30 Burst results for "Christina Bob"

Lt. Col. Oliver North (Ret.) Reacts to the Mar-a-Lago Raid

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

01:22 min | 3 months ago

Lt. Col. Oliver North (Ret.) Reacts to the Mar-a-Lago Raid

"North, your new book, I'm on it, launches today. You've got to get it. It's the giant awakes. It's about this FBI tough guy, one of the good FBI agents, Jake Cruz. It's a classic classic thriller. But I have to ask you, given what we've witnessed in the last ten days in America, and I love I've worked closely with the FBI for years. Some of the best guys there are former marines, lots of marines in the bureau, but how do you react to the events at Mar-a-Lago? Are you as horrified as I am? Oh, absolutely. I mean, it's unprecedented. I know that this afternoon they released some redacted portions of the so called affidavit that led to the raid, I very quickly let students before we sat down. I don't see anything in it that justified what took place. What I believe is about to happen said, is it probably right after the beginning of the final phase of the campaign for 2022. You're going to have a press conference held by the attorney general and probably the director of the FBI that announces that in the documents that they seized, they found evidence of a crime and the crime was remember, this was a fishing expedition. This wasn't going after a specific document. Here's what's kind of like the old days with a special prosecutor. I know, give us the man. This is right out of the communist doctrine. Give us the man. We'll find a crime.

FBI Jake Cruz Marines America
Big Tech Censorship With Alex Berenson

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

02:18 min | 3 months ago

Big Tech Censorship With Alex Berenson

"Going to read something to you that is truly shocking. It's an internal document, a communication on something called the slack platform from inside Twitter. And it's real and it's about a journalist. And it is about The White House wanting to take action against the journalist. They quote, they, The White House, wants to know about Alex berenson and the Slavic COVID adviser, suggested that they have seen data that he was the epicenter of disinformation towards the persuadable public. That description of what was going on inside of Twitter is chilling. And we are delighted to have with us the man who won his fight, at least one this battle against the censorious owners of Twitter, mister Alex berenson investigative journalist par excellence, welcome back to America first. Thanks for having me, Seth. All right, so I know you won a settlement, the courts served you well. But tell us what happened to you and your Twitter account and what you found out had been done with the collusion of The White House. Sure. So I will just say quickly before I go into the full story, that isn't actually the worst communication that we found so far. Go ahead. The worst one is another discussion on a Twitter slack channel against slack is something that employees at big companies use to talk to each other internally. Where they again reference this meeting that they had at The White House in April 2021. And in the language, I don't have the communication directly in front of me, but it almost says verbatim, they wanted to know why Alex berenson had been kicked. Oh, oh, oh, I'm sorry. That's the other part of the article that I highlighted. Okay, hang on. Let me give you the words right here because he's working off memory. Then this is the report of the discussion with The White House. They had one really tough question about why Alex berenson hasn't been kicked off the platform that Twitter employee wrote. Yes. Yes. And I expect I'm going to have more to report in the near future. And I expect that as soon as this practical, I'm going to be suing The White House and Andy slavitt,

Alex Berenson Twitter Covid White House Seth America Andy Slavitt
"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

07:19 min | 3 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"So telling them is kind of irrelevant. So let me just run something by you. I'm sure you are very professional, very diplomatic. However, from another source, I have heard that it got rather, let me say this heated, the behavior of the FBI was less than respectful to the office of the person whose home they were raiding. Did it get somewhat tense that day? Yeah. Yeah, it did. Initially, when I first got there, of course, I was heated. I was somewhat aggressive demanding to see the warrant and wanting an explanation for why they were there. They responded in like kind. And so yes, initially it was very heated. Neither of us wanted to create anything worse than what we were already experiencing. So it didn't get further than colorful exchange of words and kind of posturing and it only lasted for a minute or two with the FBI. It quickly calmed down and everything was fine. You know, the Department of Justice, the assistant U.S. attorney on site that I spoke to. It's the same type of thing. We were both kind of posturing trying to hold our ground and keep as much ground as we could in the situation. The AUSA made sure that I knew they had every right to do whatever they were doing. And that's all. Switching off cameras, not giving badge numbers, absolutely outrageous. That is the FBI's behavior. We're lucky that you were on the ground. She's going to stay with us. We're not letting her go anywhere for one more segment, follow her at Christina underscore bob. I know Sebastian well, listen to him. He's with us. We're finalizing that, oh, thank you, mister president. I like that lineup. We're finalizing the itinerary guys. It's almost time to go. It's a stand with Israel tour ten days in the Holy Land with me and my seldom colleague the national and his lovely wife Debbie join us for the trip of a lifetime. You'll be with us standing there on the shores of the Sea of Galilee. The Temple Mount in Jerusalem and the garden of gethsemane, even if you've been to Israel before, you haven't been with me and dinesh. I'm not vaccinated and I'm going. They've dropped all their COVID restrictions. So you've got no excuse. Register today reserve your places. It's not going to be open for a very, very long call 8 5 5 6 5 55 19 or just go to stand with Israel to dot com. That's 8 5 5 5 6 5 55 19 stand with Israel to dot com. We are back with Christina bob follow her on Twitter Christina underscore bob bob attorney to my former boss president Trump couple of short statements, official statements from president Trump. America has never suffered this kind of abuse in law enforcement for the FBI to raid the home of the 45th president of the United States or any president for that matter is totally unheard of and unthinkable. This break in was a sneak attack on democracy. Our republic and was both unannounced and done at a time when the president was not even present. It was for political, not legal reasons and our entire country is angry, hurt, and greatly embarrassed by it, make America great again. Just a few moments ago, the latest statement from the president, wow. In the raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, they stole stole my three passports, one expired, along with everything else. If you're wondering why he has multiple passports, I had three passports, okay? You can have a regular one, a diplomatic one, an official one. They're all different colors, depending upon what role you're using when you're traveling. Are you going on a diplomatic mission or not? So there's nothing hinky or weird about that. This is an assault on a political opponent at a level never seen before in our country. Third world, a Christina, I don't know what else is going to come out of this. I did that stealing the president's passports as if he's some kind of drug lord they want to prevent fleeing the country. Let's go back to the initial raid. How did it happen? Did you know about it in advance they tell you some people say that the Secret Service was informed, was this a surprise to you? Yes, this was a surprise to me and to my knowledge, it was a surprise to everybody involved. We had been very cooperative, like I said, we had a meeting in June with the FBI and a member of the DoJ. And gave them access to whatever they wanted. They wanted to see the storage unit. So we escorted them down and showed them the storage unit and turned over everything that we believed was responsive to their requests and president Trump himself told them anything that they want, make sure make sure that the FBI and DoJ get access to anything they want. You know, we have nothing to hide. We're open doors, open books. So you can see whatever you want. And then we did that. And then the very next thing that happened was this raid. So let me just be specific here. When they were very June, they inspected everything. You gave them whatever documents they wanted. They said, hey, can you put a better lock on the archive room and you did? Did they at that time say, by the way, we're leaving now, but we think that you've stolen some nuclear secrets and we'll be back in two months with guns. Did they say that? No, you know, they left that part out. That was not part of the conversation. And we made it very clear that, you know, we've tried to be as cooperative as we can. You know, the requests were not specific. The requests were not, we think you have X document Y document Z document. Can you turn it over? It just said, give us what you've got. It was a very general request. And we responded to it as best we could. And the way that we thought was appropriate, and then this rate happens. And so it's unprecedented, not just that they rated the personal residence of the president, but they weren't particularly specific in what they wanted. For example, when they raided Rudy Giuliani's home, they had very specific requests about what they were looking for, his devices. They got that and they left. They didn't ransack the house. They didn't go through everything. Right. Exactly what they needed. Which leads us to the conclusion that this is a fishing expedition. They want to stop him, and they just fishing for anything they can exploit. Christina, we've got a minute left I have to ask you. I haven't bugged him since this happened. I'm going to write him and send him a note, but how is president Trump doing? How are his spirits? How has this affected him? He is more determined than ever to make America great again to save this great nation. He believes in what we stand for, believes in the American people, and he recognizes that this is a political attack. And he is not about to cower to anything or anybody, and he stands for what we all stand for, American freedom, and making sure. And if anything, it's just more he's more resolved to do that. Well, that's why he must be destroyed because he loves America and he's fighting for all Americans, guys. That's why nobody owns him, nobody controls him. This administration is in a tailspin. They are so afraid afraid of him. They are stealing his passports. That's all you have.

FBI Israel DoJ America president Trump Debbie join Christina bob Christina underscore Christina AUSA Trump bob bob Sea of Galilee dinesh gethsemane Temple Mount Sebastian Jerusalem bob Secret Service
Trump's Attorney Christina Bobb Describes Tension During the FBI Raid

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

01:21 min | 3 months ago

Trump's Attorney Christina Bobb Describes Tension During the FBI Raid

"You are very professional, very diplomatic. However, from another source, I have heard that it got rather, let me say this heated, the behavior of the FBI was less than respectful to the office of the person whose home they were raiding. Did it get somewhat tense that day? Yeah. Yeah, it did. Initially, when I first got there, of course, I was heated. I was somewhat aggressive demanding to see the warrant and wanting an explanation for why they were there. They responded in like kind. And so yes, initially it was very heated. Neither of us wanted to create anything worse than what we were already experiencing. So it didn't get further than colorful exchange of words and kind of posturing and it only lasted for a minute or two with the FBI. It quickly calmed down and everything was fine. You know, the Department of Justice, the assistant U.S. attorney on site that I spoke to. It's the same type of thing. We were both kind of posturing trying to hold our ground and keep as much ground as we could in the situation. The AUSA made sure that I knew they had every right to do whatever they were doing. And that's all. Switching off cameras, not giving badge numbers, absolutely outrageous. That is the FBI's behavior.

