15 Burst results for "Harbor Safe Harbor"

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Southern California Real Estate Report

Southern California Real Estate Report

04:59 min | 1 year ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Southern California Real Estate Report

"Today on the southern california real estate report. We talk about a different type of sale. Stay good morning. Welcome to southern california real estate report. This is bob mcguire and wise coming to you from san diego california so something that we that we never really talked about on our podcast but that's a local thing and it's obviously real estate right. The ega thing it is. It's just a different type of real estate. So one of the marinas is set to change hands and it looks like it was at a pretty high purchase price that the deal went down. And it's an eighty four million dollar transaction son road is going to be transferring. Ownership in interest in basically harbour island to a group called safe harbor Safe harbor is going to be the new operator and with that. So there's there's quite a few things that went down here. Daniel and i were just talking about this off line. It's actually there's a lot to it. So the the the harbour itself is about six hundred slips right right and then with that also comes two hundred and fifty nine thousand ninety square feet of land. And then there's a million twenty nine thousand two hundred and thirty nine square feet of water and so the water is deep water. That's within the slip areas and the dachshund under the dachshund. Things like that so so they're responsible for obviously the maintenance environmental issues with water. They have the land which it turns out is basically. It's it's the eastern. Most tip of har- harbour island which is home to do very popular restaurants. One of which we have our christmas party yet for our we have had. We have had our christmas party. And it is yeah. It's a very nice restaurant and it's called island prime and then the other one is called is called sea level lounge so that is also going to go with it so son road in some communities didn't respond to the request for comment but safe harbor and his pair company already have four leases. That are around here. So they have shelter island boatyard and the sun outdoors. Rv resort in chula vista. So they have some some other interests here. This new operator and so are the old operator..

bob mcguire southern california safe harbor Safe harbor harbour island san diego california Daniel chula vista
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

07:04 min | 1 year ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"Begin by wishing you all a very merry Christmas. Remember the world way started five years ago and I said you're gonna be saying Christmas again. We say it proudly again, although they'll they'll be trying to take that word again out of the vocabulary. We're not gonna let him do Yeah. And you know, it's funny. I always run into people who are like, stop it with the war on Christmas stop with the war in Christianity. Just sound silly. There's no such thing. I don't I don't know whether I'm supposed to laugh in your face or or just like not to be like. Oh, you are so pretty. Yes, you are. Tony Got to 93. W I b c Good morning. You have the attorney general in Michigan. Tweeting out why she doesn't say Merry Christmas. Because you want to be inclusive. Guys. There's nothing wrong with saying Merry Christmas. There's nothing wrong with saying Merry Christmas at all. And in any way, it doesn't mean that you're not inclusive. Its mythology made up by really terrible people who are more interested in being woke than they are and being, I don't know, just relaxed. It's just so silly. Remember the first time I was at a store with my son and employees said Merry Christmas. My son looked devastated and asked, Are we the only people who don't celebrate Christmas? I answered. No, we're just as American as everyone else. Glad Joe Biden knows that. Never once did I think growing up celebrating Hanukkah? That I was less American than anybody else, Nor did my parents. Nor did my immigrant grandparent's it. Never it never dawned on us never dawned on us to even ask the question. That you would say that. Is as criminally ridiculous and woke and awful as can be believed. So when people say Oh, there's no such thing as this war on Christmas with this warrant, Christianity. Stop kidding yourselves. The same people who probably think that you know, or they're the same people who probably think that nothing wrong happened in the election. That's It's adorable right there. Georgia is going to certify the vote in Fulton County. Right? They've got video evidence. And you know, we don't care. We don't care. Yeah, that's a bad bamboo by See, I did it again, but it's like it's there. Whatever thing They have suitcases from under table. Coming out when they sent all the poll watchers home and just left people that account for one particular side and bread rations. Burger. The secretary of state is like we're certifying. Now Some people are wondering. Why is it that Brian Camp the governor of Georgia? Isn't demanding more off this signature on it. Well. There are some things that aren't in his purview. And this is always where President Trump is like. I don't care if it's in your purview demand it. Order it. He's saying he doesn't campus, saying he doesn't have the legal authority to do so. Now. It is very possible he doesn't have the legal authority to do so. That should not be taken as everything was on the up and up. If the I am being asked Because I gotta ask this question. Ah, lot. Of course Over the weekend. We were Tom Rash Lincoln with each drink smoke. Fantastic event by the way. State Road, 3741st Street. We had cigars from blend bar Cigar, and we had a really fantastic bourbon tasting from Jeff Clarke and noble wine and spirits. Fantastic time. I something fingers, boy Pleasure meeting. All the people in a lot of people came out. And socially, just and fantastic, really, really thrilled with everything. We were three different areas. It was it was great. Look forward to doing it again. Hopefully they'll be another time to do it. People asked if it was a fraud. My argument is I cannot prove to you fraud fraud. Is this catch all term that we use regarding the election? You asked me of this criminal activity going on. I'm going to say to you. Yes, As a matter of fact, I'm gonna look its various queue at people who don't think there was a legal activity going on. I do not think I have the ability to stop Joe Biden from being inaugurated. On January 20th Have you saved me, Tony? There's criminal activity. How do you stop him? The answer to that question is I do not have a legal mechanism to do so. Can't stop the state of Georgia from from certifying. I cannot stop Pennsylvania from certifying. I cannot stop Michigan or Arizona from certifying. Can't do it. But just the ballot curing conversation in Pennsylvania alone with Allegheny in Philadelphia counties, allowing some people to sign their the outside of their ballots, therefore, making them legal and other counties not not offering that opportunity. That's disenfranchisement. I wipe out the whole state, and I would The electors should not be be counted. Entire state was disenfranchised or at least multiple counties. Some people broke along. Some didn't and the people who didn't R R S O L Don't know if I can use that phrase on radio. Can you get a ruling on that Alison? Ruling as sure. Well You did say, And this is why I'm not in charge of elections. Pretty sure that's how that works. No, of course. Of course, Philadelphia should be are all Pennsylvania should be knocked out. Georgia. You bring ballots from under a table and suitcases while you send the poll Workers home and you allow things in Fulton County out of your head. Out of your mind. I will always look askew at the people who say out Give it up, just sucking up. You lost the election. I will laugh. Those people and I'm more than willing to engage in the intellectual fight with those pseudo intellectual people know there's a lot of them. There's a lot of usually they have jobs on TV. There are a lot of those people I don't have the mechanism. That's what all of these lawsuits are about. That's what this pushes about on Samuel Alito for, for example. Now Samuel Alito. He is the Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, and he has said that he is moving the date. That Pennsylvania has to answer his questions. Tuesday instead of Wednesday. No Why is this Or no today instead of tomorrow. No, I know I did all right Tuesday instead of Wednesday. That's it. This has to do with something called Safe Harbor. Safe harbor..

