26 Burst results for "Constitutional System"

How were pro-Trump rioters able to breach Capitol security?

KCBS Radio Afternoon News

04:31 min | Last week

How were pro-Trump rioters able to breach Capitol security?

"Of people asking this evening. How did those demonstrators breach the Senate chamber earlier in the day? More. We turn to the KCBS Ring Central news line and check in with Christopher Swift. He is in Washington, D C and an adjunct professor of national security studies at the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service. Fellow with the center for National Security Law, Professor. Thanks for joining us were you surprised that things played out the way they did, given the level of security Typical on Capitol Hill. Well, the difficulty Jeff on Capitol Hill is the sheer number of people that were trying to get into the building overwhelmed the number of people who were there to protect it. Um, normally, when the Capitol police have enough time to prepare or when they are prepared for a major event, there are multiple layers of security. It does not look like the level of security here at the Capitol was adequate today by any means. But the other thing that's important to know Jeff is the sheer number of people that were inspired in part by the president, in part by conspiracy theories, in part by, uh, you know the activity that they engaged in on Social media. To show up at the Capitol at on the corner or on a coordinated basis at a particular time and try to disrupt the constitutional transfer power. It was deliberate. It was massive and the term insurrection is an appropriate term. Legally speaking. You know you talk about perhaps the lack of preparation by police and security. I mean, the 10 living former secretaries of defense got word of a possible problems as early as or his latest last week, and they wrote this extraordinary op ed piece, so obviously they're very well connected in the intelligence world. I find it hard to believe that there wasn't more security today. You know it is. That's a really good point. Patty. For those of us who are in and around the national security community, there has been tremendous concern. About what would happen between Election Day and Inauguration Day on tremendous, tremendous concern. A lot of discussion to back channels. Ah, lot of preparation on thinking. And weighing of options within the military and law enforcement and adjacent community. Capitol Police is not part of the executive branch. It's part of It's master is the house and the Senate, um and and part of the difficulty that we've seen in this administration and as well as in previous administrations. Is a reluctance to take the kinds of groups that engaged in the violent insurrection against the Capitol today. Seriously. There's a tendency to look at them and say all these folks, they're just exercising their first and then write for these people have a legitimate grievance and just want to be heard. That's fine as long as they're pulled participating in the political process. It's a completely different thing when they go into a building and stop the constitutional transfer power, and until today, a lot of folks in law enforcement Across the country just haven't taken that threat seriously, the way they've taken other threats like foreign terrorism seriously. I would imagine that folks in your line of work, see something like this is a teachable moment. What are the lessons moving forward? Well, you know, I e. It is a very teachable moment and You know, Speaker Pelosi when she Woz open reopening the house this evening, noted that today's epiphany today when you reach a new level of awareness and understanding about how the world works. And I think there are several teachable moments here. The first teachable moment is you may not necessarily need to take these right wing authoritarian groups literally, but you absolutely need to take them seriously because they take themselves and their worldview seriously. The second is that once they were alerted to the threat, the Capitol police and other federal law enforcement here in Washington actually did a really good job of locking down, securing the area and clearing the protesters out. The house and senator back in action right now debating on the floor peacefully. And the third teachable moment that I would tell my students and I tell your audience tonight is not withstanding all of the scary things you see on the television the constitutional system. Works in our laws designed to punish people who do these things and the transfer of power is going to go forward with the delay with disruption, but it will go forward, and that's a pretty important lesson for everyone.

Christopher Swift Georgetown University School O Center For National Security L Capitol Hill Ed Piece Capitol Police Jeff Senate Washington Patty Speaker Pelosi
Is Trump Losing the Midwest?

The Beat with Ari Melber

08:53 min | 3 months ago

Is Trump Losing the Midwest?

"Welcome to the be I'm Ari Melber and we are tracking some new sides. Trump campaign is worried about losing the Midwest and thus the entire race to Joe Biden trump spending precious time and resources on defense and state carried by wapping ten points. Last Cycle Iowa Biden is closing that gap and putting the state in a dead heat I was one of the thirty nine states Kobe is surging appointed his greeting donald trump's visit many voters their view this campaign homestretch through the prism of covert. And the criticisms not just coming from Joe Biden or the Resistance Iowa leaders, public health experts, independent writers all noting the trump is coming back now for votes after turning his back on the crisis there take the influential Des Moines Register stating that after jeopardizing our live from far. Trump decides to visit Iowa in person. Or take a look at this. You can't pull up trump's I will rally tonight without seeing this massive billboard pointing the way to yes. A super spreader of. Trump is plowing forward on breaking CDC guidelines lying about the risk of Colbert and the timing of vaccine and repeating two thousand sixteen claims in that state and in other key battleground states that from what we're seeing on the ground and our reporting may not play as well. Right now Democrats, say many measurable signs show that some voters are now onto the con- take a local paper in the state of Pennsylvania noting that trump is just recycling is two thousand, sixteen jobs message, which may work less during the current recession while the president blows up these stimulus talks this week. And his key groups like suburban women turn on Donald Trump that's according to internal polling newly obtained by politico or senior citizen's wavering on trump group that he needs for a winning coalition in several of these states, and since we were last on air just last night, roughly three more million ballots are in leading to nearly fifteen million total ballots cast, which again is vital because it may lock in votes at a time when Donald Trump appears down. So. If you follow all this stuff, you could see the facts trump's record are hurting him. But with the second debate canceled this week, not everyone's falling all the details which is important to keep in mind and that's true. We checked even in some key states that the candidates are visiting even for people who do read the paper. Take Florida which so many politicos obsessed over even when the candidates are on the ground I wanNA show, you hear a fairly typical big city paper, the Orlando Sentinel, the twenty, twenty race it's not the very top story or line. It's not top two on the right. You have to squint there and find it. We put it in red for you below the full in the very lower right hand corner, and that's with the nominee Joe Biden on the ground. Elections are one on preference and turnout. Popularity or preference really helps. But turnout commander more. That's how unpopular person like Donald trump managed to eke out a win in the electoral college in the first place even though remember he never pulled very high. He never pulled past fifty percent and he finished with few voters supporting him in our weird. Constitutional System. By right now, thanks from that evidence. We showed you in what we've been showing you throughout the week that they are up. So they're laser on taking that preference and trying to get the turnout with these growing leads states that trump won in two thousand sixteen big leads in some places above the margin of error and the question is, can the Democrats actually turn all those people out? I want to bring in someone who knows all about this polling Guru Cornell Belcher who worked on both Obama campaigns and wanting to taller the national political director for supermajority, which focuses ongoing political opportunities for women good evening to both of you. Cornell when you see the numbers up. What is the vital part for campaigns in October as voting's begun interning turning preference in turn out into victory? I think are a couple of things are really important. The numbers that are structurally different from twice I wanted to make that plex a lot of people still nervous about twenty sixteen. Structurally this is different than twice a couple of ways. One is different than to sixteen. In that in all these polls are driven showing by actually has a majority. And that is critical I. don't care if you're five, six, seven points. If you're below majority crazy things can happen. But in most of these bound states and certainly the national polling, he's now at a majority in Washington Post polling which I which I pay attention to hear because they they have the third party candidate in there as well. He's still at a majority you remember. Hillary was always ahead in the forced to way choice coastal majority but with the third party candidates who. Turned up the instrumental she was never had a majority of that. She got in nationally law with what what we saw with third-party Cornell just to pause on that point you raise because this matters you're pointing out that sometimes the question the voters get on the phone is different than what they're going to see. If they turn out, they get presented with two and it can change the actual science of what we're getting when they're gonNA go in the ballot box and see three or more explain to us exactly what's different now or what you think that there's more optimism for Biden compared to that. There was a protest right and we understood that that that that the third party candidates were repealing. A inaudible segment of the electorate who who, who was my time voted for for Bronco Rock Obama and nowhere is that more crystal clear than the State Wisconsin, what you saw those young people third party forty we also understand that the Russians have had a big play in and try and direct some of those specials and African American voters toward party candidate candidate candidates here. But even with their and candidates right now structurally, Biden has a majority of which is which is good and it's a stable majority. Are This is unusual in that you can't go back in the last two or three decades seeing where a Democrat has held a double digit lead nationally embattled most these battleground states for not one month that two months, three months. But basically, since June so structurally, this is very different and within the numbers is very different because when you look at right now you know among College White Women, the Horse Races Twenty seven, sixty, nine ad from the Washington. Post poll so know. So, you're talking about structurally this lead in and his support is very different than what we saw. Hillary Clinton Sixteen in two thousand sixteen quite frankly I'm gonna Bama and teen got but this is structurally even different than what we saw for Brock Obama. In Twenty, eight, twenty, twelve in two. Thousand eight I'M GONNA bring. You Anita? But. You're saying it diplomatically are you saying you think the number support a bigger margin for buying than what Obama One? Is Is blasphemed don't Tell Brak. Obama but I. Joe By going to beat it by. Wow don't you know it doesn't work when you say don't tell someone, but you're on live TV. That's really you are I mean again, I just want to underscore this. Again, we're following the the numbers and I've tried to show viewers we're GONNA continue report for you. Particularly, the votes cast the voter registration were at fifteen million votes. The election has begun, which is different than a hypothetical poll six months ago so we have an Obama pollster. Saying tonight, he is seeing the elements of the larger victory for Biden and Obama that you own that. Not Me that's really interesting coming from you cornell. Elliott. said it you're not telling you. There's no things what they're. Not. GonNa, let you forget this. I don't see it. But what I do see is absolutely the margins nationally the margins in these battleground states are undeniable but also an organizer. So first and foremost I'm always going to default to this is a turnout game. It is all about the people get showing up. I am absolutely looking at that almost fifteen million votes cast number and have optimism optimism about what we can expect to see as we get closer to the election cycle and I'm also a woman optimistic about women boating and turning out their friends and their. Families to make sure that binding gets over the finish line because what what is interesting here is Bala failures that you mentioned about trump and your opening are like boater boater spill that and voters are living that every single day. So on top of all them enthusiasm for a Biden Harris, they're taking their lived experience in an ongoing pen to make that didn't have to be this way in an economic recession that again didn't have to be this way but are here but we're all here because of trump and his administration's ineptitude.