FBI Department Of Justice Ausa U.S.
"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

05:21 min | 3 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"Okay, one of the most important guests we could have on the show. I think we need to reach out to president Trump as well, get him back on the show. But we have an eyewitness to what happened at Mar-a-Lago last week. She is an attorney to my former boss president Trump, Christina bob. Welcome to America first. Thank you so much. I'm so excited to be here. All right, so let's do a sanity check. You're gonna be our verification. This is a former FBI agent called Stuart Kaplan, who gives us his understanding of what happened at Mar-a-Lago, cut 8 play cut. We know through her own statements, she was restricted and kept out if Christina bob was allowed to come in, she would have said, hey, guys, what are you looking for? Let me make your life a lot easier. Here are the documents here in the boxes. Be on your way and leave. I can only conclude one thing, Dan. The fact that they would prevent a council or a lawyer or the target of a search warrant to be prevented from watching just as a bird's eye view and keep in mind, I understand officer safety. We don't want to let anybody impede or obstruct the search. But it would always be one reason. And that stand because they came in there, not really knowing what the hell they were looking for. It was a fishing expedition. They went through everything. They rifled through everything and they were hoping they were going to find some smoking gun. No, I don't know if you're like a triple quadruple black belt in ninjutsu, maybe you're a super dangerous person to 300 pound FBI agents in ceramic plated bulletproof vests. But what actually happened? Is that true were you kept out of the building? How did the raid go down? Give us a blow by blow, please, Christina, as eyewitness. Yeah, he was exactly right. I arrived on scene after I got a phone call that the FBI was braiding Mar-a-Lago, and I needed to respond so I got down there about ten 30. They had been there for a while, so I'm guessing they got their maybe 9 o'clock, probably no earlier than 8 o'clock in the morning. And I reached out to the FBI agents in charge there and I said, you know, I want to see a warrant. They pushed back. They originally didn't even want to let me see the warrant. We fought for I got to stop you here. I'm no lawyer. I'm no longer, but even if you're going into a crack house, my understanding and correct, I know I'm an immigrant. I only became an American citizen in 2012. My understanding is you must show the front page of a warrant to the person whose property you are rating. Am I wrong on that? Right. That's my understanding as well. And of course, I made that argument loud and clear to which they did then show me the warrant. They allowed me to see it. They did not give me a copy until the very end so about 9 or so hours later. I was actually given the copy, but initially I got to see it, they took it away, and then I just started to follow them thinking naturally, I'm going to go watch and see what they're doing and they stop me and said, you know, basically, you can't leave the parking lot. I was relegated to the circle drive there at Mar-a-Lago right outside the ballroom. And you know, for those that see the aerial pictures, that big circle at the front, I mean, I could stand there. That's about as far as I could go. Was there anybody else who works for the president? Is a member of his family who is allowed to go in the building while they raided Melania's closet? Not to my knowledge. No, I don't think they let anybody as far as the family goes. I do think Secret Service, escorted them around the property, but and I have tremendous respect for Secret Service, not in any way trying to question them, but that's different than having a member of the family or legal counsel present. But Secret Service were there, I believe. That's true. There are reports Christina that they requested the FBI wanted to have the security cameras at Mar-a-Lago's switched off while they searched the rooms. Yeah, they did. They tried to get the cameras turned off. And initially, I think, I don't know exactly, but my understanding of the story was that initially the maintenance crew at the at Mar-a-Lago complied initially. And then, you know, they got the attorneys involved, and they said, nope, you don't have to turn them off. I believe by the time I arrived, they had been turned back on. So if they were off, they were only. Did they give a reason as to why if this was a legal warrant? Why they wanted to not be seen as to what they would do. That's a really good question. No, they didn't give a reason. And I, of course, pulled out my cell phone and started filming everything for legal legal preservation, trying to document everything that was happening. They tried to get me to stop filming. I politely, as I was capable in the moment, declined to turn my camera off. So I did what I could and documented everything that I could. But they were very much trying to get me to not film, you know, not do anything to record who was there. I asked for badge numbers of the officers. They wouldn't give me badge numbers. The FBI agent in charge there did tell me his name, so I put that down, you know, sent that to the attorneys in Washington, D.C., but as far as who actually was in the house, they only gave that to Secret Service, obviously anybody who enters the president's president. But the Secret Service doesn't own the property. They're not the targets of the war in the secret services utterly irrelevant in terms of constitutional law, most homes in America don't have Secret Service protection..

president Trump Christina bob FBI Stuart Kaplan Secret Service Christina Melania Lago Dan America Washington, D.C.
Sebastian Talks to President Trump's Attorney Christina Bobb

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

02:30 min | 3 months ago

Sebastian Talks to President Trump's Attorney Christina Bobb

"An eyewitness to what happened at Mar-a-Lago last week. She is an attorney to my former boss president Trump, Christina bob. Welcome to America first. Thank you so much. I'm so excited to be here. All right, so let's do a sanity check. You're gonna be our verification. This is a former FBI agent called Stuart Kaplan, who gives us his understanding of what happened at Mar-a-Lago, cut 8 play cut. We know through her own statements, she was restricted and kept out if Christina bob was allowed to come in, she would have said, hey, guys, what are you looking for? Let me make your life a lot easier. Here are the documents here in the boxes. Be on your way and leave. I can only conclude one thing, Dan. The fact that they would prevent a council or a lawyer or the target of a search warrant to be prevented from watching just as a bird's eye view and keep in mind, I understand officer safety. We don't want to let anybody impede or obstruct the search. But it would always be one reason. And that stand because they came in there, not really knowing what the hell they were looking for. It was a fishing expedition. They went through everything. They rifled through everything and they were hoping they were going to find some smoking gun. No, I don't know if you're like a triple quadruple black belt in ninjutsu, maybe you're a super dangerous person to 300 pound FBI agents in ceramic plated bulletproof vests. But what actually happened? Is that true were you kept out of the building? How did the raid go down? Give us a blow by blow, please, Christina, as eyewitness. Yeah, he was exactly right. I arrived on scene after I got a phone call that the FBI was braiding Mar-a-Lago, and I needed to respond so I got down there about ten 30. They had been there for a while, so I'm guessing they got their maybe 9 o'clock, probably no earlier than 8 o'clock in the morning. And I reached out to the FBI agents in charge there and I said, you know, I want to see a warrant. They pushed back. They originally didn't even want to let me see the warrant. We fought for I got to stop you here. I'm no lawyer. I'm no longer, but even if you're going into a crack house, my understanding and correct, I know I'm an immigrant. I only became an American citizen in 2012. My understanding is you must show the front page of a warrant to the person whose property you are rating. Am I wrong on that? Right. That's my understanding as well. And of course, I made that argument loud and clear

Christina Bob President Trump Stuart Kaplan FBI America DAN Christina
"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

03:07 min | 3 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"At least not from the facts. You've got to watch this gentleman show every night, 6 o'clock eastern on real America's voice, the book is fallout, nuclear bribes, Russian spies, and the Washington lies that enrich the Clinton and Biden dynasties. Let me just put a headline up here that I'm sure you found is amusing as I did. This is from The New York Times regarding the Mar-a-Lago raid Eric. Flash that headline up on the screen. Trump claims he declassified all the documents at Mar-a-Lago, even if that's true, it probably doesn't matter. That's quite a headline, John, isn't it? Well, it's typical for The New York Times, which is what they don't have, in fact, they substitute opinion for it, right? Probably maybe could have should have, that's not a headline that journalists should be writing. They should stick to the facts. And over the weekend, one of the great authors at the Washington at The New York Times. Maggie haberman was taking me on saying, you can't possibly be cooperating when you get a subpoena. I did send her back in 1998 story in The New York Times appointed out that The New York Times said she was Hillary Clinton was cooperating with the subpoena and Bill Clinton's operating to be in there. But she completely contorted my words. I said that he got his opinion, and then they did things cooperatively like allow the FBI to take a tour of the building. She has tried to cast aspersion on anything that isn't the official argument of The New York Times. I don't know. I used to read The New York Times seriously every day. I still read it, but now sometimes to find bad examples of journalism, I scratch my head on a daily basis for the way they conduct themselves as journalists. No neutrality and substituting opinion for facts when they don't have facts. Well, if you want bad examples of journalism, anything that Maggie haberman writes is a good place to start. We've only got a minute left. It kind of sparked my interest when I saw it in the final list of items taken from Mar-a-Lago that was leaked at the weekend. You also find it found it very interesting. What is the discrepancy with one of the items and the reason given for the ray John? Well, listen, this is a national security. They were trying to recover classified documents according to the search warrant. One of the first items they took, the president's executive privilege covered file on why he gave a pardon to Roger Stone. What does that have to do with the national security or classified documents? Nothing that we can tell them. Now, maybe something will change. But to me, that was the biggest red flag on a list. Most of the other items unless we're very generically described, but this one was very specific. Why do they need a Roger Stone pardon file as part of an effort to recover classified documents? I don't know. I'm scratching my head thinking that maybe there's more to this story than what the search warrant gives us. Yeah, because it's about nuclear weapons and espionage. That's why we need Roger Stone's pardon file. It stinks to high heaven. I know somebody who's going to get to the bottom of it. The man with amazing connections, doing it for decades, and he's a real journalist, follow him a J Solomon report, the book is fallout. God bless you, John, keep sending me those stories so we can push them out to all of our millions of listeners and followers across the nation..

