique about this impeachment trial versus the other two the other two both had crimes alleged in the impeachment articles president trump does not the other two impeachment trials had bipartisan support coming out of the house president trump impeachment coming out of the house did not first time I've ever seen there were many things that I agreed with with with a German never said last night but he did say some and I hope everybody hurts actually back to the Clinton days was it and I will paraphrase it and god help us if we ever purely partisan basis numbers work back then were wives and I hope you would see them today this is the most hardest impeachment process ever seen a history of this great country no crimes alleged in the trunk articles not bipartisan in a very important final point is if you look for the Democrats are asking United States Senate to do is to remove president trump from office and to bar him from ever holding office again was also unique about this trial versus president when this is done in an election it's really big the fundamental question as well is to the United States Senate the side the two thousand twenty election and overturn a two thousand sixteen election by removing this president from office I put the trust in the voters of this country they should have that say not the nicest

President Trump Lindsey Senate
House debates Trump impeachment ahead of historic vote

Michael Berry

00:50 sec | 1 year ago

House debates Trump impeachment ahead of historic vote

"A historic vote on impeachment is expected later today after the house finishes six hours of debate Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler says president trump must be held accountable for the highest of high crimes president trump places private political interests above our national security above our elections and above our system of checks and balances trump is accused of abusing power and obstructing Congress in the investigation of the Ukraine scandal Republicans continue to defend trump arguing the case is based on hearsay Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham says house Democrats are weaponize in the impeachment process I think this exercise in the house is beginning to weaponize impeachment the Intel committee conducted the fact finding elements of it which is unusual the process they use I think it's dangerous to the presidency as an institution the

Chairman Jerry Nadler Donald Trump Congress Lindsey Graham Intel Committee Judiciary Committee President Trump Ukraine Senate Judiciary Committee Six Hours
Committee members continue grilling witnesses on impeachment

WBZ Afternoon News

01:10 min | 1 year ago

Committee members continue grilling witnesses on impeachment

"A busy day in Washington the house impeachment hearings continuing this hour on Capitol Hill lawmakers from both parties presenting evidence for and against the possible impeachment of president trump more now in this ABC news special report the house Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing democratic Attorney General Goldman not telling Republican Doug Collins who ordered release of phone records showing calls between the Intel committee ranking Republican the president's personal lawyer and a conservative journalists is not in the league the information what is your included in a report that's not a leaks are adding or even go on record in front of everybody here today and say that you will not fail who ordered it you are Mr gold Mr going you or Mr Shipp I am going to go on record and tell you that I'm not going to reveal how we conducted this investigation and that's the problem we have this entire thing Mr Schiff said buying clothes I can tell you what that means is I'm done with the front now A. B. C.'s merry Bruce at the capitol I think question near still remains what's the scope of these charges against the president we know that Democrats will likely charge the president on abuse of power on obstruction possibly on primary the question of course remains will they brought in that beyond the Ukraine issue to also include obstruction of the mall or

Washington Attorney General Goldman Doug Collins President Trump Mr Schiff A. B. C. Bruce ABC House Judiciary Committee Intel Mr Shipp Ukraine
"intel committee" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

14:29 min | 1 year ago

"intel committee" Discussed on WTVN

"The house Intel committee has released the impeachment report this is Adam Schiff and again this time in twenty four hours does it to get this done sent it over to Nadler the round mound of the gavel for his hearings which starts tomorrow is gonna bring some scholars him to explain what impeachment is three of them one trump in jail and one of them does Jonathan Turley is these scholars that is not in favor of this impeachment the other three one from a frog marched out of a White House now the I can sum this up folks this this is just the the report of what should have attempted to make their money believe after these two weeks of hearings and I can give it to you in two easy steps the impeachment failure trump released the transcript of a call that the Democrats claim to be evidence of bribery and when trump did that Adam Schiff have the lie about the transcript of the call these are the facts of the case in their undisputed the president called the press president Ukraine and Adam Schiff then arrange for a whistle blower to go crazy over how terrifying it was how frightening it was all my god it was the was a more couldn't believe what he heard I had heard it secondhand he didn't hear the whistle blower was told probably by lieutenant colonel Benjamin old holes and you'll see you there was a bar than call sure of and that's when the reports came that was terrifying it was frightening it was shocking god he did that and shift puts a whistle blower with his staff lawyers and they write it up efficiently and the was abortion fort goal is to the inspector general as it sure sure to go on their first and then trump below all that to smithereens by releasing the transcript of a phone call and when that happened everybody realized there was nothing scary there was nothing frightening there was nothing shocking there was no bribery there was no quid pro quo there was nothing impeachable in the call sheriff is caught what does he do now so we did what he did shop the whistle blower aside and brought in a bunch of civil servants to explain what an ogre Donald Trump is not one of the witnesses had met drunk one of them had not one of them had spoken to him about the phone call not one of them had been on the phone call except for lieutenant colonel Veneman all whole sherry Kern you lose he trump art shift then allies during a committee hearing when he mis characterizes what trump told the president of Ukraine according to Adam Schiff the president said do you want your aid money you want your military assistance then you got to do this I want you to dig up dirt may get up if you have to on my political opponent and don't get back to me until you have something productive to tell me Schiff said the president said that seven or eight times the president never said anything of the sort transcript and then released nobody heard for the whistle blower was implores non non entity in all this so the report basically says that what trump Dan was your foreign policy to advance his own personal political interest in this announcer bribery and extortion and high crimes and misdemeanors none of this is true all this is what I say all I'm I'm a repeat to you again what this says and why this is not going to go away yeah they're talking about centurion a trump even address that he thinks of the old Republic is the lesser of a century I didn't do anything wrong he hasn't done anything impeachable he hasn't done anything in high crime or misdemeanor status he hasn't Ryder extorted anybody he he never got his investigation of Biden but Ukraine got it's a it Ukraine got its assistance funny they never got a dime during Obama's presidency and none of these bureaucrats seem to be bothered by it all all these bureaucrats only civil servants who love you queen would drop yeah I was a horrible we jogging was scary Obama never given time in fact they were you queen was attacked by Russia during the Obama administration I am next one third of Ukraine Russia just talk it's called Crimea Obama stood by and let it happen your benefits stood by watched it happen the bow tie guy can't start by watched it happen lieutenant colonel Inman all holes you can earn you'll see stood by let it happen not a one was worried trump threatened to withhold aid for a couple of minutes it's bribery it's extortion now here's here is what's going on the Democrats obviously bunch of racists sending poor camallo Heris away for the campaign in tears today a black I'm sorry you make it what color who baster campaign I she's taken on Jeff sessions she's taken on Brad Cavanaugh she's taken really Julie she's taken on their Molina should take a moment because all these people she's taken mom have gotten confirmed it it it it it but man can you believe the heart was the summit cruelty the Democrats letting this poor woman of color in Paris and humiliate herself for the presidential campaign now she pulls out of there and as CNN says the democratic campaign just got older and just got whiter what that's right a Russian agent took her out a Russian agent Tulsi Gabbard Hillary Clinton accused Tulsi Gabbard having a Russian agent and the Democrats did not defend Tulsi Gabbard Russian agent by the way I got an email the top of the break rush your conversation with these liberals and you say they don't know what we know and that when you tell them things that we know they're acting like they've never heard of before don't they know the mother report was a bomb no that's a great quite you know what these people father the mother report god strike me dead as a Russian agent this is what they said bar has ms characterized that he got out in public to a microphone before mother could and said there is nothing here and of course the first thing said about anything is all people here and remember that Mahler objected and is not happy that bar has mis characterized what's in the mall a report and the bar has gone wrong as a trump agent this is what they told me they believe the mother report does have evidence of trump colluding with Russia but because bar got to the microphone first allied about it when I told them that that story has been on CNN that story has been in the New York times that bar mis characterized it he got out there quickly and that mother was not happy about it and sent him a letter saying he didn't think his characterizations were proper and we find out that what Mahler was writing about was not bars conclusions of the overall report but rather the conclusion on obstruction Mahler never objected to bars interpretation there was no collusion but these people I was talking to think the mother report has damning evidence against that against trump can it and they believe that democratic committee is a proven this in subsequent hearings and they thought Mahler was great when he testified that's a huge disconnect out there folks I'm telling you the people on the left many of them and some of them that you you would consider being a smart and highly educated literally do not now what was the one thing I think and all this couple I'm talking about I know why they did not believe me when I told them that Hillary Clinton's campaign paid for but still dossier they had no idea that the steel dossier was opposition research that was essentially commissioned by the Clinton campaign and they had no idea who fusion GPS was yeah I'm not kidding they had no idea Hillary Clinton had anything to do with still does it not I'm giving chef some short shrift here because I think this is all of the much ado about something other than impeachment as look nothing's changed they know they're not going to get a conviction in the Senate and yet they're doing it so once the objective because this makes no sense if you really think this guy has missed behaved and needs to be thrown out of office then you're gonna go out you're gonna make the case for it and your damn well gonna follow through you're going to get a conviction in the Senate if this guy really has committed these kinds of crimes engaged in this kind of misconduct but they told the trump is not going to get convicted in the Senate they told the polling data in favor of impeachment is plummeting and yet they're doing it anyway so why because this is not really about impeachment it is about impeachment as a black mark as a discrediting item on a resume that hopefully will dissuade people from voting for trump in twenty twenty it is essentially a central asset of the Democrats twenty twenty campaign they hate Donald Donald trump's guts hello see Alexander okay still print that is and even that lame brain Al Green Democrat member congressman somewhere they have all said one way or the other we have to impeach trump otherwise he's going to get reelected go they know that as things stand today at this moment trump is going to be reelected and by the way fox as an aside I don't think they know how right they are yet I don't think they have the slightest idea of how deeply into state after state after state trumps get out the vote effort has all ready Doug I thank the trump reelection effort is mining new voters at a rate the Democrats haven't even begun to consider yeah but that's for another discussion the point is they they know he's going to win impeachment is a weapon to create a very deep wound impeachment is designed just stop his re election not to get him convicted the thrown out of office if these people like I said yesterday and I'll repeat this if they have to dig up the corpse of Robert Mahler's report and put it in a casket and bring it to a committee hearing to go back to collusion and the Russians they will do it because here is what they face if they lose and this is what scares them to death if trump wins reelection they are looking at a seven to two conservative Supreme Court after the eight years of his term by twenty twenty four is that right there would be reason enough to pull out all the stops to stop this guy the Supreme Court remember the Supreme Court the judiciary is where liberals goal for election insurance they lose elections they've got their people on the bench.

