29 Burst results for "Fiso"

Covid vaccine: PM to have AstraZeneca jab as he urges public to do the same

FT Politics

08:50 min | 7 months ago

Covid vaccine: PM to have AstraZeneca jab as he urges public to do the same

"When johnson talks about the uk's world-beating response to covid nineteen vaccine pogrom passes muster. It's been an unqualified success or one of the reasons. His conservative party are so far ahead in the polls over twenty five million brits have received their job so fall but the government unexpectedly announced show fall in the number of vaccines delivered in april juice. Supply issues and the debate has a geopolitical angle. To given the you struggling with its own vaccine rollout slovan the line. The european commission president on the block might even consider export controls. All options are on the table. We are in the crisis of the century. And i'm not ruling out any anything for now because we have to make sure that europeans are vaccinated as soon as possible so sarah. Let's begin with the overall state of the uk's vaccine pogrom based on what was set out in december. It's pretty much all going to plan fairly high levels of takeover ninety four percent i believe and the government is insisting that all over fifty will have had their first job by the middle of april. So what's the problem. Well a week ago we would have said. This was indeed the most Astonishingly amyloid success and a sign of vessel. Buoyant moved around it. Was that the with some very clear briefing to a couple of the saturday newspapers suggesting that we were actually going to move to the over forty's much sooner than expected so it was a bit of a jolt to find out on wednesday that in fact. Nhs people involved in the program had been told that they must hold booking any new appointments throughout april because the been a sudden very significant reduction in the supplies available so that really has put the first serious dent in the narrative which right from december the eight. I think it was the day. That william shakespeare became one of the first two vaccine as now suddenly. The government is in the unaccustomed position of having to explain what's happening and explain why some of the public expectations that they'd raised so hard may not be met to be fair to the government. They still absolutely insisting they're on track with the two big dates that they've set for this program that all over fifty should be vaccinated by the middle of april. And all adult britons. Who wants a job will have had it at the end of july. But there's no question that it's been a difficult political management problem for them this week and very much not the position that they'd hoped to be in the club. Let's have a look at why this might be happening and seven. I spent a lot of this week speaking to people. Whitehall trying to figure out exactly what was going on behind the scenes with matt. Hancock gave us a of clarity in the house of commons and the government is pinning own production issues. The first one is this batch of one point seven million jobs that we sent back for testing and the second thing is the supply from the soham institute of india which again the governor's put down to supply issues but others are saying that actions being blocked by modi's government from shipping out to the uk. Exactly it is pretty opaque what's happening. There are two elements. Here that can hold up. Supplies one is the genuinely technical difficulties in producing a complex biological process. I mean it's not straightforward zanu vaccine and a lot of the manufacturing sites haven't made this sort of marin a vaccine before it scale factor. You could say none of them have because this is the first one. That's the fiso won. The astra zeneca at novartis vaccine is also level to a complicated process. So there are technical supply issues and then there at the political ones. You alluded to and i don't know whether the serum institute of india supply has been blocked for political reasons because india was having rather a good downturn in covert cases. But that's turning up again. Unfortunately and there are feelings. That indian government wanted to have it at home. This is so. I think if we look at the context of this a lot of it is actually not that much of a serious problem that we were crunching the numbers this week and april is a significant moment in the vaccine program for the uk. Because yes they were vaccinated all over fifty which according to people like christie chief medical officer of england which uses ninety nine percents of deaths on messages the pressure on the nhc s. But eneko you have to install the second jobs. Really the po- gum began to scale up towards the end of january and eleven week window. The nhl is set between the first and second doses. That really kicks in april and but hancock said this week that really still going to be delivering about fourteen million jobs throughout april which is low though. It's been in march but it's still a pretty high number so it's probably good to keep it in context with feels really what's gone wrong. Here is expectations that the rogue briefing about forty s really feels like delivers come off the bush tourism bush. Johnson's tried to restrain for much of twenty twenty. One yes and i think some. Nhs officials were less than delighted about that huge raising expectations last weekend. In a way. I think this was always going to be a difficult point for the program. It was absolutely predictable that at the point at which second doses to scale up there was going to be a deep in first doses. So it's perhaps unfortunate that there wasn't more subtle public preparation. You're absolutely right international standards even in april. We're still going to be doing more. Vaccinations than many of our counterparts. So it's particularly unfortunate wasn't better preparation. Because i think in the minds of a lot of britain's the will now be a sense of this program isn't doing well it's stumbled. It didn't have to be this way that it could have been very differently presented. And after all as i said the government is still on track to meet those two deadlines that it says now clive. We need to put this in the context of europe as well and we heard from s. the von d'alene at the top. That and you still really struggling with its vaccine vo loud but the most baffling things. She's seen this week. Is the story about the astra zeneca job and how effective or side effects. That may have in this concern. Over blood clots we heard from the ama from the nhra in the uk from the world health organization. All saying there are no concerns about blood. Clots and ashes annika vaccine yet at didn't stop lawson countries from halting giving out the doses. It's a very complicated picture on side effects. At least the spotlight turned away from efficacy. Before countries in continental europe were worrying that the astrazeneca vaccine wouldn't work well enough to older people. I think the efficacy questions have more or less be answered now. The spotlight is on whether they're adverse side effects and a few of those have been discovered there. These two different sorts of blood disorders do with abnormal clotting thrombosis that have been detected in people who just been vaccinated in norway in germany elsewhere on continental europe. The numbers are tiny. I would say fewer than twenty around the continent. Investigation is still continuing. There's no proven link with the vaccine. But a lot of vaccine knowledge ists the might be a link. But that is no reason to stop the vaccination program when it's saving tens of thousands of lives probably and people have said that just by halting for a few days the astrazeneca vaccination and continental europe. This week until the european medicines agency said it was okay that would have cost lives. It loves cost lives directly because people weren't getting vaccinated and it also probably unfortunately of cost lives indirectly because all the publicity about ad side effects will just undermined confidence in the vaccine

UK Government Soham Institute Of India Astra Zeneca Serum Institute Of India Eneko European Commission William Shakespeare Whitehall Johnson Modi House Of Commons Sarah Hancock Novartis NHC Bush Matt
Why will most Australians get a less effective vaccine?

Coronacast

06:13 min | 10 months ago

Why will most Australians get a less effective vaccine?

"Australia's on track to get access to or to approve two different coronavirus. Vaccines is one from fayza. Biontech and there's one from oxford strelka but the two vaccines are quite different defies. A shot has like ninety five percent efficacy based on the studies and the oxford. One has a lot less than that. But it looks like we're only gonna get enough of the fiso one to vaccinate maybe five million people it's going to be prioritized for the people who are most vulnerable kind of everyone else is gonna get the oxford one. So we've got simony questions from people and a lot of them. Cluster around the question of why most australians going to get a vaccine that looks a lot less impressive than what we know is possible when it comes to fighting corona virus country. I just wanted to chain. Just want to alter one thing that you say. Is that the head of the therapeutic goods administration before christmas indicated that in fact they were going to get data from johnson and johnson from their vaccine. So this is not one of the vaccines that the government's got an arrangement with but i think they've made a preliminary application and all the last forty eight hours. The ceo of johnson. Johnson has said that they're going to be releasing their phase three trial data in the very near future. Now this is an adenovirus vaccine which is one which called virus. If you'd like carries the corona virus spike into the cell. A bit like the astro vaccine and the chinese vaccines. But it's a one dose vaccine rather than a two doors vaccine so really interesting vaccine. It'll be really interesting to see what they come up with this. This the johnson and johnson one and we'll possibly be another option. The tj seemed to save before christmas that this was on the table for approval which is interesting even though we haven't got a business arrangement with them as far as we are led to believe. Okay so let's just recap on the data the pfizer the moderna and the astro vaccines all do the same thing. They take genetic messages into the cell and tell the cell to produce the spike protein which then goes off into the blood and the immune system responds and create an immune reaction which is then memorized for future infections the pfizer and moderna one dude by mini which package of genetic messaging and the astra. One does it with a chimpanzee virus. Adenoviruses takes into the cell and leaves the genetic message there behind to produce the spike protein. So they do the same thing but in different ways from the trials the phaser moderna vaccines have you around. About ninety five percent efficacy. Let me just explain. The word efficacy for a moment. Efficacy is a word used in trials clinical trials which shows the in the trial context in the circumstances of that trial where the included and excluded certain people and the duration of what they monitored. That's really what efficacy means. Within the context of trial they got ninety. Five percent efficacy at reducing disease. If you were infected there were not enough data from those two trials at least not yet to show whether the affected infection and transmission although with the astra trial they did actually have datta which did suggest that the astra vaccine prevents transmission. Which makes us pretty confident that the pfizer. We'll actually resist transmission tube but we have no data on that yet. So it's efficacy. It's not effectiveness in the real world so when you introduce a vaccine or a drug into the real world. The efficacy may change. It may go down. It may go up and that will be seen as we monitor it going through. Okay so what did the astro vaccine find it. Find that when you gave to standard dozes roundabout four weeks apart thereabouts. You got sixty two percent effectiveness at reducing disease all disease and much harder effectiveness reducing severe disease so all these vaccines seemed really good at preventing severe disease and death but the oxford overall sixty two percent effective. The seventy two percent comes from an average and really shouldn't be used because it's not relevant average because the smaller british trial made an error and gave a smaller dose to some people who raised under fifty five and then give a standard does later and what they got was ninety percent effectiveness in that small. Subgroup wasn't planned but they noticed there and when they put those two together. That's got seventy percents so it's not a fair comparison. Comparing standard does to standards to those standards especially younger people might be less likely to have severe disease anyway. Yes so that makes sense biologically because what's happening. Almost certainly with the astro vaccine is that the body is developing antibodies. Nobody absolutely proven. But it's actually ironically and sort of sadly developing antibodies to the chimpanzee admiral virus so the very virus that's like an uber bringing the genetic basis into the cell. The body's reacting to that so when you get the second does the second dose isn't working as well because the body's working against the actual vaccine vaccinated against the vaccine so that makes sense with the low dose because you haven't generated as many antibodies to the chimpanzee virus there for you get a really good prime with the first low does and then a good hit with a second does now there's indications that came out of the same is true of india and a sense from the ceo of astra that the results are better than you think. And the implication was that if you separate the two standard doses by three months you might get sent effectiveness now. We talked about it a little bit but that on yesterday's corona cast 'cause that's a long time between dozes and as we've seen just talking about the uk variant. We talked about the brazilian various african very very unfair to them by country. But that's the shorthand version of doing it. We're getting a quite quickly of new variants and three months between vaccines might be too long and that the virus changes between dozes and. That's the problem there.

Johnson Oxford Astra Pfizer Therapeutic Goods Administrati Moderna Severe Disease Australia Government India UK
FDA authorizes Moderna vaccine for emergency use

The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell

01:43 min | 10 months ago

FDA authorizes Moderna vaccine for emergency use

"Breaking tonight. The fda has authorized the maduna corona virus vaccine emergency use opening the door for nearly six million doses to be shipped out at the beginning of next week. But that good news comes as confusion grows about the distribution of the already approved fiso vaccine states across the country say they were informed by the trump administration that their next shipments of the pfizer vaccine will be unexpectedly cut by forty percent the new york times reports that trump officials said that they had only allocated only two million doses for next week shipment less than the two point nine million that were delivered this week. The unexpected cutbacks causing chaos in states distribution plans according to the washington post some intending to use the second shipment to begin vaccinating residents of long term care facilities. But they now face a dilemma about whether to go ahead with those plans. Finish inoculating healthcare providers official said but pfizer said. The problem is the trump administration hasn't told them where to send the vaccines. Millions of life saving doses. So where is the trump administration. This comes on the heels of a report from nbc news. Yesterday that advises the president elect joe biden warned that donald trump's team was too optimistic about that timeline to widely distribute vaccines to the general public. Surprise surprise those doses are critically important as the us continues to set records for new cases deaths and hospitalizations to build trust in the vaccine. President elect joe biden and his wife will get vaccinated on monday house speaker. Nancy pelosi and senate majority leader mitch. Mcconnell got vaccinated today as did vice president mike pence in a televised them in a televised event this morning. Donald trump was notably

Trump Administration Pfizer FDA Confusion New York Times Washington Post Nbc News Joe Biden Donald Trump President Elect Joe Biden Nancy Pelosi Mcconnell United States Mitch Senate Mike Pence
Covid-19 vaccine: First person receives Pfizer jab in UK

Monocle 24: The Briefing

10:12 min | 11 months ago

Covid-19 vaccine: First person receives Pfizer jab in UK

"Well. Biontech and pfizer's landmark coronavirus vaccine has been given to the first person in the uk as part of a mass immunization program. The uk's vaccine roll it is being watched keenly across the rest of the world has other countries begin. Prepare to vaccinate their own populations for the latest on this. Let's talk to our health and science correspondent. Dr chris smith. Chris is also consultant for all the gist at cambridge university. I good afternoon. Chris tyler so i guess So far so good at least we have. We have a soundbite already. We had at the top of the program from this ninety year old woman. Who's been there the first to be to vaccinated chris last week. We saw a little bit of Chest thumping on the part of some politicians the uk saying look. This is great The uk is steaming ahead. How eagerly he would you say not. Just the immediate neighbors across this side of the channel but around the world are going to be watching. What are they going to watching. Forty you think over the coming days and weeks as this rolls out well think it will be a confidence boost to those other countries because no one likes to be i they unless it's a shorty. A dead cert. There's always some risk with any kind of intervention. And this is no different. So having a regulator a regulator that's world renowned the jewelry the medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency. Which is the. Uk's regulator which prior to just having jurisdiction over the uk walls prior to the brexit transition kicking providing that service for the whole of europe. Now europe does that through the ama it. It gives a precedent that other countries can look to and say right. Okay one fairly ferry. Big actor has gone ahead with this nathan. It's good therefore we're happy to Gives us some confidence too. So i think that there's always that aspect to it and it's coming good for the uk in the sense that it saying here we are. We've had a pretty rough time with this. But now some some fantastic triumph of sciences kicked in and we're about to start deploying this across the country and we're gonna we're gonna protect our outpatients. We have this type of approval from a respected Player how much do agencies elsewhere of course within the eu and obviously similar bodies all over the world. how much does it short circuit For them as you said. It establishes a precedent And does that mean that you have you know days or weeks then knocked off the process. Of course he. I'm sitting here in switzerland. Obviously a lot of talk as well about of course is also on the uk as well so does it actually then really prevent And and and and you do you have a moment where you have a real series of time locked off. They'd process well. The europeans are considering this through the jurisdiction of the ems the european medicines agency but the uk is still subject to a you know and in the uk is used one particular rule which is a regulation one seven four which is a specification for in public health crisis. Or emergency you can. Emergency approved something for use in your particular jurisdiction so the nhra has used that to approve this for the uk. Any other country in europe could've done the same thing so it's quite interesting that they've actually decided to white on a broad overarching decision from the a. But it doesn't matter. Who your regulator is they have to meet the same checks and balances. Because at the end of the day they all the gateway between a manufactured product and the public who going to receive it and it's on their neck that the decision rests so then going to say a will. They did it so we'll kind of ignore with this stuff would just sign it off. They are going to apply wherever they are in the world the same rigorous checks that they would apply whether or not someone else regulated something but it does help to give them confidence and he gives them a bit more political impetus when they see that. Another major regulator has taken a product which is also going to be wheeled out in that particular country and said well you know what's good enough is enough the ganda over the past few weeks. Of course astrazeneca moderna in this case. Biontech visor they. They've all been popping up in the headlines. Chris and of course various speeds that of course these approval processes have been working at now. We have three vaccines. We're we're now told her that there might also now be a fourth which is very much in play might be getting closer to approval. How different are all of these in terms of effectiveness and and do they all function largely the same way or do you. Also because obviously many countries that are hedging their purchasing all of them. Am i going to be particularly concerned. In a couple of weeks. If if i choose to get the moderna vaccine versus the astrazeneca versus the by pfizer one. In fact i think the uk has go options in on seven different vaccines and yes. You're right three of them are nearing the finishing nine in the uk but there are many others waiting in the wings around the world. There are ten different types of vaccine the work in ten different types of ways or being generated a more than forty and now in advanced stages of clinical trials. So pretty soon. We're going to have more vaccines than we can shake a stick at up to a point. That's a good thing and it's a good thing because not vaccines are going to be suitable for all people not vaccines are going to be available to all people not vaccines are going to work in all territories and what i mean by. That is if we take the fiso vaccine as an example. This needs to be kept at minus seventy degrees until five days or so before you're going to use all nine hundred and seventy five doses that are in batch and i've just seen a letter go from medical director saying can we make sure that we we use all nine hundred seventy five days in a within the five days so that we don't waste any of this very precious vaccine. Now that's going to be no use whatsoever in some countries where they don't even have a stable. Electricity supply let alone a stable minus eighty degrees freezer. So therefore having lots of options is a powerful thing also We don't know what the long term outcomes with these vaccines against be. We know that they provide pretty high level of protection but short after the vaccination program is finished in other words in in the weeks to a month or so. The person's completed the vaccine course. They're protected with the fis vaccine to the level of about nine hundred ninety five percent. But what happens in five months. What happens in a year. we don't know. And it may well be that other products that come along are able to confer a longer term protection. They might confer a big boost if you give one of those on top of one of the other products. This is a learning process. We're going to be sort of going through this process as time goes on an. It's always good to have more options. Where this sort of things concerned. If if your project yourselves twelve months twenty four months out do you think we also end up in a place because of because of cost because of stability many other things that they're only going to be potentially to vaccines. Is that the way things often go. The other ones might be effective but they might be too expensive as you said they might be too volatile and they fall by the wayside. I so i guess what i'm getting at. Will there sort of a clear winner in all of this in terms of one of the players and obviously the concoction that that ends up within the syringe. Well it's hard to say. I mean you know it's like niels bohr. Who is the forefather of quantum mechanics. Said prediction is very difficult especially when it concerns the future. But it's it's going to be very hard to know because we don't know what the long term outcome with these agencies. They are expensive. These genetic vaccines that pfizer. Madonna offering all pricey the astra zeneca vaccine. Which is still sitting with the regulator here in the uk. At the moment that one will be much cheaper and is also much easier to deploy and store so that there are pros and cons of all these things and it may not come down to simply a case if this one does this and this one does this therefore two horse race. I think we will definitely be a market for a few of these products whether or not. That market's going to be sufficient to sustain all forty plus of the clinical trials that are going on now but but certainly while the world is rushing to get this stuff in sufficient volume. Because that's the issue at the moment the companies just can't push it out the door fast enough the moment it's any partner storm so people are desperate to access whatever vaccine they can as fast as they can and just before we go chris any sense. When you're maybe discussing with your medica- medical call leaks. What the uptake is is going to be. I was talking to a doctor at the university hospital here in zurich the other day his defense was that you know probably just within the hospital owned probably fifty percent of the staff. You know would not be interested in taking the vaccine. Is that sort of a a pretty good gauge. In terms of how the public will look at this. Or if you're not in the medical trenches all day maybe you're going to be keener to take it any any house view from your side. I'm sensing quite a degree of what we dub vaccine hesitancy based on the questions that are coming into various radio programs on participating in basic enquiries from members of the general public and if you look at the day to this come out of the pew research center in america have been running a number of population surveys in the states and originally that was very alarming showed that fifty percent of people would reject a vaccine offered one at that point in time. They recently repeated that survey found that in fact the uptake had risen to fifty from fifty to sixty percents so in other words forty percent. Turn it down. But that's still forty percent. Turn down right now in the uk. We think it's probably going to be Less than that but at the same time still a significant proportion of people are uncertain citing rapid production very rapid approval. As a reason for concern. I do think this is largely going to take care of itself though because what will happen is that because of the way in which these vaccines are being rolled out to high priority high risk groups. I with a trickle down into the younger echo lonzo society over time by the time many of the people who live in countering who is saying. I'm nervous about this. Come to be offered a vaccine. It will have actually been through a very significant proportion of other people and that may well have in still quite a bit confidence into people are safe track record by then so i think it may be one of those short term problems. The actually takes care of itself. That's what i'm hoping anyway. Chris thanks very much for that. That was monocled health and science. Dr chris smith.

