18 Burst results for "Duchamp"
The Final Furlong Podcast
"duchamp" Discussed on The Final Furlong Podcast
"The grade one there. So it's an interesting race. But they've all got they all got gallop and Duchamp debate to beat. And I don't think that's I don't think that's a through away assessment of the race. No, I think that's a very good one. And for those who are backing settler, again, two horses are put up for the gold cup at the start of the season. 20 something. And brave man's game at 33s. I don't get what he was caught. And if the argument is, oh, well, he'll appreciate a more truly run race. And the three miles, two and a half for alongs on the new course, uphill, a chart, and you'll see a different horse. You're going to see a different gallop on the shop as well, because you can be absolutely certain. That was not gallop on the champ at its peak. That was him getting ready to be peaked for the gold cup. So who knows how good he's going to be when he actually rocks up in the gold cup itself? Jumps perfectly, touch wood. Stays, but has that wicked blend of speed as well. I think he is a very fair price at 64, very, very fair price indeed. And the excitement from William Mullins, he can't hide it. He can not hide it at all, and. He's a monster. He's an absolute monster of a race horse. On a side note, ruby Walsh was presenting the OCE coverage. And he couldn't hide his frustration quite frankly, being pissed off with Davy. And he made a reference to that happened to me as a jockey. Constantly, and it pissed him off, he said, a jockey jump in the last and failing to correct their horse so that they're gonna bump into you, which is what Davey did. David made no attempt to correct fury road. And then close it into gallop on the sharp and gallop on the shop, just went, yeah, whatever. I'm gonna keep on going, son. That's not gonna stop me, and he goes and wins even more impressively. But just for those who won't have heard it, if you're in the UK and the vast majority of listeners are, then you might not be aware of the fact that ruby was pretty pissed off on Ortiz coverage with Davies. Yes. I heard ruby on a bit that. But I definitely think it's well worth having a look back at the race again. When the tour for home, David does at least three times, try and keep sure he rolled to the nearest sideways. It is timeless. You can see his right hand was very looking head on. You can see his right hand. And he gives him a couple of talks to try and keep him straight, straight, and the horse is just login in. So I don't understand what we're saying. I really don't. Well, I know what he's saying, but I think he's very harsh on David. If you look at the race again, Davey Troy is three or four times. You can see his right arm trying to pull the horse towards the Stanford three or four, and the horse has given them no help at all. And all of a sudden the defense has come up and he has to sort of let the horse go and the horse naturally jumps to his left as they are to his right as we're looking at. But it's well worth have one more look at that race again. And it's very you can't be too Harris and debut. I think it tries another lot to crack the horse and it's just at the last moment when he come to the fence. He lets him run down up and I think, look, Lizzie had no more than me, but I'm not sure you can try and correct the horse literally as a jump on the fence. I think you just let him go. So we're talking to fans, but Davey certainly does minimum of territory times try and crack the horse before they get the defense. He does, but as they're jumping is, his whip is in the right hand and he uses it as they go into the fence. Yeah, but that's what I'm saying. Is it too late to correct the horse then at that stage? Because it's only just at the last moment where he's going to look I've tried, I've tried up a has to let him jump down. But you can't just I don't know, Lizzie would know more than us, but it's just having another look at he definitely tries to correct the horse. And a couple of times. He does prior to that, but he is using the whip. I'm watching it back here. He still has the whip in the right hand and uses it as they go into that fence and then he deviates into gallop on. So you could I got the frustration from ruby. It might have been just heat of the moment and just annoyed him, but you could tell it's a real bug bearer of him. Lizzie finally for you, your thoughts on Dave, are we doing Davy dirty here? Does Rubio an apology? Look, everyone's entitled to his opinion, and I agree that actually, if you've tried, if you've tried your best and you're inside the wings and you're at the last in a great one, you'd kind of have to be in a position where you have to slightly look after yourself. The day and you see horses run you down, fences, and it's not ideal, and you wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of it, but if it's your horse, there's only so much you can do at some stage you actually have to say right or you've now got events jump and.
The Hockey PDOcast
"duchamp" Discussed on The Hockey PDOcast
"And so I'm kind of curious about how much of that is just the fact that he's got a coach who can kind of relate to him more and can speak from personal experience and can empower them and instill that confidence in it, how much of it is an actual just good old fashioned tactical adjustment that they've made and how much of it is some miscellaneous combination of the two because the results are so much better and I think you can actually tangibly point to something. Like the shooting percentage is up and it wasn't going to be as low as it was under Dominic Duchamp regardless of what he did, but there's clear things that he's changed to his game that have resulted in this. It isn't just kind of just hoping things get better and then magically doing so. He's fundamentally changes game and the results have come along. Yeah, there's definitely there's a confluence of things coming together all the right time, right? Like DOM ducharme kind of defended himself over the summer he talked about how Cole caufield he was very positive about cold caulfield talking about how he was trying so hard even in training camp that he ended up injuring himself and preseason. So he started last season. I think he entered his groin or something like that and it kind of stopped him from having that initial burst of speed, which for a small player makes a huge difference, right? Because you've got to have some capability to get your shots off or else those big defenders are going to be in your way all the time. And then there's the overthinking that came with DOM Duchamp's very meticulous defensive minded system. The major change, yet his shot rates up, I think, three shots per hour this year over last year just in chunks. Which is great because I think you're having cold coffee you'll get 14 shots on that per hour. That's fantastic anymore. Yeah. But the biggest change between Cole caufield under ducharme and under Marty St. Louis is that he feels the freedom to stick with plays where he doesn't have the puck, especially in the offensive zone. Both him and Suzuki, the analogy that I keep on coming back to this year is if you watch them in the offensive zone for checking, they almost look like two little sharks swimming around the zone. And they put pressure on, but they're usually not like physically for checking guys, right? So they're both applying pressure and waiting for opponents to make a mistake. And when they don't, not much happens. But if they do, one little puck bobble, both of them are so quick to react that it's just like bang bang all of a sudden it's in the net or a great scoring chance at the very least. Their ability to create those chances off of failed plays or misplaced by the opponents is just like crazy elevated both from the coaching change last year and then on to this year there's another step together as they built more chemistry. And I think that's where a lot of caulfields offense has come from is that like counter attack within the offensive zone off of a four checking play, which is weird because everyone expects them to be the rush guy. He does score from there too. But having he's a good skater, but he's not McDavid, right? Like he's not going to be blowing past guys. He's not even like Paul Byron in terms of speed. So adding another layer where he can create offense that isn't just off the rush, makes him such a better player.
