17 Burst results for "Daniel Mcadams"

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

03:58 min | Last week

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"But if you're against counting them of course you hate democracy and you hate freedom so the justification for putting through these changes is that our friend the wonderful civic-minded minded attorney did was cove. It people are terrified. How dare you make them go and physically vote and show their ideas and sign this. You are truly you want people to die and so this is what did it. And here's hillary back in april april. This is a this is a tweet. States must take concrete steps now to make sure every citizen can be heard in november no matter where we are by then in fighting the cova pandemic sounds like she's laying the groundwork so started by de legitimizing trump's through russia gate then using koba to crash the economy and to enable the changing of voting rules across the country and here we are in the middle again of a color revolution in the united states. And other last thing. I'm gonna do because see just going to kick me off. I'll do this quickly. Here's a color to in ten moves and says a hat tip pepe escobar. Who did a great piece and encourage people to have a look at it. But here's ten. Here's ten moves because color revolution site. A massive pandemic killed in reality point one percent of those who get it. We need mail in ballots to be widespread as the safest way for people to vote. Endlessly publicize virtually every poll showing a massive landslide for biden every poll except for kooks use the pandemic to kill the one major thing that would make people re elect trump. Which is aside from what we know. A good-looking economy on the surface biden announces at hillary's urging that he would not concede the election before the election under any circumstance. I will not concede this the vote count on the night of the election and many of you were sitting up like i was running pretty smoothly. Favouring trump then. All of a sudden fox news calls arizona for biden inexplicably with not very much of the vote counted and certainly the voting conservative areas not counted and all of a sudden accounting stops. Why did it stop. They stopped counting. What happened. Maybe they were checking. How many votes they needed to fix things. Number eight two. Am a first batch of mysterious votes starts pouring in more than one hundred and thirty thousand. I believe in michigan were delivered one hundred percent for biden statistically impossible they said oh no that we corrected that okay with you correct then. Why doesn't trump have some more votes. He keeps losing number. Nine to five percent of the shift.

biden hillary pepe escobar attorney russia gate united states arizona michigan
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

05:46 min | Last week

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Your cancer treatments. You're selfish. Establish this create this mass hysteria lineup. People whose entire professional existence is obedience to the state. People like neil ferguson and the uk the great prognosticator whose track record is is the worst in history of predicting anything you get someone like this widely respected and he comes out and says well if you do everything we say you'll only lose two million people and that set governments in motion across the world literally let's emulate china and how they dealt with it. Let's lock everyone up. Great idea the worst aspects of china and there are some very good aspects of china but the worst aspects of china. Well by the time. The narrative comes out the narrative is established. If you go against it. You're kook. You're a bad person. You're selfish what we find out. Now that the says ninety nine point nine percent survival rate if you get it and if you're young forget i mean literally the cdc director redfield said five or six times as many kids are dying of the flu than of died kobe so anyway get out early in the stop. The facts establish the facts on the ground politicized the pandemic that is so important first of all once. It's politicizing it becomes very clear that one political side of our great divide the talks about is in it hook line and sinker and that is basically democratic party supports. Joe biden wasn't embarrassed about it. He said i am going to be the president of walk down and masks. That sounds like fun. But they signed on to it. Because it's a tribe. But unfortunately the genius of this demonic plan is that you divide of the right of the conservatives wherever you wanna call them because you have these law and order conservatives and whenever a an official issues an edict you're the first round of back the blue and stand in line and salute the flag and do whatever they say and unfortunately a lot of this. They claim his bible base. So you have a lot of bible believer saying well a have to support the civil government. I can't i can't i can't deny my religion. Even as the government itself is denying your religion. had somehow. it's okay so you split the right. You split the opposition You destroy the ability to mobilize people to fight this The so-called the pandemic k. Under the politicisation once you've terrorized the population. What do you crash. The one thing that trump depends on to get reelected which is okay. We know better. But let's just for game sake crash a great economy. We knew dr. Paul often says it's a house on sand. Never mind the perception is. It's a great economy. People won't vote for the person who's are you better off now than four years ago. Of course they would they would have gone for. Trump crashed economy terrorize a population. Divide people divide people and keep them from opposing this and it justifies the abuse heaped on people. Interestingly enough particularly the abuse in the blue states with tyrannical governor blue swing states with tyrannical governors. You had whitmer in michigan. Who is literally insane. Wouldn't let you buy some radish seeds..

china Joe biden neil ferguson cdc uk whitmer dr. Paul redfield michigan official president director
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

02:44 min | Last week

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Here's what he said when he was under oath i never saw any direct evidence that trump campaign or someone in it was plotting or conspiring with the russians to meddle in the election. What was he saying on. Tv at the same time that he was saying this as trump would say russia russia russia. They were on their on. He and brennan. Ron every cable station. You can imagine hyping. The russia thing hyping the russia threat but when they under oath and they faced in time in the slammer where they were singing a different tune. It's very very interesting. But what did brennan and clapper do after that. After omegas trump got elected. How did this happen. We we did our best to fix things and it didn't work well. They released in january twenty seventeen as we all know a critical critical document the intelligence community assessment. It sounds so official. Although there's no such thing the intelligence community releases a national intelligence estimate has several processes by which they produce their products. Well this was something new. The analysts were handpicked by brennan. He admitted it clapper interesting. There was no community-wide review state department and didn't get cut out the other different aspects of the intelligence community didn't to take cutout. Here's the finished product in the. Nsa itself said it didn't have a very high level of of of of confidence in the whole thing. What this was. It was the intelligence community investigating the intelligence community about a coup put on by the intelligence community. And that's what we've been facing now for the past few years but what. Russia gate established as well. Is this catch-all anytime bad news comes out. Well it was putin it was the russians. If you dare even look at it while you're supporting putin. Oh my gosh biden's laptop. He's high on. God knows what and puts his laptop somewhere in on it. Aside from the salacious parts were pretty good evidence that some pretty serious stuff was going on warming his father stuff. That trump was impeached over. That trump didn't do so what happens. We see immediately. Everyone lockstep well. This was russian. Disinformation russian disinformation. You had fifty former intelligence officers saying we don't have any evidence but this has all the hallmarks of russian disinformation. So you can you. Can you know sort of de-legitimizing. Nobody wanted to talk about it. Who wants to spread russian. Disinformation unless you hate america. So that's russia gate. Why kovic so important. And how does it tie together create mass hysteria using fake information. And do it quick. Do it right away. This new bug is ten times more deadly than the flu. You'll be dropping like flies get. It's a pandemic in the times of pandemic. You cannot expect things to work properly. How dare you go. Get.

russia trump brennan biden putin Ron clapper official america
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

03:30 min | Last week

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Things hits a mixed bag at best that is not important. What's important is that we've seen a year running psi ops and coup attempt it's been engineered by the deep state for lack of a better term and and continues with the intelligence community. So hey why is. Russia get so important i wanna hit us up a couple of the highlights of it so we understand first of all the purpose is to establish the illegitimacy of the two thousand sixteen election. Once you establish that president trump is illegitimate elected. of course. it's not only an option to do anything by whatever means necessary to overthrow. It's almost a patriotic duty. Your president was put into office by hostile foreign power a hostile foreign intelligence service. If you are a good patriotic american. You have a duty to do anything. Wouldn't stop at anything to stop this from going on established establish that anything is justified. We know a lot about russia gate at this point Those of us paying attention. I know that all of you have some of this will be a rehash but remember in september. The director of national intelligence john ratcliffe. You were just a couple of the highlights. He wrote a letter to lindsey graham. None of our favorite senator as you all know but it had interesting and important information the us intelligence community hand formation quote alleging that us presidential candidate. Hillary clinton had approved a campaign plan to stirrup a scandal against us presidential candidate donald trump by telling by tying him to president putin in russian hacking dnc. This is from the intelligence community. Remember for the last four years. The left said trust the intelligence community. Now they're saying don't trust the intelligence community but this is what they happen. It's important enough. At the time. That john brennan the director of central intelligence at the time and no friend of liberty actually briefed president obama on the situation saying maybe they shared some plans. But saying here's what hillary's cooking up and they passed information onto to great patriotic americans. Jim komi and peter struck her investigate. This guy is right so and then. The second thing is a server that wasn't established a narrative that the russians hacked hillary's server and boom. You're off to the races. Everything is set in motion. But what happened. Something weird happened why they didn't call them the fbi. We all know which called me himself said that would have been the best practices. But gosh they didn't do it and we didn't push it so the fbi was never given a report the dnc contact instead of the fbi. Very corrupt company called crowd strike. Hey come look at our servers. I think the russians hacked into it but don't tell the fbi don't give them right. And so here's the in crowd strike in public. Went along with the russians hacked the russians hacked. It didn't say a word but something weird happened. When they were under oath a testimony that was hidden until this year they were singing a different tune. Here's sharon henry. The president of crowd strike under oath. We only heard about it in may quote. There's no evidence to emails. Were actually exfiltrated. Their circumstantial evidence but no evidence they were actually exfiltrated. E no evidence of hack whatsoever. This is the guy who investigated. So that is. I think very important in the same trench of testimony that came out then deny clapper. We all know him..