UK Biontech Dr Chris Smith Chris Tyler Pfizer Europe Astrazeneca Moderna Chris Astrazeneca Cambridge University European Medicines Agency AMA Nhra
Russia touts COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. Leading scientists cite concerns.

NBC Nightly News

01:28 min | 1 year ago

Russia touts COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. Leading scientists cite concerns.

"The race for a covid vaccine. Russia claimed today that the trial of its vaccine shows highly effective. But will it ever make it out of russia. Nbc's simmons has more tonight's another promising announcement but can it be trusted. Russia naming it after the soviet era satellite implying in a promotional video. It will save the world in this laboratory especially if we verify proteins and tonight russian scientists in this lab say interim data shows ninety. Two percents effectiveness though. That's with sixteen thousand volunteers. Less than the forty. Three thousand for america's fiso vaccine. We traveled to moscow. Where the lab's director told me to doses could give two years immunity longer than two years. Russia is already vaccinating. Frontline workers like doctors is a good problem. It's a very important program important important for people and important for russia for people but leading scientists worry the preliminary results of being rushed down. Notes independently reviewed a very ordinary. The world health organization gives it a stamp of approval before they start exporting it all over the world. Unlike sizes version russia's vaccine may not need to be kept frozen aiding distribution. That is unlikely ever to be approved in the us

Russia Simmons NBC Moscow United States World Health Organization
What we still don't know about the vaccine announcement (but it's ok to be excited!)

Coronacast

05:09 min | 1 year ago

What we still don't know about the vaccine announcement (but it's ok to be excited!)

"Hello this is corona cost a daily podcast all about the coronavirus. I'm health reported. Teigen tyler an emphasis journalists dr norman swan. It's wednesday the eleventh of november. And we've had some really exciting coronavirus news in the last couple of days. Norman fiso the drug company has announced that their vaccine that producing maybe ninety percent effective in stopping the virus. Do we all just pack up corona costing go home now to. We don't need it anymore. No because has doesn't operate on press releases scientific papers that have been pure reviewed where we know what's going on you'd have to say pfizer's a bit out on. Its own here at least so far. Anyway they've announced this Interim analysis but it's not been peer reviewed and it's quite hard to work are exactly what's going on both fighters the one who hasn't actually joined the same platform of some of the other vaccine manufacturers. Who are out in trial. And they've got their data safety monitoring board which looked the analysis of this raw. The common one is what the monitoring board is being shared by. Some of the vaccine manufacturers. So it's not entirely transparent. There's also see you have to say also commercial element in this that they want to get a jump on it and the water here is that they're going to push for emergency use authorization before their presumably earlier than the other vaccines but the question is. Is it too early to know absolutely for sure that they're safe so they sort of questions to ask here are well. What does it mean. They've said nine more than ninety percent. Effective well you gotta read between the lines. Because it's not entirely clear from their release but it's been something like ninety four covid nineteen disease cases so this is not infections. Forty thousand people yep in the boats so this is these vaccines are not designed to pretend to fiction as we said many many times on corner cast they're designed to prevent covid nineteen disease which is fair enough because if you've protect against nineteen disease then all the sars cov to becomes is a bad cold. Let's assume that we talking about which is that has been ninety four cases thereabouts. I think that's what the announced and that they're more than ninety percent effective. It's should probably mean that something like eight or so of the cases of covid nineteen occurred in the placebo group and the remainder are six or seven or whatever it is six occurred in the vaccine group. But we didn't have those numbers. Stay away from visa. We don't have those numbers but you can assume then that from from that crudely of that ninety four percent ninety percent or more occurred in the placebo group and ten percent or fewer occurred in the vaccine group. That's what that means. And therefore is a significant gap between the two groups which is protection against covid nineteen disease. That's what i assume an endless things. No major safety issues. The ninety percent number A lot higher than what we've been talking about on corona causton in all of the full out around this announcement. I heard a lot of experts. Say that's amazing. That's a really big number much higher than we expected. So that's good news right. What's what's much higher than the regulators were willing to approve. Everybody was hoping it'd be much higher than fifty percent because fifty percents pretty disappointing and so this is really great news. If it's all right and you get superior review study of the data and goes on long enough to have a proper analysis and it's really good news for the other mini. Vaccines are just just to be clear. What this vaccine is and just a little bit of a revision on the vaccines the so the oxford vaccine and this vaccine and the moderna vaccine three scenes around the are the lead. They do the same thing in the end. Which is they put a genetic message into the cell to tell the cell to produce part of the spike protein of the corona virus and that goes into the bloodstream and the immune response the immune system reacts to that creating immunity. How the vaccine does it is uses a chimpanzee virus to take the genetic message into the sale and what bio and take the pfizer vaccine does and the moderna vaccine is. Is that parcells up amorini. Which is a parcel of genetic messaging and it goes straight into the salad self and tells the cell to produce the part of the spike protein. So this is a name are a vaccine and it's really good news because there's another mirani vaccine on the blocks which is the moderna vaccine which isn't too far behind the problem with these vaccines is that there are very low. Temperatures to transport around minus eighty of madeira. People say there's may not require that depth of temperature this makes it a very impractical vaccine for poor and middle income countries and also does make it a bit impractical even for countries like australia. Where you're going to have to coaching at minus eighty on the coaching standard frigid temperatures and the university of queensland vaccine for example will only require an a standard vaccine fridge province minus eighty. So they are vulnerable it. They do first mover advantage so that they can get out there because they know they're vulnerable to other vaccines. That might come along. Which don't require that cold chain infrastructure.

Teigen Tyler Dr Norman Swan Norman Fiso Pfizer Corona Visa Moderna Mirani Oxford Madeira University Of Queensland Australia
Charlie Kirk: Coronavirus stimulus

The Charlie Kirk Show

28:10 min | 1 year ago

Charlie Kirk: Coronavirus stimulus

"And you have Schumer Pelosi. In Biden one hundred twenty five years, Charlie Kirk of failure, unmitigated failure, swap failure and I. Think of my kids. You met my son. He's twenty one years old. My daughter's eighteen and I would think about your America their America and when I say you know, live free or die, American, the world on the brink I'm not joking. And very specifically will be probably the biggest choice election by far in my lifetime, and maybe since eighteen sixty, and there's a lot at stake We can go through the issues if you want, but it's. It's there's there's not one issue we agree on that. I can think of for the most part yet, and you wrote this, and it just really sent chills down my spine. You wrote this book to sound an alarm as a warning. Warning to my fellow patriots about the left's undying commitment turn America into a land, our parents, founders and framers wouldn't recognize it. It's perfectly put, and that's the direction that they're headed on page twenty seven. You have a great part about how Ben Franklin says we ever republic. If you can keep it, can you talk more about how this truly is? A referendum election in some sense and the left is trying to do to our country. Well the the story about Franklin's interesting, because it's, it's the constitutional convention and somebody says he comes out one days, says, is it a monarchy republic republic? If you can keep it Reagan, I quote him off. When I give speeches, said Freedom Charlie and you know this is but one generation away from extinction. And you know when if you want understand if socialism is adopted if their stated goal is adopted America as we know, it then becomes unrecognizable look, I can understand psychologically. There's a component of maybe people that that have been indoctrinated in schools, and you're great at this because you're going in to hostile environments every day, and you're saying you know what there's another way of thinking here, so maybe the idea that people think Charlie that some things are oh, everything's going to be free and they're gonNA forgive my loans at I'll have a guaranteed government job guaranteed government food. How did obamacare workout now? We're GONNA have Medicare for all or or double down on the stupidity of Obamacare and guaranteed retirement. Guaranteed vacation sounds great. But simple math shows you that you'll never get there. And that's why in the Fourth Chapter of the book did this whole history of socialism which is a history of failure? The point is look at the issues. If if we're talking about law and order. They've cited in Portland in Seattle and new. York and Chicago with the radicals. Joe Biden his yet that I know of said one good thing about the ninety nine percent of cops protect and serve and put their lives on the line for us every day. You're right. Okay, so law and order taxes. He's pledging to raise your taxes through the roof. That will destroy the economy Then they're gonNA just add all the bureaucracy. The Donald Trump spent almost four years. Eliminating that'll be gone. That means nobody's GONNA WANNA DO Business. That's why the Biden Obama economy was so bad. Then you look at where now energy independent for the first time in seventy five years with a number, one producer of energy in the world will lose that for sure We'll shut down coal fracking. Oil Gas exploration production those tens of millions of jobs high paying jobs career jobs for people. Then it's about amnesty. Or the United Sanctuary states of America versus Border Security and law and order of never mind foreign policy. We haven't even touched that part yet, so. There's a lot at stake. If those plans stated plans are implemented. America will go down the past you know. The Trash bin of history as Reagan, said Freedom One generation away from extinction we will. It I shudder to think what will happen the three you and your children by kids, and and maybe one day grandkids. ARE READY FOR THAT And I love the framing, because as the founder said either we're GonNa live free and defendant right now, or we're gonNA. Have a country that you know. We don't WanNa live it, and that's really the framing. That is so important right now, and you talk about and I'm really pleased about this. Shawn because I think we have forgotten about the Russia hoax too quickly in. In the conservative movement, you have been the leader on this every night. You were covering it. You didn't let us forget you help. Muller Accountable, you had investigative journalism and it just seemed that an Oxana names, but other conservatives just kind of drifted away from like Oh. That's what happened happened. You have two chapters on this in the book. Can you talk about that? Yeah I mean I call it Charlie, the the biggest corruption abuse of power scandal in history and the Ukraine was oh. Okay, we failed with Muller after three years. We won't. We won't even bother with a special prosecutor not to I'm going backwards here but to get to Ukraine. You? Know they're talking about quid pro quos, but you have to ignore their presidential candidate on video saying you're not getting a billion US tax payer dollars unless you're fire. That prosecutor is named Shokhin. WHO's investigating my son Hunter who went on a and said? Do you have any experience in oil? No Gas, no energy, nope, any experience in Ukraine. Nope, why are you being paid millions? No, because you dad, so there was a quid pro quo and millions of dollars for the Biden I call crime family. That's exactly right, so. Listen and China's even worse. You get to this whole thing what we now know and I believe what's coming. It's like, and this is where the media's corrupt because. They're just the propaganda wing of all things democratic. Socialist. We now know and have all the evidence that we'd ever need is that they protected their favorite candidate. Hillary Clinton. For things you and I and everybody you know that follows you and you have a massive audience would. Literally never get away with. If you had subpoenaed emails Charlie Kirk and you decided to delete them, and you decided to acid. Wash your hard drive with something. I had never heard about bleeped bleach bit and bust up your devices with hammers. You'd go to jail. If you violated the espionage act, you'd go to jail. They protected her. Then the narrative began we now know began in August. We know crossfire hurricane representatives actually went to brief. President Trump General Flynn. Flynn on national security, but they were there to try and get information on trump and Russia, the most amazing part of this, because the Democrats and the media live for all these years is that they knew and they said and they wrote, and they even testified. There was never any evidence, but there was a dirty Russian dossier. And now we know even the New York Times acknowledged full full of Russian disinformation and that was used. And they were warned not to use it, but high ranking people abusing their power, wanting to take out candidate, trump, transition, team, trump, and then deep into the Presidency Donald Trump. They use the dirty Russian misinformation dossier to ruin Carter pages life and roomed his civil liberties and constitutional rights, but more importantly to spy on candidate trump, and then they had their insurance policy. The fact that the mob in the media ignores it is beyond comprehension. I have so I have two chapters. One is on the Russia hoax, and the other is on this whole impeachment witch hunt. And I want everybody in your audience to understand one thing here if I can get one point across. Yeah, they hate Donald Trump, but they hate us more. They think we are as Peter. Struck, said the smell by the way I probably shop at Walmart say money. Why not you have a woman I love Walmart I love COSCO's. I Love I love it all. And I've shopped there my whole life I mean people always stopped me when I'm in a grocery? So, what are you doing here? Shopping? Wa I like to eat a cracks me up. So but think about that. smelly Walmart Shoppers while irredeemable deplorables, wow! Bitter Americans as Obama said that WANNA cling to their God. I'm guilty their Second Amendment Rights Guilty Bibles and religion I'm guilty of that, too. But. It's contempt for your audience. It's contemporary my audience. It's because they knew better. And they will ling. This was an attempted coup. Now do I think there's going to be arrests and prosecutions I? Do spend much slower than any of us would have liked, but the evidence is overwhelming. It's incontrovertible sad actually that this could happen. That was going to be my follow up. Question Sean because when I travel and we get thousands of e mails a on this topic. When are people going to go to jail? And can you give me insight on this? Can you give us any clues any crumbs that we're starting to see from Durham? It's I call them. It's funny. You say crumbs because call them the the Attorney General Bar breadcrumbs. It's like Hansel and Gretel. Remember. We're we're trying to follow and see the trail exactly yeah. He did say that the president was spied on. It did happen illegally. The. Think about this. If you go before Judge Judy I wouldn't WANNA lot because Judge Judy I. I've met her once she'll eviscerate. You I watched her show. You. Don't go before a court. The information that you have not verified. It actually said at the top of a FISO Warren Charlie. It says verified. Okay. We now know the dossier was unverifiable. The sub source we now know, said this this bar talk. We were making this up. This was never meant for anything and again Hillary paid for it funneled money separate issue. And so, what is going to happen I don't have a crystal ball but I. do know all of the facts that are in the public. Are Enough to indict many of the names that your audience is most familiar with. I would argue. Komi McCabe struck page. I'd like to know a clapper. Brennan's role in all of this ends up being and and others. The more fascinating deep question is. Will they get to that January fifth twenty seventeen meeting inside the Oval Office? This is when member Biden said George Stephanopoulos Oh I. Don't know. Anything about this, you know this whole impeachment Russia thing. He was the one same. Bring up the Logan Act fifteen days later Susan Rice in that meeting did the Cya memo the day that Donald Trump was inaugurated. Obama in that meeting shot Sally Age by saying a He. He knew everything about the Kislyak Michael Flynn call. If we look. To sum it up. I think we're GONNA get there because the evidence. Is that overwhelming? If we don't. I fear for the country? Because of you. GonNa Raid Manafort's home predawn raid and you're going to raid Roger Stone's home. For lying to Congress by the all many of the names I mentioned were referred for the same crime and you're gonNA. Pull it twenty nine guys in tactical gear, frogmen and tip off CNN cameras and. Have a biased jury for person. We won't have equal justice and equal application of our laws, and worse than that Charlie is. We lose our constitution. Yes, all our laws are are predicated on next great document and some `perfect, but it creates the path to perfection at a more perfect union so. Long answers. I'M GONNA talk. Show I love it. No, this is what our audience needs to hear, and and thank you for that and look I I completely agree because if we do not have people and I, say this as carefully as I can in handcuffs for what they did Donald Trump then I I will lose faith in the American justice system I. Don't want that and I don't want revenge I don't retribution I want people to be held accountable and I would want the same if someone did this to Barack Obama because it should never happen to a leader ever. Yes. and. They've gone after every single trump friend confidant, and yet if you oppose Donald Trump you get different treatment, talk a lot about the constitution in your book and the founding of our country, Sean going to be honest, I've been very let down by some of these supreme. Court decisions lately Can you comment on that and the importance to get more people like Kavanagh? Who's actually ruled brilliantly? Unlike John Roberts. I! I'm a little. I don't know what's happening. Roberts I have my theory I guess I have my sources people that. have their own ideas based on some knowledge? For whatever reason and I think this goes back to the obamacare decision. He has allowed. How the court appears to influence his decision making. I also sense with no evidence whatsoever. You're not a big fan of president trump, but that should not come into his thinking. Now. If getting rid of bureaucracy and lowering taxes and energy, independence, and securing our borders, and law and order are all part of this election. Let me tell you another big part of it. And it's you know we're taping this ninety. Whatever days away from the Election Day, I what about and we got asked. What about the Supreme Court? Yes, I go through a whole list I. Forget what paid maybe sixty seven I forget. A. In the book. Of. All the things Democrats would do if they're getting power one, is they? WanNa, stack the courts. Get rid of the Electoral College. And I. What, they're saying they. WanNa do is scary. They used to hide it Charlie. When I every single Liberal Democrat running for office, they would run to the left in the primary. They race back to the center, but you knew they wanted the left. There now openly embracing the most radical elements in the country and you know. Unfortunately we're watching it all. Play out nightly on TV and and that sad what I see happening when I think we have to remind a trump supporters that these are not trump appointed justices, a gorsuch I think ruled incorrectly on one ruling. That's it besides that gorsuch and cavenaugh have been tremendous and terrific verses Roberts. I just think we have to give the audience a sense. Sense of continued conviction that the trump appointed justices will continue to rule correctly and Clarence. Thomas and you know the the Thomas Family. They get no credit at all. I mean what he has done. And can you comment on that? 'cause I, E, you've actually been you open my eyes to that like eight years ago and I never learned about Clarence Thomas as a high schooler until you I mentioned it just as a quick aside on his incredible career. I like to do on TV and antidote on radio, too. Sometimes I call it the Hannity history, lesson 'cause I lived through all of this. I know this is going to see. You're not even thirty three, but my radio journey started in nineteen eighty-seven crazy right. Now on my twenty fifth year of Fox, I didn't think I last two. So I feel very blessed. As a side note if you haven't read my grandfather's son. Which is about Clarence Thomas is life. It's amazing. But. You know it's interesting because him and Scalia. To my opinion, my to most favorite justices in my lifetime. Scalia this incredible wit and genius and understanding and. They got a little acerbic side to when when he was questioning Clarence Thomas always set by quietly. What they called a high tech lynching at the time, the more modern. Let it. You gotTA. Remember Yeah. And you know. It was then Senator Ted Kennedy you know Robert Bork's America the borking of America. That was Clarence Thomas. Now we see it more recently cavenaugh. It exposes. The, who is Joe Biden? Who is his team? Because Clarence Thomas and Justice Scalia or the people we need on that court. We call them constitutionalists or originalists, the original intent, not people that would sight foreign law as liberal justices have done or not people that feel that they can rule by judicial Fiat and dictate or legislate from the bench. Democrats always wanted the court to do that which they could never. Do legislatively or win at the ballot box and that's why they want. We call them. Activists Justices Clarence Thomas. has shown a fidelity to the Constitution at the Antony Scalia. That is beyond enviable And the differences styles always interesting, too because Justice Thomas will always be quiet. That's very few questions. Anthony Scalia was in there in a wrestling with people. I don't know about John Roberts. I can't get into it, but I do believe the next president United States is a very good chance. You have a lot of older justices may want to retire. And I think that the next this election in just three short months. That's on the ballot and that's that's generational now. And Sean I think we have to pressure the Biden campaign to do what trump did and release a list of justices I mean president trump was so transparent and Joe Biden hasn't done it yet. Intentionally, of course, because he'll probably put repeated to lieber something on the United States Supreme Court I mean as horrifying as that might be so in two two quick closing question Sean and thank you for being so generous with your time anchorage, everyone you know. Know go by live, free or die. the first is this. Can you just talk about? We are heading into the election. A lot of trump supporters. They're failed. They're falling victim. They suppression pulse I wish that wasn't the case, but it seems like the memory of two thousand sixteen as faded where people forget. We were down by double digits. Can you just give a little vote of confidence to some of our listeners out there? That think we're just losing. I WANNA. Give the vote of confidence, but I want people to feel this way. I want people to think I'll use a football analogy that our mutual friend Linda that you know. Who's your biggest fan? My radio producer? He's amazing. Amazing, but she doesn't even know how many points you get a touchdown, so I'm giving these football analogies. I, want this election. I want people to feel the way I feel which is. We're on our own twenty. Two minutes to go. We have no time outs We're down by six. We got a cross. The plane marched down the field, cross the plane and hit the extra point to win. So if people feel a sense of genuine urgency and worry and concern, I'm cool with that because fear often as a great motivator, not irrational field fear, but if people do not vote, you will get the government that they're telling you. They're going to give you believe. That that is their agenda. To be a Republican and win. You GotTa always use this analogy got to run the table I gotTA. Get Florida Georgia North Carolina can't win without Ohio. No Republican's ever become president without it right? You got hold Iowa then you got pick off Pennsylvania Wisconsin hopefully Michigan maybe MINNEA- Minnesota will be play. Maybe the city of Arizona will be in play. By Joe Biden reference for those of you. That didn't get. We got a hold Arizona Gopher Nevada New Mexico. New Hampshire and Maine's second congressional district. If every single mom, this is a battle cry. You started out this interview with this. I wrote this book not because I like writing books. My last book I donated every Penny I made to charity I don't care. It's not that. This is a tipping point. Charlie this is I, don't. See if these policies are implemented how America recovers. Irreparable harm the to the rule of law to our courts to our economy, they want to wipe out the lifeblood of of the world's economy. This this promise of socialism and I go into such detail about how it's always failed. Here's a quick socialism of example. Member obamacare. Keep your doctor keep your plan. Save on average twenty five hundred dollars a year per family right? Okay. Millions lost their doctors. Millions lost their plans. We're all paying about two hundred percent more and add to that. Forty percent of Americans almost forty percent have only one obamacare Biden Carriage James Choice now. How did they do with that promise? Medicare is going broke. How did they do it? That promised social security. Charlie hate the break this here. He paying into it. You probably won't get it I. Barely Skate through, and they might give me ten cents until they means tested and then take it back, How does it? How did Liberal government work in New York City with all the anarchy cutting a billion dollars, so please? How's IT WORKING IN CHICAGO? All. These liberal cities have where the violence we've been talking about takes place. They all have one thing in common. They've been run by Liberal Democrats for decades right. Most of these states have been run into the ground by Liberal Democrats for decades. If you WANNA know what America will look like if Biden Bolshevik Bernie. Pelosi Schumer and Bozo. That team gets place look at new. York state and city look at Chicago the City Illinois. The State Look at California. Look at Oregon. Look at Portland, the city. Look at Seattle. Look at the state of Washington. Yes. And I. Love this country too much. You know it's an all hands on deck moment and Every everyone of you've got this connection with younger people in this country. You have this incredible. A credible platform you built, and it's become powerful and meaningful and transformative to the country, and you're going out there, and you're fighting on these college campuses and you. You know it's not easy to be in the middle of a I call it a shift. Show all the time, but let's well put, but you do it. And it's freedom works. Every time you give up freedom for security, you lose your freedom because the security that they're offering. These promises that can never ever be fulfilled. In America. The land. I'll close with this unless you want to go further I can keep going the. Barry Farber who was a mentor of mine. Just recently passed away like ninety ninety one. And he always said there's never been a country in the history of mankind that has accumulated more power and abused at less than the United States well I add. A country in the history of mankind that has accumulated more power abused at less, but used it to advanced human condition. The reason America is great and exceptional. If I can say that today, it's not perfect, but it's great. An exceptional is because of its people, and because of the fundamentals of liberty and freedom. So that? Natural rights versus government or rights, natural rights come from God doubt by our Creator. Life Liberty pursuit of happiness while you can't pursue happiness these days in Chicago New York Moreland Seattle. So there's a lot on the line. I love your audience. I'm so thankful for all you're doing, and you've got a great team that you building review and you're out there fighting the fight and I just urge you guys. Just fight like your country depends on it. Because America's, we know it. It's all hanging in the balance. Yet was Sean. You've been so generous the last quick thing I defend the president all the time personally as a person. Can you comment on that because I've had the opportunity to meet him? not as much as you obviously and get to know him, but a lot of people here misrepresentations in lies about who he is as a human being. Let's close on this note. Can you just mention one or two things that that people can take away from that? You know first of all. It's interesting. Nobody seems to understand Donald trump yet. They don't want to understand. I mean Donald Trump. The Dog Bites the beasts, things you feeling sad or get cancer. You Complain Trump. I mean that's how saying the leftist. But here's a guy that is so unique he this guy is like a soon nami force of energy like I've never met my life. The most distinct and unique quality he's had is as president. You mentioned the Supreme Court. He put those people that he said he put. He cut the bureaucracy as he said he'd caught, and he cut the taxes as he said he'd cut. He did the North Dakota. A keystone pipelines Anwar Likey said he would. He's building the wall or almost four hundred miles. A wall by the by election will be over four hundred miles. He found a way it was. It was an uphill climb He said he wanted to pull us out of foreign conflicts, but not back away from evil defeated. The Caliphate took out. Baghdadi and Associates took out Sola Mani took out the Al. Qaeda leader in Yemen. So? What makes him special and unique in terms of presidency is that he is who you see is who you get. The guy that's fights on twitter is the guy that's fighting for a better trade. Deal the guy that fights. Against Liberal Democrats and the media mob is the same guy is fighting to keep his promises that to me makes him the most unique transformative political figure in our lifetime. And Right now. The. We tip the scales. You have a choice. It's never been a bigger choice. He will keep his promises. Coronas been a little bit of a curve ball to the world, but even that ten days after the first case, the only guy that I know of thought about a travel ban will be donald trump. They were teaching at the time and Joe Binder Biden was call them Sinophobic, so he's a man of his word. He's a man that will fight to his last dying breath for this country and the promises he made, and that makes them in my view very transformative. Men will. The book is live for Your Die God bless you, Sean, thank you for that. You do and we really appreciate. It helps you soon. Thanks bye. What a great conversation that was! Please email me or questions freedom. Charlie Kirk Dot Com freedom at Charlie. KIRK DOT COM please type in trolley. Kirk, show your podcast provider. Hit subscribe, give us a five star reviews screen shot at an email us. If you want to win a signed copy of the Maga- doctrine, please get involved with turning-point USA at Teepee USA dot com that is Teepee USA DOT com. Check out divest you. Dot Com if you want to divest some of. Of your dollars from the sinister backwards malevolent higher education cartel check out our professor watchlist, professor watchlist, dot org professor, watchlist dot Org. We have some incredible new additions that you do not want to miss of radicals that are teaching your children right now to hate. America is professor watchlist dot org email me directly freedom at Charlie Kirk Dot Com your ideas and questions. You want me to ask our guests here on the Charlie Kirk show. Thank you guys so much for listening. So next time God bless.