Georgia Pennsylvania Samuel Alito Joe Biden Tony Fulton County Michigan Safe Harbor fraud Supreme Court attorney Tom Rash Lincoln President Trump Burger Jeff Clarke Brian Camp
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on WAAM Talk 1600

WAAM Talk 1600

03:56 min | 1 year ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on WAAM Talk 1600

"Nobody knew where there was a man or a woman. And it wasn't some kind of LGBT Bs. A hay was mistaken on the radio all the time for a girl. They were called to this jockeys and say, What's that girl's name and just checking? See that's a man and said No, so he actually recorded a song. Called. I'm a natural man. Really Cool stuff. That's JB Lenoir, one of the coolest cats ever out of Chicago Blues scene. Ah! Monster band to about John Mail was obsessed with this guy that's called 55 years by JB Lenoir. Some say Lenoir some saline or take your pick, either one, he said. He's the one but anyway, John Mail Ah did one of those things a lot of those English cats would do? They made he made a pilgrimage. The Rolling Stones made a pilgrimage to see muddy waters. Fleetwood Mac made a pilgrimage to see chess studios. I mean, loving them to do that, too. But we didn't record any music. Uh, John Little John Mail came over here and just hey, spent a lot of time with Jamie Lynn or his wife and recorded that album to uh uh, his tribute. Do this cat's too cool. You want yourself to get over to? Well, all the people we play on the show. Joy to yourself to get over to YouTube. Not now. You should be hanging on my every word, but just get over there and the type and J B Lenoir. Elian Oi, R and a bunch of other cool cats to love the stuff. People go work. How do you know about this stuff? I don't know. I don't know. I know, but it's just people are saying, how do you know what to play? It's not that I know what to play. It said I know what not to play. Yeah, that's the magic. The peasantry, the splendor of all of my music endeavors. It Z alternative but music fighter. You're on the edge. Uh, This is coming into what we're coming up on the 14th with today. Today is for 10 more days, two more days, and they have to do that thing I think called Send the electoral College votes in and I are about you, But is there anything else to be concerned with these days? I'm don't know. I mean, right now, it's like everything else pales in comparison because there's that pointed out in less break. Last segment. Rather, we are being stolen from there's no way. Look at it. You may support it. You may be some psychotic God, socialist, uh, Karl Marx Kool Aid drinker, but The rest of us aren't this is horrific. You know the Joe Biden right now. I'm not gonna get into a lot of this today. But the fact we're I printed it out. Biden is bread, and I guess I didn't. But Biden is bragging about. He's going to get rid of the protection for churches. Churches have that Sexy status where If they don't preach from the pulpit. If they stay with the politics, they get a tax break. But by the ones get ridiculous. He said that churches on the religious exemption is AH shelter. Ah Harbor Safe Harbor for hate. You hear that? Biden is making the case that pastors from the pulpit, priests, whatever rabbis, anybody doing what they do in church, they get safe haven because if they for hate, because It's all around the gay thing. This is the homosexual mafia that's pushing bite and say, Hey, we work for you. Now you work for us, and so he's gonna do it coming up if he gets through if he makes it down through Hasn't made it yet. Hey, President yet, baby on But I got to tell you unless Donald Trump really doubles down. Biden will prevail. Trump's got to double down It can't be that they go to the state legislators and State legislator. Sit there. Not off While they're looking at yourself. Phones can't happen. I mean, think about it. They're pretty much worthless to begin with. Now Trump's got to do some serious ass stuff here. You're on the edge. So alternative, but music. Friday.

Joe Biden JB Lenoir John Little John Mail Donald Trump J B Lenoir John Mail Harbor Safe Harbor Elian Oi YouTube Karl Marx Fleetwood Mac Jamie Lynn President
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on KGO 810

KGO 810

07:51 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on KGO 810

"Four years I should say it seems that we have sort of the refresher course in how elections work. Most of us, I think are pretty well. Way get the whole Electoral college. The The necessary 270 electoral college votes to win the majority of Americans and and then take the White House. We get that threshold, we kind of know how that works. Many of us have an opinion on whether or not we like the electoral college, not a big fan myself. I think, maybe one time in America's history It was almost necessary from a practical standpoint, but certainly not the case any longer and with technology that we have, we don't we don't need to get our votes off to an elector who can then run them by horseback. Across seven states to Washington, D. C. We don't need that stuff right? So we can do it time you were nothing. But it's It's almost like every year. We have sort of this refresher course on. Okay. Okay. 270 votes in the electoral college. The electors are chosen by the states who have all of their own different rules, and it starts to get It starts to get Deep in the weeds really fast, and it's so strange this year. That We've already got one guy who says he may not. He may not participate the peaceful transition of power. He may be trying to hang out of the White House as long as he can. Teams of lawyers already trying to figure out and around. How do we dispute the returns until beyond safe Harbor Safe Harbor? Right. There is what it's it's sort of go back into your your memory banks to recall what is the safe Harbor period. All of this stuff sort of pops up. So is there a way to make that any better? Of course, who knows? Maybe they'll be such a debate performance tonight. By one candidate or the other that All of these conversations will be moved. Maybe we'll have one candidate who simply blows the other candidate out of the water. Maybe there's a total meltdown by one candidate tonight. It is 2020. Something could happen. We both these guys in their seventies. They're going, Tio. They're going to a medical emergency on the stage tonight in front of 85 million people that we all witness and all of a sudden all the conversation we're having about the elections completely shift totally possible. It's totally possible. Riches in Paso Robles Rich called 80 88. 10 rich Thanks for hanging on, man. Are you watching this debate tonight? I'm going to watch it. I want to see Biden take the stage already Know what Trump is? You know we can. We can pretty much stipulate ease of philandering con man. Okay, fine. I want to see him take on Trump. Mild baseball coach once told me that in a contest there's two ways to do this. You Khun go full out and win and you might make a mistake here or there, or you can play not to lose. If you take the former, I guarantee you You're going to get a better chance of losing. I want to see him. Take him on in ways. You know that Hillary Clinton didn't What? So you want him to get down and dirty kind of jump in the gutter with Trump? Well, you know, if you've got somebody who doesn't play by the rules, and you choose to play by those rules, Yeah. You compact yourself on the back and say what a wonderful human being. You are. But also you're going to end up giving that guy a heck of an advantage. If he wants to get ugly, then get ugly with him. Yeah, I hear you're rich. I guess I'm kind of of this. I love the sports analogy. Incidentally, I'm a big fan of sports analogies. And and I know a lot of people who hate sports analogies. I love him. I guess I'm kind of I'm kind of like this with the whole trump thing. Well, you said we know who he is right? So if If Biden just continues to emphasize the negative after attributes, you know the philandering con man stuff. And doesn't otherwise get into the down and dirty with him. Ah, I think that that benefits and otherwise I see it as okay. What's supposed Biden starts. Oh, yeah, Well, you've paid more, Tio. Hookers and important you've paid more deporting stars than you have in taxes in the last 15 years, right if he starts doing that kind of stuff is what the Internet is for, right? That's what that's what groups like us on the Internet. Do. What if Joe Biden starts doing about a stage to me? It sort of takes away from one of the things I like about Joe is that I think he's presidential And and and I don't really want to see the office being dragged down to that sort of, you know who's the biggest gesture on the stage? Well, The thing is, I think, Biden. I think by now you can pull this off and I think you can confront him and beat presidential. But one thing you can't do is go walk off the stage and wring your hands. Oh, he's not a nice guy. Yeah, we all know that. He's not a nice guy. Oh, yeah, OK, I agree with that. I agree with you on that. Yeah, Yeah. Yeah, I think it is long as Joe is, is, ah, tough but honest right? If Joe starts making up a bunch of garbage, right, if if all this the fact checkers are working as much time on Joe's whatever he says tonight is what Donald Trump says tonight. Joe's got a problem. Because all of a sudden, you know they're they're both lying to me. Right? So why is one better than the other? I think that's from Yeah, well, he got Uncle Donald's gotta still explain why 200,000 Americans were dead? That shouldn't be that you claim your right. Yeah, I hear you, man. Rich. Thanks a lot for the call. Good talking to you. Yeah, I I think that there are so many different avenues that that Biden can explore whether it's Corona virus response. Which Trump is going to say it was the best ever. And quite frankly, it's not that we know that whether it's the taxes issue that just came out, Um, whether it's You know, unsavory ties to Russia, Ukraine all the other stuff that we've been through the last four years. There's plenty there. Plenty there. Petaluma. Debra Debra, Thanks for calling the show. Good to talk to you. I think he should go for the jugular. I want to see a trump try toe walk towards him and intimidate him like he did, Teo Hillary. I think that he need that bite needs to call out true statistics. I would also say something to the effect is if you jumped on the Corona virus like you jumped on putting in the nude. Telling risk begins their position, then pandemic. I think that he needs to bring up every single a legal thing that he has been charged of. And and that that they haven't vindicated him. I think he needed to be so laser about pointing out to you. Every single person that is watching this exactly who Trump is. I think you need to see. I don't think that's fighting dirty, though. I don't think that's going dirty double. How can the American people hold you up when you talk about women's personal body part as if you're a conquering them? Right now. I don't think that's fighting dirty..