Donald Trump Joe Biden Barack Obama Iowa Hillary Clinton Midwest Biden Harris Ari Melber Des Moines Register Cornell Orlando Sentinel Cornell Belcher Kobe CDC Constitutional System Commander Washington Post Pennsylvania
President Trump holds July 4 celebration at White House

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

01:15 min | 6 months ago

President Trump holds July 4 celebration at White House

"At the White House today hosted by President Trump, including the U. S Marine Band and U. S Navy Band Sea chanters on the national anthem during the Salute to America. Fourth of July celebration filled with a military air show and fireworks displays. Speaking from the South Lawn of the White House, the president says the architects of the United States were brave people. The Patriots who built our country We're not villains. They were heroes whose courageous deeds improve the earth. Beyond measure. The beauty and the glory of our constitutional system is that it gives us the tools to fight injustice. To hell Division and to continue the work of our founding fathers by expanding and growing The blessings of America. The crowds on the mall were thinner than gathered for last year's celebration on the National Mall. Many who showed up warm asks at the White House. Several 100 invited guests assembled on the South Lawn gathering around tables. Decorated with flowers and small U. S flags. As a military rock band played. Most guests were unmasked trumps guests were doctors, nurses, law enforcement officers and military members, as well as officials from the administration. A New

White House Patriots President Trump America National Mall U. S Navy Band Sea U. S Marine Band United States
"constitutional system" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

07:32 min | 7 months ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"This is ultimately something Congress should have taken up, and I don't know why they haven't push this through as in the house now that Democrats controlled the house Not quite sure why this hasn't been a priority, but for them if it's if it's held so closely to the heart, But but But this is this is legislating from the bench. Is it not? Well, yeah, And actually, there are no legislation this under debate right now that the house has looked at that does exactly this. So you know this is death because the law did not before. Include sexual intonation, and I I'm not. I'm not arguing one way or the other on what the right policy here is. My concern is who decides? Do we have our constitutional system where it's our elected legislators who get to make those decisions or we could turn it over to unelected judges. That's a very dangerous proposition. I mean, this mammal sound absurd to go this far, but it is kind of a slippery slope because that's normally what that kind of tends to happen and we've seen that in cases before. Because now you have the situation with a Supreme Court justice who is Reinterpreting to a modern era ver bage that it was very clear at the time that it was that it was written when this could be addressed, you know, congressional e but is that I mean, what do we have to fear in terms of going back through all of these other different decisions and different cases and re litigating them on the basis of this action? Well, justice Alito In his dissent, there were two different defense in Alito's defense. He goes through, really a parade of horribles of the kind of impact this could have. And these are all questions that If you get this legislation through the Congress, they would be able to come up with a compromise position to try to figure out how balanced very official interest like freedom of speech and freedom of religion with But with the concerns about discrimination here when the courts do it, you don't get that. So here are the issues that Alito predict are going to come up before the court things like bathrooms and locker room. You sit if discrimination on the basis of sex Also include discrimination, the basis of sexual gender identity, and that really opened the door for thing. Okay biological mad but be allowed into women's restroom and that along with all of the safety concerns that go along with that, whether women's sports Could continue as we know them. Would would. Women's professional sports be required to allow biological men who identifies them into also compete that would put Biological women on a very uneven playing field, and they eliminate them from the athletic world altogether. You have questions about religious freedom? What about churches or synagogues are MOX. How about their hiring decisions? Can they ensure that their employees are living in accord with the principles that those religious groups espouse? What about churches? How about church school's rather what about religious schools and can say continue in their higher decisions to teach the same things they're teaching Children in the classroom about their beliefs about the world about the hobby lobby case? Remember in that situation, a Christian business Didn't want to be forced to pay for a border station. Drugs for their their employees. Under this interpretation, you could argue that business owners have to then pay for it costly a sex change surgery for their employees, even if that violates their personal religious beliefs. So all of these questions it's not at all clear what the answer is going to be, and they're going to be have to be litigated one by one of the court, that's going to be not only very costly and risky for them. The businesses and the individuals involved. I think it's also a real concern because you're going to have a range of different outcomes across the country, and you're not gonna have a consistent answer to how are we? How are we going to be balancing these important concern? Any time you had a major change in the law like this? It just it unleashes a flood of litigation. But I think The fact that that's kind of coming down the pike just illustrate, but this is not with the law always said. If it were, we would already know the answers to these questions. What we're seeing here is something new and it is a sea change in the law. Now that's something that could be done properly The legislative branch, but it never should be done. Simply by the majority vote of unelected judges. This is so disappointing because I know that everyone had high hopes for Gorsuch to you. Do you consider him a disappointment? Does this make you more? I'm not as familiar with his with his backstory and and his jurist history as I am, Cavanaugh's What do you What do you foresee for Gorsuch? Is he going to kind of float to be that moderate on the Supreme Court, or do you think that he is a disappointment? Is that that serious enough? An issue tohave for him to be to be judged of failure, I guess. You know, I was there supportive of Gorsuch when he was nominated and confirmed because he has a very long track record of not being a judicial activists, hewing closely to the text and originalist understanding. I think this is an unusual circumstance for him that he would get it so wrong. I think it's because, but it's not because he said, Well, I want to update the law because he got The idea of how to even do textual ism wrong where he's looking at this again, robotic way of doing it. I think I think that that is a better result than someone saying, Well, I just think we need to update block and there are unfortunately, judges. You agree with them? That prospect so a Gorsuch overall though justice on the court that he most agrees with is Thomas. He really does have that originalist intentionally approach every justice is kind of disappointed at time. Justice Scalia head decision Clarence Thomas never has. I have to interrupt you, Kerry. He has Justice Thomas has never disappointed me. I can take it at least one decision where he later changed his mind. So he must have loved him wrong at least once. I looked like he had to give any other. So I'm with you on that. But you know, these are fallible human being. They're going to make mistakes. I do think that that in general what we see for war, which is someone who is very committed to textual Azman originalism. He's not. Are we going to get it right and I will be. I'll be the 1st 1 to call him out when I am not going paper it over when he gets it wrong, But I do think overall. He has been a really impressive judge in terms of returning the courts so things I think this this this round. Maybe not so much, but I do think we're going to continue to see that from him going forward. Carrie Severina number one best selling author of Justice on trial, which is the Cavanaugh book, which, actually anybody needs everybody needs to get this book anyway. But it's thie definitive book on the whole storm around. Wreck having a fabulous book, Harry, By the way, I read it, and it was just absolutely wonderful on you confined her also a judicial network at J. C in submarine. Oh, Carrie. Thank you so much for your perspective. And I so appreciate you being so forthright on social media because it was just I mean, very logical, very straightforward because even legal pundits today I know Everyone is getting into the trend of being super emotional and you were so zeroed in and it was so compelling, so terrific work and thank you for your time. Thank you Have a great day. You two was Carrie Severino. Her book Justice on trial as well. Judicial network. All right, as we get moving on, we got a lot. Ah, what's still to touch on rough greens? I have to tell you about this product..

