17 Burst results for "Frank Neil"

"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

Newsradio 600 KOGO

06:00 min | 1 year ago

"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

"It was yesterday. 69 degrees on the coast 79 inland 71 of the mountains and one of one in the in the desert high cloudy skies. I'm gonna just need a little bit more coffee here These guys and 65 right now downtown Kogo to use time. 5 11 Police are releasing more information on the death of a 60 year old San Diego man found in an alley off Niagara Friday night. It turns out it was a hit and run police. Say 60 year old Frank Neil had fallen into the road. It was hit by a large white vehicle whose driver kept going. Police say a good Samaritan performed CPR on kneel before paramedics got there, but the man died at the scene. Surveillance video captured an image of the vehicle believed to be in early two thousands model Chevy Suburban or GMC Yukon with a sun roof. Race suspension, shiny silver rims and side molding. Anyone with information is asked to call San Diego police or Crimestoppers. A third victim is dead. A second arrest is made after last weekend's shooting at a birthday party in New Jersey, New Jersey state police say Darryl Dawkins of Bridgeton has been arrested and charged with unlawfully possessing a gun. However, police do not believe right now that he fired any shots at the party. State Police also announced afeard death in the incident. Braille in homes of Millville City, died in a hospital Tuesday night. A motive has not been released from the shooting that police say sent more than 100. People at the party running for cover. Police continue to ask for photos, video or eyewitness accounts of what led up to the deadly shootings. Using wind and sea to generate power on land. That's the idea behind an agreement that's been signed by Governor Newsome and the federal government. The agreement means floating offshore wind platforms located 20 to 30 miles off the California coast that could provide clean power for up to 1.6 million homes over the next decade. The U. S Department of the Interior will offer a lease sale as early as next year within 400 Square mile area off the central coast northwest of Moral Bay and said For area off the northern California coast. Newsome says the offshore wind industry has the potential to create tens of thousands of good paying jobs and UN Beale leave a ble new video has gone viral. It shows a couple of bees working together to open a bottle of soda. Hop atop again. The moment was captured last week on a bottle of Orange Fanta in Sao Paulo, Brazil. It shows too, honey bees working in unison to lift the cap off the bottle. Industrious bees eventually succeed much to the delight of the woman taking the video has people buzzing on social media, with many agreeing that the bees air taking over I'm Michel Kastner. Bees apparently, are the new overlords. People say You know what? I'll take him. You could see that video one right now. Who cares? I'm good to see that video on our morning news page at coco dot com. Alright, coming up with six this evening. It is right now with Lou featuring a look at the day's top stories and you've got something interesting for us this morning, Lou. Good morning, 10. Madonna. Here's my question. If the bees are on the other side of the top of the fancy cap, How did they know that they're working with another be maybe the beat. Maybe just thought. Wow, I'm really strong. I mean, what do they do this myself? They may not even have been aware they're working together. Oh, please. There are new overlords. Lou. Just deal with their taking over alright, well, CDC guidelines back in the news, half of US adults. Now fully vaccinated as you reported, but that number drops down to just 39%. When you add in all the people under the age of 18 Aziz, you now are aware that Fizer as an authorized 12 to 15 year olds. To get the vaccination. But Donna said today that they are now seeking approval to add another option so teen should have widespread availability before school starts this fall. I know we're just heading in It's a Memorial Day weekend. But a lot of parents are concerned about what's gonna happen when all the summer fun is over. What's this school? You're gonna look like already? 14% of the nation's kids. 12 to 15 years old have received their first shot that, according to the AP, and those numbers are mirrored here in San Diego. But what's next? Because the CDC guidelines as if we understand the correctly is four fully vaccinated people there is no vaccine available for anybody under the age of 12. Currently, that would mean everyone from kindergarten through sixth grade would not have the option to be vaccinated, so couldn't be fully vaccinated. So for parents of kindergartners through sixth graders, they'd be right back where they started. Come form well, according to NPR, Madonna and adviser are doing trials right now on Children between the ages of two and nine. They say that those trials take a little bit longer because they are Children, but they would be A available at least to look at approval by the end of the year. So that's looking like Christmas. The CDC could change a lot of this. They could relax mask mandates for 5 to 11 year olds. As the school year started mass mandates on Lee were, in fact, in place in California for third graders and above so they could extend that all the way to fifth grade that would clear Lot of opportunity for parents who don't want their kids in masks going to the full or they could grant Oh emergency approval for the vaccine for kindergarten through fifth grade. But what will happen if the parents don't go along? The Kaiser Family Foundation recently put out a survey saying 60% of parents saying, No, they don't want to have their kids vaccinated. They want to wait and see. Also, there is the question of mandating the vaccination for the Children, which is a whole nother megillah. So it looks like we're gonna be wrestling with this vaccination question for kidney gardeners through fifth grade here in San Diego through the summer, General Donna All right, Lou Penrose tonight at six. Right here on news Radio. 600 Kogo, everyone. All right, Thanks. Lou will be right back. Okay? A new sign 5 17..

Lou Penrose Darryl Dawkins 12 Donna 5 20 69 degrees 60% Millville City Frank Neil Michel Kastner Tuesday night 14% CDC California today yesterday Madonna San Diego Niagara
"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

Newsradio 600 KOGO

03:14 min | 1 year ago

"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

"On the death of a 60 year old San Diego man found in an alley off Niagara Friday night it was a hit and run a Maryland Haider in the Cocoa News Center. Police say 60 year old Frank Neil and fallen into the road and was hit by a large white vehicle whose driver kept going. Police say a good Samaritan performed CPR on kneel before paramedics got there, but the man died at the scene. Surveillance video captured an image of the vehicle believed to be in early two thousands model Chevrolet Suburban or GMC Yukon. With a sunroof, a raised suspension, shiny silver rims and side molding. Anybody with information is asked to call San Diego police or Crimestoppers and a man who died when he crashed near the border Sunday morning was a sailor assigned a naval base. San Diego 27 year old Michael Pleasants was going south on the five when he veered off the freeway and struck a concrete divider. And he died at the scene. Prosecutors in New York City have convened a grand jury in a criminal investigation of former President Trump and his company. The Washington Post says the investigation covers the practices of the Trump Organization and whether the company manipulated the value of his real estate holdings. Turnings for former President Trump are asking a federal judge to throw out a lawsuit filed against him for a speech he made on January 6th at the Capitol lawyers argued. Mr Trump has absolute immunity from civil lawsuits over his official actions while in office. The lawsuit specifically cites Trump's speech near the White House on January 6th before the crowds stormed the U. S. Capitol. The family of the late George Floyd and their legal team met with President Biden Vice President Kamila Harris today on the one year anniversary that George Floyd died at the hands of a Minneapolis police officer. Attorney Ben Crump is calling for police reform legislation to pass in Congress as the next step for civil rights and justice for Floyd's family. We pray That history can repeat itself and that the death of George Floor will help prepare less toe finally get meaningful Police report. He says he plans to meet with Senators Cory Booker and Tim Scott, the lead police reform negotiators in the Senate to move forward in a bipartisan package, and one person is being treated for a gunshot wound after shots were fired. At George Floyd Square in Minneapolis today. Ah lawsuit has been filed by to animal rights attorneys on behalf of the animal protection, a rescue league against John Cox of Rancho Santa Fe, who was running for governor. The lawsuit accuses Cox of illegally holding events with a captive £1000 bear who's been drugged and abused for this purpose. And seeks an injunction to stop the actions from continuing. Cox took the bear on campaign stops. Down today Down 81 closing a 34,003 12 and now it's 3 33 Coco's real time traffic. Here's Joe Eager a couple of accidents in the North County in San Marcos East 78 Sycamore of this crash has the right lane blocked traffic coming to a stop it Civic Center Drive and North 15 at crash with injuries reported at Camino del Norte. This report sponsored by Sens. Carpet Barn Everyone spending a lot more time at home these days, and since Carpet burn is ready to help with all your flooring needs.