The New York Times Maggie haberman Roger Stone Washington Biden Trump ray John Clinton Eric Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton America FBI John J Solomon
John Solomon Shares His Reaction to Peter Strzok's FBI Comments

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

02:00 min | 3 months ago

John Solomon Shares His Reaction to Peter Strzok's FBI Comments

"Solomon is always on the beat. John, welcome back to America first. Yeah, to be with you. All right, so I don't know if you might have heard of this person that the FBI is at a topic of some discussion lately and there's a form. I think is a former FBI guy called Peter stroke, who you may have heard of who had this to say on MSNBC about his former agency, John. Well, Joe, absolutely. The American public should trust what the FBI is doing. You know what's funny is I think back the year and a half that I spent with the team looking at Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server. There is no concern. There is no outrage on behalf of any Republican. As we used search warrants, as we went out and did a very invasive investigation to try and get to the bottom of what she did or didn't do. So it's not that the FBI is targeting any one side or the other. Oh, so everybody's treated equally, John. I mean, you know this as well as anybody else. Ryo reaction to Peter stroke, the man with the most famous smirk in Washington, D.C., given your amazing coverage at just the news dot com. I know he's supposed to be an expert and I'm sure he was. I'm not going to call any question his career, but when I first reported that the FBI had used a grand jury subpoena in June to get the records from president Trump, he was casting doubt on the casting down on the FBI doesn't do that. This must be wrong. And then CNN reporting, oh, I guess it's right. It was the funniest thing to watch him do the 360. On social media. This is a guy paid to just say things right now, right? And I think we have to look at the record of those investigations. What did the IG say about the Hillary Clinton investigation? The FBI illegally usurped the authority of the Justice Department to make it conclusion that not the prosecutor that should have been left for the prosecutors. Peter struck was part of an investigation that the Justice Department inspector general went in specifically criticized as illegal improper, not handled properly thanks to James Comey.

FBI Peter Stroke John Washington, D.C. Solomon Hillary Clinton Msnbc President Trump RYO JOE America CNN IG Justice Department Peter James Comey
Donald Trump Claims FBI Seized Three Passports During Raid

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

01:33 min | 3 months ago

Donald Trump Claims FBI Seized Three Passports During Raid

"Few moments ago, the latest statement from the president, wow. In the raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, they stole stole my three passports, one expired, along with everything else. If you're wondering why there's multiple passports, I had three passports, okay? You can have a regular one, a diplomatic one, an official one. They're all different colors, depending upon what role you're using when you're traveling. Are you going on a diplomatic mission or not? So there's nothing hinky or weird about that. This is an assault on a political opponent at a level, never seen before in our country. Third world, a Christina, I don't know what else is going to come out of this. I did that stealing the president's passports as if he's some kind of drug lord they want to prevent fleeing the country. Let's go back to the initial raid. How did it happen? Did you know about it in advance, they tell you some people say that the Secret Service was informed, was this a surprise to you? Yes, this was a surprise to me and to my knowledge. It was a surprise to everybody involved. We had been very cooperative, like I said, we had a meeting in June with the FBI and a member of the DoJ and gave them access to whatever they wanted. They wanted to see the storage unit, so we escorted them down and showed them the storage unit and turned over everything that we believed was responsive to their requests, then president Trump himself told them anything that they want, make sure make sure that the FBI and DoJ get access to anything they want. You know, we have nothing to hide. We're open, open doors, open books. So

FBI Christina Secret Service DOJ Donald Trump
"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

03:41 min | 3 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"There. That's about as far as I could go. Was there anybody else who works for the president? Is a member of his family who is allowed to go in the building while they raided Melania's closet? Not to my knowledge. No, I don't think they let anybody as far as the family goes. I do think Secret Service, escorted them around the property, but and I have tremendous respect for Secret Service, not in any way trying to question them, but that's different than having a member of the family or legal counsel present. But Secret Service were there, I believe. There are reports Christina that they requested the FBI wanted to have the security cameras at Mar-a-Lago's switched off while they searched the rooms. Yeah, they did. They tried to get the cameras turned off. And initially, I think, I don't know exactly, but my understanding of the story was that initially the maintenance crew at Mar-a-Lago complied initially. And then, you know, they got the attorneys involved, and they said, nope, you don't have to turn them off. I believe by the time I arrived, they had been turned back on. So if they were off, they were only. Did they give a reason as to why if this was a legal warrant? Why they wanted to not be seen as to what they would do? Yeah. That's a really good question. No, they didn't give a reason. And I, of course, pulled out my cell phone and started filming everything for legal legal preservation, trying to document everything that was happening. They tried to get me to stop filming. I politely, as I was capable in the moment, declined to turn my camera off. So I did what I could and documented everything that I could, but they were very much trying to get me to not film, you know, not do anything to record who was there. I asked for badge numbers of the officers. They wouldn't give me badge numbers. The FBI agent in charge there did tell me his name, so I put that down, you know, sent that to the attorneys in Washington, D.C., but as far as who actually was in the house, they only gave that to Secret Service, obviously anybody who enters the president's president. But the Secret Service doesn't own the property. They're not the targets of the war and the Secret Service is utterly irrelevant in terms of constitutional law, most homes in America don't have Secret Service protection. So telling them is kind of irrelevant. So let me just run something by you. I'm sure you are very professional, very diplomatic. However, from another source, I have heard that it got rather, let me say this heated, the behavior of the FBI was less than respectful to the office of the person whose home they were raiding. Did it get somewhat tense that day? Yeah. Yeah, it did. Initially, when I first got there, of course, I was heated. I was somewhat aggressive demanding to see the warrant and wanting an explanation for why they were there. They responded in like kind. And so yes, initially it was very heated. Neither of us wanted to create anything worse than what we were already experiencing. So it didn't get further than a colorful exchange of words and kind of posturing and it only lasted for a minute or two with the FBI. It quickly calmed down and everything was fine. You know, the Department of Justice, the assistant U.S. attorney on site that I spoke to. It's the same type of thing. We were both kind of posturing trying to hold our ground and keep as much ground as we could in the situation. And the AUSA made sure that I knew they had every right to do whatever they were doing. And that switching off cameras, not giving badge numbers, absolutely outrageous. That is the FBI's behavior. We're lucky that you were on the.

Secret Service Melania Lago FBI Washington, D.C. Christina U.S. Department of Justice AUSA
Trump Lawyer Christina Bobb Describes the FBI's Conduct at Mar-a-Lago

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

02:14 min | 3 months ago

Trump Lawyer Christina Bobb Describes the FBI's Conduct at Mar-a-Lago

"Was there anybody else who works for the president? Is a member of his family who is allowed to go in the building while they raided Melania's closet? Not to my knowledge. No, I don't think they let anybody as far as the family goes. I do think Secret Service, escorted them around the property, but and I have tremendous respect for Secret Service, not in any way trying to question them, but that's different than having a member of the family or legal counsel present. But Secret Service were there, I believe. There are reports Christina that they requested the FBI wanted to have the security cameras at Mar-a-Lago's switched off while they searched the rooms. Yeah, they did. They tried to get the cameras turned off. And initially, I think, I don't know exactly, but my understanding of the story was that initially the maintenance crew at Mar-a-Lago complied initially. And then, you know, they got the attorneys involved, and they said, nope, you don't have to turn them off. I believe by the time I arrived, they had been turned back on. So if they were off, they were only. Did they give a reason as to why if this was a legal warrant? Why they wanted to not be seen as to what they would do? Yeah. That's a really good question. No, they didn't give a reason. And I, of course, pulled out my cell phone and started filming everything for legal legal preservation, trying to document everything that was happening. They tried to get me to stop filming. I politely, as I was capable in the moment, declined to turn my camera off. So I did what I could and documented everything that I could, but they were very much trying to get me to not film, you know, not do anything to record who was there. I asked for badge numbers of the officers. They wouldn't give me badge numbers. The FBI agent in charge there did tell me his name, so I put that down, you know, sent that to the attorneys in Washington, D.C., but as far as who actually was in the house, they only gave that to Secret Service, obviously anybody who enters the president's president. But the Secret Service doesn't own the property. They're not the targets of the war and the Secret Service is utterly irrelevant in terms of constitutional law, most homes in America don't have Secret Service protection. So telling them is kind of irrelevant.

Secret Service Melania Lago FBI Christina Washington, D.C. America
"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

05:09 min | 3 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"Arcade to get $5 or more on your first purchase of ten bucks or more promo code GOR KA. Angelina tells us to stay down I think and keep away from the Windows. She's a veteran, even before she's reached her teenage years. Smartphone apps show alerts spreading across the country and thoughts turn to home. I want to go home, the more they shoot, the more I want to go back, she says. But Angelina has no idea what awaits her mother couldn't look after her, and they were separated poor Angelina, that's one of the children that is a displaced refugee, her father's gone to war, separated from her mother. However, the war started is irrelevant right now. There are children suffering millions who are hungry who are starving are lord and say you're told us come unto me the little children. You can help today. If you have done all right, if you've weathered the COVID storm, if you're surviving, let's try and get food to these people. Food for the poor has connected with local pastors in Ukraine. They've already shipped 11 million meals to them, but they need to help these children further as the battles rage. Please make a donation today. You can call them directly at 8 5 5 three three zero hope or just go to my website, said go to dot com and click on the help Ukraine banner, a donation of just $50 because they have the food already already. They just have to ship it to the battlefield. $50 provides 200 meals for these children and their mothers. A $100, one time gift of a $100 is 400 meals. Make a difference to date. It's one of the most blessed things, the most godly things you can do called 855-330-4743 or just go to SEB or KA said gorka dot com and click on the help Ukraine banner. Okay, one of the most important guests we could have on the show. I think we need to reach out to president Trump as well, get him back on the show. But we have an eyewitness to what happened at Mar-a-Lago last week. She is an attorney to my former boss president Trump, Christina bob, welcome to America first. Thank you so much. I'm so excited to be here. All right, so let's do a sanity check. You're gonna be our verification. This is a former FBI agent called Stuart Kaplan, who gives us his understanding of what happened at Mar-a-Lago, cut 8 play cut. We know through her own statements, she was restricted and kept out if Christina bob was allowed to come in, she would have said, hey, guys, what are you looking for? Let me make your life a lot easier. Here are the documents. Here are the boxes. Be on your way and leave. I can only conclude one thing, Dan. The fact that they would prevent a council or a lawyer or the target of a search warrant to be prevented from watching just as a bird's eye view and keep in mind, I understand officer safety. We don't want to let anybody impede or obstruct a search. But it would always be one reason. And that Stan because they came in there, not really knowing what the hell they were looking for. It was a fishing expedition. They went through everything. They rifled through everything and they were hoping they were going to find some smoking gun. No, I don't know if you're like a triple quadruple black belt in ninjutsu, maybe you're a super dangerous person to 300 pound FBI agents in ceramic plated bulletproof vests. But what actually happened? Is that true were you kept out of the building? How did the raid go down? Give us a blow by blow, please, Christina, as eyewitness. Yeah, he was exactly right. I arrived on scene after I got a phone call that the FBI was braiding Mar-a-Lago, and I needed to respond so I got down there about ten 30. They had been there for a while, so I'm guessing they got their maybe 9 o'clock, probably no earlier than 8 o'clock in the morning. And I reached out to the FBI agents in charge there and I said, you know, I want to see a warrant. They pushed back. They originally didn't even want to let me see the warrant. We fought. I got to stop you here. I'm no lawyer. I'm no longer, but even if you're going into a crack house, my understanding and correct, I know I'm an immigrant. I only became an American citizen in 2012. My understanding is you must show the front page of a warrant to the person whose property you are rating. Am I wrong on that? Right. That's my understanding as well. And of course, I made that argument loud and clear to which they did then show me the warrant. They allowed me to see it. They did not give me a copy until the very end of about 9 or so hours later. I was actually given the copy, but initially I got to see it, they took it away, and then I just started to follow them thinking naturally, I'm going to go watch and see what they're doing and they stop me and said, you know, basically you can't leave the parking lot. I was relegated to the circle drive there at Mar-a-Lago right outside the ballroom. And you know, for those that see the aerial pictures, that big circle at the front, I mean, I could stand.