Broken Record
"duchamp" Discussed on Broken Record
"At least it wasn't in the pronounced way than it was when I had synesthesia, but boy, did Joy Division mean everything to me back then did like Nirvana, Bob Marley, Joy Division those three things in particular, like I was so crazy about those particular things. They meant so much to me and I didn't have that specific colorful reaction to them that I was describing that from the blood sugar time, but I don't think music had ever meant so much to me because life seemed so bleak. Otherwise, people didn't really enjoy being around me. People felt sorry for me a lot. The same sense of humor that used to be funny when I was like the young handsome cool guy now the same jokes didn't work anymore. Like the same sense of humor it wasn't working. I'm convinced that I was that when I was 2021, I could have been an actor at that time 27. I had the distinct feeling I could never be an actor again. After this experience of realizing how much of myself was on the surface that was the reason that my personality was what it was, it was very traumatic and so that year was tough and it ended with a few months of me making sure I avoided heroin addiction, but just doing whatever I wanted and going really off the deep end and having these crazy experiences where it was hallucinations but they were very real for me where people were in my house that weren't there and I spent hours talking to them and stuff. Marcel Duchamp flee and Clara like Perry Farrell, all kinds of people were there and I thought they were there. I would call them afterwards talking about what we had done yesterday.
ESPN FC
"duchamp" Discussed on ESPN FC
"I think that the intelligence, first of all, I think he's someone who is very intelligent and is very outspoken in when he wants to say something and I think he on top of the belief that he has the values that he has about certain things. I think he would go and fight for what he thinks is right, whether you agree or not whether you think he's too young to take so much space or to take so many responsibilities. But I don't know, but I think I respect the fact that when there's something that he doesn't like or that I want to fix, he goes and tried to do it. I find it very interesting because I always have, I have the perception, as you know, my thoughts on dish up as a manager, but I give him credit for being a man manager, but also he starts with somebody who's extremely old school. Somebody who's been through the system who would be more likely to go and respect the hierarchy and whatever. In this case, clearly he has empowered and bought back to some degree to do this. Clearly, Hugo Reese and Rafael Iran was the captain invite captain. Clearly, they don't feel threatened or whatever by Mbappé. Is that what's going on? Or do I read dechambeau? No, no, no, no, it's DOM. I mean, this one was never involved in the whole image right. He said to the players and to the national team, this is between you and them. I've got nothing to do in this. I'm happy to do this on his own. He had the support of the rest of the squad. Back in March, and even in June, and again in this since when they met up on Monday, this was back on the table and they're like, okay, what do we do? Because they clearly haven't done anything. We can't wait for them to do something. We need to do something here. And I think everybody is almost like, yeah, okay, Kellyanne, we behind you, and that's exactly what your recent advance said to look right and decent when the other meeting on Monday night, which unlocked everything, was like, we're here in solidarity with we all together in this world. We believe that what Kylian is saying, we hold behind that. This is all what we believe in. But I think Mbappé likes the fact that he can have that kind of impact and that kind of input and I think he likes players saying, yeah, we're with you on this. You're right. Let's go and do this. And I think he's not afraid to then take the lead and say, okay, I'm the face of this image rock rebellion, if you want. And I think he's a strong enough and good enough a football to take care and take the pressure that comes with it because, you know, I think there could be some critics coming from some people maybe saying like, well, stay in your place. You only 23. Yes, you won the World Cup, but you know, maybe, but I think he's ready, that comes his way, he's ready to say like, well, no, I feel like I'm part of the leadership group here, in that squad. So I'm going to voice my concern of those, my anger at something and make things change. For the better. I think everybody has to have their own personality. People usually grow into these leadership roles when they get older. But some are born with it, as well. Some are born with it. A lot of it has to do with the personalities of the leaders who are already on the team. If Roy Keane is your teammate, you probably Roy king and Gary Neville. Guys like this and your 21 22. You probably won't be the guy saying, hey, guys, I'm in charge here. What do we want to do? Blah, blah, blah. Let me go talk down. Exactly. I think that's the reality of it. Looking at this France team, the other story many stories with us. There's big injuries to people who were key in delivering the last World Cup. Obviously. Paul Pogba, we assume he's going to be fit for the World Cup, but we don't know what condition he certainly is unlikely to be matched. N'Golo Kanté, these injury things have been plaguing him really for the last two years. He may be back. Now there's a Lucas Hernandez issue as well. You can look at this and say, hey, DDA, my heart bleeds for you, but you've got so much depth. That is not a factor. Which is a fair point. We assume that these three guys that I mentioned are the first three. Lucas, I'm not sure, but maybe maybe him too. Yeah, yeah. Nailed on starters. Yeah, right? Yeah. So in Duchamp mind, that's how he views it. Is, again, I get the impression that he doesn't want to choose an alternative to these players, even though he has alternatives. He doesn't want to think about that. So benzene is another one that we could have mentioned, although he will be back after the time he'll be back. So it's not. Right now there's 5 starters that they should start in his three four one two formation that won't be playing against Australia or Denmark. And he's not a Rory. That's why I put in the article I wrote for the ESPN website. Additional doesn't worry. This is not what he does. He's a very pragmatic, kind of positive, always look on the bright side of things guy. But even now he's thinking like, why is everything that could go wrong is going wrong right now, including the injuries because he ideally would have played the strongest 11 for those two games, we saw the only ones before the world cup. Really. And to maybe have a bit more certainties on the back of June that was pretty bad to draw us to defeat. And it's not going to be able to do that, but you're right. He's got so much depth, even the team that is going to put out against Australia on Thursday night is a really, really distant team. It's a really good team. He's going to have the same lineup, so he's going to keep the same formation in these two games that he wants to play with. These guys are fit. We believe. It's a backfire, for sure. So. Let's just go through the alternatives, right? Like for like, right? You're looking at most likely who so he wants to left foot playing in that sort of left center back road. So but she could defend her, would start on Thursday night against Australia, for example, not just because he's left footed, but I think this is helping massively. We also waiting for Laporte, maybe. Well, yeah. It's a lot of ladies. Sorry to say, I'd be like, this one is gone. But maybe Lucas and as if he's back, just would fit in in that sort of left center back position with van and kunde. And then that works. Okay, but if Kim bembe and Lucas in both, then you're looking at, could you place Alibaba there? It would have to be one of the younger players. It's very much a test against Australia to see how well it comes with it or not. Conte, how would I thought this is different profile of player, but again, you're not short for people who are many is the obvious one. And maybe to the point where Germany does really well in context on a 100% content may not get back in. Pogba. So again, if Conte is fit and I'll talk about you can play content if it's a different team though and that happens.