Alito Supreme Court Congress Clarence Thomas Cavanaugh Gorsuch Justice Scalia Carrie Severino hobby lobby Carrie Severina Carrie official church school Kerry Harry
Siamese Revolution of 1932

This Day in History Class

04:27 min | 7 months ago

Siamese Revolution of 1932

"The day. Was June twenty-fourth Nineteen thirty two? The Siamese political party rots Adine, or the People's Party overthrew the government of King Rama, the seventh, ending seven Hundred Years of absolute monarchy under the kings of Yom. The bloodless coup resulted in the introduction of democracy, the first constitution of Thailand. Since seventeen, eighty, two the kingdom. Or Modern Day Thailand have been ruled by the Chakri Dynasty beginning with Rama, the I who founded the capital city Bangkok. Throughout the nineteenth century, much of Southeast Asia was colonized by the British. French and Dutch crm was never subjected to colonial rule. But Rama the fifth who reigned from eighteen, sixty, eight to nineteen, ten, set out to modernize the kingdom. He introduced social and governmental reforms that were based on western models. The old ruling families rejected his reforms, but from the mid eighteen eighty s to the early nineteen hundreds. Rama, the fifth overhauled the administration established military conscription, abolished slavery and made other major changes in the country. The king was committed to modernisation. He was also committed to maintaining Thai traditions and independence. He instituted all these reforms under the guise that they would save from the threat of Western colonialism. Civilized to colonial powers than it would supposedly avoid Western invasion. Rama the Fifth Son and successor Rama the sixth also worked to modernize the M and welcomed the adoption of some European ideals. His reforms upset members of the aristocracy and nobility as well as groups of progressives and radicals. In nineteen twelve, a group of military officers conspired to overthrow the king, but the plot failed. There is debate over the main causes of the nineteen thirty two revolution, but the rise of western educated commoner elites who become dissatisfied with politics in CSM played a significant role in the event. Rama the seventh ascended the throne in nineteen, twenty, five, He created the Supreme Council of state made up of senior princes who had served in previous administrations. They quickly let go of commerce who had been appointed in the civil service and military. During Rama the seventh rule, returning Western educated students grew disillusioned with the status quo. In Nineteen, twenty, seven, a small group of military and civilian students gathered in periods with the. Founding Party to bring change to see 'em. This group of seven people call themselves the promoters and they decided to stage a coup to end absolute monarchy in the country. To achieve this goal, they formed the canal rot. Sedan or People's Party. The promoters worked on gathering supporters. Meanwhile seamless facing economic problems, the Great Depression made it to the country by nineteen thirty. The value of rice see'ums major export fell drastically land values also fell, so the government had to make a bunch of budget cuts. By nineteen, thirty two, the People's Party was made up of more than one hundred students, military officers and non-royal government officials. On the morning of June twenty-fourth, nineteen thirty two while the king was away from Bangkok. The People's party the coup. The promoters seized control of the army as well as post and telegraph offices, and they arrested royal officials who were part of the ruling group, armored vehicles and troops gathered at the Throne Hall in the Royal Plaza and one of the promoters read the narrow Sadan Manifesto, declaring the end of absolute monarchy and the establishment of a constitutional state. Rama the seventh was playing golf in the south of Seattle. When he got news of the coup, he agreed to the demands for a new constitutional system, and by December of that year he had promulgated a new Constitution A State Council and National Assembly established, but conflict between the CANARSIE DON and the king continued. A couple of years after the Revolution Rama the seventh left for England, and in nineteen, thirty five, he abdicated the throne, spending the rest of his life in England. Was a major turning point in history the next few decades we're still characterized by political unrest and roll by military governments.

Rama King Rama People's Party Bangkok Thailand Founding Party Southeast Asia England Throne Hall Golf Chakri Dynasty Seattle Supreme Council Of State Royal Plaza State Council National Assembly
Global AI Adoption Trends

AI Today Podcast: Artificial Intelligence Insights, Experts, and Opinion

08:31 min | 1 year ago

Global AI Adoption Trends

"Hello and welcome to the AI today. PODCAST I'm your host Kathleen Mulch. I'm your host Ronald smells so one of the things we do at cognitive let occurs we produce research on the markets and landscape. We look across all the people that we've spent time talking to the use cases. The case studies all Venice. Did you spend time talking to and we ask ourselves the question once a year. Well how is he. I being adopted worldwide. What's happening in the world with people actually implementing an yeah right right are people or companies are certain regions more heavily adopting ai than others? What's really going on so a few weeks ago? We published the report called Global. Ai Adoption trends and forecast for twenty twenty. So we'll linked to it in the show notes. This one is a free download so we encourage all of our listeners to download it and check out the findings but we're going to spend some time today going through the report itself and highlight some of the key findings and maybe some unique or interesting. MM findings that we found from the survey and the report that we did and so the way that we accomplished this as we serve it we sent out the survey to over fifteen hundred individuals individuals various different companies and countries all over the world and got some two hundred and something responses and use those responses to one inform US specifically what's happening of course allowed allowed to also generalize in some ways about the trends that we're seeing for that if you're interested by the way participating in future surveys. I encourage you to reach out to us. Send us an email to info so I- NFO at Melissa and L. Y.. Dot Com and we would be happy. Include you in future service right so so we'll go through some of the key findings first and then the way that we also broke. This down was by our seven patterns obey because we said okay. Well let's one thing to say people are adopting ai but how truly are. Are you adopting A. Are you doing predictive analytics. Application or chat BOT application or hyper personalization application so some of the key findings that we've found from the the report is that by twenty twenty five over forty percent of the respondents that answered our survey said that they will implement a I in one or more of the identified seven patterns earns of Ai and almost ninety percent said that they'll have some sort of impress a implementation over the next two years. We found those numbers to be. You know very positive positive signs for the industry because it saying almost half will implement one or more pattern by two thousand twenty five so just a few years and then ninety percent so nine out of ten said that they'll have some sort of a m progress within the next two years so you might be thinking. He's looks like contradictory information. Wise that the forty percent or say and do but ninety percent have a project that they're doing two years you would think that ninety percent they're doing well this has to do with of course understanding versus the patterns because we asked them all. Okay yeah great well. Let's not talk about. How many of you are looking at doing a chat Bot and the next two years okay? How many of you are looking at doing a machine learning predictive analytics or recognition project or some sort of automation project? That's using cognitive automation. Oh well all of a sudden now. The numbers started going up and in our chart will show you kind of how the adoption patterns are looking looking because basically when you start looking at the more details yeah machine learning honestly an ai are being embedded in everything and it actually may be difficult to avoid using a machine learning. So even if you're saying well maybe we're not intending to build her on machine learning models it may end up being the end up using them anyways so we also sort of looked looked at turtle how the world was moving with. We're like well. Maybe you know North America Europe bird kind of moving at a different pace Rasiah Africa. Now you know what this is one of the interesting things about I in our research from all respondents and a response come from all over the planet they are all roughly moving at the same pace. It is true that you know Australia. Eliana Asia Europe. They have different timing. What their plans? But basically it's not like we're seeing an over concentration of aggressive plans and North American Europe and less so otherwise it's just it seems like this is just the global movement and then another thing we've talked about process automation a a lot and many companies especially many government agencies here in the. US are very hot and heavy on and process automation. In general. What we found is that fifty four percent of respondents plan to implement a approaches to process automation within the next few years so over half and then fifty two percent of respondents plan into implement a enabled conversational systems by twenty twenty five so those again were not really surprising numbers for us but something that we wanted to point out because because people are finding value in automation and I think in general taking their data cleansing it and then using it for higher level value uh-huh and so when they're able to take cognitive approaches in process automation they're starting to really see value in so we're excited that people who are really moving forward with that? Let me talk about a enabled conversational systems all the time and how companies can use that to help in a variety of different ways that can help with customer service service can also help with. It self service so they could use it internally as well and it's able to allow companies to do more with the same or less resources than before right right so our last sort of key finding sort of digging so some of the more details in a moment is that for the organizations that are sort of struggling with making ai ham or like a haven't quite quite yet taken the step. What they've said is that their biggest barrier to adoption is actually insufficient quantity or quality of data? That's like one of the biggest things things followed by lack of talent so basically people in data for a lot of response to send you know even for the people who are moving ahead. They have acknowledged that these are things that a slowing them down so for the companies that are not planning to implement ai at all within the for the next two years. The thing that they said was the biggest showstopper was just. They haven't yet justify the Arwa. which kind of makes sense or that? There isn't enough of an advantage of AI. Over non approach sprang for the ones that have taken that next episode okay. I think there's I want to do this project you know. I have have an R. Y.. I think it's going to give me an advantage. There getting stuck on people and data right right and that really comes as no surprise because cleaning data it can be a very very manual process very time intensive it can also be very costly as well and depending on the sensitivity of that data. That depends on what vendor or you can go with and where physically the data needs to be cleansed and crapped then followed by limited availability for a talent and skills. We've talked about. There's a big telling cruncher especially around data scientists so some of these smaller organizations. Just don't have the money to afford a data scientist on their team. So what can and they do then. That's where they're limited by hiring talent so digging a little bit deeper in one of the things we did our report is we asked them say okay. Well how many of you doing okay. Great Right now. How many of you are doing hyper civilization or pattern about is a nominally? Is predictive analytics. No automation which is not AI. We spent many reports talking about that. But we do track it because it is that when those pathways to get Aso we talk about process automation separate from autonomous systems. And then we talk about conversational systems recognition recognition systems and then goal driven system. And maybe it might not come as much of a surprise but the thing that's been the most widely implemented as of last year conversational national systems chat bots voice assistance Alexa skills. You know smart tech spots and embed. Yeah because you may not necessarily be thinking of those things is they. They're are all powered by machine learning especially the constitutional system. I you know high rate of adoption moving at a very sort of steady in four grants annual growth that the annual growth but like the OT overall adoption is like twenty percent and twenty four percent just keeps growing that episode. The thing that's kind of more interesting is the ramp. The rate at which people are implementing running process automation right or plan to within the next few years so in twenty nineteen there were about. Ten percent of participants had are bought in production production. Twenty twenty about sixteen percent but by twenty twenty five so five years from now fifty four percent so one out of every two every other. Yeah half half of the people want to have. Rpa In practice and implementation at their various companies and that says a lot to the growth in the potential of that

