18 Burst results for "Cheryl Atkinson"

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WBAP 820AM

WBAP 820AM

01:36 min | 2 weeks ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WBAP 820AM

"P uh Cheryl Atkinson also reporting the CD HC has changed the definition of vaccines. To fit the China virus vaccine limitations. So now. Not only not only are you not a woman anymore, you're a menstruating person, According to Alexandria, Ocasio Cortez, the geniuses, the brainiacs who now run your federal government at the CDC are changing the definition of vaccine. The Centers for Disease Control carefully evolved the definition of vaccination to meet the declining ability of some of today's vaccines, including the China virus Vaccines. The original definition. Prior to 2015 State of the vaccines prevent disease Starting in 2015, the definition was altered to say the vaccines produce immunity. Without necessarily preventing the disease. And this From CNBC. Moderna shares rose Thursday their shares their stock prices, folks. Moderna shares rose Thursday after it announces developing a two in one vaccine booster shot. How convenient Two in one booster shot that protects against both the China virus and this and the seasonal flu. Oh, Isn't that a co winky Dink Ladies and gentlemen, Moderna. As if by magic, as if by Looking in their crystal ball. You know what this is going to be something we're going to need, and, uh.

Thursday 2015 Ocasio Cortez Cheryl Atkinson CNBC two Two both Centers for Disease Control one CDC Moderna Alexandria China one vaccine CD HC today
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on 990 The Answer

990 The Answer

06:56 min | 9 months ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on 990 The Answer

"Those individuals who brought violence on this capital? Been brought here to answer. Whether they did that because of our president. It appears I will receive no answer. And we added to that, for time he raises an interesting point. He's asking questions. These are questions that Cheryl Atkinson wanted asked as well, You know, we talked with her on the podcast. I hope you go toe kristic all calm and listen to the podcast because we have an extensive conversation about last Wednesday's events. Um Doesn't even have any proof of the people that did the actual violence and the things that people are being arrested. For. There's this insinuation that it was for the president. I e. Continue to assert that There's this miss misrepresentation of all Trump voters. First of all that. They're all cultists that the Trump is somehow their rum spiritually leader. You know that This is not about the country at all that this is all about the man. That somehow they weren't lovers of the country before that Trump is the guy that made them Excited that the flag that patriotism that the bill of rights the Constitution you know, mom and apple pie, small businesses and low taxes limited government. Freedom of speech. Your second Amendment rights. These are things that patriots in this country didn't care about before Trump came along, and then people win. Hey, I didn't I've never thought of that before. I like that guy. I'm with him. It's just insulting, but that's what Democrats think So you know, Congressman Mass there is raising the point. Anybody involved in this Wednesday? We've proven that any of this is about Trump that they did this for Trump. Well, the discussion spilled over onto CNN. Remember, this is Congressman Mass double amputee. Lost his legs fighting in combat serving this country. CNN's golden boy, Jake tapper, the people who were storming the Capitol, saying the president told us to come here, Okay, It's that is happening. I mean, that is video. There's video of this. It is just exhibit a of the first of all. Have you seen video of that? I've just seen video of that the president told us to come to the capital. Danna bash is with Jake Tapper here. I've literally not seen that video. If that exists proved me wrong. I'm happy, too. I'd love to find who that is. I'd love to play it here. I'd love to be proven wrong. I'd love to say, gosh, that's reprehensible. If that's true, I've not seen a video that says that literally not No. If you're talking literal words, I have a neither do. I've not seen one video anywhere that says the president told us to come here and destroy the capital. The congressman meant nest mask has a great point. Who did, who was questioned and said yes because of what Donald Trump said. That's why I stormed the capital. Anyway, they're having this catty conversation. It's really what Jake Tapper says. That's the worst. Listen the people who were storming the Capitol saying the president told us to come here, right? That is happening. I mean, that is video. There's video of this. It is just exhibit a of the reams of evidence that we have. There's one other thing I want to share. Just one other thing. Just that's relevant. What you're saying right now is relevant. Because Congressman Brian Mast, a Republican from Florida, who lost his legs, by the way, fighting for democracy abroad, although I don't know what is I don't know about his commitment to it here in the United States. Can you believe that statement? Lost his legs fighting for democracy abroad, although I don't know about his commitment to it here in the United States. Jake Tapper. Is that kind of arrogant guy? You know, I just closed my eyes when I heard that yesterday, and I thought Oh, if only Congressman Mast and Jake Tapper could be left alone alone in a dark room with no cameras for just a little while. You know, I just Jake Tapper's the kind of guy did you ever see? Hey, fast, Eddie Jefferson. Dirty rotten scoundrels in there. You ever see the movie? Dirty Rotten scoundrels with Steve Martin and Michael Caine? I have not. Yes, I can't even talk to anymore. You can't produce the show. It makes me angry. It's a fantastic comedy. You haven't seen it now. There's no one of this. Ang. I can't What is wrong with you? It's a Steve Martin, for God's sakes. All right, well, uh Are we gonna do with you? Once the next holiday Easter? Good. Good Friday. I want even a movie buff. I only have only seen 12 movies in my life. Okay, well, anyway, there's ah, there conmen, the both of them, and they're trying to out play one another. And then Steve Martin is pretending to be a soldier in a wheelchair. He's trying to gain the sympathies of a girl. And Michael Caine's playing a doctor who's trying to help Steve Martin, who's pretending to be a soldier, and he's also trying to gain the sympathies of the same girl. They're going back and forth trying to sucker this girl. Uh, They're both in a bar and Michael Caine trying tow who The girl is trying to convince the girl The best way to help Steve Martin walk and get out of the wheelchair is to ignore him. Uh, Steve Martin. You know dressed is the soldier is sitting there when a bunch of fellow soldiers in the bar. Are looking at the doctor with the girl and say, Hey, what's going on over there? What's the deal? And Steve Martin realizes? So this is an opportunity. He convinces the soldiers in the bar. That guy over there took my girl. Yeah, And so these guys are my fellow soldier there. He took his girl. And so Steve Martin talks these soldiers at the you know, taken Michael Caine out. Taking about stuff have been stuck him on an airplane and flew out of the country. It's great. Just take the crap out of him. That's that's when I heard this Jake tapper thing. That's what I meant. I closed my eyes and I imagined Oh, for Congressman mashed to have some of his veteran buddies just for a minute. Alone. With Jake Tapper. That's that's when I closed my eyes and imagined I know that's not the kind of thing I'm supposed to think. That's what I thought..

Jake tapper Steve Martin president congressman Michael Caine Donald Trump Trump Congressman Brian Mast Congressman Mass CNN Cheryl Atkinson United States Eddie Jefferson Danna Florida
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

KLBJ 590AM

06:21 min | 9 months ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM

"Of trouble, Confusion, murkiness to molt chaos. They returned to the old way of doing things, which was so Problematic and yes, even in the good times, Rush Limbaugh at 800 to 82288 to the rich Lowry has a column today on the Biden climate change agenda, which again like Cheryl Atkinson? I'm glad to see it because it is Uh, look, I don't mean to sound when they did it. It's Z. Well, it's it's great to see a certain way of thinking amplified out there, so it's more than just one place. Here's Here's the thing about The way the left is going about approaching climate change. They give us this. Horrible Snapshot of the future. Climate change to raise the temperature is going to do this. It's going to do that is gonna hurricanes and volcanoes and all kinds of horrible rotten things. And what are we going to do? Why, if you if you listen and we're just going to sit there And lived through it. We're just going to sit there and suffer. This is how the Democrats never understand the dynamics of a capitalist economy. They passed a massive tax increase. Remember the yacht tax? They came up with a massive tax on the people who make boats. Massive individual tax increase in the people that make boats and What did people do? They started buying boats in foreign countries. Where there was no tax. No additional tax. So who got hurt? The people that actually make the boat the people that work making. Most were laid off because there were no votes being sold because there was a new tax. The Democrats think they raised taxes on like California, California's just I can't wait to tell you this. California has just passed a wealth tax. On people who are leaving the state. Because of high taxes already wait'll you hear how they're doing it so they tax in tax in tax people leave the state. The Democrats think they're just gonna sit there and pay the punishment. That's not how people are. Well, the same thing with climate change. Ladies and gentlemen, Yes, I'm still watching them to ask me every 10 minutes. Talking to my TV. Not anybody. So I'm not being rude. Nowhere could talk to my TV anyway. I want to talk to now. To maintain that these rapidly increasing climate temperatures are a threat to human existence. Entails believing that human beings are gonna be snuffed out. We're just going to sit there and die. If the planet gets a few degrees hotter. What are they talking about? A couple degrees Celsius. And what do we know why we're going to die? Why would we die? Because we're gonna sit there and we're just going to suffer. We're going to sit there and we're gonna sweat to death. We're going to sit there and we're gonna thirst to death. We're going to sit there and because climate change is going to kill us. But that's not what happens. Human beings have this marvelous ability called adaptability. Human beings have the ability to adapt. The hardship left it. It's the name of the game for the human existence or the only species that can do it well. We're not the only ones were the only ones knowingly doing it. Some species evolved to deal with various challenges to their lives, and they don't even know it's happening because they're they're stupid animals, but we have the ability to purposely and with a design structure. Adapt. The Democrats believe, for example, if the sea levels rise, which is not gonna happen, like they say, But let's say they do. We're just going to stay there in our homes and be flooded. One day you will read the story. How Rush Limbaugh famous radio talk show host died today as the sea level expanded and swallowed his house. Limbaugh did not have the sense to leave his house before the high water got there. Is that what we're going to do people living in the way of on coming? Ocean level. Just gonna sit there and drown. If the summers which is where it gets hot. If they if it gets much hotter. In places that are unaccustomed to it. Do you think we might Install air conditioning. Like what? Same. Let's take a place of inevitable. What's gonna pick a favorite places all kinds of places. That even in the summertime, you'll get all that hot. But let's say climate change makes it get two or three degrees hotter. Well, Do you think people live there might install air conditioning. In their homes. Are they just going to sit there and sweat to death? It's not what we do. When faced With arduous circumstances when faced with challenges to our lives. What do we do? Why we invent a vaccine or we find ways to mitigate the oncoming destructive force? Whatever it is, it's the name of the human game. Let's say that there are droughts out there. Let's say that it gets dry. Let's say that it gets parched. You think we're just going to sit there and die of thirst, or we're gonna find a way that deal with it. When we find a way to divert water to these newly installed newly created drought areas are we just going to sit there and suffer and eventually die? If some of these areas become unlivable. We're just going to sit there and die. No..

