10 Burst results for "Dc Circus"

"dc circus" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

WNYC 93.9 FM

01:38 min | 1 year ago

"dc circus" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

"12 Times were told to care for the widow. And the orphan. This is one of the most important commandments of the Torah. It is the tourist call to action. And it is also the promise written into our constitution. As justice, Ginsburg said, and I quote Think back to 17 87. Who were we? The people? They certainly weren't women. They surely weren't people held in human bondage. A genius of our constitution. Is that now over more than 200. Sometimes turbulent years. That we has expanded. And expanded This was just a skins. Berg's life's work. To insist that the Constitution deliver on its promise. That we the people would include all the people. She carried out that work in every chapter of her life. As an advocate, arguing six times before this court. For equal treatment for women and men. As a judge on the DC circus circuit and as a justice on this court. And as a path marking role model tow women and girls of all ages. Who now know that no office is out of reach for their dreams. Whether that is to serve in the highest court of our land. Or closer to home for me..

Ginsburg Berg DC
"dc circus" Discussed on KQED Radio

KQED Radio

01:39 min | 1 year ago

"dc circus" Discussed on KQED Radio

"12 Times were told to care for the widow and the orphan. This is one of the most important commandments of the Torah. It is the tourist call to action. And it is also the promise written into our constitution. As justice, Ginsburg said, and I quote Think back to 17 87. Who were we? The people? They certainly weren't women. They certainly weren't people held in human bondage. The genius of our constitution is that now over more than 200, sometimes turbulent years That we has expanded and expanded. This was just a skins. Berg's life's work. To insist that the Constitution deliver on its promise. That we the people would include all the people she carried out that work in every chapter of her life as an advocate, arguing six times before this court. For equal treatment for women and men. As a judge on the DC circus circuit and as a justice on this court. And as a path marking role model tow women and girls of all ages. Who now know that no office is out of reach for their dreams. Whether that is to serve in the highest court of our land. Or closer to home for me..

Ginsburg Berg DC
"dc circus" Discussed on Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