house Intel committee Adam Schiff Nadler twenty four hours eight years two weeks
"intel committee" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

Newsradio 1200 WOAI

16:45 min | 1 year ago

"intel committee" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

"The house Intel committee has released the impeachment report this is Adam Schiff and again this done in twenty four hours then I get this done the Senate over to Nadler the round mound of for his hearing which starts tomorrow is gonna bring some scholars him to explain what impeachment is three of them one trump in jail and one of them Jonathan Turley is these scholars that is not in favor of this impeachment the other three one trump from March double White House now the I can sum this up fox this this is just the the report of what shift attempted to make their money believe after these two weeks of hearings and I can give it to you in two easy steps the impeachment failure trump released the transcript of a call that the Democrats claim to be evidence of bribery and when trump did that Adam Schiff handle why about the transcript of the call these are the facts of the case in their undisputed the president called the press but impressive Ukraine and Adam Schiff then arrange for a whistle blower to go crazy over how terrifying it was how frightening it was all my god it was the was a more couldn't believe what he'd heard I had heard it secondhand he didn't hear the whistle blower was told probably by lieutenant colonel Benjamin old holes and you'll see there was a war than call sure of and that's when the reports came that was terrifying it was frightening it was shocking god he did that and shift points so was a bar with his staff lawyers and they write it up efficiently and the was abortion fort goal is to the inspector general acid shortened should've gone there first and then trump below all that to smithereens by releasing the transcript of a phone call and when that happened everybody realized there was nothing scary there was nothing frightening there was nothing shocking there was no bribery there was no quid pro quo there was nothing impeachable in the call she is caught what does he do now so we did what he did shop the whistle blower aside and brought in a bunch of civil servants to explain what an ogre Donald Trump is not one of the witnesses had met drunk one of them had not one of them had spoken to him about the phone call not one of them had been on the phone call except for lieutenant colonel Veneman all holes Hey Karen you'll see trump art shift then allies during a committee hearing when he mis characterizes what trump told the president of Ukraine according to Adam Schiff the president said do you want your aid money you want your military assistance then you got to do this I want you to dig up dirt making it up if you have to on my political opponent and don't get back to me until you have something productive to tell me Schiff said the president said that seven or eight times the president never said anything of the sort transcript and then released nobody heard the whistle blower was implores non non entity in all this so the report basically says that what trump Dan was your foreign policy to advance his own personal political interest in this announcer bribery and extortion and high crimes and misdemeanors none of this is true of all their affairs when I say all I'm I'm gonna repeat to you again what this says and why this is not going to go away yeah they're talking about centurion a trump even dress that did the Cologne told Republicans almost a century I didn't do anything wrong he hasn't done anything impeachable he hasn't done anything in high crime or misdemeanor status he hasn't Ryder extorted anybody he he never got his investigation of Biden but Ukraine got it's a it Ukraine got its assistance funny they never got a dime during Obama's presidency and none of these bureaucrats seem to be bothered by it all all these bureaucrats Wally civil servants who love you queen would drop I was a horrible we jogging with scary Obama never gave me time in fact they were you queen was attacked by Russia during the Obama administration I am next one third of Ukraine Russia just talk it's called Crimea Obama stood by and let it happen your benefits stood by watched it happen the bow tie guy can't stood by and watched it happen lieutenant colonel Inman all holes Karen you'll see stood by let it happen not a one was worried trump threatened to withhold aid for a couple of minutes it's bribery it's extortion now here's here is what's going on Democrats obviously want your racist sending poor camallo Heris away for the campaign in tears today a black I'm sorry Jamaican what color who baser campaign I she's taken on Jeff sessions she's taken on Brad Cavanaugh she's taken really Julie she's taken on their Molina should take a moment because all these people she's taken on have gotten confirmed he he he he he it but man can you believe the heart was the summit cruelty the Democrats letting this poor woman of color in verison humiliate herself for the presidential campaign now she pulls out of there and as CNN says the democratic campaign just got older and just got white her what that's right a Russian agent took her out a Russian agent Tulsi Gabbard Hillary Clinton accused Tulsi Gabbard having a Russian agent and the Democrats did not defend Tulsi Gabbard Russian agent by the way I got an email the top of the break rush your conversation with these liberals and you say they don't know what we know and that when you tell them things that we know they're acting like they never heard of before don't they know the mother report was a bomb no that's a great question what these people father the mother report god strike me dead as a Russian agent this is a bar has ms characterized that he got out in public to a microphone before mother could and said there is nothing here and of course the first thing said about anything is all people here and remember that Mahler objected and is not happy that bar has mis characterized what's in the mall a report and that bar has gone wrong as a trump agent this is what they told me they believe the mother report does have evidence of trump colluding with Russia but because bar got to the microphone first allied about it when I that story has been on CNN that story has been in the New York times that bar mis characterized it he got out there quickly and that mother was not happy about it and sent him a letter saying he didn't think his characterizations were proper now we find out that what Mahler was writing about was not bars conclusions of the overall report but rather the conclusion on obstruction Muller never objected to bars interpretation there was no collusion but these people I was talking to think the mother report has damning evidence against against trump can it and they believe that democratic committee is a proven this in subsequent hearings and they thought Mahler was great when he testified that's a huge disconnect out there folks no I'm telling you the people on the left many of them and some of them that you you would consider to be a smart and highly educated literally do not now what was the one thing I think and all this couple I'm talking about I had no white day did not believe me when I told them that Hillary Clinton's campaign paid for but still does here they had no idea that the steel dossier was opposition research that was essentially commissioned by the Clinton campaign and they had no idea who fusion GPS was I'm not kidding they had no idea Hillary Clinton had anything to do with still does it now I'm giving chef some short shrift here because I think this is all of the much ado about something other than impeachment as look nothing's changed they know they're not going to get a conviction in the Senate and yet they're doing it so once the objective because this makes no sense if you really think this guy has missed behaved and needs to be thrown out of office then you're gonna go out you're gonna make the case for it and your damn well gonna follow through you're going to get a conviction in the Senate if this guy really has committed these kinds of crimes engaged in this kind of misconduct but they told the trump is not going to get convicted in the Senate they told the polling data in favor of impeachment is plummeting and yet they're doing it anyway so why because this is not really about impeachment it is about impeachment as a black mark as a discrediting item on a resume that hopefully will dissuade people from voting for trump in twenty twenty it is essentially a central asset of the Democrats twenty twenty campaign they hate Donald Donald trump's guts hello see Alexander okay I feel that he's and even that lame brain Al Green Democrat member congressman somewhere they have all said one way or the other we have to impeach trump otherwise he's going to get reelected ergo they know that as things stand today at this moment trump is going to be reelected and by the way fox as an aside I don't think they know how right they are yet I don't think they have the slightest idea of how deeply into state after state after state trumps get out the vote effort has all ready dog I thank the trump reelection effort is a mining new voters at a rate the Democrats haven't even begun to consider yeah but that's for another discussion the point is they they now he's going to win impeachment is a weapon to create a very deep wound impeachment is designed just stop his re election not to get him convicted the thrown out of office if these people like I said yesterday and I'll repeat this if they have to dig up the corpse of Robert Mahler's report and put it in a casket and bring it to a committee hearing to go back to collusion and the Russians they will do it because here is what they face if they lose and this is what scares them to death if trump wins reelection they are looking at a seven to two conservatives Supreme Court after the eight years of his term by twenty twenty four is that right there would be reason enough to pull out all the stops to stop this guy the Supreme Court remember the Supreme Court the judiciary is where liberals goal for election insurance they lose elections they've got their people on the bench to legislate from the bench June denied conservative justice from the bench that's how they buy time when they've lost elections well trump is going to have several openings on the court to nominate replacements can you imagine these people as they're sitting here looking at the next four years thinking of a seven two Supreme Court and where is the a seven two Supreme Court what is possible roll verses weighing being re E. litigated roe versus Wade being re argued as a matter of bad law which it is if trump wins reelection the entire climate change industry will be in the ruins if trump wins reelection lonely lady who would be is that the border is will finally be closed trump will not have to win anymore elections after he wins twenty twenty could be full speed ahead trump will not be your typical lame duck president lame duck president second term president they ignoring guys can't do anything nobody is going to want to do anything for me is not going to run again trump's gonna turn that whole theory upside to his second term is going to be more focused more energetic and more productive than this one and they no it and take a look at these polls were talking about thirty four thirty five percent approval of trump by African Americans right now three different polls what if that actually manifest itself in the trump getting fifteen to twenty percent of the black vote in twenty two can you talk about the Democrat party is a trap door and the party falling in on their own trap door.