Rush Limbaugh California Cheryl Atkinson Biden radio talk show host
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

Newsradio 970 WFLA

08:36 min | 9 months ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

"12 million vote difference. That's the biggest margin in history. They say if I got 67 the smartest people in the business if I got 67 million votes, I couldn't lose. I got 75 million. They say I lost. I didn't lose. The election was rigged by whom, by the Democrats and actually interesting with by the Democrats, but by local Democrats, meaning state Democrats. They have smarted state Republicans joining us now Cheryl Atkinson is back with us. She hosts her own Sunday program called the Full Measure with Cheryl Atkinson, and, by the way, has written a terrific book slant and how the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism. Uh, If you look in the big picture, they didn't care about Russian interference when it was Hillary's Bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier. They didn't care about quid pro clothes. When it's Joe and Hunter in Ukraine. They didn't vet Obama. They didn't vet Biden. They did all the job, had no reason to leave his basement bunker because the media just spent all their time attacking Donald Trump. They care about whistleblowers, but only if it's an anonymous here, say whistleblower, not whistle blowers, hundreds and hundreds of them saying, This is what we saw. During the election. They don't want to hear from them either. On D. I just never thought I'd get this bad, but it's even worse than I think I suspected even a year ago, Cheryl Well, it's true, and to be a viewer of the news today requires you to some degree to just sort of suspend your logic because you're watching things. But I think don't make sense to most people because they see that double standard. They see anything that one side says being questioned or call the line, no matter what and anything, the other side says, being taken as truth, no matter how little evidence or even if it's proven false. And it's just effort. I think by a lot of successful effort by a lot of interest to create this alternate reality and try to convince his toe live in it, But I think a lot of people see past that I think they do, but I think Look at hunt. Let's stay on Hunter Biden born second, so big tech sensors The New York Post story near Post is the fifth biggest largest newspaper in the country. They had pictures of Hunter asleep of the crack pipe in his mouth. And by the way, what I'm told is on this hard drive is Way worse than we even know now, all of a sudden, they said, there's no credible person a scent that no credible there's no evidence whatsoever in the lead up to the election. Now Hunter has to admit that he's under investigation. Now we find out. Attorney General knew the whole time. Now, all of a sudden, I guess we have to cover it now, but it's okay because his father was we believe elected president. Um, Cheryl, does that sound like massive? Cover up to you something the media might even call a conspiracy. Well, surely if the tables were turned, and this had happened to say Donald Trump's son that had some questionable practices that have been investigated. In fact, I'm if you remember Sean a year ago, there was left wing press doing quite good investigations 100 bike, But this was when Biden Joe Biden was in the goal against Bernie. Yes, and he was in the contest. Some people didn't want him in, apparently on the left. But as soon as he won the nomination, it's like all that went down the memory hole. It's like that investigation was never done. And if anybody raised it now they were conspiracy theorists. Even though there's a well established record of some pretty good reporting on that, And like you said, if the tables were turned, and nothing has leaked out. I mean, I think it's interesting and a month for illegal leaks, Of course, but anything it seems against Donald Trump. Even if untrue, anything that hurts him leaks, but anything that could help Donald Trump or hurt somebody else, even if true, that seems to be kept a secret and that people see through that. But I take your point that bill the saturation of everything we see and watch and listen to is so dominate. By these narratives. It's hard for people to feel like they can pierce it and get the truth and figure out what's really going on. This is what I keep saying as as I get more deeply into all of this, and there's so many different aspects what I'm calling now, these institutions in America I'm really just concluding something that I really don't like to conclude. And that is, you know, we used always point to other countries and say, that's them. I hate to say it, Cheryl, But I'm really beginning to say it's us that things have have gotten that bad here again. The double standard is breathtaking spiking, which is a term we used to use the hunter Biden story or, you know, praising hearsay whistle blowers that are anonymous, but just totally ignoring witnesses and All the states, For example, where a lot of these election questions have come up. And how about in the big picture that sort of gets blended in with the other stuff? How powerful and entranced our intelligence agencies, and some of the figures inside them are in terms of Directing the narrative. I mean, we saw two top former intelligence people. Joined cable news channels where they put out propaganda almost every day against President Trump. Much of it proved to be talking about Brennan and Clapper, right, and that's that could be seen and my experience is nothing other than an intelligence operation that used the media to further the false narrative. Then at the end, even though one of the other said, I guess I got some wrong information. They know that what they put out there was wrong. We're still being used. His experts is this. Nothing happened as if there was no operation against Donald Trump. And this to me is very shocking that what I call the persistent bureaucracy. And how our intelligence agencies no matter who's president really seemed to be able to pull so many strings on what we see and hear and decide what happens in this country. And then you could even take it a step further my mind and that is that. Okay, So all of this happens the consequences, And this is where I get so frustrated with the dorm investigation. I'm like, OK, the road map. Was there the low hanging fruit was there. The indictment's already written for you in the Horowitz report. And they didn't do it. And the election comes in the election goes all of this information available about Hunter Biden and nobody says a word now after the election, Okay, I guess we could now investigate because we really have no choice because of let's see the first lady. Nothing significant will happen. And you don't think anything would happen. Nothing significant will happen now. I don't think anything will happen with Durham either. No, I don't think anything significant. I know some Republicans. They're still saying we'll turn still going to make his report and You know, I think just based on experience and what we've seen the past four years, it doesn't matter now, any of that stuff, especially that which was related to election interference in 2016, in my view, had become out before 2020 to be meaningful. It's not should have been avoided. As we got close to the election, because otherwise you're rewarding the bad actors not holding anybody accountable. And I don't think they ever will be to any meaningful degree. Because now the election is past its too late. Doesn't matter what happens now. And I think it's interesting how justice is very swift. Some people like all of the people in the Trump orbit, who were not found to be colluding with Russia, but Something else was found on them, and justice was swift. Whereas justice seems to never come for some people were these FBI investigations go on for years and years and years and sort of disappear? I will remind you that the FBI was reportedly investigating the Clinton Foundation. In three bureaus at one time during before the elections last time, including Little Rock, Washington, D. C in New York. The New York Times according to my information, found out about that and sat on the information Held it. And whatever happened that that just sort of faded away The Tony Podesta question he was involved in some of the same Lobbying efforts and that others got in trouble for on the trump side, and he shut down his business. Kind of quietly. There were rumors that maybe he was going to be arrested. Never heard another word about that. Former governor Terry McCullough. When he was governor in Virginia announced that he admitted he was under FBI investigation for something I looked maybe six months ago. Never any follow up. Don't know what happened to that. Justice does not come or at least in the same form with the same speed depending on who you are in this country things I mean, you hear it did not feel well, I feel which is I always thought that could happen somewhere else. Not here. I'll take a break, Ward, Cheryl Acton said. On the other side, the herd book, by the way slant that Had the news media taught.

President Trump Hunter Biden Joe Biden Cheryl Atkinson Cheryl president FBI Cheryl Well Trump Hillary Obama Biden Virginia Terry McCullough America Tony Podesta Cheryl Acton Attorney Ukraine
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

