35 Burst results for "Dershowitz"

What's the Difference Between a Leftist and a Liberal?

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:44 min | Last month

What's the Difference Between a Leftist and a Liberal?

"Now liberals are different than leftists. They have a lot in common, by the way, a liberals will see things similarly, but they'll stop short of how willing they're actually how willing they are to actually use government power. A great example is like one of the last liberals in America, Alan Dershowitz, right? Alan Dershowitz is pro abortion. He's generally very relaxed than immigration, but he still has an honest, you know, kind of, I would say moral fiber where he'll go and defend people for their right to speech to speak. Now that's a very important distinction between leftists and liberals is the issue of speech. If you think speech can be hostile because you say something offensive, you're a leftist. If you think speech is necessary towards a free society and you say, get over it, because you hear something offensive, you're not a leftist. You might be one of the other three categories. The other three categories have at least a higher than not value on believing that we as human beings are the speaking beings and from a Christian biblical worldview were made in the image of God. God spoken to existence in the beginning was the word the word was God and the word became flesh that word logos, rational speech, what makes us different than the beasts of the wild were able to reason were able to tell the just from the unjust not just pain from pleasure. Speech is who we are. It's not just some indifferent thing and what differentiates us from dogs or animals or the beasts of the wild. Okay, so a leftist still believes and you see this playing out all in society, that if you say something wrong, that if you say something offensive, you could actually be making the world more hostile and dangerous. They would call this hate speech. You see that kind of spreading all across America today. A liberal wouldn't go that far. A true honest liberal would say, boy, I believe there's systemic injustices. I believe there's issues here, but I'll still kind of rely on freedom of speech and classical liberal values to solve some of the issues.

Alan Dershowitz America
There Is No Such Thing as Your Truth

Dennis Prager Podcasts

02:06 min | 5 months ago

There Is No Such Thing as Your Truth

"So I have had three big dialogs with the famous lawyer Alan Dershowitz. Oh, yes, Harvard Law professor. That's right. He's a Harvard Law professor exactly and he is a lifelong liberal lifelong Democrat. He's not a leftist. And he's very courageous and he's lost all his friends because he's not a leftist. He's a liberals who are true to liberalism are anti left. That's the way it works. But anyway, so we dialog in New York City in Miami and in LA. The first one was in New York City. This is at least 20 years ago. And it was about, should you be liberal or conservative? And the issue arose about belief in the Torah, the central book of Judaism and of Christianity for that matter. And that's the first 5 books of the Bible. So at some point, I said, ladies and gentlemen, I just realized the biggest difference between Alan Dershowitz and myself. When professor Dershowitz differs with the Torah, he thinks he's right. Right. And a tour is wrong. And when I differ with the tour, this is you speaking, I think I'm wrong in the tours, right? Yes. You said that in your commentary. In which commentary. And your genesis commentary. Oh, oh, did I? Yeah, you quoted that. I thought that was great. So did I write in the commentary what his reaction was? He said that's absolutely right. Yeah, so the first type that I did is that I agree. I highlighted that, I mean, of course I highlight everything. I'm sorry, it's a compliment, but it's true. I highlight everything in that commentary. But I really appreciated that because I identify with that so much. I feel the same way when it comes to religion or to my elders, people who are older than I am, of course, I don't just blindly follow my parents, but I am happier knowing that I am not as wise as the

Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law New York City Miami LA
Alan Dershowitz: We Can Make Legislative Solutions to Elections

Mark Levin

01:27 min | 5 months ago

Alan Dershowitz: We Can Make Legislative Solutions to Elections

"Anything And we don't see any of these comparisons being made between one party and the other Jamie you're asking who served in this committee tried to stop the election of president Trump I try to stop the election of president Bush I brought a lawsuit on behalf of the voters of Palm Beach county because they because of the butterfly ballot they voted for Pat Buchanan These were Jewish voters who go to a Patrick Harris about the least favorite candidate among Jews because they screwed up on the ballot So I brought lawsuits Am I committing crimes The American legal system permission to this And there isn't a word in this legislative hearing about what to do in the future We should set up an election commission the way Israel has an election commission in England some other countries have election commissions If you have a complaint you go to the commission the commission is nonpolitical with consistent university presidents ministers scientists people who have no party affiliation and they decide whether the election is fair We can make legislative solutions to this but nobody cares about the future People only care about pointing fingers Yeah the future They want to prevent the election of Trump That's the future But they don't want to change the law They don't want to improve the law They don't want to legislate some of these problems away All they want to do is expose and finger point It's an abusive legislative process It's an abuse of the constitution It's an abusive or system of checks and balances

President Trump Pat Buchanan Patrick Harris Palm Beach County Jamie President Bush Israel England
Alan Dershowitz: TV Legal Analysts Are Wrong About Jan. 6 Hearings

Mark Levin

01:55 min | 5 months ago

Alan Dershowitz: TV Legal Analysts Are Wrong About Jan. 6 Hearings

"These people have gotten it wrong all the time Jeffrey toobin has about a zero correct rate Everything he's predicted virtually has turned out false because his predictions are based on wish fulfillment What do you want And you get all these people saying that crimes have been committed They don't understand the difference between something that may be unlawful in something that's criminal giving you an example A policeman fails to give Miranda warnings to a suspect That's unlawful but it's not criminal A person tries to run for president at the age of 34 That's unlawful but it's not a criminal And they're completely confusing this I've seen no evidence whatsoever of any violation of any criminal statute in every civil libertarian or to be upset at people who say well we should stretch the obstruction statute to fit the crime We should stretch the conspiracy statute to commit the crime to cover the crime And that's exactly what very very McCarthy art people did in the 1950s and what radicals have tried to do now And the victims of the American people We have a right to due process And our constitution is being distorted These people think that the ends justify the fact getting Trump is the main end And anything Anything that gets Trump is appropriate I hear it from my Friends on Martha's Vineyard Well why are you defending these issues It means that Trump will be in office My God that's they say that's worse than Hitler They literally say that They make that analogy to me And you know I'm going to always defend the rights of anybody whether I agree with them or disagree with them Under the constitution people just don't understand that or pretend they don't understand

Jeffrey Toobin Miranda Mccarthy Donald Trump Vineyard Martha
Alan Dershowitz: Jan. 6 Hearings Not Far From McCarthyism

Mark Levin

01:10 min | 5 months ago

Alan Dershowitz: Jan. 6 Hearings Not Far From McCarthyism

"They put on president Trump's speech but they doctored the speech and they left out the words I want you to go to the capitol and patriotically and peacefully let your voices be heard So even if you hear one side like for example in a grand jury if a prosecutor ever did that put forward a tape and doctored it they'd be disciplined perhaps this Bard and that's what's going on here You hear these accusations being made not only by the committee but by their handpicked narrative espousing CNN CNN just repeats everything they say And then they put Larry tribe my former colleague on and he says well president Trump was guilty of attempting to murder vice president Pence Nobody responds Nobody answers If a law student ever said that on a first year criminal law exam they fail Even with great inflation So what we're hearing is a completely one sided presentation And I'm a Liberal Democrat I voted for Biden and I voted for Clinton And I find this thing unacceptable and intolerable and that throwback to mccarthyism

President Trump CNN Larry Biden Clinton
Alan Dershowitz: On Jan. 6, Dems Have Cheated Even Without Opposition