AI Venice Kathleen Mulch United States Ronald Twenty Twenty North America Australia Eliana Asia Europe Melissa Alexa Scientist Africa
"constitutional system" Discussed on WBBM Newsradio

WBBM Newsradio

07:22 min | 1 year ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WBBM Newsradio

"And withdrawn by sponsor this important episode in our constitutional history supports the conclusion that the framers did not accept whole hog the British approach to impeachment as some have mistakenly argued specifically they rejected vague and open ended criteria even those carrying punishment of imprisonment in Britain because they did not want to turn our new Republic into a parliamentary style democracy in which the chief executive can be removed from office simply by a vote of non confidence that's what they didn't want sure nobody was a of the law but they created a law they created a law by which Congress can impeach and they did not want to expand that lord to include all the criteria that permitted impeachment in Great Britain the framers would never have included and did not include abuse of power as an enumerated in defined criteria for impeachment by expressly rejecting now administration they implicitly rejected abuse know what the framers have included obstruction of Congress as among the enumerated in defined criteria to face in the final especially in a constitutional system in which according to Hamilton in federalist seventy eight the legislative body is not themselves the constitutional judge of their own powers and the construction they put on them is not conclusive upon other departments instead he said the courts were designed as an intermediate body between the people as the clear in the constitution and the legislature in order to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority under our system of separation of powers and checks and balances me an instruction of justice and some other lawyers have made this argument today more thoroughly for a president to demand additional review of legislative subpoenas for their complied with the legislature is not the constitutional judge of its own powers including the power to issue subpoenas the courts were designated to resolve disputes between the executive and legislative branches and it can not be an obstruction of Congress to invoke the constitutional power of the courts to do so by their very nature words like abuse of power and obstruction of Congress are standardless it's impossible to put standards into words like that both are subjective matters of degree and amenable to varying partisan interpretations it's impossible to know in advance whether a given action will subsequently be deemed to be on one side or the other of the line indeed the same action with the same state of mind can be deemed abusive or obstructive when done by one person but not when done by another that is the essence of what the rule of law is not when you have a criteria that could be applied to one person one way and another person another way and they both fit within the terms of use of power a few examples will illustrate the dangers of standardless impeachment criteria my friend and colleague professional Feldman is argued that a tweet containing what he believed was false information could quote get the current president impeached if it is part of a broader course of conduct a tweet professor Allan Lichtman has argued that the president could be impeached based on his climate change Hollis see which he regards as a crime against humanity I have to tell you I disagree with our presidents climate change policy as I do with many of his other policies but that's not a criteria for impeachment that's the criteria for deciding who you would vote for if you don't like the president's policies and climate change vote for the other candidates find a candidate was better policies on climate change if you don't like the president's tweets find somebody resin tweet that would be easy but don't allow your subjective judgments to determine what is and is not an impeachable offense professor tribe as I mentioned are used under the criteria of the use of power president Ronald Reagan should have been impeached what any American today except the legal system in which prosecutors could charges citizen with abusive conduct no matter of crime abusive conduct fortunately we have constitutional protections against the statute that quote either for bids requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men and women of common intelligence must necessarily gas at its meaning and differ as to which application very difficult to imagine criteria that fit this description of what the Supreme Court has said violates the first essentials of due process more closely than abuse of power and obstruction of Congress another constitutional rule of construction is that one word can be interpreted in an unconstitutionally vague manner or in a constitutionally precise manner the latter must be chosen your title to use that rule of interpretation as well in deciding whether or not obstruction of Congress or abuse of power can be defined as fitting within the criteria of high crimes and misdemeanors for the Senate to remove a duly elected president on vegan on constitutional grounds surges abuse of power obstruction of Congress would create a dangerous kind precedent and be construed in the words of senator James and Grimes into approval of impeachment as part of future political machinery this is a realistic threat to all future presidents who Sir with opposing legislative majorities that could easily concoct vague charges of abuse or obstruction the fact that a long list of presidents that were accused of abuse of power were not impeached demonstrates how selectively this term has and can be used in the context of impeachment I'm sorry has mass house managers you just pick the wrong criteria you pick the most dangerous possible criteria to serve as a precedent for how we supervisors oversee future presidents the idea of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress has so far from what the framers had in mind that they so clearly violate the constitution and would place Congress above the law no nor these vague open ended an unconstitutional articles of impeachment that would charge here they're not saved by the inclusion in these articles of somewhat more specific but still non criminal type contact the specifications of themselves vague open ended and do not charge impeachable offenses they include such accusations as compromising national security abusing the power of the presidency violating his oath of office in any event it's the actual articles that George abuse of power and obstruction of justice neither of which are in the constitution was the actual articles on which you must all vote not on the more specific list of means included in.

"constitutional system" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

KTLK 1130 AM

01:32 min | 1 year ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

"Impeachment hasn't changed a lot of minds if anything people have gone deeper into their side they were already leaning towards so we a Republican suppose appeasement by about eighty five percent Democrats support Beecher by about eighty five percent Michael Scherer at The Washington Post and what happens when the impeachment dust clears as expected the house of representatives impeached president trump last night nearly all Democrats voted in favor of two articles accusing Mr trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress all house Republicans rejected both articles saying Democrats failed to show that Mr trump had committed a crime the votes followed a day of debates over Mr trump on the house floor Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler a president who subverts both our elections in our constitution and our constitutional system of checks and balances puts himself above the law and it is Congress duty to hold the president any president accountable Republican Fred Keller of Pennsylvania today will forever be remembered as a stain on our Republic these impeachment proceedings are not based upon facts evidence reason or any inappropriate or impeachable actions by our president meanwhile the house could at least temporarily withhold the articles from the Senate if speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn't believe the process will be fair it's possible a Senate trial could be delayed indefinitely denying Mr trump unexpected acquittal.