06:43 min | 9 months ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WTVN

"To 75,000,012 Million vote difference. That's the biggest margin in history. They say if I got 67 the smartest people in the business if I got 67 million votes, I couldn't lose. I got 75 million and they say I lost. I didn't lose theologian was rigged. By who by did Democrats and actually interesting by the Democrats, But by local Democrats, meaning state Democrats. They have smarted state Republicans. Joining us now, Cheryl Atkinson is back with us. She hosts her own Sunday program called the Full Measure with Cheryl Atkinson, and, by the Way, has written a terrific book slant that how the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism. Ah, If you look in the big picture, they didn't care about Russian interference. When it was Hillary's bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier. They didn't care about quid pro quos when it's Joe and Hunter. And Ukraine. They didn't vet Obama. They didn't vet Biden. They did all the job had no reason to leave his basement bunker because the media just spent all their time attacking Donald Trump. They care about whistleblowers, but only if it's an anonymous here, say whistleblower, not whistle blowers, hundreds and hundreds of them saying, This is what we saw. During the election. They don't want to hear from them either. On D. I just never thought I'd get this bad, but it's even worse than I think I suspected even a year ago, Cheryl That's true. And to be a viewer of the news today requires you to some degree to just sort of suspend your logic because you're watching things. But I think don't make sense to most people because they see that double standard. They see anything that one side says, being questioned or called alive, no matter what and anything, the other side says, being taken as truth, no matter how little evidence or even if it's proven false. And it's just effort. I think by a lot of successful effort by a lot of interest to create this alternate reality and try to convince his toe live in it, But I think a lot of people see past that I think they do, but I think Look at hunt. Let's stay on Hunter Biden born second, so big tech sensors The New York Post story near Post is the fifth biggest largest newspaper in the country. They had pictures of Hunter asleep of the crack pipe in his mouth. And by the way, what I'm told is on this hard drive is Way worse than we even know now, all of a sudden, they said, there's no credible person to say that no credible there's no evidence whatsoever in the lead up to the election. Now Hunter has to admit that he's under investigation. Now we find out. Attorney General knew the whole time. Now, all of a sudden, I guess we have to cover it now, but it's okay because his father was we believe elected president. Um, Cheryl, does that sound like massive? Cover up to you something the media might even call a conspiracy. We're certainly if the tables were turned, and this had happened to say. Donald Trump's son that had some questionable practices that have been investigated. In fact. I don't know if you remember Sean. A year ago, there was left wing press doing quite good investigations on Hunter Biden, but this was when Biden Joe Biden was in the gold against Bernie. Yes, and he was in the contest. Some people didn't want him in, apparently on the left. But as soon as he won the nomination, it's like all that went down the memory hole. It's like that investigation was never done. And if anybody raised it now they were conspiracy theorists. Even though there's a well established record of some pretty good reporting on that, And like you said, if the tables were turned, and nothing has leaked out. I mean, I think it's interesting in a month for illegal leaks, of course, but anything it seems against Donald Trump. Even if untrue, anything that hurts him leaks, but anything that could help Donald Trump or hurt somebody else, even if true, that seems to be kept a secret. And people see through that. But I take your point that bill the saturation of everything we see and watch and listen to is so dominate. By these narratives. It's hard for people to feel like they can pierce it and get the truth and figure out what's really going on. This is what I keep saying is, as I get more deeply into all of this, and there's so many different aspects. What I'm calling now, these institutions in America I'm really just concluding something that I really don't like to conclude. And that is, you know, we used always point the other countries and say, that's them. I hate to say it, Cheryl, But I'm really beginning to say it's us that things have have gotten that bad here again. The double standard is breathtaking spiking, which is a term we used to use the hunter Biden story or, you know, praising hearsay whistle blowers that are anonymous, but just totally ignoring witnesses and All the states, For example, where a lot of these election questions have come up. And how about in the big picture that sort of gets blended in with the other stuff? How powerful and entranced our intelligence agencies, and some of the figures inside them are in terms of Directing the narrative. I mean, we saw two top former intelligence people. Joined cable news channels where they put out propaganda almost every day against President Trump. Much of it proved to be talking about Brennan and Clapper. Right, And that's that could be seen. And my experience is nothing other than an intelligence operation that used the media to further the false narrative that then at the end Even though one of the other said, I guess I got some wrong information. They know that what they put out there was wrong. We're still being used. His experts is this. Nothing happened as if there was no operation against Donald Trump. And this to me is very shocking that what I called a persistent bureaucracy. And how our intelligence agencies no matter who's president really seemed to be able to pull so many strings on what we see and hear and decide what happens in this country. And then you could even take it a step further my mind and that is that. Okay, So all of this happens the consequences, And this is where I get so frustrated with the dorm investigation. I'm like, OK, the road map. Was there the low hanging fruit was there. The indictment's already written for you in the Horowitz report. And they didn't do it. And the election comes in the election goes all of this information available about Hunter Biden and nobody says a word now after the election, Okay, I guess we could now investigate because we really have no choice because of let's see the first lady. Nothing significant will happen. And you don't think anything would happen. Nothing significant will happen now. I don't think anything will happen with Durham either. No, I don't think anything significant. Like I know some Republicans. They're still saying we'll turn still going to make his report and You know, I think that's based on experience and what we've seen the past four years..

Hunter Biden President Trump Cheryl Atkinson Joe Biden president Obama Biden Ukraine Hillary Durham The New York Post Horowitz Sean America Attorney General Bernie Brennan Clapper
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

01:36 min | 1 year ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on 600 WREC

"Free speech? If if your voice my voice, others are relegated to our own websites. On and we cannot advertise or put anything out into the public square. Do we really have free speech in America? It's a good question, and I I'm kind of redefining censorship. People say, Well, you're talking about censorship, but those air social media companies and it's the news and I'm arguing. They're so inextricably tied now to government. For example, when Adam shift and call Facebook and say Take down the story on vaccine safety because Whoever I'm assuming pays him or donates to him doesn't like it. And then Facebook does it. I think that you know that become government censorship reaches into a whole new definition, and I think that's what we're seeing. And if if this isn't dialed back There may be some people who are perfectly happy to have their news curated and their information sorted through. But obviously they're not thinking down the road of well Sunday. It's not going to be the people. You want to do it who were doing it, You know, just think about the consequences Once you open the door, the slippery slope to allowing people To tell you what you ought to see And thank versus you being able to decide for yourself if you'd like to. Cheryl. Thank you so much. Always great to talk to you. Rishi ate him. Thanks, Glenn. That's Cheryl Atkinson, the name of her book itself for a pre order. We'll have around to talk about a book something, but it's called slanted. You could order it now she is. She is somebody who used to.

Cheryl Atkinson Facebook Rishi America Adam Glenn
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on 600 WREC

600 WREC

05:53 min | 1 year ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on 600 WREC

"All right. Cheryl Atkinson is with us and Cheryl, This is going to be called a conspiracy theory. I'm sure you're aware of the transition group that the the left has put together that is they're plotting. Different scenarios on really how to throw the country into chaos on how to negotiate a win for Joe Biden by In their own words encouraging Washington, Oregon in California to secede. Well, I don't think that's gonna happen, and I think some people would welcome that if it did, by the way, But I do think well, you know, landed. Davis got on Twitter the other day and said, this is former The current. I guess Hillary Clinton confident friend and said something like New York, California We ought tojust. We're going to leave. And a lot of people tweeted back like, please be my guest. How soon can you go? But I agree that That you know, I heard it again in 2016 something that some of my contacts on the right were saying Wass. That the left accuses us. They mean the right of doing everything that they did, and I just thought I kind of chuckled like Oh, that's kind of a funny saying, but I didn't really think of it is literally true. Until now, you look at Refusal to accept the outcome of the election, which they're, you know, accused Trump of doing in 2016 and now again, 2020. And then I get chills when I think about Ukraine, accusing Trump of interfering with Ukraine when They knew some months before that. This is probably going to come up yet because what Biden and his family had been involved in, which was exactly what they accuse Trump of doing only there. Their deeds were documented and acknowledged versus the sort of accusations that generic accusations that turned out not to be true against Trump, although he was impeached for it. And, Yeah, I just go back to this. The friend who said that And I'm like you can't. You're kind of right. You're proving right. So when they say something A lot of times it makes me now think, OK, what have they done that they may be trying to deflect from or what are we going to learn? You know that they did Dio when I was uncovering the Tides Foundation back in 2008 and George Soros. That's what I told my team. They will self diagnose whatever they accuse us off their doing. Because you recognized disease and people because of you. You know what I mean? You're like, Ah, They're probably doing this because that's the way you behave and they can't help themselves. They always self diagnose this. What's happening? But is actually happening on their side. Usually the The New York Times to see if I can find this came out. Ah, today or is this was yesterday. About disinformation in the 2020 presidential election, and they say election misinformation the the biggest category of election misinformation. Is the mail in ballots that there's going to be a problem with the mail in ballots. And the other one is George Soros, the investor and Democratic donor. There's so much misinformation about him. We continue to get flagged all the time when I When I say things like George Soros is investing in district attorneys, and he is trying to change things by changing the system from within at the local and the state level. That's all proven. How is that a conspiracy theory? I agreed. Because if you don't dig in the way you have it sounds crazy. It sounds far fetched. And I thought so, too. You know, at one time before I looked at some of the details, and most people don't have time to look into it, And they can't believe That stuff. You know, the stuff can be connected or how it's connected. I mean the mail and bet ballots, and I wrote about this at length and planted How can the media fact check in advance the future? You had people fact checking as fall Donald Trump's prediction that there would be fraud with the mail in ballots. How do you? How do you false fact Check something that hasn't occurred yet. But you have no idea what what's gonna happen, And then you you follow the money. Um and you find out that you know the fact check, Let's say in the case of Google doing a fact check or, you know, taking down information and their own by Alphabet, which is one of the biggest contributors to Joe Biden's campaign. When you look at, you know employees by company and they were the biggest contributor to Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. I believe in or one of the biggest in 2016. And then you start looking at all the fact checks and this against sounds conspiratorial till I looked into it for an article I wrote for real clear investigations. So many fact checkers and particularly the board as supposedly independent board of Facebook connections. So Saurus group, so Yeah, I started getting chills when I looked just like off. Maybe a couple of these people will have links to sorrows. One work directly for the source organization. And I think all but one or two out of You know, more than a dozen Had worked with these groups he founded and funded their paid forgot money. It's just Just so much money out there. The odds are that if you're looking at any kind of advocacy on the progressive side, it's been touched by money from a Saurus group. And what is what? What is your opinion on source? Why does he do that? People say to me all the time. He's a capitalist is a rich guy. Why would he want to destroy capitalism? The free market system? Why would he want to do these things?.