The Philosopher's Zone
"duchamp" Discussed on The Philosopher's Zone
"Is that the wrong question for philosophy to be asking, or is it just very difficult question that is still worth exploring? Yeah, so I enjoyed teaching this topic the definitional project. But I never go near it in my own work. And for a while, it's because I thought, well, I don't, especially being involved in the art world. We sort of know what it is. This thing that is an artwork, do we really need to keep coming to this sort of contained perfect definition? Like, what's the point in that? But actually my views about that are sort of changed because before the turn of the century, the idea of what art was was a bit more stable, at least in the west. But of course, that was socially encoded by class and also gender and race because, for example, women would be seen to make craft never high art. So obviously that view is changing. So the definitional project has, I think, encoded quite poorly what an artwork is. And I think it's perpetuated injustices around the art world as well, because if you encode and your definition of art, what is art and that sort of gendered or racial, then you're kind of automatically excluding people who can be artists, which is ridiculous. So it has caused some harm, but I do think that with the turn of the 20th century with the rise of conceptual art. That definitely may try to define our interesting because art suddenly with early conceptual art with Duchamp's urinal, for example. When art sort of became reflexive and self aware, started to say, well, what am I trying to say? That, I think, became philosophically interesting to challenge philosophers saying, well, what is art? I do think it's still a worthwhile project because people do care quite strongly about what an artwork is. They often get quite angry about the art world now.
Business Wars
"duchamp" Discussed on Business Wars
"Is 2000 Paris. Marc Jacobs excitedly paces in front of Louis Vuitton CEO eve carcel and his second in command. Jacob speaks passionately so much energy coursing through him. You can practically see it humming in the air around him. There is a precedent for what I'm suggesting. Think of Marcel Duchamp defacing the Mona Lisa. There's power in getting rough and dirty with an iconic image in creating something new, but equally as powerful. The executives in front of him share an uneasy glance. Carcel interweaves his fingers in places his hands in front of him on his desk. I just don't know. I just don't know. Jacob's clenches his fists and shakes them in front of him. I'm telling you if we do this right and transform your venerable logo into something modern and cool. We will bring in a whole new audience. People who wouldn't currently come near Louis Vuitton with a ten foot pole. The second in command leans forward. Okay, so how would you ensure that we did this right? And really did create something that is a modern and cool. Well, I wouldn't do it alone. I'd bring in Steven Sprouse to collaborate. Steven Sprouse is a fashion designer who rose to prominence in the 1980s by marrying high fashion with punk aesthetics. Sprouse will knock this out of the park and just having him on board will bring massive press attention. Carcel nods and turns toward his second in command, speaking in a low voice. The press angle does sound promising. His second in command nods. We could just produce the bag for fashion shows and photo shoots. We don't have to put them into production. Yes, yes, that sounds like a good compromise. Carcel turns back to Jacobs. Okay, let's try it. Yes. Jacob's collapses hands together and bounces up and down on the balls of his feet. This is going to be big. He can feel it. Jacobs and Sprouse work together to design a handwritten looking font that they use to scrawl the words Louis Vuitton over a variety of bags, giving it a feel that the logo has been graffitied on. It's a lowbrow pop punk aesthetic that turns people's image of Louis Vuitton on its head. And it's an immediate hit. As soon as the bag debuts at the 2001 show, it's a sensation. So many people call wanting to buy a bag with a new logo, Louis Vuitton puts the line into production. The collaboration is credited with bringing in $300 million worth of new business to the company. And while Jacobs is generating new excitement for Louis Vuitton, Gucci, finds itself at an unexpected crossroads. Its 2004 London Frida giannini sits across from Francois pinault, running her hand through her long blond hair. She hopes she doesn't look as nervous as she feels. Pino looks over her portfolio. For the past two years, jeanine has been Gucci's head handbag designer. But today, she's interviewing to become head of women's wear. This would be a major step up. And it's one she didn't expect to be taking so soon. But shocking everyone, Tom Ford and domenico de Soleil have left Gucci to start their own label after negotiations over their new contract, stalled out with Pino. Jeanine heard that didn't want to give the two men the degree of control they wanted. It's a huge change for Gucci and a huge opportunity for jeanine. Pino looks up from her portfolio and smiles. Really impressive work. Let's just jump into it. You get named as head of women's wear. Your first show, what do you do? What's your vision for Gucci? Jeannie smiles, she's ready for this. First of all, I need to state the obvious. I'm not Tom Ford. I'm not going to be able to do what Tom Ford did. But I think that's a positive. Tom's a genius, no doubt. But he has a very aggressive, very sexy style that turns off as many customers as it turns on. There are customers who want a more classic, more refined look. I would design clothes for them. And you know I think you're absolutely right. We need someone who's going to take Gucci in a new direction. We're not looking for someone to imitate what Ford did. And I think there are assets that Gucci has that haven't been taken advantage of. Gucci is over 80 years old. It has decades of archives to use this inspiration. I don't want to reinvent the wheel. Let's look at what Gucci did in the past that worked. And see how we can refresh it. To work for now. That's really smart. Janine smiles, confident sweeps over her. She thinks she's going to get this. Jeannie is named head of women's wear. But filling Tom Ford's loafers is a tall order. And whether jeanine is up to the task, is a big question. Especially while Mark Jacobs and Louis Vuitton.