John Cox Tim Scott George Floyd Michael Pleasants New York City Frank Neil £1000 Trump Civic Center Drive January 6th Sunday morning Cory Booker Trump Organization North 15 President Biden Floyd Congress George Floor San Diego Camino del Norte
"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

Newsradio 600 KOGO

03:48 min | 1 year ago

"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

"Last of three defendants to plead guilty and be sentenced to connection with the death two years ago, a 45 year old Derek Hodgkiss, Two other men were also sentenced to 14 and 15 Year terms. Police say a man found dead in an alley off Niagara in O. B. Friday night had been in a traffic collision. Homicide detectives were called since the death was suspicious. Now, traffic investigators are taking over the investigation of 60 year old Frank Neil of San Diego. They haven't released any details about the crash, but anyone with information is asked to call them. Latest now on the fighter jet crashed in Nevada. The airport says the pilot inside crashed into a neighborhood near Las Vegas. That pilot died. Witnesses say they saw thick black smoke rising up from the yard of the home where the plane went down near forces. The aircraft was a mirage F one that's a French jet owned and operated by contractors who act as enemy pilots during training flights. The NTSB is investigating. President Biden is demanding Authorities in Belarus released a release that journalist who was arrested after his flight was forced to land Roman Protess ceviche was taken into custody after fighter jets intercepted his commercial flight flying over Belarus this weekend. The president called it outrageous and said it represents a shameful assault on political dissent and journalistic freedom. He also welcome to news that the European Union was going to hit Belarus with sanctions over the incident. I'm Brian Shook. Okay, this next one whom Boy? Yeah. Did you see this? I haven't alright. I'll read it to you. Okay. Authorities in Spain are investigating after the body of a missing man was found inside a dinosaur statue. Latin time says people in there are police in Barcelona were alerted to a foul smelling Paper mache, a stegosaurus sculpture. Human leg was sticking out of it. Oh, firefighters opened the statue, leading to the discovery of the deceased 39 year old that was inside. The man had been reported missing hours earlier. Officials suspect he dropped his cell phone inside the statue climbed into it and couldn't get out. What a way to go inside of paper paper machine dinosaur. AM so You look like you left. They know I'm I'm baffled. It's like people who climb into chimneys. You can't fit there. Don't do that. No, that's always a bad idea. Just stop. Don't play Santa. Florida Governor, Ron De Santis wants to put an end to big tech censorship. The Republican signed a bill that stops social media companies from removing people from their sites without an explanation. The new law allows the state to find the company's a quarter of a million dollars a day if they remove on account of us Statewide political candidate. A fine of $25,000 a day would be applied if they remove someone running for local office. The law goes into effect. July 1st Sarah Bartlett, NBC News radio managers at the Northeast Wisconsin Zoo yesterday had to calm some nerves after visitors spotted some snakes near the soda vending machines. The zoo's Angela Kowski says the stakes were wild snakes, not snakes that escaped from the zoo. Well, okay, she says it's not uncommon to find wild snakes inside the zoo and said the snakes in question were most likely harmless. Most likely being the key words there, Chances are seriously chances are good. You may live made mostly. All right. Here are the stories trending today marks one year since the death of George Floyd that.

Nevada Angela Kowski Sarah Bartlett Derek Hodgkiss Las Vegas 14 Brian Shook Barcelona George Floyd European Union NBC News July 1st Frank Neil 15 Year Spain Republican NTSB yesterday San Diego 60 year old
"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

Newsradio 600 KOGO

03:28 min | 1 year ago

"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 600 KOGO

"Warhol, he said. If everyone's not a beauty than nobody is that is the perfect illustration off the particular police fears. Heo, Geo and Km. Why I HD to San Diego. Live local breaking for warning more on the crash of a military aircraft in Las Vegas some Marilyn Haider in the Cocoa News Center Nellis Air Force Base as it was a contractor operated aircraft that crashed about three miles south of the base. Fire officials say the plane crashed into a backyard and one person was killed, but it's not known if it was the pilot or someone at the home. And reporter Manny White. Is that a school right near the crash site. We're at Martin Luther King Jr Elementary School and a school employee tells us thankfully, no one involved with the school was hurt in. A school clerk also tells us that students saw the jet crash. They said that they saw it when they were having classes outside, and they also heard it. She described it as Really loud. Now Parents were notified and students or ordered to shelter in place until their release from school less than an hour ago and again that is in Las Vegas. More help for San Diego ins with mental illness and substance abuse. 21 Transitional units are being built in a building and Fairmont. Heights, City Heights and four vehicles will be purchased for crisis care teams. A San Diego man has been sentenced to nearly 19 years in prison for distributing fentanyl that caused the fatal overdose of the former player for the San Diego Old as text rugby Football club. 33 year old Andrew dossiers, the last of three defendants to plead guilty and be sentenced in connection with the death Two years ago, a 45 year old Derek Hodgkiss, two other men were sentenced to 14 and 15 year terms. CHP says six more people have reported having their cars hit by BBS or pellets on the 91 Freeway since last night. The family of a six year old boy killed in a road rage incident in Orange Friday is offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to a suspect. San Diego homicide detectives say a man found dead in an alley in Ocean Beach over the weekend was in a car crash. The medical examine her identifies him a 60 year old Frank Neil of San Diego. Governor Newsome confirms the June 15th re opening date. As the case numbers continue to fall. 0.8% is the positive test straight a record low for the pandemic in the state. June 15th just a number of weeks we're moving beyond the blueprint, which means with the exception of very large scale indoor events, very large scale five plus 1000. Individuals that we are. Removing All of those protocols that we've become accustomed to over the course of last year plus in three weeks will be no restrictions on outdoor gatherings or small indoor events below 5000 people as the state also puts in place the CDC guidelines around masks. Phil Mickelson was already going to play in the U. S Open a Torrey Pines, but his historic victory over the weekend at the PGA has changed things here in San Diego after becoming the oldest major golf champion in history at 50. Mickelson will now compete in the U. S Open three weeks from now, the day after his 51st birthday Instead of being special invite to play. He's earned his way into the next five U. S. Opens, including Cory Vines. I love to compete. I love playing the game. I love having opportunities to play against the best at the highest level. And so that's what drives.