Donald Trump America Joe Binder Biden President Trump Charlie Kirk Sean United States Warren Charlie Barack Obama Russia Chicago Liberal Democrats Seattle Clarence Thomas John Roberts Reagan Biden Obama Trump General Flynn Hillary Clinton York
"fiso" Discussed on C-SPAN Radio

C-SPAN Radio

03:04 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on C-SPAN Radio

"Think it's also important to note that, while we're talking extensively about the call detail record program here today section to fifteen also serves as the thirty four the FBI to gather third party business records in both counterterrorism and counterintelligence investigations of what the director of national will call traditional to fifteen authority and it's. That is was driving consideration in how congress crafted the call detail record program within section two fifteen in an effort to preserve FBI's quote unquote traditional use of that authority. I thought I'd speak for a moment about how congress responded to the Edward Snowden leaks of June twenty thirteen to provide some context for the board and the members of the public here in June twenty thirteen congress was inbetween authorizations, if he will so into twenty eleven congress had reauthorized, the USA Patriot Act in two thousand twelve congress had reauthorized what's known as the five amendments act, and that is the source of section seven two five. And typically members of congress are briefed about the classified use of those thirties in conjunction with an impending sense that in addition, inbetween, those reauthorization, we had an election. So we had new members of the house and at the time Fiso was really not at the top of the minds of congress and working with Pfizer presents a challenge for congress compared to other Saudis in that, while the act is public. It's the use of the act is largely classified. So while members are pretty to classified information as a function of their election to congress routine oversight is typically conducted by the committees of jurisdiction and their staff. And so, when the Snowden leaks occurred, a number of members were unaware of the existence of the program, either, because they were newly elected to congress. Ahead, not availed themselves the classified briefings, or frankly, had forgotten what they had learned a couple of years earlier, given the volume of information that they have to conceal, I think another challenge with the document that Edward Snowden provided to news outlets was what we refer to as a secondary order, that order is what I'm is essentially the ability to compel a provider to comply with a primary order issued by the FIS accord, if in reading the secondary order a number of people in number people in congress, and the public concluded or believed that the Pfizer court was acting as a quote unquote, rubber-stamp to the government's request because they at the time the primary order remains classified, and they were unable.

congress Edward Snowden FBI Pfizer Pfizer court director Fiso USA
"fiso" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

KTAR 92.3FM

02:55 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

"Russian disinformation, Russian disinformation and propaganda that came from inside the Kremlin. The head of the CIA. Pushed it as legit evidence. In order to get a Fiso warrant against the Trump campaign and then afterwards use that same intelligence in order to destroy the legitimacy of the twenty sixteen election. And I say and I put Brennan as part of that blame because Brennan was all over the media, the last two years accusing Trump of doing those dirty things. This was the head of the CIA, and as we said before, and I'll say it again, you want a scandal, you looking for scandal out there. I don't if this plays out the way it it's looking right now. I don't know if a bigger presidential election scandal in, in our history. I don't know if a bigger political scandal in American history. Turns out to be true, if because remember it comes down to the fact that they, they accused a president of colluding with the Russians to hack or change outcome of the election. And when you look at it from the beginning of it from the Hillary campaign, and the DNC taking the campaign money and getting the information from the Russians, which was then used by the intelligence agencies and law enforcement to spy on the opposition campaign. And then that information was used in order to try to destroy the legitimacy of the two thousand sixteen election by saying that Trump was a traitor and colluded with the Russians by there. And if you use the Democrats own definition, they did exactly what they accused Trump of doing. And they promoted it for two years. And they were the ones that did what they accused him of doing that, to me, there is no bigger scandal in American politics ever than that. I wonder because when, when we talked about Durham being assigned to this the other day we, we said, we hope it doesn't take two years. You just heard Trey Goudy set on an on a couple of items. Look very easy to find this stuff out. Yeah, you're not searching for a lot anymore. Right. And given that the I g is also looking into things. We're not there's not going to be any stalling of the Justice department. That's another point if you've got the I g looking at, if you have the if you have the a nother US attorney under the authority of the attorney general looking into it, nobody's going to hide any documents anymore. Nope. They've got to follow what you tell.

Trump CIA Brennan Fiso Trey Goudy Durham US attorney Justice department Hillary president attorney DNC two years
"fiso" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

11:28 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"Citizens. There's a document that's classified. They're try to get on classified that takes the doc- old pages of it. And it has verification to one side that really is no verification other than media reports that were generated by reporters who received the dossier. So the bottom line is the dusty has never been independently confirmed it was used to. Get a ward they knew the author of the dossier was on the Democratic Party payroll. He hated Trump. They got the warrant anyway, most Americans should be upset about that. I'm very upset about it. And we're going to get to the bottom of how nervous are you about the? I'm always interest about the I guess, but I mean, they they're coming in after the fact to look at what we did when we were trying to do it in real time and having having the pressure to try to deal with these threats as they were coming. I look I've had a great relationship with the office of the inspector general the department of Justice for literally decades now I've been investigated or the in matters that I've worked on have been investigated many times by the inspector general, it's not a pleasant process. It is not twenty five now til the top of the hour that was Lindsey Graham, and I want to give me all the documents related meeting with Christopher Steele. And now, the John Solomon story that we have been breaking now for the last week that in fact, this woman that worked at the State Department Kathleen Cava lack had met with Christopher Steele on a couple of occasions and she wrote down the Spurs. Of that meeting. And this was all sent to the FBI all sent to the department of Justice all about Christopher Steele was that he had a political agenda and a deadline, and it was still the bulk of information that was used from the Hillary Russian dossier that even the New York Times now believes could've been this information Russian disinformation from the beginning. They did it. Anyway, now that's on top of the closed door testimony of now we now know Bruce or warned everybody also in August of twenty sixteen Hillary paper, it still hated Trump is not verified and Lindsey then talking about trying to declassify document that shows the Steele dossier verification what we know it's an unverified document Castillo system by the on his own document that of course, that was the general counsel the last cut of James Baker and test. Oni? He gave you a Moi's nervous about the I report. Well, I think it should be. Now, the department of Justice inspector general is apparently homing in on the FBI use of this unverified Steele dossier as the bulk of information to us to get the FIS awards. Remember McCabe himself said no Fiso, though dossier, no FIS application and with us. Now, somebody who knows awful lot about this box those contributor, former congressman congressman from Utah. Jason shape. It's is with us. He's the author of the book, the deep state now, I know, you know, Horowitz, I know you've dealt with our wits I'm not trying to be insulting in any way. But he does take an awful lot of time considering as six hundred people working for him to get this information out. I give him credit. He's the one that found the page and struck text messages. No help from Robert Muller, by the way, who could have had it all and then clean their phones. But, you know, the inspector general, well, where do you think we are with as it relates to this investigation into FIS abuse? Well, thanks, Sean. You know, one of the reasons that takes along as they don't get the internal cooperation from the Federal Bureau of investigating. Remember Horwitz had actually go to the Pentagon to write code to actually go decipher the text messages, which now revealed literally thousands of text messages between struck and page and others. So that those types of. Rations in writing code with the Pentagon to get into the system itself is what he's up against the other thing. I would note that people forget about it. The already published I g report documents and details how F B I personnel were accepting gifts tickets meal from the media in order to get these stories out there in planted met seem to be a two way street, and I think we'll be a big part of this five abuse in that story of how these FBI'd personnel were inappropriately interacted with the media and accepting gifts. How is it? If it's an unverified. Documenta's I suggest it is because Christopher Steele. When under oath in an interrogatory in Great Britain under the threat of perjury. When he was pushed on the dossier said, I don't have any idea of any of it's true. It's it's raw intelligence. I don't know. Maybe fifty fifty. But then if you go to the new. NS memo the Grassley Graham memo, they say the bulk of the applications for the dossier. Now, we know two separate instances this State Department employee by the name of Cava lack had warned everybody after meeting which steel that he was on a political witch hunt against Donald Trump pretty much, and then the or closed door testimony, but they use it anyway. So wouldn't that be a conspiracy to commit fraud on a five court yet, the new ad on top of that Sean that John Radcliffe the congressman from Texas who is on Intel he is on the House Judiciary committee. He's one of two people that I know of that his fully read the unredacted five the applications and one of the things he said publicly is at the very top. It says there L capital verified application that is just a flat out lie from everything that we know all the documents that are starting to flow out now. And and you're right. You highlighted the fact that if there was no dot yet. There was no five. Application and so the other name that I think we should throw out there guy, Marc Elias, Marc Elias. It's in the middle this he worked for Hillary Clinton. He worked for the DNC. He's the fixer there. He's an attorney and the guy sits in the middle of all of this. And I think at the name we're going to hear more of in the future. Okay. What about other people? But you know, this is really important because a year ago may one year ago this month rod Rosenstein was on a panel. And this is what he said about a affidavit in Fiso application in a warrant. Listen, the department of Justice if we can accuse somebody wrongdoing we have to have admissible evidence credible. Witnesses to prepare to prove our case in court, and we have to fix our signature to the charging document. That's something that not everybody appreciates. There's a lot of talk about five applications and many people that I see talking about it seem not to recognize what a FIS applicant FIS applications. Has actually a warrant. Just like a search warrant in order to get five search warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears the information the affidavit is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that's the way we operate. And if it's wrong, sometimes it is if you find out anything incorrect in there that person is going to face consequences, all that person is gonna face consequences. Now, we know Komi signed one of the FIS applications the first one is that correct? And we know that Sally Yates and tape signed FIS warrants is that correct? I'm not sure of all the same itches on there. But these are some really high ranking people and the last application the third renewal. The fourth warrant was signed by rod Rosenstein himself. Was it not? Well, that's why I think Rosenstein, you know, I on the one hand I wanna Pat him on the back for a service, but on the other hand the guy had conflict, and how did he signed the document any cursory look at this? And they know that the steel dot the with somebody at the FBI have already put on a list and somebody they wouldn't do business with and yet they use this dossier. Well to me, congressman what would happen. If I committed a fraud on the court what if anybody in this audience knowingly presented information that wasn't verified. And I didn't know that until you had told me last week that the word verified is at the very top of this whole thing. Well, we would make arrangements for your wife to visit you on some Saturdays in the penitentiary, Sean, and maybe send you some ladders, but you'd be locked away. A jail, and you should be if you had done that. Okay. So we expect according to the attorney general is what we have going on the attorney general made it clear to Lindsey Graham that is looking into the investigation into Hillary, which even struck him page, you're saying was rigged, and they were part of the rigging themselves, but they're they're actually putting the blame right in the office of the attorney general under Obama, which would be Loretta Lynch. Then of course, we've got these FIS award applications than we've got other spying going on vis-a-vis, Stefan helper going after page and popadopoulos and Sam Clovis and bringing in blonde. Flirtatious bombshell spies with him is that legal to allow that to happen. And do you believe there's a possibility that our intelligence community, not the rank and file ninety nine percent? That are good. But maybe the Clapper's and the Brennan's of this world may be outsourced some work to our allies because it's illegal for them. To do it themselves to spy on Americans. I'm glad you brought that up because I really do think this story will go to Clapper and Brennan themselves. They have been so Taneja and trying to fight this back. I think they're playing defense. I think they're rejecting the fact that they potentially could have been heavily involved. And why did a lot of this happened overseas? They didn't think Hillary Clinton was going to win and be they thought they could hide it better over there. The inspector general report can only focus on department of Justice. But they've got to be working with the inspector general within the icy. It's called the intelligence community, also and cover this. And that's why you also need the cooperation of the State Department. I've met with people say everytime he may with them. They take notes. So I do believe that John relevant story to be very true. I agree. We'll take a break. More with former congressman Jason Chaffetz of Utah. Now, a Fox News contributor and Hannity Fillon. Which by the way, I hear you're doing so good. I might be out of a job by Tuesday. But you know, whatever they still have to. I think I think you're pretty say, Sean, I think you're pretty safe. All right. Stay right there. Hey, according to a recent study global Mel wear volume has risen for the third straight year. Get this it now is reached two hundred six point four million attacks in twenty eighteen alone. That is an eleven percent increase year over year and the levels of ransomware hitting the US specifically increased significantly as well hackers and now shifting their approach swift switching the scripts and those things that hide ransomware in attach PDF documents. So many ways these.

department of Justice Hillary Clinton congressman Christopher Steele Sean FBI State Department Donald Trump rod Rosenstein Lindsey Graham FIS attorney Kathleen Cava Utah fraud Democratic Party Marc Elias
"fiso" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

04:30 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"From the F B I, inter smart testimonies already indicated that she didn't know Christopher steals real name, ladies and gentlemen, for those who you in law enforcement when you use a confidential informant or an undercover they frequently have an identity in reporting. Why would that be jail if you're an undercover Joe Armacost police department, do I want your name out in in public documents trying to keep it undercover? Baby. Thank you because Joe's the undercover, and they don't want people looking them up on Facebook. That guy's a cop informants get numbers. Lisa page in a brilliant point by my guy. Didn't know Christopher Steele is identity because she only had likely his number is confidential informant number like a license plate. Some of the people in the FBI not handling Christopher Steele. Ladies and gentlemen, likely didn't know his identifiers. Therefore when the information came in from the Central Intelligence Agency from John Brennan, if they had information about collusion that I'm telling you came from Christopher Steele. There are people in the FBI who probably didn't realize that the information they got from Christopher Steele was the same information. They got from Brennan. All right. All right. Now, this these. Yeah. Rob the list techs make sense. There you go. Hey, have we checked are confidential informant list against the CIA as? No. We haven't guys we may have a problem. This information we got from steal whatever CI number nine six two seven two that we just found out as from steel because I just found out his identity is talking. We thought this information confirmed the CIA sources information it didn't know idiots. It's the same guy. He see I number six thousand four hundred twenty two with the. Who was that? It's Christopher Steele. It's the same guy. You didn't confirm anything. You just repeated the same information twice. That's what they're hiding. That's why they're saying. Oh, no, no to start with any of that started with Downer. Secondly, John Solomon's piece yesterday and other bombshell at the hill. This is important the FBI steel story falls apart false Intel media context, we're flag before the FIS is Solomon goes on and a piece even worse in October ten days before the FBI Jim Komi signs off on the first Fiso even worse, Joe they find out from the piece that Christopher Steele has been talking to this woman cavalier Liz cavalier at the State Department cavalier. She doesn't takes notes on this. We just found the notes yesterday is covering John. Solomon species talking to steal ten days before the Pfizer the same CI, the CIA and the FBI are using. Although I don't think they know it. They think it's separate sources confirming. This is crazy. At the end of the paragraph. I have up on the screen Cavaliers taking notes on what steals telling her Christopher Steele. Whose putting his information everywhere tells us woman at the State Department that the Russians are running this big collusion scheme with Trump. Through the Russian consulate in Miami. She writes kava lack in her notes. It is important to note. There is no Russian consulate Miami. Oh. Oh. A State Department bureaucrat in the snap of a Thon finger from Infinity wars figures out that there's no Russian consulate in Miami. And the FBI using CI number six seven two point five can't figure out it's the same CI the as Houston and can't figure out their CI. Christopher Steele is lying to running this operation through the Russian consulate Miami that doesn't exist. What is Jim Komi do though with steals information? He literally stamps verified on his information and walks into the Pfizer court. Now, you see what Jim commes hiding holy cow. Joe to dude is running me FBI Komi, and he can't even figure out. There's no consulate Miami. The State Department lady figured it out ten days before the Fiso..

