40 Burst results for "Harvard Law School"

Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Morning Edition

Morning Edition

00:32 min | 14 hrs ago

Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Morning Edition

"A dropping over large Nuclear weapon amongst the civilian population is a war crime. Gabriella Bloom is a Harvard law school professor specializing in the law of war. Although there was no clear treaty law 75 years ago, outlawing atomic bombings, Bloom says that's changed under the current laws of war. If you know you're going to impact, Sicilians, you must provide warning and you must take precautions to avoid harming civilians to the extent possible. There is no doubt none of that was considered. None of that was seriously wave in reference to her. She manage the sake. There was a lot of invocation of the military nature of the target. But I think that was really a rationalization to help people feel more comfortable with what they were doing that Stanford Law School professor Alan Whiner he co authored why the atomic bombing of Hiroshima would be illegal today. It's the cover story for the current issue of the bulletin of Atomic scientists, he says, while the obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not clearly illegal at the time, it seems to me quite indispensable to claim that the atomic bombing of those cities which was intended to cause widespread civilian casualties, it could be legally justified. Still whiner worries that after 75 years, memories of such horrific bombings may be fading. They may now be clearly illegal, but that's no guarantee they can't happen again. David Well, not NPR news. Planning.

Gabriella Bloom Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists Alan Whiner Professor Stanford Law School Hiroshima NPR David Well Nagasaki
Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Morning Edition

Morning Edition

00:59 min | 14 hrs ago

Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Morning Edition

"Has taken a much more aggressive approach than Facebook, especially lately, and it's really crack down on the president. It's put fact checks warning labels on some of his posts, and it also even blocked his son, Donald Trump Jr. From tweeting after he broke similar rules about spreading Corona virus missed information. So you know, I think we're just going to see kind of more of the stuff happen before the election. And what are we hearing from the Trump campaign about all of this? Well, the campaign sent out a public statement saying, Look, the president was stating a fact he was merely saying that Children are less susceptible to the disease, even though to be very clear. That's not exactly what he said on Fox News. The campaign also accused the social media platforms of being biased against conservatives. And that's something we hear from a lot of conservatives. It's not particularly backed up by evidence. But I think you know, look it. Just look at how the Trump campaign reacted yesterday when they were blocked from tweeting. It quickly removed the tweet with this video after it lost those privileges. That's an admission that this campaign really needs Twitter. You know, we no social media and in this day and age is already critical to reaching voters with a pandemic. It's even more clear. This is a campaign going to be fought online. NPR Tech correspondent Shannon Bond, Shannon. Thanks a lot. Thanks. 75 years ago. Today, an American warplane dropped the world's first atomic weapon. It exploded directly above the Japanese city of Hiroshima, instantly killing tens of thousands of civilians. That nuclear air strike and a 2nd 13 days later in Nagasaki, led to the Japanese surrender and the end of World War two. NPR's David well in the reports that what was justified by some then Is being sharply questioned today and a note The story includes graphic accounts of the aftermath of the attack. President Harry Truman was returning from an Allied Nations conference in Potsdam, Germany, where a demand for Japan's unconditional surrender had been refused. When he recorded this message to the American people. On August 6th, 1945. A short time ago, an American airplane dropped one bomb on here, Oshima And destroyed its usefulness to the enemy. Human then described the terrible new weapon that had obliterated 2/3 of Hiroshima. It is an atomic bomb. It is a harnessing of the basic power of the universe. It's explosion at 8 16 on a Monday morning created a gigantic 900 foot wide fireball 500,000 degrees hot. In that moment, I saw that bluish white flash in the windows. Setsuko Thurlow was a 13 year old in Hiroshima. That fateful day. Three years ago, she told NPR how she crawled out of a collapsed building to find dark objects approaching her. It was human beings fried by the blast there are covered with blood and burned and blood. And swollen. A flesh hanging from their bones, part of their bodies from missing and someone carrying their own eyeballs India and and that's a collapse. This stomach burst open Thurlow's campaign for decades against nuclear weapons. Earlier this week, she sent President Trump a letter. Nuclear weapons, she wrote, are not a necessary evil. They are the ultimate evil. Russell gawking. Bach witnessed the Hiroshima bombing from a very different perspective. Before his death in November, he'd been the last surviving member of the US crew on that mission passed four years ago What his thoughts were, as he rode on a warplane named necessary evil. Achenbach told voices of the Manhattan project. We had to go out and kill every one of them. We were at war. They started it. They are turned to finish it. Every day, he said. Lots of lives. Both in our military and their four years ago, Barack Obama became the first American head of state to visit Hiroshima's peace memorial. He offered condolences but pointedly did not apologize. Mere words. Do not give voice to such suffering. But we have a shared responsibility look directly into the eye of history. And ask what we must do differently. Curbside suffering again. Standing in the very same spot in November, Pope Francis suggested a great crime had occurred in Hiroshima, Dominika. They're using atomic energy to wage war, the pope said, is today. Now more than ever, a crime. There is no question that a dropping over large Nuclear weapon amongst the civilian population is a war crime. Gabriella Bloom is a Harvard law school professor specializing in the law of war. Although there was no clear treaty law 75 years ago, outlawing atomic bombings, Bloom says that's changed under the current laws of war. If you know you're going to impact civilians, you must provide warning and you must take for conscience to avoid harming civilians to the extent possible. There is no doubt none of that was considered and none of that was seriously wave in reference to you or she may Nagasaki. There was a lot of invocation of the military nature of the target, but I think that was really a rationalization. To help people feel more comfortable with what they were doing that Stanford law School professor Alan Whiner, he co authored why the atomic bombing of Hiroshima would be illegal. Today. It's the cover story for the current issue of the bulletin of Atomic scientists, he says. While the obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not clearly illegal at the time, it seems to be quite indefensible to claim that the atomic bombing Of those cities, which was intended to cause widespread civilian casualties. It could be legally justified. Still, whiner worries that after 75 years, memories of such horrific bombings may be fading. They may now be clearly illegal, but that's no guarantee they can't happen again. David Well, Noah NPR news..

Hiroshima Nagasaki NPR Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists Donald Trump Jr Setsuko Thurlow President Trump David Well Fox News Facebook President Harry Truman Twitter Gabriella Bloom Shannon Bond Stanford Law School Barack Obama
Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Morning Edition

Morning Edition

00:44 min | 16 hrs ago

Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Morning Edition

"It. We did lots of lives. Both in our military and their military. Four years ago, Barack Obama became the first American head of state to visit Hiroshima's peace memorial. He offered condolences but pointedly did not apologize. Mere words. Do not give voice to such suffering. But we have a shared responsibility look directly into the eye of history. And ask what we must do differently. Curbs of suffering again. Standing in the very same spot in November, Pope Francis suggested a great crime had occurred in Hiroshima, Dominika. They're using atomic energy to wage war, the pope said, is today. Now more than ever, a crime. There is no rush and that a dropping over large Nuclear weapon amongst the civilian population is a war crime. Gabriella Bloom is a Harvard law school professor specializing in the law of war, although there was no clear treaty law 75 years ago, outlawing atomic bombings. Bloom says that's changed under the current laws of war. If you know you're going to impact civilians, you must provide warning and you must take precautions to avoid harming civilians. To the extent possible. There is no doubt none of that was considered and none of that was seriously wave. In reference to you or she may Nagasaki. There was a lot of invocation of the military nature of the target. But I think that was really a rationalization to help people feel more comfortable with what they were doing that Stanford Law School professor Alan Whiner he co authored why the atomic bombing of Hiroshima would be illegal today. It's the cover story for the current issue of the bulletin of Atomic scientists, he says, while the obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not clearly illegal at the time, it seems to me quite indefensible to claim that the atomic bombing of those cities, which was intended to cause widespread civilian casualties, it could be legally justified. Still, whiner worries that after 75 years, memories of such horrific bombings may be fading. We may now be clearly illegal, but that's no guarantee they can't happen again. David Well, Noah NPR news. Planning a wedding can be a lot of work in the best of times, right? The food, the venue music guest list and for the bride, There's the issue of the dress. 01 organization is trying to help those who are juggling all of that as well as responding to this pandemic. Brides across America is giving away wedding dresses. Two brides who are front line workers fighting covert 19 Like Nicole Harris. She's a nurse in Massachusetts who has dealt with the virus every day. For a couple months there were exclusively a covert floor. Nicole got engaged in February and says, planning a wedding during a pandemic. Well, it was all just a bit too much like I can't do any more. I just need to sit in Just not think about anything after some days at work, so her mom heard about the dress, giveaway and hair supplied. The room was full of dresses and all different styles, all different kinds. And they were gorgeous dresses. One stood out and my mom went with me. And she said, your face even under the mask lit up. When you put this dress on Megan Roberts is part of the Navy Reserve Nurse Corps and volunteered to serve in New York City aboard the U. S and s comfort. She is now back to nursing in Kansas City and still seeing covert patients. We are The designated covert. I see you so my work with with these type of patients has not changed from what I was doing on the ship to what I'm doing every day. Robert's got engaged in May. But she was nervous about gown shopping during a pandemic. How many people can I bring? Does everybody have to wear a mask? Roberts also went through brides across America. I tried on probably 10 different dresses, but I tried this dress on probably five times. Decision made. I got teary eyed. My mom started getting teary eyed and we just kind of knew like this was this is the dress. Harris and Robert's both say they still have a lot of planning ahead. And yes, address is just a dress, but being excited about it and planning a wedding. You bring a sense of normalcy in the time that is anything but and on tomorrow's morning edition, many college kids are packing their bags, loading the car and heading to school. We get an update on higher Ed's pandemic plans. Thiss is NPR news. And on this Thursday, you are listening to K C. R w We're in on it onto the point. If America ever used its thousands of nuclear weapons, it would be suicidal and a nuclear war. There'd be no winners. Everybody is a loser, all of civilization. Is at stake. We've known that for 75 years, but our weapons of mass destruction are still on hair trigger alert, and just one man. President Trump has the power to push the button. Is it? Finally, time to make the world safer on are to the point podcast. The new school year is starting up in much the country over the next few weeks in a new poll finds that a majority of K through 12 teachers Would prefer to teach remotely this fall because the Corona virus pandemic, he'll hear how that's playing out in.

Nicole Harris Hiroshima Megan Roberts Gabriella Bloom America Barack Obama Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists Professor Nagasaki Alan Whiner Robert Stanford Law School Donald Trump Pope Francis NPR Massachusetts Navy Reserve Nurse Corps David Well
Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

Stay Tuned with Preet

01:11 min | 19 hrs ago

Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on Stay Tuned with Preet

"Based on what you just said. I wonder if you think the cavenaugh will be affected by the anger, he must feel about his right or wrong the anger he must feel about his confirmation and the anger that he displayed. Quite sharply at the confirmation hearing, this whole two week effort has been calculated an orchestrated political hit. Fueled with apparent pent up anger about president trump and the two thousand, sixteen election. Fear that it's been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons. And millions of dollars in money from outside left wing opposition groups, or is he going to let that go and try overtime to be something like John Roberts? I think. It's similar to Thomas but different in some respects. Thomas was just enraged and determined to screw his adversaries I mean I I don't think it's any more simple than that. I? Think Thomas. Just hates Liberals and Democrats with an abiding passion and every single day on the Supreme Court he is determined to screw them in every possible way and that really hasn't changed. A little different I think cavanaugh is very angry about how mistreated I think he's upset that he cannot appear in public because he was someone who liked appearing public like going universities like doing courts He does not like the fact that he's essentially a prisoner of the Supreme Court. They'll be protests wherever he goes, but he's also someone who is really kind of a Washington insider and wants to be liked and wants to be seen as something been other than a political hack in a way that Thomas doesn't care about that at all. So I think that the those might. pull him in slightly different directions by his vote. Still Cabinets vote is still very predictable one in in the vast majority of cases. I believe you wrote about the relationship between Obama and Roberts I. Think he described them as near perfect antagonists. How'd you describe trump, Roberts? The thing about Roberts and Obama is that had so much in common I? Mean It's not just that they both went to Harvard law school but they were both part of the Harvard Law Review. You know serve scholarly approach to law people who sloth they both read the constitution they both written and an for example books. Right for example, I, you know that that's that's the thing that they both had in common and so I, think politically, they were very different I mean, you know John Roberts is a serious serious conservative but I think saw an Obama. A. A serious I who just came out. very differently on most political and legal issues. John Roberts is John Roberts the title he has is not Chief Justice Supreme Court it's chief justice in the United States and Roberts takes that seriously in Robert Season as the representative of the Judicial Branch and when he hears trump saying you know judges the judges stupid or it's an Obama judge I it's it's a Bush judge. Garrity and the simple mindedness and the craven nece with which. Trump talks about the judiciary really does Rob Roberts the wrong way. Now, how many votes that actually shifts I I would have said not many but this this year, maybe it has had some effect but temperamentally and intellectually. Robertson and trump could not be farther are. There's a vacancy on the Supreme Court even as late as September October. November? Give there's a lame duck session. discomfit and were able to fill it well. You know I also spent time thinking and asking about that question in the answer I get from people who are knowledgeable about such things is there is at least a theoretical possibility that Mitch McConnell could do this six to eight weeks. It would take essentially burning down the Senate I mean imagine my question. Yeah. In the scenario in which there's a vacancy than the election happens and Biden wins and the Senate is going to flip in January so you have an incoming democratic majority. In that circumstance. McConnell is going to try is not I I don't see a scenario where McConnell doesn't try. I mean McConnell reasons that are somewhat mysterious is obsessed with the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court particular and has made it his mission to remake it. With Donald Trump and so the opportunity particularly if it's Ruth Ginsburg liberals who's obviously not well and is a possibility to leave the court. Is something that I think he's willing to take all kinds of political hell to do. You know he doesn't have a lot of room for error there only fifty three Republicans in the Senate and given what the Senate did to Obama End to America. Arlen, in keeping in mind that died on February thirteenth two thousand sixteen and they didn't allow Obama to fill that seat for eleven months to jam through a nominee at this point, would be hypocrisy of such a gigantic level that I think there are. At least some senators who will have second thoughts. McConnell has had near total control of his conference throughout his tenure. I think he would probably be able to get through, but it's not it's not a done deal. There will be people there who at least have some misgivings but you know like Susan Collins is is always having misgivings and concerns and and you know second thoughts but always winds up voting with McConnell anyway. I suspect. That would be the approach also. So I'm going to resist the temptation to go hours, which is sometimes what I wanna do with someone like you and while we're all confined it home but I will let you go all right pal. Thank you Jeff Toobin for spending some time with US congratulations on the book true crimes and misdemeanors the investigation of Donald Trump I. Wish you great success that's free. Pick everybody. My conversation with Jeffrey toobin continues for members of the.