fbi president Hillary clinton Russia president putin director donald trump lindsey graham john ratcliffe john brennan senator obama Jim komi sharon henry us peter
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

04:45 min | Last week

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Okay we're going to go on a little journey. i'll start. Interestingly enough because jeff did mention central europe in the former eastern bloc will start there about twenty five years ago actually a little less than twenty five years ago. I found myself standing in the middle of central europe where it had been living when i finished graduate school. And i was an election monitor and monitored and witnessed in viewed very closely the pre color revolutions of the era this immediately after the fall of communism some of the first elections that occurred in central and eastern europe. Despite the popular mythology were not democratic elections with the ground swell of support for democracy in fact they were managed and manipulated by the united states of america in order to assure a particular outcome and outcome was to re elect communists. And i know that sounds strange in. It certainly doesn't fit the narrative. But why would you want to reelect communists in an era of the head just thrown communism off while communist were great for the deep state in the us because they knew how to take orders. They knew how to do what they were told. They knew a strong power told them to do something and promise them all the goodies that they would continue to enjoy that they have enjoyed for so long under communism they would do it. They were compliant on the other side of that coin. There were the evil populous. People like frano tujman in croatia. People live vladimir meciar in slovakia who are populists. They were strong anti communists and they did not want to trade the old boss for a new boss. These people had to be undermined and prevented and they also buying large christians rather than atheists pagans with the communist were. They had to be prevented from being anywhere near the power so they all became far right. They all became antisemites. Say all became evil horrible people that had to be overthrown. So i sat there watching this play out and i got very frustrated and furious. I couldn't believe why are we supporting communists. Well here's what it looks like. Here's what the pre color revolutions looked like for me on the ground while i was there in it's pretty formulaic. Let's be honest first of all target before the election. You have to target someone to win and lose before the election. The bad guy is already demonized as all of the things..

europe united states vladimir meciar jeff croatia slovakia america
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

05:48 min | Last month

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Hello everybody and thank you for tuning into the Liberty Report with me. Today is Daniel McAdams. Our co-hosts Daniel. Good to see you. How are you this morning?.

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

05:34 min | 2 months ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Hello everybody and thank you for joining into the Liberty Report with me today is Daniel McAdams. Our co-host Daniel good to see you. Are you this morning? Dr. Paul doing fine doing fine? And I'm sure you've stayed up and listen carefully Years cuz we're going to give you a couple quizzes here pretty soon. Well, I stayed up too and I listen to it sort of, you know, I did I tried to but it was a pretty painful for me to do that. But evidently it was painful for others. Nobody's right and say what's not a wonderful debate. We we learned a lot and he gave me make up my mind. You don't hear much of that but there was one article. I'm going to read a little code from from case University because they're worried about the children the children. Oh, no the kids the students, you know at the school that they might get upset with this and I think they should be upset. I think they should be really upset about what time Going on and coronavirus is and everything else but there are upset with the school wants to make sure that it's not nobody's emotionally stressed out over this and they've said that this this is a known function. If you're under stress, you have these areas where you go and get unstressed at you and you have counselors coming to help you out. That's what they needed here Western Reserve University the sight of last night's presidential set up dedicated support spaces for students who've been triggered by the tense exchanges. Now there were some but I'm not quite sure I would think the philosophy that has these supporting might be part of the problem that creates the stress but the university this is really because it's medical now, this is down my alley the university announced that the support space is not a summer. Okay for Psychotherapy and does not constitute mental health treatment. You should be feeling good about the fact that your taxpayers money are being spent wisely to take care of the mental health of the kids better. They worrying about the mental health of the kids are sending no matter how old they are with face masks to school and really cause an anxiety. But anyway, this is we can rest assured that there are checking on the kids and we don't want them to be stressed because they're they're going to be stressed that when they find out what what the non political system has and what's in store for them. If we ever have a have a sorting out of all the mess that we have and that debates don't seem to resolve much of that song. What what did you gain from this little reacting to that? You know, we don't support the draft, but sometimes when I see something like that, I really started to reconsider our view on the drought because wage These guys are running off to.

Western Reserve University Daniel McAdams Dr. Paul Daniel good
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

Part of the Problem

05:40 min | 3 months ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

"Murat. Barred may have captured the imagination of a lot of people or captured the you know the the The the belief system of a lot of people in the party I. think that's probably very true. I think that people at the top of the party absolutely did not want the muses caucus to come in and start having the influence at has I don't think it's true. I don't think there's any evidence to back up your your assertion that this what the way the caucus is a working or the way that I'm working is driving people out of the party all of the evidence shows that we're bringing tremendous. Amounts of people into the party I I'm probably the number one or number two recruiter for the Libertarian Party. The Libertarian Party called me to see if I wanted to set up one of those you know pages. So I get credit and get paid off all of the people that I'm recruiting because. So many were telling them I'm the reason they joined and I turned it down because I'm not really interested in making money off of that I kind of see it as like a conflict of interest I'm like. If I'm telling you to do something. I'm saying I believe in this. So let's go do it. I did enter the same reason right doesn't seem exactly like the right thing to do but so no, I don't I don't think this what the truth is that the meese caucus came in they recruited a lot of people podcasters and a lot of different people in the Liberty Movement to join the liberty of the Libertarian Party and when that happened, they were attacked and condemned with all types of smears that are not accurate as it like Michael Heiss is a great dude he is. Not some right winger as he's working on decriminalize of mushrooms and shit like that. He's like a hard a hard core Ron Paul Leeann. But to the Group of people that that you're talking about who do criticize me and them Ron Paul is a racist to them to I. Think the whole thing is problematic even though the man Ron Paul does not have a hateful bone in his body you could never find anything that he's ever said or voted for or supported. That's even slightly racist. You'd literally what they could go back to some fucking newsletters from forty years I mean, yeah, we could. Some of that Shit that Ron Paul is is. Ron Paul has a bad habit of allowing people to do things in his name that are kind of ugly and it's happening right now at the institute to like, would you send a new person to go look the Ron Paul Institute News Yes. His website right now. Yes. I wouldn't. So we disagree why not? Because it's conspiratorial Daniel Adams never seems to find a Putin ally that he disagrees with and the non adventure. So. Let's let's drill down on that because I actually heard that I. I took some offense to you said that you think Daniel McAdams is a Russian asset on your show. Dana McAdams right now is running around calling students for liberty in Europe, CIA asset, a CIA plant because they're trying to in voting rights in Belarus okay. That sounds a little bit conspiratorial sodas calling him a Russian asset, right. So he also continually repeats the talking points that Abby Martin constantly pushes on Madero supported Madero and he is he anytime there is an a there is a foreign policy issue he tends to align with Russia and with Putin talking points and I. Think. It's curious. Okay I mean but that's like almost like okay. So you could like if we were in two thousand and three, you could accuse Ron Paul of being Saddam Hussein asset because he always seems to be taking the same side as Saddam Hussein I mean both of them don't want the US military to overthrow Saddam Hussein. So this is I mean this is not a very strong argument. Yes. Daniel Mc Adams is clearly against the. US Empire, and so when they are vilifying their next potential target, he's usually on the side of saying that there's a lot of propaganda here, and this isn't isn't right now he has a view that I don't really agree with that. We basically just shouldn't criticize the government's that the US is targeting for for whatever reason I don't necessarily agree with that but I certainly see the point that he's making but yeah, I agree. You can make the point but the the difference like and the Ron Paul Institutes recent criticism, Joe. Johnson's campaign and Adam Dick who when he writes stuff, you have to really fact check it like your criticism Jorgenson is totally genuine totally valid from your perspective and that isn't always the case with the people that are currently writing for the Ron Paul ends. That's my point. Okay. Well, let me I just WANNA finish. The last point just to make the point that I think, Daniel McAdams is making, which is, which is that if let's say in two thousand and two as there's the buildup to the war in Iraq and you're a libertarian with like a libertarian publication, maybe a writer for reason magazine and all the sudden you start writing all of these pieces about how illiberal Saddam Hussein is and how he's a brutal dictator and he Oppresses his people and how the enemy of Libertarians but which you know all is true. It does it seems a little bit weird and like the timing of that was I could understand where a libertarian would be like don't start doing this right now because clearly there's an agenda at work here and you don't really want to be on that side of the agenda. So I understand that part of the argument now in. Terms of what you're saying about their criticism of Joe Jordan's, and are you are you referring to all lives matter comment? Yeah and and I will say that McAdams blog in two thousand eleven by the way was called Putin's blog like he does have a track record with Putin like I'm just saying.