Joe Biden Donald Trump White House Trump Harbor Safe Harbor America Washington Hillary Clinton Paso Robles Rich baseball Khun Petaluma Debra Debra Teo Hillary Uncle Donald Russia Ukraine
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

Daily Tech News Show

05:51 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

"S feeds about safe harbor This is recorded for an upcoming series separate from daily Tech News. Show called no a little more that is set to launch in June The idea there is to go deep dives into single topics and I happen to record one on CD section two. Oh three safe harbor. The same day that the president signed an executive order trying to change how that section of law is enforced and I thought it might be helpful to folks trying to wrap their head around all of this to understand. What safe harbor is what CD? A two three is and what it isn't So this is a sneak preview at the upcoming series. No a little more about safe harbor safe harbor. Free Pass Government Subsidy Studio to thirty. Are you confused? Don't be let's help you know a little more about safe harbor. Let's start with the legal concept of a safe harbor. It's a safety net to try to prevent miss application of a rule. A common example is a rule against reckless driving. You might declare a safe harbor for anyone driving less than ten miles an hour if you go in that slow. Maybe it's not reckless and you can just stop evaluating. It makes things simpler for the Internet. The concept of safe harbor revolves around who is liable for. What's posted online if I run a blog and somebody posts a comment on my blog. That is libelous. You might think that the commenter is responsible for what they posted but the law may see my blog as the publisher of that comment and hold me responsible safe. Harbor is the idea that given certain conditions you can host comments from other people and you are not held liable for those postings in the US that principle is enshrined in the communications decency. Act Section two thirty of one thousand nine hundred ninety six so if you hear safe harbor and CD. A two-thirty used interchangeably. That's why all right. Let's rewind the clock an early example is Smith versus California decided by the US Supreme Court back in Nineteen fifty nine in that case a bookstore owner in Los Angeles was prosecuted for having an obscene book in his store. The Supreme Court ruled that a bookstore is just a distributor who can't be expected to review every bit of content before it sold. There's a lot of books in that store so the bookstore owner should only be liable if they knew or should have known that what they were distributing was illegal. This is an important point to consider in future. Evaluations of CD. A to thirty so remember that. The bookstore owner isn't off the hook if he selling a book. And you can say look. Everybody knew this was obscene. It was called the big book of full of obscenities right The court said that without this protection however without the protection from hey the the book was called totally not obscene. And he didn't know the court said that without this protection bookstores would limit their offerings..

US Supreme Court US president Los Angeles executive publisher California Smith
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

Daily Tech News Show

05:51 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

"S feeds about safe harbor This is recorded for an upcoming series separate from daily Tech News. Show called no a little more that is set to launch in June The idea there is to go deep dives into single topics and I happen to record one on CD section two. Oh three safe harbor. The same day that the president signed an executive order trying to change how that section of law is enforced and I thought it might be helpful to folks trying to wrap their head around all of this to understand. What safe harbor is what CD? A two three is and what it isn't So this is a sneak preview at the upcoming series. No a little more about safe harbor safe harbor. Free Pass Government Subsidy Studio to thirty. Are you confused? Don't be let's help you know a little more about safe harbor. Let's start with the legal concept of a safe harbor. It's a safety net to try to prevent miss application of a rule. A common example is a rule against reckless driving. You might declare a safe harbor for anyone driving less than ten miles an hour if you go in that slow. Maybe it's not reckless and you can just stop evaluating. It makes things simpler for the Internet. The concept of safe harbor revolves around who is liable for. What's posted online if I run a blog and somebody posts a comment on my blog. That is libelous. You might think that the commenter is responsible for what they posted but the law may see my blog as the publisher of that comment and hold me responsible safe. Harbor is the idea that given certain conditions you can host comments from other people and you are not held liable for those postings in the US that principle is enshrined in the communications decency. Act Section two thirty of one thousand nine hundred ninety six so if you hear safe harbor and CD. A two-thirty used interchangeably. That's why all right. Let's rewind the clock an early example is Smith versus California decided by the US Supreme Court back in Nineteen fifty nine in that case a bookstore owner in Los Angeles was prosecuted for having an obscene book in his store. The Supreme Court ruled that a bookstore is just a distributor who can't be expected to review every bit of content before it sold. There's a lot of books in that store so the bookstore owner should only be liable if they knew or should have known that what they were distributing was illegal. This is an important point to consider in future evaluations of CD. A to thirty so remember that. The bookstore owner isn't off the hook if he selling a book. And you can say look. Everybody knew this was obscene. It was called the big book of full of obscenities right The court said that without this protection however without the protection from hey the the book was called totally not obscene. And he didn't know the court said that without this protection bookstores would limit their offerings..