The Art Newspaper Weekly
"duchamp" Discussed on The Art Newspaper Weekly
"To me, that was far and away one of the most powerful works in the show. Yeah, it's interesting. I didn't actually recognize what the sculpture was at first. It was compelling, but then when I read into it, I was like, wow, that's kind of genius. Were you familiar with the artists prior to this? Yeah, she's been arising for us for a little while now and has done previous work dealing with mass incarceration and prison furniture as a kind of material. So it wasn't entirely new, but it's kind of at a totally different scale and at a really high level, I think. Will you particularly struck Gabi by any works on show? Were there any new artists that you hadn't heard of before that you saw their work and thought, wow, this is absolutely incredible. Yeah, definitely. And I think this overarching curatorial attention to abstraction and conceptualism made it easier to approach works that are just visually really captivating. And then digging deeper into them. For example, Dani white hawks abstract geometric Tapestry has a lot of aesthetic crossover with James little's abstract canvases. One floor below that. And Dwayne linklater, another who is a Cree artist. He created a series of abstract canvases that stand alone on its own as very beautiful. We need to dig deeper and actually has a lot to do with his cultural heritage. I was really struck on the 6th floor. The first thing you see when you emerge onto the 6th floor is two massive abstract paintings by Denise Thomas and she speaks about this kind of permanent sense of chaos, the intensity of events that are impossible to represent in the world at large and it reminded me of Jackson Pollock who is on the 7th floor in a permanent connection and he was in the Whitney with start of his career. And he, you know, his art came out of a kind of crisis in arts ability or figurative arts ability to really contend with the enormity of events in the world. And I felt that was a really interesting actual sort of dialog and relationship between some of the themes that you saw in a permanent collection and in this spinal, which is obviously very, very contemporary work. Ben, was there anything else that you were really taken with from other mediums maybe? Yeah, I mean, I think Gabby mentioned this earlier, but the Alex de corte video on the 5th floor, which is called roygbiv. It's an hour long from 2022, and it's just one of the few humorous works in this banal. I think to the points we've been making, it is a pretty serious and heavy biennial, and that is one of the few works that has kind of a dose of humor in it. And it's this video in which Alex to court day who's based in Philadelphia plays Marcel Duchamp and then plays Marcel Duchamp's alter ego, rosalie, and then plays Marcel Duchamp dressed as the Joker from the 1989 Batman movie..
The Her Hoop Stats Podcast
"duchamp" Discussed on The Her Hoop Stats Podcast
"If you're taking a shot that the other team wants you to take, you shouldn't be taking that shot just at least at this stage. Especially not earlier the shot clock. That doesn't stop talking to you, and you gotta get something off. But yeah, exactly. I think Stanford took a lot of shots that you probably would like them to take. And then they took a lot of shots that they do like to take to, especially other threes. They are good through what should you do, but they just could not hit them yesterday. I don't think that was all you constitutions. I think that was a lot of Stanford, just not having their night. Now, sometimes there's just how basketball goes, the shooting, you know, the shooting variance is just, you can never predict this sometimes. Sometimes really bad shooting teams come out and light it up and sometimes the opposite happens. And that's why I have last night exactly. So that's what happened last night. Looking ahead to Sunday, like we said, we've got a South Carolina national championship game. To me, it's like South Carolina has the better court we have also obviously you caught has the better guard to 85 page backers across the Williams, probably the best back of the country when fully healthy. And those two things are going to help sign up. I think what comes down to is you court better or South Carolina's guards better. Yeah, and I think not only better, but I think the key is deeper. And I think South Carolina's front court depth compared to UConn, especially now without dorka, is a lot bigger advantage than maybe the backcourt depth of Yukon versus South Carolina. I think Yukon has more talent in the back court for sure, but I don't know if you guys back where it is as deep as South Carolina's front court. I feel like in a way it is that Evita was plays like she did last night and she had those huge big 30s for UConn. Do you have her off the veggie or meeting you off the batch and Caroline Duchamp did it really do much for you, but she also did do anything wrong when she gave it to the game either. So they still do have a fair amount of depth in the backcourt, but I think he puts front court depth has got to be the biggest problem here. They're big, got to define trouble against Stanford without Stanford relativity. And they picked up a lot of those. I'll be offensive though. They can't be setting illegal screens going into this game. I'm picking up fouls that they really don't need to be picking up. Early on in the game because if you can't have Olivia knows my daughter and we are on the floor together for most of this game, I think it's going to be pretty difficult. Yeah, and you know, I mean, you're right, you kind of have a lot of talent in the backcourt off the bench too, but it's interesting because of their front court is so thin at this point. Avena Westbrook is almost a pseudo threat court. For like half of her minutes stretches at the fore, which sort of in things out one, two, three spots. So it's just kind of a domino effect, but you're right. I think the fouls are going to be a huge thing. I think we talked about this. Going into the final four game, like they have two true bigs, they're both file prone, one of them fouled out the other one almost did in the prior game against NC state. Will that happen against Stanford? And then it didn't because Stanford settled for three. But South Carolina is not going to settle for threes. That is we can bet on that. So if you want to win this game, their posts are going to have to stay out of foul trouble while actually guarding the post, which they didn't have to do a whole lot of against Stanford compared to what they're going to have to do tomorrow. Yeah, exactly. I think that starts with you, I'm not putting them on the offensive value because you can't have that sort of too big of a mistake in that game. And then yeah, finding way to guard only of Boston without falling. And I think the thing is too, is she's going to hit a fruit though. So sometimes it's better to let her have the basket when you pick up a foul. And they've got to be smart about that. Right. That's the thing when you have a big back down your free throws, it's really you're going to get two points either way. You really really got to let it go sometimes, but you're right. You get ten, maybe 8000 between those two, if you want to stay on the court. You have