08:53 min | 2 years ago

"dc circus" Discussed on Opening Arguments

"In the context of sort of no good deed going unpunished you might recall that in addition to. The District Court trial of Michael Flynn. In which the government's motion is pending there is also a DC circuit appeal, and the reason for that is win judge Sullivan did not immediately grant. The government's motion to dismiss Sidney POW. Again on the shortlist of one of the dumbest lawyers in America a Sydney Powell representing Michael. Flynn took immediately filed an amicus petition in the DC circus. Circus. We're not even I'm not even. Circuses on my mind. Not Even GonNa have Brian correct that I misspoke. She did not file an amicus petition. She petitioned for a writ of Mandela's. Lawyer joke that kills more like the DC circus of. She immediately went to the DC circuit and said Oh. You have to grant men, Damis, and that man dame. This is tell Judge Sullivan. He has no discretion to entertain whether or not to dismiss the case under forty eight A. He's got to do it right now, We could have also. I will tell you the Watergate prosecutors intervened at the DC or an amicus brief DC circuit. We could have filed in that case as well I did not because let's work writing. Amick and well seriously writing amicus briefs is is hard. We would have had to have written a second brief, and even though it would have drawn largely from the first one it would have been a lot of additional work and and we would have had to have done it earlier and This argument is. Terrible so I don't look. It's going to be two one 'cause. Naomi row was on the panel, but but they're going to lose, and they're going to lose hard and the way in which you can tell. They're going to lose heart. I'M GONNA. I'M GONNA link. This in the show notes Sydney Pals. Brief is one of the stupidest non jaysekulow pleadings I have ever read right like if it is just retelling the same like Cunanan version of Michael Flynn that she's been trying to peddle before Judge Sullivan and I. I'm telling you Wilkins and Henderson who are the other two judges on the panel. Don't WanNA. Hear this nonsense. Do these people know they're lying or do they actually believe this or they just don't care I I? Really WanNa know. IDOL. I can't tell either. I can tell you this because this is a petition for rid of Mandela's. Judge Sullivan is the respondent in this case and I i. I'm going to read you. This is a paragraph from page to This is what? A pending defendant before United States District Court. Judge has said about that. District Court judge to the court. That's up. That's next up from that district. Court judge right and the idea that you would talk about. The judge who's going to sentence you this way is. Something, only Sydney Powell do so. Here's what she says. The brief when the government moved to dismiss and the petitioner. That's Michael Flynn filed his consent. Respondent that's judge. Sullivan issued a defacto call for amnesty. The next day responded appointed amicus gleason who requested a briefing schedule anticipating need for time for any factual develop. Petitioner promptly filed this rip responded issued the order as requested, and Amicus has now complied launching a six hundred page frontal assault on General Flynn and the Justice Department's motion, calling it pretextual worse to paraphrase judge. Posner. amicus is playing attorney general. It is no doubt position. He could fill with distinction, but it is occupied by another person, which admittedly that's funny, but lower smackdown baby. Yeah, response unprecedented action ignores the facts of this case and defies this court. This court's binding precedent respondent is not in the executive branch and being an article. Three judge has no authority to gin up his own case or controversy where none exists, the game is over and this courtship or the Empire to leave the field. This kind of language. Is You know throughout the brief up including apart I shared out on our our on the OA. twitter in which Sydney Powell. Mistakenly uses the word Basque when she meant to use the word pack. So? Yeah, so she says that Responded Meeting Judge Sullivan and his Basque of Miki. Have you know? I think it's because she uses pack later on now I will tell you and I posed the question this way on on twitter. I I said. Do you think it is either a? Sydney pal does not know the difference between the verb bask and the Noun Pack. or be that she doesn't know the difference between those two, but it's GonNa live and pretend that what she really meant was to use the archaic term. Basque meaning a group of Crocodiles Even though that would make no set right like you like you. You might say pack of sharks to talk about lawyers but like. Lawyers Crocodile Crocodiles or slow. You know cold blooded. It's just it's. It's a dumb it. There's no way that this is an intentional analogy, but But Yeah I mean it is you know respondent and his amicus create a circus and will end will sentenced an innocent man. I mean it's just that the rhetoric is. is out of control and and it, and it's a truly strategically stupid, so maybe from a strategic standpoint this is. Just a truly stupid decision. You're going to get an angry impassioned dissent from Naomi row. Because that's who this is aimed at, but if you truly believe that Michael Flynn was a you know was one hundred percent innocent. changed his story once he got out from under the thumb of that evil, Covington and burling. That forced him deplete even though something something something Cunanan. I you know I. I like Daniel then. You'll love this brief, but. The rest of the D. C. Circuit I strongly predict will not that argument by the way is while you're listening to the show if you listen to. The show drops on Friday the twelfth, so we will soon know and the way in which that resolution works is if Mandy Mrs granted then Sullivan will be instructed to dismiss the case, and all of this will be for not and the republic will be over. If it is not which is what I predict then. We shift back to the District Court where we have filed are amicus and the court will then decide What am I? GonNa do with this motion. Am I going to grant it? Am I going to hold it sub Curia which means? To wait and conduct a hearing conduct additional fact-finding, or am I going to dismiss it out? I'm going to say I have enough evidence to say that that the stinks and And I'M NOT GONNA. Let the government come in and and do a favor for politically connected connected defendant So that's what we're waiting on. That's why this matters and I haven't were were nearing the end of the show and I haven't gotten a chance to like walk through. How Great Judge Gleeson 's briefest. I'm going to make it in the show it's. It's a brisk eighty two ages podcast. Yeah, so it's a, it's A. It's a you know tidy..

Judge Sullivan Michael Flynn District Court Amicus Sydney Powell Judge Gleeson United States District Court Mandela Naomi row DC Sydney Sidney POW Damis twitter America Brian D. C. Circuit Amick IDOL attorney
"dc circus" Discussed on WAFS Biz 1190