US Supreme Court US president Los Angeles executive publisher California Smith
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

Daily Tech News Show

05:51 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

"S feeds about safe harbor This is recorded for an upcoming series separate from daily Tech News. Show called no a little more that is set to launch in June The idea there is to go deep dives into single topics and I happen to record one on CD section two. Oh three safe harbor. The same day that the president signed an executive order trying to change how that section of law is enforced and I thought it might be helpful to folks trying to wrap their head around all of this to understand. What safe harbor is what CD? A two three is and what it isn't So this is a sneak preview at the upcoming series. No a little more about safe harbor safe harbor. Free Pass Government Subsidy Studio to thirty. Are you confused? Don't be let's help you know a little more about safe harbor. Let's start with the legal concept of a safe harbor. It's a safety net to try to prevent miss application of a rule. A common example is a rule against reckless driving. You might declare a safe harbor for anyone driving less than ten miles an hour if you go in that slow. Maybe it's not reckless and you can just stop evaluating. It makes things simpler for the Internet. The concept of safe harbor revolves around who is liable for. What's posted online if I run a blog and somebody posts a comment on my blog. That is libelous. You might think that the commenter is responsible for what they posted but the law may see my blog as the publisher of that comment and hold me responsible safe. Harbor is the idea that given certain conditions you can host comments from other people and you are not held liable for those postings in the US that principle is enshrined in the communications decency. Act Section two thirty of one thousand nine hundred ninety six so if you hear safe harbor and CD. A two-thirty used interchangeably. That's why all right. Let's rewind the clock an early example is Smith versus California decided by the US Supreme Court back in Nineteen fifty nine in that case a bookstore owner in Los Angeles was prosecuted for having an obscene book in his store. The Supreme Court ruled that a bookstore is just a distributor who can't be expected to review every bit of content before it sold. There's a lot of books in that store so the bookstore owner should only be liable if they knew or should have known that what they were distributing was illegal. This is an important point to consider in future. Evaluations of CD. A to thirty so remember that. The bookstore owner isn't off the hook if he selling a book. And you can say look. Everybody knew this was obscene. It was called the big book of full of obscenities right The court said that without this protection however without the protection from hey the the book was called totally not obscene. And he didn't know the court said that without this protection bookstores would limit their offerings..

US Supreme Court US president Los Angeles executive publisher California Smith
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

Daily Tech News Show

05:51 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

"S feeds about safe harbor This is recorded for an upcoming series separate from daily Tech News. Show called no a little more that is set to launch in June The idea there is to go deep dives into single topics and I happen to record one on CD section two. Oh three safe harbor. The same day that the president signed an executive order trying to change how that section of law is enforced and I thought it might be helpful to folks trying to wrap their head around all of this to understand. What safe harbor is what CD? A two three is and what it isn't So this is a sneak preview at the upcoming series. No a little more about safe harbor safe harbor. Free Pass Government Subsidy Studio to thirty confused. Don't be let's help you know a little more about safe harbor. Let's start with the legal concept of a safe harbor. It's a safety net to try to prevent miss application of a rule. A common example is a rule against reckless driving. You might declare a safe harbor for anyone driving less than ten miles an hour if you go in that slow. Maybe it's not reckless and you can just stop evaluating. It makes things simpler for the Internet. The concept of safe harbor revolves around who is liable for. What's posted online if I run a blog and somebody posts a comment on my blog. That is libelous. You might think that the commenter is responsible for what they posted but the law may see my blog as the publisher of that comment and hold me responsible safe. Harbor is the idea that given certain conditions you can host comments from other people and you are not held liable for those postings in the US that principle is enshrined in the communications decency. Act Section two thirty of nineteen ninety-six. So if you hear safe harbor and CD. A two-thirty used interchangeably. That's why all right. Let's rewind the clock an early example is Smith versus California decided by the US Supreme Court back in Nineteen fifty nine in that case a bookstore owner in Los Angeles was prosecuted for having an obscene book in his store. The Supreme Court ruled that a bookstore is just a distributor can't be expected to review every bit of content before it sold. There's a lot of books in that store so the bookstore owner should only be liable if they knew or should have known that what they were distributing was illegal. This is an important point to consider in future evaluations of CD. A to thirty so remember that. The bookstore owner isn't off the hook if he selling a book. And you can say look. Everybody knew this was obscene. It was called the big book of full of obscenities right The court said that without this protection however without the protection from hey the the book was called totally not obscene. And he didn't know the court said that without this protection bookstores would limit their offerings..

US Supreme Court US president Los Angeles executive publisher California Smith
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

Daily Tech News Show

05:51 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

"S feeds about safe harbor This is recorded for an upcoming series separate from daily Tech News. Show called no a little more that is set to launch in June The idea there is to go deep dives into single topics and I happen to record one on CD section two. Oh three safe harbor. The same day that the president signed an executive order trying to change how that section of law is enforced and I thought it might be helpful to folks trying to wrap their head around all of this to understand. What safe harbor is what CD? A two three is and what it isn't So this is a sneak preview at the upcoming series. No a little more about safe harbor safe harbor. Free Pass Government Subsidy Studio to thirty. Are you confused? Don't be let's help you know a little more about safe harbor. Let's start with the legal concept of a safe harbor. It's a safety net to try to prevent miss application of a rule. A common example is a rule against reckless driving. You might declare a safe harbor for anyone driving less than ten miles an hour if you go in that slow. Maybe it's not reckless and you can just stop evaluating. It makes things simpler for the Internet. The concept of safe harbor revolves around who is liable for. What's posted online if I run a blog and somebody posts a comment on my blog. That is libelous. You might think that the commenter is responsible for what they posted but the law may see my blog as the publisher of that comment and hold me responsible safe. Harbor is the idea that given certain conditions you can host comments from other people and you are not held liable for those postings in the US that principle is enshrined in the communications decency. Act Section two thirty of one thousand nine hundred ninety six so if you hear safe harbor and CD. A two-thirty used interchangeably. That's why all right. Let's rewind the clock an early example is Smith versus California decided by the US Supreme Court back in Nineteen fifty nine in that case a bookstore owner in Los Angeles was prosecuted for having an obscene book in his store. The Supreme Court ruled that a bookstore is just a distributor who can't be expected to review every bit of content before it sold. There's a lot of books in that store so the bookstore owner should only be liable if they knew or should have known that what they were distributing was illegal. This is an important point to consider in future evaluations of CD. A to thirty so remember that. The bookstore owner isn't off the hook if he selling a book. And you can say look. Everybody knew this was obscene. It was called the big book of full of obscenities right The court said that without this protection however without the protection from hey the the book was called totally not obscene. And he didn't know the court said that without this protection bookstores would limit their offerings..