Donald Trump George Soros Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Cheryl Atkinson California Ukraine Saurus group Twitter Davis Oregon Wass Tides Foundation New York Facebook Washington disease Bernie Sanders Google
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

KTAR 92.3FM

01:41 min | 1 year ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM

"Coming. You know, we don't know what goes behind the scenes, but I wouldn't. I wouldn't put anything past anybody. You are suggesting that the ideological groups are are slipping money under the tight table to reporters. Well, I don't know. Well, okay, You bring it up, all right? I have spent a lot of years in newsrooms. To my experience to the answer to that would be an absolute and complete no. But again, I'll defer to Cheryl. Well, I agree. There's not money, but I will tell you something that gave me chills. It was set to make years ago by a Republican operative when I was asking for an interview, and he said, and I told him I was going to be fair and honest in the interview of some controversy, and he said to me I know he goes and I know about you have heard about you and I know you can't be bought and I kind of was like What? I went home to talk to my husband. I said surely he doesn't mean for money. But it implied to me that there are journalists and we have evidence of this who can be bought in a different way by a promise of exclusive. If you don't report this a certain way, I will give you this exclusive. That helped me later politically, but it will look like Yet for you, so there's certain ways that favors air given or favors are granted in the way that some people could say compromise you, But it's not cash payment like though, as you said, and for the Supreme Court. If the case gets to them, they might have something to say. Sure, Atkinson, I guess we've gotta gotta pause here. Stay on the line. Cheryl Atkinson. The new book is slanted. This is Westwood one Get.

Cheryl Atkinson Supreme Court
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

WMAL 630AM

02:41 min | 1 year ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WMAL 630AM

"Weekend in an interview with Cheryl Atkinson that Richard right now is a superstar he had guts he had courage to do what he did the president said I think it's a changing of the guard that means the president the United States today well welcome and swear in Texas representative John Ratcliffe to take over for record now who just record just passed Senate confirmation last week so now he will officially be the fully confirm director of national intelligence and the president said off Radcliffe quote we have another superstar going in as you know John reckless so the president a lot of faith that rack life is gonna be able to pick up that baton that Rick Grinnell is handling handing to I I don't understand why Rick Grinnell just wasn't made there with the director why would you know what he was doing such a fantastic job why change horses why not just put him up for Senate confirmation were allowed to be acting director of forever we have a lot of acting directors in the prison because Congress is consulting up all of these confirmations why not because there's a time limit on the on the amount of time that he can serve as acting director and okay he would not make it through Senate confirmation isn't you don't think the Republicans would confirm him they were going to confirm John John Radcliffe and they did the Republicans were against him too and he made it through now Rick Grinnell is much too outspoken and aggressive to be the kind of guy who gets Senate confirmations so what ended up happening with Rachael if you recall correctly is that reckless was originally nominated last year and the Senate was prepared not to let him throw because they thought that Radcliffe was to openly pro trump and you couldn't have that in the director of national intelligence but then when the president put Rick Grinnell in office as the acting director of national intelligence that up the pressure on the Senate to get out of the way and let rack with make his way through to the president puts it back up for nomination and he makes his way through that was that is actually you know you can talk about the president the art of the deal boy did he achieve it in Seattle arrangement I'm do we know we're recruiting is going he can't leave I adore him he can't leave is it what do we know where he's going I don't know where he's going I do know he's leaving both of his posts he is not returning to be Morrison **** of Germany yeah and of course he'll be leaving the job of director of national tells us that one other thing that trump said in that interview with Cheryl Atkinson yes he said that based on the information that keeps coming out thanks to these guys quote if it keeps going the way it's going I have a chance to break the.

Cheryl Atkinson Richard
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News Radio 920 AM

News Radio 920 AM

11:32 min | 1 year ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News Radio 920 AM

"Of the five that I trust more than anyone else Cheryl Atkinson Lara Logan are the two best journalists I think out there for investigative journalism and the one I trust to do interviews and and actually ask all the right questions is Megan Kelly we've had all three of those on here in the last twenty four hours Lara is is amazing because she is like a bloodhound yeah we she was with sixty minutes and you don't get to be on sixty minutes if you're a champ and issues with sixty minutes and she just will not you give her a bone and she just will chew and chew and chew and chew and chew on it and she is as I am wildly concerned about what is happening with what is called now Obama gate it looks as though president Obama according to documents that have now just been released president Obama ordered up the russiagate scandal this was built by him we're not sure if it was just to get rid of Flynn which he didn't like I my guess is it's both or just discredit Donald Trump again I think both of those were there Flynn is a guy who knew were all of the bodies were buried and there is a lot of bodies with president Obama and I remember saying in two thousand eight because this guy's being allowed by the press to run unchecked when he leaves office there will be a scandal with him at the head of it that will dwarf Watergate I think this may be it Lara Logan joins us now hi Laura how are you I am good and right I'm good I know this bin is been a little hectic this morning to to get you on this guy but I appreciate you joining us via Skype if tell me if you know last night you in one of our producers are talking and and if you are so passionate about this because you've read all the documents is out as have I and my staff and most people haven't it could tell me what you tell me your overall view and then we'll get into specifics what's happening I think the most important thing to me that I took away from reading the document something that I sort of had a hunch about from the very beginning but now you know what's so frustrating is we don't know what we don't know right we don't have access to all of this information and there's still a lot of information that's going to come out but so so when you finally get some of these documents and the pieces of the puzzle stocked to fall into place what you realize is that as much as I really do respect Mike Flynn as as much as I I I know from a personal perspective what it's like to be targeted and destroyed publicly especially when it's I'm just the most significant thing for anyone to understand is that this isn't about my blood and it never was not my friend and it's not just about Donald Trump if you take you know what they want you to do is they want you to get into a fight about whether or not Donald Trump is a good guy or bad guy that's the political track is this about Donald Trump should he ever been elected they want you to have those conversations yes the conversation they don't want you to have there was an attempted coup to unseat a duly elected president of the United States Michael Flynn was just the first casualty it wasn't even the most important casualty and Donald Trump is not the most important thank you it is about the fact that in the United States of America something that I would never in a million years have imagined that I would see here in this country that is for everyone in the world doesn't matter it doesn't matter what party you come from I grew up on the other side of the world this country is a beacon of light or anyone who believes in freedom and your rate believes in the rule of rule that's what this country is that's what separates the United States from many other places on earth is this ideal of freedom and what we do to protect it and what and the constitution that would tie a document is written to protect that freedom the rule of law exists to protect that freedom and all the rights that flow from that accountability the first amendment it's there to protect the freedom and and that is what is at risk yeah this is about so absolute power people who wanted to take power away from those who are who exercise their rights and to install a government that they wanted and not to let it go they're not planning on letting it go and they will do anything to get so I'm Lara let me let me back up here because I I want to make sure that we're on the same page when you say it was an attempted coup it was the way I read this is that Obama put certain people in intelligence and justice in the state department we saw this with our investigation that we did on Joe Biden in in Ukraine and they were running things they way they wanted and they he put he tried to put some people into place that were it we would be coming institutional they could run without the presidency and so things would just never changed their goals of the Obama administration would just continue to run as a program underneath and that's what they didn't want stopped would you suggest it wasn't just the Obama administration I mean you are not wrong in terms of the concept and the principle the principle was to take the lifelong bureaucrats that were in all of these departments to take that fundamental kind of foundation of our civil service and our institutions like law enforcement and like intelligence and to correct them at their heart that's what the point was which is the left do historically they infiltrate they infiltrate and they own it from the ground up right and so that's the principle of what they were doing but when you have when you have five career bureaucrats from the federal bureau of investigation well asked by rod Rosenstein to wear a wire when they went into the oval office to meet with the president of the United States to be interviewed for call me shop and almost five of those bureaucrats knowing that that was wrong and probably illegal I eat cold entrapment they all agreed that tells you they're all on the team in one way or another and the thing is okay you know this right you don't have to own every single heart and soul within an institution you just have to have enough people there that are on your team to create a culture and an environment in which everyone is afraid to speak up or that the and the consequences of speaking up the price you're Hey isn't worth it so then what happens is you have people who who bought into the idea that Hillary Clinton was going to be the next president of the United States and they didn't want to be on the wrong side of that I eat the email investigation so yes on the one hand they want to sample the rule rollback on the other hand if bosses the out you know the people with real power inside the FBI not like you know just power on paper the people with real power because you're looking at counter intelligence and you're looking at the upper echelons of the FBI and the Kobe KD sector these people are telling you which direction to take there they are literally departing from the gnomes of investigative procedure and from the local right and they're saying to you we have made it this is what we're gonna do here so that the signal is sent loud and clear and I and what you you then have a moving on from that you now have a whole lot of people who are complicit in the crime and in the cover up because they now have a vested interest in making sure that none of this stuff I'm still out so you don't know we don't know at this point who is a hundred percent on the team who is an operative and who is the person who just you know was sympathetic like there are many journalists who you know our I've said it openly I didn't even think it was a revelation because everybody knows that most journalists are on the left or right Democrats or whatever you want but does that's the natural condition that was exploited by political operatives and propagandists and the architect of this coup in order to get out the message and steer the conversation in the directions they want it and it's the same so now you have journalists we're committed to this lie because they've gotten the Pulitzer Prize for and they they believe it's true and they're they're digging in because they stand to lose personally and if they if they admit that they were you know complicit in basically a cover right of a crime and and so you've got it becomes self reinforcing you don't have to own every person then add the number of journalists we're going to say whoa right I mean everyone believes this is true so it must be true and they just look for the pieces of information and they go to the same place they go back to Adam Schiff they go back to John you know to clap that they go back to Brandon they go back to the same people what time of the crime and they use them to vindicate and validate themselves I mean I NEO bomber write an editorial you're not asking a question you're doing an interview with with him you're not holding him to account for what it is that he is doing right you're not doing any of that you're actually just giving him a platform to do a call to action for everyone who is on the team that's what that was about I mean the man couldn't even articulate a real defense he didn't say this is about the rule of law listen to his words his act well I am concerned that what this is about is that somehow our concept of what the rules brought here is going to be what what did you just say you can't even repeat the lie at this point you know in a in the way that you are I would you and I both know when not complicit in this right so how would we handle it what would we do we would do exactly what I'm doing right now we would say this is about the rule look real look at this and look at the evidence we wouldn't mount some kind of yes defense right and use right away the same tactic trial by media it has to stop then we can't do this any longer to ourselves all of us it has to stop no more convicting people in the press without due process in order well okay legal process so I want to go let me take a break for a minute and then I'm gonna come back to you.