house Intel committee Adam Schiff Senate Nadler Jonathan Turley thirty four thirty five percen twenty four hours twenty percent eight years four years two weeks
"intel committee" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

14:31 min | 1 year ago

"intel committee" Discussed on KTRH

"The house Intel committee has released the impeachment report this is Adam Schiff and again this time in twenty four hours does it to get this done the Senate over to Nadler the round mound of a gamble for his hearings which starts tomorrow is gonna bring some scholars him to explain what impeachment is three of them one trump in jail and one of them does Jonathan Turley is these scholar that is not in favor of this impeachment the other three want from a frog marched out of a White House now the I can sum this up folks this this is just the the report of what should have attempted to make their money believe after these two weeks of hearings and I can give it to you in two easy steps the impeachment failure trump released the transcript of a call that the Democrats claim to be evidence of bribery and when trump did that Adam Schiff handle why about the transcript of the call these are the facts of the case in their undisputed the president called a press president Ukraine and Adam Schiff then arrange for a whistle blower to go crazy over how terrifying it was how frightening it was all my god it was the was a more couldn't believe what he'd heard I've heard it secondhand he didn't hear the whistle blower was told probably by lieutenant colonel Benjamin old holes and you'll see you there was a bar than call sure of and that's when the reports came that was terrifying it was frightening it was shocking god he did that and shift puts a whistle blower with his staff lawyers and they write it up efficiently and the was abortion fort goal is to the inspector general acid shortened should've gone there first and then trump below all that to smithereens by releasing the transcript of a phone call and when that happened everybody realized there was nothing scary there was nothing frightening there was nothing shocking there was no bribery there was no quid pro quo there was nothing impeachable in the call she is caught what does he do now so we did what he did shop the whistle blower aside and brought in a bunch of civil servants do once blamed wanted all ger Donald Trump is not one of the witnesses had met drunk one of them had not one of them had spoken to what about the phone call not one of them had been on the phone call except for lieutenant colonel Veneman all whole sherry Kern you lose he trump art shift then allies during a committee hearing when he mis characterizes what trump told the president of Ukraine according to Adam Schiff the president said do you want your aid money you want your military assistance then you got to do this I want you to dig up dirt may get up if you have to on my political opponent and don't get back to me until you have something productive to tell me Schiff said the president said that seven or eight times the president never said anything of the sort transcript and then released nobody heard for the whistle blower was implores non non entity in all this so the report basically says that what trump did wise your foreign policy to advance his own personal political interest and this announcer bribery and extortion I'm high crimes and misdemeanors none of this is Joe all this fear is when I say all I'm I'm a repeat to you again what this says why this is not going to go away yeah they're talking about centurion a trump even address that they think of the old Republic is almost a century I didn't do anything wrong he hasn't done anything impeachable he hasn't done anything in high crime or misdemeanor status he hasn't bribed or extorted anybody he he never got his investigation of Biden but Ukraine got it's a it's Ukraine got its assistance funny they never got a dime during Obama's presidency and none of these bureaucrats seem to be bothered by it all all these bureaucrats only civil servants who love you queen would drop I was a horrible we jogging with Gerry Obama never gave me a dime in fact they were you queen was attacked by Russia during the Obama administration I am next one third of Ukraine Russia just talk it's called Crimea Obama stood by and let it happen your father had stood by watched it happen the bow tie guy can't start by watched it happen lieutenant colonel Veneman all holes you can earn you'll see stood by let it happen not a one was worried trump threatened to withhold aid for a couple of minutes it's bribery it's extortion now here's here is what's going on the Democrats obviously bunch of racists sending poor camallo Heris awaiting the campaign in tears today a black I'm sorry Jamaican what color hello Vester campaign I she's taken on Jeff sessions she's taken on Brad Cavanaugh she's taken really Julie she's taken on their Molina should take a moment because all these people she's taken mom have gotten confirmed it it it it but man can you believe the heart was the summit cruelty the Democrats letting this poor woman of color embarrass and humiliate herself for the presidential campaign now she pulls out of there and as CNN says the democratic campaign just got older and just got whiter what yeah that's right a Russian agent took her out a Russian agent Tulsi Gabbard Hillary Clinton accused Tulsi Gabbard having a Russian agent and the Democrats did not defend Tulsi Gabbard Russian agent by the way I got an email the top of the break rush your conversation with these liberals and you say they don't know what we know and that when you tell them things that we know they're acting like they've never heard of before don't they know the Mahler report was a bomb no that's a great quite you know what these people thought of the mall a report god strike me dead as a Russian agent this is what they said bar has ms characterized that he got out in public to a microphone before mother could and said there is nothing here and of course the first thing said about anything is all people here and remember that Mahler objected and is not happy that bar has mis characterized what's in the mall a report and the bar has gone wrong as a trump agent this is what they told me they believe the mother report does have evidence of trump colluding with Russia but because bar got to the microphone first allied about it when I told them that that story has been on CNN that story has been in the New York times that bar mis characterized that he got out there quickly and that mother was not happy about it and sent him a letter saying he didn't think his characterizations were proper and we find out that what Mahler was writing about was not bars conclusions of the overall report but rather the conclusion on obstruction Muller never objected to bars interpretation there was no collusion but these people I was talking to think the mother report has damning evidence against that against trump can it and they believe that democratic committee is a proven this in subsequent hearings and they thought Mahler was great when he testified hi it's a huge disconnect out there folks I'm telling you the people on the left many of them and some of them that you you would consider to be a smart highly educated literally do not now what was the one thing I think and all this couple I'm talking about know what day did not believe me when I told them that Hillary Clinton's campaign paid for but still does here they had no idea that the steel dossier was opposition research that was essentially commissioned by the Clinton campaign and they had no idea who fusion GPS was yeah I'm not kidding they had no idea Hillary Clinton had anything to do for with steel dot CA now I'm giving chef some short shrift here because I think this is all of the much ado about something other than impeachment as look nothing's changed they know they're not going to get a conviction in the Senate and yet they're doing it so once the objective because this makes no sense if you really think this guy has missed behaved and needs to be thrown out of office then you're gonna go out you're gonna make the case for it and your damn well gonna follow through you're going to get a conviction in the Senate if this guy really has committed these kinds of crimes engaged in this kind of misconduct but they told the trump is not going to get convicted in the Senate they told the polling data in favor of impeachment is plummeting and yet they're doing it anyway so why because this is not really about impeachment it is about impeachment as a black mark as a discrediting item on a resume that hopefully will dissuade people from voting for trump in twenty twenty it is essentially a central asset of the Democrats twenty twenty campaign they hate Donald Donald trump's guts hello see Alexander castle court days and even that lame brain Al Green Democrat member congressman somewhere they have all said one way or the other we have to impeach trump otherwise he's going to get reelected ergo they know that as things stand today at this moment trump is going to be reelected and by the way fox as an aside I don't think they know how right they are yet I don't think they have the slightest idea of how deeply into state after state after state trumps get out the vote effort has all ready dog I thank the trump reelection effort is mining new voters at a rate the Democrats haven't even begun to consider yeah but that's for another discussion the point is they they know he's going to win impeachment is a weapon to create a very deep wound impeachment is designed just stop his re election not to get him convicted the thrown out of office if these people like I said yesterday and I'll repeat this if they have to dig up the corpse of Robert Mahler's report and put it in a casket and bring it to a committee hearing to go back to collusion and the Russians they will do it because here is what they face if they lose and this is what scares them to death if trump wins reelection they are looking at a seven to two conservative Supreme Court after the eight years of his term by twenty twenty four is that right there would be reason enough to pull out all the stops to stop this guy the Supreme Court remember the Supreme Court the judiciary is where liberals goal for election insurance they lose elections they've got their people on the bench to legislate from.

house Intel committee Adam Schiff Senate Nadler twenty four hours eight years two weeks
"intel committee" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

01:43 min | 1 year ago

"intel committee" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Scenic overlooks on the GW parkway left lanes blocked off now from garage door repair dot com the W. M. A. all weather channel forecast partly sunny today high forty eight cloudy tonight low thirty five minutes forty six in Beltsville forty eight at Reagan national I'm a real leaf on Washington's mall WMAL Rush Limbaugh the house Intel committee has released the impeachment report this is Adam Schiff and get this done in twenty four hours is that I get this done the Senate over Nadler the round mound of for his hearing which starts tomorrow is gonna bring some scholars him to explain what impeachment is three of them one trump in jail and one of them Jonathan Turley is these scholars that is not in favor of this impeachment the other three one from a frog marched out of a White House now the I can sum this up fox this this is just for you the report of what should have attempted to make their money believe after these two weeks of hearings and I can give it to you in two easy steps the impeachment failure trump released the transcript of a call that the Democrats claim to be evidence of bribery and when trump that Adam.

