19 Burst results for "Cheryl Mills"

"cheryl mills" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

07:20 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on 600 WREC

"How deep the swap was this woman was tainted I hope the judge will find that she was stated that if she isn't tainted that will be fine too but I'm not gonna do anything in terms of the great powers bestowed upon a president of the United States I want the process to play out I think that's the best thing to do because I'd love to see Roger exonerated and I'd love to see it happen because I personally think he was treated very unfairly let's talk about witness witness tampering but the man that he was tampering didn't seem that much of a problem with that he thinks they know each other for years and it's not like the tampering that I see when television when you watch a movie that's cool tampering with guns to people's heads and lots of other things so we're going to see what it is maybe there was tampering and maybe there wasn't but I can tell you that there was tremendous lying really lying and leaking classified documents that you don't know about but they leaked classified documents you know there was a young sailor who took pictures of the old submarine and sent them to Israel there's also a and they destroyed his life I let him out they will consider classified now Russia and China I guarantee you have the pictures of the separate for a long time the subway was like thirty years old they had him in the first year they don't have to wait for the thirty eight year it is a famous story then jump in here and and and so what the president now are member the county's role process crimes he's talking about Stoneheart false statements witness tampering the witness in pretty I'm president removes it out that's Roger being Roger he's you know it please don't put in a jail because as I said the he called me you know when the president right I mean think about it here's USA today James clapper lied to Congress the guardian CIA director John Brennan our talk about like the the Senate we have the New York Post Loretta Lynch lied to Congress James call me Washington examiner they say why the Congress town home also Loretta Lynch call me again investors daily Eric holder lied to Congress Lois Lerner Washington times Ludlow's learner lied to Congress US treasury secretary Jack Lew will bomb addressed by the Congress about the Iranian deal Washington times deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe lied to Congress and investigators well the IG report set for specific instances of lying three under oath what Nate does Cheryl mills lied to DOJ officials Washington examiner daily caller Clinton aide Huma Abdi lied about the dirty das it was all a lie became the basis are done verifiable dossier of of taking away the civil liberties of an American and this and the constitutional rights a quarter page to spy on a opposition party candidate then candidate trump and his transition team and deep into his presidency all based on illegal spying all based on what says at the top of a FISA application it says verified some process credit for four year forty months now what the president was referring to is and and the president's exactly right now the jury for person in this case and how we don't have a mis trial here and a new trial if ever there cried out of a lack of just this this is it and defense attorneys for started demanding a new trial based on the new information that has come out and that that has to do with the four person person's name is now out in the public domain to make a hard former president Memphis city school board commissioners unsuccessful democratic candidate for Congress she identified herself as the forewoman of the jury in the stone case pains me to see the DOJ no interfere why because they wanted nine years in jail for Roger stone and five lies six got to be kidding me but yet we now we know she has cleaned out her social media accounts because she had posted specifically about stones case before she was selected to sit on the jury why would the smart with the judge in this case ever allow this to not be thrown out immediately read tweeting arguments mocking those who considered stones dramatic arrest for lying there twenty nine guys and tactical gear frogmen in his backyard what all they had to do was say come on in regular time will love process you at eight o'clock bring tell a lawyer CNN cameras are there safely with Paul man a fort predawn raids federal tactical team twenty nine people armed to the hilt turns out that this woman had re tweeted opposed noting that stone was has you all talking about the reviewing of of force guidelines before suggesting racism was the reason for all the attention of stones arrest that receive from conservatives unsuccessful candidate for Congress waiting you know quoting at someone in August the twenty seven to tweet referring to trump is a member of the KKK falling all trump supporters racist in August of twenty ninety writing a response to a news report that ball Garrity had been projected under the trump international hotel in DC yeah this is a tainted jury and the double standard screams at us as a country this case is if there ever has been a case that cries out for a new trial this is it president speaking out about it because he should we want that system it just does system of justice I've been warning about this anyway computer systems in cars man have you ever open the hood of your car recently wolf I used to be able to fix cars I used to do tune ups and breaks and starters and alternators cell noise you name it I can pretty much do it could take care of my own car not anymore change the oil that it all electronically controlled transmissions now touch screen displays dozens of sensors I look under the hood I might forget it I can't touch this now if something breaks the problem isn't so prohibitively expensive well that's where Kerr she'll dot com comes in and if you have a big problem with your car it's the ultimate and in terms of well sh and I'm not going to have to worry about its insurance basically even if your car has a hundred fifty thousand miles on it five thousand miles now with this you get to pick the mechanical.