Angelina president Trump Christina bob Ukraine FBI Stuart Kaplan SEB Stan Dan America Christina
Sebastian Talks Mar-a-Lago Raid With Trump Lawyer Christina Bobb

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

02:43 min | 3 months ago

Sebastian Talks Mar-a-Lago Raid With Trump Lawyer Christina Bobb

"Most important guests we could have on the show. I think we need to reach out to president Trump as well, get him back on the show. But we have an eyewitness to what happened at Mar-a-Lago last week. She is an attorney to my former boss president Trump, Christina bob, welcome to America first. Thank you so much. I'm so excited to be here. All right, so let's do a sanity check. You're gonna be our verification. This is a former FBI agent called Stuart Kaplan, who gives us his understanding of what happened at Mar-a-Lago, cut 8 play cut. We know through her own statements, she was restricted and kept out if Christina bob was allowed to come in, she would have said, hey, guys, what are you looking for? Let me make your life a lot easier. Here are the documents. Here are the boxes. Be on your way and leave. I can only conclude one thing, Dan. The fact that they would prevent a council or a lawyer or the target of a search warrant to be prevented from watching just as a bird's eye view and keep in mind, I understand officer safety. We don't want to let anybody impede or obstruct a search. But it would always be one reason. And that Stan because they came in there, not really knowing what the hell they were looking for. It was a fishing expedition. They went through everything. They rifled through everything and they were hoping they were going to find some smoking gun. No, I don't know if you're like a triple quadruple black belt in ninjutsu, maybe you're a super dangerous person to 300 pound FBI agents in ceramic plated bulletproof vests. But what actually happened? Is that true were you kept out of the building? How did the raid go down? Give us a blow by blow, please, Christina, as eyewitness. Yeah, he was exactly right. I arrived on scene after I got a phone call that the FBI was braiding Mar-a-Lago, and I needed to respond so I got down there about ten 30. They had been there for a while, so I'm guessing they got their maybe 9 o'clock, probably no earlier than 8 o'clock in the morning. And I reached out to the FBI agents in charge there and I said, you know, I want to see a warrant. They pushed back. They originally didn't even want to let me see the warrant. We fought. I got to stop you here. I'm no lawyer. I'm no longer, but even if you're going into a crack house, my understanding and correct, I know I'm an immigrant. I only became an American citizen in 2012. My understanding is you must show the front page of a warrant to the person whose property you are rating. Am I wrong on that? Right. That's my understanding as well. And of course, I made that argument loud and clear to which they did then show me the warrant. They allowed me to see it. They did not give me a copy until the very end of about 9 or so hours later. I

President Trump Christina Bob Stuart Kaplan FBI Stan America DAN Christina
"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

05:23 min | 3 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"Later. Number one, the archives excuse. What was second? The second unbelievably was the nuclear codes that president Trump had kept with him. Materials of the highest Q clearance referring to our nuclear weapons. Which is strange because if you know how the Q clearance and the weapons launching system works in America, it's not like there's a piece of paper with a number on it and president Trump keeps it in his pocket and it never changes from administration to administration. It's called the nuclear football. It's carried by a man who walks within 30 feet of the incumbent president, which now sadly happens to be Joe Biden. So what are we saying that the nuclear that he took the nuclear football and put it in the closet in Melania's wardrobe? And Mar-a-Lago? And when people laughed at that, people like Rick grenell, former ambassador, former director of national intelligence, posts quite amusing memes of president Trump in The White House with a couple of nuclear bombs when people realize even that excuse is already crumbling after less than 24 hours. What's the latest this weekend? Oh, we had to raid his home because of contraventions of the espionage act from a hundred years ago. Excuse me? The espionage act, let me get this straight. So using the statute that we use to execute the rosenbergs to rest and have shocked people in time of war, because what did president Trump do exactly? Did he give a napkin with little Kim's signature? To his wife? Or they're actually positing what? The designs for the stealth bomber were stolen by president Trump and then put it in a FedEx envelope to the Kremlin? Are these people insane? This is despite the fact that this is the man who did what in office to our enemies. May I, enumerate what he did to our enemies. With Russia, he blocked the Nord stream pipeline. He had the Defense Department target and kill more than 200 Russian mercenaries in Syria who are destabilizing the region. He had the chemical weapons cash of the Assad regime bombed into oblivion by 52 crews missiles. He declared a trade war against China, and with his mean tweets remember the nasty mean tweets. He sent a very clear message to that peculiar poor kind little individual in Pyongyang. He said, you dare threaten America. And I will turn your sad stalinist country into a sheet of molten glass. Oh, and then thanks to the work that Steve and I did, the president canceled the JCPOA Ron deal. The finance one of our biggest enemies. So the guy that took on Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China. Oh, and by the way, sorry, how dumb of me crushed the ISIS caliphate unleashed jsoc brag. The seals to destroy the most dangerous global jihadi organization in the world. He's the guy that their imputing espionage crimes to. The FBI has to be dismantled. The next president of the United States must be Donald Trump. Why? Not because of any personal loyalty I have to him, although he values loyalty. And I value his support. As a former commission political officer of The White House, it has to be Donald Trump because he's the only one. Who will do what needs to be done, he knows. The power of the feds to destroy innocent people. Nobody else will do what has to be done. And by the way, thanks, Lisa Monaco. Thank Susan Rice. Thanks, Merrick Garland. Thanks, Christopher wray. You just made him more powerful than he's ever been before..

president Trump Melania Rick grenell football Joe Biden Trump United States White House Russia Defense Department FedEx Assad Kim China Syria Pyongyang Donald Trump North Korea Steve
"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

03:51 min | 3 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast

"I don't think we're a republic anymore. I would say that we're in a transition to a radical democracy. And by that, I mean that what anybody wants to do on any given day if they have the power or the votes they do it. So we don't respect the immigration law. People in the administration want to get rid of it and make the border open. They do it. If you want to have a warrant for a particular FBI operation, you can find a judge and you do it. So what I'm getting at Mark is if you have an agenda and you feel you have elected power, you don't respect any guardrails or prohibitions that constitutional republic set up to prevent the abuse of power. So on any given day, this administration can do what they want. And that's how they operate. I mean, to use an ancient example, they want to kill Socrates on Monday they can do it and say it's legal. Probably one of the wisest men alive in America today. That's a regular guest on this show Victor Davis Hanson of Stamford university. On the Mark Levin show. And he's absolutely right. Today, truth is unimportant. Power serves those who are in power. And if they want to call you a criminal, they call you a criminal. They deploy the FBI against you. I'm Sebastian gulf, this is America first and you're listening and watching the Salem news channel. We have a very, very full, full show for you today. We will have the lawyer, president Trump's lawyer Christina bob on with us next, who was there when the FBI arrived with guns to raid the private home of a man who, less than 24 months ago, was the commander in chief, was the president, will be joined by John Solomon of Justin reports, will be joined by former seal and FBI agent Jonathan gillim and Natalie winter. So you don't want to miss one second. Let me give you so much to say. Let me give you the first most important thing that you need to appreciate. Which is the whip lash force. Of how the narrative of what occurred at Mar-a-Lago. Has been covered, not really covered, attempted, explained away by the mainstream media, and by this administration. What was the first excuse? For raiding the home. Of the president. We were told it had to do with the national archives. That there were documents that belonged to the U.S. government, and that had to be returned. And that is why, despite being there, just a couple of months ago and taking away 15 boxes of documentation, they had to come back, not to just ask for documents, but to raid Melania Trump's wardrobe, to break the lock off the archived door that the FBI had demanded they put in place during their prior visit. To break into the empty safe to bring a safe cracker. Because government documents had to go into the archive. Despite the fact that every president has a sometimes decades long discussion between his lawyers and the U.S. government about which documents are his personal letters from heads of state, momentos no, no, no, in this case, we're going to come to your house and we're going to rate it two months.