Ron Paul Libertarian Party Saddam Hussein Putin Ron Paul Leeann Daniel McAdams Ron Paul Institute Ron Paul Institutes Daniel Mc Adams US reason magazine McAdams Dana McAdams Murat. Liberty Movement Michael Heiss CIA Joe Jordan meese Iraq
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

14:34 min | 7 months ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Daniel McAdams our co host? Daniel to see how this morning Paul good good West start off with some sort of good news of somebody moved in our direction. I guess we can't say the philosophy has changed completely and totally but philosophy of many Texans has been heard you know. Texas has been in the news a lot on this Dallas case which seemed to be so outrageous and rightfully so it got the attention even outside of Texas but it may be woke up some people in Texas because what is going on here. You know here here. We have this very conservative state and yet we had regulations put on as a strenuous as stringent as As anybody else but finally the people said enough is enough especially after this lady. That was running in the Salon Up Dallas and being arrested and a sudden. The noise was out there. I mean and what happened but our governor. Our governor changed his tune a bit but this all just routine a little bit of mistake and we shouldn't have arrested her sort of thing. So He's reissued is executive order on on lockdown and I would say That is good. You know I always make the point that what really makes the world tick and what creates governments is ideological and that's hard to believe because sometimes you only have ten people right the government but there's an ideology behind it and it's the tolerance or the intolerance of the people that make the different numbers do cost to do Count and and they're speaking out now. There are there for loss of face behind what they're doing you know the authoritarian approach the ignorance on corona virus. And all these things but all of a sudden you know the people smoke out which is good it reflecting a position and they say the right things he thinks. This could be constitutional. They're not this isn't constitutional is it and it certainly immoral and you know what I think. The immorality of it is catching the attention of a lot of people The The lady that was imprisoned. Fine what did you do? It prompted the Attorney General. Was it that to Baylor out and pair fun. And we willing to serve for her. This is this is pretty pretty amazing They're they're they're getting to the bottom of this when they talk this way. Of course our goal in life is always to point out the flaws in the philosophy that's leading us in a certain direction like economic policy foreign policy problems. We don't want to wait until we had to fight this. Close the war Dan. We fought to try to prevent the Persian Gulf War and and also the Iraq war but look how hard it is to close it down. So that's why a preemptive appeal for the right policy is much easier but still when they go wrong when people speak out what we noticed. Here is the governor backed down and we've heard from the attorney general. Ken Paxton who I think is pretty solid on issues. He's this act is shameful and and he's reflecting the people and maybe this is a sign that Things will change more radically in the right direction but of course they always reminded us. Don't get your hopes up folks because the world will never be the same again. If it isn't corona virus will have another virus to worry about so we we can never let our guard down so imagine our our job in trying to promote what we do on this program to get people to understand. I guess we'll we'll have that job for a while. Well the resistance to this growing tyranny from state to State County city it needed a galvanizing event really and I think this was the galvanizing event. Shelly Luther up in Dallas. She said you know what? I gotTA reopen my salon. I can't feed my kids. I'm a single mother. She said. Forget it I'm going to reopen it per and She went to. She was called before the judge. And what did he say to her? You better get on your knees and apologize for insulting all of us. Wonderful law enforcement and judicial people. Admit that you're being selfish or I'll throw you in jail. And she said okay. Throw me in jail. That's fine that kind of bravery has made her a national symbol of this kind of resistance the resistance of of humble business owners and actually we have A. We have a tweet that we can put up. This is the this is the Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick. He reacted seven days in jail. No bail and two thousand seven thousand dollar fine is outrageous. No surprise. Texans are responding. I'm covering the seven thousand dollar fine. She has to pay and I've volunteered. It'd be placed under house arrest so she can get to work and feed her kids and that got out in front of the governor himself. Who said Oh this is really. This is really too bad. She shouldn't be jailed. Patrick came out and said this is not right and I'm going to cover it and so what happened. Today is pretty interesting and this is why we talk about in the title Abbott capitulates. He's desperately trying to catch up with the way Texas or going as they wake up and so he rushed out this morning and he said I've got to change my executive order to make a new order. He said throwing Texans in jail had their business shut down through no fault of their own is nonsensical and I will not allow it to happen. That's why I'm modifying. Executive orders to ensure confinement is not a punishment for violating an order. This order is much proactive and supersedes. All other local order order order order order order making new orders. Maybe the problem is making those orders in the first place. That's right you know. There was never anybody lobbying for all this. All these regulations there lobbying now on they're fighting for emphasizing getting rid of them but they came up but nobody was begging for these things they begged for safety and a few other things. But I find fascinating. Is that if you just thought about it traditionally conservatives law-abiding people they're strong on law and order and the Democrats are lackadaisical about it but here this brings the liberals into it when they see some of the atrocious things happening. You know under this lockdown Even though they say the national position of Of the Liberals is that they're all four this lockdown. But I think there's sort of a split in that I I've said this on the program that this is an opportunity because I don't think that people suffering from this are all Republicans are all democrats. People are suffering in across the board. So if if if we could what we WANNA do is try to unify people. Because I are you always that the issue of liberty is very unifying. We may use our liberty differently but we need to be unified on it especially when it comes to this when when you get locked on conservatives and liberals get locked on and people lose their livelihoods we think. Sometimes the four left is not people who have jobs but they do have a different opinion then all of a sudden they say holy man look at what is happening and you. The bail outs have sorta pasted this over a little bit. But that money doesn't last forever. That was sort of in weeks. So they'll be this they're going to be a rebound. I don't think I don't sit around worrying about the rebound other virus generally doesn't happen but I see the rebound the fear right now. There's been temporary. Reprieve of this and the stock market is reactive. Of course that's why the Federal Reserve exists is to keep the stock market propped up. So they've been able to to do this. But the the the reprieves coming and I think that all of a sudden people were going to say enough is enough and I hope this brings the country together. Not so much pe- people who argue come together. Obey obey obey. I say come together and resist resist resist. It's the government messing Yup and and I think there's a little bit sediment coming about you know in the country where you can see when you look at some of these rallies. It isn't like you know. The bankers and the businessmen are coming to rebel. It's common people and they look both conservative and liberal to me. Yeah and they're also of all colors and races and backgrounds and that's what the media doesn't show either but you talked about fear. Fear is important because fear has driven this whole thing. They terrified people and the terrified supine. People are willing to let government do anything. But here's what's interesting. Here's how they manage and regulate the fear and I saw this headline on zero head and there are a lot of other very fearmongering publications as well. And it's new cases skyrocket of Corona virus despite opening because of opening of the economy. But then you start thinking about logically. Wasn't everyone screaming. We need more testing. More testing and states are racing to ramp up the testing ramp up the testing. And so when you do a bunch more testing you're going to find more corona virus cases so there's not a logical leap between doing more testing and more cases. It's just oh my gosh. More cases more cases. It's it's really interesting but you talk about back to Texas for a second really is politics versus science to because it's got a follow the science we're going to follow the science but isn't it interesting places. Like Harris County Places like San Antonio everywhere where you kind of have liberals in charge they trying to resist and go even further than Abbott. Who Seen as a conservative? Who's seen as the other party would have? Democrats and Republicans so it's really hard to It's really hard to ignore the politics that I think are really playing key role here rather than the science and politics gets Lewis bit confused at times and I find a little bit fascinating about what's going on between Virginia and Tennessee. Yeah this interesting you know here. They are on a border and I guess there's a street that they've is them and an Tennessee is a little bit more lenient Virginia. Because Rural Virginia's ruled by the Virginians up near Washington. Dc so they don't even care about the people on there. So you have one st doing quite well. In the restaurants that are open their thriving. You have to look across the street and they're going bankrupt and you're not allowed to open The difference here is so dramatic and think that the people who keep them closed down are actually doing anything. And you know this whole idea. We've talked about the testing for a long time. The reliability of the testing or non testing and the interpretation of it and the lack of testing. It is so so far removed from reality and decided to him. I think about it and I wonder what things would have been like if nobody had done one single test. You know they. They probably wouldn't worried about one hundred different companies making a vaccine or or closing down the use of one drug and trying to develop a new drug. There wouldn't be so much money involved in politics involved people's we'll see you're on you're crazy. What do you mean? We couldn't have just gone along without finding out where we used to do that. You know we. We used to be able to do that and let Medical People. Plot along wouldn't be dramatic. It wouldn't pull it be politicized. We costs a lot less money. And under those conditions we in many ways concord pulse polio and smallpox in the old days in medicine private individuals working in the lab that made these discoveries but no that's removed is all politicized and it's all medicine. It is has been politicized as well. So it's a real shame but that incident Virginia. And do we do. We have a happen to have anything. Picture of the street. Actually we can look the next The next clip because it's pretty dramatic shows Bristol Virginia and Tennessee on the other side. If we have that next clip we can put up but it is tragic you know. This is downtown Bristol. And it's very very sad because it's an article we found in the Washington examiner on one side. There's there's a family that owns the Burger bar. It's their family business. It's their livelihood. That's on the Virginia side. Literally a few yards from Tennessee. Side the Tennessee side is open. The governor hasn't shut the place down. The Virginia side has no customers. And here's the owner of the Burger Bar. It's just not a very fair battle or fight and I'm glad for the guys who get to open up but I sure wish it was us to tragic. They're able to do a little bit takeout. He said he was lucky. He made between eight and nine. Pm who made ninety dollars which is a tiny fraction. It's usually packed. Everyone's having breakfast eating burgers and because of governor North Northam who represents the elites in northern Virginia and the tyranny against southern Virginia. This guy just has to sit and watch as his business goes down the drain and you WanNa talk about. That's the science so the science says on this side of the street. You're going to get corona this. You'll be okay. Come on I think this example points out how arbitrary it is. If you have a consistent society had different cities towns and states if if they were consistent and defending the principles of liberty it wouldn't matter it wouldn't be this way so they arbitrarily closed down some people keep the people over that are central know Sometimes they're not essential. There's a lot more unessential peach. What people should have been closed? I I think we should non-essential people that we should really deal with the politicians in Washington deciding who in America's essential non essential but that was the case when they were closing down. What we're looking at here is the closing down of two different states differently. one st falling some Reasonable rules and and doing the job. We're looking more toward freedom. But the the the other side is arbitrarily and then when they try to open up. It's the same way. Open up everybody at once. They say that would be chaos. I say we have chaos now..