Cheryl Atkinson Lara Logan Megan Kelly
Facebook 'Fact Checker' Tied To Wuhan Virus Lab

Purity Products

00:23 sec | 1 year ago

Facebook 'Fact Checker' Tied To Wuhan Virus Lab

"Thanks Cheryl Attkisson tweeted this out Facebook fact checked as false a documentary that said it could be possible that the coronavirus came out a will hand out of a van lab so Facebook no a mark that is false and took it off was the fact checker so Cheryl Atkinson forced former CBS news reported a scientist who worked in the Warhammer lamp

Cheryl Attkisson Facebook Cheryl Atkinson Scientist CBS
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on NewsRadio WIOD

NewsRadio WIOD

05:52 min | 1 year ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on NewsRadio WIOD

"For Cheryl Atkinson I'm on Sunday night with with her a check for listing yesterday I did an interview with Lara Logan I spent three hours four hours whether she is in Colorado bull incredible everyone's job was on the ground yesterday after the interview with her she is boy oh boy is she a warrior for truth and that that is coming up but also tonight on the still program the stew show which is does America yes you have that's on playboy very hard to get gassed all my gosh very difficult to get him Jason Botterill who's who's with us again because I won eight I want you to speak splaine this theory because I think it is such a great theory that you're going to really go in depth with tonight on on students America yeah probably segment you'll never see anywhere else guarantee of this should be this is a great theory is both frightening and it's both interesting and I know how you like to track like historic trends you know and yeah the way things go but we're gonna compare ferry Goldwater to Bernie Sanders I told you this is never been done before that sounds crazy but listen so you know what radicals never win elections typically ever I'm predicting a **** I like a historic loss if Bernie Sanders gets the nomination I think he loses a starkly now the problem is R. the interesting thing is is that was burgled water nineteen sixty four nineteen sixty four Barry Goldwater was the radical of the conservative movement a radical conservative you know we actually believe in the constitution that's radical but and of course he he went on to defeat the the the you know the Rockefeller Republicans and and if you look at the debate stage you know couple days ago you pretty much saw what if what if what if they had a debate like that that's what it would have looked like it would have been all of them at this big giant smorgasbord gonna beat the food they were eating each other and that's that's what was going on but the real target was Goldwater the real target was gone Goldwater got the nomination but he lost historically I mean legitimately historically a store class I think still today was the largest you know popular vote loss in history but look what it did for the rest of the of the conservative movement I mean we had Reagan during since sixty four the best speech ever given anything a time for choosing him but then we got in the nineteen eighties sideways if you haven't if you haven't listened time for choosing just goal not now but like in twenty minutes just pulling that number up you go to YouTube and and listen to time for choosing Ronald Reagan nineteen sixty four it is phenomenal and right lock step two day still but we're so radicals lose elections and usually historically but they look what the trend that they set so if you have a party like the Rockefeller Republicans they'd had no ideas and see if this sounds like a Democrat party right now people are tired of of them they were doing what they were saying there were no new ideas Goldwater busted that trend and started a movement that look this is where it gets scary so we're all like Hey great you know like you know Sanders will lose a starkly four more years you know of of Donald Trump but what does that mean for the Democrat party just look at the Conservative Party to the Republicans back in nineteen sixty four going up to nineteen eighty what's going to happen now when the radical loses but his ideas permeated the Democrat party even other bad ideas but what does that happen what is that trend if if if we're looking at the historic model we might be in trouble and who is who is it that's watching who is it that young that is a believer in Bernie oh my god that can that is the right package and will find the right time look at that speech in twenty minutes when you watch a time for choosing from the Reagan library look at all the young faces in that crowd yeah they are in their teens and twenties and they're looking at Reagan and they're not batting an eye I mean they are in thrall those are the people now that are gonna I'm going to watch when Bernie Sanders is gonna lose the election they're the ones that are watching him right now right I mean like and it's the sort of a C. thing right at some point someone like AOC could come along that there could string together several words in a row and then what happens well I don't like what if what if she would if she came along and she could tie your shoes by yourself like magic well that night it's hard to imagine it's hard to imagine a or C. with the ability to feed herself to get through the day use a straw what someone who doesn't like that but believe the same thing same job about the garbage disposal video he's always walking around her house with a glass of wine and so he's like as at so I I didn't I I will walk in his room for a long time and there's there's a little bump on a log and I always I've lived in the it was nearly the lights go on I don't know if you've ever seen one of these well I you push it down and again points in our lives I'm not saying causation here hello he goes off crazier as always walking around our house with a glass of wine discovering something they call this but.

Cheryl Atkinson Lara Logan Colorado
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WBAP 820AM

WBAP 820AM

04:44 min | 1 year ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WBAP 820AM

"Number with investigative reporter Cheryl Atkinson and move over the old adage you can't fight city hall try fighting several layers higher than that and it's a rough road Michael in Tallahassee Florida decks grieving Michael good evening and and and I watch your program every week HL I had a few options yes go right ahead there's a deep do you think that there's a deep state question one for two to think our own government records our telephone conversations do you think our own intelligence agencies rather than spying on Americans correctly we'll ask British intelligence to spy on us and how serious do you see the problem of parallel construction that the government uses to prosecute people well there you go that's a master's thesis in contemporary of surveillance all rights just in order here is there a deep state Cheryl yes and I I always used to call the persistent bureaucracy that after years of working in Washington but from people who I've literally been told from people who worked under the Obama administration the bush administration I've been told in the past couple the year things like there is in the state I was part of it things like that and I I feel like I'm really seen it in action in the last couple years the the the oppression of course we get of a deep stay is that they they meet in the catacombs of of Washington and skulking around in the dark with the lit torch is or something I mean you can get pretty melodramatic about this how consciously does the deep state work that that entrenched bureaucracies will automatically fight to preserve their prerogatives their power their and their funding I take as a given but but how consciously would you say there is a deep state I think it's a mix I think it's pockets a very conscious needing the discussion even if they don't get that about what they're doing and I think it's also the the natural structures you describe do they record our phone calls yes do they use British intelligence and to find that they're not allowed to I'll be one better on that I would say yes but outside of this country there are places where no law the Clive and told by Intel officials they can tap into these giant internet cables that are buried in the ocean with impunity as long as they go in international waters so there's all kinds of ways they can listen to it and have no problem parallel construction the last question he asked to prosecute if I understand the question correctly using premises and other matter that this is what he's asking to prosecute people who may not deserve it yes I do think that the big problem interesting in terms of of the the use of of other into legends agencies and the like over the address to the whole issue of recording our phone conversations there are so many of them I have heard it said that it it is entirely possible that our conversations are recorded which would not serve maybe a pleasant thought but that there is no where near the resources to do anything other than record and store them there is no possible way even even using key words to to attract attention to certain conversations of no way you could ever actually make use of all this information because this is a tidal wave of conversations I think you're right so you had on two points one of them is to use it for terrorism prevention purposes to to to help you capture conversation out of the blue it seems almost pointless right now but to use that to have at your disposal if you have a name you want to search for if you want to look for Cheryl acting and stuff there's a way to do that because it's been collected so the notion isn't that they go through all of that the notion is if you start to think about bad actors looking for something that they wanted to hear or listen to a finder's fee that they wouldn't otherwise be able to back for I think the dangerous matchup some of them I believe he's a four yeah that that that other words that option is available to them and unfortunately I like any option that can be a a bad temptation here's Bradley in Pittsburgh I Bradley hi I wonder if they'll ever got the judicial watch Tom Fitton involved in our investigation hi again thank you for asking they help not with this too because I had attorneys working on it with me but they have helped on prior freedom of information act lawsuit and have been very you know have really tried to help a lot on certain matters this suit I don't believe they did anything with us because I had an attorney that took the thought initially that and helping me more to come stay with us one eight six six five oh Jimbo sharyl Attkisson our guest in the award winning investigative journalist the author of The New York Times bestsellers the spear and stone wall to both of which we spoke with her about on this program he's also the reporter and the host of.

