18 Burst results for "Court Of Appeals Court"

"court appeals court" Discussed on KIRO Radio 97.3 FM

KIRO Radio 97.3 FM

05:12 min | 6 months ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on KIRO Radio 97.3 FM

"See that covers women. Strickland. Tom spoke on the House floor about shooting in Atlanta. Um, She had some things to say about that. Well, maybe we'll get to that story later on is perhaps more details begin to sort of roll out on that tragedy than Atlanta yesterday afternoon, but to other news that is occurring around When I talked about this something about a year ago, you're in half ago. The idea that somebody living in their house of you living in your home I'm sorry You're living in your car or your RV and it's parked illegally and it's a Mass in You don't have tags on it. Then they impounded, pick it up and move it. And the idea was well, well. Hold on a second. That's just not an RV. That's just not a car. That's my home, and the question was, Can your home Taken away, impounded or towed. It does get into kind of a strange area that the law needs to step in on this. This is I think about a year ago, the Seattle City Council was wrestling this idea, Tom Yeah, I'm happy to go through the quick legal run down this happen. 2018 King County Superior Court Judge decided that it violated they move this guy's car. He was living in his car. He actually worked. I think you know, somewhere in the with the stadium cruise or something, And when he came back, he his Ah, truck was gone. And he had to wait. 21 days They charged him. You know, whatever. The impoundment fee was 500 bucks or something which he didn't have. And so the judge ruled that that was two things that it broke the state's Homestead Act, which is interesting. It's Frontier era LA. So it goes way back protecting homes from four sale. Apparently, you couldn't force the sale of your home if that was your home. The second thing he said, was the eighth Amendment of in the Constitution protects against excessive fines. And since this guy had no money to speak of that, that fine for holding, you know, impounding the car was too excessive. So then it goes to the appeals court appeals court says No, no, no, The impound fee is a legitimate because all that is, is the price of the cost of what it you know, took the city to move it. So that's okay. But he did uphold the Homestead Act, and now it's before the Supreme Court. They heard a hearing on it yesterday. It took six months for the appeals court to decide so we may have to wait another six months or even longer for this state Supreme Court decides, But that's that's the issue that's at large, and it's fascinating because it's gonna have major implications if they end up agreeing that it's part of the Homestead Act. He had guess there's a pickup truck with the 2000 GMC pickup truck. They police had warned him four days earlier that he was violating city rules that the vehicle is parked on public street and must be moved every 72 hours. I guess he figured I'm gonna take a chance. I'm gonna take a chance. I'm gonna leave it here on Wait. We gotta move it every 72 hours. He left it there. They warned him. He left it. They told it And then so then it becomes. That's not just my car. That's also my home, right? Yeah. He also said home was parked the league. But he also said that he couldn't move the car because he didn't have the parts who's waiting for parts? I don't know if that's turned over. That was one of the claims that he couldn't move it so he was aware of the The you know the fines or the direction and they gave him like a week instead of just the three days And since he didn't do it, But anyway, go ahead. That's great stuff. And the idea being it becomes. Well, then anybody could claim. Well, I'm living in this car. Yes. Will you help me? I got a shirt. I got a jacket in the back, and I got a pair of shoes in the back as well. So this car is also my home. It's have two homes. I have one in some mannish, which is a really nice place. Very little crime. And my other home is the back of this car. And you think a toad me out? You told my home my second home, my son, Don't I don't know, John, but I think it can't be a second home. I think it has to be. I think it has to be my your query of presidents. Yes. Okay, Because I'm not sure that back in there in the Homestead Act of Frontier Area never occurred to people. You could have two ranches. So I think if he had if he had a perfectly fine home then they say, Well, no. You got your own body other home? Yeah, right. But when it does doing this why the city of Seattle is fighting this so hard? Um what? What the they're afraid could be ruled. Is that well, you have to determine if this before you impound any car. You have to make sure that it's not Somebody's home, which just delays things. You know already Now, I suppose you could do a quick check in if somebody doesn't come back within seven days or something. Maybe That's one of the inconveniences. The city is saying, This is too much. This is ridiculous. We're willing to work with the people were willing. In fact, the judge, the initial judge worked out a system where he could pay. You know a reasonable amount each month and all that. And it still didn't it didn't that, you know, hit the The big issue is whether you can impound somebody's home..

Tom 500 bucks Strickland six months Atlanta two homes Seattle City Council yesterday afternoon 21 days Homestead Act Seattle yesterday John two ranches one three days Supreme Court second home LA half
"court appeals court" Discussed on KLIF 570 AM

KLIF 570 AM

01:35 min | 10 months ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on KLIF 570 AM

"Federal feels. Court appeals court Friday ruled that Tennessee can begin outlawing abortions because of prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome. It's no longer going to be an acceptable reason for having an abortion as well as prohibit the procedure if it's based on race or gender of the fetus. I can't imagine that that was ever considered, okay. But Tennessee Republican Governor Bill Lee and acted the so called reason bands earlier this year is part of a sweeping anti abortion measure. And our federal appeals court has agreed coming up on K. L I F If you're looking for a job, and you got a strong stomach We have some information about a job that they're offering in El Paso, but first traffic on the fives at 7 25 years Bill Jackson in Hurst on East Bay, 20. North, but it pipeline it's down to one lane past wreck, and it's backed up to 1 21 in Arlington on I 30 East founded Ballpark Way, the White Plains Black play an accident. Then you list someone. 33 East Bundy Rector Drive a collision has that backed up to 1 21 in Irving of the George Bush Turnpike South, But at 1 14, there's a wrecked with left lane blocked and on highways. 67 north out of Hampton. The crash has traffic down to one lane on I 35 the North by the Keys Boulevard. The accident's been cleared, so that's still recovering with Kayla up traffic on the fives. I'm Bill Jackson. Dry weather. Today's We start off this Thanksgiving week. Showers and storms in the forecast Tuesday. Mostly cloudy skies out there today, although we could see a few peaks of afternoon,.

