2 Burst results for "Congress Iit"
"congress iit" Discussed on KQED Radio
"He was aghast at that uh johnson uh had a willie fatal flaw in the sense that he was enormously hostile towards african american people he was four ending slavery but he thought that blacks should sort of exist as people without rights may be like serfs or something that would have been involved or whatever people who had no power and when he saw with the radical republicans were trying to do he said well how will side with the southern planters over these people who are trying to bring blacks into equality in society and actually one person wrote to him from the south end so of explained that he said you know we would have accented whatever terms that you laid out but he gave us hope for a white man's government he held out hope for white man's government is what he said and that's when they sort of knew that they could to resist the people in congress and stand firm for white supremacy and the south so johnson who sort of the the terrible tragedy of american history that the person who was so hostile to african american people i'm a he didn't just have the the sort of prejudices of the day even people at the time remarked upon his hostility towards blacks of so he was the one who actually gave southerners who wanted to resist hope knows you said people have to know they lost the war well he gave them a sense in a sense that they didn't lose it totally not on the question of who is supposed to rule in the south we've all been reminded of lake that johnson was just one of two presidents ever to be impeached was his impeachment really about this issue basically yes they gave a number of articles impeachment the maamun was the tenure of office act are which he violated by removing a cabinet member without the permission of congress iit was a law that was later found to be unconstitutional but it was the law at the time johnson was so recalcitrant about all of the efforts that are congress was making to try to bring blacks into citizenship and try to get control over the south are they got fed up with them essentially is what it was impeachment is the.
"congress iit" Discussed on TalkRadio 630 KHOW
"To his office in to the fbi near claims that this lawyer lied about his communications with former trump campaign adviser rick gates emma somebody else only identified as person a and moeller claims that bandres one deleted emails that his office requested concerning a report from two thousand twelve with ukraine's ministry of justice don't you love the double standard so here is a special council who's working for the fbi remember he he works for rod rosenstein the deputy director of the fbi of the upside the deputy attorney general that's who more works for here we have a case were more is guarding someone on a process crime committing perjury and obviously obstruction of justice four deleting emails yet were lois lerner in the internal revenue service delete emails and obstruct justice with the united states congress she's there were held to account when hillary clinton in whom abbott delete emails why that's just a simple mistake according to the fbi director with the difference if you wanna know what a banana republic is like this is a form of banana republicanism because we have one set of rules that were going to apply rumor going after one political party and we have a different set of rules when another political party is in office and we want to protect those officeholders or those people from criminal prosecution i don't know i don't care look let me tell you this about these processes crimes generally you use these process crimes because you don't have anything else on this lawyer so as which is why you should always be very careful if you're ever called testified before cox who i get who testified before congress iit's net cool get a lawyer i don't care if you're going to testify about whatever get a lawyer because then gift just by chance you ever get in on the radar of the fbi or anybody else with law enforcement authority in prosecution authority and what you said in the hearings differs from what you tell somebody else in an interview or a deposition to get a process crime perjury obstruction of justice and in this case it very well may be that this is all that more has on this lawyer any simply using this as pressure crying to circled the wagons the circle tighter and tighter implied that may be exactly what's going on that's fine that's.