Virginia Texas Tennessee executive Dallas Dan Patrick Daniel McAdams Washington Abbott Medical People Ken Paxton Attorney Iraq Burger bar Corona Paul smallpox
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

12:32 min | 9 months ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Daniel McAdams good to see you. How are you this morning? Paul good and we have a special program because we have a special guest to somebody that you used to work with or for Jan dice. President of the Maecenas Institute. I don't know where that qualifies him. For President of the United States. I knew he could do a better job. Jeff welcome to the Liberty Report. Good Morning Gentlemen. It's great to see both of you. I think most of our viewers know who you are but you of course Head up the Measles Institute now but you were the chief of staff for many years and had various jobs in the congressional office. So you've known Daniel for a long time and other staff members but We're glad to have you on today and all although you weren't particularly involved with all the banking regulations you were fascinated with taxation and the whole program is chief of staff and you've been speaking out and you make sure the muses institute have You know sound policy when it comes to money so we want to deal with that today because The News of course is inundated with Corona viruses. It is hard to talk about the problems of spending and the fear without talking about as well but the way thing is Jeff I think about one we seek of what's going on today is The the whole whole program of Delusion and the book by Mckay Years Ago Extraordinary Popular Delusions and you got the madness of crowds. I would think that represents a lot of what's going on today but jeff. Welcome to our program. Well I think there is a madness going on. I think what the Fed in particular has been doing since. This corona virus crisis began is nothing short of grotesque. I think what we saw Sunday from. The Fed was remarkable. I don't think it's going to work but unfortunately it also shows that we have failed in a sense. We have failed to help the public understand that. Central banks do is not some sort of marketplace or business or economic activity. It's back to form of state central planning. I think we failed to help the public understand that there needs to be a connection between saving and lending that central banks can't just conjure up money and credit out of thin air because when they do so. That doesn't actually create any new goods or services in the economy and right now with all of these crazy shutdowns by governors. I mean our economy is contracting. We're we're in a spiral. But it's it's certainly not inflationary it's deflationary so the idea that if you give people a bunch of new money and credit when there's more debt in the world than there was in two thousand eight is just absolutely crazy. It's counterintuitive and it's it's like a narcotic it's it's just designed to drug for another three months or six months or twelve months and it's it's not only grotesque but it's really shameful. I I would argue that. This is a shame pole. Time for America that we permit this kind of nonsense to go on simply because we don't want to think about it too hard to understand it to well you know and both left and right. Liberals and Conservatives Republicans and Democrats have endorsed a system or we wouldn't have had more than one hundred years old but A lot of them will profess. They do understand supply and demand and the free market pricing. And we shouldn't have wage and price control but when you come to price fixing and you look at the Fed and you look at economic planning. Which is what they're really into. And they spend their whole life almost even are they have to pay lip service to a few statistics. There are price fixer. They WANNA fix the price of money and by doing that. They WANNA fix the amount of money and it's impossible so that this is why I always assumed that this would end and not because we get more members in the congress but it's going to end because this is not viable and I just comment on this whole thing price-fixing and how ridiculous it is to think that a couple of guys you know locked up in a room Let me see What should the price of the the money be? What should the interest rates me because that makes all the difference in the world and believe me a lot of people waking up right now. Realizing the Fed doesn't have the Vegas idea what they're doing well and of course. The stock markets haven't responded the way they hoped they would. I mean they've created huge amounts or at least promises of huge amounts of liquidity over the past few days and the stock markets are still losing record amounts every day in some cases the other day more than they lost as a percentage in the Dow for Black Monday in one thousand nine hundred seven. So this idea that we can promise. Let's say what the Fed did on Sunday? Seven hundred billion dollars at least of new liquidity for the markets. That's more than the feds entire balance sheet from one thousand nine hundred fourteen up until about the two thousand seven. Two thousand eight periods. So it's not working. We've had this this concept this phrase really for more than a decade now pushing on a string and what that means is that there's a there are limits to what the Fed can do on the monetary policy side for the economy even in the short term and I like the idea that trump's nominee judy shelton has actually been critical of this. She's been critical of the idea of a group of central planner sitting in a room called the FOMC that Fed Open Market Committee and determining what the money supply is going to be or the interest rate is going to be at least targeting it so it's refreshing that she is at least talking about this and pushing back a little bit and it's strange to me. That even in Libertarian circles. What we call fin financial twitter there an awful lot of people who either downplay the role of fence. It doesn't matter much. This is all about supply and demand or they actually say it's salutary that what the Fed is doing is helpful and necessary because because of this crisis and wow. I really like to see this thing. Unraveled and fixed. I'd like to see us on a foundation of for real economy and real money before my own children get much older so I am not an advocate of pushing this thing. This can down the road any further and if we need to have a painful crisis insolvency some bankruptcy some corrections moving capital into better and higher uses than. I'd rather have it now than later. Very Good Daniel Unfortunately Jeff. I don't think that they're listening to you. Because speaking promises I was thinking you know. Mnuchin announced an eight hundred fifty billion dollar package. And that's more than the Measly seven hundred billion dollars. Tarp Bill back in Oh eight it also includes the idea of sending everyone a check which is something. Mitt Romney likes and everyone a thousand dollars. I think someone said No. She'll be five thousand. I think it should be a million then. We all have our debts paid off but fifty billion dollars to airlines We've got a bill. Those out of the White House said definitely the Casinos. Want build out Unfortunately people who enjoy the services of prostitution now prostitution. They're losing a lot of money so they may want to bail out so it's going to keep doing the same thing over and over again and thinking it's going to to work this time but as you and Dr Paul Rightly know it won't work this time. Well I'd rather bail out hookers than airlines. If I had to choose I will say this. The airline spent trillions of dollars over the last few years about ninety six percent of their free cash flow on stock buybacks and all of those trillions of dollars in market worth on the equity side of their balance sheet has just evaporated in recent days that all that money down the drain and they should have been putting that money away for operational purposes for a rainy day. Is there a more cyclical industry than airlines? I mean come on. We're going to give these guys billions of dollars. Obama's tarp bailout didn't really result in much of a resuscitation for the economy. Giving everyone a thousand dollars I mean. Do we think prices won't just adjust at least to the extent they're allowed to because we're now talking about gouging price-fixing so giving everybody a thousand dollars isn't GonNa make a difference? It's just going to create a one or two day spasm of spending on on whatever so it it really strikes me that we learn nothing in that two thousand eight period all the same errors have been compounded. All those same mistakes are being made again and we're really in the same spot. But here's what's worse. Is that the total amount of debt across the globe across society sovereign debt corporate debt personal individual household debt mortgages cars etcetera all higher. So we haven't fixed anything all of that debt that needed to be done away with to be written off. The books hasn't been it's just been replayed at so we're in worse shape than we were in two thousand eight. We need to let this crash happened. I know people don't WanNa hear that. I'm not Glib about that. I know that that means real pain for real people but this time. Let's let some of that. Pain be felt in the financial sector rather than the mom and pop sector and you touched on out even in your opening statement about the crisis if the crisis who just let it happen things will be better on the long run. But you also brought up the subject that We as Libertarians remark. People might not have done a good enough job on preparing the people and I think that is certainly true but the the crisis is going to comment isn't like they're going to say well. It looks like it's time we need to allow the correction to occur. I think the last time they even touched on that was in nineteen twenty one when they thought there was a proper policy. But they don't but I don't think we have to convince people about bringing you know do this and this and this and let the crisis comp the crisis is in the we're in the middle of it right now it's going to get worse and worse than it is going to be confusing because we Have this pandemic which I think is a stretch of imagination. I think is way overblown but nevertheless the crisis is coming. So it's back to this what what's GonNa Happen in our job. has individuals trying to change attitudes and ideas is to get the. It is out about what sound money isn't what a free society is all about and That's where you know. I keep hoping you know become a optimistic. Because I know the measles institute exists and there are others. We are reaching people. But I'll tell you what it's GonNa be a tough fight because they don't go away quietly and but I think it's an intellectual and I don't think it's a political thing of wind. We're going allow it to come. I think changing this definition of Of A downturn to a tragedy is really a beneficial correction. You know correct. Our habits correct spending. That is what the job is. So hopefully we do the vast. I hope we contribute to the positive things that we can do. When this crisis really gets going well our job right now is to help. People UNDERSTAND HOW TO REBUILD. A society is civilization and economy based on real money because everything starts with that and if we allow them to get away with blaming this crisis and their subsequent actions on this corona virus. They're going to be able to say well. This was an act of God and no one could have predicted this and as a result we had to take all of these extraordinary measures. Well all of these extraordinary measures were baked into the cake. They're the result of a very flimsy debt. Ridden economy if we had some sort of stable economy in this country. If we had some sort of sound money we could absorb a few months worth of economic downturn without panicking and rushing to the exits. So what we saw on Sunday was the Fed groping around in the dark trying to find answers actually trying to create calm in the economy when in.