Bill Jackson Tennessee Bill Lee Federal George Bush Turnpike East Bay Keys Boulevard Arlington El Paso Irving Kayla Hampton Hurst
"court appeals court" Discussed on KQED Radio

KQED Radio

04:00 min | 1 year ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on KQED Radio

"We can talk about murder boards. Because Amy Cockney Barrett has just being doing them. I've never heard of murder balls before One of our guests was saying it's the American phrase for a Nintendo practice interrogations where you get people to take you through what you're about to go through. If you're about to go through, for example, the confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court because she is President Trump's pick to fill the vacancy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Her appointment would cement Conservative majority on the Supreme Court with enormous political implications. Eyes like nothing seen in U. S history, so close to a presidential election, his Barbara Plata Amy Cockney. Barrett is a dream nominee for those on the right, but it is my honor to nominate One of our nation's most brilliant And gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court Appeals court judge is a formidable intellect, a devout Catholic, a supermom with seven Children. While I am a judge, I'm better known back home as a room, parent, carpool driver and staunchly conservative, although at this White House ceremony, she distanced herself from partisan divides. If confirmed, I would not assume that role for the sake of those in my own circle. And certainly not for my own sake. I would assume this role to serve you. It's just weeks from the election, but nothing is getting in the way of the rush to confirm the new Supreme Court Justice, the third nominated by President Trump, the stakes are just too high. Processes nomination consistent with rules. And I look forward to coming days will be a lot of fun. It will be fun for them. See Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and other Republicans because it's an unprecedented chance to secure a conservative majority on the court for a generation. And also to recharge the election campaign by energizing the base help Amy Barrett and President Trump Fight back stand up for conservative values Republicans But also Democrats have adjusted their campaign adverts to address the unexpected vacancy on the Supreme Court is rushing through a Supreme Court nominee to do just that step away care from millions of Americans and pre existing condition protections for Democrats. This is a nightmare, a job for life. A court that sets the nation's social and cultural direction on issues like gay rights, gun control, abortion and Obama care. Judge Barrett is very fair, but fans of Judge Conti Barrett are convinced she's the best candidate for the job. She's a popular law professor and Laura Walk was one of her students. Judge Barrett is not swayed by any type of personal preferences or things like that again. Witness that in the classroom no one ever knew what Judge Barrett thought about an issue. She never let her students he never Pressured them to think a certain way. Everything was hyper focused on the law. Democrats don't have the votes to stop this, and they're furious about the politics. Today I am nominating Chief Judge Merrick Brian Garland to join the Supreme Court. In 2016, Republicans blocked President Obama from filling a Supreme Court seat because it was an election year. But now that they're in power, they've changed their tune. And the conservative media is almost giddy with excitement. This is going to have a massive impact on the American judiciary, thus gonna have a massive impact. On American culture and society. If Donald Trump secures the Supreme Court seat, even if he doesn't win the election, his presidency will be deemed a success by the ideological right and by evangelical Christians. That's why they voted for him, and it will be remembered as a turning point for the nation on some of the issues that matter the most to Americans.

Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court murder Barbara Plata Amy Ruth Bader Ginsberg Matthew Kenyon President Trump Nintendo U. S
What will the Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation mean for the 2020 election?

BBC World Service

04:00 min | 1 year ago

What will the Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation mean for the 2020 election?

"We can talk about murder boards. Because Amy Cockney Barrett has just being doing them. I've never heard of murder balls before One of our guests was saying it's the American phrase for a Nintendo practice interrogations where you get people to take you through what you're about to go through. If you're about to go through, for example, the confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court because she is President Trump's pick to fill the vacancy of Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Her appointment would cement Conservative majority on the Supreme Court with enormous political implications. Eyes like nothing seen in U. S history, so close to a presidential election, his Barbara Plata Amy Cockney. Barrett is a dream nominee for those on the right, but it is my honor to nominate One of our nation's most brilliant And gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court Appeals court judge is a formidable intellect, a devout Catholic, a supermom with seven Children. While I am a judge, I'm better known back home as a room, parent, carpool driver and staunchly conservative, although at this White House ceremony, she distanced herself from partisan divides. If confirmed, I would not assume that role for the sake of those in my own circle. And certainly not for my own sake. I would assume this role to serve you. It's just weeks from the election, but nothing is getting in the way of the rush to confirm the new Supreme Court Justice, the third nominated by President Trump, the stakes are just too high. Processes nomination consistent with rules. And I look forward to coming days will be a lot of fun. It will be fun for them. See Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and other Republicans because it's an unprecedented chance to secure a conservative majority on the court for a generation. And also to recharge the election campaign by energizing the base help Amy Barrett and President Trump Fight back stand up for conservative values Republicans But also Democrats have adjusted their campaign adverts to address the unexpected vacancy on the Supreme Court is rushing through a Supreme Court nominee to do just that step away care from millions of Americans and pre existing condition protections for Democrats. This is a nightmare, a job for life. A court that sets the nation's social and cultural direction on issues like gay rights, gun control, abortion and Obama care. Judge Barrett is very fair, but fans of Judge Conti Barrett are convinced she's the best candidate for the job. She's a popular law professor and Laura Walk was one of her students. Judge Barrett is not swayed by any type of personal preferences or things like that again. Witness that in the classroom no one ever knew what Judge Barrett thought about an issue. She never let her students he never Pressured them to think a certain way. Everything was hyper focused on the law. Democrats don't have the votes to stop this, and they're furious about the politics. Today I am nominating Chief Judge Merrick Brian Garland to join the Supreme Court. In 2016, Republicans blocked President Obama from filling a Supreme Court seat because it was an election year. But now that they're in power, they've changed their tune. And the conservative media is almost giddy with excitement. This is going to have a massive impact on the American judiciary, thus gonna have a massive impact. On American culture and society. If Donald Trump secures the Supreme Court seat, even if he doesn't win the election, his presidency will be deemed a success by the ideological right and by evangelical Christians. That's why they voted for him, and it will be remembered as a turning point for the nation on some of the issues that matter the most to Americans.