Democrats Beecher Michael Scherer The Washington Post Mr trump chairman Jerry Nadler president Pennsylvania Senate Nancy Pelosi house floor Judiciary Committe Congress Fred Keller
"constitutional system" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

KTAR 92.3FM

01:33 min | 1 year ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

"That the impeachment haven't changed a lot of minds if anything people have gone deeper into their the size they were already leaning towards so we a Republican suppose appeasement by about eighty five percent Democrats support Beecher by about eighty five percent Michael Scherer at The Washington Post and what happens when the impeachment dust clears as expected the house of representatives impeached president trump last night nearly all Democrats voted in favor of two articles accusing Mr trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress all house Republicans rejected both articles saying Democrats failed to show that Mr trump had committed a crime the votes followed a day of debates over Mr trump on the house floor Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler a president who subverts both our elections in our constitution and our constitutional system of checks and balances puts himself above the law and it is Congress duty to hold the president any president accountable Republican Fred Keller of Pennsylvania today will forever be remembered as a stain on our Republic these impeachment proceedings are not based upon facts evidence reason or any inappropriate for impeachable actions by our president meanwhile the house could at least temporarily withhold the articles from the Senate if speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn't believe the process will be fair it's possible a Senate trial could be delayed indefinitely denying Mr trump unexpected acquittal.

Democrats Beecher Michael Scherer The Washington Post Mr trump chairman Jerry Nadler president Pennsylvania Senate Nancy Pelosi house floor Judiciary Committe Congress Fred Keller
"constitutional system" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

03:07 min | 1 year ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KTOK

"Saw should Congress had an approval rating nine percent by contrast Moammar Qaddafi had an approval rating at thirteen percent and his own people drag him in the streets and kill them this impeachment process demonstrates the worst in us and it is depriving us the opportunity to raise our gaze and meet the needs of the American people unless you have bipartisan consensus impeachment is a divisive issue in the country many people would think it's being done for political reasons Nancy Pelosi may twenty eighteen and here we are in the most partisan presidential impeachment in American history matter fact we open the inquiry no Republicans voted with the Democrats and you even had Democrats vote with us in the only bipartisan vote to shut down this impeachment and that brings us to your role Mister Goldman are you here as a partisan advocate for the Democrat position or you here as a non partisan investigator of the facts I'm here to present the report that we did on our investigation which was totally and completely reliant on the actual evidence that we uncovered the witness testimony and the documents are you a partisan I'm not a partisan discuss how you work for the house since two thousand five and same question school for the house since earlier this year castor do you make political donations I don't remember her Mister Goldman same question you make political donations I do Sir I think it's very important effective lord you've given tens of thousands of dollars to Democrats right Sir I I think it's very important to support candidates for office I think are have you given are over a hundred thousand you Monday I just one of the number I don't really care the basis of your more than a hundred thousand the basis of some of the number so it's ten number you know how much money Mister Burke has given Democrats I don't know and I know it's surprising it's more than a hundred thousand Mr gates I'm here to talk about this for so your so you gave tens of thousands who was ever gave hundreds of our more than a hundred thousand do you think if you'd given more money you might have been able to ask questions and answer them with Mister Burton I guess it's something you're still pondering you know the funny thing about this is that these hearings the Democrats to get the worst of it they control the committees they control the rules they control the clock they control the witnesses they control the press and they're getting the worst of it I am so proud of these Republican you have no idea and you know how unusual it is for me to say that these house Republicans ladies and gentleman have been spectacular on the Intel committee on the judiciary committee and as a general matter they have stood together they know what a farce this is they know what an attack on our constitutional system this is they have stood together it's one of the proudest moments the house Republican since I've been alive I'll.

Congress Moammar Qaddafi thirteen percent nine percent
Judge blocks some funds Trump sought for U.S.-Mexico border wall

News, Traffic and Weather

00:44 sec | 1 year ago

Judge blocks some funds Trump sought for U.S.-Mexico border wall

"Immigration advocates are celebrating a federal judges decision to block President Trump from building a border wall using funds diverted from the defense department despite the president's declaration of a national emergency, but it could be temporary. More from ABC's Stephanie Ramos, the president declared a national emergency back in February attempting to divert money from the department of defense to build the wall along the us Mexico border, but a California federal judge is, basically saying, not so fast in his order, the judge writes congress is absolute control over federal expenditures is not a bug in our constitutional system. It is a feature of that system and essential one that judge basically saying, Trump cannot divert those funds without congressional

President Trump Donald Trump Department Of Defense Stephanie Ramos Congress ABC Mexico California
President, President Trump And Congress discussed on Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

05:04 min | 1 year ago

President, President Trump And Congress discussed on Ben Shapiro

"On to President Trump and his emergency declaration. So the Senate voted yesterday to reject President Trump's emergency declaration immediately. Trump tweeted video all capital letters, the senate's resolution was passed fifty nine to forty one to overturn his national emergency declaration them saying we didn't delegate you this kind of power, and you are not allowed to simply overrule us by declaring a national emergency. And it does show that the national emergency power is to certain extent being abused. Because the fact is the national emergency act was designed to allow the president to act in the absence of congressional opinion making or weighing in the reasons declared national emergency is you don't actually have time to go to congress for the appropriations you just declare national emergency was the first time that I think has ever happened or congress has explicitly rejected national emergency declaration from the president the reason for that because the president negotiated with congress. He didn't get what he wanted. And then he declared a national. Emergency that is violation of the constitutional order. That is not how the constitution is supposed to work. President Trump said he was gonna veto this. He said I look forward to veto the just past democrat inspired resolution, which would open borders while increasing crime, drugs and trafficking in our country. I think all the strong Republicans who voted support border security and our desperately needed wall. Now, I know a lot of senators and members of the house who voted in favor of upholding the national emergency declaration. I don't think that was the right move. It only that was the constitutional move. And in fact, you saw a bunch of Republicans who switched their position on this simply because President Trump does have a massive amounts of support. The fact is that a bunch of senators flipped on this most prominently Senator Ben Sasse, Nebraska. He had said earlier, we absolutely have a crisis at the border as a constitutional conservative. I don't want a future democratic president unilaterally rewriting gun laws or climate policy. If we get used to presidents just declaring an emergency anytime, they can't get what they want from congress. It will be almost impossible to go back to a constitutional system of checks and balances over the past decades the legislative branch. Given away too much power. And the executive branch has taken too much power that seems like a pretty good predicate for voting against the national emergency declaration. And then he voted in favor of the national emergency declaration. He said the reason he did. So is because he and Mike Lee had put forward a Bill that would have curbed generally the power to declare a national emergency. And that Bill had not been had not been agreed to by the president. Well, then why are you voting with him on this national emergency? That's still doesn't answer the question. The fact is this national emergency to one being declared right now is not in fact, legally national emergency. It is a national emergency in the common parlance, it is something that congress ought to do something about we ought to have a wall. The president doesn't get to overstep his injuries. 'cause he's doing something you like the measure of a principle is whether if the violation of the principle accomplishes, something that you want your for it or against it. So if you have a principal, and then it turns out that tossing out the principal in order to get something done appeals to you. So you toss out the principal. Then you're. Really didn't have the principal to begin with. You had a politics of convenience. It's not just Senator SAS who flipped on this sort of thing. Senator Thom Tillis wrote a full op Ed saying that he was not in favor of the national emergency declaration. He announced he would vote to terminate the national emergency declaration, and then he changed his mind and voted against terminating the national emergency declaration. And listen, I understand that. There is severe pressure on the senators from people who are sitting home and who are thinking. Okay. Well, all this really comes down to his do you wanna protect the border or not? But that is a failure educate your own voters, which is part of the job. There's been this move in national politics toward we will just appease whichever voters are in front of us. It's our job to give the voters what they want. Well, that's half your job the other half of your job is to help shape. What voters want it's a convince voters. It's go back home and give people the hard messages if you're not doing that. Then you're not acting as a good Representative. This is the difference between these sort of straight democratic representation model, and the Birkin model of representation had been Burke famously wrote that if you you're a Representative then it was not just your job to represent the temporary wishes of the public. It was your job to represent to act as as your own conscience. They elected you to use your own conscience. And if the people don't like it, then I suppose they can turn you out, but they should give you a solid. Listen. They should give you a solid. Listen again. I think Republican this should have passed with an overwhelming supermajority. It did not that is that his lack of principle on the part of a lot of Republicans, including many Republicans with whom I generally agree. I think there's a case to be made. I think that you've heard Representative Dan Crenshaw make that if you really believe. Leave that it is legal for the president to declare a national emergency under current powers. Then you vote in favor of this. But there are a bunch of people who said the president doesn't have those powers under the national emergencies act, and then they voted in favor of the president exercising powers. He doesn't have that's bad. And I ache the excuses. Listen, I hear the excuses the excuse that Democrats would do this. We'll do the exact same thing. That's true. That's why I'm not a democrat. It is true. Democrats would go along with violations of the constitutional order, which is why again, I am not a