Fed Jeff I Daniel McAdams Dr Paul President United States chief of staff Measles Institute Maecenas Institute muses institute Mitt Romney twitter price fixing America Republicans
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

13:39 min | 10 months ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Is Daniel McAdams our co host Daniel. Good to see you are you this morning Dr Paul. Doing well L. has a really really up up today. You know it's almost like they one next year the end of the year election. Everything because I was just on Stuart Stuart Varney show and he was happy and the Republicans at the station. Very happy and it is a major disaster. Mr I would think that whole whole primary caucus The way the Democrats ran it. And maybe it's just a reflection of the ineptness of a interventionist and do-gooders and planners because it didn't go well but it did bring back memories a little bit and you may remember a little bit too. You know I RUN FOR PRESIDENT A couple of times and I didn't win and fortunately but especially in In and twelve. I remember because we were. You know we had built up a pretty good support and we were doing very well in Iowa and the truth is I didn't pay attention so these numbers because the holy man I've done as well as any one of those Democrats but but anyway on the night of the caucus they were doing. They measured things differently as they walked in. they There was a straw vote in that could be accomplished in our so. All these caucuses me but everybody. Everybody ready made their initial commitment and they had a straw vote and then it was reported and it was usually out a couple of hours rules and had to go through the caucus process. And I'm sure you are aware that how many steps they have to go and limitations and revote and and all this and paper ballots and very very confusing so That is that's Oh you know a big difference but I remember that night well because you know They said well looks like they're going to give you a third place you know and it because because Romney won and Santorum Second Center was close close to first place close to beat Romney. But maybe the organizers were in favor Romney because there was a bit of a contest in terms of no I did a lot better than this I wanted recount so After the big news was out and Romney got the big push the next day they came up with a new number and they say you know really sanatorium one by doesn't vote real real close but then he got Use that but the end of the story is that we fall through. The Straw boat was important but we did everything we were supposed to do. We had a a good organization and all the way up to the convention and we essentially had all the delegates except for a few that we had to give away. But so we really only one Iowa but I don't think there's a person in the country was what are you guys talking. So it's happened before I think this one has his messier and has more significance. I think it reflects the fact that the Democrats can't they don't have a message. They have a lot of negativity and And and they can't come back with trump trump trump is. They're trying to kill the Messenger. You know his message is too powerful so they came up. I and I think all intervention is end up this way but this was. It's especially bad now. I think there are a lot of problems. The Democrats are just floundering around and they don't have have a have a message and it turned out to be a fiasco and of course. Nobody believes that it was just a paper mistake. You know because I four people got to declare victory you know so. I think people will get tired of this But but still it's important. It's a big event and we'll learn more in a few weeks when they have the. Have the primary up in New Hampshire. Well you know you don't share very much with Bernie Sanders unders. Despite what some people may think but you both he has an has had and you had an have very passionate backers and supporters. And you're also outliers within your own party already so I think what you do have in common is it. Looks like you both in ripped off site in our so-called voting system but the funniest thing about this and over and over again we say we're not trump fans and I you know I find myself nauseous when he talks about. Aren't you sick of winning. It you know but you just can't help but think how could he have created something and I'm sure most of our viewers have seen his tweet but it's just I mean this falls into his lap. Here's here's trump on the Iowa fiasco. The Democratic Caucus is unmitigated disaster. Nothing works just like they ran the country. Remember the five billion dollar obamacare website that should have caused two percent of that the only person that can claim a very big victory in Iowa last night is trump. Thought you were talking that one one other Very very popular president had his training in movies. In and out of course was Ronald Reagan and his whole goal in his life and his personality was to be friendly and likeable and he achieved. That became a good politician at this and fortunately had leanings. You know at least polite I toward Constitutionalist and Libertarian. So but now we have a president that was trained in the modern age of. TV's and I have to admit. I never saw one of his shows but he's training must have taught him a lot because he certainly knows how to peel to the average person. So I think there's a there's a little contrast or a similarity between Reagan where they got their their their training. I think the the the caucus last night is a reflection of total ineptness incompetence by by the Democrats and of course. That's what the impeachment each one is all about so it isn't just Shift and Nadler. It is pervasive because in a way I think Why thanks thanks? So much. Is Bankrupt in Washington on both sides but especially the Democrats that they they are bankrupt intellectually and and It has to be a person. Do they ever go after trump because he his because he says one thing about brand troops home and then he sends them anyway. I don't care about do they care. Do there must be one fiscal conservative in the Democratic Party or the Republican Party but not the spending keeps going on and on so it's It's it's it's this this way is happening. And the and the Democrats have nothing else to do and they thought this last couple of years matter of fact they sent it was coming so they started impeaching trump before it was legal before he was even president So but that is a reflection of the descent that occurs when government government has too much power in the contest isn't over which over going to war just who gets to direct the troops who directs the money. And where's the money being spent and that's what it it is and and when it be overwhelms you at least trump has the brains to say the right things for people that know that you should have less taxes less less regulations and you should bring the troops home this sort of thing so I think I think what's happening there with the Democrats is a reflection of a sickness in this country. And I I look at it as a form of moral political intellectual bankruptcy. And we're GONNA see more on this. I'm afraid this type of attitude because Republicans are GonNa have to answer back and socially you know the grass roots are going to be awful angry if trump has setback and something happens or there's Some fraudulent election. There's going to be really a lot of a lot of anger and the The Democrats I think at the moment you'd you have to say they are looking for a fight and they don't care about anything other than how do we destroy this man and what he stands for. Yeah without without any other other options stepping back a little bit. You know. We're not what twelve thirteen hours least after we should have known the results and we don't and I did a lot of election monitoring whenever that happened we always knew something fishy was up. Something was going on but Apparently in APP and mobile the phone APP that was supposed to make everything. Super High Tech didn't function properly. And that's why the reporting was wrong. And that's why everything has gone. We have a couple of tweets just to kind of go back over what what happened A little bit if we can put up the first one if we haven't had to here is the chairman of the Democratic Party just a couple of days before the Iowa Caucus for for three years. We've been preparing for the process that officially kicks off tonight in Iowa. The Democratic presidential primary primary today are chair Tom Perez whereas reflects on the reforms. We've made to make this the most transparent primary in our history. uh-huh get rid of that one. Let's go onto the next uh-huh and this is someone commenting. This is very very fascinating not great optics. Here folks. The DEM's paid a company literally called shadow to create caucus APP. Buddha judge campaign also paid shadow F. E. C. Records show caucus APP fails Budi Judge Declares Himself Iowa winner with no results. That smells fishy and we have a final one here. This is from Moon of Alabama and. They're they're actually pointing to a great piece. That Max Blumenthal did this morning about. WHO's behind this This APP Seth Clermont at the time of publication -cation twelve hours after voting the democratic. Party's Iowa caucuses. Ended results have not been announced. The delay is the result of a failed APP. Developed by company appropriately named Shadow Inc.. This firm was staffed by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama campaign veterans and created by Democratic. Dark Money Nonprofit offit backed by hedge fund billionaires including Seth Clermont. This is really fascinating. And this may cause Bernie was surging. This past week in in his internal polling suggested that he was a real clear winner and then all of a sudden all these Hillary people come in. And there's all kinds of problems so it does make you wonder a little. It sounds like the more things change more. They stay the same in especially in politics. You know one of the questions. That Libertarians entertained quite frequently. Is You WanNa vote putting has no meaning to whatsoever and sometimes when you look at that crowd there this say for some reason. The Democrats destined S. into win this presidential race and you look at those individuals who are running. It's almost like who. WHO's the smartest and Buddha gene? They say he's pretty really smart and evidently he's an insider so it's it's it's really a corrupt system and then people ask me well. If voting seems to be so worthless purpose. Why did I get involved? And of course I got involved with the idea that I don't think I could shake it loose and get a you know. Get enough people to even start thinking about limited government but no I think if if a person goes into politics do get involved in voting that it should be a reflection of of a vision of philosophy it that to me is worth while but a lot of shortcomings on voting and law a lot of corruption. I was early early in my career. I lost election hundred to three hundred thousand votes by eight votes. We could never Never so it but voting. If if it's honest and you have an individual has a has a message. It's not you know the other. The thing is is use of violence or intellectual contest you know to spread the message and get people to understand and put pressure on the politicians because a lot of them are. There don't have much of a belief there there just to stay there and have a job and have the prestige of so if they they you sit back and they allow us to go to war in Vietnam and never fight it when it becomes popular and insane that were there and the people finally speak out the meme the Congress yes you know usually reflects it so so. The the philosophy of a country is very important but the the voting I would stink if you look at that crowd I that wasn't not much choice with those democratic. Why why why? Vote for one Them because they all seem to same some little bit more crooked than the other but philosophically who who's the most violent directed person to redistribute wealth the socialist viewpoint. And there's a real contest there so it's that type of voting openly lately that primary last night is not going no matter what happens if even if one wins. It's not going to change direction country. It's just GonNa make it much worse but I also. I think that they were so inept and incompetent. I would think that trump previous billing pretty good today. Well if you look at the foreign policy we ran on a piece on. RPI About Warren's extremely hawkish foreign policy team very pro-war we know the judge is very very pro-war very hawkish. DOC is so you're right. What's the point of voting? Really there..