Donald Trump John Roberts Mitch Mcconnell Barack Obama Supreme Court Senate Thomas Rob Roberts Jeff Toobin Chief Justice Supreme Court Roberts Harvard Law School Harvard Law Review President Trump Susan Collins Cavanaugh Washington Ruth Ginsburg Garrity
Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on NPR's World Story of the Day

NPR's World Story of the Day

00:33 min | 19 hrs ago

Fresh update on "harvard law school" discussed on NPR's World Story of the Day

"Seventy five years ago. Today, an American warplane dropped the world's first atomic weapon. It exploded directly above the Japanese city of Hiroshima, instantly killing tens of thousands of civilians that nuclear airstrike and a second one, three days later in Nagasaki led to the Japanese. Surrender. The end of world, war two NPR's David. WELNA reports. What was justified then is being questioned today in a note, this story includes a graphic account of the aftermath of the attack. President Harry Truman was returning from an nations conference in Potsdam Germany where a demand for Japan's. Surrender had been refused when he recorded this message to the American people on August six, nineteen, forty, five, a short time ago. An American airplane dropped one bomb on. Hero Shema. And destroyed its usefulness to the enemy truman. Then describe the terrible new weapon that had obliterated two thirds. Of Hiroshima, it is an atomic bomb. Of the basic power of the universe, it's explosion at eight sixteen on a Monday morning created a gigantic nine, hundred foot wide fireball five, hundred, thousand degrees hot. In that moment, I saw that bluish white flesh in that windows sets go through low was a thirteen year old in Hiroshima that fateful day three years ago. She told NPR how she crawled out of claps building to find dark objects approaching her. It was human beings fried by the blast still covered with Milan burned blackened and swollen in. Fleischer, I'm getting from the bones parts of their bodies for missing and some are adding their own eyeballs in and and that's the collapse. This stomach boost thurlow campaign for decades against nuclear weapons. Earlier this week she sent president trump a letter nuclear weapons. She wrote are not a necessary evil. They are the ultimate Evil Russell. Gawk witnessed the Hiroshima bombing from a very different perspective before his death in November. He'd been the last surviving member of the US crew on that mission asked four years ago. What his thoughts were as he wrote on a warplane named necessary evil God comeback told voices of the Manhattan project. We had to go out and kill every one of them were at war. started. Is Our turn to finish it. Redid. Rescinded. Lots of lives. Both in our military. A four years ago. Barack Obama became the first American. Head of state to visit Hiroshima Peace Memorial. He offered condolences, but pointedly did not apologize. Mere words cannot give voice to suffer. But we have a shared responsibility to look directly into the eye of history. And that's What we must do differently. Suffering. Again, standing in the very same spot in November Pope Francis suggested a great crime had occurred in Hiroshima Illu flow. MEKA GO PHOENIX. Using atomic energy to wage war. The pope said is today. Now more than ever a crime, there is no question and that a dropping over large, not clear weapon amongst the civilian population is a warcry. Gabriel Bloom is a Harvard law school professor specializing in the Law of war although there was no clear treaty law seventy, five years ago, outlawing atomic bombings loom. Loom says that's changed under the current laws of war. If you know you're going to impact civilians, you must provide warning. You must take precautions to avoid harming civilians to the extent. Possible. There is no doubt none of that was considered. A non of that was seriously weighed in reference to harassment asaki. There was a lot of invocation of the military nature. Nature of the target. But I think that was really a rationalization to help people feel more comfortable with what they were doing that. Stanford Law School Professor Alan. Winer. He co-authored why the atomic bombing of Russian mob would be illegal today. It's the cover story for the current issue of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. He says while the obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nagasaki was not clearly illegal at the time. It seems to me quite indefensible to claim that the atomic bombing of the cities which was intended to cause widespread civilian casualties could be legally justified. Still Winer worries that after seventy five years, memories of such horrific bombings may be fading. They may now be clearly illegal, but that's no guarantee they can't happen again. David Welna. NPR News. One more of the news you need and stories you love from NPR download the NPR one APP on your smartphone. You'll hear a nonstop feed stories and podcasts curated and personalized for you. GET NPR one from your phone's APP store and start listening now..

Hiroshima NPR Npr News Nagasaki President Harry Truman Winer Hiroshima Peace Memorial Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists David Welna Barack Obama Professor Fleischer Stanford Law School Milan United States Japan Thurlow Pope Francis
The Trump administration says foreign students must leave US if classes go online

MSNBC Rachel Maddow (audio)

02:37 min | 3 weeks ago

The Trump administration says foreign students must leave US if classes go online

"Donald Trump I ran for president. He's had a lot of racist and homophobic things about immigrants, and how he was going to build a wall to many of them out, he also said this. I want people to come into our country legally I WANNA have a big fat beautiful open door. A BIG FAT Beautiful Open Door for legal immigrants. That's how Donald Trump tried to convince the American, And the voters that it wasn't really about hating immigrants, it was just about the rule of law getting the so-called bad hombres out. If you recall Donald Trump has done many things, both during that election, and in the four years, since that made it really clear that he really is prejudice against immigrants of all stripes, or maybe of most stripes, and doesn't seem to care much about the rule of law, either but some level of welcome for immigrants, some level of acknowledgement that immigration is actually important to America's economy, if not its. Its values and traditions was mainstream republican consensus at the time as recently as last year, administration officials were still telling reporters. Trump actually wanted to increase the number of visas for highly skilled workers, but here's the thing Donald. Trump has repeatedly and emphatically slammed his big fat beautiful door in the faces of those same immigrants that his party once tried to make exceptions for the latest example is the trump administration's announcement of a new policy for international students who study at an American College and who studies have moved online during the pandemic. Pandemic, the trump administration essentially told those students to go back to where they came from revoking their right to stay in the United States. The decision doesn't just end the lives of those international students. It's another discouragement of them to study and potentially build their lives in America. We're shutting the door on some of the world's best and brightest minds, giving up on their contributions to American business to research, innovation and society, now and down the Road Harvard Law School Professor Vivek Wadhwa writes that the effective pushing these students away will quote. Quote likely be an exodus of academic talent to schools in Europe or elsewhere and intellectual catastrophe of historic proportions with long-term economic ramifications. There is so much at stake in this move by the president for the students for the universities, and for all of us that today the attorneys General of Sixteen. States and DC joined the age of Massachusetts ensuing the administration to try and stop the policy. They're asking Federal Court in Boston to block. The policy is the case moves forward no word yet, but as Rachel says watch this

Donald Trump Pandemic President Trump America Professor Vivek Wadhwa United States Road Harvard Law School Boston Massachusetts Federal Court DC Rachel Europe American College
Physical distancing 'impossible' for the deafblind amid COVID

The Von Haessler Doctrine

05:17 min | 3 months ago

Physical distancing 'impossible' for the deafblind amid COVID

"Imagine being unable to see or hear throughout all of this the one sense you truly rely on that sense of touch it's also been taken away from you a lot of ways there are thousands of Americans brought home the last month and a half has seriously challenged their ability to thrive A. B. C.'s Devin Dwyer reports on deaf blind Americans grappling with isolation and social distancing during the pandemic most of the sights and sounds of the inescapable the number of cases of coronavirus spiking here in the U. S. this is a terrible experience but for some Americans the scope of this outbreak has been uniquely difficult to face my name is Philip was murder I am deaf blind Philip Wismer student a gala that university Washington DC is one of an estimated forty thousand Americans facing cope with nineteen while unable to clearly see or hear I have not gone off campus since March eighteenth I only come out of my dorm to get food get the mail and that's about it it sounds lonely yeah it is sometimes I I do feel wrongly my other friends that are completely blind feeling very very isolated deaf blind Americans survive by touch hand over hand to communicate fingers on braille signs for mobility hugs and handshakes to feel connected experts say deaf blindness is a spectrum not everyone experiences complete darkness and total silence but touch is critical now comes with significant health risks in many guides are fearful of being touched and touching back twenty eight year old Tyler Samuel of Nashville Tennessee says she's fighting that loneliness relying on our partner for help with daily tasks the genetic condition since birth is degraded her hearing and sight line you're just really worried that I wouldn't wouldn't find an independent and when you do find it you don't want to lose it and so for it to be kind of chipped away is it kind of lowers your self esteem Samuel still walks to work every day by herself this is mine now can empty walk home pediatric surgery coordinator at Vanderbilt University hospital she's a freelance opera singer with dreams of going big the pandemic has prompted some soul searching I lost a friend I go to pick her up and she was very young and thirty early thirties and it prompted me to go head to get my mastectomy will together that's something that I want it like my wishes to me now a trip to the hospital is what many deaf blind Americans told ABC news they fear most there's an assumption in a lot of medical community is that it's better to speak Jack then disable Hoppin girl is a leading advocate for the community I would be terrified I would not get communication a sense that I would not get the care I need to get the virus and go to the hospital she says it's a fight for equality the daughter of an Eritrean refugee Irma is the first deaf blind woman to graduate from Harvard law school in twenty fifteen president Obama recognized her as a champion of change when I'm asking questions today hop and you're actually feeling my questions with your fingers please ask me questions I with her special braille keyboard guide dog Milo by your side Girma an informal network of deaf blind advocates are determined not to be forgotten it's certainly not and Saxena hobby disability and should deal with death Linus I think makes people very you know uncomfortable generally Rebecca Alexander of New York City wants the world to know that deaf blind professionals can pitch in to she's volunteering her services as a counselor to hospital workers on the front lines just knowing that even someone like me who the community I think at large if they knew how limited my vision and my hearing was they might not consider via someone they would reach out to for help and it does feel good to be able to provide that Ashley Benton who coordinates services for the deaf blind in North Carolina says police in rural areas are checking on residents who don't have technology to communicate they contacted us which was beautiful so we were able to work with the officers who have the appropriate PP to go in and check on the step one consumer to make sure they were safe it's so important because we're always together near Seattle deaf blind sisters Nancy and Debbie summer sticking together through it all but we can't all thank goodness we have computers we can talk with each other yeah I think the persistence to stay connected and to contribute to the recovery the deaf blind community raising its voice in its own way what do you like a missing these days I love queen I like the end all of what you mean rap city and like so many dreaming of that big escape after cove it what I would like to do after this is all over with it's taking

Katie Adamson on how the YMCA is like an Iceburg

HIT Like a Girl

06:51 min | 4 months ago

Katie Adamson on how the YMCA is like an Iceburg

"My Name Is Katie. Adamson and I am Vice President of Health Partnerships in policy at the YMCA The USA. I have been at the Y. For fifteen years that I've been in the space for thirty so old I am about prevention and at the Y. We're about community health and so a bit different from the conference. I think I'm a bit of an outlier in terms of that. But that's kind of exciting. So I started my career out working for elected officials and so the first one was Pat Schroeder from Colorado and she stealth helped start the congressional women's caucus and children's caucus and she was one of the first graduates of Harvard law school too. She was a super big innovator in women's rights and I also got to work for a member of parliament and Ireland row when I was yeah when I was there. He brought the whole government down for itchy rights again so it was kind of neat to see the parliament go down because he felt like everyone should get access to HIV care and treatment. Ap Don't mind my asking. When is this like right out of college? He was right out of college. Okay now. They're probably more progressive in the United States. Went back then. They weren't that guy that I worked for a very desmond. He introduced contraception into Ireland around the pope. While that kind of tells you he was a real meek guy I was lucky to work for him and then came back and went back to pat. Schroeder's Office. I had been an intern for her. And I said I still want to work on the hill. Can you help me find a job in so Bernie? Sanders had just been elected so when I worked for him. Nobody who was now. Everybody knows who he is. And Bernie's known a lot more. His super super liberal left issues but he was a huge and continues to be a huge advocate for prevention and that the system is skewed and needs to be right-sized towards bigger investment in prevention. So that really influenced me a lot and for him. I worked on those issues primarily and we introduced legislation to establish national cancer registry in this country so that we you know we have more baseball statistics about guys in the world series than we do about women who got breast cancer and so the idea was if you could really kind of capture when people were diagnosed how they were diagnosed that public health could intervene catch it earlier do better screening referral. Things like that so we were able to pass. That legislation helped him get reelected helped him work with Republicans which he had to do in order to get reelected so I was doing a lot of work at the time for him to increase funding for prevention and so the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said. You know we're the only federal agency outside of Washington and we don't have anyone to help us. Educate the hill about what we do. Would you come work for us so took us about me about a year to get that job? But then I gotta go down to the Centers for Disease Control and help them come up and educate members of Congress about what the problems were and how big of an issue diabetes and cancer arthritis and all these issues were for the nation and how we needed to be doing more and building more programs in communities and that was an incredible experience for me. I came back and I work for some law firms as I was A nonprofit lobbyists basically so it was a law firm for profit. But I I worked for twenty nonprofits and I had to get all of them federal money. Wow so it's very hard. That's a huge responsibility was back in the earmark days and those are really good earmarks. I worked for Christopher and Dana. Reeve when they were alive. Superman and Dino's goal was that no one would ever have to make more than one phone call after a family member had become paralyzed because she was in a privileged position. She had all the access to anything. You could need in in terms of getting help for Chris. It took her like twenty six phone calls to get just a few things answered and so we built this entire center to help people living with paralysis. Get ACCESS TO CARE and information. Our Son had an issue so I've actually reached out to the Christopher Dana Reeve's foundation in having left the hospital after six months day with something that turned their lives upside down there just tremendous. Aren't they incredible? They really are and ours was not an interest spinal cord injury issue. It was non interested central nervous system but the people over there are just a pleasure to work with. I'm so glad to hear that because I was a long time ago so I'm so glad there's still doing three. Oh yes I was lucky enough to also work for Queen Noor of Jordan. Tell us more cues one of our clients and she and her husband when he was alive did so much to get rid of landmines in Jordan. And she helped takeover after. Diana died so she took over and ran the landmines survivor network and they'd won the Nobel Peace Prize with a group of others. Trying to get land mines out of the ground but they also started a landmine survivor. Peer Support Network around the world and so when they start this peer support network around the world. They helped landmines fibers. Get jobs and be able to survive as a lot of people few lose a lamb in another country. You're completely ostracized because you're not value to your family anymore. So long story short one of my clients was Ymca. When I was working at the law firm for just six months and I was about ready to get married and have a family and I needed to slow down because it was a really busy work so I came to the YMCA. And I've been there for fifteen years and so when I came to the YMCA. It was a really good time because the why was looking at trying to take the network of twenty seven hundred wise in the country and ten thousand communities we reach and drive the ship in the direction of prevention and control of chronic disease. And we've done this a few times in our history before during World War One and World War Two. We won the Nobel Peace Prize for our work during wartime a lot of people. Don't know that you know that. Yeah we were on the ground helping prisoners of war sadly were giving him some cigarettes and some donuts but back then we didn't have the science and that was part of what we did but we did a lot of social support the why was also on the Japanese internment camps providing health and well being in recreation so really got a lot of history in this country for things we've done and collectively tried to respond to community crisis a needs later when women were going back to work and we had latchkey kid problems. Why became one of the leading provider childcare? So the why was looking at it. It's makeup and saying we have challenge here. We are hello being organization we wake up everyday thing about spirit mind and body for all and we're losing the war here and if we're not part of the solution part of the problem so how do we get everybody moving in the same direction so that was kind of when I got to be hired and so it was Super Fun. Time to start helping our wise be connected to the innovators and so we worked with Folks like the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and we taught wise. How do plan do study? Act Really How to evaluate your work how to change the building so people felt welcome when they came in so they didn't see this gym equipment Or get a tour of the why they saw coffee and people sitting down and talking