President Trump Congress Principal Representative Senate Senator Thom Tillis Senator Ben Sasse Senator Bill Mike Lee Executive Nebraska Burke ED Dan Crenshaw
"constitutional system" Discussed on WBT Charlotte News Talk

WBT Charlotte News Talk

02:02 min | 2 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WBT Charlotte News Talk

"Words against him. I'm Carmen Roberts. Fox News lawsuits filed against President Trump's national emergency to build a wall are using his own words that it is not necessary as part of their efforts to stop him reverse successful. The lawsuit. So it was filed. It was filed in the ninth circuit. And I actually think we might you very well, even in the ninth circuit because it's an open and flows case, but even without the emergency declaration, the White House says it is now identified nearly four point five billion dollars of additional funds which would be enough to build about one hundred and eighty miles of a border wall immediately without waiting for these court challenges to play out. Fox's Kristen Fisher. The ACLU is the latest to sue the president claiming that his move as an effort to undermine the constitutional system of checks and balances Mexico says it closed a temporary migrant shelter near the US border. The shelters in the border city of. Just about sixteen hundred Central American migrants have been confined over the past two weeks. The Cook County state's attorney recused herself from the investigation surrounding empire acting actor Jesse small at Chicago police dig into the alleged hate crime attack against the actor and no longer consider him. A victim jussie smollet has gone radio silent. Jim it reports that police sources say he and to acquaintances Nigerian brothers not only plan the alleged, homophobic and racist attack, January twenty ninth. Whether they rehearsed it CBS also reports the brothers saying that small at planned the attack after a death threat letter they sent him a week earlier failed to gain enough attention. Fox's Jeff monosso police want to question smollet, again has attorneys say they have no plans to allow that. And that he vehemently denies planning the attack. This is Fox News. National sources named Jan..

Fox jussie smollet Fox News President Trump Kristen Fisher Carmen Roberts Jim Cook County ACLU White House president CBS Jesse small US Mexico Chicago Jeff monosso attorney five billion dollars
Judge Refuses to Block Emergency Alert Test -

WBBM Morning News

02:10 min | 2 years ago

Judge Refuses to Block Emergency Alert Test -

"Alert test the one you got on your phone yesterday. Judge. Katherine Polk Bela in Manhattan rejected the long shot effort by the three individuals who sued without an attorney to try to stop Wednesday's test. Here's why would this is about? There's about checks and balances in our constitutional system on the government argued that the president had discretion. There's no absolute discretion constitutional system. The best example, president of the United States cannot today. Declare war because the constitution says congress has to declare war example that continues to come up as nine eleven. Why would someone in Arizona have needed to hear what was going on in New York City on nine eleven it doesn't it would just cause alarming concern? One of my personal concerns is that of the two hundred million people receiving this text test alert today. How many of them are our children fourth graders fifth graders sixth graders having phones creepy best and already in a compromise. Invulnerable state. Maturity receiving potentially harmful alarming and traumatic information that may or may not be accurate. People have asked me what I have been as passionate about this. If Barack Obama were an office or another president. Yes, I would be concerned. But we do have to acknowledge the fact that even last night, we have a president who is making fun of doctor, Dr forts testimony and sending out text messages, very recently that. The numbers of people who passed away in the hurricane in Puerto Rico. Incorrect this is not the traditional way a commander in chief addresses a nation while we are disappointed that the temporary injunction restraining order. We're not granted today. We will be returning as per advice from the judge who was fair balanced and also concerned about the constitutional implications with this presidential text to learn the

President Trump Katherine Polk Bela Barack Obama Congress Arizona Manhattan United States Puerto Rico New York City Dr Forts Attorney
"constitutional system" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

WCBM 680 AM

02:34 min | 2 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

"Understand. And I think people do not understand how hard it is to come forward. And I always say amendment say why so hard how about if you've been abused? You see the movie deliverance? How about if you're the guy strapped to the tree? Would you come forward? You want to relive that? I'm sure some deadly Ernest. You're deadly earnest. And you're stupid is a doorknob. We're supposed to take you serious Lee. And you referenced the movie deliverance. How 'bout we reference? The Duke lacrosse players. Who are accused of gang rape. Every one of them was innocent. Joe Biden who would tell you that we need to defend people who are accused of terrorism accused of mass murder who accused of mass rape. He needs to be defended through our judicial system. And yet when it comes to a a nominee to the supreme court. They're treated worse than a terrorist worse than a mass murderer and Joe Biden should know Joe Biden has been the head Soviet style. Prosecutor in many of these cases, he conspired with many of these left wing organizations ten twenty years ago to destroy numerous nominees. But this is what politicians do unlike the legal system and like the constitutional system. The ends justify the means. And for Joe Biden. That's that's how it works. The ends justify the means. I believe the victim in this is judge Cavanaugh the accuser didn't come forward in time for a full hearing during the hearing process. She can't remember particulars. I'm not talking about complicated. Things. Can't remember almost anything? And now we're told that well the the accused has to demonstrate that. That she's wrong. And he's right. And by the way in questioning the accuser. You can't questionnaire on Wednesdays. You can't questionnaire with a female lawyer, you can't questioner this can't question that. So you got all kinds of rules out there. To immunize the accuser and to. And to hold that the accused is guilty before anything is done. I played you some of the montage. I couldn't even play anymore of it last hour just to disgusting too stupid. Here's more Joe, Biden, cut seven go. Think they should do an FBI investigation. We.

Joe Biden Cavanaugh rape supreme court lacrosse FBI Prosecutor Lee murder ten twenty years
"constitutional system" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

01:58 min | 2 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KTRH

"Age top tax defenders twenty four hour weather center. It's seven one our top story. The Democrats continue grilling supreme court nominee. Judge Brad Kavanagh? Let's get the latest from ABC. A short break on Capitol Hill for supreme court nominee Brad Kavanagh and his confirmation hearing following a full day of QNA pressed about his position on hot button issues, including presidents power on the principles of judicial independence that judges sitting judges, and I am a sitting judge and nominees city here. Need to be careful about is commenting on current events or political controversies Terry Moran has been in the hearing room despite the occasional outbursts. This hearing finally got down to issues and the dominant issue today the shadow looming over cavenaugh for many Democrats, whether President Trump picked him. So he would rule in the president's favor in any cases stemming from special counsel, Robert Muller's investigation cavenaugh offered a personal declaration of independence. No one is above the law in our constitutional system. Democrats weren't satisfied and they drilled down. What are the president himself has subpoenaed to testify questions are expected to continue into the night? Michelle Franzen ABC news. It's seven oh three and newborn just hours old is in the hospital and expected to be just fine after he was dropped off at a church overnight with his umbilical cord attached firefighter. Andy Williams with the Houston fire department. Te-ok Terry is Michael berry. They had just gotten back from a call after four o'clock this morning when a man with a baby came to the station. I can't remember exactly how he worded it. But essentially somebody who dropped a baby off at church if he didn't really know what to do with it. So he brought us the fire station. He left the name of the church and address and stuff. This appears to be a case where the baby Moses law. Applies the baby Moses law applies to baby sixty days old or younger who are unharmed and safe. The law allows parents to take their child to any hospital fire, stay store.