Mark Levin

01:57 min | 5 months ago

Alan Dershowitz: On Jan. 6, Dems Have Cheated Even Without Opposition

"With respect to this January 6th committee I look at this committee And I say what the hell is this Apart from everything what the hell is this Does this have any basis in the constitution in any rational system when you have one side that's putting a video and putting up oh look at this This is the speaker from Arizona Mentioning names and the people whose names are mentioned have no say there's nobody representing them and it's a national forum and they go on and on about how crimes were committed and how they're going to make criminal referrals Shouldn't we be concerned about this This is the old mccarthyism in a new democratic ARP This is what I remember as a kid with the house in American activities committee and senator McCarthy holding people except they were fair of the McCarthy committee was fair because the Democrats would at least have a chance to ask some questions And the people who were named at least could have lawyers representing them This is like watching a basketball game but it's much more serious In which one team is allowed on the court and Steph Curry is shooting three pointer after three pointer but the other team is not even allowed on the court They're kept on the bench It's outrageous In America you don't trust witnesses unless they're subject across examination of confrontation the constitution talks about the right to confront Witnesses And here you have totally one sided presentation Any Republican who wanted to ask a single hard question was excluded by Nancy Pelosi and they put on two Republicans one of whom is quitting Congress and the other who was going to be defeated in a Republican primary and their following the narrative completely And what's worse about it is that even without opposition the Democrats have

House In American Activities C Mccarthy Committee Senator Mccarthy Steph Curry Arizona Basketball America Nancy Pelosi Congress
Alan Dershowitz: The Jan. 6 Committee Is Not a Fair Committee

Mike Gallagher Podcast

01:10 min | 5 months ago

Alan Dershowitz: The Jan. 6 Committee Is Not a Fair Committee

"Check out Alan Dershowitz, the famed law professor talking about the real impact of the January 6th select committee. Here he was yesterday with newsmax's Greta van susteren. Well, it's not a fair committee, obviously. It's like the Boston Celtics going to play the warriors and the NBA says only the Celtics can go on the field, not the warriors. One team on the field, not the other team. Nobody should pay attention to the conclusions of this kangaroo committee. Of course a committee can make a recommendation. So can you make the recommendation to Congress, but to the Justice Department, the adjustment won't follow it. President committed no crimes. His speech was constitutionally protected. Ill advised to be sure. But constitutionally protected. I put it in the same category as Chuck Schumer's speech, both ill advised, both constitutionally protected. You know, that's an interesting takeaway from professor Dershowitz. Chuck Schumer arguably incited a would be assassin to show up at Brett Kavanaugh's doorstep.

Professor Dershowitz Warriors Greta Van Susteren Newsmax Boston Celtics Celtics NBA Justice Department Chuck Schumer Congress Brett Kavanaugh
Where Are 'The Elites' Coming From?

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:51 min | 9 months ago

Where Are 'The Elites' Coming From?

"Between the people of our country, the muscular class, the welders, the police officers, the pastors, the moms, the dads, the people that do their job and the elites. Now, we rail against the elites for good reason on this program. We need better elites. And by the way, we're not saying get rid of the idea of elites, we believe in hierarchies, you're always going to have some people that are going to rule your society. This idea that you can get rid of the ruling class completely is a Marxist utopian egalitarian wish list. It's never going to happen. Utopia literally means nowhere. If you go back to Thomas more's book and kind of the creation of the term utopia, so we need better elites, not the eradication of them, not the not the disappearance of all of our elites. But when you start to rail against the elites, we should take a step back and ask ourselves the question, where are the elites coming from? Where are the training ground for the people who are now running our country? So for example, what does Hillary Clinton, a Meryl Streep? Anderson Cooper, John Kerry, Dershowitz, Paul krugman, Cory Booker, what do all those people have in common? Well, just on that list, they all went to Yale. According to U.S. news dot com, Yale law is the number one law school in the world. Number one, Stanford is number two Harvard is number three Columbia's number four to actually Columbia is tied to the University of Chicago number four. Yale is the best law school. You can get into. Number one,

Thomas Yale Law Cory Booker Anderson Cooper Meryl Streep Dershowitz Paul Krugman Hillary Clinton John Kerry Yale Columbia Stanford U.S. Harvard University Of Chicago
Left Wing Professors, Wisconsin Justices Raised Questions About 2020 Election

The Larry Elder Show

01:03 min | 11 months ago

Left Wing Professors, Wisconsin Justices Raised Questions About 2020 Election

"Meanwhile, you have two left wing professors I mentioned this before, Jonathan turley, Alan Dershowitz, both said there were so many shenanigans in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. And using COVID to change rules altered regulations, quasi legally, if not illegally, and they felt that the lawsuit that Donald Trump filed overturned Pennsylvania should be taken up by the Supreme Court would be taken up by the Supreme Court and that Donald Trump would win it. Well, the Supreme Court did not take it up. But these two professors, both of whom, by the way, voted twice for Obama thought they would. Then this Wisconsin. Donald Trump follow lawsuit overturn Wisconsin. When all the way up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, they voted four to three not to take it up. But there were three dissenters, including the chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. She talked about the ballot boxes dropboxes all their stuff that they did that she thought was problematic. And she said, we should take it up.

Donald Trump Supreme Court Jonathan Turley Alan Dershowitz Pennsylvania Philadelphia Wisconsin Supreme Court Wisconsin Barack Obama
"dershowitz" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

05:07 min | 11 months ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"Noticed a large, heavily decorated Christmas tree, setting outside of city hall. What a great question. There's just no absolute Christmas tree. This is the only Christmas miracle I believe in because this question. It's Christmas Theo. It's a time for miracles. There you go. The Christmas tree stood alone was brightly lit with Christmas lights and had several red and green ornaments decorated. Where is this going? There were no other holiday or religious symbols on the city grounds. The man who practices Judaism and is a taxpayer in the city. Was offended. He sued the city. Arguing that the city exceeded its constitutional limits in erecting the Christmas tree. Assuming the man has standing will the man prevail in his lawsuit. A, no, because the swing justice is Brett Kavanaugh. It should be one of the answers, I think. Your actual answers. Which involve Amy Cody Barrett, Bret Kavanaugh. A yes, because the city's display violates the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. B, yes, because the city's display violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment. C no because the city may engage in free speech and spread whatever message of desires, desires to, so long as it does not prohibit citizens from engaging in the same free speech. Or D, no, because the city's display does not violate the First Amendment. God, this is such a loaded question. Because I love it, I love it. Look, I know from this show that apparently the government can maintain a 9000 foot cross. In the middle of a freeway or whatever the heck that was, and that's kosher. That's fine. So I can't imagine this being a yes answer. I just can't. And I know, you know, like also, there's Christmas trees outside of city hall all the time. I think I have to be a no answer, but I mean we'll see. All right, I'll go through it. So we got a Christmas tree just to recap the facts. Christmas tree right outside a city hall. It stood alone, brightly lit. I don't know if anything that matters. Several red and green ones decorating it. No other holiday or religious symbols on city grounds. So can a Jewish citizen be like the sucks I'm offended? All right, a, yes, because the city's display violates the free exercise clause. I think that can not be right. Even if I were going to entertain a yes answer, I don't think it violates free exercise. I don't think that's where we'd be going. It doesn't have a tree doesn't stop anyone from exercising their religion, I don't think. B yes because the city's display violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment. Now that's one that I would like to be true. You know, I don't know, I guess I'm not, maybe a Christmas tree isn't that big of a deal, but if we had a very vigorous separation of church and state, which I think maybe we should have, then B would probably be the answer. It's more establishment Y than free exercise, I think. C no because the city may engage in free speech and spread whatever message it desires to. So long as it does not prohibit citizens from engaging in the same free speech. I don't like that answer in any way, shape or form. I think that having just been pranked hardcore, I don't know what to believe anymore. So stuff, but this feels wrong to me. May engage in free speech and spread whatever message it desires so long as it does not prohibit citizens. So citizens from engaging in the same free speech. No, that can't be right. So the city hall could just like preach all day. As long as it's not stopping other citizens from preaching, nah, that can't be right. So Nazi, do you know because the city's display does not violate the First Amendment? I think D is really where I'm leaning. I guess I'll do the usual thing, which is I'll eliminate too. I think I would go between B and D, I think that perhaps in my ideal world, the answer would be B, I don't know. I'm not sure how much of a screw JM as regards that. I like Christmas. I like Christmas trees, but you know I also get that we should be fair and represent everybody, so maybe maybe in a just world you would make sure that if a citizen felt they weren't being represented in their beliefs and they're kind of being treated unfairly that there'd be some recourse there. But I sadly think it's D, I think trying to think of the reasoning. And I honestly, I think it's D just because the court is right wing and religious honest. That's on my honest answer. So I'm going with D no because it doesn't violate the First Amendment. All right. If you want to play along with time machine I had to do that just share it this episode on social media include the hashtag T three BE include your answer your reasons, therefore, we will pick a winner and shower that winner would never ending fame and fortune, fame and fortune not guaranteed. And thank you. And now it's time to thank our new patrons at Patreon dot com slash law. Hope you enjoyed that recent lot awful.

