17 Burst results for "Fox House"

"fox house" Discussed on Pig & Whistle - Tales from Azeroth

Pig & Whistle - Tales from Azeroth

05:03 min | 5 months ago

"fox house" Discussed on Pig & Whistle - Tales from Azeroth

"They seem very interesting. And then by the time. I got to like level sixty. I didn't have my extract to sue. And i probably run past about twenty thirty of which are could've really used fly extra code for the epic flying but i'm not gonna i'm not gonna linger on that. So the extract of what it does is basically use it to second channel and you get a moat out of this far cloud now. Depending on what zone urine they will have different types of modes. Sorry in zanga marsh. These little fox house will be more blue and they will be moats of water in nagara. Nd it will be just a pure cloud. So they will be motive. They're in shadow. Moon valley then modes of shadow in hellfire. I would imagine. It's motor fire. But that tough to find i've not seen one can lie so i highly doubt they exist icon. Wanna say they don. But i'm probably going to be proven wrong so whichever zone or whichever moat that you wish to form you can do so in the zones with this extractor is just about knowing where these clouds can spawn and being at the right place at the right time pretty much so mote. Farming is definitely a very good income. So and if you've got saying like herding or mining wall you farming these moats wherever you are wherever it be at the top niagara nd whether it be hellfire. Peninsula fat farming moats shadow. There will always be nodes and a herbs that spun around you for that extra bit of gold so definitely make sure. The moat farming can be your top priority. Because if you look into level professions as well they are useful in doing so. The next one is quest..

zanga marsh Moon valley fox niagara Peninsula
"fox house" Discussed on Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

05:22 min | 5 months ago

"fox house" Discussed on Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

"The former presidents makes a run for the border on the brady fox. News built a wall that was dot a wall that anybody could get through. We had very few breakthroughs. Unbelievably former president trump alongside texas governor greg abbott whose pledging to finish a section of border wall to keep the state safe as he puts it a border visit today critical of the biden administration which says it's rebuilding and immigration system dismantled by the former president. A sudden turn of events for bill cosby who's being released from prison in pennsylvania after the state's highest court overturned his sex assault conviction for drugging and molesting a woman in two thousand and four. The ruling finds that an agreement with a prosecutor in a lawsuit by the accuser should have prevented charges. Also taking issue with testimony from other accusers. Judge who initially said that he was only going to allow one witness at cosby's original trial and then went on to allow five of the accusers from back in the nineteen eighties to speak his trial. And the judge felt that that testimony kind of tainted the trial and that was the basis for the release oxygen trace. Gallagher cosby is now eighty three years old. He served over two years of a three ten year sentence and has said he'd rather serve all ten than admit any wrongdoing. It's now sixteen dead in the florida condo collapse. After four more bodies were found leaving one hundred. Forty seven still unaccounted for. Some people that that that have lived remarkable lives have tremendous families and to be able to see the you know the real raw pain an emotion That this is caused Is something that. I don't think any of us are gonna ever forget florida governor rhonda sanchez. The search will continue as the community prepares to mark one week since the collapse tomorrow when the president and first lady plan to visit surf side america is listening to fox news. Don't let the challenge of reading mobile app stall your business building. Apps takes time special skills and a lot of money fortunately with sodhi snap. You can unleash your inner developer by allowing you to build and deploy apps you don't need to be a software developer and you don't need a lot of money with sodhi snap. You can create apps up to ten times faster than traditional methods leverage. Sony's free app. prototyping service. Is it sodhi dot net slash fox for free trial for fox news radio listeners. That's s. o. T. i dot net slash fox house. Democrats are moving ahead with targeted infrastructure. Bill as the white house and bipartisan negotiators. Craft and agreement. House bill for a vote. This week would spend about seven hundred and fifteen billion dollars on surface transportation and water infrastructure and investment transportation and infrastructure committee chairman oregon democrat peter. Defazio says is long overdue. It's going to be expensive but the but the good news is it is going to create millions millions of good paying jobs a price tags and policies in the house bill could be covered in a more than one. Trillion dollar bipartisan infrastructure framework negotiated between a senate group in the white house on capitol hill jared halpern fox news. This is the president continues to push for a larger spending package. The democrats could try to pass without republican support right now. The house is debating a new select committee to investigate the capital riot this after senate republicans blocked and independent commission a star from a long running soap. Opera has died. Surjan who played dr alan quartermaine. General hospitals died at the age of eighty. Four damon started nearly four hundred episodes of the abc. Soap opera then appeared as a ghost every so often after his character's death in two thousand seven he was nominated for several emmys and won in one thousand nine hundred nine. He most recently appeared on the show and twenty thirteen to celebrate. Its fiftieth anniversary. The actor had been struggling with renal failure for five years. According to his son christopher and in the end it was multiple complications. On top of kidney challenges damon also played the prince in the nineteen sixty five tv movie cinderella opposite. Lesley ann warren michelle pollino fox. News is a mixed day on wall street. The dow is up more than one hundred sixty points the smp still in record territory but the nasdaq slipping from its new record. High and lisa brady fox news schools out for summer. But if your business is running quickbooks you'll never get a break. Their manual processes integration difficulties glitchy delays will leave us scrambling for the numbers. You need failing to graduate to net. Sweet will leave you stuck in summer school while your friends party. Suite by oracle is the number one cloud financial system. No matter how big your business grows with visibility and control of your financial inventory. Hr commerce and more net suite is everything you need to grow all in one place automate your processes with next week and close your books in no time. Ninety three percent of surveyed businesses increase their visibility and control since graduating sweet special financing back nets is offering a one of a kind.

sodhi biden administration Gallagher cosby rhonda sanchez greg abbott fox news bill cosby surface transportation and wat cosby florida jared halpern fox pennsylvania Surjan dr alan quartermaine texas Defazio senate damon
"fox house" Discussed on The Face Radio

The Face Radio

03:36 min | 10 months ago

"fox house" Discussed on The Face Radio

"Welcome to the party. Dj the break is doing this. Every second fourth and fifth friday of the month ten pm eastern caller at me right here for the best in fox house so all that we like records turntables like dj culture scratching and mixing stuff right. Now listen to find a reality face. Radio from the solar brooklyn and also Right here on twitch so either way. You're doing it the speaking of which the next song. I'm about to drop on was called the funk appropriate is that off wow going down. Who's with me right here. Vinyl rowdy with.

"fox house" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

01:48 min | 1 year ago

"fox house" Discussed on 600 WREC

"Peaceful transfer of power. If he loses the November 3rd presidential election. The president will set the results of a free and fair election he will accept. The will of the American people. The president has all think lame without evidence that the November election will be rigged and that male invalid ING will lead to massive fraud in Washington, John Decker, Fox House speaker Nancy Pelosi said. It's sad that the question even needs to be asked. I don't know why the press doesn't make more of this to be very honest with you. I mean, he says that people swallow Clorox and we hear about it for the rest of our lives. But he's trying to have the Constitution of the United States Swallow Clorox, While Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell tweeted earlier today that there will be a smooth transition, just as there has been since 17 92. To Louisville, Kentucky police officer shot amid protests after the grand jury decision in the Briana Taylor case are expected to recover. One has already been released from the hospital last night situation could have been so much worse, or offs are officers. And for the people who are protesting when the gunfire rang out in from police chief Robert Schroeder. Taylor's family has announced they plan to hold a news conference tomorrow morning along with civil rights attorney Ben Crump to address the grand jury's decision. President Trump at the first of two campaign events now in Charlotte, North Carolina Money's healthcare plan, he says he will that will deliver more choice and better care for Americans at a lower cost Wall Street of the close, the Dow added. 52 points the NASDAQ plus 39 years in P, up nine points. America is listening to Fox News. 503 and NewsRadio 1055. We are seeing a spike in new Corona virus cases in.

Clorox president President Trump Briana Taylor America Fox House Mitch McConnell Nancy Pelosi Robert Schroeder United States Fox News. John Decker Louisville Ben Crump fraud Washington Kentucky
"fox house" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

01:55 min | 1 year ago

"fox house" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"Little answer yesterday, one. Asked if you would commit to a peaceful transfer of power. If he loses the November 3rd presidential election, the president will accept the results of a free and fair election he will accept. The will of the American people. The president has often claim without evidence that the November election will be rigged and that male invalid ING will lead to massive fraud in Washington, John Decker, Fox House speaker Nancy Pelosi said. It's sad that the question even needs to be asked. I don't know why the press doesn't make more of this to be very honest with you. I mean, he says that people swallow Clorox and we hear about it for the rest of our lives. But he's trying to have the Constitution of the United States Swallow Clorox, While Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell tweeted earlier today that there will be a smooth transition, just as there has been since 17 92. To Louisville, Kentucky police officer shot amid protests after the grand jury decision in the Briana Taylor case are expected to recover. One has already been released from the hospital last night situation could have been so much worse for our office. Our officers And for the people who were protesting when the gunfire rang out in from police chief Robert Schroeder. Taylor's family has announced they plan to hold a news conference tomorrow morning along with civil rights attorney Ben Crump to address the grand jury's decision. President Trump at the first of two campaign events Now in Charlotte, North Carolina Armanious Healthcare plan He says he will will deliver more choice and better care for Americans at a lower cost. Wall Street of the close. The Dow at 52 points that as that, plus 39 years in P up nine points, America is listening to me. Polls have Joe Biden ahead of President Trump. But did a poll ever ask your opinion? Now? Newsmax TV is asking Americans to vote in their national poll. Vote instantly for Trump or Biden. Just text the.

President Trump Clorox president Joe Biden Briana Taylor America Mitch McConnell Nancy Pelosi Robert Schroeder Fox House United States Louisville John Decker Ben Crump fraud Washington Kentucky Charlotte
"fox house" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

KLBJ 590AM

07:03 min | 1 year ago

"fox house" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

"Via carbon neutral delivery. Cloud Paper ink co founder Giant fridge says deforestation is a leading cause of climate change, and their toilet paper moves away from tree based paper and uses ultra sustainable renewable resource is like bamboo Instead. Other big name investors in the company include Ashton Kutcher wouldn't Paltrow and Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson disease Elise TSN do may not need that paper toilet paper anymore. Listen of Gwyneth Paltrow is behind my toilet paper, or I'm in. You're all in So it's tree free. It's plastic free and has delivered with a carbon free delivery method. So it's almost like the paper doesn't even exist. It's right. This is it. It's no paper. It's It's not there. 6 35 Got that story of Might linked in page at Todd Jeff Move, Listen, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She's not ruling out impeachment of President Trump for his effort to fill the vacant seat on the Supreme Court, even though that the right to do that is fully clear in the Constitution House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy. He tells Fox House members this morning that both parties I should reject the idea of an impeachment because if she is going after the president for impeachment because he is upholding his constitutional duty, that would be very interesting for any member to stand with her on that decision, you raise your hand when you get elected to Congress and sworn in to uphold the Constitution. You want to impeach a president from doing the duty of what he's told to do in the Constitution? That would be shocking to me, But it wouldn't be far fetched for the speaker to try because name me one problem this Democrat majority has solved. They want to defund the police. They're trying to dismantle what we know of our institutions to be by another impeachment. They're pretty much trying to destroy us by raising more taxes. They won't give small businesses. The resource is they need. There you go. That's Kevin McCarthy just a few minutes ago on Fox, If there was just a thought on right if there was another impeachment brought against Donald Trump, I don't know if I rolling makes a sound what that would be. But collectively, there would be the sound of the most massive viral collective eye roll in the history of the world. It would happen. I think it would just sell like Bush. I don't know what it sounds like Democrat Party has become that lazy teenager that you want to move out the house? Yes, exactly when you're going to leave guy. Yeah, a rational teenager. Sure, irrational emotional. Unstable. How about this report on Hunter? Biden is anybody seen where Hunter is? Hashtag? Where's Hunter 100 buying allegedly sent thousands of dollars to people. Who may have been involved in an eastern European prostitution and sex trafficking ring. That's according to a report released just yesterday. Now, the report cited Ah decided records. Which indicate that Biden has sent funds to non resident alien women in the United States who are citizens of Russia and the Ukraine. It had. Ah, well had wired finds that they have received from 100 buying two individuals located in Russian, Ukraine. It's in a seven page report. Insinuates. He's been paying off Russian hookers. That's what he's that's what the report is saying. It's an 87 page reports released yesterday by the Republican led Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee. And Finance Committee as well with a focus on 100 Buyten's business dealings in the Ukraine. There was a Russian oligarch that gave him a $3.5 million is pretty interesting. All of this happening while Dad was the VP. Exactly. Apparently. The Obama administration, according to this report, knew about some of this Yeah. The allegations were mentioned in a footnote as part of the report that delves into criminal concerns of extortion threats involving Hunter, Biden and other members of the Biden family. This, according to the New York Post this morning, Yeah, the report also mentioned some extensive public reporting concerning 100 binds alleged involvement with Prostitution services. Wow. Uh yeah, the report says Records on file with the committees do not directly confirm or refute these individual reports. However, they do confirm that Hunter Biden said. Thousands of dollars to individuals Who have either one been involved with transactions consistent with possible human trafficking Number two and association with an adult entertainment industry and number three potential association with prostitution. Man. I have no inside of how well they communicate with each other in the Biden family, But But I tell you, given all of this and everything that Hunter had going on, you cannot tell me it also largely due to the benefiting from his father's position in the world. You cannot tell me that Joe Biden and had some some some knowledge of the goings on here. At the record of Hunter Hunter. Biden's character is it's documented very well. Kicked out of the military for drugs, crack caught in some park with a crack pipe and a prostitute. He's that guy. He you know, had an affair, I guess with his his brother's widow, Yes, drove across the country to that strip club in New Orleans and impregnated the stripper Dallas in the V I. P room is a parent's dream. He is he really in and he is his unseen Since this campaign really got going, he's really going. I'm sure they they said stay in your room. Stay in your room and don't come out until we tell you what this reports. It also reveals that Biden Had a financial relationship with the widow of a Moscow mayor, who was ousted over corruption allegations that the report did not implicate Joe Biden in wrongdoing focused instead on his son Hunter. Who said Well, it's said he cashed in on his father's position by joining the board of that Ukraine Ukrainian gas company Now It also states that on Valentine's Day 20 1400 Biden's company, Rosemont, Seneca, Received $3.5 million money that was wired from Elena back Haruna, a Russian billionaire and a widow of the former Moscow mayor, Yuri Less cough. Pretty interesting it really is. But the thing is these these new findings and or more details all the stuff coming. The light will have absolutely no effect on Democrats who already have their mind made up neighbor. It'll just be blah, blah, blah. I remember during the debates with Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump remember the debates when Trump invited The women who had allegations sexual allegations against the former president. Bill Clinton member. That's absolutely I'm sitting on the front row during that first debate with Joe Biden. I'm bagging Donald Trump invite Dallas. The stripper from New Orleans to come sit in the front row with the baby with the baby crying, baby. What little Bere Esma sitting right there. Breastfeeding? Yes, That's right. 41 here a K LBJ Todd and don show be horrible, And it would be beautiful. My friends, it furniture market. That's incredible deals going on right now. You got to check him out online at my furniture market. Yeah, they're located what.

Hunter Biden Hunter Hunter Donald Trump Ukraine prostitution Kevin McCarthy president New Orleans Todd Jeff Move Gwyneth Paltrow Dallas Ashton Kutcher Seahawks co founder Fox House Russell Wilson New York Post Nancy Pelosi
"fox house" Discussed on 710 WOR

710 WOR

02:19 min | 1 year ago

"fox house" Discussed on 710 WOR

"One the okay but I didn't pick Samantha she well here's the woman that I could never obvious that's what exactly because it's boring if it's obvious why mine are better than yours how you want to place it listen to the voice and you will know who it is can hi moms to enjoy our new found friendship well Kerr to make me a sandwich Andorra I asked you to make me a sandwich make it yourself Deborah during you're a self and then choke on it yeah hi Samantha's mother played brilliantly and memorably by the great Agnes Moorehead who had the best number the red hair Natalie and she would just come in and she hated would all Derren Litten got about that character that is degrading she was a great care too big a lesbian Agnes Moorehead was and that was real life or on the show I don't know in real life now she's a famous Hollywood lesbian or get that out thanks for caring well it's always good pour in in this part is that right it was a big a lesbian she lived on Roxbury drive and for some reason you know Peter Falk my pick yesterday's Colombo he lived in Roxbury drive to and I have a friend who lives on north canon drive in Beverly hills and I often stay with her when I'm out in LA and I go for a jog I love jogging along Roxbury drive because you can run by Lucille ball's old house Jack Benny's house Peter fox house and hurry up I want to do my good the winds exist more right so we can we move on I find it okay so my character manages all right out of the winter how Joe well that's a good one all right all right fine the jobs of mine comes in a show that you like the show we.

Samantha Kerr Deborah Agnes Moorehead Natalie Derren Litten Peter Falk Roxbury drive Beverly hills LA Lucille ball Jack Benny Joe Colombo Peter fox
"fox house" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

KLBJ 590AM

01:46 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

"S. allies I'm Dave Anthony fox news is a thirty warns its operational in another city held by Kurdish fighters with help defeat the ISIS caliphate boxes Simon known as the latest live data major shift of alliances with the U. S. pulling back Kurdish forces agreeing a deal with serious governments to fend off attacks from Turkey state media in Syria showing locals chanting the name of Syrian president Bashar alas at a Syrian army units arrived Turkey's president wretched time said on me while signaling his next move seven operation targeting the Kurdish held city of man page is about to begin Dave Simon some Republicans joined Democrats critical of president trump's decision including congressman Liz Cheney who's leading the push for economic sanctions against Turkey our adversaries begin to sense weakness of our adversaries begin to think that we won't defend our allies that we won't defend our interests that that's provocative Cheney also told fox house Democrats are partly to blame we getting the president with their impeachment inquiry was not at an accident that the Turks chose this moment today former trumpet a rush of the only hill will be interviewed by three house committees Democrat Adam Schiff chairs intelligence the whistle blower may not testify telling CBS face the nation may not be necessary to take steps that might reveal the whistle blowers identity to do that and we're gonna make sure we protect the possible the president's reaction no he tweeted a few minutes ago the whistleblower must testify to explain how they got his call with Ukraine's leader so wrong he insists there was no pressure to investigate Joe Biden and his son a white police officers on administrative leave in fort worth Texas after shooting a black woman to death through the window over home Saturday police are investigating auto Tiana Jefferson's family is attorney calls it murder should be fired he should be arrested you should be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

"fox house" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

01:57 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"T. one Indianapolis at seven o'clock Russia now helping fighters who used to be U. S. allies I'm Dave Anthony fox news is a Turkey warns its operational in another city held by Kurdish fighters with help defeat the ISIS caliphate fox's Simon known as the latest live data major shift of alliances with the U. S. pulling back Kurdish forces agreeing a deal with serious governments to fend off attacks from Turkey state media in Syria showing locals chanting the name of Syrian president Bashar alas at a Syrian army units arrived Turkey's president wretched time better on me while signaling his next move second operation targeting the Kurdish held city of man page is about to begin Dave Simon some Republicans joined Democrats critical of president trump's decision including congressman Liz Cheney who's leading the push for economic sanctions against Turkey if our adversaries begin the sense weakness of our adversaries begin to think that we won't defend our allies that we won't defend our interests that that's provocative Cheney also told fox house Democrats are partly to blame weakening the president with their impeachment inquiry it was not at an accident that the Turks chose this moment was a former trump made a rush of your hill will be interviewed by three house committees Democrat Adam Schiff chairs in felons as the whistle blower may not testify telling CBS face the nation may not be necessary to take steps that might reveal the whistle blowers identity to do that and we're gonna make sure we protect that was simple the president's reaction no he tweeted a few minutes ago the whistle blower must testify to explain how they got his call with Ukraine's leader so wrong he insists there was no pressure to investigate Joe Biden and his son a white police officers on administrative leave in fort worth Texas after shooting a black woman to death through the window over home Saturday police are investigating after Tiana Jefferson's family as attorney calls it murder should be fired he should be arrested you should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law the police were responding to a neighbor's call of a door.

"fox house" Discussed on Talk 1260 KTRC

Talk 1260 KTRC

01:42 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on Talk 1260 KTRC

"Behind many of these provocations announced that it had seized this tanker one hundred ninety five million Americans are dealing with a very high temperatures as a heat wave blank it's the east coast and the Midwest plus New York City has declared an emergency on the bright side the two hottest days here will be over the weekend with temperatures at or above the one hundred degree mark while demand for electricity won't be at its peak mayor bill de Blasio said city officials are still concerned about stress on the power grid we want to make sure we balance the need for people stay cool with the amount electricity is being used in the city the city opened over five hundred cooling centers where people can get out of the heat during the day and they've extended hours it's city pools to eight PM city officials are reminding everyone that leaving children and pets in their cars and he'd like this even with the windows open can be deadly Steve casting about New York house lawmakers are preparing for next week's appearance by former special counsel Robert Muller on is four hundred forty eight page Russia probe report correspondent Lauren fox house Judiciary Committee planning to focus on five areas of alleged obstruction of justice including the president telling don began to fire special counsel Robert Muller as well as from telling began to deny publicly that he told him to fire Miller makes trading right now on Wall Street the Dow Jones industrial average is gaining thirteen points the S. and P. five hundred down eight the nasdaq off thirty one I'm in Kate's driving is freedom the freedom to keep to control your destiny to choose your path and now that freedom fits in the palm of your hand it's call.

New York City Steve special counsel house Judiciary Committee president don Robert Muller Miller Kate bill de Blasio Russia Lauren fox one hundred degree
"fox house" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

13:08 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"There's a then you can't handle the truth. Red Eye Radio. And he is currently curling. I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye interesting turn as to where the Democrats are going. Eric reading this here from FOX house speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Monday night that President Trump has demonstrated on a daily basis is obstruction of Justice amid a conflict between the White House and congress over terms scheduled testimony by attorney general William bar. I do think that the fear factor inside the Democrats right down that there, you know, now that the mullahs report, you know, they've they've gone through as much as I kind of you know, about on it, and as much political rhetoric and screaming and whining and complaining and moaning, they realized that with these foreign vestige going on right now, we're talking about the inspector general investigation as to the source of of of of, you know, the whole Russian collusion narrative. You know, the the. And the Fiso warrant the attorney general William bar looking at the beginning of this the house intelligence committee, and the criminal referrals will be going to the attorney general on it Lindsey Graham looking at it. I think they're trying to make as much noise now and Nancy using the term obstruction of Justice. It seems as if and not that they haven't used this before. But it seems to me that now the leadership realizes that impeachment might be on the table and the impeachment isn't because of any criminal activity or cried crimes and misdemeanors. But the morality that he's not legally committing obstruction of Justice. But morally he is committing obstruction of Justice. And that is worth that is worth impeachment. I don't know of always had doubts that the leadership wishes to go down that road. But they. They wished to would lease promote the fact that the president has committed obstruction of Justice, maybe not legally but morally and that should in itself justify impeachment. Even if the leadership doesn't feel like they are going to go down that path because you and I talked about it in our pre show. Meaning what if they went down the impeachment path? Let's say over the next six months to nine months. You wouldn't hear anything about what the Democrats were doing? It is the focus would be on that squarely, and it would be building support for the president. Because the American people have seen it, they they know full. Well, maybe there would be a different advantage before the Muller thing, if the moment thing is not happen. But you add that on top of the the entire Muller investigation. And the report which was obviously going nowhere. You know? It was interesting. I was thinking about it. Crystal is at CNN, former Washington Post journalists and he said oh, gosh September October. I think and he said I suspect it's only going to be a report we're not going to see any any indictments. There won't be any indictments related to the election or anybody in the campaign or Trump himself. It's likely going to be a report, and I thought to myself I was thinking about that during the day on Monday, and I wondered. How many they I I know that lawmakers knew that democrat lawmakers knew that Adam Schiff knew that that it was going nowhere that there was going to be nothing. It was it was about hanging. The cloud of doubt. And all they have to do is win the mall report comes out if it doesn't work in their favor that work to discredit it. This is this is how it's done, and they knew it was the only game that they had now trying to add impeachment to this. Go ahead. Start moving officially on impeachment and see where that gets you. Because it will be based on what what item with Bill Clinton was lying. Grand jury. With with this president. What would it be your version of obstruction was which isn't obstruction right or it doesn't rise to legal because Nancy Pelosi talking about the fact that? The White House negotiating with. Congress about how far will will testify. No, we'll take your questions from here. But we're not going to do that. That's obstruction of Justice is what they're claiming. And of course, it's not a fight between the executive branch and the congr-, but they used the term obstruction of Justice why because they want to put that out there, they they they want that to be the narrative between now, and however long this goes on I I don't really think that the Democrats want Barda testified before them. No. I know it's something we talked about yesterday on the show. Because I mentioned briefly I said I suspect in part. They're okay with him not testifying that way. It will look again make him look like hiding something and putting these ridiculous. And and how do you do that? Knowing William bar. What's the sure way to get him to not testify threaten to create these rules out of nowhere? They're not rules where you would have the staff lawyers engaging him for thirty minutes where you're going to take him behind closed doors, knowing he's not gonna talk about any of the redacted portions you take him behind closed doors. So you throw on to the table. These impossible demands knowing he's not going to respond well to them. And the other thing is the staff lawyers asking questions at the public hearing. Right. Why would you do that? And we went through that yesterday. And you know, I've time to think about it over the last twenty four hours, and I really think that we are on a point that they really don't want bar to testify because he is an extremely strong witness. You know? That that and not and I'm not saying a strong witness in defending the president, but defending the process and the process of how the department of Justice works. So the only thing that they have that they believe has been successful with this president is putting in seeds of doubt. If the president does not cooperate everything has been put in those. Let's keep planning those seeds of doubt in the American public. Well, if the president won't tell us he must be hiding something he must be hiding, right? You have seen the goal post over the last two years consistently, you know, moved. But when it comes down to even the open hearing of wanting the staff lawyers. You know, wanting the staff lawyers to you know, why why do you do that? It's the same reason that the Republicans wanted to use a staff lawyer to. To question MS Ford against Cavanaugh because they don't want any politician asking a tough question were then they would be up for criticism with Christine Ford, remembering her allegations against against Cavanaugh. Right. That's why you do that. Right. You do that. Because you don't know you don't know the territory that you don't know the territory that you're going into and you don't want to be you do not want to be construed as bashing a witness who the other side is portrayed as a victim. That you as a politician don't want to be in that cross examination role, for example with MS Ford because it could come out as a huge negative against you. That's one reason or the other reason is you believe, and I believe this is the case with bar. You have an extremely strong witness. You have no case on the other side. And none of the House Judiciary committee wants to ask the tough. What they believe are the the questions that they want to act ask that will put doubt in people's mind and tried to destroy bars reputation. They don't believe they think the lawyers can pull that off better than the politicians, and they don't want the politicians to be owned by bar. And I think bar knows that because you can still ask any question. You can have your legal people say what question should we ask? Oh, thank you. So they can prep all day. And they they already do by the way. And so I believe. That that's why the Democrats are are doing it. They don't believe they have a particularly strong case of substance on anything. They're only success is putting is planting the seeds of doubt. If we don't get full cooperation, they must be hiding something must be hiding something. We don't know what they're hiding, but they've got to be hiding something. That's why you have Pelosi using that term obstruction of Justice. They know there is no legal obstruction of Justice. They're smart enough to understand that. And so their whole point. Is it doesn't matter. Whether there was no wrongdoing. Trump is a mean guy who would try to hide something if he was doing something wrong. And we can't prove these doing something wrong. But we know when you know that he would still try to hide it. That's actually, I believe what they're attempting to promote because they believe that that will keep their base together. Yeah. I mean, then unify right? I if if they can if they can keep just throwing things at the wall. It doesn't matter if they stick right. You put them in defensive mode, and you keep them there until election day. But I think that after the House Judiciary committee. I really do believe that after you, and I talked about this after Ken Candice on owned. Jerrold Nadler and Ted lieu. And just went right back at them that they don't believe that they have the ability to deal with the strong witness. Think about it. If you saw that she owned them. And they outright mean Nadler wasn't even listening to what she was saying. It's eight is something but. And how many times I mean, Adam Schiff? How many times is he been caught lying? Over and over and over again, you would you would think they would learn from it. They continue to touch the hot stove. And so that's what I that's what I believe they're trying to do just continue. And I don't believe they think it expands. The the people that believe them. I think it's a way to unify the base that we this is the resistance, and I do believe what you saw yesterday with Nancy Pelosi saying that because of the conflict between the White House and congress over the terms of bullion bars testimony and her using the term Unstrung, the Trump obstr-, you know, demonstrates on a daily basis his excuse me here. It is quote has demonstrated on a daily basis is obstruction of Justice. There's no legal structure of Justice here. They're trying to repeating it there just keep repeating keep repeating that. Legally. He hasn't committed any obstruction of Justice, but spiritually and morally he has in you know, it we know it, and that's what keeps the resistance together the whole goal because I do think the Nancy. Pelosi probably heard it when she said, no one, peach mint, right? This is where we talk about who is controlling the democrat party. And what you saw I believe yesterday was Nancy Pelosi saying, okay, this this is at the minimum shoutout to the AFC. You know side of the of the of the house that just wants Trump impeach. We don't care whether we have anything we just want him impeached. Right. We just want him out of office. And we have the ability to go through the political process of impeachment because high crimes and misdemeanors isn't specifically defined and it's a political process, and we need to put this stain on him. And we believe if we put this stain on him. This will help us or may not help them. But it's not heard heard. But it makes no it makes them feel good. Sure. And it's not going to damage the party for from their core base. But it could mean the difference in.

Nancy Pelosi President Trump president congress William bar Adam Schiff House Judiciary committee Jerrold Nadler White House Gary McNamara attorney Lindsey Graham department of Justice FOX house Muller Bill Clinton Washington Post
"fox house" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

13:04 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Eight six six ninety redeye interesting turn as to where the Democrats are going. Eric breeding this here from FOX house speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Monday night that President Trump has demonstrated on a daily basis is obstruction of Justice amid a conflict between the White House and congress over terms of scheduled testimony by attorney general William bar. I do think that the fear factor inside the Democrats right down there. You know, now that the mullahs report, you know, they've they've gone through as much as they can, you know, on it, and as much political rhetoric and screaming and whining and complaining and moaning, they realized that with these foreign vestige going on right now, we're talking about the inspector general investigation as to the source of of of, you know, the whole Russian collusion narrative. You know, the the and the Fiso warrant the attorney general William bar looking at the beginning of this the house intelligence committee, and the criminal referrals will be going to the attorney general on it Lindsey Graham looking at it. I think they're trying to make as much noise now and Nancy using the term obstruction of Justice. It seems as if and not that they haven't used this before. But it seems to me that now the leadership realizes that impeachment might be on the table and the impeachment isn't because of any criminal activity or cri- crimes and misdemeanors. But the morality that he's not legally committing obstruction of Justice. But morally he is committing obstruction of Justice. And that is worth that is worth impeachment. I don't know of always had doubts that the leadership wishes to go down that. Road, but they wished to lease promote the fact that the president has committed obstruction of Justice, maybe not legally but morally and that should in itself justify impeachment. Even if the leadership doesn't feel like they are going to go down that path because you and I talked about it in our pre show. Meaning what if they went down the impeachment path? Let's say over the next six months to nine months, they you wouldn't hear anything about what the Democrats were doing. It was the focus would be on that squarely, and it would be building support for the president. Because the American people have seen it, they they know full. Well, maybe there would be a different advantage before the Muller thing, if the moment thing not happen. But you add that on top of the the entire Muller investigation and report which was obviously going nowhere. You know? It was interesting. I was thinking about it. Chris cillizza CNN, former Washington Post journalists and he said oh, gosh September October. I think and he said I suspect it's only going to be a report we're not going to see any any indictments. There won't be any indictments related to the election or anybody in the campaign or Trump himself. It's likely going to be a report, and I thought to myself I was thinking about that during the day on Monday, and I wondered. How many they I know that lawmakers knew that democrat lawmakers knew that Adam Schiff knew that that it was going nowhere at there was going to be nothing. It was it was about hanging. The cloud of doubt. And all they have to do is win. The all report comes out if it doesn't work in their favor that worked to discredit it. This is this is how it's done and they knew it was the only game that they had now try and add impeachment to this. Go ahead. Start moving officially on impeachment and see where that gets you. Because it will be based on what what item with Bill Clinton was lying to a grand jury. With with this president. What would it be your version of obstruction was which isn't obstruction right or it doesn't rise to legal because Nancy Pelosi talking about the fact that? The White House negotiating with. Congress about how far will will testify. No, we'll take questions from here. But we're not going to do that. That's obstruction of Justice is what they're claiming. And of course, it's not that's a fight between the executive branch and the congr-, but they used the term obstruction of Justice. Why because they want to put that out there, they they they want that to be the narrative between now, and however long this goes on I I don't really think that the Democrats want Barda testified before them. No. I know it's something we talked about yesterday on the show. Because I mentioned it briefly. I said, you know, I suspect in part. They're okay with him not testifying that way. It will look again make him look like hiding something and putting these ridiculous. And and how do you do that? Knowing William bar. What's the sure way to get him to not testify threaten to create these rules out of nowhere? They're not rules where you would have the staff lawyers engaging him for thirty minutes where you're going to take him behind closed doors, knowing he's not gonna talk about any of the redacted portions you take them behind closed doors. So you throw on to the table. These impossible demands knowing he's not going to respond well to them. And the other thing is the staff lawyers asking questions at the public hearing. Right. Why would you do that? And we went through that yesterday. And I, you know, I've time to think about it over the last twenty four hours, and I really think that we are on a point that they really don't want bar to testify because he is an extremely strong witness. You know that that and not. And I'm not saying a strong witness in defending the president, but defending the process and the process of how the department of Justice works. So the only thing that they have that they believe has been successful with this president is putting in seeds of doubt. If the president does not cooperate everything has been put in those. Let's keep planning those seeds of doubt in the American public. Well, if the president won't tell us he must be hiding something he must be hiding, right? We have seen the goal post over the last two years consistently mo-, you know, moved. But when it comes down to even the open hearing of wanting the staff lawyers. You know, wanting the staff lawyers to you know, why why do you do that? It's the same reason that the Republicans wanted to use a staff lawyer too. To question MS Ford against Cavanaugh because they don't want any politician asking a tough question were then they would be up for criticism with Christine Ford, remembering her allegations against against Cavanaugh. Right. That's why you do that you do that. Because you don't know you don't know the territory that you don't know the territory that you're going into and you don't wanna be you do not want to be. Construed as bashing a witness who the other side is portrayed as a victim that you as a politician don't want to be in that cross examination role, for example with MS Ford because it could come out as a huge negative against you. That's one reason or the other reason is you believe, and I believe this is the case with bar. You have an extremely strong witness. You have no case on the other side. And none of the House Judiciary committee wants to ask the tough. What they believe are the the questions that they want to access ask that will put doubt in people's mind and tried to destroy bars reputation. They don't believe they think the lawyers can pull that off better than the politicians, and they don't want the politicians to be owned by bar. And I think bar knows that because. You can still ask any question. You can have your legal people say what question should we ask? Oh, they can have prep all day. And they they already do by the way. And so I believe that. That's why the Democrats are are doing it. They don't believe they have a particularly strong case of substance on anything. They're only success is putting is planting the seeds of doubt. If we don't get full cooperation, they must be hiding something must be hiding something. We don't know what they're hiding, but they've got to be hiding something. That's why you have Pelosi using that term obstruction of Justice. They know there is no legal obstruction of Justice. They're smart enough to understand that. And so their whole point. Is it doesn't matter. Whether there was no wrongdoing. Trump is a mean guy who would try to hide something if he was doing something wrong. And we can't prove these doing something wrong. But we know, and you know, that he would still try to hide it. That's actually, I believe what they're attempting to promote because they believe that that will. Keep their base together. Yeah. I mean, then unified, right? I if if they can if they can keep just throwing things at the wall. It doesn't matter if they too. Right. You put them in defensive mode, and you keep them there until election day. But I think that after the House Judiciary committee. I really do believe that after you, and I talked about this after Ken Candice own owned. Jerrold Nadler and Ted lieu. And just went right back at them that they don't believe that they have the ability to deal with the strong witness. Think about it. If you saw that she owned them. And they outright mean Nadler wasn't even listening to what she was saying. It's eight is something but. And how many times I mean, Adam Schiff? How many times is he been caught lying? Over and over and over again, you would you would think they would learn from it. They continue to touch the hot stove. And so that's what that's what I believe. They're trying to do just continue. And I don't believe they think it expands. The the people that believe them. I think it's a way to unify the base that we this is the resistance, and I do believe what you saw yesterday with Nancy Pelosi saying that because of the conflict between the White House and congress over the terms of William bars testimony and her using the term on strike, the Trump obstr-, you know, demonstrates on a daily basis his excuse me here it is quote has demonstrated on a daily basis as obstruction of Justice. There's no legal obstruction of Justice here. They're trying to escape repeating it there just keep repeating keep repeating that. Legally. He hasn't committed any obstruction of Justice, but spiritually and morally he has in you know, it we know it, and that's what keeps the resistance together the whole goal because I do think the Nancy. Pelosi probably heard it when she said, no one, peach mint, right? This is where we talk about who is controlling the democrat party. And what you saw I believe yesterday was Nancy Pelosi saying, okay, this this is at the minimum shoutout to the AFC. Side of the of the of the house that just wants Trump impeach. We don't care whether we have anything we just want him impeached. Right. We just want him out of office. And we have the ability to go to the political process of impeachment because high crimes and misdemeanors isn't specifically defined and it's a political process, and we need to put this stain on him. And we believe if we put this stain on him. This will help us or may not help them. But it's not gonna hurt. But it makes no it makes them feel good. Sure. Then it's not going to damage the party for from their core base. But it could mean the difference in a presidential election. Yes. It could eight six six ninety redeye. Open.

Nancy Pelosi President Trump president William bar congress Adam Schiff House Judiciary committee White House attorney Lindsey Graham department of Justice FOX house Muller Bill Clinton Fiso Washington Post Eric
"fox house" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

13:05 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye interesting turn as to where the Democrats are going air breeding this here from FOX house speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Monday night that President Trump has demonstrated on a daily basis obstruction of Justice amid a conflict between the White House and congress over terms scheduled testimony by Torney general William bar. I do think that the fear factor inside the Democrats right down that there, you know, now that the Muller report, you know, they they've gone through as much as they can, you know, a on it and much political rhetoric and screaming and whining and complaining and moaning, they realized that with these foreign vestige going on right now, we're talking about the inspector general investigation as to the source of of of, you know, the whole Russian collusion narrative. You know, the the. And the FIS award the attorney general William bar looking at the beginnings of this the house intelligence committee, and the criminal referrals will be going to the attorney general on it Lindsey Graham looking at it. I think they're trying to make as much noise now and Nancy using the term obstruction of Justice. It seems as if and not that they haven't used this before. But it seems to me that now the leadership realizes that impeachment might be on the table and the impeachment isn't because of any criminal activity or cried crimes and misdemeanors. But the morality that he's not legally committing obstruction of Justice. But morally he is committing obstruction of Justice. And that is worth that is worth impeachment. I don't know I've always had doubts that the leadership bushes to go down that road. But they. They wished to lease promote the fact that the president has committed obstruction of Justice, maybe not legally but morally and that should in itself justify impeachment. Even if the leadership doesn't feel like they are going to go down that path because you and I talked about it in our pre show. Meaning what if they went down the impeachment path, let's say over the next six months to nine months, they you wouldn't hear anything about what the Democrats were doing. It was the focus would be on that squarely, and it would be building support for the president. Because the American people have seen they they know full. Well, maybe there would be a different advantage before the Muller thing, if the moment thing not happen. But you add that on top of the the entire Muller investigation. And the report which was obviously going nowhere. You know? It was interesting. I was thinking about it. Crystal is at CNN, former Washington Post. Journalists in. He said oh gosh September October. I think and he said I suspect it's only going to be a report, we're not gonna see any minutes. There won't be any documents related to the election or anybody in the campaign Trump himself, it's likely going to be a report, and I thought to myself I was thinking about that during the day on Monday. And I wondered how many they I I know that lawmakers knew that democrat lawmakers knew that Adam Schiff knew that that it was going nowhere. There was going to be nothing. It was it was about hanging. The cloud of doubt. And all they have to do is win the mall report comes out if it doesn't work in their favor that worked to discredit this is this is how it's done, and they knew it was the only game that they had now try an ad impeachment to this. Go ahead. Start moving officially on impeachment and see where that gets you. Because it will be based on what what item with Bill Clinton was lying. Grand jury. With with this president. What would it be your version of obstruction with which isn't obstruction? Right. Oh, or it doesn't rise to legal because Nancy Pelosi talking about the fact that. The White House negotiating with. Congress about how far will will testify noble take questions from here. But we're not going to do that. That's absu -struction of Justice is what they're claiming. And of course, it's not a fight between the executive branch and the congr-, but they used the term obstruction of Justice why because they want to put that out there, they they they want that to be the narrative between now, and however long this goes on I I don't really think that the Democrats want bar testified before them. No. I know it's something we talked about yesterday on the show. Because I mentioned briefly I said, you know, I suspect in part. They're okay with him not testifying that way will look again make him look hiding something and putting these ridiculous. And how do you do that? Knowing William bar. What's the sure way to get him to not testify frightened to create these rules out of nowhere? They're not rules where you would have the staff lawyers engaging him for thirty minutes where you're going to take him behind closed doors, knowing he's not gonna talk about any of the redacted portions you take them behind closed doors. So you throw on to the table. These impossible demands knowing he's not going to respond well to them. And the other thing is the staff lawyers asking questions at the public hearing. Right. Why would you do that? And we went through that yesterday in time to think about it over the last twenty four hours, and I really think that we are on a point that they really don't want bar to testify because he is an extremely strong witness. You know? That that and not an not saying a strong witness in defending the president. But defending the process and the process of how the department of Justice works. So the only thing that they have that they believe has been successful with this president is putting in seeds of doubt. If the president does not cooperate everything has been put in those. Let's keep planning those seeds of doubt in the American public. Well, if the president won't tell us he must be hiding something he must be hiding, right? You have seen the goal post over the last two years consistently mo- moved. But when it comes down to even the open hearing of wanting the staff lawyers. You know, wanting the staff lawyers to you know, why why do you do that? It's the same reason that the Republicans wanted to use a staff lawyer to to question MS Ford against Cavanaugh because they don't want any politician asking a tough question were than they would be up for criticism with Christine Ford, remembering her allegations against against Cavanaugh. Right. That's why you do that you do that. Because you don't know you don't know the territory that you don't know the territory that you're going into and you don't wanna be you do not want to be construed as bashing a witness who the other side is portrayed as a victim. That you as a politician don't want to be in that cross examination role, for example with MS Ford because it could come out as a huge negative against you. That's one reason or the other reason is you believe, and I believe this is the case with bar. You have an extremely strong witness. You have no case on the other side. And none of the House Judiciary committee wants to ask the tough, or what they believe are the the questions that they want to ask ask that will put doubt in people's mind and try to destroy bars reputation. They don't believe they think the lawyers can pull that off better than the politicians, and they don't want the politicians to be owned by Barney think bar knows that because you can still ask any question. You can have your legal people say what question should we ask? They prep all day. And they they already do by the way. And so I believe. That that's why the Democrats are are doing it. They don't believe they have a particularly strong case of substance on anything. They're only success is putting is planting the seeds of doubt. If we don't get full cooperation, they must be hiding something must be hiding something. We don't know what they're hiding. But they gotta be hiding something. That's why you have Pelosi using that term obstruction of Justice. They know there is no legal obstruction of Justice. They're smart enough to understand that their whole point. Is it doesn't matter. Whether there was no wrongdoing. Trump is a mean guy who would try to hide something if he was doing something wrong. And we can't prove these doing something wrong. But we know when you know that he would still try to hide it. That's actually, I believe what they're attempting to promote because they believe that that will keep their base together. I mean, they unify right? I if if they can if they can keep just throwing things at the wall doesn't matter too, right? You put them in defensive mode, and you keep them there until election day. But I think that after the House Judiciary committee. I really do believe that afternoon. I talked about this after Ken Candice own owned. Jerrold Nadler and Ted lieu. And just went right back at them that they don't believe that they had the ability to deal with the strong witness. Think about it. If you saw that she own them. And they outright me Nadler wasn't even listening to what she was saying. It's eight is something but. And how many times Adam Schiff? How many times is he been caught lying? Over and over and over again, you would you would think they would learn from it. They continue to touch the hot stove. And so that's what that's what I believe. They're trying to do just continue. And I don't believe they think it expands. The the people that believe them. I think it's a way to unified the base that we this is the resistance, and I do believe what you saw yesterday with Nancy Pelosi saying that because of the conflict between the White House and congress over the terms of William bars testimony in her using the term Unstrung, the Trump obstr-, you know, demonstrates on a daily basis his excuse me here it is quote has demonstrated on a daily basis obstruction of Justice. There's no legal structure of Justice here. They're trying to repeating there. Just keep repeating keep repeating that. Legally. He hasn't Eddie obstruction of Justice. But spiritually and morally he has in you know, it we know it, and that's what keeps the resistance together the whole goal because I do think the Nancy. Pelosi probably heard it when she said, no one, peach mint, right? This is where we talk about who is controlling the democrat party. And what you saw either leave yesterday was Nancy Pelosi saying, okay, this this is at the minimum shoutout to the AFC. You know side of the of the of the house that just wants Trump impeach. We don't care whether we have anything we just want him impeached. Right. We just want him out of office. And we have the ability to go to the political process of impeachment because high crimes and misdemeanors isn't specifically defined and it's a political process, and we need to put this stain on him. And we believe we put this stain on him. This will help us or that may not help them. But it's not. But it makes no it makes them feel good. Sure. Then it's not going to damage the party for from their core base. But it could mean the difference in a presidential election. Yes. Eight six six ninety redeye..

Nancy Pelosi president President Trump William bar congress Muller Adam Schiff House Judiciary committee White House department of Justice FOX house FIS Gary McNamara Lindsey Graham Bill Clinton Washington Post attorney
"fox house" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

13:03 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Eight six six ninety redeye interesting turn as to where the Democrats are going air breeding this here from FOX house speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Monday night that President Trump has demonstrated on a daily basis obstruction of Justice amid a conflict between the White House and congress over terms of scheduled testimony by Torney general William bar. I do think that the fear factor inside the Democrats right down at their, you know, now that the mullahs report, you know, they've they've gone through as much as they can, you know, about on it, and as much political rhetoric and screaming and whining and complaining and moaning, they realized that with these four investigations going on right now, we're talking about the inspector general investigation as to the source of of of, you know, the whole Russian collusion narrative, you know, the the and. And the FIS warrant the attorney general William bar looking at the beginnings of this the house intelligence committee and the criminal referrals that will be going to the attorney general on it Lindsey Graham looking at it. I think they're trying to make as much noise now and Nancy using the term obstruction of Justice. It seems as if and not that they haven't used this before. But it seems to me that now the leadership realizes that impeachment might be on the table and the impeachment isn't because of any criminal activity or cried crimes and misdemeanors. But the morality that he's not legally committing obstruction of Justice. But morally he is committing obstruction of Justice. And that is worth that is worth impeachment. I don't know I've always had doubts that the leadership wishes to go down that road. But they. Wished to at least promote the fact that the president has committed obstruction of Justice, maybe not legally but morally and that should in itself justify impeachment. Even if the leadership doesn't feel like they are going to go down that Pat because you and I talked about it in our pre show. Meaning what if they went down the impeachment path, let's say over the next six months to nine months. You wouldn't hear anything about what the Democrats were doing? It is the focus would be on that squarely, and it would be building support for the president. Because the American people have seen it, they they know full. Well, maybe there would be a different advantage before the Muller thing, if the moment thing it not happen. But you add that on top of the the entire Muller investigation. And the report which was obviously going nowhere. You know? It was interesting. I was thinking about it. Crystal is CNN former Washington Post. Journalists in. He said oh gosh September October. I think and he said I suspect it's only going to be a report we're not going to see any indictments. There won't be any indictments related to the election or anybody in the campaign Trump himself, it's likely going to be a report, and I thought to myself I was thinking about that during the day on Monday. And I wondered how many they I I know that lawmakers knew that democrat lawmakers knew that Adam Schiff knew that that it was going nowhere at there was going to be nothing. It was it was about hanging. The cloud of doubts and all they have to do is win the mall report comes out if it doesn't work in their favor that worked to discredit this is this is how it's done and they knew it was the only game that they had now try an ad impeachment. So this go ahead start moving officially on impeachment and see where that gets you. Because it will be based on what what item with Bill Clinton was lying to a grand jury. With with this president. What would it be your version of obstruction was which isn't obstruction right or it doesn't rise to legal because Nancy Pelosi talking about the fact that? The White House negotiating with. Congress about how far will will testify. No, we'll take questions from here. But we're not going to do that. That's obstruction of Justice what they're claiming. And of course, it's not a fight between the executive branch and the congr-, but they used the term obstruction of Justice why because they want to put that out there, they they they want that to be the narrative between now, and however long this goes on I I don't really think that the Democrats want Barda testified before them. No. I know it's something we talked about yesterday on the show. Because I mentioned briefly I said, you know, I suspect in part. They're okay with him not testifying that way. It will look again make him look like hiding something and putting these ridiculous. And and how do you do that? Knowing William bar. What's the sure way to get him to not testify threaten to create these rules out of nowhere? They're not rules where you would have the staff lawyers engaging him for thirty minutes where you're going to take him behind closed doors, knowing he's not going to talk about any of the redacted portions you take them behind closed doors. So you throw on to the table. These impossible demands knowing he's not going to respond well to them. And the other thing is this the staff lawyers asking questions at the public hearing. Right. Why would you do that? And we went through that yesterday in time to think about it over the last twenty four hours, and I really think that we are on a point that they really don't want bar to testify because he is an extremely strong witness. You know that that and not. And I'm not saying a strong witness in defending the president, but defending the process and the process of how the department of Justice works. So the only thing that they have that they believe has been successful with this president is putting in seeds of doubt. If the president does not cooperate everything has been put in those. Let's keep planning those seeds of doubt in the American public. Well, if the president won't tell us he must be hiding something he must be right. You have seen the goal post over the last two years consistently move, you know, move. But when it comes down to even the open hearing of wanting the staff lawyers. You know, wanting the staff lawyers to you know, why why do you do that? It's the same reason that the Republicans wanted to use a staff lawyer to. To question MS Ford against Cavanaugh because they don't want any politician asking a tough question were than they would be up for criticism with Christine Ford, remembering her allegations against against Cavanaugh. Right. That's why you do that you do that. Because you don't know you don't know the territory that you don't know the territory that you're going into and you don't wanna be concerned, you do not want to be construed as bashing a witness who the other side is portrayed as a victim. That you as a politician don't want to be in that cross examination role, for example with MS Ford because it could come out as a huge negative against you. That's one reason or the other reason is you believe, and I believe this is the case with bar. You have an extremely strong witness. You have no case on the other side. And none of the House Judiciary committee wants to ask the tough. What they believe are the the questions that they want to act ask that will put doubt in people's mind and try to destroy bars reputation. They don't believe they think the lawyers can pull that off better than the politicians, and they don't want the politicians to be owned by barn. I think bar knows that because you can still ask any question. You can have your legal people say what question should we ask? Oh, they can prep all day. And they they already do by the way. And so I believe. Leave that. That's why the Democrats are are doing it. They don't believe they have a particularly strong case of substance on anything. They're only success is putting is planting the seeds of doubt. If we don't get full cooperation, they must be hiding something must be hiding something. We don't know what they're hiding. But they gotta be hiding something. That's why you have Pelosi using that term obstruction of Justice. They know there is no legal obstruction of Justice. They're smart enough to understand that. And so their whole point. Is it doesn't matter. Whether there was no wrongdoing. Trump is a mean guy who would try to hide something if he was doing something wrong. And we can't prove that he's doing something wrong. But we know when you know that he would still try to hide it. That's actually, I believe what they're attempting to promote because they believe that that will keep their base together. Yeah. I mean, then unified, right? I if if they can if they can keep just throwing things at the wall doesn't matter face too. Right. You put them in defensive mode, and you keep them there until election day. But I think that after the House Judiciary committee. I really do believe that after new and I talked about this after Ken Candice own owned. Jerrold Nadler and Ted lieu. And just went right back at them that they don't believe that they had the ability to deal with the strong witness. Yeah. I think about it. If you saw that sheet own them. And they outright mean Nadler wasn't even listening to what she was saying. It's eight is something but. And how many times Adam Schiff? How many times is he been caught lying? Over and over and over again, you would you would think they would learn from it. Net continue to touch the hot stove. And so that's what I that's what I believe they're trying to do just continue. And I don't believe they think it expands. The people that believe them. I think it's a way to unify the base that we that. This is the resistance, and I do believe what you saw yesterday was Nancy Pelosi saying that because of the conflict between the White House and congress over the terms of William bars testimony and her using the term on struck the Trump obstr-, you know, demonstrates on a daily basis his excuse me here. It is quote has demonstrated on a daily basis is obstruction of Justice. There's no legal structure of Justice here. They're trying to repeating it there just keep repeating keep repeating that. Legally. He hasn't any obstruction of Justice, but spiritually and morally he has in you know, it we know it, and that's what keeps the resistance together the whole goal because I do think the Nancy. Pelosi probably heard it when she said, no one, peach mint, right? This is where we talk about who is controlling the democrat party. And what you saw either leave yesterday was Nancy Pelosi saying, okay, this this is at the minimum shout out to the AFC. You know side of the of the of the house that just wants Trump impeach. We don't care whether we have anything we just want him impeached. Right. We just want him out of office. And we have the ability to go to the political process of impeachment because high crimes and misdemeanors isn't specifically defined and it's a political process, and we need to put the stain on him. Uh-huh. And we believe if we put this stain on him, this will help us or may not help them. But but it makes no it makes them feel good. Sure. And it's not going to damage the party for from their core base. But it could mean the difference in a presidential. Yes. Eight six six ninety redeye..

Nancy Pelosi President Trump president William bar congress Adam Schiff House Judiciary committee White House FOX house FIS Lindsey Graham department of Justice Pat Muller Bill Clinton attorney Washington Post
"fox house" Discussed on 77WABC Radio

77WABC Radio

13:03 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on 77WABC Radio

"Eight six six ninety redeye interesting turn as to where the Democrats are going breeding this here from FOX house speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Monday night that President Trump has demonstrated on a daily basis obstruction of Justice amid a conflict between the White House and congress over terms of scheduled testimony by attorney general William bar. I do think that the fear factor inside the Democrats right down at their, you know, now that the mullahs report, you know, they've they've gone through as much as they can, you know, on it, and as much political rhetoric and screaming and whining and complaining and moaning, they realized that with these foreign vestiges going on right now, we're talking about the inspector general investigation as to the source of of of, you know, the whole Russian collusion narrative. You know, the the and the FIS a warrant the attorney general William bar looking at the beginning of this the house intelligence committee, and the criminal referrals will be going to the attorney general on it Lindsey Graham looking at it. I think they're trying to make as much noise now and Nancy using the term obstruction of Justice. It seems as if and not that they haven't used this before. But it seems to me that now the leadership realizes that impeachment might be on the table and the impeachment isn't because of any criminal activity or cried crimes and misdemeanors. But the morality that he's not legally committing obstruction of Justice. But morally he is committing obstruction of Justice. And that is worth that is worth impeachment. I don't know of always had doubts that the leadership wishes to go down that. The road, but they wished to at least promote the fact that the president has committed obstruction of Justice, maybe not legally but morally and that should in itself justify impeachment. Even if the leadership doesn't feel like they are going to go down that Pat because you and I talked about it in our pre show. Meaning what if they went down the impeachment path, let's say over the next six months to nine months. You wouldn't hear anything about what the Democrats were doing? It is the focus would be on that squarely, and it would be building support for the president. Because the American people have seen it, they they know full. Well, maybe there would be a different advantage before the Muller thing, if the moment thing is not happen. But you add that on top of the the entire investigation and the report which was obviously going nowhere. You know? It was interesting. I was thinking about it. Crystal is at CNN, former Washington Post journalists in. He said oh gosh September October. I think and he said I suspect it's only going to be a report we're not going to see any any documents. There won't be any indictments related to the election or anybody in the campaign Trump himself, it's likely going to be a report, and I thought to myself I was thinking about that during the day on Monday. And I wondered how many they I know that lawmakers knew that democrat lawmakers knew that Adam Schiff knew that that it was going nowhere at there was going to be nothing. It was it was about hanging. The cloud of doubt. And all they have to do is win the mall report comes out if it doesn't work in their favor that worked to discredit this is this is how it's done, and they knew it was the only game that they had now try an ad impeachment to this. Go ahead. Start moving officially on impeachment and see where that gets you. Because it will be based on what what item with Bill Clinton was lying to a grand jury. With with this president. What would it be your version of obstruction was which isn't obstruction right or it doesn't rise to legal because Nancy Pelosi talking about the fact that? The White House negotiating with. Congress about how far will will testify. No, we'll take questions from here. But we're not going to do that. Right. That's obstruction of Justice what they're claiming. And of course, it's not that's a fight between the executive branch and the congr-, but they used the term obstruction of Justice why because they want to put that out there. They they they want that to be the narrative between now and Oliver long this goes on. I I don't really think that the Democrats want bar testified before them. No. I know it's something we talked about yesterday on the show. Because I mentioned briefly I said, you know, I suspect in part. They're okay with him not testifying that way will look again make him look hiding something and putting these ridiculous. And how do you do that? Knowing William bar. What's the sure way to get him to not testify Brenton to create these rules out of nowhere? They're not rules where you would have the staff lawyers engaging him for thirty minutes where you're going to take him behind closed doors, knowing he's gonna talk about any of the redacted portions you take them behind closed doors. So you throw on to the table. These impossible demands knowing he's not going to respond well to them. And the other thing is the staff lawyers asking questions at the public hearing. Right. Why would you do that? And we went through that yesterday. And I, you know, I've time to think about it over the last twenty four hours, and I really think that we are on a point that they really don't want bar to testify because he is an extremely strong witness. You know that that and not. And I'm not saying a strong witness in defending the president, but defending the process and the process of how the department of Justice works. So the only thing that they have the they believe has been successful with this president is putting in seeds of doubt. If the president does not cooperate everything has been put in those. Let's keep planning though seeds of doubt in the American public. Well, if the president won't tell us he must be hiding something he must be hiding, right? We have seen the goal post over the last two years consistently mo- moved. But when it comes down to even the open hearing of wanting the staff lawyers. You know, wanting the staff lawyers to you know, why why do you do that? It's the same reason that the Republicans wanted to use a staff lawyer to to question MS Ford against Cavanaugh because they don't want any politician asking a tough question were than they would be up for criticism with Christine Ford, remembering her allegations against against Cavanaugh. Right. That's why you do that. Right. You do that. Because you don't know you don't know the territory that either don't know the territory that you're going into and you don't wanna be you do not want to be construed as bashing a witness who the other side is portrayed as a victim. That you as a politician don't want to be in that cross examination role, for example with MS Ford because it could come out as a huge negative against you. That's one reason or the other reason is you believe, and I believe this is the case with bar. You have an extremely strong witness. You have no case on the other side. And none of the House Judiciary committee wants to ask the top. What they believe are the the questions that they want to act ask that will put doubt in people's mind and try to destroy bars reputation. They don't believe they think the lawyers can pull that off better than the politicians, and they don't want the politicians to be owned by barn. I think bar knows that because you can still ask any question. You can have your legal people say what question should we ask? Oh, they can prep all day, and they already do by the way. And so I believe. That that's why the Democrats are are doing. They don't believe they have a particularly strong case of substance on anything. They're only success is putting is planting the seeds of doubt. If we don't get full cooperation, they must be hiding something must be hiding something. We don't know what they're hiding, but they've got to be hiding something. That's why you have Pelosi using that term obstruction of Justice. They know there is no legal obstruction of Justice. They're smart enough to understand that. And so their whole point. Is it doesn't matter. Whether there was no wrongdoing. Trump is a mean guy who would try to hide something if he was doing something wrong. And we can't prove these doing something wrong. But we know when you know that he would still try to hide it. That's actually, I believe what they're attempting to promote because they believe that that will keep their base together. Yeah. I mean they unified right? If if they can if they can keep just throwing things at the wall doesn't matter too, right? You you put them in defensive mode, and you keep them there until election day. But I think that after the House Judiciary committee. I really do believe that afternoon. I talked about this after Ken Candice own owned. Jerrold Nadler and Ted lieu and just went right back at them that they don't believe that they have the ability to deal with the strong witness. Think about it. If you saw that she owned them. And they outright me Nadler wasn't even listening to what she was saying. It's is something. But. And how many times I mean, Adam Schiff? How many times is he been caught lying? Over and over and over again, you would you would think they would learn from it. They continue to touch the hot stove. And so that's what that's what I believe. They're trying to do just continue. And I don't believe they think it expands. The people that believe them. I think it's a way to unify the base that we that. This is the resistance, and I do believe what you saw yesterday with Nancy Pelosi saying that because of the conflict between the White House and congress over the terms of boy in bars testimony and her using the term, I'm str- the Trump obstr-, you know, demonstrates on a daily basis his excuse me here it is quote has demonstrated on a daily basis obstruction of Justice. There's no legal action of Justice here. They're trying to repeating there. Just keep repeating keep repeating that. Legally. He hasn't any obstruction of Justice, but spiritually and morally he has in you know, it we know it, and that's what keeps the resistance together the whole goal because I do think the Nancy. Pelosi probably heard it when she said no impeachment. Right. This is where we talk about who is controlling the democrat party. And what you saw either leave yesterday was Nancy Pelosi saying, okay, this this is at the minimum shout out to the AFC. You know side of the of the of the house that just wants Trump impeach peach. We don't care whether we have anything we just want him impeached. Right. We just want him out of office. And we have the ability to go to the political process of impeachment because high crimes and misdemeanors isn't specifically defined and it's a political process, and we need to put this stain on him. And we believe we put this stain on him. This will help us or may not help them. But it's not heard, but it makes no it makes them feel good. Sure. Then it's not going to damage the party for from their core base. But it could mean the difference. The presidential election. Yes, it eight six six ninety redeye..

Nancy Pelosi president President Trump congress William bar Adam Schiff House Judiciary committee White House attorney FOX house Lindsey Graham department of Justice Pat Bill Clinton Washington Post CNN Jerrold Nadler
"fox house" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

13:07 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"Curling. I'm Gary McNamara. Eight six six ninety redeye interesting turn as to where the Democrats are going breeding this here from FOX house speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters Monday night that President Trump has demonstrated on a daily basis is obstruction of Justice amid a conflict between the White House and congress over terms scheduled testimony by Torney general William bar. I do think that the fear factor inside the Democrats right down there. You know, now that the mullahs report, you know, they've they've gone through as much as they can, you know, on it, and as much political rhetoric and screaming and whining and complaining and moaning, they realized that with these four investigations going on right now, we're talking about the inspector general investigation as to the source of of of, you know, the whole Russian collusion narrative. You know, the the and the FIS warrant the attorney general William bar looking at the beginnings of this the house intelligence committee, and the criminal referrals will be going to the attorney general on it Lindsey Graham looking at it. I think they're trying to make as much noise now and Nancy using the term obstruction of Justice. It seems as if and not that they haven't used this before. But it seems to me that now the leadership realizes that impeachment might be on the table and the impeachment isn't because of any criminal activity or cri- crimes and misdemeanors. But the morality that he's not legally committing obstruction of Justice. But morally he is committing obstruction of Justice. And that is worth that is worth impeachment. I don't know I've always had doubts that the leadership wishes to go down that. Road, but they wished to lease promote the fact that the president has committed obstruction of Justice, maybe not legally but morally and that should in itself justify impeachment. Even if the leadership doesn't feel like they are going to go down that Pat because you and I talked about it in our pre show. Meaning what if they went down the impeachment path, let's say over the next six months to nine months. You wouldn't hear anything about what the Democrats were doing? It was the focus would be on that squarely, and it would be building support for the president. Because the American people have seen it, they they know full. Well, maybe there would be a different advantage before the Muller thing of the moment thing is not happen. But you add that on top of the the entire Muller investigation and report which was obviously going nowhere. You know? It was interesting. I was thinking about crystals CNN former Washington Post journalists in. He said oh gosh September October. I think and he said I suspect it's only going to be a report we're not going to see any any diamonds. There won't be any indictments related to the election or anybody in the campaign or Trump himself. It's likely going to be a report, and I thought to myself I was thinking about that during the day on Monday. And I wondered how many they I I know that lawmakers knew that democrat lawmakers knew that Adam Schiff knew that that it was going nowhere at there was going to be nothing. It was it was about hanging. The cloud of doubt. And all they have to do is win the mall report comes out if it doesn't work in their favor that worked to discredit this. This is how it's done and they knew it was the only game that they had now try and add impeachment to this. Go ahead. Start moving officially on impeachment and see where that gets you. Because it will be based on what what item with Bill Clinton was lying to a grand jury. With with this president. What would it be your version of obstruction was which isn't obstruction right or it doesn't rise to legal because Nancy Pelosi talking about the fact that? The White House negotiating with. Congress about how far will will testify noble take questions from here. But we're not going to do that. That's obstruction of Justice what they're claiming. And of course, it's not fight between the executive branch and the congr-, but they used the term obstruction of Justice. Why because they want to put that out there. They they they want that to be the narrative between now and holler long. This goes on. I I don't really think that the Democrats want bar testified before them. No. I know it's something we talked about yesterday on the show. Because I mentioned briefly I said, you know, I suspect in part. They're okay with him not testifying that way will look again make him look like hiding something and putting these ridiculous. And how do you do that? Knowing William bar. What's the sure way to get him to not testify Brenton to create these rules out of nowhere? They're not rules where you would have the staff lawyers engaging him for thirty minutes where you're going to take him behind closed doors, knowing he's not gonna talk about any of the redacted portions you take them behind closed doors. So you throw on to the table. These impossible demands knowing he's not going to respond well to them. And the other thing is the staff lawyers asking questions at the public hearing. Right. Why would you do that? And we went through that yesterday. And I, you know, I have time to think about it over the last twenty four hours, and I really think that we are on a point that they really don't want bar to testify because he is an extremely strong witness. You know that that and not and I'm not saying a strong witness in defending the president, but defending the process and the process of how the department of Justice works. So the only thing that they have that they believe has been successful with this president is putting in seeds of doubt. If the president does not cooperate everything has been put in those. Let's keep planning those seeds of doubt in the American public. Well, if the president won't tell us he must be hiding something he must behind right? You have seen the goal post over the last two years consistently mo- moved. But when it comes down to even the open hearing of wanting the staff lawyers. You know, wanting the staff lawyers to you know, why why do you do that? It's the same reason that the Republicans wanted to use a staff lawyer too. To question MS Ford against Cavanaugh because they don't want any politician asking a tough question were than they would be up for criticism with Christine Ford. Remember her allegations against against Cavanaugh? Right. That's why you do that you do that. Because you don't know you don't know the territory that you don't know the territory that you're going into and you don't wanna be concerned, you do not want to be construed as bashing a witness who the other side is portrayed as a victim. That you as a politician don't want to be in that cross examination role, for example with MS Ford because it could come out as a huge negative against you. That's one reason or the other reason is you believe, and I believe this is the case with bar. You have an extremely strong witness. You have no case on the other side. And none of the House Judiciary committee wants to ask the tough. What they believe are the the questions that they want to act ask that will put doubt in people's mind and try to destroy bars reputation. They don't believe they think the lawyers can pull that off better than the politicians, and they don't want the politicians to be owned by bar. And I think bar knows that because you can still ask any question. You can have your legal people say what question should we ask? Oh, they can prep all day. And they they already do by the way. And so I believe. That that's why the Democrats are are doing it. They don't believe they have a particularly strong case of substance on anything. They're only success is putting is planting the seeds of doubt. If we don't get full cooperation, they must be hiding something must be hiding something. We don't know what they're hiding, but they've got to be hiding something. That's why you have Pelosi using that term obstruction of Justice. They know there is no legal obstruction of Justice. They're smart enough to understand that. And so their whole point. Is it doesn't matter. Whether there was no wrongdoing. Trump is a mean guy who would try to hide something if he was doing something wrong. And we can't prove these doing something wrong. But we know when you know that he would still try to hide it. That's actually, I believe what they're attempting to promote because they believe that that will keep their base together. I mean, then unified, right? I if if they can if they can keep just throwing things at the wall doesn't matter if it's too right? You put them in defensive mode, and you keep them there until election day. But I think that after the House Judiciary committee. I really do believe that after you, and I talked about this after Ken Candice own owned. Jerrold Nadler and Ted lieu. And just went right back at them that they don't believe that they have the ability to deal with the strong witness. I think about it. If you saw that sheet own them. And they outright me Nadler wasn't even listening to what she was saying. It's eight is something but. And how many times I mean, Adam Schiff? How many times is he been caught lying? Over and over and over again, you would you would think they would learn from it. They continue to touch the hot stove. And so that's what that's what I believe. They're trying to do just continue. And I don't believe they think it expands. The people that believe them. I think it's a way to unify the base that we that. This is the resistance, and I do believe what you saw yesterday with Nancy Pelosi saying that because of the conflict between the White House and congress over the terms of William bars testimony and her using the term Unstrung, the Trump obstr-, you know, demonstrates on a daily basis his excuse me here it is quote has demonstrated on a daily basis obstruction of Justice. There's no legal structure of Justice here others, they're trying to just repeating it. There just keep repeating keep repeating that. Legally. He hasn't committed any obstruction of Justice, but spiritually and morally he has in you know, it we know it, and that's what keeps the resistance together the whole goal because I do think the Nancy. Pelosi probably heard it when she said, no one, peach mint, right? This is where we talk about who is controlling the democrat party. And what you saw I believe yesterday was Nancy Pelosi saying, okay, this this is at the minimum shout out to the AFC know side of the of the of the house that just wants Trump impeach. We don't care whether we have anything we just want him impeached. Right. We just want him out of office. And we have the ability to go to the political process of impeachment because high crimes and misdemeanors isn't specifically defined and it's a political process, and we need to put this stain on him. And we believe if we put this stain on him. This will help us or may not help them. But it's not heard, but it makes no it makes them feel good. Sure. And it's not going to damage the party for from their core base. But it could mean the difference. In a presidential. Yes. Eight six six ninety redeye. For.

Nancy Pelosi president President Trump William bar congress Adam Schiff House Judiciary committee White House FOX house FIS Gary McNamara Lindsey Graham department of Justice Pat Muller Bill Clinton Washington Post
"fox house" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

760 KFMB Radio

11:24 min | 2 years ago

"fox house" Discussed on 760 KFMB Radio

"Seven seven three eight one eight one America. I am Mark Levin. I want to thank my buddy, Ben Ferguson fulfilling, and he's terrific, isn't he? Well, just explaining what took place I got a call not this Sunday last Sunday night. That the home. My parents had was flooding because of pipe blue. So I had to call a buddy and some others to turn off the water. Then I flew down there Monday morning, and I've been doing my radio and TV shows from there. Then I needed to come back to where. Absolutely no flights on Sunday. None. That is no seats on any flights. There were no flights this morning. I had to pay some exorbitant amount to get on a flight to something to get in here. And I wanna apologize to you. But that's what took place, but I didn't wanna leave you for the entire day. There's too much going on. I am very very much committed to you. In this business. And let's jump in now. The watching the news I've been reading the news looks like CNN has an obsession. CNN is a cesspool. A frauds and phonies. I take a look at this picture of Jess Jeff Zucker who's the head of CNN. He used to work in NBC. This is one freakish. Looking dude. And he's your typical knee-jerk liberal who has control over a cable channel. And folks, you should know. It's FOX MSNBC and CNN is a distant third CNN's ratings are better than they've ever been under the Trump presidency. I should say in the past several years, but they are in the toilet. Nonetheless. It's not even an also ran its and also also ran. It's far behind I mess NBC, which is rotten enough. But at least these guys on MSNBC, they'll tell you what they are. As I keep saying about CNN. You can't tell the news from the opinion there. You can. On fox. It's getting better in that regard MSNBC it is non-existent on CNN. And I'll give you some examples. You've got a fat little slob there by the name of Brian Stelter? He's a dishonest hack I've dealt with them. He's out of control. But he does exactly what Zucker tells them the Dewey suckers lapdog. Any spends almost all of his airtime. Trashing fox. They have Allison Colorado who failed at FOX now. She's at CNN spends almost Oliver time trashing, FOX. I would mention some of the morning hosts and afternoon knows. But I don't know who the hell they are because nobody watches her. They do the same thing in the evenings. They do the same thing at prime time with Don lemon and Chris Cuomo notice you don't read stories about how Don lemon and Chris Cuomo at their primetime lineup is all the time attacking Trump all the time attacking conservatives all the time race bay. Where those stores nowhere. Nowhere. So they've gone after Hannity they've go after the executives over there. And now they're going after and I'll name the two Tucker Carlson. And judge judge Janine. Pirot? Now, what CNN did because CNN doesn't do actual investigative work. They got hand fed information for media matters against America. Media matters is believe it or not a tax exempt nonprofit, nonpartisan organization under the internal revenue code how this criminal front group gets away with this. I will never know. But they are funded by the left for the purpose of destroying non radical left media. Whether it's talk radio hosts, well, that's FOX or FOX house. This is what they do every single day. So they go back, and they get some of the audio of Carlson's interview with a with a provocative program neighboring it up several several years later, and they look at this as a massage, and it's look at this. Now, they don't have a problem with real misogynists. Real misogynous in media. Some of them have had to go away. But I'll bet there's a whole bunch though there. I'll bet they're still at CNN and MSNBC. I'll bet they're stalled the New York slimes in the Washington compost. You don't hear about CHA Charlie rose anymore. You don't hear about Matt Lauer anymore? You don't hear about the people who used to sit? In front of these cameras at CNN and MSNBC who got the hook because they were sexually harassing molesting women. What about FOX? Fox's dirty laundry is out there. What about CNN's dirty laundry? What about MSNBC NBC ABC CBS? But they're furious with Tucker Carlson why? Because he's a damn good show. And he's rating very, well and CNN is trying to knock them out. And they can't knock him out based on competition. They can't knock them out based on substance. Look, there's only so many. Patients in our mental institutions are prepared to watch CNN. And as I've said over and over again, they have a monopoly on our airports through the air. It's all CNN why? Because I have a contract with CNN. They have a contract with CNN. So Tucker is supposed to resign or what he supposed to stop speaking. What? Meanwhile over there and MSNBC they have joy Reed. Did anybody at CNN spend time on joy Reid and demand that she resigned, they have Al Sharpton over that this guy doesn't just talk the talk. He walks the talk. He's a race baiter. He's a Jew baiter. MSNBC hires him. I wonder if sucker hired him when he was working at NBC toss. Oh incestuous. Let's go back to CNN. I want you folks to Google the name Jeffrey Toobin the legal analyst over there. Pretend you're media matters. I want you to Google the name Jeffrey Toobin and see what a complete sleazeball this guys. A complete sleazeball will the news division over at CNN stop using their legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin all the news people over at CNN now resign, given Jeffrey Toobin sleazeball background. Oh, yeah. He's not the only one over there. Either. Is he John? I won't get into John right now, which John Mark I'll keep that powder. Drive for now. Right, Stelter, Stelter. Does media analysis don't, you know, Noda it does hit jobs on FOX. Then there's judge Janine a nicer lady on never meet. Now, it's not like joy Reid where post after post after post. She's attacking homosexuals, she's attacking their she's attacking that all the lips came to her defense. Of course. Of course. Gene. Perreault judge. Ginny. Is supposed to resign. What what is she posted post to get fired? This group care is behind most of this. That's to kind of watch your words here and there, but this group care is behind this. This group care a front group for HAMAs group that hates America group that pretends to be a civil rights group. NS Llamas organization that hates America. That's right. I said it. There behind this as they are behind so much. I remember when I came on radio, they're trying to take out talk radio host, they succeeded. And I drew a line said all right, boys. You interfere? With me. I'm going to sue you for everything you've got tortured interference with my contract in my business, and I will conduct discovery. And we'll forget to the bottom of this HAMAs and Saudi Arabia and everything else that backs you guys over there care. But isn't it amazing? CNN was not moved by the anti-semitism. Of Omar CNN isn't moved by the anti-semitism of tally. CNN isn't moved by the anti-semitisn of AO. See she gets your own initials. Now like LBJ and JFK AFC. They weren't moved at all. You didn't hear this day in and day out? You didn't hear demands from its phony anchors and hosts in news people that any of these people should resign. Any of them should be censured any of them should be removed from committees. Tommy Di Cammarata didn't lemon. They Cuomo it tapper it wolf Blitzer. I feel like I'm dealing with the reindeer from Christmas here, Mr. British. No, they didn't. Why is that? Why is that? Then you have this. We take euless looking liberal clown Zakar Jeffrey. Jeffrey. Jeff zucker. And he goes to this event you see? He just sat tax FOX. I know where this comes from. What they try to do is pick the news side against the opinion side, Bret Baier, Chris Wallace, Martha McCallum, they got Smith. Shep falls for it. But Chris pretty solid Brett Martha. They understand what's going on here. If you twenty four seven all news on FOX, you'd have no ratings if you had twenty four seven news on CNN, which they did once they'd have less ratings than they have now negative ratings. If you did all news all the time on MSNBC, no ratings now, right? CNN is trying to find a niche for itself. I can't be MSNBC all the liberal Marxist. Cooks are over there. Eight can't go moderate. They're afraid there won't be any viewers. So what do they do? What do they do? They go, radical Kook. I don't just mean ideologically. That's true. But they hired the dumbest most emotional allow mouse, they possibly can. And they give him programs. Like, the city of Brian Stelter? Hey, what are you guys on the news side gonna resign?.

CNN MSNBC FOX Tucker Carlson Jess Jeff Zucker Omar CNN Brian Stelter America NBC Jeffrey Toobin Chris Cuomo fox Ben Ferguson Janine joy Reid FOX house Fox