Supreme Court Amy Cockney Barrett President Trump Chief Judge Merrick Brian Garl Barack Obama Murder Ruth Bader Ginsberg Professor Nintendo Amy Cockney Senate Judiciary Committee White House U. S Barbara Plata Graham Laura Walk Chairman
"court appeals court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

The Mark Belling Show

07:47 min | 1 year ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on The Mark Belling Show

"Let me give you the background of the case and what the court's rationale was for keeping the Green party off the presidential ballot. Green Party the Green Party is one of those third parties that's out there. But one that gets a decent amount of support in presidential elections. The left has been obsessed with destroying the Green Party in two thousand and twenty despite the fact that Green Party is a liberal. Party. Why? In Two Thousand Sixteen Donald Trump one Wisconsin by twenty, four, thousand votes. The Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein in two thousand sixteen got thirty, one thousand votes. There are many who believe. That if the Green Party was not on the ballot in Wisconsin Donald Trump would not have won Wisconsin in sixteen that Hillary would have. Given the fact that most expect Wisconsin it'd be very close again. There's been an effort by Democrats to keep liberal third parties off the ballot. Kanye West nominating petitions were thrown off. By the Wisconsin Election Commission backed by a court ruling. Now, today the Wisconsin Election Commission's decision to throw off the Green party candidates off the ballot was backed by the Supreme Court on a four three vote the three liberals and Brian Hagedorn voted. To not consider the Greene, county greene parties appeal the three conservatives on the court. went the other way in a strongly worded dissent. The Green Party candidate's Howie Hawkins and Angela Walker claim the State Election Commission wrongly refused to put them on the ballot. The Election Commission cited a change of address from one of the filings to another filing by one of the candidates. The candidates said Hey I moved. That's all. It seems to be a very slim technicality to take someone off the ballot the Election Commission voted three three. To take the name off the ballot given the fact that the staff recommended that the name be taken off the ballot it was off the Green Party therefore sued went to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Supreme Court today denied take original jurisdiction of the case. And therefore said that the election will the ballots do not have to be changed. The Green Party. Asked that the case be dealt with by the state. Supreme Court immediately rather than work its way up Circuit Court Appeals Court Supreme Court because. The election is coming up with the first ballots needed to be sent out. Now, they wanted the supreme court to come and render a decision right now. The four justices on the court and stop me if you're having trouble with this, I don't know how you're supposed to stop. You. Could be person could stop be if you're having trouble with this the four. On the Supreme Court said there simply isn't enough time. For the Supreme Court to consider the case and still have the ballots be sat out in time for the election, we can't have a chaotic election the absentee ballots have to be mailed. Therefore, we are not going to consider the appeal. That's something. That means Wisconsin Supreme. Court says, we don't care if the stadium election commission is denying access to the ballot. We simply don't have time to sit decide whether they have or they have not. So the Green Party is off the ballot and the Democrats have gotten their way. In their descent. The three actual conservatives on the court. Pat Rogan sack and net segler and. Rebecca Bradley. strongly. Disagree. With the court's Rash L., the most conservative, the Bunches Rebecca Bradley not to be confused with and Walsh Bradley, and I want to quote from her to set. The majority pretends the court lack sufficient time to complete our review and awarded any effective relief. What nonsense Wisconsin Law unquestionably required that Mr Hawkins Ms Walker appear on the ballot. The court could have ordered their certificate certification as candidates before any ballots were mailed to voters. Instead, the court refuses to perform its duty faithfully apply the law and allows the Wisconsin, election, commission to flouted. Thereby signaling that the election committee thereby signalling to the Election Commission that it may disregard the law at web. With no accountability to the people for its transgressions. In dodging its responsibility to uphold the rule of law. The majority ratifies a grave. Threat, to. Our Republic. Suppresses the votes of Wisconsin Citizens Irreparably impairs the integrity of Wisconsin elections. And undermines the confidence of American citizens in the outcome of a presidential election. That's Rebecca Bradley's the today. She said the facts of the case welling point to the court ordering that the Green Party candidate's names appear on the ballot by the State Supreme Court's majority joined by Hagedorn. Saying while even if they did, we don't have time to do it. That you are rewarding the election commission's Democratic members. For ignoring state law and that's precisely what has happened here. I have encouraged Republicans to be very wary of the crap that's going to occur during this election. Understand what is now just happened? State Election Commission throws off the ballot, a third party that might have siphoned away a handful of votes from Joe Biden. Those candidates. Appeal to the State Supreme Court the three liberals on the court joined by the sell out so-called conservative hagedorn saying well, maybe your rights were violated maybe you are wrongly taken off of an American ballot, but we just don't have time to decide it because we got send out the ballots so tough. Expect a repeat of this with male and ballots expect a repeat this when ballots are challenged, expect a repeat of this wed ballots come in long after the deadline and are counted by clerks and Madison and Milwaukee Anyway. We have a state elections commission that will not fairly interpret the law or administer the elections, and we now have a state supreme court. That has decided thanks to the fact that one of the so called Conservatives has decided to join the liberal bloc. that it will not stand up and safeguard the rights of Wisconsin citizens when being trampled on by leftists who use the positions that they have in government. To disenfranchise citizens. Do, I believe that this is going to come to an issue in. Wisconsin? Well. We don't know how anybody Green Party candidate would have gotten this time around Fach Jill Stein had a little bit of a backing and there are a lot of lefties who just as some conservative than one aboard for trump and sixteen, and we're GonNa Right in the guy the Charlie Sykes was touting from Utah. There are a few liberals didn't vote for Hillary last time around I'm not saying the Green Party would have gotten thirty thousand votes this time but combined I think Kanye. West. The Green Party would have gotten those voted certainly accurate to say. That, the majority of them likely would have come from by. As for the issue of Hagedorn. This.