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

07:53 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"Don't know who these people are just trust they all live pull that forged documents you have people that wrote fake Tessier use and brought him to the FBI and use people in the justice department to get him to the FBI and these people know in the front row you know better than anybody in this room what the hell I'm talking about probably some only responding Gee I'm not even talking to the folks on what they get it better than anybody to a lot of bad things are happening with cleaning it out with cleaning the swap with draining the swamp I just never knew how deep is this woman was tainted I hope the judge will find that she was stated that if she isn't tainted that will be fine too but I'm not gonna do anything in terms of the great powers bestowed upon a president of the United States I want the process to play out I think that's the best thing to do because I'd love to see Roger exonerated and I love to see it happen because I personally think he was treated very unfairly let's talk about we witness tampering but the man that he was tampering didn't seem to have much of a problem with that effect they know each other for years and it's not like the tampering that I see on television when you watch a movie that's cool tampering with guns the people's heads and lots of other things so we're going to see what it is maybe there was tampering and maybe there wasn't but I can tell you that it was tremendous lying really lying and leaking classified documents that you don't know about but they leaked classified documents you know there was a young sailor who took pictures of an old submarine and sent them to Israel there's already a and he destroyed his life I let him out they will consider classified now Russia and China I guarantee you have the pictures of the separate for a long time this submarine was like thirty years old they had him in the first year they don't have to wait for the thirty eight year that is a famous story and jump in here and and and so what the president now are member the county's role process crimes is talking about Stoneheart false statements witness dampen the witness in pretty I'm president removes it out that's Roger being Roger he's you know it please don't put him in jail because as I said the he called me you know when the president right I mean think about it here's USA today James clapper lied to Congress the guardian CIA director John Brennan our talk about why did the Senate we have the New York Post Loretta Lynch lied to Congress James call me Washington examiner they say why the Congress town home also Loretta Lynch call me again investors daily Eric holder lied to Congress Lois Lerner Washington times lot Lois Lerner lied to Congress US treasury secretary Jack Lew Obama best lied to Congress about the Iranian deal Washington times deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe lied to Congress and investigators well the IG report set for specific instances of lying three under oath what Nate does Cheryl mills lied to DOJ officials Washington examiner daily caller Clinton aide Huma Abdi lied the dirty das it was all a lie became the basis are done verifiable dossier of of taking away the civil liberties of an American and this and the constitutional rights a quarter page to spy on a opposition party candidate then candidate trump and his transition team and deep into his presidency all based on illegal spying all based on what says at the top of a FISA application it says verified some process grab for four year forty months now what the president was referring to is and and the president's exactly right now the jury for person in this case and how we don't have a mis trial here and a new trial there were there cried out of a lack of just this this is it and defense attorneys for stone a demanding a new trial based on the new information that has come out and that that has to do with the four person person's name is now out in the public domain to make a hard former president Memphis city school board commissioners unsuccessful democratic candidate for Congress she identified herself as the forewoman of the jury in the stone case pains me to see the DOJ now interfere why because they wanted nine years in jail for Roger stone for and find five lives six it got to be kidding me but yet we now we know she has cleaned out her social media accounts because she had posed as specifically about stones case before she was selected to sit on the jury why would this why would the judge in this case ever allow this to not be thrown out immediately re tweeting arguments mocking those who considered stones dramatic arrest for lying then twenty nine guys and tactical gear frogmen in his backyard what all they had to do was say come on in regular time willow process you at eight o'clock bring tell a lawyer CNN cameras are there safely with Paul man a fort predawn raids federal tactical team twenty nine people armed to the hilt turns out that this woman had re tweeted opposed noting that stone was has you all talking about the reviewing of of force guidelines before suggesting racism was the reason for all the attention the stones arrest that received from conservatives unsuccessful candidate for Congress tweeting you know quoting at someone in August the twenty seven to tweet referring to trump is a member of the KKK falling all trump supporters racist in August of twenty ninety writing a response to a news report that ball Garrity have been projected under the trump international hotel in DC yeah this is a tainted jury and the double standard screams at us as a country this case is if there ever has been the case that cries out for a new trial this is it president speaking out about it because he should do you want that system and just the whole system of justice I've been warning about this anyway a computer systems in cars man if you ever open the hood of your car recently wolf I used to be able to fix cars I used to do tune ups and breaks and starters and alternators cell noise you name it I can pretty much do it did take care of my own car not anymore changes the oil that it all electronically controlled transmissions out touch screen displays dozens of sensors I look under the hood I might forget it I can't touch this now if something breaks the problem is it so prohibitively expensive well that's where Kerr she'll dot com comes in and if you have a big problem with your car it's the ultimate and in terms of well and I'm not going to have.