US Supreme Court US president Los Angeles executive publisher California Smith
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

Daily Tech News Show

05:51 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Daily Tech News Show

"S feeds about safe harbor This is recorded for an upcoming series separate from daily Tech News. Show called no a little more that is set to launch in June The idea there is to go deep dives into single topics and I happen to record one on CD section two. Oh three safe harbor. The same day that the president signed an executive order trying to change how that section of law is enforced and I thought it might be helpful to folks trying to wrap their head around all of this to understand. What safe harbor is what CD? A two three is and what it isn't So this is a sneak preview at the upcoming series. No a little more about safe harbor safe harbor. Free Pass Government Subsidy Studio to thirty. Are you confused? Don't be let's help you know a little more about safe harbor. Let's start with the legal concept of a safe harbor. It's a safety net to try to prevent miss application of a rule. A common example is a rule against reckless driving. You might declare a safe harbor for anyone driving less than ten miles an hour if you go in that slow. Maybe it's not reckless and you can just stop evaluating. It makes things simpler for the Internet. The concept of safe harbor revolves around who is liable for. What's posted online if I run a blog and somebody posts a comment on my blog. That is libelous. You might think that the commenter is responsible for what they posted but the law may see my blog as the publisher of that comment and hold me responsible safe. Harbor is the idea that given certain conditions you can host comments from other people and you are not held liable for those postings in the US that principle is enshrined in the communications decency. Act Section two thirty of one thousand nine hundred ninety six so if you hear safe harbor and CD. A two-thirty used interchangeably. That's why all right. Let's rewind the clock an early example is Smith versus California decided by the US Supreme Court back in Nineteen fifty nine in that case a bookstore owner in Los Angeles was prosecuted for having an obscene book in his store. The Supreme Court ruled that a bookstore is just a distributor who can't be expected to review every bit of content before it sold. There's a lot of books in that store so the bookstore owner should only be liable if they knew or should have known that what they were distributing was illegal. This is an important point to consider in future. Evaluations of CD. A to thirty so remember that. The bookstore owner isn't off the hook if he selling a book. And you can say look. Everybody knew this was obscene. It was called the big book of full of obscenities right The court said that without this protection however without the protection from hey the the book was called totally not obscene. And he didn't know the court said that without this protection bookstores would limit their offerings..

US Supreme Court US president Los Angeles executive publisher California Smith
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on TechStuff

TechStuff

11:49 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on TechStuff

"Free that's A. S. A. N. A. DOT COM getting back into the DMC. We're ready to move onto title to and I know some of you are thinking they're five titles here. How long is this going to go? But really titles one and two are the big ones and the other ones are. We'll we'll touch on them but they won't be quite as an extensive so title. Two is the online copyright infringement liability limitation act which creates limitations on liability for online service providers for copyright infringement winning gauged in certain types of activities so this is of course where the term safe harbor comes from is this title two of the DMCA so safe harbor is essentially this idea that if you are an online service provider and that could be anything from an Internet service provider an ISP to a platform that people use on the Internet. Like Tumbler Youtube. Yeah exactly that. If you provide that service you are not necessarily monetarily liable for any copyright infringement. That's being performed by the users of your platform right now but there are again very specific rules in play. It's not that you're a given free license. You can't just sit there and say safe harbors safe harbor. I'm okay you have to actually show that you are one unaware that the stuff is going on and to you cannot be benefiting from the fact that infringement is going on right and furthermore if a company contacts you and says hey this thing is on your site. I it's it's copyright infringement. Please take it down. You have to do that to responded very quickly. And that's one of the reasons why we see these. These things happen where youtube will pull something very quickly because they have to under the rules of DMCA. If they received that notification I mean there's PROB- several big cases against Youtube that are all about copyright infringement. Viacom has a huge case which is still going on. That was filed in two thousand seven over contention of hundred sixty thousand clips that had been viewed one point five billion times and they were basically saying youtube you. I'll quote from it because Youtube directly profits from the Availabil- availability of popular infringing on its site. It has decided decided to shift the burden entirely onto copyright owners to monitor the Youtube site on a daily or hourly basis to detect infringing videos. So Viacom saying hey. This should not be our job and YouTube. Saying hey shouldn't be our job either. Seventy two hours worth of material being uploaded every minute. There's no one who can sit there and go over every single frame of every single video that's always Being submitted to the service. And that's basically what the court said. They threw it out without even being tried in. Twenty ten came back actually in April of two thousand twelve there was a reversal. The the court said that basically a reasonable jury could have found that that youtube was aware of what was going on. And just not taking steps right. Yes that's that's one of the things under DMCA that if the the surprise aware of it they have to take steps to prevent now again. If it's something it comes under fair use. That's where it gets muddy again really sticky and yeah because I mean it's it's not. It's not youtube job to determine what is fair use and what is not and the the the copyright holder is supposed to at least take into consideration before taking steps but ultimately fair uses something. That's decided in a court of law you know it's it's it's all down to does the copyright holder wants to take the steps to actually Prosecute someone and then the court decides if it was fair use or not. That's the real problem with us. It's really something that's decided after a court case if no court case happens so if a copyright holder never comes after you for the way. You've used something you could argue. That's because it's fair use but legally speaking. That's not the determination. It's just that no one came after you That doesn't mean that they won't come after you sometime in the future. This is the fun part of Copyright Law Right. So let's talk about some of the the things that that the the limitations on liability cover for copyright infringement. This'll safe harbor idea. One of them is transitory communications. Now this limited liability of a service provider when all the providers doing is acting as a data conduit in other words all they're doing is allowing information to pass from one entity to another entity. They're not they're not taking part in whatever. The content is They're essentially there's pipes and if you are the one who owns the pipes. You cannot be held responsible monetarily for any copyright infringement material that passes along as long as you are not complicit in that transaction so in other words if you're a service provider and you are not knowingly providing people the chance to send copyright infringement cereal back and forth or you're not profiting from it then you're not liable but if you're profiting from it then there's a problem and that's one of the things against Youtube. Is that if youtube is running ads against videos. Then that means the profiting from those videos so if the videos our videos that infringe upon something then there's there's a case there for DMCA now granted most of the time. The first step is still saying. Take this down and if you does that that's usually as far as it goes but it's something to keep in mind next system caching That limits reliability of service that retains data to send it later at cinders discretion so there are a lot of different ways of thinking about this but imagine that you have scheduled something to post at a particular time. Well a copy of that. Information may be existing on a service provider's site but what you're saying is that if materials copyrighted and it's an authorized. It's an unauthorized copy. The system cannot be held responsible for holding that copy because they're really just fulfilling their service again. Same rules apply. They can't be complicit they can't be profiting from it Storage of information on systems or networks at direction of users. Same sort of thing. You have on cloud storage if if I have a cloud storage account and the you know part of that is that I I am trusting that my provider is not snooping in on all the stuff that I'm storing on my cloud storage Then you know you can't hold the cloud storage company responsible. If I'm filling up my storage with you know all right to look at all every single one of the files right when I put my unauthorized discography of Brittany Spears up there. They can't you know they're not held responsible for it right. I should definitely hold responsibility for something like that if I were to ever do that. And I fully expect to be held responsible and also will never happen Then there's the information location tool since this. Is things like search engines so if you were to type in something in a search engine for example you were interested in a particular television show. Let's say I don't know supernatural and you were type that in some of the links that came back linked to things that were infringing. Copyright the search engine would not be held responsible for those links unless again it was violating those other roles so in other words you can't blame for putting a link up to material that infringes upon copyright because Google is not the one responsible for the material. It's just reporting. It's just a dexing links although it does do so with ads that makes me wonder. What's any kind of any of that sticky there? That's probably another issue but again there are also told that if someone reports that they are supposed to block access or taking those links down dents raised a lot of ir in the various communities online about the idea of blocking links because it's essentially breaking one of the fundamental parts of the Internet or at least the web if not the Internet. Anyway it's a different discussion Those are the four main areas where the liability is limited. They also says section twelve which is the specific section of the The law that this The it also contains a provision to ensure that service providers are not placed in the position of choosing between limitations on liability on the one hand and preserving the privacy of their subscribers on the other so in other words they are not supposed to be put into any kind of position where they have to identify someone when part of their business is all about. Hey your driver respect the privacy. Yeah they are supposed to be allowed to remain free of that. But even that has some issues so Like but essentially this is to make sure that they remain in compliance with things like the electronic communications privacy. Act SO in other words you're talking about two different laws here that kind of conflict with one another which one has precedents. In this case the privacy hell holds up over the copyright violation and really the reason why this whole section exists is to prevent companies from having to undergo massive amounts of expenses to defend themselves or also to endure excessive interference from copyright holders or from government officials and So you know the fact that the DMC stuff is in a way it's you could you could see it as a way of of bending to the will of copyright holders. That's the way a lot of critics point painted right like the. Dmca is just the government. laying down in front of copyright holders. But this one just one really actually work saw in the other direction in favor of the service providers who are just trying to do their jobs and are not necessarily. There was a case in two thousand six. I O group felt a complaint against networks for networks had site that would let users trans code video into flash sure and and I AGREE. He was saying that via networks users were trans- trans- coding videos into flash that that were copyright infringement. Okay so that they were taking a video that were under copyright and through the process of trends coating them that was violating the copyright and. They said that they said that via was responsible for this. Because as as a coder they were. They were implicit in the they were. They were actually. They were giving the people the ability to infringe just from the very nature of what the service was in the court ruled that the process was automated and that therefore yeah video had no knowledge and like they. They could not know what the content was because the actual process of trance. Coding had nothing to do with a human being reviewing stuff and saying. Hey wait a minute. It was really good that a really important clear cut case to prevent that kind of legal action shooting in the future and that makes sense because I mean youtube had for a long time was always encoding videos into flash until a couple of switchover. Html five but same sort of thing that Viacom cases just kind of spinning courts right now. Both sides are arguing that the other is burdened with the proof that that youtube and therefore google had no idea what was going on and and really how do you prove that someone doesn't know something right. You have to have evidence that they did. No that's the only way you can prove. You can't prove negative but if you are able to prove that they did know and knowingly allowed it to happen that would be the The case all right. Well we've got a little bit more to say about the DMCA but before we get into that. Let's.