WAFS Biz 1190

06:30 min | 2 years ago

"dc circus" Discussed on WAFS Biz 1190

"You want to apply and certainly the only conversation today and everything you're going to see on television is going to be related to the DC circus and that's what I'm going to call it because I don't know what else you could possibly call at this point with what they're going to be trying to be doing and what not now that gauge congressman vantage water district number one but on television a lot lately not to be all done here he was with the more real Bartel roll ball why did you stores rose how was the message you were trying to communicate well it appears we were successful in communicating the message that this was an unfair politically motivated process we saw just last week polling from eight PM ABC news reflecting that half the country or more saw this as politically motivated and unfair to president trump and so now in the coming weeks we'll have open testimony and I think that it's important for the American people to know that you've got a group of people whose names you don't know whose faces you haven't seen core part of the permanent government in Washington whether Republicans or Democrats are elected they believe it's their way or the highway president trump is very different he pushes back on permanent Washington and now you have people in the bowels of the bureaucracy of government who thinks that the president serves at their pleasure instead of them serving at the president's pleasure while there may be some truth in that I'm not going to dispute what he said because I believe there is some truth to that but you know that goes right along with Campbell Heris and something that she had to say and this is ridiculous the stuff we keep hearing now I know people that have to work a couple of jobs of errors maybe because of their salary maybe because the foster large family and does this ball stays at home or what not that may be part of it but giap here's the deal listen to camel Heris tell white teachers teachers work two three jobs very special calling it's an incredible gift working two and three jobs because on those salaries they can't pay the bills ninety four percent of the teachers in our public schools come out of pocket to help pay for school supplies eleven our teachers make eleven percent less than similarly educated eleven percent futures make less well electoral firefighter tell actual police officer tell it to somebody in the military and while you're at a camera hello to the members of Congress hard to seventy five thousand dollars a year you guys declare a crime poverty A. I. X. right away said that you need to have a pay raise she's never seen so much money in our life as witches get right now I mean this is ridiculous these people they think they they just keep saying things to deter thrown out there to see what's going to stick and they think that you're going to buy everything they tell because you're not smart enough to go and check it out that's what they think teachers do very well not all of them the world gesture to don't but the average school teacher does very well of the salaries have have gone up over the years the benefits you certainly gone up they have something just call the tax sheltered annuity that in addition to their retirement plans they can put money in there I which is tax free and remains there for as long as they want whenever they retire they not only have a pension but to have a tax sheltered annuity to boot sometimes a tax sheltered annuity is worth more then the pension is subject to going to get and that's why they do it it's a it's a it is just exactly what it sounds like a tax sheltered annuity now we talked about guns but we haven't talked about him in a while let me tell you about Bernie Sanders and let me tell you about the mandatory by back plans out there and listened listen for sure second to what he has to say this is about twenty seconds long hi my name is grace and my issue my question revolves around gun violence gun violence is an incredibly complex large epidemic in our country and I am undecided right now but I am choosing to support a candidate who prioritizes at and I wanted to ask what your plan is to combat this epidemic but also I specifically wanted to see if made for you by back up for air the teens in a forty sevens is something that you would consider well I but let me tell you what my plan is now and I don't support a mandatory by by consistently confiscation which I think is unconstitutional it means I'm going to walk into your house and take something what do you like it or not I don't like that of a stance of the constitutional of scrutiny wow listen to Bernie all right let's go to the phone lines I think we got our professor emeritus here in the Tampa area of a mystery out is that you end yeah three quick comments with I know your line up against the clock that's right one there's no such thing as gun violence guns are an inanimate object your shoulder piece of machinery their human agency that operates that John for ill or forget it and there's no such thing as John while water guards doing all the sudden the trunk on the light that god created life in full of John and were not created by what's called performance the whole premise of the arguments we get too much work for getting braces trailers and basic logic pro okay I number two I can show you right now how unfair the media is because when the Republicans marks on that scale a couple weeks back yeah yep Democrats last year sat down in the house of representatives overnight and what products in sleeping bags and everything over some stupid stock and they were heroes remember that yeah yeah senator there on the floor of the house yeah they were heroes they were fighters for justice they were looking out for the little people they were social progress of the American area in contrast the Republicans storm this yeah biased right there yeah.

eleven percent seventy five thousand dollars ninety four percent twenty seconds
"dc circus" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