Phil Mickelson Manny White Derek Hodgkiss Marilyn Haider 14 San Diego Ocean Beach $50,000 Las Vegas June 15th Mickelson BBS Cory Vines 0.8% U. S Open 91 Freeway CHP Frank Neil last night 15 year
"frank neil" Discussed on WTMJ 620

WTMJ 620

03:35 min | 1 year ago

"frank neil" Discussed on WTMJ 620

"My Miami Dhakal Ganga is coming back on the show, probably to take a victory lap for his heat, eliminating the Bucks. In the playoffs last year. We'll probably talk about Pearl Jam of the W W E as well which, by the way past well, just like we were talking about the wife and he came out really gonna regret it now, so you may have seen the It's Sunday. You know what that means. That was a tribute to Brody Lee, the wrestler who passed away yesterday, so Waited. Just stomp all over that. How do you feel now? I asked you like 20 minutes ago. What That meant and you refused to and we're not in the head space for it. 85561616 20 is the number to get in touch with us. There's a number of things we need to cram into the next 21 minutes here. Um I mean, we asked yesterday. If if the Bucks lose a game like this when it's going head to head with a Packers game when a majority of our listening audience I'm assuming probably doesn't even have Fox Sports Wisconsin because of the carriage dispute that's going on in yours truly did the game actually happened. No. Could you just protest that game? The only reason I know that it happened. And if your butt just go ahead, Just go ahead and say serious. You think this actually happened? You think we lost to the next? You think Elfrid Payton? 43 pointers. You think Frank Neil Akina hit 33 pointers wasn't four. Let's go ask Justin. I mean after that game, but may has may have well just gone and said everyone didn't happen at all. Like we're just gonna move on to the heat next one. So, speaking of the heat, and I do want to ask one serious question. I was very impressed with all of you guys yesterday. So let's keep that riding through today's show the responses that we got when we asked Have you served panic over wanted to start in a 20 point lost the Knicks and Majority of you are adults to know this is what we expected. We talked about this in the off season, we said Using the regular season to get better for the playoffs. This isn't chasing 60 wins. We're not hung up on regular season success. We understand what we bargained for. Let me ask you this, though, okay? What if you lose the next two games? I'm a little. I think the trend is down word right now. If you could say that one game, I get it, But the two of us is to be games. I'm staying with the two losses were talking about anyone. If you won't talk to you, just the one game against the next like The trend is down word. I'm not panicking by any stretch of the imagination, but if they lose the next two games, I don't feel great. But again, they cause them to conduct worth. It was both the games and buzzer beaters. And it's like, okay, well, then it could go either way. What if you lose both games and boss? What if somebody gets like? I don't wanna play the what if game and that only because It can be so many other directions. I just the trend right now. Get off your uncle Grant. Well, then I have a lot of questions. We do know tomorrow. Jimmy Butler will not or I suppose he hasn't. I don't think he's been ruled out. He is doubtful for tomorrow's game and Tory crag. Unfortunately, Has been ruled out. Um, for the bucks after suffering I don't ever happened. I still don't know what happened. Oh, he took a shot to the face where he was bleeding from the nose, and I know the Buck said Or someone with the team and tweeted out the Tory Craig will not play tomorrow. I gotta pull up the tweet again to see if it was a broken nose or what? But he is out so There's that now, Um if we're looking for positives And I'm just going to cling to this is best I can so Tory Craig..

Bucks Jimmy Butler Miami Dhakal Ganga Tory Craig Brody Lee Elfrid Payton Frank Neil Akina Knicks Wisconsin Packers Justin Grant Buck
"frank neil" Discussed on WFAN Sports Radio_FM

WFAN Sports Radio_FM

06:41 min | 1 year ago

"frank neil" Discussed on WFAN Sports Radio_FM

"Westbrook is a dog. He's going out there. He's not doing He's not doing the friendship thing is not trying to be a friend. He's trying to go at your throat. Not everybody is going to be some Duncan, not everybody's gonna be silent Assassin. But you look at somebody else Young who will go at your throat, John Moran. There's no quit in this guy and he's on ly going to get better. So I like the fact that the New York Knicks was were able to get R. J. Barrett last year. Kevin knocks come on the year before nine tentative. What is he going to be? Probably a solid role player or a contributor later on in his Korea, Frank Neil Akina great defender, But is he ever going to Max? And I think what we have what Frank now is what we get. Frank is probably going to add to his his repertoire. But Frank is what he is. He's a great defender. Maybe you'll have a consistent shot. The Nuggets. They had the Knicks pick in 26 scene because of the Carmelo trade. Guess who they got. A guy who we saw has the ability to be a killer and Jamal Murray. Kristaps. We already know how that disaster went, then even last five years here with us. Tim Hardaway Jr. Amon Shumpert, We can go back. Jordan Hill, Danilo Gallinari Wilson Chandler. Now we're talking about some of Isaiah Thomas picks. At least he was able to drafts and talent. Channing Frye. David Lee. And then if we even go back a little bit further. Oh, my goodness, Michael Sweetney. It's been ugly for the New York Knicks. It seems that everything is a rush. But, you know, I think I have a little bit more confidence that now the Knicks are going to take their time. I'm going to quote unquote try and do things the right way. I think they're going to try to not trade away assets right away. If you could bring in a free agent without breaking the bank, go ahead and do it. Is crazy. 877337 66 66. Let's go ahead and talk to al. He's calling up from Keyport out. You're on the J. R sport brief show here on the fan. What's happening, Thanks to the called They should go for fur ball. He'll set the table. He's got to be good as good as his brother. You see, his brother's getting better by the minute that so they need they'll have a point guard for years. If they get him. Those guys complain her father's crazy, But those two guys really, really played or not good shooters, but they could develop that. If they just got burned with reporters, and Randolph, you're gonna laugh and Bharat. They wouldn't be that bad. That could be you know what I mean? They could be more competitive last year. They they didn't play the right guys. They had Mars two guys on the Clippers. If they were to play grand or pores, Mars and Barrett and just somebody a point guard, they would have had a lot better record. It's just that they it's just in and they hired Rose. The guy never had a giant never did the job before. It's crazy. I don't understand it. I wanted him to hire Van Gundy and his brother if they could ever get him to come back and run the Knicks and what then make all the decisions. I don't know what what they ever did the Van Gundy to make him not wanna be here, but they should beg him and his brother to come back and run the place and have some stability. Well, well, Al, I think I think it's a little bit too late in the game for that. And thank you for cold enough from Keyport, Jeff Van Gundy actually Praise the hiring of his defensive disciple and Tom Thibodeau. I think one thing that that we can forget about if you're a fan of the New York Knicks. You want to talk about Le Mellow Bowl? How How is that even still a real possibility that would have been easy to talk about earlier in the week. Pre draft lottery. But let me remind you, the New York Knicks are selecting at number eight. AIDS. Lamell. A bowl will be a long gone by then. I can't even realistically sit here and tell you who the New York Knicks should grant. I believe they should go for guard. I think they have to go ahead and get a point guard to set things up. I don't know if that's hometown, Cole Anthony shout outs to Cole and his family. Dad, Greg I couldn't even tell you but Lamell, oboe, wass even a conversation. If you want to have a conversation about LEM l a bowl. It's whether or not you know, the Charlotte Hornets want to select and whether Michael Jordan figures that bringing in the ball family is AH, worth the headache. I mean, the dad has kind of chilled out and relaxed a little bit. I know he's primarily and, unfortunately ah, caretaker for their mom who hasn't had or been in the best of health the past several seasons. But Lem l a ball is great. I think I would have been an advocate for Lamento Bolts will be a member of the New York Knicks if the Knicks warrant selecting a thief. A 6 ft seven point guard and not everybody is going to be a transcendent talent right out the gate like Luca, Don church. But le mellow ball. He is a player. Played against some pros. He's played against grown men. You've looked at him as a prodigy who want to take his head off. It doesn't matter. He's going from Lithuania. He's going to Ohio at playing in the Spire Institute. He's going to Australia. You I don't think anybody was trying to be his friend. I think the opposition is trying to tear him up. And I have seen some of those. Those clips and highlights of grown men. Tronto abused this kid. So I think at 6 ft seven The point guard. You got some style. Lamell O would have been nice for the Knicks, especially if he could develop his offense. But yes, that does come in time. That's a pipe dream. At this point, it's our forget about that. Lamell, a bold New York Knicks. Ain't happening. And really isn't Scott is calling up from Brooklyn. Scott. You're on. The fan was on your mind. Scott, I I love the show. It's a pleasure to hear you out of the afternoon. Thank you. Scott Going ahead. First of all the necks of the pick up. Not really care. If I have the fourth pick, we'd still be complaining. That number one number two. I don't wanna see anybody named Paul on the Nicks. I don't want to deal with the drama. I don't deal with the father. He's never going to be Michael Jordan. So it's not worth the headache. What the Knicks need and mix things power to the needs of toughness. My grandmother is.