Cheryl Atkinson investigative reporter
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

Newsradio 1200 WOAI

11:42 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

"For thirty years Cheryl Atkinson was a what a correspondent in an anchor at CBS news P. B. S. C. N. N. I. N. boy and then they found out she wasn't easy progressive she was actually looking for the truth no matter where the chips fell so they are on her out on a rail good thing for us there is something called the interwebs the information superhighway really gave her home now she also has her her own show with sin clear cold full measure and she actually looks for the truth sharyl Attkisson how are you I interesting thank you I'm very good I'm I'm interested in in in hearing your theory and what you found in with the state department and shuttle diplomacy let me just say that I typically without trying to be in it for the contrary and I see something entirely different than what I think even some of the Republican thing when I listen to these hearings and it is sort of the last gasp of the person that you're operating within the state department yes speaking against a president who came in and did exactly what he said he was going to do is change the usual take charge they don't like it then I would go so far as to say his mission by our diplomats that they took action contrary to what they understood the president's foreign policy desires work which I believe is extra constitutional and perhaps worst but there they seem to think we've now heard it stated explicitly they think the bureaucrats they run the show the present work for them and they're out of their mind when he didn't see things the way they wanted him to see that they have a lot of the state department has a lot invested in Ukraine and and a policy called civil society to point that was designed by Hillary Clinton would use of state department Barack Obama and and some other some other figures that usually only belong and conspiracy theories like George Soros and they have set this course up as a matter of policy and they spoke about it at the time Cheryl with with people who were in the room helping design it that they needed it to be institutionalized so it wouldn't matter what presidents would do when they came in and went that's not what the state department is supposed to do the state department works for the president not for themselves on elected officials and I think that's one of the revelations that says that explicitly saying otherwise and I would also point out I looked at the disclosure the other day for the foreign agents registration act this is where foreign countries the close the lobbying the Canadian for hiring here in the US a lobby for their interests most countries have in a congressional coming may get paid to people they hired you know to be a certain thing crane is by far the biggest had pages and pages of people at higher in the last few years to lobby journalists and members of Congress to make contributions all kinds of things and I don't think it's any coincidence that everybody's advocating it looks to me like the state department official that sounds to me like they're advocating for Ukraine and trying to change the president's mind yes rather than the other way around right I mean I I here's the thing though is is lost on me why people can't connect here it quid pro quo is a way of life I mean it's it's it's commerce it's free market it's our marriage everything is pretty quick quid pro quo you cheat on me and I'm probably not gonna hang around and that a controversial when there is not a precondition for foreign aid or white find that there haven't been condition that that expected to have conditions that why would we why would we just give money away especially to a country that all sides even curry Ukrainian say corrupt as hell why wouldn't we have conditions on that money you had over the last day and a half at least in my mind there is such an effort by the vehicle that can make sure no one would committing Ukraine to a corruption investigation or look into election meddling in twenty sixteen why what is the harm I mean they may be like a maybe long that there wasn't any there's good evidence that there was left leaning political concluded a wide based on firsthand interviews but let's just say there isn't there wasn't any what's the harm in having the investigation that would show that why are they so hell bent on keeping the present you quite from committing to any investigation into corruption or twenty sixteen on birth I think it's strange I would love to have your brain around this may I send you a box of documents from the state department from it from the court system in Ukraine along with video tape of what we have on on officials admitting to these things because the facts are all there no one is willing to go there and it is if if this becomes just about Donald Trump my opinion share on this whole thing is if Donald Trump was doing something wrong illegal that he should pay the price if the Democrats were doing something wrong or illegal they should pay the price but we need to overturn every stone because our Republic is at stake just like with with Russia if Donald Trump was colluding with Russia he should have been impeached I don't care who's right or wrong I want to know the truth well I'm I'm concerned that the persistent character if you'd been quite effective in punishing anybody around president trump so far that have gone off script of what they want to happen and if they're able to make it work president can't institute for Policy can't cope with activations and a correction can't condition eight I mean we've been given up any notion of the constitution that says the present time in foreign policy of the play we've basically been fed now today the bureaucracy besides the things the president just have to go along with that sure can I tell you something that President Bush told me in the oval office I was there the day that Barack Obama who was then trailing Hillary Clinton he said that you know if I if I had charge I I would I would send our jets I don't care about their air space if if I want to find you know the bad guys and they're in Afghanistan I'll just send the jets over in this is the time where we kind of thought that maybe Afghanistan was kind of an ally and I said Mister president I mean can we do that it's an ally what would that mean and he looked at me and he tried to comfort me and it's booked the hell out of me he said clan don't worry I don't care who sits in this chair when they do they will be advised by exactly the same people they'll see the same facts and they'll realize the president's hands are pretty tied it's just going to stay the same well can you imagine being an outsider like from the convent of change that who understands that and think of harmful to the nation right or you get your Jeff sessions than I have good authority that says he whispered in his own office when he met with certain people because other people listening to work for him he didn't try and you want to do things that nobody around you support that how you can implement anything this is what the I think you know term limits are so important but I think service limits are important the these institutions if you've been there and you've seen five presidents come and go what do you care what the president said about lasted all of you guys and it is the air against grows and the the the programs again used please I'll send you the information look up civil society to point oh and what they were really doing and what they still are doing in Chile they they eaten institutionalize this so it just runs under the radar and the president may or may not even know it but that's that is truly what they're covering here and every single one of these people that are been testifying they're all involved in it I mean like deeply I've I have emails that through for your request that if they've come from them the end I have the money I have the state department connections we we have all of it it's it's not a hidden secret is just that no one will look into it in the press and I think that's because they've made it about trump and I think I did an interview with the author name Thomas ran a winner he wrote a book called they want any touches upon what you're saying that he goes back historically and says this was designed the swamp as we know it yes by design with without that there will be bureaucrats the permanent government they called themselves that despite what the election round and we'd be distracted by the elections the permanent government would be the one running the show and I think it's exactly what we're seeing today it really became really grew out of Woodrow Wilson's frustration with the league of nations he just knew that was right and so we just have to get this done and between him and FDR it just grew into this this this hydra that now is I think beyond most people's comprehension because they don't hear about it ever by design or you can I just look at the quick quote from the book and crenellated the Opeth and early social find his sketching out the plan one ended minutes straight of state would look like often used the phrase permanent government and then we'll still have elections and they're useful because they distracted is and what what's going to happen is we will be the lead by a man of a permanent government in no way affected by the results of the election and that's exactly where we are is I've never a and I've been doing my research on this you crane thing for about a year and what what we started to find about a year ago was disturbing and the more we look into it and it is it's truly terrifying it if if the Senate doesn't pick this up and expose what's going on if they make this just about Donald Trump if this all of this stuff is just a show it's just a show and nothing's really changed in the midst of all this in twenty fifteen to twenty sixteen carded a Ukrainian caucus that's not a coincidence I'm sure that was a result of lobbying and contribution and I think a lot of them I'm talking about Republicans are tied up in that in the Ukrainian interest in the way we don't understand and they're not doing much to counter the false narrative that there was no Ukrainian apparently election they're kind of sitting silently by with maybe a couple of exceptions they're not holding hearing back on hold they're not counterpoint in some of the things that are not true so I'm not really confident they're they're gonna do a strong and great job if you're looking at them for a counterpoint Sir may I have off there may I have one of my researchers send you a bunch of raw the information and we give you the outline on it but I I would love for you to see these documents because you are absolutely right and I think we have proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt with official documents but there's so much more work to be done on it and it has to be exposed may I reach out to you after the show look at look at it Cheryl thank you so much appreciate it god bless you bet she's the host of full measure with Cheryl acts and and just really really very bright woman all.

Cheryl Atkinson CBS P. B. S. C. N. N. thirty years
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