Christopher Dana Reeve Centers For Disease Control An Pat Schroeder Ireland Parliament Bernie Vice President Of Health Partn Harvard Law School Colorado Adamson Breast Cancer United States Queen Noor Washington Intern Sanders Institute For Healthcare Impro
An Interview with 'Clinton Cash' Author Peter Schweizer

America's Truckin' Network

11:41 min | 5 months ago

An Interview with 'Clinton Cash' Author Peter Schweizer

"Show and Peter how are you I'm great bill great to be with you now let's talk about the the book and I would note that down whenever I Google you and it comes up saying the controversial author of the massive cellar Clinton cash your controversial step back from this I look at that I look at Republicans bush forty one knew bush forty three left office know monetization one on Reagan left office he went to his ranch and now trump is actually cost them money in office what is it and the progressive mindset and this is in the mindset of libertarians are conservatives or moderates the progressive mindset says we got to monetize we got to make serious money what is there in the mindset that causes out to transpire well I think in the progressive mindset if you serve in government you're you're engaged and angelic behavior I mean you're you're you're not being selfish and greedy like people in the private sector and with that comes a sense of entitlement so in a sense that that that that you're deserving of data center you see this I mean you know we we broke the story on Joe Biden hunter Biden you know the million dollar your sweetheart deal hunter got from Ukrainians literally three weeks after Joe Biden his father as vice president is appointed point person on Ukraine policy Joe Biden says oh it looks bad but there's nothing wrong with it why because in Joe Biden's mind he is serve the public I'll put that in quotation marks since nineteen seventy two and his family deserves it so the idea is I'm I'm getting things for you it's time for me to monetize my fame and fortune thanks to that character the amazing thing to me is there sits in the oval office Barack Hussein Obama he sends Joe Biden to be in charge of Ukraine quickly his son starts making three million dollars over three years about eighty thousand a month and and and Joe Biden's mine and bomb is mine it wasn't appropriate for Joe Biden is ceda hunter hunter who's got it a sordid past you can't do that when I'm over here to get rid of corruption in Ukraine one hundred did was participate in it why didn't Obama stop yeah you didn't stop it because either he didn't care or you didn't have a full picture and I think it's just that he didn't care and what they keep saying that you people don't understand about the binds it's it's not just hunter and it's not just you crane hunter ran a veritable United Nations of corruption he did deals in China he deals in Kazakhstan deals an area he had no expertise no background any took in the money and we know that because we have the bank records related to a a corruption case involving hunter by his business partner but even more than that bill you have what I call the Biden fives and I talk about this in the book the Biden chapter seventy pages long five members of the Biden family only one of those being hunter cashed in while he was vice president you got his brother James whose father Frank his sister Valerie and his daughter Ashley's husband they all cashed in on sweetheart deals while Joe was vice president if systematic corruption when you're talking about the blinds about two weeks ago headline FBI recently rates business connected to James Biden Joe Biden's brother F. B. I. sounds like more trouble the company in question americorps holdings acquires and manages real hospitals declared bankruptcy in December now the F. B. I.'s raiding the home of the CEO of the company grand white and also others that that doesn't seem to be any interest by the FBI or by others to go after the Clintons the binds the Obamas what is their structurally in the mind of the F. B. I. I'm not talking the ninety nine percent I mean the one percent at the main base and justice the art of Robert F. Kennedy building what is there in their mind that we look for reasons to exonerate the Democrats but we look for reasons to implicate the Republicans what is what I think a lot of a bill has to do with what I call the permanent political class I mean Joe Biden is is you know he's older now but he's basically been a permanent fixture in Washington for forty years a guy like Donald Trump is going to calm I don't don trump's gonna stay in Washington DC when he leaves the White House he's gonna leave so there's a club atmosphere is by bipartisan it's the permanent political class and the reason that you don't have some Republicans warning to investigate Joe Biden is either their family is involved in some level of similar activity order hoping to at some point so this kind of the unwritten rule that we don't go after a prominent political figures and that's the reason we need to be shouting this from the rooftops we need to exposing it because here's the thing voters care about this stuff it's the reason I'm convinced that trump won in twenty sixteen and even though I think Bernie's ideas are are completely wrong for the country what's fueling his candidacy is the same anger at the corrupt establishment in Washington DC if if something universal on both sides of the aisle let's talk about your work on Bernie Sanders until your research about the hundreds of tens of millions of dollars to a mysterious company linked to his wife many thought he was a socialist who wants a revolution let's face it is a communist he wants the by violent means overthrow the United States government which is the definition of a revolution he wants fundamental change he wants the U. S. government to seize the assets of hospitals oil companies pharmaceuticals and so one would think that a guy like that is not really concerned about money he's a Ben and Jerry kind of a guy but in reality what did you find about how Bernie Sanders monetize socialism for his benefit but not ours you mentioned you know that that that sort of this is is a you know communist leanings I mean it's like the old Brezhnev stays in the Soviet Union you had them talking about world while pollution in the proletariat but they all had five deals in corrupt deals live like kings and Bernice case you know he's worth millions of dollars some of that came from writing books he's actually written more books and he's actually introduced pieces of legislation that if passed but a lot of people don't realize it more than half a million dollars of his own campaign funds have gone to buying his own book but the bigger the bigger issue bill is this this this dirty little secret about washing call media buying and and Bernie Sanders's latched on to this yeah if you were running for the Senate in the state of Ohio and you said Peter I want you to do my media buys by my TV and radio I get a commission of C. off of that it could be anywhere from ten to fifteen percent goes to the media buyer in the beauty of it is that doesn't show up anywhere in Federal Election Commission records you don't know who the media buyers well here's what Bernie did she saw this and what did he do when he started running for Congress left of the Senate he put his wife in charge of the media by which means she's got the commission even though she had no background in advertising and media buying any of this stuff so we know that she and Bernie we received hundreds of thousands of dollars by doing that and the great mystery comes to the twenty sixteen election will Bernice dropped eighty three million dollars on media buys so that means the commission somewhere between eight million and twelve million dollars where did it go well it went through a company called old town media old town media did not have a website did not have other clients it was registered to a home in the coldest sack in suburban Virginia all in the two owners of old town media were long time friends of James Sanders yeah he was after she heard Jane was asked about this by a progressive reporter in twenty sixteen what do you know about old town media do you have any connection to old town media and are you involved in this in any way and according to the professor reporter Jane Sanders just hung up the phone room of what happened to the twelve million dollars who got the media commission on that we just don't know what it's million ends is a little bit of money he monetizes the campaign so those are contribute to thirty six dollars each to the to the Sanders campaign have got to understand that goes into a pot and out of the pot comes all the media buys and that's how the Sanders family gets paid yeah and then the other thing that I think people need to know is that you know Bernie Sanders has been very clear cut in people calling the left kind of you Mister John the Baptist progressive movement why he's out of eating locusts and honey well you know he's worth millions of dollars he actually has an investment portfolio and when you look at his investment portfolio I hate to break this to you bill I know this is going to shock you he's not invested in like renewable energy companies he's not invested in you know some organic farm I mean he's invested in fortune five hundred stock that's where his investment portfolio is it's not a socially responsible investment fund that's where his investments are in when you set up you know we bought his third home the vacation home they set it up in the trust precisely to avoid paying some taxes so you know Bernie Sanders is not John the Baptist use is is more like a qualified king Herod at least in the way that is that he handles his investments in his own money let's move on to Lizabeth Warren she is picturing yourself as a every woman she knows exactly how you live your life she spent time a course in Oklahoma and then and she monetized her so called Indian heritage and I probably have more Indian blood to me than she does she use all along but you have great reporting on how she a really bad millions of dollars from corporations even though she rants and raves against corporate America how to Elizabeth Warren maker money our records network is around twelve million dollars they pay well at Harvard Law School they don't pay that well so the question becomes how did you make that money and so we re traced this we went through and found that in the mid nineteen nineties Elizabeth one was hired by the U. S. Congress and paid by us the taxpayers to help Congress to rewrite some of the bankruptcy laws okay she's a lawyer that makes sense they hire her they tend to do this whole ideas are incorporated into the bankruptcy code then what does she do bill she goes to large corporations Dow chemical and others and says you hire me as a consultant and I will help you navigate around the law I actually wrote genius is very corrupt moves and other people in Washington is done have done this she's denounced other people that have done this but she ended up working for Dow chemical Armstrong world wide a whole host of large corporations who are facing class action lawsuit towards and she was helping them minimize their exposure that's obvious a legitimate thing to do but the fact that she says I've been fighting for the little guy my entire life is simply not true she made millions of dollars helping the big guy large corporations slip out of responsibilities as it related to people who were damaged by the products those companies have produced you don't fall a few nights ago I'm watching Chris Matthews every now and then is a lucid moment and he was ranting and raving about socialism the evil socialism is because all over the world any referenced Ohio senator Sherrod brown that Sherrod brown is the kind of person that we need there because he looks after the little guys a union guy so Sherrod brown is being promoted by the mainstream media as kind of Bernie Sanders light and you've investigated were weren't shared brown gets his money from where is it that's very interesting shirt brown he always been in public life since you graduate from college he ran for the state legislature he listed himself he was still a senior at Yale when he ran for office he listed himself bill as a farmer under our occupation I don't know what kind of form he

Peter Bush Reagan Clinton
Trump Impeachment Trial Winds Down With Closing Arguments

Overnight re-air of day's programming

07:34 min | 6 months ago

Trump Impeachment Trial Winds Down With Closing Arguments

"But we begin with the latest on the Senate impeachment trial and tomorrow's Iowa caucuses the first contest in the race for the democratic nomination the Senate narrowly rejected democratic demands for witnesses but pushed off a final vote to acquit president from till Wednesday the day after he addresses Congress on the state of the union let's bring in Kevin Cork reporting from the president's retreat of Mar a Lago but the latest Calvin Chris just three more days before the White House can finally peers the cloud cover of what they've considered the brazen partisan process the single party impeachment of the president of the United States laughter Monday's closing arguments senators final remarks and then finally Wednesday at four PM the vote on the two articles of impeachment and barring a political earthquake the president's expected acquittal one by the thinnest of definition say defined Democrats still reeling from the Senate's fifty one forty nine vote rejecting demands for additional witnesses if the president is equated with no witnesses no documents acquittal will have no value wedged in between Monday's resumption of activity on the Senate floor and Wednesdays historic vote is the president's state of the union address Tuesday evening theme the great American come back the president is expected to focus on what the White House calls the blue collar economic boom lowering overall healthcare costs and safe legal immigration in a speech sources tell fox news will be both positive and optimistic I tone in sharp contrast perhaps to its we sit overnight by the president shortly after midnight in which she accused Democrats of using the impeachment process as a blazingly political process to damage the GOP and lose their chances Chris in twenty twenty Chris Kaman Cork reporting from Mar a Lago Kevin thank you they are I spoke about the Senate trial with a member of the president's defense team Alan Dershowitz professor emeritus at Harvard Law School and author of the new book guilt by accusations this is George with let's start with the Senate's decision by a vote of fifty one to forty nine not to call witnesses the Republicans have the votes so they won but is there a legal justification a legal reason for not calling evidence when there is substantial new evidence yes as I argued to the Senate if somebody were accused of the crime of abuse of power or dishonesty something it's not a crime what you do is you make a motion to dismiss on the other side has no we want to introduce evidence no no no no you can't is use evidence if there is no legitimate indictment here the articles of impeachment did not charging impeachable offense so the right answer is to dismiss it and cut it off right there no amount of witnesses could have changed that okay but the top Democrats in Congress Nancy Pelosi the house Chuck Schumer in the Senate say that the failure to call witnesses is going to put a taint on any of the weather listen to sure this country is headed towards the greatest cover up since Watergate but he will not be quite as you cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial of course you can be acquitted if you don't have a trial if they don't charge you with illegitimate crime it's the fault of Nancy Pelosi and the others for failing to charge an impeachable offense they're going to say they say he's never going to be truly acquitted because you didn't have witnesses who didn't have new evidence he dismissed it before you even really got to hear what the facts were in a criminal context it would be cool victory a great victory here if they have been charging the fans then maybe he hasn't been acquitted but he also hasn't been charged he's in exactly the same situation you should have been in had they done the right thing and not impeach him at all you've created quite a controversy with something you said in the Senate trial here is which is sad and here's some of the blood does which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest cannot be the kind of that results in impeachment if you can identify something as president that's in your public your political interest and say that's the national interest they're all bets are off is what I don't understand right you have made it clear new and I went out at last week on the question of you say that to be an impeachable offense it's gotta be a crime criminals like behavior of kin to treason and bribery that's what the constitution means when it says treason bribery or other high crimes and get into this question of whether or not the president thanks his re election is in the public interest because you seem to be implying that somehow that gives them an extra level of immunity no no it doesn't I was asked the question by a senator the question was does quid pro quo matter and my answer is it matters is what the president it is illegal or wrong but if the president is something completely waffle the fact that part of his motivation may have been to help his election cannot be the quid pro quo that's what I said I never said I mean and I don't believe that a president can do anything if he thinks it is national interest look I supported the impeachment of Richard Nixon he thought that the five crimes he committed our own national interest these folks have totally distorted quite deliberately because they saw that I was having an impact on some of the senators so they deliberately distorted what I said and said even if it's criminal what the president thinks is in the best interest it can't be an impeachable offense nonsense I never said it was three journals as I never said it New York times says I never said it and the fact that Schumer and shifts and CNN say I said it doesn't make it true again I don't even know why intense is an issue and why you got into it as I was but but my point is the activity has what you say is the case if it's criminal or criminal like activity that it can be impeachable if it's not criminal activity it doesn't matter what the motive the example I gave I said there are three levels of motor the sample I gave the president says I'm not giving you money you crane unless you give me a million dollar kick back of course that's criminal and of course he goes to jail Abraham Lincoln said the troops owned Indiana vote for Republicans in the election was that impeachable no matter what it was well it doesn't matter to me but it managed to shift and medicine to the people on the other side they were focusing on motive I was responding to them I didn't put that in my original speech because you're right but I was on the floor to respond to constitutional arguments question and it was wrenched out of context you seem pretty upset about I was very upset about that because it is has has hurt me people think I actually believe the president like Nixon can do anything he wants is exactly the opposite of what I've been teaching arguing in as a civil libertarian believing in the fifty years how dare they deliberately and willfully distort my position and then not give me an opportunity to respond all rights forget impeachment from asking you this and maybe a little agree to do it or not but a thought experiment Alan Dershowitz citizen do you find it troubling problem out at that residence with Lincoln anyway forget is not about I'm not saying it's criminal his support