New York Knicks Frank Neil Akina Lamell O Van Gundy Michael Jordan Keyport Scott R. J. Barrett Jeff Van Gundy John Moran Korea Channing Frye Michael Sweetney Westbrook Duncan Isaiah Thomas Kevin Jordan Hill David Lee
"frank neil" Discussed on Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

01:34 min | 2 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

"Hinch in twenty seventeen when you're world series is difficult thing but i don't know that it defines the quality of a manager player development not a year. You never remember the in game situations unless they are boneheaded unless things go wrong. Indians fan still blamed joel skinner for the fact the three one lead in the two thousand seven eight l. c. s. yes threats us serve ranko now managed. I wanna call him joost two point oh but he's got a different name than that. <hes> <hes> the indians manager the name was eric wedge back but everybody remembers skinner in our got to build a good coaching staff a you know some of the things i've seen from the inside think about mike social staff the difference between mike lake social staff in two thousand and two and worries at now in a much less accessible place. You have reynecke yet joe mad at bud black yet three major league managers on that venture socia- during that world series illegit frank neil frank chona's lieutenants lieutenants kevin cash and mickey callaway not not really common for pitching coaches to take on the the gigs. They'll take on the big. It's.

joel skinner frank neil frank chona eric wedge mike lake mickey callaway joost kevin cash two thousand seven eight l
"frank neil" Discussed on KNST AM 790

KNST AM 790

14:02 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on KNST AM 790

"If you want to be on the program. And if you want to send an Email, it's l rush ball and EIB net dot U S. From the Atlantic magazine saying they'll use national natural disasters. Whatever they happen to try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he waits that with economic Justice social economic gutless, which is a ten amount admission then all of this is political. It isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice edge end 'em. How could we have ever had warming in the past if human beings word around and the industrial revolution? Never have other words all of the fossil fuels today. Propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he he uses a great analogy says that put ball stadium AT and T stayed even Texas hundred thousand seats. Lisa's. Let's in order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seasons. How many of these seats are oxygen? How many of these seats are other elements? How many of these seats and he just on? How many seats are CO two. And the answer is forty the equivalent if you have if you have a hundred thousand seats in AT and T stadium. The Cowboys play football forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmospheric. Compensation? Or composition only forty. Out of one hundred thousand our CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmospheric warming. It's a long pace. And it's got a lot of scientists charts and graphs, but and his takes it gets kicked off his call denier, he's got more scientific atmospheric meteorological experience and education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will cocoa gift the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's it's proven this guy the Atlantic and the sound bite the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the network. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcast because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and stole the virtues of say conservatism or common sense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Thinkable all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years, I think has to do with the. Something to do with the report. It's it's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. It they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. The democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim his ours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media, educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been a shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives and calls both of them us and Trump vile names. Yet, the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're disguising it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and eleven by the New York Times. It's it's it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for. Well, we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now, the party that they have devoted themselves to have become immersed in antisemitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting, the international edition of the New York Times ran a despicable cartoon that featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leaving Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Come has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David collar. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now the cartoon coulda come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the dental Cam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with the dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to mean. This is blatant anti semitism in a New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may culpas, a navy apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it had been wild. Professor Dershowitz his limit about this and wants to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says the. Figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an semitic cartoon, that's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at the dental Cam, and there's No MR to be solved here. The lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. You'll Hon Omar hates Jews at exempted. Okay. So Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Rush Sheena to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the antisemitism and occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said the New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to an investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Meet note, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit your antisemitic. Make it clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international edition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times, and it's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have a Stoorikhel perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do at. It's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing lies native literally in this era in this lotion of the New York Times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush limbaugh. Talk radio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody your side already agrees. Conservatives embed Christianity, bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue elrushbo an e I b network right after his rush is always at work and the bever.

The New York Times Donald Trump Israel Rush limbaugh democrats Neil Frank Professor Dershowitz Frank neil Texas democrat party EIB Benjamin Netanyahu Atlantic magazine National Hurricane Center David collar AT Fox News
"frank neil" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