NewsRadio KFBK

12:16 min | 2 years ago

"dc circus" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

"Sullivan we are right gathered around with the everyday every day there's a little something something there and I I we talked I mean I need to I need to share with you so there's an old theory that if the host is tired of a topic the host moves on and yet at the same time every day the same topic the same subject about impeachment is that there's a fatigue that can set in some days are more interesting than others but every day there's always something and so the way I just want you to to Cher with you work the way I approach this whole thing because we're going to be in it for a while invite least through December but this impeachment stuff is I told you before I there's a there's a a sense of responsibility to keep you up to date I'll give you my observations on when something is happening from the latest go around a whatever's happening in the the Wall Street circuit The Washington DC circus Wall Street to but this is this is something that I people's I I think are feeling the fatigue is fine Philly but take I'm sure some of your feeling depicting goings or anything else out there and so what I but I want to do is I want to bring you up to date will start off if it if it is worthy of the first hour will start the first hour with it today it is worthy and then after that we're gonna try to move on to other topics and other things that are going on in the world we should pay attention to as well but it's not that I'm I'm always going to bring you the latest always give you my two cents on whatever's going on but it is going to be a bit of a marathon here at every day you cannot have some may go head exploding hair on fire news every single day but there are some people out there that are I guess thrive on I don't think most people do I think most of you were gone I don't need the chaos I'd like to know what's going on what's the latest but I don't need the chaos I got the I got enough chaos in my life so we start today what's the story that a lot of people are absolutely doing back flips over and that is the will soul blowers lawyer and the fact that his name is mark Zahed and he has been a critic of president trump for a long time for a long long time now he was hired to represent the whistle blower but at that which makes you wonder wait a minute how do these people find each other the big story is is that marks I eat has put out all these inflammatory tweets for years in fact it goes I'm sure goes back to before Donald Trump was elected but his original tweets were right out of the gate it is so I guess what I'm what I'm observing is people are are in seem to be in somewhat of a shock and I don't know why because in Washington DC this deep state or whatever you want to call them do you think that the people that work for the government the hundreds and thousands hundreds of thousands of people work for the government in Washington DC that they're all loyal to the president this president last president the next president I don't think they are I would I would I would I just a hunch I haven't looked up the the registration of of of Washington DC or the suburbs in Maryland and Virginia I would guess that it's our leans at least sixty forty Democrats maybe maybe more maybe seventy thirty Democrats it's a it the the the people work for the government in general doesn't matter whether it's from Washington DC or whether it's at your city hall or whether it's at your state legislature there are well that not no I know that the people that are elected you can go and count the nose is by days and ours but the people that work in the bowels of the government the agency people the bureaucrats they they started there when they were young and they're gonna retire there when they're old and they have their political beliefs enter and of course they don't all agree with the current governor or with the current mayor or with the current president or whatever government agency you're talking about so I I'm share with me why I should not B. R. running around in circles screaming the sky is falling because of the fact that this lawyer that represents the whistleblower is big lefty he doesn't like Donald Trump he's never like Donald Trump he was predicting the Donald Trump was going to meet an impeachment and so here he is representing the whistle blower yes it makes this whole thing looks like it was planned and could cried at scripted and it does appear that way they've been but this is the other part about it is there anybody that surprised that there haven't been people on the left that have been hoping and wishing and praying that Donald Trump would go away so I don't know there's a bunch here I can go through his tweet mark Zaid a esquire this was January thirtieth two thousand seventeen has started first of many steps hash tag rebellion hash tag impeachment will follow ultimately hash tag lawyers no so he goes on with that then he goes forty five years from now we might be recalling stories regarding the impeachment of the real Donald Trump I'll be old but will be worth the wait he wrote that in June of two thousand seventeen so he's been engine and brain and he's a Washington lawyer so he's he's he's he's tried to manipulate things to get it to where it makes it look like the wheel so blower was a was a scripted event put on by this marks I eat being the director what's this date January thirty two thousand seventeen hash tag has started as one falls to marble take their place rebellion impeachment so he's really but in Washington is a lot of people like that that are so wound up tight I mean you go to DC man those people in DC star you know for those of that live there wound up tight and hand it is tighter than a drum and that to so he explains made a statement he said those tweets were reflective and repeated the sentiments of millions of people I was referring to a completely lawful process of what president trump would likely faces result of stepping over the line and that particularly whatever would happen would come about as a result of lawyers comment referred to those working inside the administration who were already just a week into office standing up to him to enforce recognize rules of law so mark sorry he doesn't like drama he is your classic never Trumper he is resistance Aubrey tattooed on him somewhere but he's not alone and I I I he he's right he says doesn't repeat the sentiment to millions of people but I don't know why people but for those of you that support the president god bless you man but you gotta know that there's other people out there that really really don't like him there's more intense than in any other president that I remember I'm member a lot of people don't like Barack Obama but it wasn't like this this is an intensity and it also shows that this guy is one of those people that doesn't matter to him what the voters say doesn't matter he is still going to do whatever he's going to do to try to win his way come hell or high water that's just the way he is don't know the man but you can tell from his writing he was on a podcast last year he said I'm not a trump fan hello Kitty I go out of my way way on Twitter to say resistance it's not a resistance against the G. O. P. or Republican I don't think trump is a Republican quite frankly also on the podcast you acknowledge that he had been fishing for plaintiffs to launch a lawsuit concerning the trump hotel in Washington DC he said the unfair competition becomes when Donald Trump became president he has exploited his use of the presidency of the oval office to send business to the hotel we identified this as a cause of action and we were looking for a place to and we finally found one this restaurant that was willing yeah they found the guy at a restaurant many many miles away from from the hotel and said my business is being hurt by by drum hotel federal judge dismissed the lawsuit to go away so this guy is a zealot he he's been openly casting for somebody to do something so we could file a lawsuit in that and what he found was somebody that wanted to file a whistle blower complaint L. N. so all of that the whole thing about the whistle blower you can yell and scream this is invalid the guy was set up this was all a script it was a play it was planned it was not legitimate call it a hoax whatever you want to call it so you can yell about all of that but it still comes down to the facts and the facts are the facts and the facts are in the phone call they were waiting for Donald Trump to make a mistake and he in my humble opinion he did and they jumped on it they made a mountain out of a molehill my opinion and that's why I don't think this is ever really gonna go anywhere what's your reaction to this was a blower lawyer eight five five two nine five sixty six hundred.