Iowa Senate President Trump Congress
Building Great Teams and Obsessing Over the Customer Experience with Scott Becker, Founder and Publisher at Becker's Healthcare

Outcomes Rocket

09:04 min | 6 months ago

Building Great Teams and Obsessing Over the Customer Experience with Scott Becker, Founder and Publisher at Becker's Healthcare

"I have the privilege of hosting Scott Becker for the second time I had him on the podcast about three years ago we. We talked a lot about leadership and a lot of the trends in healthcare. Lots has changed in the last three years so excited to have Scott back on in in. What's close to five hundred episode So we've had many conversations if you don't remember Scott is the partner at McGuire Woods Alpi and also publisher at Bekker's healthcare Scott previously served on the McGuire Woods Boorda partners and served for nearly fifteen years as chairman airman of the national healthcare the apartment. He really the the firm has one of the best regarded healthcare practices in the world and Scott got has played a major role there. He's also the founder and publisher of bekker's healthcare and Becker's hospital review and it's related events and publications he remains remains. The publisher and chief content officer of Bekker's healthcare Yasser produces the BEKKER's C. Suite report and related media which is all focused done business outside of healthcare a graduate of Harvard law school and also Author of four books in a CPA. I don't know how he does it all but he does it. He's one of the best thought leaders in healthcare in my opinion and Excited to join him in a conversation once again. So take a listen to this. Awesome interview. you're gonNA enjoy the thoughts that that he has to share and the fun that we have during our conversation and with that introduction. I WanNa give you who a warm welcome Scott. Thanks so much for joining me again. Well thank you so much for having me always a pleasure to visit with you. Thank you sir. So Scott. You're doing on. I really cool things and and before we get into the meat and bones of today's interview is I do WanNa Park at the work you've been doing with your podcast uncast. Can you share a little bit more about it and why you guys started. There was sure so the core that we do. At bekker's healthcare has two parts of it. Our digital media efforts in our big conferences and events around three or four core core sectors and healthcare hospital systems health. It surgeries others is by so to get your of course podcasts. The podcasts are sort of a fascinating to me. It on. They're more sort of a as you know a magnificent way to just visit with interesting people people in a format you might not otherwise get to visit with them in and so yes people listen to them but the great pleasure for me is getting talk up to a whole range of leaders and people in all aspects of life. I mean yesterday at a podcast with a woman physician who's Muslim background. Speaking about being a Muslim docker America two weeks ago I spoke with Jean Woods. The CEO of Atrium health also former chair of the HA and one of the great growing systems. Those are the country. Here's get a chance to visit with magnificent group at different people and twelve chance to visit with interesting people. I tend to enjoy people. So that's that's what I love most about the podcasting and then people listening to them. It's more of a kind activity tool and a way to visit with people and if people visit in the conversations or anything else I think it's great and you're so right about that right. I mean the the ability to connect with others. That are doing great things a while. Back AGO folks ahead Scott on the podcast. He was At the very beginning actually and for those that have been listening for quite some time. You know that Scott was is one of the key people that inspired me to do my podcast so awesome to see him doing his his podcast. Now it is a great way to visit with others. And if you haven't but listen to that first episode with Scott It's episode number five. You GotTa Outcomes Rocket Dot Health type and Scott Becker. You'll you'll see where we focused on being patient centric and building outstanding teams which is something that Scott does so well and and and Scott. What's inspiring your work today? I I would say really two things inspire what I see. One is with all the talk about healthcare which you are seeing is tremendous advances in some cure for certain diseases. So oncology sort of almost didn't make that much progress for a long time in certain kinds of oncology and now making crazy progress so that inspires me just watching those things inspires me. I don't have anything to do with it. But they inspire me and then the other thing that spires ars me just you know working with magnificent people in visiting with people and hearing their stories and seeing what they're doing it so those are the two things that sort of excite me the great advances out there all all the negative talk in to just talking to people Scott and I've been to to your meetings and there are a lot of. I always connect with so many great people people to your point. You know the speakers and the keynotes are always super entertaining. What would you say makes what Bekker's offers different than what's out there? We're trying to is be queer concise fast moving and try and be very clear about our goal to teach people and entertain and the core of what we do is building everything we do around the core audience the core participants in the sector. So if you're looking at are hostile meetings it's really built around the jets built around three hundred great hostile leaders. It's not built around us. It's built around the core audience. The cord leadership in our we were in four different areas health. It also some surgery centers in spine but dissimilar a similar rasping everything. We're really built around the audience. Not around us and we try and teach entertain in clear concise simple content. And we've got a great team that implemented we've got great editorial team a Great Jenner team great leadership and Business Valentin which you can't do anything without those so it's it's a mix of things that we try and do to make work well and and it's a constantly changing environment but we've got a great team and we try and save very close to the audience really counts. That really. Is the driver behind everything we do. Love it serving bring. Your audience is super important. And it's hard to do in easy to be distracted. Can you share what you do to stay hyper focused on your audience against well. It is a is a great question. We have very very clear goals and directives on how we try and build everything that we do. And how now it's built to be audience centric versus vendor centric. And they're two very different things and we focus. I making sure our team and our audience dance is well taken care of we those things then things seem to work out well and it just a constant clarity of focus on what really counts. And we've got you know we've a few constituents. We have to take care of the audience. First and foremost doing short commercial interest. It makes sense for them and obviously our speakers speakers in our team are the other parts of that sort of stool love it. How about on the law side of things? You're still a practicing partner at at McGuire. Woods anything that you WANNA share to the listeners. That that are thinking about their their Legal Affairs and the things that they do there air. Anyone WANNA share. Yeah no it's. It's a great question so I've struggled to forever in one of them really out of the other. All my work has been in healthcare for thirty years. Now it's started as a law career and then built this media business almost by accident but grew into serious company money due to great leadership of our team. There are editorial team are Jonah deem our our business team just call and everybody else the On the law side ride the biggest congressman I've had is pretty similar built in its practice but to do that and build a practice in healthcare and then insert your center selfless equity. I was able to early on start to build great teams and everything that one dozen life. Today it requires great teams so the thing most of proud of him most excited about at the law firm is a team I built in the number of people there that have become partner in the firm that were under my mentorship. It's our ship is a whole cadre of people that really were part of my team originally and now grown to be leaders in the firm partners in the firm and one of which is now the cheer of our national healthcare practice but just a great group of people from you know give shots to all them you know people like Melissa. Holly Barks Howen Gretchen amber in more and more and And and others that really came up under in with me and Jeff cockrel perspective. Some practice that came along with me now of largely built greater backs may but was just a magnificent experience.

Scott Scott It Scott Becker Partner Bekker Jean Woods Mcguire Woods Alpi Mcguire Woods Boorda Wanna Park Harvard Law School Publisher Jonah Chairman Founder CEO Atrium Health
"harvard law school" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

15:01 min | 7 months ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"PM eastern five PM Pacific on life liberty and live and we're going to talk about everything Iran peach meant China president trump this is a man who are I went to Harvard from a little town in Arkansas I went to Harvard Law School nine eleven took place he thought about dropping out of law school and joining the army but friends of his in the army said finish law school me what the hell you started it finish it and then you can join and that's exactly what he did Mister but is he gonna Harvard finished Harvard Law School then a list that in the United States Army in the middle of the Iraq war what the front end of the Iraq war actually he served saw combat in Iraq certain saw combat here in the bronze star did you know that here in the bronze star he also served in Afghanistan he served overall to tourists total of five years before eventually would run for the house of representatives that between a store in Iraq and Afghanistan was part of what they call the old guard which watchers watches over the tomb of the Unknown Soldier he had written a book about this in these men who look over the tomb of the unknown soldiers you see the March there twenty four seven day in and day out no matter the weather no matter the day a meticulous in what they wear spit Polish their boots inspiring because they're not really just looking over the tomb of the Unknown Soldier the looking over all the tunes at Arlington cemetery Tom kind is a remarkable man he's the only senator you remember the vote was ninety eight to one one was not present to vote against the Iran deal in that part of the deal that allowed for the Senate to have some over such but he said look this should be a treaty I'm not gonna participate oversight no oversight the fact is they should be treating a forgery this wouldn't pass the two thirds of the members present we just got around the treaty clause where all the great constitutionalist they voted for it ninety eight to one time cotton voted no Tom cotton's been warning about the threat from China since before virtually anyone but the president he's a remarkable young man is very tall too by the way six feet five inches tall you will be my guest on life liberty and live in for the full hour he also serves on the Senate intelligence committee in the Senate Armed Services Committee in addition to his own personal experience we'll talk about the war powers act whether it's constitutional or not we'll talk about what the president is double talk about this non binding resolution we'll talk about impeachment we'll talk about what the Senate should do when a touch all these issues he's also become one of the leading voices against anti semitism and recently he's condemned what the city of New York has done in terms of male with a lack of bail letting these recidivists violent recidivists back on the streets when they go back in the attack these Hasidic Jews among others the BDS movement this is a real statement in a list with Warren Bernie Sanders they get all the attention there's also senators who are much more flashy than Tom cotton I believe this gentleman has a potential candidacy the Republican nomination potential in the future for president United States so I hope you'll watch this Sunday look I can do a conga line of guests single mom hot hot fast and so again I'm not gonna do it this is a different show it's life liberty and live in I know there's a lot of football out there but you can record it to because I think this is going to be a very very important interview with Tom cotton Tom cotton really has never had an opportunity to sit down for a full hour with anybody little hits here she don't really know what president talk some frequently for input and advice he does with many and I think you'll see why he talks to Tom count I never met Tom cut before this will be the first time he's been on my radio show a couple times but not that often but the hope your market down that's forty eight hours away so you might forget but I think you'll like it a lot something different I'd like senator may see her own of Hawaii it is amazing to me the individuals that some states and some congressional districts want to represent them in the nation's capital this one in particular maze corona is it the phone of the first order here she is talking about the impeachment trial caught one go so let's get back to what we really should be doing which as are focusing on which is what kind of a trial that was in the house and the Senate is it going to be a fair trial or is a camera rig trial else and just as a president tried to rake his reelection by by trying to get the it's just that she's such an idiot this can be fair is it can be impartial she's to both major right this is her argument what issues you just as a president tried to rig the real so she should recuse herself right should she would use her cell now just all the Republican should recuse themselves in the minority the Senate should be able to control thing go ahead then to go along with his political skiing is trying to with the help of Mitch McConnell Reagan the Senate trial we've had enough of you want to thank the people for Hawaii for sending us immediate any club chair no more talk about how she abused her staff on a regular basis member that screamed at them because some of them Cryin leave and so what yeah we can't we can't say too many nice things about Amy club a tree now because she seven percent in the polls or something she's just terrific here she is on M. S. LSD cut to go I have I been listening to my colleagues personally talking to them as well as hearing what they say publicly and there are a few of them that have clearly indicated that they want witnesses well that's going to be there moment either before those articles come over or when they're there with a better stand up and join us otherwise it's going to be a sham it's going to be a sham she can't win it's going to be a sham boy my son's gonna be very upset disturbed is the drummer Neil hurt P. A. R. T. passed away he was his biggest fan just pointing that out the drummer for the band rush right Mister minister the fact that Qatar he signed the Qatar for my son years ago we have it framed on the wall in the in the bunker anyway I just mentioning that because I just saw that on on television look who's back from Miller Jayapala why nobody knows but Mila giant piles back congressman she's me can't say woman ache Congress X. our Congress it or whatever she's back when she was on MSL to am SLOC today with Andrea Mitchell now there is a reporter the old Russian school let's see how this went hat tip Breitbart cut three go what games I waited on winning the articles well I think that it caps it'll let me do this interview in a cafeteria or something how much Capitol Hill icy go ahead okay on what the American people want which is a fair trial we were able to people don't want impeachment fair to stop talking for the American people you wanna eightieth Congress X. that's it the American people don't know who Pramila Jalut palace trust me on this one but she represents all of us isn't it funny how they said that the American people want no we don't go ahead over and over and over again so when Mitch McConnell not giving in to any of our demands as yeah hopefully I mean how many witnesses that the Democrats want during the Clinton impeachment trial none how many witnesses where there none none I like don't waste your time with the other Sunday shows well Mister secretary what do you mean by imminent well Mister national script what do you mean by eminent well deputy secretary via DHL what do you mean by imminent what's imminent imminent imminent Eminem and many how many embassies three four two how many are we talking this is the insanity of the left media insane they have yet to bring forth people who have suffered from this monster family members who've suffered from this man they've yet to shell the story of this monster payment all the story other than he's like Martin Luther king is not what Chris Matthews said to the Iranian people use like Martin Luther king this idiot Chris Matthews knows what the Iranian people think it's a police state it's a closed society but don't worry Chris Matthews knows from his home in Potomac Maryland reclaim Virginia he knows some big moron let's go back to Adam Smith member this guy Adam Smith what a coward house closely it's time to send it over that member all I police interview by Jim sciutto former Obama administration official cut for go you just said that he did have some disagreement about the timing of this it's the big game be on today so I I misunderstood the timing I don't have a disagreement about the timing I misunderstood I misunderstood the term is Adam's apples dropping down his belly button I understand I miss Nancy Pelosi took me into her and she went to hell in a yet masking all wrong she told me she gave me a watch for and are you dollar sign misunderstood the timing I I don't have any disagreement with Nancy Pelosi no no I agree anything she says I agree with her can I had Gee I thought it was laying out sooner than it actually is I support what the speaker is doing I such a punk it's not even funny go ahead your honor why one of Saddam over today if the recognition have an Obama former efficiency in a he's said that over already yeah look like well you're getting killed plus you get Democrats running for president they need some space they need some oxygen you guys should tell of all this is the great strategist Nancy with the media's telling him now factset factset factset yeah I had as in fact his mom said he he said he has no intention of sharing details on the rules prior to receiving the articles I don't think there is a wash at this point if it's next week it's next week I think the speaker is absolutely right you shine the light on the fact you can assess you more on your own believe Adam Smith people who are in his district congratulations you're real congressperson choose me Congress sex is Nancy Pelosi ARE the timing I misunderstood a tie the speakers absolutely right she's absolutely right she reverses course the speaker still absolutely right she is unbelievable Tehran Nancy go ahead their trial in the Senate won't even tell us what they want a fair trial in the Senate should there be due process I don't think so I mean after all it wasn't any in the house I mean should the minority the Democrats have any rights yeah they should have the same rights the minority had in the house the remote which.