to use all 8 of those on defense. Right. You can't have them. They're going to call that every time you can not happen. And you also have to use all 8 of those specifically, I would say around the rim too. You can't be fouling on a hedge or something, even if it's on leaf and even 30 feet from the basket. You have to use every foul for both of those players in the restricted arc I would say. Yeah, I would agree with that. I think that's going to be key. And then if we are South Carolina, I think you need to see hundreds of play while again and hit their shots because if you can slack off on the perimeter on them because they're not hitting shots or you come pretty good at permanent defense if they can lock them down and only Boston China has to do everything. South Carolina's could get themselves in trouble with the fact that, yes, South Carolina's defense is very good, but Yukon's offense has gotten much better. They can score from one point for systems on the floor. So they're going to find a way to score boards. Yeah, and they'll lead to you because we did see this matchup earlier this year. It was supposed to be twice. We saw it once, and Yukon was a healthy newcomer, by the way. It was helped to three points in the fourth quarter of that one. So that definitely can happen. Exactly. I'll say healthy because it's not healthy. That makes a big difference. 80% of their games this year. Yes, yes. But yeah, I think we've seen 85 be a very big part of the student that the strategy that was a non factor in that game. But yeah, I mean, I think this is a much better plan of that game. You can hear this. That was pre pages and drew that was like a page factory school do it. And if she doesn't, we don't know how we're going to win a game. You come to him and I think they're strides beyond that, but I mean South Carolina, of course, it's also gotten better throughout the season. So I think it's good for you kind of a way that that game was close. Minus that fourth quarter mall tonsil, like they know a lot of they don't melt down a fourth quarter. They can go this game. But it's going to be a tough challenge I think the way we've also been so done with it is here that it's going to be really tough to win that game with a different report. I think if we were talking about the ccar team with Dorothy Haas also coming off the bench out would be a lot more like, well, you can see how they have the depth the guards are better guards with championships. The front point that that's going to be really difficult. Definitely. And if you know front court depth does get tested with foul travel or whatever else, the only way they're going to win this game at that point, I think, is if they're able to sort of attack mismatches and maybe drive when South Carolina has those too big, you know, whoever's at the four is like 6 5 and you have a vina Westbrook at the four or whoever else for UConn. You're going to have to find a way to take advantage of that. And I think because you're going to have to play a lot smaller than South Carolina. I mean, really for the whole game. But a lot, a lot smaller for at least 5, ten minutes of this game. And so you're going to have to find a way to cancel out probably the rebounding advantage that South Carolina is going to have there with taking advantage of your own mismatches on the offensive end. Yeah, I think part of that for your country has to probably be hitting three as they don't shoot that great for three last night, but it's like easy fun can go off or someone can get really hot from three that will help them a lot and especially kind of South Carolina. It's not a huge three point shooting team. It gives you that extra point a reposition of if you can get some to get knocked down. Yeah, if you can trade two for three. Yeah. Obviously. Those are our hot takes. You make threes that usually works at your favorite. But I think the other thing, like you said, the rebounding is going to be huge..
Men In Blazers
"duchamp" Discussed on Men In Blazers
"Power in the stadium, kind of draining the club's finances. They were selling Nikola Pepe for 70 million pounds. They were selling Victor osim and for 70 million pounds. There was no reason for them to be short of cash and yet they still were. So you get the situation where Elliot effectively take over the club because Lopez is forced out. It forced to sell this investment that he has run well in one sense, but not in another. And the expectation was that the team would fall apart in the summer, which is Elliot would have to cash in to cover the debts. That didn't really happen quite as much as we thought it might. Jonathan David still there. Sven botman still there. Jonathan, the winner, still there. They didn't cash it quite a lot of The Crown jewels. At some point they will have to, but at the same time, even without losing players, it does seem as though something has been lost from lilles from Lille's DNA that may be winning the title was such an extravagant achievement, such an unlikely achievement that the team's sparkle has kind of diminished and the best example of that I guess is Burak Yılmaz. So yilmaz is proof really of Lewis campos genius. He was a 35 year old player who'd only ever really played in turkey, apart from one spell in China. When Lille brought him to Western Europe and that's not really what happened. You don't get your big move at 35. But yilmaz was a sensation in France. He was the inspiration behind that title, run as much as David is clearly the player who will go for the big fee at some point to arsenal or Tottenham or Liverpool for 40, $50 million. Yilmaz was the inspiration behind it. And this season, he looks a little bit more like a 37 year old forward who's only played in France for a couple of years. That's the reality of it. They have regressed to the mean as Lewis campos would no doubt say. And it's just a shame that it's happened so quickly with still the tour of the team in place. Cautionary tale within cautionary tale Barrett Yale Maz has become a pumpkin AKA jank to that game again. Against Chelsea, champions of the world, you'll never sing that, Tuesday, 3 p.m. Eastern Time. The other two games this week, filial versus Juventus on Tuesday, close your eyes Arsenal fans Duchamp lavish makes his Champions League debut and one no doubt scurry goal within seconds and Benfica led by in demand striker Darwin Nunez is 23 goals all competitions, face off the gate Ajax, who clearly do not fear Portuguese opponents, having put 9 goals past reigning, champs, sporting in the group stages. Wednesday, 3 p.m. eastern. After the break, we'll be right back to dig into Rory's one true love, the Europa League, but first a break. So. Paramount plus is a mountain of entertainment. And gay. With live sports, including NCAA march man is a new way for Champions League soccer. Don't miss exclusive series to obsess over, like the prequel to Yellowstone 1883. He James good? Yes, sir. And the upcoming halo live action series. While family favorites like Star Trek prodigy, welcome aboard. In the upcoming series, big Nate. I'm an idea man. This is a mountain of entertainment. Paramount plus. Now streaming. We will follow you both follow the space for another we will follow the letters of our team. Just everywhere we will follow on our own. Follow.