FBI
"cheryl mills" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

News 96.5 WDBO

06:49 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

"Was this woman was tainted I hope the judge will find that she was stated that if she isn't tainted that will be fine too but I'm not gonna do anything in terms of the great powers bestowed upon a president of the United States I want the process to play out I think that's the best thing to do because I'd love to see Roger exonerated and I'd love to see it happen because I personally think he was treated very unfairly let's talk about with witness tampering but the man that he was tampering didn't seem that much of a problem with that if they can know each other for years and it's not like the tempered that I see on television when you watch a movie that's cool temperate what does the people's heads and lots of other things so we're going to see what it is maybe there was tampering and maybe there wasn't but I can tell you that it was tremendous lying really lying and leaking SFI documents that you don't know about but they leaked classified documents it was a young sailor who took pictures of the old submarine and sent them to Israel there's also a and they destroyed his life I let him out they will consider classified that Russia and China I guarantee you have the pictures of the separate for a long time this survey was like thirty years old they had him in the first year they don't have to wait for the thirtieth year that is a famous story then jump in here and and and so what the president now are ever the council's all process crimes are you talking about stone art false statements with December the witness in pretty on president moves that I that's Roger being Roger he's you know it please don't put in a jail because as I said the he called me you know when the president right I mean think about it here's USA today James clapper lied to Congress the guardian CIA director John Brennan our talk about like the the Senate we have the New York Post Loretta Lynch lied to Congress James call me Washington examiner they say like the Congress a town home also read a Lynch call me again investors that daily Eric holder lied to Congress Lois Lerner Washington times Ludlow's learner lied to Congress US treasury secretary Jack Lew will bomb addressed by the Congress about the Iranian deal Washington times deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe lied to Congress and investigators well the IG report said for specific instances of lying three under oath what day does Cheryl mills lied to DOJ officials Washington examiner daily caller Clinton aide Huma Abdi lied the thirty das it was all a lie became the basis so don't verifiable dossier of of taking away the civil liberties of an American and this and the constitutional rights a quarter page to spy on a opposition party candidate then candidate trump and his transition team and deep into his presidency all based on illegal spying all based on what says at the top of a FISA application it says verified so process credit for four year forty months now what the president was referring to is and and the president's exactly right now the jury for person in this case and how we don't have a mis trial here and a new trial if ever there cried out of a lack of just this this is it and defense attorneys for stone a demanding a new trial based on the new information that has come out and that that has to do with the poor person person's name is now out in the public domain to make a hard former president Memphis city school board commissioners unsuccessful democratic candidate for Congress she identified herself as the forewoman of the jury in the stone case pains me to see the DOJ now interfere why because they wanted nine years in jail for Roger stone but I'm frightened five lives six got to be kidding me but yet we now we know she has cleaned out her social media accounts because she had posted specifically about stones case before she was selected to sit on the jury why would this why would the judge in this case ever allow this to not be thrown out immediately re tweeting arguments mocking those who considered stones dramatic arrest for why they had twenty nine guys and tactical gear frogmen in his backyard what all they had to do was say come on in regular time will love process you at eight o'clock bring tell lawyer CNN cameras are there safely with Paul man a fort predawn raids federal tactical team twenty nine people armed to the hilt turns out that this woman had re tweeted opposed noting that stone was has you all talking about the reviewing of of force guidelines before suggesting racism was the reason for all the attention the stones arrest that receive from conservatives unsuccessful candidate for Congress waiting you know quoting at someone in August the twenty seven to tweet referring to trump is a member of the KKK falling all trump supporters racist in August of twenty ninety writing a response to a news report that ball Garrity have been projected under the trump international hotel in DC yeah this is a tainted jury and the double standard screams at us as a country this case is if there ever has been a case that cries out for a new trial this is it president speaking out about it because he should we want that system it just does system of justice I've been warning about this anyway computer systems in cars man if you ever open the hood of your car recently wolf I used to be able to fix cars I used to do tune ups and breaks and starters and alternators cell noise you name it I can pretty much do it could take care of my own car not anymore changes the oil that it all electronically controlled transmissions now touch screen displays dozens of sensors I look under the hood of my forget it I can't touch this now if something breaks the problem is it so prohibitively expensive well that's where car shield dot com comes in and if you have a big problem with your car it's the ultimate and in terms of well.