Green Party Supreme Court Circuit Court Appeals Court Su Wisconsin State Election Commission State Supreme Court Wisconsin Supreme Court Wisconsin Election Commission Brian Hagedorn Wisconsin Supreme Donald Trump Rebecca Bradley Jill Stein Kanye Hillary Mr Hawkins Ms Walker Pat Rogan
"court appeals court" Discussed on KGO 810

KGO 810

03:23 min | 1 year ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on KGO 810

"That's you, David? Afternoon iPad. There's two David Caps is my guest, former assistant U S attorney in so cow in Central California on he's a criminal defense attorney in Los Angeles. Right now, we're talking about the case. Of E. Jean Carel, a journalist who alleged that Donald Trump raped her. What 20 years ago or so. He then when she came public, and she said that this happened he called her a liar. Said he'd never met her. Said she wasn't his type. He was very insulting to her, so she filed a defamation lawsuit against him in state court. The feds are net have now moved that case into federal court, and they're claiming sovereign immunity. So David two questions the case. The civil case had already proceeded some. Why didn't the federal government make that move immediately? And secondly, Donald Trump may not be in office anymore. By January, 20 of 2021. Will the sovereign immunity still apply to him once he's left office? I'm assuming it will because it's conduct that he Perpetrated while he was in office. Those are both great questions to answer your last question first. Yes, it would be something that he did while he was in office. But if he's voted out on November 3rd, she's going to be in a very strong position because she's going to be selling her book. Her book is getting even more publicity. By the way, a shout out to her lawyer, Roberta Kaplan has done a terrific job hung in there with her. One. All those cases in the trial court Appeal court and now they have great arguments that I haven't thought of in federal court. And of course I wish her well. But Trump can't say anything once he's not president anymore. As of January, 20th if he tries to defend himself, thinks she's a liar or something like that. That's just revised her defamation suit. What if he somehow could control himself and does not do that in this case may be over. Now, You know, Carol have some remedies. As a practical matter. I mean, it's way don't have time to talk about that right now. We'll have to do it at another time on DH. I'm very anxious to see what bird Roberta Kaplan is going to do in response to this as well. And let's talk when that happens, David David Katz has been my guest and you're listening to K G. Oh, thanks, David. Great to be with you. At the White House today, President Trump releasing his pre election list of 20 potential Supreme Court nominees. But the president also having to address his interview with Bob Woodward's new book, saying that he wanted to play down the threat of the Corona virus early on in the pandemic, the president saying today he quotes certainly did, but only in the best interests of Americans cannot show. A sense of panic, or you're gonna have bigger problems than you ever had before. Rival Joe Biden on the campaign trail today in Michigan, says that the president's actions cost Americans lives and jobs had the information. He knew how dangerous it wass. All this deadly disease ripped through our nation. He failed to do his job on purpose. New York's governor announcing today that New York City restaurants can reopen indoor dining at the end of September, with 25% capacity limits and temperature checks in place and on Wall Street stocks, closing up today, making up some of the losses from the past few days of trading. I'm Michelle Franzen. ABC News.

President Trump David David Katz president Roberta Kaplan David Caps Appeal court federal government Supreme Court E. Jean Carel Joe Biden Michelle Franzen Los Angeles ABC News Central California New York City attorney New York Carol White House Bob Woodward
"court appeals court" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

01:46 min | 1 year ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"Mike pence was in Pittsburgh at a listening session with faith and community leaders today in the wake of the death of George Floyd Reverend James Nelson who has a background in law enforcement says obstacles the police accountability extend from the police academy to intimidation in the courthouse the young officers even in my class we have to look at one another and said what are we getting ourselves into because we are being taught these guys decided to being taught that blacks are not as good we were being taught that is a we versus them all retired Pennsylvania Superior Court judge Cheryl Allen says what's happening in America is really a battle against bacon as on the truth of Jesus Christ we don't have a skin problem in this nation we have a sin problem and when we reflect on what happened to George Floyd it's not it's it's a matter of the heart it's a matter of a depraved and wicked heart the U. S. court of appeals for the DC circuit has heard arguments in the case of former trump national security adviser Michael Flynn Flynn's defense has petitioned the three judge panel order U. S. district judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss the case against plan in response to a bar justice department request speaking with Salem radio investigative reporter John Solomon foresees three possible outcomes from the appeals court appeals court as a judge element we think you'll find they could say judge element you gotta go back and do it a different way you can have this right or they could just yank the case away from home and say you know it will make the decision dismissed case over with arguing against the dismissal before Solomon former U. S. district judge John Gleeson submitted a motion that the bar justice department abused prosecutorial power on behalf of a presidential ally for requesting the government's case against planned to be dropped on Wall Street the Dow.

"court appeals court" Discussed on 1170 The Answer

1170 The Answer

01:47 min | 1 year ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on 1170 The Answer

"Vice president Mike pence was in Pittsburgh at a listening session with faith and community leaders today in the wake of the death of George Floyd Reverend James Nelson who has a background in law enforcement says obstacles the police accountability extend from the police academy to intimidation in the courthouse the young officers even in my class we have to look at one another and said what are we getting ourselves into because we are being taught these guys decided to being taught that blacks are not as good we were being taught that is a we versus them all retired Pennsylvania Superior Court judge Cheryl Allen says what's happening in America is really a battle against nakedness and the truth of Jesus Christ we don't have a skin problem in this nation we have a sin problem and when we reflect on what happened to George Floyd it's not it's it's a matter of the heart it's a matter of a depraved and wicked heart the U. S. court of appeals for the DC circuit has heard arguments in the case of former trump national security adviser Michael Flynn Flynn's defense has petitioned the three judge panel order U. S. district judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss the case against plan in response to a bar justice department request speaking with Salem radio investigative reporter John Solomon foresees three possible outcomes from the appeals court appeals court as a judge element we think you'll find they could say judge element you gotta go back and do it a different way you don't have this right or thank you just yank the case away from home and say you know it will make the decision dismissed case over with arguing against the dismissal before Solomon former U. S. district judge John Gleeson submitted a motion that the bar justice department abused prosecutorial power on behalf of a presidential ally for requesting the government's case against planned to be dropped on Wall Street the Dow by four hundred.