Harvard Arkansas Harvard Law School army Iran China president
Legal scholar says Trump's actions are "abuse of his office"

America in the Morning

02:39 min | 8 months ago

Legal scholar says Trump's actions are "abuse of his office"

"In Washington legal scholars made their case for impeachment of president trump Linda can Yanis covering the next phase of the house investigation the house Judiciary Committee has taken over armed with the house intelligence committees three hundred page report from its hearings and ready to determine if president trump's pattern of behavior warrants impeachment president trump welcomes foreign interference in the two thousand sixteen election he demanded and for the two thousand twenty election ranking Republican Doug Collins calls the impeachment process a sham it just don't like the guy the hearing called for constitutional scholars to the witness table one of them was professor Pamela Carlin was Stanford Law School who reflected on the founders of the constitution the very idea that a president might seek the aid of a foreign government in his reelection campaign would have horrified them professor Michael Gerhard with the university of North Carolina school of law told the committee that is exactly why impeachment was invented if what we're talking about is not impeachable than nothing is a peach Republican dog collar aides insisted the president broke no law in some way in saying you wait a lot lot with a lot of people listening did the founding fathers would have found president trump guilty is just simply malpractice Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman strongly disagreed if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage we no longer live in a democracy and he said the president's abuse of power cannot be allowed to go unchecked then you're sending a message to this president and to future presidents that it's no longer a problem if they abuse their power it's no longer a problem if they invite other countries to interfere in our elections professor Jonathan Turley with George Washington University law school urge the committee to slow down I'm concerned about lowering impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence an abundance of anger Turley added he believes Congress also is being too hasty when it comes to the issue of obstruction that's the problem when you move towards impeachment on this abbreviated schedule that has not been explained to me why you want to set the record for the fastest impeachment Republican Jim Jordan a staunch trump supporter took that statement even further such a fast impeachment it's a predetermined impeachment but professor Carlin said arguing against the process doesn't negate the severity of the president's actions a president should resist far an inter interference in our elections not demand it and not welcome it it is up to the house Judiciary Committee to decide whether to draft articles of impeachment and if it does so to send those articles to the full house for a vote well the committee malls that over professor Turley reiterated caution is in order it's not that you can't do this just can't do it this way Linda Kenya

Congress Professor Carlin Donald Trump George Washington University Harvard Law School University Of North Carolina S Michael Gerhard Washington Linda Kenya Jim Jordan House Judiciary Committee Jonathan Turley Noah Feldman President Trump Stanford Law School Pamela Carlin Professor Doug Collins
Democrats outline potential articles of impeachment against Trump

KNX Evening News

00:56 sec | 8 months ago

Democrats outline potential articles of impeachment against Trump

"Democrats on the house Judiciary Committee hope to draft articles of impeachment by next week the house Judiciary Committee held a hearing today testimony from legal experts about the articles of impeachment and whether there's evidence that the president is guilty of impeachable offenses three of the experts testified for the Democrats including Noah Feldman of Harvard Law School the framers understood human motivation extremely well and they knew that a president would have a great motive to corrupt the electoral process to get reelected and that's exactly why they thought that it wasn't good enough to wait for the next election because the president could cheat constitutional law expert and CBS news legal analyst Jonathan Turley testified for the Republican if you're going to accuse the president of bribery you need to make it stick because you're trying to remove a duly elected president of the United States Democrats on the committee were asked to stay in DC over the weekend as a help to draft articles of impeachment next

House Judiciary Committee President Trump Noah Feldman Harvard Law School Analyst Jonathan Turley Bribery DC CBS United States
"harvard law school" Discussed on WBT Charlotte News Talk

WBT Charlotte News Talk

01:47 min | 8 months ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on WBT Charlotte News Talk

"The house will open the next round of impeachment hearings on Wednesday with the Judiciary Committee said to hear from witnesses on what constitutes impeachment the committee released a witness list Monday Jerrold Nadler is the Democrat chairman Doug Collins is the Republican ranking member that first hearings expected to focus on the historical and constitutional basis for impeachment the witness list Noah Feldman from Harvard Law School Pamela Carlin from Stanford Law School Michael Gerhard from the university of North Carolina school of law and Jonathan Turley from the George Washington University School of law president trump has decided not to send attorneys to this first hearing perhaps at a later date thanks is Mike Emanuel on Capitol Hill fox's John Roberts has more on the president's opinion about Wednesday's hearing that a letter to Jerrold Nadler White House counsel Patsy baloney ripping the process is ambiguous and unfair we cannot fairly be expected to participate in a hearing while the witnesses are yet to be named and while it remains unclear whether the Judiciary Committee well for the president a fair process through additional hearings thanks John Roberts reporting from London where the president is attending the NATO annual meeting Ian state television to ms security forces fatally shot people during what the state describes as riots and those as writers the shootings happened in multiple cities amid a recent protest over government increases in gasoline prices Amnesty International said Monday it believes at least two hundred eight people were killed in a protest and the crackdown that followed the front so opening in the president's trade policy plans to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Argentina and Brazil that news sent stocks into a slide the Dow dropped two hundred sixty eight points yesterday.

London Brazil Ian NATO Jerrold Nadler White House trump George Washington University S university of North Carolina s Stanford Law School Harvard Law School Argentina Amnesty International Patsy baloney president John Roberts Mike Emanuel Jonathan Turley
Turkish and Kurdish Forces Said to Clash in Syria

Here & Now

04:08 min | 10 months ago

Turkish and Kurdish Forces Said to Clash in Syria

"President trump lifted sanctions on Turkey this week saying Turkey had assured him it would halt fighting against the Kurds in Syria but there are reports today of clashes between Turkish and Kurdish forces there the fighting started after president trump abruptly pulled American forces out of the border area earlier this months saying it was time to bring US troops home joining us in the studio to talk about this and other stories in the news is former Democratic Congresswoman Jane Harman she's in Town for a Harvard law school over union she is president and CEO of the Wilson Center. Great to see you in person welcome thank you Jeremy I wasn't sure you existed I'm a real person I'm not just a disembodied voice let me ask you about Syria Defense Secretary Mark Esper- said today that the US is going to keep a reduced military presence on the ground in Syria to stop Isis from taking over oil fields there there are reports the White House is considering keeping five hundred troops in northeast Syria which would be a reversal does the US have a strategy there oh we seem to have a process free foreign and security policy which is very dangerous we do have parts of government including AH the National Security Council in the White House led by a guy just met this week Robert O'Brien who seems quite capable and we do have a state armament and we do have a Defense Department and and all of the principals and deputy should have been considering carefully what the day after and the day after that would look like he we took some of our troops out of Syria. I don't believe that happened I think most people were blindsided by the decision and now we're paying the price I mean what's happening here is that plan that was under way to create a security zone between Turkey and Syria which would take care of Turkey's worries about the Kurds in eating Turkey was just about to be put in place and instead of that we took the US troops out of that part of Syria and destabilized all of Syria the long term consequences for the United States. Well we'll find out but what are your concern my concern is that we have destroyed our credibility we also have created axiom filled already by to some extent the Turks plus the Russians and the the Assad government which has used chemical weapons on its people has free rein and oh by the way there's a rumor that chemical weapons have been used during this exercise to to remove the Kurds it's not clear by whom I underpinned by Turkey or Turkish ally now who could that be sounds like assigned to me but I it's being investigated by the UN so I don't know if that's that is just heinous and consequence we might have anticipated if we'd had a reasonable process in place what about Isis how concerned are you that this will now regroup and be a threat to the US or Europe or the West in general very concerned I mean there were prisons in that swath of land that Turkey has been attacking they were prisons there of Isis fighters these prisons were horrendous it is not clear yet got who has escaped but these isis fighters in that area probably came from Europe and if they did what will they want to do if they're free they're going to want to go the the poorest Turkish border back into Europe and stage attacks in Europe and you know possibly through Europe to the US so I think this is set potentially set us back quite a lot do you think that Turkey should be booted out of NATO as a result of what just happened that's a decision for NATO to make I mean Erkki also did another no no recently which is to buy a massive air defense system called the S. four hundred from Russia NATO exists it has a collective defense organization to keep the West free it doesn't exist as an attack you know outfit against Russia but Russia is Given its actions in Ukraine and Crimea a threat to NATO and so now if you have a NATO member purchasing it's major defense system from Russia that's let's say awkward

Syria Turkey Nato United States Europe Congresswoman Jane Harman Donald Trump President Trump Russia Defense Department Isis President And Ceo National Security Council White House Robert O'brien Secretary Mark Esper Jeremy Wilson Center
NBA under fire over pro-democracy tweet

KNX Programming

00:55 sec | 10 months ago

NBA under fire over pro-democracy tweet

"The NBA's facing push back from some very prominent members of Congress over the league's reaction to a pro Hong Kong tweet by one of its general managers US senators including Democrat Chuck Schumer and Republican Marco Rubio are accusing the NBA of putting cash over human rights as a league appear to back communist China after rockets general manager Daryl Morey voice support for pro democracy supporters in Hong Kong Ricardo lectures on sports business at Harvard Law School the NBA has to deal with the business issues and how to protect itself on the one hand on the other hand they're going to protect their brand their brand calls for free speech it also calls for a whole lot of ability to allow the players and everybody else around the NBA to express themselves criticism of the NBA intensified after the league issued a statement Sunday saying mores views have deeply offended many of our friends and fans in China which is

NBA Congress Chuck Schumer Marco Rubio China Hong Kong Ricardo Harvard Law School Hong Kong General Manager Daryl Morey One Hand
Youth To Protest In Manhattan To Stop Climate Change

Morning Edition

02:22 min | 11 months ago

Youth To Protest In Manhattan To Stop Climate Change

"Learn more than a hundred countries have begun taking to the streets today as part of a global climate strike it's called to push politicians to do more to stop climate change this is the head of the United Nations climate action summit that's coming Monday the demonstrations are being driven by school age activists but the movement is forcing choices for businesses from our workplace culture desk marketplaces Meghan McCarty Carino reports youth organizers of today's climate straight cold on adults to join in and disrupt business as usual and that's just one ice cream maker Ben and Jerry's is doing shutting down stores corporate headquarters in production lines we have always tried to operate our business in a way that does less batted more good Chris Miller the company's head of social mission says they wanted to encourage staff to participate in the climate action but a tech giant Amazon employees are taking things into their own hands they have been waiting and waiting for someone in a place of power to make a change and then realized that the changes I'm going to come in less you actually stand up and try to make that change. action manager Rebecca shepherd is one of about fifteen hundred Amazon workers planning to walk off the job today they join workers at Microsoft and Google in taking collective action to demand their employers do more to address climate change do business professor Aaron chatter G. says it's part of a wave of employee activism in highly competitive industries like tech companies are very explicit to bring your whole self to work and today he says that means bringing social and political beliefs into the workplace but while highly sought after tech workers might feel empowered to speak out he might not be legally protected says Sharon block who heads the labor and work like program at Harvard Law School federal labor law does protect workers rights to organize even outside of the union but where can god a little tricky though is that's got to be something related to the workplace traditionally things like ours or wages Rebecca shepherd and Amazon says she's taking action whether it's protected or not if there's any sort of retaliation for that Amazon isn't the sort of company I want to work for yesterday Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos responded to some of the demands of workers promising to cut emissions by twenty forty employees still plan to walk out to push for greater action hi Meghan McCarthy Carino for market

Meghan Mccarty Carino BEN Jerry Chris Miller Rebecca Shepherd Microsoft Google Professor Aaron Chatter G. Amazon Jeff Bezos United Nations Sharon Harvard Law School CEO Meghan Mccarthy
Hearing with Trump loyalist Corey Lewandowski ends after 6 hours