Sullivan fatigue forty five years
Michael Cohen's DC circus to begin Tuesday with secret hearing

America Trends

00:38 sec | 3 years ago

Michael Cohen's DC circus to begin Tuesday with secret hearing

"President Trump's former personal lawyer. And so called fixer is facing three grueling days on Capitol Hill. Michael Cohen goes behind closed doors with the Senate intelligence committee today, he will be star witness in an opening hearing of the house oversight committee tomorrow and on Thursday Cohen has a private session with the house intelligence panel Cohen is facing prison time after pleading guilty to lying to congress tax fraud, Bank fraud and campaign finance violations. The campaign finance charges involving Coen's hush money payments. The two women before the two thousand sixteen presidential election

Michael Cohen Senate Intelligence Committee President Trump Fraud Coen
"dc circus" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

05:32 min | 3 years ago

"dc circus" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"First with Sebastian Gorka on eight sixty AM The Answer. Madam time. They're human league. Head back into twenty nine hundred thousand we have canco Klaus ski with us in studio, which is always the best. He's the senior legal editor for Bryant bought dot com. And the senior fellow at the American civil rights union. The war the deal we need to talk can follow him on Twitter. Ken MacLeod ski K L U K W S K I. So the president gave a very phlegmatic non teleprompter speech last Friday. And he said, oh, we're going to sign it. I want to declare national emergency. They'll challenge it in the ninth, then we'll counter, and then we'll go up to the supreme court. We were talking the break the president knows as well as we do as well as the bay stars imminently in the next year. He needs to be seen with a gold plated shovel digging. The foundation for the wall. As a lawyer expert as a man who knows the constitution, the national emergency functions. How long is it going to take for this battle through the courts when I was in the administration, we won the travel ban baffled pretty quickly. I mean, we pushed it all the way the supreme court put it on on the docket. And we one how long is it going to take for the president to get the wall started the president can start it immediately. Now, if there's a preliminary injunction slapped on it in the next few days in any of the lawsuits that have just been filed in the past few days. Then the question becomes how quickly can you either get that as we call it for short preliminary injunction, either either overturned by a higher court brat. Minimum to get a stay imposed upon it. So you can counter the injunction it. Yeah. That's right. You can either first of all if the is granted you can take that immediately up on appeal on what's called interlocutory review. Of course, like the the big multi-state lawsuit is just been filed in northern California that goes to the night circuit. There's another one filed in the DC district that was. Filed battle go to the DC circus. That's that is also a liberal court just not as liberal as the night circuit. And so they're picking their courts, very carefully. You can ultimately either get a stay imposed by the supreme court on the lower courts while injunction what while litigation is ongoing, and or and slash or you can get them to expedite the case. If I had to guess, I'd say one way or another. I am hopeful that we could have this at the supreme court level in about nine months. In the meantime, he can stop building yet. He can start building until an injunction is imposed against him. Now that could happen any day. But but this is key. Parts of what he is doing are predicated upon this emergency declaration. There are also other parts that have nothing to do with emergency. Parachutes that are just ordinary scout drug trafficking. Exactly. Right. And that's what drives me nuts. And I don't understand why the left doesn't understand this. Or maybe they just hate him that much. That's my guest. That's what he meant in the press in the presser when he said, look, I could do this without numbers and say I didn't have to go this route. I'm doing it this way because it's faster. That's because the big military components that here that he's using could only go through an emergency. But he could easily say fine. If the court is saying if there's an injunction against the emergency aspect, I'm gonna have the units that are non emergency keep spending non because we have these standing low, absolute, let's state the DOD can be used to counter narcotics trafficking. Right, right. Has nothing to do with much. Exactly. So now, what what I'm concerned about is some left wing activist judge who is going to just issue a blanket injunction to stop everything, and of course, will appeal that to at the at the end of the day, the president should win on every assertion of authority that he's doing both statutory. I'm sorry, both emergency and non emergency because none of this. And some of our friends have gotten this wrong. None of this is based on the president's inherent constitutional powers as commander in chief every single authority. He's using is coming from a law that congress passed all of these are statutory authorities laws that congress put on the seventy seven lower national. Well, not just that not just the national emergencies act, but all these construction law, it's all of the different every power. He's using here. You can cite to a provision a federal law that congress has passed. So this idea that the left? You're saying he's stealing money to build stuff. Yeah. He is only spending money that congress has appropriated through the normal process. And also put in a law that under certain circumstances, he can transfer money from one Bank account to this other Bank account. That's all he's doing. And he's not doing it. Because Sam because the constitution says, I can he say, no, I'm doing it because ten USC twenty eight oh, eight ten USC twelve three. Oh, two thirty one USC etcetera etcetera. The laws. Congress has passed. That's why we invite can to this show because you get the answers that nobody else is.