Christopher Steele FBI Joe Armacost State Department Central Intelligence Agency Russian consulate Jim Komi Miami John Solomon John Brennan Liz cavalier Facebook Trump Jim commes Fiso Lisa Pfizer court Cavaliers Downer
Eye Opener: Trump claims victory, Dems dig in

Up First

08:19 min | 2 years ago

Eye Opener: Trump claims victory, Dems dig in

"Like behavior what to Democrats do as the president claims victory. I'm Steve Inskeep with David green. And this is up. I from NPR news. Democrats have lines of inquiry. They wanna hear from this, man. The president was frustrated and angered by his seer belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency. What questions do they have for the attorney general also protesters finally forced Sudan's president from power, but their protests have not stopped. What are they want next? Stay with us. We'll guide you through this day's news. The bottom line findings are the Muller report allowed President Trump to claim victory. He does not face criminal charges. Many details. Give critics a lot of room for questions a heavily redacted four hundred and forty eight page document was released with the president legal team describing this report as a total victory. White House counselor Kellyanne Conway claim this was quote, really the best day since he got elected. And then this very accepting apologies today to for anybody who feels the grace in offering them. Now, Democrats have a very very different take on. This report. Here is House Judiciary committee chairman Jerry Nadler, the special counsel made clear that he did not exonerate the president and the responsibility now falls to congress to hold the president accountable for his action to vastly different narrative. So what does the report actually say? And what are the implications of these findings? We have a team that's been digging through the document, including NPR Justice correspondent Carrie Johnson. Who's here either? Very good morning, Steve. So if the president is not charged. What would there be in this report to hold the president accountable forty used Jerrold Nadler's phrase? Well, there's this team the investigators actually wrote that after the thorough investigation. They conducted if they had confidence the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice, they'd say, so, but they were not able to say that there are a number of what investigators describe as disturbing incidents ten or more involving the president's attempts alleged attempts to obstruct Justice to try to jam up the special counsel probe to fire. The attorney general Jeff Sessions to fire Robert Mueller, the special counsel himself and to try to get people to change their stories before they spoke with the media or or other people including trying to dangle carrots or sticks in front of people who were thinking about cooperating with Robert Muller's. Well, I'm just thinking about one particular example of the many in this report it involves Don Mcgann was then the White House counsel. Let me if I get this wrong in any way, carry the president tells Mcgann in so many words to get rid of Robert Muller. And the reason that this act is not taken which might have been seen as catastrophic by the president's critics, and even his allies the reason this is not taken it's only because mcken refused and and threatened to resign. Instead is that correct? That's exactly right. That's just one of a number of incidents where the president directed people in the White House to do things in often, Steve they actually blew him off which turns out to be a good thing for their legal liability moving, I guess Mcgann. According to the report again as you put it blew off the president in another way because the president when this was reported when this was revealed by the New York Times that the president told Mcgann to get rid of Muller. Trump told Mcgann to deny that story and Mcgann said I'm not going to falsely deny it because it's true. Yeah. I make an told investigators apparently he felt threatened by the president that the president was trying to test his metal now attorney general bar is going to face some questions after having been the man who redacted this reporter oversaw. Aw, the redaction I should say. And who then described it in a press conference yesterday? The attorney general set to testify on may first and may second in front of the Senate and the house he's gonna have a harder time in house, which is controlled by Democrats, many of whom have already described a crisis of confidence at the Justice department. They say because the way that bar has handled. This report they think he's played down the findings and basically protected President Trump at the expense of this investigation. Are there also internal investigations within the department of Justice? There are Steve the Justice department is investigating. The inspector general is investigating the launch of this investigation. The Fiso warrants in the first place as well as twelve ongoing investigations, we don't know anything about the special counsel has referred to other US attorney's offices. Everyone's talking about the Faisal warrants. I guess we should be clear on that part. This refers to I guess, we could say the Republican narrative of the Republican view of this investigation. Which is that it never made any sense. It never had a good basis, and they are questioning why. Some of the surveillance warrants were approved in the key in this investigation. Yes, the inspector general is investigating the investigators both in the US and some of the sources they were on overseas. Carry thanks for your reporting on this occasion, and many others over the past couple of years. My pleasure. Okay. So how's this report being viewed among members of congress, and what further lines of inquiry if any Democrats intend to pursue NPR's? Tim Mack has been taking a look at this. Tim, thanks for being here. Thanks for having me. Okay. Democrats have been focused on the question of obstruction of Justice by the president William bar didn't think that the evidence reached that level and Muller himself did not make that conclusion. Even though he didn't clear the president. What does that mean for Democrats will it likely means that in the house of representatives impeachment is off the table, the chair the house intelligence committee? Adam Schiff told NPR's all things considered this yesterday. The evidence would have to be graphic and spark a bipartisan consensus that it warrants the president's removal, given the fact that the public is a congressman on willing to stand up this president in any respect it's hard to see that changing here. But Democrats did signal that they intend to continue their aggressive investigations of the president's finances. His administration and the various episodes revealed by the Muller. Port and they're going to be keeping their demand that the full unredacted version of that Muller report is released ten when I was reading the report you get to the black sections, and there's usually a little tag an explanation for why something has taken out. It's either part of an ongoing matter or it grand jury material, which is supposed to be kept secret in virtually all cases, how likely is it. The Democrats are going to be getting those blackened areas removed. Well, a small group of house members, particularly those related to a DOJ oversight are gonna be able to see a less redacted version of the Miller report. But it's hard to say when the public would be able to see if ever it's going to be a long drawn out legal fight for a fuller version of that Muller report. Okay. Let me ask about what happens in congress over the next year and a half. I know the presidential campaign is well underway. But you know, there's congress and there are problems in the country and the president in his state of the union speech, essentially gave lawmakers choice as the president sought. You're either. Have warned investigation or peace, and and legislation is there any inclination in congress to actually legislate, what Republicans are echoing the president's line. They're saying, no collusion. Nope. -struction? They think all of these investigations are baseless Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell yesterday focused on what he views as Democrats is latest line of attack. That's on attorney general Bill bar Atrush. Bill bar other issue rather laughable, shade turn their guns on him. But that that's all they're left with frankly is to go after him Democrats say that they're doing oversight on a number of important issues. The characterize that there are a lot of troubling developments in the Trump administration and in the world of Trump's finances. They say it's a fundamental part of their responsibilities as a check on the executive branch, and they won't be stopping their investigations. Now, just because the mall report in that investigation is over Tim. Thanks so much. Thanks a lot. Okay. Those were key things you need to know. From the redacted Muller report. But of course, there is much more that we learned in those four hundred pages if you scroll back through your up, I feed you're gonna find that the NPR politics podcast published a special episode. We dropped just for you, deep diving on everything we learned.

President Trump Robert Muller Steve Inskeep Attorney NPR Special Counsel Congress Don Mcgann White House Justice Department Tim Mack Department Of Justice Senate Jerrold Nadler House Judiciary Committee Donald Trump Kellyanne Conway
"fiso" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

12:54 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on KTOK

"On eight hundred nine four one Sean you want to be a part of the program twenty five now til the top of the hour. Where do we go from here, and who will be held accountable? And how will we do it? That's the question we're asking. Now, you know, I talked a lot yesterday. You know, a lot of people a lot of collateral damage in this two year, you know, witch hunt. You know, going into however, many witnesses we told you yesterday. I mean, five hundred interviews and interrogations. You know, all the people that brought in for interviews. You don't go into an interview with a special counsel without a lawyer. And maybe you're not paid a whole lot of money like you would make in the private sector. And you think these Washington DC lawyers any one of them that are worth worth your time. They're all expensive thousand dollars an hour is not unheard of for a lawyer in DC and the amount of prep time that goes into every one of those sessions, nobody seems to care about that aspect of this is Congress's recklessly proposing that well, let's bring everybody back again. We'll do it until we get the answer we want even though the FBI concluded no collusion after their nine month investigation before Muller, and that we had a bipartisan Senate committee Intel committee. They concluded no evidence of Russia collusion and the house Intel committee concluding no evidence of Russia collusion. The only one that seems to think that it might be hiding out there still is the cowardly shift himself. Adam Schiff was the biggest liar in congress. As I told you he is and I was not wrong about him. And I will continue to invite him to show up here. And defend what is indefensible at this point? You know in the past very significant evidence of collusion. How do you square that with Robert Muller's decision? Not to indict anyone, and there is significant evidence of collusion. And we've set that out time and time again from the secret meetings and Trump Tower to the conversations between Flynn, the Russian ambassador to the providing a polling data to someone linked to rush intelligence and stones conversation with WikiLeaks. And the are you through? No, that's true. And as I pointed out on your show many times, there's a difference between compelling evidence of collusion. And whether the special counsel concludes that he can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the criminal charge of conspiracy. And as I've said before George I leave that decision to Bob Muller, and I have full confidence in him. And I think frankly, the country owes Bob Muller data gratitude for conducting investigation as professionally as he has. So I have trust in his prosecutorial judgement. But that doesn't mean, of course, that there isn't compelling and incriminating evidence that should be shared with the American people. You say you're gonna take it as far as necessarily that means subpoena. I sue. It means make the request. If the request is denied subpoena. If they subpoenas are denied, we will help people before the congress, and yes, we will prosecute in court as necessary to get this information. And I'll say this. I think that meal Caccio. Pronunciation is quite correct. We will win that litigation. We'll be well because how do you make the cases the Justice department that after providing eight hundred and eighty thousand pages of discovering to a Republican congressman answer to subpoenas that somehow you're precluded from providing that information to congress in the Trump investigation when likewise in the Clinton investigation there were no indictments for rod Rosenstein, or others to say, it's our policy not to share information with those not indicted. They should explain that to Bruce or Andrew McCabe or Peter Struck or Lisa page or countless others Hillary Clinton for whom they provided hundreds of thousands of pages of information to congress much of it made public. So I would hate to defend that double standard and court. And if they try to not only lose, but they will damage any reputation for impartiality each other San Francisco Chronicle on Friday, if there's no bomb show. There's no impeachment. There's no new indictments qualifies. No bombshell. Not necessarily because again, George as you pointed out, they can't indict the president that's their policy and therefore there could be overwhelming evidence on the obstruction issue. And I don't know that that's the case. But if there were overwhelming evidence of criminality on the president's part, then congress would need to consider that remedy if indictments has foreclosed, so it's really too early to make those judgments, but then you have the George popadopoulos is of the world. I been all around the campaign in two thousand sixteen his name pops up on my who George who. I thought I knew most of the people in the campaign is I interviewed the president went on the road with every candidate including the president. And here we are. Somebody that really was damaged in all of this in ways that should make every American fear this ever happening again when your constitutional rights, you're constitutionally protected rights are trampled upon by people that have the authority and the tools of intelligence to go after you for no other reason, except they don't like who you are supporting for president. And then go to a Pfizer court judge with information that we now know the FBI the DOJ and even Andrew Weisman had in August, the twenty sixteen just looking at the testimony of Bruce or in August, the two thousand sixteen well, then a few months later in October two thousand sixteen well, you use what Bruce source said was Hillary Clinton's bought and paid for Russian lies with funneled. Money through a op research firm to a foreign agent full of Russian lies. We now know that was put together by somebody that doesn't even stand by his own dirty Russian dossier. But that became the bulk of the application before Fiso warrants against Carter page. That's four means. They listen to his phone calls. They spy on his emails. Text messages. There's no there's no freedom. There's no privacy. Whatever happened a fourth amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure. They admitted to the fisa court that Hillary they never bothered to tell the judges in their application Hillary paid for that dirty dossier. They never were able to verify or corroborate it because now we know that the author of the dossier. Christopher Steele is no idea of any of it's true. But it was true enough salacious enough. The use it to bludgeon Trump because once you got Carter page, and you got the FIS warned against Carter page, you add a back door into all things Trump campaign. This is in the lead up to a presidential election. So you're using the other candidates bought and paid for of all things. Russian lies to spy on the entire Trump campaign on top of putting spies in the Trump campaign. But the one caught in the middle of it was Carter page and Carter page joins us now is a from the very beginning has been a target of this whole witch hunt has gone on now for years of his life. You now has a number of lawsuits, pending a member infamously Ray Donovan says after a long investigation where where do I go now to get my good name back. How are you feeling about the developments the last two days, Sean, I think Sunday, basically confirmed everything you've been saying for the last several years, really what the DNC and their operatives. Incited was nothing short of a witch hunt. And I think you know, we were always wondering watching what's it gonna be like when we finally moved to the next step. And I think what we saw in terms of the way that attorney general bar handled. It shows that this this ship of Justice is starting to get put on the right course. So to me that is the most important and encouraging sign. I mean, we knew the truth was the fact that they're moving towards the truth now is just really encouraging. I think as you've been saying there's some major steps ahead. Well, I need for you. I know. You've got a series of lawsuits that some of which have been made public. I guess others are going to be made public. But you know, at some point, you know, I've asked you many many times because you've traveled the world you did live in Russia for a long period of time. And I kinda got the impression you never confirmed or denied to me whether or not you actually work for the intelligence community in some capacity, but I do know that every time you came back from a foreign hostile country or a hostile regime like Russia with a hostile actor like Putin. And we all knew that he would do this. I mean, Devon Nunez worn the world in two thousand fourteen he tried to mess with the two thousand sixteen elections. That's what they do. That's what they've always done. It shouldn't have been a surprise. And but you would sit down with our Intel community, and they would debrief you, and you were friends with these people is that correct? I was always I've always served my country ever. Since my time in the navy. This is just been a constant, you know, do the best that I can. And if I'm asked for my service, I will always be willing to help the only, but the only difference is all those things you're referring to in terms of interference in the election. And I think you know, you say that that's been consistent for a long time. You're absolutely right. I think what is inconsistent is exactly what you've been highlighting Sean with the interference by the Democrats and their collusion with those same types of people. So they're the they're the epicenter of this whole. You would never give me a straight answer. If you were ever a member of because it's interesting. They got the four five FIS applications approved to spy on you. You'll only called in to talk to Muller once and it wasn't a particularly long period of time. Was it? It was a full day. And it was but it was a year and a half ago back in November twenty seven minutes. They never wanted it indict you at any point you would never even speculated about it was like you just lost in the shuffle here. But you were the means by which they got to the Trump campaign, and they were using you the entire time. Yeah. I think I think that's a fair characterization and. There's definitely some major steps in the taken to start heading towards Justice. So what what are the steps because that is now what I have begun today. What I will begin tonight on television. What are the steps that you think need to be taken? So that this never happens. Again. I don't think people understand it. We were perilously close to a real real tragedy in terms of our constitutional Republic. I mean, this was an attempted coup is I it was an attempt to rake a presidential election starting with exonerating somebody that should have been indicted by any objective measure, but being the favored candidate that should win one hundred million two zero going against the candidate who had smelly WalMart shoppers as voters. We know where they stood you know, and you know, what do you think are the steps necessary number one? I don't think the tools of intelligence could ever ever be. Turned on the American people like this, again, your constitutional rights were shredded in this process. Yeah. Well, Sean like you've been talking about there. It's absolutely essential to basically, do you know, you've provided a platform in terms of showing those next steps. And I think what what we heard from chairman Graham yesterday we heard from. Yeah. Congressman meadows congressman Jordan Rudy Giuliani. I think it's amazing the level of commitment to restoring our constitutional Republic and the rule of law in this country..