Spittin' Chiclets
"duchamp" Discussed on Spittin' Chiclets
"Because I'm beating the dead horse here. There is a connection between monaghan and to foley. They played together with the Ottawa 67s when they played junior, I would say monaghan's kind of a wild card maybe come around playoff time where we don't really know what to expect. If they can get him going with a guy that he's familiar with. And of course, to fully coming back over with his former coach, yes, cup is highly likely. So I just wanted to add that in there with dog. What did you what were you going to say, all right? No, I was just going to continue on at the Montreal fire. We had got to fully 9 goals, 17 assists 26 points and 37 games for an awful Montreal team. So this guy was getting it done on a pretty bad team and we've seen what he can do in the playoffs during the regular season. I know they cost him a pretty good prospect, but calorie. I'll move you gotta make so kudos for them to get in it done. Any other excuses for you? Well, they're surprised when a first round pick. That's a good haul for Montreal. Let's fucking top ten protected this year. Who gives a shit? What do you mean? Put your top ten protected. If calvi's getting a top ten pick, you're gonna have a shaved head, bro dude, worry about worry about your oilers dude. You're fucking oilers, buddy. You don't think I am? You got sunglasses on. That's your line all day. That's your only first round pick. Dude, everybody's gonna be scrambling. What do you who's the other guy that's gonna be up for grabs, Giroux? Who's the other big name free agent that I'm forgetting? Johnny gautier. Suck on that. Oh, he's not and a great hedge if he does in free agency after they win the police. And you're walking around in Boston in charlestown with RA with a padre caudry up anyway with what? All right, let's get some Montreal. They fight head coach DOM Duchamp on Wednesday just 7 months after coaching the habs to the Stanley Cup final. And I think what was the surprise to everybody, they needed Hall of Fame a modern St. Louis, the head coach, like I said, a name that seemed to come out of nowhere. His most recent gig was coaching a peewee team. He said, quote, I'm not coming here to be a substitute teacher. I have every intention of being here a long time, but I'll have to prove myself again and earn it gee, I don't have that clip of him talking about his philosophy if you want to play a clip of that. Playing with a little more instinct with ideas of how we want to be as a team. Now there is structure inside concepts. Systems you can say structure, when systems you box players in into only certain things they can do. And that was probably one of the things that I hated the most as a player is play in a system where I was a great player when I was allowed to make reads because the best players make the best reads, but if you take the reads out of the equation, those best players become average. So I want to make sure that I allow my best players to make reads and I rather them make a bad one, then not making a read at all. And sometime in systems, there's not much reads. I mean, I thought that was a great clip, he's comparing concepts versus systems and how you got to give guys room to create which I just, you know, I thought it was outstanding and he's a guy who needed the room to create and he ended up getting a Hall of Fame. Career out of it. They lost their first three games on behind the bench, unfortunately, 7 straight at home which ties a habs record. And then Canadians GM said there will be changes and this is the first of several of course we just mentioned the toffoli trade, but it's selling time right now, biz for the Canadians no doubt about it. It's a fire sale. I love this approach, though. And I love bringing in St. Louis because he gets the feel at the room and I don't think any pressure on him and maybe he comes back as an assistant, right? Depends what kind of rapport he gets with the players, maybe how much he can turn around and they buy into what he's selling. But I think ultimately it's for him to maybe understand who and what is in the locker room for who they should keep around moving forward. And I think that a guy who's been around the game as long as he had through a more modernized era, not just some old dinosaur to kind of be able to see that firsthand. He can then at the end of the season go up top and say, this is what I'm thinking of what's happening in this locker room right now. And they have to untap some of the young guys. I don't know, I don't know how defensive ducharme is. I don't know how tight guys were gripping their sticks, but you're gonna get nowhere if this is kind of the theme moving forward with your young prospects. At least give them an opportunity to flourish. If they land flat on their face, so be it. Well, you saw the last couple games, caulfield ended up scoring and back to back games. Like, you know, that's a guy like, you know, he saw him have all that success early on when he came in last year and really so far this year. He ended up getting sent down to the Myers. Can St. Louis on top something from him? Maybe I think Suzuki's had a solid year given the circumstances what other guys can he get things out of. So I think it's a perfect move. It's outside the box thinking and I think that that if I'm a habs fan, you're kind of like already know like we're at the bottom already. There's not going to be this suffering period. We already had the run last year. So quick and painless. All right, let's start the rebuild. I love the move. I just think that for a guy who was questions entire life doubted nonstop and then just became a Hall of Famer and an MVP and all the accolades that St. Louis acquired throughout his career, to now go on be a coach and he already here. Oh, he's only coach peewee's. What is this move? It's like, keep that in the sky. Keep questioning this guy. And from the minute his first press conference happened, you could tell this isn't a dude who's like in over his head. He is driven. He is serious and I think that he's looking at it like this is his future as a head coach in the league. So when you talk about thinking outside the box, I love that. It's not one of the, it's not one of the recycled old guys. You keep seeing and talking about with the old boys club. It's a player who's played recently. It's a former player who's played recently, knows what it's like to be doubted and questioned. And it's going to be able to kind of become a coach and use what he learned as a player to try to really change how people coach and what I'm talking about is the clip.
The Her Hoop Stats Podcast
"duchamp" Discussed on The Her Hoop Stats Podcast
"And it is February we are in the last month of the regular season for college basketball time flies when you're having fun and it's certainly been fun. Lots of upsets. Once again, to talk about this week seems to be the theme worth a couple of college basketball this season to break down kind of what we've been seeing over the last week or so, I'm here today with Adam leshan from our group Seth team. Hey, Adam, how's it going? Am I getting doing well, how are you? I'm doing good. It's been another fun Sunday of college basketball. So that's exciting to talk about. Absolutely. Yeah, it's been particularly chaotic this season. So gotta love the unpredictable nature that this woman's basketball season has brought us. So yeah, ready to dive in. For sure. I mean, I don't think we can go like a week without having a bunch of upset lately, but it makes it fun, right? We were just talking about offline. I think you really had that in South Carolina. I don't know if it's going to be in the final four. And that's a very fun problem to have in charge the same. So it's certainly exciting next month and a half or so because it's already February somehow. The season is just flying by but it's going to be a really fun next couple of months to because like you said, South Carolina is the only one I really feel pretty confident that's going to be in the final four. Otherwise it's kind of a crapshoot. So yeah, it's going to be a blast to see how it unfolds over the next couple months. Exactly. And the captain march is on because money two days away. Oh my goodness, crazy. Great. Not to get too out of ourselves when I start with what's happening right now in February. But we did have a big top ten matchup today and then of course the top ten matchup that also has some historical significance, but you can't Tennessee, number 7, Tennessee at number ten, Yukon. This afternoon, not at all the outcome I was expected to see, especially when you cut it off the Caroline due charm, who has been pretty much leading the team in scoring since page beckers went down was going to be out for the game. But you can't beats Tennessee by 19 points, felt like they were pretty much in control of the game from like towards the end of the second quarter and then really opening up in third and just ran away with it. Yeah, no, I really feel like toward the end of the first half, you can kind of gain control. And beginning of the third quarter that 14 all run was just the turning point, Kristen Williams and nika mule just really compiled that run and turned a 7 point lead into a 21 point lead. And the way that Tennessee's offense is looking lately here, the vault. That's just too big a deficit for the lady balls to overcome. So yeah, no, just really, I know this term gets overused, but it was really a statement win for Connecticut, particularly without like you said Duchamp and page backers. It just really seems like that this husky squad is really starting to gel and it'll be interesting to see how Duchamp and later on page Becker is once they return. What this husky squad at full strength can really do Chino saw a quote postgame Gino or Yama has he typically does said it was very dry since a humor. We could be good in March. That might be the understatement of the year. But yeah, once everyone's healthy, it's really going to be interesting to see how deep the huskies can go in the tournament. Yeah, you also have some jokes today about being a 7 7 spoken. With full behavior after the game today. After 19 point win against Tennessee, I guess you feeling pretty jovial. Yeah. It's not often that you see each you know in a good way. I've been even slamming a stable 22. It's over 17 countries. Oh yeah. Nobody expect nothing less. But yeah, I mean, I thought it was a really it was.