president supreme court congress Sebastian Gorka senior fellow Twitter Ken MacLeod Klaus editor California DC circus Bryant DC one Bank
"dc circus" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

05:52 min | 3 years ago

"dc circus" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"Mana Mana time the human league their head back into twenty nine nineteen. We have Kanka Klaus ski with us in studio, which is always the best. He's the senior legal editor for Bryant bought dot com. And the senior fellow at the American civil rights union. The war the deal, we need to talk can follow him on Twitter can cook lousy K L U K O W S K I. So the president gave a very phlegmatic non teleprompter speech last Friday. And he said, oh, we're going to sign it. I'm gonna decline national emergency. They'll challenge it in the ninth, then we'll counter, and then we'll go up to the supreme court. We were talking the break the president knows as well as we do as well as the bay stars imminently in the next year. He needs to be seen with a gold plated shovel digging. The foundation for the wall. As a lawyer expert as a man who knows the constitution, the national emergency functions. How long is it going to take for this battle through the courts when I was in the administration, we won the travel ban baffled pretty quickly. I mean, we pushed it all the way the supreme court put it on the on the docket. And we one how long is it going to take for the president to get the wall started? Well, the president can start it immediately. Now, if there's a preliminary injunction slapped on it in the next few days in any of the lawsuits that have just been filed in the past few days, then the question becomes how quickly can you either? Get that PI as we call it for short preliminary injunction, either either overturned by a higher court minimum to get a stay imposed upon it. So you can counter the injunction yet. That's right. You can either first of all if PI is granted you can take that immediately up on appeal on what's called interlocutory review. Of course, like the multi-state lawsuit is just been filed in northern California that goes to the ninth circuit. There's another one filed in the DC district. Filed will go to the DC circus. That's that is also a liberal court just not as liberal as the ninth circuit. And so they're picking their courts, very carefully. You can ultimately either get a stay imposed by the supreme court on the lower courts while injunction while litigation is ongoing and or and slash or you can get them to expedite the case. If I had to guess, I'd say one way or another. I am hopeful that we could have this at the supreme court level in about nine months. In the meantime, he can stop building yet. He can start building until an injunction is imposed against him. Now that could happen any day. But but this is key parts of what he is doing are predicated upon this emergency declaration. There are also other parts that have nothing to do with emergency Peres just ordinary scout drug trafficking. Exactly, right. And that's what drives me nuts, and I don't understand. And why the left doesn't understand this? Or maybe they just hate him that much. That's my guest. That's what he meant in the press in the presser when he said, look, I could do this without an emergency. I didn't have to go this route. I'm doing it this way because it's faster. That's because the big military components that here that he's using could only go through an emergency. But he could easily say fine. If the court is saying if there's an injunction against the emergency aspect, I'm gonna have the units that are non emergency keep spending non-emergency because we have these standing low, absolute, let's the DOD can be used to counter narcotics trafficking. Right, right. It has nothing to do with them much. I it exactly. So now what what I'm concerned about some left-wing activists judge who is going to just issue a blanket injunction to stop everything, and of course, will appeal that to at the at the end of the day, the president should win on every assertion of. Authority that he's doing both statutory. I'm sorry, both emergency and non emergency because none of this. And some of our friends have gotten this wrong. None of this is based on the president's inherent constitutional powers as commander in chief every single authority. He's using is coming from a law that congress passed all of these are statutory authorities laws that congress put on the seventy seven lower national. Well, not just that not just the national emergencies act, but all these construction law, it's all of the different every power. He's using here. You can cite to a provision a federal law that congress has passed this idea that the left is saying he's stealing money to build stuff yet. He is only spending money that congress has appropriated through the normal process. And also put in a law that under certain circumstances, he can transfer money from one Bank account to this other Bank account. That's all he's doing and he's not doing it. Because Sam because the constitution says, I can he say, no, I'm doing it because ten USC twenty eight hundred eight ten USC twelve three oh to thirty one USC etcetera etcetera that citing the laws congress has passed. That's why we invite Cain to this show because you get the answers that nobody else is giving you follow him on Twitter Cancun. Klaus ski K L U K O W S K. I read his articles at Breitbart nowadays listener, I have a question to you. Do you miss playing golf easily walking downstairs, hiking or sleeping through the night? Relief factor wants to get you out of pain. Like, they have for me and thousands of our listeners and my fellow show hosts. The way you get your medicine prescriptions is now changing across America. Gogo meds dot.