Congress Sean Hillary Clinton Russia president Carter George popadopoulos Bob Muller special counsel FBI Robert Muller Bruce source Trump Tower Washington San Francisco Chronicle Adam Schiff DC Trump
"fiso" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

10:37 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on KTOK

"Listen to this show one time and you're hannitized. Sean Hannity is back on the radio. I think this meeting and the revelations about it are a game changer in the investigation because they present the first evidence of actual collusion. What Mr. Trump did yesterday was to betray the women and men of the FBI, the CIA NSA and others and to betray the American public. And that's why I use the term that this is nothing short of direct collusion. Collusion's been established. It's out in the open. Right. We know this all took place in the whole notion there being no collusion. This is the biggest diversion of Trump crowd. There was collusion. So this picture that the president is so desperate to avoid this picture of collusion begins to fill. You know? That's interesting here is it's both on one hand very damning because it's collusion. They're in exclusion collision is obvious. A criminal conspiracy is collusion in implant sites. There were the back and forth between various individuals who are fully with the Trump campaign and Russian individuals that collusion, I think is quite obvious. An apparent political hurricane is out there and see for him. We'll call it. Hurricane bladder. Murphy will hold Russian thing. This is evidence of willingness to commit collusion. All right. Twenty five now til the top of the hour. Yes. I the thing is is we can run an overtime. We'll run ours. As of this type of coverage guilt by accusation. No due process. No presumption. The presumption of innocence. It's all part of where do we go from here holding a media that is corrupt abusively biased that have betrayed the American people on a level that we've never seen and even more importantly, a powerful figures in the intelligence community, the Justice department, high ranking upper-echelon FBI, not rank and file the efforts that they were all engaged. We we do know they never cared that Bernie had the primary rigged we now know that the criminal investigation into Hillary Rodham Clinton, as I went through in great detail with the help of our friend. Greg Jarrett all of the crimes that now need to finally be investigated properly and trust me, nobody in this audience, whatever get away with the leading thirty three thousand emails cleaning, your hard drive beating up your devices. It wouldn't happen you'd be indicted, and you probably found guilty. We have the Fiso warrant application that we now know was unverified able presented as the bulk of information in the FIS applications on four separate occasions and all of those that signed off on it, including Jim Komi in October two thousand sixteen and that yet in January twenty seventeen went to Trump Tower and said, and it's not verified and salacious. Well, that's not what they were telling the Pfizer court judges as they committed fraud by omission, not telling the court that Hillary had paid for it and selectively putting in those things and only those things that would seem damning to any objective judge. But not telling the judge that they couldn't and didn't verify the information and the dossier. No judge would have. Well, I'll use Andrew McCabe words. No dossier. No fiso. Warrant his words. Not mine. I've been going through a list of people on this program. We don't do the show in a vacuum every day. And you know, obviously everybody on the Hannity team. Here has been amazing. They of helped every step of the way in the research that we need every day to for two years telling you a very different story, and we have emerged with conclusive and incontrovertible evidence. But then it's John Solomon and Byron York can look at Greg Jarrett bestselling book the Russia hoax, the illicit scheme to clear, Hillary Clinton and framed Donald Trump is a reason it went number one, Sarah Carter, David shown J secular Rudy Giuliani. Kim strassel of the journal Sydney Powell Andy McCarthy. Victor Davis Hanson, Dan, Bongino, Dc McAllister rush. Mark Levin, Mollie Hemingway. Monica, Crowley meadows. Jordan, Jeff, Lord, Keri Pickett. Luke rosiak. Peter Sweitzer and Lindsey Graham. I mean, he did a good job as well. And will now take this to the next step in the Senate. The big question is where do we go from here and the author of that number one bestseller the Russia hoax? Gregg Jarrett is with us. Also, David shown has been incredibly insightful, and brilliant and sends incredibly insightful notes behind the scenes that helped daily criminal defense. Civil liberties attorney thank you both for being with us. You know, I I said on the air guys. I know everyone wanted me to spike the football yesterday. I don't feel like spiking the football. Because I think we came very very close. And if we don't fix it. We will be there and that is to an attempted coup knee, undoing of a duly elected president Greg Jarrett and literally fixing going election. You know, it's gonna take a long time for credibility and integrity. Not just in our institutions that we used to revere like the department of. Justice in the FBI. But in the media at large. These I have never in my lifetime. Sixty three years old. I have never seen such agree. Gis media malpractice, as we're seeing in the age of Trump, the media suspended any sense or semblance of fairness the abandoned objectivity they became advocates of hate against Trump. And in the process, they utterly squandered their credibility, which is by the way, they're only currency in. It is no wonder the poll after poll shows that Americans do not trust or believe just about anything. The media says I look we're gonna hold them. We actually for fun. We, you know with Sweet Sixteen time, but we put our brackets and the New York Post had brackets about the most corrupt media personalities that said the most outrageous thing, but it was like a case of group think David, and you know, here we wore we really. We did have evidence that in fact, they rigged an investigation to keep alive the candidate of their choosing. When any other American would go to jail that's a dual system of Justice. That is not equal Justice under the law that does not equal application of our laws. We now need to start there. And we need to go after all of those people that help rig that investigation and came to an exoneration before the investigation began then Pfizer. And then the lies that have been told repeatedly and the attempt to use a phony Clinton bought and paid for Russian dossier put together by a foreign agent that she paid for then used to remove a sitting president and put the country through two years of hell and division in the process. David. Yeah. Listen, you said it before you decided not despite the football. It's exactly right. Somebody wanted really to be right in this case in a sense. But throw the kudos you gave everyone else you deserve it number one. And this is not an advertising. I'm gonna say this to everybody listening to those should be listening, and you have fourteen fifteen million listeners every day, you should have one hundred and fourteen or fifteen million listeners, you've told the truth, and nobody else was willing to tell all through this period. You provide the forum for everyone to put in their facts if they knew a part of this team. And so on Linda provided the forum that deserves the credible credit and everyone in this country should be thankful because you've exposed something. Terrible us where we go from here. Greg going to have to write the sequel because Greg predicted in his book exactly why there could not have been wasn't obstruction of Justice. And we expose so many of these things that are bad. We the is still be written. I'm sorry to tell you Mr. Hannity, your work is just beginning once again because there's so much still to be uncovered. You started uncovered and you will now completely uncover and expose all of these things. We don't know where it's gonna go with Hillary Clinton. And all of these people who are behind this sister Brennan now, I mean, what can you imagine? And I must I must have had bad information. These still has a job as far as I know today at whatever I guess conspiracy. TV MSNBC unbelievable. I'm really unbelievable. And it's completely unamerican. What's happened here? And as far as whether we've learned a lesson he accused the president unequivocally of treason, president was accused of treason numerous times by these people. Using the information of his former office is the head of intelligence heard up for a person to get involved with politics or political agenda like that. But listen you ask, you know, we're we're going look at what Nadler has done Buca. What these folks are saying you're trying to pick on any word to open it up. You wanna talk about impeachment? When Muller found clearly no collusion based on a team that wanted to find collusion. No matter what. But instead has picked two people in berry. Norm is in as his so called investigators forty determined road one hundred sixty eight page article the President Trump is guilty of obstruction of Justice. That's not an investigation, and when they pick people like motor pick for his team, they diminish our system of Justice in the world is we're supposed to the leader of government of men are government of laws and not of men and women this diminishes that principle. We're a beacon of light around the world, they're gonna tear that Sunder if they keep on his political agenda to stymie, the president, no matter what when it comes to policy by attacking attacking attacking. All right. Quick break. We'll come back. We'll continue with Gregg Jarrett, David shown on the other side. All right. Have you ever wished you knew more about how politics in our constitution work? Wow. They're not teaching it in school in government schools, for example. Can you explain the differences between capitalism and socialism big debate in the country right now, if you wish you knew more about American history. Well, I have some good news. It's never ever too late. To learn. We should all be lifelong learners, no.

president Donald Trump Hillary Rodham Clinton Greg Jarrett David Sean Hannity FBI Gregg Jarrett football Russia Trump Tower Hurricane Justice department Fiso New York Post CIA MSNBC Victor Davis Hanson fraud
"fiso" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

Newsradio 970 WFLA

09:43 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

"Unknown. Exclusion implant sites there were the back and forth between various individuals who are -ffiliated with the Trump campaign and Russian individuals that collusion, I think is quite obvious. An apparent political hurricane is out there and see for him. We'll call it. Hurricane bladder. Murphy will the whole thing. This is evidence of willingness to commit collusion. All right. Twenty five now til the top of the hour. Yes. I the thing is is we can run an overtime. We'll run ours. As of this type of coverage guilt by accusation. No due process. No, presumption presumption of innocence. It's all part of where do we go from here holding a media that is corrupt abusively biased that have betrayed the American people on a level that we've never seen and even more importantly, a powerful figures in the intelligence community, the Justice department, high ranking upper-echelon FBI, not rank and file the efforts that they were all engaged. And we we do know they never cared that Bernie had the primary rigged, we now know that the criminal investigation into Hillary Rodham Clinton, as I went through in great detail with the help of our friend. Greg Jarrett all of the crimes that now need to finally be investigated properly. And I trust me nobody in this audience, whatever get away with the leading thirty three thousand emails cleaning, your hard drive beating up your devices. It wouldn't happen you'd be indicted, and you probably found guilty. We have the Fiso warrant application that we now know was unverified presented as the bulk of information in the FIS applications on four separate occasions and all of those that signed off on it, including Jim Komi in October two thousand sixteen and that yet in January twenty seventeen went to Trump Tower and said, it's not verified, and it's salacious. Well. That's not what they were telling the FIS court judges as they committed. Fraud by omission, not telling the court that Hillary had paid for it. And selectively putting in those things and only those things that would seem damning to any objective judge. But not telling the judge that they couldn't and didn't verify the information and the dossier. No judge would have I'll use Andrew McCabe words. No dossier. No Fiso warrant his words. Not mine. I've been going through a list of people on this program. You know, we don't do the show in a vacuum every day. And you know, obviously everybody on the Hannity team. Here has been amazing. They of helped every step of the way in the research that we need every day to for two years telling you a very different story, and we have emerged with conclusive and incontrovertible evidence. But then it's John Solomon and Byron York and look at Greg Jarrett best selling book the Russia. Hoax the illicit scheme to clear, Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump. You know is a reason it went number one, Sarah Carter David shown Jay secular Rudy Giuliani. Kim strassel of the journal Sydney Powell Andy McCarthy. Victor Davis Hanson, Dan, Bongino, Dc McAllister rush. Mark Levin, Mollie Hemingway. Monica, Crowley, meadows, Jordan, Jeff, Lord, Keri. Pickett Luke Rosiak, Peter Sweitzer and Lindsey Graham. I mean, he did a good job as well. And will now take this to the next step in the Senate. The big question is where do we go from here and the author of that number one bestseller the Russia hoax? Gregg Jarrett is with us. Also, David shown has been incredibly insightful, and brilliant and sends incredibly insightful notes behind the scenes that helped daily criminal defense. Civil liberties attorney thank you both for being with us. You know, I said on the air guys. I everyone wanted me to spy. The football yesterday. I don't feel like spiking the football. Because I think we came very very close. And if we don't fix it. We will be there, and that is to an attempted coup undoing of a duly elected president Greg Jarrett and literally fixing going election. You know, it's gonna take a long time for credibility and integrity. Not just in our institutions that we used to revere like the department of Justice in the FBI, but in the media at large. These I have never in my lifetime. I'm sixty three years old. I have never seen such agree. Gis media malpractice, as we're seeing in the age of Trump, the media suspended any sense or semblance of fairness the abandoned objectivity they became advocates who've hate against Trump. And in the process, they utterly squandered their credibility, which is by the way, they're only currency in. It is no wonder that poll after poll shows that Americans do not trust or believe just about anything. The media says I look we're gonna hold them. We actually from fun. We, you know with Sweet Sixteen time, but we put our brackets than the New York Post had brackets about the most corrupt, you know, media personalities that said the most outrageous thing, but it was like a case of group think David, and, you know, here we wore we really. Did have evidence that in fact, they rigged an investigation to keep alive the candidate of their choosing. When any other American would go to jail that's a dual system of Justice. That is not equal Justice under the law that does not equal application of our laws. We now need to start there. And we need to go after all of those people that help rig that investigation and came to an exoneration before the investigation began then Pfizer. And then the lies that have been told repeatedly and the attempt to use a phony Clinton bought and paid for Russian dossier put together by a foreign agent that she paid for then used to remove a sitting president and put the country through two years of hell and division in the process. David. Yeah. Listen, you know, you said it before you decided not to spike the football. That's exactly right. Somebody wanted really to be right in this case in the sense, but fro the kudos. She gave everyone else you deserve it number one. And this is not advertised. I'm going to say this to everybody listening to those who should be listening. If you have fourteen fifteen million listeners every day, you should have one hundred and fourteen or fifteen million listeners, you've told the truth. And nobody else was willing to tell all through this period. You provided the forum for everyone to put in their facts if they a part of this team. And so on Linda provided the forum that deserves credible credit everyone in this country should be thankful because you've exposed something. Terrible. Where we go from here. Greg's going to have to write the sequel because Greg predicted in his book exactly why there could not have been wasn't obstruction of Justice Henry exposed so many of these things that are bad. We it's the story is still be written. I'm sorry to tell you Mr. Hannity, your work is just beginning once again because there's so much still to be uncovered the you started uncover, and you will now completely uncover and expose all of these things. We don't know where it's gonna go with Hillary Clinton and all of these people who are behind fister Brennan. Now. I mean, what can you imagine? And I must I must have had bad information. These still has a job as far as I know. Today at whatever I guess conspiracy. TV MSNBC unbelievable. I'm really unbelievable. And it's completely unamerican. What's happened here? And as far as whether we've learned a lesson he accused the president unequivocally of treason, president was accused of treason numerous times by these people using the promoter of his former office is the head of intelligence heard up for a person, it's get involved with politics or political agenda like that. But listen you ask, you know, we're we're doing look what Nadler has done. These folks are saying they're trying to pick up any word to open it up. You wanna talk about impeachment where Muller found clearly no collusion based on a team that wanted to find collusion. No matter what. But instead Nazar has picked two people in berry Burke is in as his so called investigators or already determined road one hundred and sixty eight page article that President Trump is guilty of obstruction of Justice. That's not investigation. And when they. They pick people like Muller pick for his team. They diminish our system of Justice in the world is we're supposed to the leader of government of men are government of laws and not of men and women this diminishes that principle. We're a beacon of light around the world, they're gonna tear that asunder if they keep on his political agenda to stymie, the president, no matter what when it comes to policy by attacking attacking attacking. All right. Quick break. We'll come back. We'll continue with Gregg Jarrett, David shown on the other side. All right. Have you ever wished you knew more about how politics in our constitution work? Wow. They're not teaching it in school in government schools, for example. Can you explain the differences between capitalism and socialism big debate in the country right now, if you wish you knew more about American history. Well, I have some good news. It's never ever too late to learn. We should all be lifelong learners, no.

Hillary Rodham Clinton Greg Jarrett president Sarah Carter David Donald Trump Gregg Jarrett football Mr. Hannity FBI Hurricane Russia Trump Tower Justice department Murphy department of Justice Fiso New York Post Victor Davis Hanson MSNBC
Trump on Russia probe: "We can never let this happen to another president again"

Rick Hamada

01:17 min | 2 years ago

Trump on Russia probe: "We can never let this happen to another president again"

"Fox News after the special counsel's conclusion of no collusion. President Trump hoping for a closer look at how the Russia probe started. I will tell you. I love this country. I love this country as much as I can love anything my family my country my God. But would they did it was a false narrative? Who's Kate was a terrible thing. One. Prominent Senate Republican is pledging to dig deeper as Democrats questioned the attorney general's decision to clear the president of obstruction allegations. Fox's Jared Halpern live on Capitol Hill. Democrats said they want to see the full report authored by special counsel. Robert muller. Not just a four page summary by attorney general William bar in Senate Judiciary committee, chairman Republican Lindsey Graham says there are still unanswered questions about the Russia investigation going forward. Hopefully in a bipartisan fashion will begin unpack the other side of the story for grand. That means a review of the approval of a Fiso born and the use of a controversial dossier from former British spy Lisa Jared. President Trump says it wouldn't bother him at all for the full Muller report to be released and the head of Hillary Clinton's two thousand sixteen presidential campaign. John Podesta says the biggest lesson from the Muller probe is about character questioning how the no collusion

President Trump Robert Muller Special Counsel Russia Fox News Lisa Jared Senate Judiciary Committee Attorney Senate Jared Halpern Fiso Hillary Clinton Kate Lindsey Graham John Podesta FOX William Bar
"fiso" Discussed on 710 WOR

710 WOR

03:16 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on 710 WOR

"Clinton ever a target or subject during an investigation. Sure. She was a subject of the investigation, not a target. Correct. And why was that because we didn't develop substantial evidence to support a criminal prosecution against her? So at no time, she was an issue ever considered a target. Correct. Okay. But we now know it wasn't just the FBI that rigged the investigation. It was the FBI under the direction of Loretta Lynch and Obama's Justice department that we learned that through the testimony last week of both Lisa page and Peter Struck. But if we're gonna if we're gonna go after Trump with this this vigor, and this passion that they have. And you look at the mandate, which is any links coordination between the Russian government individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump. And any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation. Okay. Well, then we've watched the process crimes go through over and over again, where's the Muller investigation into whether or not the Clinton campaign used a foreign agent spy to collude with Russia on her paid behalf and develop a dossier from Russia filled with Russian lies now, maybe even Ukrainian lies, and where's the investigation into that Russian dossier? She paid for you know, being used in a Fiso warrant application and committing a fraud on Fiso courts and a campaign associate is of Trump is spied on they spied on the whole campaign by by doing what they did. And that was the bulk of information and where where's the investigation into the coordinated effort of the State Department to use the dossier to take down? Trump. Where's the uranium one investigation? It's it's not this is look if Muller cared about the issue all of that would have been included because this is where actual evidence exist. This is not the hysteria. And the breathless reporting that says nothing that we've heard for such a long period of time. I mean, the fact that the media is so gassed up over Manafort taxes and loan applications and not registering as a foreign agent, and Michael cones, medallions and taxes and loan applications. You know, it didn't get them what they wanted. But they could have gotten to the truth they didn't. And that is if we don't solve that problem as a country Justice is dead in America. And the foundation of our Justice system is our constitution. That would just read the constitution. It's that severe problem. I hope that answers your question. Quick break right back, and we will continue. The voice of New York. Seven ten W O R at forty five degrees at four thirty. Good afternoon. I'm.