city hall Brett Kavanaugh Amy Cody Barrett Bret Kavanaugh
Adam Carolla: If You Debate and Disagree With a Liberal, They Call You Evil

Mark Levin

01:32 min | 1 year ago

Adam Carolla: If You Debate and Disagree With a Liberal, They Call You Evil

"I think you see this others now who maybe were more Liberal Democrat and they say wait a minute When I debate with conservatives not all obviously but as a journal they want to debate They want to engage They want to understand And they stand for things that actually I might agree with I mean I may not agree with all their positions but fundamentally liberty and competition and stuff like that I find that people if they really engage or something like that even look at Alan Dershowitz right now They start to see that one side really wants to engage in another side wants to destroy the crap out of you if you don't agree with them You get that sense Yeah and it's also their terms of engagement are very twisted They're like you can agree with them on 8 out of ten things but if you disagree with them on one and a half things then they don't want to engage And your by the way what they do is they basically just go It's not that we disagree It's that you're evil And you don't engage with evil people why would you Now it's convenient because they don't want to engage and they're missing most of the facts But they do this thing where they do add hominin and then you're evil sitting down and having a conversation

Alan Dershowitz
Self-Defense Expert Andrew Branca Describes His Greatest Frustration With the Rittenhouse Case

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:35 min | 1 year ago

Self-Defense Expert Andrew Branca Describes His Greatest Frustration With the Rittenhouse Case

"With us is an expert and someone who is terrific and came highly recommended from the wonderful Jack the Soviet is Andrew Branca from law of self defense dot com Andrew welcome to the Charlie Kirk show. You have been terrific, explaining this case. What has been your greatest frustration and how the media has covered the rittenhouse case from your from your perspective and knowing the law as it pertains to self defense? Well, of course, the media is largely the propaganda arm of the political left in America. So they, with all these politicized cases, they rapidly develop a false narrative about what happened. And narrative that if it were true, would outrage anybody, but it's not true. They do this with Zimmerman. They do this with Jacob Blake. They do this with George Floyd. They do this with another Kyle rittenhouse case. And unfortunately, normal human beings only know what they perceive in their environment. They only know the information that's presented to them. And of all they see is the news media propaganda. Well, that's what they're going to believe. So people believe, for example, that Jacob Blake was shot in the back 7 times for no good reason when in fact he was armed with a knife and getting into a car with children in it. Being non compliant with lawful arrest. People, for some reason, believe that Kyle rittenhouse was an active shooter who shot a bunch of black people at a protest. None of that ever happened. Kyle rittenhouse never shot anyone who wasn't actively attacking him with deadly force. But you see people on Twitter, over the course of this trial, shocked to discover that what they thought had happened was not at all

Andrew Branca Jacob Blake Charlie Kirk Kyle Rittenhouse George Floyd Andrew Jack Zimmerman America Twitter
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:37 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Right now, the jury is deliberating or there arguing over many different kind of technical aspects or issues of evidence being provided. You know, professor Dershowitz, you are the expert on this. Have you ever seen a prosecution act like this prosecution did, especially in regards to potentially challenging the Fifth Amendment rights of Kyle, the defendant? Do you think that was an intentional tactic to try to trigger a mistrial? What's your take on that with all of your experience? Tragically I've seen this happen over and over again, prosecutors constantly violate the constitution and judges let them get away with it. Discharge has been criticized, because he hasn't let them get away with it. If the shoe were on the other foot, if this were a black lives protester who had killed and was being charged and was claiming self defense, the hard left media would be taking exactly the opposite. You know, it'd be praising the judge et cetera. So this is clearly a violation of the constitution, what the prosecution did. And I said, from day one, because this case is going badly for the prosecution. They may win. I can't predict the outcome of the case. But because they thought the case was going badly, they may have deliberately tried to get a mistrial without prejudice so that they could start all over again and do a better job. The same thing happened in the O. J. Simpson case. When the O. J. Simpson case wasn't going well, the prosecution tried to get rid of jurors. And go below them 12 numbers in order to do it again. I actually argued that aspect of the case went to LA and prevented them from doing that, but prosecutors will do that from time to time.

office of Potter case George Floyd Minneapolis Georgia New York Flynn
Lawyer Alan Dershowitz on the Rittenhouse Prosecutors' Violation of the Constitution

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:37 min | 1 year ago

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz on the Rittenhouse Prosecutors' Violation of the Constitution

"Right now, the jury is deliberating or there arguing over many different kind of technical aspects or issues of evidence being provided. You know, professor Dershowitz, you are the expert on this. Have you ever seen a prosecution act like this prosecution did, especially in regards to potentially challenging the Fifth Amendment rights of Kyle, the defendant? Do you think that was an intentional tactic to try to trigger a mistrial? What's your take on that with all of your experience? Tragically I've seen this happen over and over again, prosecutors constantly violate the constitution and judges let them get away with it. Discharge has been criticized, because he hasn't let them get away with it. If the shoe were on the other foot, if this were a black lives protester who had killed and was being charged and was claiming self defense, the hard left media would be taking exactly the opposite. You know, it'd be praising the judge et cetera. So this is clearly a violation of the constitution, what the prosecution did. And I said, from day one, because this case is going badly for the prosecution. They may win. I can't predict the outcome of the case. But because they thought the case was going badly, they may have deliberately tried to get a mistrial without prejudice so that they could start all over again and do a better job. The same thing happened in the O. J. Simpson case. When the O. J. Simpson case wasn't going well, the prosecution tried to get rid of jurors. And go below them 12 numbers in order to do it again. I actually argued that aspect of the case went to LA and prevented them from doing that, but prosecutors will do that from time to time.

Professor Dershowitz Kyle O. J. Simpson LA
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:45 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"With us right now, is Alan Dershowitz who I don't think needs no introduction and does a great job on a variety of different topics and we've had Allen on the show before. Professor Dershowitz, thank you so much for joining the program. My question is what's your take on the Kyle rittenhouse drama and kind of I read an article that said, you believe he should be acquitted, please, the floor is yours. Well, not only do I think he should be acquitted, but I don't think he got a fair trial, whether he's acquitted or convicted. The media has put not a thumb on the scale, but an elbow on the scale. They have told everybody, particularly CNN, New Yorker magazine, MSNBC, they've already told the public, this guy is a white supremacist, a vigilante. He's no good. This will send a terrible, terrible message and a precedent. They have basically tried to take the self defense issue away from the jury and broaden the crime into him being there at all. He never should have been there, you never should have had a gun. He never should have confronted any of these other people. But that's not what he's charged with. He's charged with murdering two people and attempting to murder another. His defense is self defense. And the issue should be limited to the minutes leading up to the shootings and the moments after the shootings. And he should not be put on trial for his activities that whole day, whether we like or don't like what he did that whole day and I don't like it. I wish he hadn't commented, which he hadn't brought his gun. But that's not what he's on trial for. And so the jury has been distracted, I think, from the focus by the prosecution's case, and by the outside influences of the

professor Dershowitz Kyle rittenhouse New Yorker magazine O. J. Simpson Kyle MSNBC CNN Allen Don lemon Leo Frank rittenhouse LA George Floyd Maxwell America Georgia Ahmad Arbery
Analyzing the New 'Trial of the Century' With Alan Dershowitz