youtube DMCA Viacom Google A. S. A. N. Brittany Spears action shooting Availabil
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on TechStuff

TechStuff

06:52 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on TechStuff

"On liability for online service providers for copyright infringement winning gauged in certain types of activities. So this is of course where the term safe harbor comes from. Is this title two of the DMCA so safe? Harbor is essentially this idea that if you are an online service provider, and that could be anything from an Internet service provider an ISP to a platform that people use on the Internet. Tumbler Youtube Yeah exactly that if you provide that service, you are not necessarily monetarily liable for any copyright infringement that's being performed by the users of your platform right now, but there are again very specific rules in play. It's not that you're a given free license. You can't just sit there and say safe harbors safe harbor I'm okay you have to actually. Show that you are one unaware that the stuff is going on and to you cannot be benefiting from the fact that infringement is going on right, and furthermore, if a company contacts you and says Hey, this thing is on your site. It's it's copyright infringement. Please take it down. You have to do that to responded very quickly and that's one of the reasons why we see these these. Things happen where youtube will pull something very quickly because they have to under the rules of DMCA if they received that notification. I mean there's PROB- several big cases against Youtube that are all about copyright. Infringement Viacom has a huge case which is still going on. That was filed in two thousand, seven over contention of. Hundred and sixty thousand clips that had been viewed one point five billion times, and they were basically saying. Youtube, you. I'll quote from it. Because Youtube directly profits from the Availabil- availability of popular infringing on its site, it has decided decided to shift the burden entirely onto copyright owners to monitor the Youtube site on a daily or hourly basis to detect infringing videos, so viacom saying hey, this should not be our job and youtube. Saying hey shouldn't be our job. Either seventy two hours worth of material being uploaded every minute. There's no one who can sit there and go over every single frame of every single video. That's always being submitted to the service. And that's basically what the court said. They threw it out without even being tried and twenty ten. Came back actually in April of two thousand twelve. There was a reversal. The the court said that basically a reasonable jury could have found that that youtube was aware of what was going on, and just not taking steps right. Yes, that's that's one of the things under DMCA that if the the surprise aware of it, they have to take steps to prevent now again. If it's something, it comes under fair use. That's where it gets muddy again. Really Sticky, and yeah, because I mean it's it's not. It's not youtube job to determine what is fair use and what is not? And the the the copyright holder is supposed to at least take into consideration before taking steps, but ultimately fair uses something that's decided in a court of law. You know it's. It's it's all down to does the copyright holder wants to take the steps to actually prosecute someone, and then the court decides if it was fair use or not, that's the real problem with us. It's really something that's decided after a court case. If no court case happens, so if a copyright holder never comes after you for the way you've used something you could argue that's because it's fair use, but legally speaking. That's not the determination. It's just that no one came after you That doesn't mean that they won't come after you sometime in the future. This is the fun part of Copyright Law Right So. Let's talk about some of the the things that that the the limitations on liability cover for copyright infringement. This'll safe harbor idea. One of them is transitory communications now this limited liability of a service provider when all the providers doing is acting as a data conduit in other words, all they're doing is allowing information to pass from one entity to another entity. They're not. They're not taking part in whatever the content is They're essentially. There's pipes, and if you are the one who owns the pipes, you cannot be. Held responsible monetarily for any copyright infringement material that passes along as long as you are not complicit in that transaction so in other words, if you're a service provider, and you are not knowingly providing people the chance to send copyright infringement back and forth, or you're not profiting from it then you're not liable, but if you're profiting from it, then there's a problem and that's one of the things against Youtube is that if youtube is running ads against videos, then that means. The profiting from those videos, so if the videos our videos that infringe upon something then there's there's a case there for DMCA. Now granted most of the time. The first step is still saying. Take this down and. Does that that's usually as far as it goes, but it's something to keep in mind. Next system caching that limits reliability of service that retains data to send it later at cinders discretion so there are a lot of different ways of thinking about this, but I imagined that you have scheduled something to post at a particular time. Well, a copy of that information may be existing on a service providers site, but What you're saying is that if materials copyrighted and it's an authorized an unauthorized copy, the system cannot be held responsible for holding that copy, because they're really just fulfilling their service again. Same rules apply. They can't be complicit. They can't be profiting from it. Storage of information on systems or networks at direction of users, same sort of thing you have on cloud storage, if if I have a cloud storage account, and the you know part of that is that I I am trusting that my provider is not snooping in on all the stuff that I'm storing on my cloud storage then. You know you can't hold the cloud storage company responsible if I'm filling up my storage with. All right. To look at all every single one of the files, right? When I put my unauthorized discography of Brittany Spears up there, they can't you know they're not held responsible for it right? I should definitely hold responsibility for something like that. If I were to ever do that. And I fully expect to be held responsible, and also will never happen Then there's the information location tool since this is things like search engines, so if you were to type in something in a search engine for example, you were interested in a particular television show. Let's say I don't know supernatural, and you were type that in some of the links that came back linked to things that were infringing copyright. The search engine would not be held responsible for those links unless again. It was violating those other roles..