WCBM 680 AM

13:52 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

"From the Atlantic magazine saying they'll use national a natural disasters. Whatever they happen to try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he waits that with economic Justice social economic gutless, which is a tendon out admission then all of this is political. It isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice edge end. And how can we have ever had warming in the past if human beings word around and the industrial revolution? Never have other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist and a time when the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off? He points out. We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he he uses a great analogy says the football stadium stadium in Texas hundred thousand seats. And he says let's in order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand states as how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are? Other elements how many of these seats, and then he gets down to how many of these seats are THEO too. And the answer is forty the equivalent if you have if you have a hundred thousand seats in AT and T stadium. The Cowboys play football forty of those seats if you apportion each seat atmosphere ick. Compensation? Or composition only forty. Out of one hundred thousand our CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He he indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmospheric warming. It's a long pace. And it's got a lot of science at all charts and graphs, but and his ticks gets kicked off his call denier, his got more scientific atmospheric meteorological experience and education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will I'll cocoa gift the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's it's proven this guy the Atlantic and the sound bite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice in vine, mental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the IB number. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcast because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and stall virtues of say conservatism or common sense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I cover the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Think of all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years, I think has to do with the. Something to do with the mullahs report. It's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. It they they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea had never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. In democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim is ours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media's educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form now as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives and calls both of them us and Trump via names. Yet, the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're disguising it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and eleven by the New York Times. It's it's it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for. Well, we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now the party that they have devoted themselves to have become immersed in anti semitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting, the international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon it featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leading Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David collar. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now the cartoon coulda come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the dental Cam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with dark glasses and a Yamaha. And that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to me. This is blatant anti in a New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may account as a navy apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it had been while professor Dershowitz limit about this and wants to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says the fig. Figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti-semitic cartoon. That's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at the DittoCam, and there's No MR to be solved here. The lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. You'll hunt Omar hates Jews exempted all Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Rush to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism and occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said the New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to an investigation and explanation. How the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence. And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times, they symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Meet note, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit your antisemitic. Naked clear, your anti Israel, and you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday. The international addition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times. It's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have Stoorikhel perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do. It's it's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing lies native literally in this era in this ever lotion of the times, they don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian are anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush limbaugh. Talk radio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody at your side already agrees. Conservatives embed Christianity, bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue El Rushbaugh and EIB network right after rush is always at work and the bever.

The New York Times Donald Trump Rush limbaugh Israel Democrats Neil Frank Professor Dershowitz Frank neil democrat party Atlantic magazine Benjamin Netanyahu football stadium stadium Texas David collar National Hurricane Center Fox News AT
"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

Newsradio 970 WFLA

13:56 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

"Net dot U S. From the Atlantic magazine saying, yeah, they'll use national natural disasters. Whatever they happen to try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he wakes that with economic social economic gutless, which is a ten admission then all of this is political. It isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the finance of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice edge end. And how could we've ever had warming in the past if human beings word around and the industrial revolution. Never other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says that football stadium TNT stadium in Texas hundred thousand seats. These let's in order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seasons. How many of these seats are oxygen? How many of these seats are other elements of these seats and he gets down. How many seats are CO two. And the answer is forty the equivalent. If you have if you have a hundred thousand seats in AT and T stadium with a Cowboys play football, forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmospheric. Compensation? Or composition only forty. Out of one hundred thousand our CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near situation. He he indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmosphere. Ick warming. If the long piece, and it's got a lot of science at all charts and graphs, but and he takes it gets kicked off his call to denier, he's got more scientific atmospheric meteorological experience in education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will cocoa gift the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's it's proven this guy Atlantic in the sound bite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the number. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcast because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and extol the virtues of say conservatism or common sense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I cover the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Think of all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years, I think has to do with the. Something to do with the mullahs report. It's it's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. It they they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. Democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim his hours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me because this images that drive by media, educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives and calls both of them us and Trump vile names. Yet, the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're just guys ING it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and the lend by the New York Times. It's a it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never movable to figure out. Why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for? Well, we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now, the party that they have devoted themselves to have become immersed in antisemitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting. The international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leaving Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David color. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now the cartoon coulda come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the DittoCam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to mean. This is blatant Dami semitism in a New York Times has received votes humanness criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may culpas, the nave apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how at meanwhile, professor Dershowitz livid about this and wants to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says. The figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti-semitic cartoon. That's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at the DittoCam, and there's No MR to be solved here. The lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. You hunt Omar hates Jews Alexander all Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Rush to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism and occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said to New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Me. No, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit your antisemitic. Make it clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international addition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times. It's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have Stoorikhel perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do limit. It's it's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing lies native literally in this era in this. Evolution of the times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti-conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush limbaugh. Talk radio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody your side already agrees. Conservatives embed Christianity, bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief time out. We will continue El Rushbo, and the network right after rush is always at work and the bever.

The New York Times Donald Trump Rush limbaugh Israel Democrats Neil Frank professor Dershowitz Frank neil democrat party Atlantic magazine Benjamin Netanyahu DittoCam Texas National Hurricane Center TNT stadium Fox News AT
"frank neil" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

KTLK 1130 AM

13:54 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

"S. From the Atlantic magazine saying that, yeah, they'll use national a natural disasters. Whenever they happen. To try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he points that with economic Justice social economic gutless, which is a Ted amount. Admission then all of this is political. It isn't scientic does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the Warren could could we have ever had an ice edge end. And how can we have ever had warming in the past if human beings word around and the industrial revolution? Never have other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says that football stadium AT and T stadium in Texas hundred thousand seats. In order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seats as how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are other elements? How many of these seats, and then he gets down to how many seats are CO two. Answer is forty the equivalent. If you have if you have one hundred thousand seats in AT and T stadium. The Cowboys play football forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmosphere ick. Compensation? Or composition only forty out of one hundred thousand our CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He he indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmospheric warming. If a long pace, and it's got a lot of scientists charts and graphs, but and he takes it gets kicked off his call denier. And he's got more scientific atmospheric meteorological experience in education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will I'll cocoa get the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's proven this guy. The Atlantic in the sound bite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the network. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcasts because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and stole the virtues of say, conservatism or commonsense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Think of all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years. I think has to do with the something to do with the Muller report. It's it's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. They they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. The democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim is ours. That is their primaries. Forced their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media, educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been a shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives and calls both of them us and Trump vile names. Yet, the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're just guys in it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and the eleven by the New York Times. It's it's it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for. Well, we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now, the party that they have devoted themselves to become immersed in antisemitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting, the international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon it featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leaving Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David color. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now the cartoon coulda come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the dental Cam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has his rail on the leash is what this is supposed to mean. This is blatant anti semitism in a New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may culpas, a navy apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it at. Meanwhile, professor Dershowitz limit about this. And once there to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says. The figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti-semitic cartoon. That's the world view of the New York Times if you're still looking at the dental Cam, and there's no mystery to be solved here, the lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of a shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. Ilhan Omar hates Jews exempted here. Okay. So Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Rush to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism that occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said to New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to an investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Me. No, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit your antisemitic. Make it clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international edition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times on Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times. It's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have Stoorikhel perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do. It's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing lies native literally in this era in this. Evolution of the times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush limbaugh. Talk radio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody at your side already agrees conservatives in ban Christianity, bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue elrushbo ball and EIB network right after rush is always at work and the never closes.