"court appeals court" Discussed on WAAM Talk 1600

WAAM Talk 1600

04:15 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on WAAM Talk 1600

"Single one of their customers and you know people find out about one area in which they cheat and then they don't pull away from the bank nobody should be doing business with JP Morgan chase they are criminalized institution they don't know the difference between right and wrong and people are victimized every single day that they're open for business and it's not just the media that's coopted by these people Helen you are living proof of how how when you push these legal issues in the legal judicial system how their tentacles are there so Helen decides she's going to sue at JP Morgan chase for their involvement with made off correct correct okay and ready detail playing with the Celts factual I could prove every allegation my name right and it was dismissed on the grounds that it was not credible that's not a grounds for dismissing a complaint but if it worked in this case in other words but the judge said the judge said I'm not contesting any of the facts you're presenting I just can't believe it right right right right about right it's not credible okay no mortgage they said played guilty to felony that was incredible the judge wouldn't believe okay so then so then Helen you being Helen didn't take that sitting down you went to an appeals court right I did I went to the eleven Sir okay and what did they say they said it couldn't stay to claim I went to the Supreme Court and I got no salt whether it's a District Court appeals court Supreme Court they were influenced by this criminal syndicate you know JP Morgan chase not only has enough money to pay Jamie Dimon his thirty five million dollars a year they have enough money to spread among everyone with power in this country so that we've gotten to the point where the truth does not come out except through programs like yours today well right now Helen there's an individual you mentioned how they influence labor rates and mortgage rates but they also want they also have criminally manipulated the precious metals market and there is a person who is now being prosecuted correct I Edwards yes Iran which who's it gonna employee of JP Morgan chase any supposedly sixty has stated that this goes to the top okay this policy right well his sentence his sentencing has it has been postponed several times correct as he credibility not that it's sentence was just postponed again this past week what's going on there Helen well thank you never know what's going on and the problem is that you never know whether the prosecutors are really trying to protect the public or if your project JP Morgan chase so call me a cynic but based on your track record that what you've shown it makes me think they're trying to protect JP Morgan chase exactly exactly and I mean this is a guy who says it went straight to the top which of course we know it doesn't everyone of these cases but here's somebody's coming forward and saying it and we will see what happens but I would be very very surprised if if anything constructive comes out of this I would not be the least bit surprised if they just close the case and this guy change her identity or yeah claims he forgot everything or whatever or something you know more the other thing that happens Helen if something bad happens to be right right whistle blowers right starting a couple years ago we had a lot of bankers like falling off of buildings I now I know you can get really paranoid sometimes when you look at the staff but there's a lot of money that people are trying to protect hello all the major banks Helen in in Iceland they prosecuted there the bank the banksters as I call them when they manipulated the markets the financial institutions correct right are you aware of any high ranking banking official in the United States who has been prosecuted.

thirty five million dollars
"court appeals court" Discussed on The Gentlemen of Elegant Leisure

The Gentlemen of Elegant Leisure

04:13 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on The Gentlemen of Elegant Leisure

"Wow that's like the old fashioned reductions that bullet rebounded at a great one to do all the ingredients except for when yeah made mac is here because i wanted to feature the jelly that fought with nutmeg and cinnamon the get no flavor you wouldn't have any of this left which admitted turn but <hes> but it'll be fine preserve several reviews. I think that is twenty eighteen but <hes> i tasted this morning and it's it so i'm still fine sure so except for the stomach stomach cramps so i thought well we'll we'll just we'll build it right to will build it and then and then we got a couple of choices to make it sorta like that video game. Remember the old days they had the video game in. You have to make choices. That would go this way or that. Which i'd like a dragon thing now they're all like bats doesn't seem <music>. You're thinking of dressler and it would get to a certain part of the game and it's going to do this. You're gonna do that then. It would go this way so yes but nobody ever got that food enough because took uh-huh too hard to are so difficult so with us. We've got a few options not too many but because i think we're gonna bourbon. We're going to have the preserve. We're going to have a little bit of lemon. Juice can put them off. I might stereotype stare at the camera loves mugging for the but which one and how do you do the three camera shoot. That's a house jimmy kimmel do what they've done. Multiple cameras okay well. They had one for a bunch of yeah director yeah oh right and an editor and a bunch of stuff okay. There's differences which when you do it so i don't know what to they. Call it so. I'm gonna call it. We'll see how it goes. Oh you've taken the best of all worlds yes okay. It seems like a bad idea shared a a few common ingredients and so those are the ones who are gonna go to suburban one and a half teaspoons of apple jelly half an ounce of lemon juice and then either club soda or ginger beer and then we've got a couple of options on bidders orange bidders or pay shows bidders mom choice. I think those are the only options very early with egg white much. I wanna go. They might be got aches. Knowing that aches choice gives no. We got a vote. What do you think dave you want an egg white. I don't want to because i have to go get pig. I understand i'm willing to uh shaker drink. It is gonna be shaker because you need to multiply is going to be overrides. It'll be a dry shape but we'll poured over ice. If they're going to have to go get ice anyway. Oh he'll get i. He's gotta get cute so there's there's work to be done the giant cubes and should i just go. We should get the giant cubes for the glasses and there's i think there's ice here to shake jake so we'll do a dry shake. I will throw in some ice. We'll do a wet shake is at the opposite of a shame. I think that's the only opposite of jurors was it was wet so i think we'll go with that yeah so you need to shake especially if you're gonna use an egg way because you need the most by that plus we're going to the jelly in there so that's that's a double double whammy so yeah. It's going to be a dry she. This is a crab apple trees this morning. There's not much to try by the time you court appeal court. There's not much left no imagine so. I think it really largely shirt. That's that's the same size is a big rig so when you make jelly just cook mush it so you've got everything in there but <hes> yeah so we can you guys can have a vital feel like the very sour mother like sugar so there's these quite sweet. The jelly is actually pretty good so i'll get. Let's get started here so <hes> who got jason. I'm not used to that one. Look at that to make you a big huge so we'll start with such dry shake. I leave the spoon for the.

jimmy kimmel stomach cramps mac dressler jason director dave jake editor
"court appeals court" Discussed on MSNBC Rachel Maddow (audio)

MSNBC Rachel Maddow (audio)

02:42 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on MSNBC Rachel Maddow (audio)