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:45 min | 1 year ago

Analyzing the New 'Trial of the Century' With Alan Dershowitz

"With us right now, is Alan Dershowitz who I don't think needs no introduction and does a great job on a variety of different topics and we've had Allen on the show before. Professor Dershowitz, thank you so much for joining the program. My question is what's your take on the Kyle rittenhouse drama and kind of I read an article that said, you believe he should be acquitted, please, the floor is yours. Well, not only do I think he should be acquitted, but I don't think he got a fair trial, whether he's acquitted or convicted. The media has put not a thumb on the scale, but an elbow on the scale. They have told everybody, particularly CNN, New Yorker magazine, MSNBC, they've already told the public, this guy is a white supremacist, a vigilante. He's no good. This will send a terrible, terrible message and a precedent. They have basically tried to take the self defense issue away from the jury and broaden the crime into him being there at all. He never should have been there, you never should have had a gun. He never should have confronted any of these other people. But that's not what he's charged with. He's charged with murdering two people and attempting to murder another. His defense is self defense. And the issue should be limited to the minutes leading up to the shootings and the moments after the shootings. And he should not be put on trial for his activities that whole day, whether we like or don't like what he did that whole day and I don't like it. I wish he hadn't commented, which he hadn't brought his gun. But that's not what he's on trial for. And so the jury has been distracted, I think, from the focus by the prosecution's case, and by the outside influences of the

Alan Dershowitz Kyle Rittenhouse New Yorker Magazine Allen Msnbc CNN
Alan Dershowitz: Kyle Rittenhouse 'Should Be Acquitted'

Mike Gallagher Podcast

02:25 min | 1 year ago

Alan Dershowitz: Kyle Rittenhouse 'Should Be Acquitted'

"If Kyle rittenhouse is convicted, it'll be one of the biggest disgraces in a courtroom that we'll have seen since O. J. Simpson was acquitted. Right now, 12 jurors and 6 alternates being chosen by lottery. There's a jury pool of 18. They're going to have 12 juries who get to hear the case. I mean, what a doozy it was. To watch this, Katie pavlich had great analysis Katie from town hall dot com. She was on the 5 yesterday. Here's how she said that the prosecutors blew up their own case. So the defense has been able to go back to the evidence with the jury to show them to let them see what happened. Whereas the prosecution has repeatedly changed their story based on their own witnesses blowing their case. Gage gross gross for example, admitting that he was fired upon by Kyle rittenhouse after he pointed his Glock 19 in his face. And so therefore proved the self defense case for the jury. Legal scholar Alan Dershowitz, who frankly, I think emerged as a shining light during the Trump era, he was on with Sean Hannity last night and he said the correct verdict in this case, the Kyle rittenhouse case would be acquittal. I never predict, because I've been in this business too long and Jerry's surprise and we don't know what the jury deliberations are about. We don't know what who the jurors are. I do think that there can't be a possible conviction of attempted murder on the victim alleged victim who admitted that he had pointed a gun at him seconds before he was shot. As to the two who were killed, I don't think you can make a prediction. I do think that the evidence does not show beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed a crime and that even if he were to be convicted, there would be very, very, very serious issues on appeal. So I'm not going to predict, but I'm going to tell you that the right verdict in this case would be an acquit. That doesn't mean that this young man should be praised for coming with an AR-15. That doesn't mean he's a hero. It just means the government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self defense. That's a high burden. I don't believe the government met

Kyle Rittenhouse Katie Pavlich O. J. Simpson Alan Dershowitz Katie Gage Glock Sean Hannity Jerry
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

07:18 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Walking back. Alan dershowitz has left the building. Alan dershowitz is an amazing mind. Amazing thinker principled person. Lot to say about what we just talked about. First of all we are both astonished. Yeah that it's possible that that he's convinced that biden won fair and square. I mean i would think the most sober-minded person would have to at least say that it's not clear there's a lot of Reason to believe that the election was was messed with. The question is would it be. Would it affect the outcome. But the idea that he's just sort of mouthing. The party line is a little surprising. I guess for him but also he says i think biden's the right man for the job this time i think. Can you imagine these bringing peace or something. He's bringing calm to the nation that's biden first of all biden is at the at best incompetent at best Anyway that's another story but what he was just talking about in case. People aren't getting the references. He mentioned chilmark. I mentioned edgar town. He summers on martha's vineyard an island off the coast of massachusetts Nantucket is another one. Martha's vineyard of the two is is famous for being liberal Walter cronkite lived there and he mentioned lillian hellman. I mean lillian hellman. It doesn't get more liberal than lillian. Hellman the famous Writer and i went there in one thousand nine hundred eighty five. I guess it was. This is all in my book. This is for me to plug my book. Fish out of water in fish out of water. I talk about when. I'm talking about right now but basically When i was at yale my writing teacher was john hersi. John hersi is famous for. He got a pulitzer prize for his book. A bell for a donohoe written right after the war. He wrote hiroshima which was The kind of the new report. Taj about what happened in hiroshima hiroshima and It was published published as a small book About what happened after the bomb horrifying obviously but beautiful journalism and so he was one of those liberal artists who lived on. Martha's minute he was my professor. So i i went to visit him. I guess the year or so after. I graduated and he was the kind of person who have dinner with lillian hellman They would have dinner with ralph ellison another stalwarts of the artists The the left. And it's so interesting because i really do believe. Even though they were left lefties they believed in what alan dershowitz talking about. They believed in these principles. And i think that all of that has devolved to you know where we are today which is to say A kind of fascism a kind of big state ism the fundamental principles of america. They they have left the building so interesting to hear. Somebody like twits. Talk about being snubbed. at the country club people won't talk to his wife. He's on invited to these things because they think it's unconscionable that he would stand for these things in Contravention of what they believe has to be right. And that's where we are folks. And i say this because i think that those of us who are more on the conservative side we have a responsibility not to go down that path ourselves. In other words when cuomo was resigned. I was the first one To post my shod and freud on social media and to to say you know one down one to go and p- p- post a picture of him newsome so that's kind of the fun part but then you have to think. Are we applauding things that are wrong and just as islanders which was talking about people that believe the woman. What a filthy. why when. An anti biblical anti-american concept that forget about due process. We're going to believe these people because they're better. We're gonna believe blacks over whites we're gonna believe women are what an offensive racist sexist idea but again it comes down to power in other words if you believe in principles and are willing to let the principals adjudicate situations or you just say i want to win and i don't care how i win. I don't care if we have to use dirty politics. It's poetic justice if If cuomo goes to jail for this but not for sending people to their deaths who cares. It's poetic justice. I would say we should be careful about that. I think we have to care about what is actually right. And so that's why it's important to talk to to liberals like alan dershowitz or naomi wolf. Anyone we can so that we remind ourselves that it's not about winning it's about justice it's about fairness it's about freedom and these kinds of things don't love what he talked about. Buckley and himself debating then going out and having a beer because they both were in different sized but they both respected the law and rule and order. And just well. It's like you have a principled opponent to you know that you can actually get someplace and you're not hating each other. I i hate you. And i hate your ideas. It's like i wanna. I wanna talk to you about those ideas because i think they're wrong but you can have them. It's all right and actually I mentioned mike lindell. There is no question that there's a chilling affect a lot of people. I know have been sued by dominion and the fact is that it's my idea right. I'm pretty sure this is the whole thing behind. It is that they have a lot of money and they're spending their money to quiet. People silence people to send out a chilling effect. Like the careful. Don't talk about this. don't talk about that. So you have fox news refusing to air. Mike lindell's commercial for the cyber symposium. Because they you know they've got a different corporate culture. They're not in it for what they believe in. They're in it for the corporate culture so they become part of the problem. And i just think it's important for us to talk about that on this program. I just wanted to take a minute here since we had the time. We didn't normally do this but it just really really It is important We on this program as you all know have been attacked. We've been knocked off of youtube. That's a big deal. I'll keep saying it because it is a big deal that they did that What did we do. What did we say on this program. it's obvious that we didn't do anything or say anything that innumerable people haven't done and they were not off youtube so it's become very political Okay before we go. I want to remind you We have a campaign on with food for the poor one of the project managers managers. Marcus frisch when we come back. I wanna play a quote because Well before we go to break let me just remind you go to metaxas. Talk dot com. You'll see.