"cheryl mills" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

News Talk 1130 WISN

05:42 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

"Eric holder lied to Congress Washington times Lois Lerner lied to Congress US treasury secretary Jack Lew Obama administration official lied to Congress about a key part of the Iranian deal Washington post deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe lied to Congress and investigators well that was in The Washington Times and the inspector general report Washington examiner Clinton aide Cheryl mills lied to DOJ officials let's see the daily caller Clinton aide who all my Aberdeen lied to DOJ officials well sounds like the lie a lot the media lies all the time you know you want to well do we have equal justice under the long but I think that's where the president's frustration is coming from an IAC bad bad bad bad I assume you know the Attorney General is doing his job I don't talk to the Attorney General by it but I don't know the Attorney General I would like to I think is really good but now that you know when there's a grave injustice like this you want to know that somebody's going to get to the bottom of it and what will we won't have constitutional order unless we apply our laws equally equal application we call it equal justice we call it we know eighteen USC seven ninety three gross negligence mishandling classified documents that's the espionage act intentionally mishandling classified documents even James call me it melted top secret classified information was on Hillary secret server that knowingly removing classified documents with the intent to retain them you know all of these there's so many laws we've identified what about Hillary Clinton using our office secretary of state I'm not a whole foundation you could Clinton foundation pay to play you know we got bribery the federal bribery statute gratuity statute mail fraud statute wire fraud statute honest services fraud statute money laundering all of that never the you know the whole idea will sign off on it in the very same people that we knew was we had an FBI spy that I interviewed with them that Putin's rank they were trying to get a foothold in the uranium industry and in America and that was the uranium one scandal why would America we have to import uranium we don't have enough uranium ever give up any of our uranium all the resources we did if Clinton knowingly paid let's see a foreign national they funnel money through a Perkins school we into what a aid op research group fusion GPS what about them and then hiring Christopher still pay for the dirty Russian dossier well this does that violate campaign it's the foreign nationals are filing false or misleading campaign reports I say it's a legal expense you know James call me remember that day goes through sixty minutes exonerate celery no prosecutor whatever prosecute this but it's also a crime to steal government documents member we now know the FBI actually rated call me home after he was fired we also know there was potential lying to Congress when he testified that he made the decision to clear Clinton after she was interviewed documents show was before Lipsey daisy the forget what about James call me you know what about his lies or lack of candor as inspector general Horowitz is said what about Loretta Lynch arranger Makeba Peter struck or lease of well Lisa pager James Vicki James Baker any of those officials use their positions to interfere with the Clinton investigation to absolve her for political reasons I would be a crime of that happened we know that the inspector general another is the F. B. I. believe Nandor McCabe was fired for lying to the I J. member that IG report the first one false misleading statements perjury under oath obstruction I think they'd be applicable statutes for pre dawn raids with tactical gear and prog band you know the dirty dossier oh yeah we have got to get to the bottom of premeditated fraud on the court to deny a fellow citizen their civil liberties constitutional rights spy on a president a presidential campaign transition team and then presidency they knew steel was fired for lying they know exculpatory evidence existed they had they're all warm but they still used it in the application top of the fights application it says what verified separate the deprivation of rights all these things perjury but none of it happens to the other side so I understand the you know I understand the attorney general's position on this he's in a tough spot I understand the president's frustration in this I'm frustrated is it only seems that one side gets prosecuted he peering it's coming it's coming never happens eight hundred nine four one Shawn if you want to be a part of the program our outlook I can't believe that only one and and five American homes has a home security system now I blame a lot of this on the home security industry why you pay a fortune to get it installed in the other repaint your house then they have to sign like four.

Eric holder Lois Lerner official Congress Washington US Jack Lew Obama
"cheryl mills" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

106.1 FM WTKK

03:25 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

"Rise granting Cheryl mills immunity I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity the decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she request immunity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the F. B. I. wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation so certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some emails still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the department of state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails had gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer I hope I'm getting this right in my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that have been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for by grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop the store having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was through negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broke any laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there's sufficient to justify conclusion that you violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the data you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that interview she was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with their throughout the interview yeah my my understanding was that that time she was one of Clinton's attorneys should no longer subject.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

03:01 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity to decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the F. B. I. wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills sector Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation for target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation sort of certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some emails still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection isn't that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the apartment state on secure no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather is a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails have gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer if I hope I'm getting this right on my trip so correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that have been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for my grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop the store having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptops are investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was to negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broken any laws related to classified data we have no evidence there is sufficient to justify conclusion that you violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the data you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case so why did you allow.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

News Radio 810 WGY

03:05 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

"Mills immunity I'm sorry who authorized granting Cheryl mills immunity to decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay that you requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the F. B. I. wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills sector Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation so certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some email still on the computer that will recover that were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the apartment state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails had gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer I hope I'm getting this right in my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that had been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for my grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop so I having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was to negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broken as laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there's sufficient to justify conclusion that you violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the day that you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case so why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that interview she was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with her throughout the interview.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

Newsradio 1200 WOAI

03:11 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

"Information for our final news roundup and information overload who authorized granting Cheryl mills immunity I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity this is made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the FBI wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills sector Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation for target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct some point during investigation falls within the scope of the investigation so certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some email still on the computer that were recovered they were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the apartment state on secure no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conduct a year long investigation understand where our emails are going on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer if I hope I'm goodness right my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that have been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for my grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop sort having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptops are investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was to negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broken any laws related to classified data we have no evidence there's sufficient to justify conclusion that you violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the data you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case to bring this case why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that in a few short was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with her throughout the interview yeah.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