president supreme court congress Twitter Kanka Klaus senior fellow USC editor California DC circus golf Bryant DC Breitbart America Peres
"dc circus" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

05:22 min | 3 years ago

"dc circus" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

"Of time or the human league there. The head back into twenty nine. We have Kanka cloudy with us in studio, which is always the best. He's a senior legal editor for Breitbart dot com, and the senior fellow at the American civil rights union, the war the deal, we need to talk can follow him on Twitter can cook lousy K K W S K I. So the president gave a very phlegmatic non teleprompter speech last Friday. And he said, oh, we're going to sign it. I wanted to Clem national emergency. They'll challenge it in the ninth then will counter, and then we'll up to the supreme court. We were talking the break the president knows as well as we do as well as the base stars imminently in the next year. He needs to be seen with a gold plated shovel digging the foundation for the wall as a lawyer expert as a man who knows the constitution, the national emergency functions. How long is it going to take for this battle through the courts when I was in the administration, we won the travel ban baffled pretty quickly. I mean, we pushed it all the way the supreme court put it on the on the docket. And we one how long is it going to take for the president to get the wall started the president can start it immediately. Now if there's a preliminary injunction. And slapped on it in the next few days in any of the lawsuits that have just been filed in the past few days. Then the question becomes how quickly can you either? Get that PI as we call it. I work preliminary injunction, either either overturned by a higher court or at minimum to get a stay imposed upon it. So you can counter the injunction it yet. That's right. You can either it first of all if the PI is granted you can take that immediately up on appeal on what's called interlocutory review. Of course, like the big multi-state lawsuit is just been filed in northern California that goes to the night circuit. There's another one filed in the DC district that was filed to the DC circus. That's that is also a liberal court just not as liberal as the ninth circuit. And so they're picking their courts, very carefully. You can ultimately either get a stay imposed by the supreme court on the lower courts while injunction while litigation is ongoing and or and slash or you. Can get them to expedite the case. If I had to guess, I'd say one way or another. I am hopeful that we could have this at the supreme court level in about nine months. In the meantime, he can stop building yet. He can start building until an injunction is imposed against him. Now that could happen any day. But but this parts of what he is doing are predicated upon this emergency declaration. There are also other parts that have nothing to do with emergency Peres, just ordinary Scouser and drug trafficking. Exactly right in. That's what drives me nuts. And I don't understand why the left doesn't understand this. Or maybe they just hate him that much. That's my guess. That's what he meant in the press in the presser when he said, look, I could do this without numbered since I didn't have to go this route. I'm doing it this way because it's faster. That's because the big military components that here you that. He's using could only go through an emergency. But he could easily. Say fine. If the court is saying if there's an injunction against the emergency aspect, I'm going to have the units that are non emergency keep spending non-emergency because we have these standing low, absolute, let's the DOD can be used to counter narcotics trafficking. Right. Right. Has nothing to do with emergency pounds. I it exactly. So now, what what I'm concerned about is some left-wing activists judge who is going to just issue a blanket injunction to stop everything, and of course, will appeal that to at the at the end of the day, the president should win on every assertion of authority that he's doing both statutory. I'm sorry, both emergency and non emergency because none of this. And some of our friends have gotten this wrong. None of this is based on the president's inherent constitutional powers as commander in chief every single thorny. He's using is coming from a law that congress passed all of these are. Statutory authorities laws that congress put on seventy seven lower national emergency. Well, not just that not just the national emergencies act, but all these construction law, it's all of the different every power. He's using here. You can cite to a provision of federal law that congress has passed this idea that the left is saying he's stealing money to build stuff. Yeah. He is only spending money that congress has appropriated through the normal process. And also put in a law that under certain circumstances, he can transfer money from one Bank account to this other Bank account. That's all he's doing in these not doing it. Because Sam because the constitution says, I can he say, no, I'm doing it because ten USC twenty eight oh, eight ten USC twelve three zero to thirty one USC etcetera etcetera that citing the laws congress has passed. That's why we invite can to this show because you get the answers that nobody else is.