youtube DMCA Viacom Brittany Spears Availabil
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on TechStuff

TechStuff

06:52 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on TechStuff

"On liability for online service providers for copyright infringement winning gauged in certain types of activities. So this is of course where the term safe harbor comes from. Is this title two of the DMCA so safe? Harbor is essentially this idea that if you are an online service provider, and that could be anything from an Internet service provider an ISP to a platform that people use on the Internet. Tumbler Youtube Yeah exactly that if you provide that service, you are not necessarily monetarily liable for any copyright infringement that's being performed by the users of your platform right now, but there are again very specific rules in play. It's not that you're a given free license. You can't just sit there and say safe harbors safe harbor I'm okay you have to actually. Show that you are one unaware that the stuff is going on and to you cannot be benefiting from the fact that infringement is going on right, and furthermore, if a company contacts you and says Hey, this thing is on your site. It's it's copyright infringement. Please take it down. You have to do that to responded very quickly and that's one of the reasons why we see these these. Things happen where youtube will pull something very quickly because they have to under the rules of DMCA if they received that notification. I mean there's PROB- several big cases against Youtube that are all about copyright. Infringement Viacom has a huge case which is still going on. That was filed in two thousand, seven over contention of. Hundred and sixty thousand clips that had been viewed one point five billion times, and they were basically saying. Youtube, you. I'll quote from it. Because Youtube directly profits from the Availabil- availability of popular infringing on its site, it has decided decided to shift the burden entirely onto copyright owners to monitor the Youtube site on a daily or hourly basis to detect infringing videos, so viacom saying hey, this should not be our job and youtube. Saying hey shouldn't be our job. Either seventy two hours worth of material being uploaded every minute. There's no one who can sit there and go over every single frame of every single video. That's always being submitted to the service. And that's basically what the court said. They threw it out without even being tried and twenty ten. Came back actually in April of two thousand twelve. There was a reversal. The the court said that basically a reasonable jury could have found that that youtube was aware of what was going on, and just not taking steps right. Yes, that's that's one of the things under DMCA that if the the surprise aware of it, they have to take steps to prevent now again. If it's something, it comes under fair use. That's where it gets muddy again. Really Sticky, and yeah, because I mean it's it's not. It's not youtube job to determine what is fair use and what is not? And the the the copyright holder is supposed to at least take into consideration before taking steps, but ultimately fair uses something that's decided in a court of law. You know it's. It's it's all down to does the copyright holder wants to take the steps to actually prosecute someone, and then the court decides if it was fair use or not, that's the real problem with us. It's really something that's decided after a court case. If no court case happens, so if a copyright holder never comes after you for the way you've used something you could argue that's because it's fair use, but legally speaking. That's not the determination. It's just that no one came after you That doesn't mean that they won't come after you sometime in the future. This is the fun part of Copyright Law Right So. Let's talk about some of the the things that that the the limitations on liability cover for copyright infringement. This'll safe harbor idea. One of them is transitory communications now this limited liability of a service provider when all the providers doing is acting as a data conduit in other words, all they're doing is allowing information to pass from one entity to another entity. They're not. They're not taking part in whatever the content is They're essentially. There's pipes, and if you are the one who owns the pipes, you cannot be. Held responsible monetarily for any copyright infringement material that passes along as long as you are not complicit in that transaction so in other words, if you're a service provider, and you are not knowingly providing people the chance to send copyright infringement back and forth, or you're not profiting from it then you're not liable, but if you're profiting from it, then there's a problem and that's one of the things against Youtube is that if youtube is running ads against videos, then that means. The profiting from those videos, so if the videos our videos that infringe upon something then there's there's a case there for DMCA. Now granted most of the time. The first step is still saying. Take this down and. Does that that's usually as far as it goes, but it's something to keep in mind. Next system caching that limits reliability of service that retains data to send it later at cinders discretion so there are a lot of different ways of thinking about this, but I imagined that you have scheduled something to post at a particular time. Well, a copy of that information may be existing on a service providers site, but What you're saying is that if materials copyrighted and it's an authorized an unauthorized copy, the system cannot be held responsible for holding that copy, because they're really just fulfilling their service again. Same rules apply. They can't be complicit. They can't be profiting from it. Storage of information on systems or networks at direction of users, same sort of thing you have on cloud storage, if if I have a cloud storage account, and the you know part of that is that I I am trusting that my provider is not snooping in on all the stuff that I'm storing on my cloud storage then. You know you can't hold the cloud storage company responsible if I'm filling up my storage with. All right. To look at all every single one of the files, right? When I put my unauthorized discography of Brittany Spears up there, they can't you know they're not held responsible for it right? I should definitely hold responsibility for something like that. If I were to ever do that. And I fully expect to be held responsible, and also will never happen Then there's the information location tool since this is things like search engines, so if you were to type in something in a search engine for example, you were interested in a particular television show. Let's say I don't know supernatural, and you were type that in some of the links that came back linked to things that were infringing copyright. The search engine would not be held responsible for those links unless again. It was violating those other roles..

youtube DMCA Viacom Brittany Spears Availabil
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on The Sill - Perspectives on Art

The Sill - Perspectives on Art

07:05 min | 2 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on The Sill - Perspectives on Art