Reagan Washington Limbaugh house Intel committee Adam Schiff Senate Nadler Jonathan Turley White House bribery W. M. thirty five minutes twenty four hours two weeks
Former House Intel Chair Mike Rogers Weighs In On The Impeachment Inquiry

Morning Edition

05:21 min | 2 years ago

Former House Intel Chair Mike Rogers Weighs In On The Impeachment Inquiry

"To calm yesterday's hearing was chaired by Democrat Adam Schiff of California he's the chair of the house intelligence committee and let's talk to someone now who said in that very seat Mike Rogers is a former Republican member of Congress from Michigan who was intelligence committee chairman thanks for being a congressman good morning Sir so what chairman shift said the inquiry that he is overseeing was a chance for the American people to make their own judgments what is that what it was yesterday I you know I honestly I'm a bit skeptical about the process of me and I have a couple of issues one I don't think an impeachment should be run through the intelligence community that means all of that other work that really needs to be done behind closed doors in close proximity with the the intelligence agents probably isn't getting done number one the number two I mean these are political events remember there are this is not a court of law there are no rules of evidence this is about one team trying to convince the American people that the other parties president needs to be out of office and the other team is trying to defend that purpose for keeping that president in office and really that's what you saw the start of yesterday and that's what this impeachment hearings I think is all about well I want to ask you I mean a lot of other questions that you brought up something very serious suggesting this committee is is not actually fulfilling its mandate which is to provide oversight of the nation's intelligence agencies to do you really feel that that these lawmakers are distracted right now how could you not be distracted this thing is sucking all the oxygen out of Congress let alone the committee and so I don't believe that the regular and important oversight work is happening men have on pretty good authority that it's just not happening and so even the disconnect you saw with the raid when we went and got Baghdadi the United States went in and took care of Baghdadi in Syria rated the the terrorist leader of ISIS that wasn't brief back to the committee and that tells me that those really important functions of oversight on happening number one and they're not happening on even the most serious of matters and so that read that does concern me again it's just not the purpose of that committee I would have preferred that they had moved that out of that committee to a more appropriate place maybe the judiciary maybe government oversight but the intelligence committee is designed to meet behind closed doors and not be out in the public as much as it has it's been a and it's clearly not designed it to try to set aside a legal framework and create the articles of impeachment which is as you can imagine an intense process all of that's happening I'm just not sure the other is a matter of fact I'm fairly confident it's not been that worries me a little bit but I suppose that the argument from from some who are leading this impeachment career which would be that while obviously that oversight is important so is exploring these accusations which suggests that the present United States might have dangled something as important as military aid to US ally for the benefit of trying to get a you know investigation done they could politically benefit and the army those things are are as important more important than some of the normal oversight yeah I mean I think you can do both honestly I just I'm not a big fan of doing on the Intel committee and what was interesting yesterday to me David has both an FBI former FBI agent chairman of that committee I don't know of any new facts were out other than I think with the the clip that you played when we started which was that phone call of the ambassador would make for a restaurant to the present United States from a foreign country I I certainly hope it was encrypted but when you think of that that was a little bit shocking to me and I think that his testimony is going to be really important mass or someone who is testifying next week because he seems to be the linchpin in the middle of all of that at least from the government side what would you do differently if if you're Adam Schiff in this political climate is is there any way to make this process less partisan is there any way for this committee to I don't know I mean do two things at once like you said they can you know again I will I but here's what I worry about that candidly this is gonna tear America part and it's already she you know causing you know hardship in canceling of of holiday plans for thanksgiving because faith which are torn up over it and you can hardly have a conversation in politics anymore that doesn't end up in somebody get in their feelings hurt and I worry a lot about that I just look at this process in the way it's happened and I think boy I is this the right thing to do for the country at the right time I mean no other business is getting done is that the right decision do I think of it that I mean obviously I think it was highly inappropriate for the president to have a conversation the way he did even though I think he obviously doesn't think it was a problem because he laid it out there and yesterday none of those facts were in dispute I think this is going to come down to the point of if you're a Democrat you probably think impeach him and get him out if you're a Republican you're probably thinking Hey this we know we've got to defend the president through the end of it and the rest of America which is the grades you know center left center right is left you know scratching their heads wondering if this town isn't broken beyond

Democrat Adam Schiff California House Intelligence Committee
Diplomats reveal new details on Ukraine at first impeachment hearing

The 11th Hour with Brian Williams

04:25 min | 2 years ago

Diplomats reveal new details on Ukraine at first impeachment hearing

"Day. One Thousand Twenty eight of the trump administration will go down as day one of the first public impeachment hearings in generation. Today's testimony featured to veterans senior diplomats called upon to lay out the case part of the overall case against the president. Today is testimony brought forth some some new revelations that tied trump closer to the Ukraine pressure campaign ambassador. George Kantha State Department's top expert on Ukraine. And William Taylor Taylor. The current acting ambassador to Ukraine appeared together before the House Intel Committee. Both our top diplomat. Who served under both Republican and democratic like presidents? I represent the third generation of my family to have chosen a career in public service in sworn the oath of office that all. US US public servants. Do in defense of our Constitution. Indeed there has been George Bent sworn to defend the constitution continuously for nearly sixty years. It has been a privilege for me to serve our country and the American people for more than fifty years starting as a cadet at West Point. Is You have mentioned Mr Chairman. That is an infantry officer for six cheers including with one hundred first Airborne Division in Vietnam than at the Department of Energy than as a member of a Senate staff then at NATO than with the State Department right here and abroad in Afghanistan Iraq Jerusalem and Ukraine much of the hearing focused on the July twenty fifth phone call in which President trump trump asked Ukraine's presidents Alinsky for investigations into the Biden and our two thousand sixteen election. The witnesses also described an effort by trump up in his deputies to leverage that country into delivering those investigations if they wanted the promise. US military aid to be used in their fight the Russians by the way it was against that backdrop that ambassador Taylor eventually revealed another pivotal conversation involving trump. That took replace July twenty six the day after the phone call in question. Taylor set a staffer of his recently told him about this conversation involving having the president and the trump donor turned ambassador to the EU. Gordon Sunland member of my staff could hear president trump on the phone asking ambassador ambassador. Sunland the investigations that's toll president trump the Ukrainians were ready to move forward following the call. With president trump trump. The member of my staff asked investor. Solomon what president trump thought about Ukraine. That's the song and responded that President Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden. mm-hmm which Giuliani was pressing for two sources familiar with this matter told NBC News that David Holmes currently the political counselor at the US Embassy. The in Ukraine is the staff member that Taylor was referring to there Taylor Story About Holmes earned homes and invitation at testify which he will do behind closed doors on Friday complicating matters for the Republicans and making him a less easy target. NBC NBC News. Also reports that in twenty fourteen. Mr Holmes won a State Department award for speaking out internally about the Obama Obama Administration policy in Afghanistan. Gordon Sunlen never mentioned this particular call with trump and his closed door testimony before impeachment impeachment investigators trump who spent the day hosting Turkey's president. Erta one at the White House says he was too busy to watch the hearing late today. Trump responded onto this new information however from Ambassador Taylor. I know nothing about that. First Time I've heard the one thing that I've seen that Sandelin said was that He did speak to me for a brief moment. And I said no quid pro quo under any circumstances and that's true in any event that's more second hand end information but I've never heard of conversation I don't recall no not at all. Not even a little bit intelligence committee chairman Adam. Schiff had a very different different. Take on this matter what this call indicates as other testimony has likewise indicated. Is that the instructions coming from the the president on down during the hearing Republicans Slam Taylor

Trump Trump William Taylor Taylor President Trump Ukraine Donald Trump United States George Bent George Kantha State Department Chairman David Holmes State Department Afghanistan Sunland Nbc News Gordon Sunland House Intel Committee White House Obama Obama Administration Schiff Solomon
Trump impeachment inquiry goes public

America in the Morning

02:27 min | 2 years ago

Trump impeachment inquiry goes public

"Impeachment inquiry becomes more public this week says Capitol Hill correspondent Linda Kenya on more information out there the matter Republican Tom reed says it's a good thing that the hearings are opening up but fellow Republican Kevin McCarthy tells CBS's face the nation the public hearings won't change a thing there's no transparency McCarthy says that's because the Democrats remain in control they now made the Intel committee the impeachment committee they now control even further about which Republicans could even ask questions they made Adam Schiff not only a fact witness but he's the judge the jury and the prosecutor that is on her death was unheard of systemic readily an angle or the actions of president trump the question you have to ask is did the president really sell out his country with a bribe to a foreign power to get involved in the president's personal political election has never been done by any president in the history of this country angle on ABC's this week is describing a quid pro quo on CNN's state of the union counselor to the president kellyanne Conway says a quid pro quo does not exist the rating president has said he didn't realize any aid was being held up quote he felt no pressure in this entire phone call is about two presidents have respective countries talking about how they got elected not truces Democrat Jackie spear there's no question now whether there was a quid pro quo she tells CBS's face the nation that's why the public phase of the investigation is so important I think you're going to see all of the transcripts they're going to be released probably within the next five days I don't know if they're all gonna be released on the same day but they're going to be very telling to the American people as for when this public face will officially be in that all depends says Steny Hoyer I don't know what witnesses are going to come for and what they're going to say what evidence will have to be pursued on CBS's face the nation house Majority Leader would only respond I think relatively soon house majority whip Jim Clyburn on CNN's state of the union wishes for one thing to come out of this process I believe that this whole process to me is about preserving this Republic protection to the marker say that we hold dear and I do not believe that we ought to allow political feelings to get in the middle of this maybe so but the impeachment process won't change anything says Republican Tom reed I understand people want this president remove we got election coming up here Katie year trust the American people let me see you get out of the way and let people lead this country