03:04 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KTOK

"Immunity I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity the decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the F. B. I. wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation so certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some email still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the department of state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails had gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer I hope I'm getting this right in my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that had been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for by grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop the store having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was true negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broken laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there's sufficient to justify conclusion that she violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the data you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case so why did you allow Cheryl mills.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

03:21 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

"Screening Cheryl mills immunity I'm sorry who authorized granting Cheryl mills immunity to decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the F. B. I. wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation so certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some email still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the department of state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include whether it's a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails have gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the emails found on her computer I hope I'm getting this right in my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that have been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for a by grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop the story having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was through negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broken as laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there is sufficient to justify conclusion that she violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the data you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that interview she was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with their throughout the interview yeah my my understanding was that that time.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on KNST AM 790

KNST AM 790

03:26 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KNST AM 790

"Rise granting Cheryl mills immunity I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity to decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the F. B. I. wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation or target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation sort of certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence as she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some emails still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the department of state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails had gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer I hope I'm getting this right in my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that had been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for a by grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop sort having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was true negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broken laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there's sufficient to justify conclusion that she violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the day that you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case so why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that interview she was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with their throughout the interview yeah my my understanding was at that time she was one of Clinton's attorneys should no longer subject in our investigation the agents.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

KTLK 1130 AM

03:17 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

"I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity to decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the FBI wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation or target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation sort of certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI fine classified information on either their computers I think there were some emails still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the department of state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails are going on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the emails found on her computer if I hope I'm goodness right my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that have been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for a by grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop the store having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was through negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broke any laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there is sufficient to justify conclusion that she violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the data you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case so why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that interview she was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with their throughout the interview yeah.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

03:16 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KTOK

"Mills immunity I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity to decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she requested unity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the F. B. I. wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation sort of certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some emails still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection is that a crime is what a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the department of state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something it's the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails had gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer I hope I'm getting this right in my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that have been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for a by grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop sort having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop would likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was through negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broken laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there is sufficient to justify conclusion that she violated any the statutes route with respect to classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the day that you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case so why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that interview she was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with their throughout the interview.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

03:16 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"I'm sorry who authorize granting Cheryl mills immunity to decision made by the department justice I don't know what what level inside in our investigations the if anything any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors not the investigators okay did she request immunity I don't know for sure what the negotiations involved I believe her lawyer asked for active production immunity with respect to the production of her laptop that's my understanding but again the FBI wasn't part of those conversations last week the American people learned that Cheryl mills factory Clinton's longtime confidante and former state department chief of staff and heather Samuelson council to secretary Clinton in the state department were granted immunity for production of their laptops why were they not targets of the FBI's criminal investigation for target is someone on whom you have sufficient evidence to indict a subject is someone whose conduct at some point during the investigation falls within the scope of the investigation so certainly with respect to ms mills least initially because she was an email correspondence she was a subject of the investigation did the FBI find classified information on either their computers I think there were some emails still on the computer that were recovered that were classified as my recollection isn't that a crime is when a crime Sir having classified information on computers that are outside of the server system of the department of state on secured no it's certainly something without knowing more you could include weather was a crime you have to know what were the circumstances what was the intention around that but it's certainly something is the reason we conducted a year long investigation understand where emails I've gone on on classified system that contain classified information and what did you determine with regard to the email found on her computer if I hope I'm getting this right in my troops will correct me if I'm wrong but they were duplicates of emails that have been produced with the emails have been used to sort before production do you think that Charles would have destroyed her laptop and if so why this negotiation as opposed to just asking for by grand jury subpoena well to lawyers laptop story at having done this for many many years a grand jury subpoena for lawyers laptop with the likely entangle us in litigation over privilege for a very long time and so by June of this year I wanted that laptop our investigators wanted that laptop and the best way to get it was through negotiation do you think any laws were broken by Charles we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime do you think that secretary Clinton broke any laws road related to classified data we have no evidence there is sufficient to justify conclusion that she violated any the statutes route was respected classified information is there any distinction between that statement and saying that no prosecutor would bring charges which is I think what you said in your public statements that the data you made your announcement I think it's another way of looking at it I think given the evidence in this case I still think that no reasonable prosecutor would try to bring this case or bring this case why did you allow Cheryl mills secretary Clinton's chief of staff to sit in on that interview she was a potentially a subject or target in the investigation she was a government employee she wasn't Clinton's attorney but yes she sits in there and talks with her throughout the interview yeah my.