12:50 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on WTVN

"For thirty years Cheryl Atkinson was a was a correspondent in an anchor at CBS news P. B. S. C. N. N. I. N. boy and then they found out she wasn't Razi progressive she was actually looking for the truth no matter where the chips fell so they are on her out on a rail good thing for us there is something called the interwebs the information super highway really gave her home now she also has her her own show with St Clair called full measure and she actually looks for the truth Cheryl Atkinson how are you I am interested thank you well yeah I'm very good I'm I'm interested in in in hearing your theory and what you found in with the state department and shadow diplomacy let me just say that I typically without trying to be in for the contrary and I see something entirely different than what I think even some of the Republican see when I listen to these hearings and it is sort of the last gasp of the persistent bureaucracy within the state department yes speaking against a president who came in and did exactly what he said he was going to do yes changed in Richmond usual take charge they didn't like it and I would go so far as to say his mission by our diplomats that they took action contrary to what they understood the president's foreign policy desires work which I believe that extra constitutional and perhaps worst but there they seem to think we've now heard it stated explicitly they think the bureaucrats they run the show the president works for them and they're out of their mind when he didn't see things the way they wanted him to see that they have a lot of the state department has a lot invested in Ukraine and and a policy called civil society two point no that was designed by a Hillary Clinton when she was at the state department Barack Obama and and some other some other figures that usually only belong and conspiracy theories like George Soros and they have sex this course up as a matter of policy and they spoke about it at the time Cheryl with with people who were in the room helping design it that they needed it to be institutionalized so it wouldn't matter what presidents would do when they came in and went that's not what the state department is supposed to do the state department works for the president not for themselves on elected officials and I think that's one of the revelations that says them explicitly saying otherwise and I would also point out I looked at the disclosure the other day for the foreign agents registration act this is where foreign countries disclosed the lobbying the foreign agents the hiring here in the U. S. a lobby for their interests most countries have in the congressional coming maybe a page of people they hired you know to do certain things is by far the biggest that has pages and pages of people at higher in the last few years to lobby journalists and members of Congress to make contributions all kinds of things and I don't think it's any coincidence that everybody is advocating it looks to me like the state department official that sounds to me like they're advocating for Ukraine and trying to change the president's mind yes rather than the other way around right I mean I I here's the thing that I is lost on me why people can't next here Italy quid pro quo is a way of life I mean it's it's it's commerce it's free market it's our marriage everything is pretty quick quid pro quo you cheat on me and I'm probably not going to hang around and that is going to bushel when there is not a precondition for foreign aid or a white you find that there haven't been conditions that that's expected to have conditions that why would we why would we just give money away especially to a country that all sides even curry Ukrainian say corrupt is hell why wouldn't we have conditions on that money something new has arisen the last day and a half at least in my mind there is such an effort by the diplomat can make sure no one would commit in Ukraine two and a corruption investigation or look into election meddling in twenty sixteen why what is the harm I mean they may be right they may be wrong that there wasn't any there's good evidence that their wives left leaning political concluded their wives based on firsthand interviews but let's just say there isn't there wasn't any what's the harm in having the investigation that would show that why are they so hell bent on keeping the present you claim from committing to any investigation into corruption or twenty sixteen or breast I think it's strange Cheryl I I would love to have your brain around this may I send you a box of documents from the state department front it from the court system in Ukraine along with video tape of what we have on on officials admitting to these things because the facts are all there no one is willing to go there and it is if if this becomes just about Donald Trump my opinion share on this whole thing is if Donald Trump was doing something wrong illegal then he should pay the price if the Democrats were doing something wrong or legal they should pay the price but we need to overturn every stone because our Republic is at stake just like with Russia if Donald Trump was colluding with Russia he should have been impeached I don't care who's right or wrong I want to know the truth well I'm I'm concerned that the persistent Durocher the is been quite effective in punishing anybody around president from so far that has gone off script of what they want to happen and if they're able to make it where president can't institute for Policy can't call for investigations into corruption can't condition eight I mean we've been given up any notion that the constitution that says the president trump foreign policy of the play we basically than that now Hey David bureaucracy besides the things the president just have to go along with that sure can I tell you something that President Bush told me in the oval office I was there the day that Barack Obama who was then trailing Hillary Clinton he said that you know if I if I had charge I I would I would send our jets I don't care about their air space if if I want to find you know the bad guys and they're in Afghanistan I'll just send the jets over in this is that the time where we kind of thought that maybe Afghanistan was kind of an ally and I said Mister president I mean can we do that it's an ally what would that mean and he looked at me and he tried to comfort me and it's booked the hell out of me he said clan don't worry I don't care who sits in this chair when they do they will be advised by exactly the same people they'll see the same facts and they'll realize the president's hands are pretty tied it's just going to stay the same well can you imagine being an outsider like from the convent of change that who understands that and things of harmful to the nation right or you get your Jeff sessions than I have good a story that says he whispered in his own office when he met with certain people because other people listening to work for him he didn't try and you want to do things that nobody around you support that how you can implement anything this is what the I think you know term limits are so important but I think service limits are important the these institutions if you've been there and you've seen five presidents come and go what do you care what the president said about lasted all of you guys and it is the air against grows and the the programs again used please I'll send you the information look up civil society to point oh and what they were really doing and what they still are doing in Chile they they eaten institutionalize this so it just runs under the radar and the president may or may not even know it but that's that is truly what they're covering here and every single one of these people that are been testifying they're all involved in it I mean like deeply I've I have emails that through for your request that if they've come from them and I have the money I have the state department connections we we have all of it it it's it's not a hidden secret is just that no one will look into it in the press and I think that's because they've made it about trump and I think I did an interview with the author name Thomas ran a winner he wrote a book called they just want any touches upon what you're saying that he goes back historically and says this was designed the swamp as we know it yes by design was with thought that there will be bureaucrats the permanent government they called themselves the despite what the election now and we'd be distracted by the elections the permanent government would be the one running the show and I think it's exactly what we're seeing today it really became really grew out of Woodrow Wilson's frustration with the league of nations he just knew that was right and so we just have to get this done and between him and FDR it just grew into this this this hydra that now is I think beyond most people's comprehension because they don't hear about it ever by design or you can I just looked up a quick quote from that block and granite within the office and early social sciences getting out the plan what ended minutes straight of state would look like often used the phrase hermit government instead will still have elections and they're useful because they distracted isn't what what's going to happen is we will be the lead by a man of a permanent government in no way affected by the results of the election and that's exactly where we are is I've never it and I've been doing my research on this Ukraine thing for about a year and what what we started to find about a year ago was disturbing and the more we look into it and it is it's truly terrifying it if if the Senate doesn't pick this up and expose what's going on if they make this just about Donald Trump this all of this stuff is just a show it's just a show and nothing's really changed in the midst of all this in twenty fifteen to twenty sixteen targeting a Ukrainian caucus that's not a coincidence I'm sure that was the result of lobbying and contribution and I think a lot of them I'm talking about Republicans are tied up in that in the Ukrainian interest in the way we don't understand and they're not doing much to counter that all narrative that there was no Ukrainian apparently election they're kind of sitting silently by with maybe a couple of exceptions they're not holding hearing back on hold they're not counterpoint in some of the things that are not true so I'm not really confident they're they're gonna do a strong and great job if you're looking at them for a counterpoint sure may I have off there may I have one of my researchers send you a bunch of raw the information and we can give you the outline on it but I I would love for you to see these documents because you are absolutely right and I think we have proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt with official documents but there's so much more work to be done on it and it has to be exposed may I reach out to you after the show all right look at look at it Cheryl thank you so much appreciated god bless you bet she's the host of full measure with Cheryl acts and and just really really very bright.

Cheryl Atkinson St Clair CBS P. B. S. C. N. N. Razi thirty years
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News Radio 690 KTSM