alan dershowitz biden lillian hellman hiroshima chilmark john hersi John hersi Martha Walter cronkite cuomo Hellman ralph ellison Nantucket lillian edgar martha Taj massachusetts newsome mike lindell
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

02:03 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Do you think you believe biden was was actually elected and i'm i'm fairly certain we're going to see information to the contrary soon. Everybody will have to look at it. But let's say he was the question that i have because i know you have to go. Do you think that he and his administration genuinely care about free speech. Because i don't get the impression that he that that he in the office of the president who has this tremendous bully pulpit that he gives a fig about what we are talking about right now. I don't think it even crosses his mind with the minds of the people as administration. I think they're making it work for them. Which to me is the greater scandal. Well i know. Joe biden for now. It's forty years. I like him as a person. I think he the right man for the job at this point in time. He's helping the combination. But no president kicker free speech. Thomas jefferson before he became president said given a choice between a government without newspapers or newspaper without governments. I would surely pick newspapers without government. Then he was president and then he issued a different statement. He said if nobody read newspapers. We'd be better off in smarter and fairer than if people read newspapers. So no incumbents like the media particularly and joe biden himself. I think we'll support free speech. But they're going to be people in his administration. He's appointed some people who are radically on the left just the way Republicans have appointed. Sometimes people are radically on the right. We need to move more to the center. We need to move more to all the old debate between genuine liberals in genuine conservatives. Both of whom bull we freedom of speech. I used to debate bill buckley. All the time on his television she was a conservative. A liberal enjoyed each other. We ran for a drink after we got along. There was no cancelled culture. I crave for the days of bill. Buckley versus alan dershowitz. Instead of the kind of cancel culture we're experiencing

alan dershowitz biden lillian hellman hiroshima chilmark john hersi John hersi Martha Walter cronkite cuomo Hellman ralph ellison Nantucket lillian edgar martha Taj massachusetts newsome mike lindell
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:45 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"I mean when the columbia faculty administration did not have the guts to stand up to the students who were just thugs spoiled thugs who took over the president's office in other words this goes back fifty plus years where you have a a leading class. That simply doesn't have on. Somebody called it the cultural confidence to say no get out this. It's a privilege to be here. It seems to me that that the leadership class in america whether it's university presidents or whether it's people who own sports teams or any of that stuff they don't seem right understand these fundamentals. No you're absolutely right. I look the free speech movement. Berkeley i was there when it happened. It was not free. Speech is free speech for me. Not for the free speech for the left. A look. what's going on now with ben and jerry They're boycotting israel. But they're they're the company that owns them. Unilever sells to iraq to cuba to china to belarus. They have a a company in belarus. They are among the worst human rights enablers and focusing on only on israel. It's a it's a corporate disgrace. I will never again eat that. Fat filled cholesterol well. I haven't forgiving. We're gonna break folks are going to be right back with alan dershowitz copay get off. Did not folks and talking to alan.

columbia faculty administratio belarus Berkeley america israel Unilever jerry ben cuba iraq china alan dershowitz alan
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:48 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"I mean though a is simply that the people that are animated whether on the left or on the right or any of these issues there at least paying attention even if they're on the wrong side but but it strikes me that the moneyed classes don't seem to think that this affects them in other words. The reason we are where we are is because those people typically have stepped back. They think that everything's fine. There isn't a battle for fundamental freedoms in america. They're wrong because their children are going to college and college. Today has become a propaganda mill for the hard left. And today you cannot your mind in a class or if you're a faculty member many american universities if you express views that are not politically correct. You are threatened. You won't be promoted. You won't be giving classes to teach. You won't be hired by other universities. I've written a new book called the case against new sensors five censorship by big corporations universities each and there are small never people in universities who want speech want to have a very very. Don't think speech codes. Who want to make sure that professors and students can't express users Their views and the administrators aren't doing very much about it. They talk about free speech but when it comes down to it they don't do very much to protect it on many college campuses so the rich and the elite who was sending their kids to princeton and yale and harvard in chicago and then they really do have something to worry about because they're sending them into place where they're not getting educated. They're getting propaganda is they're not being too how to think that being told what the

Frisch marcus frisch honduras america Mark metaxas New york
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

02:54 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Keep my christian faith strong and for entertaining me in my car but please can you please suggest a different podcast for me to try because my wife is getting tired of me coming home and saying i heard this great guest on the eric metaxas show. And where's my check book. We need to free a slave or feed some children. Thank you well. You know That's what we do on this program. We pray guests and often we ask for your help which we just did a few minutes ago because they really are while. We're joking around their kids in this world. Who don't have food Their slaves in the sudan who need freeing so obviously We will always do that. And it's a privilege to do that. Which i didn't expect to end here but and i won't end here but i want to remind you please go to metaxas talk dot com today or if you prefer to use your phone call one eight hundred eight four four eight six three eight four four eight six three. Hope we really do. Need your help seriously And i'll keep reminding you. But i just wanna say regarding suss quashes in this wonderful letter that we got We're a pro sasquatch podcast so we may not be an all sasquatch all the time podcast right toward were a pro sasquatch. Podcast and i would. I would interview assess squash. I mean any day. You bring him here and it's always him because the the lady suss quashes I don't have a very strict rules. Just the guys can do media. But they They're old fashioned. I wanna tell you that we did About four years ago we did a sasquatch week. We did bigfoot week on the erc. Metaxas show. I remember that. And i don't know if that's still in the archives but we didn't. We need to do it where we might have not. We might. how all right well anyway. Thanks for the letter. Love your letters. And i and i do want to say people always say to me. You have such great guests on so this reminds me to remind you. Please go to Follow us on social media. Follow me on social media please. but Sign up for my newsletter. Because i know that if you're hunting around for a guest if you get the newsletter it comes to your inbox your email and you can see all of the videos and we even put some from past weeks so you don't have to go hunting for them We do that because when we got cancelled from youtube. It's much tougher for people to find us. And so we need you to step up. Go to eric. Metaxas dot com and. Please do sign up the newsletter. Sign up your friends. sign up your family sunup. Up your book club. Maybe if your church director you have all those emails. Put them in there. You'll be blessing them. Yeah and soupy sales when he says please go and go into your mother's purse and you see some corinne paper mail that to me at this address. Yeah anyway okay. Where the time we were the day alan dershowitz will be on. It's going.

eric metaxas Metaxas sudan erc squash youtube eric alan dershowitz
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