The New York Times Donald Trump Rush limbaugh democrats Israel Professor Dershowitz Neil Frank Frank neil democrat party Atlantic magazine Benjamin Netanyahu Texas T stadium National Hurricane Center AT David collar Fox News Atlantic
"frank neil" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

NewsRadio KFBK

13:51 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

"Atlantic magazine saying that yeah, they'll use national natural disasters. Whenever they happen. To try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he waits that with economic Justice social economic gutless, which isn't ten amount admission then all of this is political. It isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice edge end. And how could we've ever had warming in the past if human beings weren't around and the industrial revolution. Never other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says that put ball stadium AT and T stand even Texas hundred thousand seats. These let's in order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seats how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are other elements? How many of these seats, and then he gets down to how many seats are CO two. And the answer is forty the equivalent. If you have if you have one hundred thousand seats in AT and T stadium for the Cowboys play football, forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmospheric. Compensation? Or composition only forty. Out of one hundred thousand our CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He he indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmospheric warming. It's a long piece, and it's got a lot of science at all charts and graphs, but and he takes it gets kicked off his called denier. And he's got more scientific atmospheric meteorological experience and education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's it's really well done. I will I'll coke I'll get the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's it's proven this guy the Atlantic and the sound bite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the EIB network. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcasts because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here an extol the virtues of say, conservatism or commonsense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Think of all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years, I think has to do with the. Something to do with the Muller report. It's it's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. It they they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea had never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. Democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim is ours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country is not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media, educated and informed and comprehensive and it's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been a shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives in calls. Both of them us and Trump vile names. Yet, the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're disguising it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and the limb by the New York Times. It's a it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for. Well, we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now, the party that they have devoted themselves to have become immersed in antisemitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting. The international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon it featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leading Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David collar. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now the cartoon coulda come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the DittoCam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to me. This is blatant anti semitism and the New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may help the nave apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it at. Meanwhile, professor Dershowitz limit about this and wants there to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says the fish. Figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti semitic cartoon, that's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at the DittoCam, and there's no mystery to be solved here, the lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. You'll Hon Omar hates Jews exempted here. Oh, that's Cortez. Who loves Johan, Omar. Russia to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism that occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said the New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to an investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Meet note, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit, you're anti semitic. Make it clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international edition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times on Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times. It's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have a Stoorikhel perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do at. It's it's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing lies native literally in this era in this evolution of the New York Times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush limbaugh. Talk radio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody at your side already agrees. Conservatives embed Christianity, bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue elrushbo an EIB network right after his rush is always at work and the IB bever.

The New York Times Donald Trump Democrats Rush limbaugh Israel Neil Frank Professor Dershowitz Frank neil Atlantic magazine democrat party Texas Benjamin Netanyahu DittoCam AT National Hurricane Center EIB Fox News
"frank neil" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

13:49 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on 600 WREC

"National natural disasters. Whenever they happen. To try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he waits that with economic Justice social economic. Which is a ten amount. Admission all of this is political. It isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice age end. And how could we've ever had warming in the past if human beings word around and the industrial revolution. Never other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says that football stadium AT and T stadium in Texas hundred thousand seats. In order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seats how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are other elements? How many of these seats and he gets down to how many seats are CO two. And the answer is forty the equivalent. If you have if you have a hundred thousand seats in AT and T state able a Cowboys play football forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmosphere ick. Compensation? Or composition only forty. Out of one hundred thousand our CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He did. He indicate scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmosphere. Ick warming. It's a long pace. And it's got a lot of science at all charts and graphs, but and he's he gets kicked off his called denier, he's got more scientific atmospheric meteorological experience and education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will coca I'll get the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's it's proven this guy. The Atlantic soundbite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the number. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcast because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and stole the virtues of say conservatism or common sense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Thinkable all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years. I think has to do with the something report. It's it's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. It is they never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. Democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim his hours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media, educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives in calls. Both of them us and Trump vile names. Yet, the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how their guys ING it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and the limb by the New York Times. It's a it's it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for. Well, we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to the labor it here. But what are these people doing? Now, the party that they have devoted themselves to have become immersed in antisemitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting. The international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leading Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David collar. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now the cartoon coulda come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the dental Cam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon at random, the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to mean. This is blatant Dami semitism in New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may culpas, the nave apologize. And they don't know how it happened all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it at. Meanwhile, professor Dershowitz limit about this. And once there to be an investigation, the New York Times should investigate itself. He says the fig. Figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti-semitic cartoon. That's the world view of the New York Times if you're still looking at the dental Cam, and there's No MR to be solved here. The lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. You'll Hon Omar hates Jews exempt. They're all Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Russia to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism and occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said the New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to an investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times, a symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic. Trump's as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Me. No, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit your antisemitic. Make it clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize to that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international addition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times of it's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about what general is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have a storage perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do at limits. It's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing native literally in this era in this. Evolution of the times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush Limbaugh van talkradio's, Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody your side already agrees. Conservatives. Embed Christianity, bad Christianity, partly American founding, the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue El Rushbaugh in the EIB network right after rush is always at work and the never.

The New York Times Donald Trump Israel Democrats Rush Limbaugh Professor Dershowitz Neil Frank Frank neil democrat party Benjamin Netanyahu National Hurricane Center AT Texas Fox News Germany El Rushbaugh NPR
"frank neil" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

13:50 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on KTRH

"S. From the Atlantic magazine saying they'll use national natural disasters. Whatever they happen to try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he waits that with economic Justice social economic gutless, which is a Ted amount. Admission then all of this is political isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank Neil Frank use to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice age end. And how could we have ever had warming in the past? If you mean beings word around and the industrial revolution. Never have other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says that put ball stadium stadium in Texas hundred thousand seats. These let's in order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seats how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are? Other elements of these seats, and then he gets down to how many seats are CO two. And the answer is forty the equivalent. If you have if you have a hundred thousand seats in AT and T state a Cowboys play football, forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmosphere ick. Compensation? Or composition only forty. Out of one hundred thousand are CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturated. He he indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmosphere. Ick warming. It's a long piece, and it's got a lot of science at all charts and graphs, but and he takes it gets kicked off his called denier. He's got more scientific atmosphere. Ick meteorological experience and education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will coca gift the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up. But it just it's proof of this guy the Atlantic and the sound bite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the IB network. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcast because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and extol the virtues of say, conservatism or commonsense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Thinkable the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years, I think has to do with the. Something to do with the report. It's it's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. It they they'd never even heard the fact or be theory or the idea never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. Democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim is ours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media, educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter hair hates Trump and hates conservatives in calls. Both of them us and Trump vile names. Yet, the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, anti semitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're just guys ING it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and eleven by the New York Times. It's a it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for. Well, we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now the party that they have devoted themselves to become immersed in anti semitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting. The international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leading Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David color. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now, the cartoon could've come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the DittoCam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon it ran in the international edition of the New York Times. Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to mean. This is blatant anti semitism in a New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this, and they have done gigantic Mayock opus nave apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it at. Meanwhile, professor Dershowitz limit about this and wants there to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says. The figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti semitic cartoon, that's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at the Cam, and there's no mystery to be solved here, the lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of a shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. You'll hunt Omar hates Jews Alexander Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Rush to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism and occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said to New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to it investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. No, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit, you're anti semitic. Make it clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international addition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times of it's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about journalism is what we think journalists, we think we think they're educated. We think they have a Stoorikhel perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do. It's it's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing native literally in this era in this. Evolution of the times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush Limbaugh talk. Talkradio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody your side already agrees. Conservatives in bed. Christianity bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief time out. We will continue elrushbo and EIB network right after..