Iowa trump president Democratic Caucus Democratic Party Ronald Reagan Bernie Sanders Stuart Stuart Varney Romney Dr Paul Daniel McAdams Mr I L. New Hampshire Seth Clermont Hillary Clinton Tom Perez Max Blumenthal DEM
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

Ron Paul Liberty Report

11:47 min | 11 months ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report

"Report with me. Is Daniel McAdams our co host Daniel. Good to see. How are you this morning? Good Yeah Watching bated breath on what's going to happen on the impeachment pay. What if they convict them? We'll the police common put Adam in person. Are they going to wonder if they'll give him another trial there. But this is not supposed to be trial. This is a political event that that to me. Probably the understatement. Because does inevitably over many many years say this is not a court of law. This is get somebody out of office for its its political but but all of a sudden you know could be as political as this one is. Wow this this is something else but I wondering a has annoyed me over these last several weeks the people who are bringing this the pollution types and others are saying they like to put a very somber very very serious note to this this this effort. We're doing now to impeach. The president is our duty is a constitutional. They say this. You know with such Saturday and you know what goes through my mind win. Did they ever vote with the constitution. Ninety Times out of one hundred. They're era they're voting against the this is very very Serious and She She yesterday was celebrating because she was signing. You know the the papers to send over the challenge to them and send it to the Senate and when she was doing this she was signing a letter by each pan and passing out these pans and guess who attacked as CNN CNN says what is she doing this. This is not not the way you usually do this. You do this when you have victory and a celebration and not for something like this and this whole the thing is it in many ways comes across as a farce but there are some serious matters to if. You're a libertarian. You happen to think well do these. People Wynn Washington ever act outside constitutional law. I remember when When when the during the last impeachment of Clinton that I had a lot of gripes and there was a lot of you know infractions on the constitution? But that's never the issue you know because they're both you know what about the wars they start Republicans and democratic. What about all this deficit financing imprinting of money all all they can always pause? You know in past something you know and they've done that to pass budgets and they do that Just recently to make sure that there's more Management of tariffs and things like that. So it's it's to find. The proper perspective is something else because I imagine this is the most politicized. She's impeachment event ever and it'll be interesting to see how this pans out. Also next week will be the big week. Of course they're they're going to be some announcement today and swearing in and we'll see what happens. I'm sure a lot of people will be watching. You know it's funny running because Pelosi said we can't wait one moment we have to appeal impeach him immediately outwards in a frenzy. We've got to get these witnesses and they were going to get this done. Then all of a sudden they got it done the frenzy and then all of a sudden everything's died remembered before Christmas or what happened which urgent we have to get him out before he continues to abuse his power. Then nothing happened. Weeks pass She said well we have to make sure that we can ensure a fair trial. So that's why we're going to send the articles over. Probably the reality. Is that the Christmas this distraction. She wanted to get that out of the way so she can continue to put it front and center in the media because if she's worried about fair trial she's worried about the politicization while she just named her impeachment judges or her impeachment managers led by Adam Schiff and jerrold Nadler the two most partisan political people in Congress Congress certainly on the democratic side. So the whole idea is it's the sombreness and we have to ensure a fair trial as you say the pins that's just like doing high fives. Yeah we got him. We got him you know so she was caught out of character doing that. Right the The other thing is that The Republicans Republicans and the Democrats are doing the same thing playing games. But some people are lamenting the fact I guess on the Democratic side. But I don't think this is such a terrible thing. The Democratic primaries getting all messed up and all and I thought well and they said this is a mess. Now what are they. What am I doing it so but I? I don't know that time. That might not hurt anybody mess up. If it's blaming released it Pelosi and some others. Can they do. We'll just what is happening is a result of their bad judgment and the whole Democratic primary such a snooze or anyway they should be thankful to have some excitement. You know taking a Tulsi Gabbard out of the last debate and not having any kind of actual debate is whether he shake her hand and she wouldn't shake his total snooze fest so this is actually probably help them get some interest get someone to focus their own again and that's that's president trump but so where we stand today now. I think it's probably about now. They're going to be marching those articles over to the Senate in a very somber way with long faces. They had to do their duty according under the constitution. But you know there are a lot of questions that still go on answering because we go live. We can't give all the answers. We don't know what the rules are going to look like. Specifically we don't know the rules on witnesses in the Senate and that's probably one of the most significant things and I don't know if you saw this on interview with Senator Paul where he talked about about some different possible scenarios for witnesses. One of them being that every single witness will be subject. To a vote requiring fifty-one senators owners voted in favor of the witness and he was kind of wondering out loud. If I might actually deny some big witnesses that might be quite ah useful to the president. Someone like Hunter Biden. Someone like this alleged whistle blower bringing him up is cross examined him. You might have some Republicans peel away and and say no. We don't want to turn this into a circus. I think McConnell already said that so there really is a lot to be determined here in this next few hours right. There's one Republican. Senator has suggested that the Democrat US candidates. I think it was four senators that have to attend the impeachment impeachment process so the Senate conviction process and She said that they should be Excuted recuse recuse themselves because they have a conflict of interest because they have a political opinion and this has to be about the funniest thing in the world as if it can you imagine jim what would have happened if somebody had a strongly biased Political opinion in the House when they were can convicting him of impeachment voting on Patriots. I mean it's it's all it's if anything. This whole thing has made it more political than than ever before. But I think recused and somebody That's that's not going to happen. I don't of course what what Republican senator wanted to do is reduced number of Democrats in try to weaken their votes. So that's not going to happen. I wouldn't think it may be a good idea but but I can entertaining anyway. I wonder is anyone in the Senate right now. There may be theoretically Klay. Who's sitting there thinking? You know I'm GonNa just GonNa give this an even look. I'm not sure I'm not You know I don't know either way particularly in in some of the Purple States it does make you wonder but you know we talk about this show of pageantry the sombreness the constitution has to be obeyed but there really is very little chance dance that there will be a conviction and removal from office. They would need sixty seven senators and you may get a couple of Republicans peeling away. But you're not going to get that sixty eighty seven because the whole thing is really kind of a sham from the beginning isn't it. They're impeaching him on purely as you've said many times purely political things and completely ignoring the actual violations that the president has done because they actually agree with the bad stuff that he's done the unconstitutional stuff that he's done so they're not going to touch that with a ten foot pole right you know. The markets have been doing quite well. If we have chaos like it were like like it happened in the seventies with Nixon. It was such a negative. They knew the president was gonNA leave in the market was crashing. It was really really bad. that's not happening happening now The stock market is skyrocketing abnormally so for my opinion but the But I think that the main reason that is the Federal Reserve there's accommodating but others have suggested and I tend to agree with this that there are already discounting the election that there's not going to be a disruption they're not going to get rid of Donald Trump. There's not going to be. There will be a continuation. But but since it's it's SORTA abnormal due to the credit credit inflation that we have that What I wouldn't be surprised to see this market going up continuously there then the correction coming you know after the the Final News break because evenly you know people say well. People voted for trump and the markets are high and everybody is happy that then one for the various reason there has to be a correction. You might see it then but the other thing is it might happen before the election which would be very harmful To trump even even the Democrats are so weak. You know it's not not too easy to get behind some moderate middle of the road or get behind a by them or or war. Warn or something like that you know it looks it looks pretty bad you know If trump has his his baggage and there's problems he he makes these other people. These other people aren't much of an option. I'll tell you from the Senate. The Democrat side. You may not have seen this but someone put together a montage of all. Biden's statements eight minutes during the during the last debate and it was. It was a video larry unintelligible all. I almost embarrassed by uh-huh and you know I mean. We have our own hiccups when we go live to. But that was that was a little bit better about our show watching that. But you know we're talking talking about you know some of the things that maybe he should be impeached for and there was a great piece. I don't know if you saw the judge wrote a judge. Napolitano had a piece antiwar dot com picked it up but he made he made an he made a good case for an actual impeach. He he wasn't making the case but it was all about shifting rationale the shifting justification further murderer of Sulejmani. And he points out that you know. Of course it was I it was a slam dunk. He was gonNA hit four embassies. It was imminent. It was coming. It was immediate. Then we find out not that actually he signed. President trump signed off on June. So the couldn't have been immediate. It's already been seven months later. But Napolitano said trump sent hassle will the joint chiefs of Staff Joint Chiefs Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Pompeo. Asper all over to brief congress on the justification Shen and he said during the briefing there was never mentioned of the four embassies that he was about to attack supposedly or any kind of imminence of it and that was shocking..