The Eric Metaxas Show

03:34 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show

"Eric taxes air. Guess what it's thursday album. Today is thursday. That means i don't know what it means to me. Smart probably friday. I'd be willing to bet a lot on that tomorrow. It'd be fry now. I want to bring a few fun facts. Fridays in tomorrow okay. We haven't done a lot of fun. Facts has it been so newsy crazy so cookie gonna have you will that. We haven't done a lot of fun. Facts fridays tomorrow can do some fun facts writing out today in. We got to mention this in a couple of minutes. Alan dershowitz alan d. Bogeyed his rap name buggy de victim. Alan dershowitz is going to be my guest. Either miss hours this morning off different. that's different. Oh oddly enough. Alan dershowitz probably the biggest lawyer in america right now. I can't think of anybody. I i mean who. Who were the big lawyers when used to think of like. Hey let's get so and so on the case I can't think of the guy's name. d- voted it. Was i can see his face but every generation there's one of those people Alan dershowitz is that guy. Harvard law professor Politically liberal but liberal in the old school sense since he's now in his eighties Liberal means we believe in free speech means we believe in the constitution honestly He's important he's an important voice. And i thank god for him so he is I believe he's jewish alan dershowitz and our two. We have evan. Say it Who is also jewish. Now the two of them. It's kind of interesting because Evans say it. He's become conservative but he was just a comedian and it just i. He's brilliant absolutely brilliant so to spectacular guests. We also have at the beginning of our two before. Evans say it. We're going to do an ask metaxas. I'ma gentle gentle gentle gentile. i'm a nice guy. And i'm going to do an ask metaxas with your questions we're gonna do it every thursday we've been keeping it up and we're going to be doing that today our one so i'm sorry to ask metaxas right now. Yes right now by the way who's tomorrow. We re hearing tomorrow tomorrow. Tomorrow let me look at the list. I saw my goodness tomorrow. We've got francis chan okay. That's a big one. You told me we're gonna get oj simpson on this program. Well i couldn't. But i got his lawyer. His lawyer alan dershowitz okay. Tomorrow's francis chan so friday with francis. It'd here his talk about right. Now yes before. We get to alan dershowitz but i know. He's you're preparing. Alan dershowitz He's being deposed. Last night. I turned on the tv and glendale is doing a three day. Cyber symposium in south dakota. I'm asking those of you who were 'prayers to pray today. The spiritual warfare is staggering. I really won't go into it. But i have friends on the ground. Sending me messages and You don't have to agree with mike. You don't have to like but i think you have to agree that. He's fighting for america that he believes he's onto something i'm sure he is under something reasonably sure. And that's why i talk about him It's one of the reasons. I'm very.

Alan dershowitz metaxas alan d Evans Eric francis chan Harvard evan america oj simpson francis glendale south dakota mike
The Me Too Movement is Gendering Justice

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:50 min | 1 year ago

The Me Too Movement is Gendering Justice

"Professor dershowitz. Can we talk just a moment about the strange cuomo scandal. My understanding is that things have just gotten so nasty and so political in america that were more concerned with whether he has touched women inappropriately than what he's done with his policies. I mean a lot of people are genuinely upset. that he that he sent a covert patients into these nursing homes. That's of course infinitely more horrifying as a concept than Whether somebody would Be doing what. He's alleged to have been doing d. Do you have any sense of why that is. Do you have any opinion on that or her. We have our priorities. If you see a doctor dressed in a doctor's white and you say to her boy you make those doctors whites look good. That is regarded as a worst sin than what happened in the nursing homes. Because there's nobody there fighting for the nursing home patients but the me too movement is on top of any deviation One of the things charged in this outrageous report done by letitia. James is that cuomo looked women up and down and he looked at parts of their body. My god if that becomes an impeachable offense or a crime Many many men and women will be in trouble. Forget remember that letitia. James who's now probably going to run for governor started it basically her report by saying believe women Essentially don't believe man that there should be a thumb gender on the scale of justice. And if you have two witnesses one man one woman in their equally credible she says believed the woman because she's a woman that reminds me of what happened in the south in the nineteen twenties. Believe whites don't believe blacks. You cannot generalize like

Professor Dershowitz Cuomo Letitia America James
No President Cares About Free Speech - Joe Biden Included

The Eric Metaxas Show

02:03 min | 1 year ago

No President Cares About Free Speech - Joe Biden Included

"Do you think you believe biden was was actually elected and i'm i'm fairly certain we're going to see information to the contrary soon. Everybody will have to look at it. But let's say he was the question that i have because i know you have to go. Do you think that he and his administration genuinely care about free speech. Because i don't get the impression that he that that he in the office of the president who has this tremendous bully pulpit that he gives a fig about what we are talking about right now. I don't think it even crosses his mind with the minds of the people as administration. I think they're making it work for them. Which to me is the greater scandal. Well i know. Joe biden for now. It's forty years. I like him as a person. I think he the right man for the job at this point in time. He's helping the combination. But no president kicker free speech. Thomas jefferson before he became president said given a choice between a government without newspapers or newspaper without governments. I would surely pick newspapers without government. Then he was president and then he issued a different statement. He said if nobody read newspapers. We'd be better off in smarter and fairer than if people read newspapers. So no incumbents like the media particularly and joe biden himself. I think we'll support free speech. But they're going to be people in his administration. He's appointed some people who are radically on the left just the way Republicans have appointed. Sometimes people are radically on the right. We need to move more to the center. We need to move more to all the old debate between genuine liberals in genuine conservatives. Both of whom bull we freedom of speech. I used to debate bill buckley. All the time on his television she was a conservative. A liberal enjoyed each other. We ran for a drink after we got along. There was no cancelled culture. I crave for the days of bill. Buckley versus alan dershowitz. Instead of the kind of cancel culture we're experiencing

Joe Biden Biden Thomas Jefferson Bill Buckley Alan Dershowitz Buckley
Alan Dershowitz on How Colleges Have Become Propaganda Mills for the Hard Left

The Eric Metaxas Show

01:48 min | 1 year ago

Alan Dershowitz on How Colleges Have Become Propaganda Mills for the Hard Left

"I mean though a is simply that the people that are animated whether on the left or on the right or any of these issues there at least paying attention even if they're on the wrong side but but it strikes me that the moneyed classes don't seem to think that this affects them in other words. The reason we are where we are is because those people typically have stepped back. They think that everything's fine. There isn't a battle for fundamental freedoms in america. They're wrong because their children are going to college and college. Today has become a propaganda mill for the hard left. And today you cannot your mind in a class or if you're a faculty member many american universities if you express views that are not politically correct. You are threatened. You won't be promoted. You won't be giving classes to teach. You won't be hired by other universities. I've written a new book called the case against new sensors five censorship by big corporations universities each and there are small never people in universities who want speech want to have a very very. Don't think speech codes. Who want to make sure that professors and students can't express users Their views and the administrators aren't doing very much about it. They talk about free speech but when it comes down to it they don't do very much to protect it on many college campuses so the rich and the elite who was sending their kids to princeton and yale and harvard in chicago and then they really do have something to worry about because they're sending them into place where they're not getting educated. They're getting propaganda is they're not being too how to think that being told what the

America Princeton Yale Harvard Chicago
Caller Concerned Not Enough Pastors Are Standing up for Freedom

Mark Levin

01:38 min | 1 year ago

Caller Concerned Not Enough Pastors Are Standing up for Freedom

"Uh, I've been fortunate to get your book. That was an early quarter and on the heels of Reading another book by Dershowitz or was rather And reading yours. I'll tell you. Here's what bothers me. I'm a senior pastor Mark had been for Almost 38 years, and as I read this stuff, and I see what's going on. I just am astounded. That there aren't more pastures. Freedom lovers, Truth lovers that are not standing up and saying, Do you guys not see what's happening here? I don't know whether to be angry to cry, to be honest with you. It's very disturbing. I'm not sure that we've got to grab our pitchforks. And then that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm just saying, we're the voices who predominately, haven't looked at to proclaim the truth. Why are they not proclaiming the truth? And I'm not expecting to have the answer, But I'm just saying it's very disturbing to me. But can I say one thing, Pastor? I've been wondering this myself. Why isn't this embraced by more and more pastors and more and more churches? Explaining what's going on in this country. This is a war and family a war on faith. This is Incredibly pernicious. We need as many people as we can. The pushback, particularly our churches and other people of faith. And maybe that's happening here and there, But I'm not getting a sense yet. I'm getting a sense that the movement is building. I know this is a matter of fact. But I'm not getting a sense that the pastors have actually jumped in on this yet. Maybe I'm totally wrong.