The New York Times Donald Trump Rush Limbaugh Israel Democrats Neil Frank Professor Dershowitz democrat party Atlantic magazine Benjamin Netanyahu ball stadium stadium Texas National Hurricane Center AT Fox News EIB Germany
"frank neil" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

KLBJ 590AM

13:58 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

"Use national natural disasters. Whenever they happen. To try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he wakes that with economic Justice social economic Ghattas, which is a ten amount admission then all of this is political. It isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice age end. And how can we have ever had warming in the past if human beings word around and the industrial revolution? Never have other words all of the fossil fuels today. Propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off? He points out. We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says the put ball stadium AT and T stadium in Texas hundred thousand seats. These in order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seats as how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are? Other elements of these teachers, and he gets down to how many of these seats are CO two. And the answer is forty the equivalent if you have if you have a hundred thousand seats in AT and T stadium. The Cowboys play football forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmosphere ick. Compensation? Or composition only forty out of one hundred thousand our twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He he. He indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmospheric warming. If the long peace, and it's got a lot of science at all charts and graphs, but and he gets kicked off his call the denier at he's got more scientific atmospheric meteorological experience in education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will I'll cocoa get the link to this since I've mentioned this now send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just. Proof of this guy, the Atlantic and the sound bite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the IB network. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people who listen to NPR and their podcast because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and stole the virtues of say, conservatism or commonsense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Think of all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years, I think has to do with the. Something to do with the Mahler report. It's it's I wish I could remember was it was just Platt out obvious. They had never heard it. It they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea had never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. The democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim is ours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media, educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been a shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter hairy hates Trump and hates conservatives and calls both of them us and Trump vile names. You have to Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, anti semitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're guys ING it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and the lend by the New York Times. It's a it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for what we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now the party that they have devoted themselves to become immersed in anti semitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting. The international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is the leading Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David color. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now, the cartoon could've come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the dental Cam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with the dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to mean. This is blatant anti semitism and a New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may culpas, a navy apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how that meanwhile, professor Dershowitz limit about this and wants there to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says the. Figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti semitic cartoon, that's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at the dental Cam, and there's no mystery to be solved here, the lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. Ilhan Omar hates Jews exempt all Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Russia to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism and occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said to New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled investigation and explanation. How the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence. And then he tweeted that the abbey semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Meet note, you can be an abbey semi you. Can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit, you're anti semitic. Naked clear, your anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published all the way back last Thursday in the international addition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And Trump is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times on Friday. They have to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times. It's not just me observing this. And this goes back to again about what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have a stark perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do at limits. It's not it's not that. They just are biased. Enter publishing native literally in this era in this. Evolution of the times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian are anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush Limbaugh talk radio's banned just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody at your side already agrees conservatives in bad Christianity, bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue El ball and EIB network right after rush is always at work and the bever closes fifteen hours a week here. What is there not said it turns out a lot? And the Limbaugh letter is a repository for three hours is just not.

The New York Times Donald Trump Israel Rush Limbaugh democrats Neil Frank Professor Dershowitz Frank neil Benjamin Netanyahu democrat party National Hurricane Center AT T stadium Fox News Texas EIB Atlantic
"frank neil" Discussed on News Radio WGOW

News Radio WGOW

13:58 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on News Radio WGOW

"S. From the Atlantic magazine saying they'll use national natural disasters. Whatever they happen to try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he wakes that with economic Justice social economic gutless, which is a Ted amount. Admission then all of this is political. It isn't scientific does anybody. Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice age end. And how could we have ever had warming in the past? If you mean beings word around and the industrial revolution. Never other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says the football stadium stadium, even Texas hundred thousand seats. Let's in order to help people understand. He I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand seats is how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are other elements? How many of these seats, and he gets down to how many of these seats are CO two. Answer is forty the equivalent. If you have if you have a hundred thousand seats in AT and T stated with the Cowboys play football, forty of those seats if you apportion each seat to atmosphere ick. Compensation? Or composition only forty. Out of one hundred thousand our CEO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He indicates scientifically how CO two cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmospheric warming. If the long piece, and it's got a lot of scientists. Charts and graphs, but and he takes it gets kicked off his call to denier, he's got more scientific atmosphere. Ick meteorological experience and education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will I'll cocoa get the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's it's proven this guy the Atlantic and the sound bite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the network. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcasts because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and extol the virtues of say conservatism or common sense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy. Of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are. And what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Think of all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was it? The other day. I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years, I think has to do with the. Something to do with the Muller report. It's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They've never heard it. It they they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. The democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim as ours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country's not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media is educated and informed and comprehensive in. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way shape manner form now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives in calls. Both of them us and Trump vile names. Yet, the Democrats. In the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're disguising it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and eleven by the New York Times. It's a it's a strange yuks to position because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for what we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now the party that they have devoted themselves to become immersed in anti semitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting. The international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon it featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leaving Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David collar. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now the cartoon coulda come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the dental Cam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon that ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with a dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is is what this is supposed to me. This is blatant anti semitism in a New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may culpas nave apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it at. Meanwhile, professor Dershowitz his livid about this and wants to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says. The figure out just how in the world. This could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti-semitic cartoon. That's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at the DittoCam, and there's no mystery to be solved here, the lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of a shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. He'll hunt Omar hates Jews at exempted all Cortez who loves Johan, Omar. Rush to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism that occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said to New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to it investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Meet note, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit your antisemitic. Make it clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize to that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international edition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is that this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times if it's not just me observing this and this goes back to again. But what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have Stoorikhel perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do at. It's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing native literally in this era in this. Evolution of the times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti Christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush limbaugh. Talk radio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody your side already agrees. Conservatives embed Christianity, bad Christianity, part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue elrushbo and the network right after rush is always at work and the bever closes fifteen hours a week here..