News Radio 690 KTSM

12:50 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News Radio 690 KTSM

"For thirty years Cheryl Atkinson was a was a correspondent in an anchor at CBS news P. B. S. C. N. N. I. N. boy and then they found out she wasn't Razi progressive she was actually looking for the truth no matter where the chips fell so they are run around on a rail good thing for us there is something called the interwebs the information super highway really gave her home now she also has her her own show with St Clair called full measure and she actually looks for the truth Cheryl Atkinson how are you I am interested thank you well yeah I'm very good I'm I'm interested in in in hearing your theory and what you found in with the state department and shadow diplomacy let me just say that I typically without trying to be in it for the contrary and I see something entirely different than what I think even some of the Republican see when I listen to these hearings and it is sort of the last gasp of the persistent bureaucracy within the state department yes speaking against a president who came in and did exactly what he said he was going to do yes changed in Richmond usual take charge they didn't like it and I would go so far as to say he had mission by our diplomats that they took action contrary to what they handed to the president's foreign policy desires work which I believe is extra constitutional and perhaps worst but there they seem to think we've now heard it stated explicitly they think the bureaucrats they run the show in the present work for them and they're out of their mind when he didn't see things the way they wanted him to see that they have a lot of the state department has a lot invested in Ukraine and and a policy called civil society two point no that was designed by a Hillary Clinton when she was at the state department Barack Obama and and some other some other figures that usually only belong and conspiracy theories like George Soros and they have set this course up as a matter of policy and they spoke about it at the time Cheryl with with people who were in the room helping design it that they needed it to be institutionalized so it wouldn't matter what presidents would do when they came in and went that's not what the state department is supposed to do the state department works for the president not for themselves on elected officials and I think that's one of the revelations that says them explicitly saying otherwise and I would also point out I looked at the disclosures the other day from the foreign agents registration act this is where foreign countries disclosed the lobbying the foreign agents they're hiring here in the U. S. a lobby for their interests most countries have in the congressional coming maybe a page of people they hired you know could be threatened paying him crane is by far the biggest that has pages and pages of people at higher in the last few years to lobby journalists and members of Congress to make contributions all kinds of things and I don't think it's any coincidence that everybody is advocating it looks to me like the state department official that sounds to me like they're advocating for Ukraine and trying to change the president's mind yes rather than the other way around right I mean I I here's the thing that I is lost on me why people can't next here it would quid pro quo is a way of life I mean it's it's it's commerce it's free market it's our marriage everything is pretty quick quid pro quo you cheat on me and I'm probably not going to hang around and that is going to a bushel when there is not a precondition for foreign aid or a white find that there haven't been condition that that's expected to have conditions that why would we why would we just give money away especially to a country that all sides even curry Ukrainian say corrupt is hell why wouldn't we have conditions on that money something new has arisen the last day and a half at least in my mind there is such an effort by the diplomat can make sure no one would committing Ukraine to in a corruption investigation or look into election meddling in twenty sixteen why what is the harm I mean they may be right they may be wrong that there wasn't any there's good evidence that there was left leaning political concluded their wives based on firsthand interviews but let's just say there isn't there wasn't any what's the harm in having the investigation that would show that why are they so hell bent on keeping the present Ukraine from committing to any investigation into corruption or twenty sixteen one breast I think it strange Cheryl I I would love to have your brain around this may I send you a box of documents from the state department fry it from the court system in Ukraine along with video tape of what we have on on officials admitting to these things because the facts are all there no one is willing to go there and it is if if this becomes just about Donald Trump in my opinion share on this whole thing is if Donald Trump was doing something wrong illegal then he should pay the price if the Democrats were doing something wrong legal they should pay the price but we need to overturn every stone because our Republic is at stake just like with Russia if Donald Trump was colluding with Russia he should have been impeached I don't care who's right or wrong I want to know the truth well I'm I'm concerned that be persistent characters he has been quite effective in punishing anybody around president trump so far that has gone off script of what they want to happen and if they're able to make it work president can't institute for Policy can't copper investigations into corruption can't condition eight I mean we've been given up any notion that the constitution that says the president Thomas foreign policy is at play we've basically been that now today the bureaucracy besides the things the president just have to go along with them sure can I tell you something that President Bush told me in the oval office I was there the day that Barack Obama who was then trailing Hillary Clinton he said that you know if I if I had charge I I would I would send our jets I don't care about their air space if if I want to find you know the bad guys and they're in Afghanistan I'll just send the jets over in this is that the time where we kind of thought that maybe Afghanistan was kind of an ally and I said Mister president I mean can we do that it's an ally what would that mean and he looked at me and he tried to comfort me and it's booked the hell out of me he said clan don't worry I don't care who sits in this chair when they do they will be advised by exactly the same people they'll see the same facts and they'll realize the president's hands are pretty tied it's just going to stay the same well can you imagine being an outsider like from the convent of change that who understands that and think of harmful to the nation right or you get your Jeff sessions than I have good a story that says he whispered in his own office when he met with certain people because other people listening to work for him he didn't try and you want to do things that nobody around you support that how you can implement anything this is what the I think you know term limits are so important but I think service limits are important the these institutions if you've been there and you've seen five presidents come and go what do you care what the president said about lasted all of you guys and it is the air against grows and the the programs again used please I'll send you the information look up civil society to point oh and what they were really doing and what they still are doing in Chile they they eaten institutionalize this so it just runs under the radar and the president may or may not even know it but that's that is truly what they're covering here and every single one of these people that are been testifying they're all involved in it I mean like deeply I've I have emails that through for your request that if they've come from them and I have the money I have the state department connections we we have all of it it it's it's not a hidden secret is just that no one will look into it in the press and I think that's because they made it about trump and I think I did an interview with the author name Thomas ran a winner he wrote a book called they want and he touches upon what you're saying that he goes back historically and says this was designed the swamp as we know it yes by design was with thought that there will be bureaucrats the permanent government they called themselves the despite what the election sounds and we'd be distracted by the elections the permanent government would be the one running the show and I think it's exactly what we're seeing today it really became a really grew out of Woodrow Wilson's frustration with the league of nations he just knew that was right and so we just have to get this done and between him and F. T. R. it just grew into this this this hydra that now is I think beyond most people's comprehension because they don't hear about it ever by design fourteen can I just looked at the quick quote from that block and granite within the office and early social scientists getting out the plan what ended minutes straight of state would look like often used the phrase permanent government instead will still have elections and they're useful because they distracted is and what what's going to happen is we will be the lead by a man of a permanent government in no way affected by the results of the election and that's exactly where we are it's I've never a and I've been doing my research on this Ukraine thing for about a year and what what we started to find about a year ago was disturbing and the more we look into it and it is it's truly terrifying it if if the Senate doesn't pick this up and expose what's going on if they make this just about Donald Trump if this all of this stuff is just a show it's just a show and nothing's really changed in the midst of all this in twenty fifteen to twenty sixteen targeting a Ukrainian caucus that's not a coincidence I'm sure that was the result of lobbying and contribution and I think a lot of them I'm talking about Republicans are tied up in that in the Ukrainian interest in the way we don't understand and they're not doing much to counter that all narrative that there was no Ukrainian interference in the election they're kind of sitting silently by with maybe a couple of exceptions they're not holding hearing back on hold they're not counterpoint in some of the things that are not true so I'm not really confident they're they're gonna do a strong and great job if you're looking at them for a counterpoint sure may I have off there may I have one of my researchers send you a bunch of raw the information and we can give you the outline on it but I I would love for you to see these documents because you are absolutely right and I think we have proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt with official documents but there's so much more work to be done on it and it has to be exposed may I reach out to you after the show or look at look at it Cheryl thank you so much appreciate it god bless you bet she's the host of full measure with Cheryl axe and and just really really very bright.

Cheryl Atkinson St Clair CBS P. B. S. C. N. N. Razi thirty years
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

News Radio 810 WGY

03:29 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

"As we continue with Cheryl Atkinson is with us host of Sinclair's full measure on Sundays, author of the New York Times bestsellers, the smear and stonewalled. All right. Remind people what happened to you both at CBS, and well elsewhere, let's put it that way to me discovering that there had been government effort show surveilled improperly. They're all kinds of interruptions of my electronic devices and computers and television, anything connected to my Verizon bios line. I never suspected the government was surveilling me because this is before we knew anything of this. But I was covering very important stories that the the Obama administration was pushing back almost daily on calling CBS different people and trying to stop them. And controversial is me. And I have forces inside the Intel agencies and connected to them approach me and tell me I was probably being monitored based on my stories and based on expanded practices. They said had begun to be you. Used bomb administration by Intel officials suspect long story short. We've had five different independent forensic exam. Look at different aspects of these intrusions are undeniable like a fingerprint, I'm told that the government nature of intrusion watching every stroke type on Santa classified documents in the computer as the Skype at that. I had to speak on conversations when you don't even know Skype on they can exfiltrated files with that list goes on and on. And I'm in the fourth year of losses against the department of Justice and unnamed John does at the FBI to try to get Justice because they won't investigate themselves for what I think was a crime. What do you do? When department of Justice is involved in won't launch investigations, well leave for stealing now civil court. That's not battle has has all kinds of immunity, but limited taxpayer money to fight. But that's where we are today. You don't Cheryl won't. Not go into details. But let's just say, and I'm really in a good position to do this. At the right time people that maybe have done on toward illegal things towards me. I will go after with the full force. The best greatest dream team of attorneys that anyone has ever put together if it's true. So we might be working on the project. Okay. Wow. Yeah. You have you have the let me say I've written about the fact that the courthouse is out of reach for most ordinary Americans lightning because of the cost and the time it should I've been overpaid for too many years. I'll be and I say all my colleagues are two now. So what are we going to do with it? I'm going to save as much as I can for. I can't save them for my kids because they'll come in and steal it. All anyway. So might as well use it to get to expo- because we don't fix this share. We're gonna lose the country. We can't lose our country over this. It is and the media's complicity in. This is disgusting. You've been amazing. Thank you so much for being with us. And I hope you'll come back again. All right. Eight hundred nine four one Sean toll-free telephone number. We'll get to your calls. Much more coming up straight ahead. Four thirty at News Radio..

Cheryl Atkinson Intel Skype CBS department of Justice New York Times Obama administration Sinclair FBI Sean Santa
"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

03:25 min | 2 years ago

"cheryl atkinson" Discussed on News-Talk 1400 The Patriot

"As we continue with Cheryl Atkinson is with us host of Sinclair's full measure on Sundays, author of the New York Times bestsellers, the smear and stonewalled. All right. Remind people what happened to you both at CBS, and well elsewhere, let's put it that way. Fire to me discovering that there have been government effort to survey only improperly, they're all kinds of interruptions of my electronic devices and computers and television, anything connected to my Verizon bias line. I never suspected the government was surveilling me because this was before we knew anything of this. But I was covering very important stories that the Obama administration was pushing back almost daily on calling CBS different people and trying to stop. And then controversial is me. And I had forces inside the Intel agencies and connected to them approach me and tell me I was probably being monitor based on my stories and based on expanded practices. They said had begun to be used the Obama administration by Intel officials suspect long story short. We've had five different independent forensic exam. Look at different aspects of these intrusions and appendix. Are undeniable, and I'm told that the government nature of intrusion watching every chase kopech type classified documents on the computer, they use the Skype at that. I had to. Conversations. They don't even know Skype on they can XFL files with that list goes on and on. And I'm in the fourth year of a lawsuit against the department of Justice and unnamed John does at the FBI trying to get Justice because they won't investigate themselves for what I think was a crime. So what do you do? When department of Justice involved in won't launch investigations will leave for stealing now civil court. That's not tell battle because government has all kinds of immunity, but limited taxpayer money to fight today. You don't Cheryl I won't go into details. But let's just say. And I'm really in a good position to do this. At the right time people that maybe if done on toward illegal things towards me, I will go after with the full force. The best greatest dream team of attorneys that anyone has ever put together if it's true. So we might be working together. On the project. Okay. Wow. Yeah. You have you have the let me say I have written about the fact that the courthouse is out of reach for most ordinary Americans like me because of the cost and the time it's been overpaid for too many years. I'll be and I say all my colleagues are two now. So what am I going to do with it? I'm going to save as much as I can for. Well, I can't save him for my kids because they'll come in and steal it. All anyway. So I'm on the whole use it to get to expo- because we don't fix the share. We're gonna lose the country. We can't lose our country over this. It is and the media's complicity in. This is disgusting. You've been amazing. Thank you so much for being with us. And I hope you'll come back again. All right. Eight hundred nine four one Sean toll-free telephone number. We'll get to your calls. Much more coming up straight ahead..

Obama administration department of Justice Intel CBS Cheryl Atkinson Verizon New York Times Sinclair FBI Sean