Dershowitz Mark Pastor
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

The Glenn Beck Program

04:29 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

"Be the.

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

The Glenn Beck Program

07:40 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

"Hello america welcome to the glenn beck program we wanna talk about justice and the american system. We have We have a couple of things going on in the world with our with our justice system. the justice department i think has become hostile to the bill of rights. Some in the fbi at the upper level of the justice department I think they are They're squashing the bill of rights as well. there is. there is a real question of. Can you get justice in america anymore and we have attorneys that are not taking on unpopular clients. Well you ever read anything about john adams. Have you ever read anything about our justice system that that's exactly why we need the alan dershowitz In our lives. And you can't be persecuted because you take on an unpopular client. When did we stop admiring our own system of justice will. That's what's happening with rudy. Giuliani and it is setting a very dangerous precedent. He's joining us. Along with alan dershowitz in sixty seconds graham. So if you are looking to buy or sell a house you've got to have the right real estate agent. You have to have somebody that you know is is highly trained and has expertise. Just talked to a friend. I think i was telling you yesterday. That said yeah. I had my cousin. Pierre real estate agent. I was a mistake and i'm like yes it is. Don't why do favors on the most important financial decision of your lifetime. Don't don't do any favors for anybody. This particular couple lost about twenty five grand because the cousin didn't understand how exactly to negotiate and how to put them into a situation to where they could pick the best offer so real estate agents. I trust dot com. this is why we were formed. Why i started this company to give you a free service to be able to find the person that follows the best practices that we have found through the five hundred best real estate agents in the country. According to the wall street journal we did our homework on. What makes a good real estate agent. What do you need to know. What are the patterns. What are the things that you can. You can look at at a real estate agent. Go okay you got it. Well we've done all the searching for you and if we have somebody in your area great if not. We won't recommend somebody. There's a long list of people that want to join real estate agents. I trust but we want to make sure that we know the people So we want you to be introduced to them. If you're looking to buy or sell a home go to real estate. Agents like trust dot com right. Now we'll send you usually pretty quickly the name of somebody in your area. Whether it's across the street across town or across the country real estate agents. I trust dot com former mayor of new york city. The hosts now commonsense sense podcast. Mayor rudy giuliani. Doing rudy. it is you know it is what is happening in our country is so astounding to me and i heard you say last week. It's this isn't america anymore. Explain to people exactly why they're trying to suspend or what they're saying what they're using to suspend your license in new york. Well i've been practicing law for over fifty years. I have never had a complaint certainly never proceeding against me and i probably have tried some of the most difficult cases in the history of the country. There are basically the complaint against me. Is that i. On a number of occasions Set forth facts indicating that there was fraud in the twenty twenty election. A those facts are all based on information and evidence. I got some other people. Most of them are backed up by acetate. It's i've offered several courts. The opportunity here these witnesses. They've been uniformly declined. I offered this court the opportunity to look at the affidavits. not only did they. They kinda lied about it and I what i what i did was i said that in in the state of georgia there were several estimates of the number of dead people. Who voted that ranged as high as eight thousand. Three thousand five thousand eight thousand and that i had that i had death certificates involving at least eight hundred of them. I explained that. That's all based on affidavits. Instead of looking at the affidavits they concluded the closest gave three different. Because i didn't give them the affidavits. I was like well. The fact is three different numbers because there are three different experts who have three different estimates. And i made that clear in in the statements that i made and they never bothered to ask to see the affidavits. I said were available. Now i have four hundred affidavits. I couldn't possibly have delivered them all to the core and also represented by judges who were on that court. Who told me that you normally don't give the underlying affidavits until you get to. The hearing is a preliminary stage. You just tell them you'll make whatever affidavits they feel are necessary available. They failed to tell you that. I did that. And make it sound like. I'm hiding the affidavit. Which is a straight out and out. Lie those affidavits backup to the number every single number that i used. And if you saw the affidavits or any court ever let these witnesses testified well the dam would break looks. Eighty courts refused to hear witnesses. I only was involved. In three of the cases. Eighty courts refused to hear a single witness single citizen who can testify that there was fraud in the election. They make it sound. Like i have the information. I don't i have other people's information. Glenn i'm sitting right now in my again Two rooms away from me is a foul room. That has those four hundred affidavits. If from american citizens like a woman sixty years old or worked for detroit for forty years and would testify under oath that she was taught how to cheat by the detroit democrat cart. They taught her how to put phony names on sony ballots names of people who were underage or debt. Now she could be charged through so really rely. I write bright and that's for.

alan dershowitz new york Three thousand john adams eight thousand forty years yesterday rudy Glenn last week Eighty courts georgia Pierre Two rooms over fifty years Mayor rudy giuliani four hundred affidavits about twenty five grand three different experts
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

The Glenn Beck Program

05:22 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

"Know your favorite genome. It's not it's not yet So efficient that the problem with all of this for humid's for big know animals to get into all of your cells. We're not there yet. We're a long long way from that but to do it. In one cell like like or modify virus or modify a bacteria That's now trivial. And that's that's kind of the the thing about the arguments that just to bring it home. That sars kobe to some people. Say well there's no footprint of classic genetic engineering well with with christopher cas nine there no footprints. It just goes in clean so that that argument. You know we can't it. It changes everything. 'cause you can't track stuff in the same way and it becomes Pretty easy to do stuff. So that's that's a little spooky right. Yeah we are. We're entering a whole new world just a whole world. Dr robert malone thank you for spending the time Over the last three days being on the program you find you find you really refreshing that you haven't brought politics into any of it just reason and common sense. Thank you so much god. Bless my pleasure. This is the best of the glenn beck program and don't forget rate ups on this. Is.

robert malone christopher cas nine one cell glenn days three beck
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

The Glenn Beck Program

04:38 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

"You want that dog. To be healthy and happy you need rough greens. I started feeding my dog kuno rough greens man like year ago year and a half ago. Something like that. I've said many times on the program and it is absolutely true. He is a different dog. Different if you're feeding your dog dry. Kibble which is basically sterilized dead food. Or if you're making it yourself at home. The truth is at rough. Greens contains a lot of the vitamins and nutrients. Your dog needs and probably isn't getting. It's a supplement sprinkle on the food and your dog. if he's anything like mine will wolf down. Your dog may not like it. I haven't heard of any that don't but maybe your dog doesn't like it and they don't want you putting any money out into this product if it if you're not going to eat it so you can get a free bag at trial bag of rough. Greens you just get like a couple of couple of days or three or five days worth of rough greens just to see if your dog likes it as much as it does if they do order the full bag and start feeding your dog rough greens. You will see a huge difference in your dogs energy activity level and health. It's rough greens get free bag now for your dog to try out at rough. Greens dot com slash beck or. Call eight. Three three glenn. Thirty three eight three glenn. Thirty three or rough greens dot com slash beck.

three five days year and a half ago Thirty three eight year ago Three couple of days couple
"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

The Glenn Beck Program

02:09 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on The Glenn Beck Program

"Time he has been on the show the last couple of days talking about What he believes is the issues with the way. The government is communicating issues surrounding the corona virus. And the vaccine's. We'll get into that a little bit. Rudy giuliani is on. He is a little upset the way the government is handling his legal career which seems to be over at the moment unless something changes and alan dershowitz is here as well to talk about the issues with the government and the way. They're coming after attorneys and disbarring them if they had anything to do with donald trump. We'll get into all of that today. Make sure to subscribe at blaze. Tv dot com slash. Glenn promo code is deleng. You'll save ten bucks off your subscription to blaze. tv. Here's the podcast. Think.