Brad Kavanagh President Trump Terry Moran president ABC Michelle Franzen Robert Muller QNA Houston fire department Andy Williams Michael berry special counsel twenty four hour sixty days
Trump targets Nike as Kaepernick ads spark boycott calls

Mike Gallagher

00:29 sec | 2 years ago

Trump targets Nike as Kaepernick ads spark boycott calls

"Supreme court Justice nominee. Brad Kavanagh this day two of his Senate confirmation hearing doing his best to assert his independence or the man who nominated him. No one is above the law in our constitutional system. And that he tells Iowa's Chuck Grassley includes the president of the United States. Did anyone asked you to make any promises or sure Ince's at all all about the way that you would rule in certain cases. Now, were you ask about your views on Roe v? Wade no.

President Trump Nike White House Ince Brad Kavanagh NFL Greg Clugston Thomasson Chuck Grassley Wally Hindes Senate Colin Kaepernick Iowa ROE Bob Woodward Wade United States Sarah Sanders Press Secretary
"constitutional system" Discussed on WLS-AM 890

WLS-AM 890

02:53 min | 2 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WLS-AM 890

"Committee members that we wasted on disrupt. Option in this order. Today. Police escorted several protesters from the room Grassley asked Cavanaugh just a few minutes ago about the charge from Democrats that he would not rule against President Trump. If he thought Trump violated the long, no one is above the law in our constitutional system. Federal as sixty nine Hamilton makes clear all the ways that the executive branch has designed by the framers of the constitution was different from the monarchy. Under our system of government, executive branch is subject to the law subject to the court system incident. Trump tweeting this morning about that new book by Bob Woodward? He wrote isn't it a shame that someone can write an article or book, totally make up stories and form a picture of a person that is literally the exact opposite of the fact and get away with it without retribution or cost. Don't know. Why Washington politicians don't change libel? Laws more on that book. From reporter Jeff Zeleny us chief of staff. John Kelly describes Trump as an idiot and unhinged Defense Secretary James Mattis says Trump has the understanding of the fifth or sixth grader and Woodward writes that Trump's former personal lawyer John Dowd who quit earlier this year told Trump he would wind up in an orange jumpsuit if he sat down with special counsel, Robert Muller rally down in Mattis all deny the quotes attributed to them by Bob Woodward trial starts today for officer Jason Van Dyke. He is the cop accused of killing. Liqun McDonald back in two thousand fourteen former top cop and mayoral candidate Garry McCarthy on with John. And Ray this morning reacting to the news that may remain. You'll is not going to run for reelection. Mccarthy told us he thinks Rahm decided to quit because he was going to lose McCarthy also attacking a manual for raising millions of dollars even though according to McCarthy Emmanuel knew he wouldn't run again eight nine dollars. And I I'm really curious is you're going to give you that money back because that's just not okay. That's one was criminal in my mind. Now that Emmanuel is out. There are no clear front runners. There's also the chance that some other big names might get in the race. Bizarre situation in Dallas this morning. Police detained demand accused of crashing a pickup truck into a FOX affiliate TV station building during a live newscast. K DFW. Posting details showing the front of the vehicle ramming into windows near an entrance. The man was arrested after ranting about high treason. He said that he believed he had been wronged and that someone was trying to kill him. WLS news time nine oh four. You LS news is sponsored in part by.

President Trump Bob Woodward Garry McCarthy executive Jason Van Dyke Emmanuel James Mattis Cavanaugh John Kelly Washington Jeff Zeleny Grassley FOX John Dowd Hamilton Liqun McDonald Robert Muller reporter
"constitutional system" Discussed on WSB-AM

WSB-AM

03:49 min | 2 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WSB-AM

"Zero seven, five zero one eight hundred WSB talk the Washington Post has a story out today that some or worried that the president's attacks on the, Justice system will have long term consequences they probably, should have been worried about the Hillary Clinton investigation and its long term impact on people thinking there were two standards of Justice in this because they were worried about that they're really worried about the. President, in. In the president's attacks on Jeff Sessions and the Justice department and all. That you know I do have to find it somewhat amusing I this is going to make some of you this can make a lot of you mad, you just, got to bear with me deal with it But these. Are all the president's people. Now in charge and if he's the guy who hires the best people in cuts the. Best deals in and he can't he can't fix the problem we'll maybe it's not a fixable problem and we're just gonna have to deal with it but nonetheless it really what struck me by the story is I've been thinking for a while and actually? Put up, a piece of the resurgent, this effort in response. To it that what, about the Democrats, ongoing efforts, to de. Legitimize the entire constitutional system I mean it's one thing and I I get the conservative the president is bashing the Justice system for example I am I am willing to say that, maybe there are things we don't know about the Hillary Clinton. Situation as to why the Republican attorney general Jeff Sessions will indictor now that he's scared maybe there are, facts that we didn't learn, from, Fox News it's amazing to me how many. People think they are experts on what Clinton. Did or did not do and yet they haven't actually Been part of the entire investigation they've just heard stuff from FOX is maybe they're they're? Facts and, play that we don't know, that have shaped why. They haven't prosecuted I, can't tell you, the number, of people. Who have told me if I did what she did I would have cleared revoked I would have been court martial river would what do we know that she actually did I mean, I think I know I think you think you know and. I think we all got our stuff from the same place and maybe there were details left out but. That's besides the point here The point. Is the, media never is concerned about democratic de legitimizing, the system, they're never concerned about democratic efforts to undermine Justice they're always concerned about what Republicans are doing they always, concern troll what Republicans are doing But. What about the Democrats They are right now this week pushing the idea that the Senate cannot confirm Brett Cavanaugh to the United States Supreme court because the president's former lawyer has suggested the president committed a felony that. Is actually legitimately their argument there are people I respect to, have, come, out, and, say whoa whoa whoa whoa we should wait until after. The midterms. Because we shouldn't we shouldn't we shouldn't confirm capital now because. The president's mired in scandal Y'all. This completely ignores the way our constitutional system is arranged in this country there are more than one branch of government the president can't do this stuff by himself I mean this gets to the way the Democrats spun the. The the mirror garland stuff that somehow his seat was stolen, no, there, are, two, branches of government involved in putting someone on the supreme. Court in. One branch decided not to put him on the supreme court And it's. Like have, have we all gone nuts here I mean the Democrats, are convincing people they convinced James Hodgkinson for God's sakes. Republicans, want to kill everyone and he tried to mass assassinate Republicans there's let me just explain what they're doing but I.

president Hillary Clinton Jeff Sessions supreme court FOX Justice department Washington Post Justice James Hodgkinson Senate God Fox News Brett Cavanaugh attorney
"constitutional system" Discussed on KHNR 690AM

KHNR 690AM

03:05 min | 2 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KHNR 690AM

"The of the democrat party while certain renegade republicans wanna protect him even though he's destroying our constitutional system and the results of the last election i've spent two hours breaking down the new york times article and the cabal against this president it is shocking shocking it's a centipede of shoes that keep dropping here and while the others this one and that he can play the fancy can do this he there's nothing he can do in response to subpoena i said whoa whoa whoa whoa well that's not correct you cannot indict a sitting president whatever my personal opinion in his irrelevant you cannot indict a sitting president that is the official position according to the department of justice i've set it on the air mr muller's people hear me i waved it in their faces on tv you cannot indict a sitting president according to the united states department of justice for which mr mueller works and as a condition of a simplicity and his appointment he must comply with department of justice policy department of justice policy to the best of my knowledge has never been altered not since the first opinion in the nixon administration and the second opinion and the clinton administration it's never been offered each of those memorandums one built upon the other they are conclusive and the idea the mr mueller would go to court indicting president united states when the president's lawrence will go all the way to the supreme court and wave around those documents for those justices would have been preposterous doesn't mean he still won't do it at a spike but i am telling you that if he follows the rules of the department of justice and if they're enforced by the attorney general of the united states he cannot indict this president or any president that when they leave office it's a different issue i've explained this poem blue in the face that this has always been about impeachment it has to be about impeachment it doesn't mean this rogue prosecutor won't try it on died anyway and that trump as far as we'll have to fight and district court and appellate court and the supreme court unless they can go directly to the supreme court i put nothing pass muller and his rogue democrat prosecutors but what i'm saying and what i said on hannity what upset behind this microphone what i've said a levin tv is the constitution is this president's best friend wrap yourself in it defended.

democrat party president mr muller nixon administration clinton administration mr mueller united states lawrence prosecutor hannity new york times official united states department of ju department of justice attorney two hours
"constitutional system" Discussed on WTMA