The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell

12:31 min | 11 months ago

Hearing with Trump loyalist Corey Lewandowski ends after 6 hours

"If you read the early reviews of today's hearing in the House Judiciary Committee by which I mean the reviews written about four are four and a half hours into the five and a half hour hearing then you would think the hearing was a mess the daily beast headline at five fifty five pm. I'm said Corey Lewandowski testimony quickly devolves into a mess but a minute later literally a minute after that was filed everything having changed it was a half hour left in that hearing when everything changed in Corey Lewandowski change coralline Dusky ran out of ways to avoid answering questions when he faced a full half hour of concentrated cross examination by lawyer hired by the committee to question witnesses in its impede from investigation the Republicans on the committee were determined to make a mockery of the committee process from the start we have never seen a more childish and abusive the use of committee process and committee rules than what the Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee did today. This was the low point in the history of house hearings procedurally the Republicans made repeated motions to shut down the hearing to just adjourn the hearing close it down and when those motions were defeated instantly by voice vote the Republicans then called for as is their right roll call votes that they knew would take time. They knew they were going to lose and they were just trying to waste time and add to the circus atmosphere that they created corey. Lou Dusky was ready for a circus. He was was not ready for serious questioning. When Republicans took their five minute turns questioning the witness they ignored corey. Lewandowski is role in the president's attempt to shut shutdown the muller investigation as described by Corn Corey Lewandowski own testimony in the mullahs report and his own notes that are reproduced in the mall the report Republican questioning deliberately did not make any sense but the question on the democratic side also mostly didn't make sense because of Republican publican interference with that questioning and the simple fact that should be obvious by now that most members of Congress are not very good at this they did not run for the district attorney they ran for the House of Representatives and every once in a while they have to play district attorney in committee hearings and generally for most of them. It doesn't go oh very well except for the people who have actually been prosecutors and so for hours on end it was a chaotic hearing with Corey Lewandowski becoming increasingly singley emboldened in his refusal to answer any question for which the answer was not already contained in the report he was asked by several Democrats to read passages the report and he repeatedly refused to do so cars when Eric Swallow Zeroed in on page ninety one of the Mullahs report which reproduced Corey Lewandowski own connotes of a speech Donald Trump dictated to him for Attorney General Jeff sessions to deliver about the Mueller Investigation Wild Wild Jeff sessions recused from supervising or commenting on the Muller Investigation in the trump written speech jeff sessions would announce that the special special prosecutor's investigation of the president is unfair and the special prosecutor would only be allowed from this point forward to investigate the possibility of quote election meddling for future elections so that nothing can happen in future elections harassment ex well well ask Corey Lewandowski to read his notes outs of his conversation with the president as reproduced in the mall report and Lewin Dusky refused to read his words allow were you were ashamed to read them out loud and you didn't deliver those words to the person the president asks you to did. You have a conscious of guilt. I have nothing to be guilty of congressman. Thank you still feel guilty today. And that's why you can't read it out loud cars when you're welcome to read the words if you'd like when the members of the committee finally finished their questioning almost five hours after hearing began it was finally time for the thirty minutes of questioning reserved for attorney. Barry Burke who is serving as a consultant of the Committee Hybrid Chairman Nadler Adler and chaos broke out once again as the Republicans pretended there was something wrong with having council ask questions in the committee even though the committee has done that many many times before especially in investigations of a president and after another round votes trying and failing to close down the hearing completely finally finally Barry Burke closed in on Corey Lewandowski for what was the worst public half hour of Corey Lewandowski life. My question to you sir is on national television. Did you lie about your relationship with the special counsel and whether they sought your interview I I don't know prior to the Muller report being published in redacted form. Did you ever misrepresent what you did on behalf of the president. I can't think of an instance where that would have occurred. Let me show you an interview that you did on May Fourteenth Twentieth Nineteen. Excuse me a I'll show it to you from February twenty-second twenty one thousand nine. Let me show it to you. Excuse me Ma'am number twenty nine thousand nine. Thank you don't ever remember the president ever asking me to get involved with Jeff sessions or the department injustice in any way shape so did you hear that Sir that was used saying on MSNBC. You don't ever remember the president ever. We're asking you to get involved with. Jeff sessions or department of Justice in any way shape or form. That wasn't true. Was it sir. I heard that UH and that was not true was it. I've no obligation beyond to the media's because there's just as dishonest as anybody else so you're admitting sir. You're not being truthful in that clip correct my interview with remember. This can be in any way you'd like. Did you lie on national television. Sorry about the president giving you a message. It's the attorney general about the special counsel's investigation. I don't recall that particular day and my mindset at the time I couldn't answer that. Corey Lewandowski told Robert Muller's investigators that he didn't want to deliver the president's message to Jeff Sessions at the Justice Department Jeff Sessions Office because he did not want the justice this apartment logs to show that he visited the Attorney General. He didn't WANNA public record of that meeting. Barry Burke pressed Corey Lewandowski on why he didn't want a public record of of him entering the Justice Department. So is it a fact. He didn't want to public log because you knew what you doing wrong so the just as the president went to an unofficial official nongovernment employees you wanted to make sure there was not a record of it isn't that right sir. No log creates a record of your visiting with the Attorney General so I would think a log world creator record degreaser that you admitted to the special counsel. You didn't want to have a record of your visit and that's why that's one of the reasons why you didn't go to the Department of Justice because she did not want to public log of your visit correct. I've never been to the Department of Justice. I don't know what goes on the Department of Justice. I don't really want to find out what happened. Department of Justice based on what's happened to other people involving the Department of Justice to be honest with you. Barry Burke insisted that the reason Corey Lewandowski did not personally deliver the president's message to Jeff. Yes actions is that Corey Lewandowski knew that would not be legal. You said so. You never did anything other than what was completely legal when you said that circus you knew if you delivered that message that told the Attorney General to instruct the special counsel delimit the investigation to exclude the president that would not be illegal. Isn't that correct surf Mr Burke. I didn't have the privilege of going to Harvard Law School. I'm not an attorney so what I know is. I didn't think at the time that the president asked me to deliver a message that anything was illegal about it. I didn't have the privilege to go to Harvard Law. So if you're telling me that in your opinion that would have been illegal then that's your opinion too but I never assume that that never thought about at the time I haven't thought about now. Why didn't you deliver the message that the president ask you delivered unless you didn't deliver it because you knew it was improper to deliver. Mr Burglar wasn't a priority. It sure reads like a priority in the mullahs report throughout the day. Corey Lewandowski refused to answer multiple questions agents about his conversations with anyone working in the White House. Berry Burke showed that this was not exactly a sacred principle to Corey Lewandowski. I can't speak to conversations that may or may not have with senior staff members of the administration to preserve the privilege they've invoked so it's such a sacred privilege as you would not disclose private communications because that would be wrong you testimony sir now. My testimony is at the White House directed that disclosed the substance of any discussions with the president advisors to protect executive branch confidentiality and I recognize that's not my privilege but I am. I am respecting the decision of the White House. Didn't you publish a book in which you disclose these very conversations. You had with senior White House officials which book you reference. I've written to New York Times bestsellers on a year so you refresh my memory with one. I'm asking you about the bestseller lead trumpy trump leading off our discussion. Tonight is democratic. Congressman Eric Swallow of California is one of the able questioners on the House Judiciary Committee because because he is a former deputy district attorney himself also joining us Mimi Roca former assistant. US Attorney Southern District of New York an MSNBC legal legal contributor cars. I WanNa start with something you brought up to Chairman Nadler when when it was your turn already been one brief recess in the hearing and so I'm not sure whether this was I could tell us whether this was coordinated with the chairman. Not specifically said you asked the chairman to consider holding holding Corey Lewandowski in contempt of Congress for the way he was testifying in that hearing which I have to say in any previous in Congress he would have been held in contempt of Congress in the first five minutes based on what we saw what's going to happen with the question of contempt of Congress for Corey Lewandowski in Dusky. It's certainly on the table and I also think the to witness chairs next to him. empty chairs should mean empty pockets and they need to be fine. There need to be consequences and when you when you by the way I could listen to that Barry Burke Exchange all day and then he he he's just masterful and finally the truth came came out but that's not how an innocent person conducts themselves. That's how he wants to help the Congress understand. You know what the president did would present themselves. That's how a guilty person acts and so are the chairman is going to consider contempt and we're not going to stop it in Lawrence and I I saw just like you did the you know the twitter. you know hot takes on what all this meant and people said it was messy. It was frustrating and that's all true but if the opposite of of this is to do nothing and let the President get away with further obstruction. We're not GonNa do that either and we have court battles that are ongoing right now so the president may benefit in the short term from confusing people and telling people to obstruct but in the long-term there's going to be a cascade of court decisions in our favor and it's not going to be very good for the trump team. Carson there is one another alternative for the mess of it and that is letting Barry Burke to either all the questioning or let Barry Burke have the first half our and then let the mess follow that yeah and it also just depends as well on the witnesses. We should assume that most witnesses are going to be like Mister Lebowski. That's just the trump style. They haven't had to have any consequences for that as of late and yes I think you know just just like you want more cowbell. Give us more burke. He was very very good. maybe Roca one of the things that you don't have in the courtroom is the other side when in the middle of your questioning jumping up in all sorts of history on equate object to something in a courtroom you better be doing it based on the rules of evidence the Democrats

Corey Lewandowski President Trump Barry Burke Jeff Sessions House Judiciary Committee Special Counsel Department Of Justice Attorney General Robert Muller Mullahs Lewin Dusky Congress Attorney White House Chairman Donald Trump Msnbc House Of Representatives
Instructor, Harvard Law School And Twenty Five Years discussed on The Small Business Radio Show

The Small Business Radio Show

01:28 min | 1 year ago

Instructor, Harvard Law School And Twenty Five Years discussed on The Small Business Radio Show

"One thing that you gotta get good at if you're going to be an entrepreneur is negotiation, but small business owners face unique challenges when it comes to negotiation her to show us how to do it is Samuel DR who's the co author of a new book called entrepreneurial negotiation. He's also instructor at the of the program of negotiation at Harvard Law School Samuel, welcome to the show. Thank you, very pleased to be here and welcome to all your listeners. So what is the unique challenge that entrepreneurs face with negotiations? Well, we have researched a lot of what entrepreneurs have to face and try to find unique in the setting of the small business or the entrepeneurship that is just starting up. We interviewed a lot of entrepreneurs, I base some of this knowledge on my own experience of twenty five years in the entrepeneurship, but the high tech their face world, and we found that there are four key factors that are. Always heightened in the world of entrepreneurship as negotiation the complexity of the negotiations are usually a high, actually when you get to the high tech or the life, sciences aren't up. But even in small businesses in the local settings, there are a lot of things that you have to be aware of the uncertainties you many of startups. Many of small businesses actually fail and the uncertainty of whether you will be around to do business next month next year. Whether you will have enough cash,

Instructor Harvard Law School Twenty Five Years
Top U.S. Law Schools Now Teaching AI Courses

WSJ Tech News Briefing

06:13 min | 1 year ago

Top U.S. Law Schools Now Teaching AI Courses

"The top law schools around the country, new A I courses schools, like Columbia, Harvard and Stanford have already introduced courses utilizing AI, how artificial intelligence meets the law after these tech headlines. Tesla CEO Elon Musk made his case for an on-demand robot taxi fleet that he says would begin next year in a presentation to investors early this week in Palo Alto, California. Mr. musk said by the middle of next year, more than one million tesla cars on the road will be able to operate without a human driver. He also expects regulatory approval in at least one market that would enable a robot taxi service by the end of twenty twenty the plan is for tesla owners to push a button on a smartphone app to put their cars into commercial service and pick up riders on the company's network a startup that helps freight carriers manage their fleets is the latest tech company valued by investors at more than one billion dollars. San Francisco based keep truck in has raised one hundred forty nine million dollars to build out its digital freight services offering things like electronic logging devices to reduce fuel usage and monitor how much time truckers spend behind the wheel. Keep trucking also says. It is developing artificial intelligence applications to analyze footage and driving events in real time and the journal says credit card pitches are moving from the mailbox to the social media feed. Several big card issuers recently increased spending on Facebook ads and never to attract new borrowers case in point capital. One and American Express spent an estimated eighteen point six million and thirteen point five million in twenty eighteen capital. One for its part has been paying Instagram and Twitter users with one hundred thousand to one million followers to post photos, manly of restaurant settings. And while growing the ad money is still significantly smaller than what several issuers spent on traditional male pitches Capital One and discover spent three hundred seventy seven million and one hundred ninety six million respectively coming up how students are getting ready to confront emerging legal issues with a I support for this podcast and the following message. Come from Deloitte, a global leader in digital transformation, helping clients apply technologies. Like, cloud, an AI to their unique business challenges Deloitte, God com slash look again. US law schools are adding artificial intelligence courses to their curricula in an effort to get students ready to confront the emerging legal issues around artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal's JR Waylon has more as official intelligence permeates. Our devices are workplace in society. It's inevitable that the legal responsibility of AI is going to be a growing concern and US law schools have recognized that and they're adding a are related coursework Wall Street Journal reporter Jared council is here with some details. So Jared, Columbia, Stanford and Harvard law schools are among those who have added courses that touch on topics. Yes. Those law schools as well as the law school at the university of Chicago and women Mary university. Somebody schools have already had technology focus kind of courses, you know, touching on internet privacy and things like that. But we started to. Notice that more of these schools are introducing a I focus courses for for their their students who ultimately will be the lawyers and judges and regulators of the future. What's the sort of training that the coursework aims to give these law students? These courses are designed to give these law students exposure to some of the current and potential issues around artificial intelligence and just get them associated with you know, questions that that that might arise like, you know, what what happens when an algorithm violate someone's civil rights or who should be at fault win an autonomous vehicle is involved in an accident with someone and even beyond those types of questions. Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used by regulators for enforcing a law that US patent and technology office and the social security administration. They're all using AI to address. Some of the the the workload and paperwork that they have. And it's raising questions like we'll how come a computer gets a decide which case is seeing and isn't seeing and so these lawyers again, they're not here to answer these questions or come up with with solutions, but just to start exploring some of the the potential issues that might arise this is part of a brave new world that we're in it's possible as you put it in your story that someday a party in a lawsuit could be represented by machine. Yeah. Speaking with professor at the university of Chicago and Anthony, Casey. And he he he mentioned that it's it's not far fetched that we could have systems that that that one day will automatically create contracts, and you know, potentially represent parties in a lawsuit and even be parties to a lawsuit there. There's already algorithms today that are that are creating music, and who has the copyrights to that music who gets paid. From the world tease. You know, all of these questions are starting to come about. And Yale Law School was one of the pioneers in this area. They offered AI related courses as far back as two thousand fourteen and a Stanford law. Professor you spoke with said, it's important to get future lawyers technologists in the same room because there's a lot for them to discuss there's been this divide. If you will where the the lawyers don't really understand the underlying technology, and how it works, and you know, what is a machine learning algorithm. And on the flip side, the the computer scientists aren't really thinking about some of the legal implications of the way, they design their their system. So the idea Stanford and even some other schools is to get them in the same room. So they can start discussing these issues, and and maybe come up with ideas at the other of their group. Didn't think of couldn't think of

AI Tesla The Wall Street Journal Stanford Elon Musk United States Columbia Capital One Professor University Of Chicago Yale Law School Deloitte San Francisco Palo Alto California Facebook Jared Council
China's Close Government-Business Ties Are A Key Challenge In U.S. Trade Talks

NPR's Business Story of the Day

04:46 min | 1 year ago

China's Close Government-Business Ties Are A Key Challenge In U.S. Trade Talks

"Support for this podcast and the following message. Come from CFA society. Washington DC does your wealth manager measure up a CFA charter holder. Does they have the investment expertise to unlock opportunities? Other advisers might not see learn more at the right question dot org. US trade talks with China face, a fundamental problem. The two countries are negotiating to end trade war was triggered by President Trump's demand for better terms. Now, it's easy for the Chinese to say promise to buy more US goods. They've got the money, but it's hard for China to alter a basic fact of its economy, unlike the US government, China's government owns half the country's largest companies and many receive big subsidies that is the advantage. The United States wants China to give up NPR's gyms rolling reports. Michael Korch, mar runs a company that makes travel bags and briefcases. It's been in his family for four generations over the years. He has watched one company after another in his feet. We'll go out of business, and for those that survive, or it means you lose I lived it. We lost. We had five hundred people employed in the US, and we went down to five Korch Marseille big problem for companies like his brutal competition from Chinese rivals. He says they can undercut his prices because they're subsidized by their government. And this is at the heart of the current trade talks the extent to which China props up its companies just last week. Massachusetts congressman Richard Neal who heads the powerful House Ways, and means committee spoke about it, the China that we trade with and compete with today is very different from the one that we had hoped would emerge. China's economy which has taken on some market characteristics remains fundamentally state directed. More than half of China's biggest companies are owned by the government. They include essential sectors, like railroads energy shipbuilding and telecommunications like government officials also maintained strong ties to. Private companies says Jennifer Hillman of Georgetown, University Law Center, they're able to direct resources and push resources into those industries in those entities that they are trying to favor Hellman notes that communist party members sit on the board of virtually every big Chinese company, the four largest banks are controlled by the government, Mark. Woo of Harvard Law School says even when a Chinese company is privately-owned it works hard to stay in Beijing's. Good graces people understand what the objectives are in Vail operate within those confines. It's especially true when the state exerts strong of control over the key elements of the economy as the Chinese economy still does it wasn't supposed to be this way when China joined the World Trade Organization in two thousand one it agreed to reform it system to become more free market, but Patrick show Vanik of Silvercrest asset management says events of the past decade have made China more confident about its own system in the wake of two thousand. And eight financial crisis. China took a different look at what it's economic model should look like and a model that was more state-driven looked a lot more attractive to them under president Xi Jinping, the government's role in the economy has only gotten bigger US officials say these policies violate the spirit if not the letter of trade law and they've pressed Beijing to stop subsidising businesses. But the ties between the government and business in China can be okay. So Vanik says Chinese officials know how to give preferential treatment of their own companies at the expense of outsiders without leaving their fingerprints anywhere. They will just say, well, there's a slowdown in inspections of this type of product from your country. It's for safety. It makes it hard for the you didn't turn around and say, okay, you're engaging in an elective because there's complete deniability Harvard's, Mark. Woo says the Trump administration needs to be realistic about what it can achieve too. The extent were expecting major fundamental structural reforms. That's going to be very difficult to obtain because they see this governance structure as having been vital for both their political economic successes. Woo says China believes it's economic model has served the country. Well, and it's not going to give it up easily. And that means US trade negotiators have their work cut out for them. Jim zarroli NPR news. Support for this podcast and the following message. Come from Comcast business having the nation's largest gig speed network was just the start. Now, they're providing gig fueled apps and solutions that exceed expectations and help businesses perform Comcast business beyond fast.