"When a balloon POPs. It makes an impulse a sharp quick sound the takes on the character of whatever space. It's in so when a balloon POPs you're really hearing. The Acoustics of the space itself says able the space interacts with the sound bringing back to listeners. Information about the geometry size materials. Present that sort of thing so that music that you heard off the top you can imagine. That's what people fifteen hundred years ago. What heard the sound what they would have heard in that space with a one piece of digital equipment. Yeah really amazing so staying on technology. The other interesting thing is that there are Japanese technologists. Who are going into that space with equipment that they run up. The walls and that equipment is able to detect gold aspects of gold and metals behind the plaster to determine if there's actually mosaics that have been covered over about the Turks and that at some point might be revealed. What were they did with the paintings and the Mona Lisa's and the rest exactly exactly interesting. That our fascination with history is wrapped up in these kinds of technology as well I like how was it back then. What did people experience so? That's really exciting. And interesting to be part of that kind of exploration. The other things interesting to to me is that anytime. There's a large project a challenging project put in front of human beings. We have to become creative. Yup We rise to the task at hand new technologies get developed right new methodologies for exploring not only developed to get accelerated young. The evolution gets speed it up whether it's the Suez Canal or other kinds of new mangas. Well think about the moon landing another example. I wonder how many spin off developments in technology came out of that program over sure and still going on. Yeah Yeah so. It's not just as spiritual building. No it's kind of a testament to the ability of mankind working together what we can accomplish when we work together and work towards a common goal which in the world we live in today. Were recording this. Podcast in the midst of this Corona virus among other things and so if there was ever a time for joint effort and collaborative efforts to be maximized. It's now sure Going back to that building second. The other thing that occurs to me for making building large like that is that the church was a sanctuary for a lot people so close harbor safe harbor so having a large large building means you can harbor a lot of people. If you're under attack. If know siege which they were were they built an entire wall remember there on the Bosphorus Strait. Yeah it's one of the reasons why the Romans initially move there. It was a very strategic position especially for controlling the waterways the Bosphorus of the Aegean Sea all the transportation of people and goods trade east West and from the position of where you were sitting on the shores of Constantinople. They built these enormous walls. That were basically impermeable for many many years because it was a constant place warfare invasion. Yeah well in some ways. It's a well today if you think about NATO growing they're the American interests keeping the Russians out. There's a wall there militarily whole Kurd situation keeping them out So what really should be a meeting point in a mixing point of cultures and ideas and all of that has been taken away by geopolitics another Berlin Wall so to speak. Yeah exactly which is a shame. Moore's Oh what a also wanted to say was. We don't have the largest cathedrals in the world anymore as the largest buildings what happened was the corporate world began to create skyscrapers and buildings dedicated to commerce the new religion so that is the new religion and the Twin Towers was the highest sophia blown up. So that's now the new focus that we're supposed to go into those structures and go. Wow look at this building basically surrender. Yeah Yeah you were cowed. You're in awe of business. Big Money No point of these kinds of structures is to draw emotions of In wonderment and also smallness as a human being walking into these buildings roiling tiny and I feel my tiny too in relation to the great powers that are quote unquote above me expressed by the beauty of the Dome and the Celestial feel the universe feel yeah so institutions unfortunately seem to be designed to make people feel tiny and powerless in some ways. Powerless without the support of the larger organization. Or more of you need me in order to live and survive. Sure because you on your own are significant. Yeah insignificant so we draw some parallel to where we are today. You know we've done that as well so we close the podcast on once again. We like to remind you that we really would love your feedback. We welcome your feedback. Positive or negative. Of course the next one we're going to do is very important podcast. We're going to be talking about something. That's been rampant around the globe and getting more rampant as we speak and that's the covert nineteen virus which at current levels is around ninety thousand probably at one hundred thousand before the weekend or close to ninety eight thousand today Razz. We're recording this. And we're actually at a higher percentage of fatalities was originally projected. Now you're in the three to four percent range even if you break it down to two point is that is continuing to spread. And it's going to be a very special podcast because what Peter and I have decided to do in support of those who have been quarantined. Is they're going to do a fourteen day. Long podcast nonstop podcast Rick so for fourteen days non stop. We're GONNA be talking and they'll want to die before it's over so anyway area until next time. Yeah until next time Joe Bell Jar or the civil podcast is a connecting media production available at the civil podcast dot com..

Bosphorus Strait Suez Canal Twin Towers Mona Lisa Aegean Sea Joe Bell Jar NATO Berlin Rick Constantinople Peter Moore
"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

Newsradio 700 WLW

04:16 min | 3 years ago

"harbor safe harbor" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

"We have you know wait while we have that some Hyatt turning fifty three she's doing that the bikini that's on may not you're not kidding. I used to date I used to hate her you know Selma high and I go back about twenty years we also have a guy with a five inch long thumbs is going viral financial one of them. I should. I thought I'd hitch hike the thing of it it'll get away in the car. what does the video the video of this guy's five inch long from is really unbelievable he went from seven hundred and fifty followers on an app called tick tock two one hundred and fifty five thousand in in what is your what is it with his thumb. it's just one time it's just on one hand the other thumb is normal. he says in an abnormally long bomb on the other hand. so was twice as long as the average them. that's been said about me once or twice. please continue police are searching for a stolen roller coaster added on union so that that that that the truck right there they're looking for the day. you know they're grown sick of truck with a roller coaster on the bag hi dad. a as of the truck hooked up a roller coaster that was at the Union County fair up in Marysville and made off with the roller coaster itself police are looking for that you can get more information on that also on the blog free the dog. please continue we also have the Kitty that has some peculiar facial markings yes I saw that looks a little bit little bit unusual played a blog like you. not safe for work let's say that we can't sail I say okay on your line is little this little faces not safe for our hopefully it's a male cat is in the mail can it is not safe harbor safe harbor got a five inch thumb but fairly symbols on cat faces and we also have a campaign to save the dog and second baby free Lisa wells to. I say let's have a protest six thirty tonight at the jail you do that you get locked up Lester first amendment done apply let's go to Pakistan to get you know who would bring in Dr Doron he's right here he's got this office right there got federal criminal. now we gotta go Rachel thank you good to have you back segment get me out of the studio born Willie under of a overcast day here in the tri state the Reds tonight against the stakes I'm going to high school football but whose deer park why you had to score wrong I'm still angry about let's see the Park Place Clark Montessori they will play that game at Withrow I'm the only lawyer working here and not in prison the big game tonight is Coleraine saying access the beds been made between you and a rock we leave you with the immortal words of this dude report. front row. I hope you don't pass judgement. because we don't know the facts of the case we don't know the whole story I'm just glad everyone in this is all right and there's no active and no one is injured because it could've been a lot worse very serious issue. early tonight around five o'clock bill Cunningham. was inactive on another vehicle even though he did I'm reading the news account or even though he didn't because the accident he was given a field sobriety test and bill Cunningham failed a field sobriety test was also given a blood test. no word on the results of that test end of statement. what. very serious charge Sears accusation. I'm glad that the no one was injured in this thing seven hundred W. L. W. more deaths linked to E. cigarettes I Matt re seven hundred WLW dot com at least five people have reportedly been killed by illnesses linked to E. cigarette use just in the past month with hundreds of people getting sick across thirty three states the surge of severe long illnesses linked to E. cigarette use has turned even more deadly just on Friday deaths were reported in Minnesota Los Angeles and Indiana and that's were state health commissioner Dr Chris box says we have a significant amount of confidence with regards to the.

Reds Dr Doron Selma bill Cunningham Park Place Clark Montessori Union County Rachel bill Cunningham. Pakistan Dr Chris box Lisa wells Indiana Marysville commissioner Lester Minnesota Los Angeles Coleraine W. L. W. Willie