FBI Stamford university Sebastian gulf president Trump Christina bob John Solomon Victor Davis Hanson Jonathan gillim Natalie winter Mark Levin Socrates America Mark Melania Trump Justin U.S. government
Christina Bobb: Trump Knows America Is Saying 'This Is Too Much'

ToddCast Podcast with Todd Starnes

01:17 min | 3 months ago

Christina Bobb: Trump Knows America Is Saying 'This Is Too Much'

"Had a chance to speak to the president since the since the raid? I have. And what is his mood? Is he fired up over this? Is he angry? All of the above. You know, I think he shares the same sentiment that America shares. Yes, it was his personal residence, and it's a personal violation to him, but it's a violation on our nation and everything that we stand for and why we have a Bill of rights. And why we have a right against unlawful search of the seizures and why there's certain requirements that the government needs to follow to make sure that we remain a free and safe society. And so in a sense, all of us have been violated in that regard and it's not just with president Trump. It's the theory of unlawful actions that the FBI and the Department of Justice have taken against any Trump supporters or Trump associates or staff members, but he has. And so if anything, I think he just wants to make sure the American people keep the country that we have. And so this isn't scaring anybody. This isn't causing anyone to cower and go, oh, okay, maybe this time we'll coward to the FBI because they've only done it a hundred times before. So I think president Trump along with his team and I think most of America are saying, this is too much. This is too far and we have to push back.

President Trump Trump Associates Seizures America FBI Department Of Justice Donald Trump
Christina Bobb: DOJ Has Been Quiet Following FBI Raid at Mar-A-Lago

ToddCast Podcast with Todd Starnes

00:31 sec | 3 months ago

Christina Bobb: DOJ Has Been Quiet Following FBI Raid at Mar-A-Lago

"Quick here before we jump back into the time machine. Any updates you can share with us regarding the investigation and the documents that the FBI got their hands on. Well, I would love to know an update. I mean, the Department of Justice has been pretty quiet on this. I think they owe the nation an explanation for what they did. They certainly haven't provided it. So I know the legal team in Washington D.C. is coordinating with them and working with them. But yeah, I'm still waiting for an explanation.

FBI Department Of Justice Washington D.C.
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

05:45 min | 4 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

"I'm back with Trump attorney Christina bob. We're talking about the FBI raid, the motives for it, the implications of it. Christina, I know as a lawyer, you can't go into the details of the warrant, but what can you tell us because initially it seemed like the raid was motivated by sort of January 6th, the January 6th committee, maybe a attempts to find out any links between Trump and what happened on January 6th. Now I'm hearing that it's not about that at all. In fact, I'm hearing it's about sort of the national records act. It seems downright preposterous. I mean, as if what to get the archive straight, they have to raid the home of the former president. What can you tell us about the warrant and what you know about, well, let's not call it the reason, but at least the pretext for the raid. Yeah. No, you're exactly right. It is as preposterous as you think it is. It is all about Nora and the records preservation act. As far as I can tell, it has nothing to do with January 6th. They say that they were looking for presidential records as we mentioned. It's the president who gets to decide what a presidential record is. And potential crimes of releasing classified information or something to that. The fact that that was what they were looking for. So they have basically turned the FBI into overzealous librarians is what this is all about, but it's all about supposedly, you know, you've got Hunter Biden with his laptop and just closing a foreign tire and the kickbacks from foreign countries. And thereafter Donald Trump because he kept a handwritten note from the prime minister that they think belongs at the archives. I mean, it is as preposterous as you think it is. I mean, if you look at the wording of this national records act, it has the usual boilerplate about records will be preserved. They won't be altered. They won't be destroyed, but I mean, no one's ever heard of presumably did the clintons take a whole bunch of stuff out of The White House when they left. I mean, I mean, they didn't just take records. They took like furniture, a curios painting, things like that, and there was apparently some negotiation about some of it that ended up going back, but it was all handled with extreme discretion. There was certainly no FBI rating the Clinton residents. I mean, the sheer brazen politicization of this seems just downright obvious. Is it aren't the American people gonna see right through it? I sure hope that. And I'm so grateful for you using your platform to point out the obvious. This clearly isn't about preservation of White House furniture and anybody who thinks that Donald Trump would take furniture from The White House, obviously had not been to Mar-a-Lago or bedminster. I mean, what he had already is much, much nicer than what you would find in The White House. So there's nothing there. This was all about documents, whether they think there's something classified. And to your point, it's preposterous that they would use this to execute a search warrant on the former president of the United States likely to be the nominee going forward, it is 100% political because there is absolutely no reason for this. There was no absolutely no reason for them to execute a search warrant when they had free access anyway. When they asked for it. So I don't know if this is a media thing if they just want to scare the public and create a buzz that there was something going down of our Lago and trying to make president Trump guilty by association because the FBI was there or if they think that they actually have something. I think they're wrong on both accounts. I think the American public is looking at the going, what are you doing? Are you going way too far? Well, I mean, let's also remember this is all against the background of dubious fisa warrants, a steel dossier that was used by the FBI and by the deep state to go after Trump for four years. You know, deep state officials coming out and saying that there was nothing to the Hunter Biden laptop. It was Russia disinformation. So there's a background already of mistrust and distrust, it seems to me that, you know, for a party that's in power, this is a, this is a desperation move and a very risky move because when you have all that, on the one hand, you might be able to smear Trump, but on the other hand, it could much easily cut the other way it could unify the Republicans. It could convince independence, so this is just, you know, they might have thought Trump's tweets are too much, but this is too much on a whole different level. And so the politics of this seem to me to be very risky for the Democrats. Yes, you're exactly right. And they can't get but they're chopped arrangement syndrome is so strong that they can't see the obvious. Yeah, I mean, like to you about Russian Russia, Russia, sorry, they used to believe it's the same. Yeah, we lied to you about Ukraine. Yeah, we liked you about January 6th. Yeah, we lied to you about a myriad of other things about unmasking all of the folks right at the beginning of the administration. Yeah, I was like, you a whole bunch, but you should believe us about this one. I mean, I don't think anybody's falling for it. And the only people that are excited about it are the people who don't want Donald Trump back in office because apparently they like the way things are going in this country. Very scary stuff. Christina bob, thank you so much for joining me. Very sobering and I opening account and thanks again. Thank you. Tired of seeing your

FBI Hunter Biden Christina bob Donald Trump Trump White House Christina Nora president Trump clintons bedminster Clinton Russia United States Ukraine
Why Did the FBI Raid Trump's Mar-a-Lago? Christina Bobb Explains

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

01:50 min | 4 months ago

Why Did the FBI Raid Trump's Mar-a-Lago? Christina Bobb Explains

"I'm back with Trump attorney Christina bob. We're talking about the FBI raid, the motives for it, the implications of it. Christina, I know as a lawyer, you can't go into the details of the warrant, but what can you tell us because initially it seemed like the raid was motivated by sort of January 6th, the January 6th committee, maybe a attempts to find out any links between Trump and what happened on January 6th. Now I'm hearing that it's not about that at all. In fact, I'm hearing it's about sort of the national records act. It seems downright preposterous. I mean, as if what to get the archive straight, they have to raid the home of the former president. What can you tell us about the warrant and what you know about, well, let's not call it the reason, but at least the pretext for the raid. Yeah. No, you're exactly right. It is as preposterous as you think it is. It is all about Nora and the records preservation act. As far as I can tell, it has nothing to do with January 6th. They say that they were looking for presidential records as we mentioned. It's the president who gets to decide what a presidential record is. And potential crimes of releasing classified information or something to that. The fact that that was what they were looking for. So they have basically turned the FBI into overzealous librarians is what this is all about, but it's all about supposedly, you know, you've got Hunter Biden with his laptop and just closing a foreign tire and the kickbacks from foreign countries. And thereafter Donald Trump because he kept a handwritten note from the prime minister that they think belongs at the archives. I mean, it is as preposterous as you think it is.

Christina Bob FBI Donald Trump Christina Nora Hunter Biden
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

05:19 min | 4 months ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

"Don't forget to use promo code DI MSH dinesh. I'm back with Donald Trump's attorney Christina bob. We're talking about the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Christina, do you happen to, first of all, how long did this process last? Was it last an hour? A couple of hours where they're there all day. How long was the FBI on site? Yeah, they were there all day. I mean, I believe they showed up around 9. Like I said, they got there before I did, so I don't know their exact arrival time, but it wrapped up probably 7 or 8. I think by the time the news broke, it was pretty much over, but it had taken I would say maybe ten hours. And when you spoke to these guys, did you ask them or did they tell you particularly what they're looking for? Or do they just eventually hand you the document and kind of go about their business as if you didn't really have any need to know? Yeah, it was the latter. They pretty much just handed me the war when they were done and it has the attachment for what they're looking for. And the media has been reporting that which is accurate that they're looking for presidential records or any possibly classified material. I don't believe that there was anything classified in there, but I'm sure that the FBI will say that there is, but I'll be curious to see exactly what they're going to say, if anything. I found it particularly interesting that they were looking for presidential records because not that long ago, judicial watch through trying to get access to presidential records for Bill Clinton and judicial watch actually lost the case because the court said, it's up to the president to decide what a presidential record is. And apparently that's been true for the first 44 presidents, but for Donald Trump, I guess the FBI is the one that gets to decide what a presidential record is and sees whatever they wanted to see. So I don't think there was anything of significance that they took, but I find it kind of ironic that every other president gets to decide for themselves what a presidential record is except for Donald Trump. I mean, is it also true, Christina? I mean, I've heard this many times before. I'm not a lawyer, but the fact that the president also gets to decide if he wants to declassify something. In other words, the classification is determined not by the archives or not by some third party, but the president himself has discretion in that area. You're exactly right, which just goes to show how asinine this entire thing is. There is no crime. There is no crime committed. And the fact that they're trying to use what they're trying to use with the national security code is they want to do that so that they can hide what they're doing because they want to be able to say, oh, it's classified. We can't reveal it to the public. We can't tell the public what we're doing and they want to cloak their crazy they're crazy authoritarian actions behind this veil of national security. But you're exactly right. President Trump decides that classified and what's not classified and he gets to decide what is a presidential record and what is not a presidential record. So this whole thing is all for nothing. It's all for show and they want to try to convince America that president Trump has committed a crime where there is nothing. There is no crime. Christina, I think I saw one of the members of the Trump family. I don't know if it was Eric Trump, who said that they even broke into the safe. Now, this strikes me as symbolically important. I mean, breaking into the safe, but he also said there was nothing in the safe. Have you seen that? Have you heard it? Can you confirm whether it's true? Yeah, I heard it. They didn't let me in where they were looking so I can't say that I saw it because I wasn't allowed to be a part of what they were doing, but yes, I would think that that's probably true. Now, you made a very interesting point, which is you said that there's nothing there. And if there's nothing there, the question for me is why would they go to all this trouble, right? Now, one of the things that I'm hearing a lot in the comment about this is the fact that, man, you know, it's very serious and Trump's going to have to worry about this, but it occurred to me that the opposite is not only just as likely but could be more likely, which is to say, think of it the Democrats are desperate to get Trump, right? Let's even go further and say, they lost the 2016 election, they know they lost the 2020 election. Who's going to be the scariest guy in 2024, so we know what they're motive is. They don't have anything on him. So why not go fishing at Mar-a-Lago? What do you think of that theory? I think you're exactly right. I think the Department of Justice and the Biden Department of Justice is politicizing the DoJ and the FBI because they are terrified of what Donald Trump represents because they know they're going to lose power. They don't have the support of the American people. They can't win legitimately. So the only way they can win is to force it, whether it's through getting rid of their political opponents, cheating and elections, whatever it is they are doing everything they can to keep a strip will hold on power. Let's take a pause. We'll be right back with Christina bob. Are you looking for