China United States Michael Korch WOO Beijing Comcast Cfa Society President Trump Washington CFA Vanik World Trade Organization Congressman Richard Neal Massachusetts Harvard Law School Vail NPR Korch Marseille Jim Zarroli Communist Party
Trump ordered aide to give Kushner security clearance: NY Times

The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell

02:01 min | 1 year ago

Trump ordered aide to give Kushner security clearance: NY Times

"House oversight committee already had an open investigation about White House security clearances, but that investigation went into overdrive today after the New York Times reported Jared Kushner was denied a security clearance by everyone involved in the process and then got a security clearance, only because President Trump intervened and ordered a security clearance for his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, something the president has repeatedly publicly denied that. He did. Two weeks of your son in laws. Hurry entrance. Donald Hillier whiteness too early officials that no I don't think I have the thirty to do that. I'm not sure. But I I wouldn't I wouldn't do it. Jarrett's a good. I was I was never involved with a security. Donald Trump is not the only Trump who denied that the president interfered in the security clearance process. There were anonymous leaks about there being issues, but the president had no involvement pretending to my clearance or my husband's clearance. Not Bunka Trump looks like when she's lying. The New York Times reports that White House counsel, Don Mcgann and White House chief of staff John Kelly were so concerned about the president ordering a security clearance for his sudden, Laura LA that they each wrote memos in which they clarified their objections to the security clearance for Jared Kushner tonight oversight committee chair Elijah Cummings sent a letter to the White House saying that they have quote, stalled equivocated and failed to produce a single document or witness to the committee about security clearances today. Harvard Law School, professor Laurence tribe said if Trump is ever impeached, the charges of great and dangerous offenses against the nation should include recklessly imperilling, our national security by abusing

Jared Kushner Donald Trump President Trump White House The New York Times Donald Hillier Elijah Cummings Harvard Law School Don Mcgann Laurence Tribe Jarrett John Kelly Laura La Chief Of Staff Professor Two Weeks
Rod Rosenstein, Jeffrey Rosen And President Trump discussed on America Tonight with Kate Delaney

America Tonight with Kate Delaney

00:37 sec | 1 year ago

Rod Rosenstein, Jeffrey Rosen And President Trump discussed on America Tonight with Kate Delaney

"President Trump has nominated Jeffrey Roseanne to be the next deputy attorney general Sierra Crawford reports the appointment being applauded by nuits army general William bar who praises the Harvard Law School graduate in a statement calling Huma excellent choice to succeed rod Rosenstein, who has served the Justice department with years of dedication. Jeffrey Rosen currently serves as transportation secretary, but he's had a long career working at the office of management and budget under former President, George W Bush, and he embar we're both partners at the prestigious law firm of Kirkland and Ellis this connection. Bloomberg news says lead bar to tap him as Rosenstein

Rod Rosenstein Jeffrey Rosen President Trump Jeffrey Roseanne Deputy Attorney General Nuits Army Harvard Law School William Bar Sierra Crawford Huma Bloomberg George W Bush Justice Department Kirkland Secretary Ellis
"harvard law school" Discussed on Newsradio 830 WCCO

Newsradio 830 WCCO

02:34 min | 1 year ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on Newsradio 830 WCCO

"Oh, here's another. Expert. The Harvard Law School studies this and our previous guests was talking about the military in that access to money. The defense has funds in his count that are not specifically designated for ending Congress's the money. It says we don't know what's going to happen in the next year. Here's one hundred billion this Harvard Law School, professor says but for the Trump supporters. Think is to say that if declares a national emergency and uses this pot is military money that he is on very solid legal ground. You're going to see very different viewpoints on this. No doubt. Among the tax coming in whatever happened to common sense in reality. I'm so sick of the president's lies as he want kept list for the past two years and back them up the truth. Yes, you can go to this. As a from a former publican, you can go to the Washington Post and go to fact check you can find many lists. I think he's approaching eight thousand now let's say it's it's lead role. It's you don't believe it. What if it's half? What if it's third fourth fifth and don't tell me all politicians lie because many of them do not at this rate? Never at this rate. The guess was talking about another Texan about the differences between private and public land. Yeah. The public land you can do this right away. The the greater challenge is on private land. How that play out? Should not declare national mercy. But you really think the damsel renegotiate even if he ends the shutdown. Well, what does the president Don negoti because that was part of his appeal. I'm not from Washington, I can get things done. I'm a dealmaker. I'm art of the deal on this one big national TV meeting with Democrats and Republicans. Let's get something done. Let's get a broad based immigration deal, then Schumer again further left, and I'd like to be than I am Pelosi. Definitely further left lane. They came to the president with twenty five billion for border security, but it also included obviously, a huge amount of that for the wall. But it also included dreamers and other issues, and because he got shouted down by his base. More saying the Democrats will never negotiate show me where the president has consistently reached out to the other side. I would like to see we're done. I have a great afternoon checkout. Paul George Anna, check out Corey.

president Harvard Law School Pelosi Washington Post Congress Paul George Anna Trump Washington Schumer Don negoti professor Corey two years
"harvard law school" Discussed on WLAC

WLAC

01:44 min | 1 year ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on WLAC

"At Harvard Law School, the Harvard crimson the big newspaper there on campus celebrated her as a native American this was directly from the director of communications there. Mark shimura. Okay. Then in one thousand nine hundred six she was still at Harvard Law School. There was a piece in the Fordham law review that that that celebrated her as a quote first woman of color. She did nothing nothing to correct that impression. And in fact, she didn't of things to encourage that impression in one thousand nine hundred eighty nine when she was a professor at university of Pennsylvania law school angling for a job at Harvard, which was desperate for diversity. She filled out a form for her employer. Felt these forms. What's your ethnicity? She checked the box. She checks the box. She claimed that she was a native American. And so obviously that was to get her in the employment pool for consideration at Harvard Law School, so she's a dishonest person. Yeah. I mean, you're the historian Elizabeth Warren for sure that can look at the away. Some people may be Warren who is doing this exploratory effort about, you know, running for president in one of my friends use very much anti Trump wouldn't vote for Trump. Reelection didn't matter. What happens? I said what if what abo- Liz Windsor nomination other democrat, you know, party here. What what if that happens? Well, how do you feel about it, man? And he's like, I'll get off the couch. Hey, here's here's here's Elizabeth Warren blaming Republicans for her bad conduct. I grew up in Oklahoma. And.

Harvard Law School Elizabeth Warren Harvard professor Fordham law review Trump Mark shimura Liz Windsor director of communications Oklahoma university of Pennsylvania president
"harvard law school" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

Newsradio 700 WLW

02:32 min | 1 year ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

"Or five FM WKNO s HD two Milford. Hey, I gotta eat a little crow here. But that's okay. I'm happy to do it going back to that NBC story about Donald Trump declaring an emergency to build the border wall. Let me just read a little excerpt from that because it is a little bit surprising. Actually, the article goes on to say legal experts said that Trump could find sure footing by using Anaba gated money within the defense department's budget because federal law allows the military to fund construction projects during war or emergencies. Pentagon spokesman a sites the title of the US code that gives the military authority to do that. And lo and behold, they go to Harvard Law School one of the most liberal law schools in the country and find a professor who has some sense never heard of him Harvard Law School, professor Mark tush net. Says this this is professor touch net. Speaking the department of defense has funds in its account that are not specifically designated for anything. Congress gives them money and says, we don't have to know what's going to happen over the next year and professor push net goes on to say, my instinct is to say that if he declares a national emergency and use us this pot unappropriated money for the wall. Listen to this people he's on very solid legal ground. So there you have it and I will eat crow. Harvard Law School professor saying, and I will repeat it. My instinct is to say that if he the president declares a national emergency and uses this pot of unappropriated money for the wall. And again, I have read about that that money is just sitting there, and it's discretionary professor touch net goes on to say he's on. Very solid legal ground. So there you got Harvard law professor that says that the president can declare an emergency. Hey, I gotta go to Marvin house a little rough within the last time. We spoke. Marvin. You doing? Okay. I heard what you just said. Okay. What?.

professor Harvard Law School Donald Trump Mark tush Harvard president Milford lo NBC US Marvin Anaba Pentagon Congress
Teen is getting high school and Harvard diplomas at the same time

KNX In Depth with Charles Feldman and Mike Simpson

00:26 sec | 1 year ago

Teen is getting high school and Harvard diplomas at the same time

"Kansas is working towards his high school diploma and his bachelor's degree as well at the same time, the Ulises high school student will collect his diploma in may. And then he'll travel to Harvard to collect his degree. The school district allowed him to take some high school classes while he was still in middle school a team, and then started taking college classes before high school. He says he hopes to attend Harvard Law School next and plans to get into politics. We wanna take a moment.

Ulises High School Harvard Law School Harvard Kansas
"harvard law school" Discussed on News Radio 1190 KEX

News Radio 1190 KEX

03:03 min | 1 year ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on News Radio 1190 KEX

"Elizabeth warren. Is less American Indian than most white people in this country. And Lindsey Graham is going is going to shame her. It really doesn't matter if she's much American Indian anyway. But it did matter it mattered to her career. It got her hired and promoted, and that's what's wrong with the playing of these games in an article in the Fordham law review in nineteen ninety five. The author writes there are few women of color who hold important positions in the academy. Fortune five hundred companies or other prominent fields or industries. This is not inconsequential diversifying these arenas in part by adding qualified women of color to their ranks. Remains important for many reasons for one there are scant women of color as role models. In my three years at Stanford law school there were no professors who were women of color. Harvard Law School hired its first woman of color. Elizabeth warren. In nineteen ninety five. Elizabeth Warren a woman of color. Could've she's one one thousand American Indian which they didn't actually use Indian blood to compare against. But hey, let's assume she is in fact, one one thousand American Indian I don't wanna take that away from her. But does that make her a woman of color? Why do we qualify people as a woman of color? Why is that important? It's important that she have been perceived in that way. Because it got her hired on it gave her an extra qualification. But here's the problem faculty positions like most other things particularly in public life in in government. Faculty positions or a zero sum game. If Elizabeth Warren got that job. Didn't that mean someone else didn't? And even if you buy into the nonsense. That you need to have women of color on the faculty for the sole purpose of being a woman of color, not because that person is the best. But if you say, well, we got to hire us one non white woman. And here comes this white woman. I'm a non white whitewater. If you say, so. That's why she has to maintain the lie because her whole career is based on that lie. You see that she's too she's into deep at this point. She can't get out. But the worst part is some black woman some Hispanic woman.

Elizabeth warren Lindsey Graham Fordham law review Harvard Law School Stanford law school three years
"harvard law school" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

03:03 min | 1 year ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on KTRH

"Elizabeth warren. Is less American Indian than most white people in this country. And Lindsey Graham is going is going to shame her. It really doesn't matter if she's much American Indian anyway. But it did matter it mattered to her career. It got her hired and promoted, and that's what's wrong with playing these games in an article in the Fordham law review. In nineteen ninety five. The author writes there are few women of color who hold important positions in the academy. Fortune five hundred companies or other prominent fields or industries. This is not inconsequential diversifying these arenas in part by adding qualified women of color to their ranks. Remains important for many reasons for one there are scant women of color as role models. In my three years at Stanford law school there were no professors who were women of color. Harvard Law School hired its first woman of color. Elizabeth warren. In nineteen ninety five. Elizabeth Warren a woman of color. Because she's one one thousand American Indian which they didn't actually use Indian blood to compare against. But hey, let's assume she is in fact, one one thousand American Indian I don't wanna take that away from her. But does that make her a woman of color? Why do we qualify people as a woman of color? Why is that important? It's important that she have been perceived in that way. Because it got her hired on it gave her an extra qualification. But here's the problem faculty positions like most other things particularly in public life in in government. Faculty positions or a zero sum game. If Elizabeth Warren got that job. Does that mean someone else didn't? And even if you buy into the nonsense. That you need to have women of color on the faculty for the sole purpose of being a woman of color, not because that person is the best. But if you say, well, we got a hire us one non white woman. And here comes this white woman. I'm a non white woman if you say so. That's why she has to maintain the lie because her whole career is based on that lie. You see that she's too she's into deep at this point get out. But the worst part is some black woman some Hispanic woman.