Linda Kenya Kevin Mccarthy CBS Adam Schiff Prosecutor President Trump ABC CNN Steny Hoyer Jim Clyburn Tom Reed Intel Kellyanne Conway Jackie Spear Five Days
Fox News poll finds record 51% support for impeaching Donald Trump

All In with Chris Hayes

11:00 min | 2 years ago

Fox News poll finds record 51% support for impeaching Donald Trump

"President's political position is eroding remarkably quickly Fox News poll just out today shows fifty one percent a majority a registered voters believe trump should not only be impeached but removed as well aw fifty one percent and this is happening because the president's misdeeds are clear and indisputable we already know President Trump corruptly uses power worse and occupied country into manufacturing dirt in his political opponent we know that from documents the president himself has released remember I would like you to do us ever though and from things the president has admitted and from things the president has done in front of US yeah well I would think that if they were honest about it that SORTA major investigation Asian very simple edser they should investigate but what we continue to learn every day is the sheer scope of the prize and the consciousness of guilt of nearly everyone involved but this whole enterprise was directed by the President CNN reports that as early as may two months before his now infamous phone call with Ukrainian President President Trump told energy secretary Rick Perry and two senior State Department officials including US ambassador EU Gordon Sunland Abraham to deal with trump's private attorney Rudy Giuliani about planning a meeting with Ukraine's president if they can satisfy rudy they can satisfy the president of Person failure with the meetings said Rudy of course was running around trying to manufacture dirt the president's enemies the president told a cabinet secretary in to senior State Department officials to work with attorney on the scheme to seek foreign help to undermine his political rival and then two months later he told the president of Ukraine the same thing remember in the call knows I will have tre Guiliani give you a call all this was happening in such a way that people involved knew how wrong it was and it's incredibly important to hold onto that simple fact as the president and his allies attempt to cut a massive Jedi mind trick to just wave away convince everyone that what the president did was fine but it wasn't fine and they knew it wasn't fine The Washington Post reported last month the president trump directly ordered his acting chief of staff to hold back that four hundred million dollars in military aid to Ukraine passed by both houses and now the New York Times reports so when the trump administration finally released the military aid American diplomats were advised to downplay the decision and true trump's initial hold up the he's the funds as an administrative matter one State Department official even wrote in an email I'm quoting here keep moving people nothing to see here now nothing to see here is just unbelievably in Culpa Tori because nothing is here means I know this is a big scandal I know this is a crime and I know this is wrong and you all know a two so I'm going to make a joke about it because we can't talk about the fact that we are now in mention wrongdoing again and again and again we see consciousness guilt and awareness by many parties of what was happening that continues to be the theme here remember the whistle blowers first memo's people in the White House knew how wrong was quote White House officials told me this information were deeply disturbed by what transpired and the phone call well now today. CBS's a different memo from that same whistle blower written after speaking to White House show who heard the entirety of trump's phone call whistleblower writing in the officials view the president had clearly committed a criminal act a crime I just witnessed the President committed crime say that well the president and his defenders are basically trying to arguments is that what president trump did was totally fine perfect on call and the other is a kind of non stop fire hose of ridiculous process claims Adam Schiff is this Nancy Pelosi that it kangaroo court you gotTa Yada the whistleblower early at secondhand knowledge none of that matters because the facts are already in the light we have them their documents and tax and emissions by the president they're all there including the crime and I say crime advisedly I'm not the independent observer of the crime was a White House official who works for the President who listened to the phone call that led the whistleblower in the official view the president at clearly committed a criminal act also puts one question rest while only raising a whole host it's quote the standard White House practice presidential level phone calls with world leaders of the White House Situation Room to produce a word for word electronic transcript that memorialize the call in this case the official told me such a transcript had indeed been produced and was being treated very sensitively in hard copy only so there is warning the whistleblower word for word transcript from call phone call that we don't have the White House can stonewall they want they can fight on privilege grounds they can stop you from testifying the one thing that we at the C. before this is all over is that word for word transcript of trump's phone call with Ukraine's president trump has no grounds to stop that the president himself says it's a perfect call the president himself released the call notes he's waived any privilege we must see the perfect call in its complete word for word version so that all of us Graham the house you and I can all marvel at just how perfect it is the cannot hide that joining me now for more on the White House stonewalling tactics when the members of Congress investigating the president congressman Mike Quigley Villanova he's a member of the House Intelligence Committee let me start right there on that obviously the president has released the call notes do you believe there's an actual word were transcript with more than what we've seen do you believe that Congress should have access to it I I believe it exists I don't know for sure that it does and obviously congress should have a right to that I don't Wanna get too bogged down with people thinking if you don't have all the details all of the evidence you can't go forward because I think the president will continue to stonewall the contender the obstruction I believe we have an extraordinary case to move forward now we're not gonNA stop we're going to be diligent but I don't want the people to think that if we don't get every last detail that we can't move forward so that that was going to be second question. I'm Adam shifts approach here as well as the other oversight committee chairs is essentially look they went on strike they obstruct maybe we'll bring an article impeachment on that we're moving forward and we have a sufficient evidence already entered into the record to drop articles of impeachment is that your view it is and I think that the what we're seeing gene is further Deflections distraction not just by the president but my colleagues who are talking about process they are tacking Adam Schiff will end Nancy Pelosi on process it's extraordinary because if anything the Intel Committee under Adam Chef has been extraordinary in involved with the details is following the letter of the law the whistle blower according to the trump appointed inspector general the trump appointed head of the intelligence community did everything right followed the letter of the law the only entity that's not is the White House and they're the ones talking about process the crimes have been committed and they're in public view the president has been insulting and criticizing the whistle blower leveling all sorts of claims along with his allies are you worried about the whistle blower being protected through this process as the law requires I have my first concern is the safety of the whistle blower of the president using terms like treasonous and traitorous and you know we do with with traders what we used to do with them I believe he's put this whistle blower at risk that's most important underneath that but as important to a certain extent is the chilling effect it has on the whistle blower system as a whole The intelligence community operates in secrecy. It has to keep us safe but that only works in an open government if whistle blower system works and the oversight of Congress works he is imperilled all that too bad things can happen. When there's no whistle blowers a bad deeds gun go unknown unpunished and leaks happen and we'll happen that threatens our sources in our methods it puts people at risk and it makes us less safe when you talk about bad deeds going on and on flagged I WANNA ask your responses story that just publishing you may not know a lot about it but it was just published Bloomberg reports that the President Trump Preston then secretary of state REX Tillerson him to persuade the Justice Department to drop criminal case that it had against an Iranian Turkish gold trader who happened to be a client of Rudy Giuliani? This is a very high profile case was brought so in district three sources saying the president told REX Tillerson to lean on the Department of Justice to drop this case of a guy who Rudy Giuliani was representing Rudy Guiliani in that same article admitting he may have talked about this with the president do you worry there are other corrupt abuses of power similar to what has been laid bare in Ukraine that are your and have not been flagged to report it I think it's obvious the president never commits a crime once and it comes to the Justice Department he thinks he has complete control the long term impacts by this president and we just won't know until it's all over may well be instructed Mary damage to the independence the integrity of the Justice Department is autocratic to think the president can tell them who they can and they can't prosecute it is obvious he has said it publicly openly that he believes he has that power and we see stories like this they're indicative of a president who thinks she's the author of the Times piece explaining diplomats urged to play down the release of the military funds for Ukraine and Ned price on we're spokesperson senior director on the National Security Council under President Barack Obama now and MSNBC National Security analyst Laura let me start with you can you explain that email has just really stuck in my mind nothing to see here email and it reminds me I reported on Enron I reported on the Housing Crisis Report on baseball during the steroids era all sorts of places where people knew something was going wrong sideways and kind of joked about it can you blamed context for that email sure so in early August the White House notified the State Department that the aid to Ukraine from the state I was going to be held it's about one hundred forty one million dollars in security assistance Congress has already approved it and then notice comes from the White House to the State Department that saying we are putting a hold on this the email traffic shows that people at the State

President Trump White House Donald Trump Trump Preston Congress Rudy Giuliani Ukraine Justice Department CBS State Department Rex Tillerson Fox News Adam Schiff Department Of Justice Adam Barack Obama
State Department blocks ambassador from testifying in Trump impeachment inquiry

Brian Kilmeade

00:36 sec | 2 years ago

State Department blocks ambassador from testifying in Trump impeachment inquiry

"The White House says it will not cooperate in the house impeachment inquiry this comes after Gordon Sunland the US ambassador to the European Union was blocked from testifying before the house Intel committee your house intelligence committee chairman Adam Schiff this morning the failure to produce this witness the failure to produce these documents we consider yet additional strong evidence of obstruction of the constitutional functions of Congress a co equal branch of government Democrats call it another example of obstruction will Republicans say it's

White House European Union Adam Schiff Congress Gordon Sunland United States Intel Chairman
"intel committee" Discussed on WLS-AM 890

WLS-AM 890

02:24 min | 2 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on WLS-AM 890

"Of the Senate Intel committee or viewing the whistle blower report as the acting director of national intelligence gets ready to testify tomorrow earlier today president trump met with Ukraine's president at the United Nations to address the transcript of their call which was released the president of Ukraine said there was no pressure we had I think glued to a phone call he to us normal we spoke about many things and I so so I think from you and is that nobody bullshit bush me yes no worries no pressure. but house Democrats are convinced the president's call was an abuse of power and ARE following through with an impeachment inquiry after the president requested an investigation of Joe Biden's sons business in the Ukraine Republican saying it does not show the president leveraging military aid as part of a quid pro quo holding his first press conference since the impeachment inquiry the president says he's not the only one who needs to be transparent but also insist on transparency from Joe Biden and his son hunter when the millions of dollars that have been quickly and easily taken out of Ukraine in China millions of dollars millions and millions of dollars taken out very rapidly our bill Cameron reporting Democrats are already beginning to overplay their hand in the impeachment drama many Democrats including many Chicago and wraps no doubt believe the summary of the trump phone call justifies the impeachment inquiry but intelligence committee chairman Adam Schiff of California played right into trump's hand when he said this there was only one message that that president of Ukraine got from that call and that was this is what I need I know what you need like any mafia boss the president didn't need to say that's a nice country you have it be a shame if something happened to it because that was clear from the conversation trump is counting on the Democrats overplaying their hand bill camera individualists Amy died in here and this just in Illinois democratic representative Mike Quigley says he's now read the complaints and the rough transcript of the July phone call. disturbing while we read this morning alarming. forced to an extraordinary magnitude by the report and that we were just right two.