FBI Donald Trump Christina bob Christina dinesh President Trump president Trump Eric Trump Bill Clinton America Biden Department of Justice DoJ Trump
Lawyer Christina Bobb Gives First-Hand Account of Trump FBI Raid

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

01:53 min | 4 months ago

Lawyer Christina Bobb Gives First-Hand Account of Trump FBI Raid

"I'm back with Donald Trump's attorney Christina bob. We're talking about the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Christina, do you happen to, first of all, how long did this process last? Was it last an hour? A couple of hours where they're there all day. How long was the FBI on site? Yeah, they were there all day. I mean, I believe they showed up around 9. Like I said, they got there before I did, so I don't know their exact arrival time, but it wrapped up probably 7 or 8. I think by the time the news broke, it was pretty much over, but it had taken I would say maybe ten hours. And when you spoke to these guys, did you ask them or did they tell you particularly what they're looking for? Or do they just eventually hand you the document and kind of go about their business as if you didn't really have any need to know? Yeah, it was the latter. They pretty much just handed me the war when they were done and it has the attachment for what they're looking for. And the media has been reporting that which is accurate that they're looking for presidential records or any possibly classified material. I don't believe that there was anything classified in there, but I'm sure that the FBI will say that there is, but I'll be curious to see exactly what they're going to say, if anything. I found it particularly interesting that they were looking for presidential records because not that long ago, judicial watch through trying to get access to presidential records for Bill Clinton and judicial watch actually lost the case because the court said, it's up to the president to decide what a presidential record is. And apparently that's been true for the first 44 presidents, but for Donald Trump, I guess the FBI is the one that gets to decide what a presidential record is and sees whatever they wanted to see.

Christina Bob FBI Donald Trump Christina Bill Clinton
Trump Lawyer Christina Bobb Describes FBI Raid on Mar-A-Lago

The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast

03:04 min | 4 months ago

Trump Lawyer Christina Bobb Describes FBI Raid on Mar-A-Lago

"I have a great deal to say about what happened at Mar-a-Lago, the FBI raid, but I'm going to hold that back a little bit because I've got the wonderful opportunity to talk to somebody who is who was right on the scene. The Christina bob is an attorney for president Trump at save America. She started her legal career at the U.S. Marine Corps. She was deployed to Afghanistan. She's defended marines in court martials, and she has a specialization in national security law from Georgetown law center in Washington, D.C., Christina, what a crazy business we're in. Something that I haven't seen in my adult lifetime. I'm not even sure if it's happened in American history. We have the DoJ of an existing administration raiding the residents of not only the man that Biden ran against in 2020, but very likely a quite possibly the man he might run against in 2024. Now, you were there, let's start by talking a little bit about I want to walk through this a little bit slowly, but let's start with Mar-a-Lago. Mar-a-Lago is not merely a kind of club that people can belong to and they can come and play golf, but president Trump lives there, doesn't he? Yeah, it's his personal residence. And I mean, it's his home. It's where he lives and is where he spends most of his time, you know, this time of year he's up north in New Jersey, but Mar-a-Lago is very much president Trump's personal residence. We were, of course, at Mar-a-Lago for the premiere of 2000 mules, and it was it's a lovely place. Trump now is not at Mar-a-Lago. He's in New Jersey. And so this raid evidently occurred in his in his absence. Talk about talk about it now from your point of view. Were you on the scene? How did you hear about it? Give us sort of the blow by blow. Yeah, I responded 'cause I'm one of president Trump's attorneys that lives in the area. I live not too far from Mar-a-Lago. And I got a call that said, hey, you need to get down there. The FBI is on site, and we need a presence there. So I went down. So I arrived after the FBI was already there, and tried to get a copy of the search warrant. They wouldn't give it to me initially. And they said they didn't even have to show it to me. I fought with them for a little while about that and said, you mean to tell me that you want to roll up at the president of the United States personal residence and you want me to take your word for it that you actually have a warrant. So they eventually showed it to me. And then they, you know, they gave me a copy of it after everything was over. So the whole thing was relatively uneventful as far as like, you know, there was not a whole lot you can do when you have a large number of FBI agents rummaging through the president's personal residence and his office in the area that he lives in in Mar-a-Lago.

President Trump Lago Christina Bob Georgetown Law Center Washington, D.C. FBI U.S. Marine Corps Donald Trump DOJ Marines New Jersey Christina Biden Afghanistan America Golf MAR
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:48 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Today we started with talking about how the media is covering the audit. Let me read one of these headlines. Here we got emailed to us freedom at charlie kirk dot com. Where someone says charlie. I'm very confused. so frustrating. The hill dot com says arizona draft audit reports show biden widened lead by three hundred and sixty votes and again. It's incredibly dishonest. Because as we have gone through that if you count illegal votes completely irrelevant. What really matters is whether or not we're counting. Legally administered ballots whether or not ballots that were sent in. We're actually consistent with arizona state law and the audit shows that upwards of fifty five thousand of them just in one county in the state of arizona very well were in violation of what state law says. It was illegally conducted. We have laws for a reason. The rule of law is there to take to keep guard rails on people against the inclination and the temptation to cheat to cut corners. So when you have this. Many fifty five thousand potential ballots that were in violation to state law. How do we deal with that. What is the path forward while on this program. We talked about how attorney general mark burnett. which very well might begin criminal proceedings and investigations into this. I hope he does. He's been very good on the vaccine issue. So i hope will step up and do that but even beyond that arizona. We were told had nothing wrong with it. We knew that was not true. Those of us that live in arizona and spent a lot of time in arizona. We know that wasn't true. And now we find out that twenty. Three thousand ballots were cast illegally people moving between one house to the other. Ten thousand ballots cast from people. That don't even live in the state anymore. And so we start to dive deeper into this in this program and we realize that the truth is that they never wanted us to talk about this in the first place by the way. If you look at conservative media out there you are going to learn a lot. Just like with the project veritas story just like with everything else. You're gonna learn a lot on who is covering the audit and who is not covering the audit if there are commentators and people on television and radio that are not touching the audit. That'll teach you a lot. We go right into it because we believe that election integrity is the most important issue before we can solve all these other issues. People do not trust the system that they are voting in if people do not trust the way we do elections then. They're not going to trust their leaders not going to trust the laws. They're not can trust the process. And after this audit it's an absolute banana republic system of the way we do elections in our country. Decertification needs to be on the table. Completely we need to find out how many of those fifty thousand potentially illegally administered ballots would've voted for biden or would have voted for trump or did vote for them and how who sent them in. Was there a process to try to send them in. Was there a machine that was behind this. So investigation is warranted necessary immediately. Why is the maricopa. County board of supervisors on willing to hand over the routers. How coordinated was this entire effort. What about investigation to pima county or coconino county investigation into the whole state of arizona. 'cause remember donald trump was declared the loser by ten thousand votes. We have here. Fifty five thousand illegally counted votes allegedly. How deep does this go. Who is behind this this. Right here is a bombshell report. That should be the news. Lead item all across the country and said they take one part that they like and they're conflicting recount with an audit. Because they don't want to actually tell you that this entire process was flawed cut corners from the outset. And what we do about. It is extremely important not just grassroots pressure but our leaders need to step up and say wow fifty. Five thousand illegally administered ballots. That's not something we're used to and it's going to require courage to fix it the find out the extent of this. Thanks so