Senate president Donald Trump Adam Schiff Hunter Biden Pelosi Daniel McAdams Napolitano Republicans CNN Senator Paul Tulsi Gabbard Staff Joint Chiefs Chairman Clinton Wynn Washington US senator Senator
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

Part of the Problem

02:40 min | 1 year ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

"And we're getting it. Right. And they're getting it wrong. So again as you see Alex Jones who's getting even more censored, and he's he's being I don't even think Alex Jones can open a checking account right now. He's he's being so unpleasant and everybody much what danger? He is. Well, I haven't been listening Alex Jones show for a while. But I bet you he's all over the Venezuela thing. So it's a real mind fuck where these people who are these alternative sources who live on the internet and aren't a part of the mainstream. They're talking about what actually matters. And the Wall Street Journal is doing nothing. On this or next to nothing. So it's a real. It's a real weird time. You know, I remember on when I was on SE Cup show when I was a contributor over there. And I always felt that this is just me speculating because she never said this to me. But I always just kind of felt like we would argue on the show, and then we'd argue off air like talk about these things all the time. And and I would I would I would point to these things that that were just huge holes in her in her point of view on the Syria as you specifically because that was like her big issue, the something Dave what runs do nothing. But her issue was that the the weapons well, it's that. But it was that, you know, Assads madman. He's killing his own people. So we have to intervene because odds killing his own people. Like, that's the only reason we're there because he's killing people, and I'd be like, yeah. But look here's a report of talk of a regime change in Syria in two thousand seven in. Thousand eight was he killing his own people. Then this is six years before he started killing people. Right. So why was it why was regime change already on on the table there? Or would be like look this is when the CIA went in or look, we armed ISIS. We are the ones who started this whole civil war and then escalated at every single step. Here's John Kerry on tape talking about it. You know, like, there's all these these things and there'd be these huge holes. But overall, I just thought there was something where and she never said this to me this was just like a feeling that I had was that. It's like look SE Cup is talking to the like what Scott Horton is to me, or like, what Daniel mcadams or some of these guys who I get my foreign policy like like news from like, I get, you know, the people who really educate me on the subject her version of that is like Dick Cheney's chief of staff three former members of the CIA like really, you know, credentialing import. Certain people. And so even if I make it good point..

Alex Jones Syria CIA Wall Street Journal John Kerry Dick Cheney Daniel mcadams Venezuela Scott Horton Assads chief of staff Dave six years
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on WSB-AM

WSB-AM

05:42 min | 2 years ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on WSB-AM

"Assess it in two ways. The the plausibility of the information and the credibility of the source and that's what I do, I use my. Reason that's the only way democracy can actually function or it's not Not real so by saying we can't be trusted to use our judgment to assess these. Things means that we are not competent to engage in democracy maybe. True maybe not you but they're not saying that's what, they're trying to do, they're not saying, they're trying to undermine democracy and that's what, I think they are they're neutering it and that is what gave rise to my latest coined term democracy. Is the opium of the. Masses because I actually said that's her doctor recently I was like just you know If you're if you're going to whatever give me, check a mole or something you're. Going to hear what I think. About what's going on in the world and the guy said I said that too when. He said you mean that you know because he's a doctor she's, like opiate does that mean that. It numbs you or it. What did he, say did it you u. s. this ties you or, dictate you and I think it's both. And of course, it's a diversion for for when you're bored but by taking the content out of the political discourse engaging it is form. Over function, it's the form, over the content it's there simply to get you to. Believe that your a part of the body, politic but if they keep you from. Understanding what the. Real issues are they neutralize you in that way then you're just a tool and I frankly I'm happy that I am able to think clearly. Again because yesterday, I, was just I was, absolutely seeing red so anyway That's, my basic impression. Of what's going on but. There's there there's so much to it and what's really the kicker Brinkley here had a genius idea of what is going on because I thought. This is just totalitarianism on the. Rise it's happening faster than. I expected Bye You had a really, scary but I would say highly plausible insight can do you know what I'm talking? About what he thinks really going on and? Why, well the people they're, censoring there's another common factor and that's that they're censoring the people that ask. Questions so when they see a news, event the critical analysis has been purged from the internet and I. May I interject that all I did was asking, question what is this question? Mark Right Exactly and that's. It and that's why I got, perch I think based on those, circumstances it was legitimate to ask that, question but this is something that they do leading up to, wars and the reason they do it is because they do not want any critical questions that undermined the unity narrative that they have to have in order to get acceptance for a war and by removing all the conspiracy theorists, quote, unquote they removed the people who traditionally ask those questions and bring the conversation into the. Public and you know? What almost always starts a. War there's, a there's a really Really telling video that I posted, on my website which I cannot refer you to now it might glossary a of a guy at one of these Washington think tanks I think for near east affairs or something but just your classic Washington think tanks CF are, associated, no doubt the guy got up and said there are every war is started by false. Flag from or provocation? From fort Sumner as it. Sumter to, to the Lusitania And, we need to do something like that to start a war with Iran that's literally like. In recent history this guy did that a few years. Back and and that's what starts, wars and that. Was the other thing that you said yeah and all the people who would question that and you might call that to light. Are removed from the internet now. So that's why this. Website that I'm the only one I. Mentioned by name but I'm happy to mention any of them by name if you want to call on tell. Me your website as long as it's not trolling I'm, that's an invitation. To troll sorry about that but which of course is going to be the, next attack because I'm one of. The very few people who has a platform I wanna talk about that too my, platform remain standing then I can talk about, this stuff I can't think of a single other website that got. Lost that that has a that, isn't their primary platform but this American everyman now nomadic every man dot blogs dot dot com he is a genius at Identifying. False flags and explaining how you know what the telltale, signs are and. What the objective is so He would be the guy the first guy. You want to take down another guy who I don't know I don't think he was on WordPress spot I heard James Corbett who's. Also a, great online journalist mentioned that Scott Horton. Who runs antiwar dot com was censored either on Twitter I dunno Daniel mcadams from, the Ron Paul report I had to take a quick break though there's just too much. To to cover but those are the guys who would point out the fabrications that would justify a war you treated me at Monica Perez show for as long as that. Lasts.