"If you don't like the ruling that district court judge gives you and you want to appeal that ruling european gets kicked upstairs to the federal appeals court which just call the circuit court. There's about a dozen federal circuit courts around the country. They're regional courts in the circuit court decides that they're going to take up your your appeal on your federal case. It'll be circuit court. Judges that review your case and for the vast vast vast vast vast majority of federal court cases. That's as far as you're ever likely to go. I mean even if you don't like the circuit court ruling that you get even if you want to take it further and you want to appeal it all the way to the supreme court. You are statistically lee speaking really not likely to get there for federal cases. I mean if you're gonna get anywhere. That circuit courts almost always the end of the line supreme court again gets all the attention but it's it's these federal appeals courts these circuit courts that do the vast majority of the appellate work in the federal system so these court circuit courts are really powerful the really important i mean they're important for individual humans individual federal cases but also for big important policy matters that end up in the courts for one reason the other the circuit courts are the the highest that the vast majority of those cases will ever go circuit courts are also important because of the judges that sit on them the circuit courts are the location from which presidents events of both parties like to pluck young promising appeals court judges when they're looking for a supreme court nominee so circuit court judges have an important the job they also particularly when they are young and i nominated they're really important decisions for presidents because those folks are often seen as the sort of bench from which supreme court nominees are chosen and one of the most consequential but also most boring political stories of the trump era <hes> <hes> the trump era and the mcconnell era. Is that the top republican in the u._s. Senate mitch mcconnell not only held a supreme court seat open during the obama presidency so president in an obama wouldn't be allowed to fill vacancy on the supreme court mitch mcconnell also held open dozens and dozens and dozens of other seats on federal courts across the country tree including dozens of seats on these very important circuit courts appeals courts so president obama couldn't fill those seats either and mitch mcconnell. How did that specifically so the next republican president could appoint those judges instead and that is how we got to the point where to something years into his time in office. President trump is closing in already on the total number of circuit court judges that president obama was ever able to appoint in his whole eight years in the white house. They just didn't let obama appoint judges..

supreme court mitch mcconnell obama president white house Senate eight years
"court appeals court" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

News Talk 1130 WISN

01:52 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

"Milwaukee public servant attacked on the job. Good morning. I'm terry. Bell is is the ten o'clock report on news talk eleven thirty w IS at a Milwaukee parking enforcement officers recovering from stab wounds. He got in a confrontation early this morning. The walkie police chief Alphonso Morales is at a loss for words over the seemingly random attack. It's just amazing. The the lack of respect that we have for some of our public servants that we have out here. It happened around two thirty near sixty seven and Velarde the parking officers, a sixty year old man and a veteran of parking enforcement. At least two people are critically injured after memorial for slain rapper nipsy hustle turned violent last night in Los Angeles. At least one person was stabbed at another was hit by cars. Hundreds of people fled the scene voters decide today, which of two state appeals court judges will gain a seat on the Wisconsin supreme court appeals court chief judge Lisa Neubauer is supported by liberal interests. While judge Brian hag. Adorn says he'll bring a conservative judicial philosophy to the state's high court, and is supported by conservative groups, the winner will replace Justice, Shirley, Abraham son, who is the courts longest serving member and the first woman elected to the state supreme court. Bob hague. Wisconsin radio network today is the deadline set by House Democrats for attorney general William Barda, turn over the full Muller. Reports House Judiciary committee Democrats are not expected to get a copy of the special counsel report by the end of the day. This is the deadline set by several House Democratic leaders for the attorney general to hand over the full report. Instead attorney general William Barr told lawmakers he should have redacted version ready by the middle of this month. Tomorrow. The House Judiciary committee is expected to authorize subpoenas to compel the reports release on Capitol Hill, Jared Halpern, Fox News.

House Judiciary committee Wisconsin attorney Milwaukee supreme court Bell Alphonso Morales William Barr chief judge Velarde Los Angeles Brian hag Jared Halpern Bob hague Lisa Neubauer Fox News William Barda special counsel
"court appeals court" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

02:59 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"That does not apply to Donald Trump. Welcome back, America. The president has backed down. He's got round heels on the nominees for the ninth circuit. And it's a it's a stunning and disappointing turn of events. Let me tell you. What happened last year at the midpoint of the year after a year and a half trying to get Diane Feinstein and Kamla Harris to deal with the White House, then White House counsel, Don Mcgann, and President Trump said enough of this nonsense. We're nominating three judges to be circuit court appeals court judges Intel. We've had it. We're done. You've been blocking them. You want return? Your blue slip. You won't negotiate with us. So they nominated three great great nominees. Patrick the Matei. Daniel Collins, Kenneth Cole, Lee, all members of the federal society. All great judges. They all would have been terrific. Yesterday and. Diane Feinstein made it very clear when she quoted she was quoted. On. December twenty eight that she did not want these people renominated the Dianne Feinstein who screwed Bret cavenaugh totally turned into fiasco has not cooperated. Goes to see the new White House counsel, Pat sip baloney early great things about, but I don't know him. Senator Harrison I made clear to the new White House counsel, Pat sip baloney that we continue to oppose the package of ninth circuit nominees. Put forward by the White House in October. And that the nominees were submitted without our agreement. Well, I don't care and neither does Lindsey Graham. There are no more blue slips those three judges ought to have been renominated yesterday when the White House sent forward fifty one nomination, but they didn't Donald Trump back down, Pat sip baloney backed down now to be very for what it's worth I supported to different people for the ninth circuit. I wanna judge Andi Guilford of Orange County's district court and judge James Rogan of California's superior court to be nominated the ninth circuit, those were my two choices, but I didn't win. So okay. I advocate for people that don't get the job. That's that's just the way it goes. But once you nominate you don't back down because of Diane Feinstein and Kamala Harris, but the president did in fact back down yesterday. That has simply got to change that will that is a disaster because that means he's got round hills. And that's the one thing that people love about Donald Trump a lot is he doesn't back down. He does not back down. Now that let me turn to the president the United States because the president of the United States has tweeted. Doc. These.