WTMA

01:32 min | 3 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WTMA

"It look so easy hi this is charlie james wake up with me and the wto a morning show weekday mornings from six to ten on twelve fifty wt tma big talker see when the constitutional system breaks down and legal system breaks down and the rule of man takes over these situations and people are saying what can we do what can we do while if the constitutional system is broken and the legal system is is out of kilter fact it's being used an abusive fashion that's the question isn't it what can we do and i don't have the answer trump's laura i'll just reiterate sent his best guy or gal into court and then hatton asked for a protective order of all documents with his name on it one i'd wanna know the underlying excuse me i would like to know the warrant i'd like to see it i'd like to know the basis for it and remember attorney client privilege the privilege applies to the client not to the attorney the attorneys job to to uphold it and i don't even understand why they felt the need to go into his office and his home in his hotel room this i have no idea why it did you subpoena the records and deal i'll be right back a decade ago amac was founded by dan weber as an alternative to the left.

charlie james wto hatton attorney dan weber
"constitutional system" Discussed on WJNT 1180 AM

WJNT 1180 AM

02:15 min | 3 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on WJNT 1180 AM

"That has no regard for the will of the people no regard for the constitutional system in the electoral college no regard for separation of powers no regard for the rule of law the committed to sanctuary cities and what sanctuary cities there there are nullified hours they believe in nullifying federal law nullifying federal aware we heard that before while we heard it from the confederacy arguing for secession in california where did we hear that one well we heard it from the confederacy just think about it and think about the criticisms of this present when you watch a show and i don't but i see clips mr producer prepares them when you see clips or watcher show like the morning joe among them you have a guy who was accused and confessed to plagiarism another guy who's not there anymore because he was a sexual predator then you have to hosts who couldn't make it in radio can't make it on real tv so they're on msnbc lecturing people about you should have relationships with your colleagues in the office what apparently that's what they did not attacking them i'm just saying how ridiculous they saw who really have nothing to bring to the table nothing importanace say bracing taligent interesting entertain nothing they are there as attack dogs that's it when you look at cnn cnn is a news operation it's an opposition attack operation dressed up as some kind of a journalist platform it's not it's not they work hand in hand with the democrats on capitol hill they work hand in hand with the prosecutor's office colmey leak to them muller's office leaks to them same with the post some of the new york times but can you imagine we're not even done the first year what's been going on here what this man trump might be able to accomplish.

electoral college federal law california producer joe sexual predator cnn capitol hill prosecutor new york times msnbc muller
"constitutional system" Discussed on KKOB 770 AM

KKOB 770 AM

02:52 min | 3 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KKOB 770 AM

"President united states and a different agenda than our foreign policy intelligence and defense department and so they've taken it upon themselves violating their oath violating federal law to leak the leak national security information to leak information about the president's conversations with other world leaders entire transcripts i've never been seen anything like this before prison the united states now he's barely able to to function he's barely able to do his job he's got congress artist but he's got this prosecutor on his but he's got people within the administration leaking on him so that's more and more difficult to do his job and i'm supposed to pile on record how hey did you see what each waited hey you know he has to be a liberal uh yeah yet but crap stand up for your country the country's been destroyed from within our constitutional system our security system our law enforcement system who are these people these rogue operators while we know some of them in there in the leadership of the fbi no question about it in my mind and some of the must be in the senior levels of our intelligence services too they are at war not just with this president their war with the constitution are at war with the voters and this is what's taking place go ahead definition is the information that if disclose would do harm to national security as director coats we'll discuss lakes are incredibly damaging to our intelligence mission and capabilities simply put these leaks heard our country all of us in government can do better the first requirement is for discipline within all our agencies of the government to prevent these leaks every agency and congress has to do better we are chad hear that mr producer leaks coming out of congress to our elected officials some of them are committing felonies they get access to top secret national security and law enforcement information and they're leaking it go ahead stand this culture of leaching must stop now the greatest the greatest participant in undermining our national security are the media now the run around and say we have a right to do this and this may have chosen we're not talking about rights not talking about free speech.

President federal law security information united states prosecutor intelligence services congress foreign policy law enforcement fbi director producer
"constitutional system" Discussed on KBOI 670AM

KBOI 670AM

02:15 min | 3 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KBOI 670AM

"Use of the law to destroy the law it is the use of the law to destroy the constitutional system it's the usual of all so subvert the election and whether you're part of the trump base or somebody else's base you're a homeless person you're rocket scientist it doesn't matter it doesn't matter this isn't about team red and team blew it's about team america go ahead then really interesting to watch this formats over the last couple of days on this wide she say four meant i believe the words foment even though that's not the appropriate word we're not fomenting where exposing at nonetheless go ahead dense of urgency about the ways in which the investigation is kind of closing in on trump and his family and even the president cut of giving voice to some of this on social media this morning he tweeted that sentiment that there would be quote an uprising if there were tightening i've had signed so it's a real concern oh i see icing now of course the the left wing days there are always taking to the street breaking shop windows destroying automobiles bernie dumpsters making threats oh yeah doesn't take much he just get pissed off an off they go i do think there is a lot of people in this country unlikely to do that we're going to be so furious so furious that the entrenched left that the entrenched in establishment and the praetorian guard media have destroyed or dislodged a legitimately elected president united states not because they ever had anything on them not because they were concerned about russia not because of any of that but because they didn't like him and they didn't want him and he wasn't supposed to win the election case closed right there go ahead his supporters are predominantly getting their news from people like mark levin and others who are the kind of thought leaders at.

scientist social media windows president russia mark levin united states
"constitutional system" Discussed on KKAT

KKAT

02:51 min | 3 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on KKAT

"United states and a different agenda than our foreign policy intelligence and defense department had so they've taken it upon themselves violating their oath violating federal law to leak the league national security information to leak information about the president's conversations with other world leaders entire transcripts i've never been seen anything like this before prison the united states now he's barely able to to function he's barely able to do his job he's got congress on his but he's got this prosecutor on his but he's got people within the administration leaking on him so it's more and more difficult to do his job and i'm supposed to pile on my car how heritage's sri what each waiting hey hey yesterday alert wire yeah yet oh crap stand up for your country the country's being destroyed from within our constitutional system our security system our law enforcement system who are these people these rogue operators while we know some of them in there in the leadership of the fbi no question about it in my mind and some of the must be in the senior levels of our intelligence services too they are at war not just with this president their war with the constitution there at war with the voters and this is what's taking place go ahead by definition is information that if disclose who would do harm to national security as director coats floral discuss police are incredibly damaging to our intelligence mission and capabilities simply pruitt these leaks heard our country all of us in government can do better the first requirement is for this fund within all our agencies of the government to prevent these leaks every agency and congress has to do better we are cia hear that mr producer leaks coming out of congress to our elected officials some of them are committing felonies they get access to top secret national security and law enforcement information and they're leaking it go ahead stand this culture of leaching must stop now the greatest the greatest participant in undermining our national security are the media now the run around and say we have a right to do this and this may have chosen we're not talking about rights not talking about free speech.

United states federal law security information president prosecutor intelligence services congress cia foreign policy law enforcement fbi director pruitt producer
"constitutional system" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

01:43 min | 4 years ago

"constitutional system" Discussed on Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates

"It says in effect we refuse to accept the result and that's a very dangerous doctrine now give him a chance doesn't mean give him car blown she just means keep an open mind opposing when is wrong trump is going to put america's constitutional system under stress the courts need to step up congress needs to step up but we ought to acknowledge the possibility that he might do some good things even that he might in the nba good president it's obvious idle shag gales optimism on this but i hear arguments and don't think they deserve to be dismissed out of hand trump has made some reassuring cabinet nominations trump's nominee for the supreme court is eminently qualified sufficiently dedicated his seems to meet the constitution and the rule of law that trump might actually come to regret the appointment trump says he'll bring forward a big increase in infrastructure investment that will be great he says he'll force drug prices down by negotiating forcefully with the pharmaceutical companies again that something democrats long proposed maybe he'll succeed in simplifying america's insane the complicated tax system now is it takes mansion trade policy because i think his proposals therein nuts abandoning tpp renegotiating nafta and all that but perhaps a few democrats in this audience quite like those ideas bernie sanders said he does if trump keep this up he said i'll be willing to work with him on some things well come out if bernie sanders is willing to give trump change shouldn't be.

congress president trump pharmaceutical companies america bernie sanders nba