Chicago Illinois chairman China Mike Quigley representative Amy California Adam Schiff Senate Intel committee bill Cameron Joe Biden United Nations president Ukraine trump acting director
"intel committee" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

01:58 min | 2 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on KTOK

"The house Intel committee, Devon newness is with us. What are the things that bothers me you warned everybody in twenty fourteen that Russia was going to pull this crap on us again? And that they do it against other countries. Nobody listened to you. You were right. You're right. And now we see the Ukraine is admitting that they tried to help Hillary in two thousand sixteen election. Nobody nobody cares because it's not against Donald Trump. And what bothers me and all of this is and this is what was so serious about the Clinton Email server issue is that why why have we in all these years has a country knowing that these hostile regimes poop Russia is a hostile regime. Putin a hostile actor. Why haven't we built the defensive defenses to prevent this? This is gone on for, you know, thirty years. We haven't built the defense capable of stopping those yet. Why? Well, we're we're always to be fair. I mean, we do spend a lot of money trying to you know, trying to build this infrastructure to combat the Chinese Russians and North Koreans of other bad actors. We spent a lot a lot of money doing it. I think the more important point though, that you brought up there, Sean is that that we had administration after administration who wanted to cozy. Up to Putin. Okay. I mean going back to Bill Clinton starting with Bill Clinton, then all George W Bush all through the Obama administration and largely if you go back, and you look Donald Trump's position that they claimed. Oh my God. They were right. By the words, Donald Trump was saying about the Russian it was no different than what Hillary or Obama or heart for George W Bush or Condoleeza Rice or anybody. It's all about who. By the way, the alone caught on tape. Colluding was your friend the cowardly shift, but Adam Schiff, congressman thank you spending the hours with our with us. We appreciate your time. Very lightning. News.

Donald Trump Russia Bill Clinton Putin Hillary house Intel committee Adam Schiff Obama administration George W Bush Devon Ukraine congressman Sean Obama Condoleeza Rice thirty years
House Republicans call on Democrat Adam Schiff to resign

The Ray Lucia Show

00:41 sec | 2 years ago

House Republicans call on Democrat Adam Schiff to resign

"All Americans should be concerned with the chairman of the house intelligence committee taking the position of judge and jury. Perpetuating false information to the American people for the last two years on Capitol Hill Republicans calling on the house Intel committee chair to resign. Republicans say they've had more than enough of California Democrat, Adam Schiff because of his never ending collusion claims about President Trump. Here's house minority leader, California, Republican Kevin McCarthy every single Republican signed a letter that this chairman. They have lost confidence. Do not believe no matter what they work on that the American public entrust them

House Intelligence Committee Chairman California Adam Schiff President Trump Kevin Mccarthy Intel Two Years
Trump: ‘Pencil-Neck’ Adam Schiff ‘Is Not A Long Ball Hitter’

Financial Issues with Dan Celia

00:42 sec | 2 years ago

Trump: ‘Pencil-Neck’ Adam Schiff ‘Is Not A Long Ball Hitter’

"Grand rapids. Michigan talking about democrat. Adam Schiff chair of the house Intel committee Republicans want him to resign because of his continuing claims of Russia collusion, even though Robert mothers report finds not. Here's the president got the smallest sneck I've ever seen. He is not a long ball hitter. The Democrats have to now decide whether they will continue to fraud the public with ridiculous. As for the report itself. The president telling the patriotic crowd after three years of lies and smears and slander, the Russia hope is finally dead.

President Trump Russia Adam Schiff Grand Rapids Intel Michigan Fraud Robert Three Years
"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

01:44 min | 3 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"We have a staffer over there arrested in being prosecuted for lying about leaking. The Senate Intel committee has been covering this whole thing up and selectively leaking negative information about Trump now if the Senate Intel committee has this. This information about the Hillary Clinton team in the negative information about the uranium one case Joe why hasn't that Lee? No serious. I'm asking why do you think why do you think the negative information about Hillary hasn't leaked from the Senate? It's not a trick up from the Senate Intel committee, but the negative information about Trump has. We don't have the press on our side. Yes. Thank you or the Senate Intel committee, right? Full of Republican swamp rats to and rhinos who hate Donald Trump. Yes, you're right though. The press is a big part of it to the press doesn't want to run negative stories like that about they want to attack. Donald trump. And the rhinos in the Democrats have been an endless source of leaks through this staffer to damage Trump. That's why the lawyer in the daily caller piece for the informant on the Clinton case, the whistle blower is like, hey, wink, wink, not the Senate committee already has this stuff. Why raid? My client's house again. Because they want it in the FBI's custody because they're clearly looking to make this stuff. Go away. Don't be surprised for a second. If on December fifth if Huber shows up for this hearing, and some of this testimony makes it out there that you see meadows in them ask questions about this. What does that rate about? What would we looking for exactly?.

Senate Intel committee Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Senate uranium one FBI Huber Joe Lee
"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

03:26 min | 3 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"That's a really terrific yield. Okay. Let me read to you from this daily caller piece. Again, why I think this is a panic move by people in the DOJ FBI because impeachments off the table because of the midterms and because Muller's investigation into collusion is entirely dead. There is no there there. From the Richard polyps in the daily caller Kane Kane's the informant, by the way, the whistle blowers. House was raided further told the FBI agent that potentially damaging classified information had been properly transmitted to the Senate and house Intel committees as permitted under the act his lawyer said the agent immediately directed his agents to begin a sweep of the suburban home anyway process that a whistle blower who voluntarily turned over damaging information about the Clinton foundation the uranium one deal which Muller and Rosenstein are involved in a whistle blower tells the FBI guy at his house or woman, we don't that doesn't say who tells the FBI agent. Hey, I'm a whistle blower. I've already given this stuff over and this stuff is potentially damaging stuff and they raid his house. Anyway, I don't have to tell you. We're facing a major threat. Big-time frightened that intimidated Cain again, the informant properly handed over the documents is lawyer told the daily caller yet even after surrendering the. Formation to the FBI the agents continue to rummage through the home for six hours has happened in Maryland, Joe by you, why after asking and getting my approval to do so DOJ I g Michael Horowitz had a member of his staff, physically take, Mr. canes classified document disclosure to the house and Senate Intel committees of the informants lawyer told the daily caller, why does that matter? Why does that matter? So let's walk through this. Again. Remember the lead this raid? I do not think is a good thing. It's an effort to Hoover up all this stuff and make it go away the Senate Intel committee, so what lawyer for this informative saying he's an informant who has information and informant who has damaging information about the Clinton foundation uranium one and the uranium one deal which Bob Muller and rod Rosenstein were heavily involved in rod Rosenstein, the prosecuting attorney this informant turned over information to the I g the lawyer makes us specific point to say this who gives it to the Senate Intel committee, Joe the Senate Intel committee what's going on in the Senate integrating, oh, the same Senate Intel committee who had the staffer James wolf who is alleged in the charging documents to have leaked significant negative information to the media about the FIS awar- new Trump probe who's alleged to have lied about. It about sensitive leaks to the media. That's what specifically what he was charged with. This is the same. Same committee the same committee. Senator Mark Warner democrat sits on who has I told you during this week shows is texting with a lobbyist for a Russian connected to Putin about setting up meetings. We Christopher Steele who worked for Hillary Clinton. Listen process process. This. This gets complicated. But it's not. It's an effort by people involved in the scheme from day one to target Trump and leaked to the press negative dossier information, that's not true. It is an effort to make all of this go away..