The New York Times Donald Trump Rush limbaugh Israel democrats Neil Frank professor Dershowitz Frank neil democrat party Atlantic magazine Benjamin Netanyahu football stadium stadium Texas David collar National Hurricane Center AT Fox News CEO
"frank neil" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

News Radio 810 WGY

13:12 min | 3 years ago

"frank neil" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

"Use national natural disasters. Whenever they happen. To try to convince Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And then he wakes that with economic Justice social economic gutless, which is a tendon admission. Then all of this is political. It isn't fantastic. Does anybody? Remember the name Neil? Frank neil. Frank used to run the National Hurricane Center. Neil Frank just published a very lengthy article that dispels all the science of climate change, it points out such logical things as how in the world could could we have ever had an ice age end. And how can we have ever had warming in the past if human beings word around and the industrial revolution? Never have other words all of the fossil fuels today that propel us and create our energy didn't exist at a time. When the world was warming. How is this possible? And then how did things ever cool off you points out? We're coming out of actually the little ice age. But that the warming has stopped. And he uses a great analogy says that put ball stadium, ATM state, even Texas hundred thousand seats. Let's in order to help people understand. He he I don't have it right in front of me. But he takes these hundred thousand as how many of these seats are oxygen. How many of these seats are other elements? How many of these seats, and then he gets down to how many of these seats are THEO too. And the answer is forty the equivalent. If you have if you have one hundred thousand seats in AT and T stated with the Cowboys play football, forty of those seats if you apportion each seat atmosphere ick. Compensation? Or composition only forty out of one hundred thousand our CO twos. Meaning we're nowhere near saturation. He he indicates scientifically how to cannot possibly be a primary factor in climate or atmosphere. Ick warming. If the long pace, and it's got a lot of science at all charts and graphs, but and he picks gets kicked off his call to denier at he's got more scientific atmosphere. Ick meteorological experience and education, most of the so-called scientists that are said to be part of the consensus have it's really well done. I will I'll coke I'll get the link to this since I've mentioned this, and I'll send it. I'll send it up to you. But it just it's proven this guy the Atlantic and a soundbite in the last hour. Telling people. Yeah, we use natural disasters. As a way to convince the Rush Limbaugh listeners that climate change is real. And we combine that with economic just economic Justice climate Justice environmental Justice. You know, I I would I would argue that you listeners the network. I would argue, you know, far more than people who just listened to the drive by media. You know, so much more than just people listen to NPR and their podcast because we talk about both sides of every issue. I always cover the left side in depth. And the reason I do this is because it buttresses my point. I don't just sit here and stole the virtues of say, conservatism or commonsense. I always compare it to what the left what the other side is saying or what they believe in order to demonstrate the supremacy of my slash our beliefs. I cover them. I covered the left in much greater depth than they do in even themselves. They're not honest about themselves, and who they are what their motives are. And I present the alternative facts that they never touch. So it is you people in this. You are the ones. Who are always free to decide who is right on whatever issue because you do get both sides presented to you here. Think of all the things people who only get their news in the drive-by media. Don't know. It's striking. What they don't know. What was the other day? I ran into somebody and was explaining something that is fundamental you. And I have understood this for two years. I think it has to do with the. Something to do with the mullahs report. It's I wish I could remember it was it was just flat out obvious. They had never heard it. It they'd never even heard the fact or the theory or the idea never heard it because all they ever do is pay attention to the drive by media. The democrats. Biggest problem is what they always claim is hours. That is their primaries force their candidates to run very far to the ultra left and the country is not socialist. That's their big problem. Anyway, it just it just kind of irritates me. Because this this images that drive by media is educated and informed and comprehensive. It's nothing. Nothing of the sort in any way, shape matter form, now Powell as synagogue shooting. Once again, there has been a shooting by a guy who hates Trump. The shooter. Here hates Trump and hates conservatives and calls both of them us and Trump vile names, yet the Democrats. And the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting. Meanwhile, antisemitism has totally taken over the democrat party. And you know, how they're disguising it. They're using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged. Universal anti semitism. Including and eleven by the New York Times. It's a it's a strange juxtaposition because America's left wing Jewish population is devoted to the democrat party. So much. So that we've never been able to figure it out. We've never been able to figure out why so many Jewish people are Liberal Democrats, given what Liberal Democrats stand for what we I look I know what the answer is. I'm not going to belabor it here. But what are these people doing? Now the party that they have devoted themselves to have become immersed in anti semitism. Led by the New York Times a couple of days before the shooting, the international edition of the New York Times. Ran a despicable cartoon it featured a blind. Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke. Trump is is leaving Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog. Trump has him on a leash. And he's wearing a star of David color. Just to make sure the point isn't too subtle. Now, the cartoon could've come right out of any of the rabid anti semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days. We have the cartoon. I'm gonna put it up this for those of you watching on the DittoCam, Gordon, switch it over. This is the cartoon it ran in the international edition of the New York Times. There's Trump dressed up as an orthodox Jew with dark glasses and a yarmulke and that is Netanyahu's face on the dog star of David collar, and it is Netanyahu leading Trump around. Well, actually, Trump has Israel on the leash is what this is supposed to me. This is blatant anti semitism in New York Times has received voluminous criticism over this. And they have done gigantic may help us a navy apologize. And they don't know how it happened and all the usual things have happened with false phony apology. Well, we don't know how it meanwhile, professor Dershowitz limit about this. And once there to be an investigation New York Times should investigate itself. He says the figure out just how in the world this. Could happen. Look at that cartoon, this is an anti semitic cartoon, that's the world view of the New York Times. If you're still looking at Cam, and there's no mystery to be solved here, the lone culprit isn't buried under layers of editors the publishing of this cartoon is symptomatic of a shared prejudice. That has infected the left look at their heroes today. He'll hunt Omar hates Jews Alexander. Okay. So pathetic who loves Johan, Omar. Russia to leave. These people are born antisemites it's part of their existence. And they are not being condemned for it. They are being excused by people like Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and remember Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years. Democrats didn't care about the anti semitism and occurred there. Professor Dershowitz said to New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to an investigation and explanation. How did the antisemitic cartoon get published who approved it what steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence? And then he tweeted that the anti semitic cartoon published by the New York Times. A symptom of a deeper problem on the left, it is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel. Bingo. Anti Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti semitism. Meaning you can oppose Israel. Meet note, you can be an anti Semite. You can you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel, and it sends the same message. In other words, it's cowardice. Rather than just admit, you're anti semitic. Naked clear, you're anti Israel. And you accomplish the same thing. It took the New York Times until Sunday to apologize for that cartoon, they published it all the way back last Thursday in the international addition, even then they only apologized on Twitter. They didn't talk about punishing the people who were behind the cartoon. And the truth is this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times Friday. They had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian. One thing that's become apparent. In reading the New York Times. It's not just me observing this and this goes back to again. But what journalism is what we think journalists. We think we think they're educated. We think they have a stark perspective. We think that they are curious that they are informed. The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. They do it's it's not it's not that. They just are biased and are publishing native literally in this era in this evolution of the New York Times. They don't have anybody who actually understands Christian Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshippers. And the reason is because there is an anti-christian bias on the left. And once there is an anti-christian or anti conservative bias. You don't have to learn anything about it. It's just bad. So Fox News is bad. Rush limbaugh. Talk radio's Ben just because they say it's bad just because we're conservative. You don't have to say anymore. You don't have to know anymore. You don't have to explain anything. Because everybody on your side already agrees. Conservatives in bed. Christianity bad Christianity. Part of the American founding the American founding bad. That's it. That's the extent of their knowledge, which of course, isn't knowledge brief timeout. We will continue El elrushbo and EIB network right after rush is always at work and the bever closes fifteen hours a week here. What is there not said it turns out a lot? And the Limbaugh letter is a repository for three hours is just not.

The New York Times Donald Trump Israel Rush limbaugh democrats Professor Dershowitz Neil Frank Frank neil democrat party Benjamin Netanyahu National Hurricane Center Texas David collar Fox News AT EIB THEO