donald trump Rudy giuliani alan dershowitz Glenn today ten bucks blaze. last couple of days tv
"dershowitz" Discussed on CATS Roundtable

CATS Roundtable

03:51 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on CATS Roundtable

"Of the time they talked about other restrictions. But i think that it's the end and we ought to understand and accept that obama healthcare is with us whether you like it or not. It's with us going to change it. Change legislator with the other very important supreme court decision was a catholic adoption agency. That doesn't provide adoption for gay couples. Look that's religious right I believe in gay adoption. But i'm catholic and There are probably the most docs jews. You don't believe in it But the constitution requires that we strike a balance between religious freedom and public policy and the supreme court unanimously ruled that a catholic adoption agency as the right to limit. Its adoptions to what its own religion oh calls for our catholic. I would wanna be open up. And and and and and have. More adoptions that went across A sexual orientation lines. But i'm not a member of that faith and so i have no right. Tell catholics what to do. And the first amendment says that the free exercise of religion shall not be prohibited so this was a rare nine to nothing decision. I think it also tells us how the cake cases going to come out. Remember that case where. A baker refused to use his baking artistic abilities to bake a cake for a gay couple. Now there's another case involving a transgender person. I think the supreme court has signaled that ultimately it's gonna ruling favor that baker and say that you can't make an artist baker somebody else Do something that is clearly in violation of their religious principles. I don't agree with it was religious principles but again i'm not the bigger and better took the last question i'm going to ask you got a minute. How do you think the supreme rule if a team up the supreme court about cringe gender issue in sports and as a boy. That is such a hard question. That is such a hard question You know i. I see both sides of the issue on one hand. You don't want to discriminate on the other hand if you get people who used to be men and were born men and have testosterone and have the muscles of men and they're beginning to dominate Women's sports and making it much harder for women to compete. One can understand why there's concern about that. I think we have to see how serious the problem is. Whether it's just a one off or a few small problems and you know you just you just You say look. It's more important that we have equality and that we have a no discrimination but if it becomes much more serious problem and if people begin to to transition in order to get the engine sport obviously that will change it so. I think this is an issue. That won't come to the court for a while and by the time it comes to the court. I think we'll know a lot lot more. But i think the courts bias will be generally in favor of Equality equal treatment for everybody. Although i understand the problem that causes it look wives complicated and it becomes more complicated. And when you get issues like this so wait-and-see professor alan dershowitz. Thank you for your sense. Thank you for your wisdom and thank you for trying to save america like we all are trying to catch up again during the week. Thank you so much. This is the cast roundtable. I'll be right back..

alan dershowitz both sides jews first amendment one hand america couple catholic nine one One couples obama catholics
"dershowitz" Discussed on CATS Roundtable

CATS Roundtable

03:25 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on CATS Roundtable

"I'm going to. It will backfire even if even if the wanted to leave The supreme court this term. He's not gonna wanna be perceived as having given into pressure. I know him. He's not the kinda guy who's gonna say. I'm gonna leave office as the result of pressure of some academics. Want me to leave. In order to serve their own political interests so a it's going to backfire. Beats age discrimination. See it politicized the supreme court and it tells us what's wrong with the hard left today. They see everything politically. There's no such thing as an institution that's above politics. They want to politicize the supreme court. Even more i hope that justice. Brian will resist. It will stay on the supreme court as long as his health permits them to stay on the supreme court. Look queen. elizabeth is what. How old is she now. and she's still raining. You know pokes until they die The framers of the constitution said that the supreme court justices should sit during good behavior. Look you wanna have term limits For supreme court justices change the constitution. But don't put pressure on a sitting justice To to retire in order to achieve your political goals. And you know people to this day are still condemning ruth bader ginsburg because she didn't retire and allow her replacement to be made by a by a democrat and she was replaced by a republican. But you know. She served her term. She she served until the good lord took her and that's the way the constitution was intended to operate. Are these other. Democrats still threatening the supreme court justices. You don't vote the right way or is that going. Well we know that Majority leader schommer stood in front of the supreme court of the united states and threatened. Yeah and That's not the first time it's happened. That happened back in the nineteen thirties when president roosevelt threatened to pack the court and he was rebuffed. I think that president biden is smarter than that. I don't think he's gonna try to pack the court at least not the supreme court. He may try to pack the lower courts but all presidents. try to do that But i don't think we're gonna see court backing. I don't think you're gonna get fifty Senators supporting that. And i don't think you're gonna get the president signing onto that Some court rulings sweet Which can common. Yeah there's some very important ones i i think. The supreme court put the rest the obama healthcare and what they basically said is look too. Many people have too much of a stake in the current obama. Healthcare insurance plan and for us up end ended and take people's insurance away. You need to have something a lot. Clearer constitutionally than what Applies here you know. There are some questions about the statute. There's doubts about it but the supreme court has found every reason now three times for say. Oh we're not gonna do this. We're not gonna offend this. This time they talk about standing.

Brian elizabeth today ruth bader ginsburg fifty Senators nineteen thirties Democrats three times republican democrat obama first time schommer biden president supreme court roosevelt united states
"dershowitz" Discussed on Mornings With Gail - 1310 KFKA

Mornings With Gail - 1310 KFKA

04:16 min | 1 year ago

"dershowitz" Discussed on Mornings With Gail - 1310 KFKA

"As star. Alan dershowitz a certainly a powerhouse. -solutely brilliant and legal minds in the timing. That interview couldn't have been better. Write this as you had the stars chamber Yes the supreme court of facebook. Has alan dershowitz calls it well waving their magic wand and yup continuing that ban of donald trump from facebook comes as no surprise to anyone particularly in a day of cancel culture. But wow just absolutely brilliant. T is by the way If you're interested in a copy of his new book you can certainly find that on amazon and well until he gets canceled on his website as well all right. Eight fifty four now thirteen ten. Kfi a thirteen ten k. f. k. a. dot com. But it does beg the question as to whether the antidote to that speech i mean you want some nameless faceless group of people you don't know what their qualifications are. Who are they to shut any one. Down based on well nebulous A infractions of some sort of community code. What the heck is that and the thing. That is even more troubling boy. I wish i had about an hour to talk with him now. Alan dershowitz have probably about a week. Who would be much better. But what is so troubling. He alluded to the fact that you had many outlets across the board taking down anything that was counter to the accepted narrative when it comes to covert at you had dr mccarey saying for example Scott atlas there's another one dr scott atlas being essentially once again by what a an algorithm or a by this group of a self styled speech police because well they weren't putting out the information that certain politicians wanted t here about covid nineteen even though guess what they were right but they were summarily. Shut down so could it be argued that in a time and we are in a tumultuous time to be sure but during such a time where we are grappling with so many issues. Isn't the antidote to those problems to those disagreements being something that is is so foundational to our nation. Don't we need more speech. You tell me nine. Seventy three five three thirteen ten. Drop me a text on our thirteen ten. Kfi a text line by the way new text line number for you who are joining archaic k. A. texting cohort nine seven four seven eight thirteen a ones as texts. Kpfk to that number the first time you use it a fifty six now. Thirteen ten kfi the power trip weekdays. Eleven thirteen ten. Kfi day in the nuggets. Get back to the western conference. Finals listened to the whole show for the latest denver. Sports stories on thirteen ten. Kfi more trouble for peleton saying today. It's recalling its tread and tread plus treadmills reversing course. After its ceo earlier urged the owners of those machines only to check safety warnings following the very tragic death of a child in an accident. Thank you ryan. Kelly technical producer. Great job this morning noko now coming up next..

donald trump Alan dershowitz alan dershowitz ryan nine amazon fifty six facebook today this morning Eight fifty four first time Thirteen ten kfi thirteen ten Eleven thirteen ten a week denver nineteen nine seven Seventy three five three thirt