Cheryl mills
"cheryl mills" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

News Radio 810 WGY

12:58 min | 3 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

"And more bold inspired solutions for America. Final news roundup and information overload. Your mentioned a pedestrian you're talking specifically about one Podesta where you not. And I was actually correct. Now, I was talking about both Podesta brothers because on July thirty first Peter Schweitzer wrote a devastating monograph called from Russia with money about John and Tony making millions from the oligarchs around Putin and aluminum and our uranium in gas in banking and then on the fourteenth of August. Breitbart published another story by by Schweitzer tying Tony Podesta the same Ukrainian political party as as Paul Manafort. So I said the pedestrians time in the barrel would come what I was saying was I intended to get that information on a background basis to a number of reporters any other narrative about what happened there is false. And there was no controversy about my tweet for six weeks until it has alleged that stone was foreshadowing Podesta's emails being stolen. Let me be clear. I never knew the source or the content of any allegedly act. Or allegedly stolen emails that is a lie. All right. So glad you're with us. News roundup information overload hour four days ago, the morning hours predawn hours of January twenty fifth well seventeen vehicles, including armored tactical trucks rolled into Roger stone's Fort Lauderdale neighborhood and two dozen heavily armed federal agents dressed in swat gear. Surround his home draw their weapons pound on his door and take him into custody. He's not a drug kingpin, not even charged with any violent crime of any kind. He's not a a mafia figure or ruthless gangster. This is not El Chapo. He has as we have discussed. This is now become another Robert Muller process violation. In other words, if if you don't have the witch hunt, none of this happens, and we all know, there's no Russia collusion, there never has been any at any point. There are a real questions here. This is now become the tactics of Andrew Weisman. The pit bull and Robert Muller and his merry band of democratic donors and even hiring Hillary Clinton's lawyer, and we went over list last night, all the Obama people that lied. When is the predawn raid gonna happen for Hillary, slam dunk case, although they put the fix in? That would be struck in Komi struck who wanted Hillary thought she should win one hundred million zero. Then of course, subpoenaed emails deleted computer's hard drive acid washes, bleach, bits them busting up devices. Or what are we going to get to Eric Holder or Cheryl mills or Brennan or Clapper who will all lied under oath or treasury officials under Obama or any of the other numbers of people? Anyway, Roger stone is with us. Now, I got a man. I mean, there's been a lot of talk. You thought the last time I interviewed you that you were being targeted that it might happen. Did you expect it to happen? This way. No, Sean, I'm represented by attorneys special counsel's office is well aware of that. I'm sixty six years old. Although I support the second amendment. I don't own a gun. I don't have a valid passport. I have no previous criminal record. I'm not a flight risk. The court said that when they gave me essentially a bond on my own signature. This was this was a a an intimidating signal to two other witnesses. It was meant to intimidate may twenty nine. Swat team armed FBI agents, surrounded my home, wearing night, goggles, brandishing assault rifles. I opened the door facing down the barrel of two guns. I was summarily. Good morning, Roger. That'll wake up better than any Cup of coffee. And I'm not making light of it. Because it shouldn't happen not in this country. And of course, there's a camera crew fifteen feet away from CNN capturing thing for charity. Yeah. Just by accident, by the way, they just happen to figure out the one day that they heard. Now, you said something last night. I your wife is sleeping, right? Yes. She was this lady. My wife is hearing impaired. She was not woken up by this close this commotion. I came downstairs, they marched me outside in handcuffs up their feet wearing my Roger stone. Did nothing wrong t-shirt gym shorts. And they said who else is in the house. I said my wife, I was afraid that they were going to sink she wasn't complying with an order because she chain hearing shooter. Did you tell them that? I told them that she was hearing impaired. They still want upstairs pounded on the door. They scared the daylights out of her. They traumatize my dogs all of this could have been avoided by simply calling my attorney the idea that they couldn't do that. Because I might destroy evidence is absurd. I've been under investigation for two years. They have nineteen of my current or former associates degree in jury or interrogated by the FBI if I was going to destroy evidence, which I. Haven't done wouldn't I've done it a long time ago. It's it's an absurd. These are the police state tactics of the of the Gestapo, this is something you'd expect in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, but not here in the United States. But the idea Sean is to poison the jury pool to make me look like public enemy number one for the American people to paint the black hat on meet before I'd had a fair trial. If I can get a fair trial in the district of Columbia. And then of course to break me financially. I don't have the funds to hire the lawyers to fight this. They wanna do to me what they did to Michael Flynn forced me to plead guilty to something. I didn't do which is why I ask people to go to stone defence