Donald Trump Russia FBI Clinton Muller Justice department Fiso State Department uranium one President Peter Struck Loretta Lynch Michael cones Obama New York America fraud Lisa forty five degrees
"fiso" Discussed on WSB-AM

WSB-AM

13:00 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on WSB-AM

"Fifty WSB. Depend on him. Greetings, welcome back, folks. Rush Limbaugh, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have a telephone number. If you want to join us eight hundred two eight two two eight eight. And if you want to send an Email, I check them until Rushbaugh. Before I get to the. Got to share this with you. I'm not doing it on purpose. I know the Beto stuff the way my mind is working. I've got these little morsels here that if I don't do them. They're they're they're going to be forgotten. Like, I still haven't been promising people for a week. To report on this story by the inventor of the web, Tim burners Lee on what needs to happen to save the internet. The thing is just it's classic. But it keeps being overridden by things that are more topical. That's more of an evergreen thing. It'll work anytime. But this so much specific stuff this one this little Diddy here, I I don't know how many people are going to mention this. And I want all of you to know it. Here's the headline. Christopher steele. He's the author of the Trump dossier, the golden showers story. None of it verified. None of it confirmed. It's all made up. This is the opposition research document that Hillary Clinton commissioned. It was this document that was used to get Fiso warrants illegally in my view to spy on the Trump campaign. It is one of the biggest political scandals in the history of this country. What has happened here? And there is a little bit of information that we've learned Christopher Steele admitted using posts by random individuals on CNN's website to back up the Trump dossier. Former British spy Christopher Steele admitted he relied on an unverified report on CNN website for part of the Trump dossier, which was used as a basis for the FBI investigation into Trump. According to deposition transcripts released. This means this stuff has been known these past two years. All of the stuff that we learned last week that Lisa page said about the bureau wanting to charge Hillary Clinton in the DOJ Obama's DOJ turning it down. This stuff has been known by congressional committees for two years. And apparently, we've known this. Well, somebody is known as we haven't known it. They just declassified some of these transcripts congressional hearings. And this guy Steele admitted that he relied on an unverified report on a CNN website for part of the Trump dossier. According to deposition transcripts released last week. Steele said last year, he used a two thousand nine report that he found on CNN's eye report website and said he wasn't aware that submissions to that site are posted by members of the public and are not check for anchor. So basically, this jerk is putting together this phony dossier filled with lies and distortions and unprovable unverified allegations about Donald Trump and colluding with Russia. So he happens to be reading the CNN website one day. And there's some story about something. And he finds a couple of posted comments that he thinks look good. So he throws them in the Nacional. He used people sitting in their basements in their pajamas. Posting their B s reactions to a news story as intelligence in his dossier, and his excuse was I didn't know those were members of the public commenting, an are you kidding me? And we've had an entire two year investigation into something that did not happen. And during this two years this testimony was made by steel to various committees before the house and Senate and nobody at the time. Decided to pull a halt all this and tell us you realize how much this could have been short changed when Lisa page testifies. The FBI wanted to charge Hillary including call me with gross negligence. But the Obama DOJ didn't Republicans have set on this for two years. Now, I don't know what the rules are obviously there's some rules that stuff has been classified not released. But it doesn't matter. There are Republicans and Democrats who heard all this now, maybe they're sitting around saying, we don't know if she was telling the truth while she was under oath for crying out loud. And she's already in enough trouble from being the extramarital affair was struck strokes Merck, and she got fired and all this. I mean, I would I would think. That she would be on a different course of action here designed to get her back in good favor with some people. Why? Assume somebody is is automatically lying at. Anyway. This is another one this this guy that is responsible for this was using posts by name members of the public as legitimate ad on intelligence and his dossier. Steele said his dossier contained raw intelligence that. He admitted could contain untrue or even deliberately false information. And they still took this to the Feis court and got warrants four different times renewed four different times to spy and various people in the Trump campaign. Because when you get that see the purpose. Here wasn't really to investigate Trump. The purpose was to acquire plausible smear is that the media would publish either before the election or during the transition or during Trump's presidency. This was not a serious research project that Steele was engaged here. You think Hillary Clinton DNC paid ten million dollars for anything other than smears? That's all. This was couched as intelligence couched as deep intelligence, recruitment and work. It was nothing but a series of smears, and none of them true. Meanwhile, there's Hillary keeping in using an illegal server to destroy evidence of her crimes, and she organizes a massive pay for play scheme with the Clinton foundation. We're not talking about people that play by the rules. This was a political hit job for the very beginning. And yet it has been treated with such seriousness in reverence that two year investigation into whether or not the Russians affected the outcome of the election. A bogus allegation never any evidence for it. They're still isn't because it didn't happen. And now we find out the guy who put together the so-called Intel dossier was relying on posted comments from anonymous members of the public. Claiming you didn't know that they were not official. He didn't know that. They were not anonymous. He didn't know how these comments on websites worked. He didn't know. And yet his word his dossier was supposedly accepted as gospel. I'll tell you this the more. We learn dust it confirms everything we thought about this bogus thing from the beginning. And then it just serves to irritate an anger assault. Fervor? And then you realize that damn thing is still ongoing. The stupid investigation is still ongoing. There's a new leak today that Muller is investigating the transcripts of a conversation at a Manhattan cigar bar over whether or not the Russians tried to influence the election. There wasn't any the Russians had nothing to do with who won the election. They didn't tamper with any votes. They didn't affect the outcome of a single election anywhere. There's not a single allegation that they did officially. If I were Trump at all this. I would have lost my mind by now, I would have lost my mind that more people haven't seen what's going on. And haven't stood up to condemn it. Okay. The Beto alr- arc have. I'm just gonna go through the headlines here. All right. The first thing I'm gonna do. They're not in order. I haven't put them in order. They just these are news stories out there. Republican National Committee. Mark Saint Patrick's Day with mugshot of dental work in a leprechaun hat, and please drink responsibly message this struck me because he RNC actually doing something funny. All look, there's Brazil on FOX, Donna Brazile joins. Fox's a news anchor. You think she'll pop defend FOX the next time. Somebody wacko on the left. Hell no way. Yeah. She's up there with never mind. Rourke says voters are not interested in personal attacks. Like, the GOP tweet. That'll Rourke says nothing in his past will hinder his or hinder his twenty twenty run. Meaning there's nothing he's done that anybody's gonna learn about that's going to have one negative impact on his on his campaign. Sorry pages were sticking together. Beto O'Rourke apologizes for jokes about wife says he has benefited from white privilege. You know, what this joke was? Rourke praised his wife for raising their kids without much help from him. And he was accused of blatant sexism and misogyny for this. He's making a self deprecating joke. It wasn't that long. This was a stereotypical joke that men constantly praised their wives for the role in raising the kids and Beto is admitting. He didn't have much to do with it. And he's in deep trouble or was in deep trouble. Because the way they see this comment is that Beddoes wife is a slave that odor and his wife, and then nothing more than a white slave. He's a misogynist, he's a sexist. He's out there moving his life forward while his wife is doing the drudgery raising the kids, and he was laughing about it. That's how they sought. So he had to apologize. For this joke, which was a self deprecating joke. It was a compliment for his white. But these clowns don't see it this way. And then he had to say, you're right. You're right. I I have benefited from white privilege. Damn right. I'm guilty. I used to be a white nationalist. But I've seen the light. Next headline or Rourke calls America's capitalistic Konami racist. Betto says he'll end the federal death penalty. Pages sticking together again. I'm sorry for all. These folks are just so much of it here. That'll O'Rourke apologizes for writing fictional fantasies about plowing over children with a car. Now, this is an interesting story in and of itself there is this reporter for Reuters. And this reporter uncovered Denno had had been a member of a computer hacking group when he was younger, and then he had written fantasy stories and among the fantasy stories was running over kids and killing them. With his car. Oh, you don't believe it. Oh, there's there's more than something wrong with this guy. There is a lot wrong with this guy, which is what makes him. Well, see, I'm still not sure what's going on. All of this news about O'Rourke. See folks, I think the Democrats are the source of it. Because I there's a part of me. I just can't see the Democrats after all that. We've heard about the past two years nominating a white male as the nominee. Can you believe if they even crazy Bernie battle or Rourke, if they do that, do you realize how much there's already anger at Beto forgetting in this because he's a white male. And the Democrats don't need a white midmorning got one that's Bernie, and they're gotta take care of him. Again. The democrats. The democrat base has it in their head that the worst thing they could do would be to nominate a white male. As their presidential candidate. And now the three throat runners are Joe Biden crazy, Bernie and this guy that'll work anyway..

Christopher steele Hillary Clinton Trump Rourke democrats CNN Beto O'Rourke Donald Trump guy Steele FBI Lisa Rush Limbaugh DOJ FOX Bernie Rushbaugh Tim Obama DOJ Republican National Committee reporter
"fiso" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

03:40 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"In a woods file to get a Fiso on Trump. And they rushed that they did it in a panic because I don't believe it was the original plan, folks. The original plan, I will insist till the day. I leave the earth absent evidence otherwise was to use national security letters unmasking essentially wiretapping of people under the guise of tapping foreigners when it was really used a retro retrofit Trump team wiretaps and the use of the NSA database to listen in and spy on the Trump team make sense Joe. What I'm suggesting to you is very simple. It is simple that they use computers meta data accumulation wiretapping national security letters when that broke down. That's when they moved to the Pfizer Corp because they had no other options that I wanted to put together some dates for you in light of this. Why it was such a rush, and why people like Tricia Anderson five didn't even read this thing yet signed off on it think about these days. Joe it's early March when Mike Rogers the NSA starts to notice that they have a significant problem with abuses, which with the NSA database people are querying this database of cell phone calls. Emails people are querying it and the head of the national security agency. Mike Rogers away still believe is the good guy in this story sensors a serious problem right around the beginning of March. He informs that time. He starts to inform people about these queries and says, hey, ladies and gentlemen, something's going on. He later requests a review by the foreign intelligence surveillance court which oversees as far visor process and with the NSA Joe, and they find out that there are private contractors acquiring the database that a lot of these queries are inappropriate that they're using inappropriate identifiers. This is all on the record, ladies and gentlemen. It's all documented you can look up the foreign intelligence surveillance court. I believe it's in March or twenty seventeen or so it was released you can look at the report page eighty two as some pretty damning information. So just so we're clear people within the United States government are giving access to private contractors to search a database a massive database. This is really really bad stuff. Okay. Not good, Angie. So right around this March time in the beginning of March, Joe where Rogers starts to sniff around and say, we've got a problem what conveniently happens just days and weeks later. Well, our buddy popadopoulos George popadopoulos Papa dis the key that popadopoulos magically after they sense. They have a problem with the FIS accord is approached by Joseph miss sued the mysterious Maltese professor who starts this entire FIS case. Basically this case that they start us against Carter page and against George popadopoulos for Russian collusion starts with this one guy. This is the guy who according to their allegations in the FBI Joseph Masuda approaches popadopoulos who's now a new member of the Trump team foreign policy advisory board approaches them and says, hey, according to these allegations, we think the Russians have some dirt on Hillary. They may have some emails. Folks, it is clear as data may now that this was a setup the page Papa that was a refines on popadopoulos, by the way, her acquiring minds wanna know about that one popadopoulos and page are plan b their plan b because Mike Rogers starts the smell that. There's a surveillance operation going on in the lists at one within the Obama administration to abuse NSA assets to spy on political opponents..

Mike Rogers Joe Trump George popadopoulos Pfizer Corp Tricia Anderson United States FBI Obama administration FIS Joseph Masuda Angie Joseph miss Hillary advisory board Carter professor
"fiso" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

10:41 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on KTRH

"Will allow us to investigate an incredible allegation that financial interests or other interests are driving this decision. Making of the president or anyone in the administration. You'll be conducting our investigation to make sure that the country is protected one of the functions of the congress the article one section of government from the days of the founding fathers was oversight of the executive branch. And the president says if you investigate me, I'm not gonna make progress that's already doing what he did with the shutdown holding the American people hostage. You know, what I think it shows John? He's scared. He's got something to hide because if he had nothing to hide he just shrug his shoulders and lead these investigations forward. He's afraid of them. All right. That was Chuck Schumer claiming while he's scared of an ongoing investigation witch hunt that has gone on unfairly. No, equal Justice under the law for the last two years of the presidency in spite of that. You know, what the president still had a list of accomplishments? It certainly would have been the envy of the eight years of the Obama administration. Wouldn't it have? Adam ship is we now look at Adam Schiff? He's now saying this investigation is pretty much so wide if you look at what he's put out there. It is stunningly wide. It's no longer confined to Russia order election hacking. Now, they're they're they're going to investigate any connection between anybody that Donald Trump ever talked to in his life, and any foreigner and clearly designed to create a sprawling investigation that will never end, you know, getting into the president's finances and businesses and just any one connection. So that they can see see we got you. You know, it's it's sort of like, the KGB the old style show me the the man I'll show you the crime, and that's where we're headed. But anyway, the president's still high grades from the speech last night the CBS poll seventy six percent of respondents loved what the president said. And seventy two percent support is immigration policies. But with that said there is another side of this investigation into Russia that is well blowing wide open more and more every day as we discovered for once that oh back in August before they ever filed a Fiso warrant that everybody was warned in the DOJ in the FBI by Bruce. And they will warn very clearly that the dossier was paid for by Hillary that it was created by a guy that hated Trump a foreign national that it was unverified and not corroborated, but they still used it. For example, Komi uses that the bulk of that Fiso warrant is application is the Clinton dossier. And then we learn oh, the he says to the president-elect in January. Well, it's salacious and unverified. Oh, very verified by him. When he signed it in October. And then it goes on to get signed four more times and still was never verified corroborated. And keep information withheld from the Pfizer court judges pretty pretty crucial information like oh, Hillary his opponent paid for it. Anyway, joining us now John Solomon from the hill and Gregg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst, author of the number one book the Russia hoax guys. Welcome back. John you've been breaking a lot of stories on this in the last week. As as Greg to. Now, we take it to another level when everybody now was warned specifically of what they should look forward. They didn't pay attention on purpose. Yeah. I think that's going to become the story line, and Sean you're going to be started. We'll be breaking tonight. Nope. I can talk to talk to you about on on the television show. But it's gonna show that Bob mother knew there was a history of abuses in the FBI from his tenure at the FBI that the Pfizer court to very extreme action. An earlier time for doing what's been alleged in shown to have occurred here. Omitting skull Pretoria evidence omitting Bob Mueller himself in his FBI. His FBI withheld exculpatory evidence as it relates to the investigation when he was before the Russian investigation. This is an earlier time when he was director of the FBI from two thousand and one thousand and fourteen there was there's an episode. We're going to be able to divulge tonight that shows that he got a very painful admonishment from the Pfizer court for a pattern more than seventy five cases of. Warrants that were submitted with a row Aeneas or evidence. So the what's gonna show do things the m- the man running the Russia investigation today. No, you should not cheat on a on a face a warrant and to that the FBI had a pattern and practice that dates all the way back to two thousand and one of omitting important information and misleading the court and the court in an earlier timeframe back in two thousand one two three four timeframe to very extreme action. And was was very concerned in the question that this will raise where's those judges today? Where's that Justice department today? Where's Bob Muller today? Where's rod Rosenstein? Why don't they show the same concern for the omissions in this Faisal warrant that the court showed in Bob Muller back in the early two thousand four when the FBI did it in other cases? So very important story that takes history, isn't that isn't even even worse than that. Isn't it even committing a fraud on the court knowingly conspiring to commit a fraud on? Feis accord taking away the civil rights of an American citizen. Why it's very interesting in the two thousand one two thousand two episode. The court said we don't care if you intended to do it or you didn't intend to do it. We will not tolerate this. They didn't care intention. Didn't even matter to them. The expectation was if you're gonna violate an American sports amendment, you better have the accurate precise. Honest means for doing it, and you take that standard, and you apply it to this the way Greg is done. So many times on television on this radio show. You can see there was knowing wealth and vast misstatement of fact, no mission facts that misled this court, so the two thousand two standards still stands today. It should be applied to this case. And the only question I have is where's the Justice department? Whereas the FBI where the leaders of the Pfizer court. Why don't they show the same concern in to twenty one thousand nine that they showed back in two thousand two thousand and three. Well, maybe they thought they could get away with it up until this point. Let me bring in Greg Jarrett. It's that that would explain a lot of the reasons. Why Muller had no problem appointing Andrew Weisman. A guy that we know himself was excoriated by a court for withholding exculpatory evidence. A guy the port put four innocent men in jail Merrill, executives for a year that was overturned in the fifth circuit a guy that ruined tens of thousands of jobs when he was the lead investigator in the Enron accounting case, and that ended up being overturned by the supreme court nine zero. So if he had issues of withholding exculpatory evidence, why would that bother Robert Mueller based on what John Solomon saying, you know, former Governor Chris Christie, who's on a book tour now says something very interesting the other day, he said I've worked with Bob Muller. I've work with rod Rosenstein, Rosenstein, hired an assassin in Bob Muller now, obviously, that's hyperbole. But but there's a level of truth to it. And the fact that Muller ignored his own conflicts of interest in taking their job. And then went about hiring a team of absolute up partisans demonstrates that this is the witch hunt that Donald Trump has called it. And it not only is is Bob Muller kind of assassin when it comes to investigations and criminal charges, but he hired a team of assassins, look at these people Weisman. And as an aide Ahmad both were involved in the Bruce or anti Trump dossier in its earlier stages. They had a conflict of interest. They are not disinterested. Prosecutors they have an interest here, and they shouldn't be on this team. Another should genie Ray who represented Hillary Clinton and another prosecutor in the case Aaron zeppelin. She represented a another individual in the Clinton Email investigation. So all of these people nearly all of them have a bias against Trump in favor of Hillary Clinton. And Bob Muller is responsible for hiring them. Let me add one other point is because when this when the FBI and the DOJ these very same officials will warn by Bruce or about the dirty dossier in August, the twenty sixteen before the Pfizer in October of two thousand sixteen. They all knew that none of this was verified, Andrew Weisman was one of the people that was briefed on that. Now that to me sounds like a conflict of interest. And what I'm beginning. To suspect may have happened is they decided to buy into the dirty Russian Clinton bought and paid for dossier as their roadmap to get Donald Trump with windy prosecutors and investigators were in on the original. Plot to frame Trump and destroy him. They cannot be fair and neutral and objective, and the law is very clear in the supreme court has said it is such that a prosecutor in any case is to seek Justice not just to win a case, and where they have a record of bias and a conflict of interest. They may not serve and, you know, William bar when he steps into the position as attorney general has to put a stop to this and hold these people accountable. If I committed a fraud on a court, I believe I'd go to jail if I withheld information from court purposely, and obviously in this case now, we know they all knew Hillary paid for it. And you turn it into a little asterisk, it may have a political taint. That's purposely withholding crucial key information that probably would have impacted the decision of those judges, and I love to hear from them one day. We'll get back. Back.

FBI Bob Muller Hillary Clinton Donald Trump Pfizer court Russia president Justice department John Solomon Greg Jarrett Andrew Weisman supreme court fraud Bob Mueller rod Rosenstein Chuck Schumer prosecutor congress Adam Schiff Bruce
"fiso" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