arizona charlie kirk biden mark burnett charlie County board of supervisors coconino county maricopa pima county donald trump
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:23 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"These people that have obstructed the process the entire time on the county board require that they comply and give us everything that we want in more jake. A lot of people are emailing us at freedom. Charlie kirk dot com and they are asking us. Well what does this mean. Do you think we can get to decertification you know. How do we right this wrong. What is the realistic path. Forward here jake as we learn that so much of this election was conducted illegally. Well realistically the path for we have to look at unfortunately political realities as well. As what's right. I stand it squarely in the of. Let's do what's right. We now know that there is beyond a shadow of a doubt questions of the highest level. That biden did not win the state of arizona and so we should be pursuing decertification. Absolutely like i said. I called back in december because of these irregularities that we now know resulted potentially fifty five thousand questionable ballots having been counted. Look when it comes to certification the political reality is that we have a one vote majority in our state house and a one vote majority in our state senate and that's gonna make the the equation forgetting the votes A little tricky. We have multiple states senators. Unfortunately like senator. Paul boyer from the west valley the west part of the phoenix area. We have senator michelle eugen to rita. Who's come out recently and attacked the audit. We have folks who have expressed that. They are not interested in decertification. And so that's something that will have to be overcome. But look i think this helps. The audit helps because it allows the grass roots to be armed with the information necessary to have the conversations to convince their elected officials and so this is the time for the grassroots and the people of arizona of all parts right an audit and election integrity doesn't benefit just republicans. It helps every single voter regardless of political chilean race ethnicity income. It doesn't matter so everyone needs to step up and make their voices heard and we should be pursuing decertification. All right well the the final question that i want to ask you which i think is really important is as we kind of. Look at everything in front of us. What pieces of reform and legislation are you pushing in arizona to make sure this never happens again. I have the just you know. I'm happy to share with you. I've got about nine election integrity pieces of legislation already in draft right now that are currently being drafted in consultation with the legislative council in our attorneys and those go from Clamping down on dropping off those of male imbalance as you know ninety to ninety five percents of arizona. Ballots cast early via a male imbalance early ballot. And when people drop those off they don't have to present any id. I have another bill. That's in draft right now. That would require a county recorder's. It would essentially establish a minimum requirement for signature matching. This was a major problem in an area where i think. Some of those fifty. Five thousand ballots came from what adrian fonterra's did is he had his minimum requirements for signature matching and then he kept lowering and lowering and lowering it all the way to zero and so when those early ballots were being undertaken out of the envelopes. They weren't even matching the signature to the voters actual signature. That is a recipe for disaster. And so we've got bill. Got a bill in drafting that would address that got a bill drafting to address electronic balaji. to -cation. There are lots of bills that we are working on. And i know there are multiple other members representatives chaplain parker fillmore finchem peterson. We've got lots of good conservatives. Who are working on election integrity legislation right now. And that's we're gonna have to have the support of the people come january so that we can get all those things done j. kaufman. Thank you for joining us and for fighting zone. We will talk to you soon. You guys can follow. Jake hoffman on social media. So check it out. Thanks so much jake. Let's summarize everything that we have covered..

Charlie kirk arizona Paul boyer senator michelle eugen west valley biden jake rita senate adrian fonterra phoenix legislative council chaplain parker fillmore finchem peterson Jake hoffman kaufman
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:40 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"That alone is equivalent to the delta that by one by quote unquote one by here in the state so you're right questionable votes equal four to five times the total margin victory. This is the problem. Cybersecurity needs to be improved electronic ballot. Adjudication is a huge problem. Here in the state handling of duplicate ballots. It wasn't just a problem charlie. It violated state law the way that the county handle it. handle duplicate. Ballots is is a massive point of contention and we need to get to the bottom and the county needs to own up and give us numbers that we can reconcile in terms of of How they handle those ballots. The county obstructed this process from day. One which prevented unfortunately the truest friends of audit. That was needed. Look every major corporation in america gets audited every single year to think that we shouldn't be auditing at the deepest levels the most important element of our republic which is our confidence in the electoral process is is an absolute shame. It's an outcry and we have to make sure that this never happens again. And that means we're gonna come back this next session and we're going to have not only election integrity legislation. We're going to have legislation to hold these counties not just maricopa county but pima county coconino county as well. It's a whole what's the hold me hannibal so jake. I'm just failing understand. Though how the talion maricopa doesn't match the audit. How is it that that you even allowed to account illegal ballots. Fifty five thousand of them. I mean this is something that would happen in the third world in nicaragua or somewhere in africa. Where is this discrepancy coming from. And how are people supposed to view any sort of election result when we get results like this from auditors. It's a great question so the reality is that when you have laws and look our legislature We've got a great republican legislator legislature. But the reality is that laws that have been passed in the past. Don't have teeth in them. And when laws don't have teeth what we found is that radical leftist won't follow the law. And so when you have people. Like adrian says when you have people like katie hobbs. In charge of our elections they simply followed the laws that are prescribed. Which means you open yourself up for these types of issues. now the republican aboard supervisors. It's a majority republican. They have been complicit in covering up whether it's bureaucratic incompetence or bureaucratic mouths seasons. Quite honestly i could care less because the voters don't care the voters want to be able to have confidence in the process and so we have to start putting teeth in the law. That's what we did this last legislative. We added class five and classic felonies for multiple election integrity bills that we've passed when we need to do more of that moving forward. Yeah to say. The least. I mean and i want to find out these fifty five thousand illegal ballots and get to the bottom of each and every single one of them how that they were ever counted in the first place who they voted for. And what the margin would have looked like if it wasn't for those fifty five thousand ballots. Now what do you think the attorney general arizona do. And then what do you think he will do given all of these findings. Well charlie i think those are two very different things. Unfortunately the best pressure point that the grassroots in arizona have is the fact that he's running for united states senate and so they're going to have to hold him accountable from an election standpoint on the campaign trail make their voices heard the legislature gave him an election integrity unit to investigate this stuff to investigate claims of election fraud. And in this case noncompliance with lawful subpoenas and clearly an election process and an oversight and accountability process that is in shambles. And so what he will do. I think he's going to be largely dependent on what people of arizona demand that he do. So please everybody contact attorney general mark. Barnevik what he should do is come in and demand he should step in with the legislature and demand that the county turnover every single record. You know the constitution delegates authority for oversight to the legislature. He should come in and in his role. Support the constitution by requiring these folks..

katie hobbs coconino county charlie pima county maricopa county hannibal maricopa legislature nicaragua united states jake adrian africa arizona attorney general mark Barnevik senate
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:24 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Why what information were they pulling off of the machine who was accessing it So there's there's a lot of remaining questions that the report that has come out shows enough fraud and it says The auditors let me. See if i can find it. It says There are an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only have happened through malicious action or severe incompetent. America county official so to me that means the attorney general needs to open a criminal investigation and figure out who did it So i expect to see that. I i i wanna earn. Mitch doesn't yes in a couple of the minute we ever remaining what does mark berna vicini do in arizona and about one minute or last. What do you want to see happen. I want on monday. I'd love to see him announce on monday that he is opening a criminal investigation to investigate fraud looking into the machines the router and who did the action now for criminal prosecution. Obviously we all wanna see that. Take place in. That will take time for him to investigate. As far as the decertifying the election he just needs to make a finding of fraud. He doesn't have to say who did it. He doesn't have to get a a verdict. He he just needs to say there was fraud that occurred and were investigating and so i wanna see him do that and once they do that then. The state legislature. Up the density certify the result christina bob from one america news network. Her instagram is christina. Underscore bob and do we have jake with uh connor or we. Are we waiting. I'm here thanks for having me charlie. Okay great all right so jake. The audit report is out fifty. Five thousand illegal ballots. Potentially we're counted and to reiterate how this all works if you count legal votes. We have a different story. Democrats if you county illegal votes. It looks like that's what we've been doing. So jake what are the big takeaways from this audit as we're waiting before the big reveal at one o'clock but what are the big takeaways in your opinion absolutely so thanks for having me look. Here's what i would say the biggest takeaway. The american people is and that's the same government. Who sucks at running the us. The the usps and the va and the dmv and addressing homelessness and that forced people in the massive lockdowns even when the science told them not to is not miraculously the embodiment of efficiency and effectiveness when it comes to running elections bottom line. The county needs to put out numbers that can be reconciled. Because right now the numbers do not reconcile. That's a huge problem. So jake explained to me the takeaway of how this audit report says that there were fifty. Five thousand potentially illegally administered ballots. I'm gonna read from part of the report. Here is pretty extraordinary. When you look into it that if you count people that have moved out of county people that have moved out of state it says here maricopa county counted two thousand five hundred ninety two more duplicate ballots than original ballots sent duplication. It says that failing to have systems that reconcile does not breed confidence in the election systems. Utilized at best. It's sloppy at worst. It could cover for fraud that could significantly impact the election results the total ballot delta of eleven thousand five hundred ninety two between the official canvas and the fifi file when considering both be counted and uncounted ballots and then finally it says in the report the top line numbers that they're more than fifty five thousand that could have been administered against arizona. State law how did arizona ever get certified in the first place. Well that's a great question. And i'll tell you i called for back in early. December them to decertify the election arguably foremost others did and it was for this. Very reason there are so many questions irregularities and what the audit is found you hit on it is mail in ballots voted from prior address about twenty three thousand. That's twice the delta. The vote margin. That biden won by potential voters that voted in multiple counties. Ten thousand three hundred forty two..