fund dot com. I urgently help need help from the supporters of the president and other Americans who were outraged at what's being done to me. You know, I look at what happened to you Manafort same thing cone, the same thing, and you in general Flynn. I mean, what we learned that the deputy FBI director tells general Flynn, you don't need a lawyer and Komi brags that he did to general Flynn, and the Trump administration that would she'd never do if was Obama or Bush has president there's something really three star general in a perjury trap. He can't afford a lawyer they threaten to go after his son. He falls on the sword for that reason. You know, I know that it's probably more of your makeup. I've known you for a number years. I guess to just say that I'm not gonna suborn then I'm going to be able to get me to suborn perjury. You're not gonna lie, but then they threaten you with what however many years in jail, and you're sixty six years old. That's not looking at. I'm looking at a potential forty five year sentence. Based on these completely bogus charges. And I know how the indictment reads, but no lawyer no reasonable individual could understand without seeing all the transcript of the four and a half hours that I voluntarily testified to see how bogus in fabricated. These charges are which is why I plead guilty today in my arraignment, but sitting at the prosecution table smirking genie Ray, the personal attorney for Hillary Clinton in the illegal Email server case, the Email case represented the Clinton foundation against charges of racketeering. She has been running the the investigation and dementia. You've been questioning the witnesses before the grand jury about me sitting next to her errands Alinsky former counsel to the State Department under Hillary Clinton is emails are actually among the emails published by WikiLeaks, clear conflict of interest recommend. Good for his job by rod Rosenstein, who we served as an assistant US attorney too. By the way, that's violation to the US. Attorney apart me the Justice department supposed to be completely independent of the special counsel's office. So these are partisan hit people, they're they they they are you know, they are Hillary supporting partisans and their their goals, quite simple. Silence. Me. Silence. Me on the info wars platform. Silence. Me so with a gag order. So I can't come on with you, Sean, that's the whole plan. And then crush me financially, which is the worst part, I'm gratified. It's so many people have gone to stone defence fund dot com to help me because my life is now in their hands. We have a precedent setting case that's called the Pentagon papers. I went over on the show in great detail last week, and I've gone over it before. Four. A lot of this case is this indictment against you. Which I've read now a couple of times surrounds your desire to get information about what WikiLeaks might release before the election in two thousand sixteen now knowing in the Pentagon papers case as well as I do. Well, it was a six three supreme court ruling that the New York Times Washington Post, they had every right to publish even stolen materials as long as they weren't part of a conspiracy to steal it or steal it themselves. You're just trying to find out like, by the way, I think almost everybody in the media was wondering what WikiLeaks was going to drop at that time. And at one point, you're speculating, and one of the emails that it was about the foundation Clinton foundation, and you weren't right about that. Which says, oh, you didn't have any coordination of anytime. You didn't conspire to steal in union and steal it. So how is this? That is correct. In fact, there's also they say an Email from a doctor Jerry Corsi telling me that the disclosures will come in August into a data releases. That's also incorrect that turns out to be totally wrong. So it's very clear that I never had advance notice of the source or the content of the WikiLeaks disclosures, either stolen or allegedly hacked that I never received any such materials that are never passed anything of the kind onto the Trump campaign or Donald Trump, and I'm not sure. What about the client because they're claiming that you did have contact with and a high ranking Trump official about this. Whatever information you're getting. But it wasn't anything. You were ever able to confirm is that correct? I got an Email from somebody in the Trump campaign about a scientist public press conference, and I responded with two things from that mornings media both of which Republican formation that that Assange was concerned about his personal security. The guardian reported that there would be weekly disclosures for every week from October first to the election political had reported that five hours earlier. So again, no inside information. I do think there are some in the Trump campaign who have been pressured to bear false witness against me, and that will be proven at trial. My lawyers look forward to calling them shifted to stand and Eric swallow well to the stand because I'm entitled if I was accused of lying to the committee to call committee members. And see what they had to say that day. And what what the Republican members of the committee thought in terms of weather, my any error, I made before the committee in my testimony in 'cause either intent or materiality. All right. We're gonna take a break more with Roger stone on the other side, eight hundred nine four one Sean is our toll free telephone number more Roger stone on the other side. Sean Hannity defending freedom and call eight out the left now more than ever we need Hannity. Another chance to put a brand in your hand is coming up at the top of the hour WTY..