Diane Feinstein President Trump White House Kamala Harris president Donald Trump Pat Intel America United States Lindsey Graham Senator Harrison I James Rogan Andi Guilford Matei Don Mcgann Patrick Daniel Collins Orange County
"court appeals court" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

02:48 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"This does not apply to Donald Trump. Welcome back, America. The president has backed down. He's got round heels on the nominees for the ninth circuit. And it's a it's a stunning and disappointing turn of events. Let me tell you. What happened? Last year at the mid point of the year after a year and a half trying to get Diane Feinstein and Kamala Harris to deal with the White House, then White House counsel, Don Mcgann, and President Trump said enough of this nonsense. We're nominating three judges to be circuit court appeals court judges in California. We've had it. We're done. You've been blocking them. What return your blue slip? You won't negotiate with us. So they nominated three great great nominees. Patrick the Matei. Daniel Collins, Kenneth could y'all Li all members of the federal society. All great judges. They all would have been terrific. Yesterday and. Diane Feinstein made it very clear when when she quoted she was quoted. On December twenty eight that she did not want these people renominated, the Dianne Feinstein has crude Bret cavenaugh totally turned into Gasco has not cooperated goes to see the new White House counsel, Pat sip baloney, early great things about him. Senator Harrison I made clear to the new White House counsel pats baloney that we continue to oppose the package of nights circuit nominees. Put forward by the White House in October. And that the nominees were submitted without our agreement. Well, I don't care and neither does Lindsey Graham. There are no more blue slips those three judges ought to have been renominated yesterday when the White House sent forward fifty one nomination, but they didn't Donald Trump back down. Pat, simple Oni backed down now to be very for what it's worth I support it to different people for the ninth circuit. I wanna judge Andi Guilford of Orange County district court judge James Rogan of California's superior court to be nominated the ninth circuit. Those were my choice, but I didn't win. So okay. I knew you advocate for people that don't get the job. That's that's just the way it goes. But once you nominate you don't back down because of Dianne Feinstein and comma Harris, but the president did in fact back down yesterday that has simply gotta change that will that is a disaster because that means he's got round hills. And that's the one thing that people love about Donald Trump a lot is he doesn't back down. He does not back down. Now that let me turn to the present the United States because the president of the United States has tweeted..

Diane Feinstein President Trump White House Donald Trump president Kamala Harris Pat California United States America Lindsey Graham Senator Harrison I James Rogan Andi Guilford Daniel Collins Don Mcgann Patrick Matei Orange County
"court appeals court" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

02:59 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

"Does not apply to Donald Trump. Welcome back, America. The president has backed down. He's got round heels on the nominees for the ninth circuit. And it's a it's a stunning and disappointing turn of events. Let me tell you. What happened last year at the mid point of the year after a year and a half trying to get Diane Feinstein and Kamala Harris to deal with the White House, then White House counsel, Don Mcgann, and President Trump said enough of this nonsense. We're nominating three judges to be circuit court appeals court judges. In california. We've had it. We're done. You've been blocking him. You won't return. Your blue slip. You won't negotiate with us. So they nominated three great great nominees. Patrick the Matei. Daniel Collins, Kenneth Cole, Lee, all members of the federal society. All great judges. They all would have been terrific yesterday. And Dianne Feinstein made it very clear when she quoted she was quoted. On. December twenty eight that she did not want these people renominated Dianne Feinstein who screwed Bret cavenaugh totally turned into fiasco has not cooperated goes to see the new White House counsel, Pat sip baloney, early great things about him. Senator Harrison I made clear to the new White House counsel. Pat, simple ony that we continue to oppose the package of ninth circuit nominees. Put forward by the White House in October. And that the nominees were submitted without our agreement. Well, I don't care and neither does Lindsey Graham. There are no more blue slips those three judges ought to have been renominated yesterday when the White House sent forward fifty one nomination, but they didn't Donald Trump back down, Pat simple baloney backed down now to be very for what it's worth I supported to different people for the ninth circuit. I wanna judge Andi Guilford of Orange County district court judge James Rogan of California's superior court to be nominated the night circuit. Those were my choice, but I didn't win. So okay. I advocate for people. They don't get the job. That's that's just the way it goes. But once you nominate you don't back down because of Diane Feinstein and Kamala Harris, but the president did in fact back down yesterday that has simply got to change that will that is a disaster because that means he's got round hills. And that's the one thing that people love about Donald Trump a lot is he doesn't back down. He does not back down now that let me turn to the president United States because the president of the United States has tweeted. The fact he's tweeted three times.

President Trump Diane Feinstein White House president Donald Trump Kamala Harris Pat california America United States Lindsey Graham Senator Harrison I James Rogan Andi Guilford Matei Don Mcgann Patrick Daniel Collins Orange County
"court appeals court" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

WNYC 93.9 FM

04:43 min | 2 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

"Court in Myanmar has rejected the appeal of two voices journalists who jail for seven years on charges of breaking the official secrets act while own and Josue were convicted in September after putting on a massacre by the army over hinge Muslims, we can speak now to Kevin Kalicki. Reuters regional editor Asia. We surprised by this. Kevin. Well, the families of wall on and we wanted to we wanted to help for a just outcome here. And what's happened is a is a disappointment. It's an opportunity missed and it's a compounding injustice for for our colleagues and for their families. The judge was fairly clear. He said that the journalists didn't didn't keep up with journalistic ethics. We couldn't disagree more forcefully. These two men remain in jail for one one reason alone as any fair reading the trial record will show those in power sought to silence their reporting and sought to block the publication of the truth. Where are you pinning your hopes on this appeal or perhaps more on international pressure leading to some sort of other mechanism to get them out of jail. We're going to continue to work for their release. The appeals court today had had an opportunity to to write an unjustice. It's it's deeply disappointing that it didn't find his way to do that. But reporting is not a crime and journalists in Myanmar as elsewhere need to be able to report the news being subject to threats and false imprisonment. People of men mar deserve to be informed of the truth. So we're gonna continue to work to free our colleagues and the government of Myanmar has an opportunity to put this, right? And and three them outside the judicial process. Have you had a chance to speak to either very windy to their families yet? I have not the news of this ruling just came out in the past few hours. Neither of them were in court today for this. Although I believe their their wives were. Understandably a deep disappointment. Do you know much about the conditions? They are in in jail sort of shape day. Well, you know, they they have they've been a strong through this and unwavering in. And their belief. Fact that they've done nothing wrong. Their journalists not spies, and they both been outspoken trial in their view that. Justice will be served. So we we we we share that belief, and we kind of draw strength from their conviction. You talked about exploring other avenues would you mean by that? What are you hoping to achieve? Well, the news of the appeals court ruling is really just come to us. It is in the Myanmar system. You have a trial court appeal court appeals court the supreme court, but but the government of Myanmar also has the ability to to pardon is. And that's what that's what we want to see happen until they're free. Mark does not have a free press and its its commitment to a rule of law and democracy remains in question. Kevin Kalicki voices regional editors Asia reacting to that news that a court in Myanmar has rejected the appeal of those two journalists while alone and Josue who were convicted of breaking the official secrets act. No to the capital of the Philippines, Manila where at an official release office. With a difference is filling in the gaps of the city's struggling transport system a community of homeless people push commuters in metal carts along rails, which is still used by the Philippine national railway. It's a dangerous business last year. At least nine people were killed Howard Johnson's centers. This report. This is Manila's. Unofficial.