Elizabeth warren Lindsey Graham Fordham law review Harvard Law School Stanford law school three years
"harvard law school" Discussed on Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard

Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard

02:56 min | 2 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard

"So you though the same friend that went down to part time? Yeah, I friend Christine Rayner. She went to Harvard Law School. Okay. And I have been in her company many times where people have asked her where she went to law school, and then she has said, I went to Harvard Law School and almost one hundred percent of the time people go, ooh, ooh, more. And I have to watch them just patronize her for about five minutes. And I've thought ever since witnessing this, wow, I would have thought having graduated from Harvard is great thing. It'd be like a fucking racing trophy, but no, it totally backfires, right people are just generally so threatened by this. Is it miserable sane where you went to college? So allow me to indulge in my white privilege. Complain about going. It is. It is a weird going. It's a weird lose-lose thing because if you say you went to Harvard, that's the reaction. And if you say you went to school in Boston, which people do a lot of people that I went to Boston or whatever, and then they would do aware be you and then you're, you're dead and you don't have to Harvard, and then they didn't want us to double Wham. Joe, I, you just it's easier to say, went to Harvard, you know, you start by going on asshole or go to school. I'm gonna. Fuck in. So let's start here. Start from this baseline. You ain't me. I'm an asshole. Do we need to talk about college? Yeah. I mean, I was on like seventy five percent of my education was paid for with financial aid. And so I feel less poverty and I feel embarrassed about it because I do feel like I earned. It's it's actually so sad that we as humans are so easily triggered threatened. Yeah, that's something that is look. I could never fucking got into Harvard. It wasn't wasn't within me either through the due diligence or test scores, and it's a huge accomplishment. And it's crazy that we hate it. If someone wins a an Olympic gold medal, no one's like gold. What I think I know exactly what it is. We all have some weird fantasy of had we committed ourselves to learning the the high bar or whatever fucking sharing that we could have. Yeah, there's something about like intellectual feelings of intellectual inferiority that really triggers something much more deep to identity. I would actually say, I think you're right, but I would rephrase it a little bit. I think that the reason we don't do that with the hundred meter dash winner because it's like that guy's not. I'm not that guy. There's no one hundred years, but Harvard is like, well, I went to this college and you went to Harvard or Yale, or Stanford at Princeton or whatever. Yeah, and so it's like it's the closeness. It's the it's thoughts Dimity to it that makes people get defensive or whatever. That's a wild guess. I don't know if there's any. There's so many things in life like this, like I will..

Harvard Law School Harvard Christine Rayner gold medal Boston Joe Princeton Yale Stanford seventy five percent one hundred percent one hundred years hundred meter five minutes
"harvard law school" Discussed on WBSM 1420

WBSM 1420

02:16 min | 2 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on WBSM 1420

"Rod rosenstein is a is threatening members of congress and saying he's going to subpoena them if they tried to get rid of him i mean look look at rod rosenstein doesn't he look like the kind of guy who got multiple wedgies when he was in middle school junior high school this kinda gotta got his lunch bag stomped on and now now he's you know he he's a prosecutor and he thinks he's a real copy thinks he's a tough guy and so he's coming after people he's never been elected to anything and he's he's threatening these elected congressmen and you know i know congressman can be corrupt than the you know they tend to be when bags a lot of them but they are elected by the people they are the people's representatives and the and i'll i'll put more more confidence in in devon nunez or mark meadows jim jordan and i will in rod rosenstein who went to harvard law school the fact that all these people with the harvard law school speaks ill of of harvard law school you know barack obama rod rosenstein the divall patrick all on all these people on the supreme court they're they're they're not they don't they don't tend to be very good people eight four four five hundred forty to forty two they don't they don't seem to care that much about the law they think they're above the law i'm howie carr he's the google of graft we go my listeners love get the tea and ronnie now has a new special what is it ronnie well you know your listeners are are going crazy for the get the tea and that's great you know we take getting sick that's the worst thing and then there's a lot of people that have blood pressure issues and this is where our alison advanced comes in and does a great job with keeping intruders out so if you don't like being sick this is what you want to be taken and we're gonna do the super teeth so what we're gonna do is put this together all they have to do is put the.

Rod rosenstein congress middle school junior high scho congressman harvard law school alison devon nunez barack obama howie carr ronnie
"harvard law school" Discussed on The Axe Files with David Axelrod

The Axe Files with David Axelrod

01:46 min | 2 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on The Axe Files with David Axelrod

"Uh you at harvard law school one of your classmates was barack obama he was two years behind me yes so he was there are now one of these a revisionist historians where i tell you i knew him very well but we used to play tuesdays and thursdays hoops in the hemingway jim saw all the gym rats knew each other he was a firstyear student one i was a thirdyear student but my best barack obama stories in two thousand seven he came to the university club you may not remember this i supported him and i buy i do i do remember and so i walked into the university club there were seven or eight of us from law school then senator obama from your great state of illinois are we are handing them cheques i turned to them i said senator i said you know we didn't really know each other that well in law school but i'm had had to rage a big shaghai said can i lied on my friends to tell them that we knew each other he laughed he didn't miss beatty said hey if you double the amount of the attack we can take it back to hawaii as the spurs out he'll he's got a great personality and by the way i did i double demanded shack and i went out and bundled form because i said to myself manama republican um i thought he was a moderate voice i had a lot of common sense he ran into him you guys can gradually guys right an amazing campaign um and i thought i was going to break a lot of different things the jackie robinson of american politics and i thought he was going to make the world better and by the way a lot of things you did i agree with we can talk about what they are some of the things he did i very strongly didn't agree one official obviously didn't like was you felt he was too rough on on wall street that his language was too rough on wall street stuff tough on wall street i know we we got into a little bit at the cnn town hall meeting at the newseum self hours i was.

harvard law school senator obama illinois beatty hawaii jackie robinson senator i manama official cnn town hall two years
"harvard law school" Discussed on Inside the Hive with Nick Bilton

Inside the Hive with Nick Bilton

02:12 min | 2 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on Inside the Hive with Nick Bilton

"Place so that's the long answer to that so let's talk about the the mood sri minute began who doesn't love talking about of god i mean he's just i i wanna like i would love to just be trapped in an elevator with him for a couple of days yeah as long as we had food and snacks but but can you tell us a little bit about him like what makes him tick i just it had find him so fascinating so yeah so scaramucci as probably allow a lot of people know the scaramucci origin surrey by now he i think he went up your harvard law school and then he worked at goldman sachs and then he failed at his first job at goldman sachs and then um i i don't know what was in between goldman sachs than him starting this company skybridge alternative estimates was basically like a fun to find funds that also had this like party on the other side in las vegas where he can just be as promoter and heat us like his the thing that gives him like lifeblood end the thing that gives him like all meaning in life is just being like this consummate schmoozer so economy sense when he was going from schmoozing on wall street to schmoozing in washington but clearly he didn't realize that washington wall street are very different places obviously that's what he's talking about you know getting stabbed in the front by these secret errors and he's just like he houston who fascinating to me i ain't i know that he is the guy who loves to be like i need from the old neighborhood were family i you know stand in front of a bus for you but i'm like endlessly fascinated by at hate him i have met him yes and what's he like in person he's i would say he's exactly like he is seen on tv and on print so that part of me that wonders like he actually doesn't seem like a bad guy a my is it just because i like him on a little bit at that i don't think he's a guy like you know looks like.

harvard law school goldman sachs las vegas washington houston
"harvard law school" Discussed on KVNT Valley News Talk

KVNT Valley News Talk

02:05 min | 2 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on KVNT Valley News Talk

"Okay this is one of those points that a number of people including the washington post james hohmann made this point in washington post president trump didn't use the term i i i i he far more frequently use the term we he used the word i twenty nine times he used the term we a hundred twenty nine times another communal word that the president used our he used at a hundred and four times okay you the tapes like the royal way but it was effective so why does elizabeth warren respond this way she tweeted this morning this is the senator from massachusetts the former professor of young joe kennedy owned by the way he met his wife and the mother of his two children at harvard law school in elizabeth warren a class so senator warren rights i went to the state of the union i wanted it burned into my eyes if there's ever a moment when i'm too tired to keep fighting i just have to close my eyes and see trump pence and ryan applauding themselves for punching families in the gut and i'm back in this fight oh yeah okay what what what is the point whoa at how how can someone answer the question seriously this is a woman who clearly wants to run for president what is she talking about how is speaker ryan how is president trump punching working families in the gut can you explain that to me please actually what the president was calling for is an effort to actually achieve more together listen fish in.

trump president elizabeth warren senator massachusetts professor joe kennedy harvard law school ryan washington post james hohmann washington senator warren rights
"harvard law school" Discussed on KQED Radio

KQED Radio

01:30 min | 2 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on KQED Radio

"Good evening and welcome to tonight's program hosted by the commonwealth club of silicon valley my name is low darras cordell it is my pleasure to introduce keyser con gold star father and author of an american family a memoir of hope and sacrifice mr khan was born in pakistan and received his law degree from the university of punjab he and his wife priscilla then lived in dubai before immigrating with their family to the united states in 1986 mr con graduated from harvard law school and that same year the cons became american citizens khan's have three sons shah who magnon and omar us army captain who magnon was tragically killed in the line of duty in iraq and posthumously awarded a purple heart and a bronze star many of us remember mr khan delivering one of the most memorable speeches at last year's democratic national convention as he talked about equality sacrifice and the ideals symbolized by the united states constitution we are honored to have him with us here too right please welcome he's here khan.

keyser mr khan pakistan law degree priscilla dubai united states harvard law school shah iraq democratic national convention university of punjab
"harvard law school" Discussed on WBSM 1420

WBSM 1420

02:05 min | 2 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on WBSM 1420

"Proved that saw michael patrick lay he breitbart because harvard university has the has refused to release her employment applications the university of pennsylvania law school the other lie ivy league law school that she was a tenured member of the faculty they refuse to release their employment documents and she claims that she never used her alleged native american heritage too wide to to jump over uh more qualified applicants but you know david french who writes for national review and i'm sure you've you've heard of david fresh yes he's a big critic of donald trump he attended harvard law school at that time and he got says you know the atmosphere around campus of that time was just uh very very critical of the school and they were demanding minority hires at harvard law school as you know and and there's no question that uh elizabeth warren presented herself as a minority in that enhanced her attractiveness to harvard law school when they heard no question about that right mind the understanding to she's a gradual of a rutgers university law school which is not exactly a firstyear lost mamone no knock on the rutgers but the harvard in these other ivy league call logist usually hire people who are graduates of the top tier absolute top tier law schools and she's i i think she's the only one who comes from a second or third tier school like or was the only one from a second or third tier school like rutgers you know it's like this is this is why she got the job because they thought they were hiring a a native american and it and it's just so preposterous to hear this the every time a trump mentions the word polka haunt us you know the the it's like it's like pavlov's dogs with the mainstream media they go crazy and they call him are racists than in it's just it makes absolutely no sense to me well i i think the reason trump does it i think he's very strategic and referring to her as pocahontas because it reminds.

breitbart harvard university law school david french national review donald trump harvard law school elizabeth warren rutgers pavlov mainstream media michael patrick university of pennsylvania law david fresh
"harvard law school" Discussed on WPRO 630AM

WPRO 630AM

01:59 min | 3 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on WPRO 630AM

"Harvard law school in teacher professors a thing or two a few few months later i happened to bump into him at another event and he made only remembered million he asked well how did it how did that work when i brought it all back to las cool i said well joe fiscally i have bad news i brought it back to my school and the professors overruled you unanimously quickly a laugh because he understood all too well the situation of law school uh and how his approaches shooters constitutional approach this methodology is basic premise these were so at odds then and now with the dominant theories of constitutional law practice the most law school i learned from you that when justice scalia spoke at law schools or spoke before law students he was looking to disrupt them in some fashion any haven et declares that he wrote his descends for law students what is it that he was seeking to achieve by disrupting those of us who just memorize well justice scalia had in mind disruption of the best and not disruption will away the campus loser disrupted now unfortunately but what he meant was he was there it intellectually shake the students up a little bit especially the one who but exposed in a serious way too textual is emerge or ridge it'll is almost ideal uh interpreting the constitution in accordance with how it's words were understood by the generation that made those words with the law school year would come to campus he would give talks in an effort to spread that message but you mentioned the also wrote defending opinions and so many supreme court cases and those content by john who is owned admission uh were aimed at the next generation of lawyer so he'd already in any one case where he was defending use all the wrong end of the case and that is his side had lost his view it lost justice scalia was left to explain in detail for a generation of law students what a better wade to.

Harvard law school constitutional law law school justice scalia john wade joe
"harvard law school" Discussed on Recode Decode

Recode Decode

01:53 min | 3 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on Recode Decode

"But let's talk about what how you got to where you that you would you had started off you have quite a resume you start off educated all and and how you so what you go through that really quickly uh so i started out studying electrical engineering at princeton and i also did a side certificate in the wilson school public in an international fairs i went straight to you harvard law school the case go before that in the book you talk a lot about your background and growing up sorta seems delic the odds night yeah i mean wasn't quite a delicacy it was a little bit of a small town than who really have very many asian so there is a little bit of tension there but in a but my parents were you know like we had dinner together every night it was very um education oriented and you know my mom was a researcher at bell labs so we had access to computers swagger yeah my dad was a math professor so it was very know we had access to a lot of information and a lot of that you know an educational tools and uh and focus and achievement around achievement yeah thought was like they had come from china on education scholarships and for them like education was the path to success and the path to contributing back and it wasn't genderbased they were pushing right boning they had with three girls regular exactly bility to be unfair gender but also wasn't that is that eu she your mother was a researcher she had a significant job in the idea was that you could achieve whatever he was that's the pressing idea now but the goals weren't that great lu lu they were like if you could be a professor or a doctor that would be so awesome and but you can do it if you work hard enough right exactly so you went under princeton go ahead turns out entrepreneurs and then after prince and i want to harvard law school and i practice corporate law for two years and you're in new york and then a year in hong kong mostly men in the group um and.

princeton law school researcher bell labs professor china new york hong kong wilson school harvard harvard law school two years
"harvard law school" Discussed on WBSM 1420

WBSM 1420

01:39 min | 3 years ago

"harvard law school" Discussed on WBSM 1420

"All poor moke yesterday they said he was a the harvard law school said he was dead he got fired now we got beat up in little italy today what's what's going on with the moke maybe should go visit his son in the hospital and is his astray ranged wife i think we're moving on from the mobster movies they even plugs out there i mean streets by the way 1973 a pretty damn good mob movie lower lackey semeck rail need is when i get in there coming up will you don't think mean streets israel news insists like every day you pull these gangsters 'cause i think you secretly think you are a little bit of a gangster who is widely biology i wanted to have you killed yati addi atta that's very true there is a little foam ogun going on with how he wishes you is a gangster yeah he's like i never clean that was a tough guy and then he pretends that he's a tough guy thou so is called and reminded me of that seem in in means streets his prefight guts out that that was the robert the niro's first the breakthrough movie he was the second lead the with harvey kyw towel was the was the lead and martin scorsese's first movie but a great great film in any way the moluccas is the most they'll hasn't been seen him so i guess i shouldn't be surprised he's he's a he'll he'll resurface somewhere he didn't do his exit interview last night on sean hannity either juicy greg gut felt he said i probably shouldn't be too harsh on the guy might end of work in here again you should have said again um how weak are today's news is.

harvard law school martin scorsese greg gut little italy israel robert the niro harvey kyw sean hannity