Senate Intel committee Senate FBI Bob Muller rod Rosenstein uranium one Clinton foundation DOJ Intel Trump Kane Kane Joe House James wolf Cain Senator Mark Warner Hillary Clinton Michael Horowitz Maryland
"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

02:46 min | 3 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"All right, more breaking news here. So I've been working on something for a while on this spy gay case in the book. It's some of it's in the book, we kinda hinted at it. But at the time of printing, I didn't have. The body of material. I do now to two point two two win assertion. I'd like to make. But there's something very interesting someone who emails me regularly emailed me yesterday. I was hesitant to bring it up yesterday. But I've been holding onto something for a while with the popadopoulos angle this by gate case, Joe, I haven't discussed this, which no you haven't. But it is it is fascinating. Vokes? There's an article from November ninth of twenty seventeen by Allie Watkins, I'll remember the name some of you are picking up right now. Some of you may not be there's an article in politico, I'm gonna put up in the show notes. And again, it's from November ninth of 2017. It's going to be the second or third article down in the show notes. If you subscribe to my Email list, Email them right to you. And it is a fascinating piece, not only because of the content of it. But who wrote it Allie Watkins Halley Watkins, the author who is Allie Watkins, why does that name sound familiar? Allie Watkins was the love interest girlfriend of the Senate staffer on the Senate Intel committee that was handling the collusion investigation show, the girlfriend of the Senate staffer on that committee who was alleged to be the recipient of many leaks from that committee. You remember wolf the guy on the committee was arrested and is being prosecuted for allegedly leaking the Fiso warrant, yes. This is his girlfriend Allie Watkins who was supposed to be the recipient of the text messages about the FIS award. Now, remember we discussed this before he if interestingly enough when the Pfizer award is the delivered to the Senate Intel committee excuse me, what is delivered to the Senate and kill Intel committee. It is likely delivered and unredacted form. The Pfizer warrant is eighty two pages. He tax wolf is girlfriend at the time. Allie Watkins, according to the charging documents he texts his girlfriend eighty two times most likely screen shots of each individual page of the FIS warn. Now, if you're a closet investigator out there, you're probably figuring out where I'm going with this. If not I'll explain it to you. There were a whole pages of the FIS warned blacked out. Meaning they were like black dots. They got the Senate Intel committee most likely the unredacted portion of the FIS it if it was eighty two pages, and he Texas girlfriend eighty two times, he most likely Joe would not text this girlfriend a fully redacted page eight Joe check this out. Here's a big black dot a page. They're not going to do that..

Allie Watkins Halley Watkins Senate Intel committee Senate FIS Joe politico investigator Texas
Collusion probe off limits in second Manafort trial, U.S. judge rules

Dave Ramsey

00:20 sec | 3 years ago

Collusion probe off limits in second Manafort trial, U.S. judge rules

"Required to respond to a subpoena to matter of the canons of judicial independence. I can't give you an answer on that hypothetical question. Democrats have claimed the president chose Cavanagh shield himself from ongoing criminal investigations ABC's. Terry Moran has more from the capital versus Nixon was about tapes about evidence. But can the president

ABC President Trump Senate Intelligence Committee Senator John Mccain Vice President Senate Brett Cavenaugh Terry Moran Intel Committee Aaron Katersky Commerce Department Mike Pence Ollie Rogan Cavanagh John Kyle Nixon Paul Manafort Manafort Roanoke Facebook America
Rosie O'Donnell Baits Donald Trump With Broadway Tunes Protest Outside White House

Red Eye Radio

11:20 min | 3 years ago

Rosie O'Donnell Baits Donald Trump With Broadway Tunes Protest Outside White House

"Only trump Could get the far left to sing patriotic songs And embrace patriotic songs the next thing you're going to see Is, the last standing for the national, anthem no, don't get. Crazy but here they are singing America the beautiful beautiful flag-waving and so we are going to call out. Rosie o'donald and all of these protesters Out there in front of the White House She. Let a, Broadway performers in the. Musical protest you said let the president no-one, no-one certain terms that we are alive awake and we are woke She said, to the crowd part. Of an ongoing anti Trump protest now on, its twenty-second consecutive night Some of those. That are protesting. As part of the Kremlin annex protest were in their third week of the event. Protesters gathered Monday this is from the hill protestors gathered Monday with an. Array of anti Trump signs many focused on alleged conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the. Russians government two of the most popular chance of the night were. Lock him up and Putin's puppet Therefore we have this challenge to those. On the left and Democrats out there that you have completely one hundred percent failed you are complete and total hypocrites. On the Russian. Allegations and you know why because you are not behind us in the yet be. I and the department of Justice releasing all the information that they have. On Trump's collusion with the Russians the Republicans are all Bort devenue Nunes is for it The Republicans the house freedom caucus therefore they've been screaming for the FBI. And the department of Justice to release all the information That, they have on Trump colluding with, the Russians it's only the Republicans that are screaming for it if. You say lock him up if you're calling him Putin's puppet why aren't, you behind us seeking the, all the, information is. Released if you are not behind us and that you are nothing but hypocrites you are liars You are hypocrites that information would prove. Once and for all to the American people you say the Trump conspired, with the Russians Wow excuse me colluded now in the last, week conspired it went from collusion to conspiracy But colluded conspired with the, Russians can change outcome of the. Election let's find out the evidence? At, the FBI. Has. So you can prove your point, why aren't you behind the release So you know and you, have the evidence that Trump colluded slash conspired, with the Russians to hack or change outcome of the election why are you not screaming for that because, that? Information surely will prove it which means in the court of public, opinion that leads to the political. Will for what impeachment and then you can move on? With the legal process right if you find that if you get your all your information here then you can go for impeachment why are you not behind us any, democrat out there why aren't, you behind the FBI and? The department of Justice releasing the information that they have on Donald. Trump and the investigation into collusion or conspiracy with, the Russians call it whatever you. Want why aren't you behind us Why are, you stating we need to get. To the truth we believed that he committed treason by? The way that sign was you can see the sign their treason if you believe that the president committed treason against the United States why aren't you behind us to, release all the information on. The investigation of Donald Trump Because, you're a bunch of hypocrites that can be the only reason you're a bunch of hypocrites If you believe it happened How are? You going to prove that, or you your your hypocrites and you know you're lying about it Because otherwise you would be behind. Us wanting the FBI because that's the only evidence that you would have is the the department, of Justice they were, the? Ones that started the counterintelligence investigation on, Trump if you believe he is guilty you want the. Evidence right and if. You don't want the evidence. It shows that you're just a bunch? Of political hacks you had, no purity you have no liberal purity All your patriotic singing everything is just a smokescreen of propaganda and lies tell us where we're wrong and anybody tell us go ahead Adam Schiff over the. Weekend while it's it's obvious it's right there. In plain sight, no, it's not you're. You're the top democrat on the. House Intel committee show the American people go with Devon Nunez go to the FBI. The Justice department and get that information unredacted in show the American people that will lead to the political that will prove that had happened and lead to the. Political will for impeachment every certainly it will every one of you on the White House lawn, are hypocrites liars and, political? Hacks you actually don't want the truth, you actually don't care about whether anybody tried to change. The outcome of the. Election you're actually you're lying Your hypocrites and, you're, using the propaganda. Of patriotic songs because you don't. Have the evidence behind you that's how far you had to go you had to. Do something as distasteful To your liberal DNA And sing patriotic songs because that shows you how much of the la- lack of evidence that you have and you. Don't want the truth why is Rosie O'Donnell a nationalist Yes she's. A nationalist America the beautiful nationalist Are we exceptional. I? Mean. You're seeing that song for reasons? Right, exactly why are you. Singing the song It's about. American exceptionalism I mean it points it out American American patriotism yes we're patriots we wanna know the truth we believe the Trump colluded with the Russians. To have the? Election will, the only way you're going to. Find? Out. Whether that's really true or not Either. You have the evidence and. Are refusing to present it because nobody's presented that evidence do those Rosie and everybody that's protesting the White House lawn for the last twenty two days Either you have the, evidence which is why you're protesting? Or you're searching for the evidence well then you should be screaming for the release of, it and if you have the evidence because you're so certain why aren't you releasing the evidence why are you calling, on, Adam Schiff to. Do what's within his power to join Devon Nunez to go to the Justice. Department to make sure that information gets out for the American. People because you're hypocrites liars, and political hacks you care more about the imagery of you doing something than the actual substance you doing something you actually. Don't care about the United States you actually don't have patriotism you're using it as propaganda at this particular moment because you don't have the substance behind you tell us where we're wrong I dare anyone to tell us where we're wrong in our analysis here you can't because either they know the evidence because they claim he committed Reason where's the evidence If you haven't because you're so certain presented to us and if, you don't have it but you, think he did it then you should be demanding that the FBI in the department of Justice and Adam Schiff get to the bottom of it and get the actual documents of the FBI and the department of Justice to show you that Donald Trump colluded or conspired with the Russians, to change the election then you. Can impeach him If you expose this to the American people the impeachment process wouldn't be far behind right the political will would be there because certainly it, would prove it let's go Man up a wait. A minute That's gender specific person up yeah I person has. Sun depth up now. Step up thank you very much 'cause person has son in it. And their son is gender. Specific People up Why aren't they? Doing that why aren't they in front? Of Adam Schiff screaming Why is that shift one at at, one, moment saying, I have proof there's proof? And then this past weekend saying well? It's obvious No no. No no no you don't Mr. Schiff if you're, a prosecutor you don't, walk up in court and say well he, murdered, the guy Chums at your evidence Everybody knows every now and then Yeah that's well that's. What he did over the weekend when I looked, at, that one interview and said well he said it's obvious. And you said it's there yet he. Never stated what it was right So. It's time we get down. To, the truth, here is it always is in our. Show and I know a lot of other people, want, the truth we want the truth those protesting on the. White House they don't care about truth All the carriers do? We, have a do, we have, an effective propaganda machine let's. Go 'cause care about the truth you care about the actual documents and the actual investigation of the FBI into Donald Trump and you're asking why is Adam. Schiff protecting Donald Trump, otherwise you're a hypocrite your hypocrites. Liars and you're using patriotism For the worst, reason which is, to promote untruthful propaganda If you'd,.