Myanmar Kevin Kalicki Josue official Manila Reuters editor Howard Johnson Asia Philippines Mark seven years
"court appeals court" Discussed on Recode Decode

Recode Decode

04:23 min | 3 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on Recode Decode

"Here's a simple before you do that for judge ruled against you. The merger has gone for judge said that we did not meet our burden of proof who so the government has a burden of proof by preponderance of fifty. One percent will cause harm, but the judge ruled almost, you know that, you know, we didn't make a single point in this case and that, you know it was implausible some of the evidence that was put forward. So it was an interesting application of some of the evidence and standards. So we'll see what the court of appeals will decide later this year hopefully we entered into an understanding with AT and t. that they would keep the Turner business separate until February twenty nineteen pending appeal. Or earlier if the peel decides that, you know they're fine. So that allows in the event, we win to allow for a structural remedy for them to sell that business off to the one side is a merger goes for somebody else. Whereas the merger goes well, the. Merger? Yeah, they closed. We let them. And as a condition, we did not seek emergency appeal. If we had sought emergency appeal that deal could have unraveled and two thirds of that deal was not problematic. And as long as they kept that business separate than we go through a regular orderly process. So in the simplest form, here's what the judge one of the mistakes in that ruling that that we assert out in in our appeal is he said that it is, you know, it is implausible that a subsidiary of a company, a wholly owned subsidiary. So let's say there's company parents that owns two subsidiaries, right? And just for the purpose of simplicity that subsidiary a, he said, it's implausible that subsidiary a would ever sack. Let's say that they get two dollars of revenue of year that they would sacrifice one dollar of revenue a year in order for the Paris. To make an extra three, right? Which you know just pure economics says, if any of those subsidiaries every single day three times on Wednesdays, you'd be willing to give up one dollar to get three dollars, right? Who wouldn't? But he said, no, they will. They'll make independent financial decisions, but that independence goes away when they're owned by the same company and has won, you know, profit and loss balance sheet. So that is something that has been recognized by the supreme court that has been recognized by every communists that that is one of the most fundamental parts of when you have one entity. And then at the same time, he said that he, there's benefits, there's efficiencies that the consumer would benefit, and we said that there could be up to a certain amount, but that only goes, if so, if you know when you combine a distributor and a and a and a content provider. Concept in economics called, you know, elimination of double marginalization than both of them will seek to get some kind of a prophet survived. Once they're combined, you presume maybe they could do away with one of those margins in order to compete with their competitors, right? So technically prices could go down. And we said, that's that could. But that only happens, right. If you believe in the same unit entity. Working to maximize the overall officer because you're not competing to get market share if they were, if it was implausible that they would ever eliminate this. So you can't have this internal inconsistency in the opinion which you know in my views, the thirteen chime on the clock puts a big shadow on the question of the logic that was applied. In this case, the judge said, look, I can't believe that I have. This was the first antitrust case that I have to have a crystal ball to look ahead perspective. Well, that's what antitrust Birger law is. You have to look what happens in the future in the future and you have to dip it in the surprised by the reeling I was surprised by the way it was written. And yeah, I was, yeah. And so when you when you go for with this, if it is not real in your favorite, just most Ford, correct. What are the two outcomes that can happen. Agrees with you. The the appeal court appeals court agrees with us..

supreme court AT government Paris Ford officer one dollar three dollars One percent two dollars
"court appeals court" Discussed on CNN's The Daily DC

CNN's The Daily DC

02:11 min | 4 years ago

"court appeals court" Discussed on CNN's The Daily DC

"Appeals court appointees and also to be ready for court so near or so obviously obviously gorsuch is the big one and that was on this report but where are we in the lower courts appeals court district court where are we at this point in the trump presidency compared to predecessors with getting nominees through the senate obviously it's got to be a little easier when you have one party controls a wing of the republicans charter the senate republican president one might imagine the pace might be a little faster it's much faster he setting records and just to remind everybody how the federal judiciary works is in three tiers we've got the supreme court everyone knows about the nine justices the next tear down court of appeals there are thirteen courts of appeals most of them regional total of one hundred seventy nine judges this is we're so much of the action is because the us supreme court only here's here's less than 1 percent of the appeals to go up to it and then the final level is the trial court judges important in their own ways but not eydelie ideologically important and where the rubber really meets the road on social issues donald trump has already pushed through 8 appeals court appointees many of them from those original list that the federal society provided him for supreme court names and at the same time for his three predecessors he's outpaced all of them in total he's got eight through that most people would say eight that doesn't sound like a lot trust me that a lot of bill clinton i think had two through a president bridal lila rose yes exactly it had only one through a george w bush uh half that number and the same individuals who brought us neil gorsuch are working very hard behind the scenes with a goal of getting twelve through by the end of the year again that doesn't sound like a huge number but it is when you when you think of how many how few vacancies there are and how they wanna there they had the machine ramped up to get these people in place they're all in sync with the the conservative party ito more more more conservative in the republican vein than middle of the road.

senate republicans president us bill clinton neil gorsuch donald trump george w bush 1 percent