Roger stone Sean Hannity Hillary Clinton WikiLeaks FBI Obama Tony Podesta Russia Donald Trump attorney United States Robert Muller special counsel Michael Flynn Peter Schweitzer America Paul Manafort Fort Lauderdale El Chapo Breitbart
"cheryl mills" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

02:46 min | 3 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on WTVN

"Conversations that they're most focused on in the history that they lay out in this indictment is that Roger stone and Jerome Corsi who will talk to later they were trying to find out. What does he have next, and they were speculating actually and saying, oh, I think the next part is going to be about the Clinton foundation. All turns out, the next thing that came out was not about the Clinton foundation. Neither and my interviews with both stone Coursey neither one of them ever talk to Julian Assange, and I've never understood if they wanted to find out, you know, where this information came from. Why do they nobody's ever contacted that I know of WikiLeaks or Assange and said where did you get it? Can you prove it was it? Russia was Russia. Was it a Russia? You know, Russia connected individual was Russia itself was that the Chinese was North Korea. Was it maybe disgruntled the ANC workers who copied it who knows? But they would find the truth. I would assume swimming it in destroy the records. So you've got again back to the same old thing, by the way, where's the indictment a Hillary Clinton? She had subpoenaed emails. She busted up her hard drive with bleach pit destroyed devices. What about all the other people here? You know, there's nothing in this that talks about Russian collusion again every single person in journalism wanted to know what was coming next with WikiLeaks. Nobody knew that's why I interviewed him. I think in January twenty seventeen when I went to Russia went to the Ecuadorian embassy. When are we gonna talk about Obama Abidine, Cheryl mills or all these other people that lied the biggest liar of all was Hillary? The biggest obstructors of all was Hillary Hillary Clinton on every level never told anybody the truth. And then she obstructed Justice. You know? Oh, Roger stone didn't turn over his emails and text messages while Hillary Clinton deleted thirty three thousand of them. We never knew a bleached it was until Hillary Clinton did that and then busting up devices and destroying. Tim cards. We can't have unequal Justice under the law or 'unequal application of the laws or a dual Justice system. Anyway, Jerome Corsi person. One in the indictment will join us coming up later in the program. We're gonna play the president from earlier. So you can hear the whole thing yourself. We've all seen the news look mass shootings terror attacks, the very dangerous world, we live in and you know, all the politicians they always want to blame the gun or take away people's guns. Most of the politicians have armed guards our friends at the USCCA.

Hillary Hillary Clinton Russia Clinton foundation Jerome Corsi Roger stone Julian Assange ANC president Obama North Korea USCCA Cheryl mills Tim
"cheryl mills" Discussed on 550 KFYI

550 KFYI

01:33 min | 3 years ago

"cheryl mills" Discussed on 550 KFYI

"Hey, Roger looking to indict you watch come on down to give yourself up. But but boom, he's already out of jail. They had what on two hundred and fifty thousand dollars bond you pay twenty-five. He's out. No actually of the signature, Bob. He. He came off the presses there. He puts his hands at the peace. Sign like, Richard Nixon. There was a spectacle. But they didn't arrest him today on Russian collusion. They arrested him for lying about licking WikiLeaks or something like that. Well, what is going on? In the meantime, you got Cheryl mills, you got Houma Aberdeen. You've got who lied to the FBI and destroyed evidence. As a matter of fact, the FBI gave him the hammer did smash their computers. Here you go. Want us us win. This is more effective smash. You've got to Hillary Clinton, and and the emails and a server did the FBI ever breakdown, Cheryl mills how did the FBI ever ever go to Houma Aberdeen south and they had even more calls because her husband Carlos danger was sex thing with teenagers underage teens. Anthony weiner. Vert and on. Anthony, Weiner is computer..

FBI Anthony weiner Houma Aberdeen Richard Nixon Cheryl mills Bob Roger Hillary Clinton Carlos fifty thousand dollars
Hillary Clinton's security clearance revoked by her own request

Power Trading Radio

00:39 sec | 3 years ago

Hillary Clinton's security clearance revoked by her own request

"Hillary Clinton no longer has a security clearance. Fox's Derek dentist tells us why security clearance revoked for Hillary Clinton at her request. The State Department confirming the agency revoked the former secretary of state's classified security credentials at the end of August because Clinton asked five others associated with Clinton, including longtime aide, Cheryl mills also had their clearances revoked the aides were known as research assistants which allowed them to keep their clearances after their time at the department concluded this summer, President Trump revoked former CIA director John Brennan security clearance, and the White House has said he's reviewing other

Hillary Clinton State Department Derek Dentist Cheryl Mills John Brennan CIA Donald Trump FOX White House President Trump Director
'Let me get my heads': Virginia woman charged in decapitation death of West Virginia man

The Dana Show

00:46 sec | 4 years ago

'Let me get my heads': Virginia woman charged in decapitation death of West Virginia man

"How death row jerry diva's opinion thou shalt not disagree it's the eleventh commandment of the commandments we don't read anyway yeah and then a woman was arrested for beheading her boyfriend told cops let me go get my head's perea west virginia woman allegedly beheaded her boyfriend last week she told the police who arrested or did they had to let her go back and get her heads rowena cheryl mills was charged with second degree murder on april first in mercer county she was covered in blood gave him a false name and then when they arrested her that she said you gotta take me back and let me get my head's oh apparently there were other body parts there so she may have been right more of the danger show coming up stay with us.

Jerry Diva Second Degree Murder Mercer County Perea West Virginia Cheryl Mills