TIME's Top Stories
"duchamp" Discussed on TIME's Top Stories
"Is it enough? By Jamie Duchamp. Toward the end of last year, Anthony klotz, a Professor of business administration at Texas a and M university who studies workplace resignations realize that a lot of people were about to quit their jobs. A record 42.1 million Americans quit a job in 2019, according to U.S. bureau of labor statistics data, but that rate dropped off during the pandemic adult year of 2020..
No Agenda
"duchamp" Discussed on No Agenda
"I knew exactly what to do with it. A douchebag no more stdm duchamp spent -duced. You could spare some much needed jobs karma it would be great murder from las ghettos. Jobs jobs jobs and jobs. That's the job. Ma dame miao diesen is back from altamonte springs florida three thirty three thirty three. Everyone big on the On the executive producer of dr happy magic number birthday to me. It's my thirty third birthday on a show day so obviously i couldn't skip out on this opportunity. Please adding to the birthday list thirty three today. July eighteenth jingles. Can i get a biscuit for my birthday. you can get that. Atlas shrugged have not heard that one an long title and an old fashioned karma. Thank you guys for everything you do in providing the best content and karma in the universe love and let love.
No Agenda
"duchamp" Discussed on No Agenda
"I knew exactly what to do with it. A douchebag no more stdm duchamp spent -duced. You could spare some much needed jobs karma it would be great murder from las ghettos. Jobs jobs jobs and jobs. That's the job. Ma dame miao diesen is back from altamonte springs florida three thirty three thirty three. Everyone big on the On the executive producer of dr happy magic number birthday to me. It's my thirty third birthday on a show day so obviously i couldn't skip out on this opportunity. Please adding to the birthday list thirty three today. July eighteenth jingles. Can i get a biscuit for my birthday. you can get that. Atlas shrugged have not heard that one an long title and an old fashioned karma. Thank you guys for everything you do in providing the best content and karma in the universe love and let love.
No Agenda
"duchamp" Discussed on No Agenda
"I knew exactly what to do with it. A douchebag no more stdm duchamp spent -duced. You could spare some much needed jobs karma it would be great murder from las ghettos. Jobs jobs jobs and jobs. That's the job. Ma dame miao diesen is back from altamonte springs florida three thirty three thirty three. Everyone big on the On the executive producer of dr happy magic number birthday to me. It's my thirty third birthday on a show day so obviously i couldn't skip out on this opportunity. Please adding to the birthday list thirty three today. July eighteenth jingles. Can i get a biscuit for my birthday. you can get that. Atlas shrugged have not heard that one in a long time and an old fashioned karma. Thank you guys for everything you do in providing the best content and karma in the universe love and let love.
WTVN
"duchamp" Discussed on WTVN
"They're going to you know they're going to play. You know, 10 12 holes something like that before. They're done tonight, And then they'll be back tomorrow to play some more. And then we'll have a cut, and then we'll start again and they should finish around three tomorrow. Providing there's no more rain delays today or tomorrow And, obviously not today, But maybe tomorrow and you know, it's a really interesting leaderboard. Morikawa is 66 is holding up really well, some some other guys got to fix under today, but he's still by himself there at six under and like you said, teeing off it and About 5 30. We got guys going off really late tonight. Some of the some of the bigger names. Obviously you're out on the course. And you know, George space and Bryson Duchamp. Oh, have been out running around trying to get, you know, get as far ahead as they can get and get as much golf in today as they can. Um, I saw Justin Thomas doesn't go till 5 15 John robs at 5 30. Rickie Fowler is a quarter to six. So You know if you're listening, and you get off work at five coming up, there's still a lot of golf to be played today. You got that right? And you know when you sit here and look at this leaderboard, Mr Golf realistic. Joining us Now is anything surprising you yet and I know there's still so much golf as we have just kind of talked about that. A lot of the guys still aren't even t and they haven't even teed it up for the second round yet because of the rain delays we had yesterday but Is anything jumping out at you? Anybody in particular jumping out at you? That seems to be playing either really bad and you thought they'd play better or people? Someone that's maybe playing better that you thought maybe wouldn't play as good? Well, I think the the surprises for me. I mean, you guys got like Scottish Chef order and out of line and old dominate here at the top of the leaderboard, and some of these guys are, you know, per perennial cut, Mr. As you know, they're they're not guys.
KQED Radio
"duchamp" Discussed on KQED Radio
"Be one of those essential workers. He was an ICU nurse in Boston until he moved to Vermont. So in the bike lane here in Burlington, nice and wide, and I'll get the other thing. It's the middle of January. We just had a snowfall and the bike lane is just is clear of any road. Left, in part because he feared for his life biking on the streets, and the commute on the subway could take as long as three hours. So what do number thoughts like him? Think about the new U. S president whose nickname After All, is Amtrak, Joe? And who's appointed a millennial people to judge as transportation secretary. Some are hopeful but Champ Oh, is not impressed. Is people were just actually millennial. He seems ancient Oh, let me look at his age. I'm fairly certain that he is. I got to get on my phone and be like nothing because he we Google it and it turns out Buddha Judge is 39 s. Oh, so I guess he counted the morning but it doesn't think like a malign. No, No, I don't. I don't think so. Duchamp. L thinking like a millennial means not thinking like a politician like all those politicians from previous generations who promised major upgrades to public transit systems. And never delivered. I'm a P easily NPR news and you are listening to NPR news. We've got traffic right now. Julie covers public transit, too. So what's the latest Julie? Nothing going on with public transit. Thank goodness fit on the roadway. We have a car fires San Ramon's 6 80 South band after Crow Canyon Road That's over on the right hand shoulder at suffers Stall Sam, a tail bridge westbound at the high rise. That's Blackie, the left Lane and back two of the North Bay eastbound 37 before Cinema Raceway. Dealing with that crashed in the left lane. So heavy back up too late. The road shoot Lee de Fish for KQED. Thank you. Julian, and support for KQED comes from the Netflix documentary The social dilemma. As users tweet like and share. Silicon.