10:41 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on 600 WREC

"Allow us to investigate an incredible allegation that financial interests or other interests are driving the making of the president or anyone in the administration. You'll be conducting our investigation to make sure that the country is protected one of the functions of the congress the article one section of government from the days of the founding fathers was oversight of the executive branch. And the president says if you investigate me, I'm not gonna make progress. That's where he doing what he did with the sharp. They're holding the American people hostage. You know, what I think it shows John? He's scared. He's got something to hide because if he had nothing to hide he just shrug his shoulders and lead these investigations go forward, he's afraid of them. All right. That was Chuck Schumer claiming while he's scared of an ongoing investigation witch hunt that has gone on unfairly. No, equal Justice under the law for the last two years of the presidency in spite of that. You know, what the president still had a list of accomplishments? It certainly would have been the envy of the eight years of the Obama administration. Wouldn't it have? Adam ship is we now look at Adam Schiff? He's now saying this investigation is pretty much so wide if you look at what he's put out there. It is stunningly wide. It's no longer confined to Russia or election hacking. Now, they're they're they're going to investigate any connection between anybody that Donald Trump ever talked to in his life, and any foreigner and clearly designed to create a sprawling investigation that will never end getting into the president's finances and businesses, and you know, just any one connection so that they can see see we got you. You know, it's it's sort of like, the KGB the old style show me the the man I'll show you the crime, and that's where we're headed. But anyway, the president's still high grades from the speech last night the CBS poll seventy six percent of respondents loved what the president said. And seventy two percent support supporters immigration policies. But with that said, there is another side of this investigation into Russia that is blowing wide open more and more every day as we discovered for once that oh back in August before they ever filed a Fiso warrant that everybody was warned in the DOJ, and the FBI bruiser, and they will warn very clearly that the dossier was paid for by Hillary that it was created by a guy that hated Trump a foreign national that it was unverified and not corroborated, but they still used it. For example, Komi uses that the bulk of that Fiso warrant is application is the Clinton dossier. And then we learn oh, the he says to the president-elect in January. Well, it's salacious and unverified verified by him when he signed it in October. And then goes on to get signed four more times and still it was never verified corroborated. And key information withheld from the Pfizer court judges pretty pretty crucial information like oh, Hillary his opponent paid for it. Anyway, joining us now John Solomon from the hill and Gregg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst, author of the number one book the Russia hoax guys. Welcome back. John you've been breaking a lot of stories on this the last week. As as Greg to. Now, we take it to another level when everybody now was warned specifically of what they should look forward. They didn't pay attention on purpose. Yeah. I think that's going to become the story line, and Sean you're gonna be story. We'll be breaking tonight. And hopefully, I can talk to talk to you tonight about on on the television show, but it's gonna show that Bob Muller knew there was a history of FIFA abuses in the FBI from his tenure at the FBI that the Pfizer court to very extreme action. Earlier time for doing what's been alleged in shown to have occurred here. Omitting exculpatory evidence omitting soda Bob Muller himself in his FBI. His FBI withheld exculpatory evidence as it relates to the investigation when he was before the Russian vested. This isn't an earlier time when he was director of the FBI from two thousand and one thousand and fourteen there was there's an episode. We're going to be able to divulge tonight that shows that he got a very painful admonishment from the Pfizer court for a pattern more than seventy five cases of fight. Warrants that were submitted with Romania or omitted evidence. So the what's it gonna show because don't do things the m- the man running Russia investigation today knows you should not cheat on a on a warrant and to that the FBI had a pattern and practice that dates all the way back to two thousand and one of omitting important information and misleading the court and the court in an earlier timeframe back in two thousand and one two three four timeframe to very extreme action. And was was very concerned in the question that this will raises where's those judges today? Where's that Justice department today? Where's Bob Muller today is rod Rosenstein, why don't they show the same concern for the omissions Spicer warrant that the court showed in admonished Bob Muller, back in the early two thousand four when the FBI did it in other cases. So very important story that takes history, isn't that isn't even even worse than that. Isn't it even committing a fraud on the court knowingly conspiring to commit a fraud? On a Pfizer court taking away the civil rights of an American citizen. Why it's very interesting in the two thousand one two thousand two episode. The court said we don't care if you intended to do it or you didn't intend to do it. We will not tolerate this. They didn't care intention. Didn't even matter to them. The expectation was if you're going to violate an American source amendment. You better have the accurate precise. Honest means for doing it, and you take that standard, and you apply it to this the way Greg is done. So many times on television on this radio show. You can see there was knowing well, full and vast misstatement of facts and omission of facts at misled this court, so the two thousand two standards still stands today. It should be applied to this case. And the only question I have is where is the Justice department, whereas the FBI where are the leaders of the Pfizer court. Why don't they show the same concern in twenty one thousand nine that they showed back in two thousand two thousand and three. Well, maybe they thought they could get away with it up until this point. Let me bring in Greg Jarrett. It's that would explain a lot of the reasons. Why Muller had no problem appointing Andrew Weisman. A guy that we know himself was excoriated by a court for withholding exculpatory evidence. A guy the port put four innocent men in jail Merrill, executives for a year that was overturned in the fifth circuit a guy that ruined tens of thousands of jobs when he was the lead investigator in the Enron accounting case, and that ended up being overturned by the supreme court nine zero. So if he had issues of withholding exculpatory evidence, why would that bother Robert Mueller based on what John Solomon saying, you know, former Governor Chris Christie who's on a book tour now, so something very interesting. The other day he said I've worked with Bob Muller. I work with rod Rosenstein, Rosenstein, hired an assassin in Bob Muller now, obviously, that's hyperbole. But but there's a level of truth to it. And the fact that Muller ignored his own conflicts of interest in taking the job. And then went about hiring a team of absolute partisans demonstrates that this is the witch hunt that Donald Trump has called it. And it not only is is Bob Muller kind of assassin when it comes to investigations and criminal charges, but he hired a team of assassins, look at these people Weizman, and as an aide Ahmad both were involved in the Bruce or anti Trump dossier in its earlier stages. They had a conflict of interest. They are not disinterested. Prosecutors they have an interest here, and they shouldn't be on this team. Another should genie Ray who represented Hillary Clinton and another prosecutor in the case errands. Ably represented another individual in the Clinton Email investigation. So all of these people nearly all of them have a bias against Trump in favor of Hillary Clinton. And Bob Muller is responsible for hiring them. Let me add one other point is because when this when the FBI and the DOJ in these very same officials will warn by Bruce or about the dirty dossier in August, the twenty sixteen before the FIS in October of two thousand sixteen they all knew that none of this was verified, Andrew Weisman was one of the people that was briefed on that. Now that to me sounds like a conflict of interest, and what are beginning to suspect may have happened is they decided to buy into the dirty Russian Clinton bought and paid for dossier as their roadmap to get Donald Trump. Windy prosecutors and investigators were in on the original. Plot to frame Trump and destroy him. They cannot be fair and neutral and objective, and the law is very clear in the supreme court has said it is such that a prosecutor in any case is to seek Justice not just to win a case, and where they have a record of bias and a conflict of interest. They may not serve and, you know, William bar when he steps into the position as attorney general has to put a stop to this and hold these people accountable. If I committed a fraud on a court, I believe I'd go to jail if I withheld information from a court purposely, and obviously in this case now, we know they all knew Hillary paid for it. And you turn it into a little asterisk have may have a political taint. That's purposely withholding crucial key information that probably would have impacted the decision of those judges, and I love to hear from them one day. We'll get back John.

Bob Muller FBI Pfizer court Hillary Clinton Donald Trump president John Solomon Russia Justice department Greg Jarrett supreme court fraud Chuck Schumer rod Rosenstein prosecutor Andrew Weisman congress Adam Schiff executive Obama administration
"fiso" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

WINT 1330 AM

11:22 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

"Our foolish wars politics or ridiculous partisan investigations. If there is going to be peace and legislation there cannot be war and the investigation. It just doesn't work that way. We must be United at home to defeat our adversaries abroad. We will also be announcing the parameters of our investigation which go beyond Russia, but in some. Will allow us to investigate an incredible allegation that financial interests or other interests are driving the session making of the president. Or anyone in the administration will be conducting our investigation to make sure that the country is protected one of the functions of the congress the article one section of government from the days of the founding fathers was oversight of the executive branch. And the president says if you investigate me, I'm not gonna make progress. That's doing what he did with the sharp. They're holding the American people hostage in what I think it shows John he's scared. He's got something to hide because if he had nothing to hide he just shrugged his shoulders and lead these investigations go forward. He's afraid of them. That was joke claiming while he's scared of an ongoing investigation witch-hunt that has gone on unfairly. No, equal Justice under the law for the last two years of the presidency in spite of that, you know, what the president's. Still had a list of accomplishments. It certainly would have been the envy of the eight years of the Obama administration. Wouldn't it have? In Adam ship is we now look at Adam Schiff? He's now saying this investigation is pretty much so wide if you look at what he's put out there. It is stunningly wide. It's no longer confined to Russia order election hacking. Now, they're they're going to investigate any connection between anybody that Donald Trump ever talked to in his life, and any foreigner and clearly designed to create a sprawling investigation that will never end, you know, getting into the president's finances and businesses, and you know, just any one connection so that they can see see we got you. You know, it's sort of like, the KGB the old style show me the the man I'll show you the crime. And that's where we're headed. But anyway, the president's still high grades from the speech last night the CBS poll seventy six percent of respondents loved what the president said and seventy two percent support is immigration policies. But with that said there is another side of this investigation into Russia that is while blowing wide open more and more every day as we discovered for once that oh back in August before they ever filed a Fiso warrant that everybody was warned in the DOJ and the FBI by bruiser, and they will warn very clearly that the dossier was paid for by Hillary that it was created by a guy that hated Trump a foreign national that it was unverified and not corroborated. But they spill used it. For example, Komi uses that the bulk of that Fiso warrant is -application is the Clinton dossier. And then we learn oh, the he says to the president-elect. In January while it's salacious and unverified. Verified by him when he signed it in October. And then it goes on to get signed four more times and still was never verified corroborated and key information withheld from the Pfizer court judges pretty pretty crucial information like oh, Hillary his opponent paid for it. Anyway, joining us now John Solomon from the hill and Gregg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst, author of the number one book the Russia hoax guys. Welcome back. John you've been breaking a lot of stories on this last week as as Greg to. Now, we take it to another level when everybody now was warned specifically of what they should look forward. They didn't pay attention on purpose. Yeah. I think that's going to become the story line, and Sean you're gonna be started. We'll be breaking tonight, and I can talk to talk to you tonight about on on the television show, but it's gonna show that Bob Muller knew there was a history of FIFA abusive in the FBI. From his tenure at the FBI that the Pfizer court to very extreme action. An earlier time for doing what has been alleged in shown Deb occurred here omitting exculpatory evidence omitting soda, so Bob Muller himself on in his FBI. His FBI withheld exculpatory evidence as it relates to the investigation. When he was does it before the rush investigation. This is an earlier time when he was director of the FBI from two thousand and one to two thousand and fourteen there was there's an episode. We're going to be able to divulge tonight that shows that he got a very painful admonishment from the Pfizer court for a pattern more than seventy five cases of warrants that were submitted with Romania or omitted evidence. So the what's it gonna show do things the m- the man running the Russian investigation today knows you should not cheat on a on a Faisal warrant and to the FBI had a pattern and practice at dates all the way back to two thousand and one of a meeting important information and misleading the court and the court in an earlier timeframe back in two thousand one two three four timeframe could vary extreme action and. Was very concerned in the question that this will raises where's the judges today? Where's that Justice department today? Where's Bob Muller today where is rod Rosenstein? Why don't they show the same concern for the emissions in this Faisal warrant that the court showed in admonished Bob Muller, back in the early two thousand four when the FBI did it in other cases. So very important story that takes his is in that it wasn't even even worse than that. Isn't it even committing a fraud on the court knowingly conspiring to commit a fraud on a Pfizer court taking away the civil rights of an American citizen? Why it's very interesting in the two thousand one two thousand two episode. The court said we don't care if you intended to do it or you didn't intend to do it. We will not tolerate this. They didn't Karen intention. Didn't even matter to them. The expectation was if you're going to violate a an American fourth amendment, you better have the accurate precise. Honest means for doing it, and you take that standard, and you apply it to this place. The way Greg is done. So many times on television on this radio show. You can see there was knowing wealth and misstatement of facts, no mission of facts that misled this court so the two thousand and two standard still stands today. It should be applied to this case. And the only question I have is where's the Justice department? Where's the FBI where the leaders of the Pfizer court? Why don't they show the same concern in two twenty nineteen that they showed back in two thousand two in two thousand and three. Well, maybe they thought they could get away with it up until this point let me bring in Greg Jarrett. It's that that would explain a lot of the reasons why Mueller had no problem appointing, Andrew Weisman. A guy that we know himself was excoriated by a court for withholding exculpatory evidence. A guy the port put four innocent men in jail Merrill, executives for a year that was overturned in the fifth circuit a guy that ruined tens of thousands of jobs when he was the lead investigator in the Enron accounting case and that ended up being overturned by the supreme court. Nine zero. So if he had issues of withholding exculpatory evidence, why would that bother Robert Mueller based on what John Solomon saying, you know, former Governor Chris Christie, who's on a book tour now said something very interesting the other day, he said I've worked with Bob Muller. I work with rod Rosenstein, Rosenstein, hired an assassin in Bob Muller. Now, obviously, that's hyperbole. But but there's a level of truth to it. And the fact that Muller ignored his own conflicts of interest in taking their job. And then went about hiring a team of absolute up partisans demonstrates that this is the witch hunt that Donald Trump has called it. And not only is is Bob Muller kind of a Chacin when it comes to investigations and criminal charges, but he hired a team of assassins, look at these people. Weisman. And as an aide Ahmad both were involved in the Bruce or anti-trump doc- a in its earlier stages. They had a conflict of interest. They are not disinterested. Prosecutors they have an interest here, and they shouldn't be on this team another should genie Ray who represented Hillary Clinton and another prosecutor in the case Aaron deputy represented a another individual in the Clinton Email investigation. So all of these people nearly all of them have a bias against Trump in favor of Hillary Clinton, and Bob Muller is responsible for hiring. Let me add one other point is because when this when the FBI and the DOJ these very same officials will warn by Bruce or about the dirty dossier in August, the twenty sixteen before the Pfizer in October of two thousand sixteen. They all knew that. None of this was verified, Andrew. Weisman was one of the people that was briefed on that. Now that to me sounds like a conflict of interest. And what are beginning to suspect may have happened is they decided to buy into the dirty Russian Clinton bought and paid for dossier as their roadmap to get Donald Trump Wendy prosecutors and investigators were in on the original plot to frame Trump and destroy him. They cannot be fair and neutral and objective. The laws are very clear in the supreme court has said it is such that a prosecutor in any case is to seek Justice not just to win a case. And where they have a record of bias and a conflict of interest. They may not serve, and you know, we embar when he steps into the position as attorney general has to put a stop to this and hold these people accountable. If I committed a fraud on a court, I believe I'd go to jail if I withheld information from a court purposely, and obviously in this case now, we know they all knew Hillary paid for it. And you turn it into a little asterisk, it may have a political taint. That's purposely withholding crucial key information that probably would have impacted the decision of those judges, and I love to hear from them one day. We'll get back John.

FBI Bob Muller Pfizer court Hillary Clinton Donald Trump president John Solomon Justice department Russia Andrew Weisman Greg Jarrett supreme court fraud rod Rosenstein Robert Mueller congress Adam Schiff executive Faisal Obama administration
"fiso" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

01:32 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"WIBC traffic. Thirteen degrees in the American standard. Heating weather center. The time is seven sixteen. Tony cats are going to be with you ninety three WIBC. The reporting out that congressional transcripts show that the wife of DOJ official. Bruce or her name is Nelly Nelly or HR? She had told house investigators this all involving the dossier. Remember, the reason that they were able to get Fiso warrants on people like Carter page the dossier, which led to which was printed by BuzzFeed and led to so much of the investigation. We're seeing right now. But it was never verified. As a matter of fact, multiple news organizations had this dossier, but didn't print it in and go with it because they couldn't verify it is Christopher Steele dossier. Well, congressional transcripts show that Nellie or said to house investigators that Christopher Steele wanted to get word to the FBI and testified that Steele was hoping that her husband kaput in a word with the FBI to follow up some way on this on this. This dossier. What the Democrats have been saying as the story goes.

Christopher Steele Nelly Nelly FBI DOJ Fiso Nellie Tony Bruce BuzzFeed Carter official Thirteen degrees
"fiso" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

02:47 min | 2 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on WTVN

"Barack Obama's fish might. I felt this leg. Matthew should never live that down and the media's reaction to the BuzzFeed story, which was patently false anybody with a brain knew it was on true shows that the media repeatedly and consistently convicts the president in the court of public opinion without any credible evidence. And they often do it based on false reports in there have been many of them. Sadly rank speculation is now treated as facts stories are agenda-driven not imformation driven. You played. The clips Sean a few minutes ago indictment impeachment imprisonment are persistent themes in both print and television news as they condemn the president at every turn they demonize them. They declare him guilty of something anything I found forty seven printed pages from the Washington Examiner of the media's coverage of Donald Trump where they've been wrong. And that's just one year twenty eight years twenty seventeen and we were scrolling it on Friday night. It happens with regularity. They never get held accountable because they'd have to hold themselves accountable. And that's why I think there is an information crisis. More importantly, what is your story and the knowledge of of two of the top FBI members under Komi being under criminal investigation. And now the story, Bruce or warning everybody about the whole visor and the dossier. Right. Where does this? Now, take us in my mind that would lead to an indictment of anybody that signed onto the Fiso aren't if what the Grassley Graham memos saying is true in that is it's the bulk of information on the application while the rest of the profession was hyperventilating over the weekend over BuzzFeed and other other silly stories. You know, there wasn't important development. Lindsey Graham, the new chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee made clear he intends to dig into these issues in a big way. I know Sean, you've been predicting that Lindsey Graham came out for the first time and said, this is part of my agenda for the next few months. He has subpoena power has many capabilities to get to the bottom of these issues. You've got several people who have resigned or were fired you've got to under criminal investigation. And you got an FBI director who by his own acknowledgment had classified memos that he apparently gave to his defense attorneys. There are a lot of serious issues. A lot of bad actors were at the top of this FBI and a critical time when the Hillary Clinton investigation was being wound down. And when Donald Trump investigation was being spun up, and we have to keep digging until we get the rental. Greg respond to that on the other side quick break right back. We'll continue Greg Jarrett and John Solomon with us..

FBI Donald Trump Sean Lindsey Graham BuzzFeed president Barack Obama Greg Jarrett Grassley Graham Washington Examiner Hillary Clinton Matthew Senate Judiciary committee Bruce chairman John Solomon director twenty eight years one year
"fiso" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

10:35 min | 3 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"John Adams famously observed at facts are stubborn things and whatever may be our wishes our clinicians for the dictates of our passion. They cannot alter the state of the facts, and the evidence pursuing truth means always yielding the facts, even if they run counter to our hopes. In a courtroom truth is about credible evidence. Not strong opinions. Now, there's a lot of talk about Pfizer applications, and many people that I see talking about it seem not to recognize what a FIS applicator FIS applications actually a warrant. Just like a search warrant in order to get Pfizer search warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears that the information. The affidavit is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that's the way we operate. And if it's wrong, sometimes it is if you find out there's anything incorrect in there that person is going to face consequences that last quote is my favorite rod Rosenstein, an affidavit and career law enforcement, and he signed his name to a Fiso warrant the last five a warrant with with the bulk of information coming from oh, an unverified and uncorroborated and since mostly debunked dossier. Oh does that apply to him? We got a new story out of the hill today. It was pretty blockbuster rod Rosenstein, the DOJ exploring ways to make two more easily spy on journalists. He I guess they're upset with some of Gregg Jarrett and John Solomon's coverage. John Solomon from the hill. Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst all through the bestseller the Russia hoax. So we've got that story on rod Rosenstein, we got a another hill report. A former official says New York Times report shows FBI employees working outside of department of Justice guidelines. This is not what their role is. But you know, excuse me, what a rules matter and another article the next FBI officials says it's not the bureau's role to pro foreign policy in the wake of Trump reports. And Greg Jarrett has a blockbuster column that has now gone viral an FBI report that is corrupt and dishonest. Welcome both of you to the program. Look, I've given my take the last hour. There's a lot of information here. But this really to me is everything we said and more Greg the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal ever in American history and the media hook line, and sinker goes with phony reports, it's one of the greatest dirty tricks perpetrated in modern American politics and egregious abuse of power by top officials at the FBI to try to portray Donald Trump and investigate him for being a Russian agent is I pointed out of my column, it's not only ludicrous on its face. But factually, they had no evidence they had no reasonable suspicion. They had no probable cause. And in fact, at the time that Komi was fired Andrew McCabe who became his replacement. Is acting director testified nobody hit interfered in the Trump Russia collusion investigation. That was followed by Rosenstein days later who said, no. Nobody has interfered Komi himself just before days before he was fired said nobody has sought to obstruct our investigation. And so what the FBI did was they were angry at Trump. They were angry that he had fired one of their own James Comey, even though it was for just cause. And so they sought retribution vengeance. So go to James baker's testimony, which became the the source of all of this were James Baker, again, another guy gone from the PI and James Baker saying they actually after the firing of Komi sat around and said, well, maybe Trump is in bed with Putin. Right. But we know if we look at the timeline that Lisa page, James call me, Peter Struck and McCabe all had said the opposite. That's right. I mean, it, you know, it's one thing to sit around in a room saying, gee, I wonder if he's a Russian aged each another thing to officially use your. Perogative empowers as chief law enforcement agency to launch a counter intelligence investigation of the president of the United States without a scintilla of evidence or justification for it. It is there's a statute of it's a felony deprivation of rights under color of law. It's abusive power. It is also obstruction of Justice. You're not allowed to use your position of power. To misuse our system of Justice. That's obstruction of Justice all of these people when William bar is takes office as the attorney general all of the evidence of what these people did should be presented to federal prosecutors. And if appropriate a grand jury so that legal action, they should be held accountable for their conduct so far John Solomon, none of that has happened. And by that we can go back to the exoneration of Hillary in spite of overwhelming evidence of obstruction overwhelming evidence. She violated the espionage act biased FBI agents that thought she should win one hundred million two zero then paying for the dossier. Rush and information leaked to the American public before the election. And then of course, the bulk of information unverified uncorroborated Russian lies used to get warrants to spy on the Trump campaign associate which again, nothing has happened. You're exactly right. There's a few people that lost their jobs, but that's it. And no one has been brought to Justice Foley yet. And I think that will follow up on the new attorney general Bill bar when he gets a confirmed. But I you know, I think Greg hit it on the head what we saw this past week. And so we've chronicled for a year year and a half. Absolute proof that political bias political opposition research was misused by the FBI to launch an investigation to try to undo duly elected president. That's now been written in stone. It's factually supported we Greg just did a great job of describing what the bureau did when they fired James Comey the bureau acted like a jilted lover and a bad break up and he tried to lash out and strike out against president. Trump was supposed to be their boss or treating them like a rival. And it's different when you're in a relationship, you post, a selfie or something embarrassing of your ex girlfriend who ex boyfriend, but here, they were using the most awesome powers of the United States government are counterintelligence investigation to try to wound the president without a factual basis without a predicate without any evidence. And most importantly, don't don't take our words for Bob Muller's, former director of intelligence when he was FBI director guy named Kevin Brock one of the most respected FBI executives in the past came on our show today, and he said the following things. This was a rogue biased outside the bounds outside the roles investigation. It makes me shamed. As a former FBI bureau to see Barrowman to see what they did during this period, they were acting like children. And I think that's an extraordinary indictment by someone who worked on the inside. He worked for Robert Muller who was the very first encounter. But they got this far they did. And then then what do you make? Then of the report on Friday in the New York Times. Why I think I think that the report on Friday as part of that retaliation, right? But I they were talking about. Maybe it will wear a wire take him out on the under the twenty fifth amendment. Then maybe we'll look at them for obstruction of Justice. And where do they maybe we'll wear a wire to that was part of it? It is it's all it's all just retaliatory behavior without a factual predicate without the evidence at the FBI is supposed to do. This is exactly how the FBI was supposed to be reformed after J. Edgar hoover. So we wouldn't do these things when tempted when emotional when when politics became more important than than commonsense. And yet a small group of FBI leaders allow all these things to happen in violation of their own rules and standards that every FBI agent who raises their hand and swears the oath. About uphold. And I think it's really shameful. The New York Times article is the ultimate example of that retaliation that Greg was talking about, you know, Greg. I actually think Trump was facing a coup is the line that Dowd. The president's former attorney raid on Brian Kilmeade show, which I thought was interesting because at the end of the day, they have used every imaginable thing that they can to try and frame this president on Russia collusion charges that don't exist. But the media runs with everything as if it's fact is if you know, if you believe the media, you would believe today the Donald Trump colluded with Putin. Yeah. Absolutely. In the epilogue of my book, I recount time and time again by name all the journalists who pronounced the president guilty of collusion without ever defining. What that thing us collusion? They thought if they simply asserted it. It was a word that would connote a crime, even though it is no crime. There would have to be a conspiracy. To commit another crime. Now, what is that is it conspiracy to defraud the government? No, there's no evidence of that. They have no factual basis to assert that in yet. You know, they've convicted the president of the court of public opinion. They do it every day. I watched this morning on CNN God, they open pronounced Trump, a an a Russian agent. They just assume it is true. And all it does is discredit themselves and undermine their credibility. We'll take a quick break more Greg Jarrett and John Solomon on the other side, eight hundred nine four one, Sean if you want to be a part of the program, so I didn't think my friends at my pillow would ever be able to outdo themselves. They've created the my pillow mattress topper, and what you do is you put it on top of your mattress..