president congress supreme court Kanka cloudy Clem American civil rights union Twitter editor senior fellow California DC DC circus Peres one Bank
"dc circus" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

05:37 min | 3 years ago

"dc circus" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"Time will. Humanly their head back into twenty nine nine. We have canco cloudy ski with us in studio, which is always the best. He's a senior legal edits. Bryant bought dot com and the senior fellow at the American civil rights union. The war the deal we need to talk can follow him on Twitter. Can't cook cloud ski K L U K O W S K I. So the president gave a very phlegmatic non teleprompter speech last Friday. And he said, oh, we're gonna sign it. I want to declare national emergency. They'll challenge it in the ninth, then we'll counter, and then we'll go up to the supreme court. We were talking the break the president knows as well as we do as well as the bay stars imminently in the next year. He needs to be seen with a gold plated shovel digging. The foundation for the wall. As a lawyer expert as a man who knows the constitution, the national emergency functions. How long is it going to take for this battle through the courts? When I was in the administration, we won the travel ban battle pretty quickly. I mean, we pushed it all the way the supreme court put it on the on the docket. And we one how long is it going to take for the president to get the wall started? Well, the president can start it immediately. Now, if there's a preliminary injunction slapped on it in the next few days, I in any of the laws that have just been filed in the past few days, then the question becomes how quickly can you either? Get that PI as we call it for short preliminary injunction, either either overturned by a higher court or at minimum to get a stay imposed upon it. So you can counter the injunction it yet. That's right. You can either first of all if the PI is granted you can take that immediately up on appeal on what's called interlocutory review. Of course, like the big multi-state lawsuit is. Just been filed in northern California that goes to the ninth circuit. There's another one filed in the DC district. That was just filed battle go to the DC circus. That's that is also a liberal court just not as liberal as the ninth circuit. And so they're picking their courts, very carefully. You can ultimately either get a stay imposed by the supreme court on the lower courts while injunction what while litigation is ongoing, and or and slash or you can get them to expedite the case. If I had to guess, I'd say one way or another. I am hopeful that we could have this at the supreme court level in about nine months. In the meantime, he can stop building yet. He can start building until an injunction is imposed against him. Now that could happen any day. But but this is key parts of what he is doing are predicated upon this emergency declaration. There are also other parts that have nothing to do with the merchants that are just ordinary countering drug trafficking. Exactly. Right. And that's what drives me nuts. And I don't understand why the left doesn't understand this. Or maybe they just hate him that much. That's my guest. That's what he meant in the press in the presser when he said, look, I could do this without number. I didn't have to go this route. I'm doing it this way because it's faster. That's because the big military components that here you bet he's using could only go through an emergency. But he could easily say fine. If the court is saying if there's an injunction against the emergency aspect, I'm going to have the unit that are non emergency. Keep spending non. Because we have these standing low, absolute, let's say the DOD can be used to counter narcotics trafficking. Right, right. It has nothing to do with much pounds. I it exactly. So now, what what I'm concerned about is some left wing activist judge who is going to just issue a blanket injunction to stop everything, and of course, will appeal that to at the at the end of the day, the president should win on every assertion of a thorny that he's doing both statutory. I'm sorry, both emergency and non emergency because none of this. And some of our friends have gotten this wrong. None of this is based on the president's inherent constitutional powers as commander in chief. Every single a thorny. He's using is coming from a law that congress passed all of these are statutory authorities laws that congress put on seventy seven lower national as well, not just that not just the national emergencies act, but all of these. Instruction law. It's all of the different every power. He's using here. You can cite to a provision of federal law that congress has passed this idea that the left is saying he's stealing money to build stuff yet. He is only spending money that congress has appropriated through the normal process. And also put in a law that under certain circumstances, he can transfer money from one Bank account to this other Bank account. That's all he's doing. And he's not doing it. Because Sam because the constitution says, I can he say, no, I'm doing it because ten USC twenty eight oh, eight ten USC twelve three. Oh, two thirty one USC etcetera etcetera citing the laws congress has passed. That's why we invite Cain to this show because you get the answers that nobody else is giving you follow him on Twitter Kanka Klaus ski Kate. L U K W S K. I read his articles at Breitbart nowadays listener, I have a question to you. Do you miss playing golf easily walking downstairs, hiking or sleeping through the night?.

president supreme court congress Twitter USC senior fellow Bryant California DC circus golf DC Breitbart one Bank Cain