LensWork
Innovation and the Clich
"Years the editor of Lens Work Publishing Brooks Jensen as an introduction to this topic. Let me begin with a little bit of inside baseball as they say. Did describe how it is that these podcasts come about. Oftentimes they're sparks from something. I read or something someone says to me or an idea. Get an e mail. Sometimes it's ideas that just bubble up out of nowhere. As I've often mentioned this happens a lot in the shower for some reason so I actually have a divers where I can jot down ideas before I forget them while. I'm still in the shower. And that's what happened this morning at phrase occurred to me out of the clear. Blue Sky jotted down. I had no idea where it was going. But I've been thinking about it all day in it's led to a very interesting train of thought. I WANNA share with you. The phrase is as a pursuit in life. The creation of art seems to be a dance between innovation an execution dance between innovation and execution. And here's what occurred to me while I was thinking about this. I've been listening to two different kinds of music of late. I've for reasons I can't explain really gotten into the piano concertos of Rachmaninoff. And I've mentioned that these are available on Youtube Etcetera. Play by this brilliant Chinese Pena's named Eugene and by sheer coincidence. I've also discovered a composer. Young woman who is very talented at composing classical music. And she's been exploring lots of other genres of music are names Nari Soul and she has been discussing of late in some of her Youtube Videos John Cage and his work. With what's called a prepared piano. He would take an open up a piano and attach things to the strings. like paper clips and whatnot and and the piano would make very funny noises and oftentimes. He would not really play music. He would just play notes and things and very innovative very creative. Very modern very sort of avant garde out there and she's been exploring some of his ideas so I I had these two things that are clashing in my brain the extreme precision and accomplishment of the execution of Rachmaninoff by Eugene Dong and John Cage and is prepared piano as explored by Nari Soul. I think these two extremes are what got me thinking about the dance between innovation and execution. LemMe ask the question. This way in terms of piano music which is a higher form of accomplishment. The extreme innovation of John Cage thinking way outside the box not only thinking outside of meter and normal harmonies and progressions but thinking about outside normal instruments. And how they can be modified in played with talk about innovation way out there so we applaud that to some degree and then at the other end of the scale is you. Juwan and her unbelievably precise playing Rachmaninoff. And the the execution that she brings to his scores are not only extremely high in terms of technical proficiency but also in terms of emotional content. So that's a very high measure of success. But can't we agree that these two are at essentially completely opposite ends of the creative spectrum? Both forms of music can bring out emotions. Strong positive and negative is zoom and both of them can be seen to fall in some sort of competition or scale of things. And which do we appreciate more? Well obviously the reason I bring all this up is because I'm thinking about this relative to photography to what's more important in photography extreme innovation here. I'm thinking of the inventive work from the imagination of photographers like Jerry. You'll Zeman or John Paul Capela Negro or Huntington Witherell or dominic rouse or the incredibly precise execution on very traditional lines. And here on thinking of Bruce Marne bomb and John Sexton and and even people like Steve McCurry. Which do we value more? The key idea here seems to me to revolve around our expectations. If we go into a piece of artwork with the assumption that what we're looking for is incredibly talented sensitive execution and we see something like the prepared piano of John Cage or the innovative of Jerry yells men or someone we might say. Well that's not what I call a picture because it doesn't look like what we expect a fine art photograph to look like on the other hand if we go in assuming that what we value. Is something really innovative? Something we've never seen before then we can look at work like. Oh maybe even Louis Balsam Robert Atoms and Lee friedlander Gary Winner. Grand and say well. That's that's not what I call a picture. But wow is that fantastic. Because it doesn't look at all like we expect a fine art photograph to look. I think it's easy for us to appreciate the fact that there are two camps. It's perhaps even easier to fall into one of those two camps without even realizing it if we're a traditionalist we're gonNA look at the innovative and the Avant Garde is being weird and certainly when people look at oh do sharp or Mcgraw eat they might look at those paintings and say that's weird. That's you know. Because it doesn't look like Rembrandt Raphael. On the other hand if greet and duchamp painted like Rembrandt and Rafael. We might look at it and say well. That's boring because it's not innovative so therefore it doesn't seem to add much to the history of painting and so we're not interested in it. Well we can do exactly the same thing in photography. How do you evaluate work when you look at it? Do you evaluate it based on its execution and how well it conforms to the cliche or do you evaluate it based on its innovation and how different and unique it is. There is a position in the Middle. Which gives me pause for concern. Because if what we're trying to do is have the best of both worlds have innovation and traditional execution for example. Then the only thing that's left is what you point your camera at that is to say trying to find something that hasn't been photographed as artwork before and turn that into your bailiwick or your creative vision. In hopes that people would look at it and say beautifully done traditionally printed man fantastic execution of something. That's never been photographed before and isn't that Nice. Do you realize that that's exactly what happened? In the early history of painting this has been discussed by lots. And lots of people. Certainly not a unique idea. And certainly not my own but basically the idea's this for generations for literally. Hundreds of years painting was of the human figure primarily religious pictures descent from the cross kinds of things but usually what happened in those paintings as they had to be set in some kind of scene and so there would be introduced in the background. Some little bit of a tree or a little stream or a building or something and with enough passage of time and hundreds of years. Painters started saying to the figure move over. We're we're more interested in what's going on in the background than we are in the human figure or the story and landscape painting was born but when landscape painting was born that way there were probably lots and lots of people around who said well. That's not what I call a painting because whereas the people this is just a bunch trees that's not very interesting so it was innovative but it wasn't traditional and it certainly didn't measure up to the kinds of execution that were expected in a portrait of a person or the painting of a of a story seen or some such thing