Donald Trump FBI Adam Schiff Justice Department White House Putin America President Trump United States Devon Nunez Rosie O'donald Rosie O'donnell Bort Devenue Nunes Rosie Intel Committee Prosecutor
"intel committee" Discussed on The Ben Shapiro Show

The Ben Shapiro Show

01:38 min | 3 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on The Ben Shapiro Show

"Happening but the republicans are not doing themselves any favor by looking hackers so the house intel committee also concluded that the russians were not interested in seeing trump would that's a fine credible conclusion that's the best way possible again it's possible that the democrats that the russians just wanted to intervene in the election make trouble because they do this a lot but it's not a good look when the house intel republicans are saying the just got it wrong so here is here's one house intel republicans saying just that and when we released that report we're going to be able to show you know what the see i just got it wrong just like they did by the way in the gulf war where they said there was weapons of mass destruction that we didn't find the cia is not perfect they often or at least from time to time we'll make mistakes as as do i as to you as do any agency and we're just gonna have to show the people they were wrong on this when kate the luck with this this doesn't look should all what he really should have said you should have said there was a wide disparity of opinion among intelligence agencies about what the russians actually wanted trump to win that as far as the evidence shows is actually true instead he's going directly after the not a good look i just i think that if you're going to tout this house intelligence report as kind of the be all end all i think that you're gonna end up in on the wrong side of on the wrong side of everything i think we should wait for muller to come down with his evidence will evaluate evidence when it comes down otherwise it's just hearsay otherwise it's he's he said she said nonsense even some gop representatives are essentially saying this one of the gop representatives is a guy named tom rooney he's a florida republican and here's what he had to say about the house gop intel committees announcement they found no evidence of collusion senate hasn't ended there as bob muller hasn't ended there is.

house intel committee trump intel cia tom rooney gop senate bob muller kate florida
"intel committee" Discussed on All In with Chris Hayes

All In with Chris Hayes

02:04 min | 3 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on All In with Chris Hayes

"And you want to bring a fox news alert democratic senator mark warner of virginia fox news has learned texted with a russian oligarchy lobbyist in an effort to contact the author of the trump dossier christopher steal because you can't make this up i guess can't trump tv went after the top democrat in the senate intelligence committee last month trying to discredit mark warner based on his private text messages with the russian connected lobbyist from whom he was seeking information for the committee's work leaders of the senate intel committee reportedly no who leaks those tax the ones that appeared on trump tv there according to your times today they concluded several weeks ago was republicans on the house intel committee that committees of course lebedeva nunez a man whose hometown newspaper calls and trump stooge sarah warrant and senate intel chairman richard burr would not confirm the report when asked about it today but joining me now democratic member of the house intelligence committee same committee is devin nunes congressman eric swallow of california did you republican colleagues leak private tax of your democratic senator counterpart well chris good evening they are not to nine it that is what is most concerning to me is the issued a statement today only can issue with what they called the absurd nature of the story but they didn't deny what was alleged in the story it also would not be the first time that we have read in the papers updates to our investigation we've seen the selective leaking to the washington examiner were democrats of learned for the first time about witnesses who are coming in but this just shows the american people what we're up against the snow that we have to plough which is that donald trump has free legal counsel in the on the house intelligence committee and and that's what we're up against every day we believe in this on asking you to make a digitally what do you believe do you believe that your colleagues leap these texts.

"intel committee" Discussed on Bill O'Reilly's Free Podcast

Bill O'Reilly's Free Podcast

02:17 min | 3 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on Bill O'Reilly's Free Podcast

"The questions that need to be asked of these agents now i've i've been asked before is it possible that the director doesn't know what's being presented to the face of court judge i will tell you why that so hard to believe the rule making behind the fis the court expressly indicated that the director and a deputy director are the only authorities that can govern the fis a court authority that they seek to obtain now can be delegated but it's very limited on on that so it's very hard to believe that it doesn't go all the way i have to the top that's why i say that when an andrew mccabe the deputy director the fbi says to the senate intel committee we would never have gotten this wire on carter page had we not use the dossier and then then call me his bosses we know the dossiers on verify i put those two sapiens together and i go there's got to be a crime here maybe it so make me they were just the gang the couldn't shoot straight but it's hard to believe a guy like colmey a mccabe these guys would be that stupid it is incredibly damaging to acknowledge that that they would not have gotten the still dossier or a gotten a warrant without the still dossier that if that is accurate that is one of the most damaging uh facts in this this scenario and it doesn't matter of your democrats republicans on that committee say an acquitted hang animal that's correct and the fact that they could not have a you know acquired this search warrant without steel dossier and then what did they know and when did they know it and if they knew that wasn't accurate or that it was paid for they had an obligation to bring that to the fis a court judge and i would also say goal the judge had an obligation to ask questions and find out who is this steel and why why is it that that this dossier right on a guy has admitted as far as i know okay that they didn't tell the judge that the steel dossier was paid for by the hillary clinton campaign.

director deputy director andrew mccabe fbi senate intel committee carter hillary clinton
"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

01:40 min | 3 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"Why wait till lozi battles come out oh you oh you heard they were missing all you heard rob and by the way you didn't hear it here first there other people who know this those emails ain't misin and ain is a word in this case they are not missing wait till you see those bad boys all right one final topic for the day we have to tell me check your the time sorry folks i just wanna make sure all right we got a little bit town left here so it's interesting that adam schiff the lead hack the ranking member democrat on the intel committee who is really disgracing himself the office and the american people he's the one pushing this trump collusion false fairy tale he's the one pushing their response to the memo couple quick things on this i have a story again in the shorter states devastating the democrats are now poland a dipsy do flip peru because democrats are and on that not matter of voting democrats out in the country but the democrats up on the hill a really a disgusting of filthy group of national security tyrants not get dan that's harsh of behind it is for a reason they have now in opposing memo opposing that's supposed to counteract the memo that was released last week that was devastating won't be addressed on a friday an they're pulling a little trick show on the memo no adam schiff who is a political act by the way just got caught on tape colluding with foreign officials to get a supposedly naked pictures of trump he got praying da da da yeah yeah sharing what kind of a dog this guy is he's literally on the phone recorded colluding with foreigners to get naked pictures of trump it like you let's forget all of that right okay for a second but that actually happen.

rob adam schiff intel committee dan poland peru
"intel committee" Discussed on MSNBC Morning Joe

MSNBC Morning Joe

02:16 min | 4 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on MSNBC Morning Joe

"Raise crime after boiled tweets president rows of pm after she blessed praise of hateful group and so to be reached the republican challenges the senate intel committee back trump's choice story disgrace richard burr told the new york times quoted was something along the lines of i hope you can conclude this as quickly as possible verse said that he replied that it would end when the committee finished its interviews burst said he did not feel pressured by trump's appeal portraying it as the action of someone who is quote never been in government lawmakers an aide said trump told senate majority leader mitch mcconnell accepted yeah i mean government i i know richard burr and richard burr heidi i believe of coal that my party a lot but i believe he's been acting honourably in a bipartisan way with more warner he's been i think over this past year one of the best of the republicans actually keeping their head down to doing their work but when he says when he says it reminds me of somebody who had not been government before that's the same way as saying what dignite fina doing that was the same thing we desire intel chiefs as well came before congress right was how it will i didn't feel pressured but these things happen in what we're seeing here is a portrait of multiple pressure points now because it wasn't even just the head of the intel committees he got multiple members of that committee other members of congress to then try in pressure burger and there was a pattern here the words that were used time to move on and so you see here a pattern where he's also cornering people on the plane blunt was was cornered on the plane to me one of the most telling parts of that article was also that in mitch mcconnell's words you could see through these interactions that this president was not able to separate out the fact that russia needed to be punished for this interference from the fact that his campaign was under investigation for collusion he couldn't separate the too and that's why you see is almost bitterness by this president every time the.

senate intel committee richard burr new york times trump congress mitch mcconnell president russia senate majority leader intel
"intel committee" Discussed on Slate's The Gist

Slate's The Gist

01:46 min | 4 years ago

"intel committee" Discussed on Slate's The Gist

"A russian company owns the us company that can mined uranium in the united states there is still a law against exporting any uranium to russia and the deal was approved by the us government the following entities approved of the deal the us nuclear regulatory commission the utah nuclear regulator secretary state the attorney general the secretaries of the treasury defence commerce energy homeland security and the head of the us trade representative and the office of science and technology but did you notice i mentioned secretary of state will hillary clinton was secretary of state one of the people and entities who approved the deal and like i said the uranium owner who got wealthy when the russians eventually bought his company did give donations to the clinton foundation why wasn't this deal rejected just wasn't a big deal because it really affect anything no one's even proved or even asserted in it's really easy to assert that any of the uranium from those utah minds ever wound up anywhere near a russian reactor missile it did wind up near a russian under reactor mr deva nunez chair of the house intel committee now he recused himself on matters related to russian interference in the election but maybe because he finds himself with all this free time he's looking at russian interference in atomic element number ninety two look trade gouty who is the chair of the oversight committee also looking into the uranium deal tell the benghazi hearings and the upshot of all that was they cleared hillary clinton or at least the majority reports said there is no evidence of wrongdoing the entire investigation certainly bloodied hillary clinton electorally perhaps the right believed that hillary clinton is still running for president seems at fox news.

united states russia the deal attorney representative clinton foundation house intel committee hillary clinton president utah secretary treasury secretary of state mr deva nunez benghazi fox