America county jake mark berna vicini christina bob Underscore bob uh connor Mitch arizona christina legislature charlie america usps va maricopa county biden
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:54 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"America's news network christina. Welcome to the program. Thank you so much. Thanks for having me. You bet so. Walk us through and we've been doing it for our listeners. The best we can. What are we learned today from. Basically the draft or the leaked report of arizona audit. Tell us yeah so the leaks report of the audit is actually really good for those that care about election integrity. There's a lot of information in there about Votes that shouldn't have been counted illegal voting and Fraudulent ballot what the spin. You know we're all hearing the liberal thin thing it's confirming biden one. It does not confirm biden one and the auditors wouldn't even say that they can confirm they would say that disconnect the election should not have been certified because there was so much fraud what they're hanging onto is there's one line in the report where they count. They do account balance right and we saw that on tv. And if you remember back in georgia right after the election everyone was frustrated with the georgia recounts. Because they're saying oh. You're just counting the same fraudulent ballots. What good is that for an audit. Well that's the portion of what the auditors did here arizona. That's not the entire audit but it's a portion because they just wanted to confirm do the ballot at least match. What the county does they were. And they're pretty close they don't match but they're they're close enough where you know. They're close enough but then they go into all of the fraud and all of the votes that were counted. That shouldn't have been counted which is at least five times the margin of victory in arizona and then they say the shouldn't have been certified and of course that's not what the liberal media reporting so I and i also expect to see more information coming out. The curing isn't a few hours. And i'm told that the report that was leaked was only partial. There's still a lot of information that wasn't included in it. So i think there's going to be a lot more interesting stuff coming out so trump supporters and those that are concerned about election integrity. I think this this'll be a good day. People will feel vindicated and something. We'll have to get through the spin. And i expect to see the attorney. General mark arnovitz opened a criminal investigation. Because there's more than enough probable cause from this report for him to do so you know and then when he does that then we can get the routers. Spunk log password. The happened with all the machines and in that will continue on so Yeah you know. It's a the the liberal. Yes so i want to ask you a question. I just want to reiterate this point. Look you can count all the ballots. You want how many of the things are you. Counting are actually legitimate. The of elections to win with legal votes. If you're winning with illegal votes than you're not actually winning the elections if you want to count legal votes than we have an entirely different story in two minutes christina. Talk about how this report shows that upwards of fifty five thousand ballots might have been illegal ballots and should never have been counted. Yeah we've got ballots that were mailed in that we're milton encountered that we have no record of them. Having been received we have balanced that were males from places that they that The residents didn't live there anymore. We have duplicate both have many votes People voting in multiple counties. And when you add all of that together it's more than five times the margin of victory and that doesn't even include the official canvas if you remember the canvas The auditors were not allowed to do the canvas because there was litigation over that. But that doesn't even look at vacant lot. How many people voted from hotel. How many dead voters were there. That's not even included. Because they weren't allowed to do it so The fifty five thousand is very very limited amount that they were even able to look at so i fully suspect once market brnovich opened his investigation. That number will increase substantially more once. They can actually get the real canvas done. So if you can hang right there christina we have to take a break. Ask you about the routers. I wanna ask all those things..

biden arizona christina georgia General mark arnovitz America milton brnovich
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:36 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"It shows that joe biden actually expanded you say hold on a second now actually shows that joe biden and his victory has a lot of question marks around it in fact it shows that we never never doing a recount. We were doing a forensic detailed and specific audit of the ballots themselves in whether or not they correlated with arizona state law and so we need to find those fifty thousand fifty. Five thousand miles not mean. It's obviously not thing. Just for the regular man arizona to do but instead we need to have the arizona attorney general or the arizona. Senate go find these ballots that were illegally conducted and find out who they voted for. Release that tally. And that will be able to show the people whether or not these illegally administered ballots which according to the audit shows that there were as many as fifty five thousand legally administered ballots. This is extraordinary and so none of this would matter. Obviously if joe biden won by five hundred thousand votes not just kinda roller is like okay. We'll fix it next time. Better luck next time. None of this would really get me animated. If joe biden one by one hundred thousand votes and why say one you know what i mean by. The joe biden declared the winner. All right just bear with me. Everybody if joe biden was declared the winner with eleven thousand votes or ten thousand votes right there on the margins and this is not an audit for the entire state of arizona. This is very important point. This is not an audit for every single part of arizona. This is just maricopa county. Imagine what an audit of flagstaff arizona would show you imagine what an audit of tucson arizona would show you to democrat strongholds in the wonderful state of arizona instead. What we have here is the beginning of what should be full-fledged full court press operation would say hey as many as fifty five thousand ballots were counted. That never should have been counted at all in the first place. Now what we have been living. Under as believe in what was the arizona result may might not actually be the arizona result itself. We're gonna go through line by line in detail by detail but the top line narrative from the media is biden got more votes in the recount. What in reality. The audit shows that there were more illegal votes. The audit goes through the actual ballot custody and standard practices and find out whether or not those ballots were counted legally or illegally the audit showed more corner cutting and potentially cheating and lawlessness. Not the other way around. The audit revealed that over fifty. Five thousand ballots were put in the category of being legitimate. That otherwise should not have been and so. Let's go through some of the specifics here number. One mellon ballots cast under voter registration. Id's for people that should not have received their ballots by mail because they moved through extensive data analysis the auditors found and discovered approximately twenty three thousand three hundred forty four votes. That meet this condition over fifteen thousand thirty five million votes from voters who moved within maricopa county prior to the registration deadline..

arizona joe biden Senate maricopa county flagstaff tucson biden
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:45 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"What is the roadmap when you reveal and you find that there were over. Fifty five thousand illegally counted ballots. Now again i just want to reemphasize his point for the fourth or fifth time to give all of you the ammunition and the information for what inevitably will be the criticism from the other side. They are just taking the top line report which is nothing more than a recount. We have always made the distinction and the differentiation between an audit in a recount. A recount is very simply saying this many ballots for biden going this box. This many ballots for trump going that box in audit is saying. Wait a second timeout. Let's actually look at the ballots in the box and find out if they should be in that box in the first place if they should be even considered as legal ballots in the first place and the audit results. Reports are continuing to come out. In fact i'm going to read directly from the report. Multiple precincts had more votes cast than voters who voted quote multiple precincts counted votes in excess of the number of votes who participated in the two thousand twenty election. The audit report continues by saying about the arizona audit report that maricopa county's own canvas is off by more than the supposed margin. Arizona never should have been certified. Say that again. Arizona never should have been certified. Voters voted in multiple counties. Told ten thousand three hundred forty two and two thousand three hundred. Eighty two ballots came from people who no longer lived in maricopa county. There are also two thousand five hundred ninety two more duplicate ballots than original ballots. The number also includes as i said earlier. Two thousand three hundred forty four mail in ballots despite the person no longer living at the address. These are called phantom or ghost voters. that's two thousand twenty three thousand three hundred forty four ballots of people that no longer live at the address that they voted. That's against arizona that's illegally conducted ballot. The official canvas does not even match. Who voted off by eleven thousand five hundred ninety two more than the entire presidential margin and so as we dive deeper into this we are. We are left with a lot of questions. But i think reasonable speculation can show us. What really happened here. But we are close to being able to objectively proving this without any shadow of a doubt without any sort of ounce of doubt. And we're close by being able to do that. If we are able to have another analysis of these ballots of this fenced in universe of these fifty five to sixty thousand ballots and find out which category that they voted. I just want to reiterate this. The maricopa county draft report is out and the report says that there were more than fifty five thousand potentially illegal ballots. Let's play cut one. Oh two on the canvassing question. And what was the result of the voluntary canvas. Say that again. In many cases what happened was they would go to my house and say. Oh hello mr smith. We see that eleven people voted from this address. Do you know them and he would say no. I'm the only one who has lived here for twenty years so that kind of goes to show them. That was the great sebastian. Gorka my colleague on the salem radio network asking a wendy. I think that's wendy rogers about canvassing but the big top line. Revelation is the fifty five thousand votes..

maricopa county Arizona biden arizona mr smith Gorka salem radio network wendy rogers sebastian
"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:41 min | 1 year ago

"christina bobb" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Kirk dot com slash support buckle up everybody. Comprehensive maricopa audit results. Here we go early. What you've done is incredible here. Maybe charlie kirk on the college campus. I want you to know. We are lucky to have charlie. Charlie kirks run in the white house. I wanna thank joe. He's an incredible guy his spirit his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building. One of the most powerful youth organisations ever created turning usa. You will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed. Countries destroyed lives and we are going to fight for freedom campuses across the country. That's why we are here. The draft report of the maricopa county audit has been leaked. There's an official press conference coming up. I think press conference or senate testimony out of arizona coming up in just a couple of hours but it looks like somebody. Within the arizona. Government has leaked the audit results to a local national public radio affiliate to try to get ahead of the story. Now if you lived in a silo and you live in a box and all you listen to. Npr read the new york times or cnn. You would think that this audit is a big dud. Waste of money total and complete failure. You see the big news story that people are leading with off see you guys did this audit and it shows that joe biden and actually won by more votes in maricopa county. That is a story that every single news agency is leading with however that is a very small part of the story. That's not actually why we were doing. The audit that is not actually why the audit was occurring. In fact i am pleased to see that in the audit results. It shows that joe biden actually expanded his margin because it actually goes to show that the process was followed correctly and at the other side can't possibly say that votes were be taken away but that's not. Actually the main reason the report was done. And that is not the bombshell news that we have to share with you today. You see this was not a recount. A recount is not an audit two different things. A recount is just counting all the ballots. Maricopa already had a recount is just making sure kate says biden and it goes in the biden. Trade says trump. It goes in the trump trick. It says jorgensen it goes in the jorgensen. An audit is examining the ballots cross. Referencing them with voter registration information. Cross-referencing them with whether or not they actually live in the county with mail in ballots were particular in particular. See asking. are these ballots. Legal are these ballots. Should they have been counted in the first place that is an audit versus a recount. You see the way the media is trying to get ahead of this to disqualify and de legitimize and undermine the audit is by saying this is this is proof because look at the recount and there it is they are calling an audit a recount. When it's something different in the bombshell news and we're going to go into this in great detail. According to the report that has been leaked out of america. County is that according to the auditors. So ross forensic data more than fifty five thousand potentially illegal ballots were cast in maricopa county. The number of illegal ballots found in maricopa county. More than fifty. Five thousand is over four times. The current amount separating president trump and joe biden in arizona. So if we just wanted to do a recount that would've took a couple of weeks biden. Trae trump trae biden and trae trump regardless of legal or illegal ballots in audit is a step further and audit is going deeper in audit. Saying no no no get it that you're putting that in that trait. Can we find out if that ballot actually should be counted in the first place that takes a lot more time which is why the audit has been a multi month process. Transparency is critical to the republic and the democrats in arizona. Are freaking out. That's why they're coming out and say actually shows that joe biden won by moore and that is a very lazy sloppy misleading treacherous and deceitful meredith..

maricopa county charlie kirk Charlie kirks joe biden arizona jorgensen biden maricopa Kirk white house charlie Npr america joe the new york times cnn senate Maricopa trump president trump