Daniel mcadams Washington opium Scott Horton Brinkley WordPress Iran Sumter fort Sumner James Corbett Mark Ron Paul Monica Perez
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

Part of the Problem

03:00 min | 2 years ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

"Yeah, I knew I knew it wasn't exactly right because right once I set it, I was kind of like. Wait that that wouldn't make sense. You don't do that with chips, but it's like, yeah, let the chips fall where they may. I still don't get it completely. You just eat them. Okay. Yeah, there you go guys, probably the fire saving my ass ones again. Oh, hey, I should say I was very happy to see that Scott Horton and Daniel mcadams are both back on Twitter. So you know that whole thing that we were talking about last week now, how weird is this? Okay. With Scott Horton. I know I don't know what happened with with Daniel, but with Scott Twitter basically sent him a message see at first they did that thing. Where by the way I heard Tom woods and Michael malice argued a little bit over this and I'm on Tom side. This was on the Tom would show also if you haven't checked out because I know a lot of you guys are gas digital subscribers. Michael malices last episode of your welcome was fantastic yet, Matt Welsh from reason magazine and Tom woods from the Tom woods show both right here in this very studio, and that was just an excellent episode. I really, really enjoyed it, and I recommend that very highly. I thought some grievances were aired and a lot of common ground was reached and it was a cool. It was a cool moment in libertarian history anyway, on Tom would show he had Michael malice on this week and they were talking a little bit. And I just think this is this to me is like the creepiest most Orwellian thing ever. But the and I don't think we got into this too much on the last show with Scott, but we mentioned it, but you know what Twitter does is they go. If you delete the tweet in question. You can come back on just such a weird thing to do. It's not like a, we deleted that tweet because we didn't like it, you go, you go clicked. You submit, all you have to do is tell me that the emperor has closed, and then you can come back into this little circle anyway. So Scott was like, you know, he's Scott Horton for all you guys who listen to the show. I'm sure you've gotten a a little bit of a taste for Scott's personality. So they're like, Scott, delete that tweet, and you can come back and Scott's like suck my dick scotch does not going to do that, which I love about him. I love it's the same thing as like when Tom when that dummy Knicks are walk was like, you have to sign a letter that says you're against fascism and he's like, fuck you. Not Tom's what words, but my words, but more or less that was the sediment of what Tom said was. He was like, nine, fuck that. I'm not doing it. And. And then Twitter cenema a like a a note or some aren't Email or some shit, and they were like, oh, we've reviewed it and it looks like we made a mistake and just reinstated account. I was reading. I think in Dan, a really some some ju guys book predictively irrational, but he's talking about cognitive dissonance and that the I think in China, they used to basically make like soldiers signed documents of like some sort of fault..

Scott Horton Tom Twitter Michael malice Tom woods Scott Twitter Tom side Daniel mcadams Knicks Michael malices reason magazine Dan Matt Welsh China
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

Part of the Problem

03:37 min | 2 years ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

"Jonathan Katz, his hand was at cats on earth. Don't add him though. And so van Buren said something which was like a zombie reference. I hope Magda guy each your face. And so then this guy cats, he, he said, I'm going to tell on you in response to Peter van Buren, and then he did and he got van Buren kicked off in it. So then van Buren Email me and said, hey, would you let people know that this is what happened and sent me a screen shot. And so then I posted that screen shot and I didn't even tag cats in the tweet. You know, when I just said that, you know, including, here's the screen shot of the boohoo little bitch. I could say that on your show, right? Here's the screen shows booboo little bitch that that tattletale on Peter van Buren got him kicked off. And so then this morning, I don't know if it was cats or if it was somebody else on his behalf towel tail on me on then Daniel mcadams also artigue knee last night and said the same thing what little bit this guy can. That's is. And so then that's it for me mcadams. And you know, I got one of these. You're temporarily suspended for twelve hours as long as you delete tweeden apologize, but I can't believe the tweet because locked out of my account. So I don't know. And then actually I'm just taking the opportunity to quit Twitter. So sick, goddamn Twitter anyway. So I'm just gonna quit and go back to reading books with my spare time. Far behind on my book than read like half of those, not even, but it's it's such a, you know, it is Twitter really is like a cesspool and there's so much terrible shit that goes on there. But at the same time, I just hate to see you off there because I just think you're you're such an important voice and for all the bullshit that's out there on Twitter, you know, there are a lot of people who like kind of find your work on there. So it's it's just a shame. Yeah. Now, you know what I mean? It's such a even without this guy. Jonathan cats ain't nothing, but a bunch of people crybaby in about what everybody else said all day. When I'm offended that you said a thing that hurt my feelings and it's all just so childish now, I mean, even as Saraji on, oh, where she's racist against white people in hoc-, writes for the New York Times, aditorial pace. So what there's a genocide or or going on right now, and we're crying about who her who's feelings and what color they were at the time that they said it and whatever. I'm just so over it man. I really don't care. Yeah, it does. It does seem like, and there's something. Yeah, I was talking about this recently with a with Tom woods, but he was in New York this week, and we went out to grab lunch and I was almost like it's like there's this, this tribal thing where we're that issue you're talking about with the latest member of the New York Times. Editorial board was tweeting out a bunch of stupid shit about white men. And you know, basically the left wing kind of talking points these days on white men or whatever, and but there is something about it where all see that shit and it makes me fierce at times and I'm like, man, fuck these guys. And then I almost have to check a thing in myself where I'm like, oh, man, I'm falling into the same tribal bullshit that every that I always complain that everybody else falls into. And this is almost to me why you have the rise of the alt-right. It's like, because the left wing people go crazy about this race. Shit. They respond to it with like, well, you're going after my tribe. Then I'll go after your tribe and then everyone fucking forgets that hundreds of thousands of people are dying in Yemen and twenty trillion dollars in debt. And we're throwing people in prison for smoking a fuck. Implant, and that's actually what's..

van Buren Peter van Buren Twitter Jonathan Katz New York Times Daniel mcadams Magda Yemen New York Saraji Editorial board Tom woods twenty trillion dollars twelve hours
"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

Part of the Problem

01:35 min | 2 years ago

"daniel mcadams" Discussed on Part of the Problem

"The there was a segment on cup show where we were discussing they they were talking about the idea of donald trump winning nobel peace prize if you know he this were to really work out like if we were to really get something out of these talks with with north korea and and i got a little bit of pushback from some people who are are like libertarians who listen to part of the problem there are a few different people who who posted that they were disappointed in what i had to say and i thought i would respond to that a little bit because there's been a little bit of a controversy within libertarians like i know daniel mcadams from the ron paul institute for peace and prosperity went back and forth with steph on mon you on twitter about this a couple months ago and a few people had were were like upset that i was i was i was more or less saying that i think this is a very good thing and i didn't say that i think donald trump should win a nobel peace prize but i was like if this goes incredibly well it which i i said i'm very skeptical that it will but if we were to get some great results out of these talks then donald trump deserve a nobel peace prize a lot more than obama ever did who didn't actually do anything for his nobel peace prize besides gives them nice speeches which by the way he did give some nice speeches but i just don't think that should earn you the prize but anyway.

donald trump north korea daniel mcadams ron paul institute steph twitter nobel obama