FBI Donald Trump Greg Jarrett president rod Rosenstein John Solomon Trump New York Times Russia James Comey Komi attorney Pfizer United States Gregg Jarrett John Adams James baker
"fiso" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

10:35 min | 3 years ago

"fiso" Discussed on KTOK

"John Adams famously observed facts are stubborn things whatever may be our wishes our clinicians for the dictates of our passion. They cannot alter the state of the facts, and the evidence pursuing truth means always doing the facts. Even if they run counter to our hopes. Courtroom truth is about credible evidence. Not strong opinions. Now, there's a lot of talk about Pfizer applications, and many people that I see talking about it seem not to recognize what a FIS applicator application is actually a warrant. Just like a search warrant in order to get Pfizer search warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who swears the information in the affidavit is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that's the way we operate. And if it's wrong, sometimes it is if you find out there's anything incorrect in there that person is going to face consequences that last quote is my favorite rod Rosenstein, an affidavit and career law enforcement, and he signed his name to a Fiso warrant the last five warrant with with the bulk of information coming from oh, an unverified and uncorroborated and since mostly debunked doc-. Oh does that apply to him? We got a new story out of the hill. Today is pretty blockbuster rod Rosenstein, the DOJ exploring ways to make two more easily spy on journalists. Yeah. I guess they're upset with some of Gregg Jarrett. John Solomon's coverage. John Solomon from the hill. Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst all through the bestseller. The Russia hoax. So we've got that story on rod Rosenstein, we got a number hill report. A former official says New York Times report shows FBI employees working outside of department of Justice guidelines. This is not what their role is. But you know, excuse me, what a rules matter and another article the next FBI officials says it's not the bureau's role so pro foreign policy in the wake of Trump reports. And Greg Jarrett has a blockbuster column that has now gone viral an FBI report that is corrupt and dishonest. Welcome both of you to the program. Look, I've given my take the last hour. There's a lot of information here. But this really to me is everything we said and more Greg the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal ever in American history and the media hook line, and sinker goes with phony reports, it's one of the greatest dirty tricks perpetrated in modern American politics and agreed use abuse of power by top officials at the FBI to try to portray Donald Trump and investigate him for being a Russian agent as I pointed out of my column, it's not only ludicrous on its face. But factually, they had no evidence they had no reasonable suspicion. They had no probable cause. And in fact, at the time that Komi was fired Andrew McCabe who became his replacement. Is acting director testified nobody hit interfered in the Trump Russia collusion investigation. That was followed by Rosenstein days later who said, no. Nobody has interfered Komi himself just before days before he was fired said nobody has sought to obstruct our investigation. And so what the FBI did was they were angry at Trump. They were angry that he had fired one of their own James Comey, even though it was for just cause. And so they sought retribution vengeance. So go to James baker's testimony, which became the the source of all of those were James Baker, again, another guy gone from the FBI and James Baker saying they actually after the firing of Komi sat around and said, well, maybe Trump is in bed with Putin. Right. But we know if we look at the timeline that Lisa page, James call me, Peter Struck and McCabe all had said the opposite. That's right. I mean, you know, it's one thing to sit around in a room saying, gee, I wonder if he's a Russian aged. It's another thing to officially use your. Perogatives empowers is the chief law enforcement agency to launch a counter intelligence investigation of the president of the United States without a scintilla of evidence or justification for it. It is there's a statute of a felony deprivation of rights under color of law. It's abuse of power. It is also obstruction of Justice. You're not allowed to use your position of power to misuse our system of Justice. That's obstruction of Justice all of these people when William bar is takes office as the attorney general all of the evidence of what these people did should be presented to federal prosecutors. And if appropriate a grand jury so that legal action, they should be held accountable for their conduct so far John Solomon, none of that has happened. And by that we can go back to the exoneration of. Hillary in spite of overwhelming evidence of obstruction overwhelming evidence. She violated the espionage act biased FBI agents that thought she should win one hundred million two zero then paying for the dossier. Russia and information leaked to the American public before the election. And then of course, the bulk of information unverified uncorroborated Russian lies used to get warrants to spy on the Trump campaign associate which again, nothing has happened or you have to the you're exactly right. There's a few people that have lost their jobs, but that's it. And no one has been brought to Justice yet. And I think that will fall upon the new attorney general Bill bar when he gets confirmed. But I I think Greg hit on the head what we saw this past week. And so we've chronicle for a year year and a half absolute proof that political bias political opposition research was misused by the FBI to launch an investigation to try to undo duly elected president. That's now been written in stone. It's factually supported we Greg just did a great job of describing what the bureau did when they fired James Comey the bureau acted like a jilted lover and a bad break up and he tried to lash out and strike out against president. Trump was supposed to be their boss or treating them like a rival. And know, it's different when you're in a relationship, you post, a selfie or something embarrassing of your ex girlfriend or your boyfriend. But here they were using the most awesome powers of the United States. Government are counterintelligence investigation to try to wound the president without a factual basis without out of predicate without any evidence. And most importantly, don't don't take our word for it. Bob, Muller's former director of intelligence when he was FBI director guy named Kevin Brock one of the most respected FBI executives in the past came on our show today, and he said the following things. This was a rogue biased outside the bounds outside the roles investigation. It makes me a shamed. As a former FBI bureau to see bureau man to see what they did. This parents they were acting like children. And I think that's an extraordinary indictment by someone who worked on the inside. He worked for Robert Muller who was the very first in Calcutta, but they got this far they did. And then then what do you make then of the report on Friday in the New York Times? I think I think that the report on Friday as part of that retaliation, right? But I they were talking about. Maybe it will wear a wire take him out on the under the twenty fifth amendment. Then maybe we'll look at them for obstruction of Justice. And where do they wear a wire to that was part of it? It is it's all it's all just retaliatory behavior without a factual predicate without the evidence at the FBI is supposed to do. This is exactly how the FBI was supposed to be reformed after J. Edgar hoover. So it wouldn't do these things when Kempton when emotional when when politics became more important than than common sense. And yet. A small group of FBI leaders out all these things to happen in violation of their own rules and environmental standards at every FBI agent who raises their hand and swears the oath. Vowed uphold and I think it's really shameful th the New York Times article is the ultimate example of that retaliation that Greg was talking about, you know, Greg. I actually think Trump was facing a coup is the line that Dowd. The president's former attorney. I'm Brian Kilmeade show, which I thought was interesting because at the end of the day, they have used every imaginable thing that they can to try and frame this president on Russia collusion charges that don't exist. But the media runs with everything as if it's fact is if you know, if if you believe the media, you would believe today the Donald Trump colluded with Putin. Yeah. Absolutely. In the epilogue of my book, I recount time and time again by name all the journalists who pronounced the president guilty of collusion without ever defining. What that thing us collusion? They thought if they simply asserted it. It was a word that would connote crime, even though it is no crime. There would have to be a conspiracy to commit another crime. Now, what is that is it conspiracy to defraud the government? No. No, there's no evidence of that. They have no factual basis to assert that in yet. You know, they've convicted the president of the court of public opinion. They do it every day. I watched this morning on CNN. Why God, you know, they all put pronounced Trump a a Russian agent. They just assume it is true. And all it does is discredit themselves and undermine their credibility. We'll take a quick break more Greg Jarrett and John Solomon on the other side, eight hundred nine four one, Sean if you want to be a part of the program, so I didn't think my friends at my pillow would ever be able to outdo themselves. Are they've created the my pillow mattress topper, and what you do is you put it on top of your mattress..

FBI Donald Trump Greg Jarrett president rod Rosenstein Russia John Solomon Trump New York Times James Comey attorney Komi Pfizer Gregg Jarrett United States John Adams Robert Muller
Trump to declassify documents relating to Russia investigation

The 11th Hour with Brian Williams

01:16 min | 3 years ago

Trump to declassify documents relating to Russia investigation

"Trump is demanding the release of FBI documents related to the Russia investigation, and essentially an investigation into himself according to a White House statement. The order comes quote at the request of a number of committees of congress, and for reasons of transparency, the declassification applies to redacted pages of the Fiso warrant obtained to monitor former campaign advisor Carter page and FBI interviews, more notably Trump also directed the DOJ to publicly release all text messages relating to the Russia investigation without reduction of James Comey Andrew McCabe Peter Struck Lisa page and Bruce or put another way. This is a presidential order to make public some previously private communications that refer to an ongoing investigation into his administration. It comes just days after former Trump campaign chair, Paul Manafort pleaded, guilty and agreed to work for the feds. It comes on the same day. We learn Muller's ready to sentence, Michael Flynn, Flynn pleaded guilty back in December, lying to the FBI about contact. He had with Russians during the campaign. He's been cooperating ever

FBI Donald Trump James Comey Andrew Mccabe Pete Michael Flynn Russia DOJ Fiso White House Advisor Congress Carter Paul Manafort Muller Bruce
 James Gunn Fired From 'Guardians Of The Galaxy' Franchise Over Past Offensive Tweets

Dana Loesch

05:03 min | 3 years ago

James Gunn Fired From 'Guardians Of The Galaxy' Franchise Over Past Offensive Tweets

"On ninety three WIBC Follow along on Twitter at d. lash official Dana lash on Facebook The whole Fiso war process needs to be looked at the warn on quarter page was supported mostly by dossier that came from Michael Steele who is being paid by, the Democratic, Party to do opposition. Research and the dossier was collected I, think from Russian intelligence services and if you ask the? FBI today how much. Are the dossier on Trump has, been verified almost none? Of, it but you say. Mostly not entirely therefore wasn't surveillance justified no not, at all view if the dossiers. The reason you issued the warrant it was a bunch. Of. Garbage, the. Dossier has proven, to be a, bunch, of garbage yeah well true and, that's Lindsey Graham saying that oh one of the other funds stories you know that one, chick that got arrested For they said she she? Wouldn't charge with spine. She was charged with violating fair, the foreign agents registration? Act, which Glenn Simpson should. Actually be charged with as well apparently she also, met with Obama officials she's the. One that everybody's supposed to know right which you know. We. Don't, but. Whenever I love, conspiracy theories straw, man, ridiculousness she apparently met with US, treasury and, federal officials during the previous administration That's a Reuters story look at that trader Apparently, it was with, the Federal Reserve vice chairman. The treasury? Undersecretary all kinds of Obama. Officials where's that I. See one Reuter? Story that's all I. See where's that at Pretty crazy how they, don't wanna talk, about that story whow wow. Insane all? Right I want to kind. Of switch it up. A little? Bit So much to there's just so much to talk about Pull this, up okay so the guy who is. The director well was director of guardians of the galaxy James, Gunn, was fired from. Directing guardians of the galaxy three three. Two or three, I love guardians of the galaxy movies. I think I I've enjoyed them immensely And I love the ensemble anyway? The, franchise director of guardians of the galaxy. James Gunn was fired he was fired Friday after this is, day, after offensive tweets. He posted between two thousand and eight. And two thousand, and nine resurfaced now I want to come back to firing, people for tweets here in a moment but this his tweets were really. Bad They were really really bad He was, writing, the, script for? Guardians three like can I. I'm going to, censor them He, like for? Instance he wrote this was August tenth. Of two thousand and August two thousand ten the expendable was so mainly I blanked. The blank out. Of the, little blank, boy next to me That's. One of them Yeah he also said Some of these I can't say they all involve kids. Like one, of them he said I like it when boys he liked it? When. Boys tied stem Yeah that was another one. Oh and then he, he tweeted quote one this. Is October of two thousand and nine wondering which Disneyland character would be the. Worst to, get raped by I think it's goofy but sleepy would suck too Just made a. Joke about raping my, friend when she was asleep Egos I'm doing this is oh my gosh they're bad this is September twenty eleven quote and doing a. Big Hollywood film adaptation of the giving tree with a happy ending the tree grows back and gives the kid can't name that Yeah oh my gosh it's so bad Most of them. I can't say These just friends playing. Pranks there so. Many tweets here I'm scrolling still. I'm just scrolling. This whole time A lot of it is about Oh man Like he tweets, about, like, oh man. That's, bad I can't even mentioned and, then, there are, a lot. Of jokes about rape cetera et. Cetera, et cetera so this is what. He said he he apologized and deleted his account, he wrote quote as these, were his last tweet free deleted as. A, quote many people, who have followed my career no when I started I've you'd myself as a provocateur making. Movies and telling jokes that were outrageous and taboo I have discussed public as I've, discussed publicly many times I've developed, as a person so has my work and humor and I gave you the link better when you. Can scroll down Kane and. Read those tweets, yourself, so I don't you don't he, continues saying quote it's, not to say I'm better but I am very very..

James Gunn Barack Obama Treasury Lindsey Graham Director FBI Twitter United States Dana Lash Donald Trump Facebook Glenn Simpson Kane Michael Steele Rape Federal Reserve Undersecretary Reuters Official
Suicide blast kills 14 near Afghanistan airport

An Economy of One

04:10 min | 3 years ago

Suicide blast kills 14 near Afghanistan airport

"He's in Washington, I'm Louise Schiavone. The Justice department is made the unprecedented move of releasing documents from the FBI's request to a special court for permission to surveilled. Former Trump campaign advisor Carter page NPR's. Mara Liasson reports. The President Trump is claiming that the documents confirmed the investigation into Russian election at your favorites is a rigged witch hunt. This is the first Fiso wiretap application ever made public. The declassified document was heavily redacted, but it shows that the application relied on evidence that Russia had tried to recruit page back in two thousand thirteen. It also relied on evidence from that dossier compiled by a former British intelligence agent President Trump tweeted this morning that the document proves his campaign was spied on Republicans in an effort to discredit the origins of the whole Russia investigation have been saying that the FBI abused its power because it relied improperly on the dossier Democrats say the FIS appliques. Was appropriate Mara Liasson NPR news One concept that emerged from the Helsinki summit last week is that the US and Russia might work together to help Syrian. Refugees return to their war-torn country but the. Head of US central command. General Joseph Patel tells ABC news. He's not convinced that US Russia cooperation should expand beyond the card. Coordination over Syrian airspace We should be doing anything more with. Russia right now I've not. For that I don't think that. We ought to be doing militarily with them right now Beyond what. We are currently we're currently doing votes l. told ABC and the Wall Street Journal that Russia's support of the Syrian, regime gives him significant pause and Afghanistan the Islamic state says it was behind a. Suicide bombing near Kabul international airport today that killed at least fourteen people the BBC's Catherine Davis reports. The blast coincided with the return of the country's exiled vice president cramps, of people including high ranking officials had gathered on, the tarmac to welcome general Dostam there was tight security for the event which was broadcast live on television but minutes after his. Convoy left the app airport an explosion occurred blast is set to. Have gone off near the main entrance where people had also been waiting general Dostum's return and the. Reason he left has. Been a subject of much speculation he went to techy. Often accusations of involvement. In the kidnap rate and torture of a political rival he's denied any wrongdoing And insists. He was in Turkey for medical treatment the BBC's Catherine Davis European Union officials are doing Washington later this week to meet with President Trump about trade this after the conclusion of, the meeting of. G twenty finance ministers and central bankers and Buenos Aires where trade was topic a this is NPR news from news, I'm Racquel Maria Dylan there's a small brush fire burning in a county park in. The hills of Milpitas the country fire has burned a couple hundred acres of grass already and is. Twenty five percent contained Cal fire officials say no homes are threatened so, far fire departments from around the south bay and, air tankers are already responding and some hikers were rescued no evacuation orders have been issued yet now too adorable baby sea otters. The marine mammal center in sausalito wants the public's help to name. An otter pop this particular pop had a rough start to life when she was first stranded she. Was suffering from demo Eric acid. Poisoning now she's recovering well and needs a name it turns out there. Are rules, for naming. A sea otter it's more like naming a Kentucky Derby horse than choosing a name for a. Family pet the center can't reuse names that would violate the terms of their licensed to treat wild animals veterinarian Abby McClain, says even animals will be released. Back into the ocean. Need names it really helps us because just memorizing numbers is very difficult especially when. You have hundreds of patients on site at one time and because the only thing cuter than a..

Russia President Trump United States Joseph Patel FBI NPR Mara Liasson Donald Trump Washington BBC Justice Department Marine Mammal Center Dostum Louise Schiavone ABC Vice